Archive for the ‘auto consciencia’ Category

O que fazer agora para acelerar o exorcismo dos instintos herdados dos animais predadores e fracos?

quarta-feira, março 22nd, 2017

….

Alguém interessado nisto?

Uma cientista neurológica brasileira esta defendendo a teoria que o córtex humano cresceu diferente dos outros animais devido aos humanos cozinharem o alimento, obtendo assim muito mais energia dos alimentos que os outros animais. E o cérebro, principalmente o cortex, é grande consumidor de energia.

Concordo mas penso que esta não é a historia toda. O cozimento do alimento criou uma diferença muito grande no mecanismo de se alimentar do predador de quem herdamos nossa metade predadora, carnívora, assassina, violenta. O predador puramente animalizado – e inclua os macacos nisso – precisam de quatro dentes proeminentes, os caninos, para por forca e matar e arrancar a carne dos ossos e triturar os músculos. Com o advento do cozimento, a carne e os musculos ja vem mais tenros, moles, os caninos são menos usados, e por outro lado, o resto da dentadura, os dentes menores ou onde existiam falhas de dentes, precisam crescer para melhorar mastigar a carne e os vegetais, mantendo a nossa metade herdada dos animais vegetarianos. E isto já começou com os macacos, que são tanto carnívoros quanto vegetarianos. Portanto começou antes da invenção do cozimento.

O menor uso e menor força ou energia dirigida aos caninos os fez atrofiar, através de milhares ou milhões de anos da historia evolutiva. Isto foi enviando mais energia vegetal ao cérebro, uma energia que foi sendo desviada do sistema límbico, do caroco reptiliano ou resquício do cérebro animal predador, parra o topo do cérebro onde se formou e desenvolveu o córtex.

O córtex menos violento e menos assassino começou a captar de uma dimensão paralela do meio externo as partículas ou bolhas microscópicas da consciência cósmica. Esta não é um pano de fundo do mundo material, pois ao contrario, a dimensão material é uma especie de calo desta dimensão. O acumulo destas partículas foi desenvolvendo o feto de consciência. A qual emerge no meio dos instintos animalescos, e dessa fusão surge o pensamento continuo, ou psique.

Mas esta psique primaria ainda é projeção do cérebro primitivo animal pois os genes criam uma arquitetura – o córtex – no mesmo modelo do cérebro inteiro do animal. Então nesta psique meio abstrata esta também projetada os caninos. Se pudéssemos tirar uma foto das pessoas que se comportam como predadores de humanos e animais, veríamos na psique deles a proeminência dos caninos, ou ao menos, o foco onde se dirige e se concentra a energia que move estes instintos.

O fato é que a Humanidade precisa mudar, exorcizar eliminar estes resquícios de caninos da psique, e este é um dos mais importantes objetivos se a humanidade quer melhorar suas condições de existência e ate sobreviver ate alcançar sua transcendência, ou então ser extinta no meio deste caminho evolucionário. E o que podemos fazer de fato a respeito disso, agora?

Temos que de alguma maneira interferir na vida dos predadores. Claro tambem sabemos que existe a outra metade da historia: no cortex existe a metade herdada das presas, dessa massa devoradora da vegetação, inconsequentemente e desenfreadamente auto-reprodutora, reacionária a qualquer mudança evolutiva. Temos tambem que exorcizar isso do cérebro e da psique. Mas como?

Bem, aqui fica o texto para ser repensado e consertado em seus erros e a questão no ar para raciocinar.

A Diferenca nas Transformacoes Mentais Entre Hindus e Matrixianos

segunda-feira, março 20th, 2017

xxxx

Interessante e diferente do comum o que se ouve neste vídeo. Nao cabe a mim julgar se o orador realmente conhece algo a mais ou nao, porem, e’ fato que de qualquer maneira ele mostra problemas comuns por angulos que nao tinhamos pensado. Se voce apreciou este video, sugiro que veja outro onde ele narra a historia de sua aprendizagem na India, o quual e’ mais interessante ( link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Umr61UnQvuE – Isso Existe – um filme sobre Sri Prem Baba – Versão em português )

Abaixo vai a analise da Matrix/DNA num comentário publicado no Youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RpARf15IctI

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli – Mar/03/20/2017

Existem vários caminhos para transformações do estado mental, inclusive os mais impróprios, como o percorrido pelo escravo que foge da senzala para tentar sobreviver solitário no meio da selva bruta. Eu fiz este caminho, então obviamente a minha transformação foi para algo diferente desta ocorrida com Sri Baba. Suspeito que as formas em que somos transformados por diferentes caminhos são fracões de uma forma final, a transformação definitiva para o transcendental. As imperfeições e soluções auferidas na minha transformação são diferentes das de Sri Baba. Mas se eu acreditar que a minha alcançada nova cosmovisão é a correta, e as outras são meros paliativos, as minhas soluções tornam-se impraticáveis e inúteis. Portanto, creio que urge – antes de tentar atuar no mundo externo – uma confrontação entre as novas cosmovisões e suas sugestões.

O que ambos percebemos e nos aflige, é a concordância de que a consciência alojada nos cérebros humanos corre risco de extermínio antes de amadurecer e aflorar livre. E ambos ficamos angustiados pela nossa debilidade em produzir as mudanças necessárias para evitar este terrível destino. Tenho razoes para crer que já existe considerável numero de meio-transformados, e nos mais diversos caminhos, e para suspeitar que o nosso encontro e debate poderia ao menos diminuir esta debilidade de cada um, de cada linhagem transformativa como esta da Índia. O guru deveria se lembrar que nem a milenar linhagem hindu conseguiu algum sucesso de mudança em seu próprio pais, onde a miséria e a superpopulação explodem.

Na selva o buscador pode chegar aos chakras, `a luz pertinente ao hemisfério direito cerebral. Mas percebe-mo-la por outro angulo e sob diferente estado físico/emocional. E’ a soma das observações relativísticas de cada observador no seu ponto do espaço/tempo que pode dar uma compreensão sobre a totalidade do fenômeno. E somente assim teríamos uma chance de descobrir o que realmente aconteceu de errado e continua acontecendo com a bolha de consciência universal e a especie em que ela encarna na Terra.

Sem conhecer de fato a causa, nunca atinaremos com sua solução. O guru fala num código divino. Tem ele percebido e entendido de fato este código fluindo nesta Natureza? A minha privada transformação mostrou o código na onda de luz invisível aos olhos humanos ( só veem um sétimo dela, a faixa da onda denominada branca ou “visível”) e nela o código encriptado. E alem disso, nos forneceu elementos para tentar montar sua Historia, desde as origens deste Universo. Nesta Historia se percebe claramente onde e porque se iniciou a distorção que ora nos ameaça, ainda tempos antes das origens da vida neste planeta. A linhagem transformista dos autores da Bíblia perceberam flashes deste evento e interpretaram-nos `a sua forma, na fabula da queda do paraíso. Pela maneira como eles distorceram os eventos tais quais eu os percebo, aprendi que nos é impossível deixar de projetar nossa condição humana e psique nestas interpretações, levando a resultados improdutivos e inclusive debilitando a capacidade de autocura humana.

Eu sei que a Bíblia começa com uma verdade fantasticamente superior `a capacidade de imaginação humana, mas depois deste começo ela erra quase tudo. Porem também sei que não estou exorcizado desta falha de projeção humana em eventos com leis e ambientes que nada tem a ver com existência humana, portanto, sei que minha cosmovisão deve conter erros. Porem, também sei que na do guru existem erros de suas interpretações. Por isso repito que precisamos encontrar um canal para expor na mesa nossas visões e estuda-las com um olhar somado impessoal, senão, não conseguiremos evitar a tragedia. (qualquer curiosidade veja meu trabalho digitando ” A Matriz Universal dos Sistemas Naturais e Ciclos Vitais”.

