Archive for dezembro, 2012

Plantas produzindo…musica?! Veja Vídeo e a opinião da Matrix/DNA

segunda-feira, dezembro 31st, 2012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=nXhhAXjKmIU#!

Singing Plants at Damanhur | Des plantes qui jouent de la musique

Se isto for real ( se os eletrodos estão realmente captando ondas de som emitidas por plantas), o som produzido imediatamente me lembra algo previsto na Teoria da Matrix/DNA, mas antes de explicar é preciso conhecer êste modêlo de ondas da Matrix.

Light - The Electric-Magnetic Spectrum by Matrix/DNA

Agora vamos ao som da musica. Repare que a musica é composta de partituras, ou seja, existe uma sequencia, um ritmo que se repete. O ritmo começa mais forte e vai se esvanecendo até chegar a um silêncio temporário, daí recomeça novo ciclo. Cada partitura tem alguma diferença com as outras, de maneira que nos parece, não existir uma partitura exatamente igual a outra.

Agora observe o grafico e situe o inicio de cada partitura em gamma-ray, alta vibração. À medida que avança o som vai enfraquecendo assim como a vibração no grafico acima vai diminuindo. No final de cada ciclo note como o som se fragmenta, assim como se fragmentam os cadaveres. Isto significaria que cada partitura é o enredo de um ciclo da vida, cada diferente periodo de vibração é uma das diferentes formas no ciclo da vida da planta.

Mas porque a planta emitiria isso? Ela não está fazendo isso porque é inteligente ou querendo revelar que existe, que tem uma história. Ela está ligada diretamente com uma estrêla pela fotossintese. A energia/luz da estrêla a está penetrando, passando por ela. E como sugere a fórmula da Matrix, cada pulsar, cada influxo de energia solar emite uma onda de luz que será igual à do grafico acima. Então, se é verdade que a musica está contando que existe o processo vital, que a planta é algo vivo, ao mesmo tempo o som está repetindo o que a onda de luz faz em todo o Universo: invade a matéria, anima-a com vibrações, mas separa a matéria em porções porque ela traz diferentes vibrações. Porem estas porções se conectam na mesma sequencia da sequencia das vibrações do grafico acima.

O DNA é composto por nucleotideos, cada bi-lateral par de nucleotideos é sua unidade fundamental de informação. Cada uma destas unidades é composta por seis elementos (4 bases e dois açucares laterais), cada elemento é o resultado material de cada frequencia de vibração. Exustem 7 tipos de frequencias da luz e apenas seis elementos no DNA, qial a explicação para diferença? observe a formula-software da matrix. A Função numero 5 é responsavel é um ramo lateral do circuito, responsavel pela reciclagem do sistema. Então essa função não aparece como som, mas é o elo entre dois ciclos, é o que produz a repetição de ciclos.  Então parece-me que  cada onda de luz solar perpassa o DNA tocando seus nucleotideos como os dedos de um pianista toca as teclas, as notas,  de um piano. A musica é “cantada” pela planta, os instrumentos são os building blocks do DNA de cada cédula da planta, mas a composição é da estrêla.

Será?!

O Sol é uma fornalha nuclear ou Eletricidade de Plasma? A Equação da Gravidade está errada? Pesquisa da Matrix/DNA

segunda-feira, dezembro 31st, 2012

Alguem comentou “o sol é eletrico, como um plasma…não é uma fornalha de fusão… gravidade não é a força diretora do Universo… eletromagnetismo é que é…muito mais potente que a força gravitacional…a equação para gravidade está errada… e a ci6encia está omitindo isso do publico”. Claro, pode ser afirmações sem fundamento, mas tem muito a ver com os modelos da Matrix/DNA, portanto registro aqui a fonte para futura pesquisa:

YOUTUBE

Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children

https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=gHbYJfwFgOU

TheOneTheOwnLak 20 minutes ago

The sun is electric…did you realise that? Like a plamsa ball…have you learned this yet?….or do you still think the sun is a fusion furnace?..and if the sun is electric..gravity is not the driving force in the universe…electromagnetism is..electromagnetism is 1,000,0000,000,000,000 times more powerful than gravity….a simple magnet picking up metal shows this…..so if the equation for gravity is wrong…why dont they tell you?..because it would mean everything is wrong about science.

·  in reply to JoshuaWaller
xxx
JoshuaWaller 14 minutes ago

… Really?

The force of gravity isn’t a constant value. Different areas have variations of gravitational value. For example, the moon has less gravity than a black hole. The same can be said for electromagnetic forces.

So yes, if you take a magnet that’s powerful enough, it can pick up a piece of iron. If the magnet isn’t powerful enough, it cannot pick up the piece of iron. Also, note, the magnet is still subject to gravity, and is incapable of lifting non-ferrous material.

·  in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak
xxx

TheOneTheOwnLak 5 minutes ago

Perhaps thats why the moon videos are so scrutinised…when you speed them up to x2 the original speed it looks like it was on earth..SO….what would happen if the gravity on the moon was the SAME as earth?..is that why they slowed it down?..because the knowledge would invalidad the equation?..on mars they say there are dust storms..but mars has 0.8% the atmosphere of earth..thats 99.2% denser here…so how is it a dust storm? there is no atmosphere?..the storms are electric..did you know that?

·  in reply to JoshuaWaller
XXX

DZZeborro 1 hour ago

This is probably going in my top 10 dumbest comments I’ve ever read on youtube. And that’s saying a lot. So many factual errors AND logical fallacies in such a small paragraph, it’s simply astounding.

·  in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak
xxx

TheOneTheOwnLak 1 minute ago

point them out please.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Do you know about the existence of the “dark light”? What do you know about? I am asking it for debating yours idea that there is only “devolution”.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)
·  in reply to DZZeborro

Debate no Youtube: How the Universe came from “Nothing”, Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss discuss

domingo, dezembro 30th, 2012

How the Universe came from “Nothing”, Richard Dawkins and Lawrence Krauss discuss

https://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=CXGyesfHzew

XXXXXXXXXXX

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNADec – 30 – r:03 AM

Dawkins, like Darwin, had reduced the Universe into terrestrial events for analyzing biological history. They conclude by evolution and tried to identify its mechanisms. But… a microbe living inside a womb watching the embryogenese of a human fetus should conclude by evolution. We, outside the womb knows that evolution is not the ultimate event, it is “reproduction”. Amplifying our vision to the time/space of universal history leads us to see reproduction of Universes with another mechanisms.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Universe is not magic,he can’t create new information from nothing. So, he only can make a new thing, system, by the same process he was made. He can’t invent from nothing new information for other kind of process. We are a new system, so, if we want to know how the Universe was made, we have the process by which we were made. Our body started with a Big Bang, explosion of spermatozoon from initial singularity. What’s was before our fecundation? Another thing like us, conscious, natural. So?

Ninguem me “Cutuca” No Maior Debate da História que Está Acontecendo Agora No Youtube? Brasileiros! Tucuta-me…please! (10)

quarta-feira, dezembro 26th, 2012

POSTS DA MATRIX/DNA PARA ABERTURA DE DISCUSSÕES

XXX

Living in the jungle I woke up for the salvage chaotic state of this biosphere. All creatures, from any plant to any animal are tortured in this existence. But, then, suddenly we see a beautiful small flower. It seems not belonging to that world. We see a bird nurturing its offspring. We see the tall tree offering flavor fruits. And we see the salvage natives. A mother holding her baby and a male bringing on food to them. This is order lifting up from chaos. This is divine evolution.

XXX

Creation plus Evolution is a process much more complex than all guys are thinking here. The deeper template where natural history is established is the history of light light and dark light, ( vibrations popping out of a membrane of nothing that separates different worlds). Matter only is adjusted over this template. Driven by this universal force, biological systems (aka life) evolves in relation to Earth and degenerates in relation to this galactic system. The source of light is creation.

XXX

God said to humans: “Grow and multiplicate!”

But…he forgot to say the same thing to this planet. Now that human had grow, we have super-population, but the planet stands the same size…

What fuck…bad designer retard god!

XXX

Thanks America! This debate is signal that a collective mind of a whole Nation has the courage to face its inner conflicts, thinking about then, suffering the pain of self-correction,but just it keeps the strong creative power of this great nation. What’s about the European and the Asian religious countries, South America, etc., which already discovered the ultimate “Truth” and has no capacity for fix what is sure wrong? There is no such debate. Yours voluntary suffering here is an heroic act!

XXX

What’s beyond the Membrane of Nothing?! The astonished idea coming from Theoretical Science, is Lawrence’s “something from nothing”. Since that Matrix/DNA calculations arrived to the astonishing idea that the seven frequencies of electric-magnetic spectrum of lightwaves are the source that imprints the vital cycle, life, into matter, we are searching the source of this natural light. The unique situation where things emerges is through membranes, then, I think there is a Membrane of Nothing.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA

NoGoodScienceForYou is here suggesting a video ( /watch?v=HRyXauc0h04) which uses real scientific reality as propaganda for his theory. I think the best education for children is showing the images of reality but, being careful self-watching for not using any kind of concepts related to adult’s interpretations, no imposition of theories. I could make a video with same images having in parallel images of spermatozoons as comets, oocyte as nuclear black holes, etc. This is for philosophy class.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA – Dec – 26 – 7:35 PM

Creationists frequently are using the probability calculus for refuting the odds of evolution and evolutionists are using the same calculus for reinforce the odds produced by chance. Both are wrong. The “individual” evolution of a new being inside a womb is driven by the external environment (human species as the non-intelligent designer) which acts internally (through DNA) and externally. Biological evolution is being driven by an yet unknown external environment, probabilities does not applies.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA 10:11 AM – DEC – 29 –

Atheists: “How man was made?”

Creationist: “By magics of God”.

Atheist: ” Hummm… how the planet was made?”

Creationist: ” By magics of God!”

Atheist: ” Hummm… how was made…

Creationist: “Stop with these stupid questions… it is magics always down!”

