Archive for setembro, 2010

Panspermia: A diferença em Relação ao Reprodutivismo da Teoria da Matriz/DNA Universal

quinta-feira, setembro 30th, 2010

Muita gente está confundindo a hipótese da origem da vida da Teoria da Matriz com a hipótese da panspermia, a qual tem sido ressuscitada e revigorada ultimamente devido à presença de materiais orgânicos vindos com meteóritos de Marte e do espaço sideral. Nêste artigo pretendo delinear as diferenças entre as duas visões do mundo.

Definição em Português na Wikipedia:

Panspermia é a hipótese segundo a qual as sementes de vida são prevalentes em todo o Universo e que a vida na Terra começou quando uma dessas sementes aqui chegou, tendo-se propagado.

Reprodutivismo: É a hipótese segundo a qual as sementes dos sistemas biológicos – aka “seres vivos” – são prevalentes em todo o Universo e que as produzidas pela própria Terra são mera continuidade evolucionária de astros como a Terra, que se apresentam como “semi-vivos/semi-mecânicos” quando observados através do modêlo de proto-sistema formado pelo astro sob um ciclo vital. Desde que em tal modêlo a estrêla Sol está incluida como mera forma do astro durante seu ciclo vital, o produto da irradiação da estrêla mais a irradiação do nucleo terrestre fornece os bits-informação necessários e suficientes para organizar a matéria terrestre em sistemas biológicos, desde que esta matéria tenha sido tratada pela novidade terrestre que é o estado líquido da matéria possibilitando as reações químicas orgânicas.

A panspermia apenas transfere o problema da origem da vida da Terra para outro astro, sem soluciona-lo. O que teria a mais a sôpa primordial do outro astro que a sôpa primordial da Terra não teria tido?! É preciso apresentar a procedência dos elementos e substâncias que constituíram o primeiro sistema vivo, apresentar quais foram as fôrças naturais atuantes e seus níveis de intensidade apropriados, descrever os mecanismos e um parâmetro factual razoavel e sobejamente conhecido por todos de processo pelo qual se desenvolveu todo o enrêdo… como apenas a Teoria da Matriz o faz.

(a continuar)

Fábricas Auto-Reprodutoras em Outros Planetas:Aplicações da Teoria da Matriz/DNA

quinta-feira, setembro 30th, 2010

Num congresso que custou 11,7 milhões de dólares, o ex-presidente Jimmy Carter quis saber tudo sôbre a idéia que rola entre os cientistas da NASA de se contruir um grande robot em cujo interior ajam fábricas, digamos por exemplo, fábricas de chassiz com matéria prima da … er… da LUA! E de Marte, Jupiter, etc.!

O robot estaria equipado para, com material lunar, ou marciano, extraído por ele mesmo, construir sósias de si mesmo e espalha-los por todo planeta. Para que? Ora, para espalhar as unidades de fabricas. Portanto bastaria uma fábrica inicial que ela seria a semente para um sem numero de fábricas iguais. E tudo isto sem o homem por a mão em nada! Ao homem apenas caberia ir lá buscar os produtos finais. Não vamos nem imaginar quais seriam as consequencias: as fabricas da Terra transferidas para outros planetas, acabaria a poluição aqui, os atuais empregados das fábricas ficariam em casa desempregados mas recebendo o salário de graça…

Foi inclusive elaborado um “paper” do tamanho de um livro contendo o projeto, que está publicado para livre leitura no website abaixo.

Mas o que sempre vai chamar a atenção da Matriz são palavras como auto-reciclagem, automação, auto-replicação, self-organization… Pois acho que ninguem mais possue a fórmula do mais perfeito, mais simples e de menor custo possivel sistema auto-replicador. Está certo que existe uma diferença entre a fábrica humana se reproduzindo em cópias e a fábrica natural astronomica que se reproduz reciclando sua própria matéria quando totalmente degradada. A fábrica da Matriz só faz uma cópia de si mesma e para fazê-lo ela precisa ser desfeita antes. Mas ela contem o software para se reproduzir e com alguma modificação ou alguns acréscimos esse software pode ser o cerne da fabrica humana. Portanto deixo aqui registrado o tema para quando tiver tempo ler todo o livro e ver o que pode ser feito à luz dos modêlos da Matriz. 

http://www.islandone.org/MMSG/aasm/AASMIndex.html

Advanced Automation for Space Missions

Alzheimer: Epidemia Suscita Urgente Pesquisa

quinta-feira, setembro 30th, 2010

A doença que está tendo o maior custo a nivel global? O artigo abaixo diz que sim. A Teoria da Matriz sugerou um enfoque e explicação inédita sôbre esta doença (verificarei se o artigo foi postado aqui) e agora com este alarme vamos retornar ao tema se houver tempo.

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20100827191248data_trunc_sys.shtml

28 September 2010
Report reveals enormous global cost of Alzheimer’s
by Kate Melville

Already costing 1 percent of global GDP and growing rapidly, Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias are the single most significant health and social crisis of the 21st century, warns a new multinational report. “This is a wake-up call,” said Dr Daisy Acosta, Chairman of Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI, the non-profit international federation of 73 Alzheimer associations around the world). “World governments are woefully unprepared for the social and economic disruptions this disease will cause.”The report, “Global Economic Impact of Dementia,” finds that Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias are exacting a massive toll on the global economy, with the problem set to accelerate in coming years. Report authors Professor Anders Wimo of the Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; and Professor Martin Prince, Institute of Psychiatry, King’s College London; say that the number of people with dementia will double by 2030, and more than triple by 2050.

Perhaps more worrying, the costs of caring for people with dementia are likely to rise even faster than the prevalence – especially in the developing world, as more formal social care systems emerge, and rising incomes lead to higher opportunity costs.

“The scale of this crisis cries out for global action,” said ADI’s Marc Wortmann. “History shows that major diseases can be made manageable – and even preventable – with sufficient global awareness and the political will to make substantial investments in research and care options.”

The report uses improved data on low and middle-income countries from the 10/66 Dementia Research Group studies in Latin America, India and China and representative population-based samples from developing countries to better quantify the cost of informal care systems that have previously been excluded from impact estimates.

Key recommendations the authors make include:

  • Governments worldwide should act urgently to make Alzheimer’s disease a top priority and develop national plans to deal with the social and health consequences of dementia. Funding-wise, a 15-fold increase is required to reach parity with research into heart disease, and a 30-fold increase to achieve parity with cancer research. 
  • The scale of the Alzheimer’s problem is a global challenge, the authors contend, which must be addressed as a top WHO priority and on the G-20/G-8 agenda.

“The care of people with dementia is not just a health issue – it is a massive social issue,” said report co-author Martin Prince. “This is particularly true in low and middle income countries which lack adequate systems of formal care.”

