Archive for dezembro 6th, 2012

Sensacional! Imagens do Momento da Ovulação Idênticas às Imagens do Modêlo Cosmológico da Matrix/DNA

quinta-feira, dezembro 6th, 2012

Momento da ovulação é fotografado pela primeira vez

http://hypescience.com/momento-da-ovulacao-e-fotografado-pela-primeira-vez/comment-page-1/#comment-240015

HypeScience

Óvulos e Imagens Iguais à Cosmologia da MatrixDNA

Óvulos e Imagens Iguais à Cosmologia da MatrixDNA (click na imagem)

Incrível como isso possa acontecer! Desenhos feitos precáriamente nas árduas condições da selva amazônica, há 30 anos atrás, agora são fotografados como fatos reais! E maior a surprêsa quando sabemos que a observação da natureza biológica aqui na Terra nos conduziu a suspeitar que estes fenômenos seriam evoluções de fenomenos que ocorrem no espaço sideral, e que poderiamos calcula-los, desenha-los. Mais uma vez mais uma previsão correta, quando esta nova visão do mundo previu que a formação de óvulos e tôda a sequencia que leva ao nascimento de humanos é exatamente igual a toda a sequencia que leva ao nascimento de astros, planetas e estr6elas!

Observe o desenho calculado na selva para origens dos astros:

Matrix/DNA Universal - Modêlo Cosmológico Original

Matrix/DNA Universal - Modêlo Cosmológico Original

Estás vendo como se trata exatamente do mesmo processo, até as formas são imitadas biológicamente aqui?!

Texto do artigo e a seguir, comentário explicativo:

“Observar a ovulação em humanos é extremamente raro e as imagens anteriores foram confusas. Jacques capturou o evento por acidente enquanto preparava uma histerectomia parcial em uma mulher de 45 anos. A liberação do óvulo foi considerada um evento repentino e veloz, mas as imagens, que serão publicadas na revista científica Fertility and Sterility, mostram que o evento leva, ao menos, 15 minutos. Pouco antes da liberação do óvulo, enzimas decompõem o tecido do folículo maduro, uma bolsa cheia de fluído na superfície do ovário que contém o óvulo. Isso leva à formação de uma protuberância avermelhada e, depois de algum tempo, surge um buraco, do qual o óvulo emerge envolto por células de apoio. Em seguida ele entra na trompa de Falópio, que o leva até o útero.”

Comentário postado pela Matrix/DNA:

Louis Morelli6.12.2012

Muito grato por estas imagens que são mais uma evidência para os modêlos evolucionarios da Teoria da Matrix/DNA. Estas imagens foram desenhadas e registradas há 30 anos atrás como resultado dos modêlos teóricos, porque são exatamente iguais às imagens do nascimento de uma nova estrêla, como se pode ver no site da Matrix/DNA Theory. Mera coincidência? Não, isso é evidencia de Evolução Universal. Compare os dois textos descritivos:

Matrix/DNA: “Antes da formação e uma nova estrêla, a entropia (enzima)decompõe uma velha gigante vermelha em fragmentos os quais formam uma nebulosa (ovário) a qual gira em rotação formando um vortex central (folículo maduro)contendo a massa degradada com todas as informações do sistema (genes). O turbilhão produz esferas incandecentes e se fundem com cometas capturados (óvulos mais espermatozóides) e com certo pêso são emitidos ao espaço sideral onde passarão pelas fases de baby-stars, planetas, pulsares, supernova, gigante vermelha e o ciclo recomeça…

Como vemos, o que está em baixo é cópia do que está encima e nós somos filhos das estrêlas.

Mas na Natureza, para realizar um processo, muitas vêzes um mecanismo é várias vêezes repetido. Podemos ver tambem os óvulos como sendo as partículas e fragmentos que resultam da fragmentação da estrêla na Função 7. Assim o cadaver estelar que é formado e aparece na imagem como metade da estrêla se decompondo pode ser visto como folículo maduro, e o canal que conduz os fragmentos a se contituir no vortex pode ser visto como a trompa de Falópio. Na verdade o óvulo é o fragmento estelar. pois apenas ele serás misturado aos cometas para formasr a esfera incandescente, que representa o óvulo depois da fecundação.

Ninguem me “Cutuca” No Maior Debate da História que Está Acontecendo Agora No Youtube? Brasileiros! Tucuta-me…please! (8)

quinta-feira, dezembro 6th, 2012

Veja os numeros anteriores dêste capitulo (7,6,5…) para informar-se.

XXXXXXXX

Posts da Matrix/DNA para Inicios de Debates:

XXXXXXXX

TheMatrixDNA1:05 PM – Dec – 13

The idea of Evolution is better than the biblical creationism because evolution leaves the mind as opened door to grow by itself, while creationism having all answers closes that door. But, like creationism have being used by mafias, groups, like the ancient Jews killing other tribes authorized by their god – if evolution is taught as blind, by random, with any purpose, it is a closing door also and can be used by mafias, dictators, etc. Matrix/DNA saw an evolution purpose: Humans Trancendence

XXX

TheMatrixDNA4:27 PM – Dec – 12 – 2012

Evolutionism, as described by Modern Synthesis, is the modern religion, in opposition to deism described by Bible. MS says “natural selection is a logical process, non random selection of mutations”, but MS says “this occurs partly because random mutations.” Then, NS is a occurred random process because its motor, its productor, is randomness. Like God does for creationists, NS fits all gaps for atheists. We don’t know scientifically why evolutionary mutations happened. Theories are welcome

XXX

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA7:48 PM – Mon – Dec – 10

Where the idea of a talking snake in the Garden comes from?

A perfect closed system is the supreme goal of any material being. Such system must have eternal thermodynamic equilibrium for mass(particles) and eternal frenetic motion for energy (waves). This goal was reached when matter built galaxies. In this system you see its channel through which runs the flow of particles/waves. It seems a spiraling serpent swelling its own tail. The serpent is the message of extreme selfishness. Got it?

XXXXXXXX

The fact that the theory of evolution threatens the existence of God is ludicrous. The Bible (or whatever holy book you use) is full of parables for our understanding. Just because EVERYTHING isn’t explained doesn’t make it any less true. Go with your heart, think with your mind, and things just work out. Zero data for or against God. It’s purely up to the individual.

Samuel Duval 48 minutes ago

Parables can be good for enforcing moral values, but they need be constantly replaced by parables about real situations here and now and cleaned from imaginations about metaphysics, which, we are sure, are not affecting events here and now. Human beings flesh and bones are composed by atoms and the forces of atoms try to driven the whole towards eternal thermodynamic equilibrium, accommodating in any state that maintains “survival”. The belief in God fits this tendency, it is motion-stopper

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Samuel Duval (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Kr0n1k4Lyfe (Creationist) = “The real fallacy are the theories Atheists attempt to come up with to fill in the gaps of a complex Universe they don’t understand”

ExtantFrodo2 ( Atheist) = “Was it making humans the established goal of the universe? We are here quite unintentionally”

Matrix/DNA (Agnostic) = “There is no enough data for understanding the existence of this world. Filling the gaps with magical gods makes no sense. Microbes inside a womb says the fetus is there unintentionally.(?!)

TheMatrixDNA7:09 PM – Thursday, Dec. – 06

XXXXXXXXXX

INICIO DOS DEBATES

XXXXXXXXXX

jaimecarrillo 2 hours ago

adam eve ya they never existed neither the big flood or the garden of eden

·

Louis Charles Morelli 1 hour ago

Yes, indeed they existed. I am challenging you to do this: Try to make a cosmological model containing all properties of life in it. For sure this must be the right model, because this stupid matter of Earth could not creating properties from nothing. Matrix/DNA model is showing that those symbols used in Bible were real, but used as metaphors for describing the state of the world before life’s origins. Why these symbols are in the Bible? Because past history was inside ancient fresh memories

·in reply to jaimecarrillo

MrGralgrathor 1 hour ago

One of these days you really have got to STOP doing drugs, and get a job or something.

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 26 minutes ago

I have a job my friend, about 50 or 60 hours a week, doing the hard work for producing what I am consuming and something else for helping those that can’t do it. My secret is that I don’t waste time with anything else than working with hands and my intellect, all in name of our EVOLUTION

·in reply to MrGralgrathor

MrGralgrathor 9 minutes ago

Yes. You’re a fruitcake. But that’s okay; you’re OUR fruitcake.

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

A fruitcake that survived seven years alone in Amazon jungle, facing all dangers? Ask it to those big beasts or smalls vibes that faced me. Or go to read a book existing in Brasil, called, “Os Guerreiros do Arco-Iris” ( The Fighters of the Rainbow) which is a documentary wrote by a journalist telling the real history of Amazon gold mines and see my name there, six times, facing gangs under weapons and heavy shootings. That’s why I am of nobody, except myself and my world view

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

What do you think? A real materialistic, realist mind that does not is a traitor of his mother nature never permits any kind of drugs taking control of self. No, I think that drunk are you and everybody that were nurtured artificially over this layer of black asphalt and could cement that causes the eclipse of our natural soil. You see fecundation and think it is big bangs, you see normal vortexes forming from dust of died stars and think they are ghosts black holes…you are drunk, not me.

Martin Koch 1 hour ago

You sure waste a lot of time jibber jabbering incoherently on this channel.

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 hour ago

A non flat earth, the sun as the center of this system, were considered incoherence once time. Give time to time and we will know who is the incoherent here…

·in reply to Martin Koch

MrGralgrathor 55 minutes ago

Don’t need time. Already know.

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes, time has anything to do with closed minds. You are a provisional shape of evolution, going to a more evolved shape, but you are working as an evolution-stopper because you think that your little brain and your condition as a microbe in this Universe are enough for grasping the final truth, of there is one. What’s delusion!

