Archive for the ‘Desconstrução da Matrix-Cultura Virtual’ Category

Gravitação e a Discordancia da Matrix/DNA no Youtube

terça-feira, março 7th, 2017

xxxx

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da4W30vOWpI

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli – Mar-03/07/2017

My friend, since you says “the idea of how we think of mass and energy is flawed”, and you are a student, I can bet on you. I found a new and different world view applying different methods like comparative anatomy among non-living and living natural systems for understanding the formation of Amazon biosphere. The final results is a totally different history than this academic world view built by the methods of Physics and Math. So, my suggestion to you: do not permit to be indoctrinated, think and try out of the box. I am not saying that my world view is the most correct, only that it shows there are others rational alternatives. My models are suggesting that there is a link between cosmological and biological evolution. So, the first living cell is merely evolution from atoms and astronomic systems. There is a universal formula ( see it at my website) inside all natural systems, so, DNA – the universal formula of living things – is evolution of this formula that also built atoms and galaxies. I call it Matrix/DNA. I found the beginning of this formula at the Big Bang, in shape of light waves ( see the electromagnetic spectrum with the formula at my website). But my interpretation is that light has no energy, neither mass, but a force, like our thoughts, mind, has a force that moves our bodies. When the wave of light propagates into spacetime is same thing when your own body is born and propagates into space time, growing. Advancing into dark matter ( or other name for space’s substance) light produces or creates friction and this friction is energy. When a light wave is established it separates portions of dark-matter plus energy which will be parts of a working natural system – the first atom and from here, galaxies, cells systems, etc. Then, every natural system like our own bodies has this internal field of energy which produces the electromagnetic field. And this field is responsible by the effects that they are calling “gravity”. Never the big force produced by astronomic bodies could making any effect on small things like apples or papers. And if there is curved spacetime, it is not between a tree and the floor… think about it… Keep opened mind and you can correct the bad ways that are deriving our Science into fantasies, like multiverse, black holes, vacuum vibration,etc. Cheers…

Occam’s Razor: Melhor Argumento para Defender a Simplicidade da Matrix/DNA Theory

segunda-feira, dezembro 12th, 2016

xxxx

A Matrix/DNA Theory esta’ se tornando a Teoria do Tudo. Tudo o que existe conhecido por nos no mundo perceptível aos nossos cinco sentidos ( e aos instrumentos de pesquisa que sao extensoes destes sentidos) esta tendo sua historia total explicada – desde o momento presente ate sua forma no Big Bang. Mas ela comecou por um método muito simples – anatomia comparada – cujos resultados sugeriram que os fenômenos do macro e microcosmos sao sempre explicados por fenômenos existentes e conhecidos aqui e agora. Em outras palavras, o Universo perceptível se compoe de três fractais: um no tamanho macro, outro no tamanho médio e outro no tamanho microscópico. Os quais ainda podem serem classificados pela evolução: um do passado remoto, um do passado recente e outro do presente. Um exemplo foi citado num dos últimos artigos escritos aqui: os 13,8 bilhoes de anos que o Universo demorou para fazer-se expressar a consciência corresponde aos 7 meses que a embriogênese de um humano demora para fazer-se expressar no embrião a consciência. Todos os passos dados na elaboracao da teoria foram respaldados por algum fenômeno conhecido e ocorrendo aqui e agora.

Isto torna a cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA, a mais simples elaborada pela humanidade. Qualquer crianca com um bom conhecimento geral poderia te-la elaborado. E e’ sobre esta simplicidade que esta sendo tao criticada pelos academicos amantes de teorias super-complexas que se aplica o tema do Occam’s Razor. Sempre que for criticado devo lembrar este argumento. Portanto, uma pesquisa sobre ele:

( Outro bom argumento veio de Einstein: ” Um autor não tem que provar sua teoria, apenas mostrar que ela faz sentido”. E nenhuma teoria faz mais sentido que aquela que respalda cada uma de suas proposições com parâmetros de fatos reais comprovados).

xxxx

Occam’s Razor says the simplest explanation is often, if not usually, correct. ( comentario lido num post)

Pesquisa sobre Occam’s Razor:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam’s_razor

  • The principle can be interpreted as stating:  Among competing hypotheses, the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected.
  • In the scientific method, Occam’s razor is not considered an irrefutable principle of logic or a scientific result; the preference for simplicity in the scientific method is based on the falsifiability criterion. For each accepted explanation of a phenomenon, there may be an extremely large, perhaps even incomprehensible, number of possible and more complex alternatives, because one can always burden failing explanations with ad hoc hypotheses to prevent them from being falsified; therefore, simpler theories are preferable to more complex ones because they are more testable.

