An example of the PAH infrared signature (bottom) and two positions in the Iris nebula showing the different types of PAH structures present. The left view shows the kinds of large PAHs that produce most of the emission between the star and distant molecular cloud. The right view samples the region surrounding the star where large PAHs are destroyed by the harsh UV and PAH fragments, smaller PAHs and fullerenes take over. Credits: the NASA Ames
- PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons)
- PAHs – extremely large molecules by astrochemical standards
- PAH signature across large regions of space, from hot regions of harsh ultraviolet (UV) radiation close to stars, to cold, dark clouds where stars and planets form.
- They found that PAHs changed significantly in size, electrical charge and structure, to adjust to the different environment at each spot in the map.
- the IRIS nebula (NGC 7023) that hosts both the extreme environment of a region close to a star as well as the more shielded, benign environment of a cold molecularcloud.
- The new maps showed that small, electrically neutral, irregularly-shaped PAHs are most important near the cold molecular cloud that is far from the star that excites PAH emission. However, when PAHs move closer to the exciting star and away from the cold cloud, they become large, symmetric and are electrically charged.
- Finally, these large PAHs are themselves broken down, as they are stripped of hydrogen and become small fragments.
-There were two findings that are especially important: the first is that positively-charged, nitrogen-containing PAH cations are needed to complete the match between the correct spectral signature and the observed emission, and the second is that dehydrogenation and fragmentation occur close to the exciting star.
- They represent an important class of prebiotic molecules, which are precursors to life,” said Jesse Bregman, also an astrophysicist at Ames.
(Importante notar: … which strongly supports the connection between mRNA and the corresponding protein structures and indicates that there is protein folding information in nucleic acids that is not present in the genetic code. This might give some additional explanation of codon redundancy.)
A hidden and never before recognized layer of information in the genetic code has been uncovered by a team of scientists at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) thanks to a technique developed at UCSF called ribosome profiling, which enables the measurement of gene activity inside living cells – including the speed with which proteins are made.
By measuring the rate of protein production in bacteria, the team discovered that slight genetic alterations could have a dramatic effect. This was true even for seemingly insignificant genetic changes known as “silent mutations,” which swap out a single DNA letter without changing the ultimate gene product. To their surprise, the scientists found these changes can slow the protein production process to one-tenth of its normal speed or less
As described today in the journal Nature, the speed change is caused by information contained in what are known as redundant codons – small pieces of DNA that form part of the genetic code. They were called “redundant” because they were previously thought to contain duplicative rather than unique instructions.
This new discovery challenges half a century of fundamental assumptions in biology. It may also help speed up the industrial production of proteins, which is crucial for making biofuels and biological drugs used to treat many common diseases, ranging from diabetes to cancer.
“The genetic code has been thought to be redundant, but redundant codons are clearly not identical,” said Jonathan Weissman, PhD, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator in the UCSF School of Medicine Department of Cellular andMolecular Pharmacology
“We didn’t understand much about the rules,” he added, but the new work suggests nature selects among redundant codons based on genetic speed as well as genetic meaning.
Similarly, a person texting a message to a friend might opt to type, “NP” instead of “No problem.” They both mean the same thing, but one is faster to thumb than the other.
How Ribosome Profiling Works
The work addresses an observation scientists have long made that the process protein synthesis, so essential to all living organisms on Earth, is not smooth and uniform, but rather proceeds in fits and starts. Some unknown mechanism seemed to control the speed with which proteins are made, but nobody knew what it was.
To find out, Weissman and UCSF postdoctoral researcher Gene-Wei Li, PhD, drew upon a broader past effort by Weissman and his colleagues to develop a novel laboratory technique called “ribosome profiling,” which allows scientists to examine universally which genes are active in a cell and how fast they are being translated into proteins.
Ribosome profiling takes account of gene activity by pilfering from a cell all the molecular machines known as ribosomes. Typical bacterial cells are filled with hundreds of thousands of these ribosomes, and human cells have even more. They play a key role in life by translating genetic messages into proteins. Isolating them and pulling out all their genetic material allows scientists to see what proteins a cell is making and where they are in the process.
Weissman and Li were able to use this technique to measure the rate of protein synthesis by looking statistically at all the genes being expressed in a bacterial cell.
They found that proteins made from genes containing particular sequences (referred to technically as Shine-Dalgarno sequences) were produced more slowly than identical proteins made from genes with different but redundant codons. They showed that they could introduce pauses into protein production by introducing such sequences into genes.
What the scientists hypothesize is that the pausing exists as part of a regulatory mechanism that ensures proper checks – so that cells don’t produce proteins at the wrong time or in the wrong abundance.
A Primer on DNA Codons
All life on earth relies on the storage of genetic information in DNA (or in the case of some viruses, RNA) and the expression of that DNA into proteins to build the components of cells and carry out all life’s genetic instructions.
Every living cell in every tissue inside every organism on Earth is constantly expressing genes and translating them into proteins-from our earliest to our dying days. A significant amount of the energy we burn fuels nothing more than this fundamental process.
The genetic code is basically a universal set of instructions for translating DNA into proteins. DNA genes are composed of four types of molecules, known as bases or nucleotides (often represented by the four letters A, G, T and C). But proteins are strings of 20 different types of amino acids.
To code for all 20 amino acids, the genetic code calls for genes to be expressed by reading groups of three letters of DNA at a time for every one amino acid in a protein. These triplets of DNA letters are called codons. But because there are 64 possible ways to arrange three bases of DNA together – and only 20 amino acids used by life – the number of codons exceeds the demand. So several of these 64 codons code for the same amino acid.
Scientists have known about this redundancy for 50 years, but in recent years, as more and more genomes from creatures as diverse as domestic dogs to wild rice have been decoded, scientists have come to appreciate that not all redundant codons are equal.
Many organisms have a clear preference for one type of codon over another, even though the end result is the same. This begged the question the new research answered: if redundant codons do the same thing, why would nature prefer one to the other?
The article, “The anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria,” by Gene-Wei Li, Eugene Oh, and Jonathan S. Weissman, was published by the journal Nature on March 28.
