Archive for the ‘Origins of Life’ Category

Universidades e Ciencias dominadas por uma ideologia na busca da solução para a origem da vida ( e a minha versão, da minha diferente ideologia).

Wednesday, July 15th, 2020

Was the Origin of Life a Fluke? Or Was It Physics? ( A origem da vida foi uma sorte, uma casualidade? Ou foi pela Física?)

By Ian O’Neill August 30, 2017

https://www.space.com/37988-did-life-emerge-from-physical-laws.html?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com&fbclid=IwAR0gjviyr8j7MU3MmS_kzAf-AjPF_LQiTg-DhEXYrO1Ont_zhgslm5J5scU

Aqui pretendo copiar cada frase importante do texto e comenta-la sob o ponto de vista da Matrix/DNA, minha propria teoria ( em portugues).

Meu post nos comentarios desta noticia no Facebook, em 13/07/2020:

” The academic mindset has a wrong approach and in this way they never will find the natural right solution. This is the opinion of a naturalist philosopher studying this problem at Amazon jungle by seven years. That whole biosphere suggests a very different history than the labs are suggesting. So, I elaborate the Matrix/DNA Theory. There is no origins of life, the word and human concept “life”, in relation to real nature, is a big cause of our mistakes. Instead life or non-life there is the biological shape of a universal natural system, which can be in other shapes, as electromagnetic or astronomic mechanical. Since this universal system coming from the Big Bang is under evolution, it makes no sense saying humans are alive and atoms doesn’t. Physics does not produces Biology, Physics is about the mechanical skeleton of a natural system, instead, it is Biology that produces Physics, the meat produces the bones. So, we must search where else there is Biology and I found it in my theoretical models of atoms, galaxies, in the electromagnetic spectrum of light waves, etc. The big secret of natural information lays on photons and light waves, which are above Physics and Biology, our Science is not searching the networks of photons inside the systems. And so on, the world is a little bit more complex and multidimensional than the academics believes. I like to talk about this issue, between different world views, someone else?”

xxxxx

Interpretação/Discussão do Texto pela Matrix/DNA World View

Jeremy England, a biophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is trying to answer these profound questions. In 2013, he formulated a hypothesis that physics may spontaneously trigger chemicals to organize themselves in ways that seed “life-like” qualities.

Matrix/DNA: Porque “physics”? O que existia no princípio eram forças naturais – que talvez seja o que denominamos de energias, porque o efeito mais evidente dessas forças era produzir movimentos no meio da inércia – e provavelmente substâncias, mais etéreas, já que ainda não tinham os átomos constituidores das substancias materiais. Talvez existissem mais coisas que ainda desconhecemos ou estas coisas com outros nomes – como a espuma ou vibrações quânticas – mas seja como for, a totalidade do que existia era Natureza Total, e não apenas Física, entendida como aspecto do mundo material. E pelo fato de depois o mundo material conter biologia, mente, vida, etc, acho racional concluir que o que os físicos lidam era apenas parte da totalidade da Natureza, ou mundo material. Então não aceitamos o que Jeremy England diz, e isso deveria ser trocado por ” a Natureza, o mundo material talvez possa espontaneamente mover químicos a se organizarem, ou serem organizados, em compostos que semeiam qualidades ou propriedades vitais. Mas qual foi o resultado final dessa movimentação dos químicos? Um sistema e funcional, o sistema celular. Então foi um sistema que moveu os químicos pois apenas um sistema pode produzir sistemas, ou se estiver fragmentado, separado em suas partes, recompor-se. E falar em sistema engloba tudo na natureza, vai muito alem da Física.

Now, new research by England and a colleague suggests that physics may naturally produce self-replicating chemical reactions, one of the first steps toward creating life from inanimate substances.

Matrix/DNA: May? Ou can? May se traduz por “pode ser que”, então não se afirma, é uma teoria. Mas tudo bem, vamos ver qual foi o experimento laboratorial ou fato real observado. Eu sou propenso a duvidar disso enquanto não identificarem no prévio mundo físico alguma situação em que um composto mais complexo se reproduz, pois se não existe, seria dizer que pela primeira vez no Universo ou nestas regiões foi criado o fenômeno da reprodução, e isso seria magica.

This might be interpreted as life originating directly from the fundamental laws of nature, thereby removing luck from the equation. But that would be jumping the gun.