Um Anjo Guerreiro no Córtex Bombardeia o Demônio do Baixo Cérebro?!

quinta-feira, janeiro 12th, 2017

xxxx

Cortex (a esq) bombardeia brainstem (a dir) inibindo instintos

Cortex (a esq) bombardeia brainstem (a dir) inibindo instintos

Parece que eles continuam vencendo. Cada dia estão descobrindo novas evidencias para reforçar sua teoria: a de que não existe mente ou consciência, nem separada do cérebro, mas sim, o que existe, são meras reações químicas e impulsos elétricos no cérebro.

Acima da coluna espinhal, logo na nuca e dentro do cérebro, tem uma proeminência que algum cientista antigo denominou de ” Complexo Reptiliano”, ou Complexo R. Seria resquício do cérebro dos repteis que os humanos herdaram e a evolução ainda mantem. Se esta proeminência se expressar mais forte que outras partes do cérebro, um humano atua como um réptil, cometendo as coisas mais hediondas. Talvez como o individuo que atacou outro na Florida e comeu o rosto dele…

Mais modernamente, esta proeminência é denominada “brainstem”, ou “tronco cerebral”, se estou traduzindo corretamente. E sabe-se que ali esta a sede dos instintos, a maioria vinda do comportamento animal. Ela se expressa continuamente e é responsável pelo comportamento agressivo. Perante alguma ofensa, mesmo que apenas verbal, começamos a ter o sentimento agressivo, e isto vem do brainstem. Se o brainstem não sentir resistência do resto do cérebro ou não for por este inibido imediatamente, o sentimento torna-se ato agressivo de fato. O que descobriram agora é relativo a outra parte do cérebro, o chamado cortex pré-frontal, que fica no alto do cérebro. Ao receber o sinal de que o brainstem despertou o sentimento agressivo, ele se contrai e se prepara. Se o brainstem ficar só nisso e não prosseguir para a ação de violência, o cortex relaxa e volta ao normal. Mas se o brainstem iniciar a reação para violência, o cortex dispara um bombardeio de neurônios sobre o brainstem tentando neutraliza-lo. Se conseguir, o humano irado se contem e não agride. Isto é o que se observa ocorrendo na matéria do cérebro e pode-se ve-lo claramente na figura abaixo. Mas…, filosoficamente falando, sera só isso mesmo?

Onde, em que outra situação, a Natureza tem suas forcas fluindo numa direcao, e de repente surgem outras contrarias impedindo as primeiras de se moverem? Ok, acho que podemos detectar varias destas situações. Por exemplo, forma-se um tornado, indo numa direcao, aparece uma montanha, ou um vale, e o tornado morre.

Não, isto não serve, pois a montanha não é uma força que move vindo da direcao oposta. E a montanha não emite nenhuma força contraria ao tornado. Talvez duas nuvens vindas de direções opostas, quando provocam trovoes e relâmpagos? Acho que não, não tenho certeza, mas acho que todas as nuvens numa regiao devem moverem-se na mesma direcao. Bem, fica isto em aberto `a busca de tal situação para que possamos aceitar que a natureza tem capacidade para fazer isto por si mesma. Pois se estes cientistas com esta ideologia puramente materialista querem defende-la, tem que mostrarem que dentro do cérebro ocorrem apenas processos físicos/químicos naturais, caso contrario, se acreditam que esta situação dentro do cérebro ocorre pela primeira vez no Universo, estarão apelando para a magia, estão se desviando para o pensamento magico de todas as religiões.

Porque o cérebro animal puramente instintivo desenvolveu outra parte nele mesmo que o combate,… é uma questão que esta filosofia me plantou na cabeça agora e nunca vi antes sendo perguntada nem respondida. Para mim não faz sentido logico natural, se vamos reduzir o cérebro a eventos físico/químicos, naturais. Ok, mas os materialistas dizem que estas mudanças ocorrem por mutações genéticas as quais ocorrem por acaso nos erros nas duplicações do DNA. Se o erro produzir uma inovação que faca o individuo, ou a população, se adaptar melhor ao ambiente, a seleção natural vai fixar esta mutação definitivamente. Não cola. Para começar, enquanto não aprimorar-mos nossa visão ainda quase cega e nossos sensores poucos e primários, e ficar-mos apenas com estes instrumentos técnicos de pesquisa que são apenas extensões destes poucos sentidos, não podemos acreditar em nenhuma conclusão definitiva sobre o porque ocorrem estas mutações. Em segundo lugar, os primeiros indivíduos com esta mutação jamais seriam selecionados naturalmente pois este novo apêndice os enfraqueceu.

Enfim, eu não acredito ( pois um filosofo naturalista nunca acredita), mas prefiro apostar na teoria de que num animal ancestral começou a se expressar uma antiga propriedade da Natureza que esteve dormente desde os átomos que formaram o cepo primitivo comum, cuja propriedade hoje denominamos de consciência. E esta consciência tem uma força própria que pode atuar sobre a matéria cerebral. E seria esta consciência que dirigiria o cortex a bombardear o brainstem. Mas não tenho provas disso como eles não tem provas de sua teoria, estão fica teoria contra teoria em aberto, sem crendices. Esta notável descoberta sera’ excelente alimento para pensar muito e partir para mais pesquisas do fenômeno. Vamos ao artigo, e nossa pesquisa:

Neural Connection Keeps Instincts in Check

http://neurosciencenews.com/instinct-prefrontal-cortex-5889/

Pesquisa:

PAG

Cn3nucleus.png

Periaqueductal gray – Wikipedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periaqueductal_gray

The periaqueductal gray (PAG) (also known as the central gray) is the primary control center for descending pain modulation. It has enkephalin-producing cells that suppress pain. The periaqueductal grey matter is the grey matter located around the cerebral aqueduct within the tegmentum of the midbrain

 

 

O que faz voce,voce?

quinta-feira, janeiro 5th, 2017

xxxx

( Copiar e traduzir este artigo. E’  muito importante sobre o conhecimento e teorias atuais da mente)

What Makes You You?

http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/12/what-makes-you-you.html

What Makes You You?

Ensaio do meu comentário a ser postado:

Congratulations, a collection of theories about the issue. There is another theory suggesting a new idea – the Matrix/DNA Theory. This theory introduces his theoretical model of the link between cosmological and biological evolution. It is the building block of galaxies (showed at my avatar above) which happens to be the same building blocks of DNA ( a lateral pair of nucleotides). The difference is

Bons Comentarios:

Corneliu Coman ·

Hey Tim! I’ve asked myself the same question over and over again, since i’ve put a lot of effort into finding “who I am”. My conclusion was close to the “continuity” (I am who I decide to be-or become).

But there goes another dillema: does any of your neurons think “I’m Tim?” or “I am Tim’s Neuron?” or “I am Neuron #1.002.125 of Tim’s Body”? Probably no (how can we know)?

So imagine Earth (or countries or whatever bigger instance) as “the bigger organism” and YOU as the neuron from the example above. Would your previous arguments still stand? probably yes. cell have atoms, molecules, dna and organelles.

So, would you realize your identity is a part of something, and you are not a stand-alone organism? Or you are stand-alone, but you cannot live isolated, so you are completely dependant to other cells (people).

So, finally, my greatest dillema: why do I see the world through my eyes (my body’s eyes) and not through yours. Or his. Or hers? It doesn’t make sense that I should be confined to myself.
Can it because all of us together are the greatest organism and I am just a cell?
Or are we simpy unable (or unconscious) of our ability to perceive everybody else’s brains?

xxxx

Copia para ser traduzida:

When you say the word “me,” you probably feel pretty clear about what that means. It’s one of the things you’re clearest on in the whole world—something you’ve understood since you were a year old. You might be working on the question, “Who am I?” but what you’re figuring out is the who am part of the question—the part is obvious. It’s just you. Easy.

But when you stop and actually think about it for a minute—about what “me” really boils down to at its core—things start to get pretty weird. Let’s give it a try.

