Archive for the ‘Consciousness’ Category

Why All Finger Prints Are Different?

Wednesday, October 4th, 2017

xxxx

This “debate” is here copied for futher development:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ&lc=z132epexbkupgxdkp23xelpwrzq4gt2sc.1507130257520093

xxxx

The Metaphysical or Spiritual reason we are unique and different from all other humans

Gamer G - 10/4/2017

Identical twins? They come from the same fertilized egg and share the same genetic blueprint. To a standard DNA test, they are indistinguishable. Even identical twins do not have matching fingerprints.We have been created or formed or evolved very unique in the world currently we are unique among 7.5billion population.

No identical twins even have same finger prints. It can never ever be a natural selection. Science can never convince for how or why the finger prints are unique.There is someone behind the scene which we cannot see. Some ppl call him as Alien and some ppl call him as “God”. But to be frank many ppl like to hear the word Alien but not God. Even some religion believes that their God will come, every words we speak are recorded and everything we did will be explicitly shown before all and their God will give judgement to entire humanity, not according to religion. Could be an unknown fact by now like how baby in the womb doesn’t know the outside world, it might think mothers womb is the only world there is nothing outside world like it can crawl, walk… That’s why we are unique is one factor to be considered. Every events are recorded. If universe came out of nothing then why can’t this be possible.Men do not want to hear about God or hell because it’s scary they have to lead a very holy life, it’s very difficult so they themselves convince to pick that there is no God, no judgement and no punishment:-) though science cannot disprove God


Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Gamer G: “No identical twins even have same finger prints.”

This difference is product of a natural process occurring at cosmological evolution and inherited by biological evolution. If you are curious about see it at

http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?p=8633 (it is Portuguese, sorry)

and the very extensive collection of articles about this issue at

http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?cat=1660
You must see the picture at the end of the first link above and the picture of Matrix/DNA formula.
But,… if you want to believe that your God is behind this natural mechanism, we did not find the mechanism’s source before the Big Bang, so, there is space for the possibility of your God. Now, please, read the explanation we found about “why we are unique among 8 billion people”. And what is the reality behind the account of Genesis, in Bible:

About 10 billion years ago, we were in shape of an ancestor non-biological, which was not conscient yet. This ancestor was carrying on the hardware and the software aspects of all natural systems. The hardware is composed by matter (space substance or dark matter) plus the energy resulted from the friction when light waves propagates among dark matter. The software is a formula like a genetic code made of light wave which came at the Big Bang, or before it.
You know that the supreme goal of matter is eternal inertia. But when this matter is impregnated with energy, the eternal goal becomes the “thermodynamic equillibrim”, because the supreme goal of energy alone is moving at light speed. Thermodynamic equillibrium is the balance between high speed and inertia.
Meanwhile, the supreme goal of the software is to reproduce the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang. This universe is merely a kind of placenta composed by galaxies and inside it there is a universal natural system being nurtured and developing, towards the final shape of its “creator”. In another words, the universal software is a genetic code imprinted as light wave and the final shape will be something like pure cosmic consciousness.
It happens that this ancestral (which was the building block of astronomical systems and our LUCA – the Last Universal Common Ancestor) became a closed system, as described by the formula’s diagram at my website. This is bad, it is a sin, because it is an interruption of the cosmological genetic process. Then. acted entropy, which fragmented the closed system into its bits-information, they falls at planets surface and lift up as biological systems, aka, living things.
This entropic event has a very smart purpose: you take a big sin, breaks it in smallest bits. Each bit will be a fraction of the big sin. Now, you put all bits ( it can be 8 billion) in a new environment where they will need fight for survival, so, expressing its bad tendency as part of the big sin. Each bit will see in all other bits the face of the ancestor sin and will hate them. Doing it, each bits will hate and exorcizing from itself its part of the sin. Final, you have the whole creature purified, and as opened system, ready to continuing the universal goal.
This event happened about 10 billion years ago and it is registered into our DNA memory. The DNA is at the center of neurons. Some altered state of mind can produce flashes of this event, but the human seeing it will not understand, if he/she does not know about galaxies, DNA, genetic code, etc. This flashes were saw by the founder fathers of the biggest religions. The Abrahamic religion described the picture of the anatomy of our closed system ancestral as the Eden Paradise, and the entropic event as The Fall. Any question, I am here…

