Archive for the ‘Darwinism’ Category

Evolucao: Porque evolucao e’ fato e teoria, ao mesmo tempo

domingo, outubro 16th, 2016

xxxx

” …we already know with 100% certainty that evolution occurs.

The “how” part is very likely to become better understood in the future, we’re still theorising “how” evolution works and how certain traits get dumped while others get developed, but the question on “does evolution occur” is a done deal.

Vejam Como esta se Levantando a maior Religião de Todos os Tempos por Crenças como “A Evolução é Inteligente” Passando no Peer-Review e Dominando Universidades

domingo, julho 10th, 2016

xxxx

Estamos tendo oportunidade de assistir ao vivo como surge uma das grandes religiões. Agora a novidade e` que, tal como no caso das outras anteriores, os protagonistas que estão criando a religião estão inconscientes do que estão fazendo, mas ao contrario dos outros que desejavam erigir uma religião, estes agora são notórios combatentes de todas as religiões e qualquer pensamento mistico.

Uma religião começa animada pela curiosidade humana elevada quando existe um motivador desesperante devido a uma interrupção na ambição humana de progresso, material e intelectual. os objetos e eventos do ambiente estão escapando ao controle porque ha’ falhas no conhecimento de causas e características destes eventos e objetos, e estas falhas começam a sugerir a existência de algo sobrenatural influenciando-os. O próximo passo é identificar objetos conhecidos como imagens porem, dota-los de poderes mágicos. E assim foram criados o Deus Sol, o Deus Touro, o Deus Dragão, o Deus Homem Barbudo, etc.

Agora três destes objetos ainda desconhecidos – os genes, a evolução e o vácuo total – estão adquirindo personalidade inteligente e estão sendo adornados com poderes mágicos. Nao vou aqui me alongar no assunto dos genes, pois quem leu os livros do Papa dos Ateus, Richard Dawkins, como o  “Gene Egoísta” sabe o que é personalizar com intenções humanas inteligentes um mero montículo disforme de átomos. Mas depois que o Projeto Genoma mostrou a Craig Venter que individualmente os genes são indefiníveis porque os resultados do conjunto deles e’que realmente causam uma doença, etc., escapando da desesperada necessidade de controle deles e consumindo bilhões de dólares, o reconhecimento de que falta conhecimento dos genes a nível material deve seguir o segundo passo, que é adorna-los de poderes mágicos. Tambem não vou me alongar no assunto do vácuo total, pois todos os que leram o livro “Do Nada veio Tudo” do Papa dos Cosmólogos, Lawrence Krauss, já perceberam que o Nada foi dotado de poderes mágicos. Vou aqui mencionar como anda o processo sobre a “evolução” devido mais um artigo publicado demonstrando mais um passo na direcao desta religião.

O artigo foi primeiro publicado pela universidade no intuito de vangloriar o sucesso de seus professores

Is evolution more intelligent than we thought?

https://www.southampton.ac.uk/news/2015/12/evolution-learning-theory-study.page

O qual provem de um ^paper^ ( não preciso dizer aqui que a religião não admite que se aplique a ela o sistema do peer review, como deveria ser aplicado)

How Can Evolution Learn?

  Richard A. Watson , Eörs Szathmáry

http://www.cell.com/trends/ecology-evolution/abstract/S0169-5347(15)00293-1

Resumindo muito, os pesquisadores uniram duas teorias – a teoria Darwinista da evolução mais as teorias da aprendizagem – e conseguiram uma mais eficiente explicação do porque e como a evolução consegue produzir efeitos e arquiteturas fantásticas que nos parecem produtos de um inteligente planejador. Unificando a teoria da evolução ( a qual mostra – segundo a crença desta teoria – que mutações ao acaso e seleção são suficientes para prover incrementada adaptação) com teorias da aprendizagem ( a qual mostra como incrementadas adaptações são suficientes para um sistema exibir inteligentes comportamentos), esta pesquisa diz o pesquisador – mostra que é possível para a evolução exibir alguns dos mesmos inteligentes comportamentos como sistemas aprendizes ( incluindo redes neurais)…

Professor Watson diz > “A Teoria da Evolução de Darwin descreve o processo diretor, mas a teoria da aprendizagem não é apenas outra maneira de explicar apenas o que Darwin já disse para nos. Ela expande o que nos pensamos sobre o que a evolução é capaz de fazer. Ela mostra que a seleção natural é suficiente para produzir características de inteligente solucionadora de problemas. Por exemplo, uma especial característica da inteligencia é a habilidade de antecipar comportamentos que podem levar a benefícios no futuro. Convencionalmente – continua o professor – evolução, sendo dependente de variações ao acaso, tem sido considerada “cega ou ao menos, míope”, incapaz de exibir tal antecipação. Mas mostrando que sistemas evolutivos podem aprender de experiencias passadas significa que a evolução tem o potencial para antecipar o que e~ para adaptar a futuros meio-ambientes da mesma maneira que sistemas aprendizes fazem”…

Professor Richard Watson

Richard Watson, Parece mas não é mais um daqueles pares de mórmons que levam as boas novas de sua religião aos quatro cantos do mundo. Watson é o novo sacerdote das universidades modernas.

Estas palavras, de acordo com a super-naturalista visão de mundo que encontrei na selva, são de um absurdo total. Próprio de quem esta’ perdendo o controle das suas faculdades mentais devido estar sucumbindo ao germe de uma nova religião.

