Vídeo bombástico torna-se viral e faz pessoas a já quatro dias e noites ligadas no computador discutindo o destino dos Estados Unidos!
http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?threaded=1&v=gHbYJfwFgOU
Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children
( Bill Nye, o segundo Carl Sagan: Religião não é Apropriada para Crianças)
Video publicado no Youtube por Bill Nye, conhecido a muito tempo como o “science guy” está causando a maior celeuma nos USA. Abaixo do vídeo, na seção “comentários” está contecendo dois posts acrescentados por segundo e já passou dos 100.000 participantes e três milhões de visitas! É assunto da Matrix/DNA por isso estamos tentando contribuir com meus dois centavos, mas onde estão os brasileiros, se o assunto tambem é do Brazil? Vai lá… veja meus posts e me tucuta…
Ultimos posts da Matrix/DNA e os outros mais interessantes:
xxx
49 seconds ago
xxx
in reply to marksmith1116 (Show the comment) 43 minutes ago
in reply to GapWim – 7:36 AM , Tuesday, September, 04
Only food for thought – They never will get the forces and elements that produced the process of (a)biogenesis because they are focusing Earth alone and forgetting the system it belongs. If no sun’s energy no life, which should be indicative, and what about cosmic radiation? What’s coming with it? In another hand, we have no good model of galaxies as system, the connections and origins are unknown. See the models in Matrix/DNA Theory as sample how this is important.
xxx
8:08 PM monday, september 03.
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
xxx
1 second ago
xxx
30 minutes ago
What about the rest of us that don’t support current evolutionary theory but are not creationist either?
in reply to truvelocity (Show the comment) 4 hours ago
A theory is still a theory scientific or not its not a fact. My theory (belief) is that God crated the heavens and the earth. And its not a blind faith, there was the great flood which we see the runes till this day, where the dinosaurs were wiped out and for which we have the fossils, the Bible has answers its just people are to lazy to read. Bill is attaching creationist so I’m defending its stand, why is Bill doing that I don’t know he could of just did a lesson on evolution instead.
Gnodnarb: “God is the way, the truth, and everything. He sent his only son to us and he died for our sins. Let us rejoice and remember the name, Jesus Christ!”
The Matrix/DNA: “If you send your son to be tortured in a salvage tribe I will call you a monster, not a God. There is no love nether rational explanation for this fairy tale.
xxx
1 second ago
Paladins, when matter is organized as systems, the systems fits in full with the spectrum of light, each part has its light frequency. This is memory, the system registered as light. The system is fragmented by entropy, this memory transferred to new system. In this way, the system called “chicken” is linked with the system called “Milk Way”. Any star incubates its offspring (planets), so it is the instinct that leads the chicken doing the same with its eggs. See pictures in Matrix/DNA Theory
xxx
1 second ago
1 second ago
1 second ago
1 second ago
1 second ago
1 minute ago
xxxx
in reply to DanThemes (Show the comment) 6 minutes ago
xxx
1 second ago
in reply to themanningsjdsjjj (Show the comment) 16 seconds ago
in reply to thelichkingz (Show the comment) 14 seconds ago
1 second ago
xxx
1 second ago
1 second ago
1 second ago
xxx
1 second ago
xxx
bawward: Evolution has never been proven in a lab (even under the perfect circumstances!)
I don’t understand what do you understand by “evolution”. It is proven naturally all times in a natural lab: the womb. Transformation of an individual as projection of transformation of its population. From blastulae to fetus to embryo… and before that… the morulae mimicking the galaxies, etc. Ooops… you believe that God appears inside the womb creating a new baby, sorry.
xxx
xxx
in reply to epicsaxman2012 1 second ago
xxx
Hardcorerockerforlif : Abiogenesis is practically us just spontaneously appearing, right? Or is there more to it than that that I don’t know about?
TheMatrixDNA: Abiogenesis is another name for cosmological embryogenesis. The whole process from aminoacids formation to the first cell system ( billions years) was a process of reproduction from this galaxy in shape of living cell. You can see the picture of a cell as a copy of the building blocks of astronomical system in the models of Matrix/DNA Theory.
xxx
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
To solve this division in the mindset of this great country, we need avoid the world “origins”. There was no origins of life, no origins of universe. The word “origins” brings on the idea that the normal natural chain of causes and effects was broken due to interference of something non material. Then creationists appeal to “God” and atheists to “randomness”. There were transformations between natural systems, never “origins”.
xxx
1 second ago
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago Why Darwinian evolutionism is a failing theory? Because in Nature everything get tired, falls, transforms, and lift up again more strong and complex. Darwin observed only biological transformations, which are all about biological systems. This is micro-evolution, another micro-cycle inside a universal macro-evolution process. The real evolution includes all natural systems, from atomic ones to galaxies. We don’t know how works a galactic system, and how it fit the gaps of ToE. xxx TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago tigerade85 : Humans did not “evolve from apes”. Humans and Apes have a common ancestor. Get your facts straight. Have you never learned about the hierarchy of natural systems? Homos Erectus, apes, the common ancestor were produced by biological systems. But biological systems can not produces consciousness. Never learned about Godel’s theorem: “it is impossible to a physical system like a brain to produce the self reflection of any part as a new emergent system.” There is hidden systems. xxx TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
xxx
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
A question for Intelligent Designer: I have a pet, a baby giraffe. Everybody knows that the first moment the body of baby giraffe came into existence was through a Big Bang: the “explosion of spermatozoon’s envelope inside an ovule. Everybody knows that the parents giraffes never lived in the Universe of that embryo( the egg ), but they were the designer of the baby. What kind of intelligence the giraffes used in that design? Why the universe needs an intelligent design if Nature can do it?
xxx TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
How reptiles became mammals? Reptiles have no feelings towards their offspring, usually they eat them. So, why happened the biggest heroic sacrifice by the reptile female cyanodont trying to keep eggs inside? It was her own will? No. We discovered in the cosmological model of Matrix/DNA Theory that our ancestor – the Milk Way – already have the two traits: puts eggs out and at the same time, keeps it inside. The photons-genes from the galaxy expressed “eggs inside” in that female.
xxx
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
xxx
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
Why are there different species? The Last Universal Common Ancestor was one and still exists. But instead transmitting its entire genome inside a closed envelope called chromosomal, his genes-bits are spreaded in space and time. If these “genes” meets in some place and time, they have the tendency for linking again at the same sequence. Then arises small packages of genes expressing less organs, different dominant genes, etc. The ancestor is the Milk Way, by the model of Matrix/DNA Theory.
xxx
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
xxx
813trooper 37 seconds ago
Is that right? So let me get this straight, There was a big boom boom, then after the big boom boom, Ameoba came out from such a cataclysmic event? Then it turned into apes then humans. LolololololoLLLLLL. Okay, I am going to go teach my kid that now.
TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
Danny Wise: Your body began with a Big Bang inside an ovule. Few days later a human embryo came out from such “cataclysmic event”. Now, with this natural real parameter known here, go making a theory about universe’s origins. You will be surprised by the wonderful results, like I am with my result, the Matrix/DNA Theory.
xxx
Somebody wrote: “some new findings lead us toward the recognition of evolution as more than a hypothesis”
xxx
droolaxx 18 seconds ago
At some point in time we humans believed the world was flat, we believed the earth was the center of the universe, and that we would have to sacrifice someone for the sun to rise. Obviously none of those are true, but those world view changes wouldn’t have changed without science. We as humans cannot progress without science. I’m all for religion, but don’t let it blind you from what’s closer to the truth.
TheMatrixDNA in reply to droolaxx ( domingo, 18:55 hs., New Yotk time)
Put it in real terms: those world view changes wouldn’t have changed without new observed empirical evidences. The word “science” is a trap. Then, past experiences have showed that has new observed facts that changes worldviews, and this includes “ours” worldviews, which will be changed. Who guarantee to you that nowadays “science” with its scientific reductionist method is closer to the truth than natural philosophy with scientific systemic method like the worldview of Matrix/DNA Theory?
xxx TheMatrixDNA 1 minute ago
xxx TheMatrixDNA 6 minutes ago
xxx TheMatrixDNA 1 second ago
xxx TheMatrixDNA 15 second ago What about our beloved children? It seems that every people here are advocating his/her worldvision and forgotten the great opportunity and responsibility this issue offers to the best goods to our children. How works the brain’s children? What about imagination? Which are the effects of ours theories, religious or scientific on children? Should be better ressuscitates natural philosophy in schools teaching all worldviews and leaving the child to choose what he want? Keeping the free thought? xxx TheMatrixDNA 12 minutes ago
xxx
TheMatrixDNA 12 minutes ago
The method of education need be inverted: kids be educated as free thinkers and as adult choose what to believe. The tool is philosophy teaching the evolution of thought, paganism, religions, scientific method. They need know all theories, like Darwinian evolucionism, Intelligent designer, I Ching, etc. Imagination is the extension of the mind and need be feeding . The fairy tale of religions and myths is doing this job. ToE has no fantasies yet, but Matrix/DNA Theory have it.