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Finger prints must be modelled by golden ratio of phi number

The links above explains the origins and evolution of human hands, but does not mention the differences of finger prints. Which can be explained by extensive articles here:

http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?cat=834

I have never thought about this interesting detail, thank you, I will research it. But, at first glance, looking the Matrix/DNA formula for an explanation, I think that it is related to the phenomena produced by the phy number. Every organism, every human is unique, as explained above: we are different, diversified copies of a unique template, the Matrix/DNA formula. In this formula there is a systemic specific function called F5, which is responsible for recycling astronomical systems and reproducing biological systems, as well copying the left face of that formula into a right face. The location point of this function at the formula circuitry is exactly 1,618… which is the known phi number. So, it is explained why all bi-lateral symmetry and the Fibonacci ratio is produced by what we call phi number. Since that all organisms are unique copy of that formula, each organism express a specific state of the formula for building its hands. Specific states has a vibrational/frequency specific level which produces a specific phi number ratio. This specific ratio is what produces a specific ratio among the stripes of finger prints.

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Why finger prints has no evolutionary or “divine” purpose.

Gamer G : “Everything should have some purpose. Including our unique finger prints”

Sorry, I am discovering now that finger prints has no purpose. It is a trait ( a detail) existent at the building blocks of DNA. Since the first cell need to move, our DNA sent to the extremities of the cell a copy of the building block, which began building the cilia and its bacterial motor. While the cell evolved to multicellular, monkeys, humans, the cilia evolved due organisms using the disposable mechanisms existent in the building block at the extremity. Those disposable mechanisms that were not required can be expressed or not, since that does not prejudices the functions of the system. The mechanism related to the lists of finger prints were very well expressed when the formula of the building block was building astronomical systems: it has produced the astronomical bodies’ superposed layers, from nucleus to periphery. Like Earth, we have the internal and external nucleus, the mantle, the tectonic plate, the crust. It happens that each end of each finger is the tool related to each specific astronomical body, so, due the mechanism being stronger expressed at our ancestor, it continued to be expressed, even that our organism did not required it. And my thesis about the golden ratio between the strips is scientifically falsifiable, maybe those working with finger prints identification has noticed it.

If Matrix/DNA world view will be proved the best theory we have, there is purpose in universal evolution. It suggests that inside this universe is occurring a genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that produced it. In the words of creationists it could be meaning that the purpose of universal evolution is producing the son of their God. But,… finger prints in humans has no evolutionary purpose.

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Gamer G: “Our unique dna complex coding or finger prints (like bar code) these coding languages should have been compiled by someone else”

The problem, Sir, is that there is no DNA complex coding. Humanity has 8 billion humans, no one identical to other, composing tribes, groups, nations. Humanity is a creation from the DNA. It makes sense to say that each human ( the building block) or the group they belong to ( genes) composes a code? Of course, not.

The wrong concept that DNA is a code is due humans missing the knowledge about what really is DNA’s building blocks. They are billions of diversified copies of a unique complete working system, which is a functional formula. As humans are diversified copies of a unique system, the human species.
It happens that this system encrypted into DNA’s building blocks is coming from cosmological evolution, as building blocks of galaxies, atoms systems and finally, we discovered it as a single light wave. If you pay the right attention to the electromagnetic spectrum, you will see that a light wave is almost a living thing, it has all parts with all systemic functions, and it propagates by the same sequence that our body grows and ages – a process or force called life’s cycle. And we don’t know which is the source of this universal natural light wave that contains “the code”.
If there is a God with supernatural power (I don’t know), he didn’t created the code later when the universe was 10 billion years old and only for biological system. It launched the code in shape of light at the Big Bang… or before it. If there is an natural ex-universe conscious being, he launched the code equal the human parents launches their genome for creation. If the mysteriously being launched the code in shape of light, it means that his body contains light.