Really, really that’s the Science they want for kids?

· 

XXX

TheMatrixDNADec – 27 – 2:28 AM

Creationist woman – “My grandfather was not a monkey!”

Lawrence Krauss – ” Well… yours case is not so clear… ” (maybe a pork?)

Evolutionists could be more intelligent if they explain the real state of Science today. All known facts suggests strongly the physical body of human beings came from primates. But Neurology – the field really expert in this matter – says that it still does not found how neurons produces thoughts and how they are related to human mind. This is hope for dignity

XXX

TheMatrixDNA – Dec – 30 – 4:23 AM

Edmond Goo: “Evolution was spoken into existence”
No. Biological Evolution is a point of time/space located at the long chain of causes and effects started with the Big Bang beginning with particles evolution, atomic and Cosmological Evolution. All forces of Biology were there at the last non-biological ancestor, the top pf cosmological evolution and I can show you where. But… we don’t know if the very seen steps of evolution is universal evolution or merely reproduction of universes.
XXX
TheMatrixDNA – Dec – 30 – 4:23 AM

GoodScienceForYou: “Mitochondria in most species has lost over 1200 complete genes”

And you says it is due degeneration from Adam’s DNA. You have a point, you are right. Adam was a closed selfish astronomical system, also called LUCA, his DNA was the formula of Universal Matrix. The decay or Fall of Adam into the microscope shape of biological system due entropy was a change from closed to opened system. Mitochondria tried to close it doing photosynthesis, and got it as cell plants.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA

The mistakes of “degeneration theory”:

About the graphic made at “evolution-is-degeneration dot ComSindex dot asp?PaginaID =1102”

Matrix/DNA:The graphic doesn”t shows a complete period of micro-evolution, nothing about universal evolution. Biological systems are result of the decay of astronomicals systems described by Newtonian mechanics plus Relativity plus Quantum Mechanics theories composing a quasi-perfect closed system, half-alive. This “evolution” has been reproduction of that ancestor

XXX

The mistakes of “degeneration theory”:

As introduction, they says: evolution theory says all life has started as single cell organisms”

TheMatrixDNA: It is wrong. There is no separation of life and no-life when talking about natural systems. Then, “life” has not started as single cell organisms. Biological systems (aka, “life”) had all principles of its forces, elements and properties inside atomic, astronomical systems, expressed or not. See them at Matrix/DNA models.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

INICIO DOS DEBATES

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Peer reviewed scientific paper shows there hasn’t been enough time in the history of the universe for evolution to take place.

Journal BIO-Complexity, “Time and Information in Evolution,” Winston Ewert, Ann Gauger, William Dembski, and Robert J. Marks, II once again show that a mathematical simulation of evolution doesn’t model biologically realistic processes of Darwinian evolution at all.

bio-complexity(dot)org/ojs/ind­ex(dot)php/main/article/view/B­IO-C.2012.4

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

This debate between Dembski team and Ewens team will not be solved while Humanity doesn’t know the entire context that affects our biosphere and living things. The existence of biological systems is not due a simultaneous act of magical creation neither a long process obeying natural selection as agent of immediate environmental changes. For instance, the process of Earth nuclear reactions and Sun’s reactions are stronger forces composing NS, any change there means changes here. See Matrix/DNA

XXX

Evolution has been destroyed and is now in the level of archaic mythological science. These priests of the past faith based pseudo science will be known for how they retarded biology and any progress towards cures for diseases. They’ll be mocked as they should be.

NOT ONE cure has ever come from the medical industry! We have rampant NEW genetic diseases eating away at us and killing our babies.

The rise in genetic diseases under their watch is horrendous. thanks to this Evodelusionism. LOOK!

The souls of the creators of the Selfish Paradise, Adam and Eve, that remains at Earth in shape of humans, are joined around the creationist world view, has been corrected. These people wants to reproduce at Earth the falling paradise, but they reserves to them the residence at the palace, while all other humans beings should be the slaves. You can see the design of that Paradise at Matrix/DNA Theory: You see Adam and Eve, the serpent, the tree, the apple, the Fall, and you will know the truth

XXX

I’m very glad to hear that you got saved. I certainly agree that the effects of Evolutionist propaganda are tragic. We need to fight for what’s true, but I don’t think comments on a YouTube video are exactly the frontlines I’m looking for. 😛

(For Evolutionists reading this comment: yes, spreading Evolutionism is only tragic from my Creationist viewpoint.)

· in reply to ncwdane (Show the comment)

The effects of Judaism and its Bible and its production as Christianism approving human slavery, sharing Humanity into predators and preys, and as Islam, the violence that never ends, are most tragic. You are a bad human when propagating that anti-Humanity book. It is rational to suppose that there is some thing as God, but one needs never forgetting the size of this Universe, then, giving to a “possible God” his real dimensions above the Universe. The bible stupidly reduces Reason and God

· in reply to Peter Markley (Show the comment)

XXX

The earliest writings on that subject come from the satanist Helena Blavatsky. She was busted several times scamming people and making up history. I take it you believe in her channeled demonic writings or one of the copycat offshoots like Zeitgeist the movie. The history lesion in Zeitgeist comes from Blavatsky’s imagination.

· in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment)

Yeahh… Blavatsky, a woman that challenged the Russian status quo established by imperators supported by arm and religion, a woman that abandoned a powerful Russian military husband, for travelling alone to Tibet searching other kind of knowledge. Was she a satanist? You, as supporter of an established power ruling at Vatican, unable to challenge the status quo, that had enslaved populations inside industries, is a saint? I prefer Blavatsky.

· in reply to Edmond Goo (Show the comment)

XXX

I have thought that the Earth is an amusement park. Where beings come, inhabit us and share our life experiences, feelings, etc. I’m not sure if the science fiction story has been written or not..

Your thought maybe is right, but, it includes the supposition that should have a parallel spiritual Universe, is it right? If so, I remember that there is no evidence/comparative parameters here for parallels universes and spiritual existences. Why not thinking that those beings that come, inhabit us, are really bubbles of consciousnesses that pops out of this planetary matter? Think about computers: software (as bubbles of intelligence) and hardware (material living bodies) in feed-back.

· in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment)

XXX

Have you ever written down your complete philosophy? It would make a great book… I would couch it in science fiction, personally.

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

I think it is not “my philosophy” because it is a normal natural effect given some circumstances. Any one, included you, should get the same world vision if – known the modern scientific data and with single scientific tools – go to live in some virgin jungle by 4 or 7 years. It is the jungle that produces this philosophy over modern hard-wired brain by scholar education. But Darwin took 30 years for written a book, the jungle is big, there are lots of data, I need doing lots of work yet.

· in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment)

XXX

GoodScienceForYou 1 hour ago

There is no evolution. There is no evidence for it. Not one species had evolved more complexity. You are a liar and are part of the denial of humans and their compulsions that destroy not only human lives but all life on earth. Putting your faith in humans has never worked. Why are you so stupid you want to thing now is different. They have killed so many people in the name of some idea.

· in reply to RipleySawzen (Show the comment)

Maybe you are right. Maybe there is no evolution inside this Universe. Millions of generations of hypothetical intelligent particles living 17 seconds each one and inside a fecundated ovum should watch the steps of evolution from single zygote to a human embryo believing that was watching evolution. We, outside their “universe” knows that it is “reproduction”. Maybe we are watching and working the reproduction of the son of some god. But… for while, we are watching evolution, that’s reality.

Changing the faith in humans for faith in supernatural ghosts produces the preys (95% of world population?) and hating humans by loving the salvage past animalism inheritance produces predators (the 1%?). Why human beings has followed these stupid millennial social models, shared into salvage capitalism, salvage communism, etc? It is the work of the “serpent” that convinced “Eve” in the “Paradise”. It is the stupid universal material tendency to be extreme selfish closed system. Not humanism…

XXX

“There are millions of single celled species that never evolved into multicellular organisms.” Exactly and that means there is no evidence of any form of advancement from a single cell to 2 cells with the new cells performing new functions. Thanks.

· in reply to RipleySawzen (Show the comment)

Don’t you know embryogenesis?! Fecundation, zygote, meiosis, morula…etc? You need learn something new, but for doing it, you need change your magic supernatural ghost creator in the sky by the real, natural, creator in the sky. Functions comes in two types: the systemic function (which is the effect over the external world from the projection of the shape of the whole system) and internal systemic function, which is related to each part of a system. There are different expressions of (cont.)

of internal functions and each system has its tendency expressed by the most strong expressed part. Any bit of external change makes changes at internal expressions. The interactions between internal parts creates infinite numbers of internal functions, called “fuzzy logic”. The initial process of eukaryotes merely replicating its cells is the first phase of biological evolution mimicking the process by which stars, galaxies are replicated, by self-recycling (see Matrix/DNA models)

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)
XXX

I want you to name one disease that “modern” medical science has cured.

I want you to find one positive mutation ever found in the human genome.

Where is your absolutely irrefutable physical evidence of simple life evolving into complex? NO opinions allows and no religious books.

· in reply to TheArgonianbeast (Show the comment)

“I want you to find one positive mutation ever found in the human genome.”

The Matrix/DNA models explains how and why the genome is continually mutated. The fundamental unit of information which is the building block of RNA/DNA is a bi-lateral pair of nucleotides, which is the biological microscopic counterpart of the building block that came evolving from quantum vortexes after Big Bang, to atoms to galaxies. This universal “matrix” diversifies into infinite different kinds of nucleotides

Medical science is going away off the beam due Biology being seen as separated from Physics. It’s the same that one try to understand the existence of human body composed by flesh organs and substance without the skeleton and nervous systems which are related to the entity of natural systems. They had separated Universal Evolution into two blocks, with no evolutionary links between them. The abysmal hole created between two blocks are being fulfilled with the myth of absolute randomness.

