Archive for novembro 15th, 2012

Astronomia: Mais Evidencias para Matrix/DNA Cosmological Model

quinta-feira, novembro 15th, 2012

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/346532/description/Rogue_planet_found_among_gang_of_stars

ScienceNews

Rogue planet found among gang of stars

By Tanya Lewis

Web edition: November 15, 2012

Ninguem me “Cutuca” No Maior Debate da História que Está Acontecendo Agora No Youtube? Brasileiros! Tucuta-me…please! (7)

quinta-feira, novembro 15th, 2012

(Vai lá e clique no botão com o polegar prá cima – claro, se você concordar com meu comentário)  Esta é a Sétima parte dêste artigo, vide as seis anteriores, numeros 6,5,4,3, 2 e 1 tôdas aqui nêste blog com o mesmo titulo) . Foram perdidos muitos posts da Matrix devido uma revisão que desapareceu do blog ( principalmente posts do dia 08,dia 15-Nov). Meus posts estão em três nomes devido problemas na conta do Youtube:  Louis Charles Morelli, TheMatrixDNA e Austriak1)

xxxxxxxxxx

Ver no Youtube os videos dos nomes abaixo:

My fellow Americans, Rationalists, and even creationists, we can’t go under dark age myths.

Christians burned many books in Ancient Alexandria, persecuted us, and jeopardized our effort for Independence 230 years ago. Persecuted us. Raped us. Religiosity has been related to lo IQs. We cannot stay under this iron curtain! We must educate the masses! More Neil deGrasse Tysons!, More Carl Sagans! More Richard Feynmans! More Naom Chomsys! More Steven Pinkers! More Michio Kakus! MORE SCIENCE!

NuggetKazooie 9 hours ago

xxxxxxxxxx

Posts modêlos para entrada todos os dias: ( no capitulo anterior, 6)

The thing that contains everything is the INFINITE. If the infinite is evolving, there is EVOLUTION. If the infinite is ecstatic,inertial, there is NO EVOLUTION. So, for one to know if there is or there is not, he needs go beyond the infinite and looking back the whole. Since that it is impossible, never, infinitely, nobody will knows the TRUTH.

Neither the most intelligent, the master, Mr. TrueVerdicts.

The phenomena of “collective humanity mind” driven groups of human beings into systems called “religions” seems to be derived from the phenomena “children playing with real objects giving ghosts meanings to them”, which seems to be derived from the phenomena “RNA/DNA organized its real matter in new way with new meaning, as living beings”. There is a real duality “reality+non-real meanings”. Based on this, Matrix/DNA Theory suggests the existence of this Universe composed by hardware+software.

Atheism and Creationism are belief systems. We know our own body is an echo-system of billions bacterias and virus, some of them created by our own strands-coded genome. A non-believer recognize that the first biological molecules as RNA replicator was created in a kind of cell (solar system) of a big body called “galaxy”. It is imperative that somewhere, somehow, this galaxy have the ancestor code. Matrix/DNA model is a rational suggestion, any mind ignoring is evidence of a believer.

TheMatrixDNA 7:29 AM – Wed – Nov – 21

Generations of microbes shared in two groups (creationists and atheists) were living inside an egg and watching a process of embryogenese. Little bit intelligent and with some science, generations drawn in the wall images of those shapes – morula, blastula, fetus – and there was a debate: one believing in evolution, other in a magic creator. Never they knew about DNA and the parents’ embryo. This is humans inside the Universe: they don’t know about the Matrix and the parent’s of counciousness.

TheMatrixDNA fri, 16, nov – 2:24 AM

To those here that lies telling that are the voice of God ( Tom, HTBK, etc.) It is funny sometimes reading other mythologies. There is one, a book from Alan Kardec, saying that is the voice of Pharaoh Amenifitah’s soul. When Moses climbed the mountain for to die, he saw thousands of souls waiting his death and a strong voice came from the sky: “Creature that used the name of God in vain, came here for to be charged by yours lies!” What situation, han…? If I am you I would stopping lying now!

TheMatrixDNA 5:05 AM – Tue – Nov – 20

What’s God? There is an infinite ocean from which pops up bubbles. These bubbles joins together creating foams. After a time the foam dissolves, the bubbles go back to be the same substance of the ocean. The ocean is infinite consciousness ( God, if you want). The bubbles are any conscious lifeforms in the Universe. The foam is the material world. That’s what is suggesting the models of Matrix/DNA Theory when I do the mistake of permitting my thoughts going to metaphysics. What do you think?

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Hinduism and Buddhism say the same thing.

geezusispan in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 10 hours ago

No they don’t, Hindus believe in thousands of gods, Buddhism has no god/deity associated with it. Sounds like totally opposite to me.

mechanicmike69 in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment) 10 hours ago

I think no because those cosmos visions generates peoples with behaviors and ideals totally different than mines. Reducing matter in its smallest portions we arrive at quarks, leptons and them, no matter at all, only bubbles like containing/formed by vortexes. From the Big Bang emerged a light wave, this light shared into sequential frequencies contains the force for life’s cycle, from the wave pops up bubbles that becomes particles, so, light creates matter and imprint life on them. Theories.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Are there more evidences for Evolution or Intelligent Designer? The origins of life can’t be understood without a planet working as catalyst and Nature applying nanotechnology. The radiation coming by stars under entropy transfers the bits-information of that stars, which meet at a planet surface and having controlled speed of reactions rebuilds the star system into microscope shape: cell system. This is previous design, but any mother giraffe does same thing without intelligence.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The Bible is the first “Theory of Everything”… about outside the Universe and anything inside. The modern scientific paradigm is a Theory of Everything inside the Universe and anything outside. I will wait a real Theory of Everything…  of everything.

TheMatrixDNA 9 hours ago

Actual real example how Creationism prejudices the student practicing: Dr. Georgia Purdom. Her creationism guides her to focuses on the roles of natural selection and mutation in microbial populations. She seeks to understand the original, created, “very good” roles of bacteria in pre-Fall world and genetic mechanisms that have led to their adaptations and pathogenicity in post-Fall world. Due faith, she not see Matrix/DNA models about pre-Fall world, which could drive her to big discoveries

xxxxxxxxxxx

Beginning of Debates

XXXXXXXX

Inanimate matter on earth simply does not search out a way to improve itself but tends toward the state of neutralization or stability.

Time produces disintegration it is destructive not constructive.

The theory of evolution s that all life evolved from single cell organisms, to its higher state, Human.

“Inanimate matter simply does not search out a way to improve itself but tends toward the state of neutralization or stability.”

Right!

“Time produces disintegration it is destructive not constructive.”

Wrong. Time does not produces, it is merely a human tool for measuring order of events. In this case it says what were happens outside the disintegration.

“The theory of evolution s that all life evolved from single cell”

Wrong. There is no separation between living systems and no-living

XXX

Nope, evolutionists use huge period of time to present something as possible, while creationists embrace possibility of superior force just as someone in 1950-es would embrace smartphones if explained to them, whilst at the same time they used landline telephones 😉

That’s a horrible analogy, what are you trying to get at? No need to over complicate things

Are you the only one who thinks that this analogy is horrible? Maybe you didn’t understand: if you want to make significant changes, it takes millions of years. If I want to make that same changes, I call for my Dad. He is an expert, and knows how to do it in minutes 😉 THAT is the FUNDAMENTAL difference, but, you don’t want to believe that I have a Dad 😉

I could believe you have a Dad doing such things as creating life, producing floods, etc, if you watched he doing that and saw the informations, the forces existing in nature for doing that. We made smartphones after discovering forces existing in nature and we used them. If yours Dad did not used existent informations, forces of nature, the analogy is not valid.

in the first half of the 20th century 300 million people prayed for ANY response from “dad” and got none. 300 Million died from smallpox. It was the efforts of men that got rid of that wonderful little creation your dad made. No one will suffer and die from smallpox EVER AGAIN! That’s a fundamental difference.

:)))) well, then you don’t know my “Dad”. Please, distinguish evermortal flesh from immortal OR mortal soul. You are not just flesh, and as easy as it is to believe that people can be plugged into Matrix (with development of technology), so it’s easy to believe that no body is necessary for one to live. If God says that sufferers, or martyrs will be saved, then believe Him. It’s easy to save a soul and load it back from a hard disk when planned.

Do you really believe in it? If so, are you really behaving as a martyr for to be saved? Jesus came here for to show how you must live for getting saved. Till 30 years doing hard work of construction, no properties, no money, no personal wishes, any way. Simple cloths, simple shoes. Let me see if you will be saved: Oh…no! I am seeing the black force of Matrix, the one that built the Newtonian watch, the hard disk here, which we inherited as the selfish gene is dominating your real behavior.

XXX

For those interested this is the best abiogenesis youtube vid I can find.

watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg

Thanks, very good. The video says: “Therefore, the vesicle with high internal pressure will grow and the neighbor will shrink.”

It is pure Hideki Yukawa Physics, another Nobel laureate, when explaining the nuclear glue between protons and neutrons. That’s why Matrix/DNA models are working well, with right previsions. It has based the origins of matter over this mechanism, calculating what would happen if the Universe began with quantum vortex spins left and right. More one prevision confirmed.

Other question based in this video. If theory of gravity does not shows or can’t contains the forces that later produced germ theory and later, biological evolution theory, something is wrong in one of these theories. A Theory of Everything will need to change at least one of these theories. Am I wrong?

XXX

here here, one more: Let’s try and make peace between Evolutionists and Creationists, let’s assume that they both are right. Bear in mind that the time depends on matter and that it can be stopped/accelerated. Now guys, does everything sound logical now? 😉

Matter is stopped or accelerated accordingly to which frequency of wavelengths is vibrating at the point where it exists. If a portion of matter is located over the frequencies next to the source, it is accelerated because the vibrations are the highest. At the end of wavelengths matter is stopped, vibrations are the lowest. If God accelerated matter for creating things in short time he went against the best state for any body of matter, which is better at the middle vibrations. Is he an idiot?

“Matter is stopped or accelerated accordingly to which frequency of wavelengths is vibrating at the point where it exists.” Who told you that? Don’t you know that LIGHT exists? What is light, they say it’s a stream of “photons”, which existence is not proven. And how about Bozon’s particle? … please, try to keep up here…

I am seeing that, if yours God exists and had accelerated matter, as says your theory for to fit into yours sacred book talking about 6.000 years, he made wrong things against natural laws. If yours God exists and creates things, his arms and hands are light. Because any wave of light as seem in the screen as electric-magnetic spectrum shows the process of life cycles and contains the code and force for imprinting dynamics into inertial mass. What hell has Boson’s particle with that?!

ps. I knew that you would start some mumbo-jumbo scientific jibberish that only few of us understand just to pull my tongue in some other direction. My questions are simple, your answers are invisible, please, give some answers before you ask anything else.

Yours issue is not simple. If I understood it right yours issue is about the time applied for producing life and these immense diversity of species. And you has concluded that a magic God worked as a catalyst accelerating matter, for to fit into yours sacred book talking about 6.000 years. It is an issue invoking complex knowledge, a complex issue. Your questions seems simple to you because you already has concluded something about. I had not, I am still considering all invisible variables

XXX

ps. I am really not trying to start a debate here, I love people and I very much wish that God saves us all, but what’s the use if someone is spitting on you over and over again when all you want is to help him…

You had 2.000 years of opportunities for to help the 95% of individuals of human species that still are slaves of hard work and being tortured by all kinds of products of bad design. 2.000 years and the teachings of your Christ, yours Budas, Allahs, etc, only worst things. With your knowledge you never could help HUMANITY. Your time finished, you are fired, you will not be reelected for the next 2.000 years. That’s it.

XXX

@van der Meer “that does not mean that life cannot come from inorganic matter”

The question is whether unguided,non-intelligent laws of nature can assimilate life from earth’s raw elements. Considering that all of man’s accumulated knowledge doesn’t suffice to perform such a feat, there is no reason to believe that wind, rain, gravity, and lightening bolts are going to do it. To think otherwise is pure religious faith. Atheists are not exempted.

We have a sample just here and now where a living body is produced from non living “organic” matter without any intelligent guided laws. Think about an ovule of mother giraffe and the baby arisen inside her, without using intelligence. So, nature alone, not intelligent can do it with existent organic matter. The problem about the first living body resting in the concept of inorganic matter. But who guarantee to you that the state of the world where the living emerged was entirely inorganic?!

XXX

Creationism & Evolution:

While the former is merly a proactive inducement conducting the logical observations of all known laws of order among the chaos of existence;it cannot obfuscate the latter.Thusly,the Evolutionary Creationism (being that things exist and interact with eachother in this energetic-dynamic “wavelength” called the Uno-Verse),being how Energy transforms itself (creates) into natural existence’s,cannot be used in religious promalgations.

What does god need with jawhweh?

Good point, thanks. Humans see here a biosphere product of chaos and when lift their eyes to the sky, they see eternal state of order. Which is a promise that order is possible and happiness resides there. They invented gods in sky with their laws and tried to driven humans into social systems obeying that laws. Now we are discovering: is light, wavelengths, who produces matter and connections, it is the bad design of chaos and sametime the good designer of order. Where do you get new laws?

XXX

Proof women are smarter than men –

AiG:

“Dr. Georgia Purdom is a compelling and dynamic lecturer and well qualified to speak on the relevance of Genesis to the issue of biblical authority. She is the only female Ph.D. scientist engaged in full-time speaking & research for a biblical creationist organization in Nth America”.

NY Times 11-4-2011:

“…Where are the women? Clustered in the life sciences. About 58 percent of all bachelors, masters and doctorates in biology are awarded to women”.

