Eyewire Forums

Discussing the “bigger picture?

http://forum.eyewire.org/discussion/comment/2268#Comment_2268

Comentario postado:

thematrixdna  5:09PM  QuoteEditFlag

Nautilus Magazine

http://nautil.us/issue/1/what-makes-you-so-special/goodbye-copernicus-hello-universe

Goodbye Copernicus – What makes You So Special

Comentario postado por mim:

TheMatrixDNA • 36 minutes ago

The author is forgetting relativity, which suggests that differente observers of a unique object, located at different point in time space, should have different interpretations. He says that “ At the hands of astronomy and cosmology, we seem to have been reduced to near nothingness”. It seems for him, an observer based in Astronomy, Physics and Mathematics, not for me, an observer based in Biology and Systemology. His theory is based solely on the skeleton of the Universe (the structure of galaxies), my theory is based on the soft meat that covers the skeleton, the biological organization of galaxies.

Our problem initial is: was this Universe produced by a previous design ( I am not saying “designer” and not “intelligent”) or not, merelly or randomly from nothing? If there is a previous design, certainly the shape at the top of evolution, ( consciousness  must be significant. If not, everything from nothing, will be forever, nothing. My method is suggesting that we are like genes building our future shape as pure and unique consciousness.

Since that the author exposed the evidences that supports his theory, I have the right to do it, although have no space here for 1% of my evidences. My method began with seven years isolated at the heart of Amazon jungle studying systems and its connections (biosphere, Earth, Solar system, Milk Way), applying the old method of comparative anatomy among all systems – living and non-living – searching evolutionary links, as the link between cosmological and biological evolution.

If an intelligent being smaller than an atom living inside human skeleton, his natural sensors and artificial sensors ( scientific tools), which are merely extension of his natural sensors, will see his ” Universe” finishing at the limits of the skeleton. He never will see the soft meet, the organs, even the mind. The effects of these things will be called ” dark matter or dark energy”. But comparative anatomy makes the investigation in reverse way, from top to botton, starting at the final product – neurology, biology – and the student will be an observer strongly affected by biological interpretation of the skeleton and the Physics observed by Mr. Caleb.

Only a unique sample of same evidence under different interpretation: The Big Bang.

The Theory is strong supported ( cosmic radiation, expansion, etc.) for both observers. My method also arrived to biologically organizing quarks, went further seeing the vacuum plenty of vibrations of ” dark” light waves as the code for life’s cycles and the source of these emanations of light was a big Big Bang. But while Mr Lawrence Klauss saw everything from nothing, and after that, a small high condensed atom, my method suggests a different thing after and beyond the Big Bang. The salvage Nature in Amazon always suggested to me: Nature does not play dices with her creatures. The chaos saw in biosphere is product of order, see the sky”. And I never saw this Universe making magics, taking something out from nothing. So, the complexity here is merely the convergence of spread informations existing at the Big Bang. The Universe only do things that he has information for. He creates things by the same process that he was created. Then, my specific type of observer plus skepticism about magics, made me see that my own body was made throught a bigbang. The first initial moment of a human body – one top evolutionary product here and now – begins when a small spermatozoon “explodes” inside a big ovule. And all sequential shapes ( morula, blastulae, recapitulates the sequential shapes of the Universe (atomic nebulae, mass of galaxies…). But my method leads me further: you can see at my website, the graphic of electromagnetic spectrum, how natural light wave has the same shape of a universal Matrix that is the actual biological DNA. It is scientific falsiable or testable: the works of DNA inside the nucleus emits the biological counterpart of cosmic radiation. This Universe is a cosmic egg (or the fossil of our ancestors) where is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the system that was before the Big Bang. This is falsiable, universes from nothing is not scientific testable.

Ok, I would like to debate here detail by detail each evidence has the two sides. It is interpretations against interpretations, since that the evidences are known by both sides. But I would like that the other side always brings on the table, a natural known parameter for supporting each Math formula or another thing used as links among the data. Like here, my known parameter for interpretation of Big Bang is embryology. I don’t know where the other side will find a natural parameter for their “nothing”, and for ” a microscopic atom able to grow to the size of the Universe” , etc.

Baseado no artigo:

The Four Elements

BY 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mario-livio/the-four-elements_b_3226409.html?utm_hp_ref=science

HUFFINGTON POST – SCIENCE

Meus posts publicado no artigo:

TheMatrixDNA

” We may have lost the naïve simplicity, but we have gained the understanding, precision, and predictive power”

What do you mean by ” gained…understanding and power”?. The naive simplicity is not the Greek and medieval culture, but the native tribes as we had in America. Today when I go to Amazon jungle and watch the life of those natives, making comparison with almost five billions of humans slaves 10 hours a day in hard work… I think the natives are smarter. The problem is that humans gained in knowledge about micro and macro dimensions, but did not evolved from the salvage inherited state from the jungle where the law is based upon predators and pray. The natives has evolved with their social systems going out from the primitive animalism. Be sure that it is not the elements formed in the stars that had invented the organization of matter into natural working systems (the stars itself were parts of systems formed long ago). Teaching that we are composed “with” elements forged in fire (,stars reactions) is very different than telling that we are ” formed” by those elements. You are passing on the idea that our existence, our origins began there, in the internal fire of stars and we reached the final understanding of our origins.You are cutting out all other alternatives suggested by humans fantasies but also by natural intuition. This is not scientific because nobody can prove that our existence is solely product of known materialistic chain of events. Which are the humans values of someone believing that stars alone are the last word? We will built a worst collective world view and so, worst shapes of social systems for human beings. As is proved that was bad behavior telling that supernatural beings are the creators,- remembering the bad social systems based in this world view. So, we don’t know the real first elements and we must tell that we don’t know. If we can’t find the basics for an ideal world view, at least we must avoid to pass on the belief that generates arrogance and is used by tyrants and salvage predators of salvage capitalism and salvage communism. There are others rational alternatives about elements above and before the stars that could driven matter into our existence, like the theoretical natural formula for natural systems suggested by Matrix/DNA Theory, which is a source for best human values, so, we must teach how keeping the mind opened for more knowledge.

XXXXXX

lighthaus

Inunda o noticiário  principalmente na Internet, a pregação da cosmovisão que esta agora na moda e é dita “cientifica”, por Físicos  Matemáticos  Evolucionistas, etc. Hoje na conferencia Ted Talks dentro do complexo do CERN, físicos disseram: ” Desde que encontramos o Higgs bóson e confirmamos a existência do Higgs Field, fechamos com honra a Teoria do Standard Model. Isto passa a ideia (mesmo para os adultos acadêmicos), de que toda a historia do mundo material desde o primeiro instante que a matéria surgiu pela primeira vez com o Big Bang, estaria definitivamente elucidada. Ao mesmo tempo livros produzidos dentro da academia se tornam os mais vendidos, como o livro de Lawrence Klauss, um físico das partículas e cosmologista ativo militante ateu nos programas televisionados, intitulado ” The Universe From Nothing”, afirmando a ideia de que do nada surge tudo, como diz bonito em inglês  ” something from nothing”. Lawrence esta sempre acompanhado do evolucionário biólogo e guru do ateísmo mundial Richard Dawkins, autor de tantos best-sellers como ” The God Dellusion” – A ilusão de um Deus.

Com essa interpretação do mundo torna-se compreensível que a mente do cientista ultrapasse as fronteiras do Universo e viaje alem dela, inquiridora, atras da elucidação do ultimo mistério. O que produziu o Big Bang? Porem como a mente não possui seus olhos mentais próprios de ver, mas necessita de explicações  é compreensivel  que essas pessoas projetem a imagem, a fenomenologia e a sua interpretação do mundo aqui para teorizar como deve ser lá. A conclusão dos físicos expressada na conferencia TED&CERN  foi: o alem é povoado por universos, ao qual denominamos “multiverso”. Enquanto isso a plateia de estudantes e reporteres já engoliu a “informação cientifica” de que universos podem surgirem do nada e são ” nada” – pois Lawrence afirma que conseguiram medir a energia total do Universo e constataram que é igual a “zero” (!). Eu que fui formado fora da caixa e por isso penso “out of the box”, exigiria que ” bring on the Universe over the table”, quero ver essa medição com meus próprios olhos!  Mas a plateia já foi intelectualmente formada dentro da universidade custeada por essa igreja doutrinaria, e para suas mentes produzirem a imagem de um mundo povoado de universos surgindo do nada é apenas um salto inevitável.

