O Debate Entre os Que Projetam o Homem para Interpretar o Mundo e os que Ignoram o Homem na Mesma Interpretação

O brilhante astro-físico Brian Koberlein, em seu website publicou um artigo interessante intitulado “Self- centered”, o que talvez se traduza por “egocêntrico”, como sendo as pessoas comuns que normalmente projetam a personalidade e experiencia de vida humana quando tentam explicar o mundo, o Cosmos desconhecido. Eu penso que no fundo sua intenção foi dar vazão à moda entre os modernos cientistas materialistas de repudiar o pensamento popular, considerado por eles “mistico” e sem fundamentos racionais.

Apesar de eu tambem sentir certo desconforto quando vejo essas crenças populares, não é menor meu desconforto quando vejo as crenças destes materialistas. Pois se o homem comum é egocêntrico – e sabemos que é – o homem não-comum porque está situado no pedestal da intelectualidade moderna, é mais egocêntrico ainda. Diria que é “ego-criador”, pois ele não vê nada de humano no Cosmos, portanto, o humano se auto-criou, a partir da matéria não-orgânica. Para mim, tanto os egocêntricos quanto os ego-criadores estão errados, ao menos é o que está sugerindo meus modelos téoricos deste mundo compilados na Matrix/DNA Theory. Bem… como não podia deixar de ser, imediatamente sentí a necessidade de retrucar ao artigo do Brian, no comentário copiado abaixo, que postei no artigo cujo link é:

Self Centered

https://briankoberlein.com/2014/10/28/self-centered/

BY  · 28 OCTOBER 2014

E meus comentarios postados ( aguardando moderação)

Louis Morelli: 04, November, 2014

To Brian Koberlein, who said: “Of all the ideas in astronomy and cosmology, the anthropic principle is perhaps the most controversial”. My question should be:

“And why is not controversial the common strong anti-anthropic principle among cosmologist and astronomers?!”

What’s the opposite of self-centered? Is it self-created? The title of this article must contains these two kinds of people.

I think ( and I know that my little brain thinks lots of wrong things) that you was educated inside a world view that is biased and like the people making the mistake of anthropic principle has no conscience of their mistake, you too have no conscience of yours mistake. And I will suggest an answer to my question:

The Cosmos is being “scientifically” seen and interpreted by humans whose intellectual formation was dominated by Physics and Math. You know… Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, etc., were biased towards Physics and Math. No Biologists, Chemists, Neurologists, pointed the telescopes to the sky. This fail from our sciences was worst when Darwin ( a naturalist philosopher) forgot the sky for elaborating the evolutionary theory. Supposing that the stupid matter of this lost rock-planet has invented the process of evolution.

Biological systems ( aka, life) like human beings were produced by this galaxy and inside this galaxy. No information came from outside this galaxy, due the distance among them. So, all life’s properties ( like sexual reproduction, metabolism, embryogenesis, digestive apparatus, etc.) must have been in its primitive e less complex shape existent at this galaxy. Thinking that they were not is not rational, it is magical thinking. So, why the theoretical model of galaxies made by the western current academic mindset does not points out where these properties are? Because they does not see the necessity for doing that due their strong anti-anthropic principle.

The modern current cosmology have divided the Universal History of Evolution into two blocks, without connections between them. There are no bridges, no evolutionary links between Cosmological Evolution and Biological Evolution in this theoretical model. But… it is against all that we know about Reason! Reasoning. Logistics. Atoms systems, astronomical systems, are species of natural systems that are ancestors of biological systems, that’s it. Like prokaryotes and reptiles are ours ancestors species. So, there is something anthropic in the sky, ours roots are there.

My big question that have wrapping my mind at night is “what happens with human brains ( by 1.500, or Middle Age) that, suddenly, suffered a mutation and was hard wired by Physics and Math alone?!”

If you could considering the hypothesis that all our modern staff of our modern schools are making a big mistake also, based upon a wrong world view; if you think that still is possible that cosmology is subject for a total revolution like the one when the heliocentric model changed the geocentric model; that Physics and Math, when approaching the human body are able only for seeing the human bone skeleton and its mechanics properties, being blind to the coverture of soft meat and neuronal connections, and so, is the same when Physics and math approaches to the Universe, seeing only its skeleton composed by galaxies… you will be interested in trying totally different astronomical models, calling Biologists, Chemists, Neurologists for participating. You can see a tentative of doing that, it is called “The Universal Matrix/DNA of All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”, googling it. Sorry, but, I am coming from other different habitat than the schools that you have – the heart of Amazon jungle – and as a naturalist philosopher asking answers to the virgin and salvage Nature, i am suspecting that a weak anthropic principle is part of the Cosmos, which is the creator of who has anthropic properties.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,