Dr. Purdom’s scientific research makes me laughing. Her creationism guides her to focuses on the roles of natural selection and mutation in microbial populations. She seeks to understand the original, created, “very good” roles of bacteria in pre-Fall world and genetic mechanisms that have led to their adaptations and pathogenicity in post-Fall world. She is making it right guided by wrong idea! Our ancestor astronomical system had good roles and entropy caused it to be post-chaotic at Earth

XXX

“Mutations explain disorder”

There are an estimated 8.7 MILLION speicies in the world at this time.

In most of them, every individual has a unique DNA signature…In humans alone, 1 spiecies, that is nearly 7BILLION unique DNA’s, not including ancestors

How much more disordered do you want?

Moron

Very good point and useful informations. There are some puzzles to be solved. This biological chaos began at the first organic molecules and till today the chaos is very strong. On other hand, we have seen punctuated development of fast order. One sample would be the Earth dominated by dinosaurs. They would eliminate all living beings that does not fit into theur ecological system till the whole biosphere fitting inside the ordered box. But the chaos is resilient. Matrix/DNA suggests why…

XXX

“Such simple instincts as bees making a beehive could be sufficient to overthrow my whole theory.” – Charles Darwin

” Bees makes beehive driven by forces emitted by atoms of their bodies, whose atoms were organized in shape of a system that reproduces biologically the system that was the building block of galaxies. The tendency of this universal system is translated into animal instincts and the base for emergent humans intellectual properties.” – Matrix/DNA Theory.

Darwin did not know the state of the astronomical system that produced this planet and life on it. You’ll understand seeing the picture of LUCA

Darwin said it was better to “treat the subject separately, especially as so wonderful an instinct as that of the hive-bee making its cells will probably have occurred to many readers, as a difficulty sufficient to overthrow my whole theory. I must premise, that I have nothing to do with the origin of the primary mental powers, any more than I have with that of life itself. We are concerned only with the diversities of instinct and of the other mental qualities of animals within the same class.”

XXX

um… no. Mutation meaning De-generate mutation. As in the de-generation of a species that was altogether fine to begin with. For example the “evolution” of a fully functional, independent wild-type of species into a domestic breed. Such as a Lynx,Cougar or African Wild-Cat to a House-cat. Or a Hunting dog to a useless ‘Shitzu’. And let’s not get started on Transmutation evolution, Which is what is taught as evolution, but cannot exist.

Evolution is Nature rewards to who better dance with her. You need to understand what’s the meaning of “successful” here. Why some living being is successful? What is the force behind “success”? At short time, it means the best adaptation and usefulness of existing environmental resources. At longer time it  means the same thing plus the best shape for facing the next environmental shape. What is the force producing these “environment”? Nature. Who was star dust and transmuted into solar system

XXX

Some of the nomadic peoples may have used dung as fuel.

Ezekiel, enacting a scene prophetic of Jerusalem’s siege, objected when God commanded him to use human excrement for fuel in baking bread.

God kindly permitted him to use cattle manure instead. (Eze 4:12-17)

This seems to indicate that it was not the normal practice in Israel. What Ezekiel is saying is that his worship to God is pure and clean and not like those who worship false gods and idols

Faithful servants of God have always regarded idols with abhorrence.

often mention is made of “dungy idols”

Is it these kinds of issues, lessons, you suggests for teaching my kids?! Humans excrement for fuel in backing bread?! Look around, please, look the real world here and now which the kids need to learn for survival and getting a better life than we got. What we have for baking bread today? Gods commanding, talking to humans? Where are you seeing such thing? Who is commanding the way we bakes bread is Nature, its resources and limits, plus the human effort for to know them: Science to my kids.

So man can read and manipulate DNA Where does the evidence lead?

Imagine that you found a computer room in the heart of a factory.

The computer is running a complex master program that directs all the workings of that factory.

the program is constantly sending out instructions on how to build and maintain every machine there, and it is making copies of itself and proofreading them…

…What would that evidence lead you to conclude?

That the computer and its program must have made themselves or that they were produced by orderly, intelligent minds?

Really, the evidence speaks for itself.

That’s the example of lazies minds that is prejudicing Humanity, keeping yet 95% of humans slaves and tortured by this absurd conditions of existence. Sir, nobody can’t have “CONCLUSIONS”. The unique validated “conclusion” in this world will really exist if one goes beyond the whole and see back the entire whole. Conclusions share Humanity into conflicting parts. There is no other rational behavior seeing such computer than investigating till exhaustion what’s the program and where it came from.

You don’t know the program? Nobody has enough information about? Do yours own research. I did mine and the evidences “suggests” a totally different answer than which you “believe”. DNA is not a computational program, is not a code transmitting any message. Its fundamental units of information are merely diversified copies of a unique bit of information which is the fundamental bit-information for atoms and galaxies.Genetic transmission since the Big Bang. But, I had not “concluded” anything

XXX

Billions of people think the left hand is the dung hand and/or the hand of devil. Too bad for the left-handed 10%. Perhaps demonizing feces is a good way to enforce hygiene, an important part of crowd control.

“Billions of people think the left hand is the dung hand and/or the hand of devil.”

First of all, there is no left or right hand. Is it left in relation to what reference point?! If the world is round? So, we need always correcting these non-thinking people, people that acts as child that has no notion about what is the reality, because these people-as child are the voter and has the power that is used for ruling Humanity. Same way we need stop anyone talking the words “origins”, etc.

XXX

EVOLUTION DEFINED (1 of 3)

“There is a theory which states that many living animals can be observed over the course of time to undergo changes so that new species are formed. This can be called the ‘Special Theory of Evolution’ and can be demonstrated in certain cases by experiments. On the other hand there is the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form. (CONT) This theory can be called the ‘General Theory of Evolution’ and the evidence that supports it is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis. It is not clear whether the changes that bring about speciation are of the same nature as those that brought about the development of new phyla. (CONT) EVOLUTION DEFINED (3 of 3) The answer will be found in future experimental work and not by the dogmatic assertions that the General Theory of Evolution must be correct because there is nothing else that will satisfactorily take its place.” – Kerkut, G.A. (1927–2004), Implications of Evolution, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, p. 157, 1960

Thanks by this intelligent quote from Kerkut. It is food for thought. The surpeising thing is that Nature is such vast and complex that it is possible that this “something else take its place” can coming from places that we have never imagined before. For instance: take out the single inorganic source from the planet surface and put it in the sky, in the place of the last evolved natural system, a galaxy, and the General Theory of Evolution makes sense. Nature applies nanotechnology also

XXX

I can teach about the boogeyman, does that make him real? (weird logic). I think you mean teach with scientific evidence?

What do you think about my suggestion:

Evidences suggests that biological evolution is more plausible than creation by magics. But the human existence in a world guided by blind evolution as suggests the known mechanisms of Modern Synthesis is depreciation, and no good source for the morals we need for every human being the best for Humanity. We need leaving opened the interpretations about evolution. There are other theories as ID, Taoism, Matrix/DNA, I will teach something about. You decide.

The school should teach what we do know and can physically observe of the natural world. But when the studies come to how we came into existence, were we are not 100% sure, then yes we should teach all the religious arguments for existence, so the child can truly have a better aspect of all reasoning out there. Its not what they should believe, but what they should know.

Except we do know human origins…its evolution

We don’t. Humans are composed by flesh meat (coming from primates ancestors), and consciousness. Neurology, the field responsible and able to emit interpretations does not know how neurons and synapses relates to thoughts, and does not affirm for sure that the human brain is the unique source that produced consciousness. Human mind influencing quantum particles behaviors – which is unknown dimension yet – and the unknown source of the whole Universe turns out humans origins to be a mystery yet.

Yes! send me some links!

I think you understood my words in wrong way and it is my fault, due my difficult with English. I am telling that it will not me that will teach you others theories. I mean, the teacher – not in a sciences classroom but in philosophical classroom – should say to students: “I will teach others existent theories, interpretations, not as acceptable as “evolution without purpose”, but you are free for knowing them and decide by yourself.”

And the word “theory” was created by “Greeks”, see Wikipedia

TheMatrixDNA

Matrix,

If I wan’t science fiction I will go watch Star Trek.

Good. Science fiction as Star Trek is a better entertainment than computational simulations with poor real data closing the minds around what we see in the screen. Star Trek, as Matrix/DNA, are made by humans with humans emotions, not only by serial Turing’s machine… Above the Newtonian solar clock maybe you will discovery a almost living galaxy as ours ancestors. What seems science fiction today, sometimes tell the truth of tomorrow… (lol, I am a poet today)

The problem with evolution, (I’m not saying I don’t believe it) is we can not directly observe it yet (it takes over billions of years). It is still a scientific theory so we can only teach it as a scientific theory. Once we can prove it truth then we can teach it as truth.

Our technology will allow us to do that.

In your lifetime you’ll witness the growth of sensor and data collection science advance to the point that we can “see.”

Think of a seed in the ground sprouting to life and growing toward the sunlight in a time-lapse movie. Same same.

But we will need to change the test tube by a big glass box containing a built astronomical environment for to produce the seed. This technology will take to much time because our current astronomical theory is on a wrong pathway, their theoretical models does not fit the required state of the world that produces such seeds. The technology could be fast if they knew the models of Matrix/DNA Theory which fits perfectly. If the models will be proved wrong I will pay the beer. Pass the mustard

Do, don’t you want me to love you

I’m coming down fast but I’m miles above you

Tell me, tell me, tell me, come on tell me the answer

You may be a lover but you ain’t no dancer.

Helter skelter, helter skelter

Helter skelter.

* the Beatles.

That’s funny! My good earlier times and the Beatles song’s lyrics evoking memories of clinging on to hessian mats and spiraling down fairground slides. But you got the exactly point: as the words helter and skelter had any meaning in themselves. they only exist as part of the pair, also biological evolution and cosmological evolution had any meaning themselves, they only becomes intelligible as an interacting pair. Thanks! Now you deserve the mustard back…

XXX

Assume 1 protein cell to be formed.

The odds are incredibly slim, but how do I begin…..? Well: It would need a cell wall to contain it, the ability to maintain and expand the cell wall, the ability to process food (outside particles), and finally, the ability to split and reproduce.

Well, membrane-wall, ability to process food, the ability to split and reproduce nature can do only using seven kinds of astronomic bodies as you can see at Matrix/DNA pictures. And these things were did 10 billions years ago! If you know about “particles working like genes” that comes from cosmic radiation to earth surface, all these things are tunneled to happen. Do you know why plants cell have wall and animal don’t? Photosynthesis linking plants to walled closed system.

XXX

There is. Read some of Michael Behe’s books on it some time. It helps to know what the people you are trying to sway actually think about these subjects.

Michael Behe’s theory is wrong due his reduced point of view as observer. From a terrestrial perspective nobody can explain if the symbioses between organic molecules ancestors of cell’s organelles can be reduced to a single initial molecule, or if there was several first initial molecules. But from an astronomical perspective we can see that all molecules and cells organelles, included RNA/DNA, can be reduced into a building block of astronomical systems. This is other theory, Matrix/DNA.

XXX

NÃO  PUBLICADO

Ok, there is a thread running here: materialists says that laughter is merelly product of Chemistry and TrueVerdicts says that it was inserted into humans from an intelligent source.  Who is right, who is wrong? I don’t know and my personal research, driven by my reasoning, collecting the data that I know are proved and trying connections among them, searching a final picture, my own “Greek” theory of everything,  suggests other origins for laughter. Neither materialism, neither creationism. My picture shows laughter in the sky and before that, emerging just at the Big Bang. If someone is curious about, continue reading.

The first laughter at living beings was emitted by a woman that was under pain and suddenly saw her baby living. This was a emotional product driven neironial chemistry which produced physicals facial contorsiosns. Emotions are development from motions of natural forces coming from Big Bang and beyond. These forces are present at all natural systems, from atoms to galaxies to humans. Then, my pictures shows the sky lauthring when a vortex inside a nucleous of “primordial” galaxies, was almost being destroued due excess of stars dust, rotating desperately for expulsing out the matter and finally getting it. The explused matter emerges as anew baby-star. So its the same scene we see here happening with any biological mother. The vortex ( whicj performs functions also like a human mouth) and the quasr surrounfing it are contorsioned physically and I can feel how they feel good when the new baby star is born. I can see the sky lauthering.

But then I make a question: Was an astronomical system the inventor of laughter? From nothing? Impossible. Something before, at atoms, had the principles of this phenomena. Then I saw a proton being invaded by energy, almost exploding and suddenly, emitting a particle, pion. New baby was born, at microscope level. The proton feling good, laughtering. But atoms had invented laughter? From nothing? Impossible. Something before… then I see the picture about matter emerging first time at Big bang. There are those quantum vortex that mimicks exactly the process theorized by the great physicist, Nobel prize, Hideku Yukawa, about the nuclear gluon. Two gropis of bubles-vortex, with opposite spins emerging tfrom an unkmown invisible dimension before and beyind the Universe, popping up and desappering fast. Whem the Universe gets cold the two vortex are linked, becoming one and producing the ancestor of a quark or lepton. When this signal as ancestor emerges, a new baby is born. I learned how was the first sexual intercourse and orgasm in the Universe. I can fell the quantum vortex smilling. But… these ghosts vortex invented laughter? From nothing? Impossible. Something before… But then I arrived to the last frontier of this material universe. I can’t go ahead. I will die knowing that I never will know what fucking thing is smilling beyond the Universe. I am not depressive because my generation makes a big effort towards understanding this wolrd and providing the next generations for tem, one day, finally, getting the supreme thesuru of knowlefdge, which will be our total freedom from this opressive ignorance. I know this theory is weird, maybe infantile, but for me, it makes more sense than the two debating here.

O QUE FOI PUBLICADO: There is a thread running here: materialists says that laughter is product of Chemistry and TrueVerdicts says it was inserted into humans from an intelligent source. I asked to Matrix/DNA who is right/wrong? She said: “Both are right and wrong. The first laughter here was produced by emotion acting over neuronal chemistry producing physical facial contortions. We can see a galactic nuclear vortex doing it. Before that we can see protons doing it. And before, vortex at Big Bang. Here I stopped”.