The differences among human beings are due the crossover of two genome that is coming with specific prior experiences plus the way that the external world reacts over he/she. The reason of differences between DNA’s building blocks is the same. There is no code. Not a code created inside this Universe by some intelligent supernatural being. It is possible that, instead genetic natural process, the ex-machine being before the universe launched the light wave applying intelligence, but, then, is was not inside this Universe.

xxxx

The difference between the scholar “biological” and the natural biology

Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Gamer G: ” U might be from biological background to provide details of research”

No, Sir, sorry. If you refers to “biological” as the human produced scientific field called Biology, I have no more this kind of biological background than about 50 years reading scholar books of biology by my own. But, if you refer to “biological” as the real natural phenomena of natural systems made off carbon and water, yes, I have some unusual background, since I spent at least seven years studying the Amazon jungle biosphere.

In the jungle I perceived constant patterns which were pointing towards atoms and astronomical systems also. This lead me to elaborate a new world view. If I had the scholar biological background I would be taught to accept the shollar world view, like the Darwinian theory. Or/and a religious worldview. But, I am skeptical included in relation to this new worldview, that is why I am testing it against real natural facts and searching debates with different worldviews for to learn more or correcting my possible mistakes. I am sure only one thing: no human is able to discover the right final world view. Nobody can understand the thru about a system (this Universe) standing inside it.

 

 

 

Evolution of the Brain? What is Science Fiction, The Constraints From Real Science and the Theory from Matrix/DNA

Saturday, September 16th, 2017

xxxx

Evolution of the Brain? What is Science Fiction, The Constraints From Real Science and the Theory from Matrix/DNA

Robert Beckendorff – 9/14/2017

All Biology is FLAWED in some way or another. It is up to MAN to take what Mother Nature has dished up and make adjustments and improvements. Eugenics is the future, guaranteed. Piss on all the religious idiots who oppose Human Progress. Micro-Bionics is the FUTURE: Soon enough, the entire brain and nervous system, will be enhanced with micro-chip and micro-robotic systems, the Cardio-Vascular system just the same. As humans become less dependant upon flawed raw biology, life will become much richer and longer. A whole new man made level of beauty and fitness will emmerge. Biology will be employed in our computers; Bio-Electronics will be employed in our bodies. We are about to convert Raw Biology into Man Made Bio-Technology. NO one can stop it. To Hell with all the religious fanatics, the all their BS about the “End Times”.

Louis Charles Morelli – Robert Beckendorff – ” … flawed raw biology…”

