Archive for the ‘Consciousness’ Category

O video das informacoes do corpo se extendendo como informacoes do campo magnetico de todo o Universo, de Nassim Haramein

Friday, August 16th, 2019


Muito importante voltar a ver porque se por a luz que encontrei no lugar do “magnetic field”, o resto fica bem similar.

Nassim Haramein – The Field of Boundless Information – Quantum University

Consciencia: Qualia, Quale, Qualia Apace: O melhor PDF

Saturday, August 3rd, 2019


Este PDF vai merecer um cuidadoso estudo devido a quantidade de informações pela teoria acadêmica atual.

From the Phenomenology to the Mechanisms of Consciousness: Integrated Information Theory 3.0

Debate at REDDIT : Why some scientists believe the universe is conscious

Friday, August 2nd, 2019



Why some scientists believe the universe is conscious

Obs: Meus posts no REDDIT foram removidos por um moderador. A desgraça dos cérebros dominados pelos meios processos de pensamentos apenas do hemisfério esquerdo do cérebro impera no REDDIT também, alias, como era de se esperar, não se poderia esperar outra coisa, desde que os filósofos ali reunidos vieram todos do meio acadêmico dominante nesta era, doutrinados pela filosofia virtual e desconhecedores da filosofia naturalista. Por isso, 90% da população mundial, ou seja, 7 bilhões de seres humanos, continuarão a serem torturados sob os atuais predadores construtores desta academia, que os mantem com sua ciência e tecnologia enganosa e tendenciosa sob o ciclo da miséria tendo suas vidas perdidas, desperdiçadas, porque não podem evoluir seus cérebros exorcizando-se dos instintos para presas. Mas eu salvei os comentários e os estou postando aqui.
Minhas respostas:
MatrixDNA - 8/3/19

The Matrix/DNA Theory suggest a third alternative for existence of consciousness. Interpreting the Universe from a biological viewpoint, rather than Physics, it arrives to a whole model where the history of 9 months of human embryogenesis is a copy of the history of 13,8 billion years of this material chain of causes and effects that began with the Big Bang. The Universe – this aglomerate of galaxies – can not be conscious, since it is not a working system, it is merely a mass of sub-system, and works like a placenta or amniotic liquid. But, the theory has found that the essence of all living things – the DNA – is merely the biological shape evolved from an essence that is the building block of galaxies and atoms, a formula called Matrix/DNA. And later we found that this universal formula were not created by atoms either, it was encrypted as the anatomy of light waves, like that emitted at the Big Bang.

There is no evolution of Universe, there is the evolution of something inside the Universe, like there is no evolution of a pregnant woman’s body, but there is the evolution of the embryo body inside it. it is not the brain of an embryo that creates consciousness, it was encrypted in the fetus, in the morula, since fecundation and beyond; so, it is not the human species’ brain that created consciousness, it was encrypted as potential not expressed in galaxies, atoms… and light waves. It is a little bit different than panpsychism.

The quantum foam is the membrane that separates this Universe/amnion from what the still unknown thing existing outside. By this membrane there are changes: the universe imports waves of light containing the genetic code – or formula for natural material systems – and exports substance of consciousness.

Embryogenesis of humans takes 7 or 8 months for expressing consciousness. Embryogenesis of the ex-universal thing being produced inside this Universe takes 13, 8 billion years for expressing consciousness. What’s the problem? It is merely a relativistic issue, since that for universes the scale of time is astronomic.


Ptscholar - posted at 8/3/19

Well, it makes sense. The entire universe functions as it is suposed to function and since obviously there isn’t any personal God overseeing all, the universe must take care of itself but how could it have the knowledge to continously do such? The answer, the universe is aware of itself. I believe the problem is not whether that is true, but rather how that happens and I bet that, once we discover this how, human life will change drastically.

MatrixDNA - post at 8/3/19

No, it does not make sense. This Universe is not a system, it has no nucleus and connected interacting parts, it is a mass of subsystems (galaxies), and messy mass can not be conscious. What we know is that something inside this Universe, when it was 13,8 billion years old, and existing at Earth surface, was very complex due evolution, and began to develop a fetus of consciousness, which still has no open eyes to see its substance, shape and body.

The unique natural, pure, rational hypothesis that we can get from what we know comes from observing the universal Nature, searching if there is some similar event/phenomena. And there is one. Human embryogenesis. An embryo at 6 or 8 months suddenly begins to express consciousness. But is not the brain of the embryo that creates consciousness, it was coming from outside its bubble/womb, from the parents, living outside its “universe”. So, the rational way to think about this question is making comparisons between the human placenta composed by cells and the universe composed by galaxies, between the human expression of consciousness at embryogenesis and the thing inside the universe expressing consciousness, which can be spread in the galaxies, throughout the entire placenta, by manny other life forms. Any other hypothesis will be appeal to phantasies.

I agree that is no God overseeing all, because I am watching here that parents can not oversee all that is happenings inside the womb of the pregnant mother. And agree that human life will change drastically when we will discover the true, but not due humans inventing a new way of life and so, merely correcting what we are doing wrong because instead asking the great questions directly to Mother Nature as a humble naturalist philosopher, we have been driving by imaginations like deism and materialist atheism.

We, humans, are 8 billion half-conscious genes building the finger of the foot of the embryo that is being built by billions of our other genes-brothers spread in this Universe, of the being composed by consciousness substance that will born at the day of the Big Birth… (maybe). The Universe will go from the Big bang to the Big Crunsh – as goes all placentas – but we will go from the Big Bang to the our Big Birth.

1 point·1 day ago·edited 1 day ago

I’m not going to lie, that was rather confusing. Not so much because I don’t understand the topic but because many claims you brought up were in nature confusing, especially your association to human embryone.

That might have been my fault but with that said, I’ll explore just one particular point, and that is precisely the one of the original post, universal consciousness. You said the universe being aware of itself doesn’t make sense because

This Universe is not a system, it has no nucleus and connected interacting parts, it is a mass of subsystems (galaxies), and messy mass can not be conscious.

Do you have any proof of that? Not that the universe seems chaotic, that’s been hinted at already by our very limited human lenses, but that the universe is just that and nothing else. No is the answer isn’t it? For even if sometimes the universe does seem chaotic, upon further inspection for some reason it always becomes ordered, always. That order may ultimately be the product of our own minds but since we know that the universe doesn’t need you or me to exist – it exists regardless of us – that is a great indicator that the order we experience actually comes from it. Since this order is, well, too ordered, it must come from an intelligent source, so like I said, the real question is what source is that and how it operates, not whether the incredible harmony present in nature is the product of a thoughtless and mindless gamble or of an intelligent unit.

