Posts Tagged ‘Agnosticismo’

Informacoes Gerais sobre as religioes do mundo – Adherents.com – o Ignosticismo?

quinta-feira, novembro 30th, 2017

xxxx

Em dez anos – de 2006 a 2016 – o numero de adultos nao-religiosos ou nao afiliados a nenhuma religiao cresceu de 16% a 26% da populacao Americana. Esperando estes novatos no ex-misticismo, avidamente e de portas abertas, estao os ateus, mentindo que ateísmo nao e’ o outro lado místico da mesma moeda religiosa. O que existia antes do Big Bang, o que existe alem deste Universo, ou alem da faixa de luz e vibracao visivel e perceptivel aos nossos sentidos, e’ metafisica, e’ desconhecido, nenhum humano sabe nada sobre isso. Mas estes novatos expatriados nao podem ficarem sozinhos, isolados na sua solidao intelectual, eles precisam se unirem, numa associacao de nao-misticos. Infelizmente por se tratar de coisa humana e’ preciso que estes associados tenham um adjetivo qualificativo, um nome. E qual seria o nome correto? O primeiro que me vem `a mente ‘e “agnostico”. Entao vamos correndo aos dicionarios, wikipedia, ver qual a exata definicao oficial para esse nome:

https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agnosticismo

Bem,… a coisa e’ complicada e desde que o nome “agnosticismo” parece lembrar alguma correste mistica antiga ou entao esta dividido entre aganosticos ateistas e adeistas, penso que esse nome ja nao e’ mais apropriado. Esta ai nova dica: Precisamos unir os novatos nao-misticos que estao vindo aos milhoes numa associacao e precisamos de um nome.

xxxxx

Dados sobre distribuicao de religioes/ateismo’agnosticismo no planeta:

A melhor fonte com quadros gerais esta aqui:

http://www.adherents.com

The Adherents.com website is primarily the work of Preston Hunter (me: webmaster@adherents.com). This is an independent project and is not supported by or affiliated with any organization (academic, religious, or otherwise). But numerous individuals (academic researchers; university professors of sociology, comparative religion or history; religious representatives) have provided assistance in their areas of expertise.
The Largest Atheist / Agnostic Populations

http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html

xxxxx

PRRIReligiouslyUnaff2016

xxxxx

Wikipedia:

Atheist, agnostic, nonreligious, irreligious, religiousness populations by country or area for 2006 as percentage of total population. ( Sendo nosso objetivo aqui detectar a populacao nao-mistica, observe que na figura o ateismo e’ erroneamente considerado como nao-mistico, e e’ pincelado com a cor mais escura/preta. Deduzo portanto que o agnosticismo seja a coe seguinte menos escura, ou seja, o azul-escuro, cujos paises de maior incidencia de nao-misticos seriam a Russia, China, enquanto os cinzas mais claros seriam paises com a populacao mais mistica)

xxxxx
 A research group of universities / research institutions in dozens of countries participated, “Global Value Survey” to examine the consciousness of the citizens of each country by common questionnaire and compare with each other from 1981, every 5 years from 1990 Has been done. It is a consciousness survey of individual units based on collecting about 1,000 samples of men and women aged 18 or over across the country for each country.
 Here, the religious composition of the world countries is illustrated from the result of this survey. Although it is necessary to judge the result taking into consideration the restriction by the investigation method, there is a division “no religion (not having religion)” because of the survey result summarized from the number of affiliated organizations of the religious organization Compared with the results, it seems that the composition of each type of religion also reflects the nationwide situation considerably because the number of subjects to be surveyed is small.
 Regarding the characteristics of Japan, first, there is a majority, with 51.8% of non religious affairs being the majority. Worldwide, the proportion of non religion is high in socialist countries and former socialist countries, the first place is 93.0% in China, the second place is 75.7% in Estonia, and the third place is in 64.3% in Czech Republic There. Outside socialist countries and former socialist countries, the Netherlands has the highest rate of 55.0%, and Japan has the second largest position.
 The second characteristic of Japan is that Buddhism is as many as 34.9%. This is the highest value among the countries in the figure. Shintoism is considered to enter “other”, but it is not so much, 3.9%.
 The religious characteristics of East Asia including common Vietnam in that the influence of Japan, China, Korea, and China is large is that the ratio of non religion is high and the ratio of Buddhism is high, and a unique pattern in the world Respectively. Similar to Japan, Korea is other than socialist countries and formerly socialist countries, while non religion is as many as 36.7%. However, in the case of South Korea, it differs from other East Asia in that there are many believers in Christianity. As shown in the figure below, Korean Christianity has greatly expanded after World War II (original source is here).

In another Asian countries, Islam has a large share in Indonesia, South Asia, the Middle East and so on. Muslims are also spreading to other African countries such as Egypt, Nigeria, Tanzania, or so much, but also to Eastern Europe. Even though it is located in Asia, Israel is special and Judaism is the majority. In addition, Judaism has a certain share in the United States (4.2%) and Tanzania (3.6%), for example.

In Europe, North America, Latin America, Christian influence is strong overall, except that non religious occupies a considerable share by country. Sectarianly there are many “Catholic” in France, Southern Europe and Latin America, many in “Protestant” in Britain, Germany, Scandinavia, Eastern Europe, Russia, the former Soviet Union countries “Greek Orthodox” “Is increasing. Regarding the fact that the Greek Orthodox as a Russian sect has been greatly increasing, refer to Fig. 9458[Column] “Values ​​shaken by the Russians”.

In Africa, Muslims and Christianity are strongly influenced, but traditional folk religion is considered to hold considerable power, and Zimbabwe, South Africa etc. have a considerable share of “other”.

International comparison of religious view and god view, comparison between Japan and South Korea was published in Diagram 9528 .

Regarding the regional distribution of faith in Japan, see the chart 7770 . Here, it is shown that non religion is common in eastern Japan, which is an emerging area in religious history.

(Original data)
Religion currently owned

I do not have (no religion) Christianity (Roman Catholic) Christianity (Protestant) Christianity (Other) Judaism Islam Hinduism Buddhism Other do not know No response
Japan 51.8 0.8 1.0 0.5 0.1 34.9 3.9 7.0
Korea 36.7 13.8 23.7 1.8 0.1 0.2 20.8 2.7 0.3
China 93.0 0.8 2.5 0.4 2.1 0.2 0.4 0.6
Vietnam 46.1 5.9 0.6 0.1 15.1 31.8 0.4
Philippines 10.9 71.5 1.8 3.2 12.0 0.6
Indonesia 6.5 92.5 0.5 0.1 0.4
Bangladesh 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 91.9 7.1 0.5
India 6.6 2.9 0.2 10.8 72.2 1.4 4.3 1.3 0.0
Iran 1.1 0.9 97.0 0.7 0.3
Turkey 2.5 0.3 0.1 96.6 0.2 0.1 0.2
Jordan 4.3 95.5 0.1 0.1
Israel 3.3 85.3 9.5 1.8 0.1
UK 13.6 51.3 0.2 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.6 16.1 1.4 14.8
Northern Ireland 15.9 36.6 16.3 0.9 0.1 28.8 1.4
Ireland 6.9 88.8 2.0 2.1 0.2
Germany 24.9 31.6 38.2 0.3 0.0 1.7 2.7 0.7
France 42.5 52.6 1.3 1.2 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.1 0.1
Italy 17.8 81.2 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.5
Spain 15.6 81.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.2
Portugal 11.4 85.6 0.3 2.4 0.3
Belgium 35.4 54.9 1.2 0.4 0.1 3.0 4.3 0.1 0.7
Luxembourg 29.9 63.8 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.6 1.8 0.2 1.7
Netherlands 55.0 22.0 10.1 0.4 1.1 0.2 0.2 11.0
Denmark 10.0 0.8 86.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 1.4 1.1
Sweden 25.3 1.6 68.9 0.4 2.5 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5
Finland 11.7 0.1 83.7 1.1 2.9 0.6
Iceland 4.3 90.6 0.4 4.2 0.1 0.3
Austria 12.2 79.0 0.7 6.1 0.1 2.0
Czech 64.3 29.6 3.8 0.1 0.1 1.3 0.9
Slovakia 23.1 64.2 11.2 0.8 0.2 0.5
Poland 4.6 94.0 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.1
Hungary 42.6 38.9 16.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.8 0.1 0.1
Romania 2.4 7.4 2.0 84.7 2.4 1.0
Bulgaria 29.8 0.3 0.7 60.3 8.4 0.2 0.3
Greece 4.0 1.5 93.4 0.4 0.3 0.4
Malta 1.3 97.7 0.9 0.1
Slovenia 29.9 66.1 0.3 1.6 1.1 0.6 0.4
Croatia 13.2 84.5 0.1 1.8 0.4
Serbia and Montenegro 5.8 6.1 0.3 78.5 0.2 5.2 0.0 0.1 2.3 1.6
Estonia 75.7 0.4 13.1 9.8 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.1
Latvia 40.6 19.5 16.9 16.7 0.1 5.7 0.1 0.4
Lithuania 19.4 74.6 1.3 2.9 0.1 1.1 0.7
Russia 48.1 0.2 0.3 47.5 0.0 3.0 0.1 0.4 0.3
Belarus 47.8 6.3 0.5 44.6 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.4
Ukraine 42.4 0.9 2.2 42.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 8.8 2.3 0.8
Egypt 5.6 94.3 0.0 0.0
Nigeria 0.7 67.0 0.1 31.7 0.3 0.1
Uganda 1.1 36.5 43.0 0.4 17.0 0.1 1.8 0.1
Tanzania 1.7 28.2 18.7 5.0 3.6 40.1 0.1 2.0 0.8
Zimbabwe 15.0 17.5 26.5 0.3 0.5 40.0 0.2
South Africa 10.6 9.5 42.4 0.4 0.3 4.0 5.2 0.1 24.3 0.3
usa 19.8 23.2 26.2 0.8 4.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 19.5 5.3
Canada 26.2 41.4 20.2 0.7 0.3 0.8 0.3 0.4 8.4 1.3
Mexico 20.5 72.3 1.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 4.9 0.6
Puerto Rico 11.1 57.2 13.2 1.4 3.5 12.4 0.8 0.4
Venezuela 27.0 65.6 6.7 0.1 0.3 0.4
Peru 4.7 82.3 0.2 0.2 11.1 1.5
Chile 33.8 53.7 2.0 0.2 0.1 9.8 0.5
Argentina 13.0 78.3 0.4 0.1 0.8 0.1 7.3 0.1

