Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) – Different faces of a unique universal system?

August 16th, 2017

xxxx

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) -2

SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

The forms of the nucleotide are a subject of Matrix / DNA interest.

According to this theory, the fundamental unit of information in DNA consists of 4 nucleotide, because the configuration of the set of 4 nucleotide is exactly the same as the universal formula for natural systems, which means, therefore, that it is a system, which means that the building blocks of DNA are differentiated copies of one and the same system.

We are seeing a phenomena that is: there are billions of human beings, but, there is no individual human being exactly equal another. At least, a little point of difference must be the specific identity of each human being. Why is there this phenomenon? Why and how Nature produced this phenomenon? There is a purpose or it is just chance?

The entire set of human beings has its beginnings on the entire set of information in the DNA.  Where Matrix/DNA is suggesting that in these billions units of information, each one is unique, there is no unit equal other. Since that humanity is evolutionary  self-projection of DNA, or its genetics, the projected result must be similar to the thing projected. So, we know why and how Nature produced this phenomenon in relation to humanity, it is missing now to search these questions about this phenomenon in relation to DNA.

Matrix/DNA Theory already has a suggestion to this question: LUCA, the astronomic Last Universal Common Ancestor of all biological systems, is being fragmented by entropy in its bits of information, and at planets like Earth – with good conditions – these bits are working like the flow of order that lift up from every cycle “chaos>order>chaos..”. This process is trying to reproduce LUCA in this new environment ( totally different from where LUCAS was formed) resulting into biological systems. Since that these bits are emitted to the galactic internal space (thermodynamic collapse of near-closed systems), spreaded, dispersed in different time and space, the new systems gets different amount and quality of bits information, when composing amino-acids and nucleotide, which could be the answer to the polymorphisms of nucleotide.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

 

                                                                SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

An important step in the search for more DNA knowledge is to look for ways to visualize this unit of information internally for to locate where each one has something different from the perfect formula, which will indicate its difference.

And for this identification, the external form of the nucleotide may also contribute. I now come across this news that academic biology already has an area of ​​research and information of the data obtained, regarding the external forms of the nucleotide, which is called SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. So open up new area of ​​research to find out what biology already knows about it.

What are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)?

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/genomicresearch/snp

( continuing reading and googling SNPs)

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - 3

 

SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

What’s the cause of “Out-of-Body Experiences”? Scientists suggesting It is ears’ fault

August 14th, 2017

xxxxx

Out of body experience

What Causes Spooky Out-of-Body Experiences? It Could Be Your Ears

https://www.livescience.com/60047-out-of-body-experiences-inner-ear.html

And my comments posted at 8/14/2017

 Louis Charles Morelli

We have scientists and their technical article focused on the ear, and all comments below from the public saying that is not the ear, it is… a thing called “soul”. Nature working in its way, the universal duality of opposites is here. But, Nature also has another universal trait: at initial conditions of any system, arises two extreme opposites which are in mutual conflict. The conflict creates chaos around, and suffering for both. The suffering makes they wake up, conflict is worst, then, they join as a par. The par produces a third element, which is more evolved than the two parents.

Ok, it means that who is right here, is not scientists, neither mystics. Must have a third alternative, with the right solution. Which is it? I think is Matrix/DNA Theory world view. It suggests that we humans, carries on ahead with the function of a egg. Inside the egg there is the amnion and placenta, which are the brain. The fact of spinal cord means that the egg was recently fecundated, the cord is the remains of spermatozoon’s tail. The creature being generated has a body under formation composed by energy from the synapses. This is the physical, hardware part of the creature. Which has under formation its software, its mind, which we call consciousness, composed by the cloud of light resulting from the energy sparks.

So, we are 8 billion half-conscious genes building a baby consciousness. My friends scientists and religious… this conflict is no intelligent. Because, genes are mortally dependable of their own success but also of the other 8 billion success. If one unique gene does not make his/her work, we – the baby – will born handicapped.

Which has the best belief that produces the best moral code for a better humanity? The scientists belief is too much “could”, mechanistic, does not respect the humans emotions, felling, etc. The “souls” believers are too much metaphysicals, while the embryo that need work is here, at material ground. The Matrix/DNA supporters are trying to help all 8 billion genes for to get good life’s conditions for doing well their job that we need. Think about that…

xxxxx

Other good article about this issue:

 The woman who ‘can leave her body at will’: Student sheds light on the strange brain activity involved in out-of-body experiences

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2575550/The-woman-leave-body-Student-sheds-light-strange-brain-activity-involved-body-experiences.html#ixzz4pldmqw3t

Too Much People Asking Peer-Review for Matrix/DNA Theory: Here is The Answer

August 13th, 2017

xxxx

Again, in a public debate, someone asked peer-review, and I have copied here my answer:

You said: ” if you have scientific evidences for your theory, please present your theory in scientific circles to be peer-reviewed. Otherwise, who is going to take you seriously?”

