Posts Tagged ‘systems’

De onde a Natureza obteve os mecanismos e processos para criar as interações internas, entre as partes de um sistema.

Monday, September 2nd, 2019

xxxxx

O bone marrow e a produção das células vermelhas

A formula da Matrix/DNA apareceu neste Universo desde o momento do BIG BANG na forma de uma onda de luz movente que ao mover-se gera uma anatomia a qual se torna o ciclo vital que foi o código suficiente para criar sistemas naturais como os vivos e os não-vivos.  Quando desenhamos a formula como um diagrama, notamos que a formula apresenta um canal ou tubo que conecta as sete partes que executam as sete funções sistêmicas entre si, na mesma sequencia do ciclo vital. Dentro do canal ou tubo corre o fluxo da energia/informação que vai carregando as instruções para fazer as próximas partes, etc. Neste canal, cada parte pode se comunicar apenas com suas duas vizinhas, seja da esquerda ou da direita. Vamos trazer a formula para lembrar isso:

The universal matrix/DNA as closed system

The universal matrix/DNA as closed system

Mas com a evolução, e principalmente no âmbito biológico, que sao sistemas abertos, as partes internas de um sistema desenvolveram canais secundários internos pelos quais cada parte consegue se comunicar com todas as outras seis partes. Como conseguiram isso? Abrindo saídas, ramificações, do circuito principal ou aproveitando poros existentes nos ossos ( ver Sinusoidal capillaries ), os quais parecem ser uma evolução dos canais de trocas que existiam nas membranas dos seres mais simples.

Em vista disso vemos o que acontece num sistema biológico como o corpo humano quando os ossos do esqueleto se tornam a capa desse canal e dentro do qual corre o fluxo de energia/informação. Esse fluxo interno aos ossos chama-se medula óssea, ou “bone marrow”, e ele produz vários tipos de células, principalmente as células vermelhas que vão se constituir no sangue.

medula óssea, também conhecida como tutano, é um tecido líquido-gelatinoso que preenche a cavidade interna de vários ossos e fabrica os elementos figurados do sangue periférico como: hemácias (glóbulos vermelhos), leucócitos (glóbulos brancos) e plaquetas.

Creio que são estas células que provocam a abertura de saídas e assim se espalham pelo corpo. Mas não são só elas, parece que o próprio circuito produz também as capas do que veio a se tornar ramificações, canais, os quais se tornaram o sistema circulatório. A imagem de uma arvore, com os galhos saindo do tronco, parece que foi um protótipo intermediário da evolução entre o circuito único dos sistemas não-biológicos e o sistema circulatório dos aninais. A coisa aqui torna-se complexa requerendo muito estudo, não sei se órgãos se comunicam com outros órgãos, talvez trocando substancias, ou se apenas o sistema circulatório governa estas interações, ao recolher substancias produzidas por um órgão e leva-las a outros órgãos. mas o importante é ter uma noção básica de como a Natureza criou o sistema circulatório dentro dos sistemas como o corpo humano.

Outro importante fator a considerar é que não apenas foi desenvolvido a rede de inter-comunicações entre órgãos, como também nessa rede estão os canais que levam informações destas interações internas para o fluxo principal da medula óssea. Então entra e sai substancias/informação, na forma de fluidos, como vemos nesta figura:

Medula óssea dentro dos ossos e poros de entrada e saída

EXISTE DE MEDIATO ALGUMA APLICAÇÃO PRATICA DESTA DESCOBERTA?

E` isso que vou deixar no ar… as vezes estes conhecimentos ressurgem na memoria quando estamos tentando resolver problemas práticos. se eu fosse cientista da medicina, repensaria nas varias doenças causadas por disfunções nesta área tendo agora esta nova abordagem. Mas outra intuição que surge agora pode vir do seguinte: A meu ver a maior causa da pobreza dos povos tem sido a falta de associação entre as classes mais baixas. O que implica na falta destas redes de interações entre os indivíduos-partes deste sistema. Teriamos que identificar numa cidade qual o canal principal. Ele deve ligar a comunidade pelas diferenças econômicas, cada qual representando uma parte ou função sistêmica. Seria preciso quebrar este canal principal, que fe dominante/predador, e isso se daria pelo mesmo mecanismo que células internas na medula óssea criam ou se aproveitam dos capilares ou poros existentes no canal principal. Mas tem que se identificar como é o canal de fato, e isto implica em desenhar a cidade, estuda-la, etc.