Related:
Alzheimer’s breakthrough: A chemical to make brain cells grow
Microorganisms Behind Schizophrenia And Alzheimer’s?
Cell phones reverse Alzheimer’s in mice
Processed foods linked to Alzheimer’s and diabetes

Source: King’s College London

O Princípio da Solidariedade e os Tetas Azuis

quarta-feira, setembro 29th, 2010

The blue tit and the milk bottle

Quem ama o Brasil e os países pobres desejando-lhes melhor situação deveria ajuntar-se a nós no esforço para incluir artigos como este nos curriculuns escolares, pois educar o povo na motivação do principio da solidariedade pode surtir melhores efeitos que a simples esmola ou ajuda em dinheiro que vem dos paises do primeiro mundo. 

Os modêlos da Matriz nos conduziram a concluir que um dos mais importantes segredos da nossa existência é o que chamamos de “O Principio Universal da Solidariedade”,  inimigo inevitável do gene egoísta que sempre vence as eternas batalhas entre os dois. Tôda vez que um sistema natural ( seja na forma de uma espécie de partículas ou na forma de dinossauro) alcança seu limite ultimo de capacidade de absorver novas informações para evoluir aumentando em complexidade, o sistema se super-especializa num modo de vida, acomoda-se tentando eternizar uma forma evolucionária provisória, mas a clava implacável da Lei de Clausius (termodinamica) abate-se sobre o sistema com o processo da degeneração pela entropia, o sistema se desfaz colapsando-se, fragmentando-se em seus bits-informação, mas nesse colapsar não retorna ao ponto zero de sua origem, e sim é amparado em alguma plataforma sedimentada pelas espécies anteriores, onde tais bits se reencontram, se misturam ao ambiente, se degladiam, o individualismo é exacerbado, geram o caos ambiente o qual os torturam, desfalecem-se,e arrastando-se descobrem que devem reunir forças, se reorganizam recompondo o sistema anterior porem agora mutado devido à absorção de novas informações do novo ambiente. O novo sistema é transcendente em relação aos anteriores, mas para chegar a esta transcendência é preciso passar por todas aquelas etapas da qual ressalta-se o momento em que os conflitos internos são eliminados e os individuos se associam, momento este que denomino de “principio da solidariedade”.

Foi exatamente este processo todo que produziu LUCA, levou-o à Queda do Paraíso, trouxe-o à Terra e fê-lo levantar-se na forma da primeira célula viva.

Pois a história real lida no artigo abaixo é um excelente exemplo deste principio. Os “blue tits” e os “red robins” são espécies de passaros de jardim comuns na Inglaterra e tão presente nas tradições do povo que muitas histórias se contam envolvendo-os. Mas enquanto os blue tits são bastante sociaveis, os red robins são extremamente individualistas. Ocorrências como a descrita nesta história revelam que a espécie sociável pode estar ganhando terreno na sobrevivencia e evolução, o que pode terminar em mais uma forma superior de blue tilts, enquanto a outra pode ser extinta. Vejamos a história (aguardando tradução).

The blue tit and the milk bottle

http://www.brefigroup.co.uk/resources/view_product/product/details_9.do

Extract from: The Living Company by Arie de Geus, Nicholas Brealey, 1999

The United Kingdom has a long standing system of delivering milk in bottles to the door. At the beginning of the 20th century these milk bottles had no top. Birds had easy access to the cream which settled in the top of the bottle. Two different species of British garden birds, the blue tits and red robins, learned to siphon up cream from the bottles and tap this new, rich food source.

This innovation, in itself, was already quite an achievement. But it also had an evolutionary effect. The cream was much richer than the usual food sources of these birds, and the two species underwent some adaptation of their digestive systems to cope with the unusual nutrients. This internal adaptation almost certainly took place through Darwinian selection.

Then, between the two world wars, the UK dairy distributors closed access to the food source by placing aluminium seals on their bottles.

By the early 1950’s the entire blue tit population of the UK, about a million birds, had learned how to pierce the aluminium seals. Regaining access to this rich food source provided an important victory for the blue tit family as a whole; it gave them an advantage in the battle for survival. Conversely, the robins, as a family, never regained access to the cream. Occasionally, an individual robin learns how to pierce the seals of the milk bottle. But the knowledge never passes to the rest of the species.

In short, the blue tits went through an extraordinarily successful institutional learning process. The robins failed, even though individual robins had been as innovative as individual blue tits. Moreover, the difference could not be attributed to their ability to communicate. As songbirds, both the blue tits and the robins had the same wide range of means of communication: colour, behaviour, movements, and song. The explanation could be found only in the social propagation process: the way blue tits spread their skill from one individual to members of the species as a whole.

In spring, the blue tits live in couples until they have reared their young. By early summer, when the young blue tits are flying and feeding on their own, we see birds moving from garden to garden in flocks of eight to ten individuals. These flocks seem to remain intact, moving together around the countryside, and the period of mobility lasts for two to three months.

Robins, by contrast, are territorial birds. A male robin will not allow another male to enter its territory. When threatened, the robin sends a warning, as if to say “Keep the hell out of here.” In general, red robins tend to communicate with each other in an antagonistic manner, with fixed boundaries that they do not cross.

Birds that flock, seem to learn faster. They increase their chances to survive and evolve more quickly.

The Nocebo Effect

quarta-feira, setembro 29th, 2010

Cada uma que a gente aprende! Veja isto: (E quem tem alergia por algo deve mesmo ler).

“Japanese researchers tested 57 high school boys for their sensitivity to allergens. The boys filled out questionnaires about past experiences with plants, including lacquer trees, which can cause itchy rashes much as poison oak and poison ivy do. Boys who reported having severe reactions to the poisonous trees were blindfolded. Researchers brushed one arm with leaves from a lacquer tree but told the boys they were chestnut tree leaves. The scientists stroked the other arm with chestnut tree leaves but said the foliage came from a lacquer tree. Within minutes the arm the boys believed to have been exposed to the poisonous tree began to react, turning red and developing a bumpy, itchy rash. In most cases the arm that had contact with the actual poison did not react.” (Gardiner Morse, “The nocebo effect,” Hippocrates, November 1999, Hippocrates.com

 More than two-thirds of 34 college students developed headaches when told that a non-existent electrical current passing through their heads could produce a headache.

Research has…shown that the nocebo effect can reverse the body’s response to true medical treatment from positive to negative.  (Root-Bernstein 1998)

A nocebo (Latin for “I will harm”) is something that should be ineffective but which causes symptoms of ill health. A nocebo effect is an ill effect caused by the suggestion or belief that something is harmful. The term ‘nocebo’ became popular in the 1990s. Prior to that, both pleasant and harmful effects thought to be due to the power of suggestion were usually referred to as being due to the placebo effect.