 I don’t blame Nature due flawed Biology because it seems clear that there is a cycle “chaos>order>transcendence>degeneration>chaos>order…” so, it seems Nature has three states, and this Earth biosphere emerged in state of chaos. What you are wishing about our future is merely the natural sequence, we are going to an ordered state. Our biggest problem is the human inheritance of three animal instincts – instinct for big predator, middle predator, and prey – which are product of chaos and we still carries on these in our genetics and modeling our psyche. So, if we produces high technology now, it will not be used for the well of the whole humanity but will be appropriated by the 1% as big predators against the other two class. Preys – the big mass of 90% of the population are inertial, they don’t care about human progress, only food, which is their way to extinction due overpopulation. So, if we don’t self-exorcise ourselves from these three instincts and don’t make efforts for others doing it, high technology will lead us to worst scenario: The Brave New World ( where everybody are stupid in the paradise) under the government of the Big Brother ( where included the human minds are not free).
Robert Beckendorff 2 days ago
Humans have always been ruled over and controlled by a tiny power above them. This is the natural way of things. Those who have control of knowledge in a scoiety, have the power to rule over the masses, and they do so usually in a benevolent way. Today, there is no excuse for being ignorant. We have instant global sharing, and an Internet that can settle any dispute, and answer any question.
Louis Charles Morelli 2 days ago
Robert Beckendorff – Are you a hard work in construction or 12 hours/day in a factory, as 7 billion humans works or are dependent of these workers and their misery wage? And still you can pay a college where one gets such knowledge? My friend, you don’t know the third world or the reality of the “projects” at the first world and these is 90% of humans. And for your sake, it is a tactic among the big predators of the third world that the population must be kept ignorant.
redlegagent 1 day ago
Try not to allow science FICTION to override real science.  It is one thing to merely deliver a micro-electrical pulse along a nerve track or to an area of the brain in a crude fashion so as to stimulate a response – as the nervous system is already established and you are merely mimicking energy transference.  It is another thing altogether to attempt to interface with human memories in a coherent fashion which may originate from different areas of the brain and for which we are not able to understand right now.  The same for attaching synthetic parts to our bodies – again via that already pre-established system.  So I would not hold my breath just yet waiting for human/technological hybrids as we clearly have a lot to learn yet.  Our brains are as good as nature could make them.  While science fiction loves to blather on about humans supposedly developing more advanced brain capacity – our current brains already use a lot of the resources our bodies can provide.  To increase brain capacity would require a fundamental re-working of our bodies to deliver the additional oxygen and nutrients required to sustain said higher functioning.  In short – we would over-tax our organ systems which could not deliver the necessary metabolic elements without compromising themselves in the process as our brains are already “hogs” who steal a sizeable chunk of our oxygen etc. from our blood supply.
eeeaten – 1 day ago
apparently i’m somewhat more optimistic than you three. i see no reason to ascribe laws of cycles or instincts to our fates, and i doubt these are even true. newton’s second law implies a natural move towards disorder, while specific systems within the universe may or may not have increasing complexity depending on local energy sources (eg a star). in regard to humanity and instincts, we have a tendency toward increasing civility and decreasing violence (pinker’s better angels is a great read on this), suggesting humanity is capable of creating a future for itself without tyranny or even war. i don’t think human-technological augmentation is far away at all (check out ray kurzweil’s predictions). we already have infinite-information devices in front of our eyes every day: it’s a small step for these to be accessed directly by our brains – limited only by (fast-evolving) technology. as ever, the future is scary but bright.
redlegagent -n1 day ago
Think of it like the old Westerns where the bad guys would climb a telegraph pole and listen in on the wire.  Things like devices which release a small electrical charge to a section of the brain so as to “disrupt” the electrical signals to prevent a seizure or else attaching a artificial limb which likewise is connected to the existing nerve pathways is basically the same thing.  All you are doing is applying an electrical charge which then transits the existing nerve pathways by overriding natural bio-chemical signals.  That is not the same as somehow tapping into our memories and being able to generate new memories + recall and manipulate neuron transmission in a coherent fashion.  To use artificial technology to enhance our knowledge means that we must be able to accurately access the human brain – understand what areas need to be stimulated to generate specific results – and to then be able to do that.  Suffice to say we are no where near that today.  It’s not like we have a USB plug in our brains.  Our brains process different information is different places – thus one must be able to understand and influence the entire brain to facilitate new information.  As to cultures – technology has always grown at a faster pace than human behavior.  We develop new technologies – and eventually we learn how to use them in a responsible way.  Social development is always the weak link in the chain since people are individuals – each with their own wants and needs – which is why change is always slow.  The way to stimulate altruism and empathy has always been via mass communication.  The more people are connected and see what goes on in the world around them – the more that awareness stimulates responses to what they see
Louis Charles Morelli
redlegagent – “To increase brain capacity would require a fundamental re-working of our bodies”.
Maybe not. We increased the processing capacity of computers while diminishing the size of hardware by advancing electronics. Same for the relation motor capacity/truck size. This is still fiction, but the Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a formula for systems made by biophotons and a network of biophotons could replace electrical chemical signals and network, without needing more nutrients from the body…
Louis Charles Morelli
eeeaten ” I see no reason to ascribe laws of cycles or instincts to our fates”.
