Archive for março, 2015

Mensagem de Domingo: Como imitar Einstein se posicionando acima da média ( Veja vídeo)

domingo, março 22nd, 2015

xxxx

Albert Einstein Legendado 

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=452653521558183

Aprendizado, a que ele se refere, e como ele o define, não é apenas ouvir e assimilar o que a humanidade já sabe, mas sim carregar isto mais um passo à frente,  principalmente prestando atenção nos fenômenos naturais e fatos gerais do mundo, mas vendo-os com os olhos de verem, e não os de apenas por ele passearem inconscientemente. O fenõmeno da luz é visto por todos, mas apenas uma meia-duzia foca sua atenção na luz e raciocina sobre ela. Quem vê a luz e corre na Internet digitando “luz” no Google para saber o que a Humanidade sabe deste fenômeno? Como mero guarda-livros, sem ter acesso a potentes laboratórios para captar, observar melhor a luz, Einstein viu-a, focou sua atenção com curiosidade, buscou saber tudo o que se sabe, e continuou a refletir sobre ela. Assim criou teorias como o numero exato da velocidade de propagação, o efeito fotoelétrico que foi comprovado logo depois e lhe deu o Premio Nobel. Sei que isso funciona porque nos 6 anos que tive isolado na selva amazônica com algumas perguntas me martelando a cabeça: “Como vou voltar para a civilização sem um plano inteligente para conduzir minha vida? Aqui na natureza virgem, intocada, ainda jazem as testemunhas das origens desta biosfera viva, a partir daqui um humano pode fazer uma interpretação teórica do que é a vida, sua existencia nela, e traçar um plano racional. Lá fora é tudo artificial, alguem nascido ali terá sua visão de mundo distorcida, fora da realidade natural. Foi assim que surgiu uma grande idéia: não existe essa separação entre vida e não vida se focar-mos todos os sistemas naturais, de atomos a galaxias a células a cérebros. E desde que células e cérebros possuem um DNA como essencia, essa essencia tem que estar tambem nos outros sistemas, como atomos e galaxias. Assim nasceu a fórmula da Matrix/DNA universal e esta me levou a perceber que qualquer onda de luz natural repete a mesma sequencia de frequencias/vibrações,potencial de energia que qualquer corpo vivo quando repete a sequencia de transformações do corpo sob o processo do ciclo vital. E isto significa que o a luz é o principio vital ou seja, foi a primeira manifestação de vida com a primeira onda de luz emitida no Big Bang. Estas teorias nascem e podem ser comprovadas ou não por experimentos, mas de qualquer forma, são estes esforços mentais na direção do espaço/tempo alem dos horizontes visiveis imediatos que conduzem o crescimento da mente e com isso ela vai puxando o corpo para distancias cada vez mais amplas, até que um dia ela possa ver e entender todo o Universo. E qualquer ser humano pode fazer isso.

Matrix/DNA Pesquisa a Troca de Energia do Petróleo por Energia Solar Para manter a Civilização Industrial

sábado, março 21st, 2015

xxxx

[–]TheMatrixDNA  

Solar and planetary nuclear energy can move natural systems better than fossil fuel – accordingly Matrix/DNA Theory. If you see the formula of all natural systems in its website you will understand what I am telling about. We have mimicked Nature’s mechanisms and systems by artificial way, with new materials, and then, we had to use artificial energy. Maybe another life form got the easiest way for natural industry.

Yours own body is a machine, an industrialized one. Is there any human made machine superior to that? And what is the energy that created the human-machine? It comes from plants. What energy created and still fuels plants? So, the very secret is to known better the chloroplasts and photosynthesis, trying to mimic this natural device for getting natural energy without changing it, without killing its free movement and then, finding the soft materials that this energy will arrange as industrial machines. At Matrix/DNA world view we are researching this issue. But the problem is more complex due two things that the Matrix’s models are pointing out that the Earth and solar magnetic fields also contributed when driving the natural energy to create biological natural systems and both – light and magnetic field – works under the process of life’s cycle nad here lays their ability to create natural system/machines.