Louis Morelli: ” I can’t do it, but is not my pretension that people here take me serious – the person debating – but take serious the contents of my replies, I am developing and testing the theory against facts and you gave me good ideas for testing.

This theory is a new, never imagined before world view, Sir, from the universe’s origins to what we have here today, in a unique logical line, based on nature and scientifically proven facts. There is no peer-review for such thing, never had. How could Copernicus getting approved with peer-review, if he was suggesting a new interpretation of the world totally strange to the scholars? What peer-review got Mendel? Even Darwin, took 30 years writing his book for announcing his theory, it went to peer-review? I am still writing a book. What about Galileo? Do you believe that they would give him peer-review if he was saying that the sky is not static, even that he could prove there was a new star in the sky? The normal human brains are not neurons configured for accepting such changes, Sir, at every cycle, Science is produced by an ideology, they never will read thousands of pages that uncomfortable, like you are feeling reading few paragraphs here.

As said Einstein when nobody understood its theory, : ” One does not need to prove that his/her theory is the right one, only showing that it makes rational sense”. The universe and its theory can not be described by Physics and Math alone, it needs biology, till neurology for explaining lots of things… do you know any scientific authority doing peer-review that would be able to analyse this theory? What if a Theory of Everything can not be elaborated by modern human sciences with all its fields? And of course, it can’t: we and our scientific instruments are able to grasp only one face of this relativistic universe with manny faces, only the face and objects and shapes and movements that vibrates and reflects light inside the visible light, but is hidden the other six worlds interacting with our world? I wrote at the introduction of my website: this is not a scientific theory, it is in the right philosophical term as coined by the Greek philosophers.

I have no PHD ( I made business administration, hihihi) for sending working to peer-review, they will not see it, although I am studying science, included university books, by myself in the last 50 years. If you ask for evidences, I have listed one thousand in the website and tens of confirmed predictions. But it is not enough for believing that this world view is the best today, I am very skeptical with myself. And the best school I have, the teacher that gave me the fundamental information is Nature, seven years studying that whole biosphere, identificating each kind of system and trying to calculate the whole network of its interactions. That biosphere sent me to lift the eyes for seeing the sky, following the sun’s light, if I was wishing answers for origins and meaning of our existence. That’s why I entered in the Astronomy field also. Ok, Sir, I am telling that ( I don’t know if you will have the tolerance for reading it), because you seems to me to be a searcher, like me, and these kind of issues are good food for thought for a searcher. Cheers, and have a happy Sunday…

The controversy between Hindu culture and Matrix/DNA culture

August 12th, 2017

xxxx

Reading articles from a Hinduist tendency blog, I noted that their concepts are good challenge for testing and developing my preferred world view, called Matrix/DNA Theory.

The blog is:

Wise Humans Wakeup Call

“Human Society Needs Stability”

Author: Jay Krishnan

https://wisehumans.blogspot.in/

The article is:

NURTURING IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT AS GENES MIGHT REMAIN DORMANT

Then I wrote to Jay and we are at the following debate. Some paragraphs of the article will be copied here for registering the replies by Matrix/DNA