· in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

XXX

I use evidence and the DNA is fantastic evidence for only DE-EVOLUTION.. All creatures are losing gene functions and we can easily see this in the DNA. Fossilization is not rare. We have samples of over 200 million fossils from most creatures that have ever lived. WE have 88% of the non bird, NOW LIVING, vertebrates as fossils and the original looks FAR more fit than what we see now. Go look! You cannot use faith and belief!!

You are watching the reduction of ENIAC into a laptop and saying it is degradation?!

But… the difference between things produced by ENIAC/apes and laptops/humans are not de-evolution.

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

XXX

“suboptimal function”

This has to be the dumbest argument for evolution of all of them.

The famous laryngeal nerve “evidence”. If the path of this nerve is not optimal then God is a screw up.

The fact that “evolution” only leads to screw ups from the original far more fit condition means that the laryngeal nerve is evidence for genetic dysfunctions of original “engineering” when the nerve was in a much shorter path at one time and “Evotards” still don’t fully know the purpose of this nerve.

·

We know. The purpose of this nerve is transforming chemical operations for connections between organism’s organs into sounds waves (voice) for connecting separated brains into a whole Humanist system. When you need transformations of signal waves you need apply quantum superposition and following separation. Then, the left and right nerves superposed makes the complete circuit of an established system, and when are separated they can be turned into a new different system. But…this is complex

XXX

In the first paragraph they clearly define “anti-evolution” or loss of good genetic engineering as the creatures “degrade” from the more “optimal” to the “suboptimal”.

This is the MOST compelling evidence for anti-evolution or gradual degrading of the best genetic engineering to the more defective genetic engineering we see today that I have ever seen and that we can see today.

·

The problem is that yours “more optimal” is good for stupid monkeys, but unsupportable for who has some intelligence. Yours optimal is called “Adam’s DNA”, a creature that was living like a stupid monkey eternally at a garden full of animals and plants. Any intelligent being would prefer the suicide, if they think that would be condemned to that life by all eternity. Thankfully had the Fall, the “Adam” genetic degradation, even that we were condemned to beginning as microscope cell here

XXX

The famous The Left Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve is totally evidence for genetic degradation. These people are “nuts” by the way in not being able to see the obvious, because they are brainwashed into seeing things BACKWARDS.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are still blind to the deeper secrets of Nature Why the left RLN os different from the right RLN? This question makes no sense, there is no right and left nerves, there is a complete circuit of a system, separated into two slices. Make the superposition of those two nerves… you gets a complete circle. Why they makes a circle and why the left has several branches? Well… see the Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems, you will understand everything. No degradation


XXX

“protein functional redundancy”

There are only a very few amino acids available to make living tissue from, so OF COURSE it will be used in different creatures to make similar body parts.

Look at the amino acids chart and tell me how many do you see? (20)

We live on a tiny finite little planet with fixed resources.

We do not have infinite resources to build body tissue from.

Drive your eyes down to look to those 20 aminoacids and now drive yours eyes up to see the galaxy, the Universe, that produced them. Ask “why”, “how”, “for what”? Do you see the evolution of aminoacids? First step: Carbon is called by Nature to be the central atom. Why? Because Nature has several different faces, states, and our astronomical system was standing at the specific state as closed perfect natural system. Which is composed by six universal functions. Just carbon atomic number. So on..

“protein functional redundancy… our tiny finite little planet with fixed resources.”

This doesn’t means that life was tunelled due intelligent design. Proteins are slices of a kind of complete systemic circuit – the system around us – so the slices are limited in number. Planets has limited variations, resources, because limited is the specific state of Nature that produced them. But biological systems (aka, “life”) are just a rebellion against the creator system, so, open for mutations

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

XXX

“anatomical and molecular parahomology”

It is ridiculous crap “pseudo science” and a stretch of the imagination.

It goes along with the idea that fools think that any similarity of use, appearance can only mean a direct genetic linage link.

This is utterly ridiculous and in fact all that we have seen of this idea in fossils of the “ancient version” of the creature are shown to have far more usable features and the “homology” becomes more complex as you go back in time.

“De-evolution”

XXX

I was “informed ” yesterday that Darwin was wrong in places and so they changed it to whatever the heck they wanted.Even when I said Thats what I was taught in school they said I was wrong…and that was only 35 years ago.So arguing “evolution ” is pointless, as they now believe SOMETHING else.Bit sad really.They dispute their own “simple to complex” .. if youcan believe that…apparently it goes BOTH ways now….very sad.

· in reply to jhawkinsjs1

While Naturalists are struggling trying to understand this world, trying to discover mechanisms and processes that can be transformed into technology for increasing Humanity power, spiritualists are criticizing them, being obstacles to their job?! No spirits and supernatural beings has made anything good for human kind till now and still 95% of our brothers in species are being tortured in this stupid conditions of life. Evolution is the idea that arose from a man that sacrificed his life for us

· in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak (Show the comment)

XXX

I was “informed ” yesterday that Darwin was wrong in places and so they changed it to whatever the heck they wanted.Even when I said Thats what I was taught in school they said I was wrong…and that was only 35 years ago.So arguing “evolution ” is pointless, as they now believe SOMETHING else.Bit sad really.They dispute their own “simple to complex” .. if youcan believe that…apparently it goes BOTH ways now….very sad.

· in reply to jhawkinsjs1

That’s the cause we agnostics prefers the naturalist/rationalist community than the religious community. Our life experience as humans at Earth have been too much bad, our dream is to change everything. The naturalists woks in rhythm of changes, while creationists are conservationist of this stupid “status quo”, so, they are obstacles and unuseful.

· in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak (Show the comment)

XXX

Even the “father” of evolution mentioned sripulations under which evolution could not be true. Those stipulations were met. Darwin discredited evolution in his own words. But you all havent actually taken any time to study it, you just assume blindly.

Why aren’t you honesty and respectful enough? If you want to destroy the worldvision of a man due you think it has bad effects, what you should do? Repeat his experiments, contest his evidences. Take a ship and go by 4 years facing the hell in a salvage world, do observations by yourself, applying the modern knowledge, show what was wrong with Darwin idea. Or do you want to refute such sacrificial heroic job standing under air conditioned? Taking Reason off Nature by magical thinking is easier

· in reply to jhawkinsjs1 (Show the comment)

XXX

@”Christianity is a theory”

No it isn’t. It’s an assertion.

· in reply to SheepTheAsian

Christianity is a theory by the real definition of “theory” by the Greeks that coined the word. It is not a theory by scientific definition, but here is not a scientific community congress, it is a public debate. Theory is “a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalizing thinking, or the results of such thinking”- Wikipedia. Christianism is product of earlier human consciousnesses recently formed as any modern baby impregnates its surroundings with magics and ghosts friends.

· in reply to emfederin (Show the comment)

@”Christianity is a theory by the real definition of “theory”

The guy was equating christianity as a “theory” to evolution as a “theory” and was attempting to put them on the same plane.

They are not.

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

Both can not equating at the same plane as the operations of a baby brain (Bible authors) is not the operations of a teenager brain (Darwin). All big religious theories were built from an unique source: the real little world seen by an infant intelligence plus flashes of memories popping up in the baby brain about a not seen but lived womb’s world. Ancient founders of all religions were visionaries (embryos) that had real visions about the womb were our ancestors shapes lived: the Cosmos.

· in reply to emfederin (Show the comment)

You will not believe in my narrative as I don’t believe in it, I am still searching a better explanation as skeptical that I am. The narrative is: a native xaman living in Amazon jungle 30 years ago, with altered state of mind due their beverages, described visions of black holes and cosmogony identical to descriptions of black holes and cosmogony seen at Blavatsky books about “The Secret Doctrine”, or “theosophy” made by ancient eastern 5.000 years ago. I have a theory about: same baby brains

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

Rational – based on or in accordance with reason or logic, able to think clearly, sensibly, and logically, endowed with the capacity to reason.

Christianity hardly fits the criteria for “rational”.

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

Yes, Christianity is not rational in the sense that Reason must be a natural product of nature. But… the non-rational productions of Bible’s authors can be rationally understood, using an analogy: the excessive installations of an industry is used to produce different sub-products. My theory is that the fusion of Chrom-2 suddenly produced an abrupt augment of cerebral mass beyond the normal installation that should be produced by the normal evolutionary chain. Earlier hominids had imaginations

· in reply to davermiava (Show the comment)

I an sorry that I am not finding now a recently published paper showing that human fetus suddenly produces neurons twice more fast than apes/monkeys fetus. I think it is a good evidence for this theory about the development of consciousness at the level of the human species, when I separated the stages of its evolution between babies/teenagers/adults shapes. But… why still there are people that believes in the Bible, which was a baby’s minded production? Missing education, denial to be adult?

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

XXX


I honestly don’t know what to think. The idea that there’s a guy upstairs pulling all the strings sounds silly, and completely illogical, yet for macro-evolution contradicts itself in more ways than one.

While it makes absolutely no sense how or why we’d choose to go back to primal technology after conquering the galaxy, the only thing I’m truly comfortable with is that we developed on another distant planet and migrated to earth.

Yes, makes no sense the idea of some intelligent powerful being responsible by this chaotic biosphere and the struggle for species to become powerful. And makes no sense that an intelligence in shape of quasi-apes after conquering galaxies with high technology arrived here forgetting all that technology. The unique explanation that makes sense to me is Matrix/DNA Theory. Intelligence was merely potential at ancestors that were, themselves, the building block of any shape of natural systems.

· in reply to SoulofaDeity

XXX

Macro evolution sounds silly because there is no such thing. Its just evolution. There is no reason to split it into micro and macro.

· in reply to tsub0dai (Show the comment)

Biological evolution is merely a micro-evolutionary cycle which must be added to lots of others micro-cycles and finally composing the Universal Evolution, from the extreme singularity resumed to a central point towards complexity expanded to astronomical size. How should you call the period of evolution that goes from yours body shape as teenager until the final shape of adult? As biological systems we are one transitional shape of a universal system that evolves by vital cycle process.

