Archive for the ‘Atheism’ Category

O conflito da Religião com o Acaso na Teoria da Evolução, e a tolerância da Matrix/DNA

Wednesday, October 16th, 2019

xxxx

Randomness and religion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness

Randomness can be seen as conflicting with the deterministic ideas of some religions, such as those where the universe is created by an omniscient deity who is aware of all past and future events. If the universe is regarded to have a purpose, then randomness can be seen as impossible. This is one of the rationales for religious opposition to evolution, which states that non-random selection is applied to the results of random genetic variation.

Hindu and Buddhist philosophies state that any event is the result of previous events, as reflected in the concept of karma, and as such there is no such thing as a random event or a first event.

Na teoria da Matrix/DNA existe e não-existe randomness. O destino do Universo esta pre-determinado, aqui esta ocorrendo um processo de reprodução genética, o embrião vai nascer e o Universo sera descartado como a placenta ( a não ser que seja possível existir uma força mais potente que o universo, vinda de fora, e interrompa a gestação, pois o ser que fecundou esta gestação não é magico, nem omnipotente, é simplesmente um ser natural). Então num processo de reprodução, todos os passos no aumento da complexidade são interpretados pelos humanos como sendo um processo de evolução, o que esta certo, relativisticamente falando. Se todos os passos estão pre-determinados, não teria lugar para acontecimentos ou estruturas formadas pelo acaso no tronco da arvore da evolução. Mas acontece que em paralelo a arquitetura que esta sendo o objeto da reprodução, o mundo esta se movendo, acontecimentos acontecem… (bah…), chuvas chovem, e as vezes estes acontecimentos penetram a dimensão da arquitetura. Podem causar um repentina mutação genética, mas geralmente são logo descartadas pela Natureza quando não batem com o template, o genoma, sendo seguido. Porem, ainda por acaso, pode ser que um evento ao acaso produziu uma mutação que é exatamente a mutação que a Natureza ia produzir a seguir, e nesses casos, para que a Natureza iria descartar e refazer o mesmo? Creio mesmo que a Natureza nem pode saber o que fé mutação programada ou mutação ao acaso. Não, a mutação ao acaso é selecionada pelo template, que é a forma final da especie sendo reproduzida, e mantida no tronco da arvore da evolução. No conflict with randomness.

xxxx

PESQUISA SOBRE A TEORIA DO ACASO:

Randomness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Randomness is the lack of pattern or predictability in events.[1] A random sequence of events, symbols or steps has no order and does not follow an intelligible pattern or combination. Individual random events are by definition unpredictable, but in many cases the frequency of different outcomes over numerous events (or “trials”) is predictable. For example, when throwing two dice, the outcome of any particular roll is unpredictable, but a sum of 7 will occur twice as often as 4. In this view, randomness is a measure of uncertainty of an outcome, rather than haphazardness, and applies to concepts of chance, probability, and information entropy. ( continua…)

O criacionista, o evolucionista, a onça e o dinossauro…

Thursday, September 12th, 2019

xxxx

Leio um debate entre um evolucionista materialista e um criacionista cristão, entao não resisto e mando um post – que não foi publicado aguardando moderador. O link fe:

https://netnature.wordpress.com/2016/07/07/evolucao-super-rapida-de-peixes-divide-especie-em-duas-no-mesmo-lago-comentado/#comment-20746

Louis Morelli commented – 9/12/19

Amigos Rossetti e Abrão… não briguem. Quando alguem diz “os criacionistas nunca vao acreditar nisso” e outro diz que “nos estamos vendo que mutacoes selecionadas aconteceram por acaso e não por um prévio design”, o debate sera sem solução. Uma vez na selva amazônica de repente uma onça apareceu na minha frente. Eu vi o terror, mas fiquei com tanto odio dela que ia me jantar, que fiz uma careta dos diabos e dei um berro maior que ela podia urrar, mostrando as duas maos como garras. Nao me pergunte porque, mas a onça parou, me olhou aterrorizada, deu meia volta e saiu correndo. Sai contando essa historia mas os primeiros ja diziam que ” eu nunca vou acreditar nisso”, entao parei de contar. Hoje me pego em duvidas se aquilo realmente aconteceu ou se sonhei, mas não sei porque, logo me reafirmo que acredito que aconteceu. O fundador-autor da Biblia tambem comecou a se perguntar se o que escreveu aconteceu ou foi imaginação, mas os ouvintes acreditaram e ele acreditou no que foi sua imaginação jurando que de fato aconteceu. Porque acreditam no deus dele e não na minha onça? A resposta sera a mesma para porque acreditam no deus magico e não na evolucao… ninguem sabe, nada a fazer.

Mas não terminava minha historia quando me interrompiam dizendo que não acreditavam, agora vou contar tudo: Quando dei meia-volta para retornar no caminho vi que um dinossauro estava ali… parado. Ahhh… foi por isso que a onça correu! E porque o dinossauro não me comia?! Notei que estava com os olhos furados, cego…

Os materialistas nunca viram um agente chamado acaso e nunca viram esse agente que nunca viram provocando uma mutacao. Mas a ideia lhes foi tão simpática que acreditam nela piamente. Nunca vao acreditar que a grande maioria das mutacoes selecionadas foram produzidas por prévio design de um agente natural real, sem magicas, que tambem não podem ver. O Agente Acaso tem em suas maos a clava do tempo e isso explica tudo!