xxxx

Jay Krishnan Jay Krishnan 4 days ago - about 8/8/17
I read Marton Piller comments below and we all should agree that Science can neither lead us to God nor prove that there is no God. All the wonders that we observe through science is by itself a proof of what a great design and creation it is, not necessary that it is an individual known as God but the energy or the power that drives everything on this universe is a unique phenomena one could consider as an invisible thing beyond our senses to recognize!
Please, take a shower of real world going to live in the jungle, from where we came from. And come back saying that this world is intelligently designed. Or go to live with 7 billions humans today that are in misery as slave workers or no work at all. See a tiger eating a baby in front of the eyes of its mother, and come telling that a benevolent powerful God is watching the scene. I have lived among the poor of the third world, I was slave, and escaped to the jungle living 7 years in Amazon jungle, I saw horrific things, I know this biosphere is product of chaotic state of Nature, we are the sons of chaos. Not of powerful, benevolent, magical Gods.
You can make yourself the questions I did at the jungle. Why chaos if we lift our eyes and see the ordered state of the Cosmos, so ordered that it can be described by Newtonian mechanics? Then, if a person is weak of brain, he will concludes that are two Gods, one, good God that designed the Cosmos and other, bad God that designed our biosphere and life. This person will invent the demon, as the second god. And will create a fairy-tale about a sin made by our ancestors, for explaining why the first biggest God permits the actuation of the second god. But if a person has the honesty wish for searching the truth he will apply the rational scientific method, and doing that, he will go further into chaos, and will not see demons, but natural causes.
Going further he will find lots of evidences of, as you said ” an energy or the power that drives everything on this universe is a unique phenomena one could consider as an invisible thing”. The weak brain will stop here with a precipitate conclusion: a magical God. The strong brain will find that there is a similar situation going on here, just facing our eyes: inside a womb, is occurring the development of a baby and, as you said ” All the wonders that we observe through science is by itself a proof of what a great design and creation it is…”. But science show us what the designer is, what the invisible energy or power is: the DNA, genetics. Not magical gods. So, the right thing to do, when questioning the causes making the complex systems in this world is searching a kind of world’s DNA, and what is doing universal genetics. I did the hard work and found a rational possibility: biological DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal Matrix , from which a got its formula. Then, was born the Matrix/DNA Theory. Since you don’t want go to be tortured in the jungle for learning the real world, and have not did the hard work, I suggest you must see this another possibility than gods and demons and magical accidents creating complex natural systems. Cheers.
Jay Krishnan  Jay Krishnan 16 hours ago Highlighted reply
Hi Charles I am sorry I had mistaken you as Marton Piller. Thanks for the awakening. If you find time please visit my blog http:// wisehumans.blogspot.in – where I suppose you will get some answers to material science versus human life science. Best regards
Jay Krishnan – I began to read your blog and I like the link you do between modern human behaviors and ancestors animals till genes. I did it also in the jungle for finding my world view called Matrix/DNA, but I went further, to ancestrals like astronomic and atomic systems. As I saw meanwhile, you didn’t this and you change it by the concept of karma, which I don’t understand and I can’t grasp real facts about it. So, if you have time and interest, we could change ideas/information between two such different cultures.
As example, you wrote:
” During early days human species lived only up to the age of 20 to 30 years if one survived childhood and adolescence and it was rare for someone to survive beyond 30 or more. It was perhaps women who survived a little bit longer as they mostly remained indoors. So generally the experience of a woman is highly internalized and passive in nature and not usually displayed like the aggressive men.”
The Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems suggests that woman’s highly internalized factor is not due social nurture and so due its universal systemic function that is coming since the astronomic configuration that produced biological systems (aka, life) here. Before producing biological DNA, this formula was a universal Matrix encoded into light waves ( we can see it at the electromagnetic spectrum) that produced fundamental particles, atoms and galaxies, so, these systems are our ancestrals like a bacteria is. The formula is hermaphrodite where the female function has the tendency to introversion, towards closed system and male function, extroversion, towards dispersion due extreme tendency to opened system. So, the female psyche tendency to be highly internalized is encrypted at the primordial DNA, when there were no humans yet. Our difference is that you goes to early biological ancestry searching the causes of humans behaviors and conditions, while I go further in the past at the ancestry that produced the early biological ancestry. Of course, we, both, has no a scientific proved statement, we have theories, maybe the right one or not, and debating it we can improve both. Cheers…
Jay Krishnan – Another example: you wrote:
” Several thousand years ago human species felt safe during day time because the daylight gave him or her awareness of what is where and how safe he or she is in a particular place. Day light provided them direction enabling one to search food and change the place of dwelling as per the individual or group needs.”
In Amazon jungle was famous among natives the bat-tribe, where humans live and hunting at night sleeping at day, Some white men told that meet then and they are blind under sun’s light. Since their territory is gold rich, they are being extinct. You know about marine’s species that lives in the darkness. So, if one species is blind at night or at day, it is produced by their free will or imposed by the environment. The very fact that humans became day-awakened seems to be the return imposed by evolution, since that insects and butterflies can’t resist to flying around a lamp and its cause is its genes rules that came from its atomic rules where particles flies around a luminous proton, or planets around a luminous star. This is universally imposed by the Matrix/DNA formula where non-radioactive pieces orbits radioactive pieces.
This “evolution return imposed by the code” is saw also in the case that insects has established a high automatized social system (ants, bees ) while humans began as chaotic groups and now is going to mimic the insects towards the highly automatized social system. What is the fundamental cause driven us towards it? Without enough intellect and no knowledge about the bad face of the code ( the Matrix/DNA has a bad force which is a system working automatized as a perfect machine – and a good force – which is a system opened to evolution – in relation to humans) for resisting to it, which dominated our last non-biological ancestral and has the tendency to be reproduced here, we are going to build a social system like predicted by Aldous Huxley under the rules of a Big Brother by Orwell. So, I am insisting that, for understanding the modern world and modern humans, we need know its roots in the past till the Big Bang.
Jay Krishnan – Another example: you wrote:
” Also the innate spiritual or political nature of a child is not only woman centric (though man’s Y chromosome provides the initial seed) but is also nurtured by a woman!”
Innate traits means genetic inheritance. Do you think that humans’ child nurtured by women has incorporated these “external far away phenomena” into its code? I don’t, because I think that biological genetics has a non-biological ancestry, I got a theoretical model of this ancestry and the model is suggesting a different solution. You must see my model-picture of the Matrix/DNA formula in relation to ” The Origins of Chromosome X and Y”. The model suggests that the very fact well described by you about the child’s woman centric is due our last non-biological hermaphrodite ancestor being a system female centralized. The X chromosome is bigger than Y because X contains the whole spherical circuity flow of information while Y contains only the left half flow of information, in a system where the female function is dominant and male function is recessive. Since that through the biological evolution there is the tendency to guide the whole Earth biosphere to be a unique system reproducing the non-biological ancestor/creator, the innate child tendency to be woman centric is very well explained by the Matrix/DNA formula.
xxxxxx
And other example:
Jay wrote:

” Therefore women folk are required to play the great role of nurturing character for human civilization to go further distance or I would rather say in the right direction!”

Louis suggestion:

Nope, it is not the right direction, accordingly to the supreme universal laws suggested by Matrix/DNA world view. The right direction for human civilization will be the one that the great role be a third alternative resulting from mixing, or fusion, the female and male character.

The female universal tendency is to be a closed system – domestic internalized, with a big house in a big farm with her male partner under her rules and full of her children playing in the yard, isolated from the external world and kept in this way eternally. She has the tendency to be monogamist. This was just the state of evolution at our astronomic ancestor where female was dominant over male character, and the universal laws destroyed it through entropy, showing that Nature does not approve this tendency,. But the tendency does not stop here: as closed system it has the natural movement for collapsing herself till reaching its own nucleus where it disappears as a point…. and this movement was the common behavior of fundamental left-spinner particles at the universe’s origins.

In another hand, the male universal tendency is to be an opened system – travelling far away from home, as warrior and hunter, conquering the world till the galaxies, leaving his offspring abandoned to its own lucky, making changes, business, with all things at the external world. He has the tendency to be polygamist. At our last non-biological ancestor, he was submitted to the female force, since the female was occupying the nucleus ( as F1, as we can see in the Matrix/DNA astronomic’s state formula, while the male was F4, orbiting around F1), and that is the cause biological chromosome Y is shorter than X ) .  But the male tendency does not stop at being an opened system, he goes to the last possibilities when becomes dispersion, disappearing by fragmentation, and this movement was the common behavior of fundamental right-spinner particles at the universe’s origins.

Two characters that are, each one, 50% right and 50% wrong. The right direction for humans is dependable that male be accessible to the right 50% from female, destroying his negative 50%, and female do the same. We need to build the third most evolved character, synchronized with Nature’s laws.

 

 

New great right prevision from Matrix/DNA Theory becames evidence by great scientific discovery:” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”

August 10th, 2017

xxxxx

About 5 days ago I was very happy because the news has confirmed my theoretical astronomical model, registered at copyrights about 30 years ago: the Sun’s nucleus has the strongest frequency of the electromagnetic spectrum and as effect, rotates 4 times fast than the surface’s sphere.

But, searching the scientific news today, I had another great moment. One of the most important prevision of Matrix/DNA Theory ( the final meaning of this universe and life existence) got a great evidence, if not a final confirmation. The news is: ” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”.

I have no time for writing about now, so, I will post here the picture of the eletromagnetic spectrum by Matrix/DNA and what I have wrote in the debate related to the last article here:

To everybody debating with me in this thread: please, see how and why the Matrix/DNA world view during the last 30 years has confirmed hundreds of its previsions. Two days ago I wrote here: ” We found that the vital principle is encoded in a light wave, like that emitted after the Big Bang”.
Today I am reading the news: ” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”. I have wrote here that in this Universe is occurring a natural genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang as an act of fecundation. And I wrote here that evolution is expanding like waves in the water: each new wave carries own the dust of the last wave and reaches more dust ahead. So the second wave of evolution receives the systems from the first wave, aggregating new information, evolving it and throwing it to next wave. The last wave has repeated all step of all waves before, that’s why a new shape, like a human embryo, repeats all evolutionary shapes. It means that the first moment of human life repeats the first moment of the Universe when the “life” of a universal natural system is began. It was a genetic code encoded by photons, then evolved to an atom like the first cell; to a nebulae of galaxies like the blastula… and so on.