MatrixDNA - 1 point· just today – 8/6/19

I understand that this seems confused to you, it is about a worldview that you never read about, and written in poor English. Do you have any proof that the Universe is a system? A working system? Where is the nucleus, which are the parts with specific systemic functions, how are they connected? I don’t know any evidence for that. Being a mass of subsystems, like a soup, does not means it must be chaotic, neither that there are working evolving order, only that is under thermodynamic equilibrium. Then, once time more, there is the similarity with human embryogenesis that I pointed out: the amnion liquid inside the egg also is not chaotic, it is under mechanic equilibrium. And the placenta around…

What is the source? If you search at my website, you will see how a single light wave contains the code for building all natural systems known in this Universe, till living systems. The code is not a message encrypted into a film, it is merely the internal anatomy of a light wave that develops when the light wave propagates into time/space. Its “organs”, or “parts” are the seven different shapes of frequencies/vibrations. So, a natural universal light wave emitted at the Big Bang works like a God genome, but, not magical, it is merely a kind of natural genetic/computational process. It is not that the Universe – as a agglomerate of galaxies – is becoming conscious, but, something inside it, developed from a light wave that is a working system in itself, that build the atom system, the astronomic systems, the biological systems is now building a conscious system. Ok, I can’t proof it yet as nobody can’t proof any worldview, merely i think mine is more rational based on reality I see here and now. Cheers…


Esta questão deriva do seguinte artigo:


“… in a universe governed by uncertainty principles rather than hard facts, what is the “material” in materialism? There is no good materialist theory of consciousness; far from it, an article in Chronicles of Higher Education last year labeled the current research a “bizarre” field of science.

Outros artigos links citados:

The universe may be conscious, say prominent scientists


Próximo post como abertura de novo tópico:

Com este post eu provavelmente serei banido do REDDIT e assim levarei a politica do REDDIT para ser debatida em outros canais de comunicação. 90% da população humana, ou seja, 7 bilhões de pessoas ainda mantendo o instinto de presas estão sendo neste momento torturados e impedidos de evoluírem por esta politica de instinto predador com sua produzida ciência e tecnologia desumanas como armas de dominação para continuarem a dominar a especie tal como as religiões deístas dominaram a academia intelectual outrora. O problema esta na forma como o cérebro modelado na passagem do macaco para o homo sapiens foi dividido em duas partes opostas entre si e configura as conexões neuroniais de maneira que estes cérebros não poderiam processar informações da realidade natural que exigiria um cérebro completo, integrado. Se tiveres curiosidade procure meus desenhos da anatomia cerebral e como os circuitos do cérebro dividido funcionam diferente dos circuitos do cérebro integrado. Portanto não existem meios de outra visão de mundo produzida por outro cérebro num nível mais integrado sequer se comunicar com os moderadores do REDDIT e por isso desisto. Mas insisto neste ultimo post me dirigindo a comunidade de filósofos aqui reunidos para sondar se existe algum amante da filosofia que esteja em processo de integração cerebral, que tentaria ao menos entender algo do que estou trazendo, para iniciar-mos uma comunidade `a parte.

Existe a filosofia virtual – praticada aqui neste canal do REDDIT e que vem dos filósofos gregos frequentadores da corte imperial debatendo no reino do imaginário se recusando a arregaçar as mangas, por a mão na massa da realidade natural do povo la’ fora da corte, para testar suas conclusões virtuais -  e a naturalista, sendo que a naturalista pode entender algo da virtual mas a virtual não pode entender nada, nem a linguagem, da naturalista. Imagine uma sala cheia de pessoas onde a maioria são de filósofos acadêmicos debatendo animadamente em inglês e no meio tem um pequeno grupo de índios falando apenas entre si no seu inglês influenciado pelo idioma nativo debatendo sua visão de mundo animadamente. Os índios vão estar atrapalhando o debate acadêmico, funcionando como ruídos na comunicação, os acadêmicos desprezam os indios e acreditam que sua visao do mundo esta totalmente errada, e darao seu jeito de separar o grupo, ou calar suas vozes expulsando-os para outra sala.

Pois meus posts removidos daqui são as vozes dos índios que foram expulsos da sala. Porque na juventude universitária eu estudei a filosofia acadêmica tendo meu cérebro modelado por ela e entendo algo dela, mas depois vivi 7 anos na selva que remodelou meu cérebro, aprendi a filosofia naturalista dos nativos e comparando as duas construí uma terceira visão do mundo, e conclui que para a evolução de todos os 8 bilhões de humanos ( predadores e presas), eles tem que aprenderem esta terceira visão. Mas assim como fui expulso da selva pelos nativos devido eu falar em sua linguagem de forma incompreensível, sou expulso também pelos nativos da academia dominando a moderação no REDDIT.

Para o moderador deve ter sido torturante tentar ler meu post num inglês quase incompreensível. Mas esta incompreensão é causada mais pelo desconhecimento da interpretação do mundo diferente da sua é – a qual tende a desprezar outras -  do que pelos erros na gramatica. Ele não sabe que se houver outros participantes com conexão neuronial diferente se interessariam em decifrar o conteúdo, e assim ele pode estar banindo um grupo, sem o saber e jamais vai entender. Nos poucos minutos que este post ficara no ar aqui, esperarei se alguém com cérebro funcionando similar ao meu se manifeste para criarmos um grupo separado.


A native from the jungle searching here someone interested in a debate between our two different worldview and philosophies

With this post I will probably be banned from REDDIT and thus I will lead the REDDIT politics to be debated on other communication channels. 90% of the human population, ie 7 billion people, still holding the prey instinct, are now being tortured and prevented from evolving their brains by this predatory instinct policy with its inhumane produced science and technology as weapons of domination to continue to dominate the prey, sort of as how the deist religions dominated the intellectual academy at Middle Age. The problem is how the brain was modeled in the “ape-to-homo sapiens passage”. It was split into two opposing parts which state configures the neuronal connections and its produced mindset, so that these brains can not process information from natural reality that would require a complete, integrated brain. If you’re curious look at my drawings of brain anatomy and how divided brain circuits work differently from integrated brain circuits. So there is no way for another worldview produced by another brain at a more integrated level to even communicate with REDDIT moderators and so I give up. But I insist in this last post directing myself to the community of philosophers gathered here to probe if there is any philosophy lovers who are in the process of brain integration, who would at least try to understand something of what I am bringing, for to start a community apart.

