Archive for maio 16th, 2012

Resposta da Matrix/DNA à pergunta: “O que o dinheiro não compra?”

quarta-feira, maio 16th, 2012

Esta resposta foi dada na seção “comentários” do seguinte link:

Eike Batista no Show Business

http://www.ninjatube.com.br/entretenimento/eike-batista-no-show-business/

Louis Charles Morelli · Nova Iorque

O dinheiro não compra o momento de alegria que um ser humano experimenta quando êle é o primeiro ser humano a descobrir um detalhe oculto na Natureza que tem influência na nossa vida e na existência do mundo, como por exemplo, que uma onda de luz contem o código para imprimir a Vida na matéria. O dinheiro não permite a quem nêle pensa a pensar o necessário para chegar as tais descobertas.

O DNA Contem Ou Não o Total Código da Vida? Se Não, Onde Está o Resto?

quarta-feira, maio 16th, 2012

Surpreendente reação e muito intuitiva veio de um autor de um post de codinome “Hkatcher” ao “paper” intitulado  “Bit by Bit: The Darwinian Basis of Life” publicado em…

http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001323&annotationId=49669

Mas talvez tão surpreendente seja a resposta da Matrix/DNA, abrindo as dimensões da fenomenologia natural para reinos jamais imaginados pelos seres humanos. Vejamos o “post” e  a seguir uma breve síntese da explicação da Matrix.

Posted by hkatcher on 12 May 2012 at 23:30 GMT

I think that any idea that the informational content of an organism is contained in its DNA is naive. If you were to take all the genes of that organism (in terms of DNA stretches that produced RNA) and transcribed and translated them (or no, if they’re meant to be RNAs), into all their final products, threw that mix into a bowl of growth media – you would not have an organisms. Every organism came from a cell, and any multi-celled organism is not a bunch of components but the result of an organized process, one we call its ‘development’. The organism is a structure ordered in both space and time, to think that a list of the twenty-five thousand different types of components, (its genome), is the same understanding the living organism is incorrect – I would like someone to build an advanced fighter jet from a list of its components – and a fighter jet is simplicity itself compared with a living cell. The codes for this four dimensional structure are not contained within DNA, the code for the sequence of amino acids constituting p53, the tumor suppressor protein doesn’t tell us what other proteins it will interact with, doesn’t tell the effects different phosphorylations will have on it and how it will interact with other proteins. The information content of the cell that makes all of the activities dependent on the transfer of genetic material (the chromatin code, the epigenetic code that controls development of organisms, something about which we know next to nothing, and then finally the simple genetic code). What the coding provided by the phosphorylation and other modifications of proteins by proteins, that change their behavior and how they interact with still other proteins – what about those interconnected webs of signaling molecules and transcription factors and DNA and how modifications affect them? How is that information coded in DNA? The interactions between chromatin, and chomosomal territories in interphase nuclei are of primal importance in cell differentiation, where is that carried in the DNA? A stem cell divides assymetrically, the chromatin of one daughter now different from the others’, where is that coded in DNA and how do you measure it’s informational content? So imagine that all that information about the interactions of proteins, DNAs, RNAs etc. with each other, the transcription factors, the kinases (some of which phosphorylate hundreds of different proteins, changing their activities, the, phospatases, acetylases, all that change the components of the cell. Those components now differ from their DNA representations (and alternate splicing extends still further the departure of a static list from the living process) , so that they are in a particular state (and what is the informational content of a ‘state’ of a living cell?)wherein the activities of one of it’s proteins could no longer, even theoretically be predicted by the 100,000 letters in its name (nucleotides in it’s DNA representation) if simply because modifications changed its properties. Does it seem credible that all of this information could be contained within the three billion nucleotides of its genome? It is simply not possible.

xxx

Resposta da Matrix/DNA:

That’s great, wonderful, Mr. Hkatcher! Then we have a problem: where are those informations encoded inside an organism? What else has an organism that we still not know it?! As a naturalist philosopher living and observing the biosphere of Amazon jungle I have no Biology knowledge like you but I usually search knowledge in all scientifc fields trying to understanding the whole and my currently theory is suggesting the answer for this question. So, from now I will describe the theory. The key are five words: photons, software, cosmological evolution, systems, light. First of all, the DNA is not a code of something existing other than itself as a system. DNA is merely a pile of sub-systems called “lateral/horizontal pair of nucleotides”. We call this pair as “bit” or fundamental unit of information. A kind of universal matrix. Why? Because the configuration of this bit is the same configuration of a primordial galactic system… So, there is a natural universal formula for organizing matter into systems, from atoms, to galaxies, to cell systems, to human beings. Well, I think that everybody will stop reading this here: this guy is away off the beam. But…

A electromagnetic spectrum of light going from X-ray to radio is the code for any life cycle when imprinted inside matter. We need do experiment for testing this strong hypothesis, which arose when in the jungle my eyes were going from the Earth surface to the Sun’s surface radiating light and this light is presents at every step of life in its biosphere. Light is broken into photons, which each one is a copy of the whole wave. Photons are like atoms in the sense that they can have their behavior changed by the system who they belongs, but they can transfer the organization of this system when they fall into atoms belonging to other environment. This could be the principles of memory transference.  At a new environment photons has the tendency to re-combination mimicking the configuration of their prior system. The result is a kind of software inside atoms/organisms composed by photons, performing a system that has informations not transferred to those atoms/organisms, which are the hardware. So, maybe here are hidden those informations that you, with good reason, are not seeing in the hardware DNA.