O Agente Acaso Magico e sua evolucao cega é o dinossauro cego dos materialistas. Hoje sei que não sei se caso da onça foi real mesmo, mas tenho certeza que o dinossauro foi sonho de tanto pensar nesse caso, e sei que foi sonho porque dinossauros não existem. Mas os materialistas ainda acreditam que seu dinossauro existe. Nada adianta contrariar…fazer o que?

Mas com que autoridade venho dizer que existe prévio design natural, real, que tambem não estou sonhando de novo? Bem, essa é outra longa historia acontecida na selva que descrevo no meu website…

Um novo Deus, para uma Nova Era

Saturday, September 7th, 2019

xxxx

Se eu tivesse uma capacidade de raciocínio, mas não o conhecimento que tenho hoje quando era aquela microscópica única célula, dois minutos apos a fecundação, e quando olhasse a distância, veria um oceano de líquido terminando numa casca, acreditaria que aquele era o inteiro universo, meu mundo se resumiria aquilo dentro da casca. Mas se nos dias seguintes visse meu corpo se transformando de formas mais simples para formas cada vez mais complexas, concluiria que estaria sendo objeto de uma evolução. Se nessa evolução, logo nos dias seguintes, desenvolvesse uma visão de raios-X e uma mente capaz de ver o passado, veria além da casca do ovo, o mundo dos meus pais, e os genomas deles produzindo aquele enorme Big Bang no centro do meu mundo quando a membrana do espermatozoide explodiu. E concluiria que além e antes do meu mundo é tudo natural, não existem seres supernaturais, e o processo pelo qual meu mundo foi feito é simplesmente um processo natural, sem nenhuma magica. E então também compreenderia que o que pensei ser evolução era, na verdade, uma ilusão, pois o que estava acontecendo dentro do meu mundo era um simples processo natural de reprodução genética. Nada supernatural, nada magico. E meu pai, e minha mãe, seriam meus deuses, o que mais amaria no mundo, mesmo eles sendo simplesmente naturais e incapazes de fazerem magicas.

Hoje estou sentado numa pedra grande que tem ao lado da porta da minha casinha numa pequena terra rural, ‘a meia-noite. Olho para o céu estrelado, penso que este é o meu mundo. Sei que o Universo esta se expandindo, então obrigatoriamente ele tem um limite, não é infinito. Mesmo que seja uma aureola de vácuo circundando-o, ele deve ter algo como a casca membranosa alem das últimas galaxias. E sei que o Universo teve início num Big Bang, similar ao do que ocorreu no primeiro instante da existência do meu corpo carnal. Tudo igual, me sinto como nos meus primeiros segundos neste mundo, um microscópico ser, que sente apenas as coisas naturais de seu mundo. Mas eu estudei muito, passei a vida carregando uma luneta para ver o céu e um microscópico rustico para ver as criaturinhas na lama dos pântanos. Sinto que minha mente se desenvolveu com as descobertas que fiz, como a existência da formula universal da Matrix/DNA, ao ponto de ter uma visão mais profunda e calcular com bom grau de probabilidade o que existe além das últimas galaxias. Também as Ciências Humanas e a minha fórmula me ajudaram a ver mais profundo no passado. Estou neste universo no ponto que estava alguns dias apos meu aparecimento como célulazinha no seu pequenino universo. E o que vejo além e no passado deste Universo, antes do meu aparecimento?

 

A fórmula universal mostrou as causas das existências de todas as coisas existentes dentro deste universo, e mais ainda, as causas de todos os eventos ocorridos nesta natureza universal. E para minha surpresa, tudo o que ela sugeriu bateu exatamente com minhas exigências racionais. Se ela sugeriu uma nova versão mais racional da Historia Universal, e nesta historia esta claramente revelado um longo processo de reprodução genética que ate ontem eu pensava, como meus amigos humanos, estar vendo evolução, então bastaria projetar a logica do processo ocorrendo aqui dentro deste mundo, para calcular o que deve existir alem e antes das fronteiras deste Universo. De certa forma adquiri uma visão de raios-X, pois agora olho o Universo pelos olhos de uma fórmula universal. Realizei os cálculos em enorme excitação e impaciência, pois intuitivamente eu sentia o que ia descobrir. E não foi surpresa quando vi, além e antes deste Universo, meus pais, naturais e auto-conscientes, mas nada de mágicas e nada supernaturais. São simples, mas sei que observam o universo engravidado, e esperam ansiosos pelo meu nascimento. Eles não desenharam este mundo onde estou, assim como minha mãe não desenhou a placenta que me envolveu e nutriu.  Assim existem os maus obstáculos, mas quando a coisa aqui vai mal, nós chutamos a barriga, gritando, rezando alto, então nossos pais percebem e administram alguma medicina, que meus irmãos aqui dizem ser “milagres que caíram do céu”… kkkkkk. São seres naturais, mas eu os amo como meus deuses. Aliás, os únicos deuses que tenho.

E agora admiro ainda mais aquele simples carpinteiro que um dia perguntado qual era o segredo fundamental deste mundo, ele levantou os olhos para o céu e disse: “Pai”. Em seguida abaixou os olhos à Terra, olhando seu corpo e disse: “Filho!”

