Archive for the ‘Evolution’ Category

Evidence for Evolution: Good Video and Debate with Matrix/DNA

Wednesday, August 23rd, 2017

xxxxx

Whatch the video, see my comments posted at the debate and copied below, and more curious evidences also copied below. Good learning!

What’s the evidence for evolution?

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIEoO5KdPvg

xxxxx

Our debate:

Syed Firdaus Syed Omar Syed Firdaus Syed Omar – 14 hours ago

explain the ability of reasoning from natural selection perspective, their origin?

When you are talking about why you have a trait, you simply need to ask if it helps you survive. The ability for complex thought is the sole reason that Humanity conquered the earth, if you look at our ancestors, you can see our skulls getting bigger over time. Complex thought helped us survive and thrive so natural selection kept it.
Louis Charles Morelli  Louis Charles Morelli – 8/22/2017
Good question, Syed, and as the Viktor answers, they insists to repeat the effects of natural selection, never mind how and why this phenomenon exists. Their thoughts reasonate that ” once time established a mechanism, like a piece well adjusted to a machine, it goes on and on…” If you think about that, this argument is against evolution itself: natural selection does not permit another effect of such machine, so, stopping evolution. Their most important target is to keep clearly that there is no purpose in Nature, evolution is a blind process, each evolutionary step begins with a random mutation coming from error at replication – which means that randomness is the ruler in this Universe, they believe in it. I am suspecting because 2 topics: 1) There is no absolute answer for everything in a world changing under evolution. Random mutation are the answers for everything like God was the answer for everything… 2) I search my own way and after hard work I found my own world view, which is not the right one, but it seems more reasonable. Comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems reveals the existence of a universal matrix formula which Nature has applied by 13,8 billion years for organizing matter (mass+energy) into natural systems. Or, saying it better: a unique formula creating a initial system at 13’8 billion years and this system is coming under evolution. Atoms, galaxies, plants, human bodies, are merely evolutionary shapes of a unique universal system. If this theory ( The Matrix/DNA Theory), is more complete, one difference is that there is a perfect formula which pulls this universal system into its direction – in the way that one day it will be perfect like the formula. So, this would be the cause and the reason for natural selection: it is the pushes towards the perfect final shape. So, if my theory is better than “the machine going on and on”, the normal is purposeful mutations not random: there are random mutations but it can be discarded or kept if it is anticipating what Nature is supposed to do, by any way…
xxxxxxxxx
Chris Mohrbacher Chris Mohrbacher 2 days ago

comparative anatomy (and DNA similarities) only demonstrates similarity, not causality. Nested Hierarchies also prove nothing as this is just people categorizing things based on the above similarities. They could be categorized in a completely different order and be equally logical. (I’m looking at you Hyena and Mongoose, classified as “cat-like…. things” ) Embryology has been debunked for decades. Species distribution doesn’t really “support” evolution… most kinds of creature has some version spread around the world. The fossil record demonstrates what has lived… not necessarily what came from what. Finding amphibian bones doesn’t suggest that it’s OUR ancestor, or the ancestor of any other non-amphibian. Which brings us down to observable evolution… and yea… that’s science. Selectively breeding dogs to generate a breed of dog with preferable traits is repeatable (science). No matter how many generations we breed, we can not take any number of dogs and breed them into a non-dog. Actual science supports specialization within a species… the idea of universal common ancestry is no less religious faith than the idea that any given pantheon of Gods used magic. Not testable, falsifiable, repeatable…. not science.
Louis Charles Morelli  Louis Charles Morelli – 8/22/2017
To: Chris
Besides the long lists of reasonable evidences, I think that when observing embryogenesis – one shape transforming into other, facing my eyes, here and now – it means that Nature alone can do it, there is a natural mechanism for doing it. The individual nature express the population nature and vice-versa. Meanwhile, there is a observable fact in embryogenesis that Darwinists are ignoring: beyond the field where individual evolution occurs ( inside the egg or the womb), there is a species that triggered the process and is the guide for the process building itself. Why not this phenomena would be projected to the whole biological evolution, or even, the cosmological evolution? Reason suggests this is the case, there is no observable process of evolution without a “shape-from-outside”. This observation could be wrong in relation to cosmological evolution, but, if it is not, a kind of creationists god ( natural and not magical), and a kind of astronomical creator like suggested by Matrix/DNA world view, could be safe. Just comparative anatomy between living and non-living natural systems leads us to calculations of causality where the final results suggests that the building block of DNA is the exactly miniaturized copy of the galactic building blocks. In this case, the species that was outside the womb that nurtured abiogenesis, was just the Milk Way. It seems that each region of this galaxy builds a component of biological system, then, transit of meteorites, comets, etc., makes that all components meets at some places…and… voila’,… we have a DNA… But, then, every process of evolution is really, an inside process of a bigger one: reproduction. It means that there was no origins of life, merely the continuation of a natural genetic process coming from cosmological evolution. And so on…
eeeaten  eeeaten 1 hour ago 

sorry louis, as a biologist this made zero sense to me
No sorry, it is natural. I am a naturalist, my world view was built in the field – the Amazon jungle, yours, in the lab. I applied the systemic method, you applies the reductionist method. And so on, two investigations where all methods are different, it results into two different world views. The difference is that you don’t know mine and I know yours. It doesn’t matter here if one makes sense to the other or not. I think that yours does not make sense since that you have broken universal evolution into two blocks – cosmological and biological evolution – with no evolutionary link between them. So, one need to fit the abyss between the two blocks with magical thinking, like magical gods or magical randomness. Then, one will believe that there was an event of life’s origins at Earth due action of some force coming outside the long chain of causes and effects since the Big Bang. This is the prejudice for academic sciences today. Since I didn’t break universal natural history and found the link which shows that there are no non-living systems before biological ones, I am satisfied with the sense that my world view expresses to me. But, common sense or not is not a good scientific tool. If we want to debate our theories we must be attained at the common known proved facts. So my first question: the transformations of a body under embryogenesis, from the simplest to most complex, is not evolution?
xxxxxxxxxx