Because of ethical concerns, nocebos are not commonly used in medical practice or research. Thus, it is not unexpected that the nocebo effect is not well-established in the scientific literature. However, there are some anecdotes and some studies that are commonly appealed to in the literature to support its validity.

Quem quizer mais informação veja em:

http://www.skepdic.com/nocebo.html

sd.gif (2133 bytes)

Cromossoma Y em Extinção: Correta Previsão da Matriz

quarta-feira, setembro 29th, 2010

Como é que é?! O cromossoma Y está desaparecendo? Vai acabar os homens do planeta, só ficarão as mulheres?! E como vão se reproduzir? Quem vai trocar pneus?

Pois fomos surpreendidos com a informação no artigo abaixo. A tempos o cromossoma Y vem perdendo genes. Quando houve a divisão em X e Y no DNA, os dois cromossomas contavam com cêrca de mil genes. Atualmente o X ainda mantem a mesma quantidade, mas o Y perdeu 800 !!! E parece que está indo a perder mais, até desaparecer por completo!

Bem, sabemos que a Teoria da Matriz/DNA apresentou um modêlo com uma idéia violenta: X cromossoma contem o circuito inteiro do sistema-corpo enquanto Y cromossoma contem apenas a metade esquerda do circuito, onde se manifesta a função reprodutiva do macho. Portanto X contem Y e Y contem apenas metade de X. A informação de que o X possui mais genes que Y vem corroborar os modelos.

Mas não é apenas esta previsão que foi confirmada. Outra muito macabra o foi tambem. A de que LUCA está se reproduzindo aqui no nosso meio. E em LUCA o dominio é matriarcal, feminino. A função feminina está localizada no nucleo do sistema, ela recicla o sistema, nela tôdas as informações se encontram separadas e portanto submissas a novo arranjo sob comando, e no nucleo está o cérebro do sistema. Deixando momentaneamente o terreno técnico e entrando na dimensão metafisica, vale lembrar que na parábola bíblica Eva teria sido enganada pela serpente, mas no sentido literal da descrição do sistema termodinamico LUCA, EVA “criou” a serpente, pois o sistema tem como circuito a forma exata de uma serpente engolindo a própria cauda, quer dizer, reciclando-se eternamente. O engano foi de Eva ao crer que a felicidade suprema estaria no tipo de Paraíso que ela criou, um sistema fechado em si mesmo, extrema expressão do egocentrismo, porta fechada à evolução dela mesma. Enquanto isso, Adão parece que acomodou-se e anulou-se no leito nupcial e desativou-se sua tendência aventureira: o Pulsar que deveria emitir cometas para fora do sistema abrindo-o, voltou-se para a direção do nucleo emitindo-os apenas a nivel interno. As primeiras sociedades de seres vivos mais perfeitas imitaram bem este regime de sistema: formigas e abelhas. Sociedades matriarcais.

Mas minha leitura dos mapas da Matriz induziu-me a supor que esta reprodução de LUCA se daria a nivel de biosfera, sendo a espécie humana apenas uma peça da engrenagem, apesar de privilegiadamente situada no nucleo. Portanto deduzí que a sociedade humana iria ser modelada nesta regra geral mecanicista no estilo do Admirável Mundo Novo governado pela Big Mother. Nunca procurei ver ou calcular isso a nivel de DNA, como isso seria representado no DNA, principalmente humano. Agora com esta noticia vem a suspeita aterradora que a ação reprodutiva de LUCA está atuando desde o DNA, com a meta de anular as caracteristicas masculinas da espécie. Inclusive eliminar a peculiaridade da psique masculina! Se isto for verdade, então de nada adiantará nenhuma ação nossa em salvaguardar a liberdade da mente humana. A Matriz está falando às paredes, gritando no vazio!?

Será que a extinção da psique masculina, a liberdade da mente humana, já estava escrita nas estrêlas mesmo antes das origens da Vida? Que no primeiro DNA da primeira bactéria já estava registrado que futuramente haveria a criação e separação dos cromossomas sexuais, e mais tarde ainda, a eliminação do Y? Mas será possível que é sina inextinguivel do espirito universal  vivendo na matéria ficar cometendo o mesmo êrro, o mesmo pecado original do Paraíso do Éden, para sempre? E Deus? Nunca nos perdoará, nunca virá em nosso socorro, abandonou-nos para toda a eternidade?

Bem, deixemos a metafisica de lado e vamos retornar com os pés no chão, estudando o artigo cientifico publicado no website:     

Scienceagogo

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20090616231446data_trunc_sys.shtml

17 July 2009
Male chromosome facing extinction
by Kate Melville

It has long been suspected that the sex chromosome that only males carry is deteriorating and could disappear entirely within a few million years, but until now, no one has understood the evolutionary processes that control the Y chromosome’s demise. Now, a pair of Penn State scientists has discovered that the Y chromosome has evolved at a much more rapid pace than its partner chromosome, the X chromosome, leading to a dramatic loss of genes on the Y chromosome at a rate that, if maintained, eventually could lead to the Y chromosome’s complete disappearance.

Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes, which are the structures that hold our DNA, but just one pair of these chromosomes are sex chromosomes, while the others are referred to as non-sex chromosomes. “In eutherian mammals [humans and other non-marsupial mammals], the sex chromosomes contain an additional region of DNA whereas, in the egg-laying mammals and marsupials [such as opossums and platypuses], this additional region of DNA is located on the non-sex chromosomes,” said Penn State’s Kateryna Makova. “At first, bits of DNA within this additional region were readily swapped between the X and Y chromosomes, but some time between 80 and 130 million years ago, the region became two completely separate entities that no longer swapped DNA. One of the regions became specifically associated with the X chromosome and the other became specifically associated with the Y chromosome.”

Writing in PLoS Genetics, Makova explains that by comparing the DNA of the X and Y chromosomes in eutherian mammals to the DNA of the non-sex chromosomes in the opossum and platypus, the researchers were able to go back in time to the point when the X and Y chromosomes were still swapping DNA, just like the non-sex chromosomes in the opossum and platypus. The scientists then were able to observe how the DNA of the X and Y chromosomes changed over time relative to the DNA of the non-sex chromosomes. “Our research revealed that the Y-specific DNA began to evolve rapidly at the time that the DNA region split into two entities, while the X-specific DNA maintained the same evolutionary rate as the non-sex chromosomes,” said Makova.

