Archive for the ‘software’ Category

Eckhart Tolle: Impressionante evento psiquico, lider espiritual americano

terça-feira, abril 18th, 2017

xxxxx

http://www.eckharttolle.com/article/The-Power-Of-Now-Spirituality-And-The-End-Of-Suffering

For two years, a small man sits quietly on a park bench. People walk by, lost in their thoughts. One day someone asks him a question. In the weeks that follow there are more people and more questions. Word spreads that the man is a “mystic,” and has discovered something that brings peace and meaning into our lives. It sounds like fiction, but today that man, Eckhart Tolle, is known worldwide for his teachings on spiritual enlightenment through the power of the present moment. His first book, The Power of Now, is an international bestseller, and has been translated into 17 languages. More than 20 years have passed since Eckhart Tolle answered his first question on that park bench. While his audience has grown, his message remains the same: that it is possible to stop struggling in your life, and find joy and fulfillment in this moment, and no other.

Says Eckhart:

“For most people, spiritual awakening is a gradual process. Rarely does it happen all at once. When it does, though, it is usually brought about by intense suffering. That was certainly true in my case. For years my life alternated between depression and acute anxiety. One night I woke up in a state of dread and intense fear, more intense than I had ever experienced before. Life seemed meaningless, barren, hostile. It became so unbearable that suddenly the thought came into my mind, “I cannot live with myself any longer.” The thought kept repeating itself several times. Suddenly, I stepped back from the thought, and looked at it, as it were, and I became aware of the strangeness of that thought: “If I cannot live with myself, there must be two of me – the I and the self that I cannot live with.” And the question arose, “Who is the ‘I’ and who is the self that I cannot live with?” There was no answer to that question, and all thinking stopped. For a moment, there was complete inner silence. Suddenly I felt myself drawn into a whirlpool or a vortex of energy. I was gripped by an intense fear, and my body started to shake. I heard the words, “Resist nothing,” as if spoken inside my chest. I could feel myself being sucked into a void. Suddenly, all fear disappeared, and I let myself fall into that void. I have no recollection of what happened after that.

The next morning I awoke as if I had just been born into this world. Everything seemed fresh and pristine and intensely alive. A vibrant stillness filled my entire being. As I walked around the city that day, the world looked as if it had just come into existence, completely devoid of the past. I was in a state of amazement at the peace I felt within and the beauty I saw without, even in the midst of the traffic. I was no longer labeling and interpreting my sense perceptions – an almost complete absence of mental commentary. To this day, I perceive and interact with the world in this way: through stillness, not through mental noise. The peace that I felt that day, more than 20 years ago, has never left me, although it has varying degrees of intensity.

At the time, I had no conceptual framework to help me understand what had happened to me. Years later, I realized that the acute suffering I felt that night must have forced my consciousness to withdraw from identification with the unhappy self, the suffering “little me,” which is ultimately a fiction of the mind. This withdrawal must have been so complete that the suffering self collapsed as if the plug had been pulled out of an inflatable toy. What was left was my true nature as the ever present “I AM”: consciousness in its pure state prior to identification with form. You may also call it pure awareness or presence.

xxxx

Pelo pouco que sei de Tolle, ele teve sorte de cair no momento exato: nao sei porque mas nos anos de 2.000, o publico estava procurando e consumindo muitos livros de auto-ajuda, pensamento positivo, etc. E ele tinha uma mensagem prometedora, era afinal um exemplar vivo bem suscedido no que todos buscavam.

Mas como todos os outros livros e seus autores, o conselho de Tolle era impraticavel, por isso seu ensinamento, nao compreendido, caiu na inutilidade, nos tempos de hoje. Pois o que Tolle pode fazer e fez, ninguem na vida moderna consegue fazer. Apos o evento psiquico, ao conseguir a sublimacao mental, ele caiu na rua como um sem-casa, mendigo. Parou de estudar, de trabalhar e ficou dois anos sentado em bancos de praca. E nunca mais iria voltar a uma vida profissional, nao fosse algumas pessoas se acercando dele e fazendo perguntas. Ele foi arrancado da sarjeta pelo publico. Como copiei logo abaixo um texto do Wickipedia, sua familia aguentou-o nestes dois anos com casa e comida, mas o repreendia dizendo que tornara-se irreesponsavel e insano.

Quem consegue repetir isto na vida moderna? Ou melhor, quem vai querer conhecer o Nirvana, alcancar a sublimacao mental, a tal preco? Ninguem. Por isso a tecnica que ele ensina para se obter o que ele obteve nao funcionou para mais ninguem. E poucos tem uma familia que os suportariam como paria.

Alem disso, mesmo que alguem conseguisse faze-lo, mas que nao fosse rico para se auto-sustentar, e tivesse que voltar ao trabalho professional, `a rotina do dia a dia dentro de uma fabrica, um escritorio, etc., quem iria conseguir ” contemplar e se admirar do presente… e para o resto da vida ficar neste estado? Ora o ambiente obrigatyorio para 90% ou mais da populacao mundial e’ o incomodo ambiente rotineiro do trabalho na repetitive e enfadonha producao em serie. Que mundo bonito existe para quem esta dentro de uma fabrica na maior parte do seu dia?

Portanto, se todos conseguissem a transcendencia para o estado de consciencia cosmica, a economia do planeta parava e todos morreriam rapido. A conclusao inevitavel e’ que Tolle esta’ sendo um professor do mal. O relato de sua experiencia unica e’ de grande ajuda para a busca do entendimento do que somos, como funciona o cerebro, que existiria uma divisao entre mente e consciencia, etc. Isto ao menos para minhas pesquisas e os paralelos que vejo entre esta experiencia e o que estao sugerindo meus modelos teoricos, tem inestimavel valor, poiss me ajudara a desenvolver mais minha busca.

Entao a diferenca entre a pregacao do Tolle e a minha esta nisso. Tambem ninguem vai largar tudo para se isolar na selva por sete anos, ou ninguem vai ter a sorte que tive em tropecar com Serra Pelada, conseguir por sorte a propriedade de um estabelecimento commercial que me pagou as despesas de manutencao na selva e me permitia retornar ao contacto com humanos em alguns meses por ano. Mas eu nao estou ensinando como conseguir um evento psiquico de transformacao de nivel mental evolutivo. Estou pregando uma promessa para se obter fatos concretos baseados num metodo de busca que lida apenas com fatos concretos, que sao do conhecimento publico. A visao de mundo onde somos 8 bilhoes de genes construindo a nos mesmos em um pode gerar uma comportamento humano coletivo que ao pouco vai mudando o Sistema, a economia baseada na auto-sustentabilidade da formula liberando a humanidade do trabalho rotineiro, e assim com o ambiente mudado e adequado para receber o que Tolle se tornou, este e’ um caminho palpavel e racional. Porem nao e’ o caminho do milagre facil e rapido de Tolle, e’ um caminho arduo e demorado.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eckhart_Tolle

Tolle stopped studying for his doctorate, and for a period of about two years after this he spent much of his time sitting, “in a state of deep bliss,” on park benches in Russell Square, Central London, “watching the world go by.” He stayed with friends, in a Buddhist monastery, or otherwise slept rough on Hampstead Heath. His family thought him “irresponsible, even insane.”