INTRODUÇÃO DO ASSUNTO NO FACEBOOK:

Acabei de descobrir mais uma explicação sobre nos e nossa Natureza. A pergunta nunca respondida por ninguém era: de onde a natureza bruta tirou a ideia para fazer galhos saindo dos troncos e formando as arvores, assim como fez veias e artérias saindo do tronco da medula óssea? Ora, a ideia já existia manifestada como fato natural desde o Big Bang!… A formula da Matrix/DNA, que alguém sugeriu-me chamar de “o genoma de Deus”, surgiu neste Universo com muita plasticidade, bastante flexível, da qual um molde inicial pode ser remodelado para se adaptar a diferentes circunstancias… e poderia-se dizer que essa flexibilidade foi Deus permitindo a existência do livre-arbítrio…

PESQUISA:

Observe como medula óssea funciona como um fluxo dentro de um cabo, ou canal, constituído de osso compacto, inclusive tendo uma película intermediaria chamada de spongy bone:

xxxxx

O fluxo interno ao canal ósseo produz uma variedade de produtos. Alem das células vermelhas, produz os pratelets e as células brancas sanguíneas, as quais são de vários tipos, como:

  • Lymphocytes, neutrophils, and monocytes. These white blood cells fight against invading bacteria, viruses, or fungi to help destroy infection. Each of these cells differs in appearance.
  • Eosinophils and basophils. These white blood cells respond to allergens that can invade our bodies.

Origin of Life: This “scientific” video and the explanation from Matrix/DNA Theory

Saturday, June 22nd, 2019

xxxx

A brief introduction to learn what this website is about is resumed in the comments below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ  ( Origin of Life – How Life Started on Earth)

Comments in Youtube:

vince pie – 6/21/19

Life did not come from non life. It came from life.

Pablo Fonseca – 6/22/19

Vince, try to change this concept by:

” Natural systems did not come from scratch. Systems came from systems”.

The word “life” is our problem ( and the word ” origins” is another trap ). So what system these biological systems ( aka, life) came from? Ok there were only two known systems: astronomic and atomic. You can see quickly that atom must be discarded, because it is too much simple than the first biological system – a complete and working cell system. So the unique alternative is astronomic systems. And it is logical: the first biological system appeared inside an astronomic and was produced with ingredients existing in this system.

But, how could a giant and super simple system producing a microscopic and super complex system?! Louis Morelli was thinking about these problem, but ia new different way: systems,… and thre is no other alternative, it did it, we must discover how. He went to Amazon jungle where still there are witness of that event, and applied comparative anatomy between biological and astronomic, when he found LUCA, the last half-biological/half-astronomic system, the lost evolutionary link between Cosmological and Biological Evolution.

There is no unsolvable enigma, the whole problem are wrong words generating wrong concepts and wrong way of thinking. These people in this video is searching the ancestral of a system as a soup of random ingredients. Systems came from system. So, Morelli shows in his website the face of LUCA, which is the building block of galatic systems and he found how LUCA was here, in the middle of that soup and minerals.

Will the secret of success lie in giving up all privacy?

Friday, April 26th, 2019

xxxx

(translated by Google, waiting corrections)

A social system will be all the more defective as more private information citizens denies to Big Brother. For he will be less able to fit all different citizens into a perfect organization.

A social system will be all the more perfect as more information about each individual Big Brother knows.

Big Brother is the abstract entity of systems that emerges as the sum of all the information of all the parts plus the information of the interactions between the parts … and if the system is not isolated, about the interactions of the parts with elements external to the system. This abstract entity in the most complex systems comes from the evolution of the self-control of the non-living systems that maintains the internal thermodynamic equilibrium. It is common among biologists to talk about an “invisible command of instructions in DNA.” This is the Big Brother of genes.

All this is immediately apparent when we have in mind the universal formula that nature has applied to organize matter in all types of existing natural systems:

And the design of the internal information flow circuit of the Matrix / DNA formula in its perfect closed system version, in the form of a software diagram

Matrix / DNA formula in its perfect closed system version, in the form of a software diagram

There is a lot of people’s reluctance to share their privacy. The Petrobras director who was arrested for corruption and was found to have a hollow wall in the house with 20 million, would not want to report it to Big Brother. This would require people to report whether they masturbate or not, how often, and how often they go to the bathroom, whether they have white hair under the paint, etc. But by the definition of perfect system, if a single information, the most seemingly contemptible that can be, internal to the system, which is not summed up in the control entity, the system will not be perfect.

We are led to conclude with certainty that humankind will never have a perfect society.

But we are also sure that either the human being changes physically or humanity will be extinguished. Certainly the changes that will occur on the planet and the solar system will reach a point that will no longer support life on Earth. An alternative that seems to be the only hope is that the human being evolves by changing his physical form, in the sense of less mass and more energy. It would be the only way to make interstellar travel, to find another planet like Earth, and / or to spread through the Universe.

But to change form, there must be transcendence. And transcendence comes from the perfect harmony of all parts with openness to self-evolution itself. This perfect harmony of all parties would imply a perfect social system. And perfect system implies that all citizens totally give up their privacy.

We are apparently faced with a paradoxical problem with no rational solution.

In Aldous Huxley’s book and movie “Brave New World,” we can have a representation of a perfect social system. But the author himself observes that the human being becomes a kind of robot, stupid, where it is forbidden to discover new thing because it would alter the order of the system, it would be forbidden to create, and forbidden or non-existent free will. Obviously many of today’s humans would reject such a system, though it would provide maximum physical happiness.

A possible solution would be for humanity to seek to form an organized society, in the sense of harmonic, without any system. This implies, without having a core, a central government. All decisions related to the social level would be dictated by plebiscites. But for that there would have to be a slow evolution in the sense of cutting cultural, behavioral edges, approaching cultures and unique behaviors. Most would always win a plebiscite. Imagine if the majority were Muslim. Many of his decisions would be unbearable to atheists, materialists, Catholics, etc. Imagine being forced to cover your face with a cloth … never wear jeans … If most were women and with the power to dictate the rules, not even Jesus would have been able to stay in the house of the woman who would not stop moving by cleaning and tidying up the house and complaining that the men did not help in that work to be talking about philosophies, politics …

So maybe the “no system” solution is possible, but it would certainly be very slow. That all the different heads are moving in the direction of one day converge to be one head, it would have to be a process in which each generation would change a minute detail of a less common behavior in the context of the global population. But also the planet would have to change in order to reach a general homogeneity of climate, etc.

Perhaps the supreme and possible solution is concealed in a concept that was said above related to Huxley’s utopia: maximum physical happiness.

I believe there are two different kinds of human need: physical and intellectual needs, or spiritual needs. Then we could think of humanity coming to two types of harmonic organization. One, referring to physical needs, would be the perfect system, total accommodation and satisfaction for the body, and another, referring to intellectual needs, without any system, harmonic but inter-differentiated, with the whole open to its evolution. The intellectual necessity would continue to motivate the spatial evolution, and with this it would withdraw from the social machine bodies to inhabit, as for example, the space stations. For in the brave new world, stupidity would interrupt any search for evolution. The discoveries, the creation, the maintenance of the autonomous consciousness, would be given above the Earth, therefore without affecting the perfect social system. But on the ship there would be no leaders, commanders, for there could be no system there.

Bee and ant societies are the biological incarnation of the universal formula for perfect system. It is understandable that the formula encrypted in genetics has managed to self-design after it has formed the body, to be the social system: ants and bees have no intellect, not even a brain worth noting. There the queen and the incarnation of the abstract identity that emerges as control of the system. but we must note that the queen herself and slave of and in her own system. She has to submit to rigid rules of discipline. It also can not discover, can not create, can not exercise free will in its entirety, as it would alter the system. Big Brother would also be a slave to the system.

The Universe has organized – or assisted the organization – everything in a system. Even the remotest rock on the ocean floor belongs to a system, the galactic. And every system is bad, because it implies death, slavery, etc. But it seems to me that the Universe is sending a message: eternal existence, total freedom, will only be bestowed upon the species in which the parts coexist harmoniously ceasing to be parts of a system.

Anyway, for now the rational suggestion for humanity faith: transform the planet into a landscaped garden and the human inserted into a mechanically automated biosphere, where the body will have the maximum of its satisfaction, but keep the mind out of it, open to evolution.

It is possible. I have not yet solved what we are going to do with our privacy of data relating to our physical body. Which includes up to the last penny, or the bottle of whiskey that I keep hidden under the bed.And as in immigration cases, if you really want to naturalize a citizen because of marriage, you may be required to inform the color of your wife’s panties to prove that the marriage is true …

And maybe that’s where the privacy issue is going to go. You want to be from the system and you understand that for the system to exist and to maintain it has to obtain and verify information, otherwise it becomes a mess, the system can undo itself. Thus you lose all shame, all protection of your physical privacy, and voluntarily surrender your body to the brave new world … But mind, never!

There would be a way for everyone to surrender the body and everyone to maintain sovereignty over their mind. But he could not be an atheist and belong to no organized religion, no church. All would conclude and have the intuition that there is at least a much more evolved intelligence, and therefore with much or total power over the material world. This intuition would be the only common denominator among all minds. Equality of minds would end there. From this intuition each mind would begin to seek and assemble its image and concepts on what would be this “cosmic consciousness.” Since every human is different from anything else, everyone had life experiences with some different detail, there would not be one god equal to the other. It would be forbidden to speak of your God and you would not accept listening to others speak of their gods so as not to disturb your image. Each God indicates a specific path, unique, to follow. Thus all humans would have intimate, unconfessable, different directions, even though they lived together. And ‘possible, for I have been doing times just doing this, my divinity no one else can conceive the same, my temple is my brain, only I can enter into it.

Universal Systems Model : Academic perspective x Matrix/DNA perspective

Thursday, August 24th, 2017

xxxx

At the academic oficial, scientific, schollar, team, there is a field called ” Universal Systems Model” and they has a diagram model:

Input > Process > Output > Feedback > Input > Process > ….

The Matrix/DNA world view has built a different model, more complex, in shape of a simple diagram of software:

Matriz Universal: Software de Sistema Fechado

The Matrix/DNA Formula as Closed System

Notice that the academic model is a reduction the Matrix/DNA’s formula diagram, where:

Input = F1
Process = F2,F3.F4,F6
Output = F7
Feedback = F7>F1

The meaning difference is that the Matrix/DNA diagram is related to natural systems, which works moved and built by the life’s cycle force. The model was perceived as a universal formula template behind all natural systems, from atoms, to astronomics, to living bodies.  While the academic diagram is related only to mechanic systems and automatized operations machines.

A second difference is that ( as we can see in the text below), the academics refers to ” open loop” and ” closed loops”, where the system begins with the open loop and the component “feedback” constitute the closed loop, in a clear reference to the states of opened systems and closed systems of Matrix/DNA formula.

A third difference is a curious one. The academic model missing the function 5, which is responsible by the reproduction of natural systems. But, when they inserts the function “feedback” they gets the recycling of the system. This difference is lots of food for thought. First, we need to define the difference between the natural reproduction and the human made machine/recycling. Is there a difference? It seems that, while natural reproduction includes entropy and death, the mechanistic recycling can avoid them. But, it seems that natural reproduction saves more energy than mechanistic recycling, due the natural reproduction using half of its energy at grown state for to feed the production of a new system, while at mechanistic recycling, the component “feedback” always comes with a new charge of outside energy. So, maybe we could change the academic model to:

Input (information + energy) > process (when half of that energy is driven directly to the input) > output > feedback (without new charge of energy) . It would produce a revolution in modern technology! So, let’s go searching a way to do it.

We will need studying the academic texts, as well the technical names, etc., for to search ways of interactions between the two models, with the goal for applying the Matrix/DNA formula to optimizing the technology.

Then, the first step will be ” googling” “Universal systems model”. As beginning, I am posting here the link to a PDF:

https://www.wsfcs.k12.nc.us/cms/lib/NC01001395/Centricity/Domain/1555/3.03_Universal_Systems_Model.pdf
Technology Competencies Problem-Solving
Fundamentals of Technology
Where we can read:
Explain the universal systems model
• Explain the components of the universal systems model
• Explain systems models in the context of the systems of technology such as communication and transportation
• Explain the elements or resources of technology as inputs to systems
The universal systems model is an attempt to graphically depict processes of all sorts. Viewing something through the scheme of the universal systems model is an attempt to simplify something that is relatively complex. The model typically includes a look at system inputs, processes, and outputs for open loop systems and a fourth component, feedback, is included in systems that are perceived to be closed loops.
These are often referred to as the “resources of technology.” System Inputs • People • Information • Tools and Machines • Materials • Energy • Time • Capital
Processes vary depending on the area of endeavor. For example, one of the main processes for a manufacturing company would be secondary material processes: separating, combining, conditioning, forming, and casting. However, a communication company would be encoding, storing, retrieving, transmitting, receiving, and decoding information. Outputs generally include certain eventualities such as expected, unexpected, desirable, and undesirable. For example, a manufacturer expected to make a profit, and this is desirable. However, the company did not expect to pollute the water when it accidentally spilled chemicals onto its loading dock. This output is undesireable.
Systems experience entropy.  Entropy is the degradation of all systems whether man-made or natural.  For example, the fuel system in an automobile malfunctions over time. Systems and sub-systems are interdependent. For example, in order for the automobile’s fuel and electrical systems to work together, the engine must be correctly timed.
Component Systems of Technology
The component systems of technology are:
B. Communication Systems – Systems that change information into messages that can be transmitted.  These systems include a sender, message, receiver, and feedback.
B.  Structural Systems – Systems that use goods and materials to build structures that will resist external force, support a load, and hold each structural element in a relative position to other parts.
C.  Manufacturing Systems – Systems using materials and processes to produce usable products.
D.  Energy, Power and Transportation Systems – Systems that convert energy into mechanical, fluid, electrical, radiant, chemical, and thermal energy.

(cont. research)