Matrix/DNA: Não podemos ter certeza que o cérebro humano disponha de todos os sensores ( e que os atuais estejam completos) para captar todas as leis fundamentais da natureza. E ninguém nunca poderá afirmar que conhece a totalidade da Natureza para poder afirmas que sabe tudo o que existe nela. Ele deveria dizer ” leis fundamentais na Natureza que detectamos…”

Life had to have come from something; there wasn’t always biology.

Matrix/DNA: O que é life, para o Universo, a Natureza? O que é biologia, para o Universo, a Natureza? Se perguntar-mos, o Universo deverá responder que não sabe nem porque os humanos criaram os conceitos embutidos nestes nomes. para mim, estes nomes representam objetos que foram produzidos na evolução deste planeta dentro do sistema solar dentro da galaxia dentro do Universo… do qual quase nada sei. Em outras palavras, vida e biologia vieram da evolução. E o que representa este outro nome criado pelos humanos, “evolução”? Bem, para mim só pode sugerir baseado no que conheço e vejo com meus olhos: na embriogênese vejo a forma de um corpo se transformar enquanto passa do simples para o mais complexo devido a expressão de informações que estavam inertes. Nenhum acaso aqui e também isso nunca foi estudado e não pertence a área da Física.

Biology is born from the raw and lifeless chemical components

Matrix/DNA: Bem, essa afirmação não pode ser cientifica porque a Ciência nunca demonstrou o evento em que químicos apenas produzem a biológica organização deles mesmos em sistemas. Para mim, existe a evolução universal de um único sistema natural que surgiu ou se formou com o Big Bang. Este sistema foi uma auto-projeção materializada de um sistema que está encriptado numa onda de luz natural. Esta onda se propaga por ondas, que podem ser divididas em sete tipos, devido suas frequências, vibrações comprimentos, etc. A primeira forma deste sistema foi feita pela primeira faixa da onda, a segunda forma pela segunda faixa… a organização da matéria no tipo biológico é uma produção da quarta faixa dessa onda. Também não posso demonstrar isso em laboratorio, portanto é teoria contra teoria, apesar de que no meu caso particular vejo mais evidencias e racionalidade na minha teoria. Porque vejo um feto aqui na embriogênese como um corpo “vivo” sob organização biológica que foi produzido pelo DNA que tem justamente a mesma configuração que vejo na onda de luz.

… that somehow organized themselves into prebiotic compounds, created the building blocks of life, formed basic microbes and then eventually evolved into the spectacular array of creatures that exist on our planet today. [7 Theories on the Origin of Life]

Matrix/DNA: Ótimo. Por favor, vamos pegar um bilhão de átomos separados entre si, de todos os tipos, vamos bota-los como um monte encima da prancha da mesa do laboratorio, vamos dar uma ajudazinha botando a mesa a vibrar, sacudir-se, e vamos assistir alguns átomos procurando outros átomos certos formando combinações certas para que apareça ali building blocks que continuarão a se moverem e se organizarem formando finalmente o primeiro sistema celular… da vida. Aí aplaudiremos e teremos mais um fato real a ser listado no rol da Ciência.

Bem… terei que pausar esta tarefa agora, mas volto depois…

“Abiogenesis” is when something nonbiological turns into something biological and England thinks thermodynamics might provide the framework that drives life-like behavior in otherwise lifeless chemicals. However, this research doesn’t bridge life-like qualities of a physical system with the biological processes themselves, England said.

“I would not say I have done anything to investigate the ‘origin of life’ per se,” England told Live Science. “I think what’s interesting to me is the proof of principle – what are the physical requirements for the emergence of life-like behaviors?”

Self-organization in physical systems

When energy is applied to a system, the laws of physics dictate how that energy dissipates. If an external heat source is applied to that system, it will dissipate and reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, like a cooling cup of coffee left on a desk. Entropy, or the amount of disorder in the system, will increase as heat dissipates. But some physical systems may be  sufficiently out of equilibrium that they “self-organize” to make best use of an external energy source, triggering interesting self-sustaining chemical reactions that prevent the system from reaching thermodynamic equilibrium and thus maintaining an out-of-equilibrium state, England speculates. (It’s as if that cup of coffee spontaneously produces a chemical reaction that sustains a hotspot in the center of the fluid, preventing the coffee from cooling to an equilibrium state.) He calls this situation “dissipation-driven adaptation” and this mechanism is what drives life-like qualities in England’s otherwise lifeless physical system.

A key life-like behavior is self-replication, or (from a biological viewpoint) reproduction. This is the basis for all life: It starts simple, replicates, becomes more complex and replicates again. It just so happens that self-replication is also a very efficient way of dissipating heat and increasing entropy in that system.

