O colapso da biosfera versus a mecanização da biosfera. Veja debate com Matrix/DNA

Interessante artigo que suscitou pronta resposta da Matrix/DNA, no setor de comentarios. Enquanto Michael Thomas acredita que haverá não apenas um colapso economico, ou da civilização humana, mas sim de toda a biosfera, os modelos da Matrix estão sugerindo que esta biosfera foi criada num estado de caos e se dirige para o estado de ordem, uma especie de paraíso terrestre, porem a grande ameaça sera o aprisionamento da mente humana dentro deste paraíso-maquina. Veja link para o artigo e o post da Matrix copiado abaixo.


posted by Michael Thomas 


About Author

Michael Thomas

I come from Boston, Massachusetts, but currently live in Germany, where I study biology. I am politically active and am working on creating my own political movement based on the idea of the government and politicians being almost totally transparent, and localized/decentralized decision making.

Meu post

My theoretical models at Matrix/DNA Theory are suggesting a different destiny other than collapse of this biosphere.  They are suggesting transformations from a chaotic state towards a ordered state. First, few things about biosphere and collapses.

This biosphere was produced by a perfect machine described by Newtonian mechanics: this Solar System. But this biosphere never got the state of order seen in the Solar watch. It is enough living a time in any jungle for to learn that the rule, the natural process,  is savagery, chaos. Above the solar system there is the galaxy, a not such ordered state, since we see supernova explosions, cannibals black holes etc. It seems that order produces chaos which produces order and so on. From chaos lift the flow of order, slowly, and Humanity seems to be the carrier for to install the final order. We are going to the “Brave New World”, under the ” Big Brother (I think in the Big Mother or Queen), like went the bees and ants social systems. Everything that moves out of the systemic ordered circuit, is extinct, only what fits in an harmonic garden will survive in the human new paradise at Earth surface.

How do you define the word ” collapse” when applied to biosphere? Is it a big structure that will fail down, as any dictionary definition? If so, it is a kind of internal collapse, but it does not apply to opened systems as the biosphere. Economics collapses are not collapses that ” fails down”, since that it produces an economic transformation. Collapses that makes structures fail down are those that happens with stationary buildings, not living systems like the biosphere. There is no extinction above evolution because evolution still is happening to the first living system – a unique cell system – since that the modern final product – humanity – is more complex, than, still a carrier of biospheric evolution.

Our big problem is not the collapse of a chaotic biosphere and its transformation into a ordered biosphere. The problem is the machine. The ordered state. The Brave New World will be the prison for this new baby-system that is being developed inside our heads – the mind, or consciousness – since that as merely pieces of the new shape of this biosphere each human being loose its own identity, and it will be the paradise of stupidity. The properties of consciousness are not seen in the solar or galactic systems, then, its informations are coming from above them, somewhere in the vast Universe or beyond.  Our biggest problem is that – although this new baby needs the accommodation of our bodies inside an ordered system working as a productive machine – we need find ways for keeping the baby outside the new order, free for flying towards its own,  far away and unknown source. Human intelligence will make humans survivors, our problem now is how to avoid the robotization of our minds. By the way, I am grateful to yours efforts studying natural systems, there are lots of insights about systems in yours article, and I think that the freedom of minds comes from their expansion, which can be reached when we make efforts to see the world as system, better than the reductionist method. Thanks.

Tags: , ,