Posts Tagged ‘scientific’

Predictions from Matrix/DNA Theory: Rules to obey

Sunday, January 19th, 2020

A suggestion from my friend:

To Louis Morelli:
You have a simple choice before you. You can spend your life as a crank, convinced of your own superiority and wondering why everyone else is refusing to acknowledge it. Or you can start making actual sense.

So, in the interest of helping you along with the second option, try this: Describe a practical prediction that follows from your “theory” and a method for testing it. The prediction should follow these criteria:


1) It should be an actual prediction. I.e. something we don’t already know.


2) It should be unique to your theory. I.e. it should be something that distinguishes your theory from every other idea out there.


3) It should be practically testable, with an objective measure of success or failure. I.e. no “you have to feel it”, no “if you use your left hemisphere, it’s obvious”, no “the jungle will tell you the answer”.

I’m sure a person as staggeringly intelligent and well-educated as yourself will recognize these as basic rules of proper scientific investigation and therefore have no objection to complying with them.

My answer:

Thanks, I will try it. But, first of all, I don´t think that I am convinced of my own superiority. I think it is actually the opposite – so humble that I never tried to go beyond my humble website. I don´t believe that I found the Ultimate Thru, neither a complete theory of it. I am, always was, a skeptical about humans knowledge, because I think our brain has no capacity to process the higher information beyond our senses. That´s why I am testing the theory against facts everyday, and selecting evidences, but, also, searching to facts that could debunk the entire theory. I am not selling anything, I am not selling myself, I don´t want to be in delusion due my wrong theory, I will not earn anything that I already have, I want the Thru, only that. If I talk about this theory with someone, it is because I am searching more minds joining and helping me in this search because I believe ( yes, here I believe) that if this theory has some thru in it, it will be beneficial to human kind, to our next generations.

Yes, I am wondering why everyone else is refusing to acknowledge the logistic and rationality in this theory. For me it is so clear, could not be in other way. We are systems, these systems has an essence, this essence is the DNA. Atoms and galaxies are systems. atoms and galaxies are our systems ancestors. They must have an essence also. This essence must be ancestor of our essence as systems. I heve applied the formula of DNA to atoms systems and astronomic systems and got how the ancestor shapes of DNA was there. If you go further, you will find the same formula as the single, natural anatomy of a wave of light, like the wave propagating from the Big Bang, what means that the code for DNA was existing before the Big Bang. It means that the first genome in this Universe came as a wave of light. This thesis is more rational than the thesis suggesting that the code in the DNA emerged here by miracles, like the one did by a supernatural God or by the inorganic matter. It is rational. I am wondering why people does not understand this rationality, this logistic. Not about why people does not understand the new theory, since I never explained it in full.

I have selected tens of predictions made by this theory in these last 30 years, that were latter proved. But the majority of these right predictions were scientifically known. I was not knowing them in Amazon jungle. The advantage here is that I didn´t need to do the experiments that revealed them, I saw them mentally by my own. Other predictions are about unknown mechanisms revealed by scientists. They see the thing happening, but they are not able to explain how or why it happens. My theory suggested the existence of these mechanisms or process and explain why it happens. But I never got to talk to the scientist and I am sure he/she will not believe in it without a long dissertation of the whole theory, for which the scientist is not wanting to waste his/her time.

I am dying. I will try, before it happens, to write a book with the must information I can do. For what? What if everything is wrong? Mendel spent his life crossing beans and wrote a manuscript about his observations. The manuscript was not saw by nobody and fell into the basement of a library. Then he died. For what he wrote it? Man, millions, billions of people are being saved due Mendels´hard work. Like me, I think Mendel has not built a family, had no kids. We spent our lives, all our energy to bring to light and feed a spiritual, or merely minded son. We write for the spiritual world, if there is one… dreaming that real people see it for the benefits of our loved human kind. It is good for us because we die in peace with our mind.

But, as suggested my friend, I must search time for trying to find a practical prediction just now…

Ciencias: Do Brasil, conexoes com exterior

Saturday, July 20th, 2019

XXXXXX

Por estes links na homepage…?

http://www.scibr.org/

SCIBR FOUNDATION

SciBr is a 501(c)(3) charitable, educational and scientific organization dedicated to promoting meaningful cultural and cooperative exchange between the United States and Brazil in education, science, innovation and research. 