In a study published July 18 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,  England and co-author Jordan Horowitz tested their hypothesis. They carried out computer simulations on a closed system (or a system that doesn’t exchange heat or matter with its surroundings) containing a “soup” of 25 chemicals. Although their setup is very simple, a similar type of soup may have pooled on the surface of a primordial and lifeless Earth. If, say, these chemicals are concentrated and heated by an external source – a hydrothermal vent, for example – the pool of chemicals would need to dissipate that heat in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. Heat must dissipate and the entropy of the system will inevitably increase.

Under certain initial conditions, he found that these chemicals may optimize the energy applied to the system by self-organizing and undergoing intense reactions to self-replicate. The chemicals fine-tuned themselves naturally. These reactions generate heat that obeys the second law of thermodynamics; entropy will always increase in the system and the chemicals would self-organize and exhibit the life-like behavior of self-replication.

“Essentially, the system tries a bunch of things on a small scale, and once one of them starts experiencing positive feedback, it does not take that long for it to take over the character of organization in the system,” England told Live Science.

This is a very simple model of what goes on in biology: chemical energy is burned in cells that are – by their nature – out of equilibrium, driving the metabolic processes that maintain life. But, as England admits, there’s a big difference between finding life-like qualities in a virtual chemical soup and life itself.

Sara Imari Walker, a theoretical physicist and astrobiologist at Arizona State University who was not involved in the current research, agrees.

“There’s a two-way bridge that needs to be crossed to try to bridge biology and physics; one is to understand how you get life-like qualities from simple physical systems and the other is to understand how physics can give rise to life,” Imari Walker told Live Science. “You need to do both to really understand what properties are unique to life and what properties are characteristic of things that you consider to be almost alive […] like a prebiotic system.”

Emergence of life beyond Earth?

Before we can even begin to answer the big question of whether these simple physical systems may influence the emergence of life elsewhere in the universe, it would be better to understand where these systems exist on Earth first.

“If, when you say ‘life,’ you mean stuff that is as stunningly impressive as a bacterium or anything else with polymerases and DNA, my work doesn’t yet tell us anything about how easy or difficult it is to make something that complex, so I shouldn’t speculate about what we’d be likely to find elsewhere than Earth,”  England said. (Polymerases are proteins that assemble DNA and RNA.)

This research doesn’t specifically identify how biology emerges from nonbiological systems, only that in some complex chemical situations, surprising self-organization occurs. These simulations do not consider other life-like qualities – such as adaptation to environment or reaction to stimuli. Also, this thermodynamics test on a closed system does not consider the role of information reproduction in life’s origins, said Michael Lässig, a statistical physicist and quantitative biologist at the University of Cologne in Germany.

“[This] work is indeed a fascinating result on non-equilibrium chemical networks but it is still a long way from a physics explanation of the origins of life, which requires the reproduction of information,” Lässig, who was not involved in the research, told Live Science.

There’s a critical role for information in living systems, added Imari Walker. Just because there appears to be natural self-organization exhibited by a soup of chemicals, it doesn’t necessarily mean living organization.

“I think there’s a lot of intermediate stages that we have to get through to go from simple ordering to having a full-on information processing architecture like a living cell, which requires something like memory and hereditary,” said Imari Walker. “We can clearly get order in physics and non-equilibrium systems, but that doesn’t necessarily make it life.”

To say England’s work could be the “smoking gun” for the origin of life is premature, and there are many other hypotheses as to how life may have emerged from nothing, experts said. But it is a fascinating insight into how physical systems may self-organize in nature. Now that researchers have a general idea about how this thermodynamic system behaves, it would be a nice next step to identify sufficiently out-of-equilibrium physical systems that naturally occur on Earth, England said.

Scientists have discovered the origins of the building blocks of life

Sunday, March 29th, 2020

by Rutgers University – MARCH 16, 2020

https://phys.org/news/2020-03-scientists-blocks-life.html

A fold (shape) that may have been one of the earliest proteins in the evolution of metabolism. Credit: Vikas Nanda/Rutgers University

Beginning of article: “Rutgers researchers have discovered the origins of the protein structures responsible for metabolism.”

End of article: “There is evidence the two folds may have shared a common ancestor and, if true, the ancestor may have been the first metabolic enzyme of life.” 

