Archive for janeiro 16th, 2018

Video sobre sintese de proteinas

terça-feira, janeiro 16th, 2018

xxxx

Video incrível em 3D que mostra todas estruturas e o processo no qual é realizado a síntese de uma proteína.

https://www.facebook.com/Soubiomais/videos/752823688258826/

Debate sobre qual o tamanho máximo pode alcançar uma criatura viva

terça-feira, janeiro 16th, 2018

xxxx

Can a Living Creature Be as Big as a Galaxy?

http://nautil.us/issue/34/adaptation/can-a-living-creature-be-as-big-as-a-galaxy#comment-3704052662

E meu comentario publicado em o1/16/18:

” Can a Living Creature Be as Big as a Galaxy?”

But, but,… galaxies are our ancestors. If you say we are living creatures, why not our ancestors? What? Galaxies are not our ancestors? We were produced by a galaxy, inside a galaxy, and only with forces and elements of this galaxy ( exactly like my body was produced from my parents’ bodies), so, why it is not our ancestor? Oh I know: your astronomical theoretical model suggests that there is no evolutionary link between galaxies and biological systems, that biological systems arises by magical chance or magical gods… These mistakes are due trying to project Physics, Math and Artificial Computation for understanding life instead doing it with Biology, organic processes and Genetics. Physics, Math and Mechanic brains applies to the bone skeleton ( of organisms and universes) not to the soft meat and sentience.

There are other theoretical astronomical models (Matrix/DNA Theory) saying just the opposite, showing how life’s properties are encrypted in mechanistic fashion into astronomical systems, suggesting a normal natural continuing evolutionary process.

Like dinosaurs arrived to a size/limit in relation to Earth environment, there is a size/limit for systems complexity in relation to universe’s environment. Like biological evolution went back in time/space for finding the smaller and humbly cynodont for continuing complexity, transforming it into mammals, cosmological evolution did same thing when the most evolved system were galaxies, too big. Then, Nature applied nanotechnology, like it is applied when resuming an adult human body into a microscopic genome.

” When it comes to known sentient life, the range in scale is even smaller, at about three orders of magnitude”

A human being waits 6 or 8 months of brain’s development for to begin express consciousness, that inherited from its parents. In relation to the universe, the universal system that began to developed, waits 13,8 billion years for expressing consciousness. Given the difference of sizes/scales of time, what is the problem?  Known that humans are genes for universal consciousness – carrying on a kind of fetus just now and here – our problem is to know how will be the connections between us and the quatrillions of other brother/genes for consciousness spreaded  in the whole universe…

 

Evolução avança em duas ondas: uma por cima, outra por baixo?

terça-feira, janeiro 16th, 2018

xxx

https://www.wired.com/2017/03/evolution-slower-looks-faster-think/

E meu comentario em 1/16/18

There is a different alternative as solution nobody said it here. The set of forces and elements of Nature that produced biological systems, has also produced all other systems, from atoms to galaxies. Like here, these forces resumed into the DNA has produced from bacteria to reptiles to mammals. So, Nature evolves modelling the smallest and the biggest, at same time. Since that transformations of the biggest ( like the solar system, the planet, etc.) occurs at lower speed in relation to the fast speed of the smallest, and since that the smallest has the tendency to acomodate refusing changes, the biggest imposes mutations at once, producing the perpetum equillibrium between the two levels… Maybe?

 

Nova evidencia para Matrix/DNA Theory: material organico e agua encontrados em meteorito

terça-feira, janeiro 16th, 2018

xxxx

My comment below explains briefly how tis news is evidence:

https://astronomynow.com/2018/01/16/ingredients-for-life-revealed-in-meteorites-that-fell-to-earth/

Ingredients for life revealed in meteorites that fell to Earth

A blue crystal recovered from a meteorite that fell near Morocco in 1998. The scale bar represents 200 microns (millionths of a meter). Credit: Queenie Chan/The Open University, U.K.

E meu comentario publicado no artigo:

Louis Charles Morelli ·Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed– posted at 01/16/18

There is a hidden detail in panspermy theory: “life didn’t arrived here coming from another planet, but as the product of the entire astronomic system projecting itself ahead, evolutionary and genetically”. The astronomical model and the life’s origins model from Matrix/DNA Theory are suggesting this solution. These news are very good as evidences for this theory. Thanks by the good job.

E meu post hoje no Facebook:

O ceu esta mandando informacoes que eleva minha teoria enquanto vai derrubando todas as outras! Me passa o catchup para meu pedaco de pizza e enche meu copo outra vez, ganhei mais essa…

O fato ‘e o seguinte (resumindo): milhares de cientistas e bilhoes de dolares estao na corrida procurando as origens da vida neste planeta, sob a ideia de que foi justo por acaso. Por outro lado, a unica teoria que um pouco diferente desta e’ a panspermia que imagina a vida surgindo em outro lugar e trazida para ca. A busca dos pesquisadores no ambiente terrestre esta frustrando-os, porque parecem cada vez mais distante do que aconteceu de fato, mas entao descobriram varios meteoritos caidos do espaco contend os building blocks basicos para a vida, e assim levantaram os olhos para o ceu, a antiga teoria da panspermia esta voltando a todo vapor. Mas esta teoria e’ irracional: ela apenas transfere o problema para outro lugar e fica do mesmo jeito sem solucao, pois como a vida teria surgido em outro lugar?

La no meio da selva a Natureza sussurrou alguns segredos no meu ouvido, e qu8ando os comparei com as interpretacoes dos academicos sobre os fatos reais, nao batiam com o que a Natureza me sugeriu. Tive que calcular tudo de novo, modelos de atomos, galaxias, processos de origens da vida. criando a Matrix/DNA Theory. Nela, a resposta nao esta na superficie da Terra e tambem esta mas nao esta na panspermia. A vida ‘e sistema biologico e foi produzido pela auto-projecao `a frente do sistema astronomico que a criou, evolucionaria e geneticamente. Claro, quem me ouviu fez uma careta de dar medo, entao calei-me. Mas ha 30 anos a Ciencia esta descobrindo novas informacoes na Terra e no espaco, todas indo contra os modelos teoricos dos academicos, e todas caindo como luvas como evidencias para a Matrix/DNA. No modelo academico nao havia agua nas origens do sistema solar e agora vem um meteorito de outro astro que apos datado revela-se remanescente das origens do sistema solar e com agua! Mas eu gritei la da selva que a maneira como astros se formam, ja contem agua, que pode ser mantida ou desaparecer… E os meus aminoacidos com a mesma configuracao de um sistema astronomico veio no meteorito…

Nao tem conversa, me passa o catchup, e hoje voces pagam a conta…

Vídeo da NASA no Youtube sobre Orion, Nebula

terça-feira, janeiro 16th, 2018

….

Take a Breathtaking Trip Through the Orion Nebula in NASA’s New Video

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/take-trip-through-orion-nebula-nasas-awesome-video-1-180967825/

Meu comentario postado no artigo:

Louis Morelli – 01/16/18

Galaxies are natural systems, which was formed billions years before biological systems, so, they are our ancestors. The properties of life, the organs of living beings, were there, in very primitive shape, maybe expressed, maybe only as potential state. We can’t see this image in full for understanding how it is as a system, because we will need not only the visible light or infrared, but the seven beams of radiation from the eletromagnetic spectrum. Maybe we will conclude that this image is like a living being, or a part of working system.

Calculating evolution in reverse way, starting here and going towards the Big Bang, Matrix/DNA Theory suggests a new model of galaxies that mimics a cell system and that, the formula-template of astronomic system is similar to the building blocks of DNA. The models are suggesting that DNA is merelly the biological shape of a universal Matrix that is coming under evolution since the Big Bang encrypted into light waves. I know, it is very weird, but we can’t ignore rational results from rational methods of calculations. Maybe we, humans, are not 30 or 60 years old, but 13,8 billion years old… at least it is our Matrix/DNA.

Cientistas religiosos e ateus, ambos projetam experimentos baseados em suas ideologias. Quem esta’ certo?

terça-feira, janeiro 16th, 2018

xxxx

Visto no artigo:

EVOLUTION IS SLOWER THAN IT LOOKS AND FASTER THAN YOU THINK

https://www.wired.com/2017/03/evolution-slower-looks-faster-think/

Seção dos comentários:

-” Creationist scientist is an oxymoron. Unlike true scientists, a “Creation Scientist” starts with the answer, which is “God did it”, and proceeds to design “experiments” to validate that answer.”

-” A creation scientists is simply one who believes in the literal account of Genesis.
I hope you don’t call your self an evolutionary scientist! Because in your reasoning, that would mean starting with the answer, which is “random chance and time did it”, and proceeding to design “experiments” to validate that answer.”

Raios, a meu ver os dois estão certos. Cientistas misticos que acreditam literalmente na narrativa de Gênesis  – sem base racional – numa resposta definitiva para explicar os mistérios do mundo, ” Deus fez isto”, e partindo desta premissa na mente, projetam experimentos nesta unica linha de logica, esperando provar sua fé. Por outro lado, também ainda não se pode provar que evolução seja o processo básico da natureza universal. Cientistas que acreditam literalmente nesta narrativa – sem prova cientifica – partem desta crença para projetar novos experimentos, esperando encontrar a prova.

Como resolver isto? Sendo imparcial?

Acho que racionalmente, quando temos um fenômeno natural sem explicação ( como a origem das especies e sistemas naturais), devemos procurar alguma outra situação da natureza que seja a imagem e semelhança do fenômeno, e que saibamos a explicação. Então, neste caso, não conheço nenhuma outra situação na Natureza onde múltiplas variações de um fenômeno tenha sido criado por magica por uma entidade sobrenatural. E conheço um fenômeno em outra situação da natureza onde vejo um processo a imagem e semelhança da evolução: embriogênese de um corpo humano. Vejo ali ocorrendo transformações de formas, sendo que cada ultima forma ‘e mais complexa que as anteriores, e isto, para mim, define “evolução”. Por isso, mesmo sabendo que minha evidencia não prova que exista universal evolução, vou seguir a bandeira dos cientistas evolucionistas. Não tenho a menor base racional para seguir a outra bandeira.