The Body Theory

We’ll start with the first thing most people equate with what a person is—the physical body itself. The Body Theory says that that’s what makes you you. And that would make sense. It doesn’t matter what’s happening in your life—if your body stops working, you die. If Mark goes through something traumatic and his family says, “It really changed him—he’s just not the same person anymore,” they don’t literally mean Mark isn’t the same person—he’s changed, but he’s still Mark, because Mark’s body is Mark, no matter what he’s acting like. Humans believe they’re so much more than a hunk of flesh and bone, but in the end, a physical ant is the ant, a squirrel’s body is the squirrel, and a human is its body. This is the Body Theory—let’s test it:

So what happens when you cut your fingernails? You’re changing your body, severing some of its atoms from the whole. Does that mean you’re not you anymore? Definitely not—you’re still you.

How about if you get a liver transplant? Bigger deal, but definitely still you, right?

What if you get a terrible disease and need to replace your liver, kidney, heart, lungs, blood, and facial tissue with synthetic parts, but after all the surgery, you’re fine and can live your life normally. Would your family say that you had died, because most of your physical body was gone? No, they wouldn’t. You’d still be you. None of that is needed for you to be you.

Well maybe it’s your DNA? Maybe that’s the core thing that makes you you, and none of these organ transplants matter because your remaining cells all still contain your DNA, and they’re what maintains “you.” One major problem—identical twins have identical DNA, and they’re not the same person. You are you, and your identical twin is most certainly not you. DNA isn’t the answer.

So far, the Body Theory isn’t looking too good. We keep changing major parts of the body, and you keep being you.

But how about your brain?

The Brain Theory

Let’s say a mad scientist captures both you and Bill Clinton and locks the two of you up in a room.

CH

The scientist then performs an operation on both of you, whereby he safely removes each of your brains and switches them into the other’s head. Then he seals up your skulls and wakes you both up. You look down and you’re in a totally different body—Bill Clinton’s body. And across the room, you see your body—with Bill Clinton’s personality.

CFO

Now, are you still you? Well, my intuition says that you’re you—you still have your exact personality and all your memories—you’re just in Bill Clinton’s body now. You’d go find your family to explain what happened:

CF1

CF2

So unlike your other organs, which could be transplanted without changing your identity, when you swapped brains, it wasn’t a brain transplant—it was a body transplant. You’d still feel like you, just with a different body. Meanwhile, your old body would not be you—it would be Bill Clinton. So what makes you you must be your brain. The Brain Theory says that wherever the brain goes, you go—even if it goes into someone else’s skull.

The Data Theory

Consider this—

What if the mad scientist, after capturing you and Bill Clinton, instead of swapping your physical brains, just hooks up a computer to each of your brains, copies every single bit of data in each one, then wipes both of your brains completely clean, and then copies each of your brain data onto the other person’s physical brain? So you both wake up, both with your own physical brains in your head, but you’re not in your body—you’re in Bill Clinton’s body. After all, Bill Clinton’s brain now has all of your thoughts, memories, fears, hopes, dreams, emotions, and personality. The body and brain of Bill Clinton would still run out and go freak out about this to your family. And again, after a significant amount of convincing, they would indeed accept that you were alive, just in Bill Clinton’s body.

Philosopher John Locke’s memory theory of personal identity suggests that what makes you you is your memory of your experiences. Under Locke’s definition of you, the new Bill Clinton in this latest example is you, despite not containing any part of your physical body, not even your brain. 

This suggests a new theory we’ll call The Data Theory, which says that you’re not your physical body at all. Maybe what makes you you is your brain’s data—your memories and your personality.

We seem to be honing in on something, but the best way to get to concrete answers is by testing these theories in hypothetical scenarios. Here’s an interesting one, conceived by British philosopher Bernard Williams:

The Torture Test

Situation 1: The mad scientist kidnaps you and Clinton, switches your brain data with Clinton’s, as in the latest example, wakes you both up, and then walks over to the body of Clinton, where you supposedly reside, and says, “I’m now going to horribly torture one of you—which one should I torture?”

What’s your instinct? Mine is to point at my old body, where I no longer reside, and say, “Him.” And if I believe in the Data Theory, then I’ve made a good choice. My brain data is in Clinton’s body, so I’m now in Clinton’s body, so who cares about my body anymore? Sure, it sucks for anyone to be tortured, but if it’s between me and Bill Clinton, I’m choosing him.

Situation 2: The mad scientist captures you and Clinton, except he doesn’t do anything to your brains yet. He comes over to you—normal you with your normal brain and body—and asks you a series of questions. Here’s how I think it would play out:

Mad Scientist: Okay so here’s what’s happening. I’m gonna torture one of you. Who should I torture?

You: [pointing at Clinton] Him.

MS: Okay but there’s something else—before I torture whoever I torture, I’m going to wipe both of your brains of all memories, so when the torture is happening, neither of you will remember who you were before this. Does that change your choice?

You: Nope. Torture him.

MS: One more thing—before the torture happens, not only am I going to wipe your brains clean, I’m going to build new circuitry into your brain that will convince you that you’re Bill Clinton. By the time I’m done, you’ll think you’re Bill Clinton and you’ll have all of his memories and his full personality and anything else that he thinks or feels or knows. I’ll do the same thing to him, convincing him he’s you. Does that change your choice?

You: Um, no. Regardless of any delusion I’m going through and no matter who I think I am, I don’t want to go through the horrible pain of being tortured. Insane people still feel pain. Torture him.

So in the first situation, I think you’d choose to have your own body tortured. But in the second, I think you’d choose Bill Clinton’s body—at least I would. But the thing is—they’re the exact same example. In both cases, before any torture happens, Clinton’s brain ends up with all of your data and your brain has his—the difference is just at which point in the process you were asked to decide. In both cases, your goal is for you to not be tortured, but in the first situation, you felt that after the brain data swap, you were in Clinton’s body, with all of your personality and memories there with you—while in the second situation, if you’re like me, you didn’t care what was going to happen with the two brains’ data, you believed that you would remain with your physical brain, and body, either way.

Choosing your body to be the one tortured in the first situation is an argument for the Data Theory—you believe that where your data goes, you go. Choosing Clinton’s body to be tortured in the second situation is an argument for the Brain Theory, because you believe that regardless of what he does with your brain’s data, you will continue to be in your own body, because that’s where your physical brain is. Some might even take it a step further, and if the mad scientist told you he was even going to switch your physical brains, you’d still choose Clinton’s body, with your brain in it, to be tortured. Those that would torture a body with their own brain in it over torturing their own body believe in the Body Theory.

Not sure about you, but I’m finishing this experiment still divided. Let’s try another. Here’s my version of modern philosopher Derek Parfit’s teletransporter thought experiment, which he first described in his book Reasons and Persons

The Teletransporter Thought Experiment

It’s the year 2700. The human race has invented all kinds of technology unimaginable in  today’s world. One of these technologies is teleportation—the ability to transport yourself to distant places at the speed of light. Here’s how it works—

You go into a Departure Chamber—a little room the size of a small cubicle.

cube stand

You set your location—let’s say you’re in Boston and your destination is London—and when you’re ready to go, you press the button on the wall. The chamber walls then scan your entire body, uploading the exact molecular makeup of your body—every atom that makes up every part of you and its precise location—and as it scans, it destroys, so every cell in your body is destroyed by the scanner as it goes.

cube beam

When it’s finished (the Departure Chamber is now empty after destroying all of your cells), it beams your body’s information to an Arrival Chamber in London, which has all the necessary atoms waiting there ready to go. The Arrival Chamber uses the data to re-form your entire body with its storage of atoms, and when it’s finished you walk out of the chamber in London looking and feeling exactly how you did back in Boston—you’re in the same mood, you’re hungry just like you were before, you even have the same paper cut on your thumb you got that morning.

The whole process, from the time you hit the button in the Departure Chamber to when you walk out of the Arrival Chamber in London, takes five minutes—but to you it feels instantaneous. You hit the button, things go black for a blink, and now you’re standing in London. Cool, right?

In 2700, this is common technology. Everyone you know travels by teleportation. In addition to the convenience of speed, it’s incredibly safe—no one has ever gotten hurt doing it.