In other words, despite the bravado of the opening sentence and the headline, it is yet another example of a misleading, overstated, click bait title. These are, unfortunately, too common on “consumer science” sites. The average Joe reads the headline only, and walks away thinking scientists have figured out far more than they actually have. This is one theory; it may have merit, but the article indicates it hasn’t even been tested yet. Right now its status is just “theory du jour.”

Morelli – 17/03/20

There was no origins of life, neither here neither nowhere in this Universe. While the human scientific enterprise will be ruled by this reductionist paradigm we will search what never existed. Which natural forces and/or elements drove molecules to becoming the protein structures responsible for metabolism? Metabolism must be a trait of ” the biological organization of matter into systems” which evolved from ” internal dynamics of non-biological ancestor system”. Which was these non-living systems? The divisionist paradigm has separated Cosmological Evolution (from the Big Bang till 10 billion years) from the Biological Evolution (from 3,5 billion years ago). There is a unique Universal Evolution but they separated it into two blocks without any evolutionary link between them. The created abism between the two blocks generated this word “origins ” as something happening from outside the chain of causes and effects. And the word “life” for separating us from our very real ancestors..

Origens da Vida: Ótimo video da “Ciencia Primitiva”

Saturday, January 18th, 2020

Opiniao da Matrix/DNA:

Nao existem “origens”, isto seria um milagre, tudo vem de transformacoes na materia. Entao de onde veio a vida? Nao veio, o seu problema esta novamente nas palavras. O que denominas vida sao sistemas naturais, do tipo biologico. Estes sistemas vieram da transformacao evolutiva dos sistemas que existiam: atomicos, astronomicos, e inclusive, ondas de luz. Os quais sao igualmente animados e apresentam todas as propriedades dos sistemas biologicos, de formas mais simples – magneticas, mecanicas, etc. Querem comparar um sistema ( no caso, biologico), com ingredientes separados, e claro, assim nao vao nunca saber como os ingredientes inorganicos produziram sistemas naturais, porque isso nunca aconteceu. A nova Teoria da Matrix/DNA soluciona todas as questoes neste otimo video. Aguarde o livro com estas explicações, ” O Genoma de Deus”.

Pergunta de um leitor:

Rogerio Catatau -11/Jan/20 A muito se buscam a origem da vida , mas uma pergunta também nos causa curiosidade : Como os homens e animais descobriram no sexo a multiplicação, dizem que os seres humanos possuem inteligência, mas também os mais diversos tipos de seres possuem o conhecimento de forma natural , então fica a dúvida, como se desenvolve ou desenvolveu está informação dobre sexo e multiplicação dentre os mais diversos seres, como se originou está consciência entre estes ! ?

Resposta da Matrix/DNA:

Rogerio, o nome “sexo” e’ uma palavra referente a um processo natural que se iniciou dentro de atomos logo apos o Big Bang ( entre protons e neutrons) e veio evoluindo, existindo nos sistemas astronomicos ( entre pulsares e buracos negros), todos hermafroditas, e que chegou a nos, sistemas biologicos, atraves da primeira celula que tambem era hermafrodita. A separacao entre sistema com dominancia do macho e sistemas com dominancia da femea ocorreu porque os sistemas biologicos sao abertos, enquanto os anteriores eram fechados em si mesmos. Veja na Teoria da Matrix/DNA como os cromossomas X e Y ja existem em sistemas astronomicos muito antes dos “vivos” surgirem.

Comentario:

Universo Transante – 4 anos atrás É a representação da ciência de forma simples e didática, para que leigos possam entender, muito bom e obrigado por postar.

Resposta da Matrix/DNA:

Mas de uma “Ciencia” ultrapassada, ideologica, que resiste em dar o seu proximo passo evolutivo. Limitada ao metodo inicial, reducionista. O proximo e mais evoluido metodo e’ o sistemico, o qual esta ausente nas universidades e todo meio academico. Eo qual ja resolveu esta questao. Aguarde o livro – O Genoma de Deus – elaborado pela abordagem sistemica da Matrix/DNA Theory.

Hipotese alternativa á reunião de fotons na Terra nas origens da vida e mais evidencias para Matrix/DNA Theory

Wednesday, November 20th, 2019

Está sendo descoberto mais moléculas que formam aminoácidos, DNA, em meteoritos. Agora, como revela este artigo com link abaixo, foi descoberto um açúcar, fundamental no DNA. Isto me leva a formular mais uma hipotese para a formação dos aminoácidos, proteinas, RNA e DNA, do que a já calculada reunião dos genes semivivos na forma de fotons vindos da entropia galactica.