Pesquisa da Matrix:

Tolle me fez notar algo que nao havia pensado. O Sistema-formula tem uma entidade abstrata que suplanta e governa seu interior, suas partes. Seria o software do hardware. No caso de Tolle, o nivel psiquico dos pensamentos mais o Sistema nervosa simpatico seria a sub-entidade de cada parte, enquanto o Eu separado dos pensamentos, a consciencia normal de Tolle e dos humanos normais seria a entidade superior das partes. Ou seja, cada parte teria uma fracao da entidade total do Sistema. Quando Tolle perde a sub-entidade individual – a cosnciencia da parte do Sistema – ele suplanta-se como Sistema e cai na esfera da hierarquia dos sistemas, ou seja, cai num Sistema superior ao humano, o qual ele interpreta como cosnciencia universal, do cosmos. Entao ele era – e todos humanos normais sao – e em yermos de software da formula, um fractal menor dentro desse mesmo fractal, porem maior.

Duas diferentes cosmovisões debatem: Quais as diferenças entre o computador hardware/software e o humano corpo/mente?

quinta-feira, abril 6th, 2017

xxxxx

Minha questao postada no Quora e acompanhamento do debate:

https://www.quora.com/Whats-the-difference-between-computer-software-hardware-and-human-body-mind

What’s the difference between computer software/hardware and human body/mind?

Jonathan DayJonathan Day, 4/6/2017
Ultimately, none.

Alan Turing created an imaginary computer, the Turing Machine, that could perform a few basic functions, moving around a tape or set of tapes. He proved that all systems based on logic MUST be equivalent or inferior to a Turing Machine. No exceptions.

We now know that there are no quantum effects in the brain and that the sorts of quantum effects that you could get in regular cells can all be reduced to systems based on logic.

A human being, therefore, is a highly complex machine (the brain has 85 billion neurons and a neuron can have up to 3,000 synapses, so you’re dealing with 255 trillion connections that can amplify/suppress signals – we’re getting into serious numbers here). A machine so complex that attempting to reproduce it with modern technology would result in a computer around ten blocks square and two or three storeys high.

So, human brains are smaller for now. That’s kinda cheating because it’s not an intrinsic difference, merely a technological one.

Louis Charles MorelliLouis Charles Morelli – 4/6/2017

Very helpful, Jonathan. Thanks. But… I think that with yours world view we will not make progress towards quantum computation and knowledge of human mind and consciousness. Yours perspective is totally mechanistic, based on Physics and Math, as the modern scholar mindset. Maybe you are right, but is is not what my personal research and world view is suggesting.

First of all, Turing did not know what a natural system is. So he did not know the logic running in these systems. If you are interested go to my website to see the formula for all natural systems.

Second there is no quantum effects in the human mind as software because quantum effects are related to an inferior level of organization of matter: it fills the boundary between Newtonian mechanics and biological organization, the frontier between the hard and bone skeleton _ studied by the fields of Physics and Math – and the beginning of the soft meat ( where begins biological organization. The human psyche organization is a superior level).

Third, we can not build a computer reproducing the human brain with this actual technology, neither hundred blocks square: complexity has a limit at any evolutionary lineage. When reaching that limit, occurs an evolutionary jump, a transformation. As happened to human brain, the jump to consciousness. It means that we need to proceed a transformation of our actual technology. Not based on binary digits and so, based on seven variables, like the DNA code. By the way, I think it is good talking between different world views. Thanks.

 

Sistema Imunológico: Como a Natureza o Inseriu nos Sistemas Biológicos?

sexta-feira, março 17th, 2017

xxxxx

Vídeo da batalha entre vírus e anticorpos. Mas antes de assistir…

A humanidade esta’ pagando um preço muito caro por ainda não ter entendido a Natureza. Milhões, bilhões de humanos continuam sendo barbaramente torturados por doenças absurdas sem que a nossa Ciência nada consiga fazer para salva-los. Mas a Ciência não tem culpa disso, ela oferece a visão e os instrumentos suficientes para esse entendimento da Natureza. A culpa esta sendo dos humanos, cuja racionalismo esta empacado pela mistica. Soma-se `a esta imaginação infantil criadora de fantasias que impede a humanidade sair de sua infância e entrar na fase adulta, os interesses mesquinhos materiais e a arrogância dos humanos que se apoderaram da Ciência. A Natureza se abre como um livro para o estudante humilde e bem intencionado, mas para entende-la é preciso uma razão muito naturalista e concentrada no esforço de aprender com admiração, pois nas suas profundezas a Natureza universal, que produziu átomos, galaxias, elefantes e humanos, é muito, mas muito complexa…

Um exemplo é a moda cientifica atual de procurar e delegar as doenças a genes, um pequeno amontoado de átomos. genes teriam propósitos, como o de dirigir organismos complexos a se reproduzirem, sendo que genes não possuem o menor resquício sequer de algum principio de sistema nervos, quanto mais inteligência para ter propósitos para o futuro…Assim nunca vão erradicar as doenças mortais que a milênios estão ai’, torturando e matando humanos. Enquanto isso, esta’ visível que os genes pertencem a um sistema – o DNA – e que agem por comandos deste sistema. Mas a inteligencia humana se desviou do foco em sistemas naturais a seculos, e sem conhecer algo de sistemas naturais não se vai nunca descobrir a causa destas doenças.

Temos aqui outro exemplo, um vídeo tecnicamente muito bem feito, porem, revelando um conhecimento superficial que jamais resolvera’ o mal que ele relata.

Não faça como todo mundo, tal como se estivessem assistindo uma batalha mas sem saber quais países estão guerreando, quais armas e meios de comunicação estão sendo aplicados, sem conhecer os generais e presidentes dos países, porque estão guerreando, etc… No final, você viu uma batalha, viu o território onde foi realizada, mas saiu sem saber mais nada. E você ouviu um narrador contando a batalha, sem explicar nada.

Lembre-se que células e vírus nem sistema nervoso possuem, quanto mais um cérebro, o qual seria necessário para explicar as operações complexas nesta batalha. No filme, uma simples célula, sai de um rio de sangue, sobre nas margens, atravessa um longo território, passa por milhares de outras células, e vai diretamente sobre uma célula, adentra-a e la dentro encontra o que saiu a buscar: vírus. Ora, nem macacos com cérebros conseguiriam fazer isso, talvez nem humanos sem aparelhos técnicos. Mas para ela se decidir a sair do rio, recebeu antes a visita de uma outra célula que lhe trouxe uma ordem de comando para fazer aquilo. Ora, células não poderiam se comunicarem desta maneira.