Curious evidences for Evolucao:

( Useful information from our friend, Randall Wilks ) Randall Wilks  Randall Wilks – 8/22/2017

EVIDENCE FOR EVOLUTION – Vestigial Human Traits
Just as humans inherit characteristics of their nearest relatives, each of us has characteristics inherited from more distant relatives. In the inner corners of your eyes you have what is called a semilunar fold or plica semilunaris. There is a muscle attached to it, but it doesn’t do anything in humans. In many other animals (sharks, frogs birds, your cat), however, that muscle controls a transparent incitating membrane or “third eyelid” that can be drawn over the eye. Proponents of ‘intelligent design’ have no explanation as to why humans have those muscles. They are perfectly consistent with evolutionary theory as vestigial remnants of an ancestral characteristic.
You also have three sets of muscles attached to your ears. In other animals, those muscles turn the ears to focus on the direction of a sound. This ability is found in monkeys, most of which cannot turn their head horizontally. Humans and the other apes can turn their heads vertically and the ability to move the ears is largely lost in those species. Using sensitive electronic devices, researches find that the human brain is sending nerve impulses to those muscles in response to sounds, but the most any human can do is a bit of a wiggle. Proponents of ‘intelligent design’ have no explanation as to why humans have those muscles. They are perfectly consistent with evolutionary theory as vestigial remnants of an ancestral characteristic. Then there is the Plantaris Muscle, which in other primates facilitates arboreal lifestyle, allowing the feet to function much the same as hands in gripping branches. The human foot has lost this ability, rather early on it seems, in the process of becoming bipedal. The muscle, however, is still there. It is a long pencil thin muscle and tendons running down the back of the calf, that are extremely painful when ruptured and often misdiagnosed as a more serious injury. This injury, often called “Tennis Leg” occurs most frequently in athletes over 40 due to the tendon and attachments becoming more brittle. With or without treatment, the two ends of the rupture will shrivel and disappear within weeks with no loss of function in the leg. It is indeed one of evolution’s leftovers. It is often harvested for reconstructive surgery elsewhere in the body. That these muscles are still present in the human body indicates that the genetic instructions for them are still present in the human genome and active to some extent.
At some point the genes for these traits may be silenced by a mutation that disables a gene (such as a premature STOP codon or frame shift) making them a pseudo gene; one which no longer produces a protein. There is evidence that is already happening as this muscle is absent in one leg or both in about 10% of the population. The same seems to be happening with wisdom teeth. In the wild, primate infants are capable of grasping and holding on to the mother’s fur shortly after birth, allowing the mother to pursue other activities. Human infants, because of the limited birth canal and large human brain must enter this world at a much earlier stage of physical and neuronal development. Despite that, the developing human embryo exhibits a grasping reflex in the uterus as early as 16 weeks. Even at birth, that reflex, the Palmar Grip Reflex, is incredibly strong as most parents of newborns will attest. While it is capable of supporting the child’s weight, one must exercise caution as the child may suddenly let go. This reflex may persist up to 6 months after birth. As this is of no benefit to a human child, it is vestigial.
We see vestigial structures all through nature. They remain in some cases because they have been adapted for other purposes, in others they remain simply because there has been no evolutionary advantage to eliminating them. Similarly, pseudo-genes are vestiges of previously active genes that have been disabled by some mutation and no longer produce a protein. There are some 20,000 of them n the human genome, many of them remnants of Olfactory Receptor (scent receptor) genes. While humans have lost an additional 30 of these genes since our ancestral lineage separated from that of chimps, most of those pseudo-genes are hand-me-downs from even more remote relatives, but disabled by exactly the same mutations, again evidence of common ancestry. They certainly do not support the idea of “intelligent design”. They are however, completely consistent with the Theory of Evolution.
Geographic Distribution of Species
As one travels from one isolated landmass, to another, one sees patterns that fit with evolutionary theory. The mammals populating the Australasian landmass (including New Guinea) prior to man’s arrival were virtually all Marsupials; kangaroos, wombats, koalas, quolls, thylacenes, et al; found nowhere else in the world, and egg laying Monotremes (Platypus and Echidnas) also found nowhere else in the world. Indeed, prior to the coming of man who brought the dingo, the only placental mammals were those that could swim there (seal) and those that could fly there (bats). It is very obvious that mammalian evolution took a quite different turn in that isolated landmass.
New Zealand as well tells of a different evolutionary history. With no native mammals, except again for those able to fly (bats) or swim (seals) there, birds assumed the ecological roles filled by mammals elsewhere. In the absence of ground dwelling predators, many birds abandoned energy consuming flight, the Kakapo, Kiwi and Moa among them. The wing of the kiwi is a mere vestige, no bigger than your little finger, with an equally useless claw at its end. Other isolated islands, Mauritania and Madagascar, also had their own unique flora and fauna, as did geologically recent islands such as the Hawaiian Archipelago. There, the science of comparative genomics shows that another species of finch underwent adaptive radiation into the at one time 55 species of Honey creepers of which only 18 survive. The same is true of many plants whose ancestral seeds found their way to these islands. The many species of the beautiful Hawaiian Silver Sword and their relatives, collectively known as the Hawaiian Silver Sword Alliance, are an example of adaptive radiation in plants over millions of years from an ancestral pacific coast tarweed. We have Polar Bears in the Arctic and Penguins in the Antarctic similar environments totally different biota. Charles Darwin made remarkable observations 150 years ago and since then biologists, geneticists, geologists, biochemists and other related fields have continued to do so and in every case further evidence is accumulated in support of what is now called the Modern Synthesis of Evolution.

