Se a Humanidade não usar com inteligencia o presente que recebeu caído dos céus ou produzido pela simples evolução natural chamado “auto-consciência”, o nosso destino será o mesmo de Adão e Eva no Paraíso: existir pela eternidade infinita num paraíso ajardinado como mais uma de suas criaturas estupidas, sem Internet, viagens em naves espaciais, com a mente totalmente atrofiada, etc., o que para mim seria pior que o inferno. A força natural que tenta nos conduzir a este destino se infiltra na psique da elite economica do planeta utilizando-a como inocente util e essa elite assim obedece inconscientemente. Existem movimentos por aí com certas ideologias que eu posso não concordar por achar que estão no caminho errado, como alguns combatendo teorias da conspiração ( veja o caso da teoria dos humanos reptilianos), mas no fundo muitas destas pessoas estão sendo tocadas intuitivamente pela mente cósmica que se sente ameaçada na sua evolução e liberdade, por isso tento me aliar e participar de alguns destes movimentos, tal como o link a seguir:
E a seguir o meu comentario como mensagem de apresentação no website do movimento:
Nome de Usuario: The Matrix/DNA
Muito obrigado pela admissão. Desde que realizando um estudo na selva amazõnica suspeitei que o rumo civilizatório sendo agora trilhado pela humanidade é o mesmo que dirigiu a evolução dos animais irracionais ( sistemas sociais das abelhas, formigas, dinossauros, etc.), cuja versão humana seria o estupido Admiravel Mundo Novo de Huxley sob o Big Brother de Orwell, suspeitei tambem que existe uma força natural emanada pelo ancestral que criou a Vida na Terra e dentro do qual ainda existimos, o qual é uma maquina descrita pela mecanica newtoniana, força esta que tende a organizar esta biosfera como uma maquina e o homem mais uma mera peça dentro dela, e que está encriptada como uma Matrix dentro do DNA e nossa genética, por isso tanto a abelha rainha como os Illuminatti são conduzidos intuitivamente e tendem a instalar um sistema onde no final eles próprios se tornam escravos do sistema. Passei então a militar de todas as formas possiveis na midia para tentar evitar este destino terrivel pois no ser humano desceu ou emergiu uma nova propriedade que os irracionais não possuem – a mente ou auto-consciencia – que não pertence ao nosso ancestral criador imediato e por isso, se adotar-mos certos comportamentos, poderemos evitar o trágico destino. Concordo que é uma proposta estranha e incomum que causa de impacto um certo desconforto intelectual por vir de uma visão de mundo desconhecida ainda, mas lembro que a diversidade de abordagens e idéias só pode enriquecer e tornar mais eficaz a grande causa do movimento da AntiNovaOrdemMundial. Tenho um website expondo esta nova cosmovisão e diariamente publicando artigos que visam desconstruir esta cultura milenar predatória cujas estatísticas mostram cerca de 500.000 paginas lidas/por mês no mundo todo. Aprecio que me corrijam nos meus erros mas espero não infringir as regras do forum e agradeço a admissão porque a sua causa é a minha causa. Abraços…
Facebook added a lot more than 100 million month-to-month active customers last year. That suggests 757 million men and women now check out Facebook everyday (1.3 billion monthly!)
LinkedIn boasts an impressive 332 million customers and Twitter 284 million.
A Teenager’s View on Social Media
Written by an actual teen
I read technology articles quite often and see plenty of authors attempt to dissect or describe the teenage audience, especially in regards to social media. However, I have yet to see a teenager contribute their voice to this discussion. This is where I would like to provide my own humble opinion.
For transparency, I am a 19-year-old male attending The University of Texas at Austin. I am extremely interested in social media’s role in our society as well as how it is currently evolving. Thus, the views I provide here are my own, but do stem from observation of not only my own habits but my peers’ habits as well.
This article will not use any studies, data, sources, etc. This is because you can easily get that from any other technology news website and analyze from there. I’m here to provide a different view based off of my life in this “highly coveted” age bracket. That being said, I’m not an expert at this by a long shot and I’m sure there will be data that disproves some of the points I make, but this is just what I’ve noticed.
I think the best way to approach this would be to break it down by social media network and the observations/viewpoints I’ve gathered over the years.
In short, many have nailed this on the head. It’s dead to us. Facebook is something we all got in middle school because it was cool but now is seen as an awkward family dinner party we can’t really leave. It’s weird and can even be annoying to have Facebook at times. That being said, if youdon’t have Facebook, that’s even more weird and annoying. Weird because of the social pressure behind the question, “Everyone has Facebook, why don’t you?” and annoying because you’ll have to answer that to just about everyone in classes you meet who makes an attempt to friend you or find you on there.
Facebook is often used by us mainly for its group functionality. I know plenty of classmates who only go on Facebook to check the groups they are part of and then quickly log off. In this part Facebook shines—groups do not have the same complicated algorithms behind them that the Newsfeed does. It is very easy to just see the new information posted on the group without having to sift through tons of posts and advertising you don’t really care about.
Messaging on Facebook is also extremely popular among our age group, mainly because they provide the means to talk to those people who you weren’t really comfortable with asking for their number but comfortable enough to send them a friend request.
Facebook is often the jumping-off point for many people to try to find you online, simply because everyone around us has it. If I met you one time at some party, I’m not going to try to check Twitter or Instagram to find out who you are. Instead, many opt for the ease of Facebook and the powerful search functionality that gives you results of people who you actually have a chance of knowing (unlike Instagram, whose search functionality, although it improved slightly in the last update, leaves much to be desired).
Instagram is by far the most used social media outlet for my age group. Please note the verbiage there—it is the most used social media outlet. Meaning, although the most people are on Facebook, we actually post stuff on Instagram. It’s always fascinating to me to see a friend with 1500 friends on Facebook only get 25 likes on a photo yet on Instagram (where she has 800 followers) she gets 253. I have a few ideas as to why this could happen:
I’m not terrified whenever I like something on Instagram that it will show up in someone’s Newsfeed and they’ll either screenshot that I liked it or reference it later. The same goes for commenting.
I am not as pressured to follow someone back on Instagram, meaning my feed is normally comprised of content I actually want to see. That being said, I will come back and scroll through an application that has content I enjoy rather than one where I have to find the occasional diamond in the rough.
The content on Instagram is usually of higher quality. People take time to edit their photos with filters, use different brightness/contrast settings (it’s even one of the steps to posting a photo), etc., to make the pictures look the best they possibly can. This means the content on Instagram is normally “better” (photo-wise), so I am more likely to go back to the application.
Instagram hasn’t been flooded with the older generation yet (noteveryone has an Instagram) meaning it’s “hip” and “cool” to the younger crowd. However, it is popular enough that if you have a smartphone it’s almost unheard of for you not to have Instagram, if not to take pictures, but to at least tag people in photos.