TheMatrixDNA – 4:25 pm – 29 – Nov – 12

XXX

This is really a disgusting video.

Not because it’s about SCIENCE (F3 reference), I fucking love SCIENCE. It’s because some person made a video that directly bashes a group of people, in this case it’s people who believe in creationism, with no means of defending themselves. Why not have a sane, appropriate discussion with the people you disagree with instead of talk bad about them when they’re not looking and when they can’t defend themselves like we’re all a bunch of middle-school kids?

This behavior about talking as authority when people listen as idiots, with no own mind for thinking, refuting, asking is totally wrong, we need stop this kind of one-direction discourse. But, we learned this behavior since childhood going to churches when a man like one other holding a book about a world that makes no sense in light of the world know today speaks alone with authority. That’s ridiculous watching a Christian mass or a Islamic/Jewish cult. That’s why I escaped out of churches..

XXX

If you watch NOVA , National Geographic , or ANY “science/nature” documentary , you will ALWAYS hear , “Mother Nature” or “Evolution” designed this or that ….. These are scientific documentaries , narrated by , or filled with commentary from scientists !!!! Well respected scientists at that …… So I ask – Who , exactly , is “Mother Nature” , that SHE can “design” ANYTHING ???? Evolution is even personified as having the ability to “design” or “create” …. Just say “God” , it’s the truth

They use these words based on Truth – the unique reality we know. Mother is reference to real observed mothers, which wombs “designs” babies and by evolutionary gradual process. The collection of real informations got from the world plus the processes producing motions are put on the table of Science where men connects all them elaborating big pictures, which are called “theories”. All pictures showed Nature like mothers, no one like magical gods, it is a lie, a prejudice to Humanity

XXX


“Everything came out of nothing in Big Bang” but “Energy or matter cannot be created or destroyed” Science has evidence for micro evolution and not for “Cosmic \Chemical \Stellar \Organic “

RAPE \ MURDER \ STEALING \ VIOLENCE cannot be categorized as GOOD or BAD by SCIENCE but Creation Theory explains so now you decide what is good for the children. I want to debate if you are willing to…..

No. The last news from scientific theories is that “quantum fluctuations emerges among a vacuum space”. Nobody knows what’s hidden beyond this vacuum and where these fluctuations are coming from. We know that chemical reactions emerges at a singular amniotic liquid and evolves to an astonishing complexity like a human baby. We know the cause is a complex system (human species). So, this is a natural parameter for inferring what’s beyond the “vacuum”.Good or bad emerges from what we wish for us.

XXX

Listen, don’t do this… you’re only hurting yourself. I speak a truth which you are not familiar with; it is natural that it’s troubling to you. Read the post you replied to again: “one prior to Moses…” <=That’s point #1

Point #2) Yes, it has become “almost” instinctive: i.e. if you raise a child amongst beasts, human morals would be foreign to that creature. So yes, it’s not biological.

You cannot fathom that which I speak until you challenge your intelligence (not your intellect).

True, , like you, I also speak about a world vision that nobody had heard or thought about. But I am not such crazy to say that “I speak a truth which you are not familiar with”. I don’t “believe” in the world vision that a rational method ( comparative anatomy between living and non-living natural systems based in Amazon jungle atmo and biosphere) is suggesting, because I know I don’t know maybe 10% of the real facts of this Universe. You have a hypothesis, or a “Greek” theory, debatable.

XXX

Follow the science. Biogenesis is a proven theory, while Abiogenesis is a failure. The Oxford Dictionary states that Abiogenesis is the technical term for Spontaneous Generation.

If you actually think that Abiogenesis is a possibility, you are ignorant of at least two things. First, the complexity and intelligent programming of the DNA molecule. Second, the mathematical probabilities of random forces creating one DNA molecule. Faith in Abiogenesis has zero credibility. Deism com

Following Science, the theory of creation is a failure. If you actually think that creation is a possibility, you are ignorant of at least two things: DNA is not a code, not a program, it is merely a pile of billions of diversified copies of one unique system, which was the building block of atoms and galactic systems. Second, we do not need applying the calculus of probability since that we can see all forces and elements necessary for building a cell existing in the world prior life’s origins

XXX

Researchers at London’s Kew Gardens said Thursday they’d discovered that the Paris japonica has a genetic code 50 times longer than that of a human being. The length of that code easily beats its nearest competitor, a long-bodied muck dweller known as the marbled lungfish.

Everything in this news are evolutionary comprehensible if we learn to expand the concept of biological evolution at Earth to the concept of cosmological evolution in the whole Universe. This plant ( Paris japonica) has the most perfect shape in relation to the last non-living ancestor. Seven universal systemic functions are visible, and the fact that plants cells makes photosynthesis is due its straight inheritance from stars. The long DNA is due established replication of closed systems

XXX

The cosmological model is at the side of the picture of a horizontal base-pair of nucleotides, in Matrix/DNA website. And the detected functions of each kind of astronomical body performing a closed system are detected as the same functions of each atom in those nucleotides and else, detected at each organelle of cell’s systems. But if you are a man of only one book, you never will see the models. The drug is your book that has collapsing your mind., sorry.

@TheMatrixDNA

I am beginning to see that you may actually be seeing patterns of similarities that are too close for coincidence, so sorry for some earlier ridicule. The patterns you see, with both atomic particles as well a biological functions being reflected in the cosmos may have a very simple answer. As painting styles can help identify an artist, the similar features of nuclear science, biology, and cosmology point to a common creator.

Oh…thanks… maybe you are the second man in the world understanding what Matrix/DNA is suggesting. After 30 years alone thinking about it and testing it against real phenomenas, surprised by confirmations of previsions, etc., I decided for doing a website, only for registering its development. But it is such difference with everything I thought before that I understand the difficult for others (from Big Bang to nowadays everything were produced by this same logical chain of causes/effects)

One big problem about this world vision is that creationists and atheists does not like it. If the DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal “DNA” (the models shows how it is at microscope level -atoms- and macroscope level (galaxies) what it means? This Universe is merely a vehicle where is occurring a process of reproduction of an ex-machine system, with consciousness. God? But is is not magic and interfering here and is not absent as wish atheists. Think about the parents of a fetus.

XXX

Listening to people that are pro creationism makes me ridiculously mad, I just watched another video from the “Creationism Museum” In retort to this video, They used the fact that 40% of the US denies evolution and opposes it, as well as in islam, of course, because it is another religion which is pro- creationism, They name scientifically behind, and very heavily religious countries as others who oppose evolution. Throwing anything they can to make it seem a justifiable view. Stupidity angersme

And I spend some time trying to figuring out the causes of this phenomena. What’s going on inside humans brains, why neurons synapses projected by external world, which is essentially natural, invent a non rational supernatural dimension?! I have arrived to my own theories but I would appreciate to known others suggestions. Any idea?

You seem to be implying that there’s some evidence for rationality being some kind of default mental state. There isn’t. Humanity has spent more time looking for and inventing answers than actually finding true and factual ones. The theories of evolution are relatively new, and any goat herder can envision some all powerful force that created all the stuff they can’t comprehend, and they can arrive at some sense of hope that this entity really cares about them and their family.

Ok, thanks, you have a reasonable theory: we see children playing with real objects but giving non real meanings to them. Then, we see the “collective humanity mind” doing same thing with the whole real world, inventing gods, religions. In another hand, I think that the atoms and molecules of RNA/DNA are being manipulated by a kind of children-DNA mentality: they built proteins which are not belonging to the inherited real non-living world composed by rocks, water, atmosphere. Are they related?

opmike343:  “Humanity has spent more time looking for and inventing answers than actually finding true and factual ones…and envision some all powerful force that created the stuff they can’t comprehend”

You described what’s happens but did not explained why. Never in this world anything natural went far away off the beam as did the human brain? We see that all others living beings reacts naturally. But… the RNA/DNA did not reacted naturally accordingly to the environment they emerged. So?
TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

matrix i tried to read up on whatever i could find on your “matrix” theory…

are you a muslim?

coz dude! i’m telling you the muslims got a cosmic egg model of the universe you’ll really like! sounded just like what you where trying to explain to me… just don’t know where the 72 virgins fit in the space ship?

*confused*

youtube.com/watch?v=NXCQelhKJ7­A i don’t know if this guy knows what he is talking about. i think his name is Vilenkin… Alexander i think.

also YT penrose multiverse

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 13 hours ago

Thanks, I watched the video of Alexander Vilenkin. Matrix/DNA Theory is not about cosmology, the astronomical model is merely a parallel product resulting from calculations about the state of the world that produced this terrestrial biosphere. No, I am not muslim, I am not affiliated to any religion, politics or other kind of organization. Are you saying not found the website? Try writing: “The Universal Matrix of Natural Systems and Vital Cycles”

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

“The doctrine that the earth is neither the center of the universe nor immovable, but moves even with a daily rotation, is absurd, and both philosophically and theologically false, and at the least an error of faith.”

–Catholic Church’s decision against Galileo Galilei

DarwinsFriend in reply to DarwinsFriend (Show the comment) 8 minutes ago

“The doctrine that all known natural systems ( atoms, galaxies, living systems) has their own kind of “DNA” and the the seven kinds of astronomical bodies are merely different shapes produced by the process of life cycle, is absurd, and both philosophically and scientifically false, and at the least an error of logistics.”

— Scientific Academy decision against Matrix/DNA Theory

Well, let’s to the time the final decision.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to DarwinsFriend (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

OK. When both DNA and its protein-based replication machinery spontaneously chanced to come into existence… provided that the odds against this coincidence occurring on a planet do not exceed 100 billion billion to one.” (Dawkins, Ibid, 1986, pp.143,146). But unfortunately for Dawkins, “1 in 100 billion billion” is only 1 in 1020 (i.e. 102*109*109 = 102+9+9). That is not enough for the chance assembly of a specific chain of 15 (2015 = ~1019.5) amino acids, i.e. not even enough for one protein!

sonusboreal 7 hours ago

Who is the beast that said to you that DNA and replication spontaneously chanced to come to into existence? We can see the building blocks of DNA are merely the chemical/biological shape of the building blocks of who really created us here: galaxies. We can see how as astronomical system self-recycles and how this mechanisms evolved to biological replication. Everything, all properties of any living being had its initial mechanisms in a single astronomical system. No “odds” in evolution.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to sonusboreal (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Exactly. How could you support such poor odds that the number of DNA replications / cell divisions / mutations could POSSIBLY assemble beings such as ours. Which position needs more faith: evolution or that it was simply created by One who could do it?

sonusboreal in reply to fangednekoyasha (Show the comment) 7 hours ago

XXX

Where was residing the DNA that was inserted inside the ovule that created your own life? Parents of ovules/egg=Parents of Universe(s). Terrestrial atoms were driven to new connections under invasion of stars radiation of photons, which are like genes/memories of stars living cycle. A model of astro-bodies under life’s cycles is identical to horizontal-pair-of-nucleotides­, so it is a galaxy being transferred to Earth and lifting up as cell systems. The Matrix is coming from beyond the Universe.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to RogerS4JC (Show the comment) 1 day ago

@TheMatrixDNA “A model of astro-bodies under life’s cycles is identical to horizontal-pair-of-nucleotides­­, so it is a galaxy being transferred to Earth and lifting up as cell systems.”

What is your mind expanding drug of choice?

RogerS4JC in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 5 hours ago

The cosmological model is at the side of the picture of a horizontal base-pair of nucleotides, in Matrix/DNA website. And the detected functions of each kind of astronomical body performing a closed system are detected as the same functions of each atom in those nucleotides and else, detected at each organelle of cell’s systems. But if you are a man of only one book, you never will see the models. The drug is your book that has collapsing your mind., sorry.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to RogerS4JC (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Exactly Angela,

It does not matter what you kill or eat.

That is exactly the reason why the human race has conquered the whole world at the cost of numerous other species. It is a perfect example of a species evolving into a ‘super’ predator.

But since we are a species that gets its strength from cooperation, we also have evolved morality. For without it we would kill each other.

Peter van der Meer in reply to Angela Pearce (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Your “morality” can be a trap. All super-predator were extincts or are going to extinction. Cooperation you see till at atoms and astronomical systems, the best sample is ants and other insects societies. Morality is individual altruism of pieces composing a selfish system. I don’t teach this concepts ( modern morality, the survivor of the fittest, the fight for competition, etc) as good to my children. We are made by stars organized as closed system/Newtonian machine. These are its traits…

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Peter van der Meer (Show the comment) 1 second ago

I think we must not be mirrored upon our Nature for extracting morals and values. We are not seeing the entire face of Nature, only this chaotic face of this biosphere that created us. We need search to change the instincts from our sinner inheritance. We need to search the knowledge about ordered state and other above it. The values and morality of religions are based on mass-inertial and pleasure/acceleration/energy and the values from evolution theory does not leads to our transcendence.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Where’s the story link?

I’ll bet you any amount of money that there have been and there still are atheists who molest children.