 

 

A Falacia Cultural da Sustentabilidade, pelo Professor Felício e pela Matrix/DNA

quinta-feira, novembro 24th, 2016

xxxx

Prof. Dr. RICARDO AUGUSTO FELÍCIO: “Rebatendo a Ideologia da SUSTENTABILIDADE e da ECONOMIA VERDE.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFoGZpcBeg8

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli – 11/24/2016

Grande, louvável e oportuna função humanista estas exercendo, professor. Grato simplesmente pela sua existência aqui e agora. Não que eu concorde com vários detalhes da sua visão do mundo, nem com as algumas de suas soluções sugeridas para estes detalhes, mas sim por se manter como uma rara antena da especie acordada como auto-critica.

Faltou a ti iniciar a palestra expondo a raiz primeira causacional que motiva esta cultura a escolher seus caminhos. Faltou expor e lembrar – embasado na Ciência – a causa da existência da mentalidade por traz desta cultura, a raiz que leva o humano impessoal a entender todo o resto dos detalhes que apresentas. Esta causa e’ a raiz psicológica dos humanos, desenvolvida a partir dos nossos criadores, os nossos ancestrais animais, sendo a psicologia humana a atual forma dos instintos animais, os quais criaram todos os sistemas sociais produzidos ate hoje, seja o feudalismo, o capitalismo, o comunismo, etc.

A pequena maioria de humanos que compreende o grupo dos aristocratas, burocratas, dos países mais desenvolvidos, criam e geram o sistema social baseado nas origens do seu psicológico, por isso, este sistema global imita exatamente as regras das selvas geradas pelas especies de animais. Se na selva temos os grandes predadores, os médios predadores, e as presas, nos sistemas sociais humanos ( todos eles) temos a classe alta ( destes aristocratas globais), a classe media e a classe dos pobres. Então, da mesma forma que os leões ficam preguiçosamente a sombra de arvores espraiando no alto da colina e observando la’ embaixo as ovelhas trabalhando de sol a sol transformando grama em carne suculenta para eles descerem e fazerem a colheita, assim os aristocratas humanos ficam em reuniões sob ar condicionado tramando como manter o povo trabalhando de maneira que lhe ofereça uma colheita mais lucrativa.

A culpa deste absurdo existencial não e’ dos grandes predadores apenas, e sim das três classes, por manterem e resistirem ao exorcismo destes instintos de seus cérebros e buscarem uma nova forma psicológica transcendente, digna de humanos e não para animais. O que estas fazendo e’ chamar a atenção para esta cultura gerada e alimentada nos 10 ou 15 mil anos da cultura transmitida por aqueles leões da colina que podem pensa-la e tramar suas artimanhas para manter seu status quo. Estas a mostrar como ela e’ falsa, como ela interpreta o mundo real de manira totalmente desvirtuada para atender seus interesses de grande predador.

O que estas a fazer e’ uma tentativa de des-construção cultural. O problema e’ que os predadores não querem mudar e vão combate-lo na sua ferocidade mandibular, enquanto as ovelhas humanas também nem sequer vão ouvi-lo porque a sua raiz psicológica vem de uma historia onde as ovelhas não podem se defenderem de leões e esta raiz foi mantida astuciosamente nestas formas de manipulação mental principalmente com a invenção das religiões, pois na condição de humanos, se as ovelhas quisessem, poderiam enfrentar e expulsar os grandes e médios predadores. Começando pelos boicotes em todo tipo de relacionamentos e trocas econômicas. Existe uma outra iniciativa em busca desta desconstrução cultural que esta a publicar diariamente as falacias da cultura e reinterpretando os fenômenos e eventos do mundo real, no website ” A Matriz Universal dos Sistemas Naturais”. Seria bom dares uma olhada ali.

Outro “cientista” neomarxista….não houve um…. um climatologista respeitável em todo mundo que escrevesse uma linha sobre a “ciência” do Prof. Felício….
Louis Charles MorelliLouis Charles Morelli1 second ago