There is the virtual philosophy – practiced here on this REDDIT channel, which comes from the Greek philosophers attending the imperial court debating in the realm of the imaginary, refusing to roll up their sleeves, putting their hands on the mass of natural reality where was living the people outside the court, to test its virtual conclusions – and the naturalist, since the naturalist can understand something of the virtual but the virtual can understand nothing, nor the language, of the naturalist. Imagine a room full of people where most are academic philosophers debating animatedly in English while in the middle there is a small group of Indians speaking only to each other in their native language-influenced by English, debating their worldview excitedly. The Indians will be disrupting the academic debate, working as noises in communication, the academics despise the Indians and believe that their view of the world is totally wrong, and will give their way of separating the group, or silence their voices by expelling them to another room. .

My posts removed from here are the voices of the Indians who were expelled from the room. Because in my college youth I studied academic philosophy having my brain modeled on it and I understand something of it, but then I lived 7 years in the jungle that reshaped my brain, learned the naturalistic philosophy of the natives and grasping different signals from that biosphere, and by comparing the two I built a third worldview, and I have conclude that for the evolution of all 8 billion humans (predators and preys), they have to learn this third vision. But just as I was kicked out of the jungle by the natives because I speak their language incomprehensibly due an unknown world view, so I am kicked out by the academy natives dominating REDDIT moderation.

For the moderator it must have been torturous to try to read my post in almost incomprehensible English. But this misunderstanding is caused more by ignorance of a different interpretation of the world, other than yours is – which tends to scorn others – rather than errors in grammar. He does not know that if there are other participants with a different neuronal connection they would be interested in deciphering my content, so he may be banishing a group without knowing it and will never understand. In the few minutes this post will be in the air here, I will wait if someone with a brain working similar to mine comes forward for us to create a separate group.

The Brave New World or The World of Free and Evolving Consciousness?

Friday, August 2nd, 2019




by Margaret Heffernan

My comments:

Louis Morelli - Posted at 8/2/19

The Brave New World with happy human bodies but, stupid, or the risk-cost adventure world, with less happy bodies but growing free consciousness? I think she is desperately trying to lead us to the second alternative. If my theoretical results are right, I discovered the evolutionary link between biological and cosmological evolution, and this link is explaining this issue very well. Our body and life in general was created by a kind of perfect astronomic machine, described by Newtonian mechanics, which modelled our genes to be the exactly reproduced offspring of this machine. So, we are being driven unconsciously to the Brave New World. Who is getting all informations about the external world today, which has been amplified to the astronomic dimensions and quanta microcosm? Not the human natural sensors connected to a biological brain which is being the egg nurturing this novelty that is consciousness, with its attributes like emotions, feelings, creativity. All new data is coming from mechanistic hard sensors connected to an electro-mechanic brain as the egg nurturing the mechanistic AI. That’s what our genetic was modelled for, by our direct non-biological ancestor: the whole biosphere in a total state of mechanistic stupid order, humans as a kind of privileged boss piece of it. This reproductive process is no good for nurturing consciousness, this galaxy is totally stupid.

Consciousness, from the sphere of beyond this Universe, nust be desperate too, like her, if it can watching us now. If my theoretical formula of Matrix/DNA is right – the universal genetics – this galaxy is not the creator of our essence, merely a bad transcription error with severe mutation. I think that we should to seat together and analysing this serious issue, before it being too later… I know that humans will have difficult for understanding what I am saying, because, I am supported by an investigation made only by a human biological brain.

O engodo na onda moderna sobre meditação

Saturday, July 27th, 2019


Existe uma grande onda no Ocidente, milhares de gurus e websites aparecendo a cada dia, enganando o povo, se aproveitando dos modernos mal-estares físicos e mentais decorrentes do stress, tentando “ensinar” as praticas orientais, budistas, de meditação. Uma cientista pesquisadora americana escreveu um longo ensaio se queixando disso, que apos seguir os gurus e praticar tais meditações ficou pior ou mais confusa do que estava antes. O que aconteceu com ela fe prova do que venho tentando alertar de que estas praticas estão erradas, muito diferente da técnica que uso baseada numa total diferente visão do mundo. O ensaio foi levado para o REDDIT para debate entre filósofos, cujo link vai abaixo e onde postei um comentário. Tambem abaixo o link para o artigo ensaio da pesquisadora.


The problem of mindfulness: while presenting itself as value-neutral, it is actually loaded with troubling assumptions about the self and the cosmos

Posted by u/voltimand - 7/26/19)

Baseado no artigo/ensaio:

The problem of mindfulness

Meu comentario postado no REDDIT em 7/27/19

MatrixDNA - at 7/27/19

After reading the article I am sure the author, neither Buddhism, does not know what’s mindfulness, they never reached it. They are talking about self, ego awareness, thinking that it is mindfulness, as the state of pure consciousness. Ego is what we feel as “I”, a physical system link between the human infant state of consciousness and the human physical body. I am thinking if we isolate this link, what else is resting? Like in the anesthesia or like an irrational animal body… which is a kind of conscious or ego neutrality, like a machine. What is the advantage getting it? The hindu nation and people are the answer: 1 billion people under the poverty through thousands of years. Is this what the Americans and Westerners want? “Nirvana” is the extreme selfish expression, like creationists believing that they are safe and prosperous reaching the spiritual state that would aligning them with Christ… and the others will burn in the hell…
My meditation technique is result of mixing three different world views: the scenes described by natives from Amazon under brain altered state by their hallucinogenic beverages, which are equal the “mystical” scenes described in Asia 5 or 10 thousands years ago; plus the Eastern picture of the “aura”, composed by two moving “serpents” enrolled in spirals having between them six “stars or chakras”, which, I discovered with the Amazon’s natives, is merely the two streams and six nitrogenous bases of DNA’s unit of information inside the neurons; plus the universal formula for systems, as the template of brain’s anatomy. It has worked very well for me. So my position here is like Bill Nye advocating evolutionary science against creationism and my suggestion is: Does not fall in confusion like the author, do not lose your time with this kind of mystical and wrong meditation, we have a great culture and nation, we can not be a new India, and I am telling about economy and quality of life. Meditation is good, it is necessary in this stressful modern world, but there is not better teacher about how to meditate than yourself, based on your own world view, what yours instincts and intuitions says to you. At meditation state you are entering into a loneliness dimension, so, go alone and by yourself in it. It would be good if you search the universal formula of natural systems that is the template of the brain and shows how the chemical/energetic flows of thoughts runs inside the brain mimicking the natural systemic circuit, because with practice we can begin to learn how to stop, avoid or drive the thoughts throughout the left, the right hemispheres integrating them with the neocortex. It is a very complex issue which Buddhists and these teachers has no idea about…
Textos esparsos nao publicados que seriam incluidos no post:
I have improved 100% my life since I got my model of meditation, totally new, totally different than anything I have saw. How you will work yours thoughts if you have no idea what’s and how the chemical/energetic circuits of thoughts runs inside the brain? How do you stop, avoid, or drive the circuit of a thought if you don’t know the brain map and the avenies on which the thought is running? But, this is a technical issue, out of topic in a philosophy forum, I will not extend about it. Then, the OP says about ” troubling assumptions about the self and the cosmos “, which is a philosophic issue. For beginning to understand what is mindfulness – in the sense of consciousness, not the ego awareness which puts consciousness aside – humans should have a good knowledge about self and cosmos, which we don’t have. My totally different life’s experience from everyone else lead me to an interpretation of self and Cosmos totally different than anything that was written, so, my interpretation of mindfulness and my meditation practices are different. I learned that all those images saw by the founders of Buddhism, The Bible narrative of the paradise, the symbol of I Ching the “aura” composed by chakras and kundalini, are merely flashes inside the brain coming from the DNA at the center of neurons. They are registered memory of our non-biological real ancestors, like atoms and galaxies, in what we call junk-DNA. I watch natives i n Amazon jungle with altered brain’s state due their allucimnogenos descibing same imagens said 5.000 years ago in Asia. They describes scenes of the building blocks of galaxies – which is almost a perfect machine very good for our ancestor – but, if you draw the scenes in a paper, you see a metaphorical narraticve of physical reality exactly like that in the Bible. They describes scenes of two moving serpents enrolled into spirals having between them six stars. The founders of these Eatern religions said they are kundaline and chackras. It is not, it is merely the two streams of DNA and the stars are the nitrogenuous bases between them. The symbols of I Ching are merely the drawning of a universal formula as templeate of all natural systems, registered into the DNA becaise each unit of DNA’s information is hust this working system. This is about philosophy, showing how the ancient ) and amlmost the modern also) world view are totally wrong, so, our understanding about self and cosmos are wrong. How you get mindfulness based on wrong assumptions?……………….I created a new process of meditation and I think it is was very good for me about health, creativity, behavior. It was resullting from mixing the eastern worldview ( chakras, kundaline after discovering that this whole picture is all about the picture of DNA, in some way broght to mind by the DNA in the neurons) with Amazon natives under altered stte of mind due their jungle’s allucinogenous. I think this practice has changed my normal human neuronial connections, and the new state lead me to discover what I called as “universal formula of all natural systems”. Since the brain is a system and its anatomy fits perfectly with the formula, the flow of a thought must be equal the flow of the energy/information running inside the formula systemic circuit. Then, came hundred of surprisingly suggestions about what are thoights, how they works in the brain, what is mind, how is the connections mind/thoughts/body, etc. Since I can’t prove the formula is real, all I have I consider as theory to be tested. What I could doing is to teach other persons this technique for having more samples testing it, but I never did it because it would take too much time for explaining everything. I think that people here in the commnts are very interested in this issue of mildfulness, so, what I am working in as novelty coild be at least very curious to them. I will try mentioning only 10% of these novelties, but, please, these are temporary results of an ongoing investigation, do not take it as my affirmation:…….What are thoughts in a chemical-energetic discription……………No human can reach mindfulness by while, because our brain is not working as a whole system. It is divided into three parts: left and right hemisphere and a central cortex and no thought can mimick the systemic circuit integrating the three parts.

Whats the meaning of life

Tuesday, March 26th, 2019


Question posted at Yahoo Answers and answer by us below…

TheUniversalMatrixThe Matrix/DNA posted at 4/5/19
We are 8 billion like half-conscious genes carrying on and nurturing inside our head-eggs and brain-placenta one genetic characteristic of a cosmic consciousness baby which is being building by millions of others genes at other worlds inside this Universe. We are facing hard times due two problems:
1) Our remotely ancestor – which means ourselves when in primitive forms – made the big mistake of building a kind of paradise from its own body becoming a self-closed system, closing the doors to its own evolution, refusing to accomplish his mission that is delivering its genetic information. Tis kind of free-will triggers entropy, then, the closed system was fragmented and falling at Earth for beginning everything again and correcting the soul from this sin;
2) Every new evolved shape of cosmic genes is a cycle divided into two phases; the first one is “eggs out”, like our biological shape came from bacterials till reptiles: the second phase is “eggs in”, when the new being is protected and nurtured. This new universal systemic shape here at Earth – consciousness – still is a fetus, and as egg out, that’s why we faces tragedies, predators, etc.
Ok, no human knows which is the real final meaning of life and this world, maybe there is no meaning, but, you can choose your own bet. I described above the meaning suggested by Matrix/DNA Theory, which, I think, is the best, most logical and rational facts based that I know.

Why All Finger Prints Are Different?

Wednesday, October 4th, 2017


This “debate” is here copied for futher development:


The Metaphysical or Spiritual reason we are unique and different from all other humans

Gamer G - 10/4/2017

Identical twins? They come from the same fertilized egg and share the same genetic blueprint. To a standard DNA test, they are indistinguishable. Even identical twins do not have matching fingerprints.We have been created or formed or evolved very unique in the world currently we are unique among 7.5billion population.

No identical twins even have same finger prints. It can never ever be a natural selection. Science can never convince for how or why the finger prints are unique.There is someone behind the scene which we cannot see. Some ppl call him as Alien and some ppl call him as “God”. But to be frank many ppl like to hear the word Alien but not God. Even some religion believes that their God will come, every words we speak are recorded and everything we did will be explicitly shown before all and their God will give judgement to entire humanity, not according to religion. Could be an unknown fact by now like how baby in the womb doesn’t know the outside world, it might think mothers womb is the only world there is nothing outside world like it can crawl, walk… That’s why we are unique is one factor to be considered. Every events are recorded. If universe came out of nothing then why can’t this be possible.Men do not want to hear about God or hell because it’s scary they have to lead a very holy life, it’s very difficult so they themselves convince to pick that there is no God, no judgement and no punishment:-) though science cannot disprove God

Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Gamer G: “No identical twins even have same finger prints.”