Each nucleotide bit is a kind of fractal, a copy of a prior system which is the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of all biological systems. The problem is that LUCA does not lives at Earth surface, he is the astronomical galactic system. LUCA is half-mechanical/half-biological, since that we can get a biological  sexual reproductive process in a mechanistic fashion only aligning astronomic bodies like planets, stars, pulsars, quasars, black holes and comets into a circuit performing a system. These semi-biological kind of matter organization is transferred to terrestrial atoms belonging to rocks and oceans through photons from stars/planetary nucleus radiation.  But in the new earth environment there are no exactly copy of the astronomical system, then, each nucleotide is a copy with a detail of variation. So, the sum of all nucleotides performs a new system, RNA or DNA, which has more informations than we can find at each part. These informations is the identity of an emerging system.

Now, we need to consider that the sum of DNA’s of any organism performs a new emerging system that is the organism itself. The organism as a whole must have more informations than the contained in each DNA. But, this excess of information, which arises from the fuzzy logic produced by DNA’s connections and interactions, are hidden where? Again the aspect hardware/software. And we know that organisms are composed by a nervous system that obeys a command of instructions. At human brain this “command”are well expressed in which we call “thoughts” or “mind”.  Now I am studying the brain searching how the synapses are building the mind as a new shape of the universal matrix formula. The final conclusion is that we need to re-build ours laboratories, the new ones based in the search for effects of natural light. Over atoms that composes life forms. And how is the interaction of a plan belonging to the mind of Bill Gates, transcripted into diagrams of softwares with the hardware of a computer. At my website there are suggestions about the matrix/DNA formula, the picture of astronomical bodies performing a system like nucleotides, the division of light spectrum into the shapes produced by life cycles, etc. Certainly it is not complete, it is not a theory of everything, our brain never will be able to do that, I believe. certainly there are a lot of errors in the models. But it suggest a new perspective, full of food for thoughts. Cheers…

Interessante Nova Visão em Profundidade do Conjunto dos Átomos Que Constituem a Matéria

quarta-feira, maio 16th, 2012

O artigo abaixo merece ser analizado linha por linha. O que faremos no próximo artigo sob o titulo “Bit por Bit: A Base Darwiniana da Vida”. Porem nêste capitulo vamos registrar e analizar um comentário postado no artigo por “bfmorris” que é de uma intuição sensacional:

Universe Today:

Alien Life May Not Be So Alien – If It Exists At All

by JASON MAJOR on MAY 9, 2012

  • Comentários:

    bfmorris

    “This deterministic looking as opposed to stochastic looking phase space should give supporters reason to pause!””

    How would this square with our stochastic universe?

    Life appears similar to the invisible dark matter I read about. We can’t see it, we can only observe its effects. It appears life is invisible; some kind of invisible management system or program, for lack of better word. We can only observe its effects. In this case, what appears to be invisible employment of organised chemistry that among other things, temporarily outwits the second law of thermodynamics.

    xxxx

wjwbudro

Very intuitive. I’d like more discussion on this thought.

xxxx
  • bfmorris

  • What I mean is, and I’m not arguing with you, it appears thus far that the most we can observe is life’s effects; ie on the matter it employs. The atoms in you or me are the same atoms found elsewhere. There is nothing special about them, and we would not be able to differentiate the atoms in us from those in a rock or a rain drop. However, no matter how many times we throw atoms in the proverbial air, we can’t recreate what we observe. The effects on those atoms, by life, are all we have at present for the observation of life. Thus my dark matter analogy, partly in levity, because we can’t see life we only see atoms and molecules behaving strangely together. Perhaps life is a form of unknown emergent energy; which reminds me that we don’t know exactly what energy is, either; we can only observe its effects.

    The entropy stage of life appears to be, death, which appears to be observable. The atoms and molecules in the dead organism immediately start acting like themselves again. The organism decays, atoms and molecules blow away, evaporate, get eaten and look special again because they are employed in another organism, or whatever.Like

  • There are plenty of deterministic processes out there. Planetary orbits, star evolution main series, et cetera are short period deterministic. Or you can narrow it down to impact shocks (real short period) and so on.

    I can’t follow your argument in the middle part. The biosphere is plenty observable.

    The thermodynamics is besides the point of the existing and observed examples of chemical and biological evolution. Obviously there is no TD problem and nobody has ever claimed such a thing.

    Please specify what you had in mind. Since the 2LOT concerns entropy what is the entropy of life and how do we observe it?

    xxxx
  • xxx

    Resposta da Matrix/DNA


    Very intuitive, Mr. “bfmorris”. As wjwbudro, I’d like more discussion on this thought.

    Why atoms behaves different in living organisms? I think the answer is in the hierarchy of natural systems. Must be an invisible natural system inserted inside these atoms and acting from above over them, changing its normal behavior when free.  The most clear example is the system of religion acting from and over a biological system called human being: the normal fighting for survival can became a suicide bomber. Or sun’s flares over Earth magnetic field. Then we have Matrix/DNA Theory models suggesting how a galactic system is half-mechanical/half-biological and how its building blocks are like nucleotides, and, how the laws and behaviors of this galactic systems penetrates earths’ atoms driving them to re-organize as a copy of that astronomic system. What you say “some kind of invisible management system or program” maybe is just the matrix formula showed in my website.

    But that is not the whole history. The formula is suggesting that any atom has the blueprint and non-expressed functions for all seven properties of life. The radiation from its nucleus produces seven different frequencies of vibrations, like the light waves. This is the magnetic field of any atom. When an electron is positioned over a specific electrosphere, the field expresses a function, like, let’s say, from your body we could see only one organ and its systemic function. if this is the right configuration of atoms systems, then became ease the bits from galactic entropy driving those atoms to re-organize in a biological fashion.

    About entropy, I think that the official theory is non-complete because they have no known complete natural system for observing. We can see the effects of entropy over natural systems, living or not living, in my model of a complete natural system. Cheers…