Archive for outubro 18th, 2016

Superposicao Quantica Desdobra-se nas Fases do Ciclo Vital?

terça-feira, outubro 18th, 2016

xxxx

O ultimo artigo aqui – sobre maos humanas  fala em superposicao de genes evoluindo para a separacao dos genes em ordem cronologica como no ciclo vital. Ha muito venho suspeitando que a superposicao quantica seria todas as diferentes formas de um corpo acontecendo  num so momento sob a perspectiva humana do tempo microscopico. Expliquei a incerteza de Heisenberg com essa teoria. E agora surge a possibilidade de que a enorme bagnca de formas monstriuisas nas origens da vida foi devido a superposicao de fotons, a qual foi repetida inicialmente pelos genes…..

Preciso desenvolver esta tese.

Formacao das Maos Humanas: Descoberta Cientifica Revela Espetacular Previsao da Matrix/DNA Theory?

terça-feira, outubro 18th, 2016

xxxxx

Existe aqui neste website varios artigos sobre as maos humanas porque a minha teoria sugeriu uma surpreendente revelacao a respeito delas: 1) as maos humanas sao o fato mais proximo da visao humana revelando a formula universal da Matrix/DNA; 2) a forma da mao, o numero de dedos e as formas dos dedos revelam que eles imitam as cinco principais formas do corpo humano, as quais sao produzidas pelo ciclo vital, e isto porque a formula dos sistemas naturais foi construida por uma unica “pessa” que se derivou nas outras devido estar sob o processo do ciclo vital.

E agora, a ciencia academica parece ter dado um cheque-mate nesta teoria. Primeiro, tinham a teoria de que os membros dos mamiferos se desenvolveram das barbatanas de um peixe, um nosso ancestral aquatico. Porem, as primeiras especies vindas daquele ancestral tinham mais que cinco dedos. Agora descobriu-se que o motivo do porque nos humanos ocorreu essa diferenca – para cinco dedos – e’ porque necies com mais de cinco os dois genes responsaveis por fazerem dedos se expressavam juntos, ao mesmo tempo. E nos humanos, os dois genes se separam, expressando-se cada um num tempo diferente do outro.

E porque isto estava previsto na Teoria da Matrix/DNA?

Simples. Nas origens e primeiras evolucoes da vida, as unidades de informacao para sistemas vivos chegavam na forma de fotons vindo de estrelas e radiacao cosmica, alem do nucleo terrestre. Chegavam sem um controle cronologico e por isso muitas vezes se superpunham atuando ao mesmo tempo, ao inves de obedecerem a ordem cronologica como foi feito o corpo ancestral, que e’ esta galaxia. Por isso produziram formas animais monstruosas. Com o avancar da evolucao estas informacoes foram se enfileirando em ordem cronologica como deve estar na formula universal e assim os corpos foram se tornando mais coordenados, mais semelhantes a formula. Neste tempo de evolucao mais avancada, aquelas unidades fotonicas se tornaram os genes, os quais, inicialmente se superpunham e tambem depois entraram na mesma ordem. Entao, desde o inicio da origem da vida estava determinado que haveria maos e com cinco dedos e os dedos na forma produzida pelo ciclo vital. E justamente isto esta descoberta cientifica confirma.

Abaixo vai o link para o artigo cientifico e copiado aqui para ser traduzido:

How evolution has equipped our hands with five fingers

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161005132654.htm

Date: October 5, 2016

Source:Université de Montréal

Summary:Have you ever wondered why our hands have exactly five fingers? Scientists have uncovered a part of this mystery, and their remarkable discovery is outlined in a new report.

Have you ever wondered why our hands have exactly five fingers? Dr. Marie Kmita’s team certainly has. The researchers at the Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal and Université de Montréal have uncovered a part of this mystery, and their remarkable discovery has just been published in the journal Nature.

A matter of evolution

We have known for several years that the limbs of vertebrates, including our arms and legs, stem from fish fins. The evolution that led to the appearance of limbs, and in particular the emergence of fingers in vertebrates, reflects a change in the body plan associated with a change of habitat, the transition from an aquatic environment to a terrestrial environment. How this evolution occurred is a fascinating question that goes all the way back to the work of Charles Darwin.

This August, researchers in Chicago, Dr. Neil Shubin and his team, demonstrated that two genes — hoxa13 and hoxd13 — are responsible for the formation of fin rays and our fingers. “This result is very exciting, because it clearly establishes a molecular link between fin rays and fingers,” said Yacine Kherdjemil, a doctoral student in Marie Kmita’s laboratory and first author of the article published in Nature.

However, the transition from fin to limb was not accomplished overnight. The fossil record indicates that our ancestors were polydactyl, meaning that they had more than five fingers, which raises another key question. Through what mechanism did evolution favor pentadactyly (five fingers) among current species?

One observation in particular caught the attention of Dr. Kmita’s team: “During development, in mice and humans, the hoxa11 and hoxa13 genes are activated in separate domains of the limb bud, while in fish, these genes are activated in overlapping domains of the developing fin,” said Marie Kmita, Director of the Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal’S Genetics and Development research unit and Associate Research Professor in the Department of Medicine at the Université de Montréal.

In trying to understand the significance of this difference, Yacine Kherdjemil demonstrated that by reproducing the fish-type regulation for the hoxa11 gene, mice develop up to seven digits per paw, i.e., a return to ancestral status. Dr. Marie Kmita’s team also discovered the sequence of DNA responsible for the transition between fish- and mouse-type regulation for the hoxa11 gene. “It suggests that this major morphological change did not occur through the acquisition of new genes but by simply modifying their activities,” added Dr. Marie Kmita.

From a clinical point of view, this discovery reinforces the notion that malformations during fetal development are not only due to mutations in the genes and may come from mutations in sequences of DNA known as regulatory sequences. “At present, technical constraints do not allow for identifying this type of mutation directly in patients, hence the importance of basic research using animal models,” said Marie Kmita.

Story Source:

Materials provided by Université de Montréal. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Yacine Kherdjemil, Robert L. Lalonde, Rushikesh Sheth, Annie Dumouchel, Gemma de Martino, Kyriel M. Pineault, Deneen M. Wellik, H. Scott Stadler, Marie-Andrée Akimenko, Marie Kmita. Evolution of Hoxa11 regulation in vertebrates is linked to the pentadactyl state. Nature, 2016; DOI: 10.1038/nature19813

Porque este mundo nao foi inteligentemente desenhado por Deus

terça-feira, outubro 18th, 2016

xxxx

Gary Bell – 10/17/2016
What design is that Melvin?  The design of the mosquito to carry gods created malaria parasites to kill 500,000 innocent people every year, mostly children.  The only intelligent design is that by evolutionary biologists that save 100’s of millions of lives every year through vaccinations, gods kill, scientists save. Not to mention the Naegleria Fowleri or the ticks. Some “intelligent design” indeed…That’s two human parasites and there’s another 340, malevolent design. I wonder all of them were on the Ark of Noah (in pairs)…?
TheMatrixDNA – 10/17/2016
Indeed, God is not guilty for this bad design. It is the result of a big mistake of free will of our ancient ancestor  10 billions years ago – which is us today. Adam (the systemic male function with tendency to opened system) was dominated by the Eve’s ( the systemic female function with tendency to closed systems – the serpent swelling its own tail) supreme will and they built their own body as a closed paradise This was the state of this world about 10bilion years ago n w call it ” the building block of galaxies” which shape function and configuration is exactly equal the building block of he DNA – a lateral par of nucleotides. So, our creator is this “sinner” Milk Way and, as all closed systems are destroyed by entropy, there was the Fall – photons-genes falling over planets’ surfaces, generating chaos which is the producer of his biosphere.We are son and product of chaos, but, since that after each chaos lift up the state of order, humanity can be the agent of order – I w does not becomes closed system again. God is not the intelligent designer, there is no magic gods. In this Universe is occurring merely a natural and genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that exists beyond and triggered the Big Bang as a event of fecundation. Our relationship with this “unknown thing” Is like the relations between a pregnant woman and the genes building her baby: in another words, there is no intelligent and factual relationship.The very fact is that we discovered that DNA is merely the biological shape of a genetic code that exists as template, a matrix, of all natural systems, from atoms, to galaxies, to humans, it is universal, that’s why we call it “The Matrix/DNA”. Ok,… this is merely my theory….
+TheMatrixDNA – I had a similar theory but the acid wore off overnight.
Something happened to me when I knew about your theory. Design of mosquitos by chance, accident after accident… bahhh… mine is more rational and has more facts as evidences. But, still, your theory is better than Melvins’…
+TheMatrixDNA  Scientific theories have two great benefits above all others, they’re testable and observable.
Science is a practice right here and now about real facts. Science has no theories. Who has theories are humans, not science. And every topic about universal origins and evolution are more testable, falsifiable and observable in my theory than yours. Do you want a test? What if we beginning with  abiogenesis? My theory says there was no origins of life and no abiogenesis: there were astronomical mutational embryogenesis into a cell system. Which are yours testable and observable facts?
+TheMatrixDNA  Science says that there were no cell systems within infinitely hot quark/gluon plasma.  Gee, that was quick, NEXT!
That’s the problem when a whole generation is indoctrinated by a temporary world view built by humans. They does not understand one word about other world view. Astronomical mutational embryogenesis means that an astronomical system is reproduced with mutations. This process of reproduction took millions or billions years, just when your theory says was occurring abiogenesis ( from the first carbon combinations into aminoacids to the first cell system – aka, the first real living being). Of course, for such theory, I need to show a model of astronomical system that fits as ancestor of a cell system, and I have it. Why the carbon atom was selected for to be the principal of organic matter?
+TheMatrixDNA  Science says that there were no cell systems within infinitely hot quark/gluon plasma.  Gee, that was quick, NEXT!
That’s the problem when a whole generation is indoctrinated by a temporary world view built by humans. They does not understand one word about other world view. Astronomical mutational embryogenesis means that an astronomical system is reproduced with mutations. This process of reproduction took millions or billions years, just when your theory says was occurring abiogenesis ( from the first carbon combinations into aminoacids to the first cell system – aka, the first real living being). Of course, for such theory, I need to show a model of astronomical system that fits as ancestor of a cell system, and I have it. Why the carbon atom was selected for to be the principal of organic matter?
+TheMatrixDNA  Carbon atoms and all heavy atoms were naturally created in the hearts of stars after the quark/gluon phase of the early universe. You only know about life on one small planet in one solar system in one ordinary galaxy and yet you think you understand all life throughout the universe, come on.  Life is carbon based here because carbon can bond with oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen because of its four valence electrons.  Life could also be silicone based which sits very close to carbon on the periodic table.  Feel free to post your science backing anything that you say, if you can’t then it’s a personal fantasy
If I am talking about solid and finally structured galaxies – like Milk Way – why are you talking about the quark/gluon phase of the early Universe?!I am not referring to “life” and “on one small planet”, I am talking about natural systems, which are everywhere in this Universe. The word “life” has different definitions by my theory and yours. Instead ” life” let’s go call it ” biological systems” as different from electromagnetic or mechanical systems. No, biological systems are carbon based not because carbon can bond with oxygen, etc. As you says, life could be “other atoms based”. Really, there are about 30 atoms that could be the base for biological systems. Atoms that sits very well with carbon are all atoms multiple of seven, because the eight atom has the same properties of the first, and so on. It means that the evolution of atoms was/is life cycle based: like yours body under a life cycle has seven principals shapes and then, you die, atoms also “die” at each seven shapes, and another evolutionary cycle begins. The carbon atom was selected for to be the base of biological systems because this system was produced by this galaxy which “DNA”, or building block is astronomical number 6, like the carbon is atomic number six. Six are the systemic functions that makes a complete functional natural system. So, the carbon atom is the best atomic “ancestor/copy” of astronomical building blocks. All astronomical systemic functions and no one else are represented by the carbon atom, ( or each 7th atom in periodic table), that’s why carbon is the base for biological systems at Earth (also, the environmental conditions at biological systems origins here).
Maybe you will understand better here: The evolutionary tree did not began with archaea, etc, here at Earth. It began with the Big Bang. At the trunk of the tree are fixed the species of the lineage that were successful transformed into the next evolved specie. Like from reptiles comes mammals, from mammals comes monkeys and humans. So, there is a universal pattern of those species’ structure. Then, like the human genome is 99% equal to chimpanzees genome, the galactic genome is 99% equal to carbon genome. But instead genome you must read “Matrix/DNA”. If you do not see the universal formula for natural systems – this universal pattern of successful lineage – at my website, you will not understand the theory.
+TheMatrixDNA  So it’s just your theory?  And nobody else’s

Unfortunately, Gary, you are right. But,… that’s because I used a field of investigation only used by Darwin, nobody else: the Amazon jungle. While Darwin stood there by 4 years, I stood there by seven years. While Darwin applied the method of comparative anatomy among living systems, I applied same method among living systems and non-living systems. Then, Darwin got the theory of biological evolution, which is micro-evolution. I got same theory but at macro level, universal. I did not stop at abiogenesis, I went till the Big Bang. I think that if you do the same that I did, you would get the same results I did. It is a normal intellectual rational occurrence.

But, see how things works. Just rolling the posts here, I found a link given by Ergonover about a surprising discovery about the evolution of human hands. I have several articles/thesis in my website about human hands because the Matrix/DNA formula have suggested and showed a surprising fact that nobody else has paid attention. And the scientific discovery now is confirming my prevision/thesis. I told before about superposition of genes and the difference with ordered expressions of genes, and related to the fingers of human hands!

This is happening in a daily basis: every day a new discovery, by NASA or some lab here, are confirming the previsions of my theory. But, since I am alone in this job and merely a half-monkey coming from the jungle, nobody pay attention to my job. No problem, I like doing it, it is my life. Now, sorry, I can’t continuing this very helpful debate with you ( thanks),  because I need doing a research in that paper. Cheers…