Pode ser que não foi preciso todos os fotons-genes necessários a um sistema celular completo terem vindo e se reunidos na Terra. Pode ser que os fotons liberados a partir da entropia na periferia da galáxia se encontram em vários astros, ou meteoritos, constituindo pequenos pacotes de informação, e mais tarde, se vários destes pacotes, pelas quedas de meteoritos, se encontram na superficie de um planeta, reinem-se ja como moléculas e completam um sistema.

Artigo:

Sugar Has Been Detected Inside Meteorites for the First Time Ever

By Rosie McCall On 11/20/19 at 11:14 AM EST

https://www.newsweek.com/sugar-detected-inside-meteorites-first-time-ever-1472986?utm_campaign=NewsweekTwitter&utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter

“Other important building blocks of life have been found in meteorites previously, including amino acids (components of proteins) and nucleobases (components of DNA and RNA), but sugars have been a missing piece among the major building blocks of life,”

“A study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS) sheds new light on the question of how biology arose from non-biological chemical processes, the researchers say. This being because the sugars discovered on the meteors studied may have been a key ingredient in some of the first examples of ribonucleic acid (RNA) formed on Earth.

Researchers were able to identify sugars on two carbon-rich meteorites (Murchison and North West Africa (NWA) 801) using gas chromatography mass spectrometry, a process that sorts molecules according to mass and electric charge.”

In contrast, there was no evidence of 2-deoxyribose—the sugar required to make DNA—in any of the samples studied, a result the researchers say supports the idea RNA evolved prior to, and was later replaced by, DNA. “This is important since there could have been a delivery bias of extraterrestrial ribose to the early Earth which is consistent with the hypothesis that RNA evolved first.”

Meu comentario postado no artigo:

Louis Morelli – 21/11/19

The extraterrestrial sugar is still inside this galaxy. This discovery is one more correct prevision of Matrix/DNA Theory 30 years ago, when composing a galactic system with the seven known shapes of astronomic bodies perceived that then galactic system is the direct ancestral of the first cell system. Entropy begnning at the periphery of this galaxy delivered its bits genetic information as seeds looking for a good land. Who drove sugars, aminoacids, proteins, for composing a working system? it is all around us.

Budismo também é contra “origens”

Wednesday, October 16th, 2019

xxxx

Hindu and Buddhist philosophies state that any event is the result of previous events, as reflected in the concept of karma, and as such there is no such thing as a random event or a first event. (wikipedia : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randomness )

A teoria da Matrix/DNA contesta o conceito e definição humana da palavra “origens”, acrescentando que nunca houve “origens da vida” nem “origem do Universo”. As propriedades da vida vem sendo expressadas gradualmente a medida que evolui o sistema universal, desde o sistema atômico, e quando chega no biológico expressa todas as propriedades juntas. Portanto não existe fronteiras, divisão clara entre o que é um sistema vivo e um sistema não-vivo. Então não teve súbita origem da vida. Alias, tido é produto de transformações de algo que existia antes. E pelo que vejo no texto acima, o Budismo também já defendia esta ideia.

Tenho alertado que estas duas palavras tem causado grande prejuízo a obtenção de conhecimento natural pela humanidade. Por causa desta divisão entre vida e não-vida separaram a Evolução Universal em dois blocos – a Evolução Cosmológica e a Evolução Biológica – e devido a esta separação que cria um abismo evolucionário entre os dois blocos surgem vários misticismos, materialismos metafísicos crendo em acasos mágicos, e religiões, que precisam apelar ao imaginário para explicarem o que aconteceu depois da evolução cosmológica, como a origem da vida. se alguém concordar com minha teoria, deve sempre contestar qualquer fala incluindo os termos “origens da vida” ou origem de qualquer coisa, a bem da humanidade.

 











Origens da Vida: Extenso informativo artigo

Wednesday, August 14th, 2019

xxxxx

Origins – what cause explains best our existence, and why?