Enquanto isso as demais disciplinas cientificas, como a Biologia, a Química  e mesmo a anciã Filosofia, todas se quedam vencidas, boquiabertas,  aceitando os ensinamentos da mestra militante Física.  Há muito tempo nem a Biologia produz uma grande teoria assim tão completa sobre as origens da matéria orgânica e dos sistemas biológicos  ou seja, da Vida, pois não precisa. Os Fisicos já disseram que não existe nenhum vinculo, nenhum elo evolucionário entre o mundo do passado regido pela Evolução Cosmológica com o mundo dos pobres mortais terrestres regido pela Evolução Biológica  pois o universo revolto em flutuações mexe a matéria como minha avó rodava o moinho para mexer os grãos de café ao torra-los, e nessas mexidas em bilhões de anos todos os acidentes não apenas podem acontecer mas acontecem de fato, e assim um acidente produziu a Vida. Se os Biólogos e Filósofos de plantão não encostaram os Fisicos na parede exigindo a prova e demonstração de onde estavam na galaxia as forças e mecanismos que produziram os complexos mecanismos que unem átomos na configuração de complexas moléculas orgânicas é porque todo mundo esta anestesiado por uma doutrina, e ninguém, estando dentro de uma tribo ou de uma igreja ousou contestar os ensinamentos dos pajés e sacerdotes. Ou ia para caldeirões a ser cozinhado com batatas ou para fogueiras a virar churrasco para urubus. Quando acontece de um filosofo meio maluco e desalojado da sociedade como eu, naturalista por nascimento e não formado dentro da universidade, arrumar sua trouxinha e viver isolado na selva amazônica perguntando a Natureza bruta e ainda intacta, as velhas questões filosóficas do ” quem sou?”, ” porque e para que me produziste?”, as respostas que a mãe Natureza lhe sussurra aos ouvidos são muito diferentes das respostas fornecidas pela doutrina la fora, na civilização do asfalto. Essa Natureza sempre esta a dizer: “Eu não jogo dados com minhas criaturas. Se você quer saber como é encima e como foi no passado, observe como é ai embaixo e no seu presente. Eu não sou magica, só posso fazer criaturas com as informações que recebi quando nasci também  portanto, o processo pelo qual se deu a origem do seu corpo tem que ser a imagem e semelhança do processo pelo qual deu origem a mim mesma. É fácil: observe a historia do seu corpo e deduza com sabedoria a minha Historia.”

-” Mas…mas quando vou na cidade e trago uma canoa cheia de livros, leio que você surgiu do nada e alem disso é trapalhona, por isso nos surgimos por acidente!”

- ” Ah… sim?! Então é por isso que ate hoje tenho assistido a repetição da mesma historia, onde todos os humanos vivendo numa mesma época provocam os grandes acidentes que tem destruído seus grandes impérios e civilizações  Quem tem a violência e mais nada no coração, vê acidentes e o nada onde não estão…”

- ” Ah… mas esta historia de que devo pensar como surgiu meu corpo para pensar como surgiu o Universo é absurda! Para começar meu corpo surgiu no instante que se explodiu o involucro de um espermatozoide…glup…”

- ” Bingo! Esta ai seu Big Bang! Existem varias alternativas para se interpretar origens não testemunhadas. ”

A Historia da Humanidade tem sido, desde suas origens ate a recente queda do império soviético, um roteiro em que civilizações são construidas em cima de uma interpretação do mundo, crescem, atingem o apogeu, criam um exercito que  ninguém mais no mundo é capaz de vencer e assim deveriam se eternizar para o sempre. Mas a Natureza nunca se eternizou em nenhuma forma que exibiu, nenhuma estrela evita seu envelhecimento, morte, e renascimento como nova estrela, um pouco diferente. A Natureza não fica de bracos cruzados, ela ate agora tem caminhado e com um proposito, transformando o mais simples em mais complexo, e nessa onda ela leva o cérebro dos vivos na mesma direção  Com isso o conhecimento naturalista tambem aumenta em relação ao conhecimento que existia no cérebro dos que modelaram um sistema social baseado na sua interpretação do mundo. Esse novo conhecimento começa a torturar cada vez maior numero de  cérebros porque se choca com o velho conhecimento de roupagens novas. E mesmo que o sistema se cerque de um poderoso exercito de sacerdotes cavaleiros de santas cruzadas, a onda natural é incontida por meros mortais, e mesmo que o império resista por 3 mil anos como o Egípcio   ou domine o mundo todo como o Romano, essa onda começa a minar sorrateiramente a harmonia artificial, e o inconsciente coletivo encontra alguma maneira de transformar o sistema da civilização,  mesmo que tenha de levar a sua civilização as ruínas.

Sera que agora, pela primeira vez na Historia, esse roteiro mudaria? Se não - e sabendo-se que estas transições são dolorosas, são como cirurgias necessárias, reparadoras, aplicadas pela Natureza, pela Evolução  para corrigir os desvios da arquitetura que esta no topo do processo evolutivo – sera melhor que estejas preparado e não seja mais um paciente na UTI do hospital da Natureza.

Na minha opinião de caipira do mato, esse pessoal da civilização moderna, principalmente os adeptos desta doutrina, perderam o controle de suas faculdades mentais. Mas posso estar redondamente enganado, talvez hajam mutações por acaso e acidentes que repentinamente produzam do nada novas especies de Historia Natural e Historia da Humanidade.

Se esta interpretação do mundo estiver errada e a civilização moderna é mais um castelo sobre areia movediça,  qual teria sido a causa de tantos seres humanos terem caído novamente na antiga armadilha?  Minha opinião é a de que, sendo a Ciência um sistema composto de disciplinas, deixou-se indevidamente que uma de suas partes se tornasse dominante enquanto todas as outras se tornaram recessivas, debeis. E a dominante foi a Física  carregando a bordo sua linguagem predileta, a Matemática, a qual, quando praticada em excesso, sai fora de sintonia com a realidade e passa a ser a linguagem de fantasmas.  Se isto de fato aconteceu, não há como negar que o produto final da Ciência nesta civilização teria que estar desviado da real Natureza, e da direção na qual ela avança  Para um sistema efetuar uma boa obra em relação a Natureza ele não pode ter dominantes internos, o todo interno tem que funcionar em completa harmonia para que a identidade final do sistema opere saudavelmente. A nenhuma parte interna especifica se pode autorizar elaborar a Teoria do Todo, esta tem que contar com a participação da Biologia, da Neurologia… e ate com a opinião selvagem de naturalistas como Darwin e dos semi-macacos como eu que andaram perguntando em infernos que os cientistas do ar condicionado e do asfalto não tiveram coragem de ir. Afinal, a selva também faz parte do todo, no tempo e sua Historia, assim como no espaço com suas distancias astronômicas.

As vezes na selva (por não ter muito o que fazer nas noites sem luz elétrica  ficava olhando as estrelas, tentando enxergar seus planetas e imaginando que nos planetas havia gente sentada e olhando para meu planeta se perguntando se haveria alguem aqui olhando para la… E imaginava qual seria o resultado se extraterrestres microscopicos e feitos de vladzolin e chanilin, vindos de um planeta dominado pela Fisica e sua Matematica, ao verem criaturas aqui feitas de carbono. Tendo olhos diferentes veriam apenas a parte da Natureza clareada pela faixa dos raios gama das ondas de luz, ou seja, veriam apenas a parte da matéria organizada na ordem dos processos e elementos fisicos e mecanicos captados pela Fisica, visiveis nessa faixa de onda. Nas ruas veriam apenas esqueletos de ossos caminhando, se movendo mecanicamente. Assim como somos demasiados pequenos e só vemos nas faixas proximas do infra-vermelho, não conseguimos ver e captar as forcas e a materia da galaxia que estão sobre nossas cabeças e nos empurram contra o solo deste planeta, os meus imaginarios amigos extraterrestres só veriam esqueletos, enquanto sabemos que o corpo humano é formado por trés niveis de organização da matéria - o fisico denso dos esqueletos, o mole e suave nivel da carne e substancias biológicas  e (talvez) o elétrico plasma no nivel de organização da consciência.

Meus ET’s enviariam constantes relatorios para seus sabios no seu planeta descrevendo a mecanica dos seres auto-moventes aqui. Todos os movimentos que pareceriam ” estranhos”, como uma cabeça ficar proxima de outra por longos minutos face a face sem se moverem, seriam relegados como excessoes para estudos posteriores, mas nunca descritos como ” dois seres com corpos ligeiramente diferenciados que possuem labios de carne se beijam por longos minutos”. Pobres ET’s!  O sono me pegava, eu acenava na direção de suas estrelas gritando ” boa noite!”, e fechava minhas duas janelas de carne que me revelavam a existencia de sua estrela, dormindo com um sorriso expressado nos labios de carne que eles não viam e assim não percebiam que eu ria deles.