· in reply to NegridoPie

XXX

from simple to complicated

· in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment)

Things does not change by themselves from simple to complicated, this should be creating new information from nothing, by magics. But there are things like atomic, astronomic, biological systems that changes from simple to complex, at individual and populations levels. Individual occurs at embryogenesis, a body transforming from extreme singularity to complex. The mystery is that this world has a hierarchy of systems and you are not seeing the system the informations are coming from.

· in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak

XXX

Panspermia, there is no real evidence, but it seems logical…

· in reply to SoulofaDeity (Show the comment)

Panspermia only transfers the question how biological systems arose, from Earth to other astronomical body. The natural elements and informations for transforming non-organic into organic and electric-magnetic-mechanical systems into biological systems does not arises by magics or absolutely randomness. Those necessary and enough for building biologicals must come from a stellar system described by Newtonian mechanics turned into half-biological galaxy, as described by Matrix/DNA Theory.

· in reply to geezusispan

@”Panspermia only transfers the question how biological systems arose, from Earth to other astronomical body”

And there you have it, folks.

You see this, soullessdeity?

Even matrixdna, world-class expert at butchering logic, reason and lucidity, not only completely understands the inherent conflict contained in your ridiculous statement, but can even state it on a level that approaches eloquence.

That alone should have you burying your head in utter shame.

· in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

I don’t understand why posts like yours are being flagged as spam. You, as everybody, has the right to express opinions, we are debating theories, one can read or ignore what he/she doesn’t like. This is not honesty. About logic I do my best advocating the logics that I learned from nude. virgin, salvage Nature living 7 years at Amazon jungle were was elaborated Matrix/DNA worldvision. Conflicts with modern scholar logic is an issue to be solved by time, not by us. Who is away off the beam?

· in reply to emfederin (Show the comment)

XXX

Look! There are trees. Someone must have designed them. See? Tree elves are real and great designers engineering trees for everyone. How else did trees get here, if not by the mysterious powers of the chief tree elf?

· 

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, trees were designed. Genetically, by transmission of “Matrix/DNA” from their creators…living in the sky. Trees are the same image of galaxies.The trunk represents the central nuclear axis. The branches are the galaxy’s arms. The leaves are the planets. The yellow fruits pending on the arms are the stars. The plant cell is the biological tendency to reproduce the closed astronomical system with chloroplasts making photosynthesis linking the cell to the star, which is an evolution-stopper.

·  in reply to PinkUnicornIsLord (Show the comment)

XXX

Mikezzz749 25 minutes ago

Question: why can’t humans create a self replicating machine? We can’t even create a machine that can eat breakfast. Intelligent designing humans can’t come close to the technology, complexity, efficiency, eloquence, etc of any type of life. Why would random chance processes be better able to produce life (even when the laws of physics, entropy, are against their natural creation?). I’m interested in an intelligent response! Do you have one?

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“Machine” and “life” are cultural symbols used for describing real states and details of Nature. We learn mechanisms, processes existing at Nature and we see matter organized as working systems. Our technology is mimicking natural phenomena, sometimes applying fuzzy logics, mixing mechanisms and materials from different phenomena and producing new arrangements. We produces “machines” because our limited sensors and brain capability see only mechanical and biological aspects of natural systems.

·  in reply to Mikezzz749 (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

If you want to debate your theory about this yet unknown world first of all you need be honest and a method. You post this exactly post here yesterday, got several answers, now answers that answers.

·  in reply to Mikezzz749 (Show the comment)

Martin Koch 46 minutes ago

Man has created self replicating machines.

·  in reply to Mikezzz749 (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Could you elaborate this information? Are you referring to synthetic molecules, like those from Craig Venter? Matrix/DNA is researching the extensive already published papers related to NASA research of self-replicating robots, but any additional information about other sectors will be welcome.

·  in reply to Martin Koch (Show the comment)

Mikezzz749 42 minutes ago

@Martin Koch really? That’s all you got? Just flat out denial? Oh brother.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

NASA has a sector dedicated to study self-replicating machines. The goal is sending robots like Curiosity to other astronomical bodies, self-replicating robots that could use the matter of those bodies for populating the astro, maybe extracting some valorous mineral, etc. I am preparing a descriptive suggestion because the Matrix/DNA models arrive to a theoretical formula, a software’s diagram about a natural self-replicating machine. It is about the Newtonian mechanics aspect of systems

·  in reply to Mikezzz749 (Show the comment)

JoshuaWaller 41 minutes ago

The same question would have been asked as to why humans can’t get to the moon a hundred years ago. Not only have we done that, but we’re getting closer to building a self replicating machine.

Also, technically, we absolutely can create a self replicating creature that eats. We can create some that are even capable of learning on a fundamental level. Programmers have done that for quite some time. It’s limited to another, simulated universe. Technically, those programmers could be gods.

·  in reply to Mikezzz749 (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

This issue is good food for thought. Nature makes self-replicating machines: a stellar system (working with the principles of Newtonian mechanics) degenerates, decomposes, its dust composes again as a new stellar system. But this process is self-recycling, when the original machine needs “dying” and its matter be used for a new one. Suppose that we could insert a software inside each atom of Curiosity and when the robot become oldest, we keep it at same place, the atoms would joining again…

·  in reply to JoshuaWaller (Show the comment)

XXX

Joe Shmoe 31 minutes ago

Then why doesn’t 1 human have at least 1 wing growing out of their back. The fly did it, w/ less of a need to fly, than we have. They can walk around all day and find poop. That is their life “poop”, poop is on the ground, they do not need wings.

·  in reply to g24417 (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Joe, the causes are deeper than we think. Wings can be a result of personal effort (anfibians jumps) or can be imposed into a specie by informations flowing in this environment. Wings are specific shapes of accessories developed from cellular cilia which was produced by a universal systemic function number 5. This same function produced the tails of comets for realizing an operation. Here, the system that built biosphere was in need of something being the transporter of pollen. It was imposed

·  in reply to Joe Shmoe (Show the comment)

XXX

Alan Clarke 18 minutes ago

@tsub0dai “humans are far more diverse as a species than any individual person”

The population of human species is comprised of individuals. Theoretically, one individual from today’s human population could be compared to one individual, Adam, in the creation model for genetic diversity. The quagga is an example of selective breeding (artificial selection) used to restore lost genetic information to a few individuals. Natural selection works oppositely toward genetic entropy, i.e. loss.

·  in reply to tsub0dai (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, Adam/Eve were/is the most perfect genome possible to be made by Nature. Their genome was the formula for building their bodies, which was a closed non-minded system, merely extension of their genome. You can see their “photo” published by Matrix/DNA theory. Natural Selection worked oppositely to their tendencies, entropy causing the big Fall. As microscopic biological systems, the offspring of Adam/Eve lifted up at planets, as opened systems. The sinner father in the sky is driven NS now.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

XXX

GoodScienceForYou 53 minutes ago

The land of militant Evotards who constantly give me death threats:

Austrailia: “The incidence rate for all cancers combined increased by 27% from 383 cases per 100,000 people in 1982 to 485 cases per 100,000 people in 2007.”

This is the highest rise in cancer of all the social liberal states I have found 127% rise in cancer in 25 years.

Cancer is only caused by genetic defects according to 449087 peer medical papers on PubMed, the international library of genetic diseases.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, cancer is an issue that needs urgent attentions. If you see the picture at my website tipping “The Cycle Of Cholesterol And The Matrix” you will know a new approach for understanding diseases. We have the formula for perfect systems, any disease is dysfunction of that formula. My problem is that I am alone doing this, have no time and resources. I did only fast research about bad cholesterol, Alzheimer. For analyzing cancer under Matrix models is necessary reading lots of informations.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

XXX

GoodScienceForYou 20 seconds ago

Germany, with militant socialists liberalism has 7.5 million functionally illiterate adults out of a population of 81.7 million.

That is a great sign of how well that works. Germany used to be the country where science and engineering prevailed and German engineering was well known. Now 9% of the population can’t read or write. They are setting up programs to educate people who have already been through the school system

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I think this is normal result from WW2: generations of people went to hard work instead schools. But this is also a suggestion that Matrix/DNA models are right. They are suggesting a different kind of targets for the Science enterprise, producing a different kind of technology, medicine, human habitat, different design for urban life. Different from that produced by Germany, whose unconscious target was driven to be a kind of Brave New World ruled by the Big Brother, mimicking insects societies

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

XXX

GoodScienceForYou 1 minute ago

OUR DNA closely maps out our history of self destruction. Its clear that we have been destroying our genome for a long time and it shows in the huge numbers of deaths directly due to genetic diseases, 30.4 million is less than half of the real number each year. Considering that we created all the viral fungal and bacterial infections by our stupid actions that kill us from infections.

We seem to have become animals with sexual compulsions owning us completely, never aware of what that is doing

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The building blocks of DNA, bi-lateral pair of nucleotides, are diversified copies of a unique system. each copy expresses a particular particle, a specific function, different of all others. These copies self-assembly themselves, free in biosphere and cell environment. Some kind of biological behavior selects among these copies which will be increased in their genomes. But the constructors of these copies does not want us as biological minded creatures, they want pieces for a natural machine.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

XXX

GoodScienceForYou 2 minutes ago

We now have the all time record of childhood congenital disease rates and at astonishing accelleration. 120% rise in Autism in 2 years! 1 in 88 diagnosed by 8 year old. 1 in 125 babies born with congenital heart disease. A rise of 135% in childhood invasive cancer in 34 years. 200% rise in 10 years of STD’s affecting 1 in 4 and young fertile girls have the highest rates. Evolution is a denial mechanism that supports this genetic suicide. “evolutionforum.info”

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I should leave these statistics for atheists answering them. But, my personal technique is searching causes based on Matrix/DNA models. They suggests that degradation of humans genetics and bodies is the predicted results from this biosphere evolution. This biosphere was produced by chaos through fragments coming from the decay of a ordered half-mechanical/half-biologica­l system. The action of these fragments is to reproduce the machine, humans must be pieces, so, it is fixing our genome.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)
XXX

GoodScienceForYou 3 minutes ago

History’s shown from the dark ages; the advent of many diseases that nearly wiped out humans, like the plague , wiping out 1/2 the population of Europe; resulted in extreme political measures, using the state religion, Gods authority, to stop diseases. Prison time public whipping, death to homos & anyone who had sex outside of a virgin marriage was a criminal period. It took a lot of suffering to learn to stop killing families children mothers fathers. Used to use a sharp pole for punishment.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I had no time yet for analyzing those plagues based upon Matrix models, but these models suggestions about the origins of viruses also suggests that diseases caused by them are produced by specific psychological states – individual or collective. Viruses are organic constructs from Matrix/DNA genetic code – which exists inside living beings and flowing in the environment – produced by universal function number 5. So, those plagues were produced by specific state of mind, which were religious.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)
XXX

GoodScienceForYou 1 hour ago

33% of people ages 15 to 64 will die from cancer in the USA. Source CDC. Childhood invasive cancer in the US has risen by 135%;34 years. STD’s in the US up 200% in 10 years with the highest rates: young women ages 14 to 24.