XXX

Louis Charles Morelli 1 hour ago

@illegalcon

He said that because he did not know what we know today, and he has not thought as we have thought. For instance he never noticed that Nature applies the mechanism of nanotechnology and its opposite movement, giantology, here and now, facing our eyes: Nature resumes a human body, 150 pounds and 2 meters long, inside a microscope chromosome. She did it when resumed an entire astronomical system into a base-pair of nucleotides. The forces for life are all there, because life was there.

·

Tom Adams 48 minutes ago

put there by the Great God…

BTW: mother nature requires the sacrifice of babies…

at least when the cult started…

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 16 minutes ago

That’s for those that are blind of one eye and see only a half part of the entire Nature. They see only the Nature surrounding us, which is product of chaos, they can’t see the other half, the ordered harmony of the Cosmos above us. The invisible Nature is expressed by the Sun: a star that is busy feeding whit her energy and protecting, enchanting, under her astronomical gravitational wings, her babies planets, who plays and dance around her. This real world loves his babies, that’s my cult, Tom

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

Tom Adams 43 minutes ago

Life is something atheists won’t admit is very special…

They have been unable to create it…

but pretend it will be done REAL SOON NOW…

even after 140 years…

Louis Charles Morelli 5 minutes ago

That’s because they did not understand what is “life” and does not know what produced it. They see evolution as any microbe inside an egg watch the evolution from blastula to fetus to embryo and think is watching evolution, when, in fact they are seeing a merely event of reproduction. They need to know the blastula shape of this cosmic egg ( the aglomerates of galaxies) that was here before the fetus formation ( the cell system) and to know the Matrix ( the DNA) that exists inside the blastula

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

XXX

Tom Adams 9 minutes ago

The Great God is the ONLY one…

Who created the Laws of Physics…

Who caused the universe to form from the residue of the Big Bang created when he created matter and anti-matter from nothing and allowed them to recombine…

Who created all life…

·in reply to jaimecarrillo(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You are mixing real phenomena known by everybody with non-real phenomena that only you says they exists. Why?! The universe was formed from the “residues” of a central point, reduced to singularity, that triggered a motion of expansion. But yours own body once time was an extreme singularity inside ova and spermatozoon that triggered a motion of expansion. Why are you blind to facts here and now that explains what happened there at macro level? Can’t you, a fetus, see your “natural” parents?

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

Martin Koch 42 minutes ago

Gibberish.

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Gibberish is the explosion of a minuscule atom containing all matter of this universe that resulted from the initial event. Gibberish is the non-existent ghost cannibal monster of the space called “black hole”.And etc. Try to avoid mathematics masturbation and computer simulations by a moment, return back to the real Nature, the answers are facing yours eyes here and now.

·in reply to Martin Koch(Show the comment)

Tom Adams 56 minutes ago

these are my beliefs…

do you have a better explanation for the Great God’s creation of the laws of physics, the universe and life?

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Tom Adams 56 minutes ago

these are my beliefs…

do you have a better explanation for the Great God’s creation of the laws of physics, the universe and life?

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

XXX

TheTapeClub 6 minutes ago

“For instance, Matrix/DNA Theory suggests a model of lightwave spectrum floating over space that carries the code for life/matter.”

“The theoretical model where lightwaves shows the resources for imprinting life on matter.”

I do not understand. Does this hypothesis state that these lightwave patterns are the *cause* of life and matter, or that they are responsible for shaping the necessary information onto matter to enable self replication, etc, and other characteristics inherent to life?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

This model is a rational sequence from previous models resulting from comparative anatomy applied over living and non-living systems. This method reveals a pattern existing in each natural system, from atoms to galaxies to cells to human beings. Nature makes new systems putting copies of the old under life cycle process, each shape produced by transformation becomes a universal function of new system. Each shape has one state of energy, which is just the sequence of frequencies of any lightwave

·in reply to TheTapeClub(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“Does this hypothesis state that these lightwave patterns are the *cause* of life and matter, or that they are responsible for shaping the necessary information onto matter to enable self replication, etc, and other characteristics inherent to life?”

I am not sure yet. Matter is inertial but invaded by or standing over lightwaves which has different vibrations makes matter acquiring the same sequence, from gamma-ray to radio, which is the cyclic vibrational sequence from babies to cadavers

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

Tedward Carpenter 23 minutes ago

Genesis 1:1 “In the Beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth”

What you have said I dont understand, it sounds like a lot of mumbo jumbo, but if you could explain it more clearly I might be able to Grasp it.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Everything is scientifically falsiable, the opposite of yours “Genesis”, so, hands at work proving it is wrong. But..maybe you can save something of yours Genesis. This hypothesis about natural light as the carrier imprinting the vital cycle into matter could be the hands and arms of yours God used for his creations. But, if so, you will need taking out this God from earth dealing with humans because he should be zillions times more greater, placing him to the magnificence that a god deserves.

TheMatrixDNA 1 day ago

Since August there are unite a few people here who have asked for evidence of absolute randomness/nothing producing vibrations. Any evidence presented? There is no scientific method able to produce a total state of world which, moving by itself, could produces the complexity we see here and now. Just the same tired atheist cliches. What’s about keeping the mind opened to search a rational scientifically experimental explanation?

TheTapeClub 13 minutes ago

Oh, we do continue to do so. And for every advance made, the sphere of influence attributed to the gods becomes ever smaller.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

XXX

Tedward Carpenter 41 minutes ago

Have you heard that our thumbs are going to get longer form texting? Do you believe this?

·in reply to DarwinsFriend(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Ok, do you want play? Texting develops and coordinates intelligence. Because for texting we use fingers, not tongs. It happens that our hand is the exactly copy of the universal natural formula used by Nature for organizing matter into systems. The picture of the formula is in Matrix/DNA website, go there and puts yours left hand over the formula, while the palm must be over Function 1. Now see the meaning of your fingers, from the smaller to last, the running life cycle, the systemic circuit

XXX

Tedward Carpenter 36 minutes ago

Its not just to believe, its to accept Jesus as your savior, and to repent.

Then to follow the Ten Commandments.

·in reply to controlledemo(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

What is the enemy that I need be safe just now? Predators, real predators. If I am a Muslim I need fight against those predators, the sheikhs of the oil; if I am Brazilian I need fight the Portuguese families that dominates the country under slavery by 500 years; if I am American I need fight against those parasites at Wall Street; And so on. I can’t fight my real enemy because you, yes…YOU, are stolen the intelligence of preys while children and they are unuseful for the right fight.You=Evil

Tedward Carpenter 10 minutes ago

What is Evil? What do you have to justify this claim, I could just as well call anyone evil. What makes some one evil?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

To me, evil is any force going against the rhythm and destiny that my poor intelligence and knowledge can grasp from the Nature I can see in this short lifetime. I am seeing that Nature is investing all its efforts for developing the human brain for better nurturing a new natural system emerging: Consciousness. And any social system or predator or religion that prejudices any human being to have theirs brains developed is a force against Nature. Against Humanity! Freedom of mind, free thinker..

Tedward Carpenter 4 minutes ago

@ TheMatrixDNA

In other words what we see is the only truth?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

No. Far away from that. We see here and now less than the half of the Truth. We see this biosphere under chaotic state. That’s the dangerous trap hidden behind a theory of biological evolution: one can extract from this chaos his/her moral values, which are primitive savagery, competition, feline smartness, etc. The other way, seeing the ordered Cosmos but does not understanding it is also a dangerous trap for moral values (dictatorship under religion). Intelligence can solve this puzzle.

XXX

Tedward Carpenter 16 minutes ago

I dont understand. And no God will be here creating the valleys.

My I ask what your position is? I know you are a Naturalist. But do you believe that there is a creator, or evolution.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I don’t “believe” Ted. And I can’t understand those that “believe”. I never forget that I am like a microbe of this Universe, as my body is a echo-system where are living millions of creatures, celled organisms that are not my cells, and I don’t know nothing about them. I never forget the super-agglomerate of agglomerates of galaxies that is this universe, and the size of my little brain. This brain for sure can not know the final Truth, if there is one. So, faith is one losing mental control

XXX

RogerS4JC 2 days ago

@marksmith1117 “is you trying to replace wcience with your personal religious feelings.”

I see a harmony:

“This most beautiful system of the sun, planets, & comets could only proceed from the counsel & dominion of an intelligent & powerful Being.” Isaac Newton

Dilemma:

Religion is not really the issue, but…emptiness, of today’s atheism…without God means turning toward something…we need coherent secular popular philosophies that effectively answer life’s vital questions. -naturalism. org

·in reply to marksmith1117(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 2 days ago

The supreme tendency of matter towards thermodynamic equilibrium transforms chaos into order, harmony. See the beauty valleys, mountains the river running calm, over there? Once time all that matter were dust being burned and moving chaotically without any harmonic shapes. But, in Matrix/DNA, we are seeing that chaos, order, death, are results of matter floating over a wave of light expanding from the Big Bang. Matter oscillates accordingly to region/frequencies of this waves it stands. No gods

·in reply to RogerS4JC

Alan Clarke 22 minutes ago

@TheMatrixDNA “See the beauty valleys, mountains the river running calm, over there?”

Yes. The “supreme tendency of matter towards thermodynamic equilibrium” will destroy all of that beauty by filling the valleys & streams with matter from mountains which erode & flatten.

“The mystery is not that an ordered state should become disordered but that the early Universe apparently was in a highly ordered state.” — Don N. Page, “Inflation Does Not Explain Time Asymmetry”, Nature, 1983

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

While I am appealing to real facts here and now ( the beauty valleys, mountains..) you are bringing on not real facts from here and now, but apparent early universe? Any idea of early universe is still metaphysics. Why not keeping the debate limited to the world that “we” see? Why you change the “we see” for the “I see”? The valleys will be destroyed, the solar system will be dust, the dust will be a solar system, the valleys will be here again. And no god will be here creating the valleys

·in reply to Alan Clarke(Show the comment)

XXX

DarwinsFriend 3 hours ago

Creationists hang their hat on “A Common Designer.”