But then one day, you head into the Departure Chamber in Boston for your normal morning commute to your job in London, you press the big button on the wall, and you hear the scanner turn on, but it doesn’t work.

cubicle broken

The normal split-second blackout never happens, and when you walk out of the chamber, sure enough, you’re still in Boston. You head to the check-in counter and tell the woman working there that the Departure Chamber is broken, and you ask her if there’s another one you can use, since you have an early meeting and don’t want to be late.

She looks down at her records and says, “Hm—it looks like the scanner worked and collected its data just fine, but the cell destroyer that usually works in conjunction with the scanner has malfunctioned.”

“No,” you explain, “it couldn’t have worked, because I’m still here. And I’m late for this meeting—can you please set me up with a new Departure Chamber?”

She pulls up a video screen and says, “No, it did work—see? There you are in London—it looks like you’re gonna be right on time for your meeting.” She shows you the screen, and you see yourself walking on the street in London.

“But that can’t be me,” you say, “because I’m still here.”

At that point, her supervisor comes into the room and explains that she’s correct—the scanner worked as normal and you’re in London as planned. The only thing that didn’t work was the cell destroyer in the Departure Chamber here in Boston. “It’s not a problem, though,” he tells you, “we can just set you up in another chamber and activate its cell destroyer and finish the job.”

And even though this isn’t anything that wasn’t going to happen before—in fact, you have your cells destroyed twice every day—suddenly, you’re horrified at the prospect.

“Wait—no—I don’t want to do that—I’ll die.”

The supervisor explains, “You won’t die sir. You just saw yourself in London—you’re alive and well.”

“But that’s not me. That’s a replica of me—an imposterI’m the real me—you can’t destroy my cells!”

The supervisor and the woman glance awkwardly at each other. “I’m really sorry sir—but we’re obligated by law to destroy your cells. We’re not allowed to form the body of a person in an Arrival Chamber without destroying the body’s cells in a Departure Chamber.”

You stare at them in disbelief and then run for the door. Two security guards come out and grab you. They drag you toward a chamber that will destroy your cells, as you kick and scream…

__________

If you’re like me, in the first part of that story, you were pretty into the idea of teletransportation, and by the end, you were not.

The question the story poses is, “Is teletransportation, as described in this experiment, a form of traveling? Or a form of dying?

This question might have been ambiguous when I first described it—it might have even felt like a perfectly safe way of traveling—but by the end, it felt much more like a form of dying. Which means that every day when you commute to work from Boston to London, you’re killed by the cell destroyer, and a replica of you is created.1 To the people who know you, you survive teletransportation just fine, the same way your wife seems just fine when she arrives home to you after her own teletransportation, talking about her day and discussing plans for next week. But is it possible that your wife was actually killed that day, and the person you’re kissing now was just created a few minutes ago?

Well again, it depends on what you are. Someone who believes in the Data Theory would posit that London you is you as much as Boston you, and that teletransportation is perfectly survivable. But we all related to Boston you’s terror at the end there—could anyone really believe that he should be fine with being obliterated just because his data is safe and alive over in London? Further, if the teletransporter could beam your data to London for reassembly, couldn’t it also beam it to 50 other cities and create 50 new versions of you? You’d be hard-pressed to argue that those were all you. To me, the teletransporter experiment is a big strike against the Data Theory.

Similarly, if there were an Ego Theory that suggests that you are simply your ego, the teletransporter does away nicely with that. Thinking about London Tim, I realize that “Tim Urban” surviving means nothing to me. The fact that my replica in London will stay friends with my friends, keep Wait But Why going with his Tuesday-ish posts, and live out the whole life I was planning for myself—the fact that no one will miss me or even realize that I’m dead, the same way in the story you never felt like you lost your wife—does almost nothing for me. I don’t care about Tim Urban surviving. I care about me surviving.

All of this seems like very good news for Body Theory and Brain Theory. But let’s not judge things yet. Here’s another experiment:

The Split Brain Experiment

A cool fact about the human brain is that the left and right hemispheres function as their own little worlds, each with their own things to worry about, but if you remove one half of someone’s brain, they can sometimes not only survive, but their remaining brain half can learn to do many of the other half’s previous jobs, allowing the person to live a normal life. That’s right—you could lose half of your brain and potentially function normally.

So say you have an identical twin sibling named Bob who developes a fatal brain defect. You decide to save him by giving him half of your brain. Doctors operate on both of you, discarding his brain and replacing it with half of yours. When you wake up, you feel normal and like yourself. Your twin (who already has your identical DNA because you’re twins) wakes up with your exact personality and memories.

twins

When you realize this, you panic for a minute that your twin now knows all of your innermost thoughts and feelings on absolutely everything, and you’re about to make him promise not to tell anyone, when it hits you that you of course don’t have to tell him. He’s not your twin—he’s you. He’s just as intent on your privacy as you are, because it’s his privacy too.

As you look over at the guy who used to be Bob and watch him freak out that he’s in Bob’s body now instead of his own, you wonder, “Why did I stay in my body and not wake up in Bob’s? Both brain halves are me, so why am I distinctly in my body and not seeing and thinking in dual split-screen right now, from both of our points of view? And whatever part of me is in Bob’s head, why did I lose touch with it? Who is the me in Bob’s head, and how did he end up over there while I stayed here?”

Brain Theory is shitting his pants right now—it makes no sense. If people are supposed to go wherever their brains go, what happens when a brain is in two places at once? Data Theory, who was badly embarrassed by the teletransporter experiment, is doing no better in this one.

But Body Theory—who was shot down at the very beginning of the post—is suddenly all smug and thrilled with himself. Body Theory says “Of course you woke up in your own body—your body is what makes you you. Your brain is just the tool your body uses to think. Bob isn’t you—he’s Bob. He’s just now a Bob who has your thoughts and personality. There’s nothing Bob’s body can ever do to not be Bob.” This would help explain why you stayed in your body.

So a nice boost for Body Theory, but let’s take a look at a couple more things—

What we learned in the teletransporter experiment is that if your brain data is transferred to someone else’s brain, even if that person is molecularly identical to you, all it does is create a replica of you—a total stranger who happens to be just like you. There’s something distinct about Boston you that was important. When you were recreated out of different atoms in London, something critical was lost—something that made you you.

Body Theory (and Brain Theory) would point out that the only difference between Boston you and London you was that London you was made out of different atoms. London you’s body was like your body, but it was still made of different material. So is that it? Could Body Theory explain this too?

Let’s put it through two tests:

The Cell Replacement Test

Imagine I replace a cell in your arm with an identical, but foreign, replica cell. Are you not you anymore? Of course you are. But how about if, one at a time, I replace 1% of your cells with replicas? How about 10%? 30%? 60%? The London you was composed of 100% replacement cells, and we decided that that was not you—so when does the “crossover” happen? How many of your cells do we need to swap out for replicas before you “die” and what’s remaining becomes your replica?

Something feels off with this, right? Considering that the cells we’re replacing are molecularly identical to those we’re removing, and someone watching this all happen wouldn’t even notice anything change about you, it seem implausible that you’d ever die during this process, even if we eventually replaced 100% of your cells with replicas. But if your cells are eventually all replicas, how are you any different from London you?

The Body Scattering Test 

Imagine going into an Atom Scattering Chamber that completely disassembles your body’s atoms so that all that’s left in the room is a light gas of floating atoms—and then a few minutes later, it perfectly reassembles the atoms into you, and you walk out feeling totally normal.

disassemble

Is that still you? Or did you die when you were disassembled and what has been reassembled is a replica of you? It doesn’t really make sense that this reassembled you would be the real you and London you would be a replica, when the only difference between the two cases is that the scattering room preserves your exact atoms and the London chamber assembles you out of different atoms. At their most basic level, atoms are identical—a hydrogen atom from your body is identical in every way to a hydrogen atom in London. Given that, I’d say that if we’re deciding London you is not you, then reassembled you is probably not you either.