Another point: tagging. I don’t have to constantly check Instagram to make sure I wasn’t tagged in any awkward or bad photos. That’s becauseyou can’t easily see them in your feed, making the whole experience seem way more private. Am I looking weird in a photo you posted? Who cares—I can just delete the tag if I really am that upset about it without fear that my friends from another social circle (who don’t follow you) will get to it first. I know Facebook has the ability to let you check every single photo tagged of you before it appears on your profile, but many people I know do not have that enabled or know it even exists.
People do not post 10000 times a day on Instagram. Many are much more polite about posting, either doing once a day, a few times a week, etc. This means that there isn’t a constant flow of content being shoved down my throat every time I open the application, and it is possible to be “caught up” with my Instagram feed.
There are no links on Instagram, meaning I’m not being constantly spammed by the same advertisement, horrible gossip news article, or Buzzfeed listicle about the “28 Ingenious Things For Your Dog You Had No Idea You Needed”
Those are some reasons why many people my age tend to use Instagram more than they do Facebook. Everything about the application makes it less commercialized and more focused on the content, meaning more teens are inclined to visit it. When we do visit the application it is a much more pleasant experience so we are more inclined to Like and interact with the posts more. This increases our interaction with the application, meaning we will use it more, etc.
Facebook gets all of the photos we took — the good, the bad, etc—while Instagram just gets the one that really summed up the event we went to. It is much more selective, and honestly people spend more time on the captions to make them relevant/funny. On Facebook we just throw up everything we got so people can tag each other and show our family members that we’re still alive.
Many of those younger than me (10–16 years old) who I’ve talked to about this matter don’t even have a Facebook — Instagram is all that they need.
To be honest, a lot of us simply do not understand the point of Twitter. There is always a core group at every school that uses it very religiously to tweet and another group that uses it to simply watch or retweet, but besides that many don’t use it. It also isn’t extremely easy to find friends on the site and many just use it to complain about school in a setting where their parents/family members (not necessarily employers) are likely not to see it.
Twitter is a place to follow/be followed by a bunch of random strangers, yet still have your identity be attached to it (this distinction will be important later on). Your tweets are also easily searchable on Twitter which is good but not good if you want to be yourself and not have it follow you around when you’re trying to land a job. Thus, to others Twitter is used like Facebook—you post with the assumption that your employer will see it one day.
There are then three main groups of Twitter users: the ones who use it to complain/express themselves, the ones who tweet with the assumption that their prospective employer will eventually see whatever they are saying, and the ones who simply look at other Tweets and do the occasional RT.
Snapchat is quickly becoming the most used social media network, especially with the advent of My Story. If I could break down a party for you in social media terms, here’s how it would pan out:
You post yourself getting ready for the party, going to the party, having fun at the party, leaving at the end of the party, and waking up the morning after the party on Snapchat.
On Facebook you post the cute, posed pictures you took with your friends at the party with a few candids (definitely no alcohol in these photos).
On Instagram you pick the cutest one of the bunch to post to your network.
Snapchat is where we can really be ourselves while being attached to our social identity. Without the constant social pressure of a follower count or Facebook friends, I am not constantly having these random people shoved in front of me. Instead, Snapchat is a somewhat intimate network of friends who I don’t care if they see me at a party having fun.
On no other social network (besides Twitter possibly) is it acceptable post an “I’m soooo bored” photo besides Snapchat. There aren’t likes you have to worry about or comments—it’s all taken away. Snapchat has a lot less social pressure attached to it compared to every other popular social media network out there. This is what makes it so addicting and liberating. If I don’t get any likes on my Instagram photo or Facebook post within 15 minutes you can sure bet I’ll delete it. Snapchat isn’t like that at all and really focuses on creating the Story of a day in your life, not some filtered/altered/handpicked highlight. It’s the real you.
Another quick aside about Snapchat—I only know a handful of people (myself included) that believe Snapchat does delete your photos. Everyone else I know believes that Snapchat has some secret database somewhere with all of your photos on it. While I will save that debate for another day, it is safe to say that when photos are “leaked” or when there’s controversy about security on the app, we honestly do not really care. We aren’t sending pictures of our Social Security Cards here, we’re sending selfies and photos with us having 5 chins.
Remember in the section on Twitter I said, “Twitter is also a place to follow/be followed by a bunch of random strangers, yet still have your identity be attached to it”? Tumblr is a place to follow/be followed by a bunch of random strangers, yet not have your identity be attached to it. Tumblr is like a secret society that everyone is in, but no one talks about. Tumblr is where you are your true self and surround yourself (through who you follow) with people who have similar interests. It’s often seen as a “judgment-free zone” where, due to the lack of identity on the site, you can really be who you want to be. The only Tumblr URLs I know of people in real life are my close friends and vice versa.
Plus, it’s simple in Tumblr to just change your URL if anyone finds you. Your name isn’t attached to that profile at all so without that URL it is pretty difficult to find you again, especially for the typical parent snooping around. This really helps make the site a place where people can post and support others posts. There is a lot of interaction on this website in the form of reblogs because people just simply have feeds of only things they care about (and are then more likely to support with a like/reblog). I wouldn’t say a lot of “socializing” — at least in the way we’ve defined it in our social media society—occurs on the site, but people can really easily meet others worldwide who hold similar interests. This makes it a very alluring site to join for many teenagers, even just to make new friends.
Yik Yak is a rather new contender, however, a ton of friends in college have the application. It has gotten to be so addicting because it focuses solely on the content of your posts—there are no followers, no profiles, nothing. Whatever is funny/relevant is at the top and everything else is at the bottom, whether Kanye West is the one who is writing it or some random kid who never talks in class.
There’s an advertisement I see often on Twitter for Yik Yak that says something along the lines of “Everyone’s on it before class starts.” I can 100% reaffirm that this is true. And everyone’s on it during class, talking about the class they are in. And everyone’s on it after class to find out what else is going on around campus.
While it hasn’t reached the popularity of the other networks, Yik Yak is a powerful contender that people actually use. Often I see people post about the fight for anonymity with other applications such as Secret. I can tell you that I do not know a single person in my network who uses that application. People reference Yaks all the time with each other or send screenshots, I have yet to ever hear of a hot post on Secret that everyone’s talking about.
A negative to Yik Yak, however, is how unused the application is whenever there is a school holiday. Yik Yak is only as good as the 10 mile radius around you, so if you are in an area with a low population of Yik Yak users, you won’t really be using the application much. The same can’t be said for the other social media sites on this list.
Many of my peers look for platforms to begin a writing blog that they can share with their friends and family. When I hear my friends say this, they automatically think of creating a WordPress site. For some reason, WordPress seems like the more “sophisticated” website to begin a blog. Others who have had experience with Tumblr will choose to open up a separate blog on there, one that is not connected to their “personal” blog on the platform.
However, once I have introduced Medium to those my age, I have never seen them turn back in terms of a platform to publish a blog.