Whale flippers with bones in them that look just like humans. The knowing gaze of an orangutan at the zoo – you can just tell what they’re thinking. Dolphins know us and haul us to the beach to keep us from drowning. Crows recognize faces and decide if your threatening at first glance.

The examples are endless and are – of course – not driven by practical design and evolution, but The Lord of Every Molecule and Thought in the Universe, right?

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I think, everybody (evolutionists and creationists) see evidences of “previous design” always down, like the ancient saw turtles always down. The problem is that this chain going down sometimes is missing solid steps, as “the previous design for human’s consciousness not seen in apes”, the “previous design for the first cell system” not seen in this non organic planet”, the “previous design for the universe not seen in the “nothing”. It is missing turtles here. I think Tom raped them.

XXX

KiDSKEPTiK 26 minutes ago

If you cross a donkey and a horse you get a mule.

The mule has reached its limit and is born sterile.

Cross a lion and a tiger and you get a hybrid called a liger that is also born sterile.

·in reply to TheFallibleFiend(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You don’t know a very deep mechanism of Nature. There is a natural formula responsible by what will be born fertile or sterile. You can see this formula since the RNA/DNA. This formula is like a face, composed by left and right sides, symmetrical phenotype, asymmetrical genotypes. RNA, as the left side, can produces three kinds of copies. One will not be interbreeded, other will be sterile, the third will be fertile, but then, you have DNA. You can see this formula in the sky: the Matrix/DNA

·in reply to KiDSKEPTiK(Show the comment)

XXX

KiDSKEPTiK 2 minutes ago

Astronomer Robert Jastrow says:

“To their chagrin [scientists] have no clear-cut answer, because chemists have never succeeded in reproducing nature’s experiments on the creation of life out of nonliving matter. Scientists do not know how that happened.”—The Enchanted Loom: Mind in the Universe p. 19.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

And to their chagrin (creationists) have no clear-cut-answer, because priests applying players or magics have never succeeded in transforming nonliving matter or the vacuum into something alive. The problem is in Jastrow’s own field: astronomy. The current astronomical models about stars, galaxies and planetary formations, the way these systems works and the cosmological evolution have no foundations for producing biological systems. The error is in the theoretical models, not in the world.

·in reply to KiDSKEPTiK(Show the comment)

XXX

5648945621

5648945621 2 hours ago

Life looks designed because evolution is NOT random.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s a great rational suggestion, I think. But, the very problem still stands: “Which natural system was the design that designed the first cell system?” Of course, must have one. If not, something, some force, coming from some source laying outside the long universal chain of causes/effects/causes… acted over abiogenesis, and I can’t accept it because it should be a non-natural source. The solution for this question will come from comparative anatomy, as being tried by Matrix/DNA models

·in reply to 5648945621(Show the comment)

XXX

DarwinsFriend 20 minutes ago

It has been said (by someone much smarter than me):

“The Nobel Prize winning scientist Linus Pauling aptly described science as the search for truth. Science does this by continuously comparing its theories objectively with evidence in the natural world. When theories no longer conform to the evidence, they are modified or rejected in favor of new theories that do conform. In other words, science constantly tries to prove its assumptions to be false and rejects implausible explanations.”

·

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

There are problems here. Science does not compares theories, humans do it. Science does not walks by its own legs, it is driven by humans. And humans has bias, always are driven by tendencies, everybody has an ideology. Science never can know the final truth of any real object or event, because Science does not know yet all natural systems aligned in the universal hierarchy that affects the smallest objects. Humans drives scientific tools to accumulate data belonging to their beliefs.

·in reply to DarwinsFriend(Show the comment)
DarwinsFriend

DarwinsFriend 1 hour ago

That’s where one tool we use acts as an umpire: Computers.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA
TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are great! If the 500 characters don’t let me finish my thought, you do it for me! Computers! Here is the final mortal trap! An electric-mechanic brain connected to mechanic sensors, investigating the invisible micro and macro dimensions, giving “his” informations to biological brains, included, building theories by simulations and imposing these theories to biological brains’ world view. Welcome to the Brave New World, zombies! No, my friend, I will fight against it till my death!

XXX

TheMatrixDNA 2 hours ago

Evolutionism, as described by Modern Synthesis, is the modern religion, in opposition to deism described by Bible. MS says “natural selection is a logical process, non random selection of mutations”, but MS says “this occurs partly because random mutations.” Then, NS is a occurred random process because its motor, its productor, is randomness. Like God does for creationists, NS fits all gaps for atheists. We don’t know scientifically why evolutionary mutations happened. Theories are welcome

fangednekoyasha 1 hour ago

Jesus fucking christ, you’re retarded.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 19 minutes ago

Thanks. My lovely, tiny, almighty lord, Pink Unicorn, said that I must forgive you, because you are so ignorant and blind about the final Truth as I am. We must cry together, my friend, or, lifting up our heads and, as soldiers, going to fighter our enemy: ignorance. By the way, Pink said that you go to heaven also and he will give you pink popcorn eternally. Pink bless you…

·in reply to fangednekoyasha

fangednekoyasha 39 seconds ago

You have no truth. Just baseless assertions without the slightest scrap of evidence. You’re no better than creationists. In sum, you’re fucking retarded.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

What did you understand when I said: “you are so ignorant and blind about the final Truth as I am”?! I mean that I actually have no truth. I am an Science-advancer, you are a “science -stopper” as will be a whole generations of humans indoctrinated to believe on blind evolution. This belief is dangerous because makes humans to behavior like insects, and insects built societies based on “The Brave New World” under the rules of the “Big Queen”. See ants and bees. PinkUnicorn bless you again…

fangednekoyasha 1 minute ago

You’re no science advancer. Science has evidence. You have none, just baseless assertions. Don’t insult my intelligence, fucking retard.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

When I said I am a science-advancer I was based on that I built theoretical models that are scientifically falsifiable. They will be debunked or acclaimed, that’s for sure. And I said you are a science-stopper because if evolution is blind, if the Universe has no purpose, as you are claiming, without any intelligible theoretical model, you are suggesting things that Science never will be able to falsify. So, you are doing a bad disservice to Science.

Tedward Carpenter 3 minutes ago

What are your religious beliefs?

This is a question of curiosity.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I don’t know if my mind have religions beliefs or not. I can’t see my mind from outside it. I was raised on the streets as orphan and homeless ( I am still now) but sometimes my relatives lead me to catholic church. The very fact that all those people of that church made me a slave for doing their hard work without paying me as they earn their money, made me conclude that Christian religion is bad source of morals designing bad social systems. I got university and my world view is naturalist.

XXX

DarwinsFriend 1 minute ago

Vestigial Organs

Some organisms have structures or organs that seem to serve no useful function. For example, humans have a tailbone at the end of the spine that is of no apparent use. Some snakes have tiny pelvic bones and limb bones, and some cave-dwelling salamanders have eyes even though members of the species are completely blind. Such seemingly functionless parts are called vestigial organs or structures. Vestigial organs are often homologous to organs that are useful in other species.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Do you really think that if humans had tail they would not be useful? I should be grateful having a long, strong tail ( that’s why I am every morning pulling out my tailbone, and I will teach my next generations doing it also, maybe we can resuscitate our lost tails). At least, a good tail could be used for holding my fast food while driving. What I am trying to say is that Modern Synthesis about natural selection must be wrong in some way. There are more hidden causes there…

XXX

Edmond Goo 12 hours ago

Please explain how those are mechanisms for evolution.

Remember that mutations are over 60% detrimental and only 0.1% advantageous (according to evolution scientists) . The advantageous 0.1% has never been seen to add genetic information.

I’d like for you to explain how random mutation could slowly over millions of years make a wing out of an arm.

Thanks in advance.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Nature can make wings and arms out of a observable universal mechanism. It is the same mechanism that produces tails in comets, cellular flagellum, humans arms and legs. It is the mechanism that produces the channel conducting dust from died star towards a central vortex (aka black hole) for to be recycling. It is the mechanisms that arises from lightwaves when degenerates to the lowest frequencies. It is a mechanism called all time that a natural system chose to express it.

XXX

Tedward Carpenter 1 hour ago

Jesus was a real person, the old testament is the history of the Jews Gods chosen people, No theologian would disagree with that.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

If the Jews’ god chosen them and not us also, this God is not my god and I should hate him, if I didn’t conclude that those Jews were lying. If you believe in this god, keep it to yourself, doesn’t be a social public asshole because there are lots of people in Western civilization that hates gods and those foreign people that discriminates us. I am interested in Jews history as I am about Chinese, Hindu, native Americans, etc, history, but, their ancient interpretations of History is ridiculous.

XXX

rogerden roger 15 minutes ago

Since August there are unite a few people here who have asked for evidence of God/designer/creation. Any evidence presented? Just the same tired creationist cliches.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Since August there are unite a few people here who have asked for evidence of absolute randomness/nothing producing vibrations. Any evidence presented? There is no scientific method able to produce a total state of world which, moving by itself, could produces the complexity we see here and now. Just the same tired atheist cliches. What’s about keeping the mind opened to search a rational scientifically experimental explanation?

lordlandraid 39 minutes ago

If you had even read my response to you earlier you might of realized why the post you just did was idiotic… What you are asking for isn’t evolution. That’s a straw man. Maybe if you actually read up on evolution and learned what it actually is, you could ask a proper question, but right now your question starts with a false premise and no one is going to answer it outside of saying ‘your question is wrong’.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The question remains: “Is there a scientific method able to produce a total state of world which, moving by itself, could produces the complexity we see here and now? All yours post is words expressing metaphysics and escaping from real facts.

ngc2440ly 36 minutes ago

Ignoring the massive straw man you decided to use you do realize the majority of the major contributers to evolution were quite religious. Remember, evolution doesn’t exclude religion despite what some ignorant people want to believe.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The amount of evidences I can see here and now shows total absence of metaphysics. The mechanisms and processes I see here and now are all from forces that are from natural precedence. Yes, the world that I had experienced all my life suggests evolution and exclude religions. Is your world different than mine?!

mia wick 17 minutes ago

If youwant to talk ab out such details feel free to mail me, but discussing things like quantumelectrodynamics or virtual particles is impossible in bite sizes and without links. But to really understand those concepts requires quite a bit of learning, and quite a few other qualities not too many people have.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Do you know any lab where I can go and see a space fit with nothing and producing vibrations? Observing the spectrum of vibration on screens does not prove that nothing produces them and I don’t know how one can prove that the space is fulfilled with only “nothing”. There are people here advocating that this world came from nothing, that’s why I am arguing against.

For instance, Matrix/DNA Theory suggests a model of lightwave spectrum floating over space that carries the code for life/matter

·in reply to mia wick(Show the comment)

mia wick 22 minutes ago

There are computer simulations, which is a recognized scientific method, that can show you evolution happens and how it happens. Other then that you woulöd need a 4 billion year experiment, which isnt really practicable.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Deism and atheism – the issues here – are related to the question “why” and not “how” or “what”. Computer simulations and exaggerated Mathematics can be a dangerous trap to human beings. Good samples are “the ghost non-existent space cannibal black holes of Stephen Hawking”, the most computer’s models about astronomy every day being debunked by new Nasa photos, etc. Do you now why happens these mistakes? Computers hardware and programs are not the Universe hardware and program.

·in reply to mia wick(Show the comment)

Tedward Carpenter 2 minutes ago

I believe that anyone that does not believe in God has to be quite ignorant, there is much Proof of a Creator, and the people that believe in evolution are in such denial of the truth they don’t see the holes in their theory. May God Bless you for defending your belief in him.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are right, “anyone that does not believe in God has to be quite ignorant”. But I am not defending gods here, I don’t know about gods, I don’t know more than the few data collected by empirical methods and the world of my life’s experience. I am quite a ignorant, no problem with that. The theoretical model where lightwaves shows the resources for imprinting life on matter could be the arm and hand of a God, but, this bad world torturing my loved species suggests no gods or a very bad god.

ordlandraid 31 minutes ago

Answer: Yes. The various mechanisms of evolution are perfectly capable of producing the creatures we see today.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Of course, they are. The issue here is about genetic mutations, the motor that triggers biological evolution. Since that one believe in random mutations being the motor, and since “random” have no mechanisms, the whole building called evolution has no answer.

·in reply to lordlandraid(Show the comment)

XXX

Chris Gough 21 minutes ago

Pretty black and white there Bill…There are really insane folks who don’t take into account fossil history, geology and the expansion of the universe. But there are also really insane people who don’t take into account the soul, morality and basic human behavior and the design of the universe. The all or nothing approach by, unfortunately you, and many creationists drives me crazy. Everyone has an agenda.

It is not insane to believe in a creator God or evolution when you look at the evidence.

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are almost at the same level which stands people selecting Matrix/DNA Theory. The unique thing we don’t agree is yours says: “It is not insane to believe in a creator God”. This chaotic biosphere, the normal torture of living beings, are evidences of no intelligent design, and they are evidences of absence of lovely gods watching this horror here. It is not insane believing in magical gods because this is normal to consciousness evolution: children believing in ghosts friends. Be adult

XXX

lordlandraid 19 minutes ago

When you look at the evidence, a god is not implied.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, but when I look at the evidence, absolute randomness is not implied. I see all biological systems coming from parents that were their previous design.

lordlandraid 12 minutes ago

Evolution isn’t ‘absolute randomness’. All offspring are based off their predecessors. Genetic mutations occur with each generation. Most mutations are neutral and are minor mutations at that. We look like we do now, but with enough mutations down enough generations, our offspring would look much different. Evolution isn’t about ‘one thing giving birth to something completely random’, it deals with variations in genetic code that stack upon each other over numerous generations.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

So, the first cause, the beginning of all process that produced this co-lateral process of variation at the genetic code, best adaptation, survival, grow of offspring, and finally its natural selection, is the variation at the genetic code. Is it wrong? But which are the causes of these variations, the cause of the cause?

XXX

icook1723 32 minutes ago

The input is a randomly generated initial population (100), a scoring function, and a mutation rate that will insert random mutations that are not present in the parents. The program then ranks generation zero, and the bottom 50 are “killed”, the top 50 are randomly mated to create 50 new solution. Novel mutants are inserted into these new solutions (3 per generation) and they are scored and ranked with the parents. Repeat this process 2500 generation, and you get clusters of possible solutions.

in reply to detroitjames2012(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s great! Labs could save billions dollars, years time if discovers Matrix/DNA models. It is explained by an analogy. Aliens intelligence were observing an Islamic country, trying to understand the behavior, the forces driven those people as organized group. They had hard time because the matter of humans bodies are composed by atoms and cells which has different set of tendencies. Everything were finally explained when they knew about a book, Koran. The Matrix is the book driven proteins

detroitjames2012 48 minutes ago

Nobody is denying the existence of your computer or it’s power to process algorithms. I’m denying your claim of knowing the existence of ‘randomy replicating replicators’ without your consciousness, since randomly replicating replicators cannot randomly replicate resulting in any definable reality without an intervening consciousness to assert it. There would be merely a realm of ‘infinite everything that’s ever possible’ including the idea of randomness and replication.

in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

My friend! What happens when a first single cell, resulting from the fusion of spermatozoon and ovule, becomes a replicating replicator, making billions of copies, each one different from all others? What is the difference between this scene you can see here and now with the hypothetical scene calculated as abiogenesis, where the results of such replications are supposed to be randomly? But… how are you seeing a mother giraffe (previous design) applying consciousness for her ovule doing that?

detroitjames2012 1 hour ago

Because the existence, idea, and concepts of ovules and giraffes require intervention of some form of consciousness to determine the definitions of those words (and the definition of ‘word’ and the definition of ‘definition’ for that matter).

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The debate is you think reality is created by consciousness, directly, while Icook and I think that our reality is created by Nature (maybe consciousness exists beyond nature as first cause). We deal with ovules, giraffes as real things at the same level of our material body reality. Birds has no conceptual definitions of giraffes, but they deal with giraffes. Why losing time with things can not be reached by us/our Science? We can’t understand consciousness as babies can’t understand parents

icook1723 1 hour ago

Yes, and evolution computer algorithms clearly show that, “in theory” given a population of randomly replicating replicators and a non-random survival search input, you can achieve results that look like design.

I use such algorithms to generate protein-ligand models that are used as a basis of drug engineering. The program uses “randomness” to search the space of possible solutions to identify the best one. These models are subsequently validated by experimentation.

in reply to detroitjames2012

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s very good new information for my personal studies. Could you be more detailed, please? I know I must type yours words doing a Google search, but any direct link will save my time. If I understood it, the key of this method is the “non-random survival model”. How do you has detected the survival search model for molecules, as proteins?! By other hand, I think that Matrix/DNA model of perfect closed systems must be the survival model applied by atoms/molecules (thermodynamic equilibrium)

detroitjames2012 56 minutes ago

In the absence of a higher form of intelligence, HUMAN intelligence is what we have. If HUMAN intelligence (in my view, my consciousness) is the whole of reality, there becomes no need for there to be a universe ‘designed’ for anything BUT human (my) intelligence.

I cannot logically come up with the existence of any other ‘realm’ where quantum entanglement, the measurement problem, and the requirement of a conscious observer to assert reality (double slit) ALL apply.

I am god. Ha! proved it.

·in reply to geezusispan(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

But you could be a dense bubble that pop out from a whole ocean of consciousness ( God, if you want call it). Lots of these bubbles makes a kind of foam above the ocean surface. This foam is the material dense Universe. If we considers this hypothesis, everything can be explained here. Till explains any spectrum of any natural lightwaves recorded in the screen shows how photons pops out from that waves. And this is explained by Matrix/DNA discovering that lightwaves contains the code for life.

detroitjames2012 1 hour ago

Creationism/ Intelligent Design is not the proof of the bible, or odin, or krisha, or anything else. It is the understanding of recognizing design when it is present. Physics allow for clay to self assemble into a statue of Einstein, but if I walk past a statue of Einstein I don’t say “there’s no proof it was intelligently designed. Physics clearly allow for it to happen on it’s own”. I don’t suspend belief in the same logic and reason that allow me to navigate reality because the topic is ID.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, any rational mind can see and recognizes that design is present for producing biological systems and consciousness systems. Still here you are being a rational mind. But any rational mind recognizes that all previous design are naturals. Never nobody saw a previous design made by supernatural beings or laws. Then, which should be your rational behavior? Search in the state of the world before biological systems’ emergency, which was the natural system that contained the design. Or don’t?!

detroitjames2012 2 hours ago

“…any rational mind recognizes that all previous design are naturals.”

This is the equal to saying, “we as humans became aware of, through our experience with the universe, a pre-existing design structure (science, math) and the ‘laws’ that allow for biological evolution (DNA) to occur. It clearly operates with a goal (i.e. create a body) demonstrating what humans recognize as design. All it’s components (quanta), however, did not need to have the goal of creating IT for IT to emerge.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Yes, well said.

But you said: “Creationism/ Intelligent Design is not the proof of the bible, or odin, or krisha, or anything else. It is the understanding of recognizing design when it is present.”

We can recognize previous design without applied intelligence.  I think that giraffes intercourse, the working of their genes, etc., has no intelligent goal when allowing embryogenesis evolution and emergency of a new baby’s giraffe. Where are you seeing intelligent previous design in Nature?

detroitjames2012 2 hours ago

I don’t know how else to say it You have to zoom out. Zoom out so far that you aren’t even holding the damn camera anymore.

“Scoring functions”, “initial populations”, and the mere idea of “random” are definitions of a reality which cannot exist without a consciousness to determine the nature of such concepts.

The fact that you are creating ‘rules of the universe’ by allowing IDEAS even to exist inherently mean you are playing god by allowing your consciousness to determine definitions.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

icook1723 2 hours ago

You seam to be moving into an undefined direction of new age thought. I think you are wrong, pretty dam confidant about it. But when you start talking the relationship of coniousness and reality, you enter a field that is beyond what science can answer. You enter philosophy, and “prof” becomes in the eye of the beholder.

detroitjames2012 2 hours ago

” But when you start talking the relationship of coniousness and reality, you enter a field that is beyond what science can answer.”

— not at all. Quite the contrary. Science shows consciousness is a requirement through double slit, which thus far has not been debunked, despite the best efforts of quantum eraser.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 33 minutes ago

Double Slit already did that. It showed consciousness to be a requirement. Otherwise, ‘matter’ exists infinitely everywhere as a conceptual particle/wave duality. It’s properties as ‘particle’ or ‘wave’ rely on the presence of the observer.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

No. Double Slit is seen as wave when observed by human consciousness. But the real material world is the material screen, which has no consciousness, and it see particles, not waves. Go back to my suggestion: we are the bubbles which composes the foam which are above the ocean waterwaves. The foam is the material universe created by our ancestors (atoms, galaxies). The ocean (infinite consciousness) is the waves, has anything to see with this Universe. You are a man, the bubble, live as a man.

You said that you are God, and Hall knew it. No, you are one of those trillions of bubbles that popped out from God, at the instant of the Big Bang. In the shape of yours ancestors ( quarks, protons, atoms, etc.) you created this Universe full of galaxies. Like the bubbles that pops up from the ocean waterwaves creates the foam. See Matrix/DNA interpretation of an electric-magnetic spectrum of lightwaves, see how the frequencies are the code for life’s cycle and how it produces photons-bubbles.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

XXX

mia wick 49 seconds ago

First a few links, so we know we are bnoth on the same page here ^^^:

dviceDOTcom/archives/2012/10/i­­s-the-universe.php

technologyreviewDOTcom/view/42­­9561/the-measurement-that-wou­l­d-reveal-the-universe-as-a-c­om­puter-simulation/

simulation-argumentDOTcom/simu­­lation.html

arxivDOTorg/abs/1210.1847

philosophynowDOTorg/issues/75/­­The_Simulated_Universe

What you say is entirely possible, buit so are many other things. I prefer to go with what can be shown through science and philosophy !

·in reply to detroitjames2012

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

About this article – I­­s-the-universe a computer simulation? I am astonishing that nobody are considering the most rational alternative, which should be: this universe carries on a reproduction process of what created it (as did by Matrix/DNA). Computation is artificial projection from natural genetics and when we observe an embryogenese process, the shapes of morula, blastula is the same we see as atoms’ nebulae, galaxies, etc. Why the human mindset refuses to hold on the Nature we see here?

·in reply to mia wick(Show the comment)

XXX

TheFallibleFiend 38 seconds ago

There is evidence of abiogenesis. First there was no life on Earth; then there was life. This had to happen somehow and saying “it must be magic” is not science. You’re not a scientist for good reason, Tom – you’re not any good at it.

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

There are ancient wrongs humans concepts that produces these jumps to magical thinking. One is the word “origins” and its common definition. We need fighting this word every time someone uses it. There is no origins of anything. If there were origins, it would means the breaks down of the long natural chain of causes and effects. It is the responsible for wrong separation “life from non-life” when referring to the evolution/mutation of a half-biological/half mechanical into a biological system

Tom Adams 24 minutes ago

sounds like avoidance of origins…

you do realize that what you stated is a corrollary to the original lie voiced by the snake in the Garden of Eden…

is there really room for lies in science?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Tom… could you looking for the theoretical model (Matrix/DNA) of the state of the world minutes before life’s origins? ( Glup… I mean, before the emergency of biological systems?) You will see the exactly picture of Garden of Eden as it was really. You will see the serpent, Adam, Eve, tree, apple, the fall, etc. This picture is recorded into our memory, it comes by flash and if a person doesn’t know astronomy, DNA, thermodynamic systems, he/she will think that it is about a magical world.

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

XXX

detroitjames2012

detroitjames2012 1 hour ago

The laws of Physics and Science break down inside Black Holes and during the Singularity that “Big Bang-ed” to become our universe.

‘Science’ as an ultimate truth of reality is COMPLETELY reliant on the accuracy of that ‘science’ being infinitely pervasive.

Knowing there are areas of space/time in the universe where it is NOT, means it cannot yet be scientifically verified as an ultimate truth, thus it is a FAITH.

If unverified Science = Philosophy; Science = Philosophy

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Are you saying that humans’ theories ( Big Bang, Singularity, etc.) break down the natural chain of causes and effects? Of course, it can’t be in this way. It means our theories are wrong. May you think another way?

At least, The Matrix/DNA Theory, coming from a different pathway, which is analyzing this world from the Biological perspective, other than the Physics perspective, is suggesting other interpretations for “black holes”and “singularity”.

detroitjames2012 14 seconds ago

Obviously they look for mistakes… it’s called “verification”, a requirement to highlight the truth of a theory. You have no way to deny the lack of verification in relation to our understanding of reality, since Science is used to explain (define) our reality, and the nature of what gave rise to substance cannot be explained.

·in reply to mia wick

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The goal of rational inquiry is searching for explanations about the nature of what gave rise to substance. And this is the marvelous force driving human knowledge. When all collected data arrives to a point where we see that our method can not advance towards that goal, we go back, before the time that the current theories were elaborated, putting all data over the table, and calculating others ways for arrangement and connections. From here will arise new theories as new guides, as Matrix/DNA

detroitjames2012 3 minutes ago

There’s a word for that….. faith.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

No. Rational minds does not transform theories into faith. rational minds has fundamental rules to obey, like Godel’s theorem; “nobody can know the final Truth of a system standing inside it, as we are inside this Universe”. Rational minds never forget that our brain is too much limited and small facing this immense world and does not know half of informations on it. That’s why Matrix/DNA does not became faith, it is a theory for being tested against real facts.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Tom…you have not answered my questions: Does yours god believe in evolution? I don’t think he is such illiterate for believing in creationism… Hey, can you phone to your god? Invite him came here taking a human course about design. The modern world need new designs. Humans with a long tail for holding fast food while driving, a third leg for carrying the weight, nose with one hole for saving energy, six fingers in the feet for running fast, etc. I will be grateful if you phone him…

·

XXX

Diego Sheish 2 hours ago

I am a catholic myself, but creationists are just an embarasment for the rest of us christians that want to see the society progress. Please, stop it.

·in reply to Diego Sheish(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

But if you are a catholic you are doing good things and bad things. You are feeding an institution that works as a counterforce to others fundamentalists religions, this is the good thing. The bad thing is that the catholic doctrine works against the right moral which would build the right social system. Nature is showing a purpose here: development of brains for nurturing the embriogenese of consciousness. 95% of humans today are not doing it. The Bible,Kuran, are viruses against this purpose.

·in reply to Diego Sheish(Show the comment)

XXX

Diego Sheish 2 hours ago

There is proof of evolution, ergo, there is proof creationism isn’t real. The human baby passes through all the stages of evolution since it’s inception to it’s birth. The human coxis is a vestigial tail, that can only be explained by evolution, as some babies are born with enlongated coxises that resemble a tail, and they can even move it.

·in reply to Ashley Stahl(Show the comment)
TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Lol… at least someone with a real naturalist Reason! Only theories based in real, observed, known facts by everybody, here and now, can be good guide and source for new discoveries. Other analogy for you: Why Earth has waited billions years before creating a first living cell? Answer: reduces 4.5 billion years to 9 months. Now makes comparison between abiogenesis and embryogenesis. The first cell must be the embryonary shape of fetus. You will see the same process. Nature is only one worker

·in reply to Diego Sheish(Show the comment)

XXX

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

DNAunion- “Direct panspermia proposed natural aliens as the ‘desginers’, no magical superbeings in the sky.”

Matrix/DNA Theory: “Panspermia is wrong when supposes that life had origins on other place, transferring the mystery from here, not solving it. There is no separation between “life and nonliving”, since that everything is natural systems. There is a half-mechanical/half-biologica­l system in the sky (see his picture) that projects itself over planets surfaces making biological systems.

XXX

Alan Clarke 56 minutes ago

@TheHigherVoltage “confirmation bias”

We are all affected by that. No evolutionist wants to think that his belief in universal common ancestry is fundamentally flawed, so he continues in his belief, thinking that evolution works just like the theory predicts. But, being “biased” is not necessarily bad if that bias is based on truth. Scientific theories are not based on truth, but on the best naturalistic explanation available until a better explanation displaces it (which happens often).

·in reply to TheHigherVoltage(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I agree that there is a natural process of evolution acting over diversification of species and I think I know a better explanation about the universal common ancestry than Modern Synthesis has, I know that this common ancestry is not proved yet, I know it will be merely a part of the next best explanation, but, at any moment, there is any kind of faith, beliefs, here. Understanding that we don’t know the final Truth is like the good Science: continuing to search it.

·in reply to Alan Clarke(Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 37 minutes ago

If man, through the application of scientific instruments and criteria, cannot perceive the existence of a thing, he cannot deny its existence simply because it is incompatible with material criteria, unless he disposes of some proof that the thing in question is impossible.

·in reply to ergonomover(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 29 minutes ago

You are pretty tight! That’s why I will sue these people that is telling my lovely, tiny lord Pink Unicorn does not exist because the scientific instruments cannot perceive His existence. Thanks and Pink bless you!

·in reply to 1tabligh

1tabligh 20 minutes ago

The Finiteness of the Chain of Causality!

The materialists may insist obstinately on denying the truth and put forward another specious argument. They may say, “We do not cut off the chain of causality but, on the contrary, perpetuate it indefinitely; we defend the principle of the infinite nature of the causative link.”

So how can great and complex beings emerge from infinite joinings of nonbeing?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“So how can great and complex beings emerge from infinite joinings of nonbeing?”

You are making a wrong separation of the Chain of Causality (complex beings and nonbeings) into two blocks and leaving an abysmal gap between then. The final result of this unappropriated method is that you will need to invent something non-natural for to fulfill this abysm. There is no such things as life and non-life. Biological systems were produced by half-mechanical/half-biologica­l systems. See the sky.

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

1Tabligh, sorry, I think your brain was structured with false informations (as creationism) then, it is hard-wired in a way that denies you make the right reasoning. As human being, you never can say anything definitive about the Chain of Causality. See this right and proved information: Godel’s theorem: “Nobody inside a system can knows the truth about the system”. We are inside the chain of causality, nobody went outside this material universe, so, there are no conclusions about…yet.

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

1tabligh 1 minute ago

To analyze the world of creation in this manner rests on the supposition of a chain of causes and effects and the infinite unfolding of a succession of causes.

However, since each cause is also an effect, it lacks being in its own essence; it is unable to partake of existence apart from the cause superior and precedent to it.

Does life gush forth from the union of the numerous factors that bring about death?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

The analyses of this world must not rests upon any previous supposition. There are no real data here approving any of possibles alternatives reached by a human brain. We don’t know if there is infinite, if there was a beginning, or if there are a third alternative. So, we don’t know about a “cause superior and precedent to it.” But you have the right to do yours own analyse. The right way is putting all known data over the table, doing its connections and elaborating a theory about the gaps.

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

1tabligh 1 minute ago

An essence that lacks life in and of itself cannot be eternal and cannot be the source for life.

If the material world is eternal, it follows that an eternal being should be subject to change and cessation, which is impossible.

Second, if the elements comprising the world are eternal by virtue of their essence, how is it possible that they should enter the embrace of death and disappearance?

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“if the elements comprising the world are eternal by virtue of their essence, how is it possible that they should enter the embrace of death and disappearance?”

You have a real fact here and now suggesting how it is possible. The composition of hardware plus software of your computer. Think about that. They both will embrace death and disappearance.The whole generation of this software and hardware models will disappears. But computers will be here. DNA, brains, universes can be the same…

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

XXX

quest4reason 3 hours ago

any analogy can be either misleading or revealing depending on how its received. am asking would not the theoretical processes of evolution beginning after abiogenesis would have occurred, continue to contradict the law of entropy which overall should be preventing the dna molecules from continuing to increase in coherently organized complexity through time?

·in reply to narco73(Show the comment)
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

There is a rational explanation about why DNA molecules are continuing to increase in complexity. DNA is a chemical/biological system produced by and existing inside other system. This other system is partially described by Newtonian mechanics but it remains in mystery since we does not know the whole system, the Milk Way an effects from relativity, QM. If this creator system is a kind of system more perfect as machine than biological systems, it is reasonable that DNA is still being built.

XXX

TheFallibleFiend 10 minutes ago

Thanks, Bill Nye, for stating this clearly. Creationists keep spewing about “real science,” but they universally convey a cartoon understanding of what science is and how it works. It’s not an accident that their backgrounds in science are very weak – it’s a prerequisite.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

From a naturalist philosopher view point Bill is right and wrong. He is right suggesting that a child driven to read and believe in a mythological book suggesting a world view that has no correspondence with the evidences we see here and now will prejudice the rational development. He is wrong suggesting that Science – as the human fight for search knowledge of natural world – based solely in reductionist method – has proved the Modern Synthesis evolutionary theory. It is not.

XXX

Right. But you will never know how it happened. So how can one build a tower without a base? There is no base to evolution so it is useless to me. You start a story from the beginning not the middle.

mangasleejosh2 in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment) 2 minutes ago

TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Scientists does not arrived to the word “evolution” trying to write a history. They were after the mechanisms and processes responsible by the real existence of these immense variety of species. Their calculations suggested some mechanisms (Variation, Selection, Inheritance, etc.). Then they are testing this mechanism every time a new fossil or a new species are discovered and the theoretical mechanisms fits very well. They are applying these mechanisms in labs and domestic breeds. It works.

XXX

Man invented gods to explain things he could not explain and demons to blame for his own foul ups.

wjpollock 30 minutes ago

Curious thoughts for you: The Bible’s authors wrote what came into their imaginations. This are produced by brains, composed by atoms which are combined and organized by forces from systems more complex than they are. If the calculations from Matrix/DNA models are right, about 10 billion years ago, the most complex natural system was exactly how was metaphorically described in the tale known as “Adam and Even in the Garden Paradise”. It was an astronomical system, made with stars, planets, etc.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to wjpollock (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

ok.. for instance look at the law of entropy, and the difference between how this physical law affects the behavior of living matter vs nonliving matter.

quest4reason in reply to tsub0dai (Show the comment) 18 minutes ago

You need more known informations for building yours interpretations of this world. You are making comparisons between complete organized systems (living matter) with parts, portions, substances (nonliving matter) belonging to other natural systems. It is wrong! Systems must be comparable to systems, parts with parts. If you do the right way you will see that any natural non-biological system (atoms, galaxies) has internal motions, metabolism, homeostasis, etc, all principles of organisms.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to quest4reason (Show the comment) 1 second ago

im sorry you feel that way about life. everything may be made of the same stuff, but there is a difference in how this stuff behaves between living organisms and dead matter.

quest4reason in reply to ColterWasHere 42 minutes ago

Of course there is difference between yours own hands and a hand alone, separated and abandoned on the street. Both hands are made of same stuff but yours hand still is part of a working natural system, the other is not. Why are you making comparisons between working systems (atoms, galaxies, organisms) and dead parts of systems( branches of trees on the soil, dried leaves, etc.) ?!

TheMatrixDNA in reply to quest4reason (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Science should not endorse evolution or creationism. Science questions everything even evolution. Everything we believe today will most likely be classified as junk science just like we view great minds of the past believing the world was flat to be an immutable fact. if someone tells Bill Nye “I don’t believe in evolution” as a scientist, he should say “Well, I disagree but I respect your opinion.” NOT badger and belittle someone for their opinions.

The AverageJoe 18 minutes ago

I don’t agree. If you was an Egyptian 3.000 years ago and one tells: “We are forcing thousands of slaves for building these pyramids because we believe in Ra, the Sun’s God”, which would be yours reaction? Every time religious group dominates governments the Egyptian history is repeated, here and now(temples). I think the goal of this world ( with gods or not) is developing human brains for the best nurturing of this emergence of consciousness. It means:help all humans’ evolution, no slaves.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to The AverageJoe (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

While rational folks here are holding the line against the creatards, the Discovery Channel is feeding them ammunition in the form of “science programming” from the Curiosity series, specifically this piece of incompetent crap – “Mankind Rising”

/watch?v=z2_-h3I_WXQ

Not even one minute in and the narrator says that abiogenesis “defies the laws of probability”. Next they explain the first cell as being the result of lightening forming DNA.

Please let your displeasure be known.

Terncote 12 minutes ago

I will watch the video but before that, The Matrix/DNA models denies their arguments. Same way that we don’t need applying the calculus of probability for to know that a human fecundated ovule will produce a new human being, we don’t need probability when we know the last natural evolved system that produced biological systems ( the entire astronomical state of the world minutes before life’s origins) for to see the evidences that it will produce a biological system. The current Nebular model..

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Terncote (Show the comment) 1 second ago

The current Nebular model in fact can’t explain the forces and elements that produced abiogenesis, but I think this model is wrong. The Matrix models are not proved yet, but, it shows were are those forces and elements. Creationism is theory also, so, it is a fight between theories. About the second argument, Matrix can challenge the creationist argument by changing lightening for the Matrix’s model of light waves coming from Sun and cosmic radiation and its effects upon terrestrial atoms.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

1) Science claims that Earth has been in existence for 4.5 billion years<= such lack of wisdom! Why would Earth have been in existence for so long, just to harbor its ever most important creed of Humans, 4.497.500.000 years later? And why would Humans have existed 2.5 millions years, then only began to do major intelligent things only in the last 1000 years or so? IT DOES NOT EQUATE. Earth is not that aged, and Humans simply did not evolve, period. (read below)

TrueVerdicts 16 minutes ago

People claims that the human fetus has been in existence for six months <= such lack of wisdom! Why would a fetus have been in existence for so long, just to harbor its ever most important shape, the embryo, seven months later? And why would the embryo have existed 2 months, then only coming to light?! IT DOES NOT EQUATE.

True, see the universe composed by galaxies, see the blastula composed by cells. Terrestrial atoms were waiting the time required by Matrix as the embryo for DNA

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

2)

A Bonobo – which resembles a Human more closely than any of the other primates from which (according to science) Human alledgedly came from – is not a Human. What science is seeing are similarities. In the while that primate where having their diverse types of “primate” progenies, there had been an intervention, an occurence which brought around the Human creed to Earth. Such occurence is narrated in diverse historical, cultural accts – which science refuses to accept for fear of being wrong

TrueVerdicts 17 minutes ago

But there others theories suggesting different interventions. Do you back up your theory of aliens intervention on NASA’s astronauts? Daniken collected hundreds of evidences, but the theory stopped, waiting for something else. You don’t have something else, no new historical and cultural acts. Matrix/DNA also has suggested this intervention over humans’brains, but the cause should be hierarchy of systems, as happens in computer evolution by the feed-back between hardware and software. So?

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Science takes the convenient position putting forward numerical claims that not even the mind of their proponents can fathom. Such claim that Earth is 4.5 billion years old is absurd. And that Humans have been around for 2.5 million — but then science turns around and conveniently says that Humans are done evolving! This nonsense is very laughable. So what caused them to be done evolving? Could it be that it’s just a very convenient position to suit their original error that Humans evolved?

TrueVerdicts 25 minutes ago

Ok, I have showed to you that the time of 4,5 billion years and all events in the last 2,5 million years are well supported by Nature when showing the process of embryogenese. Now you ask: So what caused them to be done evolving? The answer is the same. Consciousness is the emergency of the new natural shape of a universal system. Synapses are being modeled and organized to be a natural very complex system. This is other event of embryogenese not in human short time, but in universal long time

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

2) & the funniest thing is when they say ‘oh, these things that are up there, following a constant motion, the planets & moon and all of them.. oh they’re just like that because if you push something it keeps going for ever if not blocked’ — very funny – not demonstrated in real life – & also what set off the original push. Then Einstein tells you “oh, time bends” which is silly, as time does not exist physically. These guys are finished: no proof, no sense, just convenience, it’s very annoying

TrueVerdicts 39 minutes ago

The funniest thing is when people say “oh, these children that are in that house, constant playing around parents sited on the sofa, teenagers and babies and all of them… oh they’re just like that because if you push something it keeps going for ever if not blocked” – very funny, such things does not exists in TrueVerdits real life.

The scene that I see in that house’s nights, is the same I see lifting up my eyes to sky and seeing the evolutionary lineage. Time blends around the family

TheMatrixDNA in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Of course scientists use antropomorphism to explain phenomenon, it’s completely natural for people to attribute a will to what’s hard to explain. There are many religious reasons why there is thunder and lightning, why the sun rises and goes down. But we do not believe in Thor or Helios anymore, because we have evidence of the natural laws. Evolution is a natural law. It governs selection, and favours effectivity, fitness, survival, attractiveness. And would explain all your examples.

Zonkin in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment) 6 hours ago

(…use antropomorphism to explain phenomenon…Evolution is a natural law. It governs selection, and favours effectivity, fitness, survival, attractiveness.”

Not only anthropomorphism, but also, humans beings produces ideas and selects them for justifying their social status, even when they feels predators, feels that are addicts. That’s a sample. Natural selection has discarded fitness, attractiveness, animallist smartness. Where are dinosaurs, lions, eagles, whales? Rats are millions yet

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Zonkin (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Not quite sure I understand you, but yes, ideas might be the next form of evolution. Therefore the term “memes” exist, to describe memetic genes. DNA is nothing more than information that is modified and improved, while bad versions dissapear. We have seen many religious ideas dissapear, but there seem to be a few that still cling to life.

Zonkin in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment) 36 minutes ago

I am suggesting that the Darwinian mechanisms (Variation,Selection, Inheritance) can be a dangerous thing for atheists here. I think that atheists here are intellectuals, idealists that wish the better future for our next generations. And creationism is not, they approve murderers, corrupts governments, slavery, etc. But, some dictators has used wrong concepts from Darwinism for justifying their actions. Then we need explain, for instance: NS has discarded force, machiavellism, smartness, etc.

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Zonkin (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

@emfederin “There are no arguments for ID until you can show that a D exists”

Evolutionists know design when they see it:

“The adenovirus is a masterpiece of design. Each one has a single aim to breach a cell’s defenses and reach the nucleus.” – BBC “Our Secret Universe… the Cell”

“[The mammalian blood clotting system is] a powerful real-time distributed computing system.” – James Shapiro

“The world of the evolutionist is drenched in the anthropomorphism of intention.” – Michael Ruse

Alan Clarke in reply to emfederin (Show the comment) 7 hours ago

“The adenovirus is a masterpiece of design. Each one has a aim to breach a cell’s defenses and reach the nucleus.”

We agree with the theory that adenovirus must be product of previous design. A bunch of atoms could not perform all that tasks. But we have different theories about the cause of that design. Yours is ID. Mine is Matrix/DNA. The Matrix models are suggesting that virus are packets of informations from Matrix formula Function 5, which is comets in sky and RNA in cells. Show ID model

TheMatrixDNA in reply to Alan Clarke – 1:52 pm – Dec – 05 – 2012

XXXXXXXXX

GOOD INFORMATIONS:

icook1723 1 hour ago

Yes, and evolution computer algorithms clearly show that, “in theory” given a population of randomly replicating replicators and a non-random survival search input, you can achieve results that look like design.

I use such algorithms to generate protein-ligand models that are used as a basis of drug engineering. The program uses “randomness” to search the space of possible solutions to identify the best one. These models are subsequently validated by experimentation.

The input is a randomly generated initial population (100), a scoring function, and a mutation rate that will insert random mutations that are not present in the parents. The program then ranks generation zero, and the bottom 50 are “killed”, the top 50 are randomly mated to create 50 new solution. Novel mutants are inserted into these new solutions (3 per generation) and they are scored and ranked with the parents. Repeat this process 2500 generation, and you get clusters of possible solutions.

xxxx

Jesus?We know that Julius Caesar existed because there are documents,including those written by Caesar himself,to prove it.The period of Jesus’ life is one of the best documented eras in the ancient world.The Romans were obsessive historians. They wrote down everything. If there had been a “miracle man” wandering around the empire walking on water or raising the dead, you may rest assured we’d have documented evidence of it.Nothing of substance exists. Nothing.Not a shred of worthwhile evidence

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Boa Filosofia:

billymodo 3 hours ago

OK Bill… In a couple of centuries when our understanding is such that religious belief is gone… What then?

To wake up each day knowing with unyielding certainty that this is going to be one more day in a finite number of days and then that’s it…. Nothing for ever and ever!

Why on Earth would nature give me any sense of self if not to be selfish? Why explore stars that no one will ever visit? Why give my precious and finite moments to anything other than my immediate, self interest?

Pierre Marcotte 2 hours ago

Why fill your need of sense with an imaginary friend ? Why suppose that this immense universe was put here just for you ? Why think that a supreme being would have a child with a measly human, have it suffer, and then die ?

Nature (or life, whatever) does not owe you a meaning or a sense of fulfillment. We are here for a limited amount of time, it’s up to you to use that time as best you can, according to your own values. You don’t *find* the meaning of life; You make it.

·in reply to billymodo(Show the comment)

billymodo 1 hour ago

A. You have proved that your understanding is limited in all but your own Eyes. It took a little boy who was ignorant of the knowledge of the Kings invisible clothes to state the glaringly obvious… That the King was naked!

Perhaps you’re too smart to see what is right in front of you! Knowledge without understanding.

B. My nature is to kill you and any one who has stuff I want to take for myself. Nature is utterly selfish. Nature has no conscience. Nature doesn’t judge, It’s just Dog eat Dog!

MrGralgrathor 1 hour ago

“My nature is to kill you and any one who has stuff I want to take for myself.”

Really? Thankfully there’s few like you. Most people are rather good-natured, and hardly think about killing people at all. It’s the neighbourly way to live.

Seriously, if you think you’re really a psychopath, go seek help.

·in reply to billymodo(Show the comment)

DarwinsFriend 2 hours ago

> OK Bill… In a couple of centuries when our understanding is such that religious belief is gone… What then? <

Without religion – would there be more or less deaths caused by “My God is the One True God” conflicts? And with the separatism that was allowed to and encouraged to flourish for 400 centuries abandoned, would the world be a worse place to inhabit?

·in reply to billymodo(Show the comment)
XXXXXXXXXX

Estranha Informação sôbre Charles Darwin:

billymodo 33 minutes ago

I love the idea of “Darwins Freind” preaching this way when Historically anyone with anything to do with the Dunce Darwin turned out to be a mass murderer, Francis Galton (CD’s Cousin) introduced social Darwinism and an international Eugenics program. His Student Eugen Fischer ran the First German Death camp when Hitler was only six. Later he designed the Nazi death camps after perfecting Cyclon B on 15,000 mental patients. Galton’s friend Margret Sanger (planned parenthood) Sterilized millions

To this day you’ll find no one who has actually read Darwins seminal work but if they did they would discover that it was NOT a book about evolution. It was a book about Malthusian Eugenics or how to breed a better Human. The title gives it away “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”.

Albert Binet developed IQ tests which were introduced into the US in 1906 and started the massive sterilizations of the subnormal!

·in reply to matchlockfun(Show the comment)

McAfee: Milionário e Acadêmico com Harem de Sete Mulheres em Mansão de Belize Envolvido em Assassinato

quinta-feira, dezembro 6th, 2012
McAfee e a espetacular visão da praia desde sua propriedade em Belize

McAfee e a espetacular visão da praia desde sua propriedade em Belize

A noticia tornou-se as principais manchetes porque é bizarra e envolve um multi-milionario famoso. As poucas informações no noticiario não me autorizam a deduzir conclusões, porem são indicativas de como êste moderno sistema social e a cultura acadêmica está produzindo inimigos da Humanidade. Um profissional, ” expert” no mundo da computação, desenvolveu um programa anti-virus ( o McAfee), vendeu muito, arrecadou milhões, tornando-se mais um moderno milionario. As noticias agora informam que êle, com 64 anos,  tem uma mansão com esplendida vista para o mar (veja foto/vídeo abaixo) no paraiso chamado Belize, vive ali com sete namoradas (sim, sete, um verdadeiro harem!) cujas idades vai dos 19 aos 23 anos. Um idoso com um harem de jovens, uma para cada dia da semana. Em seu quintal tinha 11 cachorros, grandes, de raça assasssina. Moradores locais disseram que em Abril, a policia do pequeno país da América Central fêz uma busca de apreensão na casa do milionario em busca de armas e drogas. Encontraram ambas mas as armas eram legais e as drogas tambem, pelas leis do país. Dizem que o milionario tinha aquelas drogas que funcionavam como Viagra para mulheres.  Se isso for verdade penso que significa que ele gostava de deixar as mulheres “taradas”… para animar um velho de 64 anos deseperado por prazeres carnais.  E isto indica que um homem viveu a vida apenas materialmente sem ter desenvolvido a sua mente, para o lado da religiosidade cósmica, pois quem faz isso, quando chega na velhice despreza estes instintos animalescos, concentrado que está em suas sempre crescentes necessidades intelectuais. Que tipo de educação êste milionario recebeu da familia e das escolas? Um tipo que mantem e realça o animalismo materialista.

( Links para as noticias: http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/18/world/americas/belize-mcafee-enclave/index.html?iid=article_sidebar

http://www.cnn.com/2012/12/06/world/americas/mcafee-arrest/?hpt=hp_t2

Acontece que na mansão vizinha morava outro milionario, enriquecido no setor de construtoras, Mr. Greg Faull, os dois vizinhos viviam discutindo porque o Sr.  Faull reclamava dos fortes latidos e presença de cães perigosos. Então a poucos dias atrás apareceram 4 cachorros babando, se contorcendo, por envenenamento. O Mr. McAfee pegou um revolver e atirou na cabeça de cada cão, “para minimizar o sofrimento dêles”. Mr. McAffe avisou a policia do envenenamento. Em seguida o Sr Faull foi encontrado morto, baleado, dentro de sua casa. O Sr. McAffee foi viajar sem deixar endereço com as namoradas, mas agora foi descoberto que ele entrou na Guatemala escondido, ilegalmente,  e estava na casa de parentes de uma de suas namoradas. Mesmo sendo procurado pela policia para responder perguntas sobre a morte do vizinho, Mr.McAfee continuou ativo pondo mensagens em seu blog, dizendo por exemplo que havia saído da casa porque não queria ser molestado pela policia de Belize e que essa policia havia requerido propina para deixa-lo livre ( talvez tenham encontrado drogas e armas ilegais quando lé estiveram? Em se tratando de policia do terceiro mundo isso não seria surpresa…), enquanto afirma que ele nada sabe da morte do vizinho.

Aí está um resumo apressado do que lí, mas o que me interessa aqui é que essa história revela um mundo que pouco conhecemos, o mundo dos milionarios e formados nas grandes universidades do primeiro mundo, e como se comportam, o que eles tem em sua cabeça, quais os seus valores morais, humanos, etc. Estas revelações serão então comparadas com o tipo de milionario que a cosmovisão sugere como ideal para a Humanidade. E por outro lado, a cosmovisão sugere como seria o tipo de povo ideal que saberia como tratar estes milionarios, de acordo com seus comportamentos. Infelizmente, aqui, nêste caso, tanto o milionario quanto o resto do mundo, ou seja, todo e qualquer outro ser humano, seja rico, pobre ou branco, desde que todos tem responsabilidade no resultado final que é o estado atual da Humanidade, todos, estão errados, inclusive eu quando não assumo uma atitude mais radical contra todos os errados. E assim  deduzo pesaroso que desse jeito nada nos salvará de dias piores no futuro, uma péssima herança que deixaremos para nossas próximas gerações.

Um homem que mantem um cão raivoso em casa é inimigo da Humanidade, porque o cão pode ferir ou matar alguem. Não aceito nenhuma justificativa: tudo o que seja ameaça para qualquer ser humano não pode existir entre humanos. O argumento usual aqui é que, sendo uma casa rica, é visada por bandidos, e os cães servem para proteger os moradores. Mas se existem bandidos que agridem por dinheiro é porque existem pobres abaixo do nivel de classe média, e se existe pessoas abaixo do nivel de classe média está totalmente errado quem desperdiça recursos naturais e energia do trabalho humano com os supérfluos visiveis em uma mansão. Vejo este milionario como um predador e os bandidos como filhos de ovelhas passivas, que mutaram e não querem ser mais ovelhas, querem ser predadores tambem. Entao é cobra engolindo cobra. Que se engulam uns aos outros, o meu dinheiro é que não permito seja gasto para pagar salarios de homens armados e fardados como policias para proteger um predador. That’s it. Portanto todos nós temos que reunir, debater e encontrar uma maneira de mudar a administração da policia que é paga com nosso dinheiro. Se 6estes milionarios querem serem protegidos, que pageum seus seguranças. E a outra coisa que temos de atuar é denunciar na policia e exigir que seja retirado qualquer cão perigoso em qualquer residência urbana.

Outro fator negativo e revoltante é “as sete namoradas do Sr. McAfee”. Se um homem tem sete mulheres, vai deixar seis homens sem mulheres. Claro. A espécie sempre foi dividida mais ou menos no meio, metade homens, metade mulheres. Ou é um para cada um, ou ninguem para ninguem, não existe casamento e familia nuclear. That’s it. Se voce acha que estou erradoe  é homem, então, por favor, esteja a vontade, assuma seu cargo de homem sem mulher nenhuma. E se é nulher dizendo que estou errado, então por fasvor, pegue sua trouxa, vá ser concubina de um milionario, mas sabendo que só vai ser aceita lé enquanto for jovem e bonita. E depois quando sair de mão abanando, mais velha, sem atrativos fisicos, sem uma profissão bem remunerada e util à sociedade, não venha cá fora pedir ajuda a ninguem, principalmente a homens, a quem desprezastes quando tinhas algo para oferecer.

E o que dizer destas sete mulheres? Pistoleiras, corruptas. Claro que nenhuma mulher de 19 anos iria escol.her um velho de 64 anos por amor.  Mas porque existem mulheres que fazem isso? Pobreza. Nasceram de pais pobres, cujo motivos de pobreza inclue o mau comportamento de milionarios ao desviarem um dinheiro que deveria ir para o justo pagamento do trabalho dos pais delas para adornar suas mansões com supérfluos. baixos salarios, continuidade da escravidão, e o dinheiro daí expropriado vampiricamente vai para poços sem fundo da gula animalesca. Tudo errado. E os pais pobres são super errados porque geraram filhos sem ter as condições financeiras necessarias para tal, portanto são até piores que assassinos, pois é melhor para um ser humano não nascer do que nascer fadado a ser escravo. Ao menos duas das namoradas vieram da América Latina, que está sendo um curral de geração de escravos para o primeiro mundo, principalmente porque as igrejas evangélicas e católicas incentivam esta procriação sem aplicar os recursos cientificos.  Todos errados. O animalismo ainda é a psicologia que impera na cabeça dos humanos e os dirige em seus comportamentos prejudiciais aos próprios humanos impedindo o esforços  em se construir a Humanidade ideal para todos.

Mas ainda o que muito entristece é constatar que o Sr. McAfee foi educado por uma universidade moderna. Um homem que prefere, que gosta mais, de animais raivosos que humanos. Que pega uma arma e atira na cabeça de cães. Que desperdiça economia da Humanidade em supérfluos. Que termina a vida vivendo como nababo, louco para aproveitar todos os prazeres anumalescos antes de morrer. Isto quer dizer que ele nem considera as religiões como a cristã, que claramente prega que exista vida após a morte, que exista inferno, e que êsse comportamento conduz uma pessoa ao inferno. Isso quer dizer que a educação na universidade produz essa mentalidade, a qual me parece outro tipo de religião, denominada “ateísmo”. Me parece que essa mentalidade tambem é construida pelos valores equivocados que pessoas animalizadas extraem da teoria darwinista da evoução, que reina nas universidades. Sou contra êsse tipo de educação. Não que eu seja a favor das baboseiras pregadas pelas religiões sem evidencias, não que eu tenha certeza se existe ou não vida após a morte, e não porque eu tenho certeza que não existe inferno. E não que eu ponha em duvida o processo natural da evolução. Sou contra porque elegí como cosmovisão de mundo mais aceitável a cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA e ela sugere que:

” A pura observação do mundo – e nêle, da Humanidade – aqui e agora, nos transmite a idéia que a Natureza, e seu processo de evolução, está no caminho de desenvolver o cérebro humano para que este seja um instrumento ideal para então desenvolver  a forma que está emergindo agora, a auto-consciencia. A Matrix/DNA sugere que esta biosfera e os humanos são produtos do caos que foi produzido pela degeneração entrópica do sistema natural onde a biosfera e nós emergimos, e dentro do qual existimos: esta galaxia. E esta galaxia é um sistema fechado em si mesmo. Isto significa que o sistema optou pelo caminho do egocêntrico do extremo egoismo. E sendo nossa ancestral, dela herdamos esse egoismo na forma dos genes egoistas. Mas desse caos houve uma mutação e surgimos como sistemas abertos, o que é uma oportunidade para corrigir a falha original, o pecado que derrubou do céu a nossa ancestral fazendo-a rastejar aqui na Terra como formas vivas. Essa oportunidade de correção consiste em fazer com que o grande pecado seja dividido em 7 bilhões de frações, de pequeninos pecados, para que cada um veja nos outros os 6 e tantos bilhões de fraçies do pecado original, os quais de alguma maneira o vão agredir, e assim ele aprende a detesta-los e em fazendo isso, ele aprende o mal que é o grande pecado que ele traz em si mesmo. No final dos conflitos, lutas e guerras entre entes 7 bilhões de pecados, resultará a cura total, um ser unico que detesta este tipo de pecado, o de ser sistema fechado em si mesmo, isolando-se do mundo após abocanhar tudo o que puder para si e viver eternamente no seu paraíso cercado, tornando-se assim uma porta fechada para a evolução, estancando a evolução nessa forma humana, quie é provisória. E isto impediria a transcendencia para a próxima forma. A qual deve ser uma forma mais conciência, mais energia, mais luz, que ôsso e carne, e deverá surgir depurada do pecado dos nossos ancestrais astronomicos. Enfim, o meu objetivo que é extraído desta cosmovisão, é o mesmo objetivo da Natureza, ou até mesmo de algum deus que por trás dela se esconda. Meu objetivo é trabalhar e atuar duro mas sem acreditar nessa cosmovisão de um simples  humano, pois acreditar é a base dos radicalismos, fundamentalismos, dos desejos de impor suas ideologias sôbre outros. trabalhar e atuar socialmente para ajudar o nascimento da auto-consciencia depurada do egoísmo. Sispeito que se conseguir-mos isso, nas seguintes gerações, tõda a Humanidade será mais feliz, sem excessão de raça, côr, classe social, religião, ideologia, etc.

E esta noticia apenas relembra que tenho muito trabalho pela frente.