( segundo o bing, na busca de universal matrix, sou citado neste artigo/livro. Procurar > encontrei a seguinte nota em referencias: 23 –  http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?tag=evolucao&paged=13, no capitulo 07, sob titulo Essential elements and building blocks for the origin of life)

Reason and Science.com

http://reasonandscience.catsboard.com/t2590-origins-what-cause-explains-best-our-existence-and-why#5790

Parei lendo a extensa primeira pagina no capitulo: How the discovery of ribozymes cast RNA in the roles of both chicken and egg in origin-of-life theories

 











Jeremy England: Busca Acadêmica por Forças e Elementos da Física como Bases da Origem da Vida

Wednesday, August 14th, 2019

xxxxxx

Nova teoria sobre as origens da vida por um fisico, Jeremy England

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_England  

He was raised Jewish but did not study Judaism until he attended graduate school at Oxford University. He now considers himself an Orthodox Jew

Theoretical work

England has developed a hypothesis of the physics of the origins of life, that he calls ‘dissipation-driven adaptation’. The hypothesis holds that random groups of molecules can self-organize to more efficiently absorb and dissipate heat from the environment. His hypothesis states that such self-organizing systems are an inherent part of the physical world.

Pulitzer-Prize winning science historian Edward J. Larson said that if England can demonstrate his hypothesis to be true, “he could be the next Darwin.

xxxxxx

Artigo divulgando a teoria:

A origem da vida foi uma casualidade? Ou leis da física?

https://ciencianautas.com/a-origem-da-vida-foi-uma-casualidade-ou-leis-da-fisica/

xxxxxxxx

Artigo original em ingles:

Massachusetts physicist claims he solved mystery of how life emerged from matter

https://www.rt.com/usa/massachusetts-physicist-solve-mystery-life-098/ England pointed to plants as a great example of energy dissipaters, since they take in the energy around them, use it to sustain themselves, and disperse even more energy into their environment in the form of infrared light. Matrix: O que?! Plantas emitem luz infravermelha e no ambiente? pesquisar isso…. When sunlight strikes objects, certain wavelengths of this spectrum are absorbed and other wavelengths are reflected. The pigment in plant leaves, chlorophyll, strongly absorbs visible light and reflects near infrared.

Do plants emit infrared radiation?
When an object is not quite hot enough to radiate visible light, it will emit most of its energy in the infrared. For example, hot charcoal may not give off light but it does emit infrared radiation which we feel as heat. The warmer the object, the moreinfrared radiation it emits.
What produces infrared light?
Infrared radiation is popularly known as “heat radiation”, but light and electromagnetic waves of any frequency will heat surfaces that absorb them. Infrared light from the Sun accounts for 49% of the heating of Earth, with the rest being caused by visible light that is absorbed then re-radiated at longer wavelengths
———

Jeremy says: ” As various forms of matter seek to disperse more energy over long periods of time, they would naturally start to replicate or reproduce, since replication itself disperses as much energy as it uses up – at least on the level of RNA molecules and bacteria. “A great way of dissipating more [energy] is to make more copies of yourself,” England said.











Origin of Life: This “scientific” video and the explanation from Matrix/DNA Theory

Saturday, June 22nd, 2019

xxxx

A brief introduction to learn what this website is about is resumed in the comments below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ  ( Origin of Life – How Life Started on Earth)

Comments in Youtube:

vince pie – 6/21/19

Life did not come from non life. It came from life.

Pablo Fonseca – 6/22/19

Vince, try to change this concept by:

” Natural systems did not come from scratch. Systems came from systems”.

The word “life” is our problem ( and the word ” origins” is another trap ). So what system these biological systems ( aka, life) came from? Ok there were only two known systems: astronomic and atomic. You can see quickly that atom must be discarded, because it is too much simple than the first biological system – a complete and working cell system. So the unique alternative is astronomic systems. And it is logical: the first biological system appeared inside an astronomic and was produced with ingredients existing in this system.

But, how could a giant and super simple system producing a microscopic and super complex system?! Louis Morelli was thinking about these problem, but ia new different way: systems,… and thre is no other alternative, it did it, we must discover how. He went to Amazon jungle where still there are witness of that event, and applied comparative anatomy between biological and astronomic, when he found LUCA, the last half-biological/half-astronomic system, the lost evolutionary link between Cosmological and Biological Evolution.

There is no unsolvable enigma, the whole problem are wrong words generating wrong concepts and wrong way of thinking. These people in this video is searching the ancestral of a system as a soup of random ingredients. Systems came from system. So, Morelli shows in his website the face of LUCA, which is the building block of galatic systems and he found how LUCA was here, in the middle of that soup and minerals.











Origins of Life: Scientists produces synthetic enzyme in 2017 and they suspects that it created life at 4 billions years ago!