The fact is that atheism rests on the claim of Abiogenesis and it has been disproven by Louis Pasteur’s scientific experiments. So Theism and Deism are still viable and logical scientific options. Deism com

Angela Pearce in reply to ThePsychedelicShroom (Show the comment) 28 minutes ago

I can’t understand how works a mind that calls “spontaneous” a process that took a time described in millions/billions years! Pasteur experiments disproved “spontaneous generation theory” suggesting that life is result from what he called “vital principle”. Matter outside his lab/bottle is invaded by forces, which couldn’t invade his bottle. The problem for you – if you want to advocate any idea about life’s origins – is to show and prove these forces. Is it God? Bring on him to the table.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Angela Pearce (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

“If you don’t believe in evolution all of science falls apart.” Hmmm….think about that ( which you haven’t ). These are not the biggest questions Bill. Big bang….where did the original “stuff” come from? Since the macro and micro in the universe is ALL amazingly organized ( or it would fall apart ), how could that organization possibly “evolve” ?  Sorry,I don’t have enough faith to believe in evolution. Organizisms “willing / adapting” different wings, arms, appendages? Bad science.

sonusboreal 47 minutes ago

You could understand and accept Neo-Darwinian theory of evolution if you try to get answers by yourself. It is a hard and lots of work because you need to know all scientific and empirical facts really proved and then, trying to connect them for getting a final picture. Obviously your picture will have flaws, gaps, due knowledge of all facts, and you will have only your reasoning to hypothesize what are the missing facts. I did it and got Matrix/DNA theory, it is a sample how it works.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to sonusboreal (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

NONSENSE. REGARDLESS OF WHAT YOU MATERIALISTS THINK, POWER WILL ALWAYS LIE WITH THOSE WHO TAKE A SPIRITUAL WORLD VIEW.

THE ONLY CHOICE IS BETWEEN SPIRITUAL GOOD OR EVIL.

BETWEEN WASHINGTON OR GEORGE III, SAVANROLA OR POPE ALEXANDER VI OR KENNEDY AND BUSH.

ChristianPatriarchy in reply to TheMatrixDNA 7 hours ago

Hypocrite Christian families in name of who the slavery is practiced against those unfortunates that was born homeless and orphan” – San Francisco de Assis.

They still defends the nuclear family when Christ taught against it saying: “My brothers, my sons, are all of the world”. Ok, I was born homeless all life being explored as slave, but I don’t want revolution, war, neither changing your mind. My goal is the identification of identicals and making an isolated community, far away from you

TheMatrixDNA in reply to ChristianPatriarchy (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Are there more evidences for Evolution or Intelligent Designer? The origins of life can’t be understood without a planet working as catalyst and Nature applying nanotechnology. The radiation coming by stars under entropy transfers the bits-information of that stars, which meet at a planet surface and having controlled speed of reactions rebuilds the star system into microscope shape: cell system. This is previous design, but any mother giraffe does same thing without intelligence.

TheMatrixDNA 1 hour ago

Evolution.

NuggetKazooie in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Yaaa…ya…. I agree… but this is the rational conclusion of any observer living inside the Universe. Last year, when I had my vacations and went to visit my lovely lord PinkUnicorn’s home outside the Universe, I looked back to the Universe, and I saw a process of reproduction. Then, I understood that all processes of evolution we are watching here now, is merely gradual steps of a larger process of reproduction of Universes. Previous Design. Now I ask you: who knows the Truth? Not me, surely

TheMatrixDNA in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

This really odd myth about humans having laws handed down to them from some unseen God that comes down from the clouds on rare occasions really torques my screws.

Leaders of small human groups created various moralities. Some are genetically predisposed to being “The Leader.” Most are not. Most follow. They need inspiration – just to get out of be in the morning. As groups of humans grew and we started scratching the ground and planting crops – life became much easier than hunting and foraging.

DarwinsFriend 9 hours ago

“Some are genetically predisposed to being “The Leader.” Most are “most follow”

It is easy to understand why Nature produces this division of instincts, thereafter, human psychology. It is the universal formula that organizes matter into systems. The entire formula exists as collective unconsciousness. It is building a new shape of system, a social system. The “most follow” are representatives of parts, pieces, and the “leader” is representative of the system identity. See Matrix/DNA formula.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to DarwinsFriend (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

You still believe in spontaneous generation. There has been no examples of spontaneous generation.

Vinner Yess in reply to TheRainmaker2001 (Show the comment) 4 hours ago

No, Vinner, the amount of data collected are suggesting a rational and testable process that produces biological systems (aka “life”). What’s missing is our delay about astronomy for understanding the state of the world where and when emerges biological systems. The first cell system ( the first real living being) must have been a gradual evolution from a previous existent system and not merely a part (like a planet or a proton) and abiogenesis was astronomic embryogenese, nannotechnologically

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Vinner Yess (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

What is before Time? = before

What is after Time? = ?

What precedes Space? = precedes

What’s beyond Space? = ?

Your challenge was to answer the questions correctly, and while my answers may not have been what you were expecting, they are correct, and have fulfilled the terms of our agreement. Pay Up.

davermiava in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 3 hours ago

What is before Time?

An ex-terrestrial intelligent lifeform that had invented the same scale that we, human beings, calls “time”, for ordering chronologically the events of the long universal chain of causes and effects? Probability suggests there were life and intelligence before us and will have after us. We can not be “special” in this immense Universe. But NonTrueVerdicts believes that ” Humans being are the only intelligent beings there exist”. What arrogance!

TheMatrixDNA in reply to davermiava (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

The Universal Law of Dominion begets all wrong doings — the so-called “sins/evil” by religion. It is not of theUniverse/God; it is of Humans. It is the opposite of the Universal Law of Intelligent Conduct, which insists that all intelligent beings throughout the cosmos behave morally (with Humans being the only intelligent beings there exist). The latter law is not to be observed by any other entity in the Universe but Humans. The former is only “practiced” (not “observed”) by Humans.

TrueVerdicts 2 hours ago

“which insists that all intelligent beings throughout the cosmos behave morally”

NoTrueVerdicts, yours superstitions are caused by ignorance due the scientific reductionist method having annihilated the scientific systemic method. Long before humans existence, there were natural systems (atoms, galaxies) where parts, pieces, were behaving by the brute forces and principles that evolved to “morality”. The altruism of each part keeps the selfishness of the entire system (atoms, galaxies, etc.)

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

@Nuggetkazooie”junk”

“these regions are not just junk; according to ENCODE’s analysis, 80% of the genome has some biochemical function.

The remaining 20% may not be junk either, according to Birney, the project’s Lead Analysis Coord. He explains that while ENCODE looked at 147 different types of cells, there are a couple of 1000 in total. If other cell types are examined, functions may emerge for the phantom proportion. “It’s likely that 80% will go to 100%,” Birney said.” 9-5-2012 The-Scientist

RogerS4JC in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment) 10 hours ago

This junk DNA is evidence for Evolution. While the actives genes are Biological History memory, the non-actives are Cosmological History memory. The sum is the Universal History. But then it is not anymore DNA, it is The Matrix. Those genes called junk has information for building substance for formation of stars and galaxies, so, when unappropriated expressed they build substances and triggers mechanisms that causes the worst diseases, as cancer, diabylis, etc. Creationism is the cause…

TheMatrixDNA in reply to RogerS4JC (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

I hate the idea that it always has to be evolution vs creationism. why the f*** can`t it be evolution=creationism. Listen, I am a very strong christian that believes in God and that He created the earth and everything in it, but the idea of a multi thousand year old earth just is not logical. we have infinite evidence that the earth is 4.54 billion years old.we also have evidence that animals evolved somewhat. however the idea that all of that happened by natural processes is just complete B.S.

nathanielOmega 12 minutes ago

“the idea that all of that happened by natural processes is just complete B.S”

No, it is not. Have you made your own rational research? Have you read the most possible for a modern man, scientific books and papers revealing real known and proved natural data, and have you tried to connect these data without any previous idea, only leaving your reasoning do the work? I did, I found a final picture where everything happened by natural process till the Big Bang. Before that, maybe is your God.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to nathanielOmega (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Bill, are you saying that there was no science before the THEORY of evolution. Does science cease to exist without evolution? If what you say is cast in stone fact, then why is this arguement still so hotly debated?

Scot Wale 11 minutes ago

Yes, Science would cease to exist without its own evolution and Science is a mirror itself of the natural process of evolution. Science gets information from Nature becoming more complex and changing its shapes: long time ago there was alchemy, which changed to Chemistry. If the superstitions ruling alchemy were not removed, those experiments would never advance and Science’s evolution would be stopped at that time. If the superstition of Creationism is not removed now, Science will cease.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Scot Wale (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

“2) Before the Big Bang there was singularity, maybe quantum fluctuations, maybe the smallest dense atom;”

What bothers you about these hypotheses?

TheHigherVoltage in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 4 minutes ago

Two causes: 1) I can’t understand a material Universe that could creating new information that were not inserted into it before its origins, And we know the wonderful board of complex informations we have today. My calculations suggests that at the beginning were popping up spiral-bubbles as bits-information; 2) The unique natural parameter I can see as extreme singularity giving rise to complex systems is a recently fecundated egg. So, I suppose that before there was complexity, my models fits

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheHigherVoltage (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

How can faith be a basis for knowledge?

narco73 in reply to egwpisteuw (Show the comment) 52 minutes ago

I will give you a sample of faith being the basis for knowledge:

Once time I was with my girlfriend inside the car in the darkness…Then, suddenly I had the intuition and faith that a mosquito was sitting over her face. In the dark I couldn’t see it, but I had faith. Then I socked the noise of my girlfriend for to kill the mosquito. She showed the hurted noise and told there was no mosquito. Then I knowledge that there was no mosquito. If not faith, I never would knowing that. Trial and error?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to narco73 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

ALL conclusions involve interpretation based on assumptions. The question is if the assumptions are reasonable. Can you name an assumption that science makes that is not reasonable?

narco73 in reply to egwpisteuw (Show the comment) 49 minutes ago

Science makes no assumptions, scientists and intellectuals do it. Three assumptions that I can’t accept, but keep searching alternatives: 1) The first organic molecule replication. The mechanism must come from crystals replications; 2) Before the Big Bang there was singularity, maybe quantum fluctuations, maybe the smallest dense atom; 3) Evolution is blind, has no guiding forces, no purpose. These assumptions does not match with my observations of Nature.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to narco73 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

where did the singularity come from then?

Christian Fink-Irizarry in reply to Terncote (Show the comment) 2 hours ago

When you have questions about Nature, what else could be able to have the right answer if not Nature itself? So…Where did the singularity of a humble and single fecundated egg that initialized your own life came from? The answer is “from natural parents by the natural process of genetics”. Then, you must do what Matrix/DNA Theory did: take all modern human knowledge ( relativism, quantum superposition, Big Bang, evolution, etc.) and all scientific collected real, calculating, you will see it

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Christian Fink-Irizarry (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Angela: “Dahmer, Stalin, Mao, and other atheistic evolutionists simply live out the poisonous teachings of the darwin monkey cult.”

Totally wrong, the truth is the reverse way. These people were ignorant about the modern worldview and knowledge of life under evolution and as empty mind with bias to be dictatorial they had mirrored in the salvage rules of brute nature, becoming like animals. The Bible’s writers also projected their primitive tribal values to invent a god/like/human.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

XXX

of his moral nature….with evolution there is no objective standard for us to live by so in an evolutionist world view whos to say rape or murder or robbery is wrong? atheists and evolutionists cant justify what is right and wrong because they have no objective standard to live by…i believe evolution is a poison to the minds of those in our education system because with it there will be chaos

Christian Fink-Irizarry 2 hours ago

No. The natural process of Evolution ( when discovered as existent) leads to the most lovely and beautiful/humanist/naturalist world view, moral social code and social organization. The final conclusion from the viewpoint of Evolution is: this Universe is merely a cosmic egg and inside it is evolving a universal system (it was atom, galaxy,cell, and is becoming consciousness). Every conscious lifeform is a kind of gene, all are building the final embryo for the day of The Big Birth. Questions?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Christian Fink-Irizarry (Show the comment) 1 second ago

yes! what are you smoking?

so now the universe is gonna come to life?

mmm

and creationists are crazy?

i told you about removing your head matrix…

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Can’t you ready what’s written? It is written: ” this Universe is merely a cosmic egg and inside it is evolving a universal system”. It is not universe coming to life, eggs are finally discarded with the material placenta. What’s evolving is the fetus/embryo inside it. But there is other possibility: since galaxies are our ancestors, maybe they are lost species as were dinosaurs and we emerged inside it by the same process your genome creates virus inside you. I prefer the first hypothesis.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

“The nitrogen in our DNA,

The calcium in our teeth,

The iron in our blood,

The carbon in our apple pies

were made in the interiors of collapsing stars.

We are made of star stuff”

Carl Sagan

NuggetKazooie 11 minutes ago

Very good. But maybe Nature is more wonderful than Sagan had imagined. Stars made these elements and these elements are informations about the star’s existence. The original first stars that made all heavy elements made them for be the dust for new stars formation. But… those original stars where made wavelights imprinted into matter, which gave vital cycle to those stars, generating all seven known kinds. Then, the stuff that made us was information of something half-alive. Matrix/DNATheory

TheMatrixDNA in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Makes no sense creationists saying that life could not came form non-life, since that life came from something half-electric/magnetic (atoms), half mechanical (solar system) and half-biological (the building block of galaxies). Everything cooked by waves of starslight that has the code for imprint vital cycle process into inertial matter. Makes no sense HTBK saying that life didn’t came from pond scum. The soup was merely substance of a merely part of a merely block of the real creator.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

That’s a ton of speculation.

Kenith Adams in reply to TheMatrixDNA 4 minutes ago

Yes..you have a good point. But what’s speculation? I think are two kinds: 10 Religious, where the conclusion comes first and facts will be forced to fit in; 2) Rational, when the exhaustive observation of facts leads to a conclusion never imagined before. That’s the kind happened to Darwin in Galapagos and same with the author of matrix/DNA Theory after exhaustive observation of natural systems. Evolution and Matrix are final boards, results of new theoretical connection of new collected data.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Kenith Adams (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

“…the simple logic of Cause and effects…indicates a life giving Creator who injected life into this material universe…”- Angela Pearce

.That’s very contradictory. If something was injected into the universal natural chain of cause and effects that was not produced by this chain, there is no simple logic of cause and effect. If there is a God as creator of Natural Laws and he injected something into this Nature, he broken his own laws. But, maybe you are not totally wrong. I usually (cont

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

ask my questions directly to Nature (if Nature is the job of God, He talks to me through his creation) and about this issue Nature indicated a blastula inside a womb. I understood immediately. Blastula is not a living system yet, it seems the shape of the Universe composed by galaxies (cells). Then from blastula emerges the fetus, a living system. But the parents are not inside the womb injecting anything. Why not understanding a great God bigger than the Universe? See how in Matrix/DNA models.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

do you even understand biblical slavery?