Para mim os fisicos apenas estão captando o esqueleto do Universo, em seus niveis micro e macrocosmico. Dentro dos limites de percepção do infra-vermelho, avançando um pouco nas faixas da esquerda e da direita. Seus instrumentos de investigação são meras extensões de seus sistemas de percepção  portanto apenas captam apenas a mesma ordem do nivel de organização da materia. O resultado final que estão obtendo é o mesmo que obtiveram os nossos desastrados e míopes visitantes extra-terrestres. Estes quando se perguntassem quem ou que criou esta especie de seres terrestres seriam tentados irresistivelmente a imaginarem que foram outros esqueletos existentes fora da Terra. Por isso nossos pages e papas da doutrina moderna não podem imaginar outras origens para o universo que veem senão a de que teria sido criado como outros universos que existiriam la fora. Seus instrumentos de pesquisa são todos feitos de materia densa e mecanicos como seus sentidos de percepção  os quais nos levaram a construir motores e maquinas da mesma composição e métodos de funcionamento. Por isso quem tem nos revelado e interpretado o mundo invisivel a nossos olhos, como o microscopico na biologia, ou o macroscopico na cosmologia, é a mais avançada maquina, o computador, uma copia grosseira do nosso cerebro. E a maquina, ao invés de nos contar a verdadeira historia do Universo, conta uma historia que é a projeção de sua propria historia: se o primeiro motor funcionou quando houve uma explosão de vapor, o Universo surgiu de um explosivo Big Bang; se o movimento da maquina é um terno vai e vem, o Universo se expande inflacionariamente e por isso terá que se contrair; se o sentido da existência  se o produto final, da maquina, e triturar materia-prima, o sentido da existencia do cosmos e revelado por fantasmas e invisiveis buracos negros que, como canibais do espaço  trituram galaxias e estrelas. Na selva. o cerebro biologico se mantem selvagem, macaquito,  mas natural, e a natureza bruta revela uma diferente historia universo. Mas tambem é uma versão desconfiavel pois o humano é um incorrigível arrogante que não consegue deixar de projetar sua imagem quando imagina seus deuses ou seus mundos sem deuses. Por exemplo, meu rustico metodo de investigação que foi o primeiro método cientifico empregado muito tempo antes de jota cristo, o metodo da anatomia comparada, pelo qual se abria o corpo de um animal para se calcular como seria o corpo humano por dentro, e que na selva eu usava para montar meus modelos teoricos de atomos e galaxias depois de ver o que existia no interior das células e corpos vivos, e calcular como funcionariam protons, eletrons, planetas, estrelas, cometas, para que resultassem nos sistemas funcionais que são  deveria ter me revelado a verdadeira face do Universo. Mas quando cheguei la onde eles viram o Big Bang explosivo eu vi o subito rompimento de um espermatozoide dentro de um ovulo tal como o que deu a origem ao meu corpo, e ao invés de uma face só  eu vi uma estrutura relativística com no minimo sete faces cada uma ao sabor da interpretação do fregues. E para no final me alertar que possivelmente eu cai na armadilha narcisista, a face ultima que continha todas as outras sub-faces era justamente a imagem do DNA. Eu exclamei um nome: a Matrix! A historia do Universo que fora me revelado era projeção da historia e da personalidade, inclusive da mesma imagem, do DNA que estava escondido no centro dos meus neuronios, quem na verdade tinha dirigido a investigação  Hoje sei que a Verdade não sera tao cedo por nos alcançada porque nosso pequenino cerebro e suas imperfeiçoes não o permite capta-la. Mas ainda prefiro acreditar que a historia do cerebro biologico e da Natureza nua e selvagem esta mais proxima da Verdade que a historia do cerebro eletro-mecanico e da Natureza sufocada vestida com mantos de asfalto e cimento. Oxalá eu esteja errado, pois ainda prefiro eu sozinho pagar o preço de uma cosmovisão errada que o grande numero de meus familiares em especie pagarem se a deles estiver mais errada.

Mas longe de mim sugerir que este Universo constituido de aglomerados de galaxias como sua esquelética e mecanica estrutura, seja revestido com materia organizada a nivel biológico e ainda, acima, pelo nivel de organização mental. Sei que não existimos aqui dentro da ponta de um universo vivo como um dinossauro cosmico tao grande que o seu menor movimento de rabo demoraria bilhões de nossos anos e nunca perceberiamos que nosso Universo se mexe e se move. A invisivel e misteriosa ” dark matter” que parece compor mais de 90% deste universo não seria material organizada como a parte mole, organica deste universo. E a ” dark energy” nao seria sua contraparte mental. Por isso não tenho a coragem dos academicos e voltei da selva escrevendo inicialmente que sugiro uma teoria de que… ao invés de afirmar teorias como fatos cientificamente estabelecidos nos bancos escolares.

Mas porque o Universo não deve ser osso+carne+mente como é a criatura que ele gerou aqui?… Porque a Natureza na selva me doutrinou com o dogma de que seu criador tem que ser a sua imagem e semelhança  Ora,… porque nos temos acumulado demasiadas evidencias sugerindo que a evolução existe, e sendo assim, o Universo é uma especie de nosso ancestral que ainda existe, assim como ainda existem bacterias e macacos. Pois ele esta no passado em relação a nos, não no nosso futuro. Pode ser tambem o cemitério de fosseis de um ancestral extinto, e nos – tal como o bioma de criaturas que existem dentro do nosso corpo – teriamos emergido dentro de seu corpo. E a possiblidade de que regiões de nosso DNA, se expressadas isoladas, podem gerar virus dentro do nosso corpo, teriamos aproveitado seu dna “cósmico”. O universo não foi o criador da Natureza, apenas é uma de suas formas no passado, assim como lagartixas podem terem sido minha forma a milhões de anos atras.

Portanto o Universo pode ser o esqueleto que os fisicos estão vendo. Pode ser que não exista mais misterio, tudo morreu sob as botas dos fisicos, e estou aqui falando besteiras. Mas tem uma coisa, a qual me fez sair da minha caverna na selva, retornar a civilização que um dia me expulsou, para gritar aos quatro ventos, com raiva e revolta! Tem uma coisa… que é meu alento de esperança que a minha especie vai sobreviver e alcançar a tocha iluminada da Verdade Ultima um dia. Essa coisa é um pequeno detalhe: esqueletos não possuem informações para erigirem estruturas mais complexas, como as suaves e carnosas que os revestem, e nem plasmas conscientes que se situam ainda mais acima. Não adianta virem me dizer que esqueletos se mexem e se desintegram em pó em bilhões de anos, tentam todas as novas combinações e ressurgem como figado, estomago, coração  cerebro… Pois na selva tenho observado milhares de vezes que todos os esqueletos desaparecem no meio da terra enquanto observei que ainda existem corpos com corações e hipocampos porque vem de uma outra via de propagação de informações naturais.

Estas informações para a Vida e a Inteligencia tem que terem vindo do antes e alem do Big Bang, elas estão la no lugar de um multiverso esquelético dos fisicos. A minha preferida interpretação do mundo, enfiada com violência selvagem pelas ultimas testemunhas existentes das origens da vida nos ultimos bastiões intocados da selva, dentro do meu torturado cocuruto, é a de que este Universo é uma especie de ancestral ou ovo comisco dentro do qual esta sendo gerado por mero processo genético ou computacional, o filho do sistema que existia antes do Big Bang e deve existir ainda alem do Universo. Se neste estagio embrionario em que o feto adquiriu a forma biologica, e o embrião adquiriu a forma consciente, denominada ” especie humana”, ao menos nesta perdida região dessa imensidão cósmica, é porque o sistema criador tem Vida e é Consciente.

Interpretações diferentes são assim diferenciadas devido as conexões neuroniais serem diferentes entre nos, humanos. É compreensivel que uma cultura civilizatória modele os cerebros de toda sua população na mesma e unica configuração  Quem esta dentro de um sistema não pode conhecer as verdades e mentiras do sistema em sua totalidade, apenas quem o observa de fora. Mas estes tambem erram em suas interpretações de tal sistema se não estiverem localizados acima de todos os sistemas e verem a ultima conjuntura. Eu estou expressando a minha interpretação formada fora do sistema, mas por um sistema ainda mais atrasado. Porem é possível que o sistema de sua civilização tenha avançado mais artificialmente que naturalmente, como o sistema que me formou conserva os princípios primeiros da natureza bruta ainda. Não se influencie pelo que digo porque certamente estou errado mas lembre-se do roteiro que se tem repetido ao longo da Historia Humana e desconfie da doutrina que estão te enfiando cocuruto adentro nos bancos escolares. Pois quero morrer sorrindo com a esperança de que minha especie vai me vingar e vai subir… subir… subir ate alcançar o pico do Olimpo, se apoderar da tocha de fogo do poder e obrigar Zeus a contar tudo direitinho, tim-tim por tim-tim, e não que nossas proximas gerações sejam objetos de novas cirurgias dolorosas. A Ciência moderna é para mim a evidencia de que o resultado atual de sua atividade é um produto falso. Pois ela se tornou um sistema acomodado com uma grave irregularidade e desarmonia interna, e isto so pode produzir uma entidade doentia em relação a sua Natureza. Qualquer ser racional ainda mantenedor de suas faculdades mentais veria que ao invés de mais esqueletos la fora, tem que haver Vida e Inteligencia.  Amem!