Para começar, evolução é um nome criado por humanos para nomear um conceito abstrato que não tem representação palpável e visível no nosso mundo sensorial. Peixes se transformam em lagartos que se transformam em mamíferos… isto é a coisa concreta, palpável ( mesmo assim, não muito). O que se vê de real são transformações atras de transformações e uma sequencia indo do mais simples para o mais complexo. Para se resumir estas palavras descritivas todas criou-se um nome, evolução, e isto é o que evolução é. Houve aplicação de inteligencia na transformação de peixes para lagartos? Claro que não. Ah… mas quando você começa a mentalizar com insistência um nome bonito, na moda, apesar de abstrato de tal maneira que esse nome passa a ocupar sua mente, você começa a projetar nele uma personalidade quase humana, e de repente você esta não apenas vendo o nome como visão real, você esta inclusive vendo a visão ser inteligente. Agora que você transpôs uma entidade sobrenatural sobre o processo da transformação de peixes em lagartos, mas como você não pode dizer que a transformação em si foi inteligente porque serias expulso do meio acadêmico como um criacionista acreditando em outra velha religião, em intelligent design, você se salva colocando o “inteligente” sobre o nome abstrato. Não foi assim que se inventou Thor e depois o colocou como produtor de raios e trovoes ?

Não existe evolução, como uma coisa de per se. O que existem são micro-ciclos evolutivos dentro de um grande processo de reprodução universal. E para ilustrar isto me permitam recorrer a uma historiazinha, a qual gostaria que chegasse aos ouvidos destes misticos.

Certa vez existia um microbio nadador tao pequeno que morava dentro de um ovulo não fecundado. Chamava-se Ernesto e era inteligente, já tinha até fabricado umas lunetas, etc. A vida ia calma para o Ernesto sempre nadando naquele imenso oceano amniótico até que um dia… tudo mudou. Apareceu no centro do oceano uma nave alienígena. Ele esperou impaciente as portas da nave se abrirem para ver a cara dos alienígenas, porem, de repente a nave explodiu, num espalhafatoso big bang, e os alienígenas saíram a nadar. ( Estes caras devem ser portugueses pois não sabem fazer portas e para saírem precisam explodir o carro – pensou Ernesto, mas na verdade ele não sabia que o que tinha visto era o mero romper repentino da membrana de um espermatozoide). E cada alienígena que tinha a forma de sereio agarrou uma das sereias do lugar e começou um grande baile. Quando acordou no dia seguinte sereios e sereias tinham desaparecido e no lugar havia uma bolota disforme. A bolota continuou crescendo, depois tomou a forma de um sapinho, de um peixe, de uma lagartixa, de um feto e no fim de uma forma que Ernesto nunca tinha visto. E num belo dia a nova forma se foi, deixando Ernesto a pensar com seus botoes. “Acabei de assistir a uma historia, a qual vou chamar de Evolução”. Mas intrigado Ernesto tudo fez para tambem sair daquele lugar que não tinha mais seu doce oceano e quando chegou num lugar novo, la viu a forma  que tinha visto evoluir, e junto com inúmeras outras formas da mesma especie, e que dominavam um planeta para os quais estavam perfeitamente adaptados. E Ernesto pensou. “Caramba! Todo aquele trabalho, aquelas sucessivas transformações, tinham uma meta final, um plano inteligente, que era o de fazer uma criatura fantastica adaptada a um mundo fantástico que a esperava no futuro! Então a Evolução era inteligente e não apenas isso, podia prever o futuro!”

Meu Deus do Céu, eu não sei se tu existe, mas de qualquer forma, pare o mundo que eu quero descer!

Estes misticos modernos o são porque não conhecem aquele que foi nosso criador e dentro de cujo ventre ainda estamos sendo forjados. A foto do bicho esta’ no meu website, mas o ilusionismo da’ valor as imagens visionarias e não vê mais as imagens reais. Se eu conseguisse pô-los numa sala de aula e começasse a descrever um novo mundo no quadro negro, é certo que em poucos minutos iriam saindo um por um da sala, pois aquilo lhes seria insuportável. Como foi para o clero cristão quando um Copérnico os chamou e começou a dizer que não era a Terra o centro do mundo, etc. Ou da outra vez quando Darwin os chamou e começou a dizer que Deus não esteve aqui criando formas uma a uma. Não quiseram e não puderam ouvir, claro, passaram a vida creditando numa mentira, sobre essa mentira estava alicerçada seus privilégios como status social, etc. O desmascaramento dessa mentira seria suas ruínas.

Ao sair da sala algum poderia sair rindo ( toda vez que eu explicava alguma tecnologia da civilização para os índios, eles se riam a vontade, eu não entendia o porque, mas depois aprendi que é a reação instintiva espontânea a qualquer ameaça perturbadora que ainda esteja `a distancia).  Rindo e dizendo algo como. “Ora, nos temos 200 anos trabalhando com afinco em cima de um fenômeno natural super-complexo e você vem agora nos fazer perder empo descrevendo um mero processo de embriogênese:  E você quer dizer que isto é evolução! Não tem nada a ver. Evolução se da’ em termos de populações e não em termos individuais como ocorre com um feto na embriogênese.”