Então qual a causa desta batalha que se torna tao complexa apenas imitada por humanos inteligentes? A resposta é simples, porem desconhecida de todos os envolvidos nestas observações. Acontece que cada célula possui átomos e estes, elétrons. Estes elétrons são invadidos por partículas de luz, chamadas fótons, como estas que vem do sol. Estes fótons vieram de um sistema completo e funcional, muito simples (abaixo mostrarei a face deste sistema). O sistema de onde vieram foi fragmentado em seus bits-informação, registrados nestes fótons, cada fóton é uma informação que continua ativa, e quando se encontram em qualquer outro lugar, tendem a se enfileirarem numa sequencia ordenada que é a mesma sequencia de posições que estavam no sistema desfeito. E assim tentam reconstruir materialmente o hardware, a arquitetura física, do sistema de onde vieram. Se o sistema reconstruído é uma célula, ela vai contem uma rede de network formada por estes fótons dentro dos elétrons de suas organelas e demais substancias. Depois de construírem as células, estes fótons usam-nas para construir organismos, pois buscam repetir a incrível perfeição do sistema de onde vieram.

Você vai assistir uma batalha dentro de um organismo, entre células e vírus. Os vírus também não sabem o que fazem, eles jamais teriam a capacidade para sair de um meio formado de células para entrarem num rio de sangue e irem pescar diretamente apenas um tipo único exclusivo de peixe, chamado de célula CD4.

Tanto células como vírus estão aqui movendo-se sob o comando de uma entidade de um sistema, na forma de uma maquina quase perfeita. Cada tipo de célula ou vírus representa uma peça dessa maquina, e peças funcionam sem intenções, percepções, inteligencia. Elas não se movem por si mesmas, são movidas pela engrenagem, e determinadas a fazerem um tipo de movimento. Depois do vídeo vou apresentar o sistema de onde vieram as informações que compõem o quadro onde se realiza a batalha. Você vera que neste sistema, e a bilhões de anos atras, muito antes das origens de células e vírus, a peça representada pelos vírus são movidas de uma posição e dirigidas para um único local exato. Então a célula alvo dos vírus, representa naquele sistema, a peça que esta naquele local naquele momento.

Apenas conhecendo-se a formula dos sistemas naturais, a formação de sua identidade e capacidade de controle do todo interno, mais seu aspecto hardware/software, realmente se entende e conhece este processo complexo. A unica outra alternativa racional seria a de uma montagem inteligente, porem, tendo-se conhecimento da formula não se necessita desta alternativa… a não ser que a formula – que surgiu no meio desta Natureza impressa em ondas de luz desde o Big Bang – tenha sido criada com inteligencia alem deste Universo.

Bem, aqui esta a “alma” do sistema que criou vírus, células e organismos.

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

Já foi detectado que os vírus são os representantes biológicos da função 5, ou F5. Produzidos em F4, se dirigem a F1. Então a célula alvo na corrente sanguínea esta’ representando F1. Os vários tipos de células que formam o sistema de defesa são peças formadas na sequencia desta formula pelo processo do ciclo vital. Então temos que identificar qual é F2, F3, e assim por diante. Quando o vídeo diz que a célula tal se dirige a outra célula tal e lhe passa uma informação é preciso entender que são representantes de duas funções vizinhas no circuito da formula. Uma célula, digamos, F2, se dirige apenas a F3, sem possibilidades de errar, pelo mesmo motivo que o ciclo vital faz com que a forma criança de um humano se dirija a forma de adolescente e esta a forma de adulto, pois não teria como um adolescente errar e ir para outra forma senão a de adulto.

Uma questão ainda não respondida pela Matrix/DNA. O nosso ancestral sistema astronomico, na sua forma de sistema fechado, não realizava qualquer troca com o mundo externo, portanto, devia ter um mecanismo impedindo invasores. Mas provavelmente se tratava apenas de um campo magnético, assim como o planeta Terra se defende. Existiria outro mais eficaz?

Porque senão existia, o sistema de imunidade biológica foi um salto demasiado grande na evolução… não vejo a base solida para dar esse salto. E como não vejo uma função sistêmica capaz de exercer esta função de defesa, suspeito que isto seja produto da entidade do sistema.

Observando o vídeo:

  1. A corrente sanguínea imita o circuito esférico da formula para sistemas. Enquanto no circuito trafega energia e fótons na forma de informação, na corrente sanguínea trafegam muitos elementos, como nutrientes, células, etc.
  2. A entrada de vírus na corrente seria como a entrada de meteoritos ou qualquer outro invasor dentro do circuito astronomico. Desde que o circuito é um corpo rolando no espaço/tempo, estes invasores também no sistema astronomico adentram o corpo do sistema.
  3. Porque os vírus atacam o Linfócito CD4 (pesquisar), e não os outros elementos? Porque atacam diretamente os policias, os soldados do organismo? O que os informa, ou como eles sabem que são os soldados e não os civis, os primeiros a serem eliminados? Porque vírus e linfócitos são opostos entre si? Ou seria uma relacao predador/presa? Tera’ o linfócito, e apenas ele, um tipo de nutriente preferido pelos vírus? ( Ver a composição atômica e molecular dos dois).
  4. Com a morte dos linfócitos, macrófagos são atraídos pelos vírus. O que produz os macrófagos e como sabem que tem vírus? Pesquisar ou rememorar o que são macrófagos. Morreu a infantaria, agora vem a policia montada.
  5. Macrófagos passam uma informação aos linfócitos CD4, os quais se ativam. Ora isto é uma network! Coisa da entidade do sistema. Mas o que significa passar informação e o que significa ficar ativado, a nível molecular?
  6. Linfócito CD4 informa linfócito B e CD8 para ficarem ativados… ( eles não possuem radio ou telefone, tem que ter mensageiro levando as mensagens em mãos). Isto esta’ parecendo mais uma repetição do ciclo vital. Seriam as varias formas de linfócitos produzidas na sequencia do ciclo vital?
  7. Linfócitos CD8 saem da circulação sanguínea… Sera’ que vão combater os vírus no local que entram para invadir?
  8. Hummm… vão para as células infectadas pelos vírus. Apenas quando os vírus entraram na corrente sanguínea alertaram o sistema de defesa. Quer dizer que este Sistema não capta quando as células são invadidas?
  9. Os CD8 matam as células infectadas com vírus! Bons médicos…
  10. Linfócito B vai ao gânglio para produzir anticorpos… O que são gânglios? Como eles se encaixam na formula da Matrix/DNA? Como esse linfócito sabe que tem de ir la? E os linfócitos já não são, em si mesmos, anticorpos?
  11. Linfócito B sai dos gânglios carregado de anticorpos… e volta para a corrente sanguínea. Hummm… fazendo o papel de RNA-mensageiro e RNA-transportador?
  12. Então foram ativados dois tipos de linfócitos: um tipo para matar as células infectadas, e outro para produzir anticorpos e atacarem os virus dentro da corrente sanguínea… Mas os anticorpos não matam os virus, apenas os cercam, neutralizando-os. Entao vem os macrofagos que comem os virus na corrente. FIM

Raios! O que significa “inteligencia”? Senão um método complexo de apresentar resultados? E não acabamos de assistir um método complexo apresentando resultados? Eximias estrategias militares. Qual a diferença entre o método destas pequenas criaturas e o método dos humanos? Então existe inteligencia no mundo microcósmico? E antes das origens do homem?  Seriam estas pequenas criaturas, células, vírus, inteligentes?

