Archive for agosto 28th, 2018

Espaço e tempo: Teoria de Seth (Jane Roberts) bate com a sugestão da Matrix/DNA Theory

terça-feira, agosto 28th, 2018

xxxx

WHAT IS THE NATURE OF TIME AND SPACE?

https://www.sethlearningcenter.org/q_time_space.html

“The settings in your physical environment…the physical aspects of life as you know it, are all camouflages.

Matrix/DNA: Camuflagens no sentido de que você chamaria de camuflagens as formas anteriores do seu corpo que não existem mais para você agora, como a forma de morula, blastula, feto, criança, etc… Todas as paisagens físicas do Universo ate agora, todas as vidas da Natureza, foram e ainda são formas criadas na grande obra de gerar uma consciência cósmica, a forma final para o dia do grande nascimento.

The brain is a camouflage pattern. It takes up space. It exists in time. The mind takes up no space, it does not have its basic existence in time.

Matrix/DNA: Grande! Somos habituados a questionar se nossa mente esta dentro da cabeça, ou fora da cabeça, etc. Ora… O cérebro é um objeto físico, então ele toma um lugar no espaço físico. A mente não é um objeto físico, para ela não existe espaço físico, então não faz sentido querer situa-la num ponto do espaço… O mesmo acontece com o tempo: a vida dura 70 anos? Pode ser, para o corpo físico. Para a mente não existe tempo, não existe 70 nem um milhão de anos, ela não tem um tempo para existir ou não.

The reality of the inner universe does not take up space, nor does it have its basic existence in time. Your camouflage universe, on the other hand, takes up space and has an existence in time, but it is not the real and basic universe, any more than the brain is the mind.

Your idea of space is some completely erroneous conception of an emptiness to be filled… True inner space is to the contrary vital energy, itself alive, possessing abilities or transformation, forming all existences, even the camouflage reality with which you are familiar, and which you attempt to probe so ineffectively.

This basic universe of which I speak expands constantly in terms of intensity and quality and value, in a way that has nothing to do with your idea of space. The basic universe beneath all camouflage does not have existence in space at all, as you envision it… Space is a camouflage… ”

Matrix/DNA: Acho fácil perceber como nossa ideia de espaço não tem fundamento na realidade. Suponha que esse aglomerado de galaxias que forma este Universo tenha realmente um limite, chega a certo ponto e terminam as galaxias. O que temos ‘a frente? Espaço? Certamente não o espaço como cremos, o que pode ter é o vazio infinito. Mas se alguém construísse mais uma galaxia e a colocasse depois da ultima galaxia, o intervalo de “nada” que ficasse entre as duas seria por nos chamado de espaço. Seria medido, ate ocupado, ou seja, de repente teríamos materializado este espaço, apenas em nossa crença… O mesmo pode-se dizer que este “tempo”, uma ideia inventada por nos para podermos mediar a sequencia de eventos e situar um evento em tal estado do mundo outrora, não existe de fato, ou como algum tipo de energia, fluido, substancia, etc. 

From the book, Seth Speaks, page 235:

“As I have said many times, time as you think of it does not exist.”

From the book, The Nature of Personal Reality, page 152:

“…the fact is that all ‘time’ is simultaneous.”

From the book, Seth Speaks, page 245:

“There are an infinite number of inner universes…”

Muito interessante: Seth, psicografado por Jane Roberts, bate com previsões da Matrix/DNA

terça-feira, agosto 28th, 2018

xxxx

Mas nunca ignore as contradicoes em cada teoria/revelacao/intuicao/etc. _ After all Jane Roberts was not able to reverse her fatal disease.

Seth: The spiritual teacher that started the "New Age"

https://www.sethlearningcenter.org/index.html

https://www.sethlearningcenter.org/q_purpose_of_life.html

From “The Early Sessions:”

“The child must mature, and your system is a maturing ground, a very primary one…. A beginning school…”

… bate quando a Matrix/DNA sugere que somos ainda consciencia na forma embrionaria.

“The human race is a stage though which various forms of consciousness travel. Before you can be allowed into systems of reality that are more extensive and open, you must first learn to handle energy and see, through physical materialization, the concrete result of thought and emotion.”

Matrix/DNA: Os humanos se dividem em varios niveis de evolucao, a auto-consciencia aqui esta nas varias formas embrionarias, como a morula, blastula,feto, enbriao, e as formas intermediarias entre estas. Nos queixamos que nos sentimos e vivemos como se estivessemos algmeados, sem poder fazer o que precisamos fazer, e isto significa que o sistema biosferico na Terra e’ menos extenso e menos aberto. Para evoluir e passar a sistemas mais extensos e mais abertos, onde essa prisao se desfaz, voce precisa antes aprender a controlar a forssa de sua energia, a qual sera universal. Pois sem auto-controle, voce pode por tudo a perder. E voce aprende esse controle observando os varios tipos de mentalidades humanas em suas posicoes financeiras, usando seus poderes, aprendendo o que fazem de errado e assim prejudicam os semelhantes e o mundo.

“In more advanced systems, thoughts, and emotions are automatically and immediately translated into action, into whatever approximation of matter there exists. Therefore, the lessons must be taught and learned well. The responsibility for creation must be clearly understood.”

Matrix/DNA: Nos sistemas mais avancados qe o humano terrestre, pensamentos e emocoes sao automatica e imediatamente trasnformados em acoes. Eles podem mudar qualquer tipo de materia existente. Assim voce cria e desfaz realidades apenas tendo subitos novos pensamentos. Portanto, as licoes para voce aprender a treinar e controlar seus pensamentos e emocoes devem ser serias, muito cuidadosas, e bem aprendidas. Voce tem – antes de passar a sistemas mais evoluidos que lhe permitem este poder – que entender e assumir a responsabilidade por suas criacoes ou destruicoes efetivadas por seus pensamentos e emocoes, como amor ou odio, etc.

Melhor vídeo sobre átomos e melhor debate sobre a noção cientifica do átomo e da existência humana

terça-feira, agosto 28th, 2018

xxxxx

O video com a melhor explicacao sobre atomos e mecanica quantica basica. E os comentarios na discussao abaixo do video sao interessantes , principalmente do fisico que explica ninguem nunca viu atomos e particulas nos instrumentos da Fisica, apenas campos eletricos.

The most explanatory video about atoms and basic quantum mechanics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EOHYT5q5lhQ

This is an email I received recently from the site “Ask a Mathematician, Ask a Physicist”::::::
What are “actual pictures” of atoms actually pictures of?.
Physicist:
Actual pictures of atoms aren’t actually pictures at all. There are a few good rules of thumb in physics. Among the best is: light acts like you’d expect on scales well above its wavelength and acts weird on scales below. In order to take a picture of a thing you need light to bounce … The only thing physicists have actually seen is basically a computer image, not the real image, and second, they observe electric fields, not the particle itself. They do not observe particles themselves; they are able to observe only the field. However this alone does not prove anything, but that the electric energy field exists and that’s about it—no atoms, no photons, no electrons, no quarks. no nothing. So no, particles do not exist. Particles exist only inside mathematical abstractions and nothing more and nothing else. We don’t know what actually exists in the real world, except that there are energy fields—electric, magnetic and all other forms and all other kinds of energy fields. I forgot to add what exactly is visualized with all these microscopes including STM–the scanning tunneling microscope. What is visualized is the charge density of the electric field. Basically you observe vibrations—electric vibrations. You haven’t seen an atom either. You’ve seen an image you assume to be an atom, but it is simply an instrument’s representation of the atom. It is not the atom itself. These techniques aren’t actually “visual” like microscopes we work with in biology classes. Microscopes use lenses and light to help zoom and focus on small objects. Electron microscopes, on the other hand, use quantum scattering theory to construct the shape of small objects, then the data is transferred to a computer to create a model. The wavelengths of visible light ranges on the order of ~370nm to 750nm. These are all MUCH larger than many particles of interest (and way too large to view atoms, which are on the order of Angstroms–0.1nm). Scientists need to be creative to be able to “see” atoms. So, no, scanning tunneling microscopes and atomic force microscopes did not prove the existence of atoms.

Living the Infinite Way: Life as Oneness with God

Living the Infinite Way: Life as Oneness with God

Jul 1, 2006

Paperback


Kindle Edition

Get it TODAY, Aug 28
xxxx
Oure Energy:
Also evidence of constant creation are these words: ‘magically bursting forth are quarks spinning billions of times a second as 3 points of light, forming what are called protons and neutrons’. I found these words in the book “The Quantum World” written by the physicist Kenneth Ford. Imagine that. Turns out we are imagination itself since nothing is solid. We are brilliant, concentrated energy images or holograms. In the book “Hands of Light” written by the physicist/healer Barbara Brennan are many pictures of what we look like as holograms/eternal energy beings. Brennan trained herself to see people as holograms.
Hands of Light: A Guide to Healing Through the Human Energy Field by [Brennan, Barbara]

Hands of Light: A Guide to Healing Through the Human Energy Field – Aura – Kindle Edition

xxxxx

Entendendo Lições de Ciências – The Science Flowchart

terça-feira, agosto 28th, 2018

xxxxx

https://undsci.berkeley.edu/index.php

The Science Flowchart

https://undsci.berkeley.edu/lessons/pdfs/complex_flow_handout.pdf

 

Como aprender o “hábito da mente cientifica”

terça-feira, agosto 28th, 2018

xxxx

THE SCIENTIFIC STATE OF MIND

(para traduzir)

https://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_04

Henri Becquerel
Henri Becquerel
Becquerel's photo plate
The ruined photo plate that got Becquerel thinking

Some scientific discoveries are chalked up to the serendipity of being in the right place at the right time to make a key observation — but rarely does serendipity alone lead to a new discovery. The people who turn lucky breaks into breakthroughs are generally those with the background knowledge and scientific ways of thinking needed to make sense of the lucky observation. For example, in 1896, Henri Becquerel made a surprising observation.

He found that photographic plates stored next to uranium salts were spotted, as though they’d been exposed to light rays — even though they had been kept in a dark drawer. Someone else, with a less scientific state of mind and less background knowledge about physics, might have cursed their bad luck and thrown out the ruined plates. But Becquerel was intrigued by the observation. He recognized it as something scientifically interesting, went on to perform follow-up experiments that traced the source of the exposure to the uranium, and in the process, discovered radioactivity. The key to this story of discovery lies partly in Becquerel’s instigating observation, but also in his way of thinking. Along with the relevant background knowledge, Becquerel had a scientific state of mind. Sure, he made some key observations — but then he dug into them further, inquiring why the plates were exposed and trying to eliminate different potential causes of the exposure to get to the physical explanation behind the happy accident.

Want to develop your own scientific state of mind?

 

Think science!

You might imagine that scientific thinking differs from the sorts of reasoning tools that you use in your everyday life — that scientists go around with a head full of equations through which they view the world. In fact, many aspects of scientific thinking are just extensions of the way you probably think everyday:
Ever seen something surprising and tried to figure out how it happened? Perhaps you’ve seen a magician make his assistant disappear from a box and wondered if the trick involved a trap door ….
Ever sought out more evidence (e.g., by looking for a joint in the floor beneath the box)?
Ever come up with a new explanation for a mystery? Perhaps the trick used a mirror to reflect an image of an empty wall ….
These might seem like trivial examples, but in fact, they represent scientific habits of mind applied to an everyday situation. Scientists use such ways of thinking to scrutinize their topics of study — whether that’s human behavior or neutron stars — and you can use the same tools in your own life.

Microbiologists performing a PCR assay An inquisitive child looks to see what she can discover under a rock

Scientific ways of thinking can be applied to everyday life.
Want to develop your scientific outlook? Try to consciously apply these habits of mind to the natural world around you:

Question what you observe. How does bleach lighten your clothes? How do bees find their way back to the hive? What causes the phases of the moon?
Investigate further. Find out what is already known about your observations. Your sister says that bleach washes chemicals out of fabric, while your chemistry book says that bleach is good at breaking molecular bonds that cause chemicals to appear colored.
Be skeptical. You’ve heard that honeybees use the sun to navigate, but does that really make sense? What would they do on cloudy days?
Try to refute your own ideas. Look at things from the other side of the argument. You’d always assumed that the phases of the moon were caused by the shadow of the Earth falling on the moon — but if that were really the case, then how is it that we can sometimes see both the moon and the sun in the sky overhead?
Seek out more evidence. Does bleach work better on some sorts of stains than others? Do bees leave the hive on cloudy days? Is there any relationship between the phase of the moon and where it appears in the night sky?
Be open-minded. Change your mind if the evidence warrants it. If everything you learn about the moon clashes with the idea of lunar phases being caused by the Earth’s shadow, perhaps you should give up that idea and look for other explanations.
Think creatively. Try to come up with alternate explanations for what you observe. Maybe bees also use landmarks to get back to their hives, maybe they use the Earth’s magnetic field, maybe they follow some sort of scent trail, or maybe they use a combination of navigation methods ….
In terms of answering your original questions, some of these strategies are bound to be dead ends. At the end of the day, you’ll have learned a lot but may still be without solid answers. And if so, congratulations — you’re really thinking like a scientist! Scientific investigations, like your own exploration, often lead in unexpected directions and lack tidy endpoints. Nevertheless, these ways of thinking illuminate the world around us in ways that are often useful and always fascinating, revealing the inner workings of our everyday experiences — whether that’s a walk past a garden, a moonlit night, or just doing a load of laundry.

Luz Ilusória: Eu estou vendo galaxias, ou gases, ou poeira?

terça-feira, agosto 28th, 2018

xxxxx

Se o Universo for uma especie de maquina, ou de organismo, ou alguma coisa entre os dois, nos ainda não temos tecnologia para descobri-lo. O Universo pode ainda não ser um sistema na sua totalidade, mas sim um aglomerado de sistemas, então estas maquinas ou organismos poderiam ser suas galaxias, constelações, etc. Lembre-se sempre que, em relacao ao Universo,  nos somos como aquelas pequeninas partículas dentro de átomos ( nosso sistema solar) dentro de células ( a nossa galaxia Via Láctea),  que apontássemos nossas lentes para o ambiente ao nosso redor dentro do corpo humano ( o nosso Universo), e veríamos o pâncreas, o figado, apenas como nuvens de gases e poeira, os prótons de outros átomos seriam nossas estrelas, etc. Jamais estas partículas poderiam sequer imaginar que estão dentro desta coisa chamada de organismo, ou corpo humano. Da mesma forma, é insano e irracional escolher qualquer teoria ou hipótese sobre o Universo como certa.

Então quando ouvires ou ler estes arrogantes e pobres humanos que existem aos montes na Internet dizendo que tem certeza que o Universo começou com um Big Bang, ou “que já sabemos como funciona este Universo”, não se deixe iludir, ninguém sabe nada, ainda, mas nunca deixe de ver, seguir, as imagens e real dados que estão sendo divulgados dia a dia, pois isto em muito nos ajuda na evolução mental, a ser melhores humanos mais sintonizados com as verdades da Natureza que não começa nem termina neste planeta e sim, Ela é o Universo inteiro, ampliando nossos horizontes mentais. As informações abaixo ajudam-nos a entender o quão pouco ainda temos de tecnologia e conhecimento desse imenso Universo que ha’ apenas um século começamos a ver que existe alem da nossa galaxia, alem de melhor informar os amadores a astrônomos que tem telescópios em casa. ( texto obtido em:

https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zookeeper/galaxy-zoo/talk/1268/570127?comment=944770

Galaxias são feitas de bilhões de estrelas. Estrelas brilham, então nos as vemos pela luz que emitem. Galaxias estão muito distantes e por isso nos não podemos ver suas individuais estrelas. Nos apenas vemos agrupamentos de estrelas num brilho só. As cores são misturas de branco-azulado, branco ou avermelhado, como na imagem abaixo:

not gas but stars

Existem bilhões de estrelas nesta galaxia

Veja em: https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zookeeper/galaxy-zoo/talk/subjects/20284233

“Gas”

Existe gás em galaxias, a maioria são gases constituídos de hidrogênio ou gases de oxigênio. Gás não brilha, então nos não podemos ver gases em nossas imagens obtidas pelos telescópios. Se uma galaxia esta’ muito distante ela parece uma nebulosa, mas ainda são estrelas que estamos vendo, e não nuvens de gás. Ocasionalmente a luz ultravioleta ou Raios-X pode brilhar no gás de hidrogênio e fazer o gás iluminar como uma lampada fluorescente, e emitir luz em agradáveis cores de azul escuro, azul claro, verde ou vermelho.

voorwerpje Vermelho é gás de hidrogênio aquecido, branco são estrelas. Esta galaxia é identificada como 1237668348137177128
( ver mais em:

(https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zookeeper/galaxy-zoo/talk/1269/582784?comment=967386)

“Poeira estelar” e plano ou disco de poeira

Poeira significa pequenas moléculas. Poeira não brilha, mas nos podemos ver seus locais e posições quando ela bloqueia a luz de uma galaxia atras dela.

Example Alt Text Disco de poeira com uma galaxia atras.

Ver mais em: https://www.zooniverse.org/projects/zookeeper/galaxy-zoo/talk/subjects/20283682