So,… every time that the universal system is recreated, the event of the Big Bang is repeated! What happens at the fecundation of the Universe, 13,8 billion years ago, happens at the fecundation of any animal ovule. It is light everywhere, because the universal code for life first came in shape of a light wave!

 

Why? Because this Universe is not a magician. It can not create new information than those inserted in it at the act of its creation. It can not creating things by another method than that it was created. Anther method would means ” never existed before new information”, and this would be magics

 

What you see and think is new information is merely the result of fuzzy logics, the mixing of two or more standard information generating the possible levels of sub-information between them.

I will research now what is the secret of zinc atom, it must have some property that something at the Big Bang had. But, as I said thousand times, the big secret of genome, or DNA, is that its electrons are occupied by photons with information of the life’s code. So, that light saw by scientists occurs when the male counterpart that contains the half of the code’s network meets the another half and the entire network flourishes… the mechanism is repeated when a supernova is born, as you can see at Matrix/DNA astronomical models.
Three days ago another great prevision was conformed: #0 years ago when I got the copyright of this theory it contained that a star’s nucleus has a dynamics like the first frequency of light wave, which is the strongest. So, the nucleus should have a rotation fast than the above spherical rotations… This whole theory is results from calculations applying the most natural logic as I was studying the biosphere at Amazon jungle… and its right previsions has suggested that nature does not plays dice with its creatures, although we insist to play dices with her.
xxxx
Light - The Electro-Magnetic Spectrum by Matrix/DNA Theory

Light – The Electro-Magnetic Spectrum by Matrix/DNA Theory

A little bit of information about this issue – how to interpret the graphic:

At the extreme right ( before the gamma ray), there is the source of the wave. At the gamma ray occurs the event of fecundation ( it can be fecundation for a new  universal system, like the Big Bang, or the fecundation of an ovule, or the gestation of anew astronomical body, which begins by the nucleus, that’s why I predict the strongest vibration, or rotation, at Sun’s nucleus). See that the wave is merely the process of life’s cycle, so, the genetic code that became very complex today, at its begining was too much simple, merely the process of life’s cycle. At another articles here I describe how this light wave becames the Matrix/DNA formula.

 

Debate between a Creationist, a Materialist, and the Matrix/DNA world view

August 9th, 2017

I was in a debate in the Internet when I have an idea for explaining something of the Matrix/DNA world view in a different manner. It is interesting, so, I copied it here for thinking about tonight. What do you think?

xxxx

luvdomus  – 4 hours ago – 8/9/17: (Materialist, atheist)
The ‘jump” of abiogensis was a series of very small steps over millions of years.
There was no origins of life, so, no jump of abiogenesis. Biological systems (aka life) were built by the building blocks of this galaxy, which worked as photons-genes and became the building blocks of DNA. All known properties of life were existing in less evolved state at this galaxy, by entropy its information fail to Earth surface, as the initial conditions. See at my avatar and website the face of LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) the evolutionary link between inorganic and organic, but it never came to Earth, it is surrounding us in the sky.
Ok I described my theory. But you said “The ‘jump” of abiogenesis was a series of very small steps over millions of years”, in an affirmative way. You was not there, you have not watched it, so you need to advise that you have a theory, like I did it. Time and more data will solve which theory is the best.
+Luvdomus – Why do you believe it happened by small steps? Science has never shown life to come from non life in small steps or big steps ever. So why would you believe it?
Santana Garcia ( Materialist)
+Luvdomus – that’s because bacteria and viruses also play a roll in the complexity of life , this video did not get to that yet. Also 4 billion years of evolving matter to living things is hardly a jump. Do you really understand how long 4 billion years is ?
Smoothsay2 Smoothsay (creationist)+Santana – Do you really believe that chemicals could assemble themselves into DNA that is programmed to build cells, rna, cellular machinery, & self correcting rna polymerase transcription functions & reproduction systems? Rather a wild accident isn’t it 4 billion years or 100 billion years do you actually believe this would happen?