So, how could be broken the natural course that all ancestors ( living and non-living ancestors) has followed to such fate? The answer would be ” self-exorcising the selfish gene” since that our surrounding environment ( this biosphere) is modeled by and for to keep the selfish gene. But how you will drive a human with tendency to be big predator to other humans beings – which has the abstract shape of canines in its psyche designed by genetics – to wish their self-exorcising? A predator has canines, no way to change its behavior. Take out the preys he will die.
Louis Charles Morelli
eeeaten – ” I think you’re implying our ancestors were all selfish and violent…”
No. They were all selfish, but about violence, there is the instinct for prey which is inertial, not aggressive neither for self-defense. This is our problem, the universal duality (hot/cold,male/female,etc.) is here, how to eliminate a universal duality? But it is not, as you said “is an inescapable part of our nature” The two opposites of any duality will arrive to a marriage (hot/cold = no temperature or a median temperature). So you can go to “no more human species” or a descendant more evolved shape resulting from the marriage. It is upon to us our fate. Till now the human history offers no hope. All social systems created till now mimics the rules in the jungle among animals: there is the big predators ( the 1% or high aristocracy), the middle predators (wolves, fox, as the middle class); and the preys ( the 90% still slaves and uneducated). That’s why I am fighting my fight: we need self-exorcise this instincts from our genetics and primary psyche at the same time we need insisting with others to do that, and it means you against the three class. That’s why I am no leftist, no rightist, neither neutral: we need a new kind of social system that does not mimicks animals… or death.
redlegagent –
+Louis – computers require electricity which is not an internal part of the system but rather comes from an external source.  Look at your body.  There is a reason why oxygenated blood goes directly from the left ventricle to shunt straight to your brain – your brain requires the highest amount of oxygen of all your organs in the body to sustain itself.  Your brain is only about ~20% or so of gray matter – and gray matter is the portion which is associated with complex thinking.  The white matter represents the bulk of your brain and it is mostly there to facilitate transmission of signals for the gray matter.  This means that most of your brain is not conducive to higher thought.  So understanding that – understand that our brains place a high demand upon the rest of our body to keep it supplied with enough oxygen and blood to facilitate our currently level of cognition.  In order to foster even higher brain function – our cardio-pulmonary and circulatory systems would have to supply even more sustenance to our brains…………..at the expense of their own function + the rest of our body which also requires a certain level of cellular nutrition.  In short our brains are developed about as good as they can based upon what the body can supply them.  To access as noted via external devices – we must first understand where and how the bio-chemical signals which represent our memories and thought processes originate = and then be able to interface them in a coherent fashion so that our brain understands what we are trying to tell it and vice-versa in order to operate in a cogent fashion.  So while we are learning about how certain areas of the brain are associated with certain functions – that is not the same as being able to input new commands or recovering memories such as are associated with cognition.
Louis Charles Morelli
redlegagent – Thanks, by good information, you have demonstrated why Robert Beckendorff must slow down his optimism and what seems science fiction. We will wait to see how natural evolution will solve this problem ( maybe giants humans?). If you have not seen the theory of this smart scientist ( human brains developed due cocking food increasing absorption of energy), here is the link, TED TALK: https://www.ted.com/talks/suzana_herculano_houzel_what_is_so_special_about_the_human_brain By my hand, I am involved in an investigation about brain and consciousness that seems “weird” or “esoteric” by people with current world view. I am trying to get a full anatomy of the brain in 3D for superimposing the picture upon the drawing of a software diagram that works as a formula for all natural systems. If I can locate at least seven different regions/or pieces as glandules, the brain picture will fit with the formula picture, then, we can identify the specific systemic function of each piece/organ. The brain is a system in itself, so, it must have as template or blue print, this formula for systems. The second investigation is more “weird”. A surprising suggestion from the formula that I got is the explanation why we are using more the left than the right hemisphere. The brain is divided into two sides like the formula is also. In the formula there is a flow of information running in a spherical circuit but when the flow arrives to a Function 4, it is divided into two flows, one continuing the sphere and other going down towards the beginning, where is Function 1. In the brain, the trajectory of this lateral flow would be from the cortex towards the hippocampus, through the corpus callosum. Final conclusion: the human life still needs the fight for survival which needs focusing here and now and the attributes for these are at the left. We can’t lose time/energy with things beyond our survival zone, which are attributes of the right H. Then what is happening? Our thoughts happens only in half potential. When we begins a new thought, it must obey the systemic trajectory which designs the process of life’s cycle like our body. Each thought seems a living thing, with birth (must be at the hippocampal region, F1) , grow, maturation, degeneration and death. If it is useful is registered in the memory, if not, it is lost. It happens that in this still primitive phase of brain evolution, and the fight for survival, the thought as flow of energy’ information is born in F1, goes clockwise through the left h. and when arrive at the cortex, instead going to the right for to be enriched with its attributes, it quickly go down back to hippocampus. We can’t jump to a more elevated, holistic, cosmic, understanding and processing. I suspect that the effort in practices of meditation, like those Indian guys says they can reach nirvana, is the effort to push on the flow making it crossing the barrier of corpus callosum and entering into the right side. My second investigation is more “weird” yet. My formulas and models are suggesting that consciousness must be based in a more subtil network composed by biophotons, which our scientific instruments are not able to detect yet. There are too manny indications suggesting this hypothesis and, since consciousness must be a new system also based on the formula, I have indications about how is designed and evolving this network. If it will be proved existent, then, forget the problem brain/energy supply in relation to evolution and complexity of our mind, nature already has the solution: it is other kind of energy, free in space. ( ok, I told these things only as curiosity and since you like the issue about brain, maybe is your curiosity also). Cheers…

The R-complex reptilian inheritance and/or the ex-machine consciousness inheritance?

Thursday, August 31st, 2017

xxxxx

The R-Reptilian Complex

The R-Reptilian Complex

The reptilian brain inside the human brain?

I am sure we have often heard the expression that you have a reptilian brain. This comes from a literal interpretation of a theoretic concept developed in the 60s by American physician and neuroscientist Paul D. MacLean and as Wikipedia state: he “propounded it at length in his 1990 book The Triune Brain in Evolution’ ”  If you look it up, you will see why he has a lot to answer for in mythologizing this meme as it was he, who coined the terms ‘R’-complex/reptilian complex. ( source: diggingupthefuture.com )

This is more one detail revealing the big difference between the academic standard world view and Matrix/DNA world view, due two different approaches resulting in two different interpretations of same natural phenomenon. Before explaining this differences, let me remembering two others:

1) Freud invaded the basement of human brains and saw the beast there, because he found what he was previously and intentionally looking for. As Jewish minority in Austria, he wanted to show the white supremacists that they are inferior also. But, ok, we agree that our unconscious states preserves our animal inheritance, that the beast is there, the cause of competition among humans, but… what about the other obligatory duality complement – the angel? Humans also are able to altruism and cooperation among them. The Matrix/DNA, intentionally searching this angel, found it (the ordered face of Matrix/DNA formula modelling the brain);

2)  Darwin went to the a more primitive world and found what he was previously intentionally looking for: humans came from monkeys. His intention was due his face and body seemingly to monkey what produced the bullying from the college’s students. He was in need to prove them that they are monkeys also. Ok, we agree that the human body was inherited from some kind of monkeys’ cousin. But, humans are different from monkeys due very well expressed consciousness. So, what about consciousness? Matrix/DNA went to the jungle searching its origins and found it: while a human baby takes some months for expressing consciousness inherited from his/her creators ( the parents), the universal system produced by Matrix/DNA formula – which works like a genome – takes 13,8 billions years for expressing consciousness inherited from its creator. So, I don’t care that my body came from monkeys, I am my mind, and it came from a superior hierarchy.

Freud and Darwin made great discoveries moved by hate. Why hate sometimes finishes as benefit to human kind? These discoveries has amplified human knowledge. Because, for our evolution it is better to make some movements than standing inertial. And hate usually is moving, mixing things. But there is another force that produces movements, mixing things and producing great discoveries: love. The secret key is that all discoveries from hate puts us down (like, you are monkey, beast), while all discoveries from love puts us up (you are consciousness, angel).

Now we have the Neo-Darwinist Paul D. MacLean  that found the reptilian brain inside the human brain because he was previously intentionally looking for to prove the Darwinian theory of evolution. Good job, he got a great information for human knowledge, we agree that reptilians were ancestors of humans, so, they still are kept in our memory and anatomy. But,… what about the universal obligatory duality complement? What is it?