What Medium does right is the “recommend” function. This is unseen on WordPress (besides the typical website sharing buttons) and is really what makes Medium a community, not just a bunch of individual sites. Having a simple “Follow” system also makes it so that you come back to Medium even if you aren’t looking to write a blog. Medium also has an emphasis on commenting right next to the text (as opposed to a lengthy comment section at the bottom).
Medium’s only challenge is becoming known to the teenage audience. The layout of the site as well as the content is all there, what is needed is just the recognition of our age group. I feel that over time as more teenagers begin to discover Medium, many of my peers will begin blogging here.
Here are other social media networks that some teens use but that don’t really require a full-length discussion:
LinkedIn — We have to get it, so we got it. Many wait until college to get this (as they probably should, it isn’t for this demographic anyways).
Pinterest—It’s mainly female-dominated and is for those who have an artsy/hipster focus. Not too many people talk about it.
Kik—It’s a messaging application that is mainly used for messaging people on Twitter I guess? I don’t know anyone who uses it. The only time I ever hear this application is for the joke, “Aye you got Kik?”, normally seen as someone trying to “spit game” to attract a partner. It’s really difficult for me to describe it here but it isn’t super relevant.
WhatsApp—You download it when you go abroad, you use it there for a bit before going back to iMessage and Facebook Messenger, then you delete it. I know tons of people who use it to communicate with friends they made abroad, but I feel like Messenger is beginning to overshadow it. For international students, however, WhatsApp is a pivotal tool that I’ve heard is truly useful.
GroupMe—By far the most used group messaging application in college. Everyone has one, uses it and loves it. GIF support, the ability to “like” others messages, even trivial things such as being able to change your name between group chats all make this both a useful and enjoyable application. GroupMe also works for literally any phone or device…it is on desktop, iPhone, Android, and can work over text as well for those who may not have a smartphone.
Eu nada entendo da tecnologia da Internet mas como a Internet é uma fôrça poderosa no mundo humano este assunto deve interessar aos leigos. Portanto é bom ler o artigo com link abaixo e assistir seus vídeos. Infelizmente me parece que a Internet não é como as nuvens do céu que fluem, se formam e desaparecem sem controle de ninguem, nem mesmo do planeta. A Internet se constitui de circuitos elétricos os quais tem que correrem dentro de cabos e todos os cabos tem que ter uma fonte inicial… e esta fonte sendo algo fixo e imovel pode ser dominada, controlada, por algo ou alguem. E de fato ela existe e está sendo controlada por alguns pouquissimos humanos,… 14 no total ! Quem são estas pessoas?! Que possuem o poder sobre o mundo? A meu ver este controle tinha que ser da ONU, mas ao mesmo tempo sei que a ONU não se garante em manter segredos, os delegados estão sendo sempre substituidos e revelam os segredos tratados na ONU a seus governos… muita gente, portanto.
Como eles podem ter controle sobre o mundo? Vamos imaginar que de repente quisessem destruir a Humanidade. Todas as redes sociais seriam invadidas por uma mensagem: “Atenção, a Russia está atacando os USA com um gas quimico mortal começando pela inteira costa leste e avançando para oeste. Quem quer se salvar agora não perca um minuto, corra para o oeste… até dar tempo dos USA barra-los…”. Ao mesmo tempo o Twitter, Facebook, etç, seriam invadidos por mensagens: “É verdade! Aqui nestas cidades da costa leste que estou deixando para tras estão caindo todos mortos!” De alguma maneira o governo perderia o controle pois os governantes e militares estariam correndo tambem e de alguma maneira acionariam o ataque nuclear…
Claro, nenhuma outra organização no mundo conseguiria tal mobilização na Internet, e se tentassem a coisa seria tão lenta que o governo iria se rir da infantilidade. Alem disso nenhum humano iria querer a destruição da Humanidade levando ele mesmo junto. Mas a organização dos sete que possuem o código total da Internet poderia fazê-lo…?
Na minha cabeça se formou uma imagem metafisica do que é a Internet, e peço a quem possa me informar se estiver errado. Vamos lembrar aquelas imagens nas telas sobre os raios X de cérebros funcionando, com as sinapses aparecendo como raios elétricos pipocando aqui e ali. Em volta daquele foco de raios luminiosos tem a massa cinzenta mas como aquilo produz os pensamentos, que são coisas invisiveis, imagino que o conjunto de todos os pensamentos é como uma nuvem invisivel iluminada pelos raios, a qual denominamos “mente”. Bem, isso ér a mente individual dentro de uma cabeça humana. Mas os humanos conseguem fazer suas mentes se comunicarem entre si, então o conjunto de todas as mentes humanas formariam uma invisivel camada mental coletiva rodeando rente a superficie da Terra. Vamos chama-la de mente coletiva, e se a entendemos como uma nuvem invisivel iluminada por raios, estes raios seriam os circuitos elétricos carregando os sinais nas comunicações entre humanos, seja por telefones, televisão, etc., mas principalmente pela Internet.
Se isto estiver correto, a evolução está conduzindo o desenvolvimento de uma consciencia unica planetaria como fêz com a primeira célula viva que apareceu no planeta, depois se multiplicou e suas cópias se re-organizaram num só sistema criando os organismos multicelurales. Mas agora, no nivel mental, seria o reverso caminho, ou seja, todas as células diferenciadas se re-organizando como uma unica gigantesca célula… ?!
No controle de todas as células está um unico agente, o DNA. No controle de todas mentes individuais… terá um unico agente? Se sim, qual é?
Não quero influenciar este raciocinio com minhas tendencias e ideologia pessoal, a qual tem uma resposta direta: a Matrix/DNA. Quero ao contrario manter a mente aberta para pensar melhor este fenomeno, mas acontece que ele é tão complexo, como um detonador de mentes. A mente que tentar resolver isto começa a querer explodir, e ao menos no meu caso, sou levado a interromper e fugir do assunto imediatamente, como vou fazer agora… Good-byeeeeeee…..
Link para o artigo:
The Internet Is Actually Controlled By 14 People Who Hold 7 Secret Keys
A Matrix/DNA tem que ficar atenta aos sinais das fôrças que atuam no sentido de levar a Humanidade ao “Admirável Mundo Novo” sob o governo da “Mãe-Rainha”, tentando reproduzir o ancestral mecanicista e atrapalhando ou interrompendo a evolução da auto-consciência. A Internet é fator fundamental nesta vigilância.
Leia a versão do Marco Civil da Internet que foi ao Plenário da Câmara
Desde sua fundação, em 2008 já tive cerca de 1 milhão de visitas, do mundo todo, notadamente USA, Russia, China e ate Luxemburgo. Teria muito mais se tivesse publicando os artigos no idioma inglês, se tivesse algum tipo de recurso para anunciar que existo e se fosse feito tudo o que falta para ser um website realmente completo. Se ao menos tivesse tempo para inserir todos os artigos que escrevo as pressas em folhas de papel e gráficos/figuras, que nunca são publicadas. Nem mesmo para elaborar um legível artigo explicando todos os detalhes tenho tempo. Falta ajuda, participação, de qualquer maneira, pois o conteúdo é de utilidade publica e inimaginável pode ser o beneficio para a Humanidade se a formula da Matrix/DNA for provada como realmente existente ( apesar de já ter as milhares de evidencias, ainda continuo na duvida, como deve ser todo filosofo naturalista). Suspeito que estes acessos vem de pessoas especializadas ou estudantes fazendo pesquisas quando digitam algumas palavras na busca. Os dados a seguir saem no meu Awstats ( enquanto isso os indicadores de acessos para o publico, como o Google Analytics e os outros continuam a dizer que os acessos é zero… Porque sera? O que esta faltando no programa do website para que estas agencias percebam a realidade?)O povo brasileiro, que teria maior facilidade para ler e entender pois esta no seu idioma, continua distante do interesse pelos assuntos aqui abordados. Não admira o nível intelectual e religiosos do pais, sofrível quando comparado com outros paises… basta ver a publicacao internacional de papers cientificos ou teses intelectuais todos os dias.
Dia Numero de visitas Páginas Hits Bytes 01 Set 20134952,7564,922208.63 MB02 Set 20136073,7916,192257.32 MB03 Set 20136674,5087,096296.04 MB04 Set 20136564,5647,326290.25 MB05 Set 20138383,5276,085274.38 MB06 Set 20137423,4595,558239.90 MB07 Set 20136932,6534,223196.27 MB08 Set 20135891,9564,288286.26 MB09 Set 20136422,5744,877298.94 MB10 Set 20138182,4835,004297.35 MB11 Set 20138352,4535,307317.29 MB12 Set 20137322,5314,997302.11 MB13 Set 20138062,4654,359284.19 MB14 Set 20137013,0934,672225.94 MB15 Set 20135941,9153,890271.37 MB16 Set 20136671,9684,132272.78 MB17 Set 20136982,5724,926302.46 MB18 Set 20137413,1465,444311.22 MB19 Set 20136352,4104,476260.46 MB20 Set 20136793,2054,933257.29 MB21 Set 20137733,4594,718243.00 MB22 Set 20137404,5516,399346.12 MB23 Set 20137784,6846,834457.03 MB24 Set 20138164,2266,395417.10 MB25 Set 20138754,4996,834520.94 MB26 Set 20138873,3955,619367.22 MB27 Set 20138433,2874,948566.40 MB28 Set 20137812,7564,342394.04 MB29 Set 20136743,1584,777259.05 MB30 Set 20136534,0686,117628.41 MBMed7213,2035,323321.66 MBTotal21,65596,112159,6909.42 GB
Psiquiatras deduziram que o Facebook esta causando mal psicológico a centenas de milhões de pessoas, principalmente jovens, por ser um vicio e sugerem que seja posto um aviso na pagina como se poe nos macos de cigarros, de que o acesso ao Facebook pode danificar sua saúde. O portal tem sido responsável por males como depressão, insonia, insatisfação com a vida, ressentimentos por invejas, perda de amizades e sentimentos de solidão. Qual a sua opinião? A minha opinião e a de que estão novamente errando feio, seguindo essa tendencia de todos os especialistas formados nas universidades estarem trocando causas por efeitos em todos os processos invisíveis da Natureza. Não é o Facebook o causador destes males, mas sim o contrario, estes males da mente moderna causam o vicio ao Facebook. Ainda ontem chamei para mais uma briga os cientistas que pesquisam o câncer, por revelarem que estão concentrados na busca dos genes cuja mutação causa o câncer e gastando bilhões na busca de drogas que inibam estas mutações, gerando uma medicina que trata do doente mantendo-o doente ao invés de uma medicina preventiva que erradique a causa das mutações. A Matrix/DNA esta sugerindo que as mutações são apenas efeitos, causados por um mal funcionamento do corpo humano como sistema e que temos de ver a formula de sistema perfeito da Matrix/DNA para compara-la com o sistema corpo humano em funcionamento para detectar onde estão as irregularidades (como fiz com a questão do mal colesterol cuja gravura esta na minha homepage), e assim eliminar o câncer de uma vez por todas. Sei que é muita pretensão da minha parte mas não é minha culpa, são os resultados de um calculo metódico que minguem consegue apontar um erro. E possível que eu esteja errado já que não estou vendo mais nenhum ser humano apresentando uma visão de mundo parecida com a que estou defendendo sob o nome de Matrix/DNA, a qual esta sugerindo que esse grande mal-entendido da visão de mundo acadêmica esta no fato de que separaram a Evolução Cosmológica que aconteceu desde o momento do Big Bang até a formação do Cosmos estruturado em galaxias, e a Evolução Biológica que aconteceu e/ou esta acontecendo na superfície da Terra. A Matrix/DNA sugere uma gravura de um elo evolucionário entre as duas historias, portanto, somos a continuidade de uma unica linha evolucionaria em todo o Universo, e sugere que a Vida aqui é efeito do Cosmos como causas, enquanto os acadêmicos sugerem que a Vida começou por si mesma e é a causa primeira dos fenômenos que aqui estudam. Esta mentalidade conduz-se a uma aplicação de origens espontâneas aos fenômenos, tal como fazem agora com o Facebook colocando-o como uma origem espontânea vinda como acaso para o meio psicológico coletivo e produzindo os tais efeitos. A visão de continuidade de uma longa cadeia de causas e efeitos da Matrix/DNA sugere que o vicio do Facebook é produto do psicológico coletivo. Então não adianta atacar o efeito, o Facebook, mas sim temos que pesquisar no psicológico coletivo os sintomas que produzem coisas como o Facebook. Esta aberta a discussão, principalmente convidados os amigos psicólogos de plantão, inclusive, para participar-mos ou abrir-mos esta discussão em canais e fóruns internacionais. Isto é de suma importância pois o estado mental é produzido pela interpretação que temos do mundo real mais as reações que o mundo real apresenta para o tipo de vida feliz que essa interpretação sugere. Se a juventude esta infeliz, mesmo a de classe media alta, é porque a interpretação de mundo que lhes foi ensinada pela família e pela escola não corresponde ao mundo real, o qual então reage apresentando obstáculos ao bem-estar mental. Mas de nada adiantaria apenas esta critica teórica, pois isto parece ser intuído por todo mundo hoje. O golpe esperto da Matrix/DNA é que ela esta sugerindo uma oposta interpretação do mundo e os nossos cálculos sugerem que o mundo real reagiria favoravelmente a ela. Não vejo outro assunto de maior gravidade e importância para os humanos hoje. Meu post na Fox News:
. The truth is totally the opposite: Facebook is the effect of collective mental illness and not a cause of it. Facebook is like the therapy applied for cancers, etc., take it out out and will be worst. This sick state of young’s’ mind is being produced by the modern mindset propagated through scholar curriculum, due the scientific interpretation of real world, leading them to mechanistic behavior and nihilism. At the Matrix/DNA world view I am challenging every expert at any field to contest the real facts’ interpretations that results from my theoretical models and nobody have one. It happens that this new world view has the effect of producing happy and health state of mind, because the student discovers a wonderful meaning for his/her existence and lots of work to do. The mistake caused here by Dr. Keith is due the common tendency of replacing effects as causes, due the view that Life is produced by itself without the inherited tracts from Cosmological Evolution. So, again, life is mistakenly seen as cause and not as effect haw it would be. I am challenging here anyone with opposite opinion. Instead attacking Facebook, we need attacking the methods that are being applied for studying the modern mental state.
To @LouisCharlesMorelli You should submit your theory to a peer-reviewed scientific journal such as the Journal of Humanistic Psychology, The Journal of Social Psychology, or the Psychological Review, where it can reviewed by experts in the field. Then A) sit back and wait for them to accept your paper; or B) build your own website to advertise a theory that is rejected by the experts in the field. If your theory was as correct as you say, you would have already done this and it would be in print. Either way, an ‘anecdotally-based’ forum that is interested in discourse without scientific directives will turn a deaf ear to your ideas. There is an audience for your ideas—-but this isn’t it.
To @screwed-in-st-lou – Thanks “Screwed” by yours answer. The resulting models from my used method (comparative anatomy between living and non-living natural systems) are suggesting a picture of an astronomical natural system that should be the producer of biological systems (aka, life) here, where we can see the roots of each animal instincts coming from natural forces of non-biological world. The modern Humanistic Psychology does not know this model, then it is logical that psychologists search at animal instincts and later brain development the roots of human state of mind today, like the origins of emotions, etc. Their final theories are wrong, far away from its real sources in Nature and I can show how and why the real roots changes the final interpretations of real facts here and now. For instance, the visible behavior today of kids obsessed with virtual technology, games, etc., which has mechanistic tendency, is a normal and natural product of a process of genetic reproduction from a world described by Newtonian mechanics. If we don’t want a destiny like the solar system, operating as an eternal watch ( the Brave New World under the Big Brother), we need do something quickly for saving these kids. It happens that Matrix/DNA models discovered a different tendency in Nature where the free development of a health state of mind is possible. But… it is suggesting a more complex model for natural systems like atoms, astronomic, abiogenesis processes, a different interpretation of the Big Bang, etc., and alone I can do nothing, it is a big job for a big team. I have the website ” The Universal Matrix/DNA for Natural Systems and Life Cycles”, where I am testing the models and accumulating evidences but I have no conditions for publishing. And I am aware that my results are not complete and maybe are wrong, then, my humble position. There are natural forces and processes encrypted at our genes and modelling this biosphere towards the tendency to mechanicism due our ancestral to be like a perfect machine, this is the source of unsatisfactory state of living and conflicts with our mind today because this mind is result also from forces and natural processes coming from a system more distant in the past, which is more biological than mechanics. Our kids are being victim of a big problem created by scholar curriculum. Another interpretations, another reactions and behaviors. But… I could be wrong… it is up to you analyze it and helping or not me in this giant effort.Edit (3 minutes)
Those of you who can’t see the danger that lies in creating and spending hours every day in a world where YOU are the central figure who is admired and adored; YOU do everything right; and YOU can banish from that world those who don’t agree with you and/or don’t like you—–are living in that world.
@screwed-in-st-lou The danger is that these people creates a virtual world for themselves and lives as a static computer-stopped. The natural mind fails into an eternal dream, the individual created its own Matrix. If real life promotes the evolution of our mind through the knowledge and translation of natural phenomena into mind’s symbols or substance, while at a dream, the individual is ruled by the laws of matter that composes its body. This matter has the tendency for eternal thermodynamic equilibrium for its aspect as mass, and for eternal orgasm obtained by high speed of its aspect as energy. A kid seated at a computer playing high speed emotional games is exactly the figure where simplest matter dominates. The bombardment of informations, pictures, jokes, messages, from his two thousands friends is same situation. You can understand this quickly seeing the universal formula of closed virtual systems at Matrix/DNA website. The danger is that Nature does not permit the eternal existence of such being, which is attacked by entropy and destroyed/transformed. The danger is that such individual has nothing to do with his/her real life. And becomes unable to survival at real life. Any nose/perturbation in the external world will wake up such individual bringing him to real life, but then, he does not know what to do. The danger is that such individual as a closed system into himself stopped its own evolution while Nature is walking, transforming, advancing, and will discard any stopped obstacle that stands at Her way. But… the dreamer virtual world of these young people was created by their programming in the virtual culture that has interpreted the real phenomena of Nature into mental symbols that are not the true. The problem begins at the global scholar curricula. You don’t agree? Ok, then do what I did: go back to yours real Nature, living by seven years alone at Amazon jungle, observing the real Nature at work. You will discover that our civilization mindset is far away off the beam. Or try to prove that the interpretations of real phenomena at Matrix/DNA world view are wrong. If you do that, I will pay the beer.
I am asking permission to commentators, to Bill Nye and Youtube, for adding one approach, which is forgotten here. We are adults debating what we should transmit/transfer from our experience of life to our loved next generations. But, what about the other side? There are no children here speaking for themselves. We should try “empathy”, changing informations about “who are them”, thinking from their “mysterious” wishes, and making comparisons between their bias and the real world as we know it.
When I try to think from the “children perspectives”and the world that is waiting for them, some issues comes quick to my mind. First of all, the issue about over-population.This world will become very unsuitable for them. It seems this issue is solved in first world of Europe, but till Europe will face the effects of world over-population. We need acting over education at third world countries. What we will teach: the control by scientific methods or this “non-control” by their religions?
Apes, are healthier and perfect physical machine than human beings.They are the fittest for getting better life at this biosphere built by a kind of perfect machine, described by Newtonian mechanics. But human mind is a natural production that changed the environment, in a way that apes aren’t more adapted.Then, physically, there are degradation of the inherited ape with 75% of bad mutations and 24 neutrals. Humans are the dark reverse light at the same avenue that is advancing the white light
No. It just implies that the common ancestor of all living beings is in the sky. Which means that had no abiogenesis, but, cosmological embryogenesis with a big mutation due the ancestor was made with solid and gaseous states of matter, and the first living being was nurtured in a womb where emerged the liquid state, hence chemistry.
Well…it is not in the sky in relation to earth, because earth is part of it. It is in sky like you are just now. Have you thought about that? The “womb” for the first living being was this planet…in this cosmic region. Stellar systems and galaxies were nurtured in environment existing only solid and gaseous states. At least organic Chemistry is a recent emerged process. Something wrong here?
No human names for world views. My method was applied by the forst time in Human History: comparative anatomy among all natural systems, from atoms to galaxies to brains… and now, consciousness. Academic Science is missing to do that and the result is very bad: they had shared Universal Natural History into two separated blocks, with no evolutionary link between them. That’s why they can’t understand the emergence of life here. matrix/DNA has a better rational theory about
Comparative anatomy of natural systems. Galaxies are merely one of those. This method is rational because it is the right thing to do if you make the rational question: the first living being was a system, the cell system. So, its creator must be a system. Which natural systems were existing at that time? Which is the most suitable for to be the past evolutionary link? The right question brings on the right answer.
Super-nova is not explosion and emergence of a new star. It is the opposite:implosion. Of a dark giant planet turned on a pulsar. All planets has as nucleus the germ of a star, which nuclear reactions goes eating the layers of rocks from inside to outside. When the last layer is tiny, it collapses and the internal light is released to the external world. A new baby was born. Our ancestor made everything like we do now.
This ancestor is seen when galaxies are observed from Biological perspective, I mean, by the reverse way of evolution, knowing the last product (cells) and calculating the ancestors…It is the opposite way used by Physics perspective.There was a nebulae of lighter atoms about 12 billions years ago. The nebulae made the first lightest stars. These stars were under forces that imprint the process of life cycles. They changed shapes and composed an almost living system. Lots of evidences for it.
But why are you looking at galaxies from the “Biological perspective”?
You do realize that you’re simply making an “analogy” between “biology” and “astronomy”?
Then I hope you realize that in most schools of Logic, analogies are considered technically “fallacious” (though you can come up with “good” and “bad” analogies)… Why? Because you’re ultimately comparing apples to oranges. Yours falls under “False Analogy”.
Dave, the human idea about evolution was made based in analogy between species, fossils, DNA, etc. Why? It is the unique rational alternative we have for inquiring the unknown past times. Where Biological systems came from? Be it what to be, it was inside an astronomical system. You will not agree with that if you believe in magics, by gods or randomness. So, if biological came from astronomical, the principles for biological must be hidden in the astronomical. That’s so clear!
It really doesn’t imply, but, implying that a cell system came from a non-system, like the primordial soup, is less rational.I think what is missing for modern academic Science is knowledge about natural systems. I think there are only three: atomic, astronomic and biological. I had aligned them in this sequence for you notice that there was a movement from the simple to most complex in right chronological time. This is evolution. Universal Natural MacroEvolution. There is genetic relationship
Yes Adam had a uterus. All males have it. Encrypted In the genes. It is not expressed because the gene for phallus is expressed two times. If you see the cosmological model of the state of the world when the Bible says that Adam existed you will see that those primordial galaxies were hermaphrodite, Adam and Eve encrypted. Things are more, lots more complex than you think…sorry.
But yours body once time could be fitted on the head of a pin, Goo. Why not the Universe? The smaller initial size of the Universe is not food for atheism, it is food for agnosticism and creationism. What was existing before your body being smaller than a pin? Yours parents, right? Why not the Universe? You need to understand that nature applies nanotechnology ( making a big body as a microscope one) and giantology ( making a microscope body being a big one)
This issue is very important because if we knew the truth about the sun we could built a mechanical copy getting another kind of energy. And an important factor should be a better understanding about life origins and operations. There is a problem with the method used today: they are calculating the sun from Physics perspective only. But, since that all life is dependable of Sun’s energy, and life was created by this energy also, we need the biological perspective of the sun, made by Matrix/DNA
I just let it play out and continue as is. In a way, I’m sure it is kind of mean. My area is neuropsych, though, and I intend to study clinical psych (in fact, just got an RA position in a neuropsych and social cognition lab so we’ll see how that goes). From what I understand so far about it, cognitive behavioral therapy is actually fairly difficult and challenging, in that the therapist or clinician challenges the client’s beliefs and cognitions where they are maladaptive.
Because the cognitions are maladaptive. Examples would be, “I am worthlesss”, “I am God”, or “I hear voices which tell me to kill myself”. Also, cultural considerations are made. For instance, an American might say that a particular Japanese person is neurotically shy when it may turn out that he is just culturally reserved. I will learn a lot more about this later, but I know some now. Just please know my knowledge is incomplete.
Ok. I think the area of neuropsych is very important for future of human kind but it needs urgent self-analyses. You will think that this idea is odd, but, for neuropsych professionals to understand what is going on in the brain they will need study astronomy also. Nature produced the brain which neurons must mirror the connections among natural phenomena for to be healthier. Culture can works as a kind of malignant virus, when culture has the wrong interpretation of reality. Am I wrong?
I don’t understand your idea of self-analyses in terms of astronomy. You are correct that neuropsych scientists and clinicians must understand the brain. We do, however, spend a great deal of time understanding basic brain processes such as neurodevelopment and the basic concepts in learning like plasticity, sensitization, and habituation with model animals in controlled experiments such as those done with aplysia.
I will try to explain, but, be advised, it is merely my theory. I am trying to follow the everyday new discoveries published by neuropsych scientists and clinicians.But I apply the knowledge of the brain for trying to understand the Universe and vice-verse.The brain is shared into two hemispheres. Do you know why Nature did it this way? The building block of galaxies is shared into two hemispheres also, the connections between them help us to understand the connections here. Same functions
Well, the idea of culture being wrong about something is very touchy. There are psychologists who devote themselves to cultural psychology, such as culturally specific mental illnesses. The definition of a mental illness may help here, which is that it is only a mental illness if it 1. Causes you mental stress and 2. Interferes with your daily functioning.
And how is the definition of the whole society mental illness? How to diagnose the social mental illness? How we know if a social behavior is naturally healthier or more one collective mental illness that is not synchronized with the laws of Nature? But.. there is no way for to know what is Nature here and now if we don’t know what is our astronomical system. For instance, the cosmological model resulting from a biological perspective is different from the cosmological model made by Physics
You need understand that civilizations are built by a specific interpretation of the world = culture. All human interpretation of the world must be wrong, with some few degree of rightness.But, human beings have the resource of self-cure, or self-correction. When an individual is under this process of social self-correction, his behavior will be not normal in relation to that “wrong” civilization, which causes stress. What we can do? The patient is the society, not the individual
No, it is not so simple like that. Only for yours sake: Physicists Find Evidence That The Universe Is A ‘Giant Brain’ – If you are interested, Google it. The fact that human brains are not an entire whole, or that is not shared into 3, 4, 19 parts is because this bi-lateral symmetry is a constant pattern of natural systems, from galaxies to biological systems.
“No, it doesn’t quite mean that the universe is ‘thinking’ – but as has been previously pointed out online, it might just mean there’s more similarity between the very small and the very large than first appearances suggest.”
And the piece of speculation you are basing your claim on is “might just mean”. Hardly concrete evidence
Yes, but it doesn’t quite mean that the universe is “not” thinking also. We don’t know. My personal investigation using anatomy comparative method already suggested that the first cell is an exactly copy of primordial galaxies – if astronomical bodies are under the process of life cycle formation. I have lots of evidences suggesting it is. And “if” the cell is a copy of galaxies, the brain must be a copy of Universes. There is nothing more reasonable: the creature is the face of the creator
This is a big opportunity for you being a famous and helpful professional for Humanity. I am suggesting a new approach for neuropsych area that nobody tried before. I can’t do it because I am researching thousands of other issues and I have no knowledge/resources you have about this field.
I disagree. That would be an opportunity for me to commit career suicide before I even start. I would prefer by continuing to study cognitive rehabilitation in post surgical epileptics and learn what I can from that experience.
Ohhh…sorry, I was forgetting to talk only the things that are safe for you being a good synchronized citizen of your “health” society. I have committed my career suicide, it is very painful, I ‘must not suggest to others doing it.There are centuries people are “studying” cognitive rehabilitation and it does not works yet, without forcing the cure with drugs. be a good professional following this mindset, it is about money.
What? I don’t understand your first comment. I can, however, say that cognitive rehabilitation is a very specific therapy that has not been around for centuries and is a valid form of therapy. We are looking at a specific implementation of cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive rehabilitation works based on the idea that the brain is plastic, which wasn’t known centuries ago.
I am not resumed to cognitive rehabilitation therapy, which deals with injured brains ( If I remember it right) but I am thinking the broad sense of cognitive remediation therapy which deals with traditional diseases like schizophrenia, ADHD, and major depressive disorder.
For yours sake: The US Department of Defense has declared that cognitive rehabilitation therapy is scientifically unproved. As a result, it refuses to cover the cost of cognitive rehabilitation for brain-injured veterans
It is enough paste the title at Google. It does not talks about two hemispheres, this issue is about Matrix/DNA Theory’s models. If you see the configuration of a bi-lateral pair of nucleotides you see two hemispheres. Remember that brains are evolutionary result from evolution of nucleotides. If you try to understand how was the state of the world that created nucleotides, you need a cosmological model. If you get the right one, you will understand each division and function in the brain.
The way to tell if a society is healthy or not is simple. Is society (objectively) growing or declining. If it’s growing it’s healthy. “naturally healthier” is a subjective judgement, requiring you to impose your personal values which are not necessarily valid in the society you are commenting on.
So, when the dinosaurs society were growing it was naturally healthier? ( Don’t tell me that fare tale about meteorites) Same for lions, wales, eagles… all of then going to extinction. No, growing in not indicative that nature is happy and will support a species. It can grow in wrong way. Besides that, who is growing now and well adapted to this environment will be sick and destroyed by the next environment due natural changes.
I disagree. That would be an opportunity for me to commit career suicide before I even start. I would prefer by continuing to study cognitive rehabilitation in post surgical epileptics and learn what I can from that experience.
Actually, you can study neurodevelopment in early organisms and in humans to understand how the brain developed over time, from the nerve ganglion in some flatworms to our brains. In order to understand the organization and function of the brain, you need to study the brain using various methods, including neuroimaging, nothing more.
Nothing more? In order to understand the organization and function of the brain we need to know about natural systems, a forgot area by modern mindset. Brains are the new evolutionary shape that came from atoms systems, astronomical systems, cells systems, early organisms systems, etc. Don’t do that and you never will know what a brain is about.
What? I don’t understand your first comment. I can, however, say that cognitive rehabilitation is a very specific therapy that has not been around for centuries and is a valid form of therapy. We are looking at a specific implementation of cognitive rehabilitation. Cognitive rehabilitation works based on the idea that the brain is plastic, which wasn’t known centuries ago.
I appreciate your wikipedia search for my sake, but I am well aware that of what cognitive rehabilitation is and in what ways it has been shown effective. We will be the first to test the effectiveness of cognitive therapy in epileptics. I am aware that the Dept. of Defense will not cover cognitive rehabilitation, but I’m unaware of what relevance any of this has. Our lab’s work is our lab’s work and you are welcome to read the paper when it is published. I’m not exactly sure what your point is.
What is my point? Cognitive therapy is actually fairly difficult and challenging due wrong approach due wrong interpretation of the brain due wrong interpretation of origins and meanings of brains. If we don’t know this Nature here and now we don’t know if the unusual behavior is illness of the individual or of the society.
I am grateful for you keeping this conversation because it is constructive for my job.But I understand why you never have thought outside the box.
Nature does not permit to systems that she creates to be eternally perfect closed operating system. It is because the very foundation of this material Universe: he is assented upon the expansionist light-wave triggered by the Big Bang.This light-wave produces fragments, photons, which go out from direction of the wave. Same way, the unique perfect closed system reached by matter had fragments of mass/energy going out of the systemic circuity. With time = there is whole corruption/mutation
try to stay consistent. You said their is no evidence for spontaneous life. In fact there is evidence and some of that is that 1 – RNA and lipids arise naturally and 2 – RNA and lipids together perform all the functions of life. Also you should be concerned about Prion’s. They arise naturally and can replicate themselves. That is more evidence that life can arise naturally.
No. The fact that RNA and lipids arise naturally is not proof for spontaneous life. They arise by the same process a new human baby arise inside the womb. Should we say our bodies arose spontaneously, by chance? What is missing for you is to see and understand the larger big picture, the state and shape of the world where the first RNA arose. If you try do it you could be more helpful for Humanity. Just now you remembered me that I need go back to study prions-diseases and Matrix/DNA models
You fail to understand both the conversation and the point you are trying to make. 1st, RNA and lipids arising naturally is not “proof” – only an idiot would say that. It is however evidence. RNA and lipids do not arise in nature through the same process as they arise in our body. For example, if you freeze a solution of amino acids, they will form RNA. Hint: your body does not freeze amino acid solutions to form RNA. There are other ways they form in nature as well.
I think I can understand your point because I know your world view, but, you can’t understand my point because you don’t know mine.The emergence of RNA at abiogenesis could be an evidence for spontaneous generation only if one does not know the informations inside atoms, molecules and aminoacids. Same way, the emergence of an embryo inside a womb being watched by a microbe living in that womb should be for him evidence of spontaneous generation. He does not know DNA. You don’t know Matrix
You do not understand my point because you do not know what you are talking about. You are using the terms completely wrong and nothing you are saying makes any sense. Its like you are saying the “rabbit ran fast unicorn eats soup” (WTF?). Additionally, your idea of a world view is nonsense, we live in the same world that follows the same rules of logic and evidence, this “world view” idea is simply a dishonest way to avoid your own ignorance.
You don’t know what you are talking about. Why a long post totally off the topic that initiated our debate? It is about yours beliefs in spontaneous generation of RNA and lipids. Let’s check yours evidences? First: why carbon atom was chosen for to be the basic atom for organic matter? Second: Why carbon choose to link to N and O for building aminoacids?
Ok, you are talking something that I don’t know and I need know it. I will search the paper/articles about freeze aminoacids making RNA, but if you could advance the best paper, I will be grateful.The Matrix/DNA models are suggesting that it is impossible inside a lab to built naturally those 20 aminoacidos and naturally they will compose as RNA. If it is possible, I must throw Matrix models into the garbage. But I want to see it
I am not worried with semantics, but about facts. So, *why is carbon so well suited as the basis for life?*. What is your explanation? It is not enough to say that carbon is able for several connections, etc. It does not works at other different planets. Why Earth is the right catalyst for carbon making the right compositions for life? Of course there is no self awareness involved, but why linking to N and O results into aminoacids fitted for biological systems?
“At the moment, since we have no idea how probable life is, it’s virtually impossible to assign any meaningful probabilities to any of the steps to life except the first two (monomers to polymers p=1.0, formation of catalytic polymers p=1.0). For the replicating polymers to hypercycle transition, the probability may well be 1.0 if Kauffman is right about catalytic closure and his phase transition models, but this requires real chemistry and more detailed modelling to confirm…”
The modern academic worldview have no idea how probable life is because this worldview is denying that every son must have a father with same genetic code. This worldview is suggesting that the first cell came with a genetic code built spontaneously at abiogenesis, but they do not show where and how this genetic code was in the state of the world during abiogenesis. Do you need to apply probability calculus for to know how a female womb is suitable for creating a new life?
Impossible question?! Are you talking about the question: “Which were the natural forces and elements that contributed for building the first biological system? Where were them? How and why those forces and elements converged to this planet surface at same time?”
These is the unique most rational questions we can do. And the method for finding the answers is: “Go looking them at the ancestral existing natural systems: atoms, galaxies, etc.” Yes I did it because I am not denying our ancestors.
Hummm…Yours argument is irrefutable. Really, it is impossible to avoid the basic materials for life – they are pervasive in the universe! Yours problem will begins when you take a little bit of those ingredients, mixing them for getting the right 20 aminoacidos, only the left handed molecules, and leaving them by themselves continuing the process towards the first cell system. Since they will not do that, you will go back, to the Universe – as the designer – for asking the same question.
Yes, but why the carbon structure easily forms long chain polymers for organic life? Why the oxygen or Nitrogen structures are not such suitable? I think academic establishment never did these questions, so, they have no explanations. I will advance the explanation from matrix/DNA models: carbon has number atomic 6, which is the exactly copy of Matrix natural formula for composing natural systems. Each particle is a tool performing a specific universal systemic function. And goes on…
The sun is going to dye because he is eating himself, Goo. The lesson of his existence, the big mistake of being supreme selfish, composing his own body as his own Paradise as a closed system, is spread to the external world in shape of light, a lesson for his offspring don’t do the same mistake.Creationists did not learned the lesson. They don’t love Humanity and Nature, they makes an alliance with a powerful god and lives their selfish life. Your light is our darkness. We’ll do different
Every time you have a question about Nature (the Universe is Nature) search the answer in nature.nature does not play dice with us. So, you will see that all elements and substances inside a cell system came from outside, through holes at the membrane.Now, try to make yours theoretical model about “where the Universe came from” based upon what you see. It is better than appeal to imaginations going far out away from Nature. That’s was the method used by Matrix/DNA models
I never said that. But…natural fractal patterns are in need of analyse from a different approach, other than Math. The universal pattern that Matrix/DNA models are suggesting seems a living thing that evolves, creates different appendices, changes time from micro to macro, etc. It is the universal formula that nature uses as template for organizing matter into systems. It is better seeing as a bi-lateral pair of nucleotide, the unit of information of DNA.
Technically, science is a product of your brain. and then if there were no organisms on the planet during the Big Bang, how did they come from nothing? Macro evolution also doesn’t make sense, in the terms that everyone came from a single cell that multiplied and already had the function to multiply if it was the first one
DarkHoundNero, our known data were rationally connected and the result is the Big Bang Theory. It requires that something came “through” “nothing” and not that something came from nothing. It means that the Universe is surrounded by a kind of membrane remembering nothing, with holes. And the first cell was not the first natural system able to self-replicate: our ancestors, galaxies and stars already does that.These theories are very pretty rationals under the light of what we see here and now.
Organism is the name that we call any natural biological organized system. Then you have the same question I had 40 years ago and since nobody had the answer, I went to Amazon jungle - the still living world that witnessed the origins of life – searching the answer. There the jungle sent me to ask to the sky, because at the sky was the answer. Then, I saw the Matrix/DNA in shape of astronomical system, working exactly as an ancestral organism. Maybe my answer is wrong, but it is interesting…
The Matrix/DNA does not have seen supernatural interference upon the long chain of causes and effects that began with the Big Bang and is coming to our days.But absence of evidence is not proof for non existence. I will not destroy yours faith and hope in the existence of a lovely God, but only I will debate the events and real facts of this world that my little brain can grasp
I am not well informed about LQG, which means I need to dedicate more time studying. But…theoretical Physics seems that are going away off the beam. I don’t appreciate the idea of existing ghosts black holes as theorized by Hawking, I think that it is result of deviation of Maths from the natural world due the excess of Maths and computer simulations. Matrix/DNA is suggesting that at galactic nucleus there are merely vortexes formed by dust of died stars
It’s reasonable that any natural system 75% bad mutations goes worse and the 1% good, by logics, never should get fixed. But the macro-evidences of this world, the analyses of whole Natural History, shows that the long natural chain of causation is not linear as wish our logics. The carriage makes a curve and so, there is an evolutionary movement from simple to complex that is curve also.Have you heard about white light and dark light? It does that a system must became worst for becoming better
My definition of “life” is: “The shape of the universal natural system that began simplest as a vortex at the Big Bang, but containing all seven brutes natural forces that became the seven life’s properties. This shape correspond to our shape as “fetus” when our body is changing shapes due the action of vital cycle process. So, this Universe is a genetic reproduction process of something ex-machine, performed by steps known as Evolution, but, which, really, is the Universe under a vital cycle
If my definition will be proved the right one, life is not merely “energy”. Energy is merely a natural state got by accelerated mass and mass is the state of low energy. Both, mass and energy are not essence DE per SE, but derivations of a deepest essence: information. Informations are those quantum vortexes that appeared at Big Bang working like genes and composing quarks, leptons, etc.Reproduction of Universes…or Gods? I don’t know.
Every material body that still belongs to any natural system is light sensitive. All matter is supported by an ocean of light that produces wavelengths with different intensities of vibrations.All seven vibrations are shapes of a single vital cycle process. So, the shape of “green”color always are sensitive to “yellow” and “blue” colors due the same cause that a baby is the shape that links to embryo and child. There is symbiosis among material bodies
When a kid lose his parents and becomes homeless, his inner tendency forgets parents and turn on as hate against the hell in the streets and the world, becoming a criminal. But, if the kid is kept by relatives and grows on the same land, he keeps the memory of parents, like Uudam did, and the missing parents’ love becomes great potential tendency in some kind of arts. Usually he does nothing in relation to the whole Humanity, this species abandoned here without spiritual protectors parents. But.