Smoothsay2 – Now, imagine this belief growing. Then they will write their sacred book. ” There was a talking rock radiating light that separated the waters of the Red sea and came to Prophet Darwin saying that…”

I suspects in this way were wrote the Kuran, the Bible, etc. and, do you believe that till today there are people believing in that?! But, for telling the thru, I found that Genesis is the correct scientific description of the events that brought life and the man to Earth. It is the right description of LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) and the events creating life here. If you see and understand how works the system called LUCA ( its face is at my avatar – the life cycle of any astronomic body like Earth, and the building blocks of galaxies), you will discover all Genesis’s symbols there: the system was a paradise for X and Y (Adam and Eve), in shape of an apple, with a systemic circuit in shape of a snake, the spiral galaxy seems a tree, etc. In fact, X convinced Y to eat the apple ( which means the selfish state of closed system). And attacked by entropy the system falls to planet’s surface, in shape of genes-photons, which guided the terrestrial atoms to build aminoacids, molecules, RNA, till the first cell, which is the exactly biological copy of our sinner ancestor… the Milk Way.
Genesis is all about metaphors describing the scientific complexity for lay man! But how any ancient man knew that? 2 theories: 1) our ancestor and those events are registered at our DNA ( the junk DNA) which are at the center of our neurons and altered mental states produces flashes from that memory. Since ancient man did not know nothing about astronomy, he found the way to explain it by metaphors. 2) Aliens were here and told it… I don’t see another alternative, since I can not believe that a God of a multiverse came here…

 Louis Charles Morelli – the problem with metaphorical ideas is they are subject to any kind of interpretation so you will always will be able to make them match with any scientific or metaphysical theory.

oz surveillance –  Ok, then, I will invite you to a challenge:

 Find the scientific theory that matches with the following:
1) We built this modern city where humans will live as a paradise. But like the Brave New World of Huxley and under the Big Brother, humans will be stupid and stagnating in this shape forever. Take the red pill if you want living here;
2) Outside there are those humans cities in state of chaos, lots of problems, misery, diseases, etc. But, those people will be opened to their evolution, they could reach the galaxies. Take the blue pill if you want that.
This was the exactly situation the author described with Eve offering the apple: eat the apple, the red pill, standing forever in this “jungle” paradise I built for us; do not eat the apple and we fall in chaos far away from here…
We found that the vital principle is encoded in a light wave, like that emitted after the Big Bang. The code worked matter and built the atom system, the star system, and when went to build the galactic system… matter was reaching its supreme goal, which is to be a closed system at eternal termodynamic equillibrium.
The code could doing a choice, unifying with matter and living that paradise; or fighting matter, suffering at chaos but keeping the state of opened system, opened to its own evolution. The red pill or the blue pill?
The code choose the paradise, from the Universe came the Clausius Law, the entropy that produces the death of any system. The code falls at planets, here we are. Please, find the scientific theory that matches this metaphora like the Matrix/DNA Theory – a merely philosophical naturalist theory, matched it… Good look…
xxxxx
Then, one day after this debate, I was searching the scientific news at Internet and found a great, spetacular news ( ” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”) that is just the confirmation of several theories I wrote in the debate. So, I went back writing this:
To everybody debating with me in this thread: please, see how and why the Matrix/DNA world view during the last 30 years has confirmed hundreds of its previsions. Two days ago I wrote here: ” We found that the vital principle is encoded in a light wave, like that emitted after the Big Bang”.
Today I am reading the news: ” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”. I have wrote here that in this Universe is occurring a natural genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang as an act of fecundation.
And I wrote here that evolution is expanding like waves in the water: each new wave carries own the dust of the last wave and reaches more dust ahead. So the second wave of evolution receives the systems from the first wave, aggregating new information, evolving it and throwing it to next wave. The last wave has repeated all step of all waves before, that’s why a new shape, like a human embryo, repeats all evolutionary shapes. It means that the first moment of human life repeats the first moment of the Universe when the “life” of a universal natural system is began. It was a genetic code encoded by photons, then evolved to an atom like the first cell; to a nebulae of galaxies like the blastula… and so on.
I will research now what is the secret of zinc atom, it must have some property that something at the Big Bang had. But, as I said thousand times, the big secret of genome, or DNA, is that its electrons are occupied by photons with information of the life’s code. So, that light saw by scientists occurs when the male counterpart that contains the half of the code’s network meets the another half and the entire network flourishes… the mechanism is repeated when a supernova is born, as you can see at Matrix/DNA astronomical models. Three days ago another great prevision was conformed: #0 years ago when I got the copyright of this theory it contained that a star’s nucleus has a dynamics like the first frequency of light wave, which is the strongest. So, the nucleus should have a rotation fast than the above spherical rotations… This whole theory is results from calculations applying the most natural logic as I was studying the biosphere at Amazon jungle… and its right previsions has suggested that nature does not plays dice with its creatures, although we insist to play dices with her.

Debate with Matrix/DNA Theory in Science/AAAS

February 23rd, 2017

xxxx

Debate com a Matrix/DNA no Science/AAAS

xxxx

Earliest mollusk probably looked like a spiky slug

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/earliest-mollusk-probably-looked-spiky-slug

Avatar

A tree mimics exactly the shape of Milk Way because it was created by this galaxy. A cell system also has the same number of organelles as the number of different astronomic bodies. And there is more: each organelle performs same systemic function as each astronomic system.