The anti-Shine–Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria
Nature -484, 538–541 doi:10.1038/nature10965 – Published online – 28 March 2012
Protein synthesis by ribosomes takes place on a linear substrate but at non-uniform speeds. Transient pausing of ribosomes can affect a variety of co-translational processes, including protein targeting and folding1. These pauses are influenced by the sequence of the messenger RNA2. Thus, redundancy in the genetic code allows the same protein to be translated at different rates. However, our knowledge of both the position and the mechanism of translational pausing in vivo is highly limited. Here we present a genome-wide analysis of translational pausing in bacteria by ribosome profiling—deep sequencing of ribosome-protected mRNA fragments3, 4, 5. This approach enables the high-resolution measurement of ribosome density profiles along most transcripts at unperturbed, endogenous expression levels. Unexpectedly, we found that codons decoded by rare transfer RNAs do not lead to slow translation under nutrient-rich conditions. Instead, Shine–Dalgarno-(SD)6-like features within coding sequences cause pervasive translational pausing. Using an orthogonal ribosome7, 8 possessing an altered anti-SD sequence, we show that pausing is due to hybridization between the mRNA and 16S ribosomal RNA of the translating ribosome. In protein-coding sequences, internal SD sequences are disfavoured, which leads to biased usage, avoiding codons and codon pairs that resemble canonical SD sites. Our results indicate that internal SD-like sequences are a major determinant of translation rates and a global driving force for the coding of bacterial genomes
The Shine-Dalgarno sequence (or Shine-Dalgarno box), proposed by Australian scientists John Shine (b.1946) and Lynn Dalgarno (b.1935), is a ribosomal binding site in the mRNA, generally located 8 bases upstream of the start codon AUG. The Shine-Dalgarno sequence exists both in bacteria and archaea, being also present in some chloroplastic and mitochondial transcripts. The six-base consensus sequence is AGGAGG; in E. coli, for example, the sequence is AGGAGGU. This sequence helps recruit the ribosome to the mRNA to initiate protein synthesis by aligning it with the start codon. The complementary sequence (UCCUCC), is called the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence and is located at the 3′ end of the 16SrRNA in the ribosome. The eukaryotic equivalent of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence is called the Kozak sequence.
Mutations in the Shine-Dalgarno sequence can reduce translation. This reduction is due to a reduced mRNA-ribosome pairing efficiency, as evidenced by the fact that complementary mutations in the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence can restore translation.
The Shine-Dalgarno sequence GAGG dominates in bacteriophage T4 early genes, whereas the sequence GGAG is a target for the T4 endonuclease RegB that initiates the early mRNA degradation.
When the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence pair, the translation initiation factorsIF2-GTP, IF1, IF3, as well as the initiator tRNA fMet-tRNA(fmet) are recruited to the ribosome.
The ribosomal S1 protein in Gram-negative bacteria 
In Gram-negative bacteria, the presence of a Shine-Dalgarno sequence is not obligatory for the ribosome to locate the initiator codon. Numerous prokaryotic mRNAs don’t possess Shine-Dalgarno sequences at all: ribosomal protein S1, which binds to AU-rich sequences found in many prokaryotic mRNAs 15-30 nucleotides upstream of start-codon, can instigate translation initiation in the case of these mRNAs.
Although plastids are prokaryotic descendants and still have their prokaryotic translational machinery, SD-like sequences are not required at least in green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtiichloroplasts according to a study.
The Kozak consensus sequence, Kozak consensus or Kozak sequence, is a sequence which occurs on eukaryoticmRNA and has the consensus(gcc)gccRccAUGG. The Kozak consensus sequence plays a major role in the initiation of the translation process. The sequence was named after the person who brought it to prominence, Marilyn Kozak.
The sequence is identified by the notation (gcc)gccRccAUGG, which summarizes data analysed by Kozak from a wide variety of sources (about 699 in all) as follows:
a lower case letter denotes the most common base at a position where the base can nevertheless vary;
upper case letters indicate highly-conserved bases, i.e. the ‘AUGG’ sequence is constant or rarely, if ever, changes, with the exception being the IUPAC ambiguity code  ’R’ which indicates that a purine (adenine or guanine) is always observed at this position (with adenine being claimed by Kozak to be more frequent); and
the sequence in brackets ((gcc)) is of uncertain significance.
Como a Matrix une evolucao do macrotempo cosmologico com o microtempo biologico no DNA
Kozak’s paper was limited to a subset of vertebrates (i.e. human, cow, cat, dog, chicken, guinea pig, hamster, mouse, pig, rabbit, sheep, and xenopus)
Original Paper em PDF
The anti-Shine–Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria
Gene-Wei Li1 - , Eugene Oh1 & Jonathan S. Weissman1
- Protein synthesis by ribosomes takes place on a linear substrate but at non-uniform speeds.Transient pausing of ribosomes can affect a variety of co-translational processes, including protein targeting and folding1
- These pauses are influenced by the sequence of the messenger RNA2
-. Thus, redundancy in the genetic code allows the same protein to be translated at different rates
- Unexpectedly, we found that codons decoded by rare transfer RNAsdo not lead to slow translation under nutrient-rich conditions.
- Instead, Shine–Dalgarno-(SD)6 -like features within coding sequences cause pervasive translational pausing
- Using an orthogonal ribosome7,8 possessing an altered anti-SD sequence, we show that pausing is due to hybridization between the mRNA and 16S ribosomal RNA of the translating ribosome
- In protein-coding sequences, internal SD sequences are disfavoured, which leads to biased usage, avoiding codons and codon pairs that resemble canonical SD sites.
- Our results indicate that internal SDlike sequences are a major determinant of translation rates and a global driving force for the coding of bacterial genomes.
-established that different mRNAs could be translated with different elongation rates
- there was a clear correspondence on individual transcripts between SD-like sequences and pauses.
Keeping protein synthesis on track
The rate of protein synthesis by the ribosome can be influenced by various intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as structure in the messenger RNA and the actions of RNA binding proteins. As a result, translation is subject to transient pausing. This study provides a genome-wide view of the locations of ribosome pausing in bacteria. The most common origin of pausing is found to be hybridization between the ribosomal RNA and internal sequences of the mRNA that are similar to the Shine–Dalgarno element that serves as the entry point for the ribosome. To prevent their interference with translation, such Shine–Dalgarno-like elements are underrepresented in protein-coding sequences, accounting for some of the observed bias in codon usage. These results have implications both for our basic understanding of protein synthesis and for practical efforts to express recombinant proteins.
O atual paradigma no pensamento cientifico sobre como a Vida se originou na Terra é a teoria do RNA-world (o mundo do RNA) sugerindo que primeiro se formou a molécula RNA, e as proteínas teriam vindo a seguir. Agora a equipe do Professor Michael Blaber, da Florida State University of Medicine produziu dados que suportam a nova ideia de que não o RNA, mas sim que os 10 tipos de aminoácidos que existiam no ambiente inorgânico e produzidos por meras reações químicas teriam sido capazes de formar proteínas em ambientes com elevado teor de sal. Lembre-se que os seres vivos são formados por 20 tipos de aminoácidos dos quais, 10 tipos formaram-se junto com a formação do sistema solar, muito antes das origens da vida, e os outros 10 apenas se formam com síntese biológica, depois da emergência dos compostos orgânicos. Porque… é o que a Matrix/DNA vai explicar a seguir.
Fig.1 – A esquerda um filamento inicial de aminoácidos sem função biológica, e a direita a forma tridimensional que adquirem apos o processo de enovelamento ou dobramento (folding).