Monday, November 13th, 2017

xxxx

Then it was me who being born at this century killed the Death Sea at 2 billions years ago… This article is at the link below and following it are the copies of our commentaires at the article’s debate: 

Chemists May Have Found the ‘Missing Link’ to the First Life on Earth

https://www.livescience.com/60907-missing-link-first-life-on-earth.html?utm_source=notification

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017

To the authors:
You said: ” … A subset of chemists have devoted their careers to puzzling…”
I think it is clear that a new kind of information from a more complex natural system were among the matter of that water slime. I can’t understand these chemists that are working with the effects and not searching the cause, because if they want to solve the puzzle, the rational way is going after the cause.DAP – if it ever existed naturally – is an effect, containing the entire or part of the cause, not the cause. We are watching everyday how a new life emerges from water slime produced not by the slime, but by a bunch of information coming from outside the womb’s water, so, why for the first life would be different? Why scientists are mimicking mysticals that need never seen before phenomena? Our method at Matrix/DNA Theory found a possible natural force/element that could be the source of these outside informations for first life. Chemists need know the models and looking inside DAP and the other primordial elements for this “invisible” genome. We are losing time and money.
xxxxx
@Phillip Czekala –  I’m going to guess you’ve never actually witnessed the Birth of a Baby? If you had you would know how Ignorant your claim not to have started your life in “a bucket of shit water slime” because yours and everyone elses actually did start that way.You may or may not have started in shit, not all babies crap in Uetero, but you certainly started in “a bucket of piss water slime”. All Mammals do.
Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017
Chris Sievert – Yes but the piss water slime does nothing without an almost invisible element called genome, which did not come from the piss water slime, but from the parents of the baby, existing above and before the piss water slime. If you are rational and not a mystic or have some obscurus agenda, you will calculate that in that primordial water slime arrived some kind of prior genome. That’s why Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a theoretical model of this non-Earth genome: it is merely the miniaturized copy of astronomical systems’ building blocks. Of, course, what else were existing above and before Earth if not the Milk Way?

xxxx

Edward Guest · FSU College of Law

The ability to produce intelligent beings, well somewhat intelligent, through this process if true could likely occur in millions, maybe even billions, of star systems in our Universe. Maybe we will be surprised in a few billion Earth years how many species we find that are a lot like us.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Edward Guest – There is a curious option, maybe you don’t know it. Life is like agriculture, so, if a seed falls in an environment with good conditions, it will flourish. The seeds are splitted everywhere in space/time. But, what is this “seed” and from where it comes from? At Matrix/DNA Theory we discovered that a new theoretical model of galaxies fits exactly the configurations for a source of these seeds. The astronomical building blocks is the face and configuration of DNA building blocks. When I got these models, it was suggesting a new version of “universal history” from the Big Bang to nowadays. And the final history suggests that – as you said – initially must have diversification among aliens but all them will be fine tunelled to a unique final shape… which is the unknown shape of the natural intelligent system that triggered the Big Bang and must be existing beyond this Universe. Curious, isn’t it?
xxxxx

Philip Czekala

Total BULLSHIT.
It’s publish or perish in college land and this clown professor Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy will make up and write ANYTHING to keep his job. Maybe his life started out in a bucket of shit water slime but mine didn’t. Just think about how many gullible assholes believe this crap too. We are DOOMED.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Philip – You are right, Our life began in water slime also but the womb’s water slime can do nothing without the insertion of an almost invisible genetic code from something existing above and beyond the womb ( it means also beyond Earth as the womb for first living thing). Why the modern academic mindset is separating cosmological evolution from biologiccal evolution?! The effects of this absurd faith is causing this blindness? Do you have any explanation for human behavior?
xxxx

Jerry Bunker · Purdue University

Professing themselves wise they traded the truth for a lie. This garbage that once upon a time is sheer nonsense. Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states that in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. It takes much more faith to believe in these fairytales than to believe in the creator God

Louis Charles Morelli ·Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Jerry: ” Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states”
A book written by foreign ancient people states nothing to our people of our country and to people of XXI century, why are you coming at a Science issue and Western World telling that?! Don’t worry: if God has something to say to our country and to people of this time, He will say it directly to us, we does not accept humans intermediaries between us and God. 
Here you comes professing yourself wise. So, bring on to the table the proofs how life started and get the Nobel prize. Or are you trading the truth for a lie?
xxxx
Something folks seem to miss in their Synthesis of supposed early biology is the intense stirring caused by the Moon tides which were a hundred or more times stronger than they are now. Not only 100-200 foot ocean tides, tides expressed in the ground around the sea and, more importantly, beneath the sea too, stirring up the lighter and heaver elements, separating the stone from the metal, breaking the shell of the Earth into mud and sand, even as it tries to harden, heating things up in a band beneath the Moon’s early orbit. Remember, the Moon, containing much of it’s present mass was only a few thousand miles above the Earth at that time, having been formed by a collision between the Earth and a stoney body about the size of Mars. It slowly escaped Earth’s gravity until now it’s effects on land is negligible though the seas still rise and fall by tens of feet now, rather than by hundreds. THERE is your crucible!
Like · Reply · 1 · 4 hrs
It occurs to me that the occasion of the birth of our Moon might be quite rare in water planets. There might be fewer examples of life because of it, if the Moon tides really were a part of the equation. The local sudden heating and cooling of subsurface muds by those large tides might also have played a part, again making life as we know it even more rare.
 