Minocycline – Minociclina

http://hypescience.com/cientistas-descobrem-a-pilula-da-desconfianca-contra-mulheres-bonitas/

A noticia do link acima nos abriu uma nova hipótese para a Matrix/DNA ao observar-mos a formula da Minociclina ( um antibiotico). Cada hexagono atomico visto na formula é copia da formula para sistema fechado perfeito. Sendo a minoclina uma sequencia repetida de sistemas fechados, seria de se esperar que sua função, seu efeito, seja o de reforçar onde estiver a tendencia para sistema fechado.

Bem, a noticia revela que o homem que ingere minociclina torna-se mais racional a ponto de diminuir as chances de ele cair vitima do encanto de mulheres bonitas. A noticia apresenta sua fraca interpretação do porque isso acontece mas para quem conhece o mundo pela Matrix/DNA suspeita que a explicação é outra: a minociclina aumentaria o egoismo das pessoas, e com isso, os homens que a ingerem se fecham ao contacto e influencias externas. Seres humanos nasceram para serem sistemas físicos abertos, porem sob uma forca física material tentando dirigi-los para serem sistemas fechados, reproduzindo o grande ancestral criador. Como sistemas abertos tendem a se comunicarem e abrirem sua muralha de auto-defesa, ficando a merce de boas e mas influencias. Se a droga os altera na direção de sistemas fechados, não seria apenas contra mulheres bonitas que diminuíram relações e consequentemente o nível de confiança  mas com tudo e todos. Se na experiencia dos pesquisadores apareceu esse efeito em relação a mulheres bonitas foi porque a pesquisa foi induzida, pois colocou ade antemão o objeto “mulher bonita”, mas se tivesse colocado qualquer outro estereotipo humano, o resultado seria o mesmo.

Com isso, a Minociclina passa a ser objeto de nossa curiosidade assim como todas as formulas químicas que apresentem essa sequencia de hexagonos.

Comentario postado no artigo:

xxxx

E na sequencia dessa pesquisa:

Ver Wikipedia, Minoclina:

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minociclina 

… seus efeitos adversos (tonturas e vertiges)

Isto ev indicacao que nossa teoria esteja certa. A minoclina atua a nivel mental pois ev a central que dirige as ttendencias do individuo. Calcula-se que o nivel mental foi hard-wired para se comportar como sistema aberto e uma interferencia de uma forca  do sistema fechado causaria disturbio mental tentando refazer a configuracao de combinacoes entre neuronios.

- O cloridrato de minociclina, também conhecido como minociclina, é um antibiótico do grupo das tetraciclinas

Tetraciclina

As Tetraciclinas são um grupo de antibióticos usados no tratamento das infecções bacterianas. Comprovou-se recentemente o consumo da tetraciclina por egípcios há mais de três mil anos. Após pesquisas, foi encontrada em cerveja produzida usando-se receita antiga dos egípcios.

Mais uma confirmacao da nossa teoria? Esta substancia deveria ser usada numa tecnica de embalsamento. A formula da Matrix para sistema fechado, quando penetra e se aloja dentro de algum sistema aberto como as celulas humanas, tenderiam a aumentar a vida destas celulas alem de corrigir suas perfeicoes de estrutura e funcionamento. Eu uso a tecnica de imaginar mentalmente o software dessa formula e conduzi-la a cada sub-sistema do meu corpo… o que ev algo muito metafisico e mistico, mas o fato ev que depois que a iniciei, a 30 anos atras nunca mais minha saude teve qualquer problema, nem mesmo gripe… Mas a informacao nao diz que egipcios usavam a substancia em embalsamentos, apenas que a consumiam em algum ingrediente com que faziam sua cerveja. E possivel que o ingrediente fosse algum vegetal, como folha de palma, e usassem-na para embalsamento tambem. Obtinham o embalsamento sem saberem ou conhecerem a substancia. Precisamos pesquisar que ingrediente de cerveja era esse.

- As tetraciclinas recebem essa denominação devido à sua estrutura química, formada por quatro anéis.

Tetracycline – Tetraciclina

Mais uma pista para nossa teoria. A minociclina ev uma das variantes da tetraciclina cuja formula de 4 aneis hexagonais indicam uma forca para reforcar o aspecto sistema fechado perfeito.

- As tetraciclinas são antibióticos produzidos por diversas espécies de Streptomyces…A primeira tetraciclina foi descoberta no ano de 1948 e recebeu inicialmente o nome de aureomicina, em consequência da coloração dourada do fungo produtor;

Vamos ver mais abaixo que o produtor dessa substancia nao e um fungo e sim uma bacteria.

Bem, aqui vamos descer nas raizes primeiras do aparecimento dessa substancia no reino biologico, buscando alguma conexao com o sistema astronomico e LUCA. 

Streptomyces

… is the largest genus of Actinobacteria and the type genus of the family Streptomycetaceae.^[1] Over 500 species of Streptomycesbacteria have been described.^[2] As with the other Actinobacteria, streptomycetes are Gram-positive, and have genomes with high GC content.^[3]Found predominantly in soil and decaying vegetation, most streptomycetes produce spores, and are noted for their distinct “earthy” odor that results from production of a volatile metabolite, geosmin.

Actinobacteria

…are a group of Gram-positive bacteria with high guanine and cytosine content in their DNA.^[1][2] They can be terrestrial oraquatic.^[3] Actinobacteria is one of the dominant bacterial phyla and contains one of the largest of bacterial genera, Streptomyces.^[4] Analysis ofglutamine synthetase sequence has been suggested for phylogenetic analysis of Actinobacteria.

Actinobacteria é um filo de bactérias Gram-positivas conhecidas como actinomicetos ou actinobactérias. Estas bactérias têm organização filamentosa, muitas vezes ramificada. Dada sua semelhança com fungos e por produzirem, como estes, cadeias de esporos semelhantes a conídios, os Actinomicetos são com freqüência erroneamente classificados como tais. Ao contrário dos fungos, porém, são organismosprocarióticos em sua grande maioria aeróbios.

Os Actinomicetos ocorrem amplamente no solo, onde desempenham relevante papel biológico. Especialmente representantes do subgrupo dosestreptomicetos são muito comuns na terra. Entre estes, contam-se o Streptomyces griseus e o Streptomyces aureofaciens. Os representantes do gênero Streptomyces produzem importantes antibióticos, como a estreptomicina, sintetizada por S. griseus, a clorotetraciclina, sintetizada por S. aureofaciens, a terramicina, sintetizada por S. rimosus, entre muitos outros. Mais de oitenta antibióticos já foram obtidos de espécies do gêneroStreptomyces. Os representantes do gênero Frankia vivem em simbiose com as raízes de plantas superiores (por exemplo, da Casuarina sp.), onde levam à formação de nódulos, no interior dos quais ocorre fixação de nitrogênio.

Por fim, muitos Actinomicetos causam graves moléstias no homem e nos animais. Entre os patógenos, podemos mencionar o Mycobacterium tuberculosis, causador de tuberculose e o Mycobacterium leprae, causador da lepra. No gado, a actinomicose é causada por Actinomyces bovis.

Outros exemplos de Actinobactérias úteis ao homem são os representantes do gênero Bifidobacterium. Habitantes normais da flora intestinal, estas bactérias imóveis e anaeróbicas desempenham papel fundamental na regulação da atividade intestinal normal, principalmente em lactentes.

O fato destas bacterias causarem doencas – tuberculose, lepra – aumenta nosso interesse nesta pesquisa.

Actinobacteria-Actinomyces_israelii

Deixa-me fazer uma pausa nessa direcao da pesquisa e retornar ao artigo, pois existe ali uma palavra que precisa ser investigada:

- … Estudos com animais já haviam mostrado que a minociclina inibe as atividades microgliais. Espera-se que o efeito demonstrado neste estudo lance uma nova luz no papel, ainda desconhecido, da microglia nas atividades mentais humanas.

Wikipedia:

Microglia are a type of glial cell that are the resident macrophages of the brain and spinal cord, and thus act as the first and main form of active immune defense in the central nervous system (CNS).

O queeeeee ????!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Como ?!!!

A minociclina atua a microglia que ev um tipo de celula que ev a primeira e principal forma da defesa imunologica do sistema nervoso central?!

Bomba! Bomba!

A lampadinha das ideias acendeu de novo la dentro do cocuruto!

Acabo de descobrir quem foi o criador do sistema imunologico! Era so fazer a conexao: egoismo, sistema fechado, cerrada auto-defesa… E…. aparece a imagem de LUCA!

Esta ai a origem astronomica do sistema imunologico: nas estrelas, a 10 bilhoes de anos atras! Estas celulas microgliais sao a personificacao biologica da identidade, da personalidade de LUCA.