It seems that also the fastest growing religion is atheism.

It turns out that Evodelusionism is the religion of atheists, homos, sex addicts, socialist liberals, communists, politicians, prostitutes (no kidding) and scientists. What a group of people to model after. Eh?

· 

TheMatrixDNA 44 minutes ago

It is just the opposite. This degradation of human bodies is the corolary of millenniums of religious thought ruling societies with wrong social systems, wrong technology and wrong science. Religion is a minded-stopper, it separates men from its Nature for alliance with supernatural. Then, the whole body is driven not by the intellect, but by the laws of atoms composing the body. These atoms are matter which supreme tendency is closed inertial equilibrium. We got it, but Nature is responding.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou

TheMatrixDNA 35 minutes ago

A good sample is the biggest religions of the planet, the Asian religions, which supreme goal is the search for personal equilibrium and nirvana. We have a model of a natural system just in this exactly state: the building block of astronomical systems, our ancestor since 10 billion years ago. It is a closed system into itself, cutting relations with the whole natural world, a self-constructed paradise, where the two aspects of matter, mass and energy got its targets. Extreme selfishness.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

These building blocks grew and built galaxies. Its shape is like a perfect machine, a perpetuum motor, self-recycling. The Universe was populated by them. But, above galaxies are forces like the Clausius Law, which produces degradation, measured by entropy and the pretense eternity falls down. Today the Universe is composed by their fossils, ours ancestors. Meanwhile, consciousness was sleeping at galaxies, woke up in shape of animals and lifted up as humans. Religious aret repeating the sin

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

emfederin 1 minute ago

@”But, above galaxies are forces like the Clausius Law, which produces degradation…”

First off, it doesn’t produce degradation. It simply states that isolated systems will always achieve maximum entropy, manifested as thermal equilibrium. This is the ultimate destiny of our universe.

Secondly, galaxies aren’t isolated systems within the context of “the universe”.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Are you based on Thermodynamic Theory for systems? First of all, those theorists never knew how and what is a perfect closed system. It is built by any lightwaves invading inertial mass and modeling matter accordingly to its seven different frequencies of vibrations, from gamma-ray to radio. Entropy is the name of unit of measurement, not the sate itself. Degradation is not loosing quantities of energy/mass, is fragments escaping from the circuit flow and diminishing the quality of closed system

·  in reply to emfederin (Show the comment)

XXX

ozredneck22 3 hours ago

EVOLUTION is a fairytale for grown-ups, complete with its abiogenetic virgin birth, apes that talk and tell lies, “survival of the fittest “moral code, The prophet called Charlie, a magical process that’s never been observed while its happening, cows that tried to walk on water but became whales, a story about how a primordial soup made a chef.

· 

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Almost equal to the collection of fairytale in the Bible, eh? The big difference is that Charlie really sacrificed his best years abandoning a good life in London for facing the hell of the salvage world, observing facts for building conclusions, while the prophets of Bible forgot the real facts of nature and jumped to imaginary conclusions. Any other man that go back to the salvage world with the modern scientific knowledge will find models that solves all problems pointed by you, rationally

·  in reply to ozredneck22 (Show the comment)

XXX

odinata 10 seconds ago

DNA proves evolution.

shut your retarded hole.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

No, DNA proves that he has all informations for doing all species at Earth. DNA proves to aliens that there are diversification of species at Earth. It does not prove Evolution, it merely suggests that evolution is possible.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

XXX

Nathan Londrie 1 hour ago

I’m sorry, but last time I checked, not matter what you believe, there’s only so much evidence, and at some point you have to go on faith. Tell me again how evolution is a fact?

·  in reply to PinkUnicornIsLord (Show the comment)

odinata 16 minutes ago

DNA proves it.

FACT.

·  in reply to Nathan Londrie

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

DNA proves for a microbe as observer located inside the womb and watching the progress of a fetus that he is seeing evolution. As observers outside the womb, we know that it is reproduction. This Universe is a cosmic egg – or is an agglomerated of bodies still alive or of died fossils (galaxies) – where is occurring a normal natural process of reproduction. And we – like all conscious living beings at millions of other planets – are the minded “genes” making the embryo for the final Big Birth

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

XXX

Alan Clarke 2 minutes ago

@van der Meer “[Creationists] provide an answer, just not the correct one”

Considering that scientific theories are only temporal and never absolute (e.g. Newton’s gravitation theory was replaced by Einstein’s general theory of relativity), how do you know what the “correct” answer is concerning man’s origin? Modern-day scientists admit that they don’t know how life began nor has anyone ever created an artificial environment that facilitates the spontaneous generation of life from non-life.

·  in reply to Peter van der Meer (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Newton’s theory was not replaced by Einstein’s theory because they were dealing with different dimensions of time/space. Newton’s theory is for Einstein’s the same that atoms are for cells, it means, the new arrangement of atoms inside a cell changes their behaviors and functions. Newton was dealing with mechanics at stellar system level which is an mechanic arrangement like a watch – but Einstein was dealing with galaxies which is half-mechanical/half-biologica­l acting over stellar systems

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

We don’t know man’s origins in relation to human mind/brain, which could have aggregated new informations coming from a superior natural system located at a superior level of complexity in relation to the total systemic environment (Milk Way) that supplied informations for man’s body, about which we have the most strong evidences that came from primates. For creating biological systems from the evolutionary top of non-biological systems we need more knowledge about natural light, it is the code

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

XXX

kamphwagon1 2 hours ago

I would hardly think the lack of 100% confirmed theory in the branches of science would drive children into the wrong path, most depending on age wouldn’t grasp the Matrix /DNA theory anyway ,and most likely be taught at the college level.. Where as religion prefers to brainwash children at a young age before their logical abilities are fully developed and are still easy prey to mythical fairy tale stories and fear of invisible boogie men and good fairies … 😉

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are right, religion has not worked for improving human existence, so, they are not the solution, our futures generations needs search other alternatives, while the empirical scientifically proved facts must be known. The observation of fossil record and another known facts strongly suggests that there is a natural process from simplest to complexity, which is called “evolution” But this process happens at universal macro scale, unknown, so biological evolution is a non-complete theory.

·  in reply to kamphwagon1 (Show the comment)

XXX

RogerS4JC 1 week ago

@NuggetKazooie “negative factors you described wouldn’t apply to the other populations”

Then you get a net positive. Even very small positives soon leads to huge numbers & small negatives quickly lead to extinction.

“Human evolution thus appears like an hourglass, with a narrowing population of Homo erectus leading to possibly one single mutant, whose improved genes emerged into a new era of unprecedented progress. The transformation from failure to success is startling.” Alan F. Alford

·  in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment)

Martin Koch 1 week ago

Not true. Alan F. Alford is not an reliable witness–His first book Gods of the New Millennium (1996) drew on the ancient astronaut theory of Zecharia Sitchin

·  in reply to RogerS4JC

RogerS4JC 12 hours ago

@Martin Koch “Alan F Alford is not an reliable witness”

“however, he admitted to serious faults in his use of Sitchin’s theory and proposed an alternative, cataclysm theory of ancient myth: “I am now firmly of the opinion… the descent of the gods was a poetic rendition of the cataclysm myth…” wiki

Alan Alford is thus a “hostile witness” for creationism. Too bad he was forced to consider what he thought was a better mechanism than TOE.

Do “reliable witnesses” only have your same viewpoint?

·  in reply to Martin Koch

Martin Koch 5 minutes ago

Again, the crackpot claiming “ancient aliens” is not a valid source.

·  in reply to RogerS4JC

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“Human evolution thus appears like an hourglass,…”

But his observation above is known, being the human genes emerged by evolution or by other unknown source. Alford almost touched the deeper secret of Nature and the deeper source for religious myths. In fact happened a cataclysmic event and the descent of gods as source for human genes. But this cataclysm was not the Noah’s flood neither the explosion of Nibiru, Matrix/DNA suggests other kind of “cataclysm” and descent “gods”

·  in reply to Martin Koch (Show the comment)

odinata 1 minute ago

No, there is no known observations of any aliens, ancient or otherwise.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, that is what Matrix models are suggesting: no aliens, ancient or otherwise. We need to remember the initial state of this biosphere and the jungle is the best witness still existing about the life’s origins. It indicates that this biosphere is product of chaos. Chaos is product of cataclysm that happens on ordered environments. The environment existing before biosphere’s origins was made of atomic and astronomical systems. So, there was the Newtonian machine and ours ancestors, the “gods”

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

odinata 31 minutes ago

There is no “Matrix Model”

There is only “Matrix Gibberish”

You’re an idiot.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The Matrix model still is a theory explaining this worlds’ existence, under tests facing real proved facts. It is a natural formula used by Nature for assembling matter into systems, like atoms, galaxies, trees, humans, cells, etc. This formula is under evolution since the Big Bang ( initially the Matrix was shared by billions of vortexes as bits-information or ex-machine quantum genes) and here the formula is resumed into a base-pair of nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. Theories…

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

XXX

khoraski 1 hour ago

How is Science inappropriate for children?

TheMatrixDNA 55 minutes ago

Only when Science as real knowledge of real facts is used by someone that did the mental exercise for connecting the facts, got a big picture, and teach to children that his picture is Science. Since we for sure don’t have all facts ( maybe neither 30% of all facts of this Universe) any big picture will be product of imagination, then, should be taught as theory. Any big picture (as Matrix/DNA Theory) now will be a driven into wrong pathway for children or a closer mind

·  in reply to khoraski (Show the comment)

khoraski 38 minutes ago

Well, yeah. That’s true for both Evolution and Creationism.

My point is, Creationism, by definition, is Science.

Throwing away an entire branch of science simply because you don’t believe in it, and disallowing any studies in that field is extremely unscientific.

Personally, I think we should teach all science behind all theories of our existence, or we should teach none.

And besides. Natural Selection is not the theory of Evolution, like a lot of Atheists try to combine as one single idea.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I agree and I will talk to kids about ToE, ID, panspermia, Matrix/DNA, etc., mentioning that I don’t know which theory is more appropriated and my personal thought has indicated that there is a natural process of transformation that have increased complexity. But, all these theories must be taught in a Philosophy class, not Science class. Science only inform about real known facts, has no conclusions. The most important thing is to be certified that kids will be opened minds, free for choices

·  in reply to khoraski (Show the comment)

odinata 48 minutes ago

Shut your gibbering hole, fuckwit.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s funny. You make me remembering when Morelli was in Amazon jungle and elaborated the Matrix/DNA Theory. He saw lots of snakes in his pathway, they were static waiting any attack for expelling their venom. Louis usually touched them with a long piece of wood, and the snake bites the wood, before going away. Here in Internet, we find snakes in needs of expelling poison of their souls and any comments contrary to their beliefs works as the wood branch. Funny is that Interned is enough long

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

mrtalos 51 minutes ago

@khoraski ok fine, give me a proven testable hypothesis, just like every single real scientific thory must do, and we will start calling creationism scientific.

·

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You have a testable hypothesis. The Last Universal Common Ancestor – LUCA – of all living systems, is pictured in a intelligible astronomical model that’s testable. Taking out LUCA from Earth and out of abiogenesis, putting LUCA in the sky, all tools of a cells system can be reduced to the astonishing singularity of LUCA. Broken LUCA into small pieces, you have as result all living species seen at earth. But, LUCA was found coming from before the Big Bang, its origins is unknown.

·  in reply to mrtalos (Show the comment)

odinata 6 minutes ago

A theory is well established set of facts.

Your gibberish is not weel established.

Its not “factual”

It doesn’t qualify as a “theory” it is a madman’s rant.

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Ok, they you think you have the right for taking the word “theory” from the ancient Greeks that coined the word and give a new definition. No, my friend, the modern schools are not the owner of this world, they applied the wrong word to jobs resulting from a specific method of connecting real data, which method can be wrong. The Matrix?DNA Theory is a theory in the strictly sense obeying the right of its creators.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Good Ideas/Informations

The constant assertion of belief is an indication of fear.

All anyone has to do is see an animal react to noise or movement in the woods and watch it assume something is there, something invisible to be wary of. Some unusual invisible force that must be respected and scared of, and how easily this assumption can be extrapolated into an all mighty invisible being at the cause of all things unknown by sentient beings. Belief in god is more proof of evolution.

· in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak (Show the comment)

Sentient animals put a face to phenomena – the evolution of the ‘god’ concept. All anyone has to do is see an animal react to noise or movement in the woods and watch it Assume something is there, something invisible to be wary of. Some unusual invisible force that must be respected and scared of, and how easily this Assumption, this Instinct can be extrapolated into an all mighty invisible being at the cause of all things unknown by sentient beings. Belief in god is more proof of evolution.

· in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak (Show the comment)

Mas então tem o contra-argumento dos criacionistas, o qual precisa ser notado, considerado, pensado, para procurar a explicação:

TheOneTheOwnLak 1 minute ago

Yes we all see monkeys with Gods ….talking of evolution when primates dont worship anything kinda contradicts your words…Primates with Gods?…oh dear.

· in reply to mechanicmike69 (Show the comment)

E esta analize me fêz produzir a seguinte resposta:

That’s your big mistake! yes, primates and all animals worships real things which symbolizes divinity. Primates, dogs, worship caves. black caves, they do holes in the soil, because in their brains are flashing images of black holes, which is encrypted into DNA. Flies worship any lighting lamp, because their atoms is a scene of electrons worshiping the luminous proton. Bees and ants worships the model of astronomical closed system and indeed, they built social system as the real copy.

· in reply to TheOneTheOwnLak (Show the comment)

Tom Van Flandern:Astronomo cujo livro preciso ler

quarta-feira, dezembro 26th, 2012

From Wikipedia – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Van_Flandern

Thomas C Van Flandern (June 26, 1940 – January 9, 2009) was an American astronomer and author specializing in celestial mechanics. Van Flandern had a career as a professional scientist, but was noted as an outspoken proponent of non-mainstream views related to astronomyphysics, and extra-terrestrial life.

Personal philosophy

Van Flandern described in his book[24] how he noted a regular practice of not re-examining the fundamental assumptions underlying a theory once it gained “accepted” status, almost no matter how incompatible some new observation or experiment might be. He wrote:

Events in my life caused me to start questioning my goals and the correctness of everything I had learned. In matters of religion, medicine, biology, physics, and other fields, I came to discover that reality differed seriously from what I had been taught. As a result of this questioning process, I was startled to realize how much of my “knowledge” was indeed questionable.

In later years, Van Flandern advocated inquiry into astronomy theories which he felt were consistent with the principles of science but were not otherwise supported because they conflicted both with observations and verified theories. He espoused 10 principles for assessing ideas and dubbed theories in compliance as “Deep Reality Physics.”

Physicists and mathematicians have fundamentally different approaches to describing reality. The essential difference is that physicists adhere to certain logical principles, any violation of which would amount to a miracle; whereas the equations of mathematics generally are oblivious to physical constraints. This leads to drastically different views of what is, and what is not, possible for cosmology and the reality we live in. Physics that adheres to these logical principles is known as “deep reality physics”.

At this time he also expressed his views of the future of science to Science Digest magazine:

As science progresses we will eventually unravel the mystery of our origins, and the solution will come sooner if our minds are prepared to accept the truth when it is found, however fantastic it may be. If we are guided by our reason and our scientific method, if we let the Universe describe its wonder to us, rather than telling it how it ought to be, then we will soon come to the answers we seek, perhaps even within our own lifetimes

Publications

Van Flandern authored a book, Dark Matter, Missing Planets and New Comets: Paradoxes Resolved, Origins Illuminated,[37] in which he rejected and offered replacements for the fundamental theories of modern physics (especially special relativity, general relativity, and quantum mechanics), and challenged prevailing notions regarding dark matter, the big bang, and solar system formation, and advocated the theory that the asteroid belt consists of the remains of an exploded planet. He issued newsletters, papers, and maintained a website devoted to his ideas, which have not found acceptance within the mainstream scientific community.

Van Flandern published the Meta Research Bulletin which reported the newest discoveries and how they presented difficulties to accepted astronomical theories, such as the Big Bang and planetary formation. The Bulletin claimed mainstream scientists preferred making ad hoc corrections to the theories rather than acknowledge fundamental difficulties that might jeopardize their funding

Vídeo de Cientistas Tentando Provar a Existência da Alma pela Teoria Quantica: Posts da Matrix/DNA

domingo, dezembro 16th, 2012

YOUTUBE

Scientists say they can prove the existence of the soul.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xeh001ptDgo

Published on Nov 6, 2012

A pair of world-renowned quantum scientists says they can prove the existence of the soul. American Dr Stuart Hameroff and British physicist Sir Roger Penrose developed a quantum theory of consciousness asserting that our souls are contained inside structures called microtubules which live within our brain cells. ( See more)

Postado pela Matrix/DNA

Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Well…there is the Matrix/DNA Theory and its models arrived to light waves as the code that imprint the dynamics of lifes cycles into matter. Have you noticed that the seven frequencies of EMS, beginning with gamma-ray and finishing as radio, have the same energy intensity of a human body, beginning as baby and finishing as a cadaver? The force of life cycle is the producer of seven shapes of astronomical bodies (quasar, planet, pulsar, etc.) the seven organelles of cells, the seven m (cont.)

molecules of base-pair nucleotide, etc. What’s it means? Nature creates news system by applying light over several copies of a unique existent specie of body; these bodies changes its shapes; then it is caught seven shapes, aligned in the sequence of the light spectrum and closes the two final ends… getting a working system. You can see all models and pictures of all systems at the Matrix/DNA website. And the models suggests also a process for formation of individual consciousness.

Dendrochronology: A Matrix/DNA Rompendo os Mistérios por tras da Formação dos Anuais Nós das Arvores!

sexta-feira, dezembro 14th, 2012

Dendrochronology: Formação Anual dos Nós das Arvores

Dendrochronology: Formação Anual dos Nós das Arvores

Dendrochronology – inicio desta pesquisa:

http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wd/courses/373F/notes/lec20den.html

Created by William E. Doolittle. Last revised 11 July 2009, wed

http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wd/courses/373F/jpg/dendro08.jpg

( Obs. da Matrix/DNA: No exato periodo de um ano humano, arvores formam um novo nó! Sabendo-se que  arvores não sabem nada da divisão do tempo por humanos, pergunto-me como elas adotaram essa divisão?! E porque ela escolheu 1 ano, e não 9 meses, 2, cinco anos? Afinal, porque arvores formam novos nós? Eu tive conhecimento hoje de um estudo denominado “dendrochrology”, que está sendo desenvolvido pela UNIVERSIDADE DO TEXAS, e uma rápida olhada me fez acender novamente a lampadinha criativa e me causou o costumeiro arrepio quando sinto o florescer de uma nova grande descoberta dos profundos mistérios desta Natureza. Novos nós  (acho que esta é a palavra em português para rings, em inglês), deve ser reciclagem/replicação de existente ultimo nó, e isto nos leva imediatamente à fórmula da Matrix/DNA na forma de software de sistema fechado perfeito, pois ali está bem visivel todos os mecanismos e o inteiro processo que deflagra esta ocorrencia. Portanto este assunto merece um detalhado estudo porem a falta de tempo agora vai postergá-lo, mas para isso copio aqui o primeiro paper encontrado para analiza-lo item por item.)