Seus discípulos pensaram que quando ele olhou para si ele estava se vendo como Deus. Não, ele estava vendo seu corpo de homem, um corpo humano. O humano é o filho. Grande intuição! Se seus discípulos conhecessem estas coisas de DNA e genética, ao invés de filho ele teria dito “Genes”. Pois, na verdade, carregamos 8 bilhões de bolhas de auto-consciência com as quais estamos construindo-nos como o futuro filho. Mas mesmo assim, ele acertou na mosca!

A visão do mundo oriental sendo buscada pelo povo do Ocidente sera sua melhor alternativa nesta atual crise existencial?

Thursday, August 15th, 2019

xxxxx

Vamos tentar responder analisando um vídeo e palestra de um guru ocidental sendo cultuado no Ocidente.

A mídia está noticiando que está havendo uma grande guinada do povo ocidental na direção das antigas filosofias ou visões do mundo orientais, principalmente a hindu, representando-se principalmente pela yoga ( aqui mesmo neste website escrevi um artigo acho que ha uns dez dias atras, mencionando um debate no Reddit sobre um artigo ou livro no tema em questão, falando do retorno ao pampsiquismo, etc.).  Será isto bom ou ruim para estas pessoas? O que, qual é a visão de mundo dos seus criadores orientais? A quanto está essa visão de mundo em relação a verdadeira realidade? Muito distante ou mais próxima que as já experimentadas pelo Ocidente? Como conectar a visão de mundo criada a milhares de anos atras com a psicologia humana de hoje e o ambiente urbano moderno? Essas mentes dominadas por essa visão de mundo vão sobreviver ou melhorar sua qualidade de vida dentro deste sistema social vigente? Creio ser evidente que o povo ocidental está meio perdido entrando nesta era de incertezas em que o materialismo cientifico bombardeia as crenças herdadas dos antepassados, que ele esta precisando de um novo suporte psíquico. Mas seria o caso de buscar no passado e ressuscitar uma antiga visão de mundo ou de buscar construir uma nova, como eu fiz para mim, com a visão do mundo pela Matrix/DNA?

Este é um assunto sério, pois pessoas estarão investindo sua qualidade de vida numa aposta, da qual, eu não sei se serão ganhadores ou perdedores. Portanto, pela seriedade do assunto, é de nossa responsabilidade gastar algum do nosso tempo e esforço mental raciocinando sobre o problema. Acho que no Ocidente a maioria está como eu… Eu leio desde criança textos esparsos e até alguns livros curtos mencionando a visão de mundo oriental, mas nunca li um dos seus grandes livros, quanto mais estudar por completo o tema ( lembro-me que li, gostei, e reli Krishnamurthy, mas hoje não me lembro de mais nada dele. Porque nunca me foi útil ou porque não tentei aplica-lo disciplinarmente?). Portanto meu conhecimento é muito limitado. Mas de maneira alguma teria tempo para este estudo e nem entraria nele sem um motivo maior, pois sinto de antemão uma intuição de que não me seria útil. Pois olho para esses países orientais e deduzo que estão superpovoados com 90% da sua população vivendo sob o ciclo da miséria sendo torturada brutalmente por rituais religiosos, anti-femininos, e impedida de evoluir seus cérebros e poderes de atuação no ambiente em que vivem, e isso para mim é o indício de que a visão do mundo que produziu e mantém este estado de coisas não será salutar para o Ocidente. Posso estar errado, mas ninguém num breve argumento me convenceu o contrário. Então, ao invés de um pesado livro “sagrado” ou o estudo completo, vamos pegar um atual discurso de um guru oriental que está sendo bem difundido na moda atual ocidental entre as pessoas entrando neste barco. E vamos tentar esmiúça-lo, analisando-o, vamos ver no que vai dar.

O exemplar que selecionei para iniciar esta analise, e que achei bastante curioso mas fiquei com a sensação de inutilidade, vai no vídeo e transcript copiado abaixo para analisar-mos paragrafo a paragrafo.

What Is The Purpose Of Life?

Sadhguru answers a question about the purpose of life and explains why having a “god-given” purpose will only restrict life.

https://isha.sadhguru.org/us/en/wisdom/video/what-is-the-purpose-of-life

Questioner: It seems like there are people who know, what he meant to do, and I just don’t get that and I am in this path, where am I? What’s for me the purpose of life, if you can give an insight on that? Thank you.

Sadhguru: Isn’t it fantastic that if there is no purpose, you have nothing to fulfill, you can just live…

Matrix/DNA: Mas assim vivem os animais nossos antepassados, vivem o aqui e agora, são especialistas em praticidade, não possuem qualquer propósito na vida a ano ser manterem-se vivos… para que?! Se soubessem o que sabemos descobriram que sua especie sera irremediablemente extinta pela Natureza. E que sua existência será para sempre apagada do mundo, o Universo nunca sabera que sequer exististes. Mas aí vem a pergunta: e por acaso sera diferente com os que viveram a vida com um propósito? Nao podemos saber. Mas enfim, decididamente eu nao quero adotar esta mentalidade de vida sem qualquer propósito, sem um norte, um sonho a lutar por, pois tudo o que fizeram e são os animais eu quero me distanciar cada vez mais. Mas… se tem gente que acha que se sentirá melhor assim, que o seja.

Por enquanto, 0 a 1, esta perdendo o guru.