This difference is product of a natural process occurring at cosmological evolution and inherited by biological evolution. If you are curious about see it at (it is Portuguese, sorry)

and the very extensive collection of articles about this issue at
You must see the picture at the end of the first link above and the picture of Matrix/DNA formula.
But,… if you want to believe that your God is behind this natural mechanism, we did not find the mechanism’s source before the Big Bang, so, there is space for the possibility of your God. Now, please, read the explanation we found about “why we are unique among 8 billion people”. And what is the reality behind the account of Genesis, in Bible:

About 10 billion years ago, we were in shape of an ancestor non-biological, which was not conscient yet. This ancestor was carrying on the hardware and the software aspects of all natural systems. The hardware is composed by matter (space substance or dark matter) plus the energy resulted from the friction when light waves propagates among dark matter. The software is a formula like a genetic code made of light wave which came at the Big Bang, or before it.
You know that the supreme goal of matter is eternal inertia. But when this matter is impregnated with energy, the eternal goal becomes the “thermodynamic equillibrim”, because the supreme goal of energy alone is moving at light speed. Thermodynamic equillibrium is the balance between high speed and inertia.
Meanwhile, the supreme goal of the software is to reproduce the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang. This universe is merely a kind of placenta composed by galaxies and inside it there is a universal natural system being nurtured and developing, towards the final shape of its “creator”. In another words, the universal software is a genetic code imprinted as light wave and the final shape will be something like pure cosmic consciousness.
It happens that this ancestral (which was the building block of astronomical systems and our LUCA – the Last Universal Common Ancestor) became a closed system, as described by the formula’s diagram at my website. This is bad, it is a sin, because it is an interruption of the cosmological genetic process. Then. acted entropy, which fragmented the closed system into its bits-information, they falls at planets surface and lift up as biological systems, aka, living things.
This entropic event has a very smart purpose: you take a big sin, breaks it in smallest bits. Each bit will be a fraction of the big sin. Now, you put all bits ( it can be 8 billion) in a new environment where they will need fight for survival, so, expressing its bad tendency as part of the big sin. Each bit will see in all other bits the face of the ancestor sin and will hate them. Doing it, each bits will hate and exorcizing from itself its part of the sin. Final, you have the whole creature purified, and as opened system, ready to continuing the universal goal.
This event happened about 10 billion years ago and it is registered into our DNA memory. The DNA is at the center of neurons. Some altered state of mind can produce flashes of this event, but the human seeing it will not understand, if he/she does not know about galaxies, DNA, genetic code, etc. This flashes were saw by the founder fathers of the biggest religions. The Abrahamic religion described the picture of the anatomy of our closed system ancestral as the Eden Paradise, and the entropic event as The Fall. Any question, I am here…


Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Finger prints must be modelled by golden ratio of phi number

The links above explains the origins and evolution of human hands, but does not mention the differences of finger prints. Which can be explained by extensive articles here:

I have never thought about this interesting detail, thank you, I will research it. But, at first glance, looking the Matrix/DNA formula for an explanation, I think that it is related to the phenomena produced by the phy number. Every organism, every human is unique, as explained above: we are different, diversified copies of a unique template, the Matrix/DNA formula. In this formula there is a systemic specific function called F5, which is responsible for recycling astronomical systems and reproducing biological systems, as well copying the left face of that formula into a right face. The location point of this function at the formula circuitry is exactly 1,618… which is the known phi number. So, it is explained why all bi-lateral symmetry and the Fibonacci ratio is produced by what we call phi number. Since that all organisms are unique copy of that formula, each organism express a specific state of the formula for building its hands. Specific states has a vibrational/frequency specific level which produces a specific phi number ratio. This specific ratio is what produces a specific ratio among the stripes of finger prints.


Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Why finger prints has no evolutionary or “divine” purpose.

Gamer G : “Everything should have some purpose. Including our unique finger prints”

Sorry, I am discovering now that finger prints has no purpose. It is a trait ( a detail) existent at the building blocks of DNA. Since the first cell need to move, our DNA sent to the extremities of the cell a copy of the building block, which began building the cilia and its bacterial motor. While the cell evolved to multicellular, monkeys, humans, the cilia evolved due organisms using the disposable mechanisms existent in the building block at the extremity. Those disposable mechanisms that were not required can be expressed or not, since that does not prejudices the functions of the system. The mechanism related to the lists of finger prints were very well expressed when the formula of the building block was building astronomical systems: it has produced the astronomical bodies’ superposed layers, from nucleus to periphery. Like Earth, we have the internal and external nucleus, the mantle, the tectonic plate, the crust. It happens that each end of each finger is the tool related to each specific astronomical body, so, due the mechanism being stronger expressed at our ancestor, it continued to be expressed, even that our organism did not required it. And my thesis about the golden ratio between the strips is scientifically falsifiable, maybe those working with finger prints identification has noticed it.

If Matrix/DNA world view will be proved the best theory we have, there is purpose in universal evolution. It suggests that inside this universe is occurring a genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that produced it. In the words of creationists it could be meaning that the purpose of universal evolution is producing the son of their God. But,… finger prints in humans has no evolutionary purpose.


Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Gamer G: “Our unique dna complex coding or finger prints (like bar code) these coding languages should have been compiled by someone else”

The problem, Sir, is that there is no DNA complex coding. Humanity has 8 billion humans, no one identical to other, composing tribes, groups, nations. Humanity is a creation from the DNA. It makes sense to say that each human ( the building block) or the group they belong to ( genes) composes a code? Of course, not.

The wrong concept that DNA is a code is due humans missing the knowledge about what really is DNA’s building blocks. They are billions of diversified copies of a unique complete working system, which is a functional formula. As humans are diversified copies of a unique system, the human species.
It happens that this system encrypted into DNA’s building blocks is coming from cosmological evolution, as building blocks of galaxies, atoms systems and finally, we discovered it as a single light wave. If you pay the right attention to the electromagnetic spectrum, you will see that a light wave is almost a living thing, it has all parts with all systemic functions, and it propagates by the same sequence that our body grows and ages – a process or force called life’s cycle. And we don’t know which is the source of this universal natural light wave that contains “the code”.
If there is a God with supernatural power (I don’t know), he didn’t created the code later when the universe was 10 billion years old and only for biological system. It launched the code in shape of light at the Big Bang… or before it. If there is an natural ex-universe conscious being, he launched the code equal the human parents launches their genome for creation. If the mysteriously being launched the code in shape of light, it means that his body contains light.

The differences among human beings are due the crossover of two genome that is coming with specific prior experiences plus the way that the external world reacts over he/she. The reason of differences between DNA’s building blocks is the same. There is no code. Not a code created inside this Universe by some intelligent supernatural being. It is possible that, instead genetic natural process, the ex-machine being before the universe launched the light wave applying intelligence, but, then, is was not inside this Universe.