Debate with Matrix/DNA Theory in Science/AAAS

Thursday, February 23rd, 2017

xxxx

Debate com a Matrix/DNA no Science/AAAS

xxxx

Earliest mollusk probably looked like a spiky slug

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/earliest-mollusk-probably-looked-spiky-slug

Avatar

A tree mimics exactly the shape of Milk Way because it was created by this galaxy. A cell system also has the same number of organelles as the number of different astronomic bodies. And there is more: each organelle performs same systemic function as each astronomic system.

But, we can see it only when we know the universal Matrix/DNA formula that built all natural systems. So, for a better understand about the first mollusc shape and functions we must have on the table the matrix formula and the exactly model of the building blocks of our creator, this astronomic system – both are at my website… but still it is a theory..

xxxx

Apophenia

Correlations without causation

Endurance of stable shapes i.e celestial bodies are spherical due to their gravity, just like there is a limited number of shapes in organisms that provide practicality and durability. But this doesn’t connect the two systems in any way.

xxxx

Avatar

No, Kotsios, there is no apophenia here. It is perceiving meaningful patterns (the common at genetic inheritances) within not random data, but within data as evolutionary links. Yours scholar world view does not see these patterns because learned to be blind to the connection between cosmological and biological evolution. So, there is a big hole in their wiring of neurons.
You do not see the correlation because yours causation (origins of life) is not the first causation (origins of the universe).
If this astronomic system (Milk Way) does not connect with the first biological systems, what and who created biological systems?!  Some supernatural forces and elements coming from outside the materialistic realm of this galaxy?

And remember: such parent, such offspring, no matter the differences of environments and big mutations. By the way, if you do not know my theoretical astronomic model and the explanation how it fits exactly as the unit of information of the DNA, you never will accept that we were created by stellar system and not by dust of stars…

xxxx

All you did, was to replace a supernatural creator with the Milky Way.
Celestial organisation is based on gravity.
Biological organisation is based on chemistry.

Gravity is very weak to act on the molecular level and chemistry requires much more proximity than the celestial distances allow.

There is no connection between the origins of the two systems, besides their existence in the same universe

xxxx

Avatar

No creators, it is all about our ancestrals. Galaxies,atoms, are our ancestrals.
The human body pressure and homeostasis acts over organs and flows, it is also to weak at atomic and molecular levels. But was not gravity neither body pressure that organized matter into systems. You are missing the essence, the code, which is the formula at my website.

Organic chemistry emerged with a new state of matter – the liquid – which was not existent at galaxies’ formation. But, chemistry alone, leads matter to eternal equilibrium, never to compose working systems.

Th new planetary surface environment, different from the space, and new state of matter caused the big mutations in biological systems. While our direct astronomic ancestor was a closed system, we happened to be opened systems.

If you believe there are no connections between the system you live inside and was here producing your past ancestors and the system you are, you need to appeal to a mystic agent, like a magical randomness.. or magical supernaturals. We do need such jumps of imaginations anymore..

xxxx

You forgot about prions, viruses, RNA based life, etc.

You forgot that there are known reasons for the shapes of bodies in space, and, organ functions, etc…and that they do not share reasons.

Saying “Astronomic system” and “function” assumes things that are entirely unsupported by any evidence whatsoever.

 

You are seeing patterns that are not there.

 

You are also calling a “feeling” a “theory”.

In science, a theory is an explanation that has been tested, to falsify it, and passed the tests…and so forth,

…..not merely what a stoner says after seeing a Bohr Diagram and thinking…wow, that looks like our solar system!

xxxx

Avatar

No TJ, I did not forget these things, all them were hardly and perfect inserted in the same evolutionary lineage, from this astronomic system to complex biological organisms.

Nature has used a unique formula for all biological systems (DNA) because Nature has used a unique formula for “all” natural systems since the beginning of this Universe. I can’t believe you can not understand this obligatory evolutionary detail.

If all galaxies are similar like all biological systems, it is because all galaxies has a common essence like DNA. Same for all species of atoms systems. The evolutionary tree does not begins with archaea, fungus, but, with atoms. That’s why we can find all biological properties (metabolism,sexual reproduction,life’s cycles,etc) at atoms ( as electromagnetic fashion) and astronomic systems ( as mechanic fashion), expressed or not due evolutionary phases.