Sadhguru: ” No, but you want a purpose and not a simple purpose, you want a “God-given” purpose…

Matrix/DNA: Certo. Acho que por mais materialista ou ateu seja o indivíduo que tem um propósito para a vida, mesmo que seja quase inconscientemente tem a sensação de que exista algo sobrenatural no seu propósito, algo que transcende a vida, algo que esteja sendo aprovado, se não for por outro algo sobrenatural, ao menos pelo olho do Universo. Eu tenho um proposito na vida, não sou deísta, mas sinto que meu proposito esta sintonizado co o proposito do algo que disparou o Big Bang, que esta alem do Universo. portanto seria um ” natural super-ser dado proposito”. Enquanto isso, a maioria do povo vive na crença de que seguir o proposito que seguem esta sendo aprovado e foi determinado por um Deus.

Um x Um, o guru empatou o jogo… Apesar de que o guru erra sugerindo que as pessoas que querem ter um proposito estão erradas, e principalmente porque querem um proposito determinado por um imaginário Deus. Não, eu quero um proposito simplesmente para me diferenciar evoluindo do estado animal.

Sadhguru:  It’s very dangerous. People who think they have a God-given purpose are doing the cruelest things on the planet. Yes or no? They are doing the most horrible things and they’ve always been doing the most horrible things because when you have a God-given purpose, life here becomes less important than your purpose.

Matrix/DNA: Rapaz…! O guru agora deu uma acertada fantástica! Aqui nos percebemos que esta filosofia oriental é inimiga combatente do deísmo ocidental, mesmo que seja apenas na militância verbal e nunca tenha visto isso se projetar como violência física. Mas estes monges, que foram agredidos pelo deísmo ocidental, os vi sendo agredidos também pelos ateus orientais do Mao-Tse-Tung. Então como lidam com o ateísmo ocidental?

Esta acertada foi tao boa que vale uns 3 pontos. Então esta 4 x 1 para o guru.

Sadhguru: No, life is important. Life is important – when I say “life,” I am not talking about your family, your work, what you do, what you do not do, your party – I am not talking about that as life. This is life (referring to the self), isn’t it? Life is within you or around you? You’re mistaking the ambiance of life for life. Your home, your family, your workspace, your party – this is all ambiance of life. This is not life, isn’t it? Yes or no?

Participants: Yes.

Sadhguru: You’re mistaking the ambiance for the real thing. No. Life is important because it’s the only thing you know, you don’t know anything else. Do you know something else? Rest is all imagined stuff. The only thing is that this is beating and alive and that’s all there is.

Matrix/DNA: para mim isto esta um tanto confuso. O insight é bonito, mas pode ser apenas bonito como discurso, sem utilidade. Não existe vida que não seja suportada por um ambiente. O ambiente é sim muito importante, pois temos que estuda-lo ara melhor se adaptar nele, ou perecer. Este tipo de mentalidade mais se alinha na mentalidade que ele criticou nos deístas ( o mundo real mundano não importa, e sim o reino sobrenatural de Deus) do se alinha com os materialistas, para quem apenas importa a vida no ambiente no melhor ambiente aqui e agora. Esse tipo religioso, mistico de entender o mundo esta na base dos anti-aquecimento global, para quem o ambiente não merece atenção e se vai mudar, sera a vontade de Deus. O resto, o Universo, não é apenas imaginário, sera o ambiente que vai nos salvar quando este planeta não mais suportar vida aqui, portanto é importante, para que tenhamos motivação de estuda-lo, explora-lo, preparando nossa futura morada. Aqui o guru deu uma grande escorregada, merece perder dois pontos. 4 para o guru, 3 para os contra. 4 x 3.

 This is the greatest aspect of life – that it has no meaning to it and there is no need for it to have a meaning.

SadhguruSo, is this important? It is of paramount importance. Not you as a person, that’s not important, but you as a piece of life – it’s very important because that is the basis of everything. When I say that is the basis of everything, the universe exists for you only because you are, isn’t it? Yes or no? The world exists for you only because you are, otherwise it won’t exist in your experience. So, in every way this is important.

Matrix/DNA: ” Você não é importante, sua vida não é importante mas sim o importante é que você é uma peça da vida…”

Raios, parece que esse guru quer me fazer pirar? Meu pequenino cérebro não teve capacidade para processar logicamente está frase. Para mim o valor desta frase é zero, porque entendo que o fim dela contradiz e anula seu começo. Alias, é isto que tenho sentido ate aqui… uma frase contradiz a anterior. Sera isto charlatanismo? Mas e os brilhantes insights? Acho que não da para se analisar logicamente um assunto separado – como o proposito da vida – sem que antes se peça ao proponente descrever sua total visão do mundo. Eu cansei minha mente por enquanto, vou parar, sabendo que a responsabilidade me ordena voltar e continuar, por mais indigesto que seja. Se alguém pudesse dar uma ajudazinha continuando isso aqui…

Sadhguru: So, what is the purpose for this? See, if you had a purpose and if you’ve fulfilled it, after that what would you do? Bored, isn’t it? It is just that life is so intricate and so phenomenally intricate that if you spend a 10,000 years looking at it carefully, you still will not know it entirely. If you spend a million years looking at it with absolute focus, still you will not know it in its entirety. That’s how it is. Is there a meaning to it? The greatest thing about life is that there is no meaning to it. This is the greatest aspect of life – that it has no meaning to it and there is no need for it to have a meaning. It is the pettiness of one’s mind that it’ll seek a meaning because psychologically you will feel kind of unconnected with life if you don’t have a purpose and a meaning.