But, we can see it only when we know the universal Matrix/DNA formula that built all natural systems. So, for a better understand about the first mollusc shape and functions we must have on the table the matrix formula and the exactly model of the building blocks of our creator, this astronomic system – both are at my website… but still it is a theory..

xxxx

Apophenia

Correlations without causation

Endurance of stable shapes i.e celestial bodies are spherical due to their gravity, just like there is a limited number of shapes in organisms that provide practicality and durability. But this doesn’t connect the two systems in any way.

xxxx

Avatar

No, Kotsios, there is no apophenia here. It is perceiving meaningful patterns (the common at genetic inheritances) within not random data, but within data as evolutionary links. Yours scholar world view does not see these patterns because learned to be blind to the connection between cosmological and biological evolution. So, there is a big hole in their wiring of neurons.
You do not see the correlation because yours causation (origins of life) is not the first causation (origins of the universe).
If this astronomic system (Milk Way) does not connect with the first biological systems, what and who created biological systems?!  Some supernatural forces and elements coming from outside the materialistic realm of this galaxy?

And remember: such parent, such offspring, no matter the differences of environments and big mutations. By the way, if you do not know my theoretical astronomic model and the explanation how it fits exactly as the unit of information of the DNA, you never will accept that we were created by stellar system and not by dust of stars…

xxxx

All you did, was to replace a supernatural creator with the Milky Way.
Celestial organisation is based on gravity.
Biological organisation is based on chemistry.

Gravity is very weak to act on the molecular level and chemistry requires much more proximity than the celestial distances allow.

There is no connection between the origins of the two systems, besides their existence in the same universe

xxxx

Avatar

No creators, it is all about our ancestrals. Galaxies,atoms, are our ancestrals.
The human body pressure and homeostasis acts over organs and flows, it is also to weak at atomic and molecular levels. But was not gravity neither body pressure that organized matter into systems. You are missing the essence, the code, which is the formula at my website.

Organic chemistry emerged with a new state of matter – the liquid – which was not existent at galaxies’ formation. But, chemistry alone, leads matter to eternal equilibrium, never to compose working systems.

Th new planetary surface environment, different from the space, and new state of matter caused the big mutations in biological systems. While our direct astronomic ancestor was a closed system, we happened to be opened systems.

If you believe there are no connections between the system you live inside and was here producing your past ancestors and the system you are, you need to appeal to a mystic agent, like a magical randomness.. or magical supernaturals. We do need such jumps of imaginations anymore..

xxxx

You forgot about prions, viruses, RNA based life, etc.

You forgot that there are known reasons for the shapes of bodies in space, and, organ functions, etc…and that they do not share reasons.

Saying “Astronomic system” and “function” assumes things that are entirely unsupported by any evidence whatsoever.

 

You are seeing patterns that are not there.

 

You are also calling a “feeling” a “theory”.

In science, a theory is an explanation that has been tested, to falsify it, and passed the tests…and so forth,

…..not merely what a stoner says after seeing a Bohr Diagram and thinking…wow, that looks like our solar system!

xxxx

Avatar

No TJ, I did not forget these things, all them were hardly and perfect inserted in the same evolutionary lineage, from this astronomic system to complex biological organisms.

Nature has used a unique formula for all biological systems (DNA) because Nature has used a unique formula for “all” natural systems since the beginning of this Universe. I can’t believe you can not understand this obligatory evolutionary detail.

If all galaxies are similar like all biological systems, it is because all galaxies has a common essence like DNA. Same for all species of atoms systems. The evolutionary tree does not begins with archaea, fungus, but, with atoms. That’s why we can find all biological properties (metabolism,sexual reproduction,life’s cycles,etc) at atoms ( as electromagnetic fashion) and astronomic systems ( as mechanic fashion), expressed or not due evolutionary phases.

If you can’t see the evolutionary sequitur from a galaxy to a cell system you will need some mystical belief, like “spontaneous origins of life by chance”…

There is a universal evolution of a unique system in this 13,8 billion years, so, since it is a unique evolutionary lineage, must have repetitive universal patterns among all shapes of this universal natural system.