If you can’t see the evolutionary sequitur from a galaxy to a cell system you will need some mystical belief, like “spontaneous origins of life by chance”…

There is a universal evolution of a unique system in this 13,8 billion years, so, since it is a unique evolutionary lineage, must have repetitive universal patterns among all shapes of this universal natural system.

About theory:
Science took the name ” theory” from philosophy (the Greeks coined the word). I am using the word in its real meaning and science is not the owner of this word

xxxx

New Debate Between Creationists and Atheists about the Mystery of Existences and the Suggestion from Matrix/DNA

Wednesday, July 6th, 2016

xxxx

It takes a fool to deny the obvious

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/26/it-takes-a-fool-to-deny-the-obvious/#comment-845574

And my comment published at the Myers’ article:

The Matrix/DNA
July 6, 2016 – Amazon Jungle

Creationists and atheists world views are both “magical thinking” due a fundamental mistake: they are forgetting the naturalist systemic perspective. Any living thing is a system, a systemic biological organization of matter and energy. And systems can only coming from other system. Nobody had discovered a system coming from a part or piece of a system, neither from something not belonging to a system.
So, the first amino-acids were systems in itself, made by atoms systems and this astronomical system. Since that atoms system are too much simple, and galactic systems are lots more complex, the logic’s suggests that amino-acids were a production of astronomic nanotechnology, like human genome, chromosomes,ovules, are products of human natural nanotechnology.

Following this line of logic’s we got a new world view called Matrix/DNA where a new theoretical astronomical and atomic model fits just as the ancestors of the first living cell.

Now the problem would be:but the first system, be it an atom or an elemental particle composed by other smaller particles as a system, where it came from?

We found that all these natural systems were made by a unique natural formula. Then, we found that any universal set of radiation performing a light wave has the same formula for systems. Conclusion? The forst natural system in this Universe and perceptible dimension was a light wave.

Where the light wave came from? No other simplest thing in this Universe was detected as ” the light wave producer”. Our method of rationalization is suggesting that the first natural light wave worked as the genome of some ex-machine entity. If so, this Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the systemic thing that produced it. Is is God? If you want call it by that name, remember that it is not magical, it does things by natural process. Is is a big absolute chance? If you want call it by tat name, remember that it is a phenomena that is being reproduced exactly like it happened once, so, when this process arrive to an end, it will not be the absolute chance, because it would be an event that has been repeated.

What matters here is the final moral concept from this world view: we are 8 billion genes plus trillion of genes spread in this Universe building a kind of baby. So, each of us – as gene – has a unique, specific, not mimicked, not able to be stolen – information. It is our mission and we are not conscious about that. If one of us dies not do his/her job, the baby will born handicapped. So, let yours brother free for doing its mission. If creationism, atheism or Matrixism are wrong interpretations of this world, our inner mission will correct our wrong beliefs. And we got correction every time that we learn something new about the Universal Nature. That’s why I made the Amazon jungle my second house: there are plenty of natural phenomena for learning there.

Antropologista diz que nao somos macacos e e’ fortemente criticado por cientistas

Wednesday, November 4th, 2015

xxxx

Veja por exemplo como um biologo evolucionista ataca o artigo fornecendo link para o artigo original:

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2015/11/02/an-anthropologist-who-thinks-we-arent-apes/#comment-845027

An anthropologist who thinks we aren’t apes

 

E meu comentario postado no artigo do Pharyngula:

 

Louis Morelli

New York

November 5, 2015

If a software says ” I am computer”, and a human being think ” I am ape”, both are wrong. What’s a human being is not an issue for evolutionary biologists while neurologist does not know how neurons relates to consciousness. When I think ” What I am?” is not my physical body asking, it is my consciousness. It does not matter if my body was raped from apes, it is not my body thinking this question as I doubt that any ape think this question..

And my consciousness is a software inserted into a terrestrial biological body, be it ape or something else. Ehe Windows software came from Bill Gate’s mind and not produced by computers, so, it is not logical to think that human bodies produced their consciousness. At last, Science has no data for afirm it.

The fact that we have less chromosomes than apes is due apes are better organic machine than us. And they are better machines because they reproduces faithful the machine that created all living beings here, the Newtonian machine. Human physical body is the necessary natural machine retrocess for nurturing a different origin from a different creator. Which we don’t know who is, because we don’t know what we are.

This is a science issue? Of course, not. Science deals with objects, real things, it does not makes comparisons of two things, does not do cladistic… humans do it. When Science alone enters in the apes’ world in the jungle and in the humans world in New York, Science is dealing with two totally different things and has no real data indicating that one thing is related to another.

One day Science could to prove that our physical body came from apes and our consciousness came from our human brains. But, it didn’t yet.

And if you want to talk for Science, you must feel as you are Science, and not a scientist atheist or theist or communist with their private interpretations behind Science.