Fred Wood – You have a good point. There is a theoretical “universal natural formula for organizing matter into systems” and applying the formula for to calculate “life’s origins” the results of this calculations says exactly what you said about the role played by the Moon. New shapes of systems ( like the biological ones built at the abiogenesis period) begins by the Function 1 of the formula, which is “agitation for fragmentation and mixture of the elements of the environment”. We have not found other element able to do that function necessary for biological systems organization here. Then comes the F2, which takes the “baby” created by F1 and begins the aggregation of nutrients. This formula explains how the first lighter gaseous star and the later stellar systems were made from an atomic nebulae, how galactic’s nuclei are created by central vortex, etc. If you are curious about the formula, search ” The Universal Matrix for All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. Congratulations by the right insight











Life would be the result of chance, by Nature rolling dices? Or not?

Thursday, October 5th, 2017

xxxxx

From the debate at the link:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ&lc=z132epexbkupgxdkp23xelpwrzq4gt2sc.1507247448858067

xxxx

GravityBoy72 – 1 year ago

Amino acids…. big deal. You know how astronomically complex a living cell is beyond an amino acid?It’s a full blown FACTORY. How many rolls of the dice do you need before you get a FACTORY capable of identical replication? I don’t see how there has been enough time in the universe for that to happen.I don’t believe in “God” but neither am I convinced by the theory of evolution.I’m more open to “something else” – although I have no idea what that is.

xxxxx

Blacques Jacques – 10/05/2017

GravityBoy72 –  You under estimate how many roll of the dice have already happened . You can’t concieve of thatmuch time

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli – 10/5/2017

Blacques Jacques – I think this does not works. There is other rational alternative, based on what I can see here and now. The placenta inside the mother’s womb is changing its states (like our external environment) while the DNA inside the fetus is rolling the dices also, but only those results that fits with the placenta’s results are selected. The processes of astronomical and biological evolutions are identical. There is a unique narrow evolutionary direction for boths, that’s why the planet Earth at its 4,345 million years supports biological organisms and millions of existent planets at its 3,5 million years or any other age does not support biological organisms. You could say that the placenta transformations are not indicative that the placenta is rolling dices, there is the difference between opened and closed systems, the Universe is not tunneled to produce life, so, life is an accident, etc. But, we don’t know if this agglomerate of galaxies are not performing the rules like a placenta in relation to life. So, why one plays dice and the other don’t? 

Inside organisms there is a force rolling the dices, called DNA. And DNA has its necessities, so, it discards the results that does not fit with its necessities. Meanwhile, the external environment is rolling the dice also, but the external environment is built by the same force, elevated to “n” potence, which we call “matrix”. It means that the selector agent of two rolling dices selecting results is inside the organism and inside the external environment – the Matrix/DNA. It means a unique narrow evolutionary direction for boths, that’s why the planet Earth at its 4,345 million years supports biological organisms and millions of existent planets at its 3,5 million years or any other age does not support biological organisms.

Maybe you forgot that the dice rolled by Nature has not only six sides, but infinite sides. Take only one natural phenomena – temperature – for instance. You have two extremes ( the most hot and most cold) but mixing them the result is infinite levels of temperature. Now take another natural duality, like the rectilinear movement and the curvilinear movement. For a game of dices being able to produce a complex system like a cell is necessary thousands or millions results performing a logical sequence, like one game give 4.38477563562, a next game give 4.38477563563 and so on, millions of results in the same sequence kept inside a logical evolutionary line. In the way that at the table rolling the dice about temperature must result a number X at the same time when the dice being rolled at the table of movement also give the number X. If it does not happen, their is no catalyse for the other result getting stability. To me, its harder to believe in the dice’s rolls than believe in the Spaghetti Monster.