The difference between the scholar “biological” and the natural biology

Louis Charles Morelli - 10/04/2017

Gamer G: ” U might be from biological background to provide details of research”

No, Sir, sorry. If you refers to “biological” as the human produced scientific field called Biology, I have no more this kind of biological background than about 50 years reading scholar books of biology by my own. But, if you refer to “biological” as the real natural phenomena of natural systems made off carbon and water, yes, I have some unusual background, since I spent at least seven years studying the Amazon jungle biosphere.

In the jungle I perceived constant patterns which were pointing towards atoms and astronomical systems also. This lead me to elaborate a new world view. If I had the scholar biological background I would be taught to accept the shollar world view, like the Darwinian theory. Or/and a religious worldview. But, I am skeptical included in relation to this new worldview, that is why I am testing it against real natural facts and searching debates with different worldviews for to learn more or correcting my possible mistakes. I am sure only one thing: no human is able to discover the right final world view. Nobody can understand the thru about a system (this Universe) standing inside it.




Evolution of the Brain? What is Science Fiction, The Constraints From Real Science and the Theory from Matrix/DNA

Saturday, September 16th, 2017


Evolution of the Brain? What is Science Fiction, The Constraints From Real Science and the Theory from Matrix/DNA

Robert Beckendorff – 9/14/2017

All Biology is FLAWED in some way or another. It is up to MAN to take what Mother Nature has dished up and make adjustments and improvements. Eugenics is the future, guaranteed. Piss on all the religious idiots who oppose Human Progress. Micro-Bionics is the FUTURE: Soon enough, the entire brain and nervous system, will be enhanced with micro-chip and micro-robotic systems, the Cardio-Vascular system just the same. As humans become less dependant upon flawed raw biology, life will become much richer and longer. A whole new man made level of beauty and fitness will emmerge. Biology will be employed in our computers; Bio-Electronics will be employed in our bodies. We are about to convert Raw Biology into Man Made Bio-Technology. NO one can stop it. To Hell with all the religious fanatics, the all their BS about the “End Times”.

Louis Charles Morelli – Robert Beckendorff – ” … flawed raw biology…”