A Message From Matrix/DNA World View

Wednesday, October 23rd, 2013

Louis Charles Morelli

Shared privately  at Google+ -  8:36 PM

Humanity is in need of a big brain evolutionary jump just now, before it will be too much late. Our Science and its technology is developing fast, but, in a wrong and dangerous way (it is what my world view based in Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting and I am not the owner of thru). It is like a gun at a kids hands or food with unknown mortal poisons.
My discoveries about the light waves having the properties for life, that DNA is merely a new universal systemic shape of a universal matrix that organized matter into all systems, from atoms to galaxies, that the building blocks of astronomical systems also have the properties of life, that at every seven elements in periodic table there are one able to make “living systems” different from everything we can imagine now, that we, as systems, are composed of software and hardware, that the software has 13,7 billion years allways surviving when changing the old hardwares, that this software about 4 billion years ago made the big mistake of becoming a closed selfish system in the shape of astronomical building blocks and we are the results, lifting up from the chaos when entropy attacked our sinner ancestral, etc. and etc., everything suggesting a new world view where we are going to repeat the big mistake again here at Earth.
The discovery that the Einstein brain is different because the two hemispheres are strongly linked came to reinforce the Matrix/DNA formula and theory, that we need exercise and learning how to develop our right hemisphery. Any thought at our brain begins with the received stimulus/informations being processed at the hippocampus, like the nuclear vortex of Matrix formula called F1 is the beginning of any new circuit flow inside the system. Then, the flow goes clockwise towards F2, F3, and when arrives at F4, instead going externally rounded, it breaks and goes down as F5 towards F1. The flow falls from the central cortex towards the hippocampus again, through the corpus callosum. It means that the right hemisphere, with its universal systemic functions number 6 and 7 and part of F1, is out of any thought. But, a lot of evidences are suggesting that one ability of the right H is to grasp the natural phenomena related to the level of light, which is the beginning of everything here. We are seeing only the mechanical aspect of systems, it is missing at least, six more aspects acting over any material object. The Matrix formula is suggesting that we can make efforts for getting the flow of thoughts changing its course, penetrating the H.R. and gettin a shower of light. It means the flow crossing the central cortex and going to F6, instead falling to F1.
The very fact that Einstein’s brain had less space between the two hemispheres, suggests that his thoughts were, at certain way, penetrating the H.R. and from there, from these thoughts getting the shower of light, he could see light in a way that nobody has seen. His intuitions about the cosmological space was due the ability of H.R. expanding through spatial construction, amplifying our horizons. I am trying experiments and exercises for getting this jump but since my poor conditions where is missing everything here, and knowing that does not will be useful only one or a few individuals getting it, but everybody, we need that you join us working hard here.
At this moment we have billions of human beings being tortured in this stupid and absurd life’s conditions, they are losing the opportunity for their brain evolution, they are our brothers, our blood, the unique beings in this Universe that can do something for us and who we must love above everything. We need be here for them. We need doing something and quickly.  we need talking about what to do, the more brains thinking here, the better. Matrix/DNA formulas are suggesting what we can do, but it is merely a theory, I am not a believer in it, it merely seems logical and rational from my personal viewpoint, and it can not be from yours, so, you need teach me what’s going wrong. But, it means that we have suggestions, that it is possible doing the right thing… bring on yours suggestion and put then over the table for everybody see it. The Matrix/DNA is saying that we are going to build  again here a closed selfish social system where every human being will be slave, til the presidents, the rich families, etc.
The Brave New World under the executive power of the Big Queen, as any insect society. But the real legislative power will be the identity of the system, a non visible force, non touchable, that will enslave all of us, will get our consciousness as prisoner, and we will fail again. Only known our real enemy we will know how to avoid it. The Matrix formula is suggesting a whole new scientific enterprise with different technology as result, lot times more superior than this we have now. It is suggesting how to eliminate our viruses and bacterias enemies, for getting a working and healthy body. Why not lose some time trying to know and debating with me what I am talking about. I payed a hard price for getting this formula ( seven years studying natural systems and total biosphere isolated at Amazon jungle), if you do the same you will get it also, I believe. Com’on, are there anything with more value than living and fighting for the welfare of our species here, now and for our next generations? We are not merely optimized monkeys, we have intelligence, we have love, we have a purpose in life, we need joining together, and if we have the eternal software as pictured and suggested by Matrix/DNA we have a marvellous future. But, if we continues doing things wrong, this beautiful future will be far away from us and our kids. At this moment billions of our brothers are being tortured and they need all our efforts, with Matrix or without Matrix, we need talking about the real facts, bring on the table the real causes, the real effects, and together thinking about what we need to do at the social level. Cheers…
1

The Cellular ATP Motor came from the Galaxies’ Rotational Motor?!

Thursday, January 24th, 2013

This article is more detailed and complete in Portuguese section, here:

http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?p=333ATP Sintase: Como a Terra Copiou do Céu esta Extraordinária Engenharia! )

That’s fantastical! About a hundred years, people has watching an incredible working motor inside the living cell, and we had no idea how, or from where, Nature got it. It will be very good if you watch the motor working, in the movie/animation at

http://vcell.ndsu.nodak.edu/animations/atpgradient/index.htm

Look to the complex called “ATP Synthase”. Isn’t stupendous, whimsical?! From where came this object, this phenomenon? How did it to being?! Do you believe – as many believers – that, the stupid matter of this lost planet did it, alone? Or do you believe that the matter of other planet or constellation did it? If so, is it a magic planet? Or do you believe that God – or other non-natural being – came here to Earth and did it by magic?

We found a theoretical solution, well developed and logical, rational.  The matter of Earth did it (but, not alone), the matter of others constellations also collaborated for doing it. Everything should be possible, but, we now know how was the natural process that made it, and from where it came from: it came from the body of LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestral!