If you knew about biblical slavery you would notice a few things

1)slavery cannot be forced on anyone

2)slavery can be a free choice

3)people who owe you may repay debt with work. large debt = long servitude

4)all “slaves” released in seven years

5)biblical slavery meant as “welfare” system, if you are destitute and need a place to stay and food in your stomach, you can offer yourself as a slave to another man.no man is master over another

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 52 seconds ago

My friend, if a lovely God was the designer of a social system, all human beings should born with the same equal initial conditions. First of all, a land with the quantity and quality enough for a person, only with his hands and tools, can produce his needs of food. With lame for this person building his house. Should be forbidden for everybody buy or sell land. All other things should be made in a public land. So, nobody would need asking job to others. Only if one wants, for some other reason

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

(part1)

lol you guys like stating when theory is facts and when they are not hey?

well let me tell you something about thermo dynamics, which isn’t assumed it’s observable FACT

I put petrol in my car=5kjoules chemical energy potential.

If my engine was a perfect system with no heat loss anywhere.my car would travel 5kjoules momentum/velocity transference.now the initial energy in this perfect system with no loss cannot drive indefinitely! says ENTROPY same with the universe…

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 3 minutes ago

My friend, wrong again. Your car is an opened system, changing something with the environment ( heat, tires, etc). A perfect closed system should not change anything with the external world. It should be the perpetuum motor. But it happens that inside any system there are motions, flows of information/energy, these flows runs inside channels and like any wire,.particles slowly escapes from these channels. The system does not lose energy, loose quality of energy till…dying.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Sol invictous (The invincible sun)

Let’s see. Sun. Son. And what does a sun do? From a earthly perspective? Rise and fall. Die, and Resurrect.

MrButtlettuce 32 minutes ago

You are right, but still doing a big mistake. You had reduced yours “earthly perspective” to the short time of human existence. The real time of earthly perspective shows that at each time the sun resurrects, it had changed something. Less combustible for nuclear reactions, etc. And a more spatial perspective makes you lift up your eyes and see that the solar systems is merely a building block of a galaxy, more complex, more species of bodies (pulsars, quasars, black holes). Solar=bodies atoms

TheMatrixDNA in reply to MrButtlettuce (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Science Does in fact!It’s the Scientific THEORIES that does not.

There is no Factual duplicatable experimental proof against what i say.

the ENTIRE argument for evolution and the big bang is THEORY therefore what someone thinks!

I will agree that scientists might not agree but they are mostly all working under the assumption that the THEORY is correct.when you approach an Ernest biologist for proof,he send you to an archaeologist,who send you to a geneticist, who sends you back to the biologist

riaan visser in reply to odinata 8 hours ago

Of course the scientific theories can not agree with your theory, because at one moment, yours imagination suddenly jumps from the real scientific observed data towards imaginary supernatural worlds! But you are right when describing the confusion caused by the division of knowledge, no man can knows all data collected by each field today. Every year are published about 800 new papers! And the evidences are suggesting that we need change the Physics dominance for a “Theory of Everything”.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

super as in the primordial stew superstition?

how come you can can’t prove that?

and yet pretend ewe have…

Tom Adams in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 31 seconds ago

I have no primordial stew superstition. I know that was not the soup of amniotic liquid inside an ova alone that initialized the first moment of my body. Floating at the soup were hidden ingredients, like a genetic code that came through a big bang at the center of an ovule when the envelope spermatozoon exploded. I ask Nature when I have questions about the mysteries of existence and She as my lovely Mother and Teacher always points out a parameter saw here and now. She does’t points to books

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Tom Adams (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

actually my opinion is educated.your assumptions are the uneducated part.tell you what google”scientists”THEORY of how the first stars formed,in the Galaxy that can fuse to iron and then explode to create the heavier elements.when those first elements formed in the big bang is in an expansion so fast that they individual particle will be more than 300 000km from each other in the first second!

don’t know if you know but the gravity of a hydrogen atom doesn’t really affect anything 300k km away

riaan visser in reply to odinata (Show the comment) 9 hours ago

My dear friend Riaan! You are so funny! You told me once time that saw the bubbles that arises over water surface running at the same speed that was running the waves of that ocean! How you hope that I believe in you if I am seeing that the bubbles are too much slower? My friend, matter, be it in shape of particles, or packets of particles like atoms, stars, were the bubbles over the light’s waves that were expanding. You are funny, please, tell me more joke like that, I appreciate them.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Part 2 of 2

Using empirical science, Mendel showed that variation within a species/Biblical kind is possible within definite limits, but is not limitless as evolution would require. With these scientific facts he refuted the evolutionist of his day and the silly notion of evolution. Darwin was ignorant of the rules of genetics, though Mendel was his contemporary, Darwin, the pseudoscientist, did not read his papers.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to DraigonBoy (Show the comment) 9 hours ago

And Mendel was ignorant of modern knowledge of light, which was an essential element used by him at the yard nurturing his peas. Light makes evolution limitless because photons are the universal units of information about the whole Universe and beyond.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 2 seconds ago

XXX

“Every series of breeding experiments that has ever taken place has established a finite limit to breeding possibilities.” Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong (New Haven, Connecticut: Ticknor and Fields, 1982), p. 55.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to DraigonBoy (Show the comment) 9 hours ago

Yes, because at lab they can not reproduce the real conditions of natural environment. This earth’s s surface is bombarded from the above ( sun and others stars radiation) and from below (nuclear radiations coming through volcanic flows). At earth’s surface is resumed and microscopically reproduced the most perfect machine that nature had built astronomically. Forcing changes and adaptations upon biological systems for to fit as functional tools for this reproduction is missing at labs.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Evolution from pond scum to humans and all other life forms in between never happened, or happens; was not ever seen and cannot be reproduced as it defies applicable scientific laws and principles. Therefore, evolution would not have anything to do with the science of Thermodynamics that it defies.

You are clueless of Mendelian genetics and breeding experiments and limitations. See quotes that follow.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to DraigonBoy (Show the comment) 9 hours ago

There is no evolution from pond scum to humans due the same reason there is no evolution from a peripheral specialized cell at blastula shape to an embryo. The primordial soup and even the planet containing it are like that single cell, you can not make comparisons between one complex system (biological systems) and merely parts or substances of ancestors systems (atoms and galaxies). At a blastula is working a genetic code, DNA, as at that soup was working the ancestor code, the Matrix/DNA.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Evidence does not matter to trolls or the delusional. You can try to explain to them that there are different types of evolution – evolution of galaxies (simple dust condensing into a fantastically rich environment of stars and planets) and biological evolution – and it won’t make any difference. The reason is that if they aren’t trolls, they are believers. They have abandoned faith and taken up belief – the unfounded belief that their “evidence” makes their imaginary world real and faith moot

ExperienceCounts2 in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

The problem is that this people will leads Humanity to its own destruction, if they does not change, now. Ok, I am not the owner of Truth, my interpretation of reality is not the right one, and I don’t want to be the blind man guiding others blinds brothers. So, what I can do? Instead trying to change theirs interpretations, this debate is good for locating people that has same interpretation we have. And this self-identification is good for own planning of our future, not changing them.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to ExperienceCounts2 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

YOU ARE A PATHOLOGICAL LIAR, AN ANTI-INTELLECTUAL WITH A REPROBATE MIND.

ARE YOU WITHOUT SIN? NO YOU ARE NOT WITHOUT SIN. THEREFORE YOU ARE A HYPOCRITE.

NOW MEET JESUS WHO KNEW NO SIN AND BECAME THE LAMB OF GOD TO TAKE AWAY THE SIN OF THE WORLD BY OFFERING HIMSELF ON THE CROSS TO HIS GOD AND FATHER FOR ALL OF HUMANITY. READ JOHN3:14-18.

THE STANDARD IS JESUS AND NOT THOSE YOU CLAIM ARE CREATIONIST CHRISTIANS IN THE FALLACIOUS STRAW MAN FASHION. SUBSTANTIATE YOUR ALLEGATIONS OR SHUT UP.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to TheHigherVoltage (Show the comment) 9 hours ago

“ARE YOU WITHOUT SIN?” . Who are you for making judgments if I am a sinner or not, since that I am not suspect of doing something wrong to Humanity and Nature?! Have you lost the control of your Reason? No, you do that because you get some profit doing so and I loose something of mine. But, we have the selfish gene, so, it is probable we came from a sinner ancestry. Is it the “assassin ape”? Yes. Is it the matter tendency to be selfish closed system? Yes. Go to Matrix/DNA see our ancestry.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

ARE YOU SO STUPID? MY COMMENT WAS TO TheHigherVoltage and not you. I asked a question which is not judgemental. However, the Saints of God are to judge between good and evil and to choose good i.e. not to sin and become more and more like Jesus.

If you say you are without sin you prove yourself to be a liar. A lie is a sin.

There is no selfish gene. You are full of bunkum. I will not go to Matrix/DNA to see our ancestry that nobody saw, tested, or can reproduce using the scientific method.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to TheMatrixDNA 4 hours ago

Selfishness is a trait of biological systems inherited from ancestors systems like atoms and galaxies because all of these systems are made with matter that has the supreme tendency to reach thermodynamic equilibrium and stopping all motions. When this matter composes organized systems, its strong influence dominates the system driven it to be a closed system, cutting relations with the world. Everyone can see the selfishness of humans and ignorance finds supernatural causes as Bible’s authors.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

And if you say to me that I am a sinner without proof you are the liar. Yes, I know I am without sin. You will not go to read Matrix/DNA Theory because you are a man of a book alone ( you are addict to mythology) and like copy/paste without studying what you are pasting. What’s the “saints of god”?! Can you prove their existence using the scientific method? No. Then why are you asking the scientific method for others theories? Nonsense.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Evolutionism is an atheistic belief system based on the presumption that nothing explodes to make everything by random chance which eventually has chemical elements in water on planet earth becoming the alleged common ancestor of all that transmutes into all the life forms that ever lived. This belief defies applicable scientific laws, was never and is not observable or reproducible as the scientific method requires. Telling lies to humanity inc. children is child abuse and unscientific.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to mrjohnson2289 (Show the comment) 9 hours ago

Wrong. Evolution is a human rational conclusion observing the state of Nature today and calculating causes/effects based in the natural motions we see here and now. There are different interpretations. Matrix/DNA interprets Big Bang based on the same meaning that occurs the big bang of spermatozoon initializing our real body and life. Searching the links between the state of the world before biological systems and consciousness origins we did more complex models of atoms and galaxies’ ancestors.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

I don’t think you understood the problem. If there was no death in the world, then the population would increase with births, and no deaths would decrease it. If god still intended for every human that has lived to have a life in a world without death, then the world would be vastly overpopulated. How do you explain away that problem?

narco73 in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 8 hours ago

My friend, living beings dies due a physical process present at all natural systems. All systems born, has increased energy till middle age, when the energy begins the return. It is called entropy. Entropy begins at periphery, the degraded energy (free radicals) goes towards the center. This energy are bits-information and works as sexual energy that produces sperm and ova. During sexual activity, thus internal flow feeds the center and lift up again as a newborn. The system goes to die

TheMatrixDNA in reply to narco73 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

The complexity of life and the credibility of Darwinian evolution are inversely proportional. Our knowledge of life’s complexity is increasing:

ScienceDaily (11-18-2012) — The prevailing wisdom has been that every cell in the body contains identical DNA. However, a new study of stem cells derived from the skin has found that genetic variations are widespread in the body’s tissues… “We found that humans are made up of a mosaic of cells with different genomes,” said Dr. Flora Vaccarino

Alan Clarke 4 hours ago

The knowledge of more complexity of life, the accumulation of data proving evolution, both are increasing the credibility of Matrix/DNA Theory which models suggests that evolution in this Universe is merely steps of a ex-universal process of reproduction.There are variation of the building block of DNA – a horizontal pair-nucleotides because each unit is a copy of a unique system that varies internal expression accordingly with different external stimulus which results in different genes.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

yes of course it does!Its not write in code or in cryptic symbolism.you read what is said and contemplate what it says.

Jesus himself says in matthew 24:4Take heed that no man deceive you.For many shall come in my name, saying,I am Christ;and shall deceive many.

because again it’s the deceiver who deceives the nations, and spreading the anti christian message is one of his ways of deceiving.

The point remains!THERE IS ONLY ONE CHRISTIANITY the others is the spirit of deception of the antichrist

riaan visser in reply to Terncote (Show the comment) 25 minutes ago

Yes, but Christianism is a bad designer of social systems. The Christian nations shows today the most population surviving as slaves ( sample: the most catholic nation in the world: Brazil). The church is very rich and a black hole of society energy. Christians are not Christians. Christ must be seeing as the savior if one mimics his example of life: a humble carpenter producing with his hands at hard work, no luxury, no big houses, etc. But Christians, as evils, are smarts and blind to this.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

No!i’m fallible man,to trust me would be no better than trusting bill nye when he says evolution is a fact one walks in Christ,if you can measure them by what the Word says,to see if they walk in the truth.when they are against scripture then there is no question!

the Gospel of Christ is clear.

Jesus decides who goes to heaven

Jesus died for EVERYONE not just christians

Jesus renounces all evil against others,no violence!

Those who are evil will go to Hell,

&satan deceives to bring man to evil

riaan visser in reply to Terncote (Show the comment) 10 minutes ago

The most Christian I know are evils. There is a commandment: “You will eat your bread made by you or getting it due giving another useful product made with yours hand.” And I perfectly agree because Nature also requires the same thing of all human beings: work hard at the lame for producing the products you consume. If you don’t do that you are a predator, a vampire of others energy. I know Christians that survives as owner of stores! They never worked producing something. Aren’t they evils ?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

You want to live in a society that rejects science and lives on a bronze-age religious mentality? Then move to Gaza and join Hamas. See where that gets you.

northoforacle 3 minutes ago in playlist New Releases

NOT PUBLISHED

Or be indoctrinated by the Old Testament. You will be  the most smarter and ambitious predator in the world, because you will be believe that God chose your nation and you to be the owners and drivers of all others humans beings. They are pagans, inferiors, infidels, must be slaves. Move to Israel and see it. Or read “The protocols of the elders of zion”

XXX

entropy was created by God as a principle of this universe. there is no reason to believe that new earth and new heaven would have to follow any of the laws of this universe. mute point

then again NO it’s not clear the macro evolution happens. it’s a THEORY that has NEVER been observed

now for a cell with a limited genome, that cell will follow the degradation of genes that we see in ALL animals. which is why for instance leopards are facing almost certain extinction.

riaan visser in reply to narco73 3 minutes ago

Wrong. You have never seen a natural perfect closed system which is necessary for understanding in full the phenomena of degeneration. Our “Thermodynamic Theory” is not complete due this lack of knowledge, then, degeneration is based on opened systems and not complete closed systems. The unique event where universal matter got the organization into perfect closed system was when arose the firsts galaxies (See the picture at Matrix/DNA website) and degraded mass/energy was internalized, not…

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

expelled out. The degeneration begins at the periphery and goes towards the center, while current thermo theory only knows events when they goes expelled. God did not created entropy, humans did. Entropy is merely like a metric system for measurement of degeneration, energy decay. Evolution occurs also due this mechanism of internal flow or systems’ self-collapse. Crustaceous had skeleton externally and meal internally, they change places for soft meal getting new information from environment.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Thermo Dynamics covers transfer of heat….i.e. If you have a cup of coffe on the tabble the heat leeches out untill it reaches room temprature

It has NOTHING to do with evolution

whiteowl1415 in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 23 minutes ago

I know. But the limited and reductionist study and experiments about transfer of heat – which is, in essence, transfer of energy ( Or not?!), has extrapolated the limits of this theory and are being used by the public in the realm of philosophy, religions, etc. Like Riaan did here saying “entropy was created by God”. In fact, the flow of energy among natural systems or inside natural systems has everything to see with Evolution – if Matrix/DNA Theory will be proved right. Universal Evolution…

TheMatrixDNA in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment) 12 minutes ago

Modern philosophy is a croc of crap.

It has become a means to justify any fanicful idea that happens to some to mind.

That aside, entropy in thermodynamics is not the modern misuse of teh word as a synonym for chaos, but rather means change.

In the afore mentioned coffe cup, it is a change from hot to cool, and quite the opposite of being chaos, continues until it reached room temprature stability

whiteowl1415 in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 24 seconds ago

You are right, but you are talking about the philosophy practiced by academic scholars comfortable sitting under air conditioning. Matrix/DNA is product of pure “natural philosophy” where the searcher went to the virgin jungle facing the hell for inquiring the existence of this biosphere. As did Darwin in Galapagos. The transfer of heat (energy) happens at opened system at interactions with external world. A perfect closed system is totally isolated. Here entropy leads to more complex order.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

It is easy understanding why entropy can leads to chaos and from here, to more complex order = evolution. Think about the original galactic system, totally isolated from the world. Particles of energy begins escaping from the circuit external flow channel going towards the nucleus. But before reaching the nucleus they are stopped at a planet surface. Working like genes these particles tends to re-combination re-building the system, but different rich matter/environment cause mutation/evolution

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Except there is no such thing as a truely closed system in nature.

whiteowl1415 in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 8 hours ago

Yes, I think so. The problem is that when you extracts the energetic flow of information from the building block of DNA ( a horizontal pair of nucleotides) and observes this flow, you see it working as a perfect closed system. it does not work really as closed due the function of uracil, which reproduces those blocks, increasing the size of DNA. But, this circuit is the same that should make the seven known species of astros connected into a galactic system. The first galaxy was a closed system.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

You need remember that the process for formation of the first cell system was different from the process of formation of all cells system that came after that. The first cell was formed by symbiosis, the modern cells by merely division/reproduction. Same thing happened with galaxies formation. The first galaxy was different. There is no other way if not Matrix/DNA formula for explaining origins of quasars, pulsars, comets, first planets, star, and black hole. Today, no more perfect closed system

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

(part1)

lol you guys like stating when theory is facts and when they are not hey?

well let me tell you something about thermo dynamics, which isn’t assumed it’s observable FACT

I put petrol in my car=5kjoules chemical energy potential.

If my engine was a perfect system with no heat loss anywhere.my car would travel 5kjoules momentum/velocity transference.now the initial energy in this perfect system with no loss cannot drive indefinitely! says ENTROPY same with the universe…

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 3 minutes ago

My friend, wrong again. Your car is an opened system, changing something with the environment ( heat, tires, etc). A perfect closed system should not change anything with the external world. It should be the perpetuum motor. But it happens that inside any system there are motions, flows of information/energy, these flows runs inside channels and like any wire,.particles slowly escapes from these channels. The system does not lose energy, loose quality of energy till…dying.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

the maytricks continues)

the events that effect time in this observable universe is 1)gravity 2)velocity

thus time is not independent of the space it’s in.which gives rise to the term”space-time”thus your”theoretical”event of”timestop”cannot happen relative to the observer inside your”timestop”to him time would flow normally.yet total stopping of time can never occur only a relativistic slow down dependent on either gravity or velocity.so your”theoretical”scenario is false.

see (Occam’s Razor)

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 15 minutes ago

Gravity and velocity are produced by which thing? Material bodies at motion. They affect what things? Others material bodies, like any substance fulfilling the vacuum, be it dark energy or mayonnaise. They curves substances, not time/space. If the world stops there is no observer observing, which is other material body. The real world has only real things, yours ideas of time and space are imaginations of non-existent ghosts. Like the invention of Bible’s god, you are inventing ghosts.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

maytricks you poor man btw i’m still waiting for a pricate link to you matrixdna theory, really truly interested

as for time…

well my closest human interpretation of time would be a consecutive amount of cyclic events. independent of the scale of the cycle. galaxial stellar solar atomically even down to the smallest particle we know of all have a cyclic function or “wave” the frequency of the wave at the quantum level is also a measure of time. and It’s completely relativistic,

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 24 minutes ago

Ok, now I am understanding the foundations of your understanding about “time”. And you have a good point, you have a real evidence, the cyclic function of waves at any given scale. But you are extrapolating a real natural evidence for jumping to supernatural conclusions. You said: “thus time had a CAUSE, thus the CAUSE of time is not bound by time and therefor is ETERNAL therfore has no beginning and needs no cause”. If you search at Google “Luz: A Fórmula Para Criar a Vida?, come back we talk

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

(part2)

now we know we are a closed system to what is called the “critical density” of the universe which gives us curved space time that is finite.

youtube(dot)com/watch?v=M8tL21­vHyzg

now dna generation however is just observable FACTS again view leopard extinction. this is why you can’t sleep with your sister maytricks you’ll have funny babies due to the degradation of dna. EVERYTHING gets worse with time. nothing gets better!

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 2 hours ago

No, we are biological systems, which are opened systems. It means we have an opportunity for doing different than our ancient non-biological ancestors did. The Matrix as closed system is a theoretical model resulting from the method of comparative anatomy between all known natural systems. This result makes sense for me, but I don’t believe in it, I am testing it against real facts. It suggests there is no degeneration of the universal DNA, only for species that becomes closed in itself.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

‘this is why you can’t sleep with your sister maytricks you’ll have funny babies due to the degradation of dna.”

So how did Adam and Eve crack this nut? How about Noah?

Incest is best, sayeth the Lord.

Terncote in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 2 hours ago

The curious here is that in relation to “Adam/Eve” maybe he is pretty right. They slept together and they got the degeneration of their DNA. The problem is that Adam/Eve, as saw by the ancient people, thought quickly flashes lighting their fresh memories about long past ancestry, were merely astronomical bodies doing the functions of male and female and reproducing (re-cycling) their system. It is a theory you can see here: Google – images – origem-astronomica-dos-cromoss­omas-sexuais.jpg

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Terncote (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

NO because time is relative as proven by Einstein so your reference to the distance light travels in one year means nothing considering that both velocity and a gravity well will cause time to slow down.

You have then no reference for the year that is standard to the universe therefor your construct of measurement of light traveling in a year is based constraining time to the flow we experience currently on earth.you can have no idea how far light will travel in a year or how long that year is

riaan visser in reply to Peter van der Meer (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Time does not slow down neither speed out. Events, when measured by a metric system called “time” slow down. But slow down in relation to what parameter? What is the universal ideal velocity, which should be the parameter? The concept of velocity is in the eye of the observer and not in matter, that’s why “time” is a relativistic issue. For sure we could calculate the time-life of any beam of light since that this beam is merely photons running and designing waves which have a life’s cycle.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

But time at the time of the expansion was much faster than the light constant of today.

LangarianL2 in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 8 hours ago

Which is more evidence for Matrix/DNA models and more lessons from Nature that “time” and “space” are not entities per se. Since the Big Bang evolution is a continuum and expands like concentric waves. Why? Bib Bang emitted light, this light behaviors like we see the electric-magnetic spectrum in the screen. The first state of light was high vibrational frequency (gamma ray), the second not so much and it goes down while advance. The events at first period reaches the highest speed. Galaxies not

TheMatrixDNA in reply to LangarianL2 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

@emfederin “free energy” websites offering evidences against thermodynamics

Materialists offer evidence for abiogenesis which is against thermodynamic laws despite knowledge to the contrary: machines don’t self-assemble & sustain themselves.

“We can no longer draw a fundamental distinction between organisms and anorgana [i.e. the nonliving]” – Ernst Haeckel

“Everywhere there is mechanistic process *only*, with unbreakable necessity of cause and effect.” – Rudolf Virchow

Alan Clarke in reply to emfederin (Show the comment) 23 minutes ago

Natural non-biological systems are assembled and sustain themselves “if” the theoretical cosmological model of Matrix/DNA Theory will be proved as really existent. Seven kinds of known astronomical bodies (pulsar, star, quasar, black hole, planet, comet, dwarf star) are arranged in a linear systemic circuit based in a life’s cycle and the result is a kind of perpetuum motor, the most perfect closed system possible. Biological systems are merely evolution when added liquid state of matter.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment) 1 second ago

This astronomical system suggested by Matrix/DNA is not perpetuum due Clausius Law, the degeneration measured by entropy. It suggest a different effect of entropy in relation to thermodynamic theory (instead loosing energy to external space, the peripheral degraded energy collapses internally), because Humanity never new a perfect complete closed system before. Haeckel and Virchow were pretty right. Unbreakable chain of cause and effect evolving towards complexity reproducing ex-machine universe

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

NO genetics have shown that human population had two distinct genetic bottle necks, that inevitably leads to a single human female, they call her mitochondrial-eve and genetcis have no way of dating those bottle necks as they claim. and dna sequencing? you find efficient use of information in the genetic code of animals as proof of evolution? to me that’s proof of a common designer, who knows what to do, to get what he wants.

and then your asking a “evolutionary biologist” to be biased? lol

riaan visser in reply to TBat87 (Show the comment) 25 minutes ago

Ok, you are being more rational suggesting a “common designer” for those two distinct genetic bottle necks than those suggesting that there was no “common designer” and everything came by chance from a primordial soup. You are being pretty, naturalistic, logical. But, just when you arrives to the fundamental question “who or what was the common designer” you escape far away of naturalistic logic and creates mentally a ghost that never was saw: a magic entity. Why this silly jump?! Search Nature!

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

It obviously did work with words. Your claim is road kill. It also happen is computer programs called genetic algorithms. It also happens in biology.

ExtantFrodo2 in reply to riaan visser 2 hours ago

Part1.

no son in biology what happens is MICRO-Evolution. which means that one can take a wolf and through breading you can have a chiwawa, which is again still a k9. and will never become a cat or a new species of animal! this has NEVER happened in observable science!

genetic algorithms however uses, inheritance, selection, crossover(which is not found in nature) and mutations(which in algorithm is a random replacement of integers dependent on a predefined variable randomness…

riaan visser in reply to ExtantFrodo2 2 hours ago

The whole process of “life”, at Earth, studied by Biology, is merely a micro-evolutionary process, there is no macroevolution here. Evolution propagates as concentric expanding waves, each wave is a micro-cycle of a bigger cycle, and the whole big cycle is called “universal evolution”. Universal evolution mimics the life’s cycle process where shapes like blastula changes into shapes as fetuses, embryos, babies, so on. What’s evolving is not the Universe, it is a universal system inside it.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

You’re making my head hurt…Let me give you a simple example, start with a 4 letter word ‘SEED’, and then change one letter in that word for each ‘generation’, after enough ‘time’, you’ll get a word that doesn’t share any of the same letters as the original:

SEED-HEED-HELD-HOLD-MOLD-MOLT

Abiogenesis is how time makes matter ‘live’ – Scientists have been able to recreate the components of RNA from inorganic material.

Andromeda is in our local group, which is affected by gravity

TBat87 in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 4 hours ago

that is the most idiotic explanation i have ever heard! i see you use it often. you’ll appreciate that your argument is not even metaphorical, because it doesn’t even happen with letters. which is why we can be sure of definitions such as LIFE and NON-LIFE.

If you have any clue about abiogenesis theory, you would know that there are numerous UNPROVEN THEORIES. It all results in those in the know rejecting the idea of life forming on earth and now you nuts start looking into space!

riaan visser in reply to TBat87 3 hours ago

Those in the known rejecting the idea of “life” forming at earth are doing so because they are not able to grow as observer and see abiogenesis from a galactic perspective. We can do it without going to sit above the galaxy, if we uses our intelligence. TBat87 is almost right. His mistake is due he does not know that the real evolutionary alphabet is not resumed to only four letters (seed) but lots of different letters composing a big word. In this big word there are the letters he used:H,O,M

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

(Part1)

How does time somehow make it possible for a frog to turn into a prince? How does time make “matter” live? How does time Solve the problem that Andromeda is coming closer, which means hubble’s constant is wrong, which mean the basis for the big bang is wrong! What i would like to know from mr Nye though: If time has a beginning, what do you insert instead of “time” that magically makes NOTHING become EVERYTHING!

maybe mr Nye should apply some logic when dreaming about evolution…

riaan visser 4 hours ago

Why are you bringing on metaphysical concepts to study the real natural world? Times for sure made anything. There is no “time”as an entity “per se” time is only a human tool for measuring and for ordination of events. Imagine the whole world stopping all movements just now. And beginning all movements again. Which “amount” of time occurred in between? Zero. There is no time. And anything did “matter”live. Life is another wrong word that relates to the biological phase of a universal system.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

i study quantum physics thanks :o) and the big bang nuts believe it’s a singularity that came into existence out of “nothing” which they then call the quantum vacuum. which would inevitably require a beginning and then a cause. IF the quantum vacuum could spontaneously “create” something out of nothing

try googling “fossil record” and then when you find any record of fossil anywhere then you send that to me hey! thanks you can private me

riaan visser in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment) 3 hours ago

They had hypothesized this interpretation about the central point of universes’ beginnings because they did not know what Matrix/DNA discovered: any wave of natural light, as represented in a graphic as the electric-magnetic spectrum, is composed by seven different frequencies ( from X-ray to gamma-ray) mimicking the same process of a life’s cycle, composed by seven different shapes ( from blastula to cadaver). And light waves becomes weak being fragmented into bits = quantum vortexes.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

so in your universe the light spectrum is composed of 7 frequencies?

ok matrix you go on believing that ok!

don’t think you should even mention the word quantum with your understanding of light

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 25 minutes ago

Riaan, any opinion from yours about the Matrix/DNA interpretation of light has no value while you does not know the interpretation, which has hundreds of articles with evidences and a first one where you can see the graphic of this spectrum as the code for any life’s cycle: Google – Luz: A Fórmula Para Criar a Vida? – no way to debate this with you now.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

If you wish to examine what force will be the cause of “nature” then you have no choice but to look to the supernatural, for that is exactly the nature of the cause of the universe.

If you understood the arrow of time, you clearly would not make statements such as “time is a human tool” no the earth revolving around the sun is a TOOL to measure the flow of time. atomic clocks use atoms as a TOOL to calculate a different increment of TIME.

time is not in your mind matrix. It’s an actual FACT

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 29 minutes ago

You need show something “supernatural” and any substance called “time” as proof of yours affirmations. But, you have the right for elaborating theories about these issues, you are welcome, this way human thought evolves. In other hand, I can show here and now real facts as foundations of my theory about the “force that causes this natural universe” and I can show the “chain of causes and events” chronologically aligned by humans under a imaginary scale they called “time”. Waiting teal facts.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

If you understand what you are saying.then surely you understand that to write the genetic book of the organisms we view today.even the simplest of life forms.the amount of information and the coherency to create the organism in the genes, is tantamount to putting a monkey in front of a typewriter and assuming that over time he would by chance write a Shakespeare sonnet.Let alone a whole library of sonnets,most so complex we cannot even read the book properly.

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 34 minutes ago

You say it because you don’t know the natural system that has all principles that can produces these complex packets of informations seen here at genetic evolution. It is a humble, the simplest system possible to do with the most amount of possible informations, but, he was made by Nature through natural resources. Of course, a first and quickly look to the picture of this system says nothing, you need 30 years ( like I did) and will not discovery all its potentials. See LUCA Matrix, Google it

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

ok you go check those definitions and then you get back to me ok! I’ve already reached my quota on acting like a dictionary for today. resubmit tomorrow and i’ll give you the definitions of the words your still struggling with. I recommend a book called “The Dictionary” and then maybe check up phrase constructions. and how words fit together.

you using embryology as a proof of evolution now? coz i love showing out the idiocy of that argument! again i give you chance to google it,get back to me

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA 38 minutes ago

Yours definitions are from a specific theory, which are not “universal definitions”. Same facts has others definitions from another theories, like the word “theory”. You can’t use the scholar scientific definition of “theory”in a public debate with people that does not belongs to that community, you need to respect the Greek definition, because they coiled this word. But with education we can arrive to agreements about interpretation of real facts, no problem.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

I am not using embryology as proof of evolution. I am using embryology because it is the most known natural real parameter that we can appeal for advocating evolutionary theory. In the case of Matrix/DNA Theory that does not approve the current theory of abiogenesis because the models are suggesting that it was merely an event of “cosmological embryogenesis”with strong mutations due new environment, embryogenesis has lots to tell about genetic evolution. Which real parameter do you have?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

then Romans 1 verse 19 also says “Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them”

Thus if you start thinking about the force that can cause life! you will come to understand the immense Glory of the Living God.

P.S. The creator of NATURE would inevitably have to be SUPERNATURAL and then not confined by your “natural” view of things

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 42 minutes ago

You should be very arrogant if you belief that this microscope human brain living in this lost invisible point if this Universe could be able for to understanding the ex-machine thing that produced this immense Universe! We can elaborate theories, only that. Citing a proposition of the Bible and bringing on the same book as proof of that proposition is circular reasoning, has no rational value. “Supernatural” will be merely production of human imagination till it being shown to the public.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

nope the Creator is quite self evident by the things that was from the beginning!

Romans1:20″For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen,being understood by the things that are made,even his eternal power and Godhead;so that they are without excuse”

then when you look at the beginning you know that you have time, space and matter. and the attributes of the force that creates those are self evident!

riaan visser in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 44 minutes ago

It seems you lose the control of your imagination, my friend. Nobody can “look at the beginning”. You can elaborate theories about the beginning, like Matrix/DNA Theory, and you are welcome doing it, because for to know how was the beginning we will need go beyond this Universe and seeing the causes that creates universes. A theory can be the guide and the stimulation for us to develop the resources for advancing towards this goal. Came back to real world!

TheMatrixDNA in reply to riaan visser (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Really! Than where is the real VERIFIABLE science that conclusively establishes the evolutionary continuum? None so far.

John Heininger in reply to Terncote (Show the comment) 6 days ago

Why don’t you challenge Matrix/DNA evolutionary theory to explain the evolution of this world since seconds before the Big Bang until everything there are today and till the projection to future? Should be a useful exercise since that we need making a list for those scientific experiments that are missing…

TheMatrixDNA in reply to John Heininger 6 days ago

There are at least ten major problems with Big Bang cosmology. You might start by proving that dark matter and dark energy actually exist. Then you could address the multitude of unanswered issues relating to standard particle physics, the Higgs and evolutionary cosmology. And then provide verifiable scientific answers for the origin of life, consciousness and many other issues essential to evolution. Then you can safely exclude God from the question of origins as irrelevant. Ready, set! Go!

John Heininger in reply to TheMatrixDNA 18 hours ago

I agree. I think that all these unanswered issues will be unanswered while the Universe is being studied only by Physicists as observers. It’s like microbes inside our atoms inside our cells inside bones of our body trying to study their “universe”, which is a human body. I tried connecting the known data by another perspective – from the Biologist knowledge – and the final interpretations about Big Bang, dark energy, etc., are very different than the Physicist. What will see another observer?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to John Heininger (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Any old idiot could tell that a picture of a child at 8, depicts the same person as another photo of the same child at age 9, but it’s clear that this picture of a 50 year old is completely unrelated. It’s not difficult.

QuantumGh0st in reply to quest4reason 1 hour ago

how is it completely unrelated? same anatomy just more aged. are you trying to tell me that when a fish gets older it begins to look like a bird?

quest4reason in reply to QuantumGh0st (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

No. He is remembering that any embryogenesis process shows that while evolution gets older, a deformed and single shape as blastula becomes a complex embryo. So, there is natural and known evidence that macroevolution can use the same process for leading a reptile becoming mammal.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to quest4reason (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

What is intelligently designed/built/made/assembled has a prescribed function/purpose duty, order, form, special materials, finish, esthetics, etc. It performs its function in specialized conditions that are suitable etc.

Can you pass the test? Are these things intelligently designed/built:

Pyramids, bee, satellite, ATP Synthase motor, humans.

Humans cannot make a bee or the ATP Synthase motor. Who did that has the intelligence/ability to design/make the bee and the ATP Synthase motor?

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment) 3 hours ago

If you want to know how nature alone, without using any kind of intelligence, created the Synthase motor, using existent mechanisms upon microscopic species living inside her own body, for adapting to her own body, go to Google and write: The Cellular ATP Motor came from the Galaxies’ Rotational Motor?! The Universalmatrix had no time yet for translating to English the complete explanatory text which is: ATP Sintase: Como a Terra Copiou do Céu esta Extraordinária Engenharia!

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

HOGWASH!

NATURAL SELECTION DOES NO SUCH THING. A GIRAFFE IS A SPECIALIZED CREATE MADE AS IS WITH SPECIAL SYSTEMS TO FACILITATE THE LONG NECK I.E. BLOOD PUMPING AND PRESSURE REGULATING.

NATURAL SELECTION IS A VACUOUS TWO WORD PHRASE THAT CAN’T CHANGE A HORSE INTO A GIRAFFE.

STOP BEING SO ANTI-INTELLECTUAL AND FALLING FOR LAMARCKISTIC STORYTELLING THAT EVIL EVOLUTIONIST PSEUDOSCIENTISTS SO LOVE TO TELL THE PUBLIC.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to TheRainmaker2001 (Show the comment) 5 hours ago

My friend, any natural system (be atoms or galaxies or amoebas) does such thing naturally. Any system has its own identity, which arises from the sum of informations of its parts plus the new informations emerged through the connections among its parts, which is called “fuzzy logics”. The identity of the system goes down upon its parts and circuits, improving the channels of its flows. The mechanism is delivered in the air, if you want a long neck, take it too. Should be funny!

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

LAUGHABLE STORYTELLING. LISTEN FOLKS TO THIS FROM TheRainmaker2001 “The giraffe’s neck is the result of sexual selection and natural selection. The first giraffe like creatures would naturally have shorter necks.”

WHO SAW THE ALLEGED FIRST GIRAFFE LIKE CREATURE AND WHO SAW ITS NECK GET LONGER AND DEVELOP SPECIAL ORGANS ON THE WAY WITH EACH SEXUAL SELECTION AND NATURAL SELECTION? THERE’S NOT EVIDENCE OF THIS EVIL LYING ATHEIST.

PUT UP OR SHUT UP WITH THE STORYTELLING.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to TheRainmaker2001 (Show the comment) 4 hours ago

Who, among the Indonesians, saw the ocean changing suddenly and becoming that big tragedy? Where are the fossils of transitional giraffes?

Have you listening about punctuated equilibrium? Long periods of accommodation, inertia, suddenly intercalated by fast mutations. It happens because the creator of this biosphere is changing and small astronomical variations produces fast microscopical variations. If still they are at someplace, the transitional forms showing enlargement of neck are few ones

TheMatrixDNA in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

But… why lots of Indonesian perceived the distant change in the ocean before it happened and wisely, escaped? Due the same cause we can perceive the quickly changes of giraffe’s neck – human intelligence. Our intelligence, if not contaminated by some doctrinal virus, can see at long distances and making the right predictions without seeing events.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Lets see….

The idea that an animal that is more suited to its environment than its competition will be more successful at reproducing.

Or….

Invisible, completely un-quantifiable, magic man in the sky.

Is this some kind of joke. Shit LOL

acronus 1 hour ago 2

It is not probable that there is a magic man in the sky, but Natural History has shown that the most suited animal to its environment is attacked by Nature, discarded and driven to extinction. Where are the dinosaurs, the wales, the eagles, the lions, the hippopotamus, etc.? Evolution does not accept species that abuse their forces against competition accommodating in niches as paradises, becoming closed systems in itself, and being an evolution-stopper. She goes back selecting the smaller. .

TheMatrixDNA in reply to acronus (Show the comment) 1 second ago

There is no magic man in the sky as creator of life, bit there is a natural creator in the sky, to whom the Earth belongs to, which is the creator of biological systems at any suitable environment in this Universe.Previous non-intelligent natural design.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Extinctions happen when a species can’t adapt to changes in its environment quickly enough. And there are many ways it can happen. The introduction of a disease, changes in climate, over-population leading to starvation, etc. It is possible for a species to be too successful within it’s own environment, and change that environment, thus leading to its own demise. There isn’t a conscience, magical, mother nature lady behind it either.

acronus in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 7 minutes ago

Yes but Natural History shows that is not force against competition that leads a species to its change and transcendence to something more complex. Be it by meteors, over-population, unappropriated style of life as super-speciation, etc., Nature finds its way for destroying the evolution-stopper. There ins’t a conscience, magical, mother Nature behind our biosphere, you are right, but Nature show to us through a humble single human or canguru mother how she is as the mother’s life.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to acronus (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

I hate to tell you, but the ancient Greeks WERE the foundation of modern science…

pontecanis in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment) 45 minutes ago

I hate to tell you,but the ancient Greeks were the foundation of that Science that resuscitated at Enlightenment with Francis Bacon, but has lost its philosophical meanings as Modern Science. While the real Science enterprise was targeting the human freedom, the Modern Science is leading is to the Brave New World under the rules of Big Queen, as any insect society. What was the natural system creator of the first cell system?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to pontecanis (Show the comment) 1 second ago

There wasn’t one–chemistry is a process, not an entity.

pontecanis in reply to TheMatrixDNA 1 hour ago

Certainly there wasn’t one-chemistry process since that the unique existent system (atomic and astronomical) were not formed by chemistry. I think it is not possible a brute mutation such electron-magnetic-mechanical process turning into chemistry. Or it was a electric-magnetic + inorganic chemistry process or a mechanical Newtonian + chemistry process. I bet towards the last one because those systems are more complex than atoms. But as life came from life, systems came from systems. So?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to pontecanis (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

The evidence doesn’t match the hypothesis for evolution. The fact that there are no living ape people is evidence enough. It is not possible for apes to reproduce human beings. Its not possible. There is no mechanism in nature to make this happen. You could never convince me of something any logical person’s basic common sense would reject. The fact that apes or ape creatures can not reproduce humans is a basic inviolate law of nature.