With Matrix/DNA formula at hands, asking what it tells about this issue, I had the intuition to the look carefully to the R-complex image, and then, searching the same image mentioned by a different intention, like, the medicine approach. And found this:

Cerebro-na-Forma-de-Espermatozoide

Showing a real brain, other neuroscientist like Dr. MacLean, Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, did it with a very different intention: telling to people a wonderful message about human grandiose, how we are beings of light. Dr. Jill can be seen in an astonishing video:

My stroke of insight | Jill Bolte Taylor (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyyjU8fzEYU&t=9s )

Dr. Paul discovery make us uncomfortable because remembering our most inferior conditions. For compensation, if you have time after reading this article, try to watch this video of Dr. Jill ( there is her book too), which make us feeling the opposite way because is a suggestion of our superior condition.

The Matrix/DNA world view is suggesting that humans are the tools used by a new transition of shapes of the universal system, a transition from biological system to consciousness system. And every past transitions was applied the same process: the transition event is triggered by an act of fecundation. At the astronomical building blocks, this “fecundation” occurs when a comet ( which seems like a spermatozoon) reaches the nuclear vortex; at human beings, the fecundation occurs when a spermatozoon reaches the center of an ovule. This is not merely coincidences: the formula has an ideal shape for each function/tool and if the environment does not oppose to it, Nature does not care in using the same shapes again and again.

If this hypothesis elaborated from reading the Matrix/DNA models is the right thing, the origins of consciousness should repeat the fecundation event and, if the materials of the environment does not resist to it, should repeat the same shapes of those formula’s universal functions. Then, the origins of consciousness should exhibits the image of an ovule being fecundated by a spermatozoon. This is just the image where the head is the egg, the brain is the amnion/placenta, the hippocampus region (which is the representative of F1 in the Matrix formula, the function of formation of a new body), is the spermatozoon head and the spermatozoon tail is the spinal cord tail…

So, I entered this research with a previous intention to prove the Matrix theory while looking for an up or good effect for humans, from the R-complex. Due this intention, seeing the above image, and more this one:

 

Cérebro-e-Medula-Espinhal

 I remembered this image:

 

Óvulo-Fecundado

 

Final conclusion:

A unique image – the brain and the spinal cord – is result of a unique universal natural method applied by Nature in two different time/space of evolution with the same final meaning: the origins of a new evolutionary stage, with its appropriated shape, of the universal system. The two events were: the origins of mammals and the origins of consciousness.

Nobody can denying that the head of the spinal cord inside the brain and the tail of the spinal cord outside the brain seems the image of the head of a spermatozoon inside the ovule and the tail of the spermatozoon outside the ovule. Now, everybody is free ( and this is dependable of one previous intention due its preferred world view) for choosing if it is randomness and merely a coincidence, or it is the obligatory result when a unique author ( Nature) is the responsible for the two phenomenon.

What do you decide? How Reptilian are YOU? Or how cosmic consciousness are you? The image from Dr. Paul MacLean is representative of a real fact, but it relates to far away past times; the image from Matrix/DNA is also representative of a real fact, but it relates to our nowadays and future. It suggests that we are 8 billion humans which existence means half-conscious genes building – with more billions or trillions of conscious genes in this Universe - our unique and final body of a cosmic consciousness that will born at the day of The Big Birth. But, be carefully: as Dr. Paul and all Neo-Darwinists as me, a matrixist, we are human beings, and humans, with this little poor brain and limited sensors, are not able yet to reach the right interpretation of the real final Truth. One theory has less errors than other, we don’t know which… But for doing judgements, we need be careful that we have no previous intentions.

(Note: The fact that evolution produced reptilians was due a big mistake of our ancestors (maybe the fishes or birds?) trying to accommodate in a provisory shape in a provisory environment, threathing to stop their evolution, becoming the most competitive reptilian. How Nature has reacted and fixed the mistake is very surprising and you can know it at the article here: From Reptiles to Mammals: An Heroic Act? – http://theuniversalmatrix.com/en-us/articles/?p=106  )