Ok, let’s see the ” body of LUCA”: ( these drawinings were made in the jungle with pencils and papers, so, sorry by the bad quality. It means that an unique matricial systemic circuit rules the formation of astronomical systems, cells systems, and we had mimicked it when making the basic electric circuit of ours homes because it was encrypted into our DNA-memories):

And now, let’s see this extraordinary engineering natural job, the motor called ATP Synthase:

Ok. Seeing the two pictures, side by side, and understanding how each works, is almost automatically: we see at the astronomical ancestral proto-system a kind of proto-motor, doing the same job that the cellular machinery is doing. The picture of LUCA has a nuclei, inside the nuclei has a quasar composed by dusty and debris from stellar decomposition, and below the quasar there is the black hole. 4 billions years of Evolution, changing from celestial space and matter composed only by solid and gaseous state of matter, to Earth surface, with matter earning a new state of matter,the liquid state, and then, the chemical reactions… and finally we see the whole process of transformation at the picture below ( click on it for seeing better):

Understanding the method of investigation:

To those does not know what this website is about:

I am suggesting a theoretical model of LUCA – The Last Universal Common Ancestral.

LUCA does not leave at Earth, but it is surrounding Earth and contains Earth. The picture shows the seven known kind of astronomical bodies, but LUCA is every body. The picture shows the Life’s Cycle of LUCA, at least, his seven principal shapes in any lifetime. The seven pieces are connected as each shape of a human body in its lifetime are connected together. The LUCA’s Life’s Cycle – when reproducing and fixing its several shapes – becomes a closed perpetual motor, but not a system, yet. The systemic closed circuit of mass and energy carries the flow of information (genetic information of LUCA), but it exists only in relation to time; it does not exists visible in the space (like the several shapes of a human body during its lifetime can not be visible arranged as system in the space).

LUCA – its complete Life’s Cycle – becomes the building block of astronomical architectures, like galaxies. The picture of LUCA above can be seeing as the same picture of a base-pair of nucleotides, the fundamental unit of information of RNA/DNA. Extracting the circuit of energy as flow of information, from LUCA’s picture, we got the same picture of a unit of the DNA. By the process of Macro-Evolution, which is performed by seven variables – having among them the three variables of Darwinian micro-evolution - Nature applies “nanotechnology” transforming astronomical architecture into micro architecture. After several mechanisms and processes revealed inside this theory, LUCA is transformed into biological systems, and those becomes plants and animal systems, like human beings. Over the homo-erectus’ brain, the theory sees a new jump of macro-evolution, the elaboration of “consciousness” which we have a theoretical model suggesting its anatomy as natural system. That’s it…

Well… I am afraid I will need stopping now ( it is time for beginning work with my auto-cab in New York, so, we need stopping this historical discover…) But, after the work journey, I will came back, if God wants… Ah?! God? How I said that? Which God? Where? Hummm… maybe here at our side… or not?)

Fusion of Chromosomes Between Humans and Chimpanzees and the Emergence of Self-Consciousness

Saturday, October 27th, 2012
Fusion of Chromosomes Between Humans and Chimpanzees and the Emergence of Self-Consciousness

Fusion of Chromosomes Between Humans and Chimpanzees and the Emergence of Self-Consciousness

Which natural forces or elements caused the event of this fusion? There were something like “the mind” in some place of this Universe before that event? Was the event obeying some hidden variables acting here that we still does not know? Or the event was driven by some supernatural force? See the surprising suggestion from Matrix/DNA Theory  models.

( Sorry, this article still not translated, it is in full written in Portuguese and you can see clicking the green flag, in “Artigos” you search ”

Fusão de Cromossomas Entre Humanos e Chimpanzés e a Emergência da Auto-Consciência “, and translate it with any tool.

From Reptile to Mammals: A Heroic Act?

Thursday, September 13th, 2012

xxxx

Cynodont Exaeretodon

Cynodont Exaeretodon

xxxx

How and why the animals “invented” the extraordinary engineering of protection and feeding of eggs and embryos in the maternal body?!

The answer is astonishing, surprising! It was writen in the stars, a long time ago…

Once that they are descending from the bacteria and protists, the animals started as “oviparous”, or either, the zygote is launched to the world and left `the grace of its proper luck’.  However, at some stage of the evolution, some reptiles, fish and invertebrates started to develop a system to keep eggs in the maternal body, phenomenon that finished transforming one of them into mammal.

We have described in detail the process of this transformation, but we never had reasoned about the existential aspect of this process. Why had the animals made this?!

Thinking about a typical reptile, a lizard. An animal practically without brain, a cut voracious machine for the hunting and fight for the surviving. So dismissed of any emotion that until its blood is cold, not controlling the temperature of the body. If it feels hungry is able to eat its eggs and younglings. Nothing proven and rational exists in it to do something to protect its own eggs and much less to sacrifice its life with the painful and weighed pack of the pregnancy. Imagine the discomfort in the reptile that became link with the mammals: how many of them were sacrificed because it lost the skill of the body in the hunting and in the war for the self-defense! Decidedly it does not make sensible the current explanation of that the genes or organisms play the called “strategy of reproduction”. Genes are accumulated of atoms, only lizards want to survive, both do not elaborate strategies. Even Darwin perceived this when it said: ” I am convinced that [ this ] has been the principal, but not the exclusive way of the modifications”.