Bem isso ev assunto para outro capitulo, vou abri-lo ja: Titulo do Artigo:

Bomba! Estou Descobrindo Quem foi o Criador do Sistema Imunologico de Defesa: o Selfish Gene de LUCA!

http://theuniversalmatrix.com/pt-br/artigos/?p=5887

XXXX

Microglia are a type of glial cell that are the resident macrophages of the brain and spinal cord, and thus act as the first and main form of active immune defense in the central nervous system (CNS).

Microglia constitute 20% of the total glial cell population within the brain.^[1] Microglia (and astrocytes) are distributed in large non-overlapping regions throughout the brain and spinal cord.^[2][3] Microglia are constantly scavenging the CNS for plaques, damaged neurons and infectious agents.^[4] The brain and spinal cord are considered “immune privileged” organs in that they are separated from the rest of the body by a series of endothelial cells known as the blood–brain barrier, which prevents most infections from reaching the vulnerable nervous tissue. In the case where infectious agents are directly introduced to the brain or cross the blood–brain barrier, microglial cells must react quickly to decrease inflammation and destroy the infectious agents before they damage the sensitive neural tissue. Due to the unavailability of antibodies from the rest of the body (few antibodies are small enough to cross the blood brain barrier), microglia must be able to recognize foreign bodies, swallow them, and act as antigen-presenting cells activating T-cells. Since this process must be done quickly to prevent potentially fatal damage, microglia are extremely sensitive to even small pathological changes in the CNS.^[5] They achieve this sensitivity in part by having unique potassium channels that respond to even small changes in extracellular potassium.^[4]

DNA at 60: Still Much to Learn

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dna-at-60-still-much-to-learn

Tem intelectuais se mexendo, inquietos, revoltados contra esta situacao em que a Humanidade continua sendo torturada por velhas doencas e a nossa tao aclamada Ciencia nada consegue fazer. Veja o artigo bombatico e desafiador de um quimico e fisico escritor cientifico no link acima. E veja nosso post na revista Scientific American sob o pseudonomo de AUSTRIAK, o qual copiei abaixo:

(Bem, este foi o post inicial, mas devido exceder o limite permitido tive que resumi-lo no post mais abaixo):

AUSTRIAK:

” Sixty years on, the very definition of ‘gene’ is hotly debated. We do not know what most of our DNA does, nor how, or to what extent it governs traits. In other words, we do not fully understand how evolution works at the molecular level.”

That’s right and the proof is that diseases are continuing torturing and killing human beings. Genetics and evolutionary biology will not be understood while everybody at academic staff does not know the formula and models of Matrix/DNA Theory. The first cause of this misunderstanding is due the ignorance of origins of life, the real nature of genetics and its properties. The academic paradigm has believed that the stupid matter of this planet alone created life – against all application of opposite reasoning. It was necessary the intervention of someone outside the academic box of doctrine applying healthy and natural reasoning and the oldest naturalist method – comparative anatomy among living and non-living natural systems – for to find the real creators and the tools for eliminating these Humanity enemies that causes traditional killer diseases. The first living being was a complete system and not a piece or a part. Then, its creator must be also a system and life comes from life, so, a living creator. Then, being not a part, it is not the planet alone the creator, but the system who which the planet belongs to: the stellar system and even, this galactic system. If we are not understanding these system as alive and containing the principles of life, we don’t know these system yet, we need a new and real astronomical model.

The whole history called “abiogenesis” was merely the history of “embryogenesis” of the first living being, the first cell system. If this history took millions or billion years it is a signal that it was an astronomical scale of time, then, it was process performed by astronomic systems agents. But our academic paradigm has cut the universal evolutionary history into two blocks, with no links between them, so, the paradigm created an abism, which was fulfilled with imagination, like randomness, after the non-scientific imagination had fulfilled this gap with supernatural ghosts.

I am challenging everyone to show any real scientific data that could debunk the results of my method of investigation. But people are coming with concepts of other theories and theory does not debunks theories. And I am challenging anyone: go to live seven years facing the hell of Amazon jungle with the energy and motivation that any human being really compromised for fighting against our enemies, searching at the untouchable salvage nature that still is the witness of life’s origins the explanations about what is going wrong here and searching the tools for fixing these problems. One will discover that we have feed wrong ideas. Never had origins of life, there is no ghosts acting upon universal evolution, all life properties can be seeing at the building blocks of astronomical systems, the biological DNA was not created here but is merely a new evolutionary shape of a universal Matrix formula for all natural systems, from atoms to galaxies to human beings and now, the last one, consciousness. That DNA is not  like an encoded message but merely a pile of diversified copies of a unique system like in a factory the set of employees are not a code but any individual is a specific copy with specific function. And the most surprising news: Nature has been able to apply nanotechnology since the beginning of times,as resuming a whole galactic system inside a microscope base-pair of nucleotides, the building block and fundamental unit of information of RNA and DNA. I am opened to debate because I am furious with these people prejudicing Humanity only for the sake of defending a doctrine and academic status.

Post Publicado:

The first cause of this misunderstanding is due the ignorance of origins of life, the real nature of genetics and the source of life’s properties. That’s the conclusion of one applying the oldest naturalist method – comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems.The final results are surprising, suggesting that the academic paradigm has believed that the stupid matter of this planet alone created life – against all application of opposite reasoning, like this: since that the first living being was a complete system and not a piece or a part,its creator must be also a system, to which this planet belongs to:the stellar system and even, this galactic system. If we are not understanding these system as alive and containing the principles of life, we don’t know these system yet, we need a new and real astronomical model.The whole history called “abiogenesis” was merely the history of “embryogenesis” of the first cell system. But our academic paradigm has cut the universal evolutionary history into two blocks, with no links between them, so, the paradigm created an abism, which was fulfilled with imagination, like randomness.I am challenging everyone to show any real scientific data that could debunk the results of my method of investigation. But people are coming with concepts of other theories and theory does not debunks theories.  One will discover that we have feed wrong ideas. Never had origins of life, there is no ghosts acting upon universal evolution, all life properties can be seeing at the building blocks of astronomical systems, the biological DNA was not created here but is merely a new evolutionary shape of a universal Matrix formula for all natural systems, from atoms to galaxies to human beings and now, the last one, consciousness. That DNA is not  like an encoded message but merely a pile of diversified copies of a unique system like in a factory the set of employees are not a code but any individual is a specific copy with specific function. And the most surprising news: Nature has been able to apply nanotechnology since the beginning of times,as resuming a whole galactic system inside a microscope base-pair of nucleotides, the building block and fundamental unit of information of RNA and DNA. I am opened to debate because I am furious with these people prejudicing Humanity only for the sake of defending a doctrine and academic status.The understanding of genetics must be a interdisciplinary job, there are things like the role of photons coming from stellar radiation acting over biological systems,etc.

Kepler discovers three super-Earth planets (pictures)

http://news.cnet.com/2300-19514_3-10016530.html

Bem…, a astronomia esta avancando a passos largos, o que sugere que a mentalidade dos humanos sobre o significado da nossa existencia e deste mundo sofrera uma bruta revolucao em breve. Enquanto isso, eu comemorei a noticia porque as informacoes batem com meus modelos te’oricos e estou aproveitando a oportunidade para participar do debate nos comentarios abertos pela Cnet.com. Veja meus posts e desculpe os erros pois estou com varias dificuldades tecnicas e falta de mais tempo para correcoes.

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/videogallery/index.html?media_id=161919511

LouisMorelli

“a 7-billion-year-old star classified as a K2 dwarf — just two-thirds the size of our sun — and only one-fifth as bright.”

It is more evidences for Matrix/DNA astronomical model. The star is going to be smaller and less brighter the planets, going to be bigger and brighter. This models suggests for next 3 billion years the star will be a cadaver, star’s dust and will be recycled as new system, while the planets will be pulsars till to becoming supernovas. (I will pay the beer if Matrix/DNA’s calculations will be wrong).

” Kepler-62b, Kepler-62c, and Kepler-62d orbit every five, 12, and 18 days, respectively, making them very hot and inhospitable for life as we know it.” 

Life is not produced by any planet alone, because they have no enough information for. Accordingly to Matrix/DNA models,  genetic-like transmission of informations from astronomical systems to create biological systems, necessary information for life is composed by 50% furnished by planets and 50% furnished by stars. Planets are merely parts, pieces of systems, and the first real living being is a complete system (cell system), so, its creator must be a less evolved complete system. This Lyra stellar system is too old and these planets too hot for supporting life.

And I have a question to creatonists. If the universe is product of intelligent designer, and humans are the center of creation, why this ” intelligence” populated the universe with billions of stars and planets, since they are completely inuseful (unuseful?) and unseen?! What waste of matter and work…

XXXXX

from-the-water

All things being equal, would there not be an exact same solar system/conditions on the opposite spiral of our own galaxy? So why are they not looking there, it would be the most logical idea.Instead of hoping, you would know there is another earth.