People are constantly trying to create these false purposes. Now, they were quite fine and happy. Suddenly, they got married. Now the purpose is the other person. Then they have children. Now they become miserable with each other. Now the whole purpose that I go through all this misery is because the children. Like this, it goes on. These are things that you’re causing and holding these as purposes of life and is there a God-given purpose? What if God does not know you exist? No, I am just asking, by chance. I am saying in this huge cosmos, for which God is supposed to be the Creator and the manager of these hundred billion galaxies, in that this tiny little planet and you in Houston, Tch… Suppose he doesn’t know that you exist, what to do? Possible or no? I am sorry, I am saying such sacrilegious things but is it possible or no? What if he doesn’t know that you exist?

The need for purpose has come because you’re trapped in your psychological structure, not in your life process.

What if he doesn’t have a plan for you? Like Obama care. Suppose, he doesn’t have an individual plan for you! Don’t look for such things. The thing is, the creation is made in such a way that Creation and Creator cannot be separated. Here you are a piece of creation. At the same time, the source of creation is throbbing within you. If you pay little attention to this process of life, you would not need any purpose. It’ll keep you engaged for a million years if you want. There is so much happening – so much means so much unbelievable things are happening right here. If you pay enough attention, a million years of existence, it will keep you busy or more.

Right now, the need for purpose has come because you’re trapped in your psychological structure, not in your life process. Your psychological structure functions from the limited data that it has gathered. Within that it rolls and right now, your thought and emotion has become far more important than your life. So, because of this you’re seeking a purpose as an escape from the trap that you have set for yourself. It is a trap set by you. You can easily come out of it. If the trap was set for you by somebody else, difficult to come out because they’ll set the trap in such a way that you cannot come out.

I am talking about life not marriage, that’s what I mean. So this is a trap set by you. This is easy to come out, but that is the whole thing. Why it is so difficult is, now you’re identified with the trap, you like it. You like it because it gives you a certain sense of safety and security and protection and individual identity. If you build a cocoon around yourself, it gives you safety, but it also imprisons you. Walls of self-preservation are also walls of self-imprisonment. When it protects you, you like it. When it restricts you, you do not like it. That is why we have doors. We like the walls because it’s protecting us, but we have doors so that we can open it and get out when we want to. It doesn’t matter how nice it is, we still want to go out, isn’t it?

Those who find a purpose in their life, they become so conceited. They will live within their own trap forever thinking that they’re doing the most fantastic thing.

So that is how it is with every trap that you set. It doesn’t matter how nice it is, you still want to go out. So, the psychological wall that you’ve built, which gives you some sense of identity, which gives you some sense of being an individual person and which gives you security, beginning to experience it like a trap; somewhere you want to break it. So, one way of not breaking it is to find a purpose. Those who find a purpose in their life, they become so conceited. They will live within their own trap forever thinking that they’re doing the most fantastic thing. And now you said I’ve found a purpose. No, I am just fooling around, really! This is not a mission. People think I am some kind of a missionary because of the energy with which I am going at it. I am not going at it with any zeal, but I am going at it with a certain energy because it’s normal for me to involve myself like this in anything for that matter.

You know like last two months have been a blitz of activity; blitz means like without a day’s break, without an hour’s break it’s been going on like over twenty hours a day nonstop. So, I was in London, I did a three-day event, then I went straight from there to Kumbh. From there all of us who went there caught a flu, but then I went straight to Hyderabad, that afternoon I flew and in the evening I started a program – three-day event. All of them went down who traveled with me, but with my flu I taught three days’ program. Then I came into the ashram and then samyama started that evening, eight days of samyama which is an intense process. The day samyama closed, we started the Yaksha program and the Inner Way program. The day that closed, we had the Mahashivaratri, then Brahmachari meet and teachers’ meet – going on like this. My busy day means I am sitting twelve to fourteen hours in the same place unmoving. Everybody goes to the bathroom, but I don’t.

So, I thought I need to move a little bit and I said, ‘Let’s go golfing.’ So, we went into a mountain place close by and I went with three other people who traveled from somewhere else and came. In two-and-a-half days I did eighty-five holes in the mountains. They all came in turns, but I went all the way. Every round that you do you walk, no buggies and all that stuff, walking. Ten kilometers you walk in the mountains at 6300 feet, eighty-five holes in two-and-a-half days.

It is wonderful to exist here without any purpose. It takes a certain freedom from your psychological structure to be here without any purpose.

So, if I go like this. Is golf a purpose of my life? No. I approach everything with a certain energy. This does not mean I found a purpose in hitting a ball. Similarly, I am teaching Inner Engineering because I find it’s useful for the people. If I see a little boredom in anybody’s face, maybe I won’t teach after that. Because I still see people are eager and anxious wanting to know something, I am on. If I see people around me are bored, then maybe you’ll never see me teaching again, because I am not seeing teaching Inner Engineering as a purpose. Right now, I see it is needed.

