Archive for the ‘Research by Matrix/DNA Theory’ Category

Nova teoria biologica onde DNA e’ blueprint, como a Matrix/DNA – Bruce Lipton

Friday, August 16th, 2019

xxxxxx

Bruce Lipton The Biology of Belief Full Lecture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82ShSNuru6c

( o nascimento da epigenetica )

Muito importante a considerar:

Nature or Nurture?

Nenhum dos dois.

O que define fe consciousness. Pois consciousness pode mudar os genes (Nature) e a aprendizagem (Nurture).

Pensar nisto no assunto sobre curar os humanos do instinto de presas.

 

 

O video das informacoes do corpo se extendendo como informacoes do campo magnetico de todo o Universo, de Nassim Haramein

Friday, August 16th, 2019

xxxxx

Muito importante voltar a ver porque se por a luz que encontrei no lugar do “magnetic field”, o resto fica bem similar.

Nassim Haramein – The Field of Boundless Information – Quantum University

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZPVp0NGEYY

A visão do mundo oriental sendo buscada pelo povo do Ocidente sera sua melhor alternativa nesta atual crise existencial?

Thursday, August 15th, 2019

xxxxx

Vamos tentar responder analisando um vídeo e palestra de um guru ocidental sendo cultuado no Ocidente.

A mídia está noticiando que está havendo uma grande guinada do povo ocidental na direção das antigas filosofias ou visões do mundo orientais, principalmente a hindu, representando-se principalmente pela yoga ( aqui mesmo neste website escrevi um artigo acho que ha uns dez dias atras, mencionando um debate no Reddit sobre um artigo ou livro no tema em questão, falando do retorno ao pampsiquismo, etc.).  Será isto bom ou ruim para estas pessoas? O que, qual é a visão de mundo dos seus criadores orientais? A quanto está essa visão de mundo em relação a verdadeira realidade? Muito distante ou mais próxima que as já experimentadas pelo Ocidente? Como conectar a visão de mundo criada a milhares de anos atras com a psicologia humana de hoje e o ambiente urbano moderno? Essas mentes dominadas por essa visão de mundo vão sobreviver ou melhorar sua qualidade de vida dentro deste sistema social vigente? Creio ser evidente que o povo ocidental está meio perdido entrando nesta era de incertezas em que o materialismo cientifico bombardeia as crenças herdadas dos antepassados, que ele esta precisando de um novo suporte psíquico. Mas seria o caso de buscar no passado e ressuscitar uma antiga visão de mundo ou de buscar construir uma nova, como eu fiz para mim, com a visão do mundo pela Matrix/DNA?

Este é um assunto sério, pois pessoas estarão investindo sua qualidade de vida numa aposta, da qual, eu não sei se serão ganhadores ou perdedores. Portanto, pela seriedade do assunto, é de nossa responsabilidade gastar algum do nosso tempo e esforço mental raciocinando sobre o problema. Acho que no Ocidente a maioria está como eu… Eu leio desde criança textos esparsos e até alguns livros curtos mencionando a visão de mundo oriental, mas nunca li um dos seus grandes livros, quanto mais estudar por completo o tema ( lembro-me que li, gostei, e reli Krishnamurthy, mas hoje não me lembro de mais nada dele. Porque nunca me foi útil ou porque não tentei aplica-lo disciplinarmente?). Portanto meu conhecimento é muito limitado. Mas de maneira alguma teria tempo para este estudo e nem entraria nele sem um motivo maior, pois sinto de antemão uma intuição de que não me seria útil. Pois olho para esses países orientais e deduzo que estão superpovoados com 90% da sua população vivendo sob o ciclo da miséria sendo torturada brutalmente por rituais religiosos, anti-femininos, e impedida de evoluir seus cérebros e poderes de atuação no ambiente em que vivem, e isso para mim é o indício de que a visão do mundo que produziu e mantém este estado de coisas não será salutar para o Ocidente. Posso estar errado, mas ninguém num breve argumento me convenceu o contrário. Então, ao invés de um pesado livro “sagrado” ou o estudo completo, vamos pegar um atual discurso de um guru oriental que está sendo bem difundido na moda atual ocidental entre as pessoas entrando neste barco. E vamos tentar esmiúça-lo, analisando-o, vamos ver no que vai dar.

O exemplar que selecionei para iniciar esta analise, e que achei bastante curioso mas fiquei com a sensação de inutilidade, vai no vídeo e transcript copiado abaixo para analisar-mos paragrafo a paragrafo.

What Is The Purpose Of Life?

Sadhguru answers a question about the purpose of life and explains why having a “god-given” purpose will only restrict life.

https://isha.sadhguru.org/us/en/wisdom/video/what-is-the-purpose-of-life

Questioner: It seems like there are people who know, what he meant to do, and I just don’t get that and I am in this path, where am I? What’s for me the purpose of life, if you can give an insight on that? Thank you.

Sadhguru: Isn’t it fantastic that if there is no purpose, you have nothing to fulfill, you can just live…

Matrix/DNA: Mas assim vivem os animais nossos antepassados, vivem o aqui e agora, são especialistas em praticidade, não possuem qualquer propósito na vida a ano ser manterem-se vivos… para que?! Se soubessem o que sabemos descobriram que sua especie sera irremediablemente extinta pela Natureza. E que sua existência será para sempre apagada do mundo, o Universo nunca sabera que sequer exististes. Mas aí vem a pergunta: e por acaso sera diferente com os que viveram a vida com um propósito? Nao podemos saber. Mas enfim, decididamente eu nao quero adotar esta mentalidade de vida sem qualquer propósito, sem um norte, um sonho a lutar por, pois tudo o que fizeram e são os animais eu quero me distanciar cada vez mais. Mas… se tem gente que acha que se sentirá melhor assim, que o seja.

Por enquanto, 0 a 1, esta perdendo o guru.

Sadhguru: ” No, but you want a purpose and not a simple purpose, you want a “God-given” purpose…

Matrix/DNA: Certo. Acho que por mais materialista ou ateu seja o indivíduo que tem um propósito para a vida, mesmo que seja quase inconscientemente tem a sensação de que exista algo sobrenatural no seu propósito, algo que transcende a vida, algo que esteja sendo aprovado, se não for por outro algo sobrenatural, ao menos pelo olho do Universo. Eu tenho um proposito na vida, não sou deísta, mas sinto que meu proposito esta sintonizado co o proposito do algo que disparou o Big Bang, que esta alem do Universo. portanto seria um ” natural super-ser dado proposito”. Enquanto isso, a maioria do povo vive na crença de que seguir o proposito que seguem esta sendo aprovado e foi determinado por um Deus.

Um x Um, o guru empatou o jogo… Apesar de que o guru erra sugerindo que as pessoas que querem ter um proposito estão erradas, e principalmente porque querem um proposito determinado por um imaginário Deus. Não, eu quero um proposito simplesmente para me diferenciar evoluindo do estado animal.

Sadhguru:  It’s very dangerous. People who think they have a God-given purpose are doing the cruelest things on the planet. Yes or no? They are doing the most horrible things and they’ve always been doing the most horrible things because when you have a God-given purpose, life here becomes less important than your purpose.

Matrix/DNA: Rapaz…! O guru agora deu uma acertada fantástica! Aqui nos percebemos que esta filosofia oriental é inimiga combatente do deísmo ocidental, mesmo que seja apenas na militância verbal e nunca tenha visto isso se projetar como violência física. Mas estes monges, que foram agredidos pelo deísmo ocidental, os vi sendo agredidos também pelos ateus orientais do Mao-Tse-Tung. Então como lidam com o ateísmo ocidental?

Esta acertada foi tao boa que vale uns 3 pontos. Então esta 4 x 1 para o guru.

Sadhguru: No, life is important. Life is important – when I say “life,” I am not talking about your family, your work, what you do, what you do not do, your party – I am not talking about that as life. This is life (referring to the self), isn’t it? Life is within you or around you? You’re mistaking the ambiance of life for life. Your home, your family, your workspace, your party – this is all ambiance of life. This is not life, isn’t it? Yes or no?

Participants: Yes.

Sadhguru: You’re mistaking the ambiance for the real thing. No. Life is important because it’s the only thing you know, you don’t know anything else. Do you know something else? Rest is all imagined stuff. The only thing is that this is beating and alive and that’s all there is.

Matrix/DNA: para mim isto esta um tanto confuso. O insight é bonito, mas pode ser apenas bonito como discurso, sem utilidade. Não existe vida que não seja suportada por um ambiente. O ambiente é sim muito importante, pois temos que estuda-lo ara melhor se adaptar nele, ou perecer. Este tipo de mentalidade mais se alinha na mentalidade que ele criticou nos deístas ( o mundo real mundano não importa, e sim o reino sobrenatural de Deus) do se alinha com os materialistas, para quem apenas importa a vida no ambiente no melhor ambiente aqui e agora. Esse tipo religioso, mistico de entender o mundo esta na base dos anti-aquecimento global, para quem o ambiente não merece atenção e se vai mudar, sera a vontade de Deus. O resto, o Universo, não é apenas imaginário, sera o ambiente que vai nos salvar quando este planeta não mais suportar vida aqui, portanto é importante, para que tenhamos motivação de estuda-lo, explora-lo, preparando nossa futura morada. Aqui o guru deu uma grande escorregada, merece perder dois pontos. 4 para o guru, 3 para os contra. 4 x 3.

 This is the greatest aspect of life – that it has no meaning to it and there is no need for it to have a meaning.

SadhguruSo, is this important? It is of paramount importance. Not you as a person, that’s not important, but you as a piece of life – it’s very important because that is the basis of everything. When I say that is the basis of everything, the universe exists for you only because you are, isn’t it? Yes or no? The world exists for you only because you are, otherwise it won’t exist in your experience. So, in every way this is important.

Matrix/DNA: ” Você não é importante, sua vida não é importante mas sim o importante é que você é uma peça da vida…”

Raios, parece que esse guru quer me fazer pirar? Meu pequenino cérebro não teve capacidade para processar logicamente está frase. Para mim o valor desta frase é zero, porque entendo que o fim dela contradiz e anula seu começo. Alias, é isto que tenho sentido ate aqui… uma frase contradiz a anterior. Sera isto charlatanismo? Mas e os brilhantes insights? Acho que não da para se analisar logicamente um assunto separado – como o proposito da vida – sem que antes se peça ao proponente descrever sua total visão do mundo. Eu cansei minha mente por enquanto, vou parar, sabendo que a responsabilidade me ordena voltar e continuar, por mais indigesto que seja. Se alguém pudesse dar uma ajudazinha continuando isso aqui…

Sadhguru: So, what is the purpose for this? See, if you had a purpose and if you’ve fulfilled it, after that what would you do? Bored, isn’t it? It is just that life is so intricate and so phenomenally intricate that if you spend a 10,000 years looking at it carefully, you still will not know it entirely. If you spend a million years looking at it with absolute focus, still you will not know it in its entirety. That’s how it is. Is there a meaning to it? The greatest thing about life is that there is no meaning to it. This is the greatest aspect of life – that it has no meaning to it and there is no need for it to have a meaning. It is the pettiness of one’s mind that it’ll seek a meaning because psychologically you will feel kind of unconnected with life if you don’t have a purpose and a meaning.

People are constantly trying to create these false purposes. Now, they were quite fine and happy. Suddenly, they got married. Now the purpose is the other person. Then they have children. Now they become miserable with each other. Now the whole purpose that I go through all this misery is because the children. Like this, it goes on. These are things that you’re causing and holding these as purposes of life and is there a God-given purpose? What if God does not know you exist? No, I am just asking, by chance. I am saying in this huge cosmos, for which God is supposed to be the Creator and the manager of these hundred billion galaxies, in that this tiny little planet and you in Houston, Tch… Suppose he doesn’t know that you exist, what to do? Possible or no? I am sorry, I am saying such sacrilegious things but is it possible or no? What if he doesn’t know that you exist?

The need for purpose has come because you’re trapped in your psychological structure, not in your life process.

What if he doesn’t have a plan for you? Like Obama care. Suppose, he doesn’t have an individual plan for you! Don’t look for such things. The thing is, the creation is made in such a way that Creation and Creator cannot be separated. Here you are a piece of creation. At the same time, the source of creation is throbbing within you. If you pay little attention to this process of life, you would not need any purpose. It’ll keep you engaged for a million years if you want. There is so much happening – so much means so much unbelievable things are happening right here. If you pay enough attention, a million years of existence, it will keep you busy or more.

Right now, the need for purpose has come because you’re trapped in your psychological structure, not in your life process. Your psychological structure functions from the limited data that it has gathered. Within that it rolls and right now, your thought and emotion has become far more important than your life. So, because of this you’re seeking a purpose as an escape from the trap that you have set for yourself. It is a trap set by you. You can easily come out of it. If the trap was set for you by somebody else, difficult to come out because they’ll set the trap in such a way that you cannot come out.

I am talking about life not marriage, that’s what I mean. So this is a trap set by you. This is easy to come out, but that is the whole thing. Why it is so difficult is, now you’re identified with the trap, you like it. You like it because it gives you a certain sense of safety and security and protection and individual identity. If you build a cocoon around yourself, it gives you safety, but it also imprisons you. Walls of self-preservation are also walls of self-imprisonment. When it protects you, you like it. When it restricts you, you do not like it. That is why we have doors. We like the walls because it’s protecting us, but we have doors so that we can open it and get out when we want to. It doesn’t matter how nice it is, we still want to go out, isn’t it?

Those who find a purpose in their life, they become so conceited. They will live within their own trap forever thinking that they’re doing the most fantastic thing.

So that is how it is with every trap that you set. It doesn’t matter how nice it is, you still want to go out. So, the psychological wall that you’ve built, which gives you some sense of identity, which gives you some sense of being an individual person and which gives you security, beginning to experience it like a trap; somewhere you want to break it. So, one way of not breaking it is to find a purpose. Those who find a purpose in their life, they become so conceited. They will live within their own trap forever thinking that they’re doing the most fantastic thing. And now you said I’ve found a purpose. No, I am just fooling around, really! This is not a mission. People think I am some kind of a missionary because of the energy with which I am going at it. I am not going at it with any zeal, but I am going at it with a certain energy because it’s normal for me to involve myself like this in anything for that matter.

You know like last two months have been a blitz of activity; blitz means like without a day’s break, without an hour’s break it’s been going on like over twenty hours a day nonstop. So, I was in London, I did a three-day event, then I went straight from there to Kumbh. From there all of us who went there caught a flu, but then I went straight to Hyderabad, that afternoon I flew and in the evening I started a program – three-day event. All of them went down who traveled with me, but with my flu I taught three days’ program. Then I came into the ashram and then samyama started that evening, eight days of samyama which is an intense process. The day samyama closed, we started the Yaksha program and the Inner Way program. The day that closed, we had the Mahashivaratri, then Brahmachari meet and teachers’ meet – going on like this. My busy day means I am sitting twelve to fourteen hours in the same place unmoving. Everybody goes to the bathroom, but I don’t.

So, I thought I need to move a little bit and I said, ‘Let’s go golfing.’ So, we went into a mountain place close by and I went with three other people who traveled from somewhere else and came. In two-and-a-half days I did eighty-five holes in the mountains. They all came in turns, but I went all the way. Every round that you do you walk, no buggies and all that stuff, walking. Ten kilometers you walk in the mountains at 6300 feet, eighty-five holes in two-and-a-half days.

It is wonderful to exist here without any purpose. It takes a certain freedom from your psychological structure to be here without any purpose.

So, if I go like this. Is golf a purpose of my life? No. I approach everything with a certain energy. This does not mean I found a purpose in hitting a ball. Similarly, I am teaching Inner Engineering because I find it’s useful for the people. If I see a little boredom in anybody’s face, maybe I won’t teach after that. Because I still see people are eager and anxious wanting to know something, I am on. If I see people around me are bored, then maybe you’ll never see me teaching again, because I am not seeing teaching Inner Engineering as a purpose. Right now, I see it is needed.

So, it’s difficult for you to understand probably right now, but the things that I throw my life into, are things that don’t mean anything to me, really! You think Isha Foundation means a world to me? No. Right now, I see without a foundation, we cannot function. With great reluctance, I formed the organization. Now it’s grown, grown beyond what most people understand – it’s grown very big. Is it the apple of my eye? No. I don’t like apple in my eye, I like my eyes clear. I keep it clear of all apples. You know the last time somebody got into the apple trouble, what happened to them.

So, I am saying I am throwing myself at something with great passion. This does not mean that is the purpose of my life. It is wonderful to exist here without any purpose. It takes a certain freedom from your psychological structure to be here without any purpose. If you’re trapped in your psychological structure you need a purpose. Otherwise, your psychological structure will lose its integrity. That’s why the girl who was asking at that time, I said, “First thing you need is balance. If you have balance, then you can climb. If you don’t have balance, it’s better you stay on the ground.” It’s not safe for somebody who is not balanced to climb high. It’s best you stay close to the ground. You should not climb.

So, first thing is to establish a balance, then you loosen your psychological structure, then it’s a wonderful thing. If you are loosening your psychological structure without balance, which lot of people are doing today. See, why does somebody want to drink alcohol or take a drug? Because it loosens your psychological structure and makes you feel liberated for a moment but without the necessary balance. You have not worked for the balance, but you got freedom. Freedom without balance is destruction, anarchy, isn’t it?

The purpose of life is to live and to live totally. To live totally means – before you fall dead, every aspect of life has been explored, nothing has been left unexplored.

So, first thing is to work for balance, an enormous sense of balance where even if you dismantle your psychological structure, you can simply live here. Dismantling your psychological structure is an important process because that is your trap, that is your security, that is your stability. At the same time, that’s your trap. Because the walls are set, you feel secured, but that’s also your trap. If you dismantle your trap, you also dismantle your security, isn’t it? You also dismantle your sense of purpose. You also dismantle everything that matters to you. So, that will need balance. Without balance, if you dismantle you’ll go crazy. But, don’t look for a purpose because if you look for a purpose, you are seeking madness. If you find one, you are sure mad. Yes. If you think you’ve found a purpose in life you’re for sure gone crazy because only the insane people have purpose or people who have a purpose are insane in many ways.

These are things that you create in your mind and believe it’s true, isn’t it? Right now, ‘fighting for my country is my purpose.’ Right now if it’s necessary, I’ll fight knowing fully well it’s an unnecessary bloody fight. Yes. Then you’ll fight only to the extent it’s necessary. If you think this is your purpose, you would want to destroy the whole world for what nonsense you believe in, isn’t it? If something is needed, we will do it with absolute involvement. Tomorrow suppose I find all of you are enlightened, it may happen! Suppose I find all of you are enlightened, will I come here and say “See, what did you have? Maggi noodles? Your body, you accumulated. You are not the body, you are not the mind,” it would be irrelevant, isn’t it? Yes or no? So when I see that you are enlightened, I’ll stop Inner Engineering. Right now, it’s needed, we’re doing. This doesn’t mean this is the purpose of my life. This is an unfortunate necessity, but I will do it joyfully and with great vigor because I do that with everything, not just with this. Don’t think I only teach the program with intensity and vigor, I live my life like that with everything, I eat like that also. I will do everything with intensity and vigor, that’s how you’re supposed do your life, isn’t it?

So, please do it that way. There’s no other purpose. The purpose of life is to live and to live totally. To live totally does not mean party every night. To live totally means – before you fall dead, every aspect of life has been explored, nothing has been left unexplored. Before you fall dead, even if you do not explore the cosmos, at least this piece of life (Referring to oneself) you must know it in its entirety. That much you must do to yourself, isn’t it? That’s living totally, that you experience the whole of this, all dimensions of what this is. You did not live anything untouched. You just do that. That will take a long time. That’s good enough purpose for you.

xxxxx

Origens da Vida: Extenso informativo artigo

Wednesday, August 14th, 2019

xxxxx

Origins – what cause explains best our existence, and why?

( segundo o bing, na busca de universal matrix, sou citado neste artigo/livro. Procurar > encontrei a seguinte nota em referencias: 23 -  http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?tag=evolucao&paged=13, no capitulo 07, sob titulo Essential elements and building blocks for the origin of life)

Reason and Science.com

http://reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2590-origins-what-cause-explains-best-our-existence-and-why#5790

Parei lendo a extensa primeira pagina no capitulo: How the discovery of ribozymes cast RNA in the roles of both chicken and egg in origin-of-life theories

 

Nassim Haramein and its “Unified Field Theory”

Sunday, August 11th, 2019

xxxxx

Comece vendo este video:

https://resonancescience.org/nassim-haramein-talks-unified-physics-with-dr-j/

Nassim Haramein talks unified physics with Dr. J!

Informações sobre os 50 intelectuais mais influentes de hoje

Wednesday, August 7th, 2019

xxxxxx

A lista feita é criticada como sendo tendenciosa, escolhendo partidários e amigos, etc. No artigo da Quillette se menciona outros tantos de intelectuais atuais que deveriam estar na lista, portanto os nomes na Quillette devem ser investigados tambem.

Alem do fator ideológico, tendencioso, este post mostra outra faceta do problema:

” How does one measure others’ “intellectualism” in any way? Why would anyone take such a list seriously? How could such a list be anything other than a self-serving popularity contest? How arrogant to consider oneself qualified to identify, evaluate, and rank great intellects and top thinkers…”

Why isn’t Jordan Peterson on This List of the World’s Top Fifty Intellectuals?

https://quillette.com/2019/07/26/why-isnt-jordan-peterson-on-this-list-of-the-worlds-top-fifty-intellectuals/

e a lista da Prospect Magazine:

The world’s top 50 thinkers 2019

Informações sobre o cérebro que não se pode esquecer

Monday, August 5th, 2019

xxxxx

O cérebro humano contém mais de 80 bilhões de neurônios, cada um se unindo a outras células para criar trilhões de conexões chamadas sinapses.

Estas informações estão nos links (artigos a ler ainda):

Are There Really as Many Neurons in the Human Brain as Stars in the Milky Way?

https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/brain-metrics/are_there_really_as_many

e sobre as sinapses:

Neurotransmission: The Synapse

http://www.dana.org/News/Details.aspx?id=43512

xxxxxx

ver tambem:

Brain Metrics

 

https://www.nature.com/scitable/blog/brain-metrics

Consciencia: Qualia, Quale, Qualia Apace: O melhor PDF

Saturday, August 3rd, 2019

xxxxx

Este PDF vai merecer um cuidadoso estudo devido a quantidade de informações pela teoria acadêmica atual.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4014402/

From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0

Debate at REDDIT : Why some scientists believe the universe is conscious

Friday, August 2nd, 2019

xxxx

Questao no REDDIT PHILOSOPHY:

Why some scientists believe the universe is conscious

Obs: Meus posts no REDDIT foram removidos por um moderador. A desgraça dos cérebros dominados pelos meios processos de pensamentos apenas do hemisfério esquerdo do cérebro impera no REDDIT também, alias, como era de se esperar, não se poderia esperar outra coisa, desde que os filósofos ali reunidos vieram todos do meio acadêmico dominante nesta era, doutrinados pela filosofia virtual e desconhecedores da filosofia naturalista. Por isso, 90% da população mundial, ou seja, 7 bilhões de seres humanos, continuarão a serem torturados sob os atuais predadores construtores desta academia, que os mantem com sua ciência e tecnologia enganosa e tendenciosa sob o ciclo da miséria tendo suas vidas perdidas, desperdiçadas, porque não podem evoluir seus cérebros exorcizando-se dos instintos para presas. Mas eu salvei os comentários e os estou postando aqui.
Minhas respostas:
MatrixDNA - 8/3/19

The Matrix/DNA Theory suggest a third alternative for existence of consciousness. Interpreting the Universe from a biological viewpoint, rather than Physics, it arrives to a whole model where the history of 9 months of human embryogenesis is a copy of the history of 13,8 billion years of this material chain of causes and effects that began with the Big Bang. The Universe – this aglomerate of galaxies – can not be conscious, since it is not a working system, it is merely a mass of sub-system, and works like a placenta or amniotic liquid. But, the theory has found that the essence of all living things – the DNA – is merely the biological shape evolved from an essence that is the building block of galaxies and atoms, a formula called Matrix/DNA. And later we found that this universal formula were not created by atoms either, it was encrypted as the anatomy of light waves, like that emitted at the Big Bang.

There is no evolution of Universe, there is the evolution of something inside the Universe, like there is no evolution of a pregnant woman’s body, but there is the evolution of the embryo body inside it. it is not the brain of an embryo that creates consciousness, it was encrypted in the fetus, in the morula, since fecundation and beyond; so, it is not the human species’ brain that created consciousness, it was encrypted as potential not expressed in galaxies, atoms… and light waves. It is a little bit different than panpsychism.

The quantum foam is the membrane that separates this Universe/amnion from what the still unknown thing existing outside. By this membrane there are changes: the universe imports waves of light containing the genetic code – or formula for natural material systems – and exports substance of consciousness.

Embryogenesis of humans takes 7 or 8 months for expressing consciousness. Embryogenesis of the ex-universal thing being produced inside this Universe takes 13, 8 billion years for expressing consciousness. What’s the problem? It is merely a relativistic issue, since that for universes the scale of time is astronomic.

xxxxxx

Ptscholar - posted at 8/3/19

Well, it makes sense. The entire universe functions as it is suposed to function and since obviously there isn’t any personal God overseeing all, the universe must take care of itself but how could it have the knowledge to continously do such? The answer, the universe is aware of itself. I believe the problem is not whether that is true, but rather how that happens and I bet that, once we discover this how, human life will change drastically.

MatrixDNA - post at 8/3/19

No, it does not make sense. This Universe is not a system, it has no nucleus and connected interacting parts, it is a mass of subsystems (galaxies), and messy mass can not be conscious. What we know is that something inside this Universe, when it was 13,8 billion years old, and existing at Earth surface, was very complex due evolution, and began to develop a fetus of consciousness, which still has no open eyes to see its substance, shape and body.

The unique natural, pure, rational hypothesis that we can get from what we know comes from observing the universal Nature, searching if there is some similar event/phenomena. And there is one. Human embryogenesis. An embryo at 6 or 8 months suddenly begins to express consciousness. But is not the brain of the embryo that creates consciousness, it was coming from outside its bubble/womb, from the parents, living outside its “universe”. So, the rational way to think about this question is making comparisons between the human placenta composed by cells and the universe composed by galaxies, between the human expression of consciousness at embryogenesis and the thing inside the universe expressing consciousness, which can be spread in the galaxies, throughout the entire placenta, by manny other life forms. Any other hypothesis will be appeal to phantasies.

I agree that is no God overseeing all, because I am watching here that parents can not oversee all that is happenings inside the womb of the pregnant mother. And agree that human life will change drastically when we will discover the true, but not due humans inventing a new way of life and so, merely correcting what we are doing wrong because instead asking the great questions directly to Mother Nature as a humble naturalist philosopher, we have been driving by imaginations like deism and materialist atheism.

We, humans, are 8 billion half-conscious genes building the finger of the foot of the embryo that is being built by billions of our other genes-brothers spread in this Universe, of the being composed by consciousness substance that will born at the day of the Big Birth… (maybe). The Universe will go from the Big bang to the Big Crunsh – as goes all placentas – but we will go from the Big Bang to the our Big Birth.

1 point·1 day ago·edited 1 day ago

I’m not going to lie, that was rather confusing. Not so much because I don’t understand the topic but because many claims you brought up were in nature confusing, especially your association to human embryone.

That might have been my fault but with that said, I’ll explore just one particular point, and that is precisely the one of the original post, universal consciousness. You said the universe being aware of itself doesn’t make sense because

This Universe is not a system, it has no nucleus and connected interacting parts, it is a mass of subsystems (galaxies), and messy mass can not be conscious.

Do you have any proof of that? Not that the universe seems chaotic, that’s been hinted at already by our very limited human lenses, but that the universe is just that and nothing else. No is the answer isn’t it? For even if sometimes the universe does seem chaotic, upon further inspection for some reason it always becomes ordered, always. That order may ultimately be the product of our own minds but since we know that the universe doesn’t need you or me to exist – it exists regardless of us – that is a great indicator that the order we experience actually comes from it. Since this order is, well, too ordered, it must come from an intelligent source, so like I said, the real question is what source is that and how it operates, not whether the incredible harmony present in nature is the product of a thoughtless and mindless gamble or of an intelligent unit.

MatrixDNA - 1 point· just today – 8/6/19

I understand that this seems confused to you, it is about a worldview that you never read about, and written in poor English. Do you have any proof that the Universe is a system? A working system? Where is the nucleus, which are the parts with specific systemic functions, how are they connected? I don’t know any evidence for that. Being a mass of subsystems, like a soup, does not means it must be chaotic, neither that there are working evolving order, only that is under thermodynamic equilibrium. Then, once time more, there is the similarity with human embryogenesis that I pointed out: the amnion liquid inside the egg also is not chaotic, it is under mechanic equilibrium. And the placenta around…

What is the source? If you search at my website, you will see how a single light wave contains the code for building all natural systems known in this Universe, till living systems. The code is not a message encrypted into a film, it is merely the internal anatomy of a light wave that develops when the light wave propagates into time/space. Its “organs”, or “parts” are the seven different shapes of frequencies/vibrations. So, a natural universal light wave emitted at the Big Bang works like a God genome, but, not magical, it is merely a kind of natural genetic/computational process. It is not that the Universe – as a agglomerate of galaxies – is becoming conscious, but, something inside it, developed from a light wave that is a working system in itself, that build the atom system, the astronomic systems, the biological systems is now building a conscious system. Ok, I can’t proof it yet as nobody can’t proof any worldview, merely i think mine is more rational based on reality I see here and now. Cheers…

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Esta questão deriva do seguinte artigo:

WHY SOME SCIENTISTS BELIEVE THE UNIVERSE IS CONSCIOUS

https://mindmatters.ai/2019/08/why-some-scientists-believe-the-universe-is-conscious/

“… in a universe governed by uncertainty principles rather than hard facts, what is the “material” in materialism? There is no good materialist theory of consciousness; far from it, an article in Chronicles of Higher Education last year labeled the current research a “bizarre” field of science.

Outros artigos links citados:

The universe may be conscious, say prominent scientists

https://bigthink.com/philip-perry/the-universe-may-be-conscious-prominent-scientists-state

xxxxxx

Próximo post como abertura de novo tópico:

Com este post eu provavelmente serei banido do REDDIT e assim levarei a politica do REDDIT para ser debatida em outros canais de comunicação. 90% da população humana, ou seja, 7 bilhões de pessoas ainda mantendo o instinto de presas estão sendo neste momento torturados e impedidos de evoluírem por esta politica de instinto predador com sua produzida ciência e tecnologia desumanas como armas de dominação para continuarem a dominar a especie tal como as religiões deístas dominaram a academia intelectual outrora. O problema esta na forma como o cérebro modelado na passagem do macaco para o homo sapiens foi dividido em duas partes opostas entre si e configura as conexões neuroniais de maneira que estes cérebros não poderiam processar informações da realidade natural que exigiria um cérebro completo, integrado. Se tiveres curiosidade procure meus desenhos da anatomia cerebral e como os circuitos do cérebro dividido funcionam diferente dos circuitos do cérebro integrado. Portanto não existem meios de outra visão de mundo produzida por outro cérebro num nível mais integrado sequer se comunicar com os moderadores do REDDIT e por isso desisto. Mas insisto neste ultimo post me dirigindo a comunidade de filósofos aqui reunidos para sondar se existe algum amante da filosofia que esteja em processo de integração cerebral, que tentaria ao menos entender algo do que estou trazendo, para iniciar-mos uma comunidade `a parte.

Existe a filosofia virtual – praticada aqui neste canal do REDDIT e que vem dos filósofos gregos frequentadores da corte imperial debatendo no reino do imaginário se recusando a arregaçar as mangas, por a mão na massa da realidade natural do povo la’ fora da corte, para testar suas conclusões virtuais -  e a naturalista, sendo que a naturalista pode entender algo da virtual mas a virtual não pode entender nada, nem a linguagem, da naturalista. Imagine uma sala cheia de pessoas onde a maioria são de filósofos acadêmicos debatendo animadamente em inglês e no meio tem um pequeno grupo de índios falando apenas entre si no seu inglês influenciado pelo idioma nativo debatendo sua visão de mundo animadamente. Os índios vão estar atrapalhando o debate acadêmico, funcionando como ruídos na comunicação, os acadêmicos desprezam os indios e acreditam que sua visao do mundo esta totalmente errada, e darao seu jeito de separar o grupo, ou calar suas vozes expulsando-os para outra sala.

Pois meus posts removidos daqui são as vozes dos índios que foram expulsos da sala. Porque na juventude universitária eu estudei a filosofia acadêmica tendo meu cérebro modelado por ela e entendo algo dela, mas depois vivi 7 anos na selva que remodelou meu cérebro, aprendi a filosofia naturalista dos nativos e comparando as duas construí uma terceira visão do mundo, e conclui que para a evolução de todos os 8 bilhões de humanos ( predadores e presas), eles tem que aprenderem esta terceira visão. Mas assim como fui expulso da selva pelos nativos devido eu falar em sua linguagem de forma incompreensível, sou expulso também pelos nativos da academia dominando a moderação no REDDIT.

Para o moderador deve ter sido torturante tentar ler meu post num inglês quase incompreensível. Mas esta incompreensão é causada mais pelo desconhecimento da interpretação do mundo diferente da sua é – a qual tende a desprezar outras -  do que pelos erros na gramatica. Ele não sabe que se houver outros participantes com conexão neuronial diferente se interessariam em decifrar o conteúdo, e assim ele pode estar banindo um grupo, sem o saber e jamais vai entender. Nos poucos minutos que este post ficara no ar aqui, esperarei se alguém com cérebro funcionando similar ao meu se manifeste para criarmos um grupo separado.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

A native from the jungle searching here someone interested in a debate between our two different worldview and philosophies

With this post I will probably be banned from REDDIT and thus I will lead the REDDIT politics to be debated on other communication channels. 90% of the human population, ie 7 billion people, still holding the prey instinct, are now being tortured and prevented from evolving their brains by this predatory instinct policy with its inhumane produced science and technology as weapons of domination to continue to dominate the prey, sort of as how the deist religions dominated the intellectual academy at Middle Age. The problem is how the brain was modeled in the “ape-to-homo sapiens passage”. It was split into two opposing parts which state configures the neuronal connections and its produced mindset, so that these brains can not process information from natural reality that would require a complete, integrated brain. If you’re curious look at my drawings of brain anatomy and how divided brain circuits work differently from integrated brain circuits. So there is no way for another worldview produced by another brain at a more integrated level to even communicate with REDDIT moderators and so I give up. But I insist in this last post directing myself to the community of philosophers gathered here to probe if there is any philosophy lovers who are in the process of brain integration, who would at least try to understand something of what I am bringing, for to start a community apart.

There is the virtual philosophy – practiced here on this REDDIT channel, which comes from the Greek philosophers attending the imperial court debating in the realm of the imaginary, refusing to roll up their sleeves, putting their hands on the mass of natural reality where was living the people outside the court, to test its virtual conclusions – and the naturalist, since the naturalist can understand something of the virtual but the virtual can understand nothing, nor the language, of the naturalist. Imagine a room full of people where most are academic philosophers debating animatedly in English while in the middle there is a small group of Indians speaking only to each other in their native language-influenced by English, debating their worldview excitedly. The Indians will be disrupting the academic debate, working as noises in communication, the academics despise the Indians and believe that their view of the world is totally wrong, and will give their way of separating the group, or silence their voices by expelling them to another room. .

My posts removed from here are the voices of the Indians who were expelled from the room. Because in my college youth I studied academic philosophy having my brain modeled on it and I understand something of it, but then I lived 7 years in the jungle that reshaped my brain, learned the naturalistic philosophy of the natives and grasping different signals from that biosphere, and by comparing the two I built a third worldview, and I have conclude that for the evolution of all 8 billion humans (predators and preys), they have to learn this third vision. But just as I was kicked out of the jungle by the natives because I speak their language incomprehensibly due an unknown world view, so I am kicked out by the academy natives dominating REDDIT moderation.

For the moderator it must have been torturous to try to read my post in almost incomprehensible English. But this misunderstanding is caused more by ignorance of a different interpretation of the world, other than yours is – which tends to scorn others – rather than errors in grammar. He does not know that if there are other participants with a different neuronal connection they would be interested in deciphering my content, so he may be banishing a group without knowing it and will never understand. In the few minutes this post will be in the air here, I will wait if someone with a brain working similar to mine comes forward for us to create a separate group.

LUZ: Importantes Informações sobre as luzes do Sol

Friday, August 2nd, 2019

xxxxx

As luzes do Sol

http://www.astronoo.com/pt/artigos/luzes-do-sol-e-comprimentos-de-onda.html

Link para interessante video da NASA sobre as cores do Sol (NASA | Jewel Box Sun ):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kS57VH3QN1g

 

Sol emite uma pluralidade de ondas eletromagnéticas, de ultravioleta distante (FUV) como raios gama (maior frequência) às ondas de rádio (frequências mais baixas), por meio dos raios-X, raios ultravioletas, luz visível, raios infravermelhos, micro-ondas. Essas ondas eletromagnéticas, cujo vetor é o fóton, movem-se a velocidade ≈300 000 km/s.

Matrix/DNA: Se isto for verdade, preciso repensar a teoria da Matrix/DNA. Sempre me foi um problema resolver de onde viria os demais  fótons que contribuíram para a origem da vida ou assentamento da Matrix/DNA na forma biológica aqui, pois pensava que o Sol apenas emitia um tipo de fóton, o da luz visível. Fui levado a este erro devido a insistente afirmação acadêmica de que o Sol funciona por um processo simples de fusão de hélio e hidrogênio, liberando energia, e isto deveria liberar apenas um tipo de fóton. Então tinha que calcular como os outros seis tipos de fótons necessários para montar o DNA teria vindo da radiação cósmica de outros astros, o que sempre me pareceu um tanto estranho. Mas este artigo abriu uma grande nova janela para meus cálculos, como vai informar a seguir:

Cores do Sol, comprimentos de onda

Imagem: Esta composição mostra os diferentes aspectos da superfície ou a atmosfera do Sol em 10 comprimentos de onda diferentes, invisível a olho nu. Estas luzes especiais e coloridas do Sol é convertida pelo SDO telescópio (Solar Dynamics Observatory), de modo que os humanos podem ver. O objeto observado aqui é o Sol, aparece em um belo “arco-íris” de cores que representam a sua luz. Quanto mais elevada a temperatura, mais a cor dominante move-se das micro-ondas para ondas gama ( Ou seja, faz o caminho inverso da onda no espectro). A luz amarela tem um comprimento de onda de ≈580 nm, que vem tipicamente de átomos aquecidos a cerca de 5700 ° C, que é o caso de a superfície do Sol. Luzes extremas do ultravioleta longínquo, como ondas gama têm um comprimento de onda de ≈9 nm, geralmente é colorida verde em imagens do SDO, que normalmente vem dos átomos aquecidos a cerca de 6,3 milhões de ° C, que é o caso de erupções solares, que podem alcançar temperaturas tão elevadas. crédito: NASA / SDO / Goddard Space Flight Center

Matrix-DNA: Aqui surge uma contradição que devo resolver. Ele diz que ” quanto mais elevada a temperatura, mais a cor dominante move-se das micro-ondas para ondas gama“. Mas pelo que vejo no espectro, deduzo que as ondas gama são as menores ondas, ou seja, as micro-ondas. Mas estou considerando apenas o aspecto horizontal das ondas ( o comprimento de onda) e não o vertical (a altura da onda) . Porque a onda menor no horizontal, é a maior no vertical. E pelo que se deduz aqui, o autor considera como onda maior o aspecto altura, vertical, que por sua vez é a onda curta. Pesquisar isto…

Vamos mostrar o espectro:

Light-The-Electro-Magnetic-Spectrum by MatrixDNA THeory

Com os nossos olhos, vemos apenas os comprimentos de onda no domínio do visível entre 400 e 800 nm... note que a luz amarela tem 580 nm. 

O Sol nos envia todas as cores de luz pois é preenchido com todos os átomos presentes na Terra,…

Matrix/DNA: ” O que?!!!”.

Wikipedia: Sun

Roughly three quarters of the Sun’s mass consists of hydrogen (~73%); the rest is mostly helium (~25%), with much smaller quantities of heavier elements, including oxygencarbonneon, and iron.[19]

Ok. Mas então não foi mencionado o nitrogênio, outro elemento importante no DNA.

Grande informação! Isto descarta muitos problemas para minha teoria.

…. it is informally and not completely accurately referred to as a yellow dwarf (its light is closer to white than yellow)…

- …. It currently fuses about 600 million tons of hydrogen into helium every second, converting 4 million tons of matter into energy every second as a result. This energy, which can take between 10,000 and 170,000 years to escape from its core, is the source of the Sun’s light and heat. ( continuar a ler wikipedia sobre o Sol).

- … cada átomo do Sol, dependendo da temperatura, produz a luz de um comprimento de onda determinado

- … Cada comprimento de onda observado, revela assim informações sobre os diferentes elementos (átomos ou íons) da superfície e da atmosfera do Sol.

Matrix/DNA: Exato como meus cálculos genéticos havia previsto. O que não mencionam – e talvez nunca pensaram nisto – é que a soma total destes comprimentos de ondas de átomos, deve revelar a anatomia da estrela inteira, se os fótons emitidos ao espaço se reunissem no mesmo ponto do espaço-tempo e na mesma ordem sequencial em que foram emitidos. Isto é o que prevê meus modelos para concluir que o building block do DNA seja uma copia do building block astronômico. Porque também não consideram a minha teoria da gênese dos astros, e que por esta teoria, qualquer astro em qualquer momento, contem todas as informações de todos os outros seis tipos de astros, assim como meu corpo humano, em qualquer momento e qualquer forma de sua existência, contem todas as informações  sobre todas as outras formas do mesmo corpo.