 I don’t blame Nature due flawed Biology because it seems clear that there is a cycle “chaos>order>transcendence>degeneration>chaos>order…” so, it seems Nature has three states, and this Earth biosphere emerged in state of chaos. What you are wishing about our future is merely the natural sequence, we are going to an ordered state. Our biggest problem is the human inheritance of three animal instincts – instinct for big predator, middle predator, and prey – which are product of chaos and we still carries on these in our genetics and modeling our psyche. So, if we produces high technology now, it will not be used for the well of the whole humanity but will be appropriated by the 1% as big predators against the other two class. Preys – the big mass of 90% of the population are inertial, they don’t care about human progress, only food, which is their way to extinction due overpopulation. So, if we don’t self-exorcise ourselves from these three instincts and don’t make efforts for others doing it, high technology will lead us to worst scenario: The Brave New World ( where everybody are stupid in the paradise) under the government of the Big Brother ( where included the human minds are not free).
Robert Beckendorff 2 days ago
Humans have always been ruled over and controlled by a tiny power above them. This is the natural way of things. Those who have control of knowledge in a scoiety, have the power to rule over the masses, and they do so usually in a benevolent way. Today, there is no excuse for being ignorant. We have instant global sharing, and an Internet that can settle any dispute, and answer any question.
Louis Charles Morelli 2 days ago
Robert Beckendorff – Are you a hard work in construction or 12 hours/day in a factory, as 7 billion humans works or are dependent of these workers and their misery wage? And still you can pay a college where one gets such knowledge? My friend, you don’t know the third world or the reality of the “projects” at the first world and these is 90% of humans. And for your sake, it is a tactic among the big predators of the third world that the population must be kept ignorant.
redlegagent 1 day ago
Try not to allow science FICTION to override real science.  It is one thing to merely deliver a micro-electrical pulse along a nerve track or to an area of the brain in a crude fashion so as to stimulate a response – as the nervous system is already established and you are merely mimicking energy transference.  It is another thing altogether to attempt to interface with human memories in a coherent fashion which may originate from different areas of the brain and for which we are not able to understand right now.  The same for attaching synthetic parts to our bodies – again via that already pre-established system.  So I would not hold my breath just yet waiting for human/technological hybrids as we clearly have a lot to learn yet.  Our brains are as good as nature could make them.  While science fiction loves to blather on about humans supposedly developing more advanced brain capacity – our current brains already use a lot of the resources our bodies can provide.  To increase brain capacity would require a fundamental re-working of our bodies to deliver the additional oxygen and nutrients required to sustain said higher functioning.  In short – we would over-tax our organ systems which could not deliver the necessary metabolic elements without compromising themselves in the process as our brains are already “hogs” who steal a sizeable chunk of our oxygen etc. from our blood supply.
eeeaten – 1 day ago
apparently i’m somewhat more optimistic than you three. i see no reason to ascribe laws of cycles or instincts to our fates, and i doubt these are even true. newton’s second law implies a natural move towards disorder, while specific systems within the universe may or may not have increasing complexity depending on local energy sources (eg a star). in regard to humanity and instincts, we have a tendency toward increasing civility and decreasing violence (pinker’s better angels is a great read on this), suggesting humanity is capable of creating a future for itself without tyranny or even war. i don’t think human-technological augmentation is far away at all (check out ray kurzweil’s predictions). we already have infinite-information devices in front of our eyes every day: it’s a small step for these to be accessed directly by our brains – limited only by (fast-evolving) technology. as ever, the future is scary but bright.
redlegagent -n1 day ago
Think of it like the old Westerns where the bad guys would climb a telegraph pole and listen in on the wire.  Things like devices which release a small electrical charge to a section of the brain so as to “disrupt” the electrical signals to prevent a seizure or else attaching a artificial limb which likewise is connected to the existing nerve pathways is basically the same thing.  All you are doing is applying an electrical charge which then transits the existing nerve pathways by overriding natural bio-chemical signals.  That is not the same as somehow tapping into our memories and being able to generate new memories + recall and manipulate neuron transmission in a coherent fashion.  To use artificial technology to enhance our knowledge means that we must be able to accurately access the human brain – understand what areas need to be stimulated to generate specific results – and to then be able to do that.  Suffice to say we are no where near that today.  It’s not like we have a USB plug in our brains.  Our brains process different information is different places – thus one must be able to understand and influence the entire brain to facilitate new information.  As to cultures – technology has always grown at a faster pace than human behavior.  We develop new technologies – and eventually we learn how to use them in a responsible way.  Social development is always the weak link in the chain since people are individuals – each with their own wants and needs – which is why change is always slow.  The way to stimulate altruism and empathy has always been via mass communication.  The more people are connected and see what goes on in the world around them – the more that awareness stimulates responses to what they see
Louis Charles Morelli
redlegagent – “To increase brain capacity would require a fundamental re-working of our bodies”.
Maybe not. We increased the processing capacity of computers while diminishing the size of hardware by advancing electronics. Same for the relation motor capacity/truck size. This is still fiction, but the Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a formula for systems made by biophotons and a network of biophotons could replace electrical chemical signals and network, without needing more nutrients from the body…
Louis Charles Morelli
eeeaten ” I see no reason to ascribe laws of cycles or instincts to our fates”.
So, how could be broken the natural course that all ancestors ( living and non-living ancestors) has followed to such fate? The answer would be ” self-exorcising the selfish gene” since that our surrounding environment ( this biosphere) is modeled by and for to keep the selfish gene. But how you will drive a human with tendency to be big predator to other humans beings – which has the abstract shape of canines in its psyche designed by genetics – to wish their self-exorcising? A predator has canines, no way to change its behavior. Take out the preys he will die.
Louis Charles Morelli
eeeaten – ” I think you’re implying our ancestors were all selfish and violent…”
No. They were all selfish, but about violence, there is the instinct for prey which is inertial, not aggressive neither for self-defense. This is our problem, the universal duality (hot/cold,male/female,etc.) is here, how to eliminate a universal duality? But it is not, as you said “is an inescapable part of our nature” The two opposites of any duality will arrive to a marriage (hot/cold = no temperature or a median temperature). So you can go to “no more human species” or a descendant more evolved shape resulting from the marriage. It is upon to us our fate. Till now the human history offers no hope. All social systems created till now mimics the rules in the jungle among animals: there is the big predators ( the 1% or high aristocracy), the middle predators (wolves, fox, as the middle class); and the preys ( the 90% still slaves and uneducated). That’s why I am fighting my fight: we need self-exorcise this instincts from our genetics and primary psyche at the same time we need insisting with others to do that, and it means you against the three class. That’s why I am no leftist, no rightist, neither neutral: we need a new kind of social system that does not mimicks animals… or death.
redlegagent –
+Louis – computers require electricity which is not an internal part of the system but rather comes from an external source.  Look at your body.  There is a reason why oxygenated blood goes directly from the left ventricle to shunt straight to your brain – your brain requires the highest amount of oxygen of all your organs in the body to sustain itself.  Your brain is only about ~20% or so of gray matter – and gray matter is the portion which is associated with complex thinking.  The white matter represents the bulk of your brain and it is mostly there to facilitate transmission of signals for the gray matter.  This means that most of your brain is not conducive to higher thought.  So understanding that – understand that our brains place a high demand upon the rest of our body to keep it supplied with enough oxygen and blood to facilitate our currently level of cognition.  In order to foster even higher brain function – our cardio-pulmonary and circulatory systems would have to supply even more sustenance to our brains………… the expense of their own function + the rest of our body which also requires a certain level of cellular nutrition.  In short our brains are developed about as good as they can based upon what the body can supply them.  To access as noted via external devices – we must first understand where and how the bio-chemical signals which represent our memories and thought processes originate = and then be able to interface them in a coherent fashion so that our brain understands what we are trying to tell it and vice-versa in order to operate in a cogent fashion.  So while we are learning about how certain areas of the brain are associated with certain functions – that is not the same as being able to input new commands or recovering memories such as are associated with cognition.
Louis Charles Morelli
redlegagent – Thanks, by good information, you have demonstrated why Robert Beckendorff must slow down his optimism and what seems science fiction. We will wait to see how natural evolution will solve this problem ( maybe giants humans?). If you have not seen the theory of this smart scientist ( human brains developed due cocking food increasing absorption of energy), here is the link, TED TALK: By my hand, I am involved in an investigation about brain and consciousness that seems “weird” or “esoteric” by people with current world view. I am trying to get a full anatomy of the brain in 3D for superimposing the picture upon the drawing of a software diagram that works as a formula for all natural systems. If I can locate at least seven different regions/or pieces as glandules, the brain picture will fit with the formula picture, then, we can identify the specific systemic function of each piece/organ. The brain is a system in itself, so, it must have as template or blue print, this formula for systems. The second investigation is more “weird”. A surprising suggestion from the formula that I got is the explanation why we are using more the left than the right hemisphere. The brain is divided into two sides like the formula is also. In the formula there is a flow of information running in a spherical circuit but when the flow arrives to a Function 4, it is divided into two flows, one continuing the sphere and other going down towards the beginning, where is Function 1. In the brain, the trajectory of this lateral flow would be from the cortex towards the hippocampus, through the corpus callosum. Final conclusion: the human life still needs the fight for survival which needs focusing here and now and the attributes for these are at the left. We can’t lose time/energy with things beyond our survival zone, which are attributes of the right H. Then what is happening? Our thoughts happens only in half potential. When we begins a new thought, it must obey the systemic trajectory which designs the process of life’s cycle like our body. Each thought seems a living thing, with birth (must be at the hippocampal region, F1) , grow, maturation, degeneration and death. If it is useful is registered in the memory, if not, it is lost. It happens that in this still primitive phase of brain evolution, and the fight for survival, the thought as flow of energy’ information is born in F1, goes clockwise through the left h. and when arrive at the cortex, instead going to the right for to be enriched with its attributes, it quickly go down back to hippocampus. We can’t jump to a more elevated, holistic, cosmic, understanding and processing. I suspect that the effort in practices of meditation, like those Indian guys says they can reach nirvana, is the effort to push on the flow making it crossing the barrier of corpus callosum and entering into the right side. My second investigation is more “weird” yet. My formulas and models are suggesting that consciousness must be based in a more subtil network composed by biophotons, which our scientific instruments are not able to detect yet. There are too manny indications suggesting this hypothesis and, since consciousness must be a new system also based on the formula, I have indications about how is designed and evolving this network. If it will be proved existent, then, forget the problem brain/energy supply in relation to evolution and complexity of our mind, nature already has the solution: it is other kind of energy, free in space. ( ok, I told these things only as curiosity and since you like the issue about brain, maybe is your curiosity also). Cheers…

The R-complex reptilian inheritance and/or the ex-machine consciousness inheritance?