Now with the models of the Matrix all the thing makes sense. There was neither strategy nor heroic, altruistic efforts, of the animals; they were genetically programmed to be transformed, there acts were only instincts produced by the laws rulling the atoms that composed their bodies. For understanding the explanation you need see the two figures (clique for expand)  below:

The Matrix/DNA as Software of Astronomical Systems's Building Blocks

The Matrix/DNA as Software of Astronomical Systems's Building Blocks

Matrix/DNA as Universal Configuration For All Natural Systems

Matrix/DNA as Universal Configuration For All Natural Systems

Let us see the model of the Matrix in its evolutive state as the last ancestral of the biological beings, as galactic system, that tries to multiply in the Earth such as it in the sky. In F1 the “germs” are launched to the space without any consideration with its future luck, the offspring are abandoned to the flavor of the destination. But the fact is the system is closed, from it nothing escapes. But now, the system is all the body, and not only F1. Following, the embryo is coated with the placenta and becomes egg in position of planet. AFTER THAT IT IS NOURISHED AND PROTECTED BY A STAR.

Since that planets and stars are parts of the generating body, this means that: in a first phase the ancestral lays the eggs out and in a second phase it keeps the eggs inside. Now the Micro-Evolution in the Earth obeys this chronological order, first producing the organisms of the first phase and after that transforming them to fulfill the second phase.

Darwin could not understand the galaxy, could not know that the systemic project of it under the direction of a software coming beyond the Universe was also here,  acting on the reptile’s body. But he had the feeling that there was something else. This invisible way of modifications isdriving by the universal Matrix/DNA.

xxxxxx

Research:

Google: “Evolution in Action: Lizard Moving From Eggs to Live Birth” ( to be read all items )

( A skink species lays eggs on the coast but births babies in the mountains, giving a rare glimpse at how placentas evolved, scientists say.)


The debate over the origins of the Universe and of Life Continues Among the current theories.

Friday, August 3rd, 2012

Re: Theories – Origin of Life

http://www.biology-online.org/biology-forum/post-144164.html#p144164

Postby TheMatrixDNA » Fri Aug 03, 2012 11:35 pm

scottie wrote: Continuing on with the problem ID has not addressed.

As I stated in my last post.

They are shying away from the obvious implications of what design means.

Design is always the product of a purpose the Designer has in mind

Comment by  Matrix/DNA Theory:

Ok.In my opinion,this is the most instructive thread in the Internet for those that are interested in the question of “theories about origin of life”. It seems to me that this thread is death, abandoned,and I can’t understand it because this question wouldn’t have an end till the day that scientifically someone prove how life has emerged. The normal behavior here, I think, should be everyone trying to reinforce his/her theory bringing on more evidences, while bringing on new evidences that deconstruct the other theories.
Then, this thread must have no end because everyday the news are showing new facts that can be used as positive or negative evidence to the current theories.
I had driven for a new theory of origins of life and even the universe, when I was living in Amazon jungle and observing the systems that composes that biosphere and inquiring how must be the state of the world, in its astronomic, atomic, and even the dimension of quantum fluctuations aspects, that has produced our kind of life. Of course, my goal now must be testing the whole theory against real facts. But I and the scientific enterprise has no the necessary tools for doing it just now. Then,what I can do with this theory? The same others are doing here: searching more thoughtful brains for doing a rational scrutiny of this theory, while showing the news about facts that are evidences in favor and showing evidences that I think, does not fit in another theories.

Introducing the people to a new big theory, which requires a change of his/her world vision is a difficult task. Maybe only high intellectuals individuals with open minds that are retired and has time for spent here, like Scottie, could invest attention in your theory and debating it with you. The fundamental requirement is that you can communicate it in a language understandable and that your theory makes same sense in the light of modern known facts. For instance, we had a poster here, Leopol, with two problems: poor Google translations from Russian, a lack of evidences and a world vision that is not tasteful. But it is not justice and intellectually productive rejecting Leopol’s theory, we must deal with the details giving him the opportunity to advocate his world vision till he can not resisting anymore for lack of positive evidences. same thing I think must be the reactions about my theory, called “The Universal Matrix/DNA of natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”.

I am reading the whole thread, it is a lot of stuff, 45 pages. When finishing everything I will begin from the first post again, selecting those that are interesting to my theory and deserves a reply, proposing discussions. I know that this means that I will post here almost another 45 pages, because each post is interesting and touches the roots of Matrix/DNA world vision. I don’t know if the moderator will permit it, but I will try because this is the right thing to do. But, then there are posts that can not wait the application of this method, it is irresistible a reply just now, like this post from Scottie.