xxx Zakariye Hassan 1 minute ago
xxx
Watergun6850 23 seconds ago
-
Modern science has shown that there are genetic limits to evolution or biological change in nature. Again, all biological variations, whether they are beneficial to survival or not, are possible only within the genetic potential and limits of a biological kind such as the varieties among dogs, cats, horses, cows, etc.TheMatrixDNA in reply to Watergun6850 1 second agoWrong. What’s genetics? Is the science of genes, heredity, and variation. So, genetics is the name of a scientific discipline and Science can’t put limits in evolution. Whats is biological change? Is the change in the inherited characteristics, namely, in the genes. What is genes? A gene is a molecular unit of heredity of a living organism. Gene is stored data. What is the limit for increasing data? The environment. But the environment is the galaxy, the universe. So, no limits.xxx
Watergun6850 3 minutes ago
-
xxxYamiYami17 in reply to johnnyboy2537 (Show the comment) 1 minute ago
-
How do you know if your computer was created ?! from a scientific view ?!,yep,it’s the same way we know how your brain was created,sure not ‘Nature did it’, So if Evolution can’t make systems and can’t account for information,we conclude that you were created ! and we conclude that evolution is not even logical,so it’s can’t be a scientific theory! do you understand this ?!TheMatrixDNA in reply to YamiYami17 1 second agoWrong. Computers were not created from nothing but man reproducing nature.
-
Nature can make systems. Natural light plus mass from Higgs field made lighters atomic systems ( See Matrix/DNA models), which made stars. Stars made galaxies and galaxies made biological systems, till apes. We don’t know the source of natural light, but, saying that it is god, is saying nothing. Upon apes something unknown in Nature brought consciousness, and we don’t know what’s it.
xxx
YamiYami17 in reply to whereismymascara (Show the comment) 1 minute ago
Appeal to authorityA lot of theories where accepted once from the overwhelming majority of scientists yet they failed,that proves the the appeal to scientists is a failed argument!
xxxfawkUtube in reply to PizzaBlade17 (Show the comment) 3 minutes agoDNA could also be proof of a designer and the fact that we can manipulate this DNA to create our own versions of species then it is apparent we are nothing more than selfreplicating computer programs but instead of 1’s and 0’s we have A’s T’s C’s and G’sxxx
22 minutes ago
“Almost no one attempts to educate themselves on the basics of science and technology, yet our society is based on these. TV takes up far too much of our time and is apparently much more attractive to most of us than the beauty and wonder of science. This is a prescription for disaster. We might get away with it for a while, but sooner or later this combustible mixture of ignorance and? power is going to blow up in our faces.”xxx
Curta e correta explicação do que é “speciation”
Part 3) The fact is, there is a lot more we don’t know, than what we do know. And it is very conceivable, and most likely, that the massive amount of information we don’t know, could prove what little we think we know, to be completely wrong. So, go ahead atheist and demonstrate your faith in all that knowledge that you DO NOT have by placing that gun to your head and pulling the trigger, let’s see how lucky you are. Part 4) It takes just as much faith with the information we now possess to proclaim there is NO God as it does to proclaim there IS a God. It is A Faith either way. So you should continue searching until definitive proof is found or until you die, then you know for sure.
Vai lá… veja o post e me tucuta… prometo que no seu aniversario te mando um pirulito de presente, sabor tutti-frutti…
Biologists should be on top of the origin of the programming of life forms and they hardly even know what that is.
…so much for the “peer-review” system.
They merely *assume* life started and they *assume* that life restarted, recalibrated and reprogrammed itself billions of times over without a reason!
Their belief just has no relationship with any part of reality.
Matter only does what it’s made to do and proves you have a Maker.
PROOF OF GOD in less than 10 seconds…
watch?v=_hLWx0cgOps
TheMatrixDNA in reply to JungleJargon 1 second ago
Yes, I have makers but they did not use intelligence for doing me.Why not the same for the first biological system ( aka “life”) and for this Universe? Why are you changing the proof you can see here and now by a maker nobody saw?! Why are you betraying your Nature?
What’s your scientific argument against the rational and mathematically established Godel’s theorem: nobody can know the Truth about matter and a system standing inside the matter and the system? Then, how you say you know it?