So, it’s difficult for you to understand probably right now, but the things that I throw my life into, are things that don’t mean anything to me, really! You think Isha Foundation means a world to me? No. Right now, I see without a foundation, we cannot function. With great reluctance, I formed the organization. Now it’s grown, grown beyond what most people understand – it’s grown very big. Is it the apple of my eye? No. I don’t like apple in my eye, I like my eyes clear. I keep it clear of all apples. You know the last time somebody got into the apple trouble, what happened to them.

So, I am saying I am throwing myself at something with great passion. This does not mean that is the purpose of my life. It is wonderful to exist here without any purpose. It takes a certain freedom from your psychological structure to be here without any purpose. If you’re trapped in your psychological structure you need a purpose. Otherwise, your psychological structure will lose its integrity. That’s why the girl who was asking at that time, I said, “First thing you need is balance. If you have balance, then you can climb. If you don’t have balance, it’s better you stay on the ground.” It’s not safe for somebody who is not balanced to climb high. It’s best you stay close to the ground. You should not climb.

So, first thing is to establish a balance, then you loosen your psychological structure, then it’s a wonderful thing. If you are loosening your psychological structure without balance, which lot of people are doing today. See, why does somebody want to drink alcohol or take a drug? Because it loosens your psychological structure and makes you feel liberated for a moment but without the necessary balance. You have not worked for the balance, but you got freedom. Freedom without balance is destruction, anarchy, isn’t it?

The purpose of life is to live and to live totally. To live totally means – before you fall dead, every aspect of life has been explored, nothing has been left unexplored.

So, first thing is to work for balance, an enormous sense of balance where even if you dismantle your psychological structure, you can simply live here. Dismantling your psychological structure is an important process because that is your trap, that is your security, that is your stability. At the same time, that’s your trap. Because the walls are set, you feel secured, but that’s also your trap. If you dismantle your trap, you also dismantle your security, isn’t it? You also dismantle your sense of purpose. You also dismantle everything that matters to you. So, that will need balance. Without balance, if you dismantle you’ll go crazy. But, don’t look for a purpose because if you look for a purpose, you are seeking madness. If you find one, you are sure mad. Yes. If you think you’ve found a purpose in life you’re for sure gone crazy because only the insane people have purpose or people who have a purpose are insane in many ways.

These are things that you create in your mind and believe it’s true, isn’t it? Right now, ‘fighting for my country is my purpose.’ Right now if it’s necessary, I’ll fight knowing fully well it’s an unnecessary bloody fight. Yes. Then you’ll fight only to the extent it’s necessary. If you think this is your purpose, you would want to destroy the whole world for what nonsense you believe in, isn’t it? If something is needed, we will do it with absolute involvement. Tomorrow suppose I find all of you are enlightened, it may happen! Suppose I find all of you are enlightened, will I come here and say “See, what did you have? Maggi noodles? Your body, you accumulated. You are not the body, you are not the mind,” it would be irrelevant, isn’t it? Yes or no? So when I see that you are enlightened, I’ll stop Inner Engineering. Right now, it’s needed, we’re doing. This doesn’t mean this is the purpose of my life. This is an unfortunate necessity, but I will do it joyfully and with great vigor because I do that with everything, not just with this. Don’t think I only teach the program with intensity and vigor, I live my life like that with everything, I eat like that also. I will do everything with intensity and vigor, that’s how you’re supposed do your life, isn’t it?

So, please do it that way. There’s no other purpose. The purpose of life is to live and to live totally. To live totally does not mean party every night. To live totally means – before you fall dead, every aspect of life has been explored, nothing has been left unexplored. Before you fall dead, even if you do not explore the cosmos, at least this piece of life (Referring to oneself) you must know it in its entirety. That much you must do to yourself, isn’t it? That’s living totally, that you experience the whole of this, all dimensions of what this is. You did not live anything untouched. You just do that. That will take a long time. That’s good enough purpose for you.

xxxxx

Life would be the result of chance, by Nature rolling dices? Or not?

Thursday, October 5th, 2017

xxxxx

From the debate at the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ&lc=z132epexbkupgxdkp23xelpwrzq4gt2sc.1507247448858067

xxxx

GravityBoy72 – 1 year ago

Amino acids…. big deal. You know how astronomically complex a living cell is beyond an amino acid?It’s a full blown FACTORY. How many rolls of the dice do you need before you get a FACTORY capable of identical replication? I don’t see how there has been enough time in the universe for that to happen.I don’t believe in “God” but neither am I convinced by the theory of evolution.I’m more open to “something else” – although I have no idea what that is.

xxxxx

Blacques Jacques – 10/05/2017

GravityBoy72 –  You under estimate how many roll of the dice have already happened . You can’t concieve of thatmuch time

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli – 10/5/2017

Blacques Jacques – I think this does not works. There is other rational alternative, based on what I can see here and now. The placenta inside the mother’s womb is changing its states (like our external environment) while the DNA inside the fetus is rolling the dices also, but only those results that fits with the placenta’s results are selected. The processes of astronomical and biological evolutions are identical. There is a unique narrow evolutionary direction for boths, that’s why the planet Earth at its 4,345 million years supports biological organisms and millions of existent planets at its 3,5 million years or any other age does not support biological organisms. You could say that the placenta transformations are not indicative that the placenta is rolling dices, there is the difference between opened and closed systems, the Universe is not tunneled to produce life, so, life is an accident, etc. But, we don’t know if this agglomerate of galaxies are not performing the rules like a placenta in relation to life. So, why one plays dice and the other don’t? 

Inside organisms there is a force rolling the dices, called DNA. And DNA has its necessities, so, it discards the results that does not fit with its necessities. Meanwhile, the external environment is rolling the dice also, but the external environment is built by the same force, elevated to “n” potence, which we call “matrix”. It means that the selector agent of two rolling dices selecting results is inside the organism and inside the external environment – the Matrix/DNA. It means a unique narrow evolutionary direction for boths, that’s why the planet Earth at its 4,345 million years supports biological organisms and millions of existent planets at its 3,5 million years or any other age does not support biological organisms.

Maybe you forgot that the dice rolled by Nature has not only six sides, but infinite sides. Take only one natural phenomena – temperature – for instance. You have two extremes ( the most hot and most cold) but mixing them the result is infinite levels of temperature. Now take another natural duality, like the rectilinear movement and the curvilinear movement. For a game of dices being able to produce a complex system like a cell is necessary thousands or millions results performing a logical sequence, like one game give 4.38477563562, a next game give 4.38477563563 and so on, millions of results in the same sequence kept inside a logical evolutionary line. In the way that at the table rolling the dice about temperature must result a number X at the same time when the dice being rolled at the table of movement also give the number X. If it does not happen, their is no catalyse for the other result getting stability. To me, its harder to believe in the dice’s rolls than believe in the Spaghetti Monster.

 

Debate between a Creationist, a Materialist, and the Matrix/DNA world view

Wednesday, August 9th, 2017

I was in a debate in the Internet when I have an idea for explaining something of the Matrix/DNA world view in a different manner. It is interesting, so, I copied it here for thinking about tonight. What do you think?

xxxx

luvdomus  – 4 hours ago – 8/9/17: (Materialist, atheist)
The ‘jump” of abiogensis was a series of very small steps over millions of years.
There was no origins of life, so, no jump of abiogenesis. Biological systems (aka life) were built by the building blocks of this galaxy, which worked as photons-genes and became the building blocks of DNA. All known properties of life were existing in less evolved state at this galaxy, by entropy its information fail to Earth surface, as the initial conditions. See at my avatar and website the face of LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) the evolutionary link between inorganic and organic, but it never came to Earth, it is surrounding us in the sky.
Ok I described my theory. But you said “The ‘jump” of abiogenesis was a series of very small steps over millions of years”, in an affirmative way. You was not there, you have not watched it, so you need to advise that you have a theory, like I did it. Time and more data will solve which theory is the best.
+Luvdomus – Why do you believe it happened by small steps? Science has never shown life to come from non life in small steps or big steps ever. So why would you believe it?
Santana Garcia ( Materialist)
+Luvdomus – that’s because bacteria and viruses also play a roll in the complexity of life , this video did not get to that yet. Also 4 billion years of evolving matter to living things is hardly a jump. Do you really understand how long 4 billion years is ?
Smoothsay2 Smoothsay (creationist)+Santana – Do you really believe that chemicals could assemble themselves into DNA that is programmed to build cells, rna, cellular machinery, & self correcting rna polymerase transcription functions & reproduction systems? Rather a wild accident isn’t it 4 billion years or 100 billion years do you actually believe this would happen?

Smoothsay2 – Now, imagine this belief growing. Then they will write their sacred book. ” There was a talking rock radiating light that separated the waters of the Red sea and came to Prophet Darwin saying that…”

I suspects in this way were wrote the Kuran, the Bible, etc. and, do you believe that till today there are people believing in that?! But, for telling the thru, I found that Genesis is the correct scientific description of the events that brought life and the man to Earth. It is the right description of LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) and the events creating life here. If you see and understand how works the system called LUCA ( its face is at my avatar – the life cycle of any astronomic body like Earth, and the building blocks of galaxies), you will discover all Genesis’s symbols there: the system was a paradise for X and Y (Adam and Eve), in shape of an apple, with a systemic circuit in shape of a snake, the spiral galaxy seems a tree, etc. In fact, X convinced Y to eat the apple ( which means the selfish state of closed system). And attacked by entropy the system falls to planet’s surface, in shape of genes-photons, which guided the terrestrial atoms to build aminoacids, molecules, RNA, till the first cell, which is the exactly biological copy of our sinner ancestor… the Milk Way.
Genesis is all about metaphors describing the scientific complexity for lay man! But how any ancient man knew that? 2 theories: 1) our ancestor and those events are registered at our DNA ( the junk DNA) which are at the center of our neurons and altered mental states produces flashes from that memory. Since ancient man did not know nothing about astronomy, he found the way to explain it by metaphors. 2) Aliens were here and told it… I don’t see another alternative, since I can not believe that a God of a multiverse came here…

 Louis Charles Morelli – the problem with metaphorical ideas is they are subject to any kind of interpretation so you will always will be able to make them match with any scientific or metaphysical theory.

oz surveillance –  Ok, then, I will invite you to a challenge:

 Find the scientific theory that matches with the following:
1) We built this modern city where humans will live as a paradise. But like the Brave New World of Huxley and under the Big Brother, humans will be stupid and stagnating in this shape forever. Take the red pill if you want living here;
2) Outside there are those humans cities in state of chaos, lots of problems, misery, diseases, etc. But, those people will be opened to their evolution, they could reach the galaxies. Take the blue pill if you want that.
This was the exactly situation the author described with Eve offering the apple: eat the apple, the red pill, standing forever in this “jungle” paradise I built for us; do not eat the apple and we fall in chaos far away from here…
We found that the vital principle is encoded in a light wave, like that emitted after the Big Bang. The code worked matter and built the atom system, the star system, and when went to build the galactic system… matter was reaching its supreme goal, which is to be a closed system at eternal termodynamic equillibrium.
The code could doing a choice, unifying with matter and living that paradise; or fighting matter, suffering at chaos but keeping the state of opened system, opened to its own evolution. The red pill or the blue pill?
The code choose the paradise, from the Universe came the Clausius Law, the entropy that produces the death of any system. The code falls at planets, here we are. Please, find the scientific theory that matches this metaphora like the Matrix/DNA Theory – a merely philosophical naturalist theory, matched it… Good look…
xxxxx
Then, one day after this debate, I was searching the scientific news at Internet and found a great, spetacular news ( ” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”) that is just the confirmation of several theories I wrote in the debate. So, I went back writing this:
To everybody debating with me in this thread: please, see how and why the Matrix/DNA world view during the last 30 years has confirmed hundreds of its previsions. Two days ago I wrote here: ” We found that the vital principle is encoded in a light wave, like that emitted after the Big Bang”.
Today I am reading the news: ” Bright flash of light marks incredible moment life begins”. I have wrote here that in this Universe is occurring a natural genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang as an act of fecundation.
And I wrote here that evolution is expanding like waves in the water: each new wave carries own the dust of the last wave and reaches more dust ahead. So the second wave of evolution receives the systems from the first wave, aggregating new information, evolving it and throwing it to next wave. The last wave has repeated all step of all waves before, that’s why a new shape, like a human embryo, repeats all evolutionary shapes. It means that the first moment of human life repeats the first moment of the Universe when the “life” of a universal natural system is began. It was a genetic code encoded by photons, then evolved to an atom like the first cell; to a nebulae of galaxies like the blastula… and so on.
I will research now what is the secret of zinc atom, it must have some property that something at the Big Bang had. But, as I said thousand times, the big secret of genome, or DNA, is that its electrons are occupied by photons with information of the life’s code. So, that light saw by scientists occurs when the male counterpart that contains the half of the code’s network meets the another half and the entire network flourishes… the mechanism is repeated when a supernova is born, as you can see at Matrix/DNA astronomical models. Three days ago another great prevision was conformed: #0 years ago when I got the copyright of this theory it contained that a star’s nucleus has a dynamics like the first frequency of light wave, which is the strongest. So, the nucleus should have a rotation fast than the above spherical rotations… This whole theory is results from calculations applying the most natural logic as I was studying the biosphere at Amazon jungle… and its right previsions has suggested that nature does not plays dice with its creatures, although we insist to play dices with her.

New Debate Between Creationists and Atheists about the Mystery of Existences and the Suggestion from Matrix/DNA

Wednesday, July 6th, 2016

xxxx

It takes a fool to deny the obvious

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/26/it-takes-a-fool-to-deny-the-obvious/#comment-845574

And my comment published at the Myers’ article:

The Matrix/DNA
July 6, 2016 – Amazon Jungle

Creationists and atheists world views are both “magical thinking” due a fundamental mistake: they are forgetting the naturalist systemic perspective. Any living thing is a system, a systemic biological organization of matter and energy. And systems can only coming from other system. Nobody had discovered a system coming from a part or piece of a system, neither from something not belonging to a system.
So, the first amino-acids were systems in itself, made by atoms systems and this astronomical system. Since that atoms system are too much simple, and galactic systems are lots more complex, the logic’s suggests that amino-acids were a production of astronomic nanotechnology, like human genome, chromosomes,ovules, are products of human natural nanotechnology.

Following this line of logic’s we got a new world view called Matrix/DNA where a new theoretical astronomical and atomic model fits just as the ancestors of the first living cell.

Now the problem would be:but the first system, be it an atom or an elemental particle composed by other smaller particles as a system, where it came from?

We found that all these natural systems were made by a unique natural formula. Then, we found that any universal set of radiation performing a light wave has the same formula for systems. Conclusion? The forst natural system in this Universe and perceptible dimension was a light wave.

Where the light wave came from? No other simplest thing in this Universe was detected as ” the light wave producer”. Our method of rationalization is suggesting that the first natural light wave worked as the genome of some ex-machine entity. If so, this Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the systemic thing that produced it. Is is God? If you want call it by that name, remember that it is not magical, it does things by natural process. Is is a big absolute chance? If you want call it by tat name, remember that it is a phenomena that is being reproduced exactly like it happened once, so, when this process arrive to an end, it will not be the absolute chance, because it would be an event that has been repeated.

What matters here is the final moral concept from this world view: we are 8 billion genes plus trillion of genes spread in this Universe building a kind of baby. So, each of us – as gene – has a unique, specific, not mimicked, not able to be stolen – information. It is our mission and we are not conscious about that. If one of us dies not do his/her job, the baby will born handicapped. So, let yours brother free for doing its mission. If creationism, atheism or Matrixism are wrong interpretations of this world, our inner mission will correct our wrong beliefs. And we got correction every time that we learn something new about the Universal Nature. That’s why I made the Amazon jungle my second house: there are plenty of natural phenomena for learning there.