About theory:
Science took the name ” theory” from philosophy (the Greeks coined the word). I am using the word in its real meaning and science is not the owner of this word

xxxx

Sorry, the articles are being post only in Portuguese “Artigos”

July 6th, 2016

Please, … tap the Brazilian flag and “Artigos”, to see the everyday posts.

it is missing me time for translation. Anyone could help me with the translation to any other language? Maybe you will helping yourself and our next generations, if the models here are right…

New Debate Between Creationists and Atheists about the Mystery of Existences and the Suggestion from Matrix/DNA

July 6th, 2016

xxxx

It takes a fool to deny the obvious

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/26/it-takes-a-fool-to-deny-the-obvious/#comment-845574

And my comment published at the Myers’ article:

The Matrix/DNA
July 6, 2016 – Amazon Jungle

Creationists and atheists world views are both “magical thinking” due a fundamental mistake: they are forgetting the naturalist systemic perspective. Any living thing is a system, a systemic biological organization of matter and energy. And systems can only coming from other system. Nobody had discovered a system coming from a part or piece of a system, neither from something not belonging to a system.
So, the first amino-acids were systems in itself, made by atoms systems and this astronomical system. Since that atoms system are too much simple, and galactic systems are lots more complex, the logic’s suggests that amino-acids were a production of astronomic nanotechnology, like human genome, chromosomes,ovules, are products of human natural nanotechnology.

Following this line of logic’s we got a new world view called Matrix/DNA where a new theoretical astronomical and atomic model fits just as the ancestors of the first living cell.

Now the problem would be:but the first system, be it an atom or an elemental particle composed by other smaller particles as a system, where it came from?

We found that all these natural systems were made by a unique natural formula. Then, we found that any universal set of radiation performing a light wave has the same formula for systems. Conclusion? The forst natural system in this Universe and perceptible dimension was a light wave.

Where the light wave came from? No other simplest thing in this Universe was detected as ” the light wave producer”. Our method of rationalization is suggesting that the first natural light wave worked as the genome of some ex-machine entity. If so, this Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the systemic thing that produced it. Is is God? If you want call it by that name, remember that it is not magical, it does things by natural process. Is is a big absolute chance? If you want call it by tat name, remember that it is a phenomena that is being reproduced exactly like it happened once, so, when this process arrive to an end, it will not be the absolute chance, because it would be an event that has been repeated.

What matters here is the final moral concept from this world view: we are 8 billion genes plus trillion of genes spread in this Universe building a kind of baby. So, each of us – as gene – has a unique, specific, not mimicked, not able to be stolen – information. It is our mission and we are not conscious about that. If one of us dies not do his/her job, the baby will born handicapped. So, let yours brother free for doing its mission. If creationism, atheism or Matrixism are wrong interpretations of this world, our inner mission will correct our wrong beliefs. And we got correction every time that we learn something new about the Universal Nature. That’s why I made the Amazon jungle my second house: there are plenty of natural phenomena for learning there.

Antropologista diz que nao somos macacos e e’ fortemente criticado por cientistas

November 4th, 2015

xxxx

Veja por exemplo como um biologo evolucionista ataca o artigo fornecendo link para o artigo original:

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/11/02/an-anthropologist-who-thinks-we-arent-apes/#comment-845027

An anthropologist who thinks we aren’t apes

 

E meu comentario postado no artigo do Pharyngula:

 

Louis Morelli

New York

November 5, 2015

If a software says ” I am computer”, and a human being think ” I am ape”, both are wrong. What’s a human being is not an issue for evolutionary biologists while neurologist does not know how neurons relates to consciousness. When I think ” What I am?” is not my physical body asking, it is my consciousness. It does not matter if my body was raped from apes, it is not my body thinking this question as I doubt that any ape think this question..

And my consciousness is a software inserted into a terrestrial biological body, be it ape or something else. Ehe Windows software came from Bill Gate’s mind and not produced by computers, so, it is not logical to think that human bodies produced their consciousness. At last, Science has no data for afirm it.

The fact that we have less chromosomes than apes is due apes are better organic machine than us. And they are better machines because they reproduces faithful the machine that created all living beings here, the Newtonian machine. Human physical body is the necessary natural machine retrocess for nurturing a different origin from a different creator. Which we don’t know who is, because we don’t know what we are.

This is a science issue? Of course, not. Science deals with objects, real things, it does not makes comparisons of two things, does not do cladistic… humans do it. When Science alone enters in the apes’ world in the jungle and in the humans world in New York, Science is dealing with two totally different things and has no real data indicating that one thing is related to another.

One day Science could to prove that our physical body came from apes and our consciousness came from our human brains. But, it didn’t yet.

And if you want to talk for Science, you must feel as you are Science, and not a scientist atheist or theist or communist with their private interpretations behind Science.


U.S.A: Copyright Washington n. 000998487/2001-02-20 | Brasil: Reg. Dir. Autorais - Brasília n. 106.158/11-12-1995 | Louis Charles Morelli