The first thing these two tests illustrate is that the key distinction between Boston you and London you isn’t about the presence or absence of your actual, physical cells. The Cell Replacement Test suggests that you can gradually replace much or all of your body with replica material and still be you, and the Body Scattering Test suggests that you can go through a scatter and a reassembly, even with all of your original physical material, and be no more you than the you in London. Not looking great for Body Theory anymore.

The second thing these tests reveal is that the difference between Boston and London you might not be the nature of the particular atoms or cells involved, but about continuity. The Cell Replacement Test might have left you intact because it changed you gradually, one cell at a time. And if the Body Scattering Test were the end of you, maybe it’s because it happened all at the same time, breaking the continuity of you. This could also explain why the teletransporter might be a murder machine—London you has no continuity with your previous life.

So could it be that we’ve been off the whole time pitting the brain, the body, and the personality and memories against each other? Could it be that anytime you relocate your brain, or disassemble your atoms all at once, transfer your brain data onto a new brain, etc., you lose you because maybe, you’re not defined by any of these things on their own, but rather by a long and unbroken string of continuous existence?

Continuity

A few years ago, my late grandfather, in his 90s and suffering from dementia, pointed at a picture on the wall of himself as a six-year-old. “That’s me!” he explained.

He was right. But come on. It seems ridiculous that the six-year-old in the picture and the extremely old man standing next to me could be the same person. Those two people had nothing in common. Physically, they were vastly different—almost every cell in the six-year-old’s body died decades ago. As far as their personalities—we can agree that they wouldn’t have been friends. And they shared almost no common brain data at all. Any 90-year-old man on the street is much more similar to my grandfather than that six-year-old.

But remember—maybe it’s not about similarity, but about continuity. If similarity were enough to define you, Boston you and London you, who are identical, would be the same person. The thing that my grandfather shared with the six-year-old in the picture is something he shared with no one else on Earth—they were connected to each other by a long, unbroken string of continuous existence. As an old man, he may not know anything about that six-year-old boy, but he knows something about himself as an 89-year-old, and that 89-year-old might know a bunch about himself as an 85-year-old. As a 50-year-old, he knew a ton about him as a 43-year-old, and when he was seven, he was a pro on himself as a 6-year-old. It’s a long chain of overlapping memories, personality traits, and physical characteristics.

It’s like having an old wooden boat. You may have repaired it hundreds of times over the years, replacing wood chip after wood chip, until one day, you realize that not one piece of material from the original boat is still part of it. So is that still your boat? If you named your boat Polly the day you bought it, would you change the name now? It would still be Polly, right?

In this way, what you are is not really a thing as much as a story, or a progression, or one particular theme of person. You’re a bit like a room with a bunch of things in it—some old, some new, some you’re aware of, some you aren’t—but the room is always changing, never exactly the same from week to week.

Likewise, you’re not a set of brain data, you’re a particular database whose contents are constantly changing, growing, and being updated. And you’re not a physical body of atoms, you’re a set of instructions on how to deal with and organize the atoms that bump into you.

People always say the word soul and I never really know what they’re talking about. To me, the word soul has always seemed like a poetic euphemism for a part of the brain that feels very inner to us; or an attempt to give humans more dignity than just being primal biological organisms; or a way to declare that we’re eternal. But maybe when people say the word soul what they’re talking about is whatever it is that connects my 90-year-old grandfather to the boy in the picture. As his cells and memories come and go, as every wood chip in his canoe changes again and again, maybe the single common thread that ties it all together is his soul. After examining a human from every physical and mental angle throughout the post, maybe the answer this whole time has been the much less tangible Soul Theory.

______

It would have been pleasant to end the post there, but I just can’t do it, because I can’t quite believe in souls.

The way I actually feel right now is completely off-balance. Spending a week thinking about clones of yourself, imagining sharing your brain or merging yours with someone else’s, and wondering whether you secretly die every time you sleep and wake up as a replica will do that to you. If you’re looking for a satisfying conclusion, I’ll direct you to the sources below since I don’t even know who I am right now.

The only thing I’ll say is that I told someone about the topic I was posting on for this week, and their question was, “That’s cool, but what’s the point of trying to figure this out?” While researching, I came across this quote by Parfit: “The early Buddhist view is that much or most of the misery of human life resulted from the false view of self.” I think that’s probably very true, and that’s the point of thinking about this topic.

___________

Related Wait But Why Posts
– Here’s how I’m working on this false view of self thing.
– And things could get even more confusing soon when we have to figure out if Artificial Superintelligence is conscious or not.

Sources
Very few of the ideas or thought experiments in this post are my original thinking. I read and listened to a bunch of personal identity philosophy this week and gathered my favorite parts together for the post. The two sources I drew from the most were philosopher Derek Parfit’s book Reasons and Persons and Yale professor Shelly Kagan’s fascinating philosophy course on death—the lectures are all watchable online for free.

Other Sources:
David Hume: Hume on Identity Over Time and Persons
Derek Parfit: We Are Not Human Beings
Peter Van Inwagen: Materialism and the Psychological-Continuity Account of Personal Identity
Bernard Williams: The Self and the Future
John Locke: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Chapter: Of Identity and Diversity)
Douglas Hofstadter: Gödel, Escher, Bach
Patrick Bailey: Concerning Theories of Personal Identity

And a fascinating and related video
For a while now, my favorite YouTube channel has been Kurzgesagt. They make one amazing five-minute animated video a month on the exact kinds of topics I love to write about. I highly recommend subscribing. Anyway, I’ve spoken to them and we liked the idea of tag-teaming a similar topic at the same time, and since this one was on both of our lists, we did that this week. I focused on what the self is, they explored what life itself is. Check it out:

 

O Tanque de Isolamento Sensorio, Ironizado por um Cético

domingo, janeiro 1st, 2017

xxxx

What a Sensory Isolation Tank Taught Me About My Brain

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/12/29/opinion/sunday/whos-in-charge-the-body-or-the-brain.html

E meu comentário a respeito (não publicado)

What a modern culture isolation jungle taught me about my brain:

1) The jungle biosphere is a product of entropy attacking Milk Way;
2) The separated particles-photons of the galactic building blocks fell in state of chaos at Earth surface;
3) The photons bits-information tried to re-build the system here and got the shape of a pair of nucleotides ( the building blocks of RNA/DNA), due different environment, water and its effect, organic chemistry;
4) The same building block, less evolved, is the template for atoms systems;
5) This template is a formula made up when a portion of matter (space substance or dark matter) gets the dynamics of life’s cycles, which comes from any natural wave composed by the seven known electromagnetic radiation ( gamma-ray, visible light, X-ray, etc).
6) So, in the beginning, from a Big Bang, a wave of light with the code for natural systems penetrating dark matter created atoms which evolved to stellar systems, to galactic systems, to cell systems, to plant and animal systems, to human brains… which expresses that wave of light in shape of consciousness. (cont.)

7 Our head is the egg; the brain is the placenta; the actual fetus is the formation o fan ex-machine consciousness ( or mind, you choose the words); It is expressed as a cloud of light produced by electrical neuronal synapses.
8) Mind, or consciousness is merely the last more evolved shape of that formula, called by me ” the universal matrix/dna”.
9) So, we are 8 billion genes for consciousness which will be added to billions of bullions another genes spreaded in this universe. The Universal History must be called ” From the Big Bang to the Big Birth”.
10) Why we can not do anything as consciousness, yet? Because it is a fetus, at last an embryo of consciousness, It did not opened its own eye (the third eye) for to see its own body.
11) It is losing time trying transcendental experiences. What we must do is understanding that we are genes, bits or bubbles of consciousness. Of only a unique human does not do its job, we all will born handicapped. So, this world view has the moral code we need just now.

 

Descoberto Grande Diversidade de DNA no Cerebro: Seria Esta a Plataforma para a Auto-Consciencia?

domingo, dezembro 25th, 2016

xxxx

Sempre se acreditou que cada ser vivo possui um único tipo de DNA, o mesmo em todas as células. Descobre-se agora que ao menos no cerebro, as células neuroniais possuem muitos diferentes tipos de DNA! E’ uma grande diversificação, assim como a vida se diversificou em miríades de formas a partir de um unico cepo primitivo comum.