Tem algo desconhecido ai’. Tem uma inteligencia dentro deste meio ou atuando neste meio desde fora. Se estiver dentro do meio, significa que a Natureza é e sempre foi inteligente, mesmo antes das origens do homem. Então… o que é “Natureza”? Mas se tiver fora… Seria a tao sugerida face software que a Matrix/DNA esta’ sugerindo existir em todo hardware-sistema? Tambem natural, porem imperceptível aos nossos sentidos?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Pesquisa: (ver linfócitos,macrófitos,gânglios)

  1. Linfocito CD4:

 

Linfócito é um tipo de leucócito (glóbulo branco) presente no sangue. São produzidos pela medula óssea vermelha, através das células-tronco linfoides…

Obs: Bem,… então antes temos que ver o que é leucócito.

Os leucócitos, também conhecidos por glóbulos brancos, são um grupo de células diferenciadas a partir de células-tronco pluripotenciais oriundas da medula óssea e presentes no sangue.

Obs 1: medula óssea, base da produção do sistema imunológico, seria o campo do campo magnético?

Obs 2: as células troncos não devem serem diferenciadas, seriam as primeiras células formadas na fecundação. A partir delas começa a diferenciação celular mas veja no quadro seguinte algo bem interessante:

xxxx

Obs: As primeiras células não são diferenciadas entre si, portanto iguais – e que devem formar a morula – se diferenciam em apenas dois tipos de células, as quais são ainda indiferenciadas. Um tipo, a mieloide, é que vai se desdobrar nas muitas células diferenciadas que vão compor a estrutura sistêmica e funcional do organismo. Mas o outro tipo é o grande mistério. Ele parece surgir como um ramo lateral vindo de algo estranho `a estrutura. E’ a célula indiferenciada linfoide. A partir dela vai surgir vários tipos de células diferenciadas, mas todas tem como unica função a defesa do sistema. Isto parece uma nova invenção no Universo, o mecanismo de auto-defesa ( porem a Matrix diz que isto não pode acontecer, este Universo não pode produzir nova informação do nada). A não ser que…

Isto me lembra o planeta Terra. Ele foi formado por material visível – poeira gazes – formando uma mistura indiferenciada e esta vai produzir a estrutura do planeta, vai se diferenciar em rochas, água, etc. Afora isso, e depois de estruturado surge um segundo elemento, invisivel, que parece vir de fora da linhagem hereditaria solida dos astros: o campo magnetico. E este exerce a funcao de defesa do planeta.

Isto sugere que … A CELULA TRONCO TENHA UM CAMPO MAGNETICO…!!!

Ou uma substancia biologica que imite ou represente os campos magneticos?

Não gosto disso. Parece que estou descambando para a metafisica. Mas busco a verdade, esta esta’ com o Universo, e o Universo esta’ pouco se lixando para o que eu gosto ou não…

Bem,… em varias outras situações a formula tem sugerido que todos os sistemas naturais tem como contrapartida um campo magnético, inclusive sistemas vivos. O qual – e aqui avançando muito na especulação – poderia ser a “identidade do sistema”.

Devo continuar este estudo. Parei na Wikipedia vendo leucócitos e linfócitos… 

Software Computacional: Importante Informacao

segunda-feira, fevereiro 27th, 2017

xxxx

Entendendo a relacao entre software e hardware. Como e’ e como funciona. Como se transportam pensamentos humanos transformados em processadores e memorias, para dentro da materia da maquina.

Portugues:

Um chip (modular… ?) feito de três camadas, como um sanduíche: a camada de cima, reusavel, e’ feita de partículas condutoras de eletricidade diretamente imprimidas sobre uma folha de polietileno. A camada de baixo, e’ uma usável câmara de silicone desenhada para segurar e manter fluidos biológicos. Uma fina e isolante barreira separa a eletrônica de cima da câmara de baixo.

Ingles:

The new chip, dubbed FINP chip, is a modular, three-layered sandwich: the top reusable layer is made of commercially available conductive particles directly printed onto a flexible polyethylene sheet. The bottom layer is a disposable silicone chamber designed to hold biological fluids. A thin insulating barrier separates the top electronics from the chamber.

Obtido em ( este artigo esta bem escrito e informativo para se entender melhor como e’ a tecnologia atual compitacional e por isso vai copiado abaixo para traduzir e rememorar):

https://singularityhub.com/2017/02/19/one-cent-lab-on-a-chip-can-detect-cancer-and-infections/?utm_content=buffere7983&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer

This One-Cent Lab-on-a-Chip Can Diagnose Cancer and Infections

Medical diagnostics often feels like magic to me. With just a few drops of blood, doctors can quickly decipher a patient’s general health status—are biomarker levels in range? Are there telltale signs of infection? Are the patient’s cells healthy, or have some quietly mutated into cancerous time bombs?

Diagnósticos médicos frequentemente parecem mágicos, para mim. Com justas poucas gotas de sangue, doutores podem rapidamente decifrarem rapidamente o estado de saúde de um paciente – estão marcar biológicas `a vista? Existem indicações de infecção? Estão as células do paciente saudáveis, ou algumas mutaram para bombas cancerosas?

(continuar tradução)

Behind that magical facade, however, diagnostics lives and breathes technology. Most lab tests rely heavily on specialized machinery and teams of technicians to ensure they’re done safely and correctly. It’s a pricey endeavor: even the most basic equipment—a centrifuge that separates different components of the blood, for example—can cost several thousands of dollars, a price tag far beyond what developing countries can afford.

Without access to cheaper options, many countries stricken by HIV or malaria are severely handicapped in their battles against insurgent epidemics. For them, modern diagnostics might as well be magic.

Now, a team of Stanford engineers has figured out a cheaper alternative. A study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences describes a small, reusable microchip that can diagnose multiple diseases.

Here’s the kicker: each chip is made by standard inkjet printing, requires just 20 minutes to assemble, and the cost? A single penny.

“To the best of our knowledge, such a platform with similar functionalities, cost and advantages has not yet been reported,” the team, led by Dr. Ronald Davis, concluded in their paper.

“[This] is really a breakthrough,” says Dr. Eric Topol at the Scripps Translational Science Institute (not involved in the study). “And I don’t use that word too liberally.”

Diagnostics: from physical labs to lab-on-a-chip

When a disease like HIV or malaria strikes, not every cell in the body is infected. In order to get an accurate readout, scientists often first try to isolate the culprit cells.