(Document) Dentsu Research Institute · Japan Research Center edited “World Value Data Book of 60 Countries”

(June 9, 2006, added September 3, 2014 Christianity in Korea)

xxxx

The Largest Atheist / Agnostic Populations

http://www.adherents.com/largecom/com_atheist.html

 

Os Tres Conflitos Entre Deísmo, Ateísmo e Agnosticismo

quarta-feira, maio 3rd, 2017

xxxx

 

EVOLUÇÃO vs DEUS, documentário que enfurece ateus em todo o mundo. Assista! ( legendado em português)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDvi2defQEM

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli – Maio – 5/3/2017

O vídeo é uma farsa, como e’ uma covardia apelar pela falsa associação entre ateísmo e comunismo. Porem, os ateus merecem estes ataques. Pois ao invés de procurarem corrigir as falhas obvias nas Ciências que comprovariam a teoria moderna (neo-darwinista ou Moderna Síntese) que almeja explicar a diversificação das especies, e vem acoplada com a teoria da abiogêneses que almeja explicar as origens da vida na mesma linha logica sem ainda ter o respaldo cientifico, continuando o trabalho real investigativo na Natureza, dão o salto metafisico para fazer afirmações sobre o que ainda não foi alcançado por esta investigação. Ateísmo é fé metafisica, a outra face da moeda religiosa deísta. E quando a fé’ se instala, vão de choque com a fé oposta. Os dois grupos também rejeitam o agnosticismo e neste caso sim, é um conflito entre a presença de fé metafisica e ausência de qualquer tipo de fé metafisica.

Quântica e Picaretagem Quântica: Um Conselho para a Matrix/DNA

sexta-feira, novembro 21st, 2014

Interessante vídeo de debates com link e titulo abaixo, nos lembra e informa que do ponto de vista da Física, todas as teorias esotéricas, como estas de auto-ajuda, se querem serem consideras Ciência, que não usem a quântica, pois a Física quântica mostra que ela trata do nível abaixo dos átomos apenas, nada vê em relação a consciência, medicina, etc.

O vídeo suscitou a postagem do nosso seguinte comentário:

PSEUDOCIÊNCIAS E PICARETAGEM QUANTICA

http://universoracionalista.org/2-hangout-do-universo-racionalista-pseudociencias-picaretagem-quantica/#comments

Avatar

Para começar, a Natureza não é propriedade nem dos picaretas mencionados e nem das atuais Ciências Humanas, como a Fisica e a Matematica. A palavra “quantica” é meramente um nome dado por humanos quando se referem a uma dimensão ou ordem de fenômenos naturais, ou seja, essa parte da Natureza é “quantica” para os humanos, não para a Natureza. Ocorre que os sensores do cérebro humano, limitados, não conseguiram captar esta dimensão, e a tecnologia produziu instrumentos que são extensões tecnológicas destes sensores, os quais não estão disponiveis a todas as pessoas, foram entregues pelos governos e corporações aos Fisicos, e não aos biólogos, neurologistas, etc. Por isso esta dimensão ainda está sendo estudada apenas pela perspectiva dos Fisicos e sua linguagem, a Matematica. É preciso democratizar o uso destes instrumentos de observação e medições, para que maior numero de diferentes perspectivas enriqueçam o conhecimento. E assim dê-os aos tais picaretas quanticos para que eles mesmos se destruam se constatarem que suas teorias não tem fundamento. O certo é que vão tentar experiencias e abordagens que os Fisicos não admitem.

Pela perspectiva da Matrix/DNA Theory, a Fisica faz um necessario trabalho de desvendar o “esqueleto” do Universo, formado de átomos, galáxias e forças, mas quem prova que este Universo que produziu o corpo humano, começa e termina nesse esqueleto? Não existirá na dimensão macrocósmica niveis de organização da matéria mais complexos, como o corpo humano possui alem do esqueleto, a parte carnal, mental? Se existir nunca será o método cientifico usado pelos Fisicos que os descobrirá, e nem a lógica matematica que se aplicará. Nem os atuais instrumentos que amplificam os sensores humanos, pois eles são compostos e desenhados mecanicamente.

A dimensão dos fenômenos abaixo dos átomos certamente toca os limites materiais deste Universo para baixo e os limites do seu passado nas suas origens. Assim como o estudo da embriogênese chega ao limite espacial microscópico do DNA e ao limite temporal no momento da fecundação de um óvulo. Mas de onde veio o DNA daquele embrião e de onde veio a causa da origem daquele embrião? Estão fora do “universo” estudado. Se na embriogênese ultrapassamos estes limites, ao invés de chegar-mos ao NADA ou a Deus, vamos chegar a pais humanos, ver que o mundo se abre numa complexidade muito maior do que a embriogênese, pois vamos ver os pais, e o mundo alem deles. Vamos ver que a consciência no embrião já existia antes das origens do embrião. Assim são os limites do Universo quando estudados pelos métodos da Física e da Matemática.

Por estas coisas que defendo as tentativas de se aproveitar do conhecimento destes limites – que se convêm chamar “quânticos” por biologistas, neurologistas, psicólogos, etc. Uma complexidade maior e ainda desconhecida é uma possibilidade racional, o mais baixo nível microscópico da Natureza pode ser uma janela aberta para se ver esta complexidade, mas esta janela tem um vidro muito escuro que só permite se ver sombras do outro lado, ou não ver nada, e tem pessoas que estão fazendo teorias sobre o outro lado, inclusive algumas acreditam tanto em suas teorias, como o Chopra, que as afirmam como se fossem verdades comprovadas… e incautos compram teorias. Como é teoria a afirmação que da dimensão quântica não se aufere um conhecimento que possa explicar algo da consciência. Se a Natureza é um corpo só, o seu “pé” não pode estar separado de sua “cabeça”.

A Unica Origem de Todos os Mitos e Religiões: Teoria de Campbell e Teoria da Matrix/DNA

sexta-feira, outubro 31st, 2014

xxxx

Este artigo foi inspirado em outro, aqui:

O Poder do Mito – Joseph Campbell

http://evoluasuaconsciencia.blogspot.com/2014/10/o-poder-do-mito-joseph-campbell.html

Para quem não sabe, a visão de mundo da Matrix/DNA Theory foi resultado de métodos e lógica puramente materialista, ou melhor, naturalista. Mas uma das maiores surpresas da minha vida foi quando, analisando os modelos e formas resultantes, descobri que se fosse descrever o modelo astronomico por exemplo, numa linguagem naturalista, eu apenas usaria palavras e metáforas diferentes dos autores de Gênesis, na Bíblia, ou do autor do I Ching, mas falando do mesmo quadro, do mesmo estado do mundo a 4 bilhões de anos atras! Assim um cético racionalista estremeceu em suas bases, mas por pouco tempo, pois uma experiencia inusitada na selva me levou a descobrir a explicação racional para tantas semelhanças. Ela está resumida no post abaixo que postei naquele artigo.

O artigo fala dos livros de Joseph Campbell, famoso mitólogo norte-americano do qual só tenho lido textos esparsos e menções publicas, alertando-me que devo lê-lo assim que tiver tempo.

xxx

Comentários postados no artigo:

Louis Charles Morelli, em  October, 31, 2014.

Os diversos mitos descendem de um único mito comum ancestral, assim como as diferentes espécies tiveram um comum ancestral. E o mito primordial nasceu no estado de infância da mente humana, quando ainda frêsca e com poucas das impróprias informações produzidas por esta nefasta milenar cultura tinha a capacidade de fazer vir à tona das sinapses suas vidas passadas tão longínquas como quando nossos antepassados eram meros sistemas galácticos. Concluí isso quando acompanhei as revelações de um xamã e curandeiro na Amazônia, após tomar suas beberagens tipo Santo Daime entrava em transe, e eu ao lado de seu leito anotando, desenhando tudo o que dizia. No final meu desenho era uma síntese dos símbolos do I Ching, com todos os símbolos de Adão e Eva no Paraíso, ao mesmo tempo que era a aura com chackras e kundalines. Porque? Nativos do Amazonas vivendo em um separado continente e 4 mil anos depois, tem as mesmas visões dos fundadores das religiões, quando estão com o cérebro alterado?! Mas é a mesma cosmogonia relatada na Doutrina Secreta por Helena Blavastky obtida entre hebreus ocultistas e o esoterismo que surgiu a partir de um visionário, chamado Schimeon Ben Jochai.

O mais surpreendente foi quando percebí que a aura nada mais é que uma grotesca descrição de quem…? sim, do DNA! Os chacras são as bases no meio das duas hastes, as serpentes de kundaline. Podes ver na fórmula Matrix/DNA em meu website, o template para todos os sistemas naturais, de átomos a galaxias ao cérebro humano, como estão ali visíveis os sete símbolos do mito do paraíso ( Adão e Eva ainda nas formas dos ancestrais astronômicos do que hoje são os cromossomas X e Y, a serpente, a arvore, o proibido sistema fechado em si mesmo na forma de maçã, o estado de existência do sistema como um verdadeiro paraíso egocêntrico e por fim a Queda, quando a galaxia se fragmenta e seus bits caem na superfície de um planeta para saírem se arrastando como seres vivos. Tudo registrado em nosso DNA, 13,7 bilhões de anos de História Universal! Aí está porque todos os mitos tem como fundamento um padrão único, pois ele surge em mentes frescas ou alteradas na forma de flashes, imagens, cenas, de eventos na evolução cosmológica, e como os nativos nada sabiam de FNA, galaxias, etc., cada qual interpretou os flashes à sua diferente maneira e com isso esta diversidade de mitos na base das religiões. Enfim, o que hoje é auto-consciência, ela dormia na nebulosa de átomos, sonhou como galaxia, começou a despertar como plantas e animais, acordou no Homem e outras vidas no Universo afora, e aqui em nossas-cabeças-ovo ela ainda é um embrião que nem sequer ainda abriu seus próprios olhos ( a terceira visão) para ver a substancia e forma de seu próprio corpo. Infelizmente não tive tempo para ler algo tão interessante como o tema de Campbell, qual foram os padrões que ele encontrou, mas sei que sua teoria será diferente da minha porque ele não foi no coração da selva ouvir in loco o que nos tem a revelar o espirito ainda selvagem testemunha das origens da vida. A suspeita final é de que neste Universo está ocorrendo um processo de reprodução genética do ser que existia/existe antes do Big Bang, que nós humanos dotados do embrião da auto-consciência somos os genes construindo o Filho daquele, e a ultima forma deste embrião aqui só pode significar que o ser alem-universo é auto-consciente.Mas posso estar todo errado, pois ainda estou testando tudo isso..

Louis Charles Morelli, em  November,02, 2014.

Abelhas, formigas e pagãos construíram o mesmo modelo de sistema social. Rainhas para os insetos, deusas para humanos primitivos. Porque? Esta é a tendencia genética de todos os seres vivos. Porque a fêmea no centro do sistema ainda permanecia na memória dos pagãos e foi enterrada pela cultura e religiões.Seres vivos são sistemas naturais feitos não pela Terra apenas, mas o sistema astronomico no qual estamos dentro, e nele, a fêmea estava no núcleo ( uma bela luminosa quasar contendo um buraco negro… que na verdade é branco). Este nosso passado como deuses do espaço onde a consciência ainda dormia e sonhava com eternidade foi rememorizado pelos povos primitivos em mitos como o do Paraíso. A fêmea tem tendencia a sistema fechado enquanto o macho a tem para sistema aberto, e quando a fêmea se assentou no trono sideral ela comeu a maçã proibida, ou seja, instalou o sistema fechado que fecha às portas à evolução. Por isso as sociedades das abelhas e formigas que imitam fielmente aquele paraíso de Eva nunca evoluíram. A arvore é a imagem da galaxia tendo como eixo central quasar/buraco negro na forma do tronco, os braços espirais na forma dos galhos, os planetas na forma das folhas e as estrelas na forma dos frutos maduros pendurados nos galhos. Outro simbolo do mito é a serpente, justamente a imagem da Matrix daquele paraíso, uma cobra engolindo a própria cauda, pois o sistema se auto-reciclava como podes ver na fórmula Matrix/DNA.. O pulsar emitindo cometas veio justo na forma do cromossoma Y. enquanto o núcleo feminino veio na formula do X, por isso Adão e Eva representando o aspecto sexual homem/mulher. Depois veio a Queda, quando alem das galaxias veio a força da entropia que degenera e envelhece os sistemas, fragmentando-os em seus bits-informação que mais tarde seriam os genes, e caíram nas superfícies de planetas para reiniciarem como sistema aberto à evolução, sem a capacidade da auto-reciclagem, obrigados a procurar seu alimento. Tudo bate, somos a imagem e semelhança do building block dos sistemas astronômicos porem, onde a consciência finalmente desperta e começa a levantar-se, ainda no estado embrionário. A cultura milenar animalesca imitando ainda as regras das selvas e as religiões foram maus necessários para corrigir o erro do nosso ancestral ( ou nosso na nossa forma ancestral) cometido no céu, pois se somos aqui como sistemas biológicos uma reprodução dos sistemas astronômicos, apenas a consciência poderá inverter a tendencia para sistema aberto e continuidade da evolução.O destino do nosso corpo físico é inevitável, estamos indo na direção do Admirável Mundo Novo de Huxley, governado não pelo Big Brother de Orwell mas a uma ditadura idêntica pela Big Mother ou Big Queen. Mas este novo sistema que desperta aqui, auto-consciência deverá manter-se livre e ela nos alavancará para a aventura no Cosmos… se entender-mos tudo a tempo.

Incrível! Vídeo de Bill Nye Atacando Religiosos e Sugerindo Revolução na Educação Alcança Meio Milhão de Comentários!

quarta-feira, outubro 8th, 2014

Incrível! Um vídeo publicado em 2012 já conta quase sete milhões de visitantes e o debate que se segue parece ser o mais longo da história do Youtube, pois já conta com quase meio milhão de comentários !!!

Mas o assunto do vídeo realmente é importante e faz parte da responsabilidade de todos os seres humanos conhecerem e tomarem posições participando do tema, pois disso depende o nosso e o futuro das gerações: qual a visão de mundo estamos pondo na cabeça dos estudantes, formando suas mentes.

É um combate ferrenho entre a recem-nascida mentalidade materialista e a velha mentalidade mistica que ainda governa a maioria das decisões sociais mundiais. São duas posições extremas, dois lados de uma mesma moeda, e no meio surge agora mais uma diferente e inédita posição, tentando tambem entrar na briga. Veja o vídeo, veja o comentário abaixo postado por essa nova visão do mundo, e reflita buscando sua posição, pois disso depende se nossos herdeiros irão cantar nosso sucesso ou chorar nosso fracasso.  Pois é a maneira como interpretamos a existência do mundo e nele, nossa própria existência, que determina nossos comportamentos e portanto, nosso destino.

xxxxx

Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHbYJfwFgOU xxxxxx E o ultimo comentário postado pela nova cosmovisão “do meio”: 

Louis Charles Morelli – October 08, 2014

Darwinism is not equal the real observed natural phenomena of evolution. And Creationism is far away off the natural real world. The Universal Natural History can not be reached and understood by any human brain with these limited sensors in time/space. One need to see a system standing outside the system for understanding it, and nobody went outside this Universe… yet. Natural evolution is a observed phenomena when we see a simplest thing ( a morula, a blastula) transforming shapes and increasing complexity in 9 month. And it is easy to accept that Nature can amplify this individual phenomena, projecting it into populations transformations. But… we know that the force causing those individual transformations is something “invisible” inside the blastula, the fetus, etc.: DNA. So, why not the transformations from atoms systems to stellar systems to galactic systems to biological systems could not have a invisible force doing it?! Yes there is one, a natural universal formula for all natural systems, called “Matrix/DNA”, which is showed at “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” ( Google it). It is not possible to understand in full, biological evolution ( which is merely another cycle of universal evolution) if not knowing cosmological evolution. And darwinism knows nothing about it. There are more four variables coming from the Cosmological Evolution, acting over biological evolution here – it is not merely the three variables considered now by Modern Synthesis ( VSI – Variation, Selection, Inheritance), which fill the gaps. They are natural laws and mechanisms coming from the electromagnetic dimensions, some of them described by thermodynamic systems theory. Our problem just now is that our official astronomic and atomic theoretical models are not complete, far away off the beam, so, the scientific community can not detect the evolutionary lings between cosmological and biological evolution, while Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a model of LUCA that fits the gaps. You can see the Matrix formula working into the shape of yours hands, as any natural systems, sub-systems and accessories, like the hands. You can see as elemental structure of atoms, galaxies and now, this new shape of system called ‘consciousness”. You can see the formula inside a lateral pair of nucleotides, the fundamental unit of information of DNA. That’s due DNA is merely the biological shape of something coming from since the Universe’s origins – the Universal Matrix. The first shape of this Matrix we see at the spectrum of natural light waves, so, the original light already had the code for Life. We see evolution here, but it is not the whole history. The phases of evolution are steps of a bigger universal process: reproduction. Inside this universe as a kind of big cosmic egg, is occurring a genetic process of reproduction. Reproduction of what?! Obvious: the Unknown system that generated this Universe. We can not know it.So, while this discussion among theories ( Darwinism, Creationism, Matrix/DNA, etc.) is necessary and good for stimulating the search for more knowledge towards the final thru, it is not rational the offenses, fundamentalisms. Never forget it: our little brain is not equipped for grasping the thru about the system we are inside it. The most rational method for inquiring this mystery is observing what Nature shows here and now, and then, calculating what must be where and when we can not reach. I myself don’t believe on my elaborated theory – The Matrix/DNA – because I bet that it is not complete, it can not be completed by my little brain. My fellows at this mission, the search for our existential meanings: “Try to understand that beliefs are products of Nature and personal specific experiences hard-wiring the connections among neurons and providing informations, some of them false, others real – and only bringing on to the table real natural approved facts and events, can help the Humanity inits evolution. E outro comentario postado: 

Louis Charles Morelli – October 08, 2014

“…if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, highly respected British physicist and astronomer)” Have been normal that human’s goes first to the two extremes of any issue, and finally reaching the middle term, where relies the final thru. Like Nature goes from the extreme hot to the extreme could for reaching the middle state good for life. Here, about the universal meanings of existence, humans have going from extreme infant phantasies ( creationism) to extreme materialism ( Modern Synthesis for Natural Evolution). Sir Fred Hoyle is dancing between these two extremes, so, if it is not randomness, must be divine intelligence. The third hidden alternative, the real thru, must be in between and lots more complex. My suggestion is that when we have a big unsolved mystery, and the known theories are extremists, we need ask it directly to Nature. And Nature shows to us that the life of a baby giraffe has not beginings at random, but… it is not product of mother’s giraffe intelligence either. It is merely a long chain of causes and effects known as genetic process.So, tell us the pure rational thinking, that we must search this genetic process as responsible for emergence of life at any planet of the Cosmos. The long chain of causes and effects has coming from the simplest to gradual more complexity (it happens here, facing our eyes: the embryonary morphogenetic event), so, the genetic process must be under evolution too. It must be coming from cosmological evolution, non-living world. Here relies the third hidden alternative, which must be the final thru. No randomness, no intelligent designers. Nature does not plays dice with her creatures.Ask her, She will tell you the thru, showing to you her production here, and revealing that how She does things here, is how She did things at the origins of this Universe and life here. See what you can discover, yourself, doing that, as I did. See the solution that I discovered after seven years asking the last remained life’s origins witnesses that still are alive at the heart of Amazon jungle, and published at my website: The Universal Matrix/DNA Formula for natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. But, be advised, my findings are not the final real thru also. I have watched only the half-face of Nature, which  is the chaotic face that produced this salvage biosphere.We know that there is another half-facem the ordered state, when we lift our eyes and see this solar system and galaxy working as a watch.And even if we get the real theoretical model of the ordered Cosmos, we know that we don’t get the final thru yet. Chaotic and ordered states are the two extremes again, the final thru must relies on a third hidden more complex alternative. Today we can build theoretical models about the structure and evolutionary history of the Cosmos, as the scientific astronomers community are doing. They must be not complete, even wrong, since we have our brains hard-wired by the chaotic state, never experimenting the ordered state of Nature. So, the astronomers are projecting the laws and mechanisms of chaotic states when building their astronomical models. There is only a unique way for getting a little bit closer to the final thru: making comparisons between the ordered state and the chaotic state, extracting a third theoretical model. I did it, after 30 years of calculations, but… the final results are suggesting that it is not materialism, it is not randomness and it is not intelligent design: it is something never imagined before. Remembering that this model is not complete, it must have lots of errors, so, we must no believe on it. xxxx E como resposta a este post do Fallible Fiend:

Fallible Fiend – 4 weeks ago (edited)

When I taught at university, I warned students against cheating, but some would do it anyway.  They were always shocked that someone who understood the subject could detect their cheating, even though it was obvious.  They changed variable names and other things to mask their copying, but to no avail!  When you lie to somebody who understands, the lying is obvious!  Creatioinsts use quote mines and thereby misrepresent the scientists without caring that they are misrepresenting them!   Being caught in their intellectual incompetence is what’s making them so frothing in fraudulent Arjunasquirtz these days!  

   

Louis Charles Morelli – Octuber 09, 2014

To Fallible Fiend: “They were always shocked that someone who understood the subject could detect their cheating, even though it was obvious.”

Are you conscious about the virtual cultural matrix 10.000 or more years old built by human inheritance of animals’ instinct? I am talking about this culture that rules ours social systems, shared into big predators (the high class), medium predators (  medium class) and preys ( the slaves workers), mimicking the rules of the salvage jungle? The invention of religions is a good support for this culture due being good strategy for predators keeping slaves.  If yours students were shocked when facing reality it means they believed in it and came from middle class ( conditioned minds) because the high class knows that they are cheating. I will suggest a fantastic discovery from Matrix/DNA Theory for explaining how this virtual matrix works: I watched natives “shamans”  of Amazon jungle when taking their hallucinogenic beverages describing the same picture that very ancient people from Asia used as foundations for their mythos. The big surprise and question for me was: how could it be?! Ok, the first answer is that those people from such different places and time drunk same drugs. But, why this “altered visions” could be the foundations for religions? How they entered a brain dominated by animals instincts and survive together inside the brain?! One possible but surprising answer came when I arrived to Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems… like brains. The formula is suggesting a picture of LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor), which should be the evolutionary link between cosmological and biological evolution. This “luca” never stood at Earth’s surface, because it is the building block of astronomical systems, like this one that earth belongs to it. Another big surprise is that LUCA was described in full by those mythos. LUCA is a thermodynamic system working as perfect machine described by Physics, ( Newtonian mechanics plus general relativity) using a kind of words, metaphors, symbols, but, The Eden Paradise is the same thing described by another kind of metaphors, words, symbols! Same thing for the world view based on the symbols of I Ching. How could it be?! The explanation is rational, pure natural logistic. Systems as atoms, stellars, galaxies, are species and as such they are our evolutionary ancestors, like the species as bacterias, amoebas, reptiles. All these species are registered into our DNA’s memory. There is DNA for biological systems, but it came from another kind of “DNA” existing as building blocks for non-biological systems, which name I prefer “universal matrix”. ( The inanimate systems are registered at the junk DNA). So, when someone have altered states of brain, like those produced by drugs, this memory comes as flashes, scenes, and each people try to interpret it by its own way. You can see the seven symbols used for building the fable of Adam and Eve at the Eternal Paradise, inside a building block for any natural system, a perfect natural machine, described also by thermodynamic theory. Since that this astronomical building block is reproduced as the fundamental unit of  information called “a lateral pair of nucleotides”, you can now understand why these memories are inside our neurons. Look to LUCA at my website, and you can identify there, the serpent, the apple, the tree, the perfect paradise for Adam and Eve – which were the astronomical evolutionary state of X and Y chromosomes about 4 billion years ago! You will still understand what really was the Fall, and why the entropic force produces biological systems like me and you here. I think that once time this whole theory will be approved, it will destroy those mythos that are the foundations of all religions, forever. But… be aware: the world vision that you are teaching could be another kind of cheating the reality also. And it is, if this new theory will be proved right. So, like you can not see the virtual cultural matrix acting over you, don’t be surprised that yours students are shocked facing reality.

A Evolução do Conhecimento Sobre a Matriz Universal, Desde a Mitologia ate as Ciências Modernas

quinta-feira, dezembro 5th, 2013

O seguinte artigo motivou este assunto ( click no link):

Is “the Matrix” a new concept?

http://raysofempowerment.com/is-the-matrix-a-new-concept/

Website: Rays of Empowerment & Healing

Posted In Empowering Blogs by

A autora é especialista na mitologia ou filosofia “akashica”, da qual tenho pouco conhecimento, e por isso registro este assunto para pesquisar mais tarde. Ela chama a atenção para o fato de que a enorme onda moderna de websites e filosofias e inclusive o filme sobre o conceito “Universal Matrix” não é nada novo, pois a Matrix já havia sido revelada pelos antigos. Mas tem um porem, o qual explico no comentário abaixo:

E a seguir o meu comentario postado no artigo:

Konstadina Sadoriniou

Hi, Miss Konstadina,

Evolution is not linear, it makes curves, goes forward and back for self-correctness. So, it is the evolution of human knowledge. New intuitions/ideas about the Matrix could be self-correction of this knowledge and not repetition of an old knowledge. That’s the case of my theory about the universal matrix, exposed here in a website, called “The Universal Matrix of Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. I think that the ancient ( like akashian) intuitions were products of primitive and pure minds grasping high and hidden dimensions of this world. There were flashes of pictures flowing at those minds due action of our genetic memory registered at our DNA, then, at our neurons. But the absence of modern knowledge of the Cosmos and the microscopic world leave those ancient visionaries and their disciples without seeing the correlations of the matrix with our observed and interacting dimension here and now. My intuitions about the Matrix when living alone at the Amazon jungle left me to suppose these relations between our natural world and the Matrix due I was a well informed modern philosopher. So, it is not re-inventing the idea of the matrix, but discovering new properties and aspects of the Matrix that can be useful for practical purpose here and now, like medicine and technology. What do you think about? Cheers and congratulations for yours wisdom.

XXXXXXXX

Pesquisa:

Wikipedia – Akashic records

Akasha is a Sanskrit word meaning “sky”, “space” or “aether”, and it entered the language of theosophy through H. P. Blavatsky, who characterized it as a sort of life force; she also referred to “indestructible tablets of the astral light” recording both the past and future of human thought and action, but she did not explicitly identify these as “akashic” in nature.[1] The notion of an akashic record is attributed to Alfred Percy Sinnett, who, in his book Esoteric Buddhism, wrote of a Buddhist belief in “a permanency of records in the Akasa” and “the potential capacity of man to read the same.”[2][1] By C. W. Leadbeater‘s Clairvoyance the association of the term with the idea was complete, and he identified the akashic records by name as something a clairvoyant could read

Analise da Matrix/DNA:

Temos encontrado indícios de que algumas pessoas na Antiguidade conseguiram informações sobre o que esta registrado no RNA/DNA primordial que veio da Matrix, ou seja, sobre o passado ancestral dos sistemas não-vivos.  Nossa teoria preferida é a de que estas memorias numa mente pura e primitiva ainda não contaminada com a cultura produz flashes relâmpagos de sinapses de fatos e eventos do daquele passado. E aqui os akashic records seriam os registros dessa memoria do passado, o Akasa seria a própria Matrix/DNA no núcleo dos neuronios, enquanto quando o autor diz ” a capacidade potencial do homem em ler estes registros” seria outra maneira de explicar os flashes. A grande questão seria: porque a Humanidade perdeu essa capacidade ?!

Alice A. Bailey is not part of orthodox Theosophy but branched off in her own Bailey group known as The Lucis Trust formally the Lucifer Trust. She wrote in her book Light of the Soul on The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali – Book 3 – Union achieved and its Results:

“The akashic record is like an immense photographic film, registering all the desires and earth experiences of our planet. Those who perceive it will see pictured thereon: The life experiences of every human being since time began, the reactions to experience of the entire animal kingdom, the aggregation of the thought-forms of a karmic nature (based on desire) of every human unit throughout time. Herein lies the great deception of the records. Only a trained occultist can distinguish between actual experience and those astral pictures created by imagination and keen desire.”

 

Matrix/DNA: Bem,… ela coincide conosco no “filme fotográfico” e diz que ocultistas conseguem acessar os registros, ainda neste tempo moderno.

Readings of the akashic record were central to theosophist writings

Levi H. Dowling‘s Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ offers a version of the youth of Jesus Christ ostensibly based upon akashic record material.

In The Law of One, Book I, a book purported to contain conversations with channeled “social memory complex” known to humans as Ra, when the questioner asks where Edgar Cayce received his information, the answer received is,

“We have explained before that the intelligent infinity is brought into intelligent energy from eighth density or octave. The one sound vibratory complex called Edgar used this gateway to view the present, which is not the continuum you experience but the potential social memory complex of this planetary sphere. The term your peoples have used for this is the “Akashic Record” or the “Hall of Records“.

Matrix/DNA: Raios, isso esta se aproximando muito da nossa teoria sobre a luz. Quem é Edgar Cayce? O que e “The Law of One, Book I ?

Akasa : nada ainda encontrado sobre esta palavra, a qual seria a Matrix/DNA

Edgar Cayce (/ˈks/; March 18, 1877 – January 3, 1945) was an American psychic who allegedly possessed the ability to answer questions on subjects as varied as healing and wars, and had visions of the world ending. He also gave a reading about Atlantis while in a hypnotic trance. Cayce founded a nonprofit organization, the Association for Research and Enlightenment.[1]Though Cayce himself was a member of the Disciples of Christ and lived before the emergence of the New Age Movement, some consider him the true founder of the movement and a principal source of its most characteristic beliefs.[2]

Cayce became a celebrity toward the end of his life, and he believed the publicity given to his prophecies overshadowed the more important parts of his work, such as healing the sick and studying religion. Skeptics[3] challenge Cayce’s alleged psychic abilities and traditional Christians also question his unorthodox answers on religious matters such as reincarnation and Akashic records. However, others accept his abilities as “God-given”.

When out of the trance, Cayce generally claimed that he did not remember what he had said during the reading. The unconscious mind, according to Cayce, has access to information that the conscious mind does not—a common assumption about hypnosis in Cayce’s time.

Other abilities that have been attributed to Cayce include astral projectionprophesyingmediumship, viewing the Akashic Records or “Book of Life“, and seeing auras. Cayce said he became interested in learning more about these subjects after he was informed about the content of his readings, which he reported that he never actually heard himself.

This is an example from Gina Cerminara:[26]

Cayce once gave a reading on a blind man, a musician by profession, who regained part of his vision in one eye through following the physical suggestions given by Cayce. This man happened to have a passion for railroads and a tremendous interest in the Civil War. In the life reading Cayce gave, he said that the man had been a soldier in the South, in the army of Lee, and that he had been a railroad man by profession in that incarnation. Then he proceeded to tell him that his name in that life was Barnett Seay, and that the records of Seay could still be found in the state of Virginia. The man took the trouble to hunt for the records and found them in the state capitol at Richmond: that is to say he found the record of one Barnett Seay, standard-bearer in Lee’s army who had entered and been discharged from the service in such and such a year.

Controversy and criticism

Cayce advocated some controversial and eccentric ideas from his trance readings. In many trance sessions, he reinterpreted the history of life on Earth. One of Cayce’s controversial claims was that of polygenism. According to Cayce, five human races (white, black, red, brown and yellow) had been created separately but simultaneously on different parts of the Earth. Cayce also accepted the existence of Atlantis and claimed that “the red race developed in Atlantis and its development was rapid”. Another claim by Cayce was that “soul-entities” on Earth had intercourse with animals to produce giants that were as much as twelve feet tall

Website dedicado a Cayce:

Association for Research and Enlightenment

http://www.edgarcayce.org/

 

Ninguem me “Cutuca” No Maior Debate da História que Está Acontecendo Agora No Youtube? Brasileiros! Tucuta-me…please! (5)

segunda-feira, outubro 8th, 2012

(Vai lá e clique no botão com o polegar prá cima – claro, se você concordar com meu comentário)  Esta é a quarta parte dêste artigo, vide as três anteriores, numeros 3, 2 e 1) . Foram perdidos muitos posts da Matrix devido uma revisão que desapareceu do blog ( principalmente posts do dia 08). Neus posts estão em dois nomes: TheMatrixDNA e Austriak1)

( Deletar PC Cleaner Urgente! Perdí Todos os posts entre 11 e 13)

Ultimos posts da Matrix/DNA: (perdidos posts de 04, thuesday, devido PC cleaner)

XXX

Posts modêlos para entrada todos os dias:

My question:

Saying that God creates Universes and man that seems like him inside it is not problem because humans also creates eggs and men inside it. Saying that Universes becomes a hot and concentrated small dot and explodes becoming again Universe is not problem because a big adult human becomes small egg and after the sperm “explosion” becomes adult again. But saying God lives inside Universes and Universes evolves without purpose are problems because I can’t see these things in Nature. What’s up?

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

As an agnostic and defending a new and unknown evolutionary theory different than ToE, I want for my kids ToE in science classrooms and ID obligatory in social/philosophical class. Evolution is not understood if only based on biological history, so, ToE is non complete “theory” and is necessary that it be criticized and checked by ID. ToE has no intellectual support for a meaning of our existence as religions does for avoiding kids falling on drugs, and ToE alone will not keep free thought.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago – 8:56 PM – Tue – 09 – Oct.

I think Bill Nye is the expression of a second wave of Enlightenment, as happened at 18th century, due human Reason reaching a new shape in its vital cycle. Philosophers joining to scientists and atheists against those fantasies of Reason’s baby times, promoting science and intellectual interchange and opposed superstition, intolerance and some abuses by church and state. If the first wave was based in Newton ( after Copernicus and Galileo), now it is largely based in Darwin and Astronomy.

Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago – 7:14 PM – Oct – 12

Creationist “faith” can not be explained rationally based on current scientific view of the world. But, at same time this faith is an aberration produced by Nature, this aberration can not be explained because the scientific current world view does not translate the real world. This faith is product of expression of data storaged in the wrong called junk/DNA, real data about real world of times beyond 4 billion years. People with this faith has hard-wired brain confused by these memories.

XXX – PERDÍ OS POSTS ENTRE 11 E 13.  RECOPIA-LOS.

TrueVerdicts: You haven’t criticized my post: “Science does not explain what does not exists. Time-Space are not entities “per se”, they are human imaginary creations. Think the Universe as a ball. Beyond the ball is nothing, infinite. There is no space in nothing. Now, take any object from the ball and put it outside. Now you have a distance for measurement. You created space. Something for time. Imagine everything stopping moving and coming back moving again. How much time in between? Zero…

Louis Charles Morelli 1 hour ago – 7:00 PM – Oct – 13

XXX

Here are creationists and immediate naturalists debating. They want to model the formation of children’s minds of the world. But, there are a minority – the cosmic naturalists agnostics – that also has its own model. We want our voice be heard here also. As said “illegalconspiracy”, a child with mind structured upon lots of evidences of a natural process of biological evolution interpreted by modern Darwinism will be a believer in an almost magical blind God acting without any guidance (cont.).

For us, biological evolution, the change into news species over long time, is obvious. In another hand, although we consider the indoctrination of children by a doctrine expressed in Bible is a prejudices to their healthy, we try to see the world from a cosmological point of view, and our suspection is that this process is not blind, what leaves opened to possibilities, included a non-biblical kind of “god”. So, although evolution must be a fact, the Darwinian interpretation must be a theory.

XXX

OT, huh? Well…

“Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ” Ephesians 6:5

“Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to win their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord.” Colossians 3:22

“Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed.” 1 Timothy 6:1

So much for that.

That’s why earthly masters are the fundies of Christianism and appreciate that book – the Bible. And why you see the high authorities of the church always hand by hand with earthly masters. The very group of predators, mimicking the rules of the salvage system of the jungle for building social systems for humans. That’s why I hate that book since everybody treats me all my life as slave because I was born without family and homeless. I don’t understand why the preys are so indoctrinated.

XXX

since many times creationists are accused of inhibiting science because of their presuppositions (the God-did-it-so-there’s-nothing-­more-to-study idea; but in reality, it’s just the opposite—“God did it” so we have every reason to study it!). Creationists for many years have argued that non-coding DNA is not junk (see “Junk” DNA Is Not Junk)

And now the scientific thought is acting as a science-stopper again. Due some success explaining evolution by Darwinian mechanisms and due our Astronomy still beginning and doing wrong cosmological models (as the wrong model of spontaneous generation of astronomic bodies), modern scientists don’t are stimulated to search the links between cosmological and biological evolution. The result is that changing in species are not understood because there are mechanisms coming from cosmology.

XXX

Ohno stated, “The earth is strewn with fossil remains of extinct species; is it a wonder that our genome too is filled with the remains of extinct genes?”1 Due to his evolutionary presupposition, he assumed that non-coding DNA was merely a “genetic fossil” that may have been useful somewhere in our evolutionary past but had been discarded as we evolved into more complex, higher organisms. Since this “junk” DNA was no longer needed,

Ohno had great intuition, he is in the right track. But he is touching something deeper, he can’t imagine that. Since we discovered that the fundamental unit of information of DNA – a horizontal base-pair of nucleotides – is just a copy of the fundamental building block of old galaxies, we have everything for supposing that DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal Matrix evolving since the Big Bang. If so, junk-DNA is memory of 13,7 billions years of evolution!

XXX

Mutation and natural selection, thought to be the driving forces of evolution, only lead to a loss of functional systems. Therefore, antibiotic resistance of bacteria is not an example of evolution in action but rather variation within a bacterial kind. It is also a testimony to the wonderful design God gave bacteria, master adapters and survivors in a sin-cursed world.

Not in relation to a closed system. Entropy attacks these systems beginning at periphery and advancing internally towards the center. There are no loss of energy/mass but degradation. From periphery goes the bits-information of that system, but if these bits reaches a platform, like a planet surface, a neuron in the brain, they have two alternatives: mixing with locals elements, reorganizing themselves as mutants end lift up as a new system. Or, as in Alzheimer’s, they does not re-organizes.

XXX

I’m pretty sure you know the Bible isn’t written in English, close enough is what we get, as long as the meaning is exactly what it is supposed to be expressed as, the Bible is surely more perfect than any other book available today. You should tell a judge that eye witness is INCREDIBLY FLAWED and there are no truthful people in the world, not even if God’s inspiration is flowing, OH WELL you wouldn’t ever get that. Besides they have no gain in writing a biased testimony, doing it to die.

I have my own theory about the Bible. Some events and places described in Genesis ( the Garden Paradise, Adam/Even, the selfish serpent, the fall to Earth) are real metaphorical but exactly descriptions of the state of the world and the event occurred before abiogenesis. They describes the body and process of LUCA – the Last Universal Non-Biological Ancestor. But I Ching, The Secret Doctrine, also describes the same LUCA. Explanation? Memory of past times registered into junk/DNA.

XXX

1GODISNOWHERE1: “Nothing in the periodic table of elements needs Darwin’s theories”

They need. The elements are different, diversified, because their origins was under the laws of evolution. Mendeleev discovered that each element of positions derived from 7 have the same properties. And Matrix/DNA discovered that different shapes of those elements corresponds to the different shapes of living beings under vital cycle. So, lithium and neon are babies, beryllium and magnesium are kids, etc. Louis Charles Morelli 1:56 PM – Wed -17

XXX

I wonder what the more believable theory is: that everything was created from nothing during the big bang or that matter was already here and was just re-organized by a higher intelligence into what we now call the universe. Higher intelligence or nothing that is our choices.

BigWater59 1 hour ago

I think there is a problem about the scientific community interpretation of Big Bang and this problem is that the Universe is being studied by Physics and its theories are elaborated with mathematical intellectual exercises. One sample? Physics arrived to “maximal amount of entropy” causing the Big Bang. But, a biocentric view see universes produced by Big Bangs as spermatozoon explosions and zygotes being formed due entropy attacking a human body system. Which method is the best? I don’t know.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to BigWater59 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

This has been flagged as spam hide • 

1) Creationism is the beleif that a diety created everythign out of nothing…it is the ONLY concept put forth that says From Nothing

2) Big Bang says from a singularity..an expansion from condensed matter.NOT from nothing

This will natural lead to “Well then where did the singularity come from?” which is an argument from ignorance.

Personally, I tend towards the veiw that the universe is eternal and cyclic and that eventually it will colapse back into a singularity and repeat

whiteowl1415 in reply to BigWater59 (Show the comment) 33 minutes ago

All things that are cyclic replicates the last shape automatically, does not need repeats internal evolution again and again. Sample: the first cell system was organized by symbioses, but after that it does not do it anymore, it merely replicates. There is other argument for a theory of recycling universes?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to whiteowl1415 21 minutes ago

This has been flagged as spam hide • 

Things that are cyclic repeat stages, they need not do so the same way.

Seaons are cyclic, this does not mean it is going to rain on the exact same days every spring or that the snow will fall in the exact same amount.

The cycles can contain internal variation.

Note I said I beleive, not proven, but…

Stars convert lighter elements to heavier ones, logicaly we will eventually end up with only the heaviest which through gravity of thier mass should recolapse

whiteowl1415 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 16 minutes ago

Ok… I think we are based in two different things: I am based in systems and you in processes. That’s why I appeal to a system (a cell) and you to a process ( seasons). The weird question is: the universe is a system or a process? If it is a process, you earned, the universe is self-recycling. But, I am not sure. Stars makes heavier elements. But I always search parameter in Nature here. Womb’s cells makes dense placenta for discarding it in name of embryonic evolution, not re-cycles.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

This has been flagged as spam hide • 

Nothing in nature isn’t recycled.

Amoung other animals, the placental is often reconsumed by the parents.

When it isn’t it nourishes the soil for plants.

People waste, nature never does.

whiteowl1415 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 8 minutes ago

Again, our problem is “process or system?” You said that your preferred theory is a self-recycling universe. I prefer an universe under evolution reproducing an old universe but increasing a little bit of complexity. Reconsumed placenta is a process among a lots of them that composes a whole system. In relation to embryonic evolution and its womb, placenta is discarded forever. In relation to Universes, matter will be discarded in name of an embryo of counciousness. You are part of that embryo.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

We have no acceptable theory of evolution at the present time. There is none; and I cannot accept the theory that I teach to my students each year. Let me explain. I teach the synthetic theory known as the neoDarwinian one, for one reason only; not because it’s good, we know it is bad, but because there isn’t any other. Whilst waiting to find something better you are taught something which is known to be inexact, which is a first approximation

–Professor Jerome Lejeune, Lecture in Paris

JoelMckay69 2 minutes ago

There are other theories than neoDarwinian theory that has found as existent the natural process of evolution, working with different mechanisms and suggesting new worldviews. Then, why you don’t know them? Because they can’t be published, the established mindset does not permit it. For instance, I will talk about Matrix/DNA Theory, which arose applying the method of comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems – trying to find a link. But, the found link is not ideologic accepted

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to JoelMckay69 – 12:38 AM – Tue – 16

That is not an argument against evolution it is an argument against abiogenesis. I take it you’re a Matrix student?

BigWater59 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 3 minutes ago

Yes, the theory is not argument against evolution, as I said: “it found as existent, the natural process of evolution”. The problem is about the differences between the final results between the two theories. 1) The link of Matrix/DNA is the same LUCA – the last common ancestor of all biological systems – hypothesized by Darwin, but Matrix/DNA found LUCA to be an astronomical system and not a microscope organism; 2) Matrix/DNA suggests 7 variables instead 3 of ToE. This changes the whole view.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to BigWater59 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

I am sorry Louis but that is still a biogenesis argument not genesis argument. I understand the basics of matrix but it still doesn’t fit into this debate.

BigWater59 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 1 minute ago

Yes it is a genesis argument also. What is the first moment of your body? The “”big bang”of a spermatozoon inside an egg. Now, try to project this real event here over the Big Bang theory and see the Universe as an cosmic egg. But then, the event here suggests that was there, before the Big Bang, a previous design for evolution here, inside the parents (system) that produced the Big Bang. It is genesis by a natural being without using intelligence and magics, but with consciousness. Makes sense.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to BigWater59 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Actually you have a good point and that is what really exist without consciousness to understand it. Is there an universe without conscience life. Good question which I would say no. Nice point.

BigWater59 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 26 minutes ago

The problem arises when we try to develop this theory, trying to go deeper into the final mystery..The models suggests that any wave of natural light is the code for imprinting life into inertial mass. You can see why in the theory website. So, it suggests that the ex-machine system that triggered the Big Bang made it using only light. But the source of this light seems to be a kind of vortex (based in QM). Is it “the natural god” a kind of vortex? A vortex with consciousness?! I am lost now

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to BigWater59 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

You’re a little over the top now and I am not a matrix student so bring it down a little so we can understand your point.

BigWater59 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 6 minutes ago

The theory is based in a formula made like a computer’s software diagram but at same time is a unit of genetic information. The surprisingly thing is that all known natural systems fits exactly when superposed upon the formula, suggesting that the formula is the way nature organizes matter into systems, from atoms to galaxies to human bodies. Later, we noticed that the functions of that formula can be expressed as the seven different frequencies of light waves and it explains the vital cycles.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to BigWater59 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

To say that Humans evolved is to say that intelligence/science saw birth with Humans — that science was at stage zero prior to Humans — as humans are the most intelligent entities — this is conflicting, because there existed things beyond human understanding prior to humans. <= Do grasp your mind very well around this. This only concludes that there was intelligence prior to humans which engineered them.

TrueVerdicts 3 days ago

I don’t understand. It is not what Nature is showing here and now. The nowadays bodies of human beings are made by parents through natural genetic process without parents applying intelligence and although it happens, these bodies evolves and reveals intelligence. That is the real way nature works facing our eyes. So, a rational mind must apply the same process when inquiring the origins of first human beings. The non-living matter must have the forces for intelligence, but doesn’t applied it.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Only one problem(if Bill is honest) with his narrow-minded assertions. The fossil record. As every paleontologist knows, the fossil record displays a consistent pattern of sudden appearance followed by stasis, that life’s history reflects variation around a set of basic models rather than one of accumulating improvement and finally that mass extinction has been predominantly by catastrophe rather than gradual obsolescence.

Jonathan Michaels 3 hours ago

These three questions are solved by Matrix/DNA Theory, unifying cosmological and biological evolution. The most complex non living system must be direct ancestor of the less complex biological system – of course. Since this ancestor is astronomical – it is the building block of galaxies, a system that works as perfect natural machine and shows all life’s properties – and the first living is microscope, Nature used the same process we see here when miniaturizes a human body inside chromosomes.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to Jonathan Michaels – 7:47 ÃM – Mon – 15

XXX

First there was simple single celled life. Then suddenly, about 530 million years ago, most major animal phyla were here. The fossil evidence is missing showing how life went from the single cells to the major complex divisions of animal life we have today. After the early Cambria era explosion of life there is fossil evidence that that life was now here. But no fossil evidence beforehand showing how simple single celled organisms suddenly became very, very, very complex.

EphraimManasseh in reply to narco73 (Show the comment) 35 minutes ago

No. The Big Bang of “your life” can be watched here and now, every time is exploded the envelope of a spermatozoon inside an ovule. The Universe only can create things like itself was created. Abiogenese is not going from single soup to single cell, it is about the almost perfect closed system that works like a machine called “galaxy” and nanotechnologically going to a single biological cell. Mother Nature does not play dice with us. She is showing here how she works. Why are you cheating her?!

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to EphraimManasseh (Show the comment) 16 minutes ago

XXX

(Fill in the blank, whatever your blank is) bless Bill Nye. My childhood, for what little of it you were a part of, was that much more awesome while you were in it. Let’s hope you’re right. Let’s hope in the future, the outdated ways of thinking which rule today are gone. Replaced by education and knowledge rather than fear and overreaction. The only saving We All Need is from ignorance.

homewherehorrorlives 18 minutes ago

“The only saving We All Need is from ignorance.” That’s the most beautiful phrase I like and I would ad my bit: “and saved from our selfish gene”. This selfishness expresses in everybody. The result is forgetting that our little brain facing this immense mystery can not grasp the final Truth. So, we watch evolution here, but is it blind without purpose? I watch evolution inside a womb, a shape of blastula becoming unrecognizable in the next shape as fetus. But, then…there is purpose. So?!

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to homewherehorrorlives (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

These debates are mostly useless. I never try and “win”, I just interject verses from the Bible and let God work on your hearts when you read them.

1 Thessalonians 2:13 For this cause also thank we God without ceasing, because, when ye received the word of God which ye heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but as it is in truth, the word of God, which effectually worketh also in you that believe.

The1Indignitary 10 minutes ago

It does not works with me. The History of America, my ancestors, its fairy tiles, folklore and traditions in first place, that’s what I want for my kids, not those of foreign origins. And there are no mentions of interventions of God in our History. So, if the god of foreign people is real, he has not talking with us, then, he is not real for us and not our friend. You are practicing mental terrorism on my kids. Let’s the people of America alone for discovering the meaning of our existence.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to The1Indignitary7:43 – PM – Oct – 13

XXX

Why do so many Christians pretend that science and/or evolution are religions? This is a difficult question to answer because there are so many possibilities. Perhaps religion so controls their lives that they can’t think outside of religious categories. Perhaps they can’t imagine that anything which makes strong claims isn’t religious.

IDisnotscience 42 minutes ago

They have something (a fault on modern scientific thought) for hold on: 1) Darwin should never talk this: the diversification of life shows that species were not created one by one ( by God). Because Darwin was not prepared for explaining the origins of species; 2) Scientific worldview resists to link cosmological evolution with biological evolution and had inserted, in this big abism, the magical thinking of randomness. Scientists need avoiding to extrapolate to worldviews for avoiding enemies

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to IDisnotscience 7:24 PM – OCt – 13

XXX

1) Your science is simply an extremely negligible STUDY of an existing, indescribably sophisticated science/intelligence. Nothing simply ‘be’ be it not Time-Space. The engineering of the tree is the utmost science; the making of the star is the utmost science, the systematic, purposeful, flawlessly timed, synchronizing of cosmological entities is the utmost science; the engineering of the brain is the utmost science…

TrueVerdicts 48 minutes ago

Search the natural matrix formula that organizes matter into systems and discover from where is coming all this “engineering”. If after that you will say loud that this is the formula created by God for creating things in these Universe without magics, I will show for you that this formula is coming from something natural, extra-universe. But you still will say that the extra-universal was created by God… and here I will stop. I don’t know.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

1)Do you realize that your science, as a subject of Time-Space, is lesser than Time-Space, making Time-Space greater (than all) — as such, your science CANNOT explain Time-Space. And, it certainly not with physical approach. Your science is very negligible. It’s no hot stuff! It’s sad that you believe that Time-Space can explain by physics alone. You ought to be begin to understand that Time-Space simply ‘be’; that, in itself is illogical, metaphysical, it cannot be explained with physics.

TrueVerdicts 38 minutes ago

Science does not explain what does not exists. Time-Space are not entities the per se, they are human imaginary creations. Think the Universal as a ball. Beyond the ball is nothing, infinite. There is no space in nothing. Now, take any object from the ball and put it outside. Now you have a distance for measurement. You created the space. Something for time. Imagine everything stopping moving and coming back moving again. How much time was there? Zero.There is measurement of a chain of events.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Your science will erroneously claim that intelligence dwells within biology, as it seeks to deny all possibilities of anything outside of physics. Intelligence does not reside in the body. “Thoughts” may, allegedly, be influenced in the manner you mentioned as a result of the mechanism/the biology being affected by the drug; i.e, when you alter/impact a vehicle’s part, the vehicle may perform differently; this does not mean the operator/driver/intelligence of the vehicle is ONE with it!

TrueVerdicts 32 minutes ago

Alzheimer’s is proof that intelligence/consciousness resides in our bodies. As the brain decays so does the intelligence and personality. Your ‘soul’ assertion dissolved with a single physical decay.

mechanicmike69 in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 25 minutes ago

I will suggest an argument for your theory. Think about a computer decay like Alzheimer, but, die fire. The hardware goes destroyed, but what happens with the software? As said mechanicmike69, the scientific theory uses Alzheimer as evidence that consciousness reside in our body. I think that computers are evidence that consciousness is separated. The software resident in computer is destroyed but the same software is in other places, like the mind of his creator, other computers. Do you agree?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

The “software” in humans is the interconnection of billions of nerve cells, that die when you die and have no duplicate copies. Your argument is rediculous.

HodadWah in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 32 minutes ago

Hold on. Bits in a computer does not organizes themselves for running a software and does not creates their own software. And for clues that my argument is ridiculous you need bring on the paper peer-reviewed that reveals the mechanisms by which neurons are related to thought. There is no one. My theoretical models suggests that a natural software composed by photons is transmitted by galaxies over primordial soups driven abiogenesis. This software, later, becomes human consciousness. Weird,but

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HodadWah (Show the comment) 1 second ago

xxx

EVOLUTION DOESN’T MAKE FOSSILS; FOSSILS ARE NOT EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION. STOP HIJACKING THE EVIDENCE OF THE GLOBAL FLOOD OF NOAH FOR YOUR EVIL ATHEISTIC PSEUDOSCIENCE OF EVIL EVOLUTIONISM.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to ExtantFrodo2 (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

That’s funny! You say that one real natural phenomena – the amount of collected fossils – are being used by evil evolutionism as evidence for evolution, and at the same time, you point out one real natural evidence that sometimes in that place in the past had some flood and uses it by yours evil religionism as evidence for your imaginary fairy tales. If you think this behavior is a sin, why you do it?!!

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN 1 hour ago

Because he is mentally ill.

HodadWah in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 4 minutes ago

What should mean that his brain is hard-wired in a non natural way? And maybe due indoctrination? I think that my brain is not hard-wired correctly also and I explain it by the fact that I am product of a chaotical biosphere that has tortured me mentally. But, if he have problems we need try to help him going back to the right track. My theory suggests that the supreme goal of evolution here and now is evolution of human brains and that we need all human brains evolving for our collective future

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HodadWah (Show the comment) 1 second ago

I have waisted enough of my time trying to explain things to religious people. They do not get it and I think never will. I now try to humiliate them with their beliefs. But you go for it. I enjoy reading your post.

HodadWah in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 1 minute ago

I understand that you are upset due religious prejudicing yours goals. I was just reading Cosmic Log where comments criticizing NASA for spending money with Curiosity for finding pieces of metals. I will give my last dollar for NASA doing it because I need cosmic expansion, and religious does not help. But I don’t agree with humiliation, I think it does not work either. They are our brothers, we need find a kind of method for bringing them to our team, but, it needs be good for them also.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HodadWah (Show the comment) 2 seconds ago

XXX

EVOLUTION DOESN’T MAKE FOSSILS; FOSSILS ARE NOT EVIDENCE OF EVOLUTION. STOP HIJACKING THE EVIDENCE OF THE GLOBAL FLOOD OF NOAH FOR YOUR EVIL ATHEISTIC PSEUDOSCIENCE OF EVIL EVOLUTIONISM.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to ExtantFrodo2 (Show the comment) 4 minutes ago

That’s funny! You say that one real natural phenomena – the amount of collected fossils – are being used by evil evolutionism as evidence for evolution, and at the same time, you point out one real natural evidence that sometimes in that place in the past had some flood and uses it by yours evil religionism as evidence for your imaginary fairy tales. If you think this behavior is a sin, why you do it?!!

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 2 seconds ago

XXX

This argument looks like it’s gonna go on forever….

VitalSubtlety 15 minutes ago

Not forever. The reliance on evidence for making decisions, for understanding what is true, for establishing one’s position with regard to everything else – is growing. Religions rely on non-evidence , are based on faith, and fail as means to find truth. With the internet, more people see this and abandon the old ways.

ExtantFrodo2 in reply to VitalSubtlety (Show the comment) 10 minutes ago

Congratulations! You wrote what is happening with the right words. I think that religion has been propagating inside churches/schools by that authoritarian strategy of one-direction-dialogue. Nobody in a mass can stop the priest for asking questions when don’t understand/don’t accept something. Now, with Internet, everybody can see  doctrine questions enunciated and has the courage for doing what has been afraid to do. God Bless the Internet…oh…I mean… PinkUnicorn bless the Internet…

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to ExtantFrodo2 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Part 1 of 2

You can’t deny God from ignorance as you aren’t all knowing. What you don’t know is infinitely more than what you believe you know but is mostly wrong. Only a superior intelligence could and did create all that exists that humans didn’t and can’t reproduce in the world nor could or does mindless & lifeless chemical elements by chance. This leaves only God, a superior intelligence/being, as a reasonable and intellectually honest option.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to TheRainmaker2001 (Show the comment) 18 minutes

Please, tell me how and which method have you used when connecting the real and natural amount of proved data we have today and show me the final picture did you got? I did my own search for knowledge of those data, I choose a method (comparative anatomy between all known natural systems) for connecting all that data, I got a final picture, which is not suggesting any magic intervention of gods, from since before the origins of this Universe to nowadays. I am very curious to know your picture.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

One cannot have knowledge/science of things presumed/imagined, which do not happen, and have hot happened and which cannot be reproduced. Pond scum to you evolution never happened or happens.

EVOLUTIONISM IS A LIE AND PSEUDOSCIENCE AND SCIENCE FICTION ATHEISTIC STYLE. IT HAS BECOME THE RELIGION OF THE ATHEISTIC SORT.

COMPARATIVE ANATOMY DOESN’T SUBSTANTIATE YOUR IMAGINED NOTIONS THAT A BEAR BECAME A WHALE; A MONKEY BECAME A HUMAN, THAT BIRDS CAME FROM DINOSAURS. THIS IS INSANE & UNSCIENTIFIC.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes

You are right…lol! One cannot get the final Truth (if have one) based solely in all data we know today. Any methodical exercise of connecting the