Este comentario acima veio como resposta a uma pergunta feita no Reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/AskScienceDiscussion/comments/2zr0xn/if_life_is_possible_on_other_planets_how_likely/

If life is possible on other planets, how likely is it that fossil fuels would develop? Would industrialization be possible without fossil fuels?  – self.AskScienceDiscussion

submitted friday, march, 2015, by thapopjackson

Origem da Vida: Nova Tese da Prébiotica Bioquimica Positivista a Ser Pesquisada

sábado, março 21st, 2015

xxxx

Chemists claim to have solved riddle of how life began on Earth

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html

xxxx

Chemistry in a post-meteoritic-impact scenario. A series of post-impact environmental events are shown along with the chemistry (boxed) proposed to occur as a consequence of these events. a, Dissolution of atmospherically produced hydrogen cyanide results in the conversion of vivianite (the anoxic corrosion product of the meteoritic inclusion schreibersite) into mixed ferrocyanide salts and phosphate salts, with counter cations being provided through neutralization and ion-exchange reactions with bedrock and other meteoritic oxides and salts. b, Partial evaporation results in the deposition of the least-soluble salts over a wide area, and further evaporation deposits the most-soluble salts in smaller, lower-lying areas. c, After complete evaporation, impact or geothermal heating results in thermal metamorphosis of the evaporite layer, and the generation of feedstock precursor salts (in bold). d, Rainfall on higher ground (left) leads to rivulets or streams that flow downhill, sequentially leaching feedstocks from the thermally metamorphosed evaporite layer. Solar irradiation drives photoredox chemistry in the streams. Convergent synthesis can result when streams with different reaction histories merge (right), as illustrated here for the potential synthesis of arabinose aminooxazoline at the confluence of two streams that contained glycolaldehyde, and leached different feedstocks before merging. Credit: (c) Nature Chemistry (2015) doi:10.1038/nchem.2202 Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-03-chemists-riddle-life-began-earth.html#jCp

Meu comentario a ser postado no artigo:

1) Que as primeiras  moléculas complexas se formaram  simbionticamente com a junção de ingredientes separados já é previsto na matrix/DNA onde a vida na Terra veio de uma genética separadas no tempo e no espaço.

Copia do artigo para ser traduzido:

(Phys.org)—A team of chemists working at the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, at Cambridge in the UK believes they have solved the mystery of how it was possible for life to begin on Earth over four billion years ago. In their paper published in the journal Nature Chemistry, the team describes how they were able to map reactions that produced two and three-carbon sugars, amino acids, ribonucleotides and glycerol—the material necessary for metabolism and for creating the building blocks of proteins and ribonucleic acid molecules and also for allowing for the creation of lipids that form cell membranes.

Scientists have debated for years the various possibilities that could have led to life evolving on Earth, and the arguments have only grown more heated in recent years as many have suggested that it did not happen here it all, instead, it was brought to us from comets or some other celestial body. Most of the recent debate has found scientists in one of three chicken-or-the-egg first camps: RNA world advocates, metabolism-first supporters and those who believe that cell membranes must have developed first.

The chemists with this new effort believe they have found a way to show that all three arguments are both right and wrong—they believe they have found a way to show that everything necessary for life to evolve could have done so from just , hydrogen cyanide and ultraviolet light and that those  could have all existed at the same time—in their paper, they report that using just those three basic ingredients they were able to produce more than 50 nucleic acids—precursors to DNA and RNA molecules. They note that early meteorites carried with them ingredients that would react with nitrogen already in the atmosphere, producing a lot of . By dissolving in water, it could have very easily come into contact with hydrogen sulfide, while being exposed to ultraviolet light from the sun. And that, they claim, would have been all that was needed to get things going.

The findings by the team are sure to garner a great deal of interest in the scientific community and others will no doubt be testing and commenting on their findings. If what they claim passes muster, their work will likely be remembered as one of the great achievements of our time.

 Explore further: NASA Ames reproduces the building blocks of life in laboratory

More information: Common origins of RNA, protein and lipid precursors in a cyanosulfidic protometabolism, Nature Chemistry (2015) DOI: 10.1038/nchem.2202

Ver secção de comentários:

 

Materialismo/Ateísmo: Interessante Definição

sábado, março 21st, 2015

xxxx

As usual, atheists sneer ( escarnio, sarcasmo) at anything that doesn’t fit their narrow little world view. None of it can be true because of course we have the BEST POSSIBLE science RIGHT NOW to deal with these issues. There is NO POSSIBILITY that the universe holds things and truths we cannot perceive. Nope. If human ingenuity and our Very Expensive Instruments cannot detect it, then it obviously can’t exist, because we are The Epitome Of Evolution.

I can’t decide who is more arrogant – these self-worshipping, intolerant Angry Atheists, or the insane Fundamentalists whose worldview they insist on applying to everyone who doesn’t agree with them. (Because of course, the world ONLY contains those two viewpoints. There is no possibility of religion or philosophy or spirituality containing anything else. Nope, you’re either a complete materialist or a raving snake-handler. Nothing else exists.)

xxxx

Extraído do post:

  • Serai1
  • THURSDAY, APR 26, 2012 05:24 PM -0300

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/

Pharyngula Banned: Como o Big Brother Está Sendo Inoculado na População Via Universidades, Professores, Internet.

sexta-feira, março 20th, 2015

Eu fui proibido de participar dos comentários/discussões no Blog Pharyngula, que pertence a um militante ateu professor de Biologia. O meu post que foi a gôta d’água não foi a real causa do banimento mas sim uma anterior discussão que tive com os seguidores do proprietário blogueiro a respeito do cérebro e como acontece a memorização. Naquela discussão ele já tinha ameaçado me expulsar de seu blog. Os materialistas ateus estão empenhados férreamente em impor a “sua verdade cientifica” de que a mente humana, ou auto-consciencia, é mais um produto da mera evolução ao sabor das fôrças cegas naturais. Não tenho nenhum problema que eles acreditem nisso, mas quando querem por na mente dos estudantes que isso já é verdade cientifica eu entro no meio lembrando que não existe ainda prova cientifica disso. E aí querem me calar a bôca.

Eu não concordo com nenhuma das teorias religiosas que tem sido imposto na formação da intelectualidade humana nestes ultimos milhares de anos e penso mesmo que elas foram e continuam a serem prejudiciais à Humanidade. Mas o inconsciente coletivo da humanidade é uma projeção do inconsciente coletivo do individuo, o qual enquanto criança precisa de fantasias para manter sua instalada capacidade ociosa que é sua imaginação, viva, e não deixar que ela se atrofie, e portanto, o inconsciente coletivo da Humanidade que ainda é  criança tambem, precisa de fantasias organizadas sociais. Nesse ponto as religiões tem servido como um mal necessário, indispensavel enquanto não se inventa um outro tipo de fantasia menos nocivo. E a doutrina ateísta infelizmente não preenche o vácuo na imaginação do individuo quando ela ataca e mata a religião. A doutrina materialista ateísta desemboca no NADA, no nihilismo netzsheniano e com isso deixa as mentes vazias de fantasias. Mas como a fantasia é uma necessidade imperiosa do cérebro, e é impossivel alguem se mover para fazer algo sem ter um propósito inconsciente, estas mentes vazias jovens ficam pr6esas fáceis e hipnotizadas à mercê dos traficantes e suas drogas produtoras de fantasias. Não adianta derrubar um mal colocando outro pior no seu lugar. Por isso me animei com a cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA, pois ela não é uma fantasia religiosa, não deixa a mente vazia: ela fornece um propósito naturalista de transcendental Natureza, e esse transcendental é uma nova fantasia mas saudável e benéfica para a Humanidade.

É possivel que meu post gôta d’água foi um ato equivocado da minha parte no tocante ao bom costume de “comentar dentro do tópico”, e tambem em relação à idéia de “como deve ser o tamanho de um post, não sendo  muito longo”,  e ainda pelo fato de que estou propragando minha teoria e meu website. E outros motivos negativos podem meus posts causarem: devido meus erros na gramatica em inglês tornando dificil e  incomoda sua leitura para os nativos no inglês; a chocante dificuldade de uma mente criada e condicionada por uma especifica visão do mundo e sua doutrina ideológica ao se deparar com outra visão do mundo jamais vista que sempre vai contradizer algo do que tal mente acredita piamente.

Portanto, entendo o desconforto causado ao proprietário e seus seguidores, que não precisam e não são obrigados a engolirem tais dissabores em sua própria casa.

Então porque o fia e vou continuar a fazê-lo, me comportando como um estraga-prazeres e “troll” sempre invadindo os endereços da Internet dominados por pessoas que jamais vão sequer se disporem a estudarem e analizarem a minha especifica e  inédita visão do mundo, principalmente se nem eu mesmo “acredito” nela?! E sem ganhar um tostão, muito pelo contrário, pagando com meu tempo de vida para fazer tal trabalho nada prazeiroso?!

Acontece que os modelos teóricos resultantes dos calculos que acredito serem impessoais aplicados para chegar à Matrix/DNA cosmovisão estão sugerindo que a Natureza tende a dirigir a biosfera na Terra ao destino de ser uma máquina perfeita e estupida como é o estado da galaxia que  criou esta biosfera. E a espécie humana a ser transformada de maneira que sua ultima forma seja meramente mais uma peça de tal máquina. Tal estado final e tal final propósito inconsciente desta galáxia já foi intuido por autores em livros como “The Brave New World” de Aldous Huxley e “1984” de George Orwell”. E penso estar vendo a implantação deste estado fluindo através da visão do mundo dominante nos curriculums escolares, sendo que professores, estadistas, bilionarios no poder global de fato, e estudantes, já são as consequencias, os efeitos, desta ideologia que emerge da doutrina escolar.

Eu não tenho certeza sobre estes resultados, por isso continuo tentando testa-los contra quaisquer fatos/fenomenos naturais que se me apresentem. Mas eu penso que estes resultados, a sua visão do mundo, apesar de estarem certamente incompletos, é o que de mais lógico e racional que temos aqui hoje. E o destino para a espécie humana que eles pintam, é negro. O mais terrivel destino possivel à minha mente cujo principal motivo de desejar continuar sua existencia é a capacidade de ser livre e poder continuar a evoluir, a crescer. Esse destino seria pior que o inferno cristão, ao menos ali eu estaria livre para buscar uma maneira de liquidar o diabo e seu inferno. No admiravel mundo novo a perda da propriedade sobre minha própria mente mataria tambem até o desejo de escapar do Big Brother.

Eu vou continuar sim a minha luta, mesmo que o campo de batalha se torne cada vez mais estreito e inacessivel, por conta destes banimentos. Já não importa muito se a minha visão de mundo, incompleta, tem ou não algo de verdade nela, se meus temores tem ou não fundamentos naturais, vou continuar defendendo e divulgando-a, pois o mais terrivel que poderia me acontecer na hora da morte seria continuar mantendo este temor e olhar para tras vendo que nada fiz para combate-lo. naqueles ultimos momentos da minha vida um sentimento doloroso estaria me sufocando, o sentimento de ter sido um covarde, um pária. Ao contrário, se eu continuar lutando, seja qual for o modo da minha morte, sempre vou cair com a cabeça em pé e um sorriso intimo de alegria da missão cumprida, uma sensação prazeirosa inigualavel. Em relação aos meus inimigos ou meros militantes oponentes como o proprietario do Pharyngula, nos meus lábios o  rumor de umas poucas palavras: “Perdô-os, porque vocês como eu, não sabemos se o que estamos fazendo é certo ou errado”.

A seguir o tópico e o post causador do meu banimento, mas antes disso…

A propósito, um video com uma jóia do humor britanico, ilustrando como está ocorrendo esta patrulha ideológica na Internet:

Argument Clinic – Monty Python’s The Flying Circus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

Explicação sobre o enredo do video:

This Entire sketch is the representation of the internet. Which is a bit silly since this came out long before the internet…
“The man enters a establishment, it being the web-browser. He asks the lady for help in getting a argument, she being the web browsers search bar and/or search engine.The Search engine/Search Bar seems to be a bit faulty, so he ends up going to a wrong website(The Websites being represented by each room) for which he ends up being yelled at(CAPS LOCK AND ALL!1!).
When He finds himself in the right place, he soon learns that the internet can be a bit stupid/stubborn/one-sided, et cetera. At times and doesn’t end up getting the entertainment he wanted, ending with him leaving in search for a place to complain about these things.And of course the man screws up again and ends up in the weird place of the internet.”

…In fact, I think that if the web existed like it does now back then, it would be a bit too much like Monty Python. As Monty Python is pretty much the Internet of old. It’s random, silly, stupid, funny and majority of us love it and always visit it every once in a while(or in some cases, are always in front of it.)  😉

xxxxx
A seguir o tópico e o post causador do meu banimento:
Oh, right, it’s today

We first met in 3rd grade, which would have been 50 years ago. We used to sometimes walk home together from school — we lived about 4 blocks apart — in junior high, about 43, maybe 44 years ago. I worked up the nerve to ask her out on one date in high school, the homecoming dance in 1974, which was 41 years ago. We started dating regularly in 1976, so 39 years ago. We took our time with the courtship, and got married over spring break while we were in grad school, on 16 March 1980, 35 years ago…

 louismorelli

Congratulations,… but, you and yours wife merely repeated the event occurred 13,7 billions years ago, when happened the first date and marriage in this Universe. This is the theory we get when unifying the Physics of the great Nobel Prize Hideki Yukawa and Matrix/DNA models. You are repeating the beginnings of a new evolutionary cycle so, you need to know what is coming next. At that time there were only a unique species, ours first ancestors: quantum vortices. They were shared into two groups: one spin right and the other, spin left ( the first manifestation of this universal dichotomy of extreme opposites). So, they were beginning the evolution of opposites that today is also about the sexual division into female and male. Like you and yours wife were popping out in the space of the school, these vortices was popping out in the substance ( aether or dark matter) of this universe-bubble. One group emerged as a micro point, then was growing as a spiral and exploded by excess of energy. It was you, the male. The other group emerged as micro bubble/spiral that was decreasing till disappearing due missing energy. It was yours wife, the female. As they, both, drew a spiral and fast movement in the space, it was common happening chocks among them. These chocks and movements turned on the Universe very hot and everything was chaos. Like the boys and girls initially have the tendency to fight one to other. The Universe was condemned to stands in that state for the eternity.

However, it seems that those non-material vortices had the principles of human emotions, because they learned that their quickly existence of merely 17 millionth of a second and bad life in the chaos making them sick was caused by themselves, because their mutual fight. Meanwhile the spatial substance was expanding, resulting into less chocks, and then, the Universe was less hot. The female and male vortices sometimes were flying in parallel, avoiding the shocks and suddenly one female that was dying due losing energy linked with a male that was going to die due increasing and excess of energy. This is mimicked today when at a mate, the male transfers its energy and substance to the female.

Then, instead the female dying, she got the energy from the male, and instead the male dying by energy’s explosion, he passed on its energy to the female. They unified into one unique body, but, now in equilibrium and here was born the nuclear atomic glue between protons and neutrons, when the particle pion with energy goes from one to another and go back. At this moment the first quark appeared, the first manifestation of matter in this world, and the whole sky celebrated. Today this event is the marriage, and the pion became the first baby of the universe. Of course, also, at this event at 13,6 billions years ago happened the first shape of sexual intercourse in the Universe.

That’s why you and yours wife must celebrated this anniversary with all emotions and happiness – which is my will, you deserve it. This event is also repeated at every time that occurs a new fecundation: the explosion of a spermatozoon’s membrane at the center of an ovule, the following liberation of males genome/genes in the amnion for to meet the female genes, the marriage between each pair responsible by same genetic trait, etc.

This is beautiful, the world without magics and gods is more lovely, wonderful and divine. Without intelligent designs but throughout previous genetic designs repeated again and again in the whole universal evolutionary history – like mother giraffe does not apply intelligence but, naturally, produces the most extraordinary engineering as a new baby giraffe – and the pappy/mom PZ Myers produces a new baby Myers. Get the must fun in yours celebration, Mr. Myers, and don’t forget to lift up a glass with champagne in saludo to the Universe which must always also celebrates these same events. And another glass to the genius of Hideki Yukawa that lead us to learning such wonderful lessons.

And don’t forget the next evolutionary step waiting for you. Those two vortices made one quark where one couple became one body. Then they look for another neighbours quarks for making a great society, a super particle like proton, neutron, electron. Then they evolved to an atom system, those to galactic systems… So, the next step for you is to search the best union with neighbors, citizens of this country and finally all citizens of this planet. Our mission must go on…

PZ Myers

Now that Louis Morelli is puking up his technicolor bullshit in random threads, it is time to say goodbye.

Banned.

xxxx

O que você pensa disso?

Eu penso que

Vida ou Não-Vida Após a Morte: Incrivel Nova Tese Nasce Dentro da Matrix/DNA: Seríamos A Dualidade Onda/Particula Em Evolutivo Feed-Back: Guidance Wave Theory

quinta-feira, março 19th, 2015

xxxx

Capitulo Contendo Coleções de Dados Sobre a Categoria “Vida ou Não-Vida Após a Morte?”

Esta nova teoria denominada Guidance Wave Theory de Ian Miller bate surpreendentemente com os resultados sendo sugeridos pela Matrix/DNA Theory sobre o que acontece na morte de um corpo humano. Veja meu comentário explicando como, a seguir:

Life after death

https://ianmillerblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/life-after-death/

ian miller blog

Meu Comentario ( a ser traduzido para português) ( Não Publicado, aguardando moderação):

A Vida Após a Morte Pode ser Explicada pela Dualidade Onda/Partícula. Cada corpo humano individual representa os aspectos “onda” e  “partícula”.  Partícula é seu aspecto corpo material visível, é sua posição em relação ao espaço, e onda em relação ao tempo é um aspecto invisível a nós, pois não vemos e não podemos tocar o tempo. Como partícula ela não se limita a um corpo individual ( o qual é apenas uma micro-cópia, um fractal da partícula) , ela se completa como o coletivo dos indivíduos, ou seja, a espécie. E espécies podem desaparecerem para sempre ou serem transformadas em novas formas, outras espécies. A espécie humana vem de uma linhagem evolutiva de um único sistema natural que se originou no Big Bang na sua mais simples forma e até o presente momento sempre foi transformado, ou seja, como partícula e no coletivo, ela nunca morreu.

No seu aspecto de onda do tempo, cada corpo humano no  seu tempo de existência é apenas um infinitesimal tempo do tempo total deste sistema sob evolução, ou seja, do tempo universal de 13,7 bilhões de anos. Isto quer dizer que na morte de um corpo a onda universal jamais morre ali. Em outras palavras, não existe vida após a morte porque simplesmente, na verdade, não existe “morte”.

We are arriving to same theoretical results coming from two different methods ( mine is comparative anatomy between living and nonliving natural systems). My theory called “Matrix/DNA, the universal formula for all natural systems and life’s cycles”, suggests that a unique body under the process of life’s cycle is at same time a wave and a particle. The particle is any momentum of that body and the wave is the lifelong time of that body. It happens that our DNA, which is the essence of every life’s species is merely the terrestrial biological shape of a universal essence, which I am calling “Matrix”. This result from my method is due when extracting the circuit flow connecting all parts of a system we get a formula in shape of computational diagram and it is equal from atoms to galaxies to plants cells to human brain’s configuration. Again, this universal formula coming within a system that emerged at the Big Bang and today is acquiring the shape of human brain and possibly also the shape of a new system called consciousness, is the universal Matrix/DNA.

So, it means that each momentum state of this unique universal system is a particle and this particle had appeared as several individuals which dies, but the particle’s shape continues to existing as the collective, called “species”. It is the particle as collective that is evolutionary transformed into new more complex systems. As sample we have an analogy with the individual human body, which could be called “particle” and we know that this particle under the process of life’s cycle is transformed into several shapes, from blastula to fetus to teenager, etc.  So, an individual body-particle dies, but the collective of this body particles does not: it is transformed. It means that this universal system-particle called human body is 13, 7 billion years old, like the Matrix/DNA.

But… the formula is showing that the body which is a system is seen by us as particle at a given moment of its lifelong, while we can not see its time running at that moment because the time or life’s cycle force is a wave. Since that there is a unique natural system evolving under the process of life’s cycle since the Big Bang to today consciousness, it means that there is a unique wave of time and it is 13,7 billion years old. It means that when a body-system-particle disappears as individual, the wave does not disappear because it is the collective of all individuals and it will continuing the evolution, certainly to the next transcendental or more complex shape of this universal system.

My method lead me to a new interpretation of the electromagnetic spectrum of light waves. From gamma ray to radio, all different states of frequencies/vibrations/colors are equal the sequence of transformations of the state of energy/vibration of a unique human body, from fetus to adult. It means that also a light wave is under the process of life’s cycle… in another words, a light wave is the most simplest “living thing”. So simplest that it goes back to the extreme singularity at the initial moments of the Universe… or, beyond it. It means that the Universal Matrix, which today and here is encrypted into the biological DNA, and is the formula organizing the brain and consciousness, was existing before this Universe in shape of light. If consciousness is the final end of this evolution, it must be returning to be the initial light. Again, as light, it is a wave.

Declarations like the famous neuroscientist that had a left hemisphere stroke and saw everything as light without separation between her body and the external world are good evidences that this theory about the consciousness being a kind of light waves the survives after death is in the right track. Congratulations Mr.Ian: you had an astonishing insight. (sorry by the English language errors and you can see the Matrix/DNA formula at its website).

xxxx

( Artigo copiado aqui para ser traduzido)

The issue of whether there is life, or consciousness, after death is one of those questions that can only be answered by dying. If there is, you find out. My wife was convinced there is, and she was equally convinced that I, as a scientist, would quietly argue the concept was ridiculous. However, as she was dying of metastatic cancer we had a discussion of this issue, and I believe the following theory gave her considerable comfort. Accordingly, I announced this at her recent funeral, in case it helped anyone else, and I have received a number of requests to post the argument. I am doing two posts: one with the mathematics, and one where I merely assert the argument for those who want a simpler account. The more mathematical post is at (http://my.rsc.org/blogs/84/1561 ).

First, is there any evidence at all? There are numerous accounts of people who nearly die but do not, and they claim to see a tunnel of light, and relations at the other end. There are two possible explanations:
(1) What they see is true,
(2) When the brain shuts down, it produces these illusions.
The problem with (2) is, why does it do it the same way for all? There was also an account recently of someone who died on an operating table, but was resuscitated, and he then gave an account of what the surgeons were doing as viewed from above. The following study may be of interest (http://rt.com/news/195056-life-after-death-study/ ) One can take this however one likes, but it is certainly weird.

What I told Claire arises from my interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is significantly different from most others’. First, some background. (If you have no interest in physics, you can skip this and go to the last three paragraphs.) If you fire particles such as electrons one at a time through a screen with two slits, each electron will give a point reading on a detector screen, but if you do this for long enough, the points give the pattern of wave diffraction. This is known as wave-particle duality, and at the quantum level, an experiment either gives properties of a particle or those consistent with a wave, depending on how you do it. So, how is that explained? Either there is a wave guiding the particles or there is not. Most physicists argue there is not and the electrons just happen to give that distribution. You ask, why? They tend to say, “Shut up and compute!” Einstein did not agree, and said, “God does not play dice.” What we know is that computations based on a wave equation give remarkably good agreement with observation, but nobody can find evidence for the wave. All we detect are the particles, but of course that is what the detectors are set up to detect. It is generally agreed that the formalism that enables calculations is sufficient. For me, that is not sufficient, and I think there must be something causing this behaviour. Suppose you cannot see ducks but you here a lot of quacking, why do you assume the quacks are just the consequence of your listening, and there are no ducks? There is a minority who believe there is a wave, and the pilot wave concept was formed by de Broglie.

Modern physics states the wave function is complex. In general, this is true, but from Euler’s theory of complex numbers, once (or twice) a period (which is defined as the time from one crest, say, to the next) the wave becomes momentarily real. My first premise is
The physics of the system are determined only when the wave becomes real.
From this, the stability of atoms, the Uncertainty Principle and the Exclusion Principle follow. Not that that is of importance here, other than to note that this interpretation does manage to do what standard theory effectively has as premises. My next premise is
The wave causes the wave behaviour.
At first sight, this seems obvious, but recall that modern quantum theory does not assert this. Now, if so, it follows that the wave front must travel at the same velocity as the particle; if it did not, how could it affect the particle? But if it travels at the same velocity, the energy of the system must be twice the kinetic energy of the particle. This simply asserts that the wave transmits energy. Actually, every other wave in physics transmits energy, except for the textbook quantal matter wave, which transmits nothing, it does not exist, but it defines probabilities. (As an aside, since energy is proportional to mass, in general this interpretation does not conflict with standard quantum mechanics.) For this discussion, the most important consequence is that both particle and wave must maintain the same energy. The wave sets the particle energy because the wave is deterministic, which means that once the wave is defined, it is defined for every future with known conditions. The particle, however, suffers random motion and has to be guided by the wave in my theory.

Now, what is consciousness? Strictly speaking, we do not know exactly, but examination of brains that are conscious appear to show considerable ordered electrical activity. But if electrical activity is occurring, that is the expenditure of energy. (The brain uses a remarkably high fraction of the body’s energy.) But since the movement of electrons is quantum controlled, then the corresponding energy must be found in an associated set of waves. Moreover, it is the associated wave that is causal, and it alone can overcome the randomness that may arise through the uncertainty of position of any particle. The wave guides the particle! Another important feature of these Guidance Waves is they are linear, which means they are completely separable. This is a general property of waves, and is not an ad hoc addition. It therefore follows that when we are conscious and living “here”, there is a matrix of waves with corresponding energy “there”.

Accordingly, if this Guidance Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics is correct, then the condition for life after death is very simple: death occurs because the body cannot supply the energy required to match the Guidance Waves that are organizing consciousness, and the random motion of particles in the brain, due to heat, overpower the order that bodily consciousness requires. The body now is no longer conscious, and hence is dead, and useful brain activity ceases. But if at the point where the brain can no longer provide its energy contribution for consciousness, the energy within the Guidance Wave can dissociate itself from the body and maintain itself “there”, and recall that the principle of linearity is that other waves do not affect it, then that wave package can continue, and since it represents the consciousness of a person, that consciousness continues. What happens next depends on the conditions applicable “there”, and for that we have no observations.

Is the Guidance Wave interpretation correct? As far as I am aware, there is no observation that would falsify my alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics, while my Guidance Wave theory does make two experimental predictions that contradict standard quantum mechanics. It also greatly simplifies the calculation of some chemical bond properties. However, even if it is correct, that does not mean there is life after death, but at least in my interpretation of quantum mechanics it is permitted. That thought comforted Claire in her last days, and if it comforts anyone else, this post is worth it.

xxxxx

Outro excelente artigo e posterior comentários com muitos links sobre o tópico:

Near death, explained

New science is shedding light on what really happens during out-of-body experiences — with shocking results.

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/

( E como resposta ateísta de PZ Myers, ver:

Near-death, distorted

Taking aim at a recent Salon story about the science of out-of-body experiences

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/

Origem da Vida: Livro Expõe Nova Teoria Contradizendo a Standard Theory

quinta-feira, março 19th, 2015

xxxx

Planetary Formation and Biogenesis (Elements of Theory Book 2)

http://www.amazon.com/Planetary-Formation-Biogenesis-Elements-Theory-ebook/dp/B007T0QE6I

Ian Miller – Author – blog: http://www.amazon.com/Ian-Miller/e/B004XXEUZQ/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_pop_1

Book Description

 April 10, 2012

Why is our solar system different from most of the others we see? How common are planets like Earth that have life on them? Is there life under the ice of Europa? Why will alien life have similar systems to ours? How did we get homochirality, and more to the point, why? Planetary Formation and Biogenesis is the second ebook in my series Elements of Theory, which is designed to illustrate how to form a theory by inducing from the set of observations. There is a review of the literature with over 700 references, most presenting different aspects. This review shows there are significant problems with standard theory, including: there is no known mechanism to form the required planetesimals, there are no explanations for the fact that all the planets in our system are different from each other, the Martian surface is incomprehensible on standard theory, the initial conditions argued for Earth should not lead to life, there is no standard explanation for homochirality and standard theory fails to give clues as to when to expect life and what variations are possible. Perhaps most critically, standard theory requires longer than 15 My to form Jupiter to the stage where gas can rapidly accrete, and the accretion disk usually lasts 1-10 My following stellar formation. Critically, LkCa 15b has formed in 2 My, it is three times further than Jupiter from a smaller star than the sun, and it is 5 times bigger than Jupiter. That requires new theory.The second part employs Aristotelian methodology to induce a theory. It proposes that accretion is actually a chemical phenomenon, that our solar system represents a solar system where the stellar cleanout was ca 1 My after stellar cleanout. It predicts four major ice cores, each with their own characteristic composition, and shows why the four rocky planets have the composition they have. The biochemicals required for life arise naturally, it shows why homochirality arises, and why all carbon-based life will almost certainly commence with RNA, even though ribose is the least stable and least likely to be formed of the common sugars, why ATP is the energy transfer chemical, and it proposes some simple experiments to show how it probably developed. There are over 80 predictions, one of which includes no life under-ice on Europa.

Planetary Formation and Biogenesis (Elements of Theory Book 2)

Porque Ordem e Justiça São Impossiveis Onde Um Tem Mais Poder Que Outro

terça-feira, março 17th, 2015

xxxx

Mesmo sendo um um humano justo, é-lhe impossivel resistir a tentação de sempre puxar a brasa para sua sardinha… glup,… quero dizer, a água para seus peixes.

A musica da Vida – Livro de Denis Noble

sábado, março 14th, 2015

xxxx

Trata-se de uma nova e diferente visão de mundo tendo como base a Biologia, por um expert em Biologia.

Muito Importante este website deste Livro, com varios videos,artigos interessantes para Matrix/DNA. Noltar a vê-lo:

The Music of Life  ( livro de Denis Noble)

http://musicoflife.co.uk/ (website introdutorio)

Ver tambem: http://hannahflaum.wix.com/the-music-of-life-a-promotion#! – (outro website do livro)

http://musicoflife.co.uk/pdfs/The%20Music%20of%20Life-sourcebook.pdf – ( O Livro – em e-book, pdf, mas não sei se é o original e se está completo. 1240 paginas! )

xxxx

Ver este video aqui:

Interview and discussion

on the philosophical and social inadequacies

of neo-Darwinism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mj3_J19rqTw&feature=youtu.be

Humanate dialogue with Denis Noble

Published on Jun 4, 2014

A dialogue 21 Feb. 2014 between Hans Liljenström and Denis Noble in the context of the HumNatE project (Human Nature Exploration) which is a collaboration bewteen the Sigtuna Foundation and Agora for Biosystems. This project is funded by the John Templeton Foundation.

xxxx

A physiologist thinks about evolution ( sobre Denis Noble)

http://sandwalk.blogspot.com.br/2015/01/a-physiologist-thinks-about-evolution.html

The Physiome Project: About Systems Biology and Life’s Evolution

sábado, março 14th, 2015

xxxx

The Physiome Project

http://physiomeproject.org/

From molecules to humankind

The Physiome Project is a concerted effort to explain how each and every component in the body, from the scale of molecules up to organ systems and beyond, works as part of the integrated whole.