LouisMorelli

Must have two methods for formation of galaxies and stellar systems, accordingly Matrix/DNA astronomical models. Like the formation of cells systems, there were two methods: the first original systems were formed by symbiosis among molecular structures and after them, all cells are produced by reproduction. We don’t know if Milk Way is the first or second generation. But it seems that the arms are not symmetric, which suggests first generation, and that it is not equal.

XXXXX

XXXX

misleading_title

XXXXXX

Outras participacoes da Matrix/DNA:

Kepler telescope spots two planets in life-friendly orbit

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/kepler-telescope-spots-two-planets-in-life-friendly-orbit/2013/04/18/3702721a-a86c-11e2-a8e2-5b98cb59187f_allComments.html?ctab=all_&&wp_login_redirect=0

ad4hk2004

4/19/2013 2:40 PM GMT-0300

Undoubtedly there is life on other planets. And likely there are some with intelligent life.
But we forget that all lives follow a cycle of conception, birth, growth, maturity, senescence, and death.
So to there is a cycle to all species. It follows the same cycle. The fossil records are clear on this.
We should expect that there are planets currently in the mid cycle, starting the cycle, and planets that have finished the cycle. Only those in mid cycle will be generating or listening to signals.So too are we, following the cycle. H. Sapiens is somewhere near the end of maturity or is already entering senescence. We are approaching 8 billion in the near future. We have polluted the land and the waters and the air. We have fouled our own nest. WIthin the lifertime of your young children and their children we will exceed the ability to feed everyone. We will have burned the fossil fuels down until only a lucky few nations will have energy reserves – which will mostly be coal. Many countries of the arid parts of the world have destroyed their soil until it is just dross and blow sand. Aquifers have been pumped dry. The land furrowed and rutted and dead. Technology will allows us to overcome these issues but only until the lack of energy will stop us in our tracks. At that point fossil fuels become much too valuable as the building blocks of fertilizer and pharmeceuticals and materials ato allow it to be burned in combusiton engines any longer. Then the giant water pumps stop, the freighters rust at the dock and the electric lights no longer burn in the giant cities at night.

As a member of the species H. Sapiens we will not persist as long as our predecessors, Neanderthalis and others. Being genetically hostile we will turn against ourselves and wrest the food from our neighbors bleeding hand. The cities will become graveyards vast and empty. Pockets of people will exist in the outlands much as our ancestors.

And our transmitters will be silent.

Louis Morelli:

ad4hk2004, you are forgetting something. This planet had its atoms in non-organic state and then, they developed life. Something unknown had invaded these atoms, driven them to new combinations. This “something unknown” created fuels, building block for fertilizers, etc., the accessories for sustaining life. If we discover this ” something unknown” we will be able for keeping this production. So, there are people searching this “something” and we have reasonable suggestions, models, like those of Matrix/DNA Theory. This ” something” must be related to sun’s energy and light/photons. You have been smart when mentioned that any life follows a life’s cycle. So, this ” something unknown” must bring on a dynamics which is the force that imprints life’s cycle into non-organic matter. Since we have no evidences of supernatural actions here, and since we know that before organic matter here there were only atomic systems, stellar systems and galactic systems, we must conclude that this ” something” was/is transmitted by one or all these systems. Matrix/DNA Theory, searching it among these system had interesting surprises, like a model where galaxies itself already are subjected to this process of life’s cycle. It means that entropy of galaxies shares them into its smallest ” bits-information”, which must be carried by photons, delivered into space by stellar radiation. We have calculated how it happens, how these photons invades terrestrial atoms driven them to new combinations, towards organic matter and then, towards life. But we went further when discovering that any photon is a complete copy of a light wave, and since any light wave presents different intensities of vibrations, measured as frequencies like X-ray, visible as colors like ultraviolet, infrared, etc., we have observed that light is the real candidate as the first carrier of life’s cycles. In other words: light is the code for creating life, everywhere.

You are right being worried about our wrong behavior and our future. We need, all of us need to participate in movements that

 try to stop this crazy collective behavior, like the grow of super-populations, consumerism, etc. But we need also applying our efforts for to use the resources that Nature is offering gratefully, for us to solve ours problems, like this abundant energy creating life and its accessories  Stay tuned with Matrix/DNA work, join to us, and maybe our next generations will be grateful to you.

MCHSG

1:57 AM GMT-0300

These fools never realise that they have to spread life in universe rather than finding one. For me looks like finding image in mirror at dark night.

Louis Charles Morelli

2:51 AM GMT-0300

Galaxies are spreading life in universe, accordingly Matrix/DNA comparative models between living and non-living systems. Galaxies are half-mechanics/half biological, an intermediate state between the mechanic stellar system and cell systems. And old galaxies attacked by entropy are fragmented into bits-information, which falling at planetary surfaces where there is water, chemistry reactions, they lift up as microscope base-pair of nucleotides, the fundamental unit of information in DNA. We must search it, because life must be abundant in Universe.

XXXXX

Louis Charles Morelli

11:51 PM GMT-0300

Informations from other sites are: ” Kepler-62b, Kepler-62c, and Kepler-62d orbit every five, 12, and 18 days, respectively, making them very hot and inhospitable for life as we know it.”And accordingly to Matrix/DNA astronomical models, these planets are not habitable if the above informations are right, but they must had supported life time ago.

XXXXX

Fierce Normy

10:52 PM GMT-0300

What do they hear from us? Is it, “this is supper calling”?

I think they will hear from us something like: ” We are going to negotiate…”

XXXXX

NASA’s Kepler discovers three potentially habitable planets

http://www.engadget.com/2013/04/18/nasa-kepler-discovers-three-habitable-planets/

MaxJacobi

@ToyYoda there is no need in drones if planets are habitable with intelligent life they can send video to us themselves. Unfortunately we won’t live long enough to see it either.

LouisCharlesMorelli

  @MaxJacobi @ToyYoda I am telling you: there is a galactic Empire, the emperor is Austriak, from Orion, Nebula and there is inter-planetary Internet. We will be able to connect and then, we will see and talk with all these people… or ghosts.

Excuse me, I can have a dream also, like this one.

ypm1023

Even if found other planet humans can survive, but never achieve global migration

LouisCharlesMorelli

@ypm1023 Maybe will be global migration if we build a big motor and transform this planet into a spacecraft… I heard that the chines are doing that…Edit (2 minutes)

ToyYoda

Translation of languages can be quite hard. There are many ancient written languages we don’t know how to translate. Hieroglyphics took decades to understand and we still don’t know all of it. These languages were written by people not aliens.

LouisCharlesMorelli

@ToyYoda Matrix/DNA is developing a code for sending message to space that will be easy for any alien intelligence. It is based  upon light waves. Each frequency has a color, these colors can be symbols like letters and light waves are the same everywhere. The problem is: does aliens have eyes like us? What if they don’t see the same frequencies?XXXXXXhttp://www.tgdaily.com/space-features/71059-nasas-kepler-discovers-three-super-earth-size-planets-in-habitable-zone

TheMatrixDNA

50 comments • 54 votes

TheMatrixDNA • a few seconds ago

Maybe Kepler is grasping informations from these planets and the NASA team could not see it, due wrong astronomical models. These artist rendering is based upon our own stellar system, which star is very different. Accordingly to Matrix/DNA astronomical models, when a star is old and less brighter, its planets are also old and going to be transformed into pulsars. If so, their surfaces must be covered with giant volcanoes, from which eruptions must have radio waves. Kepler maybe is capturing these radio waves and the scientists would think that they are coming from the star.

xxxxx

http://www.space.com/20726-kepler-earth-like-exoplanets-gallery.html

Louis Charles Morelli · Queens

These planets has no life just now because they belongs to an old stellar system. Accordingly to Matrix/DNA Theory, life is seeded everywhere inside and by galaxies, as merely evolution from the half-mechanical/half biological evolutionary state of galactic systems. These initial informations from Kepler is more evidence for Matrix/DNA models: smaller than sun and less brighter star means that its planets are bigger and being transformed into pulsars.

Ken Freeze · Follow · Martinez (Califórnia)

I think this underscores why the search for life (past or present) on Mars is so important. If it can be proved that there once was life on Mars, it could mean that any planet in the habitable zone with water could very well hold life. If it can be proved that Mars was once habitable, yet never held any life whatsoever (I know, very hard to prove a negative), then the chances of any of these exo-planets harboring life goes down immensely.

 

Louis Charles Morelli · Queens

Ken, maybe Mars have all conditions and informations for seeds of life growing, but it is located at a non appropriated for the right and necessary frequencies of sun’s light. If Matrix/DNA Theory is right, Mars is not holding the ultraviolet/visible/infrared frequencies of light, which furnishes necessary conditions for emergency of life

XXXXXX

Quadrillian

 I cannot see this being a stable system.

