Jump start: tiny planthoppers’ gears make it first off at the lights
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/jump-start-tiny-planthoppers-gears-make-it-first-off-at-the-lights-20130913-2tq91.html#ixzz2enLHuD3k
September 14, 2013 – by Meeri Kim
Tudo o que se descobre feito pela Natureza aqui na superfície da Terra, se descobre tambem na formula da Matrix/DNA que já era feito pela Natureza a 10 ou 13,7 bilhões de anos atras e no espaço sideral. Por exemplo, na figura acima, atônitos cientistas observando o filme revelado por microcâmeras instalados num inseto menor que um mosquito, uma extraordinária engenharia mecânica sendo acionada e funcionando, que explica aquela questão que humanos se perguntaram desde o inicio dos tempos: ” Como, raios, esse bicho pula tao rápido, como um piscar olhos, saltando no ar em distancias centenas de vezes maior que seu corpo?!!!” Não se encontrava uma explicação racional em bases cientificas, parecia mesmo um milagre. Já imaginou se humanos conseguissem fazer isso? Ninguem conseguiria dar um soco, um pontapé, em ninguem! Se alguem estivesse numa esquina esperando o sinal abrir para atravessar a rua, e de repente decidisse que era melhor estar na outra esquina um bloco a frente, era só dar um salto no ar, em microsegundos… Mas espera ai! Isso não ia dar certo. Todo mundo iria querer pular para ganhar tempo, então ia ser uma “trombaiada” no ar entre humanos das feias… daquelas de todos saírem com seus narizes quebrados. E ia ter os atletas do pulo, com alguns trombando com aviões passando la em cima.
A formula da Matrix/DNA ensina que tudo o que a Natureza tem de recursos, estão encriptados no nosso DNA, e depende da vontade ou necessidade de uma especie desenvolver e expressar tais recursos. Em algum momento da evolução, na passagem de insetos para a forma seguinte, nossos ancestrais abandonaram esse recurso do salto espontâneo, porque estava lhes causando algum problema. Agora sei porque.
Mas onde estava esta engenharia oculta na Natureza quando ela construiu, por exemplo, os sistemas astronômicos, tais como as galaxias? Vamos ver a formula no seu desenho rustico feito em papel de embrulhar pão enquanto eu dava tapas no ar tentando acertar os danadinhos vampirinhos chamado piuns e carapanãs que queriam me jantar chupando meu sangue, mas não conseguia acertar um porque o pulo da minha desajeitada mão é muito mais lento que os pulos deles.
Matrix/DNA: O template para todos os sistemas naturais, de átomos a nucleotideos a galáxias e células. O circuíto energético padrão.
E para esclarecer melhor, vamos tambem trazer esta formula no seu aspecto de alma dos sistemas, ou seja, apresentada como um diagrama abstrato de software:
E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software
O segredo esta no cone central da Função 1, que no building block de galaxias se refere ao núcleo onde se esconde um vórtice rotativo. A Função 1 é a responsável por triturar, misturar processando, a massa e energia que entra no rodamoinho e emitir o resultado final para o espaço externo. Como todas as demais seis funções sistêmicas universais, ela vai confeccionar o seu instrumento de ação de acordo com o material disponível e as condições reinantes num dado ambiente. Ela construiu o vórtice no nucleo das galaxias, mas antes deve ter construido (vai me perdoando ai as falhas de acentuação das palavras e os erros datilográficos porque estou num teclado que só fala inglês e tenho que escrever este texto muito rapido porque o meu tempo fora do trabalho é muito curto), o mecanismo que emite um píon de um próton na direção de um nêutron dentro do nucleo atômico, e depois, mais tarde ela construiu o aparato feminino da confecção e emissão de um novo baby, assim como ela teve que se contorcer um pouco e dar seu jeito de construir a boca dos animais, já que esta é a porta de entrada e trituração dos alimentos. Mas a emissão de babys é um processo lento, a emissão de vitaminas e fezes dos alimentos também é um processo lento, e a emissão de sementes de astros pelo nucleo galáctico é ainda mais lento, tomando milhões de anos. Enquanto isso, o pulo dos insetos é algo instantâneo, rapidíssimo! Como isso é possivel? Qual outro recurso da Natureza encravado no DNA dos insetos eles usaram para conseguir tal façanha?
Simples. É a identidade do sistema que determina a velocidade do fluxo energético que corre dentro de seu circuito sistêmico. Ela pode se acelerar ou ate se estacionar, no caso das hibernações.
Vemos então na figura azul acima que os sistemas naturais possuem a capacidade de se movimentarem por vontade própria, girando sobre si mesmo. Nos acionamos este principio quando nosso corpo rodopia, como faz a bailarina no palco. Agora, temos um problema: o auto-rodopio é um rodopio do sistema inteiro, como um todo. No entanto, temos observado que para conseguir rodopios dentro do sistema, e não dele inteiro, os humanos inventaram uma coisa chamada de rodas de engrenagem ( ”It’s remarkable that these gears look so similar to the gears man has designed, even the individual teeth are so similar,” said Professor Burrows ). Então como a Natureza internalizou um mecanismo externo, como foi que esse obreiro universal que denomino de Função 1 conseguiu aplicar esta mesma solução, transformando o livre rodopiar do sistema em rodas de engrenagem par fazer suas partes internas rodopiarem?
Diz o artigo acima:
” They found that the insects have toothed gears at the base of their hind legs that intermesh and rotate to perfectly synchronise the timing of each limb’s release during a jump. With this mechanism, the legs are locked and coupled together. The time delay from moving one leg to another is as short as 30 microseconds, or 30 millionths of a second, allowing the insects to leap faster and farther. Without synchronisation, the insect’s body will spin instead of going straight forward due to the orientation of its hind legs, Professor Burrows said. For example, using the most extreme case, a single-legged planthopper can only helplessly spin around in the same spot without getting anywhere.”
Traduzindo grosseira e rapidamente: ” O inseto, cuja figura é essa aqui…:
Sprung: The planthopper has provided evidence that the powerful jumps of insects are made possible by interacting gears in the hind legs. Photo: Courtesy of Malcolm Burrows
tem uma especie de roda dentada em suas pernas com um calibrador para sincronizar o movimento de rotação com o movimento de impulso para a direção inclinada ” para a frente e para o alto”. Assim o calibrador regula a liberação de cada movimento em microsegundos. Com este mecanismo as pernas são fechadas e acopladas juntas. O atraso de tempo entre o impulso que faz o inseto girar sobre si mesmo e o impulso que faz o inseto ir para o alto é sincronizado, senão, como acontece om um inseto que tenha só uma perna, ao invés dele saltar, ele fica no chão rodopiando sobre si mesmo.”
Entendeu? Nem eu entendi direito, mas isso se deve a lentidão do nosso raciocínio que não nos permite as vezes acompanhar os movimentos em velocidades quase igual da luz que a Natureza pode executar. O que interessa é que ele acontece. No espaço sideral a Natureza construiu um sistema na forma espiralada ( a formula acima na realidade não é uma esfera como parece, mas sim, uma espiral, acontece que eu ainda não tive tempo para calcular e modificar o desenho), que, em relação ao nosso sistema de visão, situa o cone nuclear numa posição horizontal em relação ao sistema. Mas quando foi fazer as bocas dos animais, o sistema giratório horizontal não era possível, como a trituração dos pedaços grandes de matéria jogando-os uns contra os outros tambem não era possivel aqui na Terra devido a diferença gravitacional. Então a F1 teve que verticalizar o cone e transformar suas aureolas que compõem a linha espiral na forma de dentes. Separando o cone em duas metades se saiu com os maxilares inferior e superior, cada parte saindo com sua metade de dentes. Vemos quando cavalos mastigam que eles apenas não só fazem chocar os dentes das duas partes, mas tambem, no instante seguinte ao choque, vemos o maxilar inferior se mover da direita para a esquerda, enquanto o superior fica estacionado, o que completa o processo de trituração da erva. A isso chamamos de ” mastigação”. Esta é uma parte chata e enfadonha na observação dos detalhes na Natureza, tanto que a maioria das pessoas jamais concentrou sua mente para pensar porque o maxilar vai para a esquerda. No entanto, temos que fazer o sacrifício de observar estes detalhes chatos porque são eles que nos fizeram criar as áreas da engenharia e foram estes sacrifícios de físicos como Galileo atirando pesos do alto de torres e observando cada detalhe em suas quedas que hoje temos esta extraordinária engenharia que tanto já nos tem livrado do trabalho forcado e rotineiro.
Inseto que se esquece de acionar ao mesmo tempo seu impulso para frente, gira rapidamente sobre si mesmo na mesa ate ficar tonto, cambalear e ir ao chão, ao invés de se exibir na nossa frente e dizendo: “Veja como sou capaz de pular muitas vezes a altura do meu corpo!” e realmente dar o pulo. Não funcionou seu calibrador natural. Mas com tudo isso, com mais esta fantástica e louvável descoberta de nossos esforçados cientistas que tiveram a pachorra de colocar uma microcâmera atada na barriga do inseto, e mais a observação da formula da Matrix/DNA Universal, a cada dia vamos aumentando a nossa inteligencia, a qual nada mais é que a transformação dos fenômenos naturais em símbolos, imagens, internalizadas em nossa mente, e tais mínimos detalhes são somados para resolver problemas práticos do nosso dia a dia, desenvolvendo nossa tecnologia, a qual um dia vai nos catapultar para dar-mos o gigantesco salto sobre as distancias interstelares e nos colocar no Cosmos aberto a nossa busca de conhecimento, de liberdade e de poder… assim como nossa incansável busca alem do espaço sideral de quem foi que nos criou.
Veja video no Youtube sobre –
Planthopper gears in action
O melhor texto da materia e este na National Geographic
fazer um ultimo post para todos os artigos:
Meu comentario postado na National Geographic:
Louis Charles Morelli
September 14, 2013
” The planthopper nymphs lose them when they become adults. But the adults don’t shoot off in uncoordinated spins”
These scientists need to know the design of the most perfect machine built by Nature – which was the real creator of biological systems like the planthopper – for understanding the origins and function of every piece in planthopper. The design is the theoretical model of the building blocks of galaxies systems elaborated by Matrix/DNA Theory, the anatomy of LUCA – the Last Universal Common Ancestor. These astronomical building blocks have identical configuration with the building blocks of DNA, nucleotides. It means that all novelty found at any biological systems are reducible to this galaxy. For instance, the tooth-like structure first appeared at the DNA “zipper”. This separation into two wheels came from the separation of DNA strands. But… the DNA tooth-like came from the reproduction here of the vortex existing at the nucleous of this galaxy. The vortex is a conic spiral. If we cut this cone into two halfes, we have the spiral lines like tooth at each half. In the design we can see that the vortex works like a bump, ejecting new babies stars. This mechanism is coupled after the gearing vortex. Like it is in planthopper. The most astonishing issue is about the planthopper life cycle being shared into two phases, when the young gears changes methods. At Matrix/DNA Theory we know that evolution always works shared into two phases (like the first eggs-out and the second, eggs-in). In the sky, the emitted baby-star also shows two phases of movement: first, it rotates around the vortex, but, as it becomes old, it gets another circuit, launched ahead the vortex. This synchronization was not invented by insects, it already exists in the sky! Everything equal! I have discovered that everything about bees or ants social organization is just a copy of this building block of our ancestor astronomical system. Insects are the best copies of LUCA. What came later were deviations of biological systems due the new environment.
Postado tambem em: Yahoo News
Paper publicado em:
AAAS.ORG. – Science
Interacting Gears Synchronize Propulsive Leg Movements in a Jumping Insect
Meus comentarios e debate no artigo do Wshington Post:
Louis Charles Morelli
This mechanisms of synchronized self-spinning and jumping can be seen working at the building block of galaxies 10 billions years ago. It is encrypted at biological DNA and can be used by any species that needs to express its genes. For most accurate understanding you can see it in the Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems, googling: O Impressionante Salto dos Insetos, Explicado Pela Ciência, já Estava Escrito nas Estrelas a Bilhões de Anos Atras!
I knew this story would bring the creatards and IDers crawling out of the woodwork in droves. We just love to let our critical thinking go out the window and give ghost stories free reign when we see something natural that has the appearance of human design.
I would laugh if it weren’t so tragic.
Louis Charles Morelli
8:42 PM EDT
But… the second wave of creatards today is coming from the critical thinking, besides the magical thinking, like this one, believing that this stupid matter of this lost planet could inventing such extraordinary engineery. It is not enough Nature teaching that everything complex – like this synchronized instrument – does not appears by magics from poor soups, neither from magics of intelligent designers, but is product of long, long evolution. Rational thinking suggests that we must search the origins of this mechanisms not in galaxies, which are not magical creators either, but before it, at the atomic nucleus, when a proton emits pion towards a neutron and keeps the system spinning.Don’t go there, continuing to believe that this mechanisms is here because it is here, and you never will understand it in full.
This is a bit off topic but seeing all the theists and “intelligent design” folks makes me want to pose them a question or two:How do they reconcile the existence of evil in a universe created by an all-powerful, infallible and omniscient being that is supposed to be good? God could have created a perfect universe without evil because he’s all-powerful. Evil can’t an oversight because he is all-knowing and infallible. “Free will” is a cop-out because one can’t have free-will if one was created by a being who knew with perfect certainty before he created his creation what those creations would do.
Louis Charles Morelli
9:13 PM EDT
First of all, while you are believing in the current cosmological model and the world view resulting from this model, you never will understand what is in Nature that human intuition at its infant times called “evil”. It happens to you because this world view is wrong, not because the existence of evil is wrong. You are not enough smart for asking yourself that ” I am seeing bad forces causing bad effects at every event in this world, but I am criticizing those that believes in evil…” In other words, you are searching yours self-blindness, because evil=bad forces for infant minds. When we have a more accurate cosmological model with a more true world view, the meaning of evil and the explanation for bad forces changes dramatically, but then we understand how a baby mind had operated when translating bad forces into the idea of an identity that they called ” evil”. In Matrix/DNA model, bad forces originated from photons that goes out from the normal course of light waves which is the carrier of life’s code. They creates a self-reality, separated from the creator’s goal, which does not care about this separated simulated reality. And those photons are our universal creators, our first ancestors, so, we are creators of bad forces. But… there is nothing supernatural here, since that this universe is merely a genetic process of reproduction from a natural system existing beyond the Big Bang. Things are far, far more complex than we were thinking…
L.C.M:I don’t believe in “evil”. I was addressing those who do believe in “evil”, “good” and, especially, “god”.I don’t think you understood a word I wrote but way to make personal attacks and call me an “infant”. It speaks volumes about you.
Louis Charles Morelli
Now I knew that you did not understand a word I wrote, but it is my fault, since that English is not my native language and I am based in a world view that you never had read before. I understood that you don’t believe in evil, I was trying to explain from my viewpoint why the infant minds at the beginning of human culture had the intuition about evil. There were no intention of personal attack, sorry. I am not a creationist and I don’t know nothing about magical gods and magical evil also, my post suggesting that these mechanisms already existed from billions of years is based in theoretical models of Matrix/DNA Theory.
10:23 AM EDT
LCM:Thanks for the elaboration. That makes more sense.I’m sorry that I mistook you for insulting me. Now that I know you’re not a native speaker it makes more sense. I thought you were just crazy but now I can see better what you were getting at.And your English is very good. It’s just that some of the phrasing you used could be interpreted as saying I had a “baby mind” but now I see you didn’t mean it like that.Sorry again for the misunderstanding. It’s more my fault than yours
ESTA SERIA MINHA RESPOSTA A ANDREW23, MAS, CLARO, NÃO A PUBLICAREI PORQUE ALEM DE SER FORA DO TOPICO DO ARTIGO, é MUITO LONGA.
All right. I used the words “baby minds” because my theoretical models in Matrix/DNA Theory are suggesting that human mind, or consciousness is merely a new evolutuionary shape of a universal system that began its existence at the Big Bang, fragmented in quantum vortexes popping out into this time/space. The supposed existence of an unknown force responsible for instructions in the DNA and now, the same force, more evolved, working as instructor of human brain, lead me to search this force before life’s origins and the comparative method between living and non-living systems suggested a model where this unknown force is a kind of software, that evolves by feed-back with changing hardwares, like atoms, astronomicals and biological systems. I have calculated the shape, the picture of this new emergent system called “mind”, based in evolution and the brains’ structures. Now, the job is testing the theory. If the models are right, human consciousness must be just now a kind of embryo or a baby at birth. So, the primitive tribes that invented religions maybe were at the mind’s state of fetus or baby minds.
But, as you explained very well in yours post, the religious faith does not resists to scrutiny by Epicuro’s logica. Moreover, the believer does not care, he continues feeding his faith. Why it happens? The models of Matrix/DNA are suggesting a surprising explanation. The believers will expose the fair tales of the fall of Lucifer due his free will, and after that the fall of Adam/Eve after choosing the reign of Lucifer insted the reign of God. Since that Lucifer(the evil) is bad for us, they invented the sacrifice of Jesus Christs, the fair tale of Mahomeh, etc. Now it is up you if you chose the lucifer or the God way. The worst thing here is that this metaphysical elaborated logica makes sense. It makes more sense than Epicuro’s logica, because it does not explain anything about the existence of this world. So, we, that see the Epicuro’s logica as the best, will never convince a believer using only words. Those fair tales were genially invented for to fit the fantasies that populates a infant mind, which has the normal behavior like any kid of believing and talking with invisible friends
My focus then, has been upon the process that created those genial fair tales. So, by the most ancient books I found that these middle east religions began when a man, called Schimeon Ben Jochai, described worlds seen in his visions, which are resumed as ” The Stancias of Dzian”. We read there notions as black holes in the sidereal space, spirits spinning seven times, etc. Schimeon’s disciples had antropomorfized those descriptions and their development resulted into the Bible, the Kuran. Now, oir problem is to explain how Schimeon’s brain produced those descriptions about worlds and dimensions never seen by others. Matrix/DNA models suggests a reazonable explanation. It happens that the model of a building block of galactic systems, when designed over a paper, shows all symbols amd events contained in those fair tales. We see there the shape of the system is the shape of a SERPENT, but by a different perspective is also like a TREE, and seen from above is like an APPLE. If you look to the model now you will understand it. Then, the model shows energy circuits that works like X and Y chromossomas in a mechanical reproductive procees, and antropormorfazing it you get the names of ADAM and EVE. The astronomical system was a closed system, a kind of PARADISE for matter at thermodynamic equillibrium, but, as closed system it is prohibited by the laws of the Universe, that they called “GOD”. As result, the galaxy was built by evil, “LUCIFER”. Then, entropy attacks every natural system, and the result is the “Fall” of this systems. It happened that this building block of astronomical systems were fragmented by entropy into its smallest bits and from stars they are radiated towards Earth surface. Here, these bits meets together and begins to re-built the astronomical system, in a microscope and mutated enviroment. The final results today is “humans” as the offspring of Adam/Eve. Everything described at those fair tales in the BIble – without antropomorfizing it – was real once time, about 5 billions years ago! It is merely a scientific description of Cosmological Evolution!
The problem is: How Schimeon got the real Universal Natural History, 4 thousand years ago?! At Amazon jungle I was watching natives describing their visions after drinking a kind of alucinogenous beverage. My surprise is that they described something very similar to Schimeon’s and more, very similar to those visions og a chinese that saw dragons in the lake and created the oriental religions. It happens that the figure of I Ching is exactly the model of the building block of galaxies, again! My final theory is results of logical thinking: the state of the world at billions years ago, before that world building the events of life’s origins, were fragmented into bits-information in shape of photons irradiated by stars. At Earth surface these photons worked like genes, building the first living cell system, wich is a biological reproduction of that building block of astronomical systems. These photons-genes constitutes primordial RNA and DNA, and this DNA are at the center of human brains’ neurons. It happens that primordial native minds like Schimeon, and natves of Amazon jungle, with or not alucinogenous, makes that flashes from the time that our ancestors were galaxies, popo out in the mind. Since that the observer does not comprehend the Cosmos and the events seems humanized, they invents analogies, antropomorfizing the past times. Everything must be at our memories. Welcome to the world of Bible, Kuran, they make more logical sense than Epicuro’s logics because they are based in natural logics, although fantasied. There are no gods and evils like described in these books, but, we, humans, are a kind of natural system, last evolved product of a unique natural system that once time was in shape of atoms, stellar, galactic system, and then, was in shape of bacteria, fish, monkey, etc. This system has crossed Cosmological History with a kind of unconscious free will, it made mistakes against natural universal laws, but if you go now to the natives of Amazon jungle showing pictures og galaxies, black holes, DNA, cells systems… wait more 50 years and go back… you will find a lot of new natuves fair tales of gods like Tupa and spirits of the jungle, etc.. But… those fair tales will be a logical constrution, because they were based in real pictures and real events, showed by you. It is a kind of ” Deja vu”, you are their memory in the future bringing adqured knowledges about the past.
This is pretty cool. Nature can be truly amazing.One species achieves something through mutation and (I assume being bugs) massive procreation, another evolves individual intelligence and some genius invents it.
Louis Charles Morelli
We have problems with yours statement. First (One species achieves something through mutation) you are seeing the same that ” one species created something never existed before, so, it created something from nothing”. Second (another evolves individual intelligence), you are saying that another species crated intelligence where never intelligence existed before, so, it was created from nothing. Third (some genius invented it), again, you are saying that there are genius able for creating something from nothing. If we breaks the current world view taught at schools we meets these slices of “something created by nothing all the way around”. But, it is not enough that Darwin had discovered that no novelty came from nothing, everything is result of gradual transformation leaving from the simple to complex. It means that the informations for doing such synchronized gear already were disposable in the Universe, it were not created here and now. That’s what I am doing with my Matrix/DNA Theory: searching till the Big Bang where were the informations for everything complex we see here and now and how they developed.
I do love it when people see something that *seems* extremely improbable and say “that’s clearly impossible!” and then follow up by arguing that something which is *actually* impossible is more likely!
You hear it from believers in all sorts of nonsense. (read more)
Louis Charles Morelli
I do love it when people see something here never saw before and calls the mechanism of mutation and natural selection for explaining it existence. But I do love that same people does not found at the state of the world when these biological systems emerged here, the forces and elements of mutation and natural selection. In another world, while the antique magical thinking invented God as magical being, these modern people shows same magical thinking inventing a state of the world as magical device. You hear it from believers that believes that they have critical thinking….As you said “Small variations happening over millions of years being “selected for” by basic, natural laws can’t possibly have lead to something so complex. It MUST be the work of a supernatural being… “, now the saying is that it is the work of bubbles that pops out from nothing like popcorn. On Matrix/DNA Theory we are observing that during 9 months an initial amount of mass without shape called blastulae goes from small variations to small variations and finally creates a very complex thing. It is Nature showing the process occurring here and now, Nature does not plays dice with us, it makes things here like it makes things everywhere, even at cosmological scales. Bit there is no supernatural being inside the womb making those things and I am not seeing bubbles popping out from nowhere. That’s happens inside the womb because there is a program working hidden inside matter. then. the normal rational thinking goes to outside, till the entire Cosmos, searching for some specie of program hidden into matter. I found the Matrix formula, showed at my website. Of course, it is not the whole thing, but it is a more rational explanation.
I thought one of the scientists was going to have a theory about how such an intricate mechanism with interdependent pieces could come about through an extremely long series of random events. Oh well, let’s just say it’s “unknown”.
Louis Charles Morelli
Rusty, there is explanation about “how such an intricate mechanism with interdependent pieces came into existence here”. All these pieces already exists in the most perfect machine created by Nature, called ” the building block of galaxies”. If you see the picture of that astronomical machine ( the theoretical model of Matrix/DNA Theory), you see there all these pieces. And if you knows how this astronomical system made biological systems, throughout a normal genetic process, you will understand how this insect has coupled these mechanisms together again. The biggest surprise waiting for Darwinists that believes in LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) is that LUCA never existed at Earth surface, but it is the entire system to which this planets belongs to. There is no Intelligent Designer acting between this galaxy and its creations, which does not means that could not be possible that an Intelligent Designer was acting before the Big Bang. I know that small variations and natural selection does not explain this mechanism either, but, the theories elaborated by these scientists are based upon a wrong cosmological model.
The intellegent design aficionados have come out of the woodwork.Intellegent design just like creationism is nonsense. There is no good reson for needing a God to create the universe.If there were an all powerful, all knowing, perfect and thus never changing God, why would He even bother with all this? Before He even created the Universe, He would have known exactly what would happen in it for all time – where every sub-atomic particle would be as well as what every human would ever do.Being all powerful, He could have created the Universe 13.8 billion or 6000 years or 6 days ago and made it exactly as it is right now. So what would have been the point? How is messing with a bunch of tiddly winks very interesting when you already know exactly what they will do before you start.
As Stephen Hawking has stated – God was not needed to create the Universe. Nor do we need a God to understand what our purpose is or even to provide a moral compass. Our purpose as a species is to survive and grow. And many of us have found that by helping others, we really are helping ourselves do just that.
So, yours technical explanations about how insects got these mechanisms is…. I know, you will repeat the mantra: small variations over time, successful procreation and natural selection. But, any chain of variations needs a beginning. So, where and when have you located in Nature the forces and elements that converged to here and how was the process they used. If you does not know those forces and elements there is no difference between yours beliefs and the beliefs of those intelligent designers aficionados. You are affirming something you does not know the primordial foundations. Am I wrong?
Take care when listening to Stephen Hawking. It is not his natural sensors, connected to his natural brain, that’s invading the micro and macro cosmos in search of informations. Those sensors are mechanical instruments connected to an electro-mechanical brain. Does not believe in such world view. I think it is more rational preferring the different world view of Matrix/DNA that’s coming from the brute and salvage nature at Amazon jungle, at least, it is natural.
Pensamento sendo desenvolvido:
Como a Natureza produziu esta engrenagem com dentes?
Pense num cone espiralado girando sobre si mesmo. Se separar este cone verticalmente em duas metades, teremos cada parte com metades das linas horizontais. Se novamente ficarmos juntando e separando as duas metades, veremos algo semelhante a uma boca mastivgndo, batendo dentes com dentes.Ou veremos um zipper, como o DNA.
Vamos pensar raciomalmente sobre este fenomeno? Estamos observando um insecto, o qual pe um monte de atomos organozados, conectados, num modelo unico, especifico. E de repente nos vemos este monte de atomos pulando alturas incriveis e numa incrivel velocidade. Tentando entender o que esta acontecendo, descobrimos que este monte de atomos se organizou na forma de engrenagem, dentada, que dispara um impulso para girar sobre si mesmo, mas tal impulso apenas serve para iniciar um movimento que apresenta um diferente efeito, o de saltar rapido e longe. E nos parece que a direcao do movimento foi previamente determinada.
Vamos aos atomos, ao que sabemos deles, procurando onde e como estao os seus recursos que lhes permitem tal movimento. Vemos eletrons pulando camadas eletronocas, vemos no nucleo, particulas pions emitidas por protons na direcao do neutron, vemos eletrons girando em torno do eixo nuclear… e assim estamos cendo que os atomos ja tinham estes recursos revelados no corpo que eles formaram e que chamamos de inseto. Mas nao vemos rodas dentadas nos atomos.
Comentario Publicado em:
Ok, we have discovered the planthopper gears, and explained a natural phenomenon. My question is: how this stupid insect made off this non-intelligent Nature got it?! This equipment is from a human being view point, new information, but… is it new natural information, I mean, from Nature’s view point? Of course the answer must be “no”. Nature is not magical, it can not creates new information from nothing. The natural forces and elements applied into this equipment must be elsewhere. Where? The Matrix/DNA Theory method suggests an explanation:
Time before the existence of insects, there were vortexes at the center of this ” Milk Way”. This vortex is spinning around its axis. This vortex is spiral. If we cut a spiraled cone into two half, and then try to link them together, we will see the spiral lines as toothlike structures. Hold the right slice and move the left, we get the spinning movement. This whole picture was reproduced as the DNA’s zipper. It is not surprise that this DNA have reproduced into insects the phenomenons that are registered into its memory. If we look to Matrix/DNA model of galaxies, we can see how its nucleus works like a bump ejecting new baby-stars.
But where the insect got the trick of jumping ahead under a driven pre-determined direction and coupled this thick with the other already installed equipment?! Let’s go again at past times searching inside the whole universal Nature. Then we find that this movement like “rocket emission” was performed by volcanoes, when emitting magma. Before that, we see this phenomena at atoms’ nucleus when a proton emits a pion. These processes were existing inside the body of this insect creator… which is this astronomical system. We know that natural creators pass on their informations to their offspring. If the reproductive process happens at new environment with new materials, will be mutations, like mechanical systems into biological systems. So, those informations about black holes and volcanoes… they are here, resumed into an insect marvelous equipment. Welcome to Matrix/DNA world view.
Interessantes Comentarios na Internet:
Answer 1 / 3 – Submitted 1 day ago…
Oh those show offish insects, there they go again showing how they beat us homo sapiens to the punch. It is really mind blowing to divide into the body workings of insects and their close kin. There is the bombardier beetle which has it own chemical weapon that it can fire out of its abdomen. It uses a form of internal combustion where two chemicals are mixed so an exothermic reaction takes place that produces temperatures up to 212 degrees F. The rise in temperature causes a pressure increase just like in a piston and a toxic distasteful and irritating chemical is expelled at the beetle’s enemies.
Insects were also making paper and silken threads long before we masterminds decided to copy them. They figured out how to gather and treat plant based foods for long term storage such as honey, long before we tackled the problem. There are even species of ants that raise other insects as livestock such as aphids they farm and others that work underground fungus farms for a food crop.
Awarded Answer (What’s This?)
Answer 2 / 3 – Submitted 1 day ago…
Planthoppers, or Issus coleoptratus, are everyday, garden-variety insects, slightly larger than fleas, that use a unique mechanism to propel themselves at blistering speeds up to three feet in a single bound. During their nymph stage, planthoppers have gears on their hind legs that allow them to coordinate their movements and accelerate at rates of 200Gs.
The planthopper’s gears look very similar to the cogs used in manufacturing, right down to the way the teeth engage. The perfect synchronicity of the gears allows the planthopper’s hind legs to move within 30 microseconds of one another. To put it into perspective, a planthopper could launch itself 100 times in the same time it would take a grasshopper to move it’s legs just once. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq0Mf2pt2XA
Planthoppers lose the gears on their hind legs when they become adults after molting five or six times. The adult insects synchronize their movements with friction created by rubbing their legs together.
Answer 3 / 3 – Submitted 1 day ago…
The natural world is amazing, and time again there are organisms that, evolutionarily speaking, far exceed the natural capacity of a human being.
If human beings were not superior because of our minds, we would be at a distinct disadvantage in the natural world, because at some point some creature would evolve to become our natural predator.
What I do know is that if humans had discovered this creature before the industrial and mechanical advances in history, those advances might well have happened way sooner in human history. That the natural world has something that took humans many years to figure out, and even more years to perfect, is incredible.
This little insect demonstrates that if the organic components that make it so unique were put into a larger creature, with commensurate increases in size to adapt, that there would be something truly fantastical going on.
This creature, this little insect, it has a survival mechanism and apparatus, that, from a nature perspective, far exceeds what most animals can ever hope to accomplish. The only exceptions to that exist in the ocean, but the nature of motive transport down there is far different than what it is like up top.
Science should study this insect in incredible detail, to try to understand how the creature’s body is not destroyed every single time that it jumps, because if the organic technology exists for a tiny little insect to survive at speeds that are super fast, then in theory, the technology could be applied to improve current mechanical technologies. There is a lot of hope, a lot to be learned, from studying the natural world.
This discovery is another in a long list of discoveries that the natural world is something to be treasured, studied, and, hopefully, conserved, because once it is extinct, it tends to be gone for good. It worries me every single time I read about the extinction of yet another species, because I wonder, every single time, what other organic technologies and knowledge gets lost. What other wonder aspects of different fish and insects exist out there that humans have no idea of because we haven’t figured it out yet. There is still so much to the planet that is a mystery, and even with seven billion humans on it toiling away, there is still so much to learn.
This is a good thing, this discovery, because it demonstrates that are there true mechanical wonders in the natural world, but also that humans have arrived at a point where we are able to start to understand these insects, even at the speeds they move. Those aspects of this discovery are something truly worth marveling about.
Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/09/13/5734456/researchers-find-another-gear.html#storylink=cpy
Los Angeles Time: http://discussions.latimes.com/20/lanews/la-sci-leg-gears-20130914/10
“Gears may seem like a purely human invention.”
What did this gear? DNA has this tooth-like structure as a “zipper”. Bumps exists at any nucleus of any natural system. Rotating structures exists at galactic and atomic nucleus. Rocket impulsion were seeing everywhere in Nature before insect’s existence. Look to volcanoes, or the proton emission of a signal particle, the pion. So, this biological gear is product of evolution and convergence of natural forces and elements to the same point at time/space… the insect body. Nature can do it because all informations about the whole galaxy are encrypted at the DNA. We discovered it when calculating the configuration of LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) using the method of comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems. The building blocks of atoms and galaxies are exactly the same configuration of the unit of information in DNA, a base pair of nucleotides. So, DNA is merely a biological shape of a universal Matrix. Then, I have elaborated the Matrix/DNA Theory, which models are under testing. It is up to any species making that the right genes are expressed, since that it is necessary for survival.
The Universe works like the embryonic process: initially there are mass without shape (blastulae) then evolution goes on and finally gets a complex architecture. All informations for a baby were there, inside the matter, hidden in the matter, when occurred the Big Bang, the explosion of an spermatozoon envelope. Man does not create anything new, neither Nature. There are no something from nothing, and there is no elaboration inside this Universe by some supernatural intelligent designer. This Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a genetic process of reproduction, the son or daughter of the natural system existing before the Big bang. Like we do our babies. Man has intuition which is about data registered at our DNA’a memory, then, man only mimics Nature.
You are ” almost” right. These biological gears are result of the matter in this planet that belongs to a stellar system that belongs to a galactic system… and here we see mechanical gears. Then, if have gears in Nature before this insect, we don’t need God for doing it. You are right because Darwinian Theory can’t explain the origins of this biological gears, just because Darwinians had separated Biological Evolution (or micro-evolution) from Cosmological Evolution, because Darwin and nowadays evolutionists does not know what this Milk Way is about. There is a new cosmological model, called “The Universal Matrix/DNA” which found that everything existing in this biosphere is reducible to LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor), but it is not the microscope and terrestrial common ancestor believed by Darwin… LUCA is astronomical and stands in the sky! Do you want to know where is these gears in the body of our astronomical creator? Inside the galactic nucleus there is a vortex, on shape of spiraled cone. If we cut the cone getting two halves, the spiral lines will be like teeth. If we rotate one half and try to connect again with the other half, the teeth will make the other half spinning, but in opposite direction. The vortex emits to space babies stars, like a pump. Everything is equal the image we see in this insect. The first biological copy of this mechanical astronomical gear was the “zipper: saw in DNA. Try to see the two DNA’s strands being separated, see the tooth, the spiral shape, and imagine what happens if you join them together rotating one half. If this mechanism is encrypted into the DNA, any life form can make its genes to be expressed. But… you will ask: “How an astronomical structure could be transformed into a microscope structure?! The answer is: ” Nanotechnology, my friend. Nature do it all time. Nature takes an adult man, 30 years old, 200 pounds, big volume, and put it into a microscope spermatozoon… Any other question go to see the real face of Milk Way at Matrix/DNA website, you have all answers there. But… The Matrix is suggesting that before the Big Bang there was a natural complex and conscious system that triggered the Big Bang by same method that the external cover of any spermatozoon explodes inside an ovule. So, yours idea of previous design is safe, and if you want to call that ex-machine system as God, no problem.
No: The Independent – UK
Half a gearing system would never work, so any piecemeal ‘evolution’ in that direction would be of no benefit to the organism, and ceteris paribus probably a hindrance, to be selected out.
Systems are only of actual benefit when they are complete and functional. Biology contains millions of different complete, functional, organic and behavioural systems, and zero ‘evolving’ on-the-way-to-being-complete systems.
If Darwinism were true one would expect many thousands of the latter to be observed.
The truth is that Darwinism requires an enormous amount of faith (plus society-wide indoctrination) to subsist. The irony is that those who most believe in it are the kind of people most likely to scorn faith.
You are right, systems only works when they are complete. So, why Nature begins with a piece here that has no immediate use, like the bumps in the insect’s backyard?! There is a new evolutionary theory, called ” The Universal Matrix/DNA”, which suggests a rational explanation. The real creator of this biosphere and all biological systems here is/was a perfect mechanical system. At my website you see the design. I got it making comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems, searching the missing link. Then, the anatomy of a link that fits very well happens to be the building block of astronomical systems.This link as perfect machine shows every piece of this insects gears and rocket propulsion.It happens that the ancestral machine was fragmented by entropy,all pieces were separated, and by genetic process they were built here in a biological way. Then, biological species does not have all pieces. One has a piece that I called F5, it is about wings. These insects have a piece that mimics the central nucleus of that astronomical machine, which is a quasar containing a white hole in shape of spiral spinning vortex. It does everything this insect do.
It’s a reply to you, because it was the evolution of the human hand that was the key to the development of intelligence, a position first argued by Engels, of all people, and now supported by recent research, published in the last couple of weeks
(see Science Daily)
Marsinah: I need the link for this article at Science Daily and any other talking about this research. In Matrix/DNA Theory I am very interested about human hands because my theoretical models are suggesting that it is key for deep understanding about evolution/nature. Please, put yours left hand over the formula with the palm over the cone at F1, and each finger over each other function, try to understand the meaning. Matrix/DNA suggests that the shape of human hands is the shape of Matrix formula, which should be the ancestral of DNA at cosmological evolution. The position, shapes, and functions of all fingers match exactly with the shapes and functions of all pieces in a perfect system. But, in the Matrix formula for perfect systems, its pieces are different due obeying the transformations produced by life’s cycles. Then, the fingers are aligned in same sequence of any process of life system. The explanation is that, every time Nature needs to built a new system or a new accessory for existent system, nature apply the same formula that I called Matrix. Then, the formula can be modified for adaptation to do the work that the system needs, but the structural formula is kept. Look to yours fingers: the smaller mimics the babies’ shapes and functions, the next mimics the children/teenager, the middle mimics the young/adult, the other mimics the mature adult and the thumb mimics the senior going to die…it is the history of any life’s cycle! Cheers…
It’s a long URL – the best way to find it is to google “science daily” “language and tool-making skills evolved at the same time”, or for the full-length article (it’s not behind a pay-wall) go to DOI 10.1371/journal dot pone dot 0072693
Thanks, I found it. Reading the article, first thing I thought is a question: If the same brain activity is used for language production and making complex tools, it means – I think – this brain’s region is a kind of translator and converter? Language is the invention of a new system that takes real phenomena and events changing or translating them by signals or symbols of a different dimension. Tools are merely extension of ours members and sensors, in another words, they are the translation of natural phenomena into new materials. Both are about translation and conversion. But, at least in this article, the researchers only paid attention to evolutionary story, forgetting this important information about the brain. Studying this region as translator and converter will be useful for technology development, I think.