Archive for dezembro 10th, 2012

Aplicando os Modêlos da Matrix/DNA para Obter Resultados Lucrativos: Scoring Functions, Computer Simulations for Drugs Search

segunda-feira, dezembro 10th, 2012

Importantissimo novo canal aberto para a Matrix/DNA pesquisar e tentar obter resultados reais aqui e agora!

Tudo começou ao ler o seguinte debate:

detroitjames2012 1 hour ago

Creationism/ Intelligent Design is not the proof of the bible, or odin, or krisha, or anything else. It is the understanding of recognizing design when it is present. Physics allow for clay to self assemble into a statue of Einstein, but if I walk past a statue of Einstein I don’t say “there’s no proof it was intelligently designed. Physics clearly allow for it to happen on it’s own”. I don’t suspend belief in the same logic and reason that allow me to navigate reality because the topic is ID.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

icook1723 1 hour ago

Yes, and evolution computer algorithms clearly show that, “in theory” given a population of randomly replicating replicators and a non-random survival search input, you can achieve results that look like design.

I use such algorithms to generate protein-ligand models that are used as a basis of drug engineering. The program uses “randomness” to search the space of possible solutions to identify the best one. These models are subsequently validated by experimentation.

·in reply to detroitjames2012

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s very good new information for my personal studies. Could you be more detailed, please? I know I must type yours words doing a Google search, but any direct link will save my time. If I understood it, the key of this method is the “non-random survival model”. How do you has detected the survival search model for molecules, as proteins?! By other hand, I think that Matrix/DNA model of perfect closed systems must be the survival model applied by atoms/molecules (thermodynamic equilibrium)

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 48 minutes ago

Nobody is denying the existence of your computer or it’s power to process algorithms. I’m denying your claim of knowing the existence of ‘randomy replicating replicators’ without your consciousness, since randomly replicating replicators cannot randomly replicate resulting in any definable reality without an intervening consciousness to assert it. There would be merely a realm of ‘infinite everything that’s ever possible’ including the idea of randomness and replication.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

My friend! What happens when a first single cell, resulting from the fusion of spermatozoon and ovule, becomes a replicating replicator, making billions of copies, each one different from all others? What is the difference between this scene you can see here and now with the hypothetical scene calculated as abiogenesis, where the results of such replications are supposed to be randomly? But… how are you seeing a mother giraffe (previous design) applying consciousness for her ovule doing that?

icook1723 32 minutes ago

The input is a randomly generated initial population (100), a scoring function, and a mutation rate that will insert random mutations that are not present in the parents. The program then ranks generation zero, and the bottom 50 are “killed”, the top 50 are randomly mated to create 50 new solution. Novel mutants are inserted into these new solutions (3 per generation) and they are scored and ranked with the parents. Repeat this process 2500 generation, and you get clusters of possible solutions.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s great! Labs could save billions dollars, years time if discovers Matrix/DNA models. It is explained by an analogy. Aliens intelligence were observing an Islamic country, trying to understand the behavior, the forces driven those people as organized group. They had hard time because the matter of humans bodies are composed by atoms and cells which has different set of tendencies. Everything were finally explained when they knew about a book, Koran. The Matrix is the book driven proteins

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 2 minutes ago

I don’t know how else to say it You have to zoom out. Zoom out so far that you aren’t even holding the damn camera anymore.

“Scoring functions”, “initial populations”, and the mere idea of “random” are definitions of a reality which cannot exist without a consciousness to determine the nature of such concepts.

The fact that you are creating ‘rules of the universe’ by allowing IDEAS even to exist inherently mean you are playing god by allowing your consciousness to determine definitions.

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

detroitjames2012 45 minutes ago

… and if such a realm exists to hold the idea of ‘randomness’ and ‘replication’ in the absence of consciousness, it forces us to retreat to the perspective of viewing the ‘universe’ from a birds-eye view capable of understanding it in it’s entirety… what would that make us?

·in reply to icook1723(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 2 seconds ago

Ok. Detroit is an observer seeing theoretically the relations between consciousness and its productions called “humans concepts”, as “randomness”, “replication”, “scoring functions”, etc. And Icook is an practical observer in a lab seeing proteins, “drugs”, etc. The debate has common denominators, they are the words: randomness, replication, initial population, etc. For Detroit the first cause is consciousness, for Icook, it is matter. Anyone could analyze the debate suggesting a solution?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
INICIANDO A PESQUISA:
Primeiro, saber o que é “scoring function”:
WIKIPEDIA:

Scoring functions for docking

In the fields of computational chemistry and molecular modellingscoring functions are fast approximate mathematical methods used to predict the strength of the non-covalent

(A noncovalent bond is a type of chemical bond, typically between macromolecules, that does not involve the sharing of pairs of electrons, but rather involves more dispersed variations of electromagnetic interactions. The noncovalent bond is the dominant type of bond between supermolecules in supermolecular chemistry.[1] Noncovalent bonds are critical in maintaining the three-dimensional structure of large molecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, and are involved in many biological processes in which large molecules bind specifically but transiently to one another. The energy released in the formation of noncovalent bonds is on the order of 1-5 kcal per mol.[2] There are four commonly mentioned types of non-covalent interactions: hydrogen bondsionic bondsvan der Waals forces, and hydrophobic interactions.[2] The noncovalent interactions hold together the two strands of DNA in the double helix, stabilize secondary and tertiary structures of proteins, and enable enzymesubstrate binding and antibodyantigen association. Ver resto )

interaction (also referred to as binding affinity), between two molecules after they have been docked.

(In the field of molecular modelingdocking is a method which predicts the preferred orientation of one molecule to a second when bound to each other to form a stable complex.[1]Knowledge of the preferred orientation in turn may be used to predict the strength of association or binding affinity between two molecules using for example scoring functions. Ver resto)

Most commonly one of the molecules is a small organic compound such as a drug and the second is the drug’s biological target such as a protein receptor.[1] Scoring functions have also been developed to predict the strength of other types of intermolecular interactions, for example between two proteins[2] or between protein and DNA.[3]

Ninguem me “Cutuca” No Maior Debate da História que Está Acontecendo Agora No Youtube? Brasileiros! Tucuta-me…please! (9)

segunda-feira, dezembro 10th, 2012

POSTS DA MATRIX/DNA PARA ABERTURA DE DISCUSSÕES

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Where the Bible’s authors got the idea of Adam and Even from? In the beginning of this Universe there were quantum vortexes, spin left and right. Two vortex = phenotype= symmetry. Two spins=variables of genotype= asymmetric. These vortex was fragments, bits-information from the system ex-machine=genes. Today we have human male and female= same specie=symmetry. With opposite tendencies= asymmetry. The ancients had fresh memories about non-living times when ours ancestors built the galaxies.

XXX

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I have a question to evolutionists:

This night I was reading about light, electric magnetic spectrum and so on. I think the deepest foundations of this material world is like an ocean of lightwaves still propagating from the pulsation that began with Big Bang. Instead of luminous light we see the deep darkness because it blind us. Matter is this condensed light becoming particles. So, the world is all white, bodies are unseen. We see it colored. Is it not an evidence of intelligent design? 5:51 PM – Dec – 18

XXX

Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

A suggestion to Bill Nye: “All human beings still are blind facing the mysteries of existence. All beliefs, all amount of evidences, are still changing, they are merely temporary. So, don’t be the blind man that lies to others that you can see and you knows the right pathway. As you are blind, you could drive they to fall into the holes of this journey. Let the doubt be taught to the children, ID is not plausible facing the evidences now, but it maintains the challenge to blind evolution. 6:00 PM – Dec. – 16 – 2012

Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Humans and apes are two products of “creation” not understood by evolutionists and two products of “evolution” not understood by creationists. In blastula, billions of cells “evolve” and differentiate to form different organs, all directed by a prior reproductive plan to “create” a new organism. Likewise all the different lifeforms are being directed to form different parts of a new machine, a biosphere that will be the reproduction of this astronomical machine. We need save our mind. 8:37 AM – DEC – 17


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

INICIO DOS DEBATES

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Edmond Goo 6 days ago

No one knows what the mechanism for evolution is.

I’m sorry but that is the truth.

You can ask scientists, Creationists, and evolutionists and no one will be able to tell you the mechanism for evolution unless it’s “mutation” (a laugh riot). Even evolutionist data disproves mutation as an engine of anything unless it’s extreme defects like two human heads or lungs born outside the body.

Evolution has no center and no mechanism.

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)


1-We can describe all mechanisms composing the natural process of evolution. The evolution from a state of the world where the most complex system where galaxies for cells system, comprising the period of abiogenesis. Not the modern galaxies but the original galaxy grew in an environment containing only gaseous and solid state of matter. With six kinds of pieces (organs) built by six universal systemic functions and more one piece responsible for replication (see picture at Matrix/DNA) this (cont)

2-system reached the supreme goal of matter: mass in inertial equilibrium and energy in accelerated motion under thermodynamic equilibrium. A perfect machine, a kind of motor perpetuum. Attacked by entropy the peripheral mass/energy fails internally by degradation/radiation towards the nucleus.  But in their way there are bodies as planets. The mass can be added to planets’ matter (will be catalysts), and arrives the decayed photons which  penetrates the atoms. These photons were trained (cont)

3-as components of a machine and like virus they try to driven atoms towards connections that mimics the galactic configuration. But now the environment is different because appeared the third state of matter, the liquid, chemistry, so, will be there a severe mutation. Connected photons inside different atoms gets new arrangements of matter, called organic. Carbon is chosen as central atom because its atomic number of each particle, 6, is the most exactly copy of that galactic system. (cont

4-Composing aminoacids which are sequential slices (20)/functions of the systemic circuit and making then expressing different functions we get proteins/enzymes. At same time another group of photons are getting completes copies of the celestial system, which are called “nucleotides”. Other group of photons coming from stellar radiation located at the nest of stars around the nucleus driven atoms to build vesicles (the central black holes) and membranes (event of horizon).(cont)

5-When these groups meets they increase the sequences and reproduces the left side of the face of galactic system, called RNA. Made the left and using the seventh function ( n.5, replication) they built its own right face, DNA. A unique body, molecule, under the process of life cycle gets different shapes which are the organelles. Finally you have the first cell system. Now you can extract from here the seven mechanisms, the whoole process, which is far more complex than Darwinian theory.

XXX

DNAunion 2 hours ago

Actually, the Bible tells us that the serpent told the truth and that god lied.

God said that the day they ate the fruit they would die; the serpent said they surely would not. They ate the fruit and the didn’t die that day.

Serpent: 1

God: 0

·  in reply to DETigers2012 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 37 minutes ago

In the mind of ancient ascetics, there were flashes produced by scenes registered into their DNA at the center of their neurons. Scenes of obscures bodies as spheres, cones, vortexes connected by a perfect energetic circuit. Suddenly, the scenes shows the system falling apart, being fragmented and its bits lifting up as human beings. It were scenes about an unknown world but surely floating in the sky. The whole insertion of god and talking serpents were the results searching explanations.

·  in reply to DNAunion (Show the comment)

DNAunion 2 minutes ago

Fuck off, sock puppet asshole troll.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You said: “Actually, the Bible tells us that the serpent told the truth and that god lied. Serpent: 1

God: 0 ”

Instead acting like you, wasting your time reading a mythological book, for denying it based on reading another opposite interpretations, I am wasting my time trying to do my own connection of real known data. And I am discovering a real world totally strange for you, as it is also for creationists. Ok, ours time are ours times and everyone has the right to chose how waste it.

·  in reply to DNAunion (Show the comment)

XXX

Alan Clarke 1 week ago

@Martin Koch “you have an assertion that can’t possibly be tested”

We both have to make assertions for a starting point. I start with a fully-formed Adam. You start with a rock. In my model, Adam’s descendents slowly degrade. In your model, a very genetically-anemic rock becomes alive (minerals mix in a primordial soup & get struck by a lightning bolt) and lots of mutations accumulate until people appear. We can’t recreate Adam in a laboratory but neither can you duplicate abiogenesis.

·  in reply to Martin Koch (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

There is a third assertion suggesting rational models about the “body of Adam” – without supernatural ingredients – and the model of lightwaves that drove abiogenesis without randomness. It is called “Matrix/DNA Theory” and the models are scientifically testable. Yes, a little bit of more natural knowledge, the corrections of our current astronomical/cosmological models and we will be able to recreate “yours Adam” and duplicate abiogenesis in the lab.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

XXX

DNAunion 1 hour ago

Actually, the Bible tells us that the serpent told the truth and that god lied.

God said that the day they ate the fruit they would die; the serpent said they surely would not. They ate the fruit and the didn’t die that day.

Serpent: 1

God: 0

·  in reply to DETigers2012 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

In the mind of ancient ascetics, there were flashes produced by scenes registered into their DNA at the center of their neurons. Scenes of obscures bodies as spheres, cones, vortexes connected by a perfect energetic circuit. Suddenly, the scenes shows the system falling apart, being fragmented and its bits lifting up as human beings. It were scenes about an unknown world but surely floating in the sky. The whole insertion of god and talking serpents were the results searching explanations.

·  in reply to DNAunion (Show the comment)

XXX

DETigers2012 53 minutes ago

Eve fell into temptation when Satan told her that eating from the tree of life would make her like God, obviously it was a lie

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Is this myth the imaginative explanation for the bad design of actual human existence at this chaotic biosphere? Accordingly with modern cosmological models about the state of the world moments before life’s origins, the myth is surprisingly right! Symbols, metaphors, describing a system more complex than Newtonian celestial mechanics! Eve and Adam were the dual symmetric flow of energy/information composing the systemic circuit of the most evolved astronomical system and ancestors of (cont)

chromossomes X and Y (see the picture at Matrix/DNA Theory). Satan is the symbol for closed systems, which is the supreme expression of selfishness because a closed system cut relations with the world and stops evolution. Tree is the same shape of that galactic system: the trunk is the central axis, the blanches are the spirals, the fruits are the stars pending at the arms, etc. The insect societies mimics very well the astronomical system, with the Queen as the ruler and its tendency is (cont.)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

the same we can see as supreme goal of any woman: having the best palace, husband and children= perfect closed system. While the male tendency (Adam) is to be a open system, our celestial ancestor was ruled by the female counterpart, the “paradise” was built by Eve. The serpent swalling its own tail is the exactly picture of a closed system’s circuit. But, if this system dreamed to be eternal, there was the entropic force and so, the Fall, and then, we are here just now. No gods, no magics

·  in reply to TheMatrixDNA (Show the comment)

XXXXXXX

1tabligh 6 days ago

Mechanics tells us that a motionless body is always motionless *unless* it becomes subject to a force *external* to itself. This law represents an inviolable principle in our material world, and we *cannot*, therefore, believe in a theory of probability *or* accident.

·  in reply to g24417 (Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are doing everything wrong. If Mechanics theorists says the word “body” they make a mistake because there is great difference between inertial mass, as matter, and body as a system. Any system has internal force and can do motions, at least, internal motions. And then, they are passive of accidents.

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

Alan Clarke 50 minutes ago

@Martin Koch “No I don’t [start with a rock]. Strawman.”

What do you start with? Hydrogen gas?

“Hydrogen is a light, odorless gas, which, given enough time, turns into people.” – Edward R. Harrison, British astronomer & cosmologist, Smithsonian Magazine, Dec. 1995

·  in reply to Martin Koch (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Harrison is a cosmologist, astronomer. Our current field of astronomy/cosmology is at the same stage that were the Greek philosophers who believed on spontaneous generation. After the Big Bang there was light, waves of light. The electric-magnetic spectrum of light shows seven different frequencies, from gamma-ray to radio. The intensity/period of vibrations varies in the same way that varies the energy of a human body. Every frequency has a human shape, beginning with gamma-ray=baby.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

The function of hydrogen is being “bridges” like the United Nations Organization is the bridge among countries. We can extract energy from hydrogen like we could extracting the money of UNO, if dissolving it. Cosmological Evolution have worked step by step obeying a universal natural formula, like the evolution at embryogenesis is worked by a formula, the DNA. The best atom that mimics the universal formula is Carbon 6, it has all six universal functions of that universal formula.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

XXX

GoodScienceForYou 2 minutes ago

After reading over 30,000+ articles on DNA and genetics, there has never been found even one verifiable positive mutation in humans. There are approximately 40,000 (min) deleterious mutations that make us the weak sickly and stupid people we are today. I am angry at the ancestors who fucked up (literally) our fantastic DNA. True evil promotes genetic diseases from viral infections of the fetus. That is how we got this way.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

ouis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

The fantastic DNA of Adam/Eve. A whole life eternally, forever, determined to live as stupid, totally absent mind, playing as children in a garden. No electricity, no Internet, no Mr. Bean. Accordingly to theoretical models about the natural system ancestor of the first cell system, the ancestor of biological DNA was really fantastic, the most perfect machine made with matter. If there wasn’t entropy, that ancestor should be an eternal perpetual motor. But the principles of mind were imprisoned

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“True evil promotes genetic diseases from viral infections of the fetus.”

Viruses are organic slices of the whole energetic flow of information flowing inside the astronomical ancestor of DNA. They are the slice corresponding to the universal function number 5. At the sky, this function is performed by comets, at cell level, it is performed by RNAm. At nuclear atomic level, it is the particle “pion” that flows between neutron and proton. The evil is ignoring its roots not fighting the causes.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“I am angry at the ancestors who fucked up (literally) our fantastic DNA.”

Yes, in fact they did it. The DNA was fantastic… for stupid minds, not for the mind that needs expansion. At 4 billions years ago, the whole ancestor of biological DNA could be nannotecnologyzed, reduced, to fit entire inside a microscope nucleotide. Few informations, but the most perfect machine ever. Meanwhile, the non-loving ancestors of chromosomes X and Y ( which should be Adam/Eve) were living their “paradise”.

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“never found even one verifiable positive mutation in humans”.

That’s the right way by which evolution works. Nature didn’t make mammals from the most evolved reptile -dinosaurs – but she went back in time, contracting space, for to find the tiny smaller cynodont, and from here evolution lifted up again. Evolution is curve, not linear. Same way Nature did not selected the gorilla for transcendence to human specie. Gorilla was the exactly biological copy of Newtonian machine = wrong way

·  in reply to GoodScienceForYou (Show the comment)

XXX

PureLoveEnergy 6 minutes ago

in all reality though regardless if you BELIEVE if god is the creator or not? heres a fact that we DO KNOW…..YOU ARE A CREATOR, you have the ability to create any kind of life you want, your choices and thoughts create your life…we all have the ability to create any kind of planet to live on…we have chose to destroy this earth, to destroy each other and destroy ourselves..i want to create a world that things are abundant and beneficial to everyone instead, i want to evolve in this way

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You are away off the beam, so, don’t be furious when people here call you “hippie” or “new age”. No, I don’t know that I am a creator and never have saw someone making a “creation”. We did not created any life, nobody had created planets and nobody chose to destroy this planet. If you want to be beneficial to everyone, you need be wise, and the unique method for getting wisdom is observing Nature and learning her mechanisms and processes: scientific method

·  in reply to PureLoveEnergy (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 14 hours ago

The existence of the first cause is identical with its essence; its being the first cause is, indeed, also identical with its essence. Both these properties imply freedom from need, whereas things whose existence is borrowed stand in need of a cause, because they are characterized by transformation and change, by emergence from non-existence and entry into existence.

·  in reply to lordlandraid

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

That’s make sense, you have a real fact as parameter for it, here and now. The parameter is the phenomena of creation of living beings. The first cause are the parents and they are identical with their essence (DNA). Maybe this “first cause is really freedom from need, especially the needs about generating offspring, animals get pregnant without knowing that will be parents. The son that borrows this existence is in need of reaching the level of existence of their parents. Ok. All “natural”…

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 58 minutes ago

Stop with the automated responses already. It’s peculiar.!

Poor fella!

Dodging ALL the questions and quibbling in vain!

The argument of an IGNORANT!

In other words, that which moves is the subject of motion, while the mover is the cause of motion. Can the same thing in the same respect be simultaneously a subject of motion and a cause of it?

·  in reply to TBH717 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes and it happens facing yours eyes just now: your computer. First there was an idea and it produced the abacus. The future technology involving software (the idea inside the computer) and the hardware (the material machine) already was encrypted into the abacus. Then, the abacus elevated the human pier of calculations, which worked as feed-back over the idea elevating the software’s complexity. The Universe is same thing and we see the software as “DNA’s instructions”, human mind, etc.

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 2 hours ago

Matter or God?

Take your choice!

Matter and Motion

Matter is in continuous motion and constant development. This is a fact on which we all agree. Further, matter requires a cause that moves it. This is another fact admitted with no disputation. The most basic issue regarding the philosophy of motion is this. Can the matter in motion be the cause or agent of its motion?

·  in reply to TBH717 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You have yours selected “theory” about what could be the cause of matter motion. You need show for us yours calculations from the state of matter here and now till its last limits possible to be reached by yours logics, which must be linear because the chain of causes/effects seen here is linear. If you don’t do that, don’t wait that others will change their selected theory. My calculations arrived to the limits finding the electric-magnetic spectrum of lightwaves as cause of matter’s motions.

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 5 hours ago

Even if the followers of a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim, to conclude firmly and forcibly that non- being reigns beyond the sensory realm would be a non-scientific choice, based on imagination and speculation.

·  in reply to DZZeborro (Show the comment)

1tabligh 5 hours ago

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“a religious school of thought had no proofs for their claim”

All religions were born from a unique source: the ancient fresh memory was producing flashes of past times registered into the DNA. Past times when the ancestor of the biological DNA – the universal Matrix – was composing and living the life as atomic or astronomical systems. If you see the formula of Matrix you will see all the symbols and pictures of all religions resumed into that simple formula. But.. the flashes were about Nature

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

odinata 59 minutes ago

Anybody who thinks tabligh is going to respond rationally to any question you ask him or any comment you make is in for disappointment.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

I don’t think so. His last post when he says “The implementation of God’s will is intertwined with the relations between cause and effect, with the complex network of reasons and causes…” is a well elaborated logic from  religious viewpoint. The debate now is between you, showing all forces and elements of a given state of the world prior a new event – like the origins of life – for proving that there was no supernatural will acting over that event. And he needs point what forces God used…

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 3 minutes ago

You have started to jump to conclusions!

The implementation of God’s will is intertwined with the relations between cause and effect, with the complex network of reasons and causes. In order for a thing to become the object of the divine will, it must not be impossible and must, in its essence, possess receptive capacity; divine will is accomplished by means of the receptivity of things. It is true that the divine effulgence is infinite and constantly overflowing, but the ground destined to receive it may be defective and unable to absorb the infinite share that superabundant source offers it.

The ocean is an immensely abundant source of water, but a tanker has only a limited capacity to take on its water; in fact, only a minute amount of that water can be loaded onto a tanker. Clearly enough, what is finite and limited in this case is the capacity of the tanker, not the water in the ocean.

·  in reply to pineapplepenumbra (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“The implementation of God’s will is intertwined with the relations between cause and effect, with the complex network of reasons and causes.”

That’s the vision of Deepak Chopra and his “infinite consciousness”? It is like the suggestions of Matrix/DNA models: being the Universe a kind of cosmic egg where is occurring a natural process of reproduction of the system that was existing before the Big Bang, and if we have consciousness here, it is due that ex-machine system has consciousness. But..

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

But.. any process of reproduction has no active presence of the thing/being reproduced inside the womb/egg. Don’t yours God know all future? He must know. Then, when creating a thing/being, known by anticipation that it will make wrongdoings and will need corrections, why he does it? Could a mother/father permitting a genetic free will of their fetus that should cause the fetus Fall? If they can correct at least the environment that would driven to the Fall? I never will permit it for my kids

1tabligh 10 hours ago

How can great and complex beings emerge from infinite joinings of nonbeing?

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

If we are struggling when trying to calculate what was the system before the Big Bang are you jumping to the system that was before it?! It is metaphysics.The long chain of causes and effects is indicating something about the “ancestor” of this Universe: it must be “natural”, it must be more complex than everything here, it creates or generates universes by genetic reproduction or computation, it must have physical body and consciousness, it must be an ignorant about details occurring here.

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 2 hours ago

The existence of each part of the chain manifests inadequacy, impotence, and origination in time; whence did its existence arise?

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“the chain manifests inadequacy, impotence, and origination”

That’s totally wrong! If there is a chain flowing, by default there is no origination of anything. There is no “origins”, no origins of life, no origins of universes. Every new event, every new phenomena, must be merely new arrangement of a given chain. That’s could be called “transformation” as yours body transforms from baby shape to kid. If there are increased information must come from hierarchy system’s chain, parallels

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

  • drak6468 3 hours ago

    Hey if you think you really wanna see another side of the argument, and are truly seeking the truth check out this vid:

    /watch?v=AwZF7JTRfnY

    ·  in reply to emfederin (Show the comment)
    • Louis Charles Morelli

      Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

      He shows the movie “Unlocking the mystery…” where everything seems magics. But, if you have the model of the state of the world at the time when occurred abiogenesis, you will perceive that those systems (atoms, stellar, galaxies) have a building block that has evolved since the Big Bang, a simple shape of vortex that contains the principles of all natural forces. It worked as work the DNA for biological systems. So, you can understand every step in that film, where the mechanisms came from

      ·  in reply to drak6468 (Show the comment)
      • Louis Charles Morelli

        Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

        For instance, the nucleus containing DNA is the universe containing billions of building blocks which has the same shape and function of each nucleotide. Then there is the first “machine” that identificates a section of DNA for producing a protein. We can see the same scene at cosmological level happening in that building block: every time a star or planet or pulsar extinguishes, the system identificates the blank space, built other and replace it and this is made by life cycle process.

        • Louis Charles Morelli

          Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

          How aminoacids leaves the ribosome one after other, walking to outside on line, the exactly sequence required by a specific protein? Simple. The filament of DNA is the circuit of a system that was circular, closed, in the sky and here biologically became opened by cutting two extremes. The entire circuit is mimicked here by the total sum of proteins. Each protein is a large slice of the circuit. Aminoacids are smalls slice of that large slice. Aminoacids walks like a flowing circuit

    • Louis Charles Morelli

      Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

      2) He makes comparisons between “slices of wood exploded building a house” and “the origin of Universe by Big Bang Theory”. Any calculation about before the origins will be merely metaphysics. The unique rational way for calculation what was before is looking for similar situation (origins of things made by the universe here and now). The similar scene here is the explosion of spermatozoon inside ova giving origin to a new body. But, this body is less complex than the thing that was the cause

      ·  in reply to drak6468 (Show the comment)
    • Louis Charles Morelli

      Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

      1) He makes comparisons between a book and DNA (genotype). It is absurd! In the book, informations are merely symbols, letters, while in the DNA as in any matter informations are real things and living, functional things: vortexes, the makers of fundamental particles. Vortexes emerges, grow, divide, replicates, eat, expels, they die. Having glue and catalysts they becomes packages of bits-information, complex information, as any human being is a specific and unique package of information.

      ·  in reply to drak6468 (Show the comment)

XXX

Alter form towards new forms?! Matter (as mass) and matter ( as energy) alters forms from one to other, anything else, since they search only eternal equilibrium as a closed circuit. Thermodynamics is about the behavior of energy then, yes, has everything to do with Metalheadk93 question.

XXX

odinata 1 hour ago

“The very earliest universe was so hot, or energetic, that initially no particles existed or could exist”

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 5 minutes ago

You need to show at least in lab that such state is possible. My personal observations of this world suggests that there is limits for everything, and when arriving to the limits, instead reaching it, things are transformed. Yours hot universe is beyond the limits, isn’t it? Are you appealing to magical thinking also? .

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

odinata 2 minutes ago

That’s what CERN was built for.

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

CERN will have the same problem of Miller/Urey experiments, never getting the next working step. If CERN proves the Big Bang Theory it will build a micro-galaxy inside the tubes, but, before this galaxy produces life, the black hole will eat the galaxy. I think there is something else – a working force – hidden from our knowledge, that is missing.So, I make comparisons between the Universe and a living body. Here I see that this force is called DNA. Then, for the Universe must be a Matrix/DNA

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

odinata 6 minutes ago

Sounds like you reject science before it even happens.

Good for you, fruitcake.

how ‘bout you stop clogging this thread with your jibber jabber now, m’kay?

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You are mixing Science as collection of data with theories elaborated trying to connect the data, as it is Big Bang Theory as one interpretation of a theoretical big picture. This is not debating Science but interpretations, theories.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

odinata 21 minutes ago

You are mixing jibber with jabber.

Please shut it.

I’m sick of your garbage–it has nothing to do with science.

It is diarrhea from the bowels of your imagination.

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

ErgoCogita 11 minutes ago

” If CERN proves the Big Bang Theory it will build a micro-galaxy inside the tubes, but, before this galaxy produces life, the black hole will eat the galaxy.”

It’s nicknamed the “Big Bang Machine” because the particle debris from collisions mimics the conditions all matter in the Universe went through before matter started to form, not because we predict it will create Universes. And neither do we predict it creates black holes….

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

No way, Ergo. The particles debris from collisions is a necessary scientific experiment, we are all waiting their results, but till now they never mimicked the state before matter started for, because if it happens, a new universe should emerge there. It really took few seconds for emergency of this universe, accordingly to the theory, so, it is not necessary waiting too much time. And if emerges a new universe, for sure, it will have black holes, accordingly to Hawkins

·  in reply to ErgoCogita (Show the comment)

TheTapeClub 17 minutes ago

Who the hell told you CERN was building a device to create galaxies?

It’s worth pointing out that, even though the concept is misinformed, the word you are looking for is “universe” as opposed to “galaxy.”

There are already hundreds of thousands of readily observable galaxies, but one observable universe.

Second of all, the term “matrix” is a numeric set, mostly used in computer science and pure mathematics. This correction doesn’t really affect your idea, but try and find a different word.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Please, what’s universe if not a super-agglomerate of agglomerates of galaxies?! If you gets the initial condition of the universe, what should do the things you have in the tube if not galaxies?! Same way for Urey experiments: if they got the real reduced atmospheric initial conditions, they only need the right catalyst for getting those aminoacids forming polymers, proteins, RNA, replication, etc. Accordingly to Big Bang Theory, it does not need catalysts for emergency of hydrogen atoms…

·  in reply to TheTapeClub (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Thanks, any suggestion for correcting, testing or improving this theory are welcome. And you touched a good point here. Which shows the modern deviation of Science from its initial target. If you look to definitions of this world you have: The Free Dictionary: 1. A situation or surrounding substance within which something else originates, develops, or is contained. But if you go to Wikipedia you see …no definition. This word was coined by Latin meaning “the mother”and this is my meaning

·  in reply to TheTapeClub (Show the comment)

odinata 21 minutes ago

You are mixing jibber with jabber.

Please shut it.

I’m sick of your garbage–it has nothing to do with science.

It is diarrhea from the bowels of your imagination.

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You said: “The very earliest universe was so hot, or energetic, that initially no particles existed or could exist”

Please stops with this nonsense! If this is yours elected theory, say it: “Accordingly to the best theory, the very earliest universe was…” Don’t be a closed mind, a Science-stopper. Don’t “belief” on big pictures about times and spaces nobody reached yet. I don’t “believe” in Matrix/DNA Theory, that’s the reason I am testing it against real facts and debating theories.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 39 minutes ago

” You don’t speak English and you don’t know what you are tlaking about.”

That’s the most stupid conclusion I have seen here: since you don’t speak English you don’t know anything, or you know less than me…What arrogance!

·  in reply to odinata

odinata 36 minutes ago

You may know something–but no one here can tell because you can’t form a coherent sentence.

ITs pure gibberish.

Nonsense.

Shut your fucking hole already.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

The problem is not about coherent sentence. It is about the non coherent logics that theorists used for connecting the real collection of data into big pictures, which was taught to you as “world view”. Now you will have problems for fixing this error, connecting everything again by another method. That’s the same problem of creationists educated by the Bible.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

XXX

odinata 5 minutes ago

“The very earliest universe was so hot, or energetic, that initially no particles existed or could exist”

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)

odinata 5 minutes ago

radually the immense energies cooled – still to a temperature inconceivably hot compared to any we see around us now, but sufficiently to allow forces to gradually undergo symmetry breaking, a kind of repeated condensation from one status quo to another, leading finally to the separation of the strong force from the electroweak force and the first particles.

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)

XXX

whiteowl1415 18 minutes ago

“No other explanation.”

Unless you count particles being enternal, which is the only feasable way to look at it in light of the Laws of Conservation.

·  in reply to metalheadk93 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

I can’t understand the Law of Conservation producing Evolution, could you explain it? This law should rule all particles, or any material body composed by particles already existing at eternal inertia, and even of there was any disturbance it should be immediately corrected, since that the supreme tendency of matter is getting the thermodynamic equilibrium. Why are there particles, and bodies composed by them, missing energy, obligated to move on, striving for survival?

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)

ErgoCogita 26 minutes ago

“I can’t understand the Law of Conservation producing Evolution,”

There is no “Law of Conservation”. there IS, however, the Law of Conservation of Energy but it doens’t pose the slightest problem for biological evolution. Energy is not created nor destroyed in the process…

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

I think that evolution should be the result of energy motions. The other possible state of energy – mass – accordingly to e=mc2, should have no inner motions. And energy tendency to become mass, and vice-versa, indicates a eternal state of eternal return, not evolution. Something is missing here. That’s what Matrix/DNA is about

·  in reply to ErgoCogita (Show the comment)

XXX

metalheadk93 26 minutes ago

Where did the particles come from in the big bang. Cause and effect. No other explanation.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

odinata 21 minutes ago

You are mixing jibber with jabber.

Please shut it.

I’m sick of your garbage–it has nothing to do with science.

It is diarrhea from the bowels of your imagination.

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Why do you search answers in yours imagination instead looking for it in real nature?! That’s the behavior of babies and kids. Try to looking in Nature something similar to the big picture that the actual known data is suggesting. They are suggesting an initial central point, smaller than the space occupied by matter today, at extreme singularity, that have expanding and becoming complex. Is there something similar here? Yes, exactly the same scene: the moment of fecundation, yours origins

·  in reply to metalheadk93 (Show the comment)

metalheadk93 45 minutes ago

I’m asking a simple question and drawing the only possibility and truth that stems from the answer. You understand the cause and effect nature and the presence of universal, immaterial, and unchanging laws.

You wish for logic to be broken in order to suit your own militant crusade. Cause and effect. You say, boom and it’s there.

It’s a fallacy you condone. what data? Data from your imagination or data that simply fits like apples to oranges

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

No, you are not asking a question, you have stopped making the rational unanswered question when absorbing a non-rational theory. I suggested that there is here and now a similar scene to the big picture suggested by Big Bang Theory. But the scene here goes against all interpretations made till now (except Matrix/DNA theory) about the causes of Big Bang. Here you see ex-machine “NATURAL” parents. Not nothing and not magics. Seems everybody went far away off the beam. Consciousness is a baby yet

·  in reply to metalheadk93 (Show the comment)

XXX

metalheadk93 1 hour ago

To the contrary there’s no evidence God didn’t give anything, and there’s no other explanation to origin other than God.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes, there is. But, explanations elaborated by human beings never will be the final Truth, if there is one. Because no intelligence can know the Truth about a system (like the Universe) standing inside it. And even if something comes from outside the Universe talking to humans, our brains never would be able to understand the explanation. It is impossible for us rationally understanding the hypothesis that never had a beginning, as it is impossible to do with a world that had a beginning

·  in reply to metalheadk93 (Show the comment)

XXX

Mikezzz749 1 hour ago

@TheTapeClub well, I think your knowledge of God is rather flawed. God gave us free will, but Adam and Eve were perfect before the fall. Same with plants and animals. It said that the were no animals that killed–all vegetarians. And there weren’t thorns, etc on plants. These came symbolically after the fall. So did human violence, selfishness, abuse, etc. His design was not flawed, and neither is God’s salvation. But the choice to walk away is flawed.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yours logic does not work, if they were perfect they never should make that mistake, never doing any error. Parents never would do to their sons what yours “god” did. This is logic of children or from somebody that is merely worried to produce a fiction without taking care of logical meaning, like the author of Gulliver or Harry Potter.

But, new cosmological models suggests that the state of the world about 4 billions years ago was exactly as described by metaphors in Genesis without magics

·  in reply to Mikezzz749 (Show the comment)

XXX

DPrichProductions 7 hours ago

evolution is a fairy tale. Ever heard of the princess and the frog, the frog turns into a human…fairytale. But add 4.5billion years and it’s science. There is no evidence for evolution to be true, and I would put money on that.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

A blastula turning into a human is a fairy tale also? The blastula saw by a microorganism inside is the same scene of this Universe populated by galaxies. And here is the deep secret: it is this Universe turning into a human, not the frog. The frog is a provisional not complete shape between the astronomical state of the world and a human being. You can see how an astronomical system, composed by the seven known shapes of bodies, performs a working almost biological system on matrix/DNA models

·  in reply to DPrichProductions (Show the comment)

XXX

pineapplepenumbra 14 hours ago

Obviously I know that the Sun is very big and far away and that the Moon is much smaller and much nearer, but if they didn’t appear the same size, we wouldn’t get the wonder of total eclipses and the Moon is verl alege compared to other moons in the solar system and performs useful functions such as keeping the Earth tilted at about 23 degrees and creating tides; don’t you think that it’s just too useful to be mere coincidence?

We’ve discovered hundreds of exoplanets and none of them seem to

·  in reply to mynameisnotconnor (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

And maybe there are many useful functions of Moon for life. If the Matrix/DNA models are right, shouldn’t have life at earth. The atoms at the primordial soup should be moved and mixed. The state of the planet was almost inertial, then, those atoms never could get the necessary speed of meetings for getting the first organic combinations. This kind of mixing were got by thermal ocean vents, but, there was not enough informations. The missing informations were in the Sun. Moon with tides did it

·  in reply to pineapplepenumbra (Show the comment)

XXX

DPrichProductions 4 hours ago

Here is the thing. I believe In the beginning, God. You believe in the beginning Dirt. Science has proven that energy can not be created or destroyed. Now tell me where energy came from?

·  in reply to g24417 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Before the beginning of this Universe there was a natural system, like before the beginning of yours own body there was a natural system. And since that the meaning of yours beginning is the reproduction of that system, so, the meaning of the of the system that began with the Big Bang is to reproduce the system ex-machine. But.. what was before the ex-machine system? That’s not a human rational question. Nobody can know the Truth of a system living inside it. It is not rational having answers.

·  in reply to DPrichProductions (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“Now tell me where energy came from?” Energy and mass are two states derived from primordial information. Active information+energy, inertial information+mass. Where the primordial information came from? Yours body is active energy moving mass. Both came for information coded in DNA. So, the primordial information came from the ex-machine system that is being reproduced inside this Universe. They were like quantum-genes, in shape of bubbles formed by vortexes popping up here.

·  in reply to DPrichProductions (Show the comment)

DPrichProductions 4 hours ago

we are obviously talking about a different God. My God is. He was there before our interoperation of time. He created time, so therefore has to be outside of it. Steve Jobs isn’t in my MAC telling it how it works. He made it work while still being outside of it.

·  in reply to emfederin (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Time has no substance, no entity, it is a human creation for ordering events into chronological order. Jobs is inside the Mac as projection of his mind into something called software. Software is an abstraction projected by a mind connecting functions of a system. We discovered that this Universe, since the Big Bang is composed by software and hardware which are evolving together by interdependent feed-back.So, the natural ex-machine system must be composed by the same. If you call it God…

·  in reply to DPrichProductions (Show the comment)

DPrichProductions 3 hours ago

you see, evolution is a religion, much like Christianity. Although Christianity is a belief in life, evolution is a belief in death, that is what Hitler believed about Jews and actually killed million of them. I have learned science, and it didn’t make any sense to me. I found out that God fills in the many holes of the evolutionary theory. I cannot answer all of your questions, but I do know this for sure. There is a God and He loves you, and died for you. I pray that you will see him some day

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“There is a God and He loves you”.

This is a bad thing you are doing to human beings. That’s the reason behind the cause that all citizens of a third world Christian country are totally unuseful for to try to fix the wrong doings on that corrupts ans slavery social system. They don’t have any deep information about economy, history, politics, their book is only one about foreign mythology. If there are something in this world that loves you it is only other human being, teach it to persons.

·  in reply to DPrichProductions (Show the comment)

DPrichProductions 3 hours ago

Genesis 1 says theta there were 3 layers of firmament, or sky. the oxygen part, ice part and space part. The media will not show proof against evolution.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

DPrichProductions 3 hours ago

Genesis 1 says theta there were 3 layers of firmament, or sky. the oxygen part, ice part and space part. The media will not show proof against evolution.

·  in reply to odinata (Show the comment)

pontecanis 1 hour ago

“Energy and mass are two states derived from primordial information.” Energy and mass are not derived from “information”. Ths is complete nonsense.

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

And yours theory about energy origins is…? The problem here. are two: 1) DPrich asked to you, if in the beginning it was dirt, where energy came from. If you don’t have a good theory for answering this question, you are in trouble; 2) You understand “information” based in the abstract scholar concept as defined in Wikipedia: is a sequence of symbols that can be interpreted as a message. But information is a Greek word meaning: the force that “in”+”form”, gives form, shape and motion to…

·  in reply to pontecanis (Show the comment)

XXX

whiteowl1415 48 minutes ago

There is no such thign as a circle.

Archimedes lied.

He was actualy workign on baking repies and “Pi” is his attempt to cover that he couldn’t remember the silent E in “Pie”

When someone ask him what the heck a Pi was, he started rambling numbers and claiming it went on forever without repeating so that noone would investigate, because EVERYONE hates math

·  in reply to pineapplepenumbra

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

There is no such thing as a circle. What are you talking about? Go to Wikipedia see “circle” and come back saying that there is no circle.

Archimedes lied? What alternative ratio do you have for the ratio between a circumference and its diameter?! What’s Pie? For yours sake, there is a new astonishing discover about Pi and Phi. Pi is irrational constant due Nature never makes a circle directly, it emerges from natural spirals, which has no ends. And it is the product or of bi-lateral symmetry

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)

XXX

pineapplepenumbra 2 hours ago

Well, you said “No”, but you haven’t explained why, do you just think it’s a massive coincidence?

·  in reply to davermiava

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Davermiava maybe has not a good theory that fits all requirements but Matrix/DNA Theory has it. You need see an analogy, a real fact here and now: how Nature creates a new living body. A human couple makes the right womb and inserts the right informations. Everything works naturally, it is based on a previous design (human species) but the couple does not applies any kind of intelligence, the baby, with good and bad things, is made off. You need to know the state of the world, as the designer

·  in reply to pineapplepenumbra (Show the comment)

XXX

Edmond Goo 1 hour ago

I have never seen a “Fit” mutation.

If it happens so often, how come it’s never been seen?

·  in reply to Raz0rking (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 2 seconds ago

Do you want to see “fit” mutations? Ok, look now to yours hands. Animals like horses and birds has no hands like humans, with five fingers, each one appropriated for specific functions. Which force drove the transformation of hands? Yours fingers explains it. From the smaller finger to the thumb, it reveals the process of any life’s cycle. The smaller is the baby, the next is the kid, the next is the teenager, the other is the adult, the thumb is the senior. And life’s cycles comes from Light!

·  in reply to Edmond Goo (Show the comment)

XXX

pineapplepenumbra 1 minute ago

Religion has killed, is killing and will continue to kill for a long time to come.

It doesn’t have to literally have crusades inorder to cause misery and death, there is the immoral, unscientific and illogical opposition to condom use, killing 15 million Africans (so far, although not all can be attributed to religion) by Aids, along with overpopulation causing scarcity of resources, not to mention how many have died from diseases that would have been preventable had the religious Right not

·  in reply to kamphwagon1 (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

What do you say about billions of humans just now, at atheists and religious countries, slavers of mechanical work, till 12 hours a day? Shouldn’t technology and automation doing this work? What do you have to say about the natural requirement for all human beings: due you was born, you will consume, so, you will need working with yours own hands producing yours needs. If you don’t produces everything you consume, it means that you will be a predator, a vampire of others energy.” What’s wrong?

·  in reply to pineapplepenumbra (Show the comment)

whiteowl1415 2 minutes ago

“Shouldn’t technology and automation doing this work?”

Not at all.

Automation is already too big a problem.

I think it odd how noone seems to connect that we start developing things like self checkout stations and even though the prices on everythign remain the same, baggers and clerks lose thier jobs.

Too much automation is the root cause of the unemployment rate problems, in the U.S. at least

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Then you think that human beings must be submitted eternally, passively, to that natural requirement: “you, as human being, must be a slave of mechanical work, which is the way for producing what you consume”?! Each human being consumes about 40 tons of plants…have you produced it with yours hand? Have you made one entire house, yours house? No.

About 10 billion years ago, seven kinds of astronomical bodies were performing a system, the most perfect machine, all hard work made by automation.

·  in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 2 hours ago

You still don’t get it, do you?

I have already in my inbox more then 15965 replies from wannabes monkeys, teachers, profs, scientists etc!

What makes you think, you are a special duped wannabe monkey?

No wasting time!

Talk science and answer the questions otherwise clock off!

The chain of causality cannot recede into infinity!

Stupid brainless cuckoo atheist with asinine mind!

·  in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“The chain of causality cannot recede into infinity!”

Nobody, being rational, can affirm anything about the chain of causality… yet. Because every time happening an event producing a new phenomena is the total state of the Universe at a given moment that projects itself, with all its forces and elements, towards a specific point in space/time, which point can have forces and elements from the state of the world outside the Universe. Infinity?! Evidences for it please…

·  in reply to 1tabligh (Show the comment)

XXX

Alan Clarke 3 days ago

Some evolutionists argue that placentals tend to outcompete marsupials when they share the same habitats (which may be true). It may be that competition from placentals drove marsupials to migrate away from the Ark ahead of placentals. Perhaps marsupials then gained an early foothold in Australia and South America and, in these fairly isolated areas, and without competition from placentals, they thrived in those places.” – creation. com

·  in reply to tsub0dai

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

So we have three hypothesis: the evolutionist to which there was no ark and kangaroos never leaved Australia, the creationism to which marsupials traveled the long distance to Australia and South America, and Matrix/DNA to which kangaroos always were there because they are product of an evolutionary lineage geographically determined due the solar and terrestrial radiation. Creationism see marsupials travelling, instead, Matrix/DNA see the travels of photons and Darwinism don’t see any travel.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

XXX

Alan Clarke 9 minutes ago

@parsivalshorse “they could not possibly have known that the flood was global”

Your assumption is based on philosophical naturalism.

·  in reply to parsivalshorse (Show the comment)

g24417 4 minutes ago

“philosophical naturalism” – do you mean science? There is no better way to know things than through science. The less scientific something is, the less reliable it is. In fact that is the purpose of science, to weed out mistakes and lies.

·  in reply to Alan Clarke (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes, but lately Science is not practicing full philosophical naturalism. Be careful about the current theories elaborated on the basics of the last data obtained and the excess of Math exercise, because these data are driven us to a wrong worldview. Don’t belief in the interpretations of things located inside galactic nucleus as being ghosts black holes, or about the central point resuming into extreme singularity as being a Big Bang. Science was taken by computer’s philosophical artificialism

·  in reply to g24417 (Show the comment)

XXX

Edmond Goo 15 hours ago

You take Darwin over Pasteur when it was Pasteur who invented vaccines and not Darwin. Pasteur was doing was science. Darwin was doing philosophy.

Darwin invented nothing.

Charles Darwin’s own Grandfather wrote a book about evolution and he died 3 years before Charles was born. Charles Darwin was not an originator or a scientist. He was a good writer. He should have written fiction. My bad, he did.

·  in reply to NuggetKazooie (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Charles Darwin is the kind of hero Humanity needs. Who else should sacrifice his.her better years ( the 20’s), abandoning the good life of London, for facing the hell of desert islands and salvage jungles, only in the name of Humanity’s freedom from existential ignorance? What have you did for getting the basic knowledge that human kind already got? Sitting comfortable under conditioned air and reading a book of mythology? And what did you similar to Darwin’s sacrifice for advancing knowledge?

·  in reply to Edmond Goo (Show the comment)

XXX

Tom Adams 2 hours ago

still waiting for actual proof of primordial snot mythology…

it’s been 150 years…

that’s REAL SOON NOW, eh, goebbels?

·  in reply to TheFallibleFiend (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes, we are almost there. NASA is collecting real data and everyday is pictured a new shape of astronomical body. We are connecting these shapes into a circuit, supposing that those bodies were not formed by spontaneous generation as theorized by the current scholar cosmological model. We suppose that they are different shapes of an unique initial body under the force of life’s cycles, the same that makes yours body be a blastula and later, a baby, an adult, etc. This circuit was in that soup

·  in reply to Tom Adams (Show the comment)

XXX

TheFallibleFiend 2 hours ago

Evolution CAN’T possibly explain FACT X! Of course, I haven’t done the least bit of actual research to CONFIRM fact x, but I innately know more than all of the actual scientists doing the actual science, because I’ve done like research and stuff, and I’m just way smarter than they are.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

All scientists are wrong… It is possible, it happened many times before. Plank and the negative square root, Dirac and antimatter, Einstein and relativity, Copernic and heliocentrism, etc, etc. Professional scientists are all of them educated by the same scholar curriculum which teach the amount of real proved data and express a worldview based on the theories elaborated by someone that tried to connect those data for getting a big picture. The secret is in the connection of those data.

·  in reply to TheFallibleFiend (Show the comment)

XXX

PureLoveEnergy 20 minutes ago

im not religious and im not exactly atheist either….science is not limited to 1 dimension we live in a multidimensional reality so physical science is only going to explain this 1 physical dimesnsion….everything is energy vibrating on diffirent frequencies the lower you get into the frequencies everything becomes more compressed and compacted therefore making physical matter…the higher you get into the frequencies everything is pure light and energy…so we no very little about science

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You are getting good intuitions.The most surprising thing is that we are discovering the whole physical Universe composed by brute matter has an invisible coverage of Biology and life! We are begining to perceive that this Universe seems a human body, and Physics is the method for studying and describing only the skeleton; above the skeleton there is the soft fresh where the more complex and suave laws of Biology is the right method. And for a Theory of Everything still have the conscious layer

·  in reply to PureLoveEnergy (Show the comment)

MrGralgrathor 18 minutes ago

@Snookums

“science is not limited to 1 dimension”

You don’t dig linear thinking, ey?

“so we no very little about science”

… O, gods, I really, really, really, really HATE you GODDAMN new age hippies. Sorry, I can’t help it. I really do. With all my heart.

·  in reply to PureLoveEnergy (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

95% of world population still slave of mechanical work and being tortured till by the most microscopic virulent creatures! Yours “linear thinking”is fired! Sorry about that. Your time is finished, you had your opportunity. Evolution is not linear, it makes curves in space/time. Nature did not made mammals from dinosaurs, she went back in time, contracting the space, lifting up the small cyanodont. Yes, now she is doing the same. She is not piking up Wall Street but going back to Woodstock.

·  in reply to MrGralgrathor (Show the comment)

geezusispan 42 minutes ago

It’s all OK. When the machines take over, like they always do, they will be able to span space, to find another planet that will support our forms of life. Then they will introduce life and it will flourish once again! I’m sure this science fiction story has already been used…. darn it.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Maybe you will be surprised. Humans makes machines because this ability is registered at the DNA before…life origins. Our non-biological ancestors, the stars, already built the most perfect possible machine, with pretensions to be eternal. Welcome to the knowledge of a new cosmological model. But beyond the stars there is the Universe, which corrects deviation by the Clausius Law – entropy. Then, there was the Fall and we are here. This biosphere is still built by the machine don’t be a piece.

·  in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment)

Jules Le Tanneur 16 minutes ago

What’s your evidence?

(not the sociological changes, but whatever you claim to be true and undetected by science)

·  in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Evidences? You should be with us instead being an obstacle, we need help just now. Everyday lots of scientific papers being published (800 papers by year?) and we are trying to know each one for testing these new models. We can’t do that alone. But… only as first indication, I will use the most easy evidence at hands just now: yours own hands. Put the left hand over the Matrix/DNA formula as software, the palm over Function 1, each finger over each other function. Learn what’s your hand!

·  in reply to Jules Le Tanneur (Show the comment)

Jules Le Tanneur 1 hour ago

“Physical” science can only explain what has a detectable impact on the world, and will try to explain all of it.

The “rest”, by definition, has no detectable impact on the world, so why do you care about it and how do you know anything about it?

·  in reply to PureLoveEnergy (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Why?! Any real object – be it a simple stone – belongs to a system. Systems have different shapes accordingly their evolutionary level of complexity. They are hierarchy aligned, in the way that natural, but invisible and untouchable systems exerts influence upon that stone. Physical Science is touching these invisible systems, hidden at micro and macro level only through mechanical sensors linked to electric-mechanical brains. Biological sensors of ours brain would detect something else

·  in reply to Jules Le Tanneur (Show the comment)

PureLoveEnergy 51 minutes ago

because energy is what EVERYTHING is, you are not going to understand this physical dimension without understanding cosmic laws and energy and how they work, science will tell you that energy has a huge impact on this world i mean it is infact what everything is, thoughts and feelings are energy nd have an impact on the physical too because everything is all interconnected with eachother…think beyond just this 1 dimesion…we know brainwaves exist but on what dimesion do they exist ask this ?

·  in reply to Jules Le Tanneur (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Hold on, PLE ! Don’t do the same mistake did by creationists and atheists. Don’t jump from the real world here and now to absolutes, our little brain can not know the truth about this world. Search ways, methods, for touching Nature step by step, each time more deeper, don’t escape through metaphysics.

·  in reply to PureLoveEnergy (Show the comment)

PureLoveEnergy 25 minutes ago

if energy vibrates at a higher frequency then physical matter then it will be invisible to this physical dimension…dont look at it like everything is matter look at it as everything is energy…we need to try to understand this energy and how it works like i said matter is just simply the condensed state of energy..what is the source of this energy?

·  in reply to Jules Le Tanneur (Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Sorry entering with my two cents here. What’s energy? The Matrix/DNA models are suggesting that energy is not the first essence. The very first essence in this Universe is “information”, splitted in shape of vortexes. . Energy is active information, mass or “matter” is information at rest, inertial state. A good analogy is the beginning of yours own body. The principal force and the ruler of everything, from the moment of fecundation to all life, is information encoded at DNA.

·  in reply to PureLoveEnergy (Show the comment)

XXX

Jules Le Tanneur 10 minutes ago

Denial of evolution is unique to the United States *within the developed world*.

It’s also very common in other deeply religious countries (christianity, islam, and others) in the less developed countries.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes, but the developed (?) countries are not doing good also. Everyone wants a private palace, his/her Garden Paradise at Earth. Consumerism to the high level. The youngs’ times at game playing a virtual world. The worldview based in theories elaborated through computer simulations, the Universal History narrated by the electric-mechanic brain. We are going to the most horrible trap of destiny: The Brave New World, ruled by the Big Queen, as any insect society. Matrix/DNA is mind free of that

·  in reply to Jules Le Tanneur (Show the comment)

PureLoveEnergy 51 minutes ago

because energy is what EVERYTHING is, you are not going to understand this physical dimension without understanding cosmic laws and energy and how they work, science will tell you that energy has a huge impact on this world i mean it is infact what everything is, thoughts and feelings are energy nd have an impact on the physical too because everything is all interconnected with eachother…think beyond just this 1 dimesion…we know brainwaves exist but on what dimesion do they exist ask this ?

·  in reply to Jules Le Tanneur (Show the comment)

XXX

carrieicecream 23 hours ago

It’s sad to think that everybody need evidence for everything. Religion is about faith, not evidence. That’s why faith is the biggest test in my life, as well as many other Christians and Jews and Muslims, etc.

·

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

If you are young and want a good life at yours advanced ages, listen to the councils of an old man. It is better that you seek more and more evidences in natural world than stopping to search because you choose a faith based in a specific interpretation of those known evidences. I have seem lots of old people crying because they did wrong in their life guided by a kind of faith. God did not saved the Christians from being eaten by lions at Caesar arena. Their was a wrong faith, of course

XXX

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I have a question to evolutionists:

This night I was reading about light, electric magnetic spectrum and so on. I think the deepest foundations of this material world is like an ocean of lightwaves still propagating from the pulsation that began with Big Bang. Instead of luminous light we see the deep darkness because it blind us. Matter is this condensed light becoming particles. So, the world is all white, bodies are unseen. We see it colored. Is it not an evidence of intelligent design? 5:51 PM – Dec – 18

AtomicBl453 11 minutes ago

How life came to be is far more advanced than a fictional character in a book spewing hate/intolerance/guilt and was once noted to believe in witches.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Believing in witches is caused by beliefs that “life came to be”. There is no such thing. There were no origins of life, at least, inside this Universe, and by extension on the thing that created this universe. This word “origins” is a misconception that drives human minds away off the natural beam towards the two kind of magical thinking: creationism and randomness. If you want to see how galaxies and atoms are living working systems, see the models at Matrix/DNA Theory

·in reply to AtomicBl453(Show the comment)

JustThink00 19 minutes ago

uh, no?

and if so, how does that disprove evolution?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That does not disprove evolution, but it disprove intelligence behind evolution. Light waves from Big Bang are the projection of the invisible side of any material object, the hardware. Light waves are the projection of the software that walks side by side with matter, the hardware. Lightwaves is the projection of the natural system’s intelligent mind that produced genetically this universe, like our psychology is projection of our parents’ minds. Got the theory?

·in reply to JustThink00(Show the comment)

g24417 29 seconds ago

I can’t say that you have accurate understood the subject you have been reading. And no – there is nothing in nature that shows intelligent design. Its best to disassociate yourself from the ID people – ID is designed to be dishonest. You can’t “follow” ID honestly, it is impossible.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I know that the ID movement is designed to be dishonest because it was born inside a closed mind worldview. But… this puzzle seems to be real and astonishing. All different things we see are merely bunches of the same atoms and they are different due these atoms have different vibrations accordingly to which different frequency of light they stands on. So, there is no separation of things, there is no colored things, everything is white.We “see” separated things and then, we can live. Why?!

·in reply to g24417(Show the comment)

sidewaysgravity790 1 hour ago

uhm no, some objects reflect and absorb light differently than other materials.For example, a red pen absorbs all the other spectrums of light except the red wavelength which gets reflected into our retina and what we end up seeing.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)
That’s the problem: there is no red wavelength. This wavelength that you call “red” is merely a non-colored, a white specific frequency of light. The “red” is in the eye of the observer. And that’s my unsolved puzzle now: if we did not see these non-existent colors, we couldn’t move in this world. Oppsss…I think I found the explanation! At any specific age my body has a specific shape different from all others shapes. Just at now, I see my photos from young times: same body. I am going…

g24417 6 minutes ago

Sorry, its hard to parse your meaning with the words you are using. We can’t “see” atoms, we can only see photons. Our perception of atoms is not effected by their “vibration”. Maybe you are thinking about strings. Neither strings no atoms have a direct bearing on the frequency of light – that is a different phenomenon. There is a “white” – it is simply a composite of all other perceptible colors. So no – the puzzle is not real because you are not accurately describing things.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

I think having a direct bearing of atoms and the bodies they composes with light in relation to our vision: we see these bodies due the existence of light. But the light coming to and reflected by these bodies has no different colors in itself, it is always white. Absence of light means darkness, so the whole world is black and white. If you are in the white, it is the same you are in the dark, you see no separations of things. The colorful world exists only in our back brain where lays images

·in reply to g24417(Show the comment)

XXX

geezusispan 3 minutes ago

Buddhists are trying to realize the one, be with the one, experience the one. Escape the cycle of birth ad death. No, they do not have a deity…

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

About 10 billions ago, one ancestor of us, did the same thing that Buddhists are trying to do today. To realize the one, be with the one, escape the cycle of birth and death, all these goals are expressions of a closed system, the extreme expression of selfishness. The building block of galaxies that arose 10 billions years ago, containing the force that today is our mind, did it, becoming a closed system in the sky. If you are interested, see the picture of this galaxy at my website.

·in reply to geezusispan(Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 28 minutes ago

Mechanics tells us that a motionless body is always motionless *unless* it becomes subject to a force *external* to itself. This law represents an inviolable principle in our material world, and we *cannot*, therefore, believe in a theory of probability *or* accident.

·in reply to g24417(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

And do you have any idea about this force that imprint a force into material bodies driving them to obey the vital cycle which makes the transformations of shapes? Do you believe that it is one force or several different forces? How God manipulates this force called vital principle?

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

1tabligh 2 minutes ago

If we continue the chain of cause and effect indefinitely, the existence of each link in the chain will be conditional on that of the preceding link, which, in turn, will be conditional on the existence of the link preceding it. It is as if each link in the chain of causality were to proclaim loudly from the depths of its being: “I shall not don the garment of existence until that other one has set foot on the plain of being.”

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

At least, someone here trying to be trustworthy natural! But, at some point, you seems to fall down from the logical avenue! Please, follow this chain of cause and effect in the reverse way, from the top of complexity here and now, which is consciousness, followed down by human brain system, followed down by human body system and go down…to galaxies to atoms till arriving at the last frontiers of this material universe. Seems you was trying to do it, but, suddenly, you fail down seeing gods?

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

1tabligh 25 minutes ago

Each link depends on a condition that has not been fulfilled, and each one is, therefore, *barred* from enjoying the blessing of existence.

Since we see the whole of the universe to be surging with different forms of being, there *must* exist in the world a cause that is *not* an effect, a condition that is not subject to a condition; *otherwise* the surface of the world would *not* be this thickly covered with phenomena.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

My models are suggesting same thing: “each link depends on a condition that has not been fulfilled”. But my models are suggesting a different explanation than yours explanation, which is “God is the condition”. I will appeal to an analogy: computers evolution. Each new generation of hardware brings on a novelty that has no material foundation seen at the last generation of hardware. This novelty has a link which is fulfilled with an invisible ex-machine thing, the mind behind softwares. Then ?

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Then I was calculating how the building blocks of original galaxies – which is exactly as a base-pair of nucleotides, the unit of information of DNA – arrived at Earth for driven terrestrial atoms to organizing just like the astronomical block. The results of this calculation is: software. Living software composed by vortex which popping up as half-matter from light waves. There is no mind here behind the evolution of this natural software: it was programmed for evolution before the Big Bang

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

QuantumGh0st 3 minutes ago

If one can assert that non-physical things can cause physical universes to emerge, in order to avoid absurdities like infinity, then one can assert that universes can arise without a cause, in order to avoid absurdities like non-physical causality (Gods). Quantum mechanics allows a universe to appear without a violation of energy conservation, but God, supposedly, creates the universe ex-nihilo (from nothing). We’re then told that God does all this without time.

·in reply to 1tabligh

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Well thought! My problem that I can’t accept thermodynamics principles as energy conservation causing the emergence of this Universe is that I can’t see these immense quantity of informations we see here today existing at the initial singularity. Quantum mechanics seems to me that is on the way for solving this problem. By the way, I prefer appeal to the nature I can see here and now: my body started by a big bang inside a ball suggesting to be very simple. The informations were hidden inside

·in reply to QuantumGh0st(Show the comment)

QuantumGh0st 16 seconds ago

Does information need to exist in a consistent quantity, though? I understand that energy is always conserved, and that information is contingent on physical expression, but couldn’t less information exist in certain configuration of matter, and increase with the change in configuration of matter up to a point where the physical configuration could not express any more information? Before I attempt to clarify, could you give a non-mathematical definition of what you think information is?

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“could you give a non-mathematical definition of what you think information is?”

I have no personal definition, I am only following the results from Matrix/DNA models. Information is seen in a genetic way mixed with Yukawa mechanisms for nuclear gluon. Information is a force that gives shapes, forms and functions to inertial mass, and this force is lightwaves produced by quantum vortexes which works as ex-machine genes. My quarks and leptons are made with these vortexes

·in reply to QuantumGh0st(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Very good and thoughtful point! Again, I suggest you trying to see the initial singularity at the event of ours own body. I think there is less information in DNA than the amount of information having in the body produced by him. But, the most units of information of the body is due fuzzy logic, due mixing matricial informations from what derives less important information. There are few increased information caught at the environment, but the environment is just the Matrix, a bigger DNA

·in reply to QuantumGh0st(Show the comment)

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

That’s all about the systemic configuration seen at the Matrix/DNA universal formula, which is, theoretically, the natural force organizing matter into systems. The formula is the most simple but complete configuration a natural system can reaches. With evolution these matricial informations are mixed generating inside informations, which increases the internal complexity. There is the limit for complexity imposed by the initial configuration. Repeating the initial, reproduction happens.

·in reply to QuantumGh0st(Show the comment)

XXX

1tabligh 5 minutes ago

Those who refuse to worship God find themselves prostrating before their inner idol; passion and desire rule every dimension of their beings.

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

You are pretty right! Without knowing the deepest secret of Nature, yours intuition touched it. This universe carries on the evolution of a unique natural system, which has the free will to chose between closed (selfishness) or opened (permissiveness) system. Your example – prostrating before inner idol – is a behavior of the parts of a closed system prostrating before the entity of its own system. But, the other common human behavior is like you, prostrating to the same system as if it is God

·in reply to 1tabligh(Show the comment)

XXX

ZolotoPartii 10 minutes ago

I dont believe in evolution. I don’t believe in god either. I don’t base my knowledge on believes. Fuck you Bill Nye, and all the condescending bullshit that people like you are in to in this century.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

You are super-ape-right! These people need awe for wake up! They were nurtured separated from Mother Nature by a layer of black asphalt surrounded by tall cements trunks mimicking our trees. I am coming from Amazon jungle, educated and nurtured by the real salvage but pure spirit of Nature. I am here for pulling back the mind of these people to Reason. Look this forum! Nobody uses a unique language of Nature! Worldwide floods, ape transforming into humans, black holes eating galaxies… !!!

·in reply to ZolotoPartii(Show the comment)

Martin Koch 7 minutes ago

Whether you believe in evoluiton or not matters just as much as if you believe in photosynthesis…or not.

·in reply to ZolotoPartii(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Zoloto, please, pull the ears of this man for him wake up! He is making comparison between evolution and photosynthesis, OK, let’s go use his own argument. The same error he does when looking to photosynthesis he does when looking to evolution. He forgets to see the flow of energy that lift up from the flower linking her to the star and he forget to see the flow of meaning and forces that lift up from biological evolution linking it to Cosmological evolution! That’s why Modern Synthesis wrong!

·in reply to Martin Koch(Show the comment)

XXX

docmatt31765

docmatt31765 1 hour ago

i already covered the big bang thats just as much a farce as evolution

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Your are the proof that Nature uses making things beginning with singularity and Big Bang: the astonishing simplicity of a microscope ball called ova and the explosion of an spermatozoon… and voilá…here are you! Do you want a universe or a human being? What do you thing about a giraffe? The forces, mechanisms processes are the same…if you knows about the History of evolution of these mechanisms. Why do you need imaginary friends and think that these real tools are tolls, like a baby?

·in reply to docmatt31765(Show the comment)

XXX

docmatt31765 18 minutes ago

By comparison only 1020 grains of sand could fit within a cubic mile and 10 billion times more (1030) would fit inside the entire earth. So, the probability of forming a simple cell by chance processes is infinitely less likely than having a blind person select one specifically marked grain of sand out of an entire earth filled with sand.

·

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

The probability that free radicals produced by entropy of a human male body after the 16s’ goes to a center where all them are joined producing a genome – like the Earth produces magma at its center – and then, this whole body be joined with a female body, which has produced her genome, and reactions from which results a final new system cell, developing a new human body, is equal to…? Welcome to abiogenesis where the union of Mother Earth and Father Sun is well explained by Matrix/DNA Theory

·in reply to docmatt31765(Show the comment)

XXX

Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 10 hours ago

Humans and apes are two products of “creation” not understood by evolutionists and two products of “evolution” not understood by creationists. In blastula, billions of cells “evolve” and differentiate to form different organs, all directed by a prior reproductive plan to “create” a new organism. Likewise all the different lifeforms are being directed to form different parts of a new machine, a biosphere that will be the reproduction of this astronomical machine. We need save our mind.

ExtantFrodo2 10 hours ago

yes, do put “evolve” in quotes there. Those cells do not change genetically to differentiate. In fact, differentiation is part of the genetic package as a whole which is inextricable from the formation of the phenotype. It is bad form to conflate “change over time” (which might as well be applied to ANYTHING), with the more specific notion of biological evolution.

The Matrix/DNA Theory has solved this problem also. Different species as rats and apes or lizards and amoebas does not change genetically also…in relation to biological systems’ source, the Last Universal Non-Biological Ancestor. The difference we see at these genomes are due they are slices of the original genome, genomes does not expresses all informations from the source. Macroreproduction is different of microreproduction in the way genomes are transferred: they are free in the space

XXXXXXX

illegalconspiracy 1 hour ago

“There is enough information capacity in a single human cell to store the Encyclopedia Britannica, all 30 volumes of it, three or four times over.” Dawkins

If its unreasonable to believe that an encyclopedia could have originated without intelligence, then it’s just as unreasonable to believe that life could have originated without intelligence. J Sarfati, Ph.D

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

It is not unreasonable because we can see nature doing it without using intelligence just now: she resumes an adult human body with more informations than in the cell into a microscope chromosome. Nature applies nanotechnology since the Big Bang: she had resumed a whole working perfect astronomical machine into a cell system, through the process known as abiogenesis. What intelligence has used mother giraffe for resuming the informations of her body and transferred them to her baby?!

XXX

QUESTIONANDO THE SCIENTIFIC MAINSTREAM CONSENSUS:

DarwinsFriend 1 day ago

> With automatons like you simply repeating your programming and never challenging anything, science is safe from any need to advance.<

The rover on Mars – functioning – would say you’re full of crap.

·in reply to billymodo

Scientists didn’t do that, it was engineers!

You seem to be confused between those who speculate and claim to be scientists and those who bring science to life.

You may think of a flashy new design for your car but an engineer will put that design on the road.

Science may waste Billions of dollars searching for planets that we will not be able to visit in a million years while engineers are bringing water to the land of millions of hungry people here on earth. Get things in perspective please.

·in reply to DarwinsFriend

DarwinsFriend 19 hours ago

The Mars rover Curiosity has found something — something noteworthy, in a pinch of Martian sand. But what is it? The scientists working on the mission who know are not saying. Outside of that team, lots of people are guessing.

The intrigue started last week when John P. Grotzinger, the Mars mission’s project scientist, told National Public Radio: “This data is going to be one for the history books. It’s looking really good.”

11/27/12 NYT

·in reply to billymodo

billymodo 36 minutes ago

It’s incredible to see just how many Pharmaceutical Corporations are on the verge of a particular medical breakthrough, Or how Archaeologists are just getting to the real exiting part of a dig, or how some science department are on the verge of an epoch making discovery. etc… just as the vital government funding/subsidy is up for renewal.

Call me an old cynic but…. I think I’ve seen this before, What ever it is I’m guessing it’ll cost the taxpayer a kings ransom, and for what?

·in reply to DarwinsFriend

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Do you know something? You are fuck..right! You brought an issue very important, and I would like to learn more about how are you thinking. If I got it right, Science was founded by pioneers as Sir Francis Bacon as a way for ordering the mess that was the empirical data collected by Humanity. The search for real knowledge of the real world for improving the human conditions of life. Am I wrong? If not, don’t you agree with this goal? If you agree, what is the difference with Science today?

·in reply to billymodo(Show the comment)

XXX

RogerS4JC 16 hours ago

@geezusispan “In the olsd days everyone was programmed to believe in some religion, just like now.”

I was programmed to believe in Evolution by the public school system and became an outspoken proponent. Only the evolutionary model was taught and no competing theories. I had a moment of honesty with myself that I was not 100% sure only 99.9%.  Since the stakes were very high, it was enough to commence my own investigation to confirm or falsify a 0.1% chance I may be wrong. God won decidedly.

·in reply to geezusispan(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Did you commence yours own investigation?! Ok, it means that you brought all collected real data ( fossils, genetic maps, etc.) over the table and tried to connect them in a different way that Darwin and Modern Synthesis did. I am very, very interested how one can do this exercise of connections and finally getting the same results that the Bible’s authors got. The unique possible way is inserting magical non-natural forces as links among events, but, where do you got these forces from?!

·in reply to RogerS4JC(Show the comment)

XXX

TrueVerdicts 12 minutes ago

You should type this 100 times. Look, I have a drill which I do where I simply ask them easy questions as in a contest — and they’re immediately rendered dumbfounded.

These guys are FINISHED! Evolution was conceived by some 18th century old dude, when we didn’t know better. Now, we’re able to see sites and edifices left behind indicative of intelligence preceding Humans.

Evolution has no center, no root, no basis, no continuity, and gives absolutely no sense to life. It’s just convenience.

·in reply to Edmond Goo

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Nope. Evolution is surviving and facing yours eyes, here and now. I will not mention the facts and evidences that atheists rationally has repeated here to exhaustion, I will appeal to a natural process: human embryogenesis. What is the immense diversification of different cells seen in any blastula, coming from a unique ancestor, a unique first cell, that emerged at fecundation? What is the sequence of transformations of shapes from morula, blastula, till the shape of yours grandfather?

·in reply to TrueVerdicts(Show the comment)

XXX

TrueVerdicts 25 seconds ago

1) This theory, which is NOT yours, would also negate everything science has proposed. So at this point I don’t know where you stand.

Nonetheless, YOU agree with this theory; I, on the other hand, am a philosopher as well; and I cannot say that I agree with it.

Additionally, this theory would render negligent the desire to imagine and philosophy, as it predicts that one would make such efforts to no avail.

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Everything wrong, True. If you are referring to Matrix/DNA Theory, yes, I elaborated it, as prove the copyrighted originals. It does not negate any data collected buy Science, it only conflicts with others theories from scientific thought. If you don’t agree with it because you are a philosopher, I agree because I am a philosopher. The difference is that I kept holding the foundations of philosophy which is Naturalism, while you went away becoming a mystic. No, it does not predicts that.

·in reply to TrueVerdicts(Show the comment)

XXX

TrueVerdicts 1 week ago

4) Religion’s argument that a single-being God created the Universe is also errorneous. The Universe is self-intelligent, was not created, but engineered itself. The Absulute God is physically the Universe (in other words, the Universe is what God is).

The one-being god of religion is/are Human(s). It is overtly said in the Bible that he/they are Humans. e.g “in the likeness of God”. It also specifies that it WAS NOT just one being, e.g “let us create man”.

TheMatrixDNA 1 week ago

Stop saying “the universe is… or is not…”, this is totally nonsense. We have not seen the last frontiers of this Universe, we have no clues about its size, complexity, meanings. No aliens, no gods, talks with someone that you know that are not lying. Everybody knows that you don’t have enough information about do Universe. Do not be ridiculous. Introduce yours theories with education, asking evidences, known facts, pro and against it, don’t try to be our dictator.

·in reply to TrueVerdicts(Show the comment)

TrueVerdicts 1 hour ago

If you wish to omit the phrase “the universe is” from your lexicon, by all means do that. In doing so, you must also suppress the accolade of the term ‘universe’ with any other verb, not just ‘to be’. In doing so, you will not speak of the of the word. I’m quite fine with you doing that! I won’t:)

Allow yourself to think and conceive on your own (and not simply resorting to referencing/reciting another man’s written data), then you’ll see the necessity in expressing that which you conceive.

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA

Terncote

Terncote 52 minutes ago

“In doing so, you will not speak of the of the word. I’m quite fine with you doing that! I won’t:)”

TwueVeredick – Grande Administrator of Lexicons and Dispenser of Universal Laws!!!!

“Allow yourself to think and conceive on your own …”

What escapes you is that MAtrixDNA actually IS expressing an original and personal perspective. While he is enthusiastic about his ideas, at least he isn’t an insufferably self important prick about it, unlike you.

·3in reply to TrueVerdicts(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 48 minutes ago

True…, you said: “The Universe is self-intelligent, was not created,…” You are affirming things that are not seen inside the Universe, you are appealing to things that could be existing beyond the Universe”. Here is the mistakes produced by yours logic. You can say “the Universe is…” when referring to things observable from humans conditions, like “the universe is this super-agglomerate of agglomerates of galaxies…”

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

XXX

TrueVerdicts 20 minutes ago

I REFUSE TO CONTINUE TO DEBATE YOU GUYS when U cannot begin to give an explanation to sites & edifices that are on Earth that our group of Humans, obviously, did not build. You’re not just gonna close your eyes on them yet, continue to blah-blah-blah. It’s a waste of my time!

I’M ORROGANT, I’m logic. I’m not a Daniken or a Sitchin. You need to just shut up & listen to this truth, period. This truth will be made available for those intelligent to consider. The rest of you can carry on in error!

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Poor man, you are going to be disappointed and it is very sad discovering it too later. I will repeat again the most profound and true logic for being observed by all humans that wish to keep the control of their minds: Godel’s Theorem: : Nobody can know the Truth about a system standing inside it”. You was made by this system called Universe, you are inside this system, you never went outside it, you never saw it from above, you CAN’T KNOW THE TRUTH. We need you as a health mind, an open mind

·in reply to TrueVerdicts(Show the comment)

XXX

TrueVerdicts 25 minutes ago

2) …meaning when we encounter a planet able to bear life, the beings there are going to have similarities with Humans, are going to have those 3 common senses — and btw, Humans are still going to be superior to them there that are not Humans.

In conclusion, similarities are going to be common throughout The Universe, but it doesn’t mean they’re the same. & certainly are not equal to Humans. So I resubmit to you that Humans didn’t evolved from Earth despite the similarities science insists on

·in reply to TheMatrixDNA(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Have you seen a model of non-biological living being? Go to Matrix/DNA models, if you are not seeing my picture here. All life’s properties are presents at a theoretical model built only with the known seven shapes of astronomical bodies connected mechanically and floating in sidereal space. The principles for these 3 common senses are there also. If this system real exists, it was our creator, but he can go by others ways creating intelligence in creatures you can’t imagine.

·in reply to TrueVerdicts(Show the comment)

XXX

Tom Adams 7 minutes ago

looks like the atheists are for the most part celebrating the sabbath!

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Do you know what’s a real sabbath? I was invited to watch one by an international people. It happened at Serra Pelada, Amazon, at the top of a mountain that has produced 400 tons of gold. They are deists, but the “spirit” they invoked calls himself “Lucifer”. When he saw me came and said: “You are here! You lived 3.000 years ago for doing a mission here and you didn’t it, because you surrounded under thentations of the king’s palace. Yours name was Socrates. You came back, do it right now…

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

Tom Adams 13 minutes ago

That was interesting…

does this happen often?

have you calculated the patterns that cause it?

BTW: be careful with satanic rituals…

you would not want a demon to possess you, would you?

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

Yes, but you are not such ingenious for believing that “spirits” and “Lucifer” were there, are you? And there is no such thing as “demons possessing someone” Knowing that I was a naturalist doing research it was easy for them inventing this lie as “Socrates”. No, it does not happen often, I never had notice about they there again. Yes, there are patterns you see at others rituals from African origins, like “candomblé” , Yemanjá, etc.

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

XXX

Tom Adams 1 hour ago

so you exclude all things beyond you ken?

if you think about it, I just reduced your argument to absurdity…

Indeed you may be more likely to use UFO’s as an explanation than the Great God who, I believe, created the Laws of Physics, to which he is not subject, the Universe as a result, and all life…

If so, you may consider yourself a PHD from hollywood…

·in reply to G Quinn(Show the comment)
Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

All “laws of Physics” emerges from a single vortex, Tom. Pay attention to real facts you have here and now, try to observe them with yours intelligence, instead being lazy and escaping from hard work appealing to a magic and powerful daddy in the sky. Vortexes as those popping up at yours yards, also can pops up at the vacuum. They comes rotating in two different directions, so you have spin right and left, the origins of all opposite duality and asymmetric on this world. Included the (cont)

different characters between male and female humans. Due all them having the same shape (phenotype), but different spins, has all symmetry, like the half-left and half-right sides of your face.Vortexes are spirals that arises and disappears, from here you get all phenomena being or inertial-tendency or motion-tendency. Each ring of a vortex has different size, different velocity, and from here arises all other physical properties and the fuzzy logic that acts as variables composing genotype.

Tom Adams 4 minutes ago

Lazy?

cmon, louis…

you have absolutely no idea where the Laws of Physics came from…

people have likened me to the improbability vortices in chaos theory, btw…

stuff always happens around me…

or maybe I notice it better than most…

what is the source of your observations, btw?

they remind me of new age physics…

are crystals involved?

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

I don’t know where the Laws of Physics come from, but I need to know the source if I want better conditions of human life for me and everybody. There are three methods just now: 1) The scientific naturalist reductionist method basing its theories upon the field of Physics; 2) The creationist method basing its theory over ancient narratives of relations between humans and non-natural entities; 3) Matrix/DNA, basing its theory upon the naturalist systemic worldview and narratives of humans-apes

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

Tom Adams 20 minutes ago

then you are certain to be disappointed…

Until we are cognizant of Beyond The Big Bang, all we can do is create theories that will probably be wrong…

how does the source of the laws of physics have anything to do with creating “Even it it were true, and we have no reason to believe it is”…

That sounds suspiciously like eco-baloney science…

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

No, you are at the risk of being disappointed quickly than me! Because you have permitted your mind to do the dangerous jump from the real Nature we see here and now towards beyond the Big Bang, you have falling somewhere and thinking you are at the right place. Yours position have no the solid foundations I am keeping under my feet. For to calculate the source of natural laws that created this Universe I am based on the source of laws that created my natural body: the source is “natural parents

·in reply to Tom Adams(Show the comment)

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“people have likened me to the improbability vortices in chaos theory, btw…”

These people are being driven by the normal state of any human being here and now that maintains the control of their reasoning. Humans emerged from this biosphere, this biosphere is better observed at virgins regions like Galapagos and Amazon jungle, and there rationally we see evolution and chaos. So, human beings were made by the chaotic state of Nature, it explains the intuitive state of mind doing Chaos Theory

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“stuff always happens around me…or maybe I notice it better than most…”

But you can’t be limited to the stuff that is happened around us for building yours worldvision, because what are happening here and now are being influenced by forces coming from the invisible levels of micro and macro dimensions. So, it is this astonishing phenomena we see as diversity of biological systems here. Yours method and the reductionist method used by Modern Synthesis are bot non-complete.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

“what is the source of your observations, btw? are crystals involved?”

If you search at Matrix/DNA website you see a chapter opened investigating crystals, we are doing research about. Crystals seems to be formations of matter containing the half part of informations for doing a biological system, but Nature discovered that they are dead end, not as much flexible for continuing the process of formation. So, from crystals were extracted the principles of replication and catalysis.

ergonomover

ergonomover 4 minutes ago

Your ‘logic’ is so fuzzy, it is like a hairball: nothing but fluff.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

This logical thinking could be wrong, I am not the owner of the Truth and I know that I don’t know almost anything. But vortexes are real things that are real and disposable for scientific verification, so, my logic is a Science-opener. In other hand yours magical thinking based on the supernatural has no real things for scientific verification, you are a Science-stopper. I don’t want that you be the professor of my kids because I am seeing that the most powerful force for humans is Science.

·in reply to ergonomover(Show the comment)
XXXXXXXXXXX
TheFallibleFiend

TheFallibleFiend 24 minutes ago

The Dunning-Kruger Effect ensures that those who are the most profoundly ignorant of science which continue to reject evolution based on their cartoon “understanding” of it.

The Dunning-Kruger Effect ensures that all scientific mainstream consensus, which are always temporary because human kind remains ignorant of the most profound phenomena of Nature, continue believing that the Modern Synthesis interpretation of the existent natural process of evolution applies only over biological systems, losing the wish to continuing to search the whole truth about evolution at more distant levels, like at astronomical and atomic systems. So, ToE remains a non complete theory

TheFallibleFiend 19 minutes ago

Thanks for that demonstration!

·in reply to Louis Charles Morelli

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

It is the same method of demonstration being used by the defenders of Modern Synthesis as the ultimate and complete truth: putting the fossils over the table and defending that there is a chain of connectedness among them, and this chain works under some mechanisms. My demonstration is taking every day all provisional shapes of astronomical bodies and all discovered states of atoms, putting them over the table and following the intuition that there is universal evolution. What’s the problem?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
GOOD INFORMATIONS FOR MATRIX/DNA:

RogerS4JC 4 minutes ago

@tsub0dai “where was this data published? oh that’s right. it wasn’t”

Moving the goal post:

@tsub0dai “CRSQ isn’t peer reviewed scientific literature”

“…Newton’s Principia, & Einstein’s original paper on relativity was published in a scientific journal (Annalen der Physik), but did not undergo formal peer-review. Darwin’s own theory of evolution was first published in a book for a general and scientific audience — his Origin of Species — not in a peer-reviewed paper.” – Casey Luskin

·in reply to tsub0dai
xxx

Edmond Goo 44 minutes ago

Come on, it’s been 10 years. Dr. Behe held up the flagellum as an example.

You are so very wrong.

Now Japanese researchers have uncovered a bacteria with 7 engines working together. This is 7 times worse than Behe’s original flagellum yet Behe’s flagellum is unchallenged.

Don’t ignore the evidence. Embrace it. The truth will set you free.

·in reply to whiteowl1415

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

“Your search – Japanese researchers have uncovered a bacteria with 7 engines working – did not match any news results” – Google

Could you be more specific? Do you have a link?

·in reply to Edmond Goo(Show the comment)