Archive for setembro, 2013

Bomba: Um Corpo Humano não tem apenas um DNA, mas muitos deles! Foi Previsto na Matrix/DNA 30 Anos Atras!

sábado, setembro 21st, 2013

DNA Double Take

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/17/science/dna-double-take.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

By CARL ZIMMER – Published: September 16, 2013 118 Comments

DNA sequencing elements displayed on a monitor. – Noah Berger for The New York Times
Modéstia a parte, eu fui o primeiro ser humano na Terra a dizer varias coisas que iam completamente contra tudo o que foi dito e imaginado. Por exemplo, como provam meus direitos autorais, a 30 anos atras, eu escrevi: “O DNA não é um código genético, e sim apenas uma pilha de diferentes variações de um único sistema, encriptado num par lateral de nucleotídeos”, ou ” nunca houve origens da vida, desde que os sistemas biológicos nada mais são que produto evolutivo de uma unica linhagem evolucionaria universal que vem desde o Big Bang, unindo a Evolução Cosmológica a Evolução Biológica”, ou então… ” De átomos a galaxias a seres humanos, tem existido uma unica formula usada pela Natureza para criar estes sistemas, derivada de uma onda de luz, a qual denomino Universal Matrix/DNA”. E etc. foram varias propostas totalmente fora de tudo que se havia imaginado, porque, como um filosofo naturalista por nascimento, curioso pelos mistérios sobre nossa existência, fui buscar alguma resposta no meio da selva amazônica, onde sofri um colapso cultural, desci ao mais fundo poç0, regredindo quase ao estagio semi-símio, para captar o espirito da natureza selvagem e ouvir o que ela tem a nos dizer, a mim, desta geração fabricada no asfalto que perdeu suas raízes com sua mãe Natureza. Claro que ninguém ouviria como ninguém ouviu um semi-macaco maltrapilho e andarilho recém saído da selva, e os poucos que ouviram julgavam estarem perante um louco balbuciando coisas incoerentes. Claro. Mas como um cético por Natureza eu nunca acreditei também no que pensei ouvir da selva, porem mantive sua voz escrita e comparando seus anúncios com o que a Ciência ia descobrindo de novidades. E passados 30 anos, ao invés de ter jogado toda a teoria no lixo, só a vejo sendo confirmada dia a dia, como hoje, em mais esta noticia que derruba tudo o que os especialistas sempre pensaram, publicada no New York Times, mas que já era uma conclusão obvia na visão de mundo que arranquei das selvas. Na selva é o único lugar onde existem intactas algumas testemunhas das origens da Vida que ainda tem na memoria o estado do mundo de onde ela veio. Sei que ela não disse tudo e contou algumas mentiras, mas não tem como negar que ela foi a primeira a dizer estas surpreendentes verdades!
XXXX
Do artigo no New York Times:

From biology class to “C.S.I.,” we are told again and again that our genome is at the heart of our identity. But scientists are discovering that — to a surprising degree — we contain genetic multitudes. But scientists are finding that it’s quite common for an individual to have multiple genomes. Some people, for example, have groups of cells with mutations that are not found in the rest of the body. Some have genomes that came from other people. “There have been whispers in the matrix about this for years, even decades,

xxxx

Meu Comentario no New York Times que não foi postado devido comments closed:

DNA is not a genetic code, but, it is merely a pile of different variations from a unique system. This is the next surprise waiting for us to know. So, since that multicellular organisms are result of multi-building blocks, their genome are diversified. This is a prediction from Matrix/DNA Theory, 30 years ago. The primordial system is a lateral pair of nucleotides, as the fundamental unit of information in DNA, and this microscope system is a process of nanotechnologycal reproduction of the building blocks of primordial galaxies, revealing that there is a unique universal evolutionary lineage linking Cosmological Evolution and Biological Evolution. The force driven this evolution is a wave of light called Universal Matrix/DNA and it works as living fractals, where, at any given new shape of system, the internal structure is kept, but the periphery is under variation modeled by environment, struggle for light expansion or biological survivor, and adaptation. The Matrix/DNA is coming from the Big Bang under evolution and is the formula used by Nature for to build natural systems, from atoms to galaxies to human beings. Then, there is no origins of life, since that all properties of a human body already were present at those mistakenly called non-living systems, expressed or not.

Célula Animal, Célula Vegetal: A Diferença que estava Escrita nas Estrelas antes da Origem da Vida

sábado, setembro 21st, 2013

Por favor, se interessar, clique nas figuras para ver as legendas, enquanto não consigo resolver êste problema técnico)

xxxx

Célula Animal e Vegetal em Imagem Comparativa

celula-vegetal-celula-animal.jpg

O primeiro ser vivo que surgiu na superficie dêste planeta foi uma célula, ou seja, um sistema celular completo com tôdas as organelas capazes de realizar tôdas as propriedades vitais. Mas porque surgiram duas formas diferentes de célula, de maneira que uma deu origem a êsse imenso reino vegetal e a outra a a êsse igualmente imenso reino animal? Procurei saber de professores mas sempre desviam a pergunta para responder como é a diferença entre as duas e não respondem o porque das diferenças. Apenas nos modêlos da Teoria da Matrix/DNA existe uma explicação, muito lógica e racional, penso eu, mas claro, como se trata de uma teoria, vamos continuar a pesquisar êsse mistério.

Quem criou a primeira célula, ao menos no planeta Terra, foi o planeta Terra, ou algo dentro dêle, ou algo fora dêle, ou algo que está dentro dêle e fora dêle ao mesmo tempo. Alguma dúvida até aqui? Acho que não, mas se alguem a tem, gostaria de saber a causa da dúvida. Não vale contra-argumentar com crenças em coisas super-naturais aqui, pois aí saio fora da discussão.

Se alguem defender a primeira alternativa, a de que foi o planeta Terra inteiro que convergiu com todos seus constituintes para essa criação, terá que apresentar um modêlo do planeta no seu estado evolutivo a cêrca de 3 bilhões de anos atrás, ou outra data momentos antes das origens da primeira célula completa. Êste modêlo terá que conter todos os fenômenos contidos na primeira célula, em seus estados menos evoluídos, e mostrar quais foram os processos que atuaram para transformar aquêles estados menos evoluídos daquêles fenômenos nos estados evoluídos dos fenômenos celulares. O que existia no planeta antes da origem da vida que se parecia com uma mitocondria e atuava como uma mitocondria? O que existia que se reproduzia pela meiose? E assim por diante.

Claro que a Ciência acadêmica responderia que tudo isso veio do reino da química, mais exatamente da quimica orgânica. Depois vão reduzir a quimica organica à inorganica e assim apresentar os principios de tudo na matéria inanimada do planeta. Quais foram as fôrças e elementos da materia inanimada do planeta que produziram quais reações quimicas que mais tarde produziram o fenômeno sexual? Ou a engenharia do aparelho digestivo?

Acho que ninguem – alem de mim na Matrix/DNA – tem procurado responder estas questões, talvez nem mesmo sequer pensado nestas questões. Ao menos tenho procurado nas bibliotecas e nada encontrado. E porque não? Porque a quimica seria mágica. Mas não a maior mágica terrestre, pois esta foi a biologia, que criou coisas espetaculares que jamais existiram antes no Universo. Para mim, que experimentei afastar o conhecimento da civilização e buscar um aprendizado na natureza primitiva da selva, na minha cabeça não existia as palavras “quimica” e “biologia” quando estava fazendo minha investigação na selva, o que existia no meu raciocinio era apenas a matéria e seus processos. Estas palavras são criações dos humanos nas cidades que para mim nada diziam. Portanto nunca pude desviar o raciocinio da matéria para encontrar “nomes mágicos”, pois no meu mundo apenas existia a normal correnteza de causas e efeitos que meus sentidos percebiam.

As células são as unidades estruturais das plantas e animais, os tijolinhos básicos dêstes edifícios que são os nossos corpos como seres vivos. Mas basta olhar para um elefante ao lado de uma árvore para se ficar admirado como o mesmo tijolinho inicial – a primeira célula que surgiu na Terra – fêz coisas tão diferentes entre si! Como e porque, em dado momento, a célula inicial se dividiu em duas diferentes, como se uma escolhesse seu futuro indo para o sul e a outra na direção do norte?!

Bem,… as que foram por um caminho foram se transformando, tornando-se mais complexas e poderosas e hoje chegam a constituir gigantescas árvores, como as castanheiras, as sequóias! As que foram pelo outro caminho se transformaram ainda mais e tornaram-se mais complexas e chegaram ao tamanho dos dinossauros e à inteligência do homem.

Ok … A maioria das pessoas de hoje têm a vida muito ocupada com os afazeres diários, estudos, video-games, etc., por isso elas olham para êste mundo como êle é e ponto final, não perdem tempo com elocubrações mentais se perguntando porque, de onde, diabos, veio isso tudo? O nosso método cientifico reducionista moderno está mais preocupado em resolver problemas imediatos que dêm lucro, que buscar as respostas aos porques, procurando chifres em cabeça de cavalos.

Mas eu acho que em algum lugar aí fora do meu mundinho tem gente quase como eu, que tem a vontade e consegue escapar da vida mundana para curtir seus pensamentos intimos pensando mais profundamente sôbre a vida e a existência. E quando se presta atenção a detalhes do mundo que os normais desprezam, começamos a suspeitar que o mundo material imediato e perceptivel – apesar de largamente anunciado pelos cientificistas que as Ciências Naturais já sabem tudo do nosso mundo médio, faltando agora apenas desvendar algumas coisas do micro e macro cosmos – por si só não possui os recursos que foram necessários para fazerem certas coisas acontecerem. Aqui nós tambem – os “raros inquietos” – nos dividimos como fêz a primeira célula. Uns escolhem o caminho que sugere existirem fôrças supernaturais atuando no nosso mundo, e vão avançando tanto por este caminho que passam mesmo a acreditar em entidades supernaturais, como deuses, etc. Outros escolhem outro caminho, o de suspeitar que o mundo material contem muito mais recursos do que os que conhecemos, sejam vindos dos invisiveis micro e macro cosmos, ou das ondas invisiveis de luz, vibrações e estas coisas tôdas ainda não bem entendidas que não captamos com nosso complexo sensorial mas vemos seus efeitos no mundo real.

E o que tem isso a ver com a pergunta: como e porque a célula inicial se dividiu em duas a ponto de uma se tornar uma gigantesca castanheira e a outra numa girafa que estica o pescoço para tentar no alto, alcançar as fôlhas destas árvores? Tem tudo a ver, mas calma lá…

Eu saí fora da vida normal mundana e caí no reino dos raros inquietos, acho que um pouco por vontade própria e um muito porque fui na verdade expulso para fora da civilização. Sabe como é… fiquei órfão sem familia aos três anos, fiquei fisicamente raquitico e feio, era um pêso e significava problemas para quem me visse e assim era afastado para os guetos. Acabei fugindo para o meio da selva viver com cobras e macacos que tambem não gostaram de dividir seus territórios comigo mas ali eu tinha alguns predicados que me davam alguma fôrça para impor-me e manter o meu território, só meu. E ali eu tinha muito tempo para escapar do mundo material e ficar com meus pensamentos intimos perguntando o porque das coisas serem como são. Mas é claro: eu só conhecia a metade feia do mundo e não poderia aceitar sequer a hipótese de que haveria algo supernatural e inteligente e bondoso por trás dos fenômenos observados no mundo como acreditaram aquêles que davam bolas ao pensamento na civilização mas que tambem conheceram a outra metade bela do mundo. Então eu escolhí ou fui conduzido pelo caminho e método extremamente materialista que exibe respostas aos porques baseadas nos recursos materiais do mundo.

Por exemplo, na selva eu coçava o cocuruto quando olhava para uma capivara ao lado de uma castanheira e me perguntava como uma unica célula inicial produziu duas coisas tão diferentes. Quando eu saía do meu casulo e ia para o lugar dos feios e desventurados que buscavam ouro na selva para retornar triunfantes na civilização, como era a mina de Serra Pelada, e dava uma esticada até a cidade de Marabá, comprava livros, um monte dêles (arrumei até uma luneta para ver o céu e um microscópio rudimentar para observar a lama dos pantanos e cada fôlha ou bichinho que atravessava meu caminho), muitos cadernos e tons of canetas, lápis de cor para desenhos e voltava correndo para meu casulo, desenhar as cenas que só eu via na escuridão e no coração da selva. Sei que será fantasia dizer isto, mas seis ou sete anos depois fiquei tão anormal e psicótico que acreditei que desenvolví uma espécie de empatia para com as coisas da selva, que eu entrava nos corpos das árvores e dos bichos e penetrava com visão microscópica até suas células e átomos para entende-los e me pegava ás vêzes na minha rêde de dormir a sonhar que conversava com um espirito selvagem que sentia emanar da selva. Outras noites ao anoitecer eu apontava a luneta para o céu e ficava horas observando o céu limpido e admiravelmente estrelado visto da selva e me perguntando – de onde, diabos, veio tudo isso?! E adormecia sonhando que falava com estrêlas, galáxias, até ter pesadelos acordando de repente com a cena de estar explodindo junto com o Big Bang – influencia dos livros de Ciências que roubava da biblioteca da universidade ou adquiria nas lojas onde não resistia a comprar os livros sôbre as grandes teorias cientificas: aliás, o método cientifico era uma das unicas coisas que apreciava da civilização dos homens lá fora, pois êle me esclarecia sôbre os recursos do mundo material e explicava muitas causas das coisas que eu queria entender. Mas a luneta mostrando o mundo estrelado à noite e o microscópio mostando o mundo invisivel e pequeno no dia começou a me fazer ficar obcecado por certos padrões comuns, como por exemplo, o mais grosseiro dêles , que é o fato dos building blocks do céu, os sistemas estelares, ser constituidos de nucleo e ter corpos na periferia, com a célula e átomos tambem terem nucleos e corpos na periferia. Porque corpos originados na Terra, com milhares de outras alternativas para escolherem, foram escolher seus building blocks exatamente à imagem e semelhanca do que suporta o Cosmos, e se os átomos surgiram primeiro, porque o sistema estelar imitou sua configuração, seu jeitão geral, e se a célula surgiu depois, porque ela imitou o jeitão do sistema solar?! Tinha que ter elos entre estes dois mundos, talvez os recursos pairando nos céus tivessem influenciado a divisão da célula inicial. Mas quais?!

As teorias cientificas recusavam ver os possiveis mas evidentes elos, era eu que estava no “wrong track”, estas teorias fantásticas diziam e eu abaixava a cabeça aceitando, afinal o que era eu, senão o patinho feio escondido na lata de lixo? Mas eu reagia de algum modo pois elas eram muito baseadas no desenvolvimento do raciocinio matematico, ao qual eu procurei entender um pouco como funciona. E acabei por afirmar a mim mesmo que tinha algo errado com as teorias porque a lógica matematica não poderia ser a lógica natural porque a Natureza criou coisas, como a reprodução de corpos, os pensamentos, etc, que foram saltos criando buracos dentro da lógica matematica. Quando a evolução dos répteis chegou aos dinossauros ela não seguiu a lógica do raciocinio matematico aduzindo complexidade e se dirigindo na direção do mamifero, mas ela, a evolução, ou seja, o normal fluxo dce causas e efeitos, descartou o dinossauro e regressou ao pequeno cyanodonte para dele chegar ao mamifero. Holes. buracos no nosso percebido espaço/tempo, não capturáveis pela lógica matematica por que esta é linear e não abre pausas para o espaço contrair e o tempo regredir do futuro em direçao do passado, mas nem por isso são buracos fantasmagóricos ou supernaturais, pois eles podem ser captados pela lógica da Razão se esta retornar ao seu reino real e não teórico. Eu podia estar no caminho errado, mas as evidências sugeriam que a civilização lá fora com sua poderosa inteligencia tambem estava num caminho errado. O reino real tinha que falar mais idiomas que a matematica. Mas quais? Eu perguntava às árvores e bichos da selva durante o dia e ao céu estrelado durante a noite.

(xxxx)

Então … porque a Natureza criou dois tipos diferentes de células e determinou que todas as futuras geracoes da celula vegetal ficariam plantadas, imoveis, recebendo seu alimento gratuitamente na boca, e todas as futuras geracoes da celula animal mover-se-iam, caminhando para “obter o pao com o seu suor”?!

Esta’ na resposta a esta questao um dos maiores indicios de qual o proposito da existencia do Homem na Terra. E queremos saber a explicacao, pois esse assunto e’ um dos mais importantes, ja’ que devido a essa obra da Natureza, consumimos a maior parte do nosso tempo trabalhando, cacando os recursos para satisfazer nossas necessidades, e muitas vezes alguns passam a vida toda torturados num trabalho indesejado. Enquanto isso a arvore frondosa nos espreita sempre de bracos cruzados… mas foi justo essa especie de maldicao sobre os seres do reino animal que salvou a vida da Matriz Universal, e esta especie de presente de grego ao reino vegetal que os condenou a se tornarem um beco sem saida determinado `a extincao.

A resposta surge quando observamos o corpo de LUCA (Last Universal Common Ancestor), o verdadeiro criador da Vida na Terra. (Infelizmente esta imagem das celulas nao esta’ terminada, pois falta inserir e enfatizar as setas que indicam o circuito sistemico, o qual fara o leitor imediatamente perceber a mesma configuracao da imagem de LUCA. Mas a inclusao das funcoes ao lado dos nomes de cada organela sao uteis nessa visualizacao). Enfim, resumindo a explicacao temos:

“LUCA era dotado do livre-arbitrio. E uma das importantes escolhas que ele podia fazer era algo entre estas duas alternativas:

1) Tornar-se um Sistema Natural Fechado em Si Mesmo: Esta alternativa implicaria em viver num paraiso, eternamente, pois teria o alimento gratuito, seria hermafrodita para poder viver 24 horas no orgasmo, mas com a disvantagem de ter que cortar relacoes com o mundo externo ao seu corpo, inclusive com qualquer outro ser vivente. Escolher esta alternativa seria  a revelacao ou expressao maxima do egoismo e LUCA fecharia as portas `a Evolucao, tentando eternizar sua forma que certamente era uma forma provisoria;

2) Continuar como seus ancestrais, sendo um Sistema Aberto ao mundo, a outros seres, todas as vantagens e disvantagens que isto acarreta. Esta alternativa seria escolhida por uma personalidade nao-egoista, e manteria as portas abertas `a Evolucao.