Three large planets INSIDE the orbit of this supposedly “inhabitable” planet? What these media “stories” are sorely lacking in is any discussion about the fact that most of the systems discovered by Kepler are unstable. The planets often have highly elliptical orbits, and the configuration of planetary orbits suggests a very transient planetary structure. We appear to be discovering that planets are very much temporary residents of the universe. They form, last a few million years, then get flung into wildly different orbits. This is a far cry from the multi-billion year stability of our solar system.No wonder we appear to be alone.The gushy, breathless “another earth discovered!!!” style of these articles is depriving people of knowledge of one of the most profound discoveries of our time: that the Earth is unique and we are alone.

It really is a shame.

Louis Morelli:

Yours observation should be intelligent ( I cannot see this being a stable system) and yours intuition should be brilliant (planets are very much temporary residents) only if the current academic astronomical theoretical model is wrong and the Matrix/DNA model is more complete. My models suggests that no system is stable since they are growing or decaying, and this system observed by Kepler is decaying. My models suggests that astronomical bodies obeys the process of life’s cycle, if so, they have their shape transformed continually like any living being. If such suggestion is true  planets are merely a phase like teenager time is a phase of a human body. But when an astronomical body is at this phase it is a source for diversified creation, so, the unique phase when an astronomical body can support life. Since this phase takes millions or a billion years, life can be everywhere in the Universe (you can understand the whole thing seeing Matrix/DNA astronomical models)

xxxxxxxx

LESSWRONG – A community blog devoted to refining the art of rationality

http://lesswrong.com/lw/h3p/welcome_to_less_wrong_5th_thread_march_2013/

Eu penso que esta é uma grande e louvável iniciativa, pois vis buscar e manter a saúde da nossa racionalidade, da nossa mente. A Matrix/DNA tem alguns conflitos com o moderno entendimento e modelo de racionalidade, por isso tentaremos participar num debate. O site tem um bom fórum para boas discussões e, muito importante: se seu Inglês ainda é sofrível, não se acanhe, procure na pagina  http://lesswrong.com/lw/h3p/welcome_to_less_wrong_5th_thread_march_2013/ e veras uma relação de mediadores dispostos a te ajudar a corrigir seu texto. Eu estou sendo boicotado nos fóruns de idioma Inglês porque meu assunto é totalmente estranho, uma visão de mundo nunca imaginada por mais ninguém  e se isso vai num texto muito difícil de digerir porque esta cheio de erros gramaticais, de concordância, etc., então torna-se realmente impossível das pessoas se disporem a ler e pensar no assunto. Para mim esta foi a maior oportunidade encontrada na Internet para sanar este problema e aprender mais.

XXXX 

Comentarios postados pela Matrix/DNA em:

Welcome to Less Wrong! (5th thread, March 2013)

TheMatrixDNA12 April 2013 05:30:03 AM0 points

I am here proposing a new definition of rationality and its new rational behavior. Living at Amazon jungle by seven years, at untouched and virgin territory, Nature has showed to me that our current understand of rationality is wrong. Reason is product of human brain which is product of this biosphere which is product of this solar system, this Milk Way and this Universe. But, the current academic world view has separated this normal chain of evolution into blocks with no evolutionary links between them. The final results is that the gaps between these blocks are being fulfilled with mystic and imaginations, like emergency of new systems as cell system by chance alone. The current dominance of Physics for interpreting the whole Universe, its meanings, etc, is wrong: since the Universe produced our human body composed by skeleton, soft meat and consciousness, it is reasonable to infer that the Universe has informations for doing it, maybe the Universe has equal composition. Since Physics is limited to the study of Universe’s skeleton and its mechanics properties, Physics and Math can not reach a theory of everything. It will be necessary applying biology, neurology, etc. for getting a better universal knowledge. That’s what I am trying to do with my Theory called ” The Universal Matrix/DNA of Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” which reveals a kind of rationality that will be not comprehensive here initially. I don’t know who is the most right one, so, I think we must debate this issue. It is about the healthy of our Reason.

XXXX

Postado em:

Explicit and tacit rationality

29lukeprog09 April 2013 11:33PM

http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/h6b/explicit_and_tacit_rationality/

TheMatrixDNA12 April 2013 06:48:18AM

What means “allowing “the energy of the universe” to lead her.” ? We can make an analogy. Imagine a fetus inside the womb. The mother’s womb is the energy of the universe leading the fetus. Normally, fetus have no rationality and free will, they can’t do nothing. But adult humans are different, they can drive their destiny, taking decisions. Since that fetus do nothing he will be successful in relation to its mother’s state but, if its mother is poor, ugly, living at non-hospitable location, he will be not successful in relation to its destiny. Oprah must had to be a collaborator when molested and learned survivor bias and maybe got something as reward by the molesters. To her, the molesters were the energy of the Universe and one must be submitted to it, dancing this music, for to be rewarded. Then, ” give to people what they want”.

But…did Oprah the right thing to do? Yes if we are merely animals, and not if we have post-death existence, be it as a soul or genetically imprinted into our offspring. Because the Earth’s biosphere is the womb of human beings and it is product of chaos due the fall of our ancestors non-biological astronomical systems (see Matrix/DNA models for understanding it). The biosphere’s laws are not the laws of the Universe at ordered state. I think that if I am a fetus with intelligence, knowing that my mother’s womb is making me poor, ugly, for to be a slave, I will fight against these ” universal energies” and i will be born different than my parents, their immediate world, on which I will be not successful. But I did it right in relation to long term destiny…and if there is long term destiny, Oprah is doing everything wrong…

XXXXXX

Rationality is Systematized Winning

42Eliezer_Yudkowsky03 April 2009 02:41PM

http://lesswrong.com/lw/7i/rationality_is_systematized_winning/

Comentario postado por TheMatrixDNA:

TheMatrixDNA13 April 2013 08:02:05PM

There is an issue never remembered here, about the question that we believe the world is X but it is Y: Are you shure that rationality is pure product of brains… Are you shure that mind is pure product of brains… What if mind is product of a hidden superior natural system whose bits-information are invading our immediate world and being aggregated to our synapses… If so, rationality as pure product of mind will make the most evolved rationalist a loser, by while… Or don t… (sorry, I have no puntuaction mark in this keyboard)

In Amazon jungle, lays our real origins. And you see there that this biosphere is product of chaos. We are product of chaos, not order. It seems to me that we are the flow of order lifting up from chaos. So, for long term winning, those that best represents this flow will have bad times because the forces of chaos are the strongest. Then, the winners now, are still representants of chaos, less evolved…

But it seems to me that above the chaotic biosphere I see Cosmos at ordered state. So, I suspect that this Cosmos is the ” natural” super-system sending bits-information and modelling this terrestrial chaos into a future state of order.  It is acting over the last evolved system here, and I think it is the mind, not the brain. So, if one is being driven for to be  rationalist (in relation to Cosmos and ordered state), he,she will be a loser in relation to this biosphere in chaotic state. The intelligent best thing to do should to find a middle alternative, fighting this world at the same time that do it with less sacrifice. What do you think…

XXXXX

Resposta de Estarilo ao meu post:

Estarlio14 April 2013 01:05:21AM

What do you think…

More ordered states could prove to be unsustainable whether or not there’s some sort of overarching system such as you describe at play. Your assumptions seem to be quite complicated and thus get a low probability ahead of time, there’s no specifically supporting evidence (indeed it’s not even sure what supporting evidence for some super system sending down information would be.)

Basically the idea falls beneath the noise level for me in terms of credibility. Maybe ordered systems lose because the magical unicorns have a love of chaos in their hearts. I consider the two ideas about as seriously.

Meu replay para Estarilo:

Thanks, Estarilo. I really need to fix my world vision and thoughts. You said:

More ordered states could prove to be unsustainable whether or not there’s some sort of overarching system such as you describe at play.

I think yes, more ordered state must be unsustainable, eternally. But, chaos also must be unsustainable. If so, there are these cycles, when chaos produces order and order produces chaos. The final results is evolution, because each cycle is a little bit more complex. There is hierarchy of systems. Overarching systems can be  two types: 1) in relation to complexity and, 2) in relation to size, force. A lion is more strong than a human, but human is more complex. We have two systems modelling evolution at Earth. 1) the astronomical system (biggest size and less evolved), which is our ancestor, but we are inside it, he created us. This system is a perfect machine, but not intelligent, not rational like us. Whatever, he is the agent behind natural selection, because he is the whole environment. 2) The second system is untenable, but he must exists, because here there is mind, consciousnesses  and our ancestral astronomic has no mind. I don’t accept that this Universe creates things that he has no information for, so, the system that made the emergence of mind here must be superior to the Universe. And if he is ex-machine, makes no sense to talk about ordered or chaotic states. He must be more sustainable than the Universe. I am not talking about supernatural gods, I am suggesting a natural superior system from which this thing called consciousness is coming  from..

You said: “ there’s no specifically supporting evidence”

It is probable because we have a real known parameter. An embryo gets ” mind” because it comes from a superior hierarchic system that exists beyond his “Universe” (the womb). The superior system is the human species, his parents. So, it is possible that a natural super-system existing beyond our universe have transmitted before the Big Bang the informations for the mind appears here at the right time.

You said: “ Maybe ordered systems lose because magical unicorns…”

In the alternation between cycles, there are the alternations between dominant and recessive. If chaos is dominant here and now, the ordered state is weak and a loser, till the chaos being extinct. And rationality is more relative to order than chaos. But rationality is not the wisdom. Must have a third superior state. What do you think ?

XXXXX

Resposta de MugaSofer ao meu post:

Yes, these things (personality, memories, etc.) composes our ” state of being” and they are merely product of brains/nature. But, we have a real phenomena where we watch the emergence of consciousnesses without being product of brains: the embryo. There is no natural architecture able to be conscious of its existence, neither are the brains alone. So, where comes from the conscious state of embryos? From a superior hierarchic system that exists beyond his universe (the womb), and this system is called ” human species” . So, it is not zero the probability that human mind is product of a hidden superior natural system whose bits-information are invading our immediate world and being aggregated to our synapses, besides the possibility that it was encrypted into our genes (if my models about Matrix/DNA are right).

You said: “Are you saying evolution will make us irrational? Or that rationality is incompatible with lovecraftian puppetry? Or something completely different?”

No, evolution will make us more suitable to real natural world. But, due the alternation between chaos and order, and due our origins coming from chaos, the flow of order (which is the basis for rationality) is the baby and weak force just now. Chaos is dying, order is growing, but now, chaos still is the strongest, so. irrationality and randomness are the winners, by while.

You said: “ You … realize human’s didn’t evolve in the Amazon, right?” 

I don’t understand your question. Being still virgin and untouchable, the elements of Amazon hidden niches are witness of life’s origins. And we see chaos here. So, our origins came from terrestrial chaotic state of Nature, which came from ordered state of Cosmos… Cyclic alternations.

You said: ” I’m not sure I’d characterize the natural world as “chaotic” as such. Complex, sometimes, sure, but it follows some pretty simple rules, and when we deduce these rules we can manipulate them.” 

Natural world is the Universe, not this terrestrial biosphere alone. This biosphere is a kind of disturbance, a noise, in relation to the ordered state of Cosmos. Biosphere is product of an entropic process, like the radiation of sun. So, the disturbance is corrected by the ordered Cosmos, from which is coming the emergence of those rules you are talking about. The curious thing is that humans are the carriers of those rules, we are bringing order to our salvage environment.

You said: ” The universe is definitely ordered, but don’t forget evolution can produce some pretty “designed” looking structures.” 

The Universe, as a conglomerate of galaxies, seems to be mass with no shape, not a system. We don’t know if there is a nucleus,  relations among parts, etc. We can’t know if it is ordered or chaotic. Evolution is the result of a flow of energy moving inside this Universe. Like any fetus is under evolution due a genetic flow producing more designed looking structures. The source of this “evolution” is a natural system (human species) living beyond the fetus’ universe (the womb). This is the unique real natural parameter we have for theories about the universe.

You said:  You seem to be treating “order” and “chaos” more like elemental forces or something, and generally sound like you’ve got problems with magical thinking.

It is not magical thinking, it is the normal natural chain of causes and effects. Every system that reaches an ordered state is attacked by entropy, which produces chaos, from which lift up order again, but each cycle is more complex than the ancestors cycles. At chaotic states, like our biosphere, generations of empty minds are more likely to be winners, while generations of reasonable minds must be losers at short time and the final winner at long time.  But, maybe the jungle is teaching me everything wrong. What do you think?

XXXXX

Resposta de CCC14 ao meu post:

CCC14 April 2013 09:35:39AM

I don’t accept that this Universe creates things that he has no information for

It is possible to create something without having the information for it. The classic example; if enough monkeys type at random on enough typewriters for long enough, then sooner or later (probably much, much later) one of them will randomly type o ut the complete works of Shakespeare. Even if none of the monkeys have ever heard of Shakespeare

Minha resposta para CCC14

TheMatrixDNA14 April 2013 08:31:40PM

I can’t grasp yours example. Typewriters has the informations. Letters are graphic symbols of sounds that are signals of real things. My world vision started with comparative anatomy between all natural systems and the universal patterns founded here were projected for calculations about universes and first causes. As final result we got the same theory of Hideki Yukawa calculating the nuclear gluon, how protons and neutrons interacts. As result, this universe started with all informations for everything here, like any new  origins of any human being started with prior information for creating the embryo and its womb (his entire universe). But these informations for universes are natural. Two groups of vortexes  one spin right, other spin left. The interactions between then creates the intermediary movements. Each vortexes has at least seven properties which were the physical brutes forces(tendency to inertia, tendency to movement; tendency to grow, tendency to shorter; etc.). The different intensities of these forces and their interactions produces an  infinity of individual types or vortex. Each vortex is one information, like genes. Th ere are genes that begins working later, so, there are universal informations in the air not applied yet. Like those building consciousness here. But, my results from these method is still theoretical. It makes sense and one day will be falsifiable

XXXXX

Resposta de MugaSofer

MugaSofer14 April 2013 03:11:35PM

An embryo gets ” mind” because it comes from a superior hierarchic system that exists beyond his “Universe” (the womb). The superior system is the human species, his parents.

Well, an embryo develops a mind because it’s got the genetic code for it – which, yes, comes from the larger external system that evolved that code. Is that what you meant?

So, it is possible that a natural super-system existing beyond our universe have transmitted before the Big Bang the informations for the mind appears here at the right time.

I must admit, I don’t see how that follows. Are you suggesting our universe was designed specifically as a “womb” to create us? That’s the only analogy I can see, and evolutionary advantage seems a simpler reason for sentience to evolve – although I guess those aren’t mutually exclusive, if this “natural super-system existing beyond our universe” anticipated that would result in us. But why postulate this? It could as easily have designed the universe as a “womb” to produce muffins! We could as easily be part of this muffin-womb. (Man, there’s a sentence I never expected to type.)

If chaos is dominant here and now, the ordered state is weak and a loser, till the chaos being extinct. And rationality is more relative to order than chaos.

But science again and again has discovered that what we thought was “chaos” is merely the complex result of simple rules – order, in other words, that we can exploit with rationality.

And rationality is more relative to order than chaos. But rationality is not the wisdom. Must have a third superior state. What do you think ?

If rationality works in ordered states, what’s the analog that works in “chaotic” states?

Minha resposta para  MugaSofer14 April 2013 03:11:35PM

TheMatrixDNA14 April 2013 09:00:08PM

You said: “Well, an embryo develops a mind because it’s got the genetic code for it – which, yes, comes from the larger external system that evolved that code. Is that what you meant?”

Our conflict is due two different interpretations of genetic code. You think that biological systems (aka life) evolved a genetic code, so, you think that had no genetic code before life. It is not what is suggesting the results from my different method of investigation. There is no ” code” in the sense that are composed by symbols. Each horizontal base-pair of nucleotides is a derivation with some little difference of an ancestor system, the original first galaxies. (you need see the model of this galaxy and how it fits as nucleotide in my website). So, DNA is merely a pile of diversified copies of a unique ancestor astronomical system, which produces diversification and functional biological systems. But, galaxies got their system’s configuration from atoms system, and they got from particles as systems, so, the prior causes of this ” genetic makeup” seems to be beyond the Big Bang. The informations for building the mind of an embryo came from a system outside his womb; maybe informations for building minds in the whole universe came from a natural system outside the universe. Why not?

(Sorry, I need stop now but I will come back. Sheers…)

Bose-Einstein condensates evaluated for communicating among quantum computers

http://www.rdmag.com/news/2013/04/bose-einstein-condensates-evaluated-communicating-among-quantum-computers

Thu, 04/11/2013 – 5:03pm

A team of Georgia Tech researchers adjusts equipment used to study a gaseous Bose-Einstein condensate composed of sodium atoms. The condensate could be used for communicating among quantum computers. Shown, (l-r) are postdoctoral fellow Carlo Samson, associate professor Chandra Raman, and graduate student Anshuman Vinit. Photo: Georgia Tech/Gary Meek

Comentario postado por Matrix/DNA

TheMatrixDNA • a few seconds ago

Everything wrong! And in this way we never will get the quantum computer. First of all they are not dealing with systems, but, processes. System is different, a very most complex issue (see the universal matrix-formula of a single perfect system in Matrix/DNA Theory). Then, aligning three millions of sodium-ions atoms hoping that this wire will transport information does not work. Any information is a system in itself, so, it presents the normal circuit of life’s cycle. Which is shared into seven different vibrational states. Then, we should built lines of ions shared into these different states, in the same order of light waves vibrations/ kind of frequencies. We have an alternative:photons. Instead magnetic fields. Because any photon is a miniature of light-wave, he is able to carry an entire information.

XXXX

Comentario postado tambem em:

http://regator.com/p/259988714/bose-einstein_condensates_evaluated_for_quantum_computers/