Observando esta descoberta pela ótica da formula da Matrix/DNA, membro-me que  a evolução caminha por ciclos ou ondas. Quando a especie que esta’ no topo evolucionario chega ao seu limite de complexidade possível, ela decai, gera o caos e renasce de suas cinzas diferenciada em muitas cópias diferentes entre si. Depois estas cópias se amalgamam formando um único elemento novamente, o qual representa a ordem que se levanta do caos, porém mais complexo que o ancestral. E’ como um leque que se abre num lugar simples e se fecha num lugar variado. A grande diversificação de sistemas biológicos – por exemplo – e’ produto da queda desta galáxia na forma de biosfera caótica. Ora, o cerebro humano produziu um novo tipo de sistema natural, que e’ a mente, ou auto-consciencia. Sera’ esta o novo elemento-síntese resultante daquela diversificação?

The brain’s stunning genomic diversity revealed

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2016-09-brain-stunning-genomic-diversity-revealed.html

Medical Press – September 12, 2016

Artigo copiado para traduzir quando tiver tempo:

Our brains contain a surprising diversity of DNA. Even though we are taught that every cell in our body has the same DNA, in fact most cells in the brain have changes to their DNA that make each neuron a little different. (read more)

Nos Possuímos Uma Alma?

segunda-feira, outubro 31st, 2016

xxxxx

Interessante artigo informando varias opinioes inteligentes sobre esse grande misterio e a seguir, minha opiniao registrada no comentario abaixo:

http://climatologiageografica.com.br/nos-possuimos-uma-alma/

Nós possuimos uma alma?

Meu comentario postado no artigo:

Pois a minha investigação pessoal com varias experiencias incomuns me conduziram a uma diferente ideia sobre o que se postula como “alma”. As ondas de luz naturais imitam o ciclo vital do nosso corpo. Portanto, uma onda de luz natural foi a primeira forma “vital”, a primeira forma de sistema natural funcional neste mundo material. A luz e’ composta de partículas, fótons, os quais, trouxeram as informações deste sistema astronomico que produziu as formas biológicas ( vivos) neste planeta. Ao se encontrarem aqui, estes fótons remontam o sistema de onde vieram, numa rede de conexões, dirigindo os átomos a formarem os corpos vivos físicos. Acontece que esta rede e’ igual ao que os orientais antigos desenharam e chamaram de aura. Assim, a substancia da aura ‘e a luz a qual contem o código da vida. Em outras palavras, neste Universo esta ocorrendo um processo de reprodução da “coisa” que gerou o universo, e o DNA daquela “coisa” e’ uma Matrix/DNA universal, cuja forma atual, na especie humana, e’ a forma da aura. As sinapses dos neurônios se refletem numa nuvem luminosa a qual ainda não podemos perceber, porem esta luz e’ o feto ou embrião de consciência da luz que veio do alem. Claro, isto ainda ‘e uma teoria, estou trabalhando na tentativa de captar esta rede de fótons, provar que átomos e galaxias tiveram suas formas de DNA-aura, etc. No meu website tem as figuras da onda de luz como código da vida, do DNA dos sistemas não-vivos ancestrais, etc. Mas para mim isto faz mais sentido racional que todas explicações acima.  Ao menos, enquanto as opiniões no artigo ainda são jogos de palavras, na Toeira da Matrix/DNA apresentamos as imagens, as figuras e coisas palpáveis que podem serem testadas cientificamente. Nos somos imortais, porem numa dimensão em que ainda somos como embriões, nem abrimos os olhos para vê-la, e’ o que sugere esta visão do mundo. Ela sugere que neste planeta cada ser humano tem uma especie de bolha luminosa contendo um gene de uma super-consciência cósmica, mas por enquanto estas “bolhas” estão separadas formando uma camada aureolar superficial de inconsciente coletivo ao redor da Terra, e quando estas bolhas se fundirem numa so, sera’ a consciência do super-organismo de Gaia, a ser fundida com as demais consciências de outros planetas deste Universo. No fim seremos um como o Um de onde viemos, assim como o baby e’ um vindo do humano que o gerou.

 

The Photonic Field: O Que Decide Quem Sera’ Rico ou Pobre

quinta-feira, outubro 20th, 2016

xxxx

Uma nova tese dentro da Matrix/DNA Theory: The Photonic Field

( E mais abaixo veja como funciona ou nao a intuicao que leva a espetaculares descobertas no relato do sonho que tive ao dormir pensando nesta tese)

Eu tenho certeza que existe um fator alem do nosso observavel e conhecido natural que mantem uma pessoa pobre e outra, leva-a a ser sempre rica. Isto pelas ocorrencias reais que tenho visto nesta vida. Acreditei nisso na quarta vez que estive para por a mão no pote de ouro, aconteceu algo absurdo, inesperado, vindo do mundo externo, escorreguei e cai no zero onde nasci.

Para um filosofo naturalista, que aplicou o mais extremado materialism racionalista na sua investigação sobre a existência, esta afirmação e’ totalmente for a de contexto. Mas o que e’ tem que ser, não depende se gostamos ou não, e isto e’ fato, e já havia desistido de solucionar este mistério, pois em termos de metafisica, não tenho o menor acesso – se e’ que ela existe e que este seja um fenomeno metafisico.

Mas e’ impensavel qualquer outra solução. Esta pressão para baixo, para manter o humano no nivel baixo das condições de vida, ou esta força que empurra outros sempre para mais acima, para mais fortunas e sorte na vida, existe. Mas pelo mundo que conheço, não ha lugar para esta força, por isso, pensei ser algo metafisico. E por isso, depois da quarta vez, deixei de tentar. Contra algo invisivel e tao determinado, tao poderoso, não tenho como lutar.

Porem, hoje me ocorreu uma ideia, que pode mudar o significado desta força. Pode ser que ela não seja metafisica. Pode ser que ela seja feita de substancia conhecida, porem ainda pratica,mente intocavel e invisivel. Os fotons. A luz.

Primeiro descobri que apenas os fotons podem explicar como esta galaxia se reproduziu na forma de sistema celular, de ser vivo. Eles formariam entre si uma rede, uma network reproduzindo o sistema  ” building block astronomico”, em tamanho miniaturizado, microscopico.

Mas e se eles formam redes tambem nos tamanhos de planetas? Digo, uma aureola em volta da superficie do planeta, em que eles se infiltram na crosta de terra e na atmosfera. Assim, eles estariam conectados com suas copias microscópicas, as quais estão dentro dos corpos humanos., e todos os outros seres vivos.

Esta rede terrestre teria as sete faixas de frequencias/vibrações da luz, e cada corpo tem uma sua vibração, assim se daria a conexão. Acontece que uma faixa existe embaixo, subalterna a outras, e esta faixa, conectada e imposta a mesma vibração do corpo humano, o manteria embaixo, subalterno a outras pessoas com faixas de vibrações mais altas.

Tenho pensado muito ultimamente no instinto a predador e presa que esta’ na carga genética humana, herdada dos animais, e algumas vezes, surge soluções apenas se alem de ser uma força interna ao humano, ela for tambem externa, atuando a nivel social.

Isto me lembra outras teses relacionadas, como a camada terrestre do inconsciente coletivo da humanidade de Teilhard du Chardin, e a minha tese já ensaiada em outros artigos aqui, sobre o super-organismo de Gaia.

Estaria relacionado a isto, tambem, os assuntos ou teses especulativas sobre um campo magnético do corpo humano, e teses sobre a aura.

Bem,… por enquanto isto vai seguir o curso normal das teses, vou deixar a ideia solta no ar e burilando na cabeca. Esta tese esta for a do escopo da Matrix/DNA ( ao menos, me parece), não faz parte do feitio desta cosmovisao, mas sao demasiados fatos, demasiadas evidencias, então não posso ignora-la. Voltarei neste artigo sempre que algum avanco ou assunto relacionado houver.

xxxx

O Sonho Motivado pela Reflexao na Tese “The Photonic Field”

Inacreditavel,… mas parece que tam a ver.