Since diseased cells are usually a much smaller population than healthy cells, scientists often need to tag them with a special marker in order for the machines to reliably pick them out—kind of like sticking a reflective sticker on a night-time cyclist for more visibility. This step is long and tough: not all target cells get tagged with the marker, and sometimes the marker itself can change the properties of a cell, which disrupts subsequent readouts.

About 15 years ago, scientists began exploring the possibility of simplifying—and miniaturizing—the whole process. Most cells and biomolecules have distinctive properties—size, shape, density and electronic charges, to name a few. Exploiting these properties, scientists made dozens of specialized sensors that only capture bioparticles with a particular property.

When combined with microfluidics, a technology that deals with small amounts of liquid, the sensors were about to isolate blood cells, sequester bacteria, or grab onto various proteins and DNA molecules from droplets of blood and other biological samples—and the first lab-on-a-chip devices were born.

Almost immediately, global health advocates realized the potential of these portable diagnostic wonders for helping poor, developing countries. But they were tough to make.

“[These] platforms often require access to a clean room, sophisticated equipment, and highly trained personnel to perform…manufacturing procedures,” says study author Dr. Rahim Esfandyarpour to Singularity Hub. “This entire procedure can take several days or weeks.”

The flexible inkjet-nanoparticle-printed biochip

To circumvent these problems, Davis’s team turned to a surprising manufacturing device: an ink-jet printer, similar to the one you probably have at your workplace.

The new chip, dubbed FINP chip, is a modular, three-layered sandwich: the top reusable layer is made of commercially available conductive particles directly printed onto a flexible polyethylene sheet. The bottom layer is a disposable silicone chamber designed to hold biological fluids. A thin insulating barrier separates the top electronics from the chamber.

Making the chip is an easy two-step process.

First, users can use any vector-drawing software—for example, Adobe Illustrator—to draw a customized electronic configuration. Because different configurations can be used for different diagnostic purposes, this step tailors the chip to a user’s exact needs.

Next, using any inkjet printer, the drawn electronic pattern is printed onto a cheap, plastic-like sheet, and plopped onto single-use chambers that can be supplied to the user in bulk.

Just like 3D printing, these designs may eventually be downloadable, allowing anyone with a printer to produce their own biochips when needed.

“Production only takes 20 minutes,” says Esfandyarpour.

Similar to previous microchips, the FINP chip isolates cells and biomolecules based on their intrinsic electrical properties. As proof-of-concept, the team designed a chip with two types of chambers: one that isolates cells, and one that analyzes them. They then ran the device through a series of experiments to validate the chip.

In one test, the team showed that the device could efficiently capture breast cancer cells from a fluid sample. Similar to most biomolecules like proteins and DNA, cancer cells have a unique surface charge. By manipulating the electronic field, researchers were able to steer the cancer cells toward a specific chamber on the chip and trap them there, away from all the other cell types.

Since the ability to pick out rare circulating tumor cells can increase our understanding of cancer metastasis, the device could help us detect early spread and potentially save lives, especially in developing countries, the authors explain.

In another experiment, the team wanted to see if the chip could be used to accurately count the number of cells in a given sample. Immune cell counts are often used to diagnose infectious diseases like tuberculosis and malaria, and traditionally done with a technique called flow cytometry that can cost $100,000 for the equipment alone. The penny chip performed just as well.

Democratizing diagnostics

The FNIP chip is the latest win for frugal science—a field that’s bringing cheap, portable and reliable tools to doctors anywhere in the world.

You’ve probably heard of some previous designs: a foldable microscope that costs just 50 cents, or a paper centrifuge that doesn’t require electricity.

Davis and his team are now working hard to get their chip ready for commercialization.

“Any platform for diagnostics or other biomedical applications must go through several testing, validation and optimization paths before commercialization, and we’ll take and follow it very seriously,” says Esfandyarpour.

But the team is optimistic that their device can make a difference.

“[We believe] this work will enable greater individual access to… diagnostic applications in resource-poor and developing countries,” says Davis.

Livro para Sair Correndo a Ler: Se DNA e’ Software, Quem “Escreveu” o Código?

sexta-feira, janeiro 20th, 2017

xxxx

https://grahamhancock.com/bunzelt1/#comment-2673

If DNA is Software, Who “Wrote” the Code?

Louis Morelli says: jan-20/2017

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

You must see my Matrix/DNA Theory, as your book and theory will give me more data for developing mine. The first manifestation of the first shape of DNA was what people call “the eletromagnetic spectrum of all seven kinds of radiations and I called the universal light wave. It is a code not only for life (aka,biological systems) but for all shapes of a unique universal system that is evolving since the Big Bang and change shapes because the light wave is the real process known as life cycle.I discovered that this light wave is also a simple software diagram like the one we apply in computers. So, the diagram is a universal formula that fits as template for all natural systems, from atoms, to galaxies, to cell systems, to brains and now, consciousness is being formed to be the new shape of this system.At my website (http://theuniversalmatrix.com) you see the spectrum, the formula, and the models of atoms and galaxies over the formula.
This theory was built in Amazon jungle in seven years when studying in that whole biosphere, the systems and interactions among them.There was a common pattern (the formula) and coming from the non-biological world. The research took a burst to unexpected ways when I was watching the native people drinking the Brazilian type of hallucinogen, called “Saint Daime”. Their visionary description resulted in my drawing as pictures of chackras and kundaluni, which later I discovered was a real description of the DNA’s streams and bases.Adding their descriptions about cosmology plus the pattern at real systems, I got different astronomic models and discovered that described by metaphors those models is the same description of religions foundations, like the Eden paradise, the I Ching, etc. So, my theory is that the halluginogenous brings to counciousness flashes of memories registered in the DNA ( I think at the junk DNA) from our non-biologial ancestrals shpare of that universal system till the Big Bang.From which raised the light wave with its code.
So, this non-visible spectrum is the software, modelling dark matter into a system that evolves like our own bodies.The shapes of this systems are the generations of hardwares. The actual shape is an embryo of consciousness, we are the genes building this embryo just now. Consciousness is the abstract identity of any natural system that arises as the sum of informations of all its parts plus the inner interactions among these parts plus the interactions with the external world. Consciousness was sleeping at atoms, dreaming at galaxies, began waken up at plants and animals and is lifting up at humans and other intelligent life around this Universe, which are the other genes. In this Universe ( the egg, the placenta) is occurring a process of genetic/computational reproduction of the unknown thing that produced it.The very fact that consciousness emerged here and now means that the unknown and ex-machine must be a natural system and conscious.Our theories are complementaries, I will running by your book and my suggestion is that you need to know what no school is teaching:the real meaning and working of natural systems.Cheers,…

Louis Morelli says:

Your comment is awaiting moderation.

Sorry the poor English and digited errors above. There is something important for you knowing: the explanation why these hallucinogens works this way. Plant’s cells were the first built as biological systems. They were built by photons/bits information coming from stars and this planet’s nuclei. It happens that this astronomical system is a closed system which is the application of the Matrix/DNA formula in its perfect state.So, plant cells try to mimic its creator – or ancestral – as closed system, that’s why they do photosynthesis, linked direct to a star. Animals cells is missing an important systemic function – performed by the chloroplasts – then, animal cells are opened systems. And our brain, as product of animal cell are opened systems, also. When the perfect closed formula from the plant is absorbed by the brain, the neural network is rewired towards approximating the state of closed system, the perfect state. It seems that the mind is mixed with the creator system, which is cosmological, so, those phantastic visions, theogonies,magical thinking, etc. At my website the formula is draw as closed system, but you can see it as opened system retiring any piece.Cheers,…

Refazendo a Introducao da Pagina Home

sábado, novembro 28th, 2015

xxxx

E’ preciso refazer a pagina Home consertando vários erros e acrescentando as ultimas descobertas, como o gráfico da luz, consertando a parte em Inglês, etc. Nesta pagina vou registrando o que fazer:

1) O Software do DNA = Identidade do Sistema.

O DNA ‘e como um computador apenas no sentido de que ele ‘e composto por software e hardware. O Hardware e’ a parte visível, física, biológica do DNA. O software ‘e o conjunto de informações resultante da soma de informações de todas as partes do sistema mais as informações geradas pelas experiencias da existência do sistema, inclusive as novas informações geradas dentro do sistema pelas interações entre as partes que não são vizinhas na sequencia do circuito. Essa totalidade de informações e’ o elemento que regula o sistema, portanto e’ o governo do sistema, ou a identidade do sistema. Esta identidade ‘e invisível, como o e’ a mente em relacao ao cérebro.

Mas num forum ( cujo link vai abaixo), um participante mostrou que a forma como esta escrito na introdução da home page, o leitor interpreta tudo errado. E isto fica aqui registrado para fazer a devida correção quando houver oportunidade.

In your opening page, which is linked to, you claim;

Quote

DNA is material structure and an unknown command of instructions, and computer is software plus hardware – the process of universal evolution is composed of hardware and software that interact among themselves retroactively;

This is a bad analogy. If I had to use it, I would say DNA is the software, and the proteins that read it are the hardware. A better analogy would be the DNA is the blueprint to our body.

E minha resposta foi ( muito mal, devia ter respondido como faco a explicação acima)

You said: “This is a bad analogy. If I had to use it, I would say DNA is the software, and the proteins that read it are the hardware. A better analogy would be the DNA is the blueprint to our body.”

Matrix: Proteins are like the hands (or robots) of the DNA for to build a cell system, and after that, a multicellular living body.  But, for to understand this theory it is necessary to explain what I think is a natural system and I can’t do it here. A cell system is merely a little bit complex reproduction of a nucleotide system. Which is reproduction of a proto-astronomical system. Universal evolution is evolution of a unique system that was born with the Big Bang. Then, from atoms system to human body system is the same evolution we see about computers. There are a process of feed-back between a universal formula of natural systems (a kind of software called Matrix) and the hardware, which produces evolution.

You said: “If it is possible, it’s going to happen.”

Matrix: “Yes, I agree that your theory is possible. But, the Matrix/DNA theory is possible also. The three billion years used for to build the first living being (the first cell system) could be by abiogenesis (as you explained above) or astronomical embryogenesis (as suggested by Matrix/DNA theory). I don’t know if abiogenesis theory is scientifically falsiable, but embryogenesis is. We need photos from a hundred different kinds of astronomical bodies for to prove that LUCA is real. If all photos are only about the seven known shapes we know today, your theory will earn. But, take care, look to the photos that NASA is publishing almost every day: each photo is coming with the same comments: this body is not a common planet or star or pulsar like our models and we need to change the astronomic theory.

Obs: Este leitor esta me trazendo uma confusão, pois segundo o que entendo aqui, ‘e que o software “lê” o hardware. Penso que ele lê não o hardware, mas as informações depositadas no hardware através de softwares. O DOS não e’ tambem um software? Em todo o caso, quando digo que o software e’ a identidade, o governo do sistema, e’ obvio que ele lê o sistema inteiro, quando o controla. Proteínas são pedaços do circuito esférico do sistema desenhado como a formula da Matrix/DNA,, incluindo o tempo (setas, ondas) e as partes ( as figuras, partículas)
xxxxx

2) Tirar a insinuação de criacionismo da evolução

http://sguforums.com/index.php/topic,30719.0/nowap.html?PHPSESSID=88b399afd79dc2d55eac885b6ee72726

Offline Unlimited

Re: First Post: The Universal Matrix?
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2010, 01:50:38 AM »
Quote

Darwin and The Matrix/DNA Theory agreed with the idea of Evolution and with the suggestion that there was a primitive common block which would have brought forth life on Earth. But Darwin thought LUCA as a microscopic stump and could never imagine that LUCA is astronomical, formed by the seven shapes of astronomical bodies! This picture is the Face of LUCA. This discovery enhances the idea of evolution by adding four more variables observed in LUCA upon the Darwinian formula with only three variables (VSI – Variation, Selection, and Inheritance), fulfilling the gaps and explanations in the biological and cosmological evolution, and suggesting the existence of an Intelligence Supreme beyond the borders of this universe.

So you are filling the gaps with god? Sounds like you are giving up to me. Sounds like, a god of the gaps. I hope you don’t convince anyone out there with real talent, to not explore the subject any further.

Have you ever watched smoke from a cigarette? That is partical interaction, thats happening billions of times a second, in say, a drop of water. Things are getting sloshed around, collided together, knoted, twisted, ripped apart, literaly every movement possible. Now if there are already simple organics, like those found throughout our solar system, would it not be possible to create more complex organics? Why draw the line there? Something will find a way to reproduce, the interactions are so random, that you basically cover all the possibilities of current particle interaction, over an extended amount of time. If it is possible, it’s going to happen. When it happends, it is the only thing to matter, everything else is innert matter, waiting to be fed apon, by the most complex interaction of particles available.

E minha resposta foi:

Hi, Unlimited, thanks by the helpful comments.

You said: “So you are filling the gaps with god?”

Matrix: “I never said the word “god”. You are saying it. No, the gaps are not filled with god but with variables coming from LUCA as a closed thermodynamic system: entropy, fragmentation, chaos, mutation due new state of matter, order, super-specialism, entropy, fragmentation… Universal evolution is about the evolution of a unique system that appeared at the Big Bang. The biological organization of matter and its evolution is merely a step of a macro-universal evolution. And you cannot explain evolution ( for instance: the transformation from the reptile cyanodont to mammal) if you don’t apply those variables.

I have mentioned that the models of Matrix Theory suggests the existence of an ex-machine intelligence because the models suggests this universe carries out a genetic reproduction. So, if intelligence is a shape of the embryo, the system ex-machine being reproduced here must have intelligence. But, it does not mean that there is an intelligent design: any mouse or giraffe are able to reproduce itself without applying intelligence. I did not use intelligence for doing my son.

Outros Pesquisadores Chegando Perto da Matrix/DNA: O DNA e’ um Software de Multibilhoes Anos

terça-feira, maio 26th, 2015

xxxx

Deus criou a genetica natural universal e o Homem tenta imita-Lo artificialmente produzindo os softwares computacionais. E a Matrix/DNA uniu os dois numa linguagem inteligivel aos humanos. Veja este artigo e o meu comentario postado na area de debates: ( quando tiver tempo volto aqui para traduzi-lo)

DNA Is Multibillion-Year-Old Software

http://bigthink.com/errors-we-live-by/dna-is-multibillion-year-old-software

by Jag Bhalla

A Fórmula da Matriz/DNA como Algoritmo Para Todos os Sistemas Abertos e Fechados

terça-feira, maio 26th, 2015

xxxx

A fórmula da Matriz/DNA como algoritmo de um sistema fechado ( existente somente nas escalas atomicas e astronomicas):

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

F1) Existem ingredientes crus no espaco, na forma de massa e energia, e rodopiando devido rotacao do espaco?

Se sim, forme-se o rodamoinho e misture ingredients crus cozinhando-os ate que bolhas sejam ejetadas para o espaco externo. As bolhas serao o nucleo de um novo corpo astronomico;

Se nao, nao se forme o rodamoinho.

2) Uma bolha agrega mais ingredientes crus e congelados do espaco?

Se sim, continue se dirigindo para dentro do espaco sidereal, agora sob o nome de semente estelar ou planeta;

Se nao, desfaca-se como bolha.

3) O planeta passa perto de uma estrela?

Se sim, caia na sua orbita;

Se nao, continue vagando no espaco ate se desfazer.

4) O nucleo e’ alcancado pela energia da estrela?

Se sim, inicie reacoes nucleares se alimentando das camadas externas de ingredients, ou seja, das camadas geologicas;

Se nao, torne-se uma lua.

5) A reacao nuclear evolue comendo as camadas ate a superficie?

Se sim, a pressao forma os vulcoes que ejetam cometas que caem na espiral galatica rumo ao nucleo;

Se nao, congele-se como uma lua.

6) A reacao nuclear atingiu a ultima camada superficial?

Se sim, colapse-se como uma estrela supernova;

Se nao, congele-se como lua.

7) Esgotaram-se as particulas de energia dentro dos atomos das camadas de nutrientes?

Se sim, desfacao o resto em massa ingrediente para formar novo rodamoinho;

Se nao, torne-se um planeta gigante morto de gas inerte.

A fórmula da Matriz/DNA para sistemas abertos:

1) Repita todos os passos ate F5

2) Queres se eternizar nesta forma de corpo?

Se sim, vas internamente para o nucleo;

Se nao, vas externamente para se relacionar com o exterior desconhecido.

Traducao para o Ingles:

The Matrix/DNA formula as a closed system algorithm (exists only at atomic and astronomical scales):
F1) Are there are raw ingredients in space, in the form of mass and energy, and swirling due rotation of space?
If so, form a whirlpool mixing raw ingredients and cooking them until bubbles are ejected to the external space. The bubbles will be the core of a new astronomical body;
If not, don’t form the whirlpool.
2) The bubble adds more raw and frozen ingredients in the space?
If yes, continue heading into the sidereal space, now under the names of “star-seed” inside a “planet”;
If not, be undone as a bubble.
3) The planet passes close to a star?
If yes, get in their orbits;
If not, continue wandering in space to unravel.
4) The nucleus is reached by the star’s energy?
If yes, start nuclear reactions feeding on the outer layers of ingredients, i.e. the geological layers. Go to F6;
If not, become a moon.
5) Is the nuclear reaction evolving and eating the layers to the surface?
If yes, the pressure form the volcanos ejecting comets (carrying on active nuclear reactions for to activate the whirlpool) and  falling internally on the galactic’s spiral towards the core. Go to F1;
If not, freeze like a moon.
6) The nuclear reaction reached the final surface layer?
If yes, self-collapsing becoming a star supernova;
If not, freeze like moon.
7) Were sold out the energy particles within the atoms of the nutrients’ layers?
If yes, self-dissolves into fragmented in ingredient mass to form new whirlpool, and self recycles yours body.
If not, become a giant dead planet of inert gas.

The Matrix/DNA formula for open systems:

1) Being yourself an electromagnetic structure, or atomic, or astronomic, or biological, repeat all steps to F5;

2) Do you want to perpetuate this form of body/life’s cycle/closed system?
If Yes, go internally to the nucleus and repeat his eternal cycle;
If not, go externally to relate to the outer unknown.
Note: for example, if you’re a man, and married, drive all your F5 for a single and same woman, reproducing only a unique type of DNA. If you’re a man, and celibate, drive your F5 to the largest quantity of different women, producing diverse kinds of DNA. Other example: drive yours behaviors to be an extreme nationalist or to be opened to globalization. Or other: as a bird in Galapagos, keep yourself in Galapagos eternally or immigrates to the next island for to be found by Darwin as mutated and naturally selected.

Oportunidade para Brasileiros-Feras e Criativos. Prêmios para Selecionados

sexta-feira, março 14th, 2014

A Innocentive é uma organização promovendo o progresso da tecnologia, publicando as ofertas existentes de prêmios/financiamentos para idéias inovadoras. Abaixo vai o link para uma oferta na qual participei enviando uma proposta ( é muito simples, sem burocracias). Os selecionados nesta proposta terão pagos as despesas para participar numa conferencia no Canadá ( base de 3.000,00 dolares), mais um premio de 8.500,00 dolares, e mais o que pode vir depois, com contratos, etc. Sempre é bom estar atento na Innocentive e… torçam por mim… seria uma grande oportunidade para debater meus modelos feitos na selva com experts em todas as areas cientificas.

Ideas for Annual Computational Cognition Competition

https://www.innocentive.com/ar/projectRoom/index?challenge=9933054

AWARD: $8,500 USD  |  DEADLINE: 4/15/14  |  ACTIVE SOLVERS: 29  |  POSTED: 3/14/14

Source: InnoCentive      Challenge ID: 9933054     Type: Ideation
xxxxxx

My Submitted Solution:

   Natural Software Formula for Systems plus Optical Physics an
Submitted: 2014-03-14

Cérebro e Consciência: Interessante Teoria

sábado, janeiro 18th, 2014

Mind exists outside of physical world – will you agree?

http://www.ted.com/conversations/22404/mind_exists_outside_of_physica.html

Jan 10 2014 –  by Pabitra Mukhopadhyay –

However, our ideas of consciousness, mind, intelligence, information processing etc. with respect to environments (and I am not even talking about ‘rich internal life’ or qualia) are unfairly based on neuronic hierarchy of sentience. Like for consciousness to be handled by a scientist, his/her field has to be neuro-biology. In order to discuss consciousness and mind legitimately we are supposed to be within the boundaries of cognitive sciences – and these do not offer much of explanation at all.

If I understand it correctly, consciousness is all about being aware of the environment to start with, intelligence is the capacity to interact with it to survive at the most basic level and mind is the information processing software of conscious life. It is very unclear to me why sentience has to be sole territory of neurons, brains and nervous systems. There is much evidence of hormonal sentience of plants.

It appears to me that we tend to monopolize the ideas of consciousness, mind and intelligence in an anthropocentric way where human brain figures as the last word.

Minha opinião e comentário postado na conversação do TED (foi dividido em dois posts):

Louis Morellthumb  January, 18 -2014 – 10:13 AM

Well, I am currently choosing a theory of the mind that comes from outside cognitive sciences and the anthropocentric self-projection. This definition came from calculus, when applying comparative anatomy between living and non-living natural systems. First, was discovered an unknown system that fits as the evolutionary link between living and non-living. But, the link is an astronomical system, and despite the fact that it is half-mechanical and half-biological, the problem was, 30 years ago, to figure out why and how it was transformed or produced from itself a copy at microscopic dimensions and as biological system. Solving this problem, the researcher found a natural living software inside all systems and called it “the universal mind”.

Of course, the process used in that “self-reproduction”, must be the genetic process in its primitive state. Then, it was revealed: the astronomical system is a closed system, which attacked by entropy have its degradation beginning at its periphery, producing fragments that are driven internally towards its center, the nucleus. But, the periphery was under radiation producing energy, in shape of light, emitting photons. Those photons worked like bits-information from the old system and at a new environment ( like the surface of an internal planet) those photons joining again reproducing at microscopic scale and with mutations evolving its biological properties. The photons worked as the ancestors of biological genes, the whole as the genome, but the picture of this genome is identical to a diagram of software that we build for operating a hardware. The crucial difference is that the natural software is a living thing. Evolution has worked in same way that worked the evolution of ours computers: the primitive first hardware did easier to get more informations from the external world, these informations went to a human mind that feels the necessity of improving the software, but then, need a more powerful (cont.next post)

Louis Morelli – January, 18, 2014 – 10:19 AM

… powerful hardware, a process of feed-back.

So, every natural system – from atoms to galaxias to plants to animals to humans –  are composed by descartable hardware and a living software, and this includes the human brain as a system. This software is under evolution, its first amd primitive shape was the light wave emitted by the Big Bang, expanding, penetrating dark inertial matter and imprinting the code for life. Finally, the whole description of this software mind was described thousands years ago: there is a universal soul that was sleeping at atoms, dreaming at galaxies, began waking up at plants and animals, and now is an embryo of consciousness being nurtured inside this kind of egg that is the human head.

The big question is: knowing that the hardware becomes old and “dies”, what happens with this living software? Of course, our wish is that the software must survival, then, our research will be guided to find this result. Because now, we are not more watching the results revealed by an investigative method that worked by itself without human interference, then we can’t avoid the anthropocentrism. We are focusing natural light because it started the process and we are suspecting that the acceleration of synapses is producing a kind of luminous plasma. If so, our mind must be like bubbles containing light and dust of a cosmic ocean of light. When we are alive,  these bubbles are inside our heads, when the hardware dies, the bubble explodes becoming the ocean itself. Since that the ocean is the whole and known non boundaries, this theory fits with what people that had experience visions after-death are talking about. I am crazy looking to all theories, but I hope that you appreciate this theory, because we are in need of more people doing the research, more minds thinking together. Cheers,

Resposta do Autor ao Meu Comentario:

thumb

Pabitra Mukhopadhyay 50+

Jan 18 2014: For a theory that seems too descriptive to me and I honestly am making no sense of it. Please appreciate that when I am saying ‘theory of mind’ I am asking it on the foundation of science and not the way psychologists (human psychologists or psychiatrists) use it. I am not sure psychology or psychiatry is science at all.
http://www.arachnoid.com/psychology/

It is acceptable to me that ‘mind’ is a concept akin to scientific concepts the way Arkady argued. Only problem is scientific concepts have practical applications with predictable results. ‘Mind’ as a concept does not appear to be so.

It is difficult even to feel complacent that science will one day find out how exactly mind works. First reason being there seems to be no branch of science presently studying the ‘mind’ concept. Second merely knowing the exact architecture of brain or the physical basis of neurons can predict behavior, not mind.

That makes perception, cognition, attention, emotion, phenomenology, motivation, brain functioning, personality, behavior, and interpersonal relationships floating without solid scientific foundation.

Now please re-read my question and try answering.

Minhas respostas:
thumb

Louis Morelli

To: Pabitra Mukhopadhyay – 30 – jan- 2014

1) You says: “For a theory that seems too descriptive to me and I honestly am making no sense of it.”
My comments: When reading you I have the suspect that you are coming to this issue with a previous preference, with bias founded upon something that you want to believe. If i am right, yours attitude would explain why you think my theory is too descriptive. There are no limits on descriptions when talking about mind because “mind”is the most complex phenomena observed here and now by a limited brain. So, mind must have inserted into it all aspects of this Universe and probably, beyond the universe. There is no way for applying Occam’s razor on this issue. If you think that you will already understood or will understand what mind is before yours death, forget it. If you wish to study this phenomena, you need be very patient and truing to know every detail of the Universe where mind emerged ( or the universe that mind created…). It is ggo trying to understanding others’ theories because they are discovering things that you didn’t.  Then, you conclude that you are not making sense of my theory. Of course, you don’t know nothing about it, about 30 years of research that you never made. The appeal to “don’t make sense” is yours Occam’s razor,  a tool that is not appropriated by an student of consciousness.
2) You says: ” Only problem is scientific concepts have practical applications with predictable results.”
My comments: Which practical applications and predictable results had quantum theory or general relativity or evolution theory at the time they were launched? The study of mind need be supported by the real facts of this natural world, despite knowing that our brains and scientific resources will not reach tomorrow the whole knowledge about the mind. Id you does not follow the search and lessons step by step, you will fall into a belief system of the mind and then, you will go far away from the final knowledge.

To: Pabitra Mukhopadhyay 30- jan- 2014

3) You says:  “Now please re-read my question and try answering.”
There is no answer to yours affirmation that “mind exists outside the physical world”. Because nobody can prove its answer, as you can’t prove that affirmation. You should ask: My theory today is….. which is yours theory? Why? These should be an optimal initiative from yours, let’s go changing informations and knowing what others are getting about a phenomena that will be solved only if and when the first human can go outside the physical world that is this universe observable by our limited sensors. My method of investigation is not “officially scientific” and I started with no previous concepts. The final result is suggesting that consciousness and human body is explained by an observable phenomena here and now: the mind of Bill Gates ( existing outside computers) the software windows ( a production/reproduction of something existent in the mind of Bill Gates that are projected inside the computer) and the computer’s hardware ( the physical human brain). Remembering that there is an evolutionary process of feed-back between hardware and software, that hardwares are discarded and changed but the software is not, it is growing, becoming complex.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX