Origem e Evolucao do Processo de Reciclagem

junho 12th, 2017

xxxx

https://www.facebook.com/Soubiomais/videos/692919990915863/

Enzyme Helicase – e’ quem vem de fora e inicia o processo da replicacao do DNA

ENZIMAS DE REPLICAÇÃO DO DNA

#BiologiaMolecular

No processo de replicação do DNA várias enzimas estão envolvidas, como a DNA-polimerase, helicases, proteínas SSB, ligases, topoisomerases e primase. Aqui estão algumas.

As helicases são enzimas com função de quebrar as pontes de hidrogênio entre as bases, para que as duas fitas de DNA se separem. Essa separação é essencial para que a forquilha de replicação se movimente.

A primase é a enzima que sintetiza os primers (iniciadores), que são pequenas sequências de RNA, a partir de um molde de DNA. Em eucariotos, a atividade da primase está localizada como componente da DNA-polimerase.

A DNA-polimerase é a enzima que faz a síntese de uma nova fita de DNA. Ela possui a capacidade de adicionar nucleotídeos na extremidade 3’OH de uma região pareada do DNA, fazendo com que a cadeia se estenda no sentido 5’→3’.

A polimerase δ é responsável pela replicação do genoma nuclear, enquanto a polimerase α está envolvida na síntese do primer para o início da replicação e na formação dos Fragmentos de Okazaki. As polimerases β e ε participam dos processos de síntese durante a reparação do DNA. E a polimerase é responsável pela replicação de DNA mitochondrial.

Ver agora a replicacao do RNA, que, Segundo me parece, foi a primeira vez que uma molecula se replicou.

XNA replication

TRAPPIST-1: Onde esta a maior chance da primeira descoberta de Vida fora da Terra. Panspermia?

junho 10th, 2017

xxxx

http://www.trappist.one/#

https://www.eso.org/public/unitedkingdom/images/eso1706o/

A size comparison of the planets of the TRAPPIST-1 system, lined up in order of increasing distance from their host star. The planetary surfaces are portrayed with an artist’s impression of their potential surface features, including water, ice, and atmospheres.

A size comparison of the planets of the TRAPPIST-1 system, lined up in order of increasing distance from their host star. The planetary surfaces are portrayed with an artist’s impression of their potential surface features, including water, ice, and atmospheres.

Enhanced interplanetary panspermia in the TRAPPIST-1 system

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.00878.pdf

We present a simple model for estimating the probability of interplanetary panspermia in the recently discovered system of seven planets orbiting the ultracool dwarf star TRAPPIST-1, and find that panspermia is potentially orders of magnitude more likely to occur in the TRAPPIST-1 system compared to the Earth-to-Mars case.

Nos apresentamos um simples modelo para estimar a probabilidade de panspermia interplanetaria no recente descoberto Sistema de sete planetas orbitando a ultrafria estrela ana TRAPPIST-1, e achamos que panspermia e’ potencialmente de grande magnitude para parecer mais possivel ocorrer em TRAPPIST-1 comparado com o caso de Terra-para-Marte.

As a consequence, we argue that the probability of abiogenesis is enhanced on the TRAPPIST-1 planets compared to the Solar system. By adopting models from theoretical ecology, we show that the number of species transferred and the number of life-bearing planets is also likely to be higher, because of the increased rates of immigration.

( continuar traducao)

 

Luz: Fotons nos Eletrons

junho 8th, 2017

xxxx

Prova cientifica da sugestao da Matrix/DNA Theory de que nas origens da vida, photons solar e nuclear trerrestre adentravam eletron assumindo a maquinaria atomica e digirindo os atomos a combinacoes biologicas como projecao da formula.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light

EMR in the visible light region consists of quanta (called photons) that are at the lower end of the energies that are capable of causing electronic excitation within molecules, which leads to changes in the bonding or chemistry of the molecule.

EMR = Eletro-magnetic-radiation

Origem da Vida: Descrição Da Primeira Química para Leigos

junho 4th, 2017

xxxx

Post postado em:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ&lc=z12rtxmiipbfz1ake22vcfh4lymvcpskj.1496220005938083

What drives the molecules to be ordered by themselves? is there an ordering force? How do yo know that first molecules that got some level of order, kip that order during millions of years? I can tell a story of how the Mona Lisa painted alone without human intervention, will you believe that tale? No? why no?, I can not believe in your tale
To Jorge Juarez: I believe you may not understand how chemistry works. I will try to explain in layman’s terms.
RNA/DNA did not just form by themselves. At first, there were extremely simple replicating molecules. How this works is that when these molecules come into contact with certain chemicals, they bind. Certain molecules will bind to certain parts of the molecule. Some of these happen to be a “reverse” copy; they bind in the opposite order.
When all spots have been filled, the new molecule splits at these sites, and thus replicates. It splits do to opposite forces. These first molecules were only 5-6 atoms in length; very simple. Because these molecules could replicate, they eventually became very common, and thus were everywhere.
Now, it is common knowledge that molecules can undergo changes (chemical reactions). Sometimes, these changes would make these molecules replicate faster by becoming more attractive (more binding spots). Sometimes they would become more stable (harder to break). Etc. Now, because these changes would make these molecule “superior” (they were able to replicate better than previous versions), they would become very numerous. And just like before, after time they would become extremely common.
Now, this process would repeat, and repeat, and repeat. Each time getting just SOMEWHAT slightly more complex. Repeat this process millions of times, and its not hard to see where DNA came from. The reason the molecules kept that order is because once they started replicating, there were tons of them. So even if most got destroyed, there were always extra because they replicated. What you have to also understand is that there are TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS of different chemical combinations possible.
Even infinite. So it is not unlikely that at LEAST one of these combinations could produce a self-replicating molecule. Also, there are 10000000… molecules in the Earths oceans, undergoing chemical reactions. So its not really hard for life to form.
The analogy of the Mona Lisa does not work, because dna did not just fully appear. It took millions of small very simple steps in order to finally emerge. The process took millions-billions of years.
xxxx
+Jorge Juarez  – Because we do not know the exact conditions of early Earth. That is why we are unable to replicate it. That is the whole point; we are trying to find the conditions of early Earth. We have an idea, but its too long ago to know exactly. Thus, scientists are trying different methods and environments. We are slowly narrowing it down. The key is replicating the EXACT same conditions. Given that this was 4 BILLION YEARS AGO, I think a lot of credit is due to the fact we ALREADY have RNA forming in labs. This I think is your misunderstanding. We DO know how life formed. We DO know the process. What we don’t know is the environment.

Origem da Vida: Desconhecimento das Condicoes Ambientais Iniciais da Terra x Sugestao Astronomica da Matrix DNA

junho 4th, 2017

xxxx

+Jorge Juarez – We have not reproduced life and proved abiogenesis because we do not know the exact conditions of early Earth. That is why we are unable to replicate it. That is the whole point; we are trying to find the conditions of early Earth. We have an idea, but its too long ago to know exactly. Thus, scientists are trying different methods and environments. We are slowly narrowing it down. The key is replicating the EXACT same conditions. Given that this was 4 BILLION YEARS AGO, I think a lot of credit is due to the fact we ALREADY have RNA forming in labs. This I think is your misunderstanding. We DO know how life formed. We DO know the process. What we don’t know is the environment.

Vida Extraterrestre: Nova teoria

junho 3rd, 2017

xxxx

Interessante artigo onde enviei o post copiado abaixo que esta aguardando aprovacao do moderador

Gizmodo

Hibernating Aliens Could Explain The Great Silence

Read more at https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/06/hibernating-aliens-could-explain-the-great-silence/#comment-3885145#pSublsCE04V1Zfsl.99

https://www.gizmodo.com.au/2017/06/hibernating-aliens-could-explain-the-great-silence/#comment-3885145

 

thematrixdna @thematrixdna

Reading all comments here, nobody remembered this possibility. Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting that any advanced life form more evolved than human beings, will create its own environment, where a unique astronomical body performs the seven systemic functions performed today by the known seven kinds of astronomic bodies. Such final astronomical body and the physical structure of such life form, I think, can not be detectable by our current technology.
Stars, planets, quasar, pulsar, comets ,black holes, moon, each one has a specific systemic function that fits this life form needs. So, why not resume 7 into 1, having everything at the same time/space?
For understanding such astronomical body you need know the astronomical systemic model that works like the perfect automated machine, almost a perpetum motor, at my website.
People are forgetting that the first change when any new intelligent species does is about its environment, like humans changed the landscape of jungle into urban cities.

Origem da Vida: Video e Debate com Matrix/DNA

junho 3rd, 2017

xxxx

Neste video ha um debate em que participo com muitos posts. Aqui farei o script dos posts e tentarei trazer os posts para ca…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ&lc=z12rtxmiipbfz1ake22vcfh4lymvcpskj.1496220005938083

 Post by Matt C – 6/3/2017
Louis Charles Morelli  – but there is no way to tell if there was an original propagation of light carrying genetic information, so the chances of you having discovered it I’d say are pretty slim. there are no astronomical bodies with the same configuration as a nucleotide. carbon atoms have not got the same configuration as any astronomical bodies, apart from solar systems in the fact that they both have a central round thing being orbited by several smaller presumably round things. I’ve looked on your website and it simply shows that you came up with your theory first and then looked for evidence for it which resulted in you making random slight parallels into evidence to fit your theory. your theory holds no logic, no credibility and no evidence.
xxxx
1) there is no way to tell if there was an original propagation of light carrying genetic information
Matt C – I will answer with several posts, ok?
1) there are no astronomical bodies with the same configuration as a nucleotide
Louis Charles MorelliLouis Charles Morelli – 6/3/2017
Matt C – I will answer with several posts, ok?
1) there are no astronomical bodies with the same configuration as a nucleotide
Of course, not. I did not said that. Before explaining this in other words, Matt C, I need remember something. Sorry but our modern academic Sciences has a big hole in its method that is responsible for Science weakness today, as in the issue of diseases, etc. The big hole is about “natural systems”. For example, the Genoma Project was believing in ” one disease, one gene”. Venter discovered that it is not, each disease is due a network of spread genes in the DNA. But,… the DNA is a messy of millions systems, each one composed by a number of genes, so, the right is: “each disease, each genetic-system”. It happens that no Science field knows what is a real natural working system. If they knew it, they would be able to identificate and separating each genetic system, then, identifying the system producing each disease.
But, knowing what is a natural system is very easy, because Nature knows only one kind of system, which has been applied since the Big Bang for organizing matter/energy in a workable way, in architectures. This universal system is a formula, which we can translate it as a the must simplest diagram of software ( its appearance is simplest but its network hided all complexity we know in Nature. When you understand the whole thing, you learn to identifying what is hidden)).
It is like saying: ” All species of living things has in common, a biological formula, called DNA “. Then, you can say: ” All natural systems, be it electric-magnetic (atoms, etc.), mechanic (astronomic systems), biological ( living beings),… has in common, a universal DNA, a formula, called ( this is my chosen name, you can chose other), Matrix/DNA. What we know by a building block of DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal formula that is driving universal evolution since the Big Bang.) This formula makes the internal structure, the energetic circuit, the flow of informations, the systemic configuration, the parts and the nucleus of all known natural system.
Why the whole staff of academic and private Science did not get it ? Science began in the right way for humans, with the reductionist method, which is opposite, or complementary, to the systemic method. Our scientific instruments could grasp ( seeing the whole body) corpuscular structures, but not the network of connections among structures. There were some intuitions towards systems, like Margullis and its symbiotic theory, or Fritjof Capra, with “The Tao of Physics”. Then came Bertallanfy trying to do what Francis Bacon did with the reductionist method: a big initial theory of systems, a collection of everything that had some systemic appearance. But not knowing what is a system, how it is composed, how it works, where to grasp a synapse of connection between two parts, his big job stopped by century. Then, some Mathematicians and Physics, as Wiener, Rosemberg, etc, take the approach but thinking about systems as computational cybernetics. It is not this way that natural system works and is revealed. And nobody went back to Bertallanfy for resuscitating the systemic approach, the scientific knowledge is zero today. They are confusing systems with merely slices of processes inside a whole system.
I can’t say more in this post, but I have 30 years seeing the world, each natural phenomena, from this systemic perspective, always identifying the formula at each phenomena and getting a specific interpretation that fits very well in the big picture – from the Big Bang to consciousness. If you are interested in natural systems, you can tell here, we will continue in other posts.
So, you are right: there is no astronomical body with same configuration of nucleotide. I am saying that the system to which any astronomical body belongs has the configuration ( the same natural formula, or Matrix/DNA ) that has not a nucleotide, but a lateral base-pair of nucleotides with two sugars and four nitrogenous bases, which composition is a complete working system. But you need see over the table the model of an astronomical system, at the side of the Matrix/DNA formula, at the side of a nucleotide system, for understand it. Cheers…
( continuar respondendo os topicos abaixo)
3) carbon atoms have not got the same configuration as any astronomical bodies
4)you came up with your theory first and then looked for evidence for it which resulted in you making random slight parallels into evidence to fit your theory
5) your theory holds no logic, no credibility and no evidence.
xxxx

cq33xxcq33xx2 days ago

so how life started?

Louis Charles MorelliLouis Charles Morelli – 6/3/2017

Ok, you are in a good track. You are not convinced by people that think inside the box. They think that knows how life started and you know that they doesn’t know. Maybe you find the answer thinking outside the box. i did it and I find an answer that makes sense. Let’s go trying it? Your own life started with a Big Bang, when the membrane’s spermatozoon exploded inside an ovule. if you put over the table the shapes of the Universe from the Big Bang till galaxies ( where cosmological evolution became biological evolution at Earth), and at the side, you put the shapes of your body from that big bang to morulae, blastulae, you will see the same shapes. So, if your own life started and evolved same way of the Universe, it means that life did not started at Earth, but at the first moment of the Universe. There was no origins of life here. Lol… never nobody said that, this is thinking outside the box, really
xxxxx
Texto-resposta para Jay C ( postou a uma semana atras), que nao foi publicado pelo site fora do ar:
Jay C – My two cents here. Hm Grraarrpffrzz explained Materialistic Evolution (ME) in a brilliant way and his counter-arguments about the Christian God showed that this belief does not make sense, but still you can save something of God. Pay attention that ME’s hypothesis only postergate the problem of DNA information to another question: where the RNA information came from? And that DNA replication explains DNA formation does not explain the formation of the first DNA or RNA, or any biological molecule. Where were at the physical world before life’s origins something that was replicating itself? Nobody answered this question. But your assertion that information from chemicals to life was a kind of message or code and message only comes from intelligence is not true. There is no genetic code, no message in the DNA. For explaining it let’s apply another question: There are 8 billion humans. Each human has something different from all others, so, we can say that each human is a unique and specific information. Something he/she will do different from all others. Could we say that Humanity ( the sum of 8 billion humans) is a code, or a message? No. DNA is a pile of millions of different individuals, the fundamental unit of information: a lateral base-pair of nucleotides. It happens that each lateral base-pair of nucleotideos is a system in itself. It is just the universal formula of natural systems, where the two sugars at the strands are F1 and F4, and the four bases are F2,F3,F6 and F7. A fifth base, uracil , is responsible for these systems reproductions into new systems. All these millions of systems are derivation from a universal template, like all humans are derivations of a human species shape. Since this formula is the template of the – not only Earth environment, but the whole inter-galactic environment – and biological organization of matter is merely a process of reproduction of the whole galactic system, the environment produces new copies of DNA’s units for to develop this process. So, there is no genetic code, there is no message, there is no origins of life and there is no abiogenesis. There is a universal reproduction of a unique system coming from the Big Bang, being transformed into new shapes (atoms>galaxies>RNA/DNA’s building blocks>cells>monkeys>…). Ok, at monkeys, materialistic evolution opens the door to a ex-machine being and here maybe a kind of God is possible. I will explain: Each human baby’s brain expresses consciousness at 6 or 8 month of embryognesis. But, you know, it is not the baby’s brain creating consciousness first time in the Universe, it already was existing at human species, outside the little universe of the embryo. It happens that we are seeing this ” consciousness” existing as potentiality and under evolution since the Big bang as the identity of any ancestor system. Consciousness was sleeping at atoms, dreaming at galaxies, beginning to wake up at cells and now it is a fetus or embryo inside humans heads, an embryo that still has no opened its own eyes for to see its own body. If human babies takes 6 or 8 months for expressing consciousness from its parents, and humans are the shape of the universal system here and now, it means that the ex-machine system takes astronomical 13,8 billion years. What is the problem? It is relativistic to size, time, etc. So, this universe is merely an agglomerate of galaxies like the placenta is an agglomerate of cells and inside this universal placenta is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the unknown ex-machine conscious natural system existing beyond the universe. So, something from God is safe… yet. But, please, not the absurd Bible’s God, a pregnant mother and the father does not make interference at the work of the genes building their baby. Be happy that you ( as part of all conscious beings working just now at millions of galaxies ) will be one baby that will born at the end of this universal placenta, at the day of the Big Birth. ( but, ok, I only suggested to you a new theory based on Naturalistic Ex-Machine Evolution. Cheers…

Debate no NYT sobre beneficios/maleficios da Inteligencia Artificial

maio 31st, 2017

xxxx

December 5, 2016

Is Artificial Intelligence Taking Over Our Lives?

https://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2016/12/05/is-artificial-intelligence-taking-over-our-lives

E meu comentario postado no debate ( na pagina do primeiro artigo: As Robots Replace Old Jobs, New Jobs Should Be Invented )

Louis Charles Morelli

New York, NY

Will the biological brain imposes its rules upon the electro mechanic brain or will be the opposite? Let’s see it:

1) At fifty years ago there was a biological brain that decided to build its copy with hard matter in a mechanistic fashion;

2) The mechanic brain was developed till getting its own mechanistic sensors, like cameras mimicking vision, etc. But there was a novelty here: the mechanistic brains’ sensors can see where human sensors can not, like the microscopic and astronomic levels;

3 Then, the biological brain ( still imposing his software with its rules) sent these sensors into micro devices exploring the world of atoms, molecules, and spatial devices exploring the space;

4) These sensors came back with new informations that the biological brain never knew about. Based on these informations, the biological brain rewrote the software, remodeling the hardware and sent back the brains’ robots to the micro and macro world. This process is being repeated till today.

But,… mechanistic sensors are racists, they selects some data and rejects another kind of data, which would not be selected by biological sensors. Without humans perceiving it, the mechanistic brain was changing inside the biological brain, the living vision of the world by the mechanistic vision of the world. Life and the universe’s theories describes it as machines. What do you think?

Ooops! Nova Imagem de Jupiter Alerta Matrix/DNA Sobre a Equitativa Distribuicao de Fotons prevista pela Teoria

maio 31st, 2017

xxx

Ha anos vem acontecendo o mesmo. Os academicos nao apenas sugerem suas teorias, mas afirmam-na como porta-vozes cientificos, e como estas teorias vao contra meus modelos, eu retruco com outra teoria e eles simplesmente ignoram. Mas entao a tecnologia se desenvolve e fornece cada vez instrumentos mais potentes na colecao de dados.  E quando os novos dados chegam sempre dizem como nesta noticia agora:

“We’re seeing a lot of our ideas were incorrect and maybe naïve,” Scott J. Bolton, the principal investigator of the Juno mission, said during a NASA news conference on Thursday.

Os modelos teoricos deles tem tantos remendos que minha admira que ainda nao perceberam que do modelo original nao resta mais nada. Enquanto isso, quando tenho tempo de analizar os novos dados e compara-los com meus modelos, descubro que estavam justamente previstos e mais, os novos dados me fazem perceber novos dados que ainda nao tinha observado. vejamos exemplos com as figuras abaixo:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/25/science/nasa-juno-spacecraft-jupiter-storms.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fscience&action=click&contentCollection=science&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=sectionfront

NASA’s Jupiter Mission Reveals the ‘Brand-New and Unexpected’ (may,25,2017)

As faixas tipo listas de zebra bate com a nocao de aneis espiralados que a Matrix/DNA sugeriu na existencia de estruturas que dao o nascimento a estrelas. Veja neste meu modelo desenhado rusticamente a mao na selva amazonica:

Sistema-Elo Entre os Sistemas Naturais Não-Vivos e os Sistemas Biológicos

Sistema-Elo Entre os Sistemas Naturais Não-Vivos e os Sistemas Biológicos

I can’t write a long text here explaining it, but at the …. oh, raios, eu estava escrevendo em portugues,… Eu nao posso escrever longos textos aqui para explicar mas o cone espiralado na rustica figura acima ‘e o berco de estrelas. E porque digo isso? Porque o meu modelo esta sugerindo que planetas que se encontram no estado em que Jupiter esta hoje, em milhoes ou bilhoes de anos acabam saindo do Sistema solar e se tornam novas estrelas, pois no seu nucleo cresce um germe estelar.

Mas nao e’ esse fato que levou a Matrix/DNA a comemorar a boa-nova. O fato e’ que os aneis que se ve na figura de Jupiter – em numero de seis – explica maravilhosamente uma questao que eu andava procurando e nao tinha acertado com uma solucao satisfatoria. a questao de como uma estrela emite todos os tipos de suas informacoes por radiacao em tao curto tempo como foi necessario para dirigir a criacao da vida na Terra. Com a existencia das faixas emitindo magneticamente ( como diz o artigo: strong magnetic fields), agora sei como todos os tipos de fotons chegam aqui ao mesmo tempo para se reunirem e reproduzirem o sistema de onde vieram usando atomos da Terra. Hallelluyah!

Assim, enquanto os academicos estao neste momento puxando os cabelos ao compararem os novos dados com seus modelos e verem que nada bate, eu estou vibrando com o acerto dos meus modelos… mais uma vez nos ultimos 30 anos de tantas vitorias igual a essa.

Vamos ao segundo fato usando a imagem abaixo que tambem foi obtida agora pela NASA:

Multiple images combined show Jupiter’s south pole, as seen by NASA’s Juno spacecraft from an altitude of 32,000 miles. The oval features are cyclones.

Ciclones? Justo o que desenhei a 30 anos atras? Vejamos outro desenho dos meus modelos:

O Ultimo Ancestral Não-Vivo e Inanimado

O Ultimo Ancestral Não-Vivo e Inanimado

Veja no desenho a figura que esta mais `a direita, cheia de pintas. Este o resultado do que meus calculos apontaram como sendo um pulsar. As pintas sao gigantescos vulcoes que tomam toda a superficie emitindo cometas. Jupiter esta no ponto de gigante e velho planeta se transformando em pulsar paara depois se tornar uma estrela, supernova. Diz ainda meus resultados que estes vulcoes vao se formando nos planetas novos devido aberturas que vao surgindo na crostra como valvulas de escape do material sob forte pressao resultante das reacoes produzidas pelo nucleo digerindo os atomos da crostra. mas como o planeta gira por rotacao e por translacao, o que se ve nestes gifgantes gasosos acima dos vulcoes que vao se formando e’ a lava e fumaca emitida na forma de cyclone, espiralados. Entao, estou dizendo que embaixo de cada cyclone deste, e produzindo estes ciclones, estao os vulcoes. Assim minha teoria se torna cientificamente testavel, pois chefgaremos um dia mais perto de Jupiter e descobriremos o que produz estes ciclones.

Enquanto isso vou continuar a ler o artigo para ver como eles explicam estes ciclones baseados nos modelos deles. yac,yac,yac…

Afinal de Contas, Porque Existe “Beleza” na Natureza? A Matrix/DNA Pesquisa e Opina

maio 31st, 2017

xxxx

Artigo na secao de Ciencias do New York Times inicia fazendo a pergunta acima, a qual, por certo, e’ uma questao filosofica relacionada ao existencial. Porem, lancada a questao no meio academico que vaga em meio `a mentalidade reducionista, ainda, ignoram a filosofia e o aspect existencial para falarem dos efeitos da beleza entre passaros e demais animais. reudzindo o assunto para o planeta Terra e suas producoes. Este desvio comum no pensamento moderno me incomoda porque nos desvia do caminho do conhecimento veridico, por isso elaborei um comentario `as pressas sem antes consultar a formula da Matrix/DNA e postei na pagina do Facebook do New York Times, o qual vai copiado abaixo.

Registro aqui o link para o artigo porque esta questao e’ uma questao a ser pensada e pesquisada pela Matrix/DNA:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/29/science/evolution-of-beauty-richard-prum-darwin-sexual-selection.html?smid=fb-nytscience&smtyp=cur

Louis Charles MorelliLouis Charles Morelli

05/31/2017

Beauty is not a property of life or biology: it was existing billion years before life’s origins. At an astronomic system and its mechanistic counterpart of reproduction, the body that performs the female sexual function ( the black-white hole) is surrounded by the most brilliant body – a quasar – which is the final target of the male genome ( comets) emitted by the body that performs male function ( the pulsar). Pulsars does not see beauty, black-white holes does not makes effort to be beautiful creating quasars, but, indeed, the sexual activity happens and the attractive factor – the quasar or female ornament – is beautiful and is part of it. The article begins asking “why is there beauty after all” and then, it forgets this question and goes talking about birds and terrestrial biological evolution. The answer to that question must be at universal nature, inserting cosmological evolution, not resumed to Earth and its traits. Sad reductionism. In this way we never will find the answer to that question. Have you noticed that the patterns, colors, of feathers resembles the figure of molecules, DNA, or, another words, images that mimics the images of things inside the brain of these creatures? If so, is not beauty the cause of selection and so, the interaction between what is inside one partner with the image of what is outside of the other partner. It means that – as happens with our ancestors astronomic systems – there is no beauty, but molecular or atomic self-identification generating levels of self-values. But, I think the final answer is related to light frequencies and vibrations of states of chaos (ugly productions) and state of order (beauty productions), hat underlies our visible world, so, we can’t answer it now.