Se eu tivesse tempo imediatamente pediria: “Ok, então por favor me mostre o fato cientifico observado da evolução sobre populações ou algum outro evento no Cosmos que seja semelhante a teoria da evolução por populações que vocês elaboraram.

Não tem. Pela logica ela existe, eles devem estarem certo falando que houve um processo evolucionário baseado na transmissão de genes mutados entre gerações de populações, mas este processo nunca sera’ um fato cientifico comprovado porque, se na teoria todas as transformações começaram por uma mutação ao acaso, e acasos são impossíveis de se repetirem em laboratórios – pois se algum dia alguém repetir um acaso ele deixara’ de se-lo e se entendera’ que ele sempre foi uma lei – … Mas não é nisto que esta errando feio. Mutações por acaso devem ocorrer a todo instante, o processo de transcrição do DNA é muito complexo e depende de todas as demais condições inalteráveis, mas quando ocorre uma mutação por acaso, se a Evolução pudesse falar ela diria: ” Ora, seja bem vinda, você me poupou um bocado de trabalho. Podes ficar porque de qualquer maneira eu iria ter de faze-la mesmo…” Ou então: ” Você nada tem a fazer aqui, vieste bagunçar o meu projeto? Estas descartada para sempre!”

O motivo do erro é outro, muito mais complexo. Eles separaram a Historia Universal em dois blocos – a Evolução Cosmológica e a Evolução Biológica – sem nenhum elo evolucionário entre os blocos, e este abismo criado só pode ser preenchido com a mistica. Para se explicar a existência do segundo bloco da Historia, com suas origens da vida, é preciso inventar um deus magico, e este se chamou Deus Acaso Absoluto, produtor das mutações ao acaso, milagrosas.

O Universo é uma especie de ovo cósmico, as galaxias são as células de uma placenta, e dentro deste Universo esta ocorrendo um processo de reprodução genética daquilo ou daquele que carrega este ovo cósmico no ventre. Este universal macro-processo de reprodução é um fractal que vai se dividindo em fractais menores, ou seja, micro-ciclos deste processo, do qual a evolução biológica, a evolução de nove meses de uma embriogênese são meros fractais, mas como tais se dão pelo mesmo processo universal. Por isso, temos que observar e prestar atenção na projeção deste processo universal que esta aqui, na frente de nossos olhos, para tentar-mos entender o que esta ocorrendo a nível universal. Por isso a historinha do Ernesto. Uma historia que tem sangue nas veias de sua racionalidade, mas rejeitada porque as mentes em fase religiosa só apreciam os contos mágicos de fadas.

A evolução é inteligente! So faltava essa… Assim resolvem um mistério que estavam tentando entender: como a evolução cega pode produzir algo tao fantástico como um corpo humano?!

Ora, quem fez meu corpo foi o DNA dos meus pais sem que tivessem aplicado qualquer naco de inteligencia para me fazerem, tudo ocorreu naturalmente. Meus pais nunca vieram me dizer que para me fazer contrataram uma arquiteta inteligente chamada Evolução.

Criacionismo: O inútil Trabalho de Charles Darwin

quarta-feira, julho 6th, 2016

xxxx

Traduzir o texto aqui.

The wasted career of Charles Darwin

http://www.cornswalled.com/2014/02/the-wasted-career-of-charles-darwin.html#more

Tem interessantes argumentos como:

“Well, if you are a product of chance, your brain is a product of chance. Therefore, the thought patterns that determine your logic are also the products of chance. If your logic is the result of chance processes, you can’t be sure it evolved properly. You can’t trust your own logic.” (Ham, 26)

E nos comentários, outra joia:

The notion that God set events in motion billions of years ago, in such a way as to achieve the universe as it is now, is beyond incredible. To simply “create” the final product would be like playing a video game with all of the cheat codes on hand.

Video : Debunking the Arguments Against Evolution and the Arguments for Evolution – by Matrix/DNA Theory

domingo, novembro 1st, 2015

xxxx

The video with the link below was produced by creationists as response to the evolutionist Bill Nye video against creationism. Since that there is now a middle-term world view, which is against creationism and academic theory of evolution, called Matrix/DNA Theory, I am exposing below the Matrix answers to the topics related by those videos.

CMI: Evolutionism is not appropriate for anyone – a response to Bill Nye 

CMI = Creation Ministries International

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xSi8g2ouCQ&list=FLCPp07tsWrxoMUPoJDiCf4w&index=5

Following, the Matrix/DNA answers posted at the Youtube comments section:

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli – Nov – 01 – 2015

CMI: ” If you try to ignore the problems with evolution your worldview becomes just crazy, just untenable, itself inconsistent.”
Matrix/DNA Theory: ” Yes, the Darwinian theory of evolution has lots of non explicable problems and the absurd conditions of life of those more evolved species is a fact against this theory. If God ask me: ” Do you want repeat your life again or do you want to born as a bacteria?” My answer should be: ” If I will born again like these 95% of world population that are slaves today, I will prefer to be a bacteria”. All species that reached the best fitness, adaptation, were extincts or going to extinction. So, there is no biological evolution, this world is inconsistent. But… If we know the right process of natural, universal, cosmological, evolution, we learn that an intelligent species could evolves, and at other planets some of them did it. Life and evolution at Earth dimension are untenable, but at the universal, the world dimension, it is not, it makes sense. The problem is that the natural process of evolution is not limited by the three variables mechanisms discovered by Darwin. VSI – Variation, Inheritance and Natural Selection alone will drive any specie to the wrong fitness, wrong adaptation, selected by the wrong agent, like humans have selected the wrong leaders and celebrities. There are more four mechanisms coming from cosmological evolution. Non-intelligent animals can not knowing them but we can and so, we could produce the right behaviors and mutations on to the right way.”

xxxxx

Louis Charles Morelli – Nov-01-2015

CMI: “Sure animals change with each new generation, but the types of changes that are observed will never amount to the kind of change that evolution requires even given millions of years.”

Matrix/DNA Theory: “Both, evolutionists and creationists are 50% wrong and 50% right. In fact, mutations alone, by chance and natural selection, does not amount to what evolution requires. But, in fact, biological evolution did it. Them how Nature did it? Applying the same method applied at embryogenesis. In the hierarchy of natural systems that Earth belongs to, there is a system revealed by Matrix/DNA that is driving biological evolution for reproducing it, like at embryogenese the evolution of that process does not amount to the kind of change required for a blastula becoming a baby in 9 months. If embryogenesis do it is because there is DNA and a system beyond the ovule, which is the human species. This explanation is the explanation required by biological evolution. So, there is a system, beyond Earth and surrounding Earth, that emitted seeds of life containing its ” DNA”, and this system is the parents, it is driving evolution here. The human problem for knowing the thru is the academic official Astronomy. They does not know what an astronomic system is, they don’t have the right model of the galactic system that created life internally. Matrix/DNA Theory has the right astronomic model where all life’s properties, included a kind of DNA in shape of a Matrix, are there. It does not need any information from outside this galaxy and from any supernatural entity, this galaxy has all information, since it is the link between cosmological and biological evolution, and since it is half-mechanics and half-biology. Darwinian evolution can not explain completely the mechanisms of evolution because it is limited to Earth and based on wrong concepts coming from Physics, Math and Astronomy.. It is possible that a hypothetical superior intelligence has developed a kind of genetic-computational program for generating such galaxies that can produces biological systems, but, if it did, it must be before the Big Bang, from beyond this Universe.

xxxx

+YHWHisSovereign This video was absolutely hilarious and so true! He’s even wearing that stupid, dr who bow tie!  Bill Nye is, as you guys pointed out, totally wrong about Evolutionism keeping america in the science race, in 1962 America’s public schools rated in the top 10% worldwide in science, math & overall education. Then, in 1963, we removed prayer & creation & began teaching kids they evolved without God. Today, America’s schools rank in the bottom 20%. The Bible Word warns us to avoid false science and today we’re reaping the fruit for not doing so.

+Michael Friedl : In fact, removing prayer & creation from schools, and replacing them with the atheism world view, can diminish the moral motivation of students and producing a non-humanist adult. But, the thousand of years when schools were dominated by creationism, build this social system, based on slavery of the weak and privileges for the those linked to sacerdotes, these absurd and torturing condition of 95% of world population. We doesn’t need a world view based on chance, and doesn’t need a world view based on magical thinking. We need a new world view which reveals a humanist moral code, based on better life for all humans. Like the Matrix/DNA world view.
xxxxx
We all wish evolutionists would turn to science instead of trying to indoctrinate children into their religion. Evolutionism has nothing to do with science. It is contrary to some of the best scientific laws. In information theory, it is well known that information cannot increase when being transmitted from one point to another. With evolutionism, it can, and must increase. Evolutionism has been thoroughly debunked, but its proponents don’t care.
+YHWHisSovereign – That’s information theory. In evolution, there are free informations in the air, coming from more evolved systems than biological systems, which can be aggregated to biological systems like us. At embryogenesis, how new and more complex information are added to the fetus shape, making it an embryo and baby shape? Because the new informations are existing inside the fetus and at the fetus environment. Learn about the right astronomical model and you will see these informations in the air.
xxxx
Your statement is completely false. We cannot observe, test, and predict evolution. It would take millions of years of observing, testing, and predicting which no one has or can do. Observing finches change from one variation of a finch to another variation of a finch, does not prove evolution. All it shows is adaptation. No one can observe the origins of kinds (I’m not talking about species), except the creator of those kinds.  Believing in creation, as what the Bible lays out, is not blind faith. The Bible has been proven to be very reliable. Thanks to archaeology and extra-biblical resources, many of the claims in the Bible has been proven. The consistency of scripture also validates the Bible. The logic behind the necessity of the attributes of God, being a requirement for the reality that we observe, or rational thought itself, is overwhelming to me. An example of this is: God is universal, immaterial, and invariable. The laws of logic are universal, immaterial, and invariable. The existence of the laws of logic are therefore explained by the existence of God. From ID, they can predict the existence of irreducible complexity in biological structures. Engineers also learn a lot from studying nature. If nature came about by chance, there would be nothing to learn except that the approach to engineering should also be about chance. Hopefully no engineer would take this approach. The DNA code is also amazingly similar to the coding practices of engineers. You should take the time to research this area.
Louis Charles Morelli – Nov -21 – 2015
+YHWHisSovereign You said: “Believing in creation, as what the Bible lays out, is not blind faith.”


Of course, it is blind faith.
1) You said above that ” Your statement is completely false… because No one can observe the origins of kinds”. Have someone observed, watched, creation? No, then, the Bible’s authors statement is completely false.
2) Saying that ” the universal laws of logic are universal, immaterial and invariable and it proves a God that has these properties” is circular reasoning. And false: nobody knows what the universal law is while does not go outside and beyond the universe. Nobody can know the thru of a system standing inside it. And I am seeing these laws evolving, under variation, from merely electromagnetic laws to Physics to Chemistry to Biological laws.
3) If these laws are immaterial, only by magis they could acting among mater. Have you watched magics anytime?  
 

I am suspecting that in fact there are laws from a universal logics. From the Big Bang ( with a different interpretation) to human beings, the Matrix/DNA Theory has grasped a logics hat fit everything we know, but this logic is the same of genetic computation. So, this universe can be merely a kind of cosmic egg where is occurring a genetic process for the reproduction of the thing that triggered the Big Bang. This logic is pure natural. If you want to believe that genetic computation was created by a God before the Universe, there is no problem with that, but then, such God does no need coming all time at every planet that holds life creating species by species. Genetics programme alone can do it, from electromagnetic level to biological and even consciousness level. Yours God is too much small, and is he less intelligent than Bill Gates? And why this universal logics couldn’t be produced by a natural being existing beyond the observable universe that is merely being reproduced as consciousness? Where all conscious beings like humans are the genes? Genes does not know what they are doing, and why are them here.Remember: Jesus Christ, the great human philosopher, pointed to the floor and said ” Son” and pointed to the sky and said ” The Father”. He doesn’t said God. Between father and son there is genetics.

Rod Swenson Ensaio Sobre O Livro de Daniel Dennet – Darwin’s Dangerous Idea

terça-feira, julho 7th, 2015

xxxx

Este livro ou ensaio me interessou porque fala de um Dennet que esta defendendo uma teoria de que tudo no Universo se resume a algoritmos…. e a formula da Matrix/DNA pode ser representada como um algoritmo.  Registro para voltar e ler.

http://philosophyofscience.net/dennett/dennett3.html

Daniel Dennett’s book, Darwin’s Dangerous Idea – Essay Review by Rod Swenson

Rod Swenson
Center for the Ecological Study of Perception and Action
University of Connecticut

xxxxxxx

Dennet disse que a grande ideia de Darwin nao foi a ideia da evolucao, mas a ideia da evolucao pela selecao natural. A qual ele define como a a melhor ideaia que algum humano ja teve. Entao, seguindo a discussao do ” se-entao” logica da natural selecao,, Dennet modifica isto para dizer que o que Darwin na realidade descobriu foi um algoritmo , e a ideia de que toos os frutos da evolucao podem ser explicados como os produtos de um processo algoritmo. E esta seria a ideia perigosa de Darwin.

 

Dennett, 1995b) states elsewhere that “Darwin’s great idea [was] not the idea of evolution, but the idea of evolution by natural selection,” which he calls “the single best idea anyone has ever had” (p. 2 1). Then, following a discussion of the if-then logic of natural selection (see later), Dennett modifies this to say that what Darwin really discovered was an algorithm, and that “the idea that all the fruits of evolution can be explained as the product of an algorithmic process, is Darwin’s dangerous idea”

 

Criticas ao Darwinismo: Peer-Reviewed paper conclui que o Darwinismo “Tem certamente alcançado o fim”

domingo, maio 3rd, 2015

Peer-Reviewed Paper Concludes that Darwinism “Has Pretty Much Reached the End of Its Rope”

http://www.evolutionnews.org/2012/02/has_darwinism_p055941.html

Primeiro Livro Brasileiro Sôbre Evolução Humana: “Assim caminhou a humanidade”

sexta-feira, abril 17th, 2015
xxxxx
 
Veja artigo sobre o livro no link:
 
http://darwinedeus.blogfolha.uol.com.br/2015/04/16/assim-caminhou-a-humanidade/#comentarios
 
Image result for from monkey to humans

O passado que nunca vamos contar aos extra-terrestres

 
Interessante tambem é ver como todo artigo cientifico sobre evolução deflagra uma torrente de discussão entre religiosos e ateus nos comentarios. O que me prejudica quando preciso comentar, debater, mas me limitando aos fatos reais e cientificamente conhecidos. A seguir meu comentário enviado ao artigo:
(aguardando moderação)
 
Louis Morelli – Friday, April, 17/2015 
“… a obra de Darwin, deu-nos os “óculos” conceituais mais apropriados para enxergar nossa humanidade…”Discordo. Foi um gigantesco passo do conhecimento humano mas um pequenino passo do conhecimento do tudo. Mesmo o mais atualizado conhecimento de Darwin à Moderna Síntese ainda é quase nada porque: 2) As forças e elementos naturais que carregam a evolução não podem terem sido inventadas pela natureza aqui neste planetinha e devem vir da Natureza do Universo, desde o Big Bang. Apenas a teoria da Matrix/DNA, desenvolvida por um brasileiro na selva amazônica sobre as origens da Vida conseguiu até hoje apresentar uma lógica e racional sugestão onde e como estiveram estas forças e elementos constituindo os ancestrais sistemas naturais como átomos e galaxias. Mas ela aponta 7 mecanismos para a evolução acontecer enquanto o neo-darwinismo ainda só conhece 3. 3) Cresce o numero de cientistas descontentes com essa teoria. E etc.

the universal  matrix

“Parem de me seguir, pôxa!”

Origem da Vida: Nova Tese da Prébiotica Bioquimica Positivista a Ser Pesquisada

sábado, março 21st, 2015

xxxx

Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html

xxxx

Chemistry in a post-meteoritic-impact scenario. A series of post-impact environmental events are shown along with the chemistry (boxed) proposed to occur as a consequence of these events. a, Dissolution of atmospherically produced hydrogen cyanide results in the conversion of vivianite (the anoxic corrosion product of the meteoritic inclusion schreibersite) into mixed ferrocyanide salts and phosphate salts, with counter cations being provided through neutralization and ion-exchange reactions with bedrock and other meteoritic oxides and salts. b, Partial evaporation results in the deposition of the least-soluble salts over a wide area, and further evaporation deposits the most-soluble salts in smaller, lower-lying areas. c, After complete evaporation, impact or geothermal heating results in thermal metamorphosis of the evaporite layer, and the generation of feedstock precursor salts (in bold). d, Rainfall on higher ground (left) leads to rivulets or streams that flow downhill, sequentially leaching feedstocks from the thermally metamorphosed evaporite layer. Solar irradiation drives photoredox chemistry in the streams. Convergent synthesis can result when streams with different reaction histories merge (right), as illustrated here for the potential synthesis of arabinose aminooxazoline at the confluence of two streams that contained glycolaldehyde, and leached different feedstocks before merging. Credit: (c) Nature Chemistry (2015) doi:10.1038/nchem.2202 Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html#jCp

Meu comentario a ser postado no artigo:

1) Que as primeiras  moléculas complexas se formaram  simbionticamente com a junção de ingredientes separados já é previsto na matrix/DNA onde a vida na Terra veio de uma genética separadas no tempo e no espaço.

Copia do artigo para ser traduzido:

(Phys.org)—A team of chemists working at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, at Cambridge in the UK believes they have solved the mystery of how it was possible for life to begin on Earth over four billion years ago. In their paper published in the journal Nature Chemistry, the team describes how they were able to map reactions that produced two and three-carbon sugars, amino acids, ribonucleotides and glycerol—the material necessary for metabolism and for creating the building blocks of proteins and ribonucleic acid molecules and also for allowing for the creation of lipids that form cell membranes.

Scientists have debated for years the various possibilities that could have led to life evolving on Earth, and the arguments have only grown more heated in recent years as many have suggested that it did not happen here it all, instead, it was brought to us from comets or some other celestial body. Most of the recent debate has found scientists in one of three chicken-or-the-egg first camps: RNA world advocates, metabolism-first supporters and those who believe that cell membranes must have developed first.

The chemists with this new effort believe they have found a way to show that all three arguments are both right and wrong—they believe they have found a way to show that everything necessary for life to evolve could have done so from just , hydrogen cyanide and ultraviolet light and that those  could have all existed at the same time—in their paper, they report that using just those three basic ingredients they were able to produce more than 50 nucleic acids—precursors to DNA and RNA molecules. They note that early meteorites carried with them ingredients that would react with nitrogen already in the atmosphere, producing a lot of . By dissolving in water, it could have very easily come into contact with hydrogen sulfide, while being exposed to ultraviolet light from the sun. And that, they claim, would have been all that was needed to get things going.

The findings by the team are sure to garner a great deal of interest in the scientific community and others will no doubt be testing and commenting on their findings. If what they claim passes muster, their work will likely be remembered as one of the great achievements of our time.

 Explore further: NASA Ames reproduces the building blocks of life in laboratory

More information: Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism, Nature Chemistry (2015) DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2202

Ver secção de comentários:

 

Debate entre Religiosos, Ateus, e Matrix/DNA: Sobre Origens e Evolução

domingo, março 1st, 2015

xxxx

https://plus.google.com/u/0/

ElevateD

Shared publicly  –  Yesterday 1:31 AM

 
 
#800
The Myth of Evolution
Evolution is not scientific and that, evolution is a religion and it was created to mislead people and lower the moral standard in our society. Evolution has too many errors to be logical and mutation cannot create life! What type of demoralizing speech is this to say that the transferring of information in different species were transferred by mutation?Since Darwinists are unable to account for how a protein might have formed spontaneously, they claim that the beginning of life was “a first molecule capable of self-reproducing.” First of all, there is no such thing as a “self-reproducing molecule.” If this molecule was a protein, the smallest units inside the living cell, then it must be borne in mind that proteins themselves have no “self-reproductive” property.

In order for a protein to be able to self-replicate, It needs:
Other proteins
DNA
Ribosomes
Endoplasmic reticulum
Cytoplasm
Energy manufacturing mitochondria
And the cell membrane.
In short, A FULLY EQUIPPED CELL.

Therefore, the idea of a “self-reproducing molecule” is totally fraudulent. It is impossible for a molecule not inside a living cell to be able to take in energy from the outside and use it to replicate itself. To refer to this as “an organization progressing toward life” is demagoguery and a deliberate distraction. “Organization progressing toward life” is a totally illogical term. The smallest living thing is “a CELL.” Only a cell and the structures inside it can self-reproduce. Only a cell can take in energy from the outside and use it. Only a cell can maintain its own existence through its own organelles and the energy it takes in from the outside.

To put it another way, there can be no supposed stages progressing from the inanimate toward life. Life can never come from something inanimate. That’s absolutely impossible. All research at the molecular level has proved in the 20th Century that life cannot come from what is inanimate; and this has been confirmed by science in the 21st Century. Not even the presence of a protein is enough for a living thing to form. In order to be able to explain life, Darwinists have to account for the formation of a single cell. But they are still unable to account for how a single protein might have emerged spontaneously. A tiny protein inside the cell totally demolishes Darwinism.

Also, the fossil record indicates that living things did not evolve from primitive to advanced forms, but instead emerged all of a sudden and in a perfect state. In short, living beings did not come into existence by evolution, they were created.

Even Darwin himself was aware of the absence of such transitional forms. It was his hope that they would be found in the future. Despite his hopefulness, he realized that the biggest stumbling-block in his theory was the missing transitional forms. Therefore in his book The Origin of Species he wrote the following in the chapter “Difficulties of the Theory”:

“ …Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we everywhere see innumerable transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?… But, as by this theory innumerable transitional form must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust to the earth?… But in the intermediate region, having intermediate conditions of life, why do we not now find closely-linking intermediate varieties? This difficulty for a long time quite confounded me.”

http://harunyahya.com/en/Articles/2013/the-fossil-record-refutes-evolution
http://harunyahya.com/en/pages/id/1858/Fossils-Refute-Evolution

This has proven to be a blatant lie! How can you people believe such a lie? What is really happening to the eyes of you people?

xxxx
Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory
First you said: “” Evolution is not scientific and that, evolution is a religion…”
You are right and wrong. Evolution is a relativistic issue. It is dependable of the observer at his point in time/space. So, a microscopic observer situated inside an ovule being fecundated and watching the whole process of embryogenesis, he will see the transformations and arisen of complexity as evolution. But we, outside the ovule, knows that is merely “reproduction”. Then, human beings are microscopic observer inside this Universe. It is normal that what we are watching here seems to be evolution. But, Matrix/DNA Theory has its version of Universal Natural History which suggests that inside this Universe is occurring a merely process of genetic reproduction of the unknown thing that was/is existing beyond this “cosmic egg”. And, as says the Godel’s theorem: “Nobody can knows the thru about a system standing inside it” While we does not go outside this Universe for seeing from the outside perspective, we never will know it is is evolution or reproduction…
Then, evolution is scientific like the evolutionary process of embryogenesis is, and is not religion because there is no magics in embryogenesis. But you are right: we can not be affirmative saying that we are watching evolution inside this Universe.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory:
Second, You said: “Evolution has too many errors to be logical…”
Yes, there are errors, because: 1) Evolution is a positive force flowing in the middle a matter’s environment that also contains its counterpart, the negative force. So, the first and supreme goal of this matter is to reach the  eternal inertia as closed system under thermodynamic equilibrium. It happened when universal evolution arrived to the shape of astronomical systems, notary, the galactic systems. It is the most perfect possible machine, but, closed to evolution. Then, the positive force attacked these systems with entropy, fragmenting them into its smallest bits-information (photons), spreading these bits in time and space inside the own galactic body, and the final result is that these bits lifted up as biological systems, which are opened systems to  evolution. 2) There is a small degree of free-will for this universal system under evolution and it is the cause of a lots of evolutionary errors; 3) Every new shape of this universal system obeys two stages: first, the environment is under chaos and the eggs are put out, subject to negatives forces, making lots of errors; second, there  is the hierarchy of systems, which determined that any new system is not really put out, they was always inside another big system which is the ordered state. Since that the biggest system is promoting a reproductive process, at the final all shapes of systems will be the perfect final system as the son of the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory:
You said: “What type of demoralizing speech is this to say that the transferring of information in different species were transferred by mutation?”
It seems mutations to you that is an observer located inside the space and time occurring a universal process. And it seems mutations by randomness to some people. Both are right and wrong. A hypothetical observer inside a fecundated ovule will see continuous transformations, but since that he does not know DNA and genetics, he will believe that is watching mutations, and caused by chance. We are observers inside this egg-universe and you does not know the Universal Matrix driving like the DNA a cosmological process of reproduction. Since there is the negative forces and some free-will, actually there are mutations by chance or caused by negative forces against universal evolution. Some of these mutations by chance are beneficial to the process, so, they are kept; those that are against the big purpose of evolution are discarded.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: ( fourth)
You said: ” Since Darwinists are unable to account for how a protein might have formed spontaneously…”
Darwin had no knowledge that he was watching a micro-cycle of cosmological evolution, which is related to this biological evolution. So, he couldn’t calculated the anatomy of LUCA – the last Universal Common Ancestor of all biological system. LUCA is an astronomical system to which Earth belongs to. Look its face at my avatar here, the internal circuity of vital cycle of astronomical elements. The “goal” of LUCA is to reproduce itself in shape of biological system here, an embryogenic process measured in astronomical scale of time, that’s why biologicals are evolving by 3,5 billion years.
Proteins are the biological representatives of the spherical systemic circuit, which is shared into particles/waves, being the particles as astronomical bodies in the sky or cellular organelles in a cell, or yet, the several different shapes that yours body gets in yours lifetime. So, the first proteins were not formed by their own or by casual combinations of atoms into molecules. There was an invisible variable coming with sun’s light, radiations from Earth’s nucleus, and cosmic radiation, invading terrestrial atoms and driving them to build the proteins.
xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: (fifth)
You said: ” they claim that the beginning of life was “a first molecule capable of self-reproducing.”

The ancestor and creator of “life” at Earth was this astronomical system we are inside it. And it already was “self-reproducing”. It is enough for understanding it seeing the anatomy of this LUCA at my website. But… since that LUCA is our primitive ancestor, every mechanism and life’s properties  must be evolutionarily reduced to its 10 billion years ago. So, in LUCA the process of self-reproducing was merely a process of self-recycling, which needs that a system dies totally and from its dust, lift up again in the same shape it was before. The interstellar dust contained the information for this self-rebuilding. When evolution arrived to biological systems – which are not closed system like LUCA – the self-recycling process was not possible, but the forces doing it developed the process merely by launching a lateral branch of the systemic circuit towards its nucleus… and then… was born what you call “self-reproduction”.

xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: (sixth)
You said: “proteins themselves have no “self-reproductive” property. In order for a protein to be able to self-replicate, It needs:
Other proteins
DNA
Ribosomes, etc…”

The first primordial molecules or proteins were not in needs of self-replicating. They were formed obeying the natural rules of a reproductive process, the reproduction of the astronomical ancestor “LUCA”. And there is a difference between LUCA reproduction and humans reproduction. While humans transmits its genetic information closed inside an internal membrane called spermatozoid and ovule (which makes only one possible copy), LUCA transmitted its genetic information with its bits spreaded into time and space, inside the whole galaxy. Arriving to a common environment, those bits do what immigrants do in New York, each race joining themselves and creating its own village. So, the first packets of information were differentiated and it created the enormous diversity of proteins here, and later, the diversity of life’s shapes. Those smallest packets later joined to form bigger ones but always in the same circuit’s sequence performed at LUCA. So, equals and different proteins arose here and there, at everyplace at Earth’s surface, without needing a complete cell.

xxxx

Edit
Matrix/DNA Theory: ( last)

I will stop here but I can refute and explain any assertion that you can make against Darwinism, not from Darwinism but from the Matrix/DNA world view. The Matrix wrote a new version of Universal Natural History without founding any trace of supernatural beings doing any magics here. Yours and the evolutionists problem is that both forgot our supreme mother nature for asking answers to supreme existential questions. You, both, need going back to watching Nature, because nature does not plays dice with its creatures: the method that nature creates universes, biological lifes and human bodies is always the same, so, watch the creation of yours son for getting those answers. This Universe is merely an agglomerated of old ancestors called “galaxies” in which bodies we arose and are living now. In this universe is occurring a genetic process of reproduction from the unknown natural system that was/is existent beyond it. If you want call it/him/her as God, or if the atheists want call it as “the Absolute Nothing” I have no problem with it, but. please, take out these things called “magics”, “supernaturals”, because they does not exists inside this Universe and you, neither the opposite theorists can prove it. But… the models of Matrix/DNA can because they are scientifically falsifiable.

Aviso aos Físicos: O Excesso de Física Leva à Loucura. Veja Vídeo Aqui

segunda-feira, fevereiro 16th, 2015

Richard Dawkins Knows Nothing About Nothing?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v34QjYPuiEA

Meu comentario explicando a versão da Matrix, publicado em:

http://designinteligente.blogspot.com.br/2013/08/dawkins-nada-confuso.html#comment-form

 

O problema dos ateus é o mesmo dos deístas…  é apenas uma palavra que nada significa: “origens”. Alguem alguma vez na vida viu a “origem”de alguma coisa? Ou seja, algo que comprovadamente nunca existiu antes em lugar e tempo nenhum surgindo perante seus olhos, ou mesmo que seja perante os olhos de mil gerações? Me apontem pelo menos uma. Tudo é produzido pelas transformações ou convergências de fôrças e elementos já existentes antes, isso é o que pode ser cientificamente comprovado. E este universo, assim como esta vida, não podem ter surgido ou se transformado de um NADA que não possuía nenhuma fôrça, nenhum elemento, assim como não pode ser o resultado da transformação de algum Deus Mágico nem a magia pode ter alguma fôrça ou elemento em si mesma.  Por causa desta nefasta palavra que logo conduz a imaginação humana aos reinos dos pensamentos mágicos, alguem precisa inventar soluções inexistentes, tais como deuses mágicos e nada mágicos. Falar ou pensar em origens de universos ou origens da vida é uma absurda aberração contra a racionalidade. A unica visão do mundo que não precisa de “origens” pra explicar as existências de universos e da vida é “A Matriz Universal dos Sistemas Naturais e Ciclos Vitais”, como explica seu website.

Publicado em Youtube:

 

The problem of atheists is the same for deists … it’s just a word that means nothing: “origins”. Anyone have ever seen the “origin” of something? That is, something that never existed before proven in any place and time appearing before their eyes, or even if it is in the eyes of a thousand generations? Please,  point at least one. Everything is produced by transformations or convergence of forces and before existing elements, this is what can be scientifically proven. And this universe, and this life, may not have arisen from a NOTHING that had no forces, no elements, and can not be the result of the transformation of a Magic God or some magics  that may have no some force or element in itself. Because of this ominous word that soon leads the human imagination to the realms of magical thinking, someone needs to invent nonexistent solutions, such as magic gods and magical nothing. Talking or thinking about origins of universes or origins of life is an absurd aberration against rationality. The only worldview  that does not need “origins” to explain the existence of universes and life is “The Universal Matrix of Natural Systems and Vital Cycles”, as explains their website.  But, then, they are agnostics.