Archive for the ‘Formula of Matrix/DNA Theory’ Category

A Formula da Matrix/DNA e o Dilema Existencial Humano.

Saturday, August 17th, 2019

xxxxx

( Obs: levar esta figura ao power-point para botar numeros nas camisas)

 

Formula da Matrix/DNA: humano como sistema fechado

Formula da Matrix/DNA: humano como sistema fechado

 

Basta escrever o numero F2 no homem que comeca a subir a escada que toda a formula emerge. Assim, F4 sera o homem no topo da escada, F6 o homem caído como cadaver, F7 sera o sistema degradado comecando a se auto-reciclar.

The Matrix/DNA as Software of Astronomical Systems's Building Blocks

The Matrix/DNA as Software of Closed Systems

Muito interessante notar algo. O quadro expressa algo mal, como um ciclo de vida sem sentido, torturado. Enquanto isso, foi exatamente o que aconteceu na Historia Natural quando uma forma nossa ancestral se auto-organizou como sistema fechado em si mesmo, cortando todas as relações com o mundo externo. Fez isto com a intencao de ter o paraíso perfeito apenas para si e viver esse paraíso eternamente.

Para iniciar a abertura deste sistema, ou para evitar que um sistema aberto se torne fechado, o principal recurso esta em F4. Representa a funcao reprodutora do macho no sistema. Ele tem opcao entre duas escolhas. Ou emite sua carga genetica apenas na direcao de F1 ( monogamia), fechando o sistema num rodizio auto reciclável,  ou emite tambem para fora do sistema, fecundando F1s externos, gerando mais sistemas. O que vai determinar o enfraquecimento e morte de si mesmo como sistema, apesar que sua carga genetica continua existindo e proliferando.

E a figura parece ter sido feita propositalmente para mostrar isso. O homem no topo da escada, F4, esta com a mão na cabeca como se estando indeciso, ao ver seu corpo caído e sabendo que isso sera seu futuro, se escolher a opcao sistema fechado. Muito interessante, material para se refletir mais sobre a formula.

No sistema astronomico, F4 é a estrela, como o Sol. No ciclo vital humano, F4 é o adulto iniciando sua maturidade sexual. Na celula é a mitocôndria, que emite ATP para manter com energia F1.

Caminhar para sua morte ou para a sua escravidao eterna?

Assim parece que a Natureza é implacável, insensível com suas criaturas e ja tem a predisposição para puni-las. Mas resta uma remota possibilidade da coisa ser diferente. Nos percebemos e conhecemos apenas esta dimensao material. Um estudo mais profundo dos fenomenos naturais levanta a suspeita de que ao lado deste hardware material caminha um software, invisível a nos. Se o homem escolher a opcao de abrir o sistema – que é a opcao da sua morte imediata – o hardware continuara existindo e se multiplicando no exterior. Para o homem isto não é consolador, pois ele, seu ego, sua personalidade é o que mais lhe interessa e não seu genoma no corpo de outros humanos. Mas se a vida depois da sua morte continua no seu aspecto hardware, porque não tambem no aspecto software? Ninguem pode afirmar sim ou não, pois este nos é invisível, pertence a uma dimensao não tocável ou perceptível aos nossos sentidos.

Enfim, tambem não se pode afirmar que a Natureza seja insensível com suas criaturas, se o software sobreviver.

Crise na reciclagem do lixo e solucao na formula da Matrix/DNA

Friday, August 16th, 2019

xxxxx

Os recicláveis dos USA estavam sendo comprados pela China, a qual parou de comprar e agora estao sendo jogados nos lixões ou no mar, um problema serio que tende rapidamente se tornar calamitoso, considerando a noticia seguinte:

” While the industry stalls, residents and businesses are consuming and generating more waste than ever. In 2014, Los Angeles County generated approximately 22 million tons of waste. By 2018, that number had climbed to 30 million tons…

O fenomeno “reciclagem” nos lembra logo da formula universal para todos os sistemas naturais, pois nela é praticada a reciclagem do material degradado. Portanto vamos ler a noticia no link abaixo e trazer para ca’ a formula ver o que ela sugere como solucao:

As California’s recycling industry struggles, companies and consumers are forced to adapt

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/as-californias-recycling-industry-struggles-companies-and-consumers-are-forced-to-adapt/ar-AAFQNkA?ocid=spartanntp

E a formula da Matrix/DNA:

The universal matrix/DNA as closed system

The universal matrix/DNA as closed system

Bem… na verdade este assunto sera melhor visivel no esboço feito na selva da formula:


Matriz DNA Universal

Vemos na formula que o fluxo de energia/informacao do sistema se apresenta como um circuito fechado que se auto recicla. Quando o fluxo chega na funcao 7 ( que representa o “cadaver” do sistema) ele se decompõem em poeira ou particulas e nesta forma vai reconstruir a funcao 1, que é o ponto inicial do fluxo. Outro detalhe a se notar é que o fluxo se compoe alternativamente de particulas e ondas. na verdade o fluxo e a trajetória de um unico corpo material que rola ao sabor do seu ciclo vital, transformando-se em novas formas que se tornam as partes ou pessas do sistema.

Entao, F1 é onde inicia a formacao do corpo. trata-se do cone rotativo, um especie de caldeira em turbilhão. Para ele vem todos os ingredientes como materia-prima para formar o corpo. Alem de F5 que traz a energia que mantem a rotação, o rodamoinho recebe as impurezas na forma de massa degradada da morte do sistema anterior. esta formula é a base de todos os sistemas naturais, de atomos a galaxias a corpos vivos, porem, um dos seus aspectos principais é o de ser a formula que mostra como funciona um sistema aberto e um sistema fechado em si mesmo. Mostramos a formula no seu aspecto de sistema fechado porque seria o estado perfeito, eterno, como um moto-perpetuo. Para imaginar seu aspecto de sistema aberto basta cortar o circuito esferico entre F7 e F1, ficando o circuito com duas pontas que não se tocam, e portanto o sistema não seria auto-reciclavel, mas sim com morte predeterminada.

Sendo a formula do sistema perfeito, tem que ser a formula de um sistema completamente automático. neste aspecto o sistema é a mais perfeita maquina possivel. Que processa materia-prima fornecida por ele mesmo e produz um produto final, que  é ele mesmo.

Entao para o homem se livre do trabalho estupido rotineiro, ele deve buscar implantar um sistema mecânico automatizado de producao e consumo, baseado na formula. Vamos supor que o sistema sera implantado na producao, consumo, limpo e auto-sustentavel, de refrigerantes. Em F1 chegam os ingredientes do conteúdo do produto e se for o caso, tambem para embalagem do produto. de F1 o protótipo do produto vem ‘a luz e segue para F2, o qual ainda esta no meio da carga de materiais degradados e outros ingredientes que serao agregados ao protótipo. Em F3 o produto esta pronto para consumo, em F4 é comprado e consumido ( F5 seria o retorno da energia para retroalimentar F1, que neste caso, pode ser o dinheiro pago pelo consumidor). A partir dai o que é consumido pode ser ejetado para fora do sistema em F4 se for um sistema aberto ( mais na forma de urina) e o resto continua para F6, retornando os frascos para ser reciclado m F1.

Em outras palavras, no sistema automatizado perfeito, o material reciclável deve retornar diretamente para a fabrica que o produz. E ela ter a instrumentação para fazer a reciclagem.

mas o sistema de producao/consumo humano veio junto com o humano do estado caótico da Natureza, e não diretamente do estado de ordem do sistema astronomico. Portanto é   inevitável a fase inicial de problemas caóticos, que tem que serem aos poucos resolvidos visando o estado de ordem automatizado e eficiente, inclusive mantendo inalterado a fonte da materia-prima e sem poluir o exterior. Nesta fase caótica o mercado global caótico faz com que o consumidor esteja nos USA e a fabrica na China. Isto distorce a formula tendo que se inserir uma enorme distancia entre F7 e F1 + F2. Esta distancia tem que ser percorrida com energia vinda de fora da maquina, aumentando o custo do processo producao/consumo/reciclagem.

vamos separar o local da producao deixando a fabrica na China e a central de reciclagem nos USA, transportando o produto ja reciclado para a China? O certo mesmo era trazer de volta as fabricas que estavam nos USA que nunca deveriam ter ido para a China, pincipalmente quando existe um conflito de interesses entre consumidos e fabricantes.

Ai esta a solucao final sugerida pela formula: os consumidores, a fabrica, e a central de reciclagem devem estarem no mesmo local, ou regiao, ou pais. Qualquer outra alternativa continuara sendo prejudicial a humanidade. O artigo diz que a solucao deve vir dos “lawmakers”, os politicos que fazem as leis. Estes deveriam conhecer melhor este mundo conhecendo sua formula basica.

Hierocles’ Cycle (estoicismo): A formula como sistema fechado?

Tuesday, July 30th, 2019

xxxxx

Para pensar:

The Hierocles' Cycle of Human Attention

The Hierocles’ Cycle of Human Attention

E a formula dos sistemas fechados:

The Matrix/DNA as Software of Astronomical Systems's Building Blocks

The Matrix/DNA as Software of Astronomical Systems’s Building Blocks

Entao:

F1 = Self, Eu

F2 = Family

F3 = Friends

F4 = Community

F5  ( and or F6 ?) = All Humanity

F7 = Earth

The Matrix/DNA arriving to be reaveled in the biological DNA! Big hopes!

Sunday, July 7th, 2019

xxxxxx

https://singularityhub.com/2019/07/02/radical-new-dna-microscope-reimagines-the-cellular-world/ 

This Radical New DNA Microscope Reimagines The Cellular World

Jul 02, 2019

Paper deste artigo ( livre, mas nao li):

DNA Microscopy: Optics-free Spatio-genetic Imaging by a Stand-Alone Chemical Reaction

https://www.cell.com/cell/fulltext/S0092-8674(19)30547-1

rainbow cell segmentation in DNA microscopy biotechnology

Since 30 years ago I have written: ” The building blocks of biological DNA is the exactly copy, with different materials, of the building blocks of galaxies.”

Nobody could accept it, neither to research my work searching something in it. I agree it is a very stranger idea for humans.  Since our primordial times we have separated us from what we see in the skies. Nobody thought that we could be an evolutionary continuum from the evolution of what’s in the sky.

The cause is that we are not seeing the real sky and the real microscopic structures of our bodies. We didn’t know about Nature ability to practice nanotechnology, although nature always revealed it to us, when a big human body becomes a microscopic code inside the genome. But…

” It’s not every day that something from the 17th century gets radically reinvented.” – says this article.

” … this month, a team from the Broad Institute at MIT and Harvard took aim at one of the most iconic pieces of lab ware—the microscope—and tore down the entire concept to recreate it from scratch.”

And what is the initial results? - “The first time I saw a DNA microscopy image, it blew me away,” said Regev.

Yes… the sky is coming down to be see by humans how it is. Look to the above image. And now look to the image below:

Image result for the universe

I find it impressive that when we are at the middle of the macro and the micro, and we see above and below, we see the same image. I think that if we goes towards the above and towards the micro at same time, we will continuing seeing same images. because the two far away images will be clarifying at the same proportion. And when we will arrive the last frontier of the sky and of the particles, we still will see the same images. But, then, we will see things working, will extract the supreme meaning of this two structures. And they will be the same. We will see the Matrix/DNA formula as foundation of everything, at least, everything material inside this Universe, and our bodies.

For the Matrix/DNA to be discovered in full inside the DNA we need technology that reveals the network of synapses built by the connections among the photons that are inside the particles as electrons and protons inside the atoms inside the DNA. Still is missing a lot, but advances like this news in this article deserves a big commemoration.

xxxxxxxxxx

Meu post no Facebook:

Great! Vejo o mundo humano dividido em dois níveis. Um, inspirado na leitura do livro da Melinda Gates, me causa imensa tristeza, ao conhecer os extremos do sofrimento ainda existente na maioria dos humanos, os quais estão nas camadas mais pobres. Outro, baseado em artigos como o link abaixo, vejo a humanidade forcando o avanço da tecnologia, caminhando com pressa na direção de descobrir nos segredos da Natureza o significado da nossa existência, que trara novos valores morais, e não a tecnologia, mais estes novos valores morais, vão nos levar a consertar o que de horrível esta acontecendo com a população pobre. Pois como sempre pensei, a Melinda esta mostrando que a estrategia para salvar os pobres desta carnificina e pobreza não é lhes dar dinheiro e comida agora, mas antes disso é mudar sua cultura, a errada interpretação do mundo que eles tem nas suas cabeças. Mudar cultura é mudar valores morais e mudar valores morais é mudar o comportamento, os objetivos, e estes mudam a economia em qualquer tribo. Os macacos podem estar a viver em cima de jazidas de riquezas, mas sempre serão fracos e pobres por causa de sua incipiente e quase nula visão do mundo, a qual determina seus comportamentos e objetivos nas suas vidas. Assim como os macacos menores são canibalizados pelos maiores, dentre os humanos ainda a maioria dos empresários vampirizam as energias, o tempo, a vida de seus empregados. Estes empresários que tiveram acesso a níveis superiores de educação escolar ainda tem uma visão do mundo baseada, por exemplo, nas imagens do seu DNA ocorrendo uma competição, uma luta,entre os genes, para vencer o mais forte e deixar maior descendência. Mas a imagem que ainda veem do DNA é aquela do seculo dezessete (XVII), vista de tao longe como hoje vemos as galaxias distantes e delas quase nada vemos e entendemos quase tudo errado. mas as recentes imagens do DNA já consertam muita coisa e produz novas impressões no cérebro destes empresários, levando-os a pensar no Universo quando veem o DNA. Esta ampliação dos horizontes humanos levarão a uma correção nas nossas atitudes com o planeta e os seres vivos aqui existentes.

Figure thumbnail gr5

Figure 5Inferred Large-Scale DNA Microscopy Images Preserve Cellular Resolution

Origins of Life: Scientists produces synthetic enzyme in 2017 and they suspects that it created life at 4 billions years ago!

Monday, November 13th, 2017

xxxx

Then it was me who being born at this century killed the Death Sea at 2 billions years ago… This article is at the link below and following it are the copies of our commentaires at the article’s debate: 

Chemists May Have Found the ‘Missing Link’ to the First Life on Earth

https://www.livescience.com/60907-missing-link-first-life-on-earth.html?utm_source=notification

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017

To the authors:
You said: ” … A subset of chemists have devoted their careers to puzzling…”
I think it is clear that a new kind of information from a more complex natural system were among the matter of that water slime. I can’t understand these chemists that are working with the effects and not searching the cause, because if they want to solve the puzzle, the rational way is going after the cause.DAP – if it ever existed naturally – is an effect, containing the entire or part of the cause, not the cause. We are watching everyday how a new life emerges from water slime produced not by the slime, but by a bunch of information coming from outside the womb’s water, so, why for the first life would be different? Why scientists are mimicking mysticals that need never seen before phenomena? Our method at Matrix/DNA Theory found a possible natural force/element that could be the source of these outside informations for first life. Chemists need know the models and looking inside DAP and the other primordial elements for this “invisible” genome. We are losing time and money.
xxxxx
@Phillip Czekala –  I’m going to guess you’ve never actually witnessed the Birth of a Baby? If you had you would know how Ignorant your claim not to have started your life in “a bucket of shit water slime” because yours and everyone elses actually did start that way.You may or may not have started in shit, not all babies crap in Uetero, but you certainly started in “a bucket of piss water slime”. All Mammals do.
Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017
Chris Sievert – Yes but the piss water slime does nothing without an almost invisible element called genome, which did not come from the piss water slime, but from the parents of the baby, existing above and before the piss water slime. If you are rational and not a mystic or have some obscurus agenda, you will calculate that in that primordial water slime arrived some kind of prior genome. That’s why Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a theoretical model of this non-Earth genome: it is merely the miniaturized copy of astronomical systems’ building blocks. Of, course, what else were existing above and before Earth if not the Milk Way?

xxxx

Edward Guest · FSU College of Law

The ability to produce intelligent beings, well somewhat intelligent, through this process if true could likely occur in millions, maybe even billions, of star systems in our Universe. Maybe we will be surprised in a few billion Earth years how many species we find that are a lot like us.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Edward Guest – There is a curious option, maybe you don’t know it. Life is like agriculture, so, if a seed falls in an environment with good conditions, it will flourish. The seeds are splitted everywhere in space/time. But, what is this “seed” and from where it comes from? At Matrix/DNA Theory we discovered that a new theoretical model of galaxies fits exactly the configurations for a source of these seeds. The astronomical building blocks is the face and configuration of DNA building blocks. When I got these models, it was suggesting a new version of “universal history” from the Big Bang to nowadays. And the final history suggests that – as you said – initially must have diversification among aliens but all them will be fine tunelled to a unique final shape… which is the unknown shape of the natural intelligent system that triggered the Big Bang and must be existing beyond this Universe. Curious, isn’t it?
xxxxx

Philip Czekala

Total BULLSHIT.
It’s publish or perish in college land and this clown professor Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy will make up and write ANYTHING to keep his job. Maybe his life started out in a bucket of shit water slime but mine didn’t. Just think about how many gullible assholes believe this crap too. We are DOOMED.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Philip – You are right, Our life began in water slime also but the womb’s water slime can do nothing without the insertion of an almost invisible genetic code from something existing above and beyond the womb ( it means also beyond Earth as the womb for first living thing). Why the modern academic mindset is separating cosmological evolution from biologiccal evolution?! The effects of this absurd faith is causing this blindness? Do you have any explanation for human behavior?
xxxx

Jerry Bunker · Purdue University

Professing themselves wise they traded the truth for a lie. This garbage that once upon a time is sheer nonsense. Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states that in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. It takes much more faith to believe in these fairytales than to believe in the creator God

Louis Charles Morelli ·Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Jerry: ” Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states”
A book written by foreign ancient people states nothing to our people of our country and to people of XXI century, why are you coming at a Science issue and Western World telling that?! Don’t worry: if God has something to say to our country and to people of this time, He will say it directly to us, we does not accept humans intermediaries between us and God. 
Here you comes professing yourself wise. So, bring on to the table the proofs how life started and get the Nobel prize. Or are you trading the truth for a lie?
xxxx
Something folks seem to miss in their Synthesis of supposed early biology is the intense stirring caused by the Moon tides which were a hundred or more times stronger than they are now. Not only 100-200 foot ocean tides, tides expressed in the ground around the sea and, more importantly, beneath the sea too, stirring up the lighter and heaver elements, separating the stone from the metal, breaking the shell of the Earth into mud and sand, even as it tries to harden, heating things up in a band beneath the Moon’s early orbit. Remember, the Moon, containing much of it’s present mass was only a few thousand miles above the Earth at that time, having been formed by a collision between the Earth and a stoney body about the size of Mars. It slowly escaped Earth’s gravity until now it’s effects on land is negligible though the seas still rise and fall by tens of feet now, rather than by hundreds. THERE is your crucible!
Like · Reply · 1 · 4 hrs
It occurs to me that the occasion of the birth of our Moon might be quite rare in water planets. There might be fewer examples of life because of it, if the Moon tides really were a part of the equation. The local sudden heating and cooling of subsurface muds by those large tides might also have played a part, again making life as we know it even more rare.
 
Fred Wood – You have a good point. There is a theoretical “universal natural formula for organizing matter into systems” and applying the formula for to calculate “life’s origins” the results of this calculations says exactly what you said about the role played by the Moon. New shapes of systems ( like the biological ones built at the abiogenesis period) begins by the Function 1 of the formula, which is “agitation for fragmentation and mixture of the elements of the environment”. We have not found other element able to do that function necessary for biological systems organization here. Then comes the F2, which takes the “baby” created by F1 and begins the aggregation of nutrients. This formula explains how the first lighter gaseous star and the later stellar systems were made from an atomic nebulae, how galactic’s nuclei are created by central vortex, etc. If you are curious about the formula, search ” The Universal Matrix for All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. Congratulations by the right insight

Evidence for Evolution: Good Video and Debate with Matrix/DNA

Wednesday, August 23rd, 2017

xxxxx

Whatch the video, see my comments posted at the debate and copied below, and more curious evidences also copied below. Good learning!

What’s the evidence for evolution?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIEoO5KdPvg

xxxxx

Our debate:

Syed Firdaus Syed Omar Syed Firdaus Syed Omar – 14 hours ago

explain the ability of reasoning from natural selection perspective, their origin?

When you are talking about why you have a trait, you simply need to ask if it helps you survive. The ability for complex thought is the sole reason that Humanity conquered the earth, if you look at our ancestors, you can see our skulls getting bigger over time. Complex thought helped us survive and thrive so natural selection kept it.
Louis Charles Morelli  Louis Charles Morelli – 8/22/2017
Good question, Syed, and as the Viktor answers, they insists to repeat the effects of natural selection, never mind how and why this phenomenon exists. Their thoughts reasonate that ” once time established a mechanism, like a piece well adjusted to a machine, it goes on and on…” If you think about that, this argument is against evolution itself: natural selection does not permit another effect of such machine, so, stopping evolution. Their most important target is to keep clearly that there is no purpose in Nature, evolution is a blind process, each evolutionary step begins with a random mutation coming from error at replication – which means that randomness is the ruler in this Universe, they believe in it. I am suspecting because 2 topics: 1) There is no absolute answer for everything in a world changing under evolution. Random mutation are the answers for everything like God was the answer for everything… 2) I search my own way and after hard work I found my own world view, which is not the right one, but it seems more reasonable. Comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems reveals the existence of a universal matrix formula which Nature has applied by 13,8 billion years for organizing matter (mass+energy) into natural systems. Or, saying it better: a unique formula creating a initial system at 13’8 billion years and this system is coming under evolution. Atoms, galaxies, plants, human bodies, are merely evolutionary shapes of a unique universal system. If this theory ( The Matrix/DNA Theory), is more complete, one difference is that there is a perfect formula which pulls this universal system into its direction – in the way that one day it will be perfect like the formula. So, this would be the cause and the reason for natural selection: it is the pushes towards the perfect final shape. So, if my theory is better than “the machine going on and on”, the normal is purposeful mutations not random: there are random mutations but it can be discarded or kept if it is anticipating what Nature is supposed to do, by any way…
xxxxxxxxx
Chris Mohrbacher Chris Mohrbacher 2 days ago

comparative anatomy (and DNA similarities) only demonstrates similarity, not causality. Nested Hierarchies also prove nothing as this is just people categorizing things based on the above similarities. They could be categorized in a completely different order and be equally logical. (I’m looking at you Hyena and Mongoose, classified as “cat-like…. things” ) Embryology has been debunked for decades. Species distribution doesn’t really “support” evolution… most kinds of creature has some version spread around the world. The fossil record demonstrates what has lived… not necessarily what came from what. Finding amphibian bones doesn’t suggest that it’s OUR ancestor, or the ancestor of any other non-amphibian. Which brings us down to observable evolution… and yea… that’s science. Selectively breeding dogs to generate a breed of dog with preferable traits is repeatable (science). No matter how many generations we breed, we can not take any number of dogs and breed them into a non-dog. Actual science supports specialization within a species… the idea of universal common ancestry is no less religious faith than the idea that any given pantheon of Gods used magic. Not testable, falsifiable, repeatable…. not science.
Louis Charles Morelli  Louis Charles Morelli – 8/22/2017
To: Chris
Besides the long lists of reasonable evidences, I think that when observing embryogenesis – one shape transforming into other, facing my eyes, here and now – it means that Nature alone can do it, there is a natural mechanism for doing it. The individual nature express the population nature and vice-versa. Meanwhile, there is a observable fact in embryogenesis that Darwinists are ignoring: beyond the field where individual evolution occurs ( inside the egg or the womb), there is a species that triggered the process and is the guide for the process building itself. Why not this phenomena would be projected to the whole biological evolution, or even, the cosmological evolution? Reason suggests this is the case, there is no observable process of evolution without a “shape-from-outside”. This observation could be wrong in relation to cosmological evolution, but, if it is not, a kind of creationists god ( natural and not magical), and a kind of astronomical creator like suggested by Matrix/DNA world view, could be safe. Just comparative anatomy between living and non-living natural systems leads us to calculations of causality where the final results suggests that the building block of DNA is the exactly miniaturized copy of the galactic building blocks. In this case, the species that was outside the womb that nurtured abiogenesis, was just the Milk Way. It seems that each region of this galaxy builds a component of biological system, then, transit of meteorites, comets, etc., makes that all components meets at some places…and… voila’,… we have a DNA… But, then, every process of evolution is really, an inside process of a bigger one: reproduction. It means that there was no origins of life, merely the continuation of a natural genetic process coming from cosmological evolution. And so on…
eeeaten  eeeaten 1 hour ago 

sorry louis, as a biologist this made zero sense to me
No sorry, it is natural. I am a naturalist, my world view was built in the field – the Amazon jungle, yours, in the lab. I applied the systemic method, you applies the reductionist method. And so on, two investigations where all methods are different, it results into two different world views. The difference is that you don’t know mine and I know yours. It doesn’t matter here if one makes sense to the other or not. I think that yours does not make sense since that you have broken universal evolution into two blocks – cosmological and biological evolution – with no evolutionary link between them. So, one need to fit the abyss between the two blocks with magical thinking, like magical gods or magical randomness. Then, one will believe that there was an event of life’s origins at Earth due action of some force coming outside the long chain of causes and effects since the Big Bang. This is the prejudice for academic sciences today. Since I didn’t break universal natural history and found the link which shows that there are no non-living systems before biological ones, I am satisfied with the sense that my world view expresses to me. But, common sense or not is not a good scientific tool. If we want to debate our theories we must be attained at the common known proved facts. So my first question: the transformations of a body under embryogenesis, from the simplest to most complex, is not evolution?
xxxxxxxxxx

Curious evidences for Evolucao:

( Useful information from our friend, Randall Wilks ) Randall Wilks  Randall Wilks – 8/22/2017

EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION – Vestigial Human Traits
Just as humans inherit characteristics of their nearest relatives, each of us has characteristics inherited from more distant relatives. In the inner corners of your eyes you have what is called a semilunar fold or plica semilunaris. There is a muscle attached to it, but it doesn’t do anything in humans. In many other animals (sharks, frogs birds, your cat), however, that muscle controls a transparent incitating membrane or “third eyelid” that can be drawn over the eye. Proponents of ‘intelligent design’ have no explanation as to why humans have those muscles. They are perfectly consistent with evolutionary theory as vestigial remnants of an ancestral characteristic.
You also have three sets of muscles attached to your ears. In other animals, those muscles turn the ears to focus on the direction of a sound. This ability is found in monkeys, most of which cannot turn their head horizontally. Humans and the other apes can turn their heads vertically and the ability to move the ears is largely lost in those species. Using sensitive electronic devices, researches find that the human brain is sending nerve impulses to those muscles in response to sounds, but the most any human can do is a bit of a wiggle. Proponents of ‘intelligent design’ have no explanation as to why humans have those muscles. They are perfectly consistent with evolutionary theory as vestigial remnants of an ancestral characteristic. Then there is the Plantaris Muscle, which in other primates facilitates arboreal lifestyle, allowing the feet to function much the same as hands in gripping branches. The human foot has lost this ability, rather early on it seems, in the process of becoming bipedal. The muscle, however, is still there. It is a long pencil thin muscle and tendons running down the back of the calf, that are extremely painful when ruptured and often misdiagnosed as a more serious injury. This injury, often called “Tennis Leg” occurs most frequently in athletes over 40 due to the tendon and attachments becoming more brittle. With or without treatment, the two ends of the rupture will shrivel and disappear within weeks with no loss of function in the leg. It is indeed one of evolution’s leftovers. It is often harvested for reconstructive surgery elsewhere in the body. That these muscles are still present in the human body indicates that the genetic instructions for them are still present in the human genome and active to some extent.
At some point the genes for these traits may be silenced by a mutation that disables a gene (such as a premature STOP codon or frame shift) making them a pseudo gene; one which no longer produces a protein. There is evidence that is already happening as this muscle is absent in one leg or both in about 10% of the population. The same seems to be happening with wisdom teeth. In the wild, primate infants are capable of grasping and holding on to the mother’s fur shortly after birth, allowing the mother to pursue other activities. Human infants, because of the limited birth canal and large human brain must enter this world at a much earlier stage of physical and neuronal development. Despite that, the developing human embryo exhibits a grasping reflex in the uterus as early as 16 weeks. Even at birth, that reflex, the Palmar Grip Reflex, is incredibly strong as most parents of newborns will attest. While it is capable of supporting the child’s weight, one must exercise caution as the child may suddenly let go. This reflex may persist up to 6 months after birth. As this is of no benefit to a human child, it is vestigial.
We see vestigial structures all through nature. They remain in some cases because they have been adapted for other purposes, in others they remain simply because there has been no evolutionary advantage to eliminating them. Similarly, pseudo-genes are vestiges of previously active genes that have been disabled by some mutation and no longer produce a protein. There are some 20,000 of them n the human genome, many of them remnants of Olfactory Receptor (scent receptor) genes. While humans have lost an additional 30 of these genes since our ancestral lineage separated from that of chimps, most of those pseudo-genes are hand-me-downs from even more remote relatives, but disabled by exactly the same mutations, again evidence of common ancestry. They certainly do not support the idea of “intelligent design”. They are however, completely consistent with the Theory of Evolution.
Geographic Distribution of Species
As one travels from one isolated landmass, to another, one sees patterns that fit with evolutionary theory. The mammals populating the Australasian landmass (including New Guinea) prior to man’s arrival were virtually all Marsupials; kangaroos, wombats, koalas, quolls, thylacenes, et al; found nowhere else in the world, and egg laying Monotremes (Platypus and Echidnas) also found nowhere else in the world. Indeed, prior to the coming of man who brought the dingo, the only placental mammals were those that could swim there (seal) and those that could fly there (bats). It is very obvious that mammalian evolution took a quite different turn in that isolated landmass.
New Zealand as well tells of a different evolutionary history. With no native mammals, except again for those able to fly (bats) or swim (seals) there, birds assumed the ecological roles filled by mammals elsewhere. In the absence of ground dwelling predators, many birds abandoned energy consuming flight, the Kakapo, Kiwi and Moa among them. The wing of the kiwi is a mere vestige, no bigger than your little finger, with an equally useless claw at its end. Other isolated islands, Mauritania and Madagascar, also had their own unique flora and fauna, as did geologically recent islands such as the Hawaiian Archipelago. There, the science of comparative genomics shows that another species of finch underwent adaptive radiation into the at one time 55 species of Honey creepers of which only 18 survive. The same is true of many plants whose ancestral seeds found their way to these islands. The many species of the beautiful Hawaiian Silver Sword and their relatives, collectively known as the Hawaiian Silver Sword Alliance, are an example of adaptive radiation in plants over millions of years from an ancestral pacific coast tarweed. We have Polar Bears in the Arctic and Penguins in the Antarctic similar environments totally different biota. Charles Darwin made remarkable observations 150 years ago and since then biologists, geneticists, geologists, biochemists and other related fields have continued to do so and in every case further evidence is accumulated in support of what is now called the Modern Synthesis of Evolution.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) – Different faces of a unique universal system?

Wednesday, August 16th, 2017

xxxx

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) -2

SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

The forms of the nucleotide are a subject of Matrix / DNA interest.

According to this theory, the fundamental unit of information in DNA consists of 4 nucleotide, because the configuration of the set of 4 nucleotide is exactly the same as the universal formula for natural systems, which means, therefore, that it is a system, which means that the building blocks of DNA are differentiated copies of one and the same system.

We are seeing a phenomena that is: there are billions of human beings, but, there is no individual human being exactly equal another. At least, a little point of difference must be the specific identity of each human being. Why is there this phenomenon? Why and how Nature produced this phenomenon? There is a purpose or it is just chance?

The entire set of human beings has its beginnings on the entire set of information in the DNA.  Where Matrix/DNA is suggesting that in these billions units of information, each one is unique, there is no unit equal other. Since that humanity is evolutionary  self-projection of DNA, or its genetics, the projected result must be similar to the thing projected. So, we know why and how Nature produced this phenomenon in relation to humanity, it is missing now to search these questions about this phenomenon in relation to DNA.

Matrix/DNA Theory already has a suggestion to this question: LUCA, the astronomic Last Universal Common Ancestor of all biological systems, is being fragmented by entropy in its bits of information, and at planets like Earth – with good conditions – these bits are working like the flow of order that lift up from every cycle “chaos>order>chaos..”. This process is trying to reproduce LUCA in this new environment ( totally different from where LUCAS was formed) resulting into biological systems. Since that these bits are emitted to the galactic internal space (thermodynamic collapse of near-closed systems), spreaded, dispersed in different time and space, the new systems gets different amount and quality of bits information, when composing amino-acids and nucleotide, which could be the answer to the polymorphisms of nucleotide.

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)

 

                                                                SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

An important step in the search for more DNA knowledge is to look for ways to visualize this unit of information internally for to locate where each one has something different from the perfect formula, which will indicate its difference.

And for this identification, the external form of the nucleotide may also contribute. I now come across this news that academic biology already has an area of ​​research and information of the data obtained, regarding the external forms of the nucleotide, which is called SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms. So open up new area of ​​research to find out what biology already knows about it.

What are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)?

https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/genomicresearch/snp

( continuing reading and googling SNPs)

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) - 3

 

SNPs – Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms

The Universal Algorithm Formula of Matrix/DNA For All Systems

Tuesday, May 26th, 2015

xxxx

Matriz Universal: Software de Sistema Fechado

The Universal Matrix/DNA Formula for Closed Systems

The Matrix/DNA formula as a closed system algorithm (exists only at atomic and astronomical scales):
F1) Are there are raw ingredients in space, in the form of mass and energy, and swirling due rotation of space?
If yes, form a whirlpool mixing raw ingredients and cooking them until bubbles are ejected to the external space. The bubbles will be the core of a new astronomical body;
If not, don’t form the whirlpool.
2) The bubble adds more raw and frozen ingredients in the space?
If yes, continue heading into the sidereal space, now under the names of “star-seed” inside a “planet”;
If not, be undone as a bubble.
3) The planet passes close to a star?
If yes, get in their orbits;
If not, continue wandering in space to unravel.
4) The nucleus is reached by the star’s energy?
If yes, start nuclear reactions feeding on the outer layers of ingredients, i.e. the geological layers. Go to F6;
If not, become a moon.
5) Is the nuclear reaction evolving and eating the layers to the surface?
If yes, the pressure form the volcanos ejecting comets (carrying on active nuclear reactions for to activate the whirlpool) and  falling internally on the galactic’s spiral towards the core. Go to F1;
If not, freeze like a moon.
6) The nuclear reaction reached the final surface layer?
If yes, self-collapsing becoming a star supernova;
If not, freeze like moon.
7) Were sold out the energy particles within the atoms of the nutrients’ layers?
If yes, self-dissolves into fragmented in ingredient mass to form new whirlpool, and self recycles yours body.
If not, become a giant dead planet of inert gas.

The Matrix/DNA formula for opened systems:

1) Being yourself an electromagnetic structure, or atomic, or astronomic, or biological, repeat all steps to F5;

2) Do you want to perpetuate this form of body/life’s cycle/closed system?
If Yes, go internally to the nucleus and repeat his eternal cycle;
If not, go externally to relate to the outer unknown.
Note: For example, if you’re a man, and married, drive all your F5 for a unique and same woman, reproducing only a unique type of DNA. If you’re a man, and celibate, drive your F5 to the largest quantity of different women, producing diverse kinds of DNA. Other example: drive yours behaviors to be an extreme nationalist or to be opened to globalization. Or other: as a bird in Galapagos, keep yourself in Galapagos eternally or immigrates to the next island for to be found by Darwin as mutated and naturally selected.

- See more at: http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?p=9279#sthash.oijK1n4s.dpuf