I think there is a big difference about what “design” means when making comparison between the designs made by Scottie as an engineer and the designs that emerges in Nature. But we can see this difference only from the view point of another observer with another world vision. The way Scottie was educated for dealing with designs he can not understand that other things can do design without using a mind,a purpose. Let’s focus on the generation of a new baby’s giraffes. When mating, father and mother giraffes are doing same minded project of a design that will be real in the future? Or the future designed baby will be product of merely flow of natural laws? Could be possible that the flow of natural laws creates unpredictable complex designs? The phenomena of giraffes doing a new baby is not a proof that this is normal functioning in this world? Where is the mind behind this whole process? Where is the design while a female and a male genomes are fusing together inside an egg and during the whole process of gestation? I think that the design only appears outside the egg, ex-machine in relation to the egg. And the author of that design also are outside the egg, They are ex-machine in relation to the egg. They are natural construction by natural laws and they are not applying their minds for doing the design. Also the male and female giraffes has no purpose of doing the design that will emerges from their natural mating act.
Someone here has any problem with my proposition? I will consider that no, and will continue.
This biological phenomena of babies’ generation is the unique real fact known by everybody when a design appears in Nature. We know the causes, the authors, the process, the evolution of whole process.
My question is: why every current theory (exception of Matrix/DNA Theory) forgets this phenomena when trying to understand what is going on in the whole Universe? Why every author of every theory made by human beings ( exception of Matrix/DNA Theory) believes that the explanation of universe’s and life’s existences is better when applying human imagination creating images of theoretical universes instead cleaning up the action of human imagination and applying what we see here and now, as real, over the whole universe for getting those explanations?

If we try doing that, this universe will be merely a material structure in which, inside it, is occurring a process of reproduction, from something ex-machine. Every process of reproduction is a sum of small and gradual processes of evolution. The observer inside an egg will think that is watching evolution and really he is; but the observer outside the egg will know that the evolution is an illusion, a process inside something bigger, called “reproduction”.

The world inside an egg is a natural world, like the womb where the egg is located. If the universe is a natural world, why it should not be located inside a natural world, working, like the womb? Why people from TOE are imagining that babies giraffes are products of random processes filtered by natural selection exerted by the mother wombs’ giraffe? They are not… but their imagined universe is explained like that. Why people from ID are imagining that babies giraffes are products of previous design made by the mind of father and mother giraffes? They are not… but their imagined universe is explained like that. Why Matrix/DNA Theory is believing that babies giraffes are products from the normal chain of causes and effects through natural laws that are passing through the bodies of father and mother giraffes? It is and its universe is explained like that.

What we see in this universe is the evolution of a unique system that appeared in shape of atoms, has evolved to shape of galaxies and to shapes of living beings. Like inside an egg a first cell has passed through several shapes. The final shape of the contents of a fertilized human egg has consciousnesses, but it appears as the last shape, maybe after the birth, ex-machine in relation to the egg. In the whole history of this egg never had the action of intelligence neither randomness. Why people are imagining a Universe that works in other way?! In the same way, I think, the process inside the egg and in relation to the egg is purposeless. There is no goal of the matter inside the egg, neither the action of an outside agency, as believed by Scottie, driven the processes towards a design. Do you believe that molecules called genes has the conscious goal of making a design in the shape of a giraffe? Do you believe that the parents giraffes or another entity outside the egg is acting inside the egg, driving its matter towards a final design, in shape of a giraffe? I can’t believe in that. But, if you apply everything in the same way over the whole universe, based in the current proved facts we have about the universe, you get everything working like the real world we are experimenting just now. Them why rationally someone could refuse this theory? Some ideas? But please, let’s work with facts, evidences only, Not ideologies or psychological analyses of the authors of these theories.

The girl who silenced the world for 5 minutes discovers the Natural Law called “Solidarity Principle”!

Thursday, May 17th, 2012

Surprisingly, the video in Youtube about a Canadian girl who addressed a UN Meeting on issue of environment continues being debated online and got till now 19 millions views and 47.000 comments! TheMatrix/DNA, reading the comments concluded that the posters are missing a more rational and scientific approach, then we contribute with the post copied below. Who want to see the video go to:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQmz6Rbpnu0&feature=related

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The Universal History teaches that there is a Natural Law that could save Humanity, by destroying it. This law is the “Solidarity Principle”, discovered due the models of Matrix/DNA Theory.

  • 13 billion years ago the Universal Nature was only a cloud of “errant” particles moving and chocking among themselves, creating the chaos; Chaos bring to any kind of material body the erosion and suffering;  When they begins the understanding that union is better because brings order and happiness; Then the particles guided by this law moved slowly, they linked one to other in packages big and bigger, so, they got the transcendence for becoming a system: the Atom.

    Again the same happened in the transcendence of atoms to Astronomic Systems ( see the Matrix models for galactic systems formation). Unicellular micro-organisms got it when became multi-cellular organisms; and among the animals in the jungle under the salvage law had one specie that went to live on the cave, where children, females, seniors, they were feed with the resting of big animals brought by strong hunters, who learned to hunt in groups. That was the origins of the familiar system.

  • This specie was reward and became the Homo Specie. Now we as homo specie have the free will for choosing: continuing being dominated by the selfish gene that drives to fighting the individuals of same specie and producing chaos and suffering for everybody, or learning the Natural Law controlling the inner-selfish gene and being a difference that wish the state of order.

  • The human species is a provisional shape in Universal Evolution, this shape will change because all ancestors had changed, but we are the first Natural System that has the consciousness which give us the ability for choosing if our transcendence will come with or without suffering. If you don’t agree, you must show to us here which real facts of natural world you know for supporting your theory. Bla-bla-bla does not matter.


U.S.A: Copyright Washington n. 000998487/2001-02-20 | Brasil: Reg. Dir. Autorais - Brasília n. 106.158/11-12-1995 | Louis Charles Morelli