After determining that the Y chromosome has been evolving more rapidly and has been losing more genes as a result, they wanted to find out why the Y chromosome has not already disappeared entirely. “Today, the human Y chromosome contains less than 200 genes, while the human X chromosome contains around 1,100 genes,” said co-researcher Melissa Wilson. “We know that a few of the genes on the Y chromosome are important, such as the ones involved in the formation of sperm, but we also know that most of the genes were not important for survival because they were lost, which led to the very different numbers of genes we observe between the once-identical X and Y. Although there is evidence that the Y chromosome is still degrading, some of the surviving genes on the Y chromosome may be essential, which can be inferred because these genes have been maintained for so long.”

Makova and Wilson then decided to test the hypothesis that some of the genes on the Y chromosome are being maintained because they are essential. The team’s approach was to compare the expression and function of genes on the Y chromosome with analogous genes on the X chromosome. “If the genes’ expressions and/or functions were different, then it would make sense that the genes on the Y chromosome would be maintained because they are doing something that the genes on the X chromosome can’t do,” explained Makova. “This hypothesis turned out to be correct.”

Although some of the genes on the Y chromosome have been maintained, most of them have died, and the team found evidence that some others are on track to disappear, as well. “Even though some of the genes appear to be important, we still think there is a chance that the Y chromosome eventually could disappear,” said Makova. “If this happens, it won’t be the end of males. Instead, a new pair of non-sex chromosomes likely will start on the path to becoming sex chromosomes.”

In the future, the team plans to use its newly generated data to create a computer model that tracks the degeneration of the Y chromosome. The scientists hope to determine how long it will take for the Y chromosome to disappear.

                                              xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Apenas para lembrar o leitor, vamos repetir aqui o modêlo da Matriz sôbre a origem e significado dos cromossomas sexuais: (clique na Imagem para ver melhor)

Cromossomas Sexuais: As origens que vem das Estrêlas

Quadro Comparativo entre Evolucionismo, Criacionismo e Reprodutivismo

segunda-feira, setembro 27th, 2010

Estou trabalhando agora numa idéia que parece bastante apropriada para esclarecimento do leitor. Inspirei-me num quadro encontrado no website russo:

Creation of the world or the theory of evolution

http://creation.xpictoc.com/?p=383#awp::?p=383

…o qual ainda não li o suficiente para saber se é imparcial ou tendencioso. A tradução feita pelo Google contem êrros óbviamente mas dá para entender o sentido geral. Se alguem conhece algum quadro similar em outro website favor me informar.

 Proof of evolution: the Laws of Nature

The theory of evolution has a number of allegations that many take for scientific fact. This table will help you understand what is fact and what yalvyaetsya only guess. If you wish to add or improve this tabitsu , to form a definition as something else , then write about it in the comments. The tables are considered evidence for evolution related to osnovnm laws of nature.

  Evidence for evolution Facts  
  Evolution occurs through random mutations According to the theory of evolution development happens through random mutation, which gradually change from one form to another more advanced species. What do we get the result : must occur a series of mutations to some individuals, this mutation should be useful , must also appear at the same time two such individuals , with different sex , they need to survive and produce offspring that will have the same symptoms (the descendants of the same need to survive , to find a similar mutant of the opposite sex , etc.).In nature, this phenomenon has not yet been observed once. Also not in archeology poluptits , poluryb , poluloshadey , polusobak , and other semi- species

The fact that such a mutation, how they operate and what is actually produced , read the site http://evolution.verges.ru/mutation.php

A Teoria da Matriz/DNA Universal, ou Reprodutivismo apresenta um modêlo teórico de astros como o planeta Terra existindo sob um ciclo vital o qual se torna um comando de instruções para organizar a sua matéria em sistemas biológicos. A soma dos bits-informação na forma de fótons irradiados pelo nucleo da Terra que contem informações relacionadas ao cromossoma Y se encontram na superfície da Terra e dentro dos átomos com os bits-informação-fótons irradiados pela estrêla Sol (X cromossoma). Assumindo o contrôle de tais átomos os fotons tentam reproduzir na integra o sistema astronômico original no novo ambiente cuja novidade principal é o estado liquido da matéria possibilitando as reações químicas orgânicas. Reunindo-se em diferentes locais e tempos na superfície da Terra e qualquer outro astro em similares condições produzem diferentes pacotes de informações que resultam na diversidade das espécies. Cada criatura formada é conduzida ou obrigada a buscar e receber ou rejeitar novos fótons vizinhos contidos nos alimentos, no afã de se reconstituir o sistema original completo e quando tal acontece seu corpo é transformado por mutação e maior complexidade.     
  Selection and artificial selection support the evolution of With artificial selection, or selection , the person intentionally alter the genes of animals or plants , by selecting only the right to him of individuals . Herewith:
1. The animal released by nature, will be destroyed in the process of natural selection ( they are less adapted to life with a person they do not have that reaction and immunity, which is in wildlife , etc.).
2. A man chooses what he wants (eg, small dogs , fleshy cows , etc.), which does not exist in the natural environment (and on the theory of evolution is not a man created everything).
3. Mutations are useful only for the person (eg, smaller or larger amounts of meat and fat) and either useless or harmful to the animal .Selection produces changes within a species . Breeders for many centuries exposed animals and plants of various ” torture “(eg radioactive radiation ), but has never been such , that has resulted in a new look. Dogs – that dogs that Chihuahua – that would have them do, and how would they differ from each other , are still the dogs ( dog / wolf form ) and can interbreed with each other , producing offspring – dogs.
 
  Natural selection produces new species Under natural conditions without human intervention mutations occur quite rarely. Most of the mutated individuals are destroyed by natural selection. The small part that survives , or is unable to reproduce , or their descendants do not inherit the mutant particular parent. Thus , natural selection destroys just mutated individuals , leaving normal and healthy ( similar to those that were in the beginning, so to speak, created ). Natural selection only rejects poor individuals , but does not play a creative role and does not create new species ! It can only work if already have a variety in which it can perform its action. In other words, if a number of different living beings is already available , natural selection decides who survives and who will have offspring , but who do not . No one doubts that natural selection occurs , because All this is constantly monitored , but it does not confirm Darwin’s theory and does not answer the question of where these creatures come from in its diversity for selection. Natural selection can describe the variability within a population , but can not explain the jump from one species to another .  
  Animals adapt the environment Yes, animals are adaptable, it is a fact . But adaptation does not confirm the theory of evolution – rather the contrary, a reasonable idea. When this adaptation occurs minimal changes. For example, in cold conditions, the fur becomes fluffy , somewhere in some birds have to eat something else , so they have a little change in the shape of the beak – as in the case of the ” Darwinian ” finches (note that the birds at the same time remains The same bill, only to exterior changes ). Have never seen a major change in an organism ( eg animals , who have in relation to environmental change to more water life, has never appeared gills or fins ).  
  Survival of the fittest The most popular term of Charles Darwin – ” survival of the fittest “- is a tautology. Who survives ? One who is most fit . Who is most suited ? Yes, the one who survives ! Think about what this means ? To anything! This phrase is absolutely useless.
In addition, SURVIVAL absolutely no proof available.Natural selection – is a unique mechanism that keeps out the weak and sick to breed and live better health , without which our planet would long ago have remained normal animals and plants (if at all would have remained ). Not only as intelligent design, such selection will not name. Natural selection occurs – that’s a fact , but it does not explain the emergence of beings, and absolutely no way supports the theory of evolution.
 
