Veja por exemplo como um biologo evolucionista ataca o artigo fornecendo link para o artigo original:
E meu comentario postado no artigo do Pharyngula:
November 5, 2015
If a software says ” I am computer”, and a human being think ” I am ape”, both are wrong. What’s a human being is not an issue for evolutionary biologists while neurologist does not know how neurons relates to consciousness. When I think ” What I am?” is not my physical body asking, it is my consciousness. It does not matter if my body was raped from apes, it is not my body thinking this question as I doubt that any ape think this question..
And my consciousness is a software inserted into a terrestrial biological body, be it ape or something else. Ehe Windows software came from Bill Gate’s mind and not produced by computers, so, it is not logical to think that human bodies produced their consciousness. At last, Science has no data for afirm it.
The fact that we have less chromosomes than apes is due apes are better organic machine than us. And they are better machines because they reproduces faithful the machine that created all living beings here, the Newtonian machine. Human physical body is the necessary natural machine retrocess for nurturing a different origin from a different creator. Which we don’t know who is, because we don’t know what we are.
This is a science issue? Of course, not. Science deals with objects, real things, it does not makes comparisons of two things, does not do cladistic… humans do it. When Science alone enters in the apes’ world in the jungle and in the humans world in New York, Science is dealing with two totally different things and has no real data indicating that one thing is related to another.
One day Science could to prove that our physical body came from apes and our consciousness came from our human brains. But, it didn’t yet.
And if you want to talk for Science, you must feel as you are Science, and not a scientist atheist or theist or communist with their private interpretations behind Science.