LUCA, nosso ancestral, cujo DNA hoje e’ a nossa essencia, o que significa que LUCA era nos mesmos a 4 bilhoes de anos atras, escolheu a primeira alternativa. Basta uma rapida olhadela em sua anatomia e seu mundo para ver  o paraiso, o manah caindo do ceu, o hermafroditismo e o total isolamento.

Mas LUCA errou num detalhe: eternidade. A Historia mostrou que LUCA como sistema fechado nao era eterno.   No corpo do Homem hoje observamos o fenomeno em que, todas as informacoes particulares, especificas, de todas as celulas diferenciadas, inclusive das partes superficiais do corpo, sao resumidas numa miniatura denominada genoma, encontrado quase no centro do corpo de onde e’ emitido para gerar outro corpo humano. Pois com LUCA aconteceu algo similar. Coimo LUCA era um ser meio-mecanico/meio biologico, podendo tambem ser explicado pela mecanica Newtoniana, esse mesmo processo vai cahamar-se entropia, um principio da termodinamica.  De alguma maneira,  a materia da superficie do sistema, sutil e muito lentamente comecou a se decompor, a irradiar suas unidades que sao bits-informacao, mas como LUCA era uma ilha cercada pelo nada, e a materia necessita de um meio para se mover, estes bits nao eram lancados para o espaco externo, mas sim decairam na direcao do centro ou nucleo do corpo de LUCA. Por um processo mais complexo que descrevemos em outras partes deste website, estes bits, como unidades geneticas, quando em queda podiam encontrar obstaculos no meio do caminho, como por exemplo, um planeta. E aqui se juntaram. Como, na verdade, eram fragmentos do genoma de LUCA, quando expelidos tentaram fazer o mesmo que fazem no corpo humano, ou seja, reproduzi-lo.  Reproduziram aqui na Terra, da melhor maneira possivel com novos materiais e num ambiente totalmente diferente,  o corpo de LUCA, que resultou, em alguns lugares,  no sistema celular vegetal e em outros, no sistema celular animal.

Mas a celula vegetal foi a reproducao mais bem sucedida, uma copia fiel, contendo como organelas todas  as sete funcoes universais executadas pelos sete orgaos do corpo de LUCA. Por isso ela esta’ conectada direta mente ao Sol, de onde recebe o alimento e faz a fotossintese.  Mas esta fidelidade ao seu progenitor significa tambem que ela herdou o mesmo carater: expressao maxima do “selfish gene”, so nao se tornou um sistema fechado perfeito porque isso era impossivel, mas mesmo assim, ligando-se com o planeta por baiso e a estrela por cima ela praticamente cria um circuito de sistema isolado e auto-reciclavel, ou seja, aquele em que os nutrientes sao produzidos e consumidos pelo circuito sistemico.

Quanto a celula animal, precipitou-se, ou foi abortada prematuramente, pois ainda nao havia recebido ou completado as constituicoes das ultimas pecas, que e’ o instrumento material da Funcao Universal n.6 e n.7, e saiu-se a mover. Como podemos ver no corpo de LUCA, a F6 e’ ocupada pela estrela, cuja versao terrestre e’ o cloroplasto, por isto o cloroplasto trabalha a energia da estrela. Os poucos “genes cosmicos” que havaim adentrado o corpo da celula animal, nao conseguindo completar-se como a organela cloroplasto, aderiram `a vizinha mitocondria, dando a esta um reforco tecnico que resultou numa melhor operacao e producao do ATP. Quanto aos genes da Funcao 7, que em LUCA produziu o cadaver estelar e correlato horizonte de eventos, ou por toda a regiao para onde e’ excretada a materia degenerada do cadaver, e cuja tarefa ‘e limpar o sistema dos detritos e tudo o mais inutil,  vieram ainda em numero tambem pequeno e conseguiram apenas uma especie de caroco do que iriam fazer, que e’ a organela denominada lisossomo. Com a evolucao da primeira celula animal e sua culminancia atual na forma de corpo humano, este ainda ressente de um sistema escretor que mal funciona e mal desenhado, inclusive com baixa operacionalidade o que resulta em materia fecal retida no organismo, enquanto o vegetal nao tem esse problema.

Mas foi realmente uma maldicao o destino dado `a celula animal e a toda suas futuras geracoes? Penso que nao. Enquanto o reino vegetal nao tem como e nao quer evoluir, pois a facilidade da fotosintese o acomoda num modo super-especializado de ser, e portanto esta inexoravelmente condenado `a extincao, seja alntes por alguma causa ou entao quando o planeta mudar e nao mais suportar a vida,  a celula animal sofreu, mas lutou e transcendeu ate chegar a constituir-se na especie humana. E como continua a manter as portas abertas `a evolucao, e’ possivel que jamais seja extinta, pois a humanidade pode emigrar quando o planeta mudar.

Voces devem ter notado a semelhanca desta historia com a fabula metaforica na Biblia, sobre Adao no Paraiso. Sim, mas este e’ assunto para outro artigo.

Origens da Vida: Thermophiles como LUCA?

sábado, setembro 21st, 2013

Na FAME ( Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution) le-se o seguinte a respeito das origens da Vida:

The Early History of Life

The Temperature History of Life

Features of the physical environment surrounding an ancestral organism can be inferred by reconstructing sequences of ancient proteins made by those organisms, resurrecting these proteins in the laboratory, and measuring their properties. Our studies suggest that the ancestors of modern life were thermophiles (heat-loving). (NASA)

xxxx

Pesquisa

Thermophile

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thermophiles produce some of the bright colors of Grand Prismatic SpringYellowstone National Park

thermophile is an organism — a type of extremophile — that thrives at relatively high temperatures, between 45 and 122 °C (113 and 252 °F).[1][2] Many thermophiles are archaea. Thermophilic eubacteria are suggested to have been among the earliest bacteria.[3]

Thermophiles are found in various geothermally heated regions of the Earth, such as hot springs like those in Yellowstone National Park(see image) and deep sea hydrothermal vents, as well as decaying plant matter, such as peat bogs and compost.

Unlike other types of bacteria, thermophiles can survive at much hotter temperatures, where as other bacteria would be damaged and sometimes killed if exposed to the same temperatures.

As a prerequisite for their survival, thermophiles contain enzymes that can function at high temperatures. Some of these enzymes are used in molecular biology (for example, heat-stable DNA polymerases for PCR), and in washing agents.

A scientific conference for those who study thermophiles has been held since 1990 at locations throughout the world, including Viterbo, Italy; Reykjavik, Iceland; New Delhi, India; and Bergen, Norway. The 2011 edition was held in Big Sky, Montana, USA, and hosted byBozeman Campus, Montana State University.[4]

Catalogo da Vida ( Catalogue of Life) – Database

sábado, setembro 21st, 2013

Sempre que se precisar saber a posicao evolucionaria de qualquer sistema biologico, assim como informacoes a respeito.

http://www.catalogueoflife.org/colwebsite/

Total Species: 1,426,888
Total contributing datatabases: 135

Metano e a Origem da Vida volta ao Noticiário: Curiosity não o encontra em Marte.

sexta-feira, setembro 20th, 2013

Curiosity rover’s methane result challenges life theory

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24165219

xxxx

RELEASE 13-288

NASA Curiosity Rover Detects No Methane on Mars

http://www.nasa.gov/press/2013/september/nasa-curiosity-rover-detects-no-methane-on-mars/#.Ujuissako3U

xxxx

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/science/space/mars-rover-comes-up-empty-in-search-for-methane.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

The Curiosity rover’s failure to detect methane on Mars is a blow to theories that the planet may still host some types of life, say mission scientists.

Telescopes and satellites have reported seeing small but significant volumes of the gas, but the six-wheeled robot can pick up no such trace.

On Earth, 95% of atmospheric methane is produced by microbial organisms.

Researchers have hung on to the hope that the molecule’s signature at Mars might also indicate a life presence.

The inability of Curiosity’s sophisticated instrumentation to make this detection is likely now to dent this optimism.

“Based on previous measurements, we were expecting to go there and find 10 parts per billion (ppbv) or more, and we were excited about finding it. So when you go to search for something and you don’t find it, there’s a sense of disappointment,” said Dr Chris Webster, the principal investigator on Curiosity’s Tuneable Laser Spectrometer (TLS).

The Nasa rover’s search is reported online in a paper published by Science Magazine.

Curiosity has been sucking in Martian air and scanning its components since shortly after landing in August 2012.

From these tests, it has not been possible to discern any methane to within the present limits of the TLS’s sensitivity.

This means that if the gas is there, it can constitute no more than 1.3ppbv of the atmosphere – equivalent to just over 10,000 tonnes of the gas.

This upper limit is about six times lower than the previous estimates of what should be present, based on the satellite and telescope observations.

Deep down

The number of 1.3ppbv is very low, and will put a question mark against the robustness of those earlier measurements.

The fact that Curiosity is working at ground level and in one location should not matter, as the Martian atmosphere is known to mix well over the course of half a year.

Methane at Mars could have a number of possible sources, of course – not just microbial activity.

It could be delivered by comets or asteroids, or produced internally by geological processes.

Methane mapTelescopes have reported relatively strong signals (red = 10ppbv) in the past

But it is the link to life that has most intrigued planetary scientists.

Earth’s atmosphere contains billions of tonnes of methane, the vast majority of it coming from microbes, such as the bacteria found in the digestive tracts of animals.

The speculation has been that some methane-producing bugs, or methanogens, could perhaps exist on Mars if they lived underground, away from the planet’s harsh surface conditions.

This theory was bolstered by the previous observations making their detections in spring-time. It was suggested that the seasonal rise in temperatures was melting surface ices and allowing trapped methane to rise into the atmosphere in plumes.

But in Dr Webster’s view, Curiosity’s inability to detect appreciable amounts of methane now makes this scenario much less likely.

“This observation doesn’t rule out the possibility of current microbial activity, [but] it lowers the probability certainly that methanogens are the source of that activity,” he told the BBC’s Science In Action Programme.

Or as team-member Prof Sushil Atreya, from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, put it: “There could still be other types of microbes on Mars. This just makes it harder for there to be microbes that kick out methane.”

‘Evolving story’

Dr Geronimo Villanueva is affiliated to the Catholic University of America and is based at Nasa’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

He studies the Martian atmosphere using telescopes here on Earth. He cautioned that additional, much more precise measurements were needed from the rover before firm conclusions could be drawn.

“This is an evolving story as we get more numbers,” he told BBC News.

“If Curiosity’s statistics hold, it’s important because it sets a new bound. Methane should last a long time in the atmosphere and the fact that the rover doesn’t see it puts a big constraint on possible releases. But I would like to see more and better Curiosity results, and more orbiter results as well.”

ESAEsa’s Trace Gas Orbiter: New satellite missions will also make measurments

Dr Olivier Witasse is the project scientist on the European Space Agency’s (Esa) Mars Express satellite, which made the very first claimed methane detection back in 2003.

He also said much more data was required.

“There is some indication from the Mars Express data – and it has not been published yet because it’s a very complicated measurement – that the methane might peak at a certain altitude, at 25-40km. The Curiosity results are interesting but they have not yet settled the issue.”

Esa has its ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter launching in 2016, which will be able to make further methane searchers. And the Indian space agency (Isro) is due to despatch its Mangalyaan probe to the Red Planet later this year. This, too, has methane detection high on its list of objectives.

Curiosity itself will work to improve its readings, and will shortly deploy an “enrichment” process that will amplify any methane signal that might be present.

“We can lower that upper limit down to tens of parts per trillion, maybe 50 parts per trillion,” said Dr Webster.

XXXXXXXXXX

Grande Comentario no New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/20/science/space/mars-rover-comes-up-empty-in-search-for-methane.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

  • Ahmet Erdem
  • Istanbul

Well, you’re probably never going to find life if you begin from the point of “if it’s not compatible with what I say about what is needed for life to begin and sustain itself, then it isn’t life.” and how do we know we can detect the vibratory frequencies of all life?

XXXXXXXXX

Pesquisa:

Observar que methano é CH4, ou seja, o Carbono obtem 4 pontes de hidrogenio, iniciando a captura dos outros atomos que começariam os aminoacidos.

Possivel tese: o mecanismo ancestral da respiracao na materia inorganica?

Any expert in Chemistry or Astronomer here? I am layman, but, trying to uderstanding this news. Methane is crucial for aminoacids; methane was found in comets…. is it right? Based in Matrix/DNA Theory, methanol (CH3OH) brings on it its sentence of death, the killer oxygen. If there are clouds of methane, it means that its building blocks are constantly dying but must have a source constantly supring new ones. Then, must have a molecule, CH4, (methane) which absorbs O and becomes methanol. O makes the new molecule surviving with short life and it is dissolved, maybe returning to be CH4. This mutations of CH4 into methanol and methanol back to CH4, due Oxigen, seems to be a primordial mechanism of respiration.

xxxxxx

Wikipedia: Methanogenesis and extra-terrestrial life

The presence of atmospheric methane has a role in the scientific search for extra-terrestrial life.[12] The argument being that methane in the atmosphere will eventually dissipate, unless something is replenishing it. This can be detected (by using a spectrometer for example) then that means there is, or relatively recently was, life present. This was debated[13] when methane was discovered in the Martian atmosphere by M.J. Mumma of NASA’s Goddard Flight Center, and verified by the Mars Express Orbiter (2004)[14] and in Titan‘s atmosphere by the Huygens probe (2005).[15] It is also argued that atmospheric methane can come from volcanoes or other fissures in the planet’s crust and that without an Isotopic signature it is difficult to say what exactly was the origin.

xxxx

My people! You are so away off the beam! In this way, living alien creatures will walk under yours noses and you will not see them. Methane, CH4 is related to biological systems, not “life”. Biological system is a working system not too much different from a galactic working system. Of course!… galaxies created biological systems. Who else? All properties of life are seen as hidden processes of those building blocks of astronomical systems. So, what’s life? The forward step of cosmological evolution at Earth surface? The offspring of Milk Way, as eggs spread in the space? But, who said that the diversification of species from galaxies  does not exist? Who said that any system evolved from a galactic system must be Carbon based? The periodical table shows that every seven elements, the next one repeats all properties of the first. Then, if Carbon is number 6, the element number 13, Al, has same properties. Methane is a precursor of biological systems because the Carbon atom gets 4 hydrogen bridges for capturing the atoms for forming aminoacids. The proof is that methanol, a derivative, found in comets, can produce aminoacids. So, at different environment, in another planet, there is Al and not Carbon, as the base for a working system that is the next evolutionary step. System based in Al that can evolves, till reaching intelligence. Are they alive? If you call those properties expressed by astronomical system as precursor of life, them the aliens based in aluminium atoms are alive. But if there are 200 chemical elements, we do the calculus (200 by 7 = 28…) must have 28 different natural systems evolved directly from galaxies, which has nothing to see with biological systems. In Matrix/DNA Theory we have the formula Nature used for creating galaxies, those Last Universal Common Ancestor for those 28 different species of natural systems. If Curyosity and everybody else going fairway searching for “life” does not know that template, they will see a “living” being and will think that it is a rock!

Muito longo. Tive que resumir o post no seguinte modo:

xxxxx

Thank you for your submission. We’ll notify you at au***@hotmail.com when your comment has been approved.

My people! You are so away off the beam! In this way, living alien creatures will walk under yours noses and you will not see them. Methane, CH4 is related to Carbon based natural systems evolved from building blocks of astronomical systems. Carbon based systems are called “biological systems”. But… who said that diversification of species exists only here, and not at the offspring of this Milk Way?! The periodic table shows that the properties of an element repeats at every group of seven elements. Then, Carbon, number 6, has properties repeated by Al, 13 ( if I remember it right). Methane is CH4, what means that C gets 4 bridges for capturing atoms and forming aminoacids. Why not aluminium do the same? Impossible you will say, because can not exists a living being Al based. Who said living being? We are looking for natural systems evolved from astronomical systems that can evolve getting complexity, still getting intelligence. In Matrix/DNA Theory we have the template for astronomical building blocks, and, if Curiosity or someone else does not know the template… will not grasp what we are looking for.

  • Frank De Canio
  • Union City, NJ

The problem with such explorations is that we are using a human perceptual apparatus to discover a form of life that may be totally different than our expectations. For all we know Martians may have explored planet Earth and found no form of life on it if they were looking through different forms of perception. The color blind do not see colors, and other forms of perception see a flat field with no depth. Maybe we see no life because we’re looking with preconceived notions? Or maybe as the article suggests life on earth ultimately began on Mars and we’re the colonized planet and Martians the colonizers. Hamlet says in Shakespeare’s eponymous play: “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” But then Hamlet had more pressing concerns than seeking life on Mars.

  1. I have to agree with you and Hamlet, after making an exercise: comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems, trying to calculate the face of a possible missing evolutionary link. I got a surprising picture: an astronomical system working under Newtonian mechanics but showing a cover of biological process! Is it possible?! Where is hidden this mysterious system, the real creator of life at Earth? It happens that the system is formed by our planet “if” astronomical systems changes their shapes obeying to a life’s cycle process. Like our own body change shapes from blastulae to fetus to adult, etc., astronomical bodies changes from babies to planets to pulsars, to stars. etc. But, the current official cosmological model is sure that these bodies are formed by spontaneous generation, I must be wrong. Ok, ancient people also believed in spontaneous generation and the current official model can not be the creator of life. My model, yes, everything for building life is there. Let’s go testing the models, time will be the judge.

    • blackmamba
    • IL

    We are searching for evidence of life as we know it. And that definition has been expanding over the years. From deep water thermal vents to toxic springs and dark deep radioactive rocks life is quite varied and resilient. And the fossil record and drifting continents show an ever changing and dynamic planet. Most things that have ever lived are extinct.

    Is exobiology a science? When there is no subject? No facts? No evidence? Or is it theology and mythology?Is there any evidence of intelligent life on Earth worthy of an alien ET stopping by to communicate and visit with us? Are we that intelligent life? Are we life as they know it?

    Thank you for your submission. We’ll notify you at au***@hotmail.com when your comment has been approved.

    1. Our intelligence is a property of our “consciousness” which is a new emerging natural system and still is a kind of fetus or embryo inside an egg called “head” that neither opened its own eyes for to see the shape of its own body and substance. Our conscious system appeared here yesterday, in relation to cosmological time. But in this 15.000 years of cultural existence we learned that for survival we must believe there is a long universal chain of causes and effects where no supernatural forces or magics were seen. Then, based in this experience and lesson, we created the scientific method, which drove us to learn a longer period of these chain than our own existence, we reaches 3 or 4, till 13,7 billions years of this chain. Now we know that this astronomical system can creates at least 27 different shapes of systems, others than the bioligical system created here, We have the initial formula that Milk Way are using for creating new systems, which can evolves till getting intelligence. They can be not carbon based, but aluminium based, etc. If one of them, stranger that could be, walking at our eyes, we will know that they are not alive like us, but they are our brothers, coming from the same astronomical mother – the Milk Way. It is weird, but, if have bacteria in Mars, they are our brothers,,,

      xxxx

      Life on Mars: Down but not out says Mars Society founder

      http://news.cnet.com/8301-11386_3-57603966-76/life-on-mars-down-but-not-out-says-mars-society-founder/?refresh=1380013896492

      by  – 

      Meus comentarios postados na CNET :

      The non-existence of methane does not indicates that Mars don’t have what we need looking for. We must don’t search for “life” only, but for any kind of natural system different from those that we know: atom, stellar, galactic and biological systems. If we find a system more complex than the last evolved non-biological system ( the galactic system, I think) it will be better, but, it don’t need be a biological system, which we call “life”. The galactic system is the creator of biological systems here, at Earth, but at other planet with different conditions and materials, this galaxy could create other kind of systems, which, maybe could evolve till getting intelligence, or consciousness. The Matrix/DNA Theory suggests a model of the building block of primordial galaxies, it explains how the building block becomes a base-pair of nucleotides and evolves into DNA, but it make it here due the existence and abundance of Carbon. It happens that at the periodic table we cn see that at every seven species of atoms, the next one repeats the properties of the first. Then, we have about 28 atoms that can be used buy this galaxy for developing systems more complex than itself. Methane is the initial phase because a Carbon atom is connected to 3 hydrogen atoms which works as bridges for capturing other kind of atoms and beginning construction of amino acids. But there are other 27 kinds of atoms that can do the same, it there is no easy use of carbon at a given planet. Then, carbon methane is not the unique resource for having what we are looking for.

      marcusmh777

      There is no carbon based life on Mars… except for the microbes we sent there… and those microbes have died.

      No methane, no life.   It IS that simple.

      Now, let us make one more hard stipulation… if we found methane that WOULD NOT prove that life exists now, nor ever existed.  But,  when we find NO methane we are 100% sure there is no life, nor was there any life, on Mars. End of story.

      This is not about probabilities, wishful thinking, or religion; its hard cold science. We didn’t find methane, QED, there is no life.

      Zubrin’s suggestion that we need humans there (along side our already perfectly working probe droids) to make real progress is asinine.  Its over folks.  Curiosity has been sucking down several tons of gas for a period of over a year and its instruments have not found even  trace methane. That’s the end of the science on this thing folks. There is absolutely no good reason to send human beings to the red planet; ever.

      …  particularly when we have people on good ‘ol planet earth who do not have clean drinking water nor enough to eat.   Let’s get real here…

      LouisMorelli

      Reply to  @marcusmh777 –  I will show to you how the Milk Way is “alive” and Science can’t grasp it. With six balls in the space more one vortex, we can have a process of sexual reproduction. Or any kind of metabolism seen at human body. These six balls and vortex are just the seven different kinds of bodies that composes the Milk Way. More: with six balls and a vortex we can make a working base-pair of nucleotides, the fundamental unit of information of DNA. If you want see it you must go to the models and pictures at the Universal Matrix/DNA website ( I am not making propaganda but I can’t bring the images here). We need understand that “life” is a wrong word, a wrong concept. Everything that we call life made by biological systems, electromagnetic and mechanical systems can do it also. Science can not see these properties at those natural systems because we are using the reductionist method yet. Science can see the entire process of sexual reproduction at human beings! It needs breaking the process into parts. We are finding these processes at those systems because we are using and developing the scientific systemic method, and the scholar science is a century behind us when the issue is “natural systems”. We are not searching for life, we are searching for complex systems that can evolve till getting intelligence and consciousness, system that can be built with iron, gold, or whatever….

       

       

Stephen Hawking, Lawrence Krauss, As Informações Perdidas e a Armadilha que Representam

quinta-feira, setembro 19th, 2013

Excelente vídeo com legenda em português, descrevendo uma saga incrível atual protagonizada por aqueles que estão sendo considerados os papas do pensamento acadêmico moderno, como Stephen Hawking e Lawrence Frauss, mas que me incita a deixar uma alerta de algo que acho estar errado (baseado na Teoria da Matrix/DNA), o que explico nos comentários postados abaixo do vídeo no Youtube e no site Mistérios do Mundo (veja o video no primeiro link ou siga-o no Youtube):

O Paradoxo de Hawking

Documentário: BBC – O Paradoxo de Hawking ( The Hawking Paradox) 

http://misteriosdomundo.com/documentario-bbc-o-paradoxo-de-hawking

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F57o78rfra0

Meu comentario, postado no Misterios do Mundo:

Hawking é um exemplo do grande mal que está contaminando o meio acadêmico, professores e estudantes. Seus sentidos naturais foram anulados pela doença e foi conectado a um computador. Este é um cérebro eletromecânico dotado de sentidos próprios (sondas, medidores,telescópios, microscópios, etc) os quais, como extensão mais poderosas dos sentidos humanos tem invadido o micro e o macrocosmos na busca de informações. Mas o computador apenas vê e capta as informações relativas aos aspectos mecânicos dos objetos, nada percebe da biologia na matéria e muito menos, quando esta se conecta a algum tipo de mente. Quando o computador se tornou o senhor das informações, passou-as ao cérebro biológico, porem como eram mecânicas, foi alimentando e programando o cérebro biológico a ser mecânico. Ao ponto do ser humano acreditar na versão do Universo contada pelo computador: assim o Universo nasceu de uma explosão (tal como o motor a explosão), produziu buracos negros canibais ( porque a maquina inicialmente tritura matéria-prima), e pela inflação se recicla eternamente ( porque a engrenagem do vai-e-vem é o único sentido existencial da maquina). A face negra da Matrix é a tendencia da matéria buscar seu equilíbrio termodinâmica e todos os sistemas naturais se tornarem sistemas fechados em si mesmos, ao contrario da outra face a de sistemas abertos. Assim se tornou esta galaxia numa perfeita maquina que criou essa biosfera aqui e sua fotografia como maquina perfeita, descrita pela mecânica Newtoniana, esta no meu website. Atacada pela entropia ela se fragmenta em seus bits-informação que  são espalhados caoticamente no seu interior, podendo cair em planetas onde se re-encontram e tentam reconstruir o sistema de onde vieram. Então, do caos, se levanta um novo fluxo de ordem e a biosfera tende ser sua reprodução mecânica, com humanos como meras peças privilegiadas. Seja bem vindo ao Admirável Mundo Novo de Huxley onde existira uma Grande Rainha como nas sociedades mecânicas dos insetos, a qual sera um tipo de ditador como o Grande Irmão de Orwell. A Matrix, através do cérebro eletromecânico já conquistou as universidades e seus asseclas como Hawkins e L. Krauss (Something from Nothing) são glorificados. Ora, a Física descreveria apenas o esqueleto humano, ela jamais captaria a parte carnal e muito menos a mental. Partes que foram feitas por esse Universo porque ele tinha informações para faze-las, ele as contem, de alguma maneira elas o constituem, mas onde estão? O meu avatar ai do lado já responde. Enquanto a Física dominar a Ciência, o lado vivo do Universo e quica uma consciência cósmica alem dele nunca serão percebidos. Na Teoria da Matrix/DNA meus modelos inspirados na selva bruta amazônica enquanto mantive o cérebro biológico, primitivo, débil e pequenino,mas senhor das informações, estão sugerindo que mesmo a galaxia já contem uma cobertura organizada por leis biológicas, como podes ver meu modelo no avatar ao lado. Desmascarando a face negra da Matrix, conhecendo-a, haverá uma oportunidade do estudante salvar sua mente dessa escravidão desse admirável paraíso terrestre que se aproxima, porem bom apenas para estúpidos humanos robotizados. Porem, isto é apenas minha opinião, posso estar todo errado. O estudante tem que pensar nisso e escolher seu caminho.  Não existem estes fantasmas black holes, o que existe nos núcleos galácticos são vórtices como qualquer outro formado por uma nebulosa rotativa. Não existe colapso gravitacional alcançando a singularidade absoluta pois todos sabemos que tudo na Natureza se transforma antes de atingir o absoluto. Perderam tanto o controle das faculdades mentais que já acreditam piamente que tudo veio do nada, como o livro de sucesso do Krauss esta afirmando! Tenho pena do Hawking, do Krauss, mas eles foram enganados, o que se pode fazer? Só poderemos confiar numa Historia do Universo narrada pelo cérebro biológico atuando com seus sensores biológicos, cérebros de fisicos, matematicos, mas tambem biologos, neurologistas…estes tambem tem que participar numa Theory of Everything,  e por mais ninguem, muito menos um alienígena artificial!… A selva tambem me sugeriu que o Universo surgiu com uma explosão no mesmo estilo do Big Bang, porem ao invés de mera Física, eu vi tudo sendo regido por leis biológicas tambem, assim como meu corpo surgiu da explosão de um espermatozoide no centro de um ovulo e a biologia dirigiu minha evolução. A Física apenas capta e descreve a mecânica de meu esqueleto ósseo. e os meus órgãos como o meu figado não fala a linguagem Matemática. Mas…e eu também não sou o Universo?!

Postado no Youtube:

TheMatrixDNA 

TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago

Se eu fosse um microbio, especialista em Física e Matemática, situado dentro de um ovulo onde acabou de entrar um espermatozoide e sua membrana explodiu num escandaloso Big Bang, eu iria escrever a Historia do meu Universo como uma sucessão de movimentos, maremotos e terremotos, buracos negros trituradores (ribosomos), quasares emissores de energia (mitocondrias e ATP), etc. Como a Teoria Cosmológica de Hawking, Krauss. Jamais ia perceber a Vida ali.. Por isso prefiro a Cosmologia da Matrix/DNA

 

Experimento Sugere Interação entre Cometas e Planetas Gerando Aminoácidos e Confirmando Previsão da Matrix/DNA Theory

terça-feira, setembro 17th, 2013
Ice-blasting test proves that comet impacts can spark life’s ingredients 
http://science.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/09/16/20528594-ice-blasting-test-proves-that-comet-impacts-can-spark-lifes-ingredients?d=1

Meus comentarios postados aqui:

  • comment author avatar Louis Charles Morelli

30 years ago was copyrighted a theory just saying: ” half of informations for new systems comes from F5 (comets) and the another half comes from the host (Earth). Nobody else published something connecting comets and origins of life at that time. The Theory, called “The Universal Matrix/DNA for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” shows the formula at its website. You can see at my avatar here how the formula works: look the internal circuit where, from the nude man is emited the spermatozoon towards the woman by the same process that from pulsars’s volcanoes at the right side emits comets towards the yellow colord vortex at the left side. And every day each new scientific discovery is proving the models of that theory. But its suggestions are totally different. For instance, there was no origins of life since that the ancestor and creator (building blocks of astronomical systems) of biological systems shows all biological properties. There are no division among natural systems as living systems and non-living systems. Pulsars and comets were ancestors of Y chromossome. And so on…

raymond-392453 commented 

Life is ubiquitously universal ! This proves it.

Louis Morelli replied 

IN REPLY TO: raymond-392453 #1  — If you understand life as biological system it is not universal. Universal is a natural system that began at the Big Bang in shape of quantum vortexes and evolved to atoms systems, stellar systems, galactic systems and here, into biological systems. Any atom heavier than carbon has hidden in it the seven properties of life, in shape of electromagnetic layers. When there are electrons occupying a layer, the atom expresses one property, while the other six are hidden. So, these atoms could be called “life”? Astronomical systems are described by Newtonian mechanics, we think they are mechanical systems, but, the resulted processes from internal interactions are equal the biological processes of life. (Ok, I am based in Matrix/DNA Theory models), and I could be wrong.

Danny McNeal commented 

Chemical mechanisms for the fusing of simple amino acids into long-chain nucleotides have classically been hard to hypothesize.

Louis Morelli replied 

IN REPLY TO: Danny McNeal #2 You said: fusing of simple amino acids into long-chain nucleotides have classically been hard to hypothesize.)

Amino acids into nucleotides?! I need some help here about chemistry. Amino acids are not fused into chain of proteins? And nucleotides fused into chain of RNA/DNA? I think they are two different things. By the way, the Matrix/DNA formula is suggesting that proteins are the biological representative of flows of energy/information running inside the systemic circuit, while nucleotides are biological representatives of bodies composing the system. The formula for natural system is composed of energy/information in shape of waves (which are related to time and processes) = proteins. And particles (the bodies), which are related to space/inertia. That’s the explanation for proteins and RNA having different formations.

Danny McNeal – replied 

El Profe:

So. spontaneous evolution could form the 3 billion units of specifically ordered biological information on the human DNA molocule? Get real… not even in the time span of a million universes.

Well that’s a hefty claim, which is fine provided you can actually back it up, and the burden of proof for your statement is on you. On what do you base this? (Most of us know better than to claim a negative, which cannot be proven. You can no more prove that human DNA could not possibly have evolved in 4.65 billion years of earth’s history than you could prove that pink polka-dotted unicorns don’t exist.) Meanwhile, scientists are making no claims of certainty, as you have just done, only honestly reporting that they see absolutely no evidence thus far that rules out the possibility of life spontaneously evolving, while hypothesizing and testing possibilities for how parts of that process may have occurred.

In terms of what is realistic, the vast majority of all evolutionary biologists, geophysicists, and other scientists whose areas of expertise touch upon these concepts identify absolutely nothing in the known laws of physics or statistics that lead them to believe that billions of years is an insufficient time period for human DNA to have evolved. And indeed, with each salient scientific discovery on these subjects, it seems ever less unlikely. It would be foolish and unscientific to categorically ignore that statistical trend.

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: Danny McNeal #2.3

You are almost right. Human DNA can be a result of 4 billion years of biological evolution which can be a result of variation, adaptation, natural selection and reproduction. But… if is there a hidden agent driven this evolution? And maybe it exists, as suggested in Matrix/DNA Theory. Who is the invisible agent? Merely the creator and host of organic matter and biological systems, inclusive the DNA. This hidden agent is this astronomical system and its Cosmological Evolution. Nucleotides are merely biological copies of building blocks of galaxies, which are half-mechanical/half biological. At my website you can see the pictures, side by side of a nucleotide and the astronomical building block. This invisible agent is driven this whole biosphere, created by him, for to be its copy, like at any process of reproduction. Human beings are going to be merely a piece of this mechanical/biological system, that’s is the explanation for we are going towards the Brave New World under the Big Queen, as already went the social systems of ants and bees. And the scientists are not seeing this visible agent that is surrounding us from all sides due Astronomy and Physics making the wrong cosmological model.

Flame77_7 commented 

comment author avatar

There is a lot of “Ifs” and “possible” with there experiments….. but hey will see where the experiment lead… The problem is the same  “debris” also “should” have struck Mars, Moon and other planets (as they mentioned in the article) but the crux is the “conditions” for life not the chemistry.   You can find the “essence” of base nucleatides “everywhere” but to “coax life” even impacts with the right ingredients would not be enough.

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: Flame77_7 #5

but the crux is the “conditions” for life not the chemistry.   You can find the “essence” of base nucleatides “everywhere” but to “coax life” even impacts with the right ingredients would not be enough.

There are bits-information for formation of natural systems that resembles the galaxy everywhere inside this galaxy. This galaxy is a system attacked by entropy, so, any star (which has bits-information of the entire system) is radiating fragments of this system in shape of photons, which are bits-information and can work like genes if they meet at the surface of bodies that has conditions for them to join and trying to reproduce the galaxy. But these conditions are dependable of lots of circumstances. Matrix/DNA Theory models are suggesting that the ideal planet must be located in a solar region corresponding to a specific frequency of solar magnetosphere. The weird thing here is that there are possibilities for formation of systems that does not resemble ” life” as we know it, but this system could become intelligent also. Then, we must take the picture of the building block of astronomical systems (the picture is in Matrix/DNA website) and calculate all possibles shapes that they can evolve into. Maybe there are “living beings” made off iron, rubber, plastic, etc.

Moe Szyslak commented 

comment author avatar

One question :  Did the Ice cristals Have some form of Life from the Begining or was it totally without life of any kind , including adam , proton , neutron movement , which is a life in it self ?

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO:Moe Szyslak#6

” Did the Ice cristals Have some form of Life from the Begining?”

Yes Moe, they did. Dry ice is the solid form of carbon dioxide (chemical formula CO2), comprising two oxygen atoms bonded to a single carbon atom. It happens that carbon atom is the unique atom that mimics the building block of astronomical systems, which are the ancestors of the building blocks of RNA/DNA and aminoacids. The problem is that we understand as “life” the biological shape of that astronomical system. Biology is result of increasing a new state of matter – the liquid state (water) and then, emerging the organic chemistry. The ancestor in the sky was made with only two states of matter – solid and gaseous. Then, biological shape is a big mutation due different environment ( at Earth surface we have gravitational force) and different materials. There is no problem for Nature reducing a system of astronomical dimensions into a system of microscopic dimension, since Nature applies nanotechnology, like when it resumes an adult human being inside a microscopic genome. Carbon atom reproduces at atomic dimension the astronomical building block because both, have six elements that works as systemic functions. That’s why carbon was selected for being the foundation of organisms. But… everything I said is based in the models of Matrix/DNA Theory and it could be wrong… take care.

Here we are again commented 

comment author avatar

The problem is not going to be finding life. I think life is abundant, Every fifth star system will have a Goldilocks planets. The problem is Distance. Time. Space is too cast, the distance will stop us unless some great breakthrough comes along showing us how to warp space-time. We are doomed to be a one planet species until such time comes along. Oh how I wish it could be in my lifetime. Sigh. Is the next Einstein here currently?

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO:Here we are again#7

The problem is Distance

Maybe we will solve the problem of distance while you still being alive. The key is a better understanding about natural light. Our ship must be rocketed by something that mimics the sources of natural light. Any light wave expands forming at least seven different frequencies. But… it expands into space, there is no time in light wave expansion,, or at least, it is dispresible . At Matrix/DNA Theory I have discovered that any light wave  has the code that imprints life into inertial mass as the one that fits the space. Because the sequence of different vibrations, or frequencies, is the same sequence of a life cycle that transform our body into at least seven different shapes (blastula, fetus, baby, kid, teenager, etc.). So, if a star is at 200 light years from here, we need to calibrate the source/rocket that reduces a light year into one day and multiply it by 200… and our ship will be there inside 24 hours. How will be the source/rocket? We need to reproduce mechanically any natural source of light, like, for instance, stars. It will not be that difficult since that we are almost creating black holes inside those synchrotrons…and Matrix/DNA has the formula for doing it. (but, maybe the theory is wrong… take care.

a—rand commented 

comment author avatar

Amazing to what extent some people will go, to disapprove the existence of a higher power or intelligence.  No, I don’t think the earth was created in 6 days, but something somewhere was created from nothing.  NOTHING!  When something is made from nothing, it is called Creation.  Meditate on that concept for a while.

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

When something is made from nothing, it is called Creation

Something from nothing, accordingly L. Krauss, does not violates any laws of Physics, but Nature is not limited into matter organized by Physics laws. There are matter organized by biological laws also, which is one level more complex. At Matrix/DNA Theory the models are suggesting that this galaxy is covered by a layer of primitive biological organization that Physics can not grasp it. And must have the laws related to consciousness, also. I think that “something from nothing” violates the laws of rationality, which is related to coinsciousness.

You need to define what you understand by “creation”. Yours own body was made throughout an initial Big Bang ( if the observer was inside the egg when exploded the spermatozoon’s membrane). Nature does not play dice with us, so, the method it uses for creation here it must use everywhere. That’s why Nature makes you by triggering an initial “explosion/expansion” – Nature was made by the same process. So, if you understand the formation of your body as “creation”, no problem with that.

We know that before and beyond the egg that gave birth to you there were the parents ( the observer inside the system can not see them, because nobody inside a system can knows the truth about the system – a Godel’s theorem) like we can not know what was before this cosmological egg called Universe. But… the conclusion is clear: some kind of parents.

Yours parents did not used intelligence for doing you. It is all about natural, genetic process. At Matrix/DNA Theory we re-wrote the History of Universe and the final conclusion is that inside this Universe is occurring a process of genetic reproduction… of… the unknown natural system that was before the Big Bang. No problem if you want call it “God”. But…everything I said is based in a theory, which can be wrong…

Brisaberreplied 

comment author avatar

IN REPLY TO: danangel #9

Doesn’t say that this proves comets DID create the ingredients for life.  Only proves that they could have.  A common argument is that random physical events could not have created complex organic molecules.

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: Brisaber #9.3

It is a random physic event that Marie meet John, but it is not a random physic event that they created a new life. It is enough that the “program” for creating life was, half inside John and half inside Marie. At Matrix/DNA Theory you can see the suggestion about how the program for doing amino acids was half inside the comet and half inside Earth’s matter.

Chuck-3538322 commented 

comment author avatar

The problems of primodial soups are big, but bigger yet is the infeasability of generating without supernatural input an enormous increase in complexity. A wide gulf separtes an aqueous solution containing a few amino acids from the simlest living cell.

Years ago, molecular biophysist Harold Morowitz calculated the size of this gulf. If one were to take the simplest living cell and break every chemical bond within it, the odds that the cell would reassemble under ideal natural coditions ( the best possible chemical environment) would be one chance in 10 to the 100 billionth power. Most of us cannot even begin to picture a speck of chance so remote. With ods so remote as 1 in 10 to the 100billionth power, the time scale issue becomes irrelevant. What does it matter if Earth has been around for ten seconds, ten thousand years or ten billion years?  If all the matter in the universe were converted into the building blocks of life, and if assembly of these building blocks were attempted once a microsecond for the entire age of the universe, then instead of the odds being one in 10 to the billionth power, they would be one in 10 to the 99,999,999,916 power… Some people will believe in anything as long as it is not the hand of God in creating all that surrounds you. Sad.

Louis Morelli replied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

 The problems of primodial soups are big, but bigger yet is the infeasability of generating without supernatural input an enormous increase in complexity. A wide gulf separtes an aqueous solution containing a few amino acids from the simlest living cell

Chuck, there is the possibility that God is more intelligent, as such that He does not need going to each planet touching its matter with supernatural input for starting life. Cell system is the exactly copy of this astronomical system surrounding us. The primordial soup was being bombarded by sun’s light. But… before the formation of any astronomical system, the inertial mass of this space was bombarded by waves of light emitted by the Big Bang. Should be enough if God created light waves containing something like computational program under evolution. Then, the program was inserted into the whole space, creating atoms, systems, galactic systems, and emitted by stars like our Sun, creating biological systems, till, conscious systems. But… such God even did not need using intelligence for doing that, if such program was inside Him, like the genetic program that made you was inside your father. Nothing supernatural, everything natural. It is enough that such God is made off a substance: light. If you want to know how a cell system is the exactly copy of an astronomical system – like son and father – see both pictures at Matrix/DNA website. It is a theory, but it solves this problem, rationally.

JoeAllen commented 

comment author avatar

SCIENCE is, by definition, a body of knowledge that has been established by the SCIENTIFIC METHOD.

The following TWO BASIC HYPOTHESES of Darwinian Evolution have NOT yet been established by precise, repeatable experiments as demanded by the SCIENTIFIC METHOD:

HYPOTHESIS #1: Life-less matter with NO Genome, was somehow TRANSFORMED into a living single-cell organism with a Genome.*

HYPOTHESIS #2: Single-cell organisms somehow EVOLVED into a multi-celled organism.**

When these two Basic Hypotheses are established by means of the SCIENTIFIC METHOD, I will 100% accept Darwinian Evolution as SCIENCE.

 

——————————————————————–

* Nobel Laureate FRANCIS CRICK, the co-discoverer of DNA, after spending more than 40 years trying to prove this Hypothesis, eventually rejected it as … UTTERLY IMPOSSIBLE … !!!

 

** Nobel Laureate WERNER ARBER, a Swiss micro-biologist, has spent more than 50 years of his life, documenting the cumulative effects of MUTATIONS on thousands upon thousands of generations of single-cell organisms. Thus far, Werner Arber reports that he has found … NO MECHANISM … that would enable a single-cell organism to evolve into a multi-cell organism.

Louis Morelli replied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

The following TWO BASIC HYPOTHESES of Darwinian Evolution have NOT yet been established by precise, repeatable experiments as demanded by the SCIENTIFIC METHOD:

It happens that Darwinian Evolution is not about universal evolution (it is biological evolution, a micro-cycle of universal evolution), and interactions between comets and planets is about cosmological evolution. Darwinian evolution has found only three variables (VSI = Variation,selection, inheritance), but, universal evolution has these three variables and more four variables – which has influenced biological evolution also.

” Life-less matter with NO Genome, was somehow TRANSFORMED into a living single-cell organism with a Genome.”

If you say that a single cell is life, you must say that the building block of this galaxy is life also, because all properties here are there also. And about genome, it is merely a pile of derived shapes of a unique system – encrypted into a base-pair of nucleotides. It happens that this same system exists at astronomical scales. So, portions of matter does not have “genome” but, astronomical system have it.

The evolution from a single-cell organism into a multi-celled organism happens by the mechanism of quorum sensing. A large population of single-cells attached as the marine corals has the tendency to self-organize by the same template that was organized one individual. It happened when the primordial nebulae composed solely by atoms became stellar systems. See Matrix/DNA models and you have more information.

comment author avatar

Michael (Astronomy.FM) replied 

And the scientists are not seeing this visible agent that is surrounding us from all sides due Astronomy and Physics making the wrong cosmological model.

Translation:  “Hey, lookee here!  With this magic wand I can see things that are invisible to science!”

Reaction:  “Poppycock and balderdash.”

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

Michael, magical wand is being applied by you, as astronomer, through mechanical sensors connected to a electromechanical brain, elaborating cosmological theories from computer simulations. The final conclusion of yours is that randomness is magical, able to create things like the genetic code, and the Nothing is magical, able to create something. What is the difference from the magical gods of creationists?

I have no magical wand, I have a real human scientific method, which is keeping a biological brain when analysing the data got by mechanical sensors, putting them under the scrutiny of human reasoning. My method is simple: comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems, the ancient method that began this enterprise called Human Science. But… human consciousness still is a baby (it can not open its own eyes for to see its own body, yet) and every baby translates the real phenomena that they are seeing into fantasies, maybe because they does not have a rational method. So, I am aware that my theoretical astronomical models must have some kind of fantasy, although I am trying to clean them when applying a rational method. Yours model has as the best representative a man that lost his natural sensors, they does not works anymore, he is connected to a computer, which sensors are mechanics, the data are analysed by computational simulations, so, the electromechanical brain is modelling the biological brain for to be a mechanical brain also, when interpreting the invisible dimensions at micro and macro scales. The final result is that yours theoretical Universal History is the same history of man made machines, beginning with the motor explosion in a big, big bang! Wake up man, while you have time. We need a universal history, the meaning of life and our existence, from a humanistic view point, narrated by our Reason.  Astronomers today are getting the Stephen Hawking disease. By the way, it is theory against theory, and since one can not debunks the other, only time wil be the final judge.

Ferrosynthesis-3490482r

“Attacked by entropy”  What does that mean?”

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: Ferrosynthesis-3490482 #5.4

What means “attacked by entropy”? First of all, you need remember that all of us here are talking about theories, each one trying to reach the final correct interpretation from the results of this experiment. But… thermodynamics is a theory also, since that it relates to natural systems, and nobody knows a real closed and complete natural system. My method has suggested a theoretical model of natural closed system, I am based upon it, because it has made right predictions and is rational, accordingly to my still infant and non-complete reasoning. I got this model of closed system when trying comparative anatomy between the data we have about this galactic system and the data we have about the nowadays results of its evolution, which is the cell system. This method draw a picture of an intermediary system between Milk Way and cells, which should be the missing evolutionary link. It happens that the picture reveals a complete working closed system, at astronomical level. My conclusion is that it in fact exists and is a kind of building block of astronomical systems. Then, calculating how this astronomical system was transformed into a cell system, the explanation is entropy. But… entropy of closed system is not like the third thermodynamic law, which is based into opened systems. Entropy of closed systems is internalized, something like when yours own body reach the final energy grow at 16 years old and begins to decrease. Informations from the periphery of yours body are driven into a small, microscope, copy of yours, called spermatozoon. The configuration of a astronomical building block is the same configuration of a DNA building block. Then, biological systems that emerged here are results from entropy acting over this galactic system. Also, pieces of comets falling over Earth surface means events of chaos, not order, which means the presence of entropy. The risen of amino acids means that from chaos is emerging a flow of order. But… still it is a theory, 30 years under testing against every new scientific discovery, and it could be wrong.

Brisaberreplied 

comment author avatar

My post was more directed at danangel, who was not satisifed with the title of the article.  I merely pointed out that the title was appropriate.  In my mind there is no doubt that comets were involved in biogensis of life on earth, both as a means of delivering materials and delivering energy.

As for some metaphysical matrix mumbo-jumbo, it’s not needed.  There is plenty of opportunity within the normal physical universe for things to happen randomly with astonishing results.  There is no need to rely on “hidden agents” or “unknown natural systems” that predate the big bang.  You can look all you want for some deeper meaning, but science is the study of the observable physical universe, not the metaphysical.

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: Brisaber #9.6  –  You made a good point remembering to danangel that the title refers to proving the existence of a natural mechanism, does not prove that this mechanism was applied with comets. And I merely pointed out that yours saying “a  common argument is that random physical events could not have created complex organic molecules” suggests that this experiment proves that this argument is wrong. Nope. From these amino acids to the very complexes molecules of life there is an astronomical distance. If you want to fulfill this astronomical distance with your mumbo-jumbo magical randomness producing events that reaches the complex molecules as DNA, feel free for doing it. We will talk when you finally will prove it in the next 3,5 billion years. The program inside John and Marie are not metaphysical mumbo jumbo and they are not unknown natural system, so, it is rational that one use them trying to explain the origins of life. But, yours  sequence of random events as the creator of DNA, this is purely metaphysical, since that it is.not falsiable and never will be. But… I don’t worry about, it is theory against theory, nothing else…

Danny McNealreplied 

comment author avatar
MUITO BOM POST! 

Atom Balm:

In reply to: Danny McNeal #1.5also, isn’t there a difference between evolution and abiogenesis?

Well, it depends on how you define your scope. The comment left by jock59801 immediately below yours is correct in that “BIOLOGICAL evolution and abiogenesis are two completely different things”—that the evolution of living organisms, which are already arbitrarily defined by us to be “living,” is distinct from the question of how PRE-biotic building blocks actually assembled into self-replicating living systems. Abiogenesis is just one hypothesis for how this may have taken place. The term “evolution” can, however, and often is in the scientific literature and professional journals defined with a wider scope, which encompasses not only biological evolution but the evolution of pre-biotic building blocks across the arbitrary threshold of inanimate/animate, as well as the evolution of the physical conditions in which the laws of chemistry and physics play out among these building blocks. When evolution is defined this expansively, it is better thought of as the study of the principles of self-organization on all levels of matter and energy.

To define the term “evolution” expansively is necessary when scientists probe questions such as, “What is the range of conditions which a planet, a planet’s host solar system, and even a solar system’s host galaxy must evolve to in order to allow for pre-biotic building blocks to cross the arbitrary threshold into what we call life, not to mention the range of conditions which must be evolved for BIOLOGICAL evolution to take place.” Doing so takes account of the fact that, in the strictist terms, the earth gave birth to us, but only with the help of key characteristics of the solar system, such as the stabilizing influence of the moon on the precession of Earth’s axis of rotation and the gravitational influence of Jupiter that reduced the rate of cometary/asteroidal bombardment of the earth dramatically, as well as the help of key characteristics of our host galaxy, such as the organization of regions of low radiation flux, stable solar system orbit around the galactic core, etc.

Ultimately, my comment to BannedForLife above was in response to his/her use of the term “evolution” to encompass the process of pre-biotic precursors self-organizing through the laws of chemistry and physics over time. Since I had no way of knowing how expansively s/he was defining the term “evolution,” I just ran with it…

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: Danny McNeal #1.20

Very well said. You have the ability to put the right words at right place. Sometimes I think that the relation between this galaxy and us is equal the relation between us and the 80 or 90% of cells that inhabit our body but does not belong to us. These tiny bacterias are totally dependable of the internal conditions and structure of human bodies, so, we are dependable of the right equilibrium of this galaxy and its structure. Do you think a billion year ahead these bacterias inside our body will evolve to insects, reptiles, mammalians, monkeys and microscope humans? Certainly no, because our body is different from galaxies and should drive their evolution to another shapes. What matter here is that we have a situation where it is clear that an invisible agent (to bacterias as observer in their little world) also drives evolution. Then, evolution is not a blind force, neither natural selection is merely a logistic that results from random events. It suggests that there is an agent behind natural selection. For our intern bacterias the agent is the human body, for us in this planet (as observer at our little planet) it is the galaxy… It is the Matrix/DNA and when I talk about it some people says that the Matrix is metaphysical… Only food for thought… Am I wrong? Where?!

dbarakreplied 

comment author avatar

IN REPLY TO: Brisaber #2.5  Guys like that like to twist words and facts and concepts to their own side of an argument, even when they KNOW they’re being disingenuous. Even if they truly believe their position, they’ll lie to promote it. It’s the same in politics, conservative and liberal.

Louis Morellireplied 

comment author avatar

  • YOU

IN REPLY TO: dbarak #2.11  You are right. Steeling balls into blocks of ice with a glorified BB gun is news to be explored at exhaustion by believers in the theory that from nothing comes something and believers that the existence of life is a marvellous trick of Nature, since that if not collisions between comets and planets never would be life. These guys are not able to rationalize anymore that something from nothing is a metaphysical idea, and are not able to ask themselves why, hells, just happened that comets have ammonium hydroxide and methanol and planets have pristine water and carbon dioxide ice for such perfect marriage generating building blocks of life. I thought about, I made this question to myself 35 years ago when my hobby was calculating cosmological models that could produce life as it is here and the best model is designed here at my avatar. See there which are the mechanisms that give origins to comets,the mechanisms that drives comets towards planets and the composition of comets containing half information for creating biological systems. If you want understanding it, you need go to the Matrix/DNA website, which was copyrighted long time ago. There are several holes in the theory and yours contribution or yours prove against it will be welcome.

XXXXXXXXXXXXX

Post For Los Angeles Times:

http://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-comet-impact-life-20130916,0,4729019.story

At my avatar here you can see this mechanisms discovered now, how and why it works (comets emitted by pulsars towards the nucleus in analogy  of a spermatosoon emitted by a human male towards the pregnant woman. This mechanism is part of Matrix/DNA Theory copyrighted about 30 years ago, when nobody was thinking about such possibility. This news is more evidence and right prevision of this theory.

It is not  a random event that ammonium hydroxide and methanol from comets are complementary with pristine water and carbon dioxide ice from planets for producing building blocks of life. Like it is not merely coincidense that planets have the shape of eggs and comets the shape of spermatozoons: the offspring repeat the shapes of their creator. Then, the mechanisms that produces life at planets are ancestors of the mechanisms that produces human babies. Biological systems (aka “life”) are merely effects of reproduction of astronomical systems.  So, it is not a weird idea that comets hitting planets could produce amino acids, it is result of an unique universal evolutionary lineage of a unique natural system that began at the Big Bang.

XXXXXXXXXX

Posts nos Artigos em Portugues:

http://misteriosdomundo.com/criatura-engrenagens-pernas-descoberta

Louis Charles Morelli ·  Quem mais comentou · Queens

De onde a Natureza ou este inseto obteve recursos para construir esta engenharia se ambos são considerados não inteligentes?! No meu avatar ao lado está a explicação. Foi pela observação de milhares de fenômenos assim curiosos na selva amazônica que me levou a elaborar a Teoria da Matrix/DNA a qual sugere sempre explicações jamais pensadas antes. Todas as partes desta engrenagem e os mecanismos de impulso já existiam na Natureza antes das origens da vida, em qualquer dos antigos sistemas naturais, como átomos e galaxias. Por exemplo, a engrenagem com rodas dentadas. No núcleo galático existe um turbilhão espiralado na forma de cone e sua existência vem dos primórdios do Universo quando vórtices quânticos com sentidos contrários se ligavam formando partículas cônicas. Separando-se o cone verticalmente obtém-se duas metades cada qual contendo a meia parte de cada linha magnética, assim como duas partes de um zipper. Esta operação foi imitada ao surgir o DNA, formado por duas partes “dentadas”,porque tendo sido esta galaxia que produziu os sistemas biológicos aqui, suas características foram transmitidas aos nossos corpos. Tal criatura, tal criador. Depois repetiu-se no flagelo bacteriano. E os insetos nada mais fizeram que expressar os seus genes que tinham informação em potencial para essa maquinaria, devido alguma necessidade de sobrevivência. Também o impulso espontâneo já existia, basta lembrar dos vulcões emitindo magma, ou prótons emitindo píon. Esse inteiro fenômeno é visível na formula da Matrix/DNA e, a formula que a Natureza tem usado quando produz uma nova forma do sistema universal que vem desde o Big Bang, a qual está no meu website. Toda essa engrenagem foi descrita a 30 anos atras quando entrei com o registro para copyright. Mais uma vez nossas previsões se confirmam. Veja mais explicações no debate que se segue ao artigo na NBC NEWS, “Ice-blasting test proves that comet impacts can spark life’s ingredients”

Sérgio Pereira · Auxiliar Administrativo na empresa Prefeitura de São Vicente

A ciência cada vez mais mostrando evidências de projeto (Design Inteligente) nas plantas e animais. Isso não surgiu do acaso ou de um processo não-direcionado (seleção natural) de milhões e milhões de anos. Porém, alguma mentes obtusas não querem ver. O pior cego é aquele que não quer ver.

Louis Charles Morelli ·  Quem mais comentou · Queens

Mas também manter a mente no estado infantil quando se avança para a idade adulta não é aconselhável. Crianças fantasiam a realidade, falam com amigos invisíveis. Da mesma forma essa auto-consciência que surgiu na Terra ainda ontem em termos de tempo cosmológico ainda esta na sua infância por isto é natural que elabore construções fantasiosas como as religiões misticas e veja fantasmas inteligentes em fenômenos naturais facilmente explicados pela Natureza depois que o conhecimento racional observa e estuda o fenômeno. Veja a explicação de onde vem as origens desta maquinaria no meu post acima ou no meu website. No próprio avatar ao lado feito a 30 anos atras podes ver o mecanismo funcionando. A visão de mundo da Matrix/DNA não descarta a possibilidade de que antes e alem do Universo exista um sistema natural consciente e inteligente criador de universos e tudo que neles estão, porem como tudo aqui dentro foi explicado numa simples linha logica de causas e efeitos sem a necessidade de interferência de nenhuma inteligencia. A mamãe girafa produz uma girafinha, uma obra de extraordinária engenharia, sem usar nenhuma inteligencia. Assim tem sido tudo o que a Natureza tem feito. A auto-consciência de quem quer estudar pode agora dar o salto evolutivo e sair do estagio infantil. Concordo também que a ação de ateus no meio intelectual e cientifico revela imaturidade mental, ao criar acasos mágicos e absolutos que não estão presentes na linhagem evolucionaria descoberta pela Matrix/DNA. Temos nosso cérebro ainda muito pequenino, a imensidão e idade deste mundo é inimaginável,e isso aconselha a manter-mos a mente aberta a todas as possibilidades e continuar buscando respostas, amadurecendo. Não existem certezas para eliminar nossos deuses, porem devemos observar imensidão deste mundo para deixar de reduzir os deuses a nossas ínfimas dimensões, devemos restaurar os deuses a grandeza que eles merecem.
XXX
No Los Angeles Times
rRuhling at 7:56 PM September 16, 2013

Baloney! I have three degrees in science, including one in chemistry. The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics says the energy systems of the universe  run down unless acted upon by an outside force. To think that life “could” come as they hypothesize, is utter nonsense, “like a jumbo jet from an explosion in a junk yard, as one scientist put it in TIME magazine some years ago. For a really good website on the facts of life vs evolution, I recommend this website– http://pathlights.com/ce_encyclopedia/creation-encyclopediaTOC.html

Louis Morelli at 6:17 PM September 20, 2013   Change your avatarThe 2nd law of thermodynamics is theory and is not complete since nobody never saw a closed system and does not know how it works. But, life couldn’t come as they hypothesize also, since that there is no knowledge about this galactic system that produced “life”. And the word “life” makes no sense if we don’t call the ancestors natural systems (atoms, galaxies) as life also. We have discovered that impacts into dry ice by bodies with carbon dioxide and methnol can creates some aminoacids, that’s it. Everything else is speculation and interpretations driven by privates world views. The Matrix/DNA Theory’s models suggested 30 years ago that comets are agents acting for biological systems formation and suggested other kind of mechanism, but, it is theoretical also. We have no other alternative than search more and more.

XXXXXXX – FIM DOS COMENTARIOS –  XXXXXXX

Tiras da noticia:

–  “This process demonstrates a very simple mechanism whereby we can go from a mix of simple molecules, such as water and carbon dioxide ice, to a more complicated molecule, such as an amino acid,” the University of Kent’s Mark Price, one of the leaders of the experiment, said in a news release. “This is the first step toward life. The next step is to work out how to go from an amino acid to even more complex molecules such as proteins.”

–  ammonium hydroxide and methanol, two key compounds found in comets.

 the team found several amino acids in the goop, including glycine, norvaline, alanine and isovaline. No amino acids were found in the control ice. That suggested that the cometary chemicals were key to the reaction

– Goldman and their colleagues mixed up a batch of pristine water and carbon dioxide ice 

Ok. Entao os materiais que foram misturados (do cometa mais da Terra) foram: pristine water, carbon dioxide ice, ammonium hydroxide, methanol.

– That suggested that the cometary chemicals were key to the reaction

 “the catch is that these building blocks need the right conditions in order for life to flourish.”

– “This increases the chances of life originating and being widespread throughout our solar system,”

 “As this new work shows, amino acids, once formed, are relatively stable to further degradation,” Benner told NBC News in an email. “This is unlike ribose, for example, which is part of a genetic molecule. Unfortunately, it is not clear that proteins built from amino acids can ‘do’ genetics.”

 

XXXXXXXXXX

Pesquisa:

NA TERRA

1) Pristine water: definition, having its original purity; uncorrupted or unsullied. = h2o

2) Carbon dioxide ice or Dry ice, (gelo seco) sometimes referred to as “cardice” or as “card ice” (chiefly British English), is the solid form of carbon dioxide. Dry ice is the solid form of carbon dioxide (chemical formula CO2), comprising two oxygen atoms bonded to a single carbon atom. It is colorless, with a sour zesty odor, non-flammable, and slightly acidic.

Carbon dioxide (chemical formula CO2) is a naturally occurring chemical compound composed of two oxygen atoms each covalently double bondedto a single carbon atom. It is a gas at standard temperature and pressure and exists in Earth’s atmosphere in this state,

As part of the carbon cycleplantsalgae, and cyanobacteria use light energy to photosynthesize carbohydrate from carbon dioxide and water, withoxygen produced as a waste product

carbohydrate is an organic compound comprising only carbonhydrogen, and oxygen, usually with a hydrogen:oxygen atom ratio of 2:1 (as in water); in other words, with the empirical formula Cm(H2O)n (where m could be different from n).[1] Some exceptions exist; for example, deoxyribose, a sugar component of DNA,[2] has the empirical formula C5H10O4.[3] Carbohydrates are technically hydrates of carbon;

NO COMETA:

3) Ammonia solution, also known as ammonium hydroxideammonia waterammonical liquorammonia liquoraqua ammoniaaqueous ammonia, or simply ammonia, is a solution of ammonia in water. It can be denoted by the symbols NH3(aq).

Like other gases, ammonia exhibits decreasing solubility in solvent liquids as the temperature of the solvent increases.

4) Methanol, also known as methyl alcohol, wood alcoholwood naphtha or wood spirits, is a chemical with the formula CH3OH (often abbreviated MeOH).  From synthesis gas:  Carbon monoxide and hydrogen react over a catalyst to produce methanol.

(Nao confundir methane CH4 com methanol CH3OH)  – O methane volta a ser noticia porque a Curiosity nao acha metahne em Marte (antes satelites e telescopios imformavam captarem metano la) e isso confrona a teoria de que o planeta tenha tido ou ainda tem vida, pois metano pe fundamental para iniciar a vida. Estou deduzindo pela formula do metano que ele ja tras sua morte rapida em si mesmo, pelo atomo de oxigenio. Entao seria um gaz que constantemente estaria trocando seus building blocks como na sopa primordial do Big Bang. Mas entao teria que ter uma fonte produzindo metano constantemente, ou algo qie recebe o gaz desfeito e o refaz. Mas esta curta vida do metano lataria a possibilidade das moleculas iniciais da vida, como aminoacido, se firmarem. No entanto, tem a informacao que na Terra, 95% do metano pe produzido por organismos vivos.. Isto levanta a hipotese de que nao apenas as moleculas de gaz metano desapareciam, mas sim a totalidade do gaz tambem, porem, logo apos se firmarem, os organismos contornaram o problema do desaparcimento do gaz aprendendo eles mesmos a produzi-lo. Se aprenderam a produzi-lo pe porque a fonte do metano esta no corpo deles. Isto quer dizer que a fonte misteriosa que supria metano para a atmosfera de Marte, e da Terra, foi transferida ou transmitida sua copia para o corpo do organismo. Agora pe preciso saber como o organismo produz o metano, para saber onde esta a fonte inorganica que sumiu da Terra e talvez de Marte.

Surge a hipotese que o metano respira, ou seja…, A formula do metano pe CH3OH. Suponha que exista uma molecula CH4. E nela entra um Oxigenio. Torna-se metano. O oxigenio desfaz a molecula. Mas imediatamente outro CH4, ou o mesmo que resultou da morte de um metano absorve novo O. O metano surge novo ou ressuscita, se veio de outro metano desfeito. Isto pode ter sido o principio da respiracao no mundo organico.

xxxxxx

Intuicoes, conclusoes:

Anino acido formam proteinas e nao nucleotides, nao estao no RNA e DNA. Parece-me que aminoacidos representam a corrente de energia que curcula no circuit, o que chamo de ondas do tempo, enquanto nucleotideos representam os corpos no circuito, ou seja, as mesmas ondas tornadas particulas. Isto porque ja tenho descoberto que proteinas representam os trechos do circuito entre os corpos.

Amino acids (/əˈmn//əˈmn/, or /ˈæmɪn/) are biologically important organic compounds made from amine (-NH2) and carboxylic acid (-COOH)functional groups, along with a side-chain specific to each amino acid. The key elements of an amino acid are carbonhydrogenoxygen, and nitrogen, though other elements are found in the side-chains of certain amino acids. About 500 amino acids are known[1] and can be classified in many ways. Structurally they can be classified according to the functional groups’ locations as alpha- (α-), beta- (β-), gamma- (γ-) or delta- (δ-) amino acids; other categories relate to polaritypH level, and side chain group type (aliphatic, acyclic, aromatic, containing hydroxyl or sulfur, etc.) In the form of proteins, amino acids comprise the second largest component (after water) of human musclescells and other tissues.[2] Outside proteins, amino acids perform critical roles in processes such as neurotransmitter transport and biosynthesis.(Ver mais)

Comparison of the structures of alanine and beta alanine. In alanine, the side-chain is a methyl group; in beta alanine, the side-chain contains a methylene group connected to an amino group, and the alpha carbon lacks an amino group. The two amino acids, therefore, have the same formulae but different structures.

Ok. Entao aminoacidos sao formados de amine (-Nh2) mais Carboxylic acid (-COOH). Vejamos o que pe isto:

Amines are organic compounds and functional groups that contain a basic nitrogen atom with a lone pair. Amines are derivatives ofammonia, wherein one or more hydrogen atoms have been replaced by a substituent such as an alkyl or aryl group.[1] Important amines include amino acidsbiogenic aminestrimethylamine, and aniline; see Category:Amines for a list of amines. Inorganicderivatives of ammonia are also called amines, such as chloramine (NClH2); see Category:Inorganic amines.Compounds with the nitrogen atom attached to a carbonyl of the structure R–CO–NR′R″ are called amides and have different chemical properties from amines (Ver mais)

secondary amine

Ammonia or azane is a compound of nitrogen and hydrogen with the formula NH3. It is a colourless gas with a characteristic pungent smell. Ammonia contributes significantly to the nutritional needs of terrestrial organisms by serving as a precursor to food and fertilizers. Ammonia, either directly or indirectly, is also a building-block for the synthesis of many pharmaceuticals and is used in many commercial cleaning products. Although in wide use, ammonia is both caustic and hazardous. The global industrial production of ammonia for 2012 is anticipated to be 198 million tonnes,[7] a 35% increase over the estimated 2006 global output of 146.5 million tonnes (Ver mais)

carboxylic acid /ˌkɑrbɒkˈsɪlɪk/ is an organic acid characterized by the presence of at least one carboxyl group.[1] The general formula of a carboxylic acid is R-COOH, where R is some monovalent functional group. A carboxyl group (or carboxy) is a functional group consisting of a carbonyl (RR’C=O) and a hydroxyl (R-O-H), which has the formula -C(=O)OH, usually written as -COOH or -CO2H.[2]

Carboxylic acids are Brønsted-Lowry acids because they are proton (H+) donors. They are the most common type of organic acid. Among the simplest examples are formic acid H-COOH, which occurs in ants, and acetic acid CH3-COOH, which gives vinegar its sour taste. Acids with two or more carboxyl groups are calleddicarboxylictricarboxylic, etc. The simplest dicarboxylic example is oxalic acid (COOH)2, which is just two connected carboxyls. Mellitic acid is an example of a hexacarboxylic acid. Other important natural examples are citric acid (in lemons) and tartaric acid (in tamarinds).

xxxxx

Nucleotides are organic molecules that form the basic building blocks of nucleic acids, such as DNA and RNA. A nucleotide is composed of a nucleobase, a five-carbon sugar (ribose or deoxyribose) and at least one phosphate group.

Nucleotides serve to carry packets of energy within the cell (ATP). In the form of thenucleoside triphosphates (ATPGTPCTP and UTP), nucleotides play central roles inmetabolism.[1] In addition, nucleotides participate in cell signaling (cGMP and cAMP), and are incorporated into important cofactors of enzymatic reactions (e.g. coenzyme AFADFMNNAD, and NADP+).

Synthesis[edit source | editbeta]

Nucleotides can be synthesized by a variety of means both in vitro and in vivo.

In vivo, nucleotides can be synthesized de novo or recycled through salvage pathways.[3] The components used in de novo nucleotide synthesis are derived from biosynthetic precursors of carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, and from ammonia and carbon dioxide. The liver is the major organ of de novo synthesis of all four nucleotides. De novo synthesis of pyrimidines and purines follows two different pathways. Pyrimidines are synthesized first from aspartate and carbamoyl-phosphate in the cytoplasm to the common precursor ring structure orotic acid, onto which a phosphorylated ribosyl unit is covalently linked. Purines, however, are first synthesized from the sugar template onto which the ring synthesis occurs. For reference, the syntheses of the purine and pyrimidine nucleotides are carried out by several enzymes in the cytoplasm of the cell, not within a specificorganelle. Nucleotides undergo breakdown such that useful parts can be reused in synthesis reactions to create new nucleotides.

In vitro, protecting groups may be used during laboratory production of nucleotides. A purified nucleoside is protected to create a phosphoramidite, which can then be used to obtain analogues not found in nature and/or to synthesize an oligonucleotide.

 

Localizando a Formula da Matrix/DNA no Sistema Corpo Humano

segunda-feira, setembro 16th, 2013

 

Mao pela Reflexologia e a Formula da Matrix

 

A Matrix primeiro criou o corpo biológico ao longo da evolução depois que a primeira célula se multiplicou e possibilitou a emergência dos multi-celulares. No meio destes corpos primitivos foi surgindo um sistema nervoso, o qual continha a identidade do sistema. Posteriormente deste sistema nervoso a Matrix criou um novo sistema mais complexo que é o cérebro. Cada órgão do corpo humano, localizado no tórax e quadris, deve corresponder a cada organela do sistema celular, assim como cada organela deve corresponder a cada grupo de moléculas que compõem a unidade de informação do DNA, que é um par horizontal de nucleotideos contendo as bases nitrogenadas e o açúcar nas hastes. E cada parte dessa unidade de informação corresponde a cada Função Universal Sistêmica na Formula da Matrix.

O problema agora é identificar no corpo humano qual órgão corresponde a qual função sistêmica. Como disse o grande Vaclav Havel ” a nossa Ciência conseguiu penetrar nos mais recônditos e microscópicos pontos do corpo humano, conhecemos muito sobre atomos, moleculas, células, órgãos… mas… no entanto, doenças milenares como o cancer, a diabete, etc., continuam a matar milhões de humanos. Isto deve ser porque algo esta nos escapando…” E na minha opinião o que esta faltando é o conhecimento do corpo como sistema, como um todo, pois parece-me que aquela identidade invisível dos sistemas que esta causando estas doenças. E se a teoria da Matrix/DNA estiver correta, com a sua formula temos uma grande oportunidade de finalmente alcançar este conhecimento. E eliminar estas doenças. Portanto o beneficio para a Humanidade seria gigantesco, o que justifica nosso esforço tentando qualquer possibilidade.

Na figura acima temos um quadro fornecido pela “reflexologia”, da qual nada sei, mas suspeito que se trata de algo feito com base na filosofia oriental, que relata coisas como chacras, pontos energéticos da acupuntura, etc. Se o mapa acima tiver fundamento, o nosso trabalho se torna facil. Observe, por exemplo que, se localizar-mos a F1 onde esta a figura uterina, a coisa começa a fazer sentido. O intestino bem acima realmente preenche a ideia da formula da Matriz com a F7, onde se depositam os dejetos do cadáver. A posição do coração vai bater exatamente na posição da F4 – pulsar, o órgão masculino que ejeta, bombeia, magmas vulcânicos, de onde pode ter vindo o coração como uma bomba ejetando o sangue.

Vou agora fazer uma pesquisa melhor do que é “reflexologia”, pois o mapa acima parece merecer credito.

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflexoterapia

Reflexoterapia é a utilização terapêutica da Reflexologia. É uma técnica de tratamento por meio de estímulos em uma área reflexa. Reflexologia é o estudo das delimitações destas áreas, assim como as suas funções e ações diante das patologias humanas. É um dos recursos da medicina natural, holística, ou medicina complementar, antigamente conhecida como medicina alternativa, mas também considerado como Pseudociência. Em 2009 uma revisão sistemática de experimentos aleatórios controlados concluiu que “A melhor evidencia existente até o momento não demonstra que a reflexologia é eficaz no tratamento de qualquer condição médica”.

Do In, de origem japonesa, e o Tui Na, de origem chinesa, incluem princípios de Reflexoterapia como estes entre seus tratamentos. Não há consenso entre os reflexologistas sobre como a reflexologia deve funcionar, a idéia unificada é que algumas áreas no pé correspondem à áreas do corpo, e que manipulando-as pode melhorar a saúde através do “chi”. Uma suposta explicação é que a pressão recebida pelo pé (ou outra parte do corpo) pode enviar sinais que “equilibram” o sistema nervoso ou que liberam quimicas como a endorfina que reduz o stress e dores.2 Estas hipoteses são rejeitadas pela grande maioria da comunidade médica, a qual cita a falta de evidência científica e a bem estudada Teoria do Germe da Doença.

1. Pituitary 2. Neck 3. Side of head and Brain 4. Top of head and Brain 5. Sinus 6. Eye 7. Eustachian tube 8. Ear 9. Thyroid 10. Lung 11. Heart 12. Solar Plexus 13. Liver 14. Spleen 15. Stomach and Pancreas 16. Small Intestine 17. Colon 18. Bladder 19. Ureter tube 20. Kidney 21. Adrenal 22. Shoulder 23. Ovary/testes. 24. Sciatic Nerve

Ficheiro:Reflexology of the Hand.JPG

 

Áreas reflexas

As principais áreas reflexas trabalhadas são: as mãos (reflexo palmar); os pés (reflexo podal); as orelhas (reflexo auricular); a coluna (reflexo vertebral); a face (reflexo facial); e o crânio (reflexo cranial); a boca reflexo (bocal)

Nas mãos

O mesmo princípio se aplicaria às mãos. Nas mãos e nos pés, a região mais próxima à ponta dos dedos corresponderia à cabeça e a região mais próxima ao pulso e ao tornozelo à região do quadril.

Nos pés

Os praticantes desta técnica acreditam que existem pontos nos pés que refletem a situação da saúde do corpo humano por inteiro. Por isto, estimulam-se estas áreas para aliviar dores, distúrbios orgânicos, emocionais (leves) e de várias partes do corpo, gerando assim um grande equilíbrio corporal, da maneira mais simples possível.

Sir William Osler (n. 12 de Julho, 1849 – f. 29 de Dezembro, 1919) médico canadense, sendo um dos ícones da medicina moderna, chamado por vezes de “pai” dela, era um conhecedor e defensor da Reflexologia Podal, tendo um dia afirmado que: “Quando os nervos dos olhos e dos pés forem corretamente entendidos, haverá menos necessidade de intervenções cirúrgicas”

Críticas

A crítica mais comum contra a reflexologia é a falta de evidências para a afirmação de seus efeitos, ou de qualquer base científica ou demonstrativo para as suas teorias. Assim como outraspseudociências sem qualquer efeito provado além de placebo, se seus pacientes dependerem apenas dela ou até rejeitar tratamentos médicos efetivos, aumenta o risco de saúde do paciente.

A afirmação que a reflexologia pode manipular energia(Ki ou chi) sempre foi extremamente controversa, já que não há nenhuma evidência científica mostrando a existência desta energia(´Ki´, ´balanço de energia´,´estruturas cristalinas´ ou ´meridianos´) no corpo.

DEFINICOES DO TEXTO:

do-in serve-se dos mesmos pontos utilizados na acupuntura para tratar e prevenir distúrbios e enfermidades no corpo, restaurando, segundo os conceitos damedicina chinesa tradicional, o fluxo da energia Ki, onde esta tenha sofrido bloqueios ou desequilíbrios.

Tui Na 推拏 ou 推拿 (também grafado tuiná), é uma forma de massagem chinesa frequentemente utilizada junto com outras técnicas terapeuticas daMedicina Tradicional Chinesa, como a acupunturamoxabustãofitoterapia chinesa e qigong.

Qi (também grafado como ch’i na romanização Wade-Giles ou ki na romanização do japonês), é um conceito fundamental da cultura tradicional chinesa. O termo pode ser associado de um modo bem amplo ao conceito ocidental de energia: diferentes ideogramas com este mesmo som representam em chinês a energia dos alimentos, do ar e a energia pré-natal

xxxxxXXXXXX

Agora ver o mapa acima da mão ampliado. Procurar mais da imagens da mão no Google. Trazer para cá imagem do corpo humano mostrando localização e função dos órgãos.

 

As Mãos : Novas Informações (Teoria de Engel e Reflexology Map)

domingo, setembro 15th, 2013

Assunto a ser pesquisado e incluído no artigo sobre as mãos pela Matrix/DNA

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/machines-imitate-life-the-insect-that-goes-through-the-gears-just-like-a-car-8812231.html
stumpyTA  Dr. Plop

I’ll give you a transitional example. Humans.

We were (before we developed speech) evolving towards a better system. Our thumbs – a great tool – are slowly being replicated with our little fingers. You’ll note that your little finger is actually significantly stronger than your middle fingers.

While as good at gripping as our hand currently is, it would be far far better if we had two thumbs. We could grab and manipulate much heavier and more diverse objects.

This is unlikely to continue as we have a virtual 99% child survival rate now so there’s no longer an advantage to humans having stronger little fingers so that strain will likely go no further – but it is, as you requested, one of thousands of ‘intermediary’ stages of evolution whereby something can be observed in progress, and not as a complete set.

Dr. Plop  stumpyTA  (criacionista)

Is there any evidence in the record of human remains to suggest that man’s little finger has ever changed form/function?
There are a great many species that have human-like hands, and that are subject to the vicissitudes of living in the wild. Your rationale is that such species could benefit from having two thumbs. Is there any evidence that such species either now or in the paleontological record have shown signs of their little fingers turning into thumbs?

Marsinah Jawa  Dr. Plop

There are no other species with a thumb like humans have

If you had ever watched an orang utan trying to use a saw, you would have see the advantage of our thumbs

Raja Bob  Marsinah Jawa

What specific attribute of human thumbs are you referring to?

Opposable thumbs appear to be common in primates generally, including both Strepsirrhini and the Haplorhini suborder which includes Hominidae, or great apes, which is what humans are.

Marsinah Jawa  Raja Bob

Human thumbs are unique in that they are not just opposable but are able to grip strongly across the other digits. That makes them flexible and powerful enough to create and use tools – look them up

Marsinah Jawa  Dr. Plop

It’s a reply to you, because it was the evolution of the human hand that was the key to the development of intelligence, a position first argued by Engels, of all people, and now supported by recent research, published in the last couple of weeks
(see Science Daily)

XXXXXX

A evolução das mãos humanas foi fundamental para o desenvolvimento da inteligencia, uma posição primeiro defendida por Engels, e agora suportada por recente pesquisa, publicada nas ultimas semanas no Science Daily ???

Preciso pesquisar isso e acrescentar no artigo sobre as mãos. 

Meu comentario postado no debate acima do The Independent:

Avatar

TheMatrixDNA  Marsinah Jawa

• a minute ago – Sept/15/2013 – 03:a7 PM

Marsinah: I need the link for this article at Science Daily and any other talking about this research. In Matrix/DNA Theory I am very interested about human hands because my theoretical models are suggesting that it is key for deep understanding about evolution/nature. Please, put yours left hand over the formula with the palm over the cone at F1, and each finger over each other function, try to understand the meaning. Matrix/DNA suggests that the shape of human hands is the shape of Matrix formula, which should be the ancestral of DNA at cosmological evolution. The position, shapes, and functions of all fingers match exactly with the shapes and functions of all pieces in a perfect system. But, in the Matrix formula for perfect systems, its pieces are different due obeying the transformations produced by life’s cycles. Then, the fingers are aligned in same sequence of any process of life system. The explanation is that, every time Nature needs to built a new system or a new accessory for existent system, nature apply the same formula that I called Matrix. Then, the formula can be modified for adaptation to do the work that the system needs, but the structural formula is kept. Look to yours fingers: the smaller mimics the babies’ shapes and functions, the next mimics the children/teenager, the middle mimics the young/adult, the other mimics the mature adult and the thumb mimics the senior going to die…it is the history of any life’s cycle! Cheers…

XXXXXXXX

Obtido no Facebook em: ( Sun Gazing)

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=244375882383915&set=a.136345136520324.30543.136336876521150&type=1&theater

 

Reflexology Chart – Hand Points. Press with thumb for 5 seconds & release for 3 seconds, in the affected point. Repeat for 2-3 minutes for 5 to 10 days.

The humans hands is a good evidence that there is a universal Matrix formula being used by Nature. The shape of our fingers and palm is not merely product of random and blindness evolution guided by necessity. You will understand everything if you put yours left hand over my avatar here. Click over the avatar, put the palm just over the pregnant woman, the minor finger just over the baby, and so on, till the thumb over the dying old man. Are you grasping that yours fingers is a real account of a life cycle? Think about the shape, size and function of each finger making comparisons with the figures under them. But, why it is in this way? No metaphysics, no intelligent designer, it happens that every time Nature needs to create a new system or any accessories for existing systems, Nature apply the same formula. Then, the final shape and function will be determined by the circumstance where the new tool will operate. It is fantastic, Nature does not stops at surprising us… it seems that there is some kind of intelligence hidden behind everything, an intelligence that solve all problems with a single but living formula! I didn’t know about reflexology chart and now I will research this issue because it is not surprising that our hands contains points related to the whole system. It must be because the hands were made by the universal Matrix/DNA formula.

 

O Impressionante Salto dos Insetos, Explicado Pela Ciência, já Estava Escrito nas Estrelas a Bilhões de Anos Atras!

sexta-feira, setembro 13th, 2013

Jump start: tiny planthoppers’ gears make it first off at the lights

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/jump-start-tiny-planthoppers-gears-make-it-first-off-at-the-lights-20130913-2tq91.html#ixzz2enLHuD3k

September 14, 2013 – by Meeri Kim

Close up: The intermeshing gears of the planthopper.

Planthopper_gears

Tudo o que se descobre feito pela Natureza aqui na superfície da Terra, se descobre tambem na formula da Matrix/DNA que já era feito pela Natureza a 10 ou 13,7 bilhões de anos atras e no espaço sideral. Por exemplo, na figura acima, atônitos cientistas observando o filme revelado por microcâmeras instalados num inseto menor que um mosquito, uma extraordinária engenharia mecânica sendo acionada e funcionando, que explica aquela questão que humanos se perguntaram desde o inicio dos tempos: ” Como, raios, esse bicho pula tao rápido, como um piscar  olhos, saltando no ar em distancias centenas de vezes maior que seu corpo?!!!”  Não se encontrava uma explicação racional em bases cientificas, parecia mesmo um milagre. Já imaginou se humanos conseguissem fazer isso? Ninguem conseguiria dar um soco, um pontapé, em ninguem! Se alguem estivesse numa esquina esperando o sinal abrir para atravessar a rua, e de repente decidisse que era melhor estar na outra esquina um bloco a frente, era só dar um salto no ar, em microsegundos… Mas espera ai! Isso não ia dar certo. Todo mundo iria querer pular para ganhar tempo, então ia ser uma “trombaiada” no ar entre humanos das feias… daquelas de todos saírem com seus narizes quebrados. E ia ter os atletas do pulo, com alguns trombando com aviões passando la em cima.

A formula da Matrix/DNA ensina que tudo o que a Natureza tem de recursos, estão encriptados no nosso DNA, e depende da vontade ou necessidade de uma especie desenvolver e expressar tais recursos. Em algum momento da evolução, na passagem de insetos para a forma seguinte, nossos ancestrais abandonaram esse recurso do salto espontâneo, porque estava lhes causando algum problema. Agora sei porque.

Mas onde estava esta engenharia oculta na Natureza quando ela construiu, por exemplo, os sistemas astronômicos, tais como as galaxias? Vamos ver a formula no seu desenho rustico feito em papel de embrulhar pão enquanto eu dava tapas no ar tentando acertar os danadinhos vampirinhos chamado piuns e carapanãs que queriam me jantar chupando meu sangue, mas não conseguia acertar um porque o pulo da minha desajeitada mão é muito mais lento que os pulos deles.

Matrix/DNA: O template para todos os sistemas naturais, de átomos a nucleotideos a galáxias e células. O circuíto energético padrão.

Matrix/DNA: O template para todos os sistemas naturais, de átomos a nucleotideos a galáxias e células. O circuíto energético padrão.

E para esclarecer melhor, vamos tambem trazer esta formula no seu aspecto de alma dos sistemas, ou seja, apresentada como um diagrama abstrato de software:

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

O segredo esta no cone central da Função 1, que no building block de galaxias se refere ao núcleo onde se esconde um vórtice rotativo. A Função 1 é a responsável por triturar, misturar processando, a massa e energia que entra no rodamoinho e emitir o resultado final para o espaço externo. Como todas as demais seis funções sistêmicas universais, ela vai confeccionar o seu instrumento de ação de acordo com o material disponível e as condições reinantes num dado ambiente. Ela construiu o vórtice no nucleo das galaxias, mas antes deve ter construido (vai me perdoando ai as falhas de acentuação das palavras e os erros datilográficos porque estou num teclado que só fala inglês e tenho que escrever este texto muito rapido porque o meu tempo fora do trabalho é muito curto),  o mecanismo que emite um píon de um próton na direção de um nêutron dentro do nucleo atômico, e depois, mais tarde ela construiu o aparato feminino da confecção e emissão de um novo baby, assim como ela teve que se contorcer um pouco e dar seu jeito de construir a boca dos animais, já que esta é a porta de entrada e trituração dos alimentos. Mas a emissão de babys é um processo lento, a emissão de vitaminas e fezes dos alimentos também é um processo lento, e a emissão de sementes de astros pelo nucleo galáctico é ainda mais lento, tomando milhões de anos. Enquanto isso, o pulo dos insetos é algo instantâneo, rapidíssimo! Como isso é possivel? Qual outro recurso da Natureza encravado no DNA dos insetos eles usaram para conseguir tal façanha?

Simples. É a identidade do sistema que determina a velocidade do fluxo energético que corre dentro de seu circuito sistêmico. Ela pode se acelerar ou ate se estacionar, no caso das hibernações.

Vemos então na figura azul acima que os sistemas naturais possuem a capacidade de se movimentarem por vontade própria, girando sobre si mesmo. Nos acionamos este principio quando nosso corpo rodopia, como faz a bailarina no palco. Agora, temos um problema: o auto-rodopio é um rodopio do sistema inteiro, como um todo. No entanto, temos observado que para conseguir rodopios dentro do sistema, e não dele inteiro, os humanos inventaram uma coisa chamada de rodas de engrenagem ( ”It’s remarkable that these gears look so similar to the gears man has designed, even the individual teeth are so similar,” said Professor Burrows ). Então como a Natureza internalizou um mecanismo externo, como foi que esse obreiro universal que denomino de Função 1 conseguiu aplicar esta mesma solução, transformando o livre rodopiar do sistema em rodas de engrenagem par fazer suas partes internas rodopiarem?

Diz o artigo acima:

” They found that the insects have toothed gears at the base of their hind legs that intermesh and rotate to perfectly synchronise the timing of each limb’s release during a jump. With this mechanism, the legs are locked and coupled together. The time delay from moving one leg to another is as short as 30 microseconds, or 30 millionths of a second, allowing the insects to leap faster and farther. Without synchronisation, the insect’s body will spin instead of going straight forward due to the orientation of its hind legs, Professor Burrows said. For example, using the most extreme case, a single-legged planthopper can only helplessly spin around in the same spot without getting anywhere.”

Traduzindo grosseira e rapidamente: ” O inseto, cuja figura é essa aqui…:

Sprung: The planthopper has provided evidence that the powerful jumps of insects are made possible by interacting gears in the hind legs.

Sprung: The planthopper has provided evidence that the powerful jumps of insects are made possible by interacting gears in the hind legs. Photo: Courtesy of Malcolm Burrows

tem uma especie de roda dentada em suas pernas com um calibrador para sincronizar o movimento de rotação com o movimento de impulso para a direção inclinada ” para a frente e para o alto”. Assim o calibrador regula a liberação de cada movimento em microsegundos. Com este mecanismo as pernas são fechadas e acopladas juntas. O atraso de tempo entre o impulso que faz o inseto girar sobre si mesmo e o impulso que faz o inseto ir para o alto é sincronizado, senão, como acontece om um inseto que tenha só uma perna, ao invés dele saltar, ele fica no chão rodopiando sobre si mesmo.”

Entendeu? Nem eu entendi direito, mas isso se deve a lentidão do nosso raciocínio que não nos permite as vezes acompanhar os movimentos em velocidades quase igual da luz que a Natureza pode executar. O que interessa é que ele acontece. No espaço sideral a Natureza construiu um sistema na forma espiralada ( a formula acima na realidade não é uma esfera como parece, mas sim, uma espiral, acontece que eu ainda não tive tempo para calcular e modificar o desenho), que, em relação ao nosso sistema de visão, situa o cone nuclear numa posição horizontal em relação ao sistema. Mas quando foi fazer as bocas dos animais, o sistema giratório horizontal não era possível, como a trituração dos pedaços grandes de matéria jogando-os uns contra os outros tambem não era possivel aqui na Terra devido a diferença gravitacional. Então a F1 teve que verticalizar o cone e transformar suas aureolas que compõem a linha espiral na forma de dentes. Separando o cone em duas metades se saiu com os maxilares inferior e superior, cada parte saindo com sua metade de dentes. Vemos quando cavalos mastigam que eles apenas não só fazem chocar os dentes das duas partes, mas tambem, no instante seguinte ao choque, vemos o maxilar inferior se mover da direita para a esquerda, enquanto o superior fica estacionado, o que completa o processo de trituração da erva. A isso chamamos de ” mastigação”. Esta é uma parte chata e enfadonha na observação dos detalhes na Natureza, tanto que a maioria das pessoas jamais concentrou sua mente para pensar porque o maxilar vai para a esquerda. No entanto, temos que fazer o sacrifício de observar estes detalhes chatos porque são eles que nos fizeram criar as áreas da engenharia e foram estes sacrifícios de físicos como Galileo atirando pesos do alto de torres e observando cada detalhe em suas quedas que hoje temos esta extraordinária engenharia que tanto já nos tem livrado do trabalho forcado e rotineiro.

Inseto que se esquece de acionar ao mesmo tempo seu impulso para frente, gira rapidamente sobre si mesmo na mesa ate ficar tonto, cambalear e ir ao chão, ao invés de se exibir na nossa frente e dizendo: “Veja como sou capaz de pular muitas vezes a altura do meu corpo!” e realmente dar o pulo. Não funcionou seu calibrador natural. Mas com tudo isso, com mais esta fantástica e louvável descoberta de nossos esforçados cientistas que tiveram a pachorra de colocar uma microcâmera atada na barriga do inseto, e mais a observação da formula da Matrix/DNA Universal, a cada dia vamos aumentando a nossa inteligencia, a qual nada mais é que a transformação dos fenômenos naturais em símbolos, imagens, internalizadas em nossa mente, e tais mínimos detalhes são somados para resolver problemas práticos do nosso dia a dia, desenvolvendo nossa tecnologia, a qual um dia vai nos catapultar para dar-mos o gigantesco salto sobre as distancias interstelares e nos colocar no Cosmos aberto a nossa busca de conhecimento, de liberdade e de poder… assim como nossa incansável busca alem do espaço sideral de quem foi que nos criou.

XXXXXXXXXX

Veja video no Youtube sobre –

Planthopper gears in action

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq0Mf2pt2XA

XXXXXXX

O melhor texto da materia e este na National Geographic

This Insect Has Gears In Its Legs

http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/09/12/this-insect-has-gears-in-its-legs/

XXXXXXXXXX

fazer um ultimo post para todos os artigos:

XXXXXXXX

Meu comentario postado na National Geographic:

  1. Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Louis Charles Morelli
September 14, 2013

” The planthopper nymphs lose them when they become adults. But the adults don’t shoot off in uncoordinated spins”

These scientists need to know the design of the most perfect machine built by Nature – which was the real creator of biological systems like the planthopper – for understanding the origins and function of every piece in planthopper. The design is the theoretical model of the building blocks of galaxies systems elaborated by Matrix/DNA Theory, the anatomy of LUCA – the Last Universal Common Ancestor. These astronomical building blocks have identical configuration with the building blocks of DNA, nucleotides. It means that all novelty found at any biological systems are reducible to this galaxy. For instance, the tooth-like structure first appeared at the DNA “zipper”. This separation into two wheels came from the separation of DNA strands. But… the DNA tooth-like came from the reproduction here of the vortex existing at the nucleous of this galaxy. The vortex is a conic spiral. If we cut this cone into two halfes, we have the spiral lines like tooth at each half. In the design we can see that the vortex works like a bump, ejecting new babies stars. This mechanism is coupled after the gearing vortex. Like it is in planthopper. The most astonishing issue is about the planthopper life cycle being shared into two phases, when the young gears changes methods. At Matrix/DNA Theory we know that evolution always works shared into two phases (like the first eggs-out and the second, eggs-in). In the sky, the emitted baby-star also shows two phases of movement: first, it rotates around the vortex, but, as it becomes old, it gets another circuit, launched ahead the vortex. This synchronization was not invented by insects, it already exists in the sky! Everything equal! I have discovered that everything about bees or ants social organization is just a copy of this building block of our ancestor astronomical system. Insects are the best copies of LUCA. What came later were deviations of biological systems due the new environment.

Postado tambem em: Yahoo News

http://news.yahoo.com/creature-interlocking-gears-legs-discovered-180333015.html

XXXXXXXXX

Paper publicado em:

AAAS.ORG. – Science

Interacting Gears Synchronize Propulsive Leg Movements in a Jumping Insect

http://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6151/1254

XXXXXXXX

Meus comentarios e debate no artigo do Wshington Post:

Louis Charles Morelli
3:53 PM EDT
This mechanisms of synchronized self-spinning and jumping can be seen working at the building block of galaxies 10 billions years ago. It is encrypted at biological DNA and can be used by any species that needs to express its genes. For most accurate understanding you can see it in the Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems, googling: O Impressionante Salto dos Insetos, Explicado Pela Ciência, já Estava Escrito nas Estrelas a Bilhões de Anos Atras!
Bob Smith
7:16 PM EDT
I knew this story would bring the creatards and IDers crawling out of the woodwork in droves. We just love to let our critical thinking go out the window and give ghost stories free reign when we see something natural that has the appearance of human design.
I would laugh if it weren’t so tragic.
Louis Charles Morelli
8:42 PM EDT
But… the second wave of creatards today is coming from the critical thinking, besides the magical thinking, like this one, believing that this stupid matter of this lost planet could inventing such extraordinary engineery. It is not enough Nature teaching that everything complex – like this synchronized instrument – does not appears by magics from poor soups, neither from magics of intelligent designers, but is product of long, long evolution. Rational thinking suggests that we must search the origins of this mechanisms not in galaxies, which are not magical creators either, but before it, at the atomic nucleus, when a proton emits pion towards a neutron and keeps the system spinning.Don’t go there, continuing to believe that this mechanisms is here because it is here, and you never will understand it in full.
andrew23boyle
This is a bit off topic but seeing all the theists and “intelligent design” folks makes me want to pose them a question or two:How do they reconcile the existence of evil in a universe created by an all-powerful, infallible and omniscient being that is supposed to be good? God could have created a perfect universe without evil because he’s all-powerful. Evil can’t an oversight because he is all-knowing and infallible. “Free will” is a cop-out because one can’t have free-will if one was created by a being who knew with perfect certainty before he created his creation what those creations would do.
Louis Charles Morelli
9:13 PM EDT
First of all, while you are believing in the current cosmological model and the world view resulting from this model, you never will understand what is in Nature that human intuition at its infant times called “evil”. It happens to you because this world view is wrong, not because the existence of evil is wrong. You are not enough smart for asking yourself that ” I am seeing bad forces causing bad effects at every event in this world, but I am criticizing those that believes in evil…” In other words, you are searching yours self-blindness, because evil=bad forces for infant minds. When we have a more accurate cosmological model with a more true world view, the meaning of evil and the explanation for bad forces changes dramatically, but then we understand how a baby mind had operated when translating bad forces into the idea of an identity that they called ” evil”. In Matrix/DNA model, bad forces originated from photons that goes out from the normal course of light waves which is the carrier of life’s code. They creates a self-reality, separated from the creator’s goal, which does not care about this separated simulated reality. And those photons are our universal creators, our first ancestors, so, we are creators of bad forces. But… there is nothing supernatural here, since that this universe is merely a genetic process of reproduction from a natural system existing beyond the Big Bang. Things are far, far more complex than we were thinking…
andrew23boyle
9:18 PM EDT

L.C.M:I don’t believe in “evil”. I was addressing those who do believe in “evil”, “good” and, especially, “god”.I don’t think you understood a word I wrote but way to make personal attacks and call me an “infant”. It speaks volumes about you.
Louis Charles Morelli
10:04 PM EDT

Now I knew that you did not understand a word I wrote, but it is my fault, since that English is not my native language and I am based in a world view that you never had read before. I understood that you don’t believe in evil, I was trying to explain from my viewpoint why the infant minds at the beginning of human culture had the intuition about evil. There were no intention of personal attack, sorry. I am not a creationist and I don’t know nothing about magical gods and magical evil also, my post suggesting that these mechanisms already existed from billions of years is based in theoretical models of Matrix/DNA Theory.
andrew23boyle
10:23 AM EDT
LCM:Thanks for the elaboration. That makes more sense.I’m sorry that I mistook you for insulting me. Now that I know you’re not a native speaker it makes more sense. I thought you were just crazy but now I can see better what you were getting at.And your English is very good. It’s just that some of the phrasing you used could be interpreted as saying I had a “baby mind” but now I see you didn’t mean it like that.Sorry again for the misunderstanding. It’s more my fault than yours
ESTA SERIA MINHA RESPOSTA A ANDREW23, MAS, CLARO, NÃO A PUBLICAREI PORQUE ALEM DE SER FORA DO TOPICO DO ARTIGO, é MUITO LONGA.
All right. I used the words “baby minds” because my theoretical models in Matrix/DNA Theory are suggesting that human mind, or consciousness is merely a new evolutuionary shape of a universal system that began its existence at the Big Bang, fragmented in quantum vortexes popping out into this time/space. The supposed existence of an unknown force responsible for instructions in the DNA and now, the same force, more evolved, working as instructor of human brain, lead me to search this force before life’s origins and the comparative method between living and non-living systems suggested a model where this unknown force is a kind of software, that evolves by feed-back with changing hardwares, like atoms, astronomicals and biological systems. I have calculated the shape, the picture of this new emergent system called “mind”, based in evolution and the brains’ structures. Now, the job is testing the theory. If the models are right, human consciousness must be just now a kind of embryo or a baby at birth. So, the primitive tribes that invented religions maybe were at the mind’s state of fetus or baby minds. 
But, as you explained very well in yours post, the religious faith does not resists to scrutiny by Epicuro’s logica. Moreover, the believer does not care, he continues feeding his faith. Why it happens? The models of Matrix/DNA are suggesting a surprising explanation. The believers will expose the fair tales of the fall of Lucifer due his free will, and after that the fall of Adam/Eve after choosing the reign of Lucifer insted the reign of God. Since that Lucifer(the evil) is bad for us, they invented the sacrifice of Jesus Christs, the fair tale of Mahomeh, etc. Now it is up you if you chose the lucifer or the God way. The worst thing here is that this metaphysical elaborated logica makes sense. It makes more sense than Epicuro’s logica, because it does not explain anything about the existence of this world. So, we, that see the Epicuro’s logica as the best, will never convince a believer using only words. Those fair tales were genially invented for to fit the fantasies that populates a infant mind, which has the normal behavior like any kid of believing and talking with invisible friends  
My focus then, has been upon the process that created those genial fair tales. So, by the most ancient books I found that these middle east religions began when a man, called Schimeon Ben Jochai, described worlds seen in his visions, which are resumed as ” The Stancias of Dzian”. We read there notions as black holes in the sidereal space, spirits spinning seven times, etc. Schimeon’s disciples had antropomorfized those descriptions and their development resulted into the Bible, the Kuran.  Now, oir problem is to explain how Schimeon’s brain produced those descriptions about worlds and dimensions never seen by others. Matrix/DNA models suggests a reazonable explanation. It happens that the model of a building block of galactic systems, when designed over a paper, shows all symbols amd events contained in those fair tales. We see there the shape of the system is the shape of a SERPENT, but by a different perspective is also like a TREE, and seen from above is like an APPLE. If you look to the model now you will understand it. Then, the model shows energy circuits that works like X and Y chromossomas in a mechanical reproductive procees, and antropormorfazing it you get the names of ADAM and EVE. The astronomical system was a closed system, a kind of PARADISE for matter at thermodynamic equillibrium, but, as closed system it is prohibited by the laws of the Universe, that they called “GOD”. As result, the galaxy was built by evil, “LUCIFER”. Then, entropy attacks every natural system, and the result is the “Fall” of this systems. It happened that this building block of astronomical systems were fragmented by entropy into its smallest bits and from stars they are radiated towards Earth surface. Here, these bits meets together and begins to re-built the astronomical system, in a microscope and mutated enviroment. The final results today is “humans” as the offspring of Adam/Eve. Everything described at those fair tales in the BIble – without antropomorfizing it –  was real once time, about 5 billions years ago!  It is merely a scientific description of Cosmological Evolution!  
The problem is: How Schimeon got the real Universal Natural History, 4 thousand years ago?! At Amazon jungle I was watching natives describing their visions after drinking a kind of alucinogenous beverage. My surprise is that they described something very similar to Schimeon’s and more, very similar to those visions og a chinese that saw dragons in the lake and created the oriental religions. It happens that the figure of I Ching is exactly the model of the building block of galaxies, again! My final theory is results of logical thinking: the state of the world at billions years ago, before that world building the events of life’s origins, were fragmented into bits-information in shape of photons irradiated by stars. At Earth surface these photons worked like genes, building the first living cell system, wich is a biological reproduction of that building block of astronomical systems. These photons-genes constitutes primordial RNA and DNA, and this DNA are at the center of human brains’ neurons. It happens that primordial native minds like Schimeon, and natves of Amazon jungle, with or not alucinogenous, makes that flashes from the time that our ancestors were galaxies, popo out in the mind. Since that the observer does not comprehend the Cosmos and the events seems humanized, they invents analogies, antropomorfizing the past times. Everything must be at our memories. Welcome to the world of Bible, Kuran, they make more logical sense than Epicuro’s logics because they are based in natural logics, although fantasied. There are no gods and evils like described in these books, but, we, humans, are a kind of natural system, last evolved product of a unique natural system that once time was in shape of atoms, stellar, galactic system, and then, was in shape of bacteria, fish, monkey, etc. This system has crossed Cosmological History with a kind of unconscious free will, it made mistakes against natural universal laws, but if you go now to the natives of Amazon jungle showing pictures og galaxies, black holes, DNA, cells systems… wait more 50 years and go back… you will find a lot of new natuves fair tales of gods like Tupa and spirits of the jungle, etc.. But… those fair tales will be a logical constrution, because they were based in real pictures and real events, showed by you. It is a kind of ” Deja vu”, you are their memory in the future bringing adqured knowledges about the past.
XXXXXXXXXX
andrew23boyle
This is pretty cool. Nature can be truly amazing.One species achieves something through mutation and (I assume being bugs) massive procreation, another evolves individual intelligence and some genius invents it.
Louis Charles Morelli
9/13/2013 9:26 PM EDT

We have problems with yours statement. First (One species achieves something through mutation) you are seeing the same that ” one species created something never existed before, so, it created something from nothing”. Second (another evolves individual intelligence), you are saying that another species crated intelligence where never intelligence existed before, so, it was created from nothing. Third (some genius invented it), again, you are saying that there are genius able for creating something from nothing. If we breaks the current world view taught at schools we meets these slices of “something created by nothing all the way around”. But, it is not enough that Darwin had discovered that no novelty came from nothing, everything is result of gradual transformation leaving from the simple to complex. It means that the informations for doing such synchronized gear already were disposable in the Universe, it were not created here and now. That’s what I am doing with my Matrix/DNA Theory: searching till the Big Bang where were the informations for everything complex we see here and now and how they developed.
Aran Rees
I do love it when people see something that *seems* extremely improbable and say “that’s clearly impossible!” and then follow up by arguing that something which is *actually* impossible is more likely!
You hear it from believers in all sorts of nonsense.  (read more)
Louis Charles Morelli
9/13/2013 9:44 PM EDT

I do love it when people see something here never saw before and calls the mechanism of mutation and natural selection for explaining it existence. But I do love that same people does not found at the state of the world when these biological systems emerged here, the forces and elements of mutation and natural selection. In another world, while the antique magical thinking invented God as magical being, these modern people shows same magical thinking inventing a state of the world as magical device. You hear it from believers that believes that they have critical thinking….As you said “Small variations happening over millions of years being “selected for” by basic, natural laws can’t possibly have lead to something so complex. It MUST be the work of a supernatural being… “, now the saying is that it is the work of bubbles that pops out from nothing like popcorn. On Matrix/DNA Theory we are observing that during 9 months an initial amount of mass without shape called blastulae goes from small variations to small variations and finally creates a very complex thing. It is Nature showing the process occurring here and now, Nature does not plays dice with us, it makes things here like it makes things everywhere, even at cosmological scales. Bit there is no supernatural being inside the womb making those things and I am not seeing bubbles popping out from nowhere. That’s happens inside the womb because there is a program working hidden inside matter. then. the normal rational thinking goes to outside, till the entire Cosmos, searching for some specie of program hidden into matter. I found the Matrix formula, showed at my website. Of course, it is not the whole thing, but it is a more rational explanation.
RustysMaster
I thought one of the scientists was going to have a theory about how such an intricate mechanism with interdependent pieces could come about through an extremely long series of random events. Oh well, let’s just say it’s “unknown”.
Louis Charles Morelli
9/13/2013 10:24 PM EDT

Rusty, there is explanation about “how such an intricate mechanism with interdependent pieces came into existence here”. All these pieces already exists in the most perfect machine created by Nature, called ” the building block of galaxies”. If you see the picture of that astronomical machine ( the theoretical model of Matrix/DNA Theory), you see there all these pieces. And if you knows how this astronomical system made biological systems, throughout a normal genetic process, you will understand how this insect has coupled these mechanisms together again. The biggest surprise waiting for Darwinists that believes in LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) is that LUCA never existed at Earth surface, but it is the entire system to which this planets belongs to. There is no Intelligent Designer acting between this galaxy and its creations, which does not means that could not be possible that an Intelligent Designer was acting before the Big Bang. I know that small variations and natural selection does not explain this mechanism either, but, the theories elaborated by these scientists are based upon a wrong cosmological model.
dickm
The intellegent design aficionados have come out of the woodwork.Intellegent design just like creationism is nonsense. There is no good reson for needing a God to create the universe.If there were an all powerful, all knowing, perfect and thus never changing God, why would He even bother with all this? Before He even created the Universe, He would have known exactly what would happen in it for all time – where every sub-atomic particle would be as well as what every human would ever do.Being all powerful, He could have created the Universe 13.8 billion or 6000 years or 6 days ago and made it exactly as it is right now. So what would have been the point? How is messing with a bunch of tiddly winks very interesting when you already know exactly what they will do before you start.

As Stephen Hawking has stated – God was not needed to create the Universe. Nor do we need a God to understand what our purpose is or even to provide a moral compass. Our purpose as a species is to survive and grow. And many of us have found that by helping others, we really are helping ourselves do just that.

 Louis Charles Morelli
9/13/2013 11:15 PM EDT

So, yours technical explanations about how insects got these mechanisms is…. I know, you will repeat the mantra: small variations over time, successful procreation and natural selection. But, any chain of variations needs a beginning. So, where and when have you located in Nature the forces and elements that converged to here and how was the process they used. If you does not know those forces and elements there is no difference between yours beliefs and the beliefs of those intelligent designers aficionados. You are affirming something you does not know the primordial foundations. Am I wrong?
Take care when listening to Stephen Hawking. It is not his natural sensors, connected to his natural brain, that’s invading the micro and macro cosmos in search of informations. Those sensors are mechanical instruments connected to an electro-mechanical brain. Does not believe in such world view. I think it is more rational preferring the different world view of Matrix/DNA that’s coming from the brute and salvage nature at Amazon jungle, at least, it is natural.
xxxxx
Pensamento sendo desenvolvido:
Como a Natureza produziu esta engrenagem com dentes?
Pense num cone espiralado girando sobre si mesmo. Se separar este cone verticalmente em duas metades, teremos cada parte com metades das linas horizontais. Se novamente ficarmos juntando e separando as duas metades, veremos algo semelhante a uma boca mastivgndo, batendo dentes com dentes.Ou veremos um zipper, como o DNA.
Vamos pensar raciomalmente sobre este fenomeno? Estamos observando um insecto, o qual pe um monte de atomos organozados, conectados, num modelo unico, especifico. E de repente nos vemos este monte de atomos pulando alturas incriveis e numa incrivel velocidade. Tentando entender o que esta acontecendo, descobrimos que este monte de atomos se organizou na forma de engrenagem, dentada, que dispara um impulso para girar sobre si mesmo, mas tal impulso apenas serve para iniciar um movimento que apresenta um diferente efeito, o de saltar rapido e longe. E nos parece que a direcao do movimento foi previamente determinada.
Vamos aos atomos, ao que sabemos deles, procurando onde e como estao os seus recursos que lhes permitem tal movimento. Vemos eletrons pulando camadas eletronocas, vemos no nucleo, particulas pions emitidas por protons na direcao do neutron, vemos eletrons girando em torno do eixo nuclear… e assim estamos cendo que os atomos ja tinham estes recursos revelados no corpo que eles formaram e que chamamos de inseto. Mas nao vemos rodas dentadas nos atomos.
XXXXXX
Comentario Publicado em:
Ok, we have discovered the planthopper gears, and explained a natural phenomenon. My question is: how this stupid insect made off this non-intelligent Nature got it?! This equipment is from a human being view point, new information, but… is it new natural information, I mean, from Nature’s view point? Of course the answer must be “no”. Nature is not magical, it can not creates new information from nothing. The natural forces and elements applied into this equipment must be elsewhere. Where? The Matrix/DNA Theory method suggests an explanation:
Time before the existence of insects, there were vortexes at the center of this ” Milk Way”. This vortex is spinning around its axis. This vortex is spiral. If we cut a spiraled cone into two half, and then try to link them together, we will see the spiral lines as toothlike structures. Hold the right slice and move the left, we get the spinning movement. This whole picture was reproduced as the DNA’s zipper. It is not surprise that this DNA have reproduced into insects the phenomenons that are registered into its memory. If we look to Matrix/DNA model of galaxies, we can see how its nucleus works like a bump ejecting new baby-stars.
But where the insect got the trick of jumping ahead under a driven pre-determined direction and coupled this thick with the other already installed equipment?! Let’s go again at past times searching inside the whole universal Nature. Then we find that this movement like “rocket emission” was performed by volcanoes, when emitting magma. Before that, we see this phenomena at atoms’ nucleus when a proton emits a pion. These processes were existing inside the body of this insect creator… which is this astronomical system. We know that natural creators pass on their informations to their offspring. If the reproductive process happens at new environment with new materials, will be mutations, like mechanical systems into biological systems. So, those informations about black holes and volcanoes… they are here, resumed into an insect marvelous equipment. Welcome to Matrix/DNA world view.
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Interessantes Comentarios na Internet:
Answer 1 / 3 – Submitted 1 day ago…
ArisArisBrain (4,925)

Oh those show offish insects, there they go again showing how they beat us homo sapiens to the punch. It is really mind blowing to divide into the body workings of insects and their close kin. There is the bombardier beetle which has it own chemical weapon that it can fire out of its abdomen. It uses a form of internal combustion where two chemicals are mixed so an exothermic reaction takes place that produces temperatures up to 212 degrees F. The rise in temperature causes a pressure increase just like in a piston and a toxic distasteful and irritating chemical is expelled at the beetle’s enemies.

Insects were also making paper and silken threads long before we masterminds decided to copy them. They figured out how to gather and treat plant based foods for long term storage such as honey, long before we tackled the problem. There are even species of ants that raise other insects as livestock such as aphids they farm and others that work underground fungus farms for a food crop.

Awarded Answer (What’s This?)

Answer 2 / 3 – Submitted 1 day ago…

GloryS1GloryS1Brain (11,964)

Planthoppers, or Issus coleoptratus, are everyday, garden-variety insects, slightly larger than fleas, that use a unique mechanism to propel themselves at blistering speeds up to three feet in a single bound. During their nymph stage, planthoppers have gears on their hind legs that allow them to coordinate their movements and accelerate at rates of 200Gs.

The planthopper’s gears look very similar to the cogs used in manufacturing, right down to the way the teeth engage. The perfect synchronicity of the gears allows the planthopper’s hind legs to move within 30 microseconds of one another. To put it into perspective, a planthopper could launch itself 100 times in the same time it would take a grasshopper to move it’s legs just once. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq0Mf2pt2XA

Planthoppers lose the gears on their hind legs when they become adults after molting five or six times. The adult insects synchronize their movements with friction created by rubbing their legs together.

Answer 3 / 3 – Submitted 1 day ago…
DtKnightDtKnightAuthority (531)

The natural world is amazing, and time again there are organisms that, evolutionarily speaking, far exceed the natural capacity of a human being.

If human beings were not superior because of our minds, we would be at a distinct disadvantage in the natural world, because at some point some creature would evolve to become our natural predator.

What I do know is that if humans had discovered this creature before the industrial and mechanical advances in history, those advances might well have happened way sooner in human history. That the natural world has something that took humans many years to figure out, and even more years to perfect, is incredible.

This little insect demonstrates that if the organic components that make it so unique were put into a larger creature, with commensurate increases in size to adapt, that there would be something truly fantastical going on.

This creature, this little insect, it has a survival mechanism and apparatus, that, from a nature perspective, far exceeds what most animals can ever hope to accomplish. The only exceptions to that exist in the ocean, but the nature of motive transport down there is far different than what it is like up top.

Science should study this insect in incredible detail, to try to understand how the creature’s body is not destroyed every single time that it jumps, because if the organic technology exists for a tiny little insect to survive at speeds that are super fast, then in theory, the technology could be applied to improve current mechanical technologies. There is a lot of hope, a lot to be learned, from studying the natural world.

This discovery is another in a long list of discoveries that the natural world is something to be treasured, studied, and, hopefully, conserved, because once it is extinct, it tends to be gone for good. It worries me every single time I read about the extinction of yet another species, because I wonder, every single time, what other organic technologies and knowledge gets lost. What other wonder aspects of different fish and insects exist out there that humans have no idea of because we haven’t figured it out yet. There is still so much to the planet that is a mystery, and even with seven billion humans on it toiling away, there is still so much to learn.

This is a good thing, this discovery, because it demonstrates that are there true mechanical wonders in the natural world, but also that humans have arrived at a point where we are able to start to understand these insects, even at the speeds they move. Those aspects of this discovery are something truly worth marveling about.

XXXXXXXX

Read more here: http://www.sacbee.com/2013/09/13/5734456/researchers-find-another-gear.html#storylink=cpy

Los Angeles Time: http://discussions.latimes.com/20/lanews/la-sci-leg-gears-20130914/10

“Gears may seem like a purely human invention.”

What did this gear? DNA has this tooth-like structure as a “zipper”. Bumps exists at any nucleus of any natural system. Rotating structures exists at galactic and atomic nucleus. Rocket impulsion were seeing everywhere in Nature before insect’s existence. Look to volcanoes, or the proton emission of a signal particle, the pion. So, this biological gear is product of evolution and convergence of natural forces and elements to the same point at time/space… the  insect body.  Nature can do it  because all informations about the whole galaxy are encrypted at the DNA. We discovered it when calculating the configuration of LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) using the method of comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems. The building blocks of atoms and galaxies are exactly the same configuration of the unit of information in DNA, a base pair of nucleotides. So, DNA is merely a biological shape of a universal Matrix. Then, I have elaborated the Matrix/DNA Theory, which models are under testing. It is up to any species making that the right genes are expressed, since that it is necessary for survival.

The Universe works like the embryonic process: initially there are mass without shape (blastulae) then evolution goes on and finally gets a complex architecture. All informations for a baby were there, inside the matter, hidden in the matter, when occurred the Big Bang, the explosion of an spermatozoon envelope. Man does not create anything new, neither Nature. There are no something from nothing, and there is no elaboration inside this Universe by some supernatural intelligent designer. This Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a genetic process of reproduction, the son or daughter of the natural system existing before the Big bang. Like we do our babies. Man has intuition which is about data registered at our DNA’a memory, then, man only mimics Nature.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

http://www.businessinsider.com/insect-with-mechanical-gears-2013-9

You are ” almost” right. These biological gears are result of the matter in this planet that belongs to a stellar system that belongs to a galactic system… and here we see mechanical gears. Then, if have gears in Nature before this insect, we don’t need God for doing it. You are right because Darwinian Theory can’t explain the origins of this biological gears, just because Darwinians had separated Biological Evolution (or micro-evolution) from Cosmological Evolution, because Darwin and nowadays evolutionists does not know what this Milk Way is about. There is a new cosmological model, called “The Universal Matrix/DNA” which found that everything existing in this biosphere is reducible to LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor), but it is not the microscope and terrestrial common ancestor believed by Darwin… LUCA is astronomical and stands in the sky! Do you want to know where is these gears in the body of our astronomical creator? Inside the galactic nucleus there is a vortex, on shape of spiraled cone. If we cut the cone getting two halves, the spiral lines will be like teeth. If we rotate one half and try to connect again with the other half, the teeth will make the other half spinning, but in opposite direction. The vortex emits to space babies stars, like a pump. Everything is equal the image we see in this insect. The first biological copy of this mechanical astronomical gear was the “zipper: saw in DNA. Try to see the two DNA’s strands being separated, see the tooth, the spiral shape, and imagine what happens if you join them together rotating one half. If this mechanism is encrypted into the DNA, any life form can make its genes to be expressed. But… you will ask: “How an astronomical structure could be transformed into a microscope structure?!  The answer is: ” Nanotechnology, my friend. Nature do it all time. Nature takes an adult man, 30 years old, 200 pounds, big volume, and put it into a microscope spermatozoon… Any other question go to see the real face of Milk Way at Matrix/DNA website, you have all answers there. But… The Matrix is suggesting that before the Big Bang there was a natural complex and conscious system that triggered the Big Bang by same method that the external cover of any spermatozoon explodes inside an ovule. So, yours idea of previous design is safe, and if you want to call that ex-machine system as God, no problem.  

XXXXXXXX

No:  The Independent – UK

http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/machines-imitate-life-the-insect-that-goes-through-the-gears-just-like-a-car-8812231.html

Avatar
Dr. Plop

Half a gearing system would never work, so any piecemeal ‘evolution’ in that direction would be of no benefit to the organism, and ceteris paribus probably a hindrance, to be selected out.
Systems are only of actual benefit when they are complete and functional. Biology contains millions of different complete, functional, organic and behavioural systems, and zero ‘evolving’ on-the-way-to-being-complete systems.
If Darwinism were true one would expect many thousands of the latter to be observed.
The truth is that Darwinism requires an enormous amount of faith (plus society-wide indoctrination) to subsist. The irony is that those who most believe in it are the kind of people most likely to scorn faith.

Avatar

You are right, systems only works when they are complete. So, why Nature begins with a piece here that has no immediate use, like the bumps in the insect’s backyard?! There is a new evolutionary theory, called ” The Universal Matrix/DNA”, which suggests a rational explanation. The real creator of this biosphere and all biological systems here is/was a perfect mechanical system. At my website you see the design. I got it making comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems, searching the missing link. Then, the anatomy of a link that fits very well happens to be the building block of astronomical systems.This link as perfect machine shows every piece of this insects gears and rocket propulsion.It happens that the ancestral machine was fragmented by entropy,all pieces were separated, and by genetic process they were built here in a biological way. Then, biological species does not have all pieces. One has a piece that I called F5, it is about wings. These insects have a piece that mimics the central nucleus of that astronomical machine, which is a quasar containing a white hole in shape of spiral spinning vortex. It does everything this insect do.

Avatar
Marsinah Jawa  Dr. Plop

It’s a reply to you, because it was the evolution of the human hand that was the key to the development of intelligence, a position first argued by Engels, of all people, and now supported by recent research, published in the last couple of weeks
(see Science Daily)

TheMatrixDNA  Marsinah Jawa

Marsinah: I need the link for this article at Science Daily and any other talking about this research. In Matrix/DNA Theory I am very interested about human hands because my theoretical models are suggesting that it is key for deep understanding about evolution/nature. Please, put yours left hand over the formula with the palm over the cone at F1, and each finger over each other function, try to understand the meaning. Matrix/DNA suggests that the shape of human hands is the shape of Matrix formula, which should be the ancestral of DNA at cosmological evolution. The position, shapes, and functions of all fingers match exactly with the shapes and functions of all pieces in a perfect system. But, in the Matrix formula for perfect systems, its pieces are different due obeying the transformations produced by life’s cycles. Then, the fingers are aligned in same sequence of any process of life system. The explanation is that, every time Nature needs to built a new system or a new accessory for existent system, nature apply the same formula that I called Matrix. Then, the formula can be modified for adaptation to do the work that the system needs, but the structural formula is kept. Look to yours fingers: the smaller mimics the babies’ shapes and functions, the next mimics the children/teenager, the middle mimics the young/adult, the other mimics the mature adult and the thumb mimics the senior going to die…it is the history of any life’s cycle! Cheers…

 

Avatar
Marsinah Jawa  TheMatrixDNA

It’s a long URL – the best way to find it is to google “science daily” “language and tool-making skills evolved at the same time”, or for the full-length article (it’s not behind a pay-wall) go to DOI 10.1371/journal dot pone dot 0072693

 

Avatar
TheMatrixDNA  Marsinah Jawa

Thanks, I found it. Reading the article, first thing I thought is a question: If the same brain activity is used for language production and making complex tools, it means – I think – this brain’s region is a kind of translator and converter? Language is the invention of a new system that takes real phenomena and events changing or translating them by signals or symbols of a different dimension. Tools are merely extension of ours members and sensors, in another words, they are the translation of natural phenomena into new materials. Both are about translation and conversion. But, at least in this article, the researchers only paid attention to evolutionary story, forgetting this important information about the brain. Studying this region as translator and converter will be useful for technology development, I think.