O dobramento de proteínas é um processo químico através do qual a estrutura de uma proteína assume a sua configuração funcional. Todas as moléculas de proteínas são cadeias heterogêneas não-ramificadas de aminoácidos. Ao dobrar e enrolar-se para tomar uma forma tridimensional específica, as proteínas são capazes de realizar a sua função biológica. Muitas proteínas fazem-no espontaneamente durante ou após a sua síntese no interior das células. Apesar destas macromoléculas aparentarem estar a dobrar-se a si mesmas, de facto a sua dobragem depende em grande medida das características da solução que as rodeia, incluindo o tipo de solvente primário (no interior das células é água ou lípidos), da concentração dos sais, da temperatura e das moléculas que a rodeiam. Mas nunca foi observado o enovelamento dos 10 primeiros aminoácidos e acredita-se que estes aminoácidos primitivos não eram capazes de fazer o enovelamento. O que a equipe do Professor Braber diz estar produzindo seria a prova de que eles podiam faze-lo, ao menos quando estão em soluções com alto teor salinico.
Ora, se os primitivos aminoácidos podiam se enovelar, se tornariam proteínas biologicamente funcionais, e como eles existiam antes do RNA, então teríamos que mudar o paradigma do RNA-world para o Protein-world. E como estes 10 primitivos aminoácidos formados junto com o sistema solar tem sido encontrados em meteoritos vindo do espaço… a Vida pode existir em outros mundos…
Mas porque 10 aminoácidos - justamente a metade dos que formam os seres vivos – podem se formarem nas origens de sistemas estelares, mesmo antes da formação de planetas, e os outros 10 apenas se formam depois que aos 10 primeiros se juntarem outras moléculas tais como o RNA… Apenas os modelos da Matrix/DNA previram isso e explica racionalmente.
Vejamos a formula da Matrix (Fig 2):
E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software
E vejamos a formula organizando a materia em building blocks de galaxias primitivas, depois em aminoácidos depois nucleotídeos depois células… (Fig. 3)
Matrix/DNA: O template para todos os sistemas naturais, de átomos a nucleotídeos a galáxias e células. O circuíto energético padrão.
E por fim seres humanos (Fig. 4)
Human and Celestial Primordial Body Lifes Cycles – Matrix/DNA Theory
Os modelos da Matrix/DNA estão sugerindo que a metade (50%) das informações para a formação de sistemas biológicos vem das reações nucleares dos núcleos planetários e a outra metade vem das radiações das estrelas como o Sol. Estas informações vem na forma de fótons e os planetas expressam como dominantes as informações do trecho entre F1 e F4, enquanto as estrelas expressam de F6 a F1 ( como tem efeito retardado, a F5 deve chegar ao tempo do segundo grupo). Os 10 primitivos aminoácidos foram formados por uma estrela, nem planetas existiam ainda, o que sugere serem do segundo grupo. Mas justamente neste grupo que compreende a face direita da Matrix é o campo da entropia degenerativa, quando as peças dos sistemas iniciam sua queda energética tendem a oxidar, desmanchar, e não formar estruturas firmes, a qual eve a função do primeiro grupo, com sua energia ascendente. os outros 10 aminoácidos devem ter formado pedaços firmes de sistemas e coincidiram com o aparecimento do RNA, o qual eve o representante da Função 5 que tem a função reprodutiva, a qual apenas se expressa quando o grupo um já esta formado. Se a Matrix estiver certa, o Prof. Blaber esta equivocado em sua teoria ( tanto que ate agora ele apenas conseguiu um principio de enovelamento com o minimo de 12 diferentes aminoácidos nunca com os 10 primitivos apenas. Mas a teoria do RNA-world também seria equivocada, pois sem proteínas enoveladas o RNA sequer surgiria e nada poderia fazer. Mas vamos continuar esta pesquisa… (Mais informações muito importantes devem ser lidas no artigo do link acima).
Dawkins, like Darwin, had reduced the Universe into terrestrial events for analyzing biological history. They conclude by evolution and tried to identify its mechanisms. But… a microbe living inside a womb watching the embryogenese of a human fetus should conclude by evolution. We, outside the womb knows that evolution is not the ultimate event, it is “reproduction”. Amplifying our vision to the time/space of universal history leads us to see reproduction of Universes with another mechanisms.
Universe is not magic,he can’t create new information from nothing. So, he only can make a new thing, system, by the same process he was made. He can’t invent from nothing new information for other kind of process. We are a new system, so, if we want to know how the Universe was made, we have the process by which we were made. Our body started with a Big Bang, explosion of spermatozoon from initial singularity. What’s was before our fecundation? Another thing like us, conscious, natural. So?
NoGoodScienceForYou is here suggesting a video ( /watch?v=HRyXauc0h04) which uses real scientific reality as propaganda for his theory. I think the best education for children is showing the images of reality but, being careful self-watching for not using any kind of concepts related to adult’s interpretations, no imposition of theories. I could make a video with same images having in parallel images of spermatozoons as comets, oocyte as nuclear black holes, etc. This is for philosophy class.
Creationists frequently are using the probability calculus for refuting the odds of evolution and evolutionists are using the same calculus for reinforce the odds produced by chance. Both are wrong. The “individual” evolution of a new being inside a womb is driven by the external environment (human species as the non-intelligent designer) which acts internally (through DNA) and externally. Biological evolution is being driven by an yet unknown external environment, probabilities does not applies.
Creationist woman – “My grandfather was not a monkey!”
Lawrence Krauss – ” Well… yours case is not so clear… ” (maybe a pork?)
Evolutionists could be more intelligent if they explain the real state of Science today. All known facts suggests strongly the physical body of human beings came from primates. But Neurology – the field really expert in this matter – says that it still does not found how neurons produces thoughts and how they are related to human mind. This is hope for dignity
No. Biological Evolution is a point of time/space located at the long chain of causes and effects started with the Big Bang beginning with particles evolution, atomic and Cosmological Evolution. All forces of Biology were there at the last non-biological ancestor, the top pf cosmological evolution and I can show you where. But… we don’t know if the very seen steps of evolution is universal evolution or merely reproduction of universes.
GoodScienceForYou: “Mitochondria in most species has lost over 1200 complete genes”
And you says it is due degeneration from Adam’s DNA. You have a point, you are right. Adam was a closed selfish astronomical system, also called LUCA, his DNA was the formula of Universal Matrix. The decay or Fall of Adam into the microscope shape of biological system due entropy was a change from closed to opened system. Mitochondria tried to close it doing photosynthesis, and got it as cell plants.
This debate between Dembski team and Ewens team will not be solved while Humanity doesn’t know the entire context that affects our biosphere and living things. The existence of biological systems is not due a simultaneous act of magical creation neither a long process obeying natural selection as agent of immediate environmental changes. For instance, the process of Earth nuclear reactions and Sun’s reactions are stronger forces composing NS, any change there means changes here. See Matrix/DNA
“I want you to find one positive mutation ever found in the human genome.”
The Matrix/DNA models explains how and why the genome is continually mutated. The fundamental unit of information which is the building block of RNA/DNA is a bi-lateral pair of nucleotides, which is the biological microscopic counterpart of the building block that came evolving from quantum vortexes after Big Bang, to atoms to galaxies. This universal “matrix” diversifies into infinite different kinds of nucleotides
Look! There are trees. Someone must have designed them. See? Tree elves are real and great designers engineering trees for everyone. How else did trees get here, if not by the mysterious powers of the chief tree elf?
Yes, trees were designed. Genetically, by transmission of “Matrix/DNA” from their creators…living in the sky. Trees are the same image of galaxies.The trunk represents the central nuclear axis. The branches are the galaxy’s arms. The leaves are the planets. The yellow fruits pending on the arms are the stars. The plant cell is the biological tendency to reproduce the closed astronomical system with chloroplasts making photosynthesis linking the cell to the star, which is an evolution-stopper.
Question: why can’t humans create a self replicating machine? We can’t even create a machine that can eat breakfast. Intelligent designing humans can’t come close to the technology, complexity, efficiency, eloquence, etc of any type of life. Why would random chance processes be better able to produce life (even when the laws of physics, entropy, are against their natural creation?). I’m interested in an intelligent response! Do you have one?
“Machine” and “life” are cultural symbols used for describing real states and details of Nature. We learn mechanisms, processes existing at Nature and we see matter organized as working systems. Our technology is mimicking natural phenomena, sometimes applying fuzzy logics, mixing mechanisms and materials from different phenomena and producing new arrangements. We produces “machines” because our limited sensors and brain capability see only mechanical and biological aspects of natural systems.
Could you elaborate this information? Are you referring to synthetic molecules, like those from Craig Venter? Matrix/DNA is researching the extensive already published papers related to NASA research of self-replicating robots, but any additional information about other sectors will be welcome.
NASA has a sector dedicated to study self-replicating machines. The goal is sending robots like Curiosity to other astronomical bodies, self-replicating robots that could use the matter of those bodies for populating the astro, maybe extracting some valorous mineral, etc. I am preparing a descriptive suggestion because the Matrix/DNA models arrive to a theoretical formula, a software’s diagram about a natural self-replicating machine. It is about the Newtonian mechanics aspect of systems
The same question would have been asked as to why humans can’t get to the moon a hundred years ago. Not only have we done that, but we’re getting closer to building a self replicating machine.
Also, technically, we absolutely can create a self replicating creature that eats. We can create some that are even capable of learning on a fundamental level. Programmers have done that for quite some time. It’s limited to another, simulated universe. Technically, those programmers could be gods.
This issue is good food for thought. Nature makes self-replicating machines: a stellar system (working with the principles of Newtonian mechanics) degenerates, decomposes, its dust composes again as a new stellar system. But this process is self-recycling, when the original machine needs “dying” and its matter be used for a new one. Suppose that we could insert a software inside each atom of Curiosity and when the robot become oldest, we keep it at same place, the atoms would joining again…
Then why doesn’t 1 human have at least 1 wing growing out of their back. The fly did it, w/ less of a need to fly, than we have. They can walk around all day and find poop. That is their life “poop”, poop is on the ground, they do not need wings.
Joe, the causes are deeper than we think. Wings can be a result of personal effort (anfibians jumps) or can be imposed into a specie by informations flowing in this environment. Wings are specific shapes of accessories developed from cellular cilia which was produced by a universal systemic function number 5. This same function produced the tails of comets for realizing an operation. Here, the system that built biosphere was in need of something being the transporter of pollen. It was imposed
@tsub0dai “humans are far more diverse as a species than any individual person”
The population of human species is comprised of individuals. Theoretically, one individual from today’s human population could be compared to one individual, Adam, in the creation model for genetic diversity. The quagga is an example of selective breeding (artificial selection) used to restore lost genetic information to a few individuals. Natural selection works oppositely toward genetic entropy, i.e. loss.
Yes, Adam/Eve were/is the most perfect genome possible to be made by Nature. Their genome was the formula for building their bodies, which was a closed non-minded system, merely extension of their genome. You can see their “photo” published by Matrix/DNA theory. Natural Selection worked oppositely to their tendencies, entropy causing the big Fall. As microscopic biological systems, the offspring of Adam/Eve lifted up at planets, as opened systems. The sinner father in the sky is driven NS now.
Yes, cancer is an issue that needs urgent attentions. If you see the picture at my website tipping “The Cycle Of Cholesterol And The Matrix” you will know a new approach for understanding diseases. We have the formula for perfect systems, any disease is dysfunction of that formula. My problem is that I am alone doing this, have no time and resources. I did only fast research about bad cholesterol, Alzheimer. For analyzing cancer under Matrix models is necessary reading lots of informations.
Germany, with militant socialists liberalism has 7.5 million functionally illiterate adults out of a population of 81.7 million.
That is a great sign of how well that works. Germany used to be the country where science and engineering prevailed and German engineering was well known. Now 9% of the population can’t read or write. They are setting up programs to educate people who have already been through the school system
I think this is normal result from WW2: generations of people went to hard work instead schools. But this is also a suggestion that Matrix/DNA models are right. They are suggesting a different kind of targets for the Science enterprise, producing a different kind of technology, medicine, human habitat, different design for urban life. Different from that produced by Germany, whose unconscious target was driven to be a kind of Brave New World ruled by the Big Brother, mimicking insects societies
OUR DNA closely maps out our history of self destruction. Its clear that we have been destroying our genome for a long time and it shows in the huge numbers of deaths directly due to genetic diseases, 30.4 million is less than half of the real number each year. Considering that we created all the viral fungal and bacterial infections by our stupid actions that kill us from infections.
We seem to have become animals with sexual compulsions owning us completely, never aware of what that is doing
The building blocks of DNA, bi-lateral pair of nucleotides, are diversified copies of a unique system. each copy expresses a particular particle, a specific function, different of all others. These copies self-assembly themselves, free in biosphere and cell environment. Some kind of biological behavior selects among these copies which will be increased in their genomes. But the constructors of these copies does not want us as biological minded creatures, they want pieces for a natural machine.
We now have the all time record of childhood congenital disease rates and at astonishing accelleration. 120% rise in Autism in 2 years! 1 in 88 diagnosed by 8 year old. 1 in 125 babies born with congenital heart disease. A rise of 135% in childhood invasive cancer in 34 years. 200% rise in 10 years of STD’s affecting 1 in 4 and young fertile girls have the highest rates. Evolution is a denial mechanism that supports this genetic suicide. “evolutionforum.info”
I should leave these statistics for atheists answering them. But, my personal technique is searching causes based on Matrix/DNA models. They suggests that degradation of humans genetics and bodies is the predicted results from this biosphere evolution. This biosphere was produced by chaos through fragments coming from the decay of a ordered half-mechanical/half-biological system. The action of these fragments is to reproduce the machine, humans must be pieces, so, it is fixing our genome.
History’s shown from the dark ages; the advent of many diseases that nearly wiped out humans, like the plague , wiping out 1/2 the population of Europe; resulted in extreme political measures, using the state religion, Gods authority, to stop diseases. Prison time public whipping, death to homos & anyone who had sex outside of a virgin marriage was a criminal period. It took a lot of suffering to learn to stop killing families children mothers fathers. Used to use a sharp pole for punishment.
I had no time yet for analyzing those plagues based upon Matrix models, but these models suggestions about the origins of viruses also suggests that diseases caused by them are produced by specific psychological states – individual or collective. Viruses are organic constructs from Matrix/DNA genetic code – which exists inside living beings and flowing in the environment – produced by universal function number 5. So, those plagues were produced by specific state of mind, which were religious.
33% of people ages 15 to 64 will die from cancer in the USA. Source CDC. Childhood invasive cancer in the US has risen by 135%;34 years. STD’s in the US up 200% in 10 years with the highest rates: young women ages 14 to 24.
It seems that also the fastest growing religion is atheism.
It turns out that Evodelusionism is the religion of atheists, homos, sex addicts, socialist liberals, communists, politicians, prostitutes (no kidding) and scientists. What a group of people to model after. Eh?
It is just the opposite. This degradation of human bodies is the corolary of millenniums of religious thought ruling societies with wrong social systems, wrong technology and wrong science. Religion is a minded-stopper, it separates men from its Nature for alliance with supernatural. Then, the whole body is driven not by the intellect, but by the laws of atoms composing the body. These atoms are matter which supreme tendency is closed inertial equilibrium. We got it, but Nature is responding.
A good sample is the biggest religions of the planet, the Asian religions, which supreme goal is the search for personal equilibrium and nirvana. We have a model of a natural system just in this exactly state: the building block of astronomical systems, our ancestor since 10 billion years ago. It is a closed system into itself, cutting relations with the whole natural world, a self-constructed paradise, where the two aspects of matter, mass and energy got its targets. Extreme selfishness.
These building blocks grew and built galaxies. Its shape is like a perfect machine, a perpetuum motor, self-recycling. The Universe was populated by them. But, above galaxies are forces like the Clausius Law, which produces degradation, measured by entropy and the pretense eternity falls down. Today the Universe is composed by their fossils, ours ancestors. Meanwhile, consciousness was sleeping at galaxies, woke up in shape of animals and lifted up as humans. Religious aret repeating the sin
Are you based on Thermodynamic Theory for systems? First of all, those theorists never knew how and what is a perfect closed system. It is built by any lightwaves invading inertial mass and modeling matter accordingly to its seven different frequencies of vibrations, from gamma-ray to radio. Entropy is the name of unit of measurement, not the sate itself. Degradation is not loosing quantities of energy/mass, is fragments escaping from the circuit flow and diminishing the quality of closed system
EVOLUTION is a fairytale for grown-ups, complete with its abiogenetic virgin birth, apes that talk and tell lies, “survival of the fittest “moral code, The prophet called Charlie, a magical process that’s never been observed while its happening, cows that tried to walk on water but became whales, a story about how a primordial soup made a chef.
Almost equal to the collection of fairytale in the Bible, eh? The big difference is that Charlie really sacrificed his best years abandoning a good life in London for facing the hell of the salvage world, observing facts for building conclusions, while the prophets of Bible forgot the real facts of nature and jumped to imaginary conclusions. Any other man that go back to the salvage world with the modern scientific knowledge will find models that solves all problems pointed by you, rationally
No, DNA proves that he has all informations for doing all species at Earth. DNA proves to aliens that there are diversification of species at Earth. It does not prove Evolution, it merely suggests that evolution is possible.
DNA proves for a microbe as observer located inside the womb and watching the progress of a fetus that he is seeing evolution. As observers outside the womb, we know that it is reproduction. This Universe is a cosmic egg – or is an agglomerated of bodies still alive or of died fossils (galaxies) – where is occurring a normal natural process of reproduction. And we – like all conscious living beings at millions of other planets – are the minded “genes” making the embryo for the final Big Birth
@van der Meer “[Creationists] provide an answer, just not the correct one”
Considering that scientific theories are only temporal and never absolute (e.g. Newton’s gravitation theory was replaced by Einstein’s general theory of relativity), how do you know what the “correct” answer is concerning man’s origin? Modern-day scientists admit that they don’t know how life began nor has anyone ever created an artificial environment that facilitates the spontaneous generation of life from non-life.
Newton’s theory was not replaced by Einstein’s theory because they were dealing with different dimensions of time/space. Newton’s theory is for Einstein’s the same that atoms are for cells, it means, the new arrangement of atoms inside a cell changes their behaviors and functions. Newton was dealing with mechanics at stellar system level which is an mechanic arrangement like a watch – but Einstein was dealing with galaxies which is half-mechanical/half-biological acting over stellar systems
We don’t know man’s origins in relation to human mind/brain, which could have aggregated new informations coming from a superior natural system located at a superior level of complexity in relation to the total systemic environment (Milk Way) that supplied informations for man’s body, about which we have the most strong evidences that came from primates. For creating biological systems from the evolutionary top of non-biological systems we need more knowledge about natural light, it is the code
I would hardly think the lack of 100% confirmed theory in the branches of science would drive children into the wrong path, most depending on age wouldn’t grasp the Matrix /DNA theory anyway ,and most likely be taught at the college level.. Where as religion prefers to brainwash children at a young age before their logical abilities are fully developed and are still easy prey to mythical fairy tale stories and fear of invisible boogie men and good fairies …
You are right, religion has not worked for improving human existence, so, they are not the solution, our futures generations needs search other alternatives, while the empirical scientifically proved facts must be known. The observation of fossil record and another known facts strongly suggests that there is a natural process from simplest to complexity, which is called “evolution” But this process happens at universal macro scale, unknown, so biological evolution is a non-complete theory.
@NuggetKazooie “negative factors you described wouldn’t apply to the other populations”
Then you get a net positive. Even very small positives soon leads to huge numbers & small negatives quickly lead to extinction.
“Human evolution thus appears like an hourglass, with a narrowing population of Homo erectus leading to possibly one single mutant, whose improved genes emerged into a new era of unprecedented progress. The transformation from failure to success is startling.” Alan F. Alford
@Martin Koch “Alan F Alford is not an reliable witness”
“however, he admitted to serious faults in his use of Sitchin’s theory and proposed an alternative, cataclysm theory of ancient myth: “I am now firmly of the opinion… the descent of the gods was a poetic rendition of the cataclysm myth…” wiki
Alan Alford is thus a “hostile witness” for creationism. Too bad he was forced to consider what he thought was a better mechanism than TOE.
Do “reliable witnesses” only have your same viewpoint?
“Human evolution thus appears like an hourglass,…”
But his observation above is known, being the human genes emerged by evolution or by other unknown source. Alford almost touched the deeper secret of Nature and the deeper source for religious myths. In fact happened a cataclysmic event and the descent of gods as source for human genes. But this cataclysm was not the Noah’s flood neither the explosion of Nibiru, Matrix/DNA suggests other kind of “cataclysm” and descent “gods”
Yes, that is what Matrix models are suggesting: no aliens, ancient or otherwise. We need to remember the initial state of this biosphere and the jungle is the best witness still existing about the life’s origins. It indicates that this biosphere is product of chaos. Chaos is product of cataclysm that happens on ordered environments. The environment existing before biosphere’s origins was made of atomic and astronomical systems. So, there was the Newtonian machine and ours ancestors, the “gods”
The Matrix model still is a theory explaining this worlds’ existence, under tests facing real proved facts. It is a natural formula used by Nature for assembling matter into systems, like atoms, galaxies, trees, humans, cells, etc. This formula is under evolution since the Big Bang ( initially the Matrix was shared by billions of vortexes as bits-information or ex-machine quantum genes) and here the formula is resumed into a base-pair of nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. Theories…
Only when Science as real knowledge of real facts is used by someone that did the mental exercise for connecting the facts, got a big picture, and teach to children that his picture is Science. Since we for sure don’t have all facts ( maybe neither 30% of all facts of this Universe) any big picture will be product of imagination, then, should be taught as theory. Any big picture (as Matrix/DNA Theory) now will be a driven into wrong pathway for children or a closer mind
I agree and I will talk to kids about ToE, ID, panspermia, Matrix/DNA, etc., mentioning that I don’t know which theory is more appropriated and my personal thought has indicated that there is a natural process of transformation that have increased complexity. But, all these theories must be taught in a Philosophy class, not Science class. Science only inform about real known facts, has no conclusions. The most important thing is to be certified that kids will be opened minds, free for choices
That’s funny. You make me remembering when Morelli was in Amazon jungle and elaborated the Matrix/DNA Theory. He saw lots of snakes in his pathway, they were static waiting any attack for expelling their venom. Louis usually touched them with a long piece of wood, and the snake bites the wood, before going away. Here in Internet, we find snakes in needs of expelling poison of their souls and any comments contrary to their beliefs works as the wood branch. Funny is that Interned is enough long
You have a testable hypothesis. The Last Universal Common Ancestor – LUCA – of all living systems, is pictured in a intelligible astronomical model that’s testable. Taking out LUCA from Earth and out of abiogenesis, putting LUCA in the sky, all tools of a cells system can be reduced to the astonishing singularity of LUCA. Broken LUCA into small pieces, you have as result all living species seen at earth. But, LUCA was found coming from before the Big Bang, its origins is unknown.
Ok, they you think you have the right for taking the word “theory” from the ancient Greeks that coined the word and give a new definition. No, my friend, the modern schools are not the owner of this world, they applied the wrong word to jobs resulting from a specific method of connecting real data, which method can be wrong. The Matrix?DNA Theory is a theory in the strictly sense obeying the right of its creators.
Lendo o artigo sôbre Panspermia, descrito abaixo, descubro hoje a existência de uma molécula, Xanthine, e uma rápida pesquisa revelou que tudo nela, inclusive sia fórmula quimica, bate em tudo com as previsões dos modêlos teóricos da Matrix/DNA feitas há 30 anos atrás. É fascinante a explicação sôbre o que produziu esta molécula, porque ela foi feita aqui, e para que veio. O artigo onde a encontrei estará em outro artigo a ser feito aqui porque n6ele estamos analizando a questào da panspermia:
Panspermia Theory for Life’s Origins Gets Boost from Top Scientists
Life is all about information – its replication and processing.” — Professor Paul Davies
(Artigo copiado aqui para ser analizado e comentado item por item pela Matrix/DNA Theory)
A team of scientists from the United States, United Kingdom and the Netherlands have determined that chemicals in a meteorite that form the building blocks of DNA and RNA had formed before the meteorite fell to Earth. In a paper published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters on June 15, the team documents an examination of molecules found in the Murchison meteorite, fragments of which landed near the village of Murchison, Victoria in Australia in 1969.
Previous studies had identified amino acids and sugars in the meteorite that were believed to have formed in space. The samples the current study examined included molecules of uracil and xanthine,
Matrix/DNA: “Isto relembra a previsão feita a 30 anos atrás baseada nos modêlos teóricos da Matrix/DNA de que a uracil é a molécula dos nucleotídeos que foi feita pela função sistêmica universal numero 5, a qual, quando está na forma de building block de galaxias, faz os astros denominados “cometas”, e quando está na forma de sistema celular faz os RNA’s M e T ( mensageiro e transportador). Xanthine é uma novidade para mim, portanto vamos conhecer ela recorrendo inicialmente à Wikipedia:
Xantina é uma base purínica, composto orgânico encontrado na urina e também em diversos tecidos do corpo humano, além de estar presente em algumas plantas.
Um exemplo comum de xantina é a cafeína.
O termo Xantina deriva do grego Xanthos – que alude à cor amarela…
Lol!… Não precisou mais que 3 minutes para identificar na fórmula da Matrix de onde veio a Xanthine e saber para que veio. Ela é uma catalista, ou seja, é como uma bacia chacoalhando e mexendo as substancias dentro dela. Diferentes velocidades do chacoalho, diferentes durações dos chacoalhos e talvez diferentes direçôes dos movimentos produzem diferentes compostos finais. Isto é, a grosso modo, denominado “catálise”. A Xanthine foi produzida aqui na Terra pelas particulas-informação vindas de radiações estelares como o Sol, e/ou de radiação de nucleos planetários, na forma de fótons, que invadem átomos “inertes” obrigando-os à novas conexões, na tentativa de reproduzir o sistema de onde vieram ( pura ação genética). As informações embutidas na Xanthine se referem ao trecho do circuito sustêmico da fórmula da Matrix/DNA que vai da Função 7 à Função 1. Ou seja, no corpo humano vai do órgão “fígado” ao órgão “coração”; no sistema celular é o trecho que vai da organela “lisossoma” ao nucleo celular: no building block astronomico é o trecho que vai do cadaver estelar ao vortex nuclear. Pela sua ação catalizadora, eu aposto que suas informações sejam mais relacionadas à ultima parte do segmento daquele trecho, devendo já conter metade de informações para elaborar o vortex: ela faz o que faz o vortex no espaço sideral – chacoalhar massa e energia degradada. Se no meteórito encontramos uracil e xanthine juntos, isto significa que a o vortex que está sendo iniciado na forma de Xanthine já está recebendo cometas, espermatozóides do espaço, o que, a nivel biologico significa que naquele meteórito já estava toda a infraestrutura instalada para se iniciar a construção da Vida, ou melhor, de um par de base de nucleotideos. Fantástico!
A fórmula quimica da xanthine reforça nossas interpretações. Vemos um ring completo, com seis átomos ou seja, hexagonal ( o que significa que a forma astronomica foi copiada uma vez e completa, mais uma estensão com uma figura pentagonal, cinco átomos, o que significa que uma segunda cópia da mesma forma foi parada na função 7 ( não conta a F5, que é o ramo interno do fluxo sistêmico, nem conta a F1, que representa-se como a primeira cópia em torno da qual se desenvolve a segunda). A forte presença do átomo N ( nitrogênio) na segunda cópia (segundo anel) é sempre indicativa de que a fórmula quimica expressa dominantemente o aspecto entrópico degenerativo da face direita da Matrix, pois êste átomo tem numero atômico 7, justamente um a mais do que o Carbono, que na Terra é a cópia fiel da Matrix astronomica. Ora, se um átomo tem em si o sistema completo (6 atomos) e mais um somando 7, isto significa que êle está reforçando a espressão da Função 7 e já abrindo caminho para a construção da Função 1. Por isso a fórmula inteira da Xanthine é esta mensagem: ” aplique-se a êste composto movimentos expressados por mim ( direção, duração, velocidade) que faça um cadaver de sistema ser mais fragmentado, degradado, para ser ressuscitado, ou seja, que um sistema seja reciclado, reiniciado”. Veja na Wikipédia esta informação: “xanthine é o processo resultante da degradação de uma purina”, o que bate mais uma vez com nossas previsões. Assim a descrição do fenômeno com palavras como está no texto da Wikipedia bate com a informação revelada pela fórmula quimica, e as duas descrições bate com a descrição da fórmula astronomica da Matrix/DNA e as três descrições batem com a descrição da Matrix/DNA sôbre o que são nucleotideos, para depois tôdas estas descrições baterem com o significado existencial que a Matrix/DNA sugeriu para atomos, galaxias, células, corpos humanos. Assim funciona uma lógica numa teoria racional (claro, uma pobre racionalidade como só poderia ser a racionalidade limitada ao nosso pequenino cérebro perdido nêste pontinho insignificante dêste imenso Universo. Com o avançar do nosso conhecimento deve avançar o alcance da nossa racionalidade e então, suponho, mais completa e rica será a descrição).
Copiemos aqui a fórmula da Xanthine:
Xanthine A Molécula na Origem da Vida do trecho entre F7 e F1
E sua aparência como compôsto atômico:
Xanthine: A Molécula na Origem da Vida do Trecho entre F7 e F1 - Aparência Atômica
Terei que rever tudo sôbre purinas, guanine, PNP, para aprender mais como é isso tudo. Por enquanto, paro aqui porque o trabalho está exigindo minha presença lá fora, para retornar e continuar isto se a vida o permitir.
Óvulos e Imagens Iguais à Cosmologia da MatrixDNA (click na imagem)
Incrível como isso possa acontecer! Desenhos feitos precáriamente nas árduas condições da selva amazônica, há 30 anos atrás, agora são fotografados como fatos reais! E maior a surprêsa quando sabemos que a observação da natureza biológica aqui na Terra nos conduziu a suspeitar que estes fenômenos seriam evoluções de fenomenos que ocorrem no espaço sideral, e que poderiamos calcula-los, desenha-los. Mais uma vez mais uma previsão correta, quando esta nova visão do mundo previu que a formação de óvulos e tôda a sequencia que leva ao nascimento de humanos é exatamente igual a toda a sequencia que leva ao nascimento de astros, planetas e estr6elas!
Observe o desenho calculado na selva para origens dos astros:
Matrix/DNA Universal - Modêlo Cosmológico Original
Estás vendo como se trata exatamente do mesmo processo, até as formas são imitadas biológicamente aqui?!
Texto do artigo e a seguir, comentário explicativo:
“Observar a ovulação em humanos é extremamente raro e as imagens anteriores foram confusas. Jacques capturou o evento por acidente enquanto preparava uma histerectomia parcial em uma mulher de 45 anos. A liberação do óvulo foi considerada um evento repentino e veloz, mas as imagens, que serão publicadas na revista científica Fertility and Sterility, mostram que o evento leva, ao menos, 15 minutos. Pouco antes da liberação do óvulo, enzimas decompõem o tecido do folículo maduro, uma bolsa cheia de fluído na superfície do ovário que contém o óvulo. Isso leva à formação de uma protuberância avermelhada e, depois de algum tempo, surge um buraco, do qual o óvulo emerge envolto por células de apoio. Em seguida ele entra na trompa de Falópio, que o leva até o útero.”
Muito grato por estas imagens que são mais uma evidência para os modêlos evolucionarios da Teoria da Matrix/DNA. Estas imagens foram desenhadas e registradas há 30 anos atrás como resultado dos modêlos teóricos, porque são exatamente iguais às imagens do nascimento de uma nova estrêla, como se pode ver no site da Matrix/DNA Theory. Mera coincidência? Não, isso é evidencia de Evolução Universal. Compare os dois textos descritivos:
Matrix/DNA: “Antes da formação e uma nova estrêla, a entropia (enzima)decompõe uma velha gigante vermelha em fragmentos os quais formam uma nebulosa (ovário) a qual gira em rotação formando um vortex central (folículo maduro)contendo a massa degradada com todas as informações do sistema (genes). O turbilhão produz esferas incandecentes e se fundem com cometas capturados (óvulos mais espermatozóides) e com certo pêso são emitidos ao espaço sideral onde passarão pelas fases de baby-stars, planetas, pulsares, supernova, gigante vermelha e o ciclo recomeça…
Como vemos, o que está em baixo é cópia do que está encima e nós somos filhos das estrêlas.
Mas na Natureza, para realizar um processo, muitas vêzes um mecanismo é várias vêezes repetido. Podemos ver tambem os óvulos como sendo as partículas e fragmentos que resultam da fragmentação da estrêla na Função 7. Assim o cadaver estelar que é formado e aparece na imagem como metade da estrêla se decompondo pode ser visto como folículo maduro, e o canal que conduz os fragmentos a se contituir no vortex pode ser visto como a trompa de Falópio. Na verdade o óvulo é o fragmento estelar. pois apenas ele serás misturado aos cometas para formasr a esfera incandescente, que representa o óvulo depois da fecundação.
A Teoria da Matrix/DNA terá que enfrentar a arraigada cosmovisão/doutrina que se apossou do sistema acadêmico global. Ela parece vir do que se chama “secularismo”. Isto está definido e bem explicado seus efeitos no primeiro post abaixo do Alan Clarke. Mas adicionalmente, o debate copiado abaixo trouxe mais um grande material para pesquisa. O esqueleto biológico deve ser uma cópia da Matrix na sua forma como LUCA, portanto falta fazer um desenho mostrando isso. Ao mesmo tempo, a informação neste debate a respeito da existencia de soft tissues and biomolecules no meio dos ossos me leva á intuição de estar vendo a evolução biológica recapitulando a cosmológica, ou ainda mais, que os eventos da cosmológica ficarem registrados aqui, nesta biológica arquitetura. Preciso estudar isso. para tanto buscar as informações sugeridas no debate. O que foi ” Mary Schweitzer’s supposed 69 myo T. rex bones”? Pesquisar isso. Ver abaixo minha resposta no debate.
SECULAR RELIGION — “ideas, theories or philosophies which involve no spiritual component yet possess qualities similar to those of a religion. Such qualities include DOGMA, a system of indoctrination…designated enemies… The secular religion [fills] a role which would be satisfied by a church or another religious authority.” – Wikipedia (emphasis mine)
@XGralgrathor “There is only one scientific theory”
@jjukil “there is only the one theory, and no competing explanations”
My evidence is the same as yours. We differ only in our interpretations of the evidence. Evolutionists tried to interpret stretchy transparent blood vessels in Mary Schweitzer’s supposed 69 myo T. rex bones whose contents could be “squeezed out” to be biofilm. When that interpretation fell apart, they changed their interpretation to exceptional preservation of original tissues by raising the preservation limit from thousands of years to millions.
Mary Schweitzer never even claimed to have found unfossilised tissue. You are simply wrong. What she claimed to have found were ‘fragments of mineralised collagen’ and the impressions left by the soft tissue. At no point was the dating of 65 million years ever even in question by the actual reseaqrchers involved in that discovery.
“…recent studies have suggested that primary soft tissues and biomolecules are more commonly preserved within preserved bones than had been presumed. Some of these claims have been challenged, [arguing that the tissues]… are microbial artifacts [biofilm], not primary soft tissues. … extracts from a specimen of Brachylophosaurus canadensis has shown the interpretation of preserved organic remains as microbial biofilm to be highly unlikely.” – Peterson et al.
This is more one strong evidence for cosmological evolution. The biological vertebrate skeleton is just a copy of the sky made with bones. That’s explained by Haeckel theory that “phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny” amplified to cosmological level. The head is the “black hole at the nucleus of a galaxy”, the throat is the systemic circuit, the vertebral column is the espiral, etc. Primary soft tissues and biomolecules were made by genes referring to minutes after Big Bang,so, the “microbial”
Cromossoma humano 2 and seus análogos em outros primatas
Todos os outros primatas tem 24 cromossomas (gorilas (G), chimpanzes (C), orangotangos (O), etc.) mas a espécie humana(H) tem apenas 23. Considerando-se que a teoria da evolução esteja correta, esta sugere que a espécie humana tenha evoluido a partir de algum primata. Então porque perderia um cromossoma? A resposta veio quando se descobriu que o 23* cromossoma humano é justamente resultado da fusão entre os 23* e 24* cromossomas dos primatas. Como se pode observar no quadro acima.
Mas o que significaria essa fusão? O que teria provocado essa fusão? E o que dela de fato teria resultado?
Pensando nisso e observando a fórmula da Matrix/DNA me veio uma idéia que pode ser bem próxima da verdadeira resposta final. Trata-se de outra sugestão da fórmula, a de que todos os sistemas materiais, naturais, dêste Universo possuem uma face invisivel a nós, a qual seria justamente a Matrix feita de fótons ( que pode ser a aura aventada pelos orientais). Esta sugestão surgiu quando calculamos como teria siso o processo pelo qual o building block dos sistemas astronomicos teria se infiltrado na sôpa promordial terrestre e dirigido seus átomos a construir o primeiro sistema celular: ele veio na forma de um diagrama de software, fragmentado em seus bits-informação, manifestados na forma de fótons. Daí a sugestão de que a evolução tem sido resultado da interação entre esta face material visivel, que é o hardware, e a outra invisivel, que é o software. Uma, que se encontra fixada na matéria, capta informações do meio ambiente que são tambem absorvidas pela outra que flutua livre e por isso pode incorpora-las e mutar, porem fazendo isso ela modela o hardware em busca de maior capacidade para obter mais informações… um continuo processo de retro-alimentação, feed-back.
Mas à medida que a evolução avança, o aspecto hardware vai sendo cada vez menos util, pois o Universo material tem um limite de informações, e o software passa a buscar informações na sua própria dimensão. Isto significa que o sistema que estiver no tôpo da evolução – como é o caso aqui e agora do corpo humano – torna-se mais “etéreo”, mais software. Em outras palavras significa que o homem torna-se mais conciência e menos animalismo.
Então voltemos ao mistério da fusão. O software vem desde antes do Big Bang interagindo com o hardware através de alguma peça do hardware que é uma porta de entrada e saída para o software. Esta peça teria sido o cromossoma 24 nos primatas. Quando um evento novo forçou a fusão ( e suspeito que este evento tenha sido o agrupamento na caverna originando as familias, emergindo as emoções, sentimentos, morais), o software passou a se expressar com mais fôrça. No dizer da religião antiga oriental, ”a alma dormia no átomo, sonhava nas galaxias, começou a acordar nos animais, e despertou no homem”. Então essa fusão teria sido uma ampliação do software/mente dentro do hardware, ou seja: se antes dormia numa unica peça, pela qual fracamente podia interagir com o organismo, e assim pouco contrôle tinha sôbre instintos, pernas, braços, órgãos sexuais, etc., – agora ela pode, com a fusão dos cromossomas, ou seja, com a fusão da peça “dela” com todas as demais peças do organismo, ter maior controle e poder se expressar com mais força, impondo sua vontade anímica sôbre a vontade material.
Faz sentido para ti? Para mim parece que a coisa tôda tem lógica e é muito importante. Sua importancia vai desde entender melhor o que somos, até a descoberta de como tornar os computadores mais “inteligentes” , talvez até mesmo tendo mais visão do que seria um computador quantico com inteligencia artificial. Por isso vou levar mais essa pesquisa para frente. Vem comigo?
Mud does not appear in the bible, but clay does as a parable. Adam was made from the dust of the earth and after the flood,the rain turned the dust int the clay.? The clay would be the offspring of Adam if you were to plug in the code.