  Law pedomorfoza Haeckel has invented yet another law – the law pedomorfoza , states that an adult representative of the species bears the features of the calf of its evolutionary ancestor, so that the child Pithecanthropus had to have the same structure of the skeleton and skull, that the modern adult. The idea largely was not even discussed .  
  Matter and energy are constantly striving to increase the complexity Everything is constantly striving to destruction, decay into simpler forms . The second law of thermodynamics , the most confirmed observations physical law states that any system of matter or energy , free from external influence, always tends to decay. If the system has advance knowledge of the DNA type , its order can grow. But no system is open or closed , can not increase the network of information itself , regardless. The amount of information increases , provided an external source, privnosyaschego it. DNA – the most effective system for storing information of all known until now. The second top is no doubt points to the fact that its information – a product of an act of creation, rather than blind chance .  
  And the matter and energy are eternal , or else in nature should be a way they arise out of nothing The first law of thermodynamics says that matter and energy can not be created or destroyed by any known natural process. The second law adds that the matter and energy are becoming less and less useful. At some point past their usefulness was 100%. Prior to that, the laws of nature did not act . So in both cases, we will search for the origins of matter and energy somewhere outside of nature. The theory of evolution has no scientific excellence . Those who deny that God created matter and energy , see their emergence consequence of a certain process, which , like God , does not obey the known laws of nature. We can not scientifically prove God’s existence, but also impossible to prove the existence of an unknown process. And then , and another – a matter of faith , not science .  
  Homology – similarity between living organisms proves their common ancestor Homology – a structural similarity in living beings. The principle of systematic biology, comparing and judging on the bodies of the principles of their design plan .When comparing the anatomy of various mammals, it becomes evident that parts of the body are of a general plan of the building. In the example usually given forelimbs whales , bats and humans. Interpret this example may be two ways: either such a structure allows the best way to implement the purpose of the forelimbs and, therefore, indicates that intelligent design , or it is unshakable evidence of descent from a common ancestor. The second explanation is based on the alleged relationship , as well as to the theory of evolution.

Similarity ( homology ) is not evidence of a common ancestor , according to the theory of evolution , but rather a indication of general the designer, as is the theory of creation. In any case , the homology can be viewed from two positions , based on their own worldview ( the common ancestor or an intelligent designer ), so it does not prove the theory of evolution .

Besides, if people are completely different from all other life forms (and if all animals are different from each edge ) , how would we then be able to live ? We eat food to our body is necessary for life energy and nutrients – but what would we eat if every other earthly body is completely different would be from us in their biochemical composition ? Whichever way our body is able to digest these substances and how we used amino acids, sugars and other components from other forms of life, if they differed from the chemical components of our body ? Biochemical similarity is necessary in order that we can eat !

 
  Evolution occurs through cross- hybridization Hybrids , or are sterile , or – in rare cases – Infertility is manifested through several generations. Moreover , hybridization among wild animals in their natural habitat is unknown.  
  The theory of “punctuated equilibrium” – it is assumed that life evolved by sudden , dramatic evolutionary leap Initially asserted that evolution occurs through the acquisition of properties , then it was assumed that due to the survival of the fittest , then there was the idea of cross- breeding , then – the hypothesis of mutation , which was continued by the assumption of micromutations , and now came into vogue hypothesis of ” punctuated equilibrium . Clearly, every new theory – a tacit recognition of false previous . The theory of punctuated equilibrium , like its predecessors , ignores the fact that to continue the process of evolution must happen miracles in two of different sexes organisms at one time and in one place this huge world. Order to carry out sexual reproduction should occur a series of absolutely incredible favorable changes in both creatures.  
Over time, evolving from simple to complex (eg, cell-to- man) Science is well established that any isolated system eventually loses energy and falls into decay. In accordance with the natural law of entropy increase the warm cools , high becomes low , the order becomes disorder and complicated becomes scattered . Everything is destroyed over time : an abandoned garden overgrown with weeds , the car prorzhaveet , the watch stops , clothing istleet … Living organisms reach adulthood ( this apparent increase in the order accompanied by an increase of disorder in their environment ), then age and die . The sun burns 4.7 million tons of its mass every second. the Sun billions of years , then once it was so huge that was burned the earth to the ground. The fact that the sun gradually ” losing weight “implies that it decreases in size and from the original perfect form is moving toward fewer and perfection.    
, natural balance, continuous movement of trillions of solar systems in the billions of galaxies evolve naturally Nothing – not even burnt match – not arisen by chance. Stone does not roll while for this will not be reason – a force acting on it. An object will not come in motion without a governing force . Life comes only from life.  
The evolutionary process is determined micromutations , ie mutations that occur gradually and so slowly that they simply can not be traced Raises the inevitable question : if they can not be traced , how do we know what they are? Proves a theory is impossible to prove it ? Sane person would ever believe in the theory of this assumption .  
There is a clear mechanism leading to the development of living beings in their development process to more complex forms of more complex properties In Darwin’s time believed that the frequent or occasional use of body organs , leading to their development or atrophy , these changes are transmitted to offspring. Here are the most common of these theories: in the giraffe grew a long neck, because many generations of these animals craning his neck.
Unquestionably established that it is – just a delusion. Changes that occur because of frequent or rare use of the body are not transmitted to offspring. Features characteristic of every living being, are determined solely by genetic information , which the animal receives from parents in the form of DNA. This information no influence intensity of use of organs.
But then how could emerge from the evolving creatures such new bodies, such as bone , eyes , wings , etc.? How did they get the first time? Scientists must recognize that the only possible mechanism – random mutation of parental DNA , which are then transmitted to descendants . But is this true? If we talk about all the ever studied mutations , then it is unlikely that even one of them has increased the viability of the animal. All ever observed mutations were either harmful or, at best, useless. Never observed any doubt a useful mutation. But evolution involves millions of useful mutations, their whole continuous series.
Thus , the intensity of the body has no value , the mutation is uniquely harmful. What do we have ? There is no mechanism that would ensure the process of evolving .
 