Dendrochronology

Geographical phenomena, regardless if they are physical or human, share one thing in common in addition to involving the surface of the earth–change. Soils evolve; sediment is transported; streams flow; and vegetation grows. Time is involved with each of these, but all too often we tend to envision the environment as static rather than dynamic. This is perhaps more so for vegetation than anything else. There are many ways of assessing vegetation change, but one of the oldest and most reliable is by dendrochronology–the study of tree rings [example].

Factors influencing growth. Most people think that trees add a ring for every year of growth. To a great extent this is true, but there is more. Ring formation is as much a function of moisture as any annual cycle; years with greater-than-average rainfall result in thick rings whereas years with less-than-average rainfall result in thin ones.[example] Many scientists have been very successful in reconstructing past weather and climatic conditions and patterns by assessing tree ring widths. Coniferous trees have proven to be the best and easiest, but not the only, trees with which to work.

Trees also add one ring for each rainy season within a year. If the climate of a particular region is wet year-round, as in the tropics, rings tend to be very thick and almost indistinguishable. If the climate of an area has two distinct rainy seasons separated by periods of no rain, trees will add two rings per year. Now, here’s a problem to consider. How might one interpret tree rings if an area with bimodal rainfall experiences an anomolous year in which there is only one rainy season? Clearly, dendrochronology isn’t as easy and clearcut as it might seem at first glance.

Problems affecting growth. Complicating the interpretation of tree rings are other factors, three of the most common of which are burning, sloping terrain, and multiple trunks. Forest fires can burn off the bark and outer rings on one side of a tree and thereby affect the tree’s growth, and hence ring formation, in following years. “False rings” can make life difficult for dendrochronologists. Slopes can affect the centricity of tree ring formation. It is not at all unusual to find trees with thicker rings on one side of the tree than on the other.[example] In those cases were trees are growing on stable slopes, the rings tend to be thick on the downslope side. On unstable slopes, where landslides have disturbed vegetation, rings tend to be thicker on the upslope side. Trees with multiple trunks, junipers, for example, pose special problems. Growth patterns above points of bifurcation are usually different from that below the fork although the ages of the two segments might well be the same.

Uses. Dendrochronology has its widest application in archaeological and forestry studies. Archaeologists study the ring patterns in timbers they find during excavation of prehistoric and historic sites. They do so principally to determine the ages of sites, but increasingly are concerned with understanding past environmental (climate) conditions.

How does one date an archaeological site with dendrochronology? By reconstructing the tree ring sequence if a preserved timber is found. This is done by examining the timber and numerous samples from several other sites and proveniences within reasonable proximity to each other.[example] The ring patterns from each sample are compared in anticipation of finding identical patterns in samples that overlap, but are from trees that sprouted and were cut at different times.[example] Once the sequence is complete, the archaeological site under investigation can be dated in reference to the exact year in which the timber was cut.[example]

In some places, such as parts of the American Southwest, a sufficient number of tree ring specimens have been collected, curated, and studied for so long that a very long dendrochronological sequence exists.[example] In other places, for example northern Mexico, relatively recent and relatively old sequences have been established, but there is a gap spanning late prehistoric and early historic times (ca. A.D. 1500). This gap means that the actual dates of the prehistoric sequence cannot be determined at this time. Sequences of this nature are described as floating sequences [example]. Also, in some archaeological contexts, the outer “soft wood” has deteriorated, leaving only the inner “heartwood” for analyses [example].

Archaeological scientists deal with trees that have been cut down, and, therefore, are dead. Foresters and other scientists concerned with the age, health, and vigor of living trees, and their productivity in terms of timber resources, also use dendrochronology, but these people do not cut down trees in order to examine the growth rings. They use a special coring device.

Increment borers have three parts–the borer bit which is hollow and threaded at the tip, an extractor which is a trough that slides inside the bit, and a handle which attaches to the bit in the shape of a T and also serves as a storage tube for the bit and the extractor. To use an increment borer the bit is removed from and then attached to the handle. The extractor is removed and set aside. The bit lubricated with beeswax and screwed into the subject tree. Care is taken to insure that the bit is parallel to the ground and pointed directly at the center of the tree. It is inserted slightly past the tree’s center. Once in place, the extractor is carefully inserted into the tube, between the inside of the bit and the top of the core, concave side down. The handle is then turned one-half turn counterclockwise to break the core loose. The core is removed in the extractor and either examined on the spot or placed in a plastic soda straw or specially made tray for transport back to the lab. The bit is then extracted and the hole in the tree filled with puddy.

In the lab, cores are permanently mounted, labeled, analyzed, and stored. Mounting typically involves a half-round piece of wooden moulding with a groove cut length-wise on a table saw. Cores are glued into the grooves and then sanded flat. Sometimes they are stained. Data about the core are written directly on the moulding mount.

An excellent website dealing with dendrochronology can be found by clicking here.


Suggested Additional Readings

Montmorillonite: Um Cristal Envolvido nas Origens da Vida. Informações do Quasar para Membranas?

terça-feira, dezembro 11th, 2012

WIKIPEDIA: Montmorillonite is also known to cause micelles (lipid spheres) to assemble together into vesicles. These are structures that resemble cell membranes on many cells. It can also help nucleotides to assemble into RNA which will end up inside the vesicles. It has been demonstrated that this could have generated highly complex RNA polymers that could reproduce the RNA trapped within the vesicles.[8] This process may have led to the origin of life on Earth.

Montmorillonite Mineral envolvido nas Origens da Vida

Montmorillonite Mineral envolvido nas Origens da Vida

Montmorionite Phyllosilicate, single tetrahedral nets of 6-membered rings

Montmorionite Phyllosilicate, single tetrahedral nets of 6-membered rings

Montmorillonita é um mineral.

  • Fórmula Química – (Na,Ca)0,3(Al,Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2.nH2O
  • Composição – Silicato de alumínio, magnésio e cálcio hidratado
  • Cristalografia – Monoclínico
  • Classe – Prismática
  • Propriedades Ópticas – Biaxial negativo

Montmorillonite is a very soft phyllosilicate group of minerals that typically form in microscopic crystals, forming a clay. It is named after Montmorillon in France. Montmorillonite, a member of thesmectite family, is a 2:1 clay, meaning that it has 2 tetrahedral sheets sandwiching a central octahedral sheet. The particles are plate-shaped with an average diameter of approximately one micrometre. Members of this group include saponite.

Montmorillonite is the main constituent of the volcanic ash weathering product, bentonite.

The water content of montmorillonite is variable and it increases greatly in volume when it absorbs water. Chemically it is hydrated sodium calcium aluminium magnesium silicate hydroxide (Na,Ca)0.33(Al,Mg)2(Si4O10)(OH)2·nH2O. Potassium, iron, and other cations are common substitutes, the exact ratio of cations varies with source. It often occurs intermixed with chloritemuscoviteillite,cookeite, and kaolinite.

Informação: Crystallization is the process of forming a crystalline structure from a fluid or from materials dissolved in a fluid. (More rarely, crystals may be deposited directly from gas; see thin-film deposition and epitaxy.)

Isto indica como o estado liquido começou a modelar recombinando os atomos terrestres, dirigidos pelos semi-genes de LUCA

Info:

Crystals can also be formed by biological processes, see above. Conversely, some organisms have special techniques to prevent crystallization from occurring, such as antifreeze proteins.

Organigenic crystals

Many living organisms are able to produce crystals, for example calcite and aragonite in the case of most molluscs or hydroxylapatite in the case of vertebrates

Lista dos Predadores/Parasitas e Atividades Inimigas da Liberdade e Evolução da Consciência Humana

terça-feira, dezembro 11th, 2012

Êste assunto é politico, economico, portanto fora dos assuntos da Matrix/DNA a não ser sua relação com a categoria “A Grande Causa da Humanidade”:  os modêlos da Matrix/DNA estão sugerindo que existe um propósito atual fluindo pela Natureza Universal: a geração de uma consciência cósmica, que pode ser uma reprodução de uma possivel consciência infinita. Os modêlos estão sugerindo que essa tendencia do Universo está sendo aplicada aqui e agora, sôbre os cérebros de seres humanos, e deve estar sendo aplicada em muitos outros mundos, para então todos convergirem a formarem uma unica entidade. Desta forma cada ser humano existe com a função de um gene, e assim como os genes biológicos sobem ao cérebro na forma de neuronios para constituirem uma só pessoa adulta, cada ser humano estará sendo conduzido para um sistema na forma social que terá uma unica camada mental. De cada planeta habitável surgirá essa unidade na forma de outro gene e todos juntos se tornarão a consciencia universal, filha da infinita. Para que os humanos vivam melhor é preciso sintonuzar-se com êste propósito. A Natureza não pára, não espera, avança, atropela, se vinga. É preciso dançar o ritmo da musica que ela estiver orquestrando, senão seremos expulsos do salão de baile. Cada ser humano carrega uma cabeça que está servindo como um ôvo onde está sendo gerado esta consciência. O cérebro humano está sendo desenvolvido para atender essa embriogenese cósmica. Todos temos que ceder nossos cérebros para a Natureza fazer seu trabalho. Isto significa que temos de dirigir o cérebro ao conhecimento da Natureza, o que significa que assim ela se projeta simbólicamente para dentro da cabeça na forma de informações registradas no cérebro, e assim ela o modela segundo seus desígnios. Como recompensa vem os confortos e prazeres da adaptação. Alem de lidar com nosso cérebro individual temos que estar atentos nos outros genes como nós, no estado e atividades dos cérebros da nossa espécie. Temos que ajudar os mais fracos ou impedidos no sentido de libertarem-se de quaisquer amarras e estimuala-ls a dcesenvolverem seus cérebros. De maneira alguma devemos ser agentes de obstaculos para evolução dos outros. E a parte mais dificil dessa tarefa é nossa obrigação em lutar contra as fôrças existentes dentro da nossa própria espécie, que devem ser vistas como virus afetando cérebros, entorpecendo-ps, causando humanos doentios, viciosos, predadores, parasitas, criminosos. Estas forças malignas são poderosas e muitas vêzes se suportam nos ombros de seus hospedeiros, que constituem a maioria da massa inerte do povo. Ao invés destas fôrças contribuirem para os designiso do sustema hierarquico supeiror consciente, elas atuam como agente s do sistema ancestral que ainda nos envolve e influe neste meio-ambiente, o supremo egoísta sistema fechado astronomico onde existimos. Estas fôrças negativas tem o propósito de nos conduxzir a um sistema na base do “Admiravel MIndo Novo”, um sistema de sere automatizados, felizes, ricos, mas totalmente estupidos e condenado 1à extinção, um sistema que elege uma Grande Rainha, como fazem os viventes sem intelecto que atuam dirigidos apenas pelos instintos dessa força, as abelhas, formigas, cupins.