Our mission is to connect Brazilian scientists, artists and entrepreneurs working abroad and to mobilize their talents to create a more prosperous, fair and sustainable Brazil.

xxxxx

Serrapilheira Fundacao

https://serrapilheira.org/

Fundação de apoio a pesquisa e divulgação cientifica no Brasil

O Serrapilheira é uma instituição privada sem fins lucrativos. Tem o objetivo de financiar pesquisas de excelência com foco em produção de conhecimento e iniciativas de divulgação científica.

xxxxx

REDECOMCIENCIA

REDE BRASILEIRA DE JORNALISTAS E COMUNICADORES DE CIENCIAS

https://www.facebook.com/redecomciencia/











The conflict between the Official Medicine and Matrix / DNA’s Medicine

Monday, September 19th, 2011

( sorry if this “Google” translation prejudices to grasp the real issue)

Modern scientific thought is convinced that the big traditional diseases are first caused by disorders of genes. The models of the Matrix / DNA are suggesting that the disease is first caused by dysfunction of the system/human-body, that is, a systemic dysfunction that produces dysfunction of genes.

The scientific thinking is convinced that genes are modified by themselves or that the DNA / RNA make mistakes or errors of transcription of genes changing positions often by chance, and so on. Anyway the root cause would be reduced to focus on genetic DNA. The models of the Matrix / DNA suggest that genes are only expressions of the system, this is who makes the changes and other errors of genes.

The scientific thinking took a stunning thwack with the Genome Project. They were convinced about the slogan “a disease, a gene”, therefore the mapping of the DNA would be the solution because it would suffice to compare maps of healthy people with maps of sick people and detect the gene responsible. With the completion of the project showed that the map obtained is not so: the disease is a product of many genes changed in several regions of DNA and we do not know why they connect in the dysfunction or how they connect. We are back to the ground zero and the diseases are still torturing and killing humans

The models of the Matrix / DNA have a perfect formula of universal system. It says that all materials architectures are clusters of systems derived from that formula. The DNA itself has as its fundamental unit of information, such as buiding block, sets of four nucleotides, which is a copy of the universal formula. So the DNA is derived from a stack of a single system. The formula shows how are the connection between the parties. It helps to identify the parts self-connected with its functions in the system. It leads to identify and separate systems within the networks that make up an architecture, be it a galaxy or a human body. And the formula is the perfect system, it lends itself to be compared with all isolated systems architecture, showing where the dysfunctions are and the probably cause. Just eliminate the causes indicated and the body works perfect.

The modern scientific thought knows nothing of the Matrix / DNA, I am the only person who is trying to divulgate it and only through this website. I am the only person who is testing the formula against natural facts and studying it day by day. 30 years doing this have convinced me that the formula is real.

At least, that the formula need to become known … and even that is destroyed as unreal, the subject of diseases can not refuse any opportunity to try.

What have you to say and to do about all this? Is there anybody with cancer, alzheimer, obesity, high cholesterol, diabetes, etc.. in the family? Are you sure that you will always be free of these scourges? So it’s nice to do something, possible, and faster, for Science toknow and test this formula. At least, yell at me.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Next, we will record here the news with issues related to the topic:

1) Molecular Changes Found Responsible for Depression in Women

http://www.healthenclave.com/news/molecular-changes-found-responsible-depression-women-1270.html

Written By:
Vikas Shukla

For the first time, molecular-level changes have been detected in the brains of depressed women. The findings reveal that there is a connecting link between the two hypotheses of biological mechanisms leading to mental illness. The research was conducted by scientists at School of Medicine, University of Pittsburg and findings were published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry.

The study author Dr. Etienne Sibille, Associate Professor, Pitt School of Medicine, noted that very little research has been done on mental illnesses of women, although they are twice as likely as men to suffer from severe and frequent depression. The outcomes of research will provide better understanding of one of the most common psychiatric illnesses.

In the study, post-mortem brain tissue samples of 21 depressed women and 21 similar women without any history of depression were examined. The researchers observed reduced expression of certain genes, including the one for brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), in depressed women as compared to their peers. Also, the expression of genes responsible for neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) was drastically low in depressed women. These changes were observed in amygdala, a part of human brain responsible in sensing and expressing emotion.

The scientists next focused on the impacts of BDNF on GABA cells by genetically engineering mice to carry different mutations in BDNF gene. They identified two mutations that led to same reduction in GABA subtype and also reflected other changes witnessed in depressed human brains. The finding will enhance future research on depression.

Psychiatrists and researchers have surmised many times in the past that reduced BDNF levels play key role in depression, and they have also hypothesized that reduced activity of GABA is an important factor.

Dr. Sibille said that their work has linked the two concepts together by demonstrating that, first, BDNF is evidently low in depression and, second, low BDNF influences particular subtypes of GABA in a way that develops characteristics we observe in depressed brains.

The researchers have continued with exploration of molecular pathways between BDNF and GABA. The project received funding from National Institute of Mental Health.