             

Table developed by : evolution.verges.ru

Universo Holográfico?

segunda-feira, setembro 27th, 2010
Ver artigo completo em:
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20090103205047data_trunc_sys.shtml

“Holographic noise” may herald new era in physics
by Kate Melville

A British-German team of physicists searching the depths of space for gravitational waves may have stumbled on one of the most important discoveries in physics, according to American physicist Craig Hogan. Hogan, from the Fermilab Centre for Particle Astrophysics in Illinois, is convinced that data from a gravitational wave detector at the Centre for Gravitational Physics in Germany contains the tell-tale signature of a holographic universe. The signature, Hogan says, manifests itself as a mysterious background noise in the detector data that has so far not been explained.

Terra Preta

segunda-feira, setembro 27th, 2010

Meu Deus! Abençoada seja a Internet! Em um minuto podemos experimentar extases nos mais variados formatos, podendo por exemplo ter conhecimento da existência do “WOW Signal” cuja lembrança ficará em minha memória para o resto da vida e no instante seguinte ser surpreendido pelas informações sôbre as descobertas do segrêdo da terra preta. Êste assunto deve aqui ficar registrado não apenas pela sua importancia, mas também porque o amigável aspecto do átomo de carbono muito perseguido pela Teoria da Matriz/DNA parece aí estar implicado. Se ainda não conheces o tema, deleite-se com este artigo no site:  

http://www.bidstrup.com/carbon.htm

Saving The Planet While Saving The Farm

. Um detalhe bastante curioso e seria ironico se não fôsse tão mórbido é a história de Francisco Orellana. O homem chega na Europa dizendo alarmado que viu na Amazônia cidades muito ricas de nativos em vales exuberantes de fertilidade e com muito ouro tentando convencer investidores para uma nova excursão. Mas demoram oito anos para voltarem e quando o fazem nada encontram, apenas nativos zanzando sem destino pelas ordas da selva. O homem é ridicularizado e acusado de mentiras fantasiosas. Mas ele não mentiu. Aconteceu que ele e sua tripulação trouxeram uma doença que em oito anos acabou com tôdas aquelas civilizações! Os nativos que conseguiram escapar foi o que a expedição tardia encontrou!

A Ilusão da Física

sexta-feira, setembro 24th, 2010

Lendo o livro “The Physics Delusion”, de Johan F. Prins, é impossível a mim em certos trechos evitar que os pêlos se arrepiem. Meu Deus! Veja isto: “… the “hundreds of thousands of professors” who taught and did research on superconduction: They are suddenly confronted with the incontestable fact that what they are teaching, and the paradigm within which they have been doing research, have been wrong all along for more than 50 years.” 

Como não sou Físico, nêste campo não opino. Mas isto serve como idéia (não como exemplo, pois não sei se a Verdade está com o autor do livro) do que aconteceria se de repente alguns dos modêlos da Teoria da Matriz/DNA Universal estiverem corretos! Você consegue acreditar que ainda é possível – dado o conhecimento científico que temos hoje – que estamos sujeitos a descobertas revolucionárias bem abaixo de nossos narizes fazendo com que todo nosso mundo em que acreditamos, entorne de cabeça para baixo? Como foi quando Copérnico tirou a Terra do centro do Universo? Ou Galileu quando acabou com a crença de milhares de anos de que o céu seria imutável? Ou Darwin quando exorcizou Deus da criação do homem e no seu lugar trouxe o macaco? 

Imagine você vivendo nos anos 1,500.  Tôda sua vida você viu o Sol movendo-se e a Terra parada. Tudo o que os adultos escreveram e ensinaram a milhares de anos dizendo a mesma coisa. Num belo dia à noite, ouvindo o rádio, vem a noticia de que o Sol sempre estêve parado, é a Terra que se move… (bem, naquela época ainda não havia rádio. Vamos supor então que um amigo te telefona dando a noticia… êpa… também não havia telefone… raios, não importa como você recebeu a noticia). Só quero que imagine como ficaria ansioso pelo amanhecer e como iria correndo olhar o Sol, como ficaria sua cabeça vendo-o mover-se, como pisarias forte no chão pensando: se essa p… tôda está se movendo, quer dizer que estou viajando no espaço?! E a Bíblia mentiu, Deus mentiu, meu professor, meu avô, todos foram enganados?! 

O fato é que se a inteligência humana não tivesse recebido essa sacudidela hoje ainda estaríamos viajando a lombo de cavalo, não haveria a Ciência e tecnologia que existe agora. Mas a Ciência e tecnologia que está aí resultou na diferença que de 500 milhões de torturados pela vida em 1.500, hoje existam 5 bilhões. Então seria de bom grado que ocorresse nova sacudidela que produzisse uma Ciência e tecnologia realmente vantajosa para a espécie humana. 

 Seria possível o nosso mundo virar do avêsso sómente se fomos enganados, que o conhecimento “real” cientifico é bem menor do que nos ensinaram nas escolas, de que o que aprendemos como “leis da Natureza”, não são reais leis da Natureza. 

Por exemplo, como ficariam milhões de professores e estudantes se descobrissem de repente que a Terra não é um objeto físico que surgiu espontaneamente do material que sobrou do Sol, como todos aprenderam nos bancos escolares, mas sim que é sua vovó antiga mas ainda presente, uma entidade semi-viva, que tem um ciclo vital, que vai se transformar numa estrêla e inclusive se reproduzir sexualmente?! Que tôda a interpretação dos fundamentos das origens e evolução inserida nos curriculuns escolares pela área da Astronomia está errada? Ou mesmo que o processo de evolução na realidade é tão mais complexo do que Darwin imaginou que as ideologias, os conceitos, os entendimentos do mundo e da vida, baseados na Teoria da Evolução de Darwin, nos ultimos cem anos estiveram errados? Lá no Purgatório, Hitler pularia furioso no pescoço de Darwin gritando: “Você me enganou!” (se é verdade que o evolucionismo influenciou a ideologia nazista, como acreditam alguns, eu não sei). 

Estou tentando com afinco acompanhar os debates sôbre essa bombástica matéria, em muitos dos quais o autor se apresenta para se defender, nos fóruns da Internet. Tenho dito que existe uma camada biológica revestindo a Natureza desde os fenômenos microscópicos aos macroscópios, de maneira que a Física sózinha nunca vai conseguir explicar o Universo, sua existência, e nossa existência. Depois que Hawking me ofendeu dizendo que a Física explicou o Universo e suas origens e por isso a Filosofia Naturalista (minha área) estaria morta, sem apresentar provas, e pelo fato de as outras disciplinas permanecerem cegas à tese do revestimento biológico, cheguei a suspeitar – como disse aqui em artigos anteriores, que as universidades, o mundo intelectual enfim, está sob uma ditadura da Física. Ajunte-se a isso o fato de meus modêlos estarem indicando que a Matemática não é a linguagem da Natureza além do alicerce mecânico.  

Mas existe um outro assunto me preocupando. A Teoria da Matriz sugere que LUCA se reproduzirá através da biosfera terrestre, e que o homem será engolfado como mera peça de uma engrenagem, se nossa mente não sobrepujar e dominar as fôrças da matéria em nossos corpos. Porque LUCA é uma máquina.   Ora, para que isto se realize é preciso que a mente do homem torne-se unica e exclusivamente mecanicista. E para tanto, não terá sobrevivência o biologismo, o vitalismo, o sentimentalismo, o mentalismo e muito menos as perguntas incômodas da Filosofia Naturalista. Segundo a cosmovisão de Hawking no Universo nunca existiu estas coisas, foi tudo invenção na Terra, portanto deve tudo se evaporar e se perder no tempo e espaço.  

Será que a Ditadura da Fisica é um mero efeito das tendências viciadas das f’ôrças da matéria que modelam a biosfera e a nós por se encontrarem incrustradas em nossa carga genética?  Mas como a Ciência da Física é um produto da mente humana, isto indicaria que LUCA já alcançou nossa mente? Se sim, isso quer dizer que entramos na reta final do processo reprodutivo do pseudo Paraíso do Éden, que esta fatalidade é irreversível? Porque LUCA  já estaria de posse das faculdades mentais dos dirigentes acadêmicos? Bem, exatamente isso é o que meus modêlos prevêem que vai acontecer se não despertar-mos a tempo, nas eu pensava que êsse tempo ainda estaria muito distante. Para ajuntar a isso tudo vejo as mulheres crescendo em poder mas mantendo a mesma tendência de sistema fechado em si mesmo. Justamente como profetizaram meus modêlos, entramos na reta final do Admirável Mundo Novo sob o Império da Grande Mãe? 

Vejamos apenas o curto texto do livro abaixo: 

1.10 Back to common sense
 

Physics is at present terminally ill! Some physicists know it, and have
mentioned it in books they have written: For example, Lee Smolin in his book
entitled The Trouble with Physics. My experience over the past ten years has
led me to conclude that if one decides to point out a possible alternative
route, which in any way lies outside mainstream-dogma, these same
physicists will ignore you, or silence you as quickly as they can. They know
something is wrong, but do not want to seek solutions which lie outside the
paradigm within which they themselves have been, and still are operating!
The mainstream physicists have become like a person who is searching
for his/her wallet under a streetlamp since there is light under the lamp; even
though the wallet had been lost further away in the dark! And this is occurring
at the time in human history when our survival depends on new paradigmshifts
in physics and other sciences.
It has thus become imperative that we must wrench the control of
physics from the hands of people who are consistently suppressing new
ideas which could lead to paradigm-shifts. It has become clear to me that one
will not be able to convince the mainstream physicists while they have control
over “what must be allowed to be known in physics”. The time has thus come
for the intelligent lay-population to learn about the issues involved and to act
in the interest of the future of human-kind. We all must enter the debate so
that informed and logical conclusions and decisions can be reached.
This book is thus intended for those people with common sense who still
have open minds: The type of person who would not be scared to state that
the “Physics-Emperor” is walking around naked even though the “expertphysicists”
in control of the “physics-church” stand around in admiration,
convinced that the Emperor is wearing the finest “strings” ever conceived
within eleven dimensions!
It will also be beneficial for the “physics-priests” in control of physicsdogma
to read this book: However, I would not be surprised if they will not
allow themselves to benefit from such an experience. It is quite amazing how  an “expert” can argue against simple compelling evidence when he/she does not want to believe it. This is reminiscent of what happened 400 years ago
when Galileo handed a telescope to one of the Church’s Cardinals to observe
the mountains on the moon: After having “peered” through the telescope at
the moon the Cardinal said: “I do not see any mountains”. This confirms the
validity of the well-known cliché according to which: “Nobody is as blind as
those who do not want to see”.
I hope this book will help to return physics to its original intent; which is
to model nature so that we can visualise it in terms of logical mechanisms
which relate to our human experience: Although apparently abhorrent to
Heisenberg, I believe that if we cannot visualise physics, we are not
practising physics but voodoo! Our purpose as physicists has always been to
model the primary causes responsible for driving the processes in nature;
instead of viewing nature as being controlled by the whims of gods: Or as
God throwing dice! Or as “spontaneously” changing its symmetry, etc., etc.!
I also hope that this book will serve to wake-up a new generation of
younger scientists who will be brave enough to leave the security of the
street-lamp of mainstream physics-dogma and venture into the dark where
they will surely find the paradigm-shifts which the human race is so
desperately in need of at present.

 

E mais este trecho: 

“Are physicists really so stupid that they cannot understand the latter
simple incontrovertible experimental and logical fact? I believe that they just do not want to concede; since once they do, they will be compelled to admit that the presently-accepted models on superconduction are all wrong: i.e. that there are at least six physicists who received Nobel Prizes for wrong physics.
 

Furthermore, they will next be compelled to admit that there are large
sections of quantum physics, based on the same concepts, which are
completely wrong: i.e. at least another fifteen physicists who received Nobel Prizes for wrong physics.
 

They do not want to accept that it is not a scandal when well-accepted
physics is proved to be wrong: On the contrary, when this happens, it
advances physics. It is, however, a scandal when the information which could prove that accepted physics might be wrong is being suppressed; as is
happening at present.
 

Why is this happening? Just imagine the “hundreds of thousands of
professors” who taught and did research on superconduction: They are
suddenly confronted with the incontestable fact that what they are teaching, and the paradigm within which they have been doing research, have been wrong all along for more than 50 years.
This is just too horrible for them to contemplate: They thus rather feign a “sudden” inability to understand when the simplest empirical relationship in physics ever, namely Ohm’s law, applies and when it does not apply. 

In addition, those physicists who have not been directly involved in the
field of superconduction, stay out of the fray by claiming that they are not
“experts” in the field: Can it really be true that the majority of physicists alive today are not expert enough to understand the limitations of Ohm’s law? Impossible!
 

E vejamos apenas mais êste: 

It is a great pity that Ohm’s empirical relationship between an applied
voltage V over a resistor and the current I flowing through a resistor, has been called Ohm’s “law”. It is not a law of nature but an empirical relation-ship which only manifests within a material when the charge-carriers suffer
so many consecutive acceleration-scattering events that one can
approximate their movement by an average, constant drift velocity; even
though the charge-carriers are not actually moving with such a constant
velocity (see section 14 for a more in-depth analysis).
 

Bem… eu tenho dito que para derrubar os modêlos da Teoria da Matriz Universal não adianta virem com outras teorias, tem que apresentarem fatos “reais” e comprovados mecanismos ou leis naturais. Agora vou ter que mudar meu dito. As leis naturais não são mais confiáveis… enquanto não aparecer – se aparecer – físicos que nos convençam que o autor está errado. 

Bem… deixa-me acrescentar mais este trechinho só, porque me é irresistível. Está no Q&A do website do autor: 

Question 12  
Why do you think that your experimental results cause such strong negative reactions, even downright hostility?
It really surprises me that (even) scientists can be so dogmatic that they too are willing to reject experimental results in favour of existing theory. “The earth must be stationary!!” In the present case the experimental results are commensurate with the formation of a macro-phase which consists entirely of electrons. The stability of such a phase cannot be explained in terms of classical physics and neither in terms of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. Both branches of physics accept that singular electron-particles represent reality, and therefore, predict that the electrons should “explode” out of the gap. Hence, if one accepts the experimental findings one is forced to conclude that theoretical physics needs to be amended.** Physics that has lasted almost a century and is littered with Nobel Prizes is not easily dethroned. It is far easier and certainly safer (from a career point of view) to maintain that the experiment must be flawed despite the fact that one cannot find a flaw. F urthermore, if a scientist has written numerous papers based on incorrect assumptions, it must be frightening to accept that you have wasted years of your life. I have sympathy with such persons, but I cannot allow my feelings to stand in the way of scientific progress.

** My convictions and predictions are:

  • (i) time and independent verification will show that the experiment is not flawed
  • (ii) theoretical physics will have to be amended (as shown further in this book)
  • (iii) other branches of science will be affected, e.g. chemistry, biology, computing, cosmology
  • (iv) advanced exciting new technologies will arise
  • (v) the experiment will become a classic, rivalling the double-slit experiment that Feynman called “the only mystery in physics”
  •   
    Não entendo disso mas a idéia que me vem à cabeça é que o autor está dizendo que seria possivel assistirmos uma caravana de eletrons formando uma fila ordeira passando no ar como fazem os aviões da esquadrilha da fumaça! Segundo a teoria reinante isto é impossível porque para haver um fluxo de eletrons é preciso um fio conductor. No final do fio os eletrons devem-se espalhar aleatóriamente no espaço e desarranja-se a fila. Mas isso me faz pensar como esse processo microscópio e no nosso passado foi transferido para nós, nossos corpos e nosso macro-ambiente. Existe uma condição em que a matéria natural é condutora de um fluxo de energia (considerando que energia seja bits-informação ativos) sem que sejamos capazes de detectar esse fluxo: o ciclo vital de um corpo. Ainda não entendido como ele funciona (tenho buscado algum material de alguem estudando o que é ciclo vital e não encontro) acho que existe uma força fluindo num corpo para causar aquelas peculiares trasnformações de forma e avanço no tempo. Então o próprio corpo seria o condutor do fluxo da força de um ponto na escala do tempo para o ponto seguinte. Essa força não deve formar nenhum campo elétrico no corpo, nem ao redor dêle, pois se o fizesse, particulas dessa força seriam dispersadas no espaço o que alteraria o período do ciclo vital. Muita coisa aqui conduzindo à suspeita que esse autor está tocando este aspecto invisivel do ciclo vital nos fenômenos naturais, por isso mexe com todas as teorias fundamentais da física, a qual certamente nunca pode detetá-lo a micro e macro níveis.  

    Só mais êste trechinho aqui: 

    Question 9 

    Your analysis hinges on the requirement that thermodynamic equilibrium has to manifest. What is your justification that you actually have reached equilibrium?
    Thermodynamic equilibrium manifests when macro-parameters (specifically temperature) do not change, even though a change in micro-parameters occurs. In the present case the major macro-parameter (which relates to temperature) is the current. In this experiment equilibrium must thus have manifested (as mandated by the second law of thermodynamics) when the current remained constant for hours and even days on end.
    Raios! Se êsse cara conseguiu o equilibrio termo-dinamico ele conseguiu alguma situação de sistema fechado, o qual só foi possível no estado de LUCA. E isto prenuncia a possibilidade do moto-contínuo. Ou não?!

    E só mais esta, prometo: 

    Question 13

    What areas of theoretical physics are inconsistent with your experimental findings?
    The most fundamental conclusion is that the Born-interpretation of the wave function as a probability amplitude has to be wrong. This, in turn, forces one to conclude that we live in a causal universe. Here I am in good company as Einstein always maintained that “God does not play dice”.

    Acho que quando o Stephen Hawking diz que o universo não precisa de Deus para ser criado porque universos podem surgirem espontâneamente por sua própria conta êle está acreditando em não-causal universo. Como os modêlos da Matriz chega até às fronteiras do Universo sugerindo uma História Universal que aponta direto para uma causa geradora do universo (um sistema natural que está se reproduzindo aqui) vou torcer para êste autor e Einstein, mesmo que para êles a causa que os modêlos indicam nunca lhes tenha ocorrido.

    “Entanglement”  foi uma grande surprêsa e é um assunto que tem chamado a atenção de muita gente. Mas talvez exista ainda uma maior surprêsa por trás disso. Veja o texto abaixo:

    Only after Einstein’s death could experiments be designed to test whether “entangled particles” can actually communicate faster than the speed of light. This became possible after the Irish physicist, John S. Bell, postulated a now famous inequality-condition which must manifest when the communication is instantaneous.

    Against all expectations it was found experimentally that “entangled particles” can communicate faster than the speed of light: The resultant conclusion, which is accepted as correct by those in control of the “physicschurch” at present, is that Einstein has “again” been proved wrong and the Copenhagen-interpretation has been vindicated. 

    The latter conclusion is wrong: The fact that such instantaneous communication is possible, apparently between ‘two particles’, still does not negate Einstein’s argument that the interpretation of the theory of quantum mechanics is not complete. It does indicate that there must be “a mechanism” which requires a physical explanation. After all, it is an incontrovertible physics-fact that when one jiggles an electron on one side of a room, another electron only jiggles in sympathy on the other side of the room after a time-lag determined by the speed of light. So what would enable two electron-“particles” to communicate faster after they have entangled?
     
    1.9.14 Space without time
    There is a way, probably the only way, in which communication can occur
    instantaneously: It rests on the postulate that an entangled wave does not
    consist of separate “particles”, as interpreted by the Copenhagen-group;
    but that it is a single holistic wave. One can then argue that “within” the
    “three-dimensional essence” of this holistic wave, the wave is in
    instantaneous contact with itself over the whole three-dimensional space its
    intensity occupies; even when this “holistic-essence” forms a fragmented
    entity within three-dimensional space (see section 32.14