Não adianta tentar desviar-nos a atenção do tema real usando palavras abstratas que nada significam em nosso dicionario, como ” neomarxista”, capitalista, comunista, etc. Isto são criacoes verborreicas desta cultura predatória milenar e sobre nos não produz mais qualquer efeito. Atenha-se a criticar os fatos reais apontados no video trazendo seus fatos reais. Você demonstra aqui sua tendencia animalescamente instintiva a predador e reage de acordo ignorando que o palestrante mencionou no inicio que ele apresentaria o tema sob a ótica contraria a sua, do ponto de vista dos pobres-presas. Deves ser mais um coxinha, mas aqui ‘e area dos intelectos buscando o exorcismo dos instintos animais de nossos cérebros, portanto aqui não cabem intelectos tendendo a serem nem coxinhas nem mortadelas. Boa, Fagner, continue vigilante e ativo.
Colocar qualquer questionamento com embasamento filosófico como Marxista é ignorância ou inocência demais. Não existe a ciência de fulano ou de ciclano, a ciência é fundamentada através de metodologia, e questionar faz parte, o ceticismo do professor é válido e é saudável no âmbito acadêmico. Refutando o seu argumento só no ano de 2008, cerca de 650 cientistas retiraram o seus respectivos nomes do relatório do IPCC (painel que faz as previsões climáticas.)

A causa inconfessável dos homens gordos estarem frequentando academia de malhacao

segunda-feira, setembro 12th, 2016

xxxx  

Men’s Hidden Body Fat Fears Fueling Gym Attendance

NEUROSCIENCE NEWS  – 

http://neurosciencenews.com/men-gym-fat-fear-5008/

And the Matrix/DNA opinion:

Closed systems does not grows in quality and complexity, only in size and weight, here is the first cause of humans obesity.

As we were suspecting, obesity has its deeper cause in human’s psychology. It is a field for Psychology, not other kind of Medicine. But also, it does not work for Psychology trying to change the bad behaviors of obeses. It does not work: diets, gym exercises, etc. It is a psychology problem, but is deeper than we were thinking.

Almost everything is wrong with modern human life, and obesity is one effect. A natural system becomes obese when its tendency is more towards closed system than opened system. And the main operator of humans as closed system is the selfish gene. We inherited this gene from our non-biological ancestor, the most extremely closed systems that exists, the Milk Way.

So, the obesity phenomena is something that goes deeper into de meaning of our nature and existence. To avoid it, would be necessary an effort to re-hard-wiring their brains. And this is possible only when the modern world view – totally wrong – is replaced by a more realistic world view. One more things to say:

1) When a society is going in the wrong way, don’t worry about their pressures, because are pressures leading to bad ways;
2) The meaning of humans existence is to be half-conscious-gene building the great embryo of universal consciousness. But as this whole biosphere, we are the sons of this galaxy, which is the most perfect machine, so, this genetic tendency try to reproduce the creator here, The whole biosphere becoming a half-mechanical/half-biological machine, where humans will be merely another mechanic piece. This tendency will lead us to the happy but stupid humans of the Brave New World, ruled by the Big Brother. It is our free-will to choose if we will follow this immediate genetic inheritance or if we will be accessible to information coming from a most deeper inheritance, the cosmic one, which is trying to make us like its genes.
3) The modern tendency for robotization of human beings lead us to leave the things about the body while discarding the things about the essentia of consciousness. One thing is increasing physical consumerism and due the selfish gene leading to be a closed system – from which mass and energy can not escape – the body becomes more and more fat.
4) Those that understood this new world view can eat the same amount of food, and never becomes fat. That’s because they give more importance to the mind, which turns them to be opened system and all times very busy doing things that discards obesity.

Reproducao da Galaxia na Terra Visa Trocar Especie Humana Por Inteligencia Artificial

sábado, setembro 3rd, 2016

xxxx

Nunca tinha pensado nisto antes. Ate agora pensei que a reprodução do sistema fechado celeste se completara com a especie humana desalojada da auto-consciência e totalmente robotizada para ser apenas mais uma peça na maquina biológica. Mas o artigo com link abaixo de repente me fez ver outra possibilidade, e agora me parece mais logica.

http://singularityhub.com/2016/08/08/what-if-intelligent-machines-could-learn-from-each-other/?utm_content=buffer1ee28&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer

What If Intelligent Machines Could Learn From Each Other?

Novo Debate Entre Criacionistas e Ateus Sobre o Mistério das Existências e a Sugestão da Matrix/DNA

quarta-feira, julho 6th, 2016

xxxx

It takes a fool to deny the obvious

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/26/it-takes-a-fool-to-deny-the-obvious/#comment-845574

And my comment published at the Myers’ article:

The Matrix/DNA
July 6, 2016 – Amazon Jungle

Creationists and atheists world views are both “magical thinking” due a fundamental mistake: they are forgetting the naturalist systemic perspective. Any living thing is a system, a systemic biological organization of matter and energy. And systems can only coming from other system. Nobody had discovered a system coming from a part or piece of a system, neither from something not belonging to a system.
So, the first amino-acids were systems in itself, made by atoms systems and this astronomical system. Since that atoms system are too much simple, and galactic systems are lots more complex, the logic’s suggests that amino-acids were a production of astronomic nanotechnology, like human genome, chromosomes,ovules, are products of human natural nanotechnology.

Following this line of logic’s we got a new world view called Matrix/DNA where a new theoretical astronomical and atomic model fits just as the ancestors of the first living cell.

Now the problem would be:but the first system, be it an atom or an elemental particle composed by other smaller particles as a system, where it came from?

We found that all these natural systems were made by a unique natural formula. Then, we found that any universal set of radiation performing a light wave has the same formula for systems. Conclusion? The forst natural system in this Universe and perceptible dimension was a light wave.

Where the light wave came from? No other simplest thing in this Universe was detected as ” the light wave producer”. Our method of rationalization is suggesting that the first natural light wave worked as the genome of some ex-machine entity. If so, this Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the systemic thing that produced it. Is is God? If you want call it by that name, remember that it is not magical, it does things by natural process. Is is a big absolute chance? If you want call it by tat name, remember that it is a phenomena that is being reproduced exactly like it happened once, so, when this process arrive to an end, it will not be the absolute chance, because it would be an event that has been repeated.

What matters here is the final moral concept from this world view: we are 8 billion genes plus trillion of genes spread in this Universe building a kind of baby. So, each of us – as gene – has a unique, specific, not mimicked, not able to be stolen – information. It is our mission and we are not conscious about that. If one of us dies not do his/her job, the baby will born handicapped. So, let yours brother free for doing its mission. If creationism, atheism or Matrixism are wrong interpretations of this world, our inner mission will correct our wrong beliefs. And we got correction every time that we learn something new about the Universal Nature. That’s why I made the Amazon jungle my second house: there are plenty of natural phenomena for learning there.

 

Natural ou Cultural: De onde vêm nossas aptidões e comportamentos?

sábado, junho 18th, 2016

xxxx

Um artigo com link abaixo toca numa importante questão existencial humana. Porem mais uma vez vemos que os investigadores científicos se espraiam nas superfícies dos fenômenos naturais, teimando em resistir a não entrar mais fundo para entender as raízes destes fenômenos, como estamos fazendo na Teoria da Matrix/DNA. Portanto, tambem não pude resistir a postar um comentário no artigo, o qual vai transcrito abaixo. Claro que a amplitude da minha abordagem causa desconforto aos superficiais, cuja reação e’ a de ignorar o básico pois isto mantem a ilusão do conhecimento.

O tema e’ importante como se pode ver pela questão inicial que ele propõe:

“um dos campos mais debatidos atualmente (em meio científico) e’  o problema do Natural versus Cultural, ou seja, o que o ser humano aprende, ou decorre do meio, versus o que é biológico, ou genético.”

Natural ou Cultural: De onde vêm nossas aptidões e comportamentos?

http://www.universoracionalista.org/natural-ou-cultural/

E o meu comentário enviado ( aguardando moderação):

Esta questão está resolvida pela Matrix/DNA World View, mas as duas visões misticas – deísta e materialista – impedem-nos de entender a solução. O primeiro DNA formado na Terra já veio com necessidades, tendencias ou instintos. Então onde e como começaram estes fenômenos naturais? Nos bilhões de anos de moléculas simples evoluindo na abiogênese? O racional e’ procurar na matéria do estado físico e anatômico do mundo dito não-vivo que criou estas moléculas, onde estavam os cepos primitivos que evoluiram para estas propriedades. Então encontramos lá, as sete forças naturais, e divididas em dois grupos, as negativas e as positivas. Por exemplo, a força centrifuga da expansão de uma onda de luz em meio a substancia espacial (dark matter) evoluiu hoje no humano na tendencia a obesidade, a necessidade extrema da gula, a ambição, a extroversao, etc. Ela fez as moléculas crescerem ate tornarem-se proteínas. A sua simétrica oposta, centrípeta de compressão, produziu no humano a introspecção, a timidez, etc. Todos os detalhes da carga genética e da cultura podem ser vistos nas suas raízes nascendo junto com o nascimento desta natureza universal. E sem conhecer isto nunca se entendera o que são.

E as características superiores de estados mentais como as emoções, sentimentos, que emergiram com os humanos? Ora a resposta esta debaixo de nossos narizes: um feto humano apenas emerge a consciência aos 6 ou 8 meses quando o cérebro esta formado para manifesta-la. Isto significa que a propriedade da consciência esteve presente como latência potencial durante 13,7 bilhões de anos esperando a evolução formar um cérebro com cortex cerebral. Como ela ja estava em potencial no DNA do feto desde o instante da fecundação.

Estas forcas estavam e formavam este sistema astronomico que evoluiu para sistema biológico, elas modelaram a carga genética que perpassou todas as especies biológicas. Mas quando não paramos ai,  nos aprofundamos mais no passado, vemos estas  forcas modelando os sistemas atômicos ( as forças nucelar fraca e forte, as forças moveis eletrônicas ou periféricas, etc.). E descendo ainda mais vemo-las compondo os vortices quânticos que pipocavam no limiar do Big Bang. E estes vortices surgiam pela resistência da dark matter ‘a expansão das ondas de luz deflagradas com o Big Bang. Um mero olhar de um onda e vê-se as sete forças ali, vindas do antes e alem do Big Bang.

Nos somos filhos diretos de uma maquina, a mais perfeita possível para a Natureza, tanto que ela e’ descrita pela mecânica Newtoniana. Esta maquina-sistema natural foi descoberta, temos sua completa anatomia e significados. O pensamento cientifico moderno ainda não atinou para soluções a questões deste tipo porque tornou-se to mistico quanto uma religião: separam a evolução cosmológica ( do Big Bang passando pelos sistemas atômicos e chegando nos astronômicos) da evolução biológica ( primeiros aminoacidos ao primata ancestral do homem). Separam a História Natural Universal em dois blocos sem nenhum elo evolutivo entre os dois, produzindo-se um vácuo no meio o qual tem que ser preenchido com o apelo ao milagre… a Vida teria surgido por acaso e não que  Universo, desde antes de sua origem estava tunelado como a placenta para produzir a Vida. Voces nunca vão entender de fato  carga genética e a cultura enquanto não se livrarem equivoco infantil. Este assunto levantado pelo Universo Racionalista daria um bom debate conosco da Matrix/DNA, desde que haja de fato a vontade de aprender a realidade e não aderir ‘a moda do pensamento dominante numa época temporária.

xxxx

E estendendo o assunto….

Não vamos saber oque somos enquanto o pensamento cientifico insistir neste erro crasso de nos separar da nossa real Natureza ( o que a Teoria da Matrix/DNA já compreendeu e resolveu). Os comportamentos instintivos são herdados dos primatas que foram herdados de metabolismos primitivos da primeira célula viva que foram herdados das forças naturais deste sistema natural que nos criou e dentro do qual existimos: este sistema astronomico. E estas forças de sistema vieram dos primeiros instantes do Universo, constando das 7  forças básicas que compõem uma completa onda de luz emitida como um vortex espiral.

Quanto ao comportamento desenvolvido pela experiencia humana – denominado cultural – e~o resultado da competição entre dominância e recessividade entre o geneticamente herdado da natureza bruta mais a agregação da entidade do sistema universal, o qual esta produzindo através dos nossos cérebros isto que denominamos :auto-consciência.

A nossa herança genética vem de um sistema fechado em si mesmo que funciona como uma maquina perfeita, tanto que e’ descrito pela mecânica, e Newtoniana. Em contraposição ao estado de sistema aberto em que os sistemas biológicos se tornaram, essa herança nos passou o gene egoísta e podemos ver na sua anatomia o fenômeno da existência de predadores e presas, protagonizado pelas suas partes internas. Os sistemas sociais de abelhas, formigas, imitam exatamente a configuração do sistema astronomico, e os humanos tem a liberdade de escolher entre os desígnios da materia bruta ou os designios da entidade consciente universal, que e’ tornar nossos cerebros o melhor equipamento e placenta para gestar este feto de conscienvia que carregamos, e dos quais somos como que genes

Na Fronteira Entre Escravos e Escravistas, Acomodam-se Confortavelmente os “Especialistas”

domingo, maio 8th, 2016
xxxx
Um comentário de um leitor num artigo com o link abaixo, e’ uma obra-prima expressando em palavras o que eu sinto mas não conseguiria dizer tao bem. Por isso copio e registro o comentário aqui. Mas antes de lê-lo, lembre-se do seguinte. Existe hoje uns 7 bilhões de humanos insatisfeitos com a vida, e um grande parte deles sendo realmente torturados, carregando a vida como fardo peso. Isto significa que o sistema social inteiro esta todo errado. Contra números e fatos não existem argumentos teóricos, rebuscados, opiniões individuais. E se o sistema esta todo errado, e’ porque os humanos não se desenvolveram intelectualmente o necessário para ter conhecimento de como fazer um sistema social certo em que não haja os 7 bilhões de insatisfeitos. Se não existe o conhecimento certo, não existe especialistas em coisa alguma. Ou seja, se existisse, ele seria expulso do sistema errado que ai esta. Se se dizem especialistas, o são para sistemas errados.
xxxx
Claro, existem as exceções. Existem por exemplo os especialistas numa area da medicina que realmente trabalharam e continuaram a estudar porque realmente gostam do trabalho mais do que gostam das luxurias e por isso não são avaros por receberem mais pelo seu trabalho do que pagam os outros por seus trabalhos que eles não querem fazer.  Mas nem estes são especialistas no sentido que conhecem a “medicina”, pois esta medicina que ai esta esta ainda toda errada. A medicina correta quando a humanidade de fato conhece-la, sera aquela preventiva que não permite o afloramento de doenças, e não esta que so’ sabe atuar depois da doença aparecer.
xxxx
Estes indivíduos ocupam principalmente os cargos públicos e os altos salários das companhias.  Quanto aos governos sabemos que fazem errado simplesmente pelo fato daquela maioria citada sendo torturada. Quanto as companhias, sabemos que existem e operam apenas porque o sistema ainda imita a nossa herança genética recebida dos animais e assim se baseia na competição entre grandes predadores ( ou grandes escravagistas), médios predadores ( classe media ou capatazes, onde se acomodam os especialistas), e as prezas. Tudo errado. Portanto, sempre quando vejo artigos, entrevistas, auto-propaganda, ou quando vou verificar algo com um funcionário publico, como os juízes, por exemplo, analiso com muito cuidado o que dizem de um lado, de outro trago a mente o quadro real da carnificina acontecendo la’ fora na rua, e sempre encontro falhas nos seus “especialismos” as quais me levam a contra-argumentar. Mas quando você retruca a um especialista, o que acontece? Vamos ver o elucidativo comentário do sábio leitor abaixo:
 xxxx

According to the ‘experts’, any ‘reaction’ which fails to recognize their expertise and therefore threatens the highly regarded, man-made paper and plastic (bureaucratic and political) status quo is an over-reaction. This over-reaction must be guarded against, constantly. One of the routine means of stopping over-reaction is of course, censorship of the public and their various attempts at outcry.

Experts are very dependent upon your agreement with (complete submission to) them, to maintain their comfortable (and comforting) salaries and their authoritative positions in the various departments of knowledge at the various centralized think tanks. So that when they actually do work, do something physical and basic, it is only for their OWN pleasure and health, NOT FOR YOURS, and not part of an ongoing intense and exhausting soul killing struggle for bare bones survival, as is the case with the rest of us.

There is, at present, a very sharp dividing line between slaves and slave keepers and it is called ‘expertise’.

Now, ‘Shhhhhhhh’! Don’t say anything more about this and continue to rely upon and place your agreements with these ‘experts’. Put your life in their hands, so that they can continue to live and prosper. Read their many monographs and spiels and speeches, always submit to their superior knowledge and superior training, buy their many books and publications and don’t ever over-react!

Oh, and yes: GET BACK TO WORK, NOW.

OR YOU WILL BE FIRED.

The Controversy about the Making of an Ideal Society

segunda-feira, maio 2nd, 2016

xxxx

( Titulo em Portugues: Buscando o Melhor Sistema Social: Diferenças de visões entre MatrixLight/DNA e Modernos Acadêmicos )

This article was here copied ( in black) because I saw that I can not agree with lots of things and must analise each phrase inserting the MatrixLight/DNA criticism ( blue letters).

http://blog.ictp.it/wp/?p=112

Economics And The Making of A Perfect Society

by Matteo Marsili

CC 2.0 NIH/NIAIDWe humans are the only species that makes the rules by which we interact. Animals don’t. They are subject to the law of the jungle,…

I don’t agree. All types of societies created till now mimics the rules of te jungle, where there are big predators ( the high class), medium predators (middle class) and preys ( the real producers and really vampirized by the other two class). Which humans makes the law? The most numerous class of humans, the poor, be it in feudalism, capitalism or communism, never made any laws.

 

while we make laws that govern our behavior and design institutions with “laws of motion.”

So, in the same way as we can build airplanes and make them as efficient as possible, why can’t we also build efficient societies? Each of us has a different idea of what efficient means here, but there are minimal requirements we should all agree with. For example, a society should make collective decisions that are not self-contradictory and that cannot be manipulated by introducing irrelevant alternatives.

Sadly, there is no recipe for organizing a society in such a way as to achieve even these minimal requirements.

Yes there is one; a step forward the formula applied by Nature for creating working natural systems. It is known and called MatrixLight/DNA formula,which is the program template behind every natural system, from atoms to galaxies to human brains. The problem is that nature has applied only two states of that formula, one for ordered state which is the closed system aspect and the other is opened system for chaotic states, like Earth biosphere. Ants and bees societies have mimicked the mechanistic ordered closed system, while human beings are applying the dispersive opened system but with tendency to becomes a closed system also if will prevail the big predators. Dinosaurs ( and all big predators,like lions, wales, eagles, etc. went this suicide way). The ideal state of the formula should be “self-oriented evolution synchronized with universal ( cosmological plus biological) evolution”.

The problem has no solution besides dictatorship. This is a theorem that Kenneth Arrow, the Albert Einstein of economics, proved in the fifties.

What?! The unconditional rule of big predators with no resistance? This is a consciousness-evolution stopper, which is the force acting naturally just here and now. Nature never tolerated it before, so it will not permit long life to any system built against its tendency. The ants and bees societies did it, that’s why they are in a dead end.

 

Amartya Sen, another economist, argues that this is actually not a bad result. All it says is that individual opinion and interests are not enough to organize a society. You need discussion and a process by which people’s view converge on the common good. That’s democracy.

The Greeks might have known this, because in times when they had no time to discuss, they used to turn to dictatorship.

That’s why the ancient Greek civilization is extincted. Dictatorship is an aberration, it still works as the rule of the jungle in chaotic state, but it will be destroyed.

If we can’t design a perfect society, maybe we can aim at understanding the ones we have. In principle, a society is a collection of many interacting individuals, so this looks like the problem of deriving the laws of a collection of many interacting particles, like a gas in physics. If particles are subject to forces, individuals are subject to economic incentives: they will do what makes them better off. There has been a great effort by mathematical economists to derive economic laws from profit seeking behavior of individuals.

Another big mistake. Particles in gaz does no create any working system and less tan it, any system that could evolve towards its transcendence. As the History of the Universe shows to us, any new system emerges from the death of a prior system. Initially there is chaotic state due extreme chocking competition and selfishness of all elements. The chaos leads all elements to suffering and slow down the motion, which will downing the temperature, the conflicts are changed by touching, cooperation grows, a new system is established. The search for profit encours into extreme competition, conflicts, and never goes towards the transcendence of the social system, which could avoid new extermination. Changing competition by cooperation is a matter of changing the moral code and this is a matter of a better world view. Yours suggestion is doing a bad service here.

Remarkably, this has shown that, in an ideal world where every wishable thing can be traded, letting competitive markets run free is enough to bring the society to an optimum.

Competitive market running free? But,… you should search for competitive humans running free. And it means ” initial equal conditions”, before the competition stars. You know… 90 % of the world population had no initial resources, they were homeless, never were free. The initial owner of the whole territory are the lions, sharks, eagles. This was the beginning of capitalism. Communism has long gone? Of course, the communist lions were much less strong in the competition with the traditional capitalist lions. Remember that communism was gone due a could war, it means, a war inside the same species. 

What a strong argument in the cold war era, when the ideals of free markets (capitalism) were clashing with those of centrally planned (communist) economies! Communism has long gone, but we also realized that our world is far from those ideal conditions where free markets are enough to make things work. On top of that, behavioral economists and neuro-economists have shown that individuals do not just care about their own interests, and sometimes behave irrationally. In spite of a few financial crises after the fall of the Berlin wall, much of our political economics (the “laws of motion” of our societies) are still based on the free-markets capitalist ideology.

Capitalism is similar to economic Darwinism: competition in free markets selects the fittest firms, those producing most efficiently what consumers demand. Yet, as Darwinian evolution has produced strange creatures like dinosaurs, our “free markets” have produced “too-big-to-fail” banks.

The problem is that Darwinian Theory does not describes the ideal natural process of evolution, in universal terms. It is merely a non complete description of micro-cycles evolution, like the biological evolution in state of chaos. Then, the selected fittest of Earth’s life evolution never had long life, all them goes to extinction, like all civilizations and emperors created till now as extension of the animals’ jungle rules.  Darwin and still the Modern Synthesis have seen only three evolutionary variables, but, for ideal systems there are seven variables, most coming from the organization of thermodynamic systems. While our moral code and world view is driven by Darwinian evolution we never will grasp the real ideal universal process of evolution for crating the best social system. 

These, like black holes, are distorting economies’ space-time around them, absorbing all they come in contact with, scaring the world’s economy with threats of systemic failures.

CC The TaxHaven, AP Photo/Richard DrewWe don’t fly people on airplanes if we’re not sure how those airplanes work. Yet we fly the whole world’s economy on financial markets that are designed by us, with rules that we write. But we don’t understand how they work. Isn’t it a paradox?

Not for me. The MatrixLight/DNA formula for natural systems explains the apparent paradox. One thing is… a system opened to its own evolution for not being destroyed by natural forces never can leaving the flow of energy/information, beyond the point where begins the entropic process. Biological life is here today due obeying this rule with chirality, not absorbing molecules spinning right where entropy leaves. So, when a social element gets more material resources than it needs for surviving in acceptable conditions, instead going spinning entropically, it should to deviate the resources for expanding the system into the external world. We do it when investing in space exploration. The problem is that most human beings keeps the exceedingly resource because they want own paradises… the entropic realm.

It’s a very expensive paradox, given the cost of the last financial crisis. It’s not clear whether we can afford the cost of leaving economics as a pseudo-science. We have made tremendous advances in understanding how collective phenomena emerge from interactions between individuals. That’s Statistical Mechanics, a science whose founding father himself thought of as being naturally suited to understand our societies. We have a great deal of data, and can test hypotheses and falsify theories, which is what science is about.

Nope. Human sciences has not understanding how the ” ideal” collective phenomena emerges and Statistical Mechanics does not applies because there is no natural mechanistic system, all them are living systems. Till the stellar and galactic systems – which are the building blocks of the Universe mechanical skeleton – are born as living things, they grow, gets maturation, are attacked by entropy and dies. There is no long living or eternal mechanistic motions inside natural systems. But, you have facing yours eyes a process of nature making an idea working system: the familiar human system. A complete and working familiar system must have seven elements, one of each performing a systemic function: the baby for keeping the perpetuation, the child for keeping the growing, etc. But, a familiar ideal system has its seven elements as the right shapes of a human body under the process of life’s cycle. Divide yours lifetime by seven meaning shapes and you have a (hermaphroditic,in natural sense) the template for all natural systems. It is about life motions and not mechanics motions. Socal economic system should mimics the familiar economy system.

We cannot make experiments on real societies. Yet there are “economies” of different species of bacteria “trading” nutrients — the microbiomes in our guts, or on our skin or teeth. Bacteria choose, play games, consume and work to produce goods for others. They also have a social life. Microbial communities are a hot topic, because the equilibrium of their “economies” is intimately related to our health. Yet, they could also teach us a lot about economics and provide the experimental test bed for the theories of economic equilibria. This, I believe, is a very exciting research direction, which is why ICTP plans to have a workshop on the economics of microbial communities in 2017.

I know a little bit about bacterial societies but I can advancing that is no good idea mimicking their behaviors ans systems. Bacteria does not search their evolution, they are exterminated when the host body dies. We, humans, are in need of a model that leads us to survive the death of our actual environment and leads us towards our transcendence. 

Today, as never before, we have the tools to advance our understanding of our economies. The making of a perfect society may remain a utopic dream, but at least we can make economics a science that can better inform our globalized society on the choices it faces.

Thanks for the opportunity for testing the MatrixLight/DNA against the mainstream mindset.

Blog_MarsiliMatteo Marsili is the co-head of ICTP’s Quantitative Life Sciences Section.

Desconstrução da Cultura Predatória Matricial de 10.000 anos: O Aliado NewsInsideOut.com

quarta-feira, abril 20th, 2016

xxxxx

https://newsinsideout.com

Launched in December, 2014, NewsInsideOut.com has begun its mission to expose a media-built matrix of fabrications being promoted against the public interest.

Backed by a cooperative of Truth journalists citing contractual rights to mainstream access, NewsInsideOut.com offers investigative reporting, news and opinions turning the matrix of manufactured consensual reality inside out. Reports from the site deconstruct memes (evolutionary principles in the spread of ideas and cultural phenomena) whose ongoing production was identified as a de facto mission of the current mainstream.

NewsInsideOut.com  represents a deliberate attempt to ensure that news from Truth movement journalists such as Jon Kelly and Alfred Lambremont Webre reaches a wider public arena in the mainstream media. Both Kelly and Webre have defined current YouTube, Facebook, and website presences known throughout the awakened communities. The NewsInsideOut.com site is focused on professional news publishing operations providing grounds for digital syndication (the means by which stories enter mainstream news outlets including radio, newspapers and television.

NewsInsideOut.com interviews and articles are in furtherance of our journalistic mission and protection from governmental interference under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms of the Canadian Constitution, and the Magna Carta (UK) and are an absolute prohibition and bar to any imposition, criminal, equitable, common law, admiralty law, civil to NewsInsideOut.com‘s publication of true facts.