Deitei pensando nesta tese, imaginei como seriam as imagens desta rede ao redor da Terra, peguei no sono e, de manha me lembrei de ter tido um sonho estranho.

Apareceu na minha frente um conhecido que não vejo a uns 30 anos, o qual me ofereceu um emprego e uma casinha abandonada num terreno longínquo para morar. O Nilo era um turco filho de um meio-rico e que ficou muito rico. Me lembro dele com certa repugnância e revolta pois era um tendente a grande predador e com isso esfolava o que podia das presas em que punha suas garras. Bruto e estupido, decidi pela demissão numa discussão, mas continuei morando no casebre enquanto ele não me expulsasse e eu ano arrumasse outro emprego.

Então no sonho o turco apareceu na frente do casebre e veio entrando. Mas logo na porta ele olhou para o teto e surpreso perguntou o que era aquilo. Olhei tambem e fiquei sem palavras. O teto estava todo coberto por aquela planta que sobe nas paredes,  e’ erva daninha, no Brasil chamam-na de trepadeira. Tinha muitas folhas, verdes, grandes, e o resto era cipo. Olhei para fora e notei que todo o quintal e os terrenos vizinhos estavam cobertos pela planta. Admirei como eu não havia visto aquilo, principalmente estando pendurado n teto, caindo sobre moveis. Mas na minha vida isso não tem sido novidade pois como filosofo quando estou no lugar da morada estou pensando muito longe e alem disso, devia estar atarefado procurando trabalho e enfrentando as dificuldades alem de que devia estar pronto para sair dali.

Eu respondi que, se ele quisesse, eu riria cortar tudo e inclusive as ramas que vinham dos terrenos vizinhos para impedir que retornasse. Ele balbuciou algo como ” não adianta pois nesta altura as sementes estão espalhadas por todo lugar. E fazendo um ar de maroto esperto ele disse:

” A solução aqui e’ “devolução”. Mandar de volta para onde veio.”

E acordei por aqui, acho que apenas isto lembro do sonho. Agora vamos a minha interpretação.

A planta de ramagem de cipo e folhas representa a rede fotônica. Ela esta na atmosfera terrestre em volta do planeta, por isso a vi no teto da casa e por volta da casa. O turco representa o grande predador que faz parte dos três instintos humanos herdados dos animais da selva no tocante a divisão de poder. O predador apareceu no sonho porque foi este assunto que no dia anterior comecei a pensar buscando uma solução de como exorcizar estes três instintos dos humanos.  E no desenrolar destes pensamentos me lembrei de outra tese onde ” o comando invisivel do DNA não esta dentro dos genes, mas sim fora deles, no mundo externo a eles. E me parece que a força que faz presas continuarem sendo presas mesmo quando elas tem tanta ou maior força do que os predadores, elas não se unem para usa-la. Parece que são dominadas mentalmente, ficam abobalhadas. reclamam que sofrem sob o jugo dos predadores, mas parece que gostam disso, nada fazem para mudar a situação. A não ser quando aparece um lider ou ocorre alguma catástrofe natural, mas estas tambem são forças externas as presas. Então, buscando como seria e onde estaria esta força externa, me lembrando da invasão de fotons nas origens da vida, no inconsciente coletivo, etc., me surgiu a ideia da network fotonica. Esta seria a força invisivel mantendo a humanidade imitando as regras selvagens dos animais na forma de seus sistemas sociais.

A imagem que me veio a mente durante o dia anterior ao sonho foi a de uma rede fotonica semelhante a rede neuronial com suas sinapses, no cérebro. Com a diferença de que a rede fotonica seria planetaria. Entrou ai tambem antigos pensamentos sobre a possibilidade do corpo humano ter um campo magnetico talvez da mesma natureza do campo magnetico da Terra.

Muita imaginação, aparentemente descabidas. mas como o cerebro guardou isso e sonhou com isso? Como e porque ele representou a rede fotonica com a trepadeira? Porque ele foi buscar uma lembrança muito antiga na memoria que pensava já esquecida, ao trazer o turco para a cena? Na época do turco eu nem sequer imaginava estas coisas de predadores e presas. Isto me apareceu na mente apenas uns 20 anos depois do turco, quando vivi na selva amazonica. Entao como o cérebro ligou o conceito de predador com a personalidade conhecida do turco? E porque o predador buscou sua face de astuto felino e disse” devolução”?!

As soluções encontradas tiveram que preencher certos e requisitos fundamentais antes de serem aceitas. Elas tem que obedecer a formalidade da logica, ou seja, o teorema da logica formal. Portanto tem de ser racional, fazer sentido `a luz do mundo real que experimento. Ela tem que apresentar um parâmetro real, factual, existente em algum outro lugar da Natureza. Por exemplo, minha teoria do que existe no centro da galaxia ( diferente da teoria do buraco negro, mas não muito), encontrou vários parametros ocorrendo em outros lugares da natureza.

Mas são soluções surpreendentes. Sao testaveis cientificamente, porem, uma ciencia com métodos diferentes dos atuais praticados e ditados por uma  visão do mundo inédita. Se eu vou encontrar uma solução para o comando invisivel do inconsciente coletivo responsavel por manter a carga genética humana com estes 3 instintos animais, sera mais uma solução espetacular. Que abrira as portas para novas investigações, novas ideias. Por isso registro aqui o sonho, para continuar a pensar na tese me lembrando da rede da trepadeira, do predador,… e de algo que parece importante.

Porque devolução?! Estaria sendo sugerido que o método ideal para erradicar essa erva daninha que e esta rede fotonica causando a manutenção dos instintos, ‘e manda-la de volta de onde veio? Mas ela veio da galaxia como sistema fechado em si mesmo. La já existe o fenomeno predador/presa.

Uma ideia me surge agora. Outra tese desenvolvida e’ a da onda de luz universal se desfazendo em fotons na sua ultima frequencia e estes fotons esparsos retornando a recompor a onda de luz, porem, com energia negativa e luz escura. Retornando ao Big Bang, onde volta ser reemitida como luz clara. Seriam esta rede fotonica e mais estes instintos a zona escura em que estes fotons retornam? Isto seria devolução.

Material para continuar a pensar nesta tese…..

xxxx

Pesquisa:

( Dar uma relida na energia de Reich e similares. Lembrar de ” as nuvens de pensamento, nourees, de Pietro Ubaldi)

 

 

 

Auto-Consciencia: Bom Video do Atual Conhecimento

sábado, agosto 27th, 2016

xxxx

xxxx

E meus comentarios postados no Youtube:

Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli – 8/27/2016
Discovering the evolutionary link between Cosmological and Biological Evolution – the real LUCA – we had a new view about consciousness. First, because we can see LUCA arising in this Universe as natural waves of light. The seven different frequencies/vibrations composes a formula for building systems, the so called Matrix/DNA formula. After 13,8 billions years, light waves emitted at the Big Bang and containing the code for natural systems, invaded dark matter, the friction producing electricity, breaking it in slices, organizing these slices into working systems accordingly to the code. The waves were broken into photons, which penetrates electrons and drive atoms to new combinations, more complex systems. Arriving at the system called human brain, the network of photons inside neurons through synapses is re-building the light waves, but now, it is self conscious. So, the substance of consciousness is ex-machine conscious light. So, from the Bug bang till now this Universe was like a computer, composed by hardware and software. The software, or consciousness was sleeping at atoms, dreaming at galaxies, began waking up in plants and animals and now is a kind of embryo being nurtured in the egg-head of humans – and elsewhere where there are intelligent life. We, humans, are 8 billion conscious genes building this embryo (with all other intelligent lifeforms), which will be our body, the universal conscious body, merely a natural and genetic reproduction of the unknown thing that creates universes. Things are so simple for understanding… So, be friend and helpfull to all humans ( and intelligent aliens) because each one is a gene of yourself, each one is a message, a bit-information, unique, non transferable, a Cosmic mission. If only one do not accomplish its mission, we will born handicapped… In the beginning there was the Big Bang ( the fecundation act), at the end will be the Big Birth. Alleluyah…. my brother!
Sometimes i suspect that my consciousness is the only that exists. All you people are just puppets in my world, playing a script along, providing the reality with wich i interact…
The material world is real just now, like my mother’s womb was my material world, my entire universe for 9 months. But my mother’s womb was not the material world of my father and neither mine after birth. So, this Universe is like the placenta, will be discarded, and you will be the only thing that exist … in a different world. Just now you are the Matrix that built the other puppets and yours body, like genes build billions of cells to get the fetus and after that, the genes goes to neurons for to be a unique personal mind. In a next evolutionary wave, 8 billions of ( Teilhard du Chardin almost grasped it) half-conscious genes called humans will perform the Gaia’s mind. And in a next evolutionary wave, billions of Gaia/stars’s minds will go to the end of this Universe, at the day of Big Birth, as the totally-conscious son of the unknown thing that creates universes…

Terceiro Olho, Glandula Pineal,… Baseado no Terceiro Olho da Tuataras

quinta-feira, agosto 25th, 2016

xxxx

Para aqueles que ja conseguiram exorcizar de sua mente o espectro herdado geneticamente dos animais relacionados aos instintos de predador/presa, qual a alternativa que temos na tentativa de conduzir outros humanos a realizar tal facanha? Praticamente nenhuma desde que o estado natural desta biosfera favorece eles e nao a nos, portanto. eles tem a forssa, as sortes, os privilegios.

Talvez houvesse uma alternativa, uma esperança. A mente – ou auto-consciencia – não e’ uma heranca desta galaxia (como sao os instintos animais), ela vem de algum lugar fora da galaxia, segundo o que esta sugerindo a formula da Matrix/DNA. Acho logico supor que esta dimensao inimaginavel da mente seja superior em complexidade, poder, `a galaxia e  suas coisas internas. E parece provavel que nesta dimensao superior haja entidades – ou coisas – conscientes. E estas “entidades” devem, de alguma forma, notar quando suas “crias” comecam a desabrochar em qualquer lugar. E talvez, ao verem estas crias em serias dificuldades, poderiam ate intervir e ajudar. Nesse caso, nos teriamos alguma ajuda para afrontar os humanos apoiados pela galaxia. Mas o que isto tem a ver com o “terceiro olho”, a glandula pineal, etc.?

Duas coisas. Primeiro que forssamos nossa mente a acelerar seu desenvolvimento e para tanto precisamos forssar o aprimoramento de nossos sensores. Existem sensores que regrediram na evolucao dos ancestrais, como esse terceiro olho das tuataras. Temos que buscar informacoes sobre tudo relacionado a eles. Segundo que se possivel for acelerar o desenvolvimento destes sensores ( pelo metodo esquematico de meditacao da Matrix/DNA), talvez consigamos gritar mais alto e ser-mos ouvidos pelas entidades do mundo auto-consciente. Claro isto e’ mera especulacao e uma possibilidade remota, mas a maioria do que conseguimos hoje era possibilidade remota antes de surgirem.

Entao no Reddit surgiu um debate sobre este assunto:

Tuataras have a “third eye” that is “no longer” used for vision. Was it earlier in evolution? Are there creatures with 3 functional eyes in the fossil record?

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/4z2ie1/tuataras_have_a_third_eye_that_is_no_longerE sobre seu ^terceiro oljho_used/?sort=old&limit=500

E entao postei o seguinte comentario no debate:

TheMatrixDNA – 8/26/2016

This is speculation, but, based on a solid theory, Matrix/DNA. The third eye was the first sensor produced by the astronomic template of DNA for perceiving itself. This template was built by photons, which are the bits-information-like-genes trying to reproduce here at Earth surface the decayed astronomic system, that’s why the third eye, the pineal gland, the antennas, are related to light.

The problem was that the decay of this astronomic system was produced by entropy which creates chaos from which lift up order. Our biosphere began with the chaotic state of Nature, biological shapes surpassed the force of the ancestor template and the third eye, as everything related to light, became a recessive dominated trait, waiting that biological organisms reaches the state of order for coming back again. As I said, this is what I’m getting reading the formulas of Matrix/DNA and I could doing mistakes. But it is useful for us, in the sense that it wake up our wishes to resuscitate the third eye, the antennas through the recovery of pineal gland, because for understanding this world we will need sensors able to grasp electromagnetic fields… or the photons network behind the DNA, the solar system, the galaxy, etc., merely called “Matrix/DNA”. Cheers,…

xxxxx

Vamos fazer uma breve pesquisa e retornar depois ao debate no Reddit.

O que e’ tuatara?

Tuatara are reptiles endemic to New Zealand and which, although resembling most lizards, …

Sphenodon punctatus in Waikanae, New Zealand.jpg

Tuatara, apenas em New Zeland

E sobre seu terceiro olho:

The eyes ( tuataras) can focus independently, and are specialized with a duplex retina that contains two types of visual cells for both day and night vision, and a tapetum lucidum which reflects onto the retina to enhance vision in the dark. There is also a third eyelid on each eye, the nictitating membrane.

The tuatara has a third eye on the top of its head called the parietal eye. It has its own lens, cornea, retina with rod-like structures, and degenerated nerve connection to the brain, suggesting it evolved from a real eye. The parietal eye is only visible in hatchlings, which have a translucent patch at the top centre of the skull. After four to six months, it becomes covered with opaque scales and pigment. Its purpose is unknown, but it may be useful in absorbing ultraviolet rays to produce vitamin D, as well as to determine light/dark cycles, and help with thermoregulation. Of all extant tetrapods, the parietal eye is most pronounced in the tuatara. It is part of the pineal complex, another part of which is the pineal gland, which in tuatara secretes melatonin at night.[17] Some salamanders have been shown to use their pineal bodies to perceive polarised light, and thus determine the position of the sun, even under cloud cover, aiding navigation. The tuataras third eye are pronounced photoreceptive eye, which is thought to be involved in setting circadian and seasonal cycles.

A parietal eye, also known as a third eye or pineal eye, is a part of the epithalamus present in some animal species. The eye is photoreceptive and is associated with the pineal gland, regulating circadian rhythmicity and hormone production for thermoregulation.

Adult Carolina anole (Anolis carolinensis) clearly showing the parietal eye (small grey/clear oval) at the top of its head.

The parietal eye (very small grey oval between the regular eyes) of a juvenile bullfrog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The third eye ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_eye)

(also known as the inner eye) is a mystical and esoteric concept referring to a speculative invisible eye which provides perception beyond ordinary sight.[1] In certain dharmic spiritual traditions such as Hinduism, the third eye refers to the ajna, or brow, chakra.[2] In Theosophy it is related to the pineal gland.[3] The third eye refers to the gate that leads to inner realms and spaces of higher consciousness. In New Age spirituality, the third eye often symbolizes a state of enlightenment or the evocation of mental images having deeply personal spiritual or psychological significance. The third eye is often associated with religious visions, clairvoyance, the ability to observe chakras and auras,[4] precognition, and out-of-body experiences. People who are claimed to have the capacity to utilize their third eyes are sometimes known as seers.

According to this theory, humans had in far ancient times an actual third eye in the back of the head with a physical and spiritual function. Over time, as humans evolved, this eye atrophied and sunk into what today is known as the pineal gland…

The pineal gland, also known as the pineal body, conarium or epiphysis cerebri, is a small endocrine gland in the vertebrate brain. The shape of the gland resembles a pine cone, hence its name. The pineal gland is located in the epithalamus, near the center of the brain, between the two hemispheres, tucked in a groove where the two halves of the thalamus join. The pineal gland produces melatonin, a serotonin derived hormone which modulates sleep patterns in both circadian and seasonal cycles.

Debate no Reddit: