Porque este mundo nao foi inteligentemente desenhado por Deus

xxxx

Gary Bell – 10/17/2016
What design is that Melvin?  The design of the mosquito to carry gods created malaria parasites to kill 500,000 innocent people every year, mostly children.  The only intelligent design is that by evolutionary biologists that save 100’s of millions of lives every year through vaccinations, gods kill, scientists save. Not to mention the Naegleria Fowleri or the ticks. Some “intelligent design” indeed…That’s two human parasites and there’s another 340, malevolent design. I wonder all of them were on the Ark of Noah (in pairs)…?
TheMatrixDNA – 10/17/2016
Indeed, God is not guilty for this bad design. It is the result of a big mistake of free will of our ancient ancestor  10 billions years ago – which is us today. Adam (the systemic male function with tendency to opened system) was dominated by the Eve’s ( the systemic female function with tendency to closed systems – the serpent swelling its own tail) supreme will and they built their own body as a closed paradise This was the state of this world about 10bilion years ago n w call it ” the building block of galaxies” which shape function and configuration is exactly equal the building block of he DNA – a lateral par of nucleotides. So, our creator is this “sinner” Milk Way and, as all closed systems are destroyed by entropy, there was the Fall – photons-genes falling over planets’ surfaces, generating chaos which is the producer of his biosphere.We are son and product of chaos, but, since that after each chaos lift up the state of order, humanity can be the agent of order – I w does not becomes closed system again. God is not the intelligent designer, there is no magic gods. In this Universe is occurring merely a natural and genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that exists beyond and triggered the Big Bang as a event of fecundation. Our relationship with this “unknown thing” Is like the relations between a pregnant woman and the genes building her baby: in another words, there is no intelligent and factual relationship.The very fact is that we discovered that DNA is merely the biological shape of a genetic code that exists as template, a matrix, of all natural systems, from atoms, to galaxies, to humans, it is universal, that’s why we call it “The Matrix/DNA”. Ok,… this is merely my theory….
+TheMatrixDNA – I had a similar theory but the acid wore off overnight.
Something happened to me when I knew about your theory. Design of mosquitos by chance, accident after accident… bahhh… mine is more rational and has more facts as evidences. But, still, your theory is better than Melvins’…
+TheMatrixDNA  Scientific theories have two great benefits above all others, they’re testable and observable.
Science is a practice right here and now about real facts. Science has no theories. Who has theories are humans, not science. And every topic about universal origins and evolution are more testable, falsifiable and observable in my theory than yours. Do you want a test? What if we beginning with  abiogenesis? My theory says there was no origins of life and no abiogenesis: there were astronomical mutational embryogenesis into a cell system. Which are yours testable and observable facts?
+TheMatrixDNA  Science says that there were no cell systems within infinitely hot quark/gluon plasma.  Gee, that was quick, NEXT!
That’s the problem when a whole generation is indoctrinated by a temporary world view built by humans. They does not understand one word about other world view. Astronomical mutational embryogenesis means that an astronomical system is reproduced with mutations. This process of reproduction took millions or billions years, just when your theory says was occurring abiogenesis ( from the first carbon combinations into aminoacids to the first cell system – aka, the first real living being). Of course, for such theory, I need to show a model of astronomical system that fits as ancestor of a cell system, and I have it. Why the carbon atom was selected for to be the principal of organic matter?
+TheMatrixDNA  Science says that there were no cell systems within infinitely hot quark/gluon plasma.  Gee, that was quick, NEXT!
That’s the problem when a whole generation is indoctrinated by a temporary world view built by humans. They does not understand one word about other world view. Astronomical mutational embryogenesis means that an astronomical system is reproduced with mutations. This process of reproduction took millions or billions years, just when your theory says was occurring abiogenesis ( from the first carbon combinations into aminoacids to the first cell system – aka, the first real living being). Of course, for such theory, I need to show a model of astronomical system that fits as ancestor of a cell system, and I have it. Why the carbon atom was selected for to be the principal of organic matter?
+TheMatrixDNA  Carbon atoms and all heavy atoms were naturally created in the hearts of stars after the quark/gluon phase of the early universe. You only know about life on one small planet in one solar system in one ordinary galaxy and yet you think you understand all life throughout the universe, come on.  Life is carbon based here because carbon can bond with oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen because of its four valence electrons.  Life could also be silicone based which sits very close to carbon on the periodic table.  Feel free to post your science backing anything that you say, if you can’t then it’s a personal fantasy
If I am talking about solid and finally structured galaxies – like Milk Way – why are you talking about the quark/gluon phase of the early Universe?!I am not referring to “life” and “on one small planet”, I am talking about natural systems, which are everywhere in this Universe. The word “life” has different definitions by my theory and yours. Instead ” life” let’s go call it ” biological systems” as different from electromagnetic or mechanical systems. No, biological systems are carbon based not because carbon can bond with oxygen, etc. As you says, life could be “other atoms based”. Really, there are about 30 atoms that could be the base for biological systems. Atoms that sits very well with carbon are all atoms multiple of seven, because the eight atom has the same properties of the first, and so on. It means that the evolution of atoms was/is life cycle based: like yours body under a life cycle has seven principals shapes and then, you die, atoms also “die” at each seven shapes, and another evolutionary cycle begins. The carbon atom was selected for to be the base of biological systems because this system was produced by this galaxy which “DNA”, or building block is astronomical number 6, like the carbon is atomic number six. Six are the systemic functions that makes a complete functional natural system. So, the carbon atom is the best atomic “ancestor/copy” of astronomical building blocks. All astronomical systemic functions and no one else are represented by the carbon atom, ( or each 7th atom in periodic table), that’s why carbon is the base for biological systems at Earth (also, the environmental conditions at biological systems origins here).
Maybe you will understand better here: The evolutionary tree did not began with archaea, etc, here at Earth. It began with the Big Bang. At the trunk of the tree are fixed the species of the lineage that were successful transformed into the next evolved specie. Like from reptiles comes mammals, from mammals comes monkeys and humans. So, there is a universal pattern of those species’ structure. Then, like the human genome is 99% equal to chimpanzees genome, the galactic genome is 99% equal to carbon genome. But instead genome you must read “Matrix/DNA”. If you do not see the universal formula for natural systems – this universal pattern of successful lineage – at my website, you will not understand the theory.
+TheMatrixDNA  So it’s just your theory?  And nobody else’s

Unfortunately, Gary, you are right. But,… that’s because I used a field of investigation only used by Darwin, nobody else: the Amazon jungle. While Darwin stood there by 4 years, I stood there by seven years. While Darwin applied the method of comparative anatomy among living systems, I applied same method among living systems and non-living systems. Then, Darwin got the theory of biological evolution, which is micro-evolution. I got same theory but at macro level, universal. I did not stop at abiogenesis, I went till the Big Bang. I think that if you do the same that I did, you would get the same results I did. It is a normal intellectual rational occurrence.

But, see how things works. Just rolling the posts here, I found a link given by Ergonover about a surprising discovery about the evolution of human hands. I have several articles/thesis in my website about human hands because the Matrix/DNA formula have suggested and showed a surprising fact that nobody else has paid attention. And the scientific discovery now is confirming my prevision/thesis. I told before about superposition of genes and the difference with ordered expressions of genes, and related to the fingers of human hands!

This is happening in a daily basis: every day a new discovery, by NASA or some lab here, are confirming the previsions of my theory. But, since I am alone in this job and merely a half-monkey coming from the jungle, nobody pay attention to my job. No problem, I like doing it, it is my life. Now, sorry, I can’t continuing this very helpful debate with you ( thanks),  because I need doing a research in that paper. Cheers…