Vamos aqui listar itens quando a ação destas forças negativas dentro da Humanidade forem identificadas. E tentar traçar estratégias de oposição a elas. Tanto esta lista e estratégias, enquanto forem registradas e pensadas apenas por este autor, devem ser entendidas como sendo suspeitas, até mesmo radicais, erradas. Pois entra aqui a experiencia de vida pessoal: o autor têve uma péssima qualidade de vida e acredita que as caisas são 1) O êrro ancestral ou pecado original quando construimos o falso paraiso na forma do sistema galáctico fechado em si mesmo, cuja queda produziu esta biosfera em estado caótico de onde emergimos em meio ao sofrivel caos; 2) A continuidade e atividade da psicologia egoísta que herdamos do ancestral, presente nos humanos que ainda representam esta força negativa, e os quais, pela fôrça e astucia felina herdada dos predadores animais tem sido os mentores dos sistemas sociais onde o autor sente que está tudo errado, é preciso desmanchar e refazer tudo. Esta experiencia de vida extremada deve influenciar erroneamente os juizos aqui veiculados pelo autor, por isso requer-se a participação de outros com experiencias de vida mais normalizadas.

A) Todos os recursos naturais da atmosfera pertencem à Humanidade, aos seus países, não podendo serem cedidos, vendidos, comercializados de alguma alguma. Qualquer decisão a rspeito, qualquer contratação de “terceiros”para qualquer serviços n6este nível deve ser por consulta e voto de todos os cidadãos, sem transferencia de votos a terceiros.

1) Corruption Responsible for 80% of Your Cell Phone Bill

http://www.republicreport.org/2012/cell-phone-corruption-bill/

POSTED AT 1:45 PM BY  – Dec – 11 – 2012

REPUBLIC REPORT

(VER A NOTICIA E ÊSTE POST NO FACEBOOK:

And so Americans continue to have a small number of expensive, poor quality cell phone providers. And how much does this cost you? Take your phone bill, and cut it by 80%. That’s how much you should be paying. You see, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, people in Sweden, the Netherlands, and Finland pay on average less than $130 a year for cell phone service. Americans pay $635.85 a year. That $500 a year difference, from most consumers with a cell phone, goes straight to AT&T and Verizon (and to a much lesser extent Sprint and T-Mobile). It’s the cost of corruption. It’s also, from the perspective of these companies, the return on their campaign contributions and lobbying expenditures. Every penny they spend in DC and in state capitols ensures that you pay high bills, to them.

Identificar nomes, delinear estratégias.

XXXXXXX



Aplicando os Modêlos da Matrix/DNA para Obter Resultados Lucrativos: Scoring Functions, Computer Simulations for Drugs Search

segunda-feira, dezembro 10th, 2012

Importantissimo novo canal aberto para a Matrix/DNA pesquisar e tentar obter resultados reais aqui e agora!

Tudo começou ao ler o seguinte debate:

detroitjames2012 1 hour ago

Creationism/ Intelligent Design is not the proof of the bible, or odin, or krisha, or anything else. It is the understanding of recognizing design when it is present. Physics allow for clay to self assemble into a statue of Einstein, but if I walk past a statue of Einstein I don’t say “there’s no proof it was intelligently designed. Physics clearly allow for it to happen on it’s own”. I don’t suspend belief in the same logic and reason that allow me to navigate reality because the topic is ID.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

icook1723 1 hour ago

Yes, and evolution computer algorithms clearly show that, “in theory” given a population of randomly replicating replicators and a non-random survival search input, you can achieve results that look like design.

I use such algorithms to generate protein-ligand models that are used as a basis of drug engineering. The program uses “randomness” to search the space of possible solutions to identify the best one. These models are subsequently validated by experimentation.

·in reply to detroitjames2012

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s very good new information for my personal studies. Could you be more detailed, please? I know I must type yours words doing a Google search, but any direct link will save my time. If I understood it, the key of this method is the “non-random survival model”. How do you has detected the survival search model for molecules, as proteins?! By other hand, I think that Matrix/DNA model of perfect closed systems must be the survival model applied by atoms/molecules (thermodynamic equilibrium)

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 48 minutes ago

Nobody is denying the existence of your computer or it’s power to process algorithms. I’m denying your claim of knowing the existence of ‘randomy replicating replicators’ without your consciousness, since randomly replicating replicators cannot randomly replicate resulting in any definable reality without an intervening consciousness to assert it. There would be merely a realm of ‘infinite everything that’s ever possible’ including the idea of randomness and replication.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

My friend! What happens when a first single cell, resulting from the fusion of spermatozoon and ovule, becomes a replicating replicator, making billions of copies, each one different from all others? What is the difference between this scene you can see here and now with the hypothetical scene calculated as abiogenesis, where the results of such replications are supposed to be randomly? But… how are you seeing a mother giraffe (previous design) applying consciousness for her ovule doing that?

icook1723 32 minutes ago

The input is a randomly generated initial population (100), a scoring function, and a mutation rate that will insert random mutations that are not present in the parents. The program then ranks generation zero, and the bottom 50 are “killed”, the top 50 are randomly mated to create 50 new solution. Novel mutants are inserted into these new solutions (3 per generation) and they are scored and ranked with the parents. Repeat this process 2500 generation, and you get clusters of possible solutions.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s great! Labs could save billions dollars, years time if discovers Matrix/DNA models. It is explained by an analogy. Aliens intelligence were observing an Islamic country, trying to understand the behavior, the forces driven those people as organized group. They had hard time because the matter of humans bodies are composed by atoms and cells which has different set of tendencies. Everything were finally explained when they knew about a book, Koran. The Matrix is the book driven proteins

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 2 minutes ago

I don’t know how else to say it You have to zoom out. Zoom out so far that you aren’t even holding the damn camera anymore.

“Scoring functions”, “initial populations”, and the mere idea of “random” are definitions of a reality which cannot exist without a consciousness to determine the nature of such concepts.

The fact that you are creating ‘rules of the universe’ by allowing IDEAS even to exist inherently mean you are playing god by allowing your consciousness to determine definitions.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 45 minutes ago

… and if such a realm exists to hold the idea of ‘randomness’ and ‘replication’ in the absence of consciousness, it forces us to retreat to the perspective of viewing the ‘universe’ from a birds-eye view capable of understanding it in it’s entirety… what would that make us?

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 2 seconds ago

Ok. Detroit is an observer seeing theoretically the relations between consciousness and its productions called “humans concepts”, as “randomness”, “replication”, “scoring functions”, etc. And Icook is an practical observer in a lab seeing proteins, “drugs”, etc. The debate has common denominators, they are the words: randomness, replication, initial population, etc. For Detroit the first cause is consciousness, for Icook, it is matter. Anyone could analyze the debate suggesting a solution?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
INICIANDO A PESQUISA:
Primeiro, saber o que é “scoring function”:
WIKIPEDIA:

Scoring functions for docking

In the fields of computational chemistry and molecular modellingscoring functions are fast approximate mathematical methods used to predict the strength of the non-covalent

(A noncovalent bond is a type of chemical bond, typically between macromolecules, that does not involve the sharing of pairs of electrons, but rather involves more dispersed variations of electromagnetic interactions. The noncovalent bond is the dominant type of bond between supermolecules in supermolecular chemistry.[1] Noncovalent bonds are critical in maintaining the three-dimensional structure of large molecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, and are involved in many biological processes in which large molecules bind specifically but transiently to one another. The energy released in the formation of noncovalent bonds is on the order of 1-5 kcal per mol.[2] There are four commonly mentioned types of non-covalent interactions: hydrogen bondsionic bondsvan der Waals forces, and hydrophobic interactions.[2] The noncovalent interactions hold together the two strands of DNA in the double helix, stabilize secondary and tertiary structures of proteins, and enable enzymesubstrate binding and antibodyantigen association. Ver resto )

interaction (also referred to as binding affinity), between two molecules after they have been docked.

(In the field of molecular modelingdocking is a method which predicts the preferred orientation of one molecule to a second when bound to each other to form a stable complex.[1]Knowledge of the preferred orientation in turn may be used to predict the strength of association or binding affinity between two molecules using for example scoring functions. Ver resto)

Most commonly one of the molecules is a small organic compound such as a drug and the second is the drug’s biological target such as a protein receptor.[1] Scoring functions have also been developed to predict the strength of other types of intermolecular interactions, for example between two proteins[2] or between protein and DNA.[3]