Pedroval56 37 seconds ago

Yes, there is a natural mechanism for doing that, Pedroval. We see this mechanism working at non-living natural closed systems and it was projected for working at biological systems also. When a system becomes super-specialized, getting the perfect thermodynamic equilibrium, it is attacked by degeneration which is measured by entropy. It is not that the system loses energy, it is due particles of energy escaping from the channels of energy flows. It makes things like fusion of chromosomes

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Pedroval56 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

@spratherii “Genetics proves evolution beyond all other sciences”

“Science doesn’t prove anything. Proofs occur only in mathematics. Furthermore, mathematical proofs are not absolutely true, since one begins with assumptions called axioms and postulates. If they change, your “proofs” change. In science, nothing is ever absolute, and not all the evidence and possible explanations have been considered. Those who use the word “prove” in a scientific context usually are overstating something.

SCIENCE DOESN’T “PROVE” ANYTHING cont…

Hardly ever will you hear an experienced scientist say that something in science has been proved. Better terms include indicates, suggests, and supports. In science, explanations (hypotheses and theories) are made increasingly plausible or implausible by evidence.” – Walt Brown

Alan Clarke 1 week ago

The computer you’re using relies on scientific principles, which must be fundamentally true in order to work. Saying we can’t ever prove anything is the same as saying we can’t ever truly experience the universe directly as it is only an interpretation our brain makes using information gathered by our sensory organs. Gravity is true now, and will be for the entire lifetime of our species, so your argument is moot.

mrjohnson2289 in reply to Alan Clarke 1 week ago

This comment has received too many negative votes

@mrjohnson2289 “The computer you’re using relies on scientific principles”

True. Unlike the “soft” science of Darwinian evolution, computers are based on something much harder that can be observed in a lifetime and repeated with a high level of confidence: mathematics & engineering: mechanical, electrical, manufacturing… When Intel progressively increased the # of transistors on their CPU’s from 3,500 in 1972 to 2.2 million in 2011, fewer people debated it than universal common descent.

Alan Clarke in reply to mrjohnson2289 1 week ago

“Unlike the “soft” science of Darwinian evolution”

See? There it is again; the disingenuous suggestion that there is a “historical science” and an “operational science” which somehow differ from one another on a fundamental level. Merely the latest transparent ID attempt to sow confusion. Annoying nevertheless.

XGralgrathor in reply to Alan Clarke 1 week ago

@XGralgrathor [Re: disingenuous suggestion that “historical science” & “operational science” differ fundamentally]

Would you therefore conclude that the probability of Socrates’ or Moses’ existence which is based on historical research is fundamentally the same as the probability of two objects being attracted to one another with a force inversely proportional to the square of their separating distances since historical & operational certainties are fundamentally the same?

Alan Clarke in reply to XGralgrathor 1 day ago

@Alan Clarke

You ignore the fact that this too is based on the same principles: formulate hypotheses, test against observations.

In other words: what things (documents, artifacts, phenomena, and so on) would we expect to find HERE and NOW if the hypothesis were true?

ALL science works this way. There is *NO* distinction between your “operational” and “historical science”.

XGralgrathor in reply to Alan Clarke 44 minutes ago

From Matrix/DNA, not published ( too long)

Alan used two groups of real facts for distinguishing soft/historical from hard/operational Science. As for soft Science he appealed to “Darwinian evolution and gravity”; as hard science he appealed to “computers and Socrates&Moses existence”. His target is denying evolution. What’s is wrong with his arguments? The answer is in the computers. This machines were not created from nothing, they emerged from human brains as projections of themselves. And computers are composed of visible hardware and invisible software. Brains, and evolution also. He is not considering the software. Evolution is a sequence of events where a physical hardware is used as appropriated tool for the software getting new informations from the environment. Then, the hardware becomes unappropriated for ruling those new informations required by the advance of software. New accessories are needed like Intel CPUs, etc. So, the software makes the change and evolution of physical hardware, but science can not grasp (yet) the intercalated events related to the software. Appears the gaps, as in fossil records, and Alan is using this in a malicious way.

O que foi publicado:

@XGralgrathor: Alan used two groups of real facts for distinguishing soft/historical from hard/operational Science. As for soft Science he appealed to “Darwinian evolution and gravity”; as hard science he appealed to “computers and Socrates&Moses existence”. His target is denying evolution. What’s is wrong with his arguments? Think about. For Matrix/DNA Evolutionary Theory it is easy to debunk his arguments, but I will not do it.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to XGralgrathor (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

The evidence doesn’t match the hypothesis for evolution. The fact that there are no living ape people is evidence enough. It is not possible for apes to reproduce human beings. Its not possible. There is no mechanism in nature to make this happen. You could never convince me of something any logical person’s basic common sense would reject. The fact that apes or ape creatures can not reproduce humans is a basic inviolate law of nature.

Pedroval56 1 hour ago

Yes, there is a natural mechanism for doing that, Pedroval. We see this mechanism working at non-living natural closed systems and it was projected for working at biological systems also. When a system becomes super-specialized, getting the perfect thermodynamic equilibrium, it is attacked by degeneration which is measured by entropy. It is not that the system loses energy, it is due particles of energy escaping from the channels of energy flows. It makes things like fusion of chromosomes

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Pedroval56 (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

next you will say grass is blue.

Pedroval56 in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

That’s the problem! You said: “There is no mechanism in nature to make this…” Then, someone comes talking that knows a mechanism in Nature that make it. Instead asking explanations – which should be a rational reaction of people that knows we don’t know the final Truth – you answers with something that affirms your conviction that we are wrong. This is called “fundamentalism.”

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Pedroval56 (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

@Pedroval56

You are. Per definition. Just as you are a mammal, a vertebrate and a tetrapod. Like mammal, vertebrate and tetrapod, ‘ape’ is just a label attributed to all lifeforms that share certain features. And because humans share all features that are shared by all apes, humans are per definition apes.

Don’t fight definitions, boy. It makes you look silly.

XGralgrathor in reply to Pedroval56 (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

circular logic, typical.  I’m not an ape sir.

Pedroval56 in reply to MrGralgrathor (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

The curious thing here is that the event when Nature discarded apes as the shape that “she” was needing for continuing evolution is the same meaning of the event when God expulsed Adam/Eve out of the Paradise. And is the same meaning of the event when dinosaurs were discarded and Nature went back looking for the smaller cynodont for continuing evolution to mammals. The meaning/law is: “don’t accommodate in a provisional shape as closed system stopping evolution, you will be discarded.”

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Pedroval56 (Show the comment) 56 minutes ago

You are not an ape, neither is product of evolution from apes. You are a mind, consciousnesses, a kind of cosmic software that is under evolution by working linked to a hardware( your meat flesh body). You came from Adam/Eve, direct from the Paradise, and failed direct inside an “homus” just when there was the fusion of chrom 2. Your problem is the Bible: the authors interpreted wrong the “voice” and “ïmages” that popped up on their brains.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 48 minutes ago

XXX

“…recent studies have suggested that primary soft tissues and biomolecules are more commonly preserved within preserved bones than had been presumed. Some of these claims have been challenged, [arguing that the tissues]… are microbial artifacts [biofilm], not primary soft tissues. … extracts from a specimen of Brachylophosaurus canadensis has shown the interpretation of preserved organic remains as microbial biofilm to be highly unlikely.” – Peterson et al.

Alan Clarke in reply to parsivalshorse (Show the comment) 3 hours ago

This is more one strong evidence for cosmological evolution. The biological vertebrate skeleton is just a copy of the sky made with bones. That’s explained by Haeckel theory that “phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny” amplified to cosmological level. The head is the “black hole at the nucleus of a galaxy”, the throat is the systemic circuit, the vertebral column is the espiral, etc. Primary soft tissues and biomolecules were made by genes referring to minutes after Big Bang,so, the “microbial”

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment) 2 hours ago

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Contra Religião

Religion literally damages the connections between the left and right hemispheres of the brain(left is logical thought,right is creative thought).Thereby keeping logic/reality from ever communicating with the creative/imagination in the right.So the imagination runs wild without control.Religious minds are literally separated.They literally compartmentalize their religion from reality in their brains. MRI & CAT scans have shown their brainwaves to match mental patients(schizophrenics).(YOU)

mechanicmike69 in reply to Vinner Yess (Show the comment) 4 hours ago

XXXXXXXXX

INFORMAÇÕES IMPORTANTES

“Mutations explain disorder”

There are an estimated 8.7 MILLION speicies in the world at this time.

In most of them, every individual has a unique DNA signature…In humans alone, 1 spiecies, that is nearly 7BILLION unique DNA’s, not including ancestors

How much more disordered do you want?

Moron

Evolução Cosmológica Recapitulada na Biológica: Mary Schweitzer’s 69 myo T. rex bones

quinta-feira, novembro 15th, 2012

A Teoria da Matrix/DNA terá que enfrentar a arraigada cosmovisão/doutrina que se apossou do sistema acadêmico global. Ela parece vir do que se chama “secularismo”. Isto está definido e bem explicado seus efeitos no primeiro post abaixo do Alan Clarke. Mas adicionalmente, o debate copiado abaixo trouxe mais um grande material para pesquisa. O esqueleto biológico deve ser uma cópia da Matrix na sua forma como LUCA, portanto falta fazer um desenho mostrando isso. Ao mesmo tempo, a informação neste debate a respeito da existencia de soft tissues and biomolecules no meio dos ossos me leva á intuição de estar vendo a evolução biológica recapitulando a cosmológica, ou ainda mais, que os eventos da cosmológica ficarem registrados aqui, nesta biológica arquitetura. Preciso estudar isso. para tanto buscar as informações sugeridas no debate. O que foi ” Mary Schweitzer’s supposed 69 myo T. rex bones”? Pesquisar isso. Ver abaixo minha resposta no debate.

SECULAR RELIGION — “ideas, theories or philosophies which involve no spiritual component yet possess qualities similar to those of a religion. Such qualities include DOGMA, a system of indoctrination…designated enemies… The secular religion [fills] a role which would be satisfied by a church or another religious authority.” – Wikipedia (emphasis mine)

DOGMA EXAMPLES:

@XGralgrathor “There is only one scientific theory”

@jjukil “there is only the one theory, and no competing explanations”

Alan Clarke in reply to XGralgrathor (Show the comment) 1 week ago

how nice you cut out the middle portion. but like we keep saying by all means. jjukil say there is the one theory and no competing explanations. but there COULD be. please provide evidence for one!

tsub0dai in reply to Alan Clarke 1 week ago

@tsub0dai “please provide evidence for one!”

My evidence is the same as yours. We differ only in our interpretations of the evidence. Evolutionists tried to interpret stretchy transparent blood vessels in Mary Schweitzer’s supposed 69 myo T. rex bones whose contents could be “squeezed out” to be biofilm. When that interpretation fell apart, they changed their interpretation to exceptional preservation of original tissues by raising the preservation limit from thousands of years to millions.

Alan Clarke in reply to tsub0dai 1 week ago

Mary Schweitzer never even claimed to have found unfossilised tissue. You are simply wrong. What she claimed to have found were ‘fragments of mineralised collagen’ and the impressions left by the soft tissue. At no point was the dating of 65 million years ever even in question by the actual reseaqrchers involved in that discovery.

parsivalshorse in reply to Alan Clarke 1 week ago

“…recent studies have suggested that primary soft tissues and biomolecules are more commonly preserved within preserved bones than had been presumed. Some of these claims have been challenged, [arguing that the tissues]… are microbial artifacts [biofilm], not primary soft tissues. … extracts from a specimen of Brachylophosaurus canadensis has shown the interpretation of preserved organic remains as microbial biofilm to be highly unlikely.” – Peterson et al.

Alan Clarke in reply to parsivalshorse 1 minute ago

This is more one strong evidence for cosmological evolution. The biological vertebrate skeleton is just a copy of the sky made with bones. That’s explained by Haeckel theory that “phylogeny recapitulates ontogeny” amplified to cosmological level. The head is the “black hole at the nucleus of a galaxy”, the throat is the systemic circuit, the vertebral column is the espiral, etc. Primary soft tissues and biomolecules were made by genes referring to minutes after Big Bang,so, the “microbial”

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Matrix Formula em diabetes-glucose-regulation: Pesquisar

quinta-feira, novembro 15th, 2012

Encontrada nova imagem que lembra a formula da Matrix como fonte de todos os circuitos sistêmicos, e tratando-se de assunto importante (diabete, flixo do sangue, etc.), registro isso como novo capitulo para pesquisa.

Matrix Formula em diabetes-glucose-regulation

Matrix Formula em diabetes-glucose-regulation

Matrix Formula At Several Evolutionary Stages

Matrix Formula At Several Evolutionary Stages

Matrix Formula as Software