Thursday, August 31st, 2017


The R-Reptilian Complex

The R-Reptilian Complex

The reptilian brain inside the human brain?

I am sure we have often heard the expression that you have a reptilian brain. This comes from a literal interpretation of a theoretic concept developed in the 60s by American physician and neuroscientist Paul D. MacLean and as Wikipedia state: he “propounded it at length in his 1990 book The Triune Brain in Evolution’ ”  If you look it up, you will see why he has a lot to answer for in mythologizing this meme as it was he, who coined the terms ‘R’-complex/reptilian complex. ( source: )

This is more one detail revealing the big difference between the academic standard world view and Matrix/DNA world view, due two different approaches resulting in two different interpretations of same natural phenomenon. Before explaining this differences, let me remembering two others:

1) Freud invaded the basement of human brains and saw the beast there, because he found what he was previously and intentionally looking for. As Jewish minority in Austria, he wanted to show the white supremacists that they are inferior also. But, ok, we agree that our unconscious states preserves our animal inheritance, that the beast is there, the cause of competition among humans, but… what about the other obligatory duality complement – the angel? Humans also are able to altruism and cooperation among them. The Matrix/DNA, intentionally searching this angel, found it (the ordered face of Matrix/DNA formula modelling the brain);

2)  Darwin went to the a more primitive world and found what he was previously intentionally looking for: humans came from monkeys. His intention was due his face and body seemingly to monkey what produced the bullying from the college’s students. He was in need to prove them that they are monkeys also. Ok, we agree that the human body was inherited from some kind of monkeys’ cousin. But, humans are different from monkeys due very well expressed consciousness. So, what about consciousness? Matrix/DNA went to the jungle searching its origins and found it: while a human baby takes some months for expressing consciousness inherited from his/her creators ( the parents), the universal system produced by Matrix/DNA formula – which works like a genome – takes 13,8 billions years for expressing consciousness inherited from its creator. So, I don’t care that my body came from monkeys, I am my mind, and it came from a superior hierarchy.

Freud and Darwin made great discoveries moved by hate. Why hate sometimes finishes as benefit to human kind? These discoveries has amplified human knowledge. Because, for our evolution it is better to make some movements than standing inertial. And hate usually is moving, mixing things. But there is another force that produces movements, mixing things and producing great discoveries: love. The secret key is that all discoveries from hate puts us down (like, you are monkey, beast), while all discoveries from love puts us up (you are consciousness, angel).

Now we have the Neo-Darwinist Paul D. MacLean  that found the reptilian brain inside the human brain because he was previously intentionally looking for to prove the Darwinian theory of evolution. Good job, he got a great information for human knowledge, we agree that reptilians were ancestors of humans, so, they still are kept in our memory and anatomy. But,… what about the universal obligatory duality complement? What is it?

With Matrix/DNA formula at hands, asking what it tells about this issue, I had the intuition to the look carefully to the R-complex image, and then, searching the same image mentioned by a different intention, like, the medicine approach. And found this:


Showing a real brain, other neuroscientist like Dr. MacLean, Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, did it with a very different intention: telling to people a wonderful message about human grandiose, how we are beings of light. Dr. Jill can be seen in an astonishing video:

My stroke of insight | Jill Bolte Taylor ( )

Dr. Paul discovery make us uncomfortable because remembering our most inferior conditions. For compensation, if you have time after reading this article, try to watch this video of Dr. Jill ( there is her book too), which make us feeling the opposite way because is a suggestion of our superior condition.

The Matrix/DNA world view is suggesting that humans are the tools used by a new transition of shapes of the universal system, a transition from biological system to consciousness system. And every past transitions was applied the same process: the transition event is triggered by an act of fecundation. At the astronomical building blocks, this “fecundation” occurs when a comet ( which seems like a spermatozoon) reaches the nuclear vortex; at human beings, the fecundation occurs when a spermatozoon reaches the center of an ovule. This is not merely coincidences: the formula has an ideal shape for each function/tool and if the environment does not oppose to it, Nature does not care in using the same shapes again and again.

If this hypothesis elaborated from reading the Matrix/DNA models is the right thing, the origins of consciousness should repeat the fecundation event and, if the materials of the environment does not resist to it, should repeat the same shapes of those formula’s universal functions. Then, the origins of consciousness should exhibits the image of an ovule being fecundated by a spermatozoon. This is just the image where the head is the egg, the brain is the amnion/placenta, the hippocampus region (which is the representative of F1 in the Matrix formula, the function of formation of a new body), is the spermatozoon head and the spermatozoon tail is the spinal cord tail…

So, I entered this research with a previous intention to prove the Matrix theory while looking for an up or good effect for humans, from the R-complex. Due this intention, seeing the above image, and more this one:



 I remembered this image:




Final conclusion:

A unique image – the brain and the spinal cord – is result of a unique universal natural method applied by Nature in two different time/space of evolution with the same final meaning: the origins of a new evolutionary stage, with its appropriated shape, of the universal system. The two events were: the origins of mammals and the origins of consciousness.

Nobody can denying that the head of the spinal cord inside the brain and the tail of the spinal cord outside the brain seems the image of the head of a spermatozoon inside the ovule and the tail of the spermatozoon outside the ovule. Now, everybody is free ( and this is dependable of one previous intention due its preferred world view) for choosing if it is randomness and merely a coincidence, or it is the obligatory result when a unique author ( Nature) is the responsible for the two phenomenon.

What do you decide? How Reptilian are YOU? Or how cosmic consciousness are you? The image from Dr. Paul MacLean is representative of a real fact, but it relates to far away past times; the image from Matrix/DNA is also representative of a real fact, but it relates to our nowadays and future. It suggests that we are 8 billion humans which existence means half-conscious genes building – with more billions or trillions of conscious genes in this Universe - our unique and final body of a cosmic consciousness that will born at the day of The Big Birth. But, be carefully: as Dr. Paul and all Neo-Darwinists as me, a matrixist, we are human beings, and humans, with this little poor brain and limited sensors, are not able yet to reach the right interpretation of the real final Truth. One theory has less errors than other, we don’t know which… But for doing judgements, we need be careful that we have no previous intentions.

(Note: The fact that evolution produced reptilians was due a big mistake of our ancestors (maybe the fishes or birds?) trying to accommodate in a provisory shape in a provisory environment, threathing to stop their evolution, becoming the most competitive reptilian. How Nature has reacted and fixed the mistake is very surprising and you can know it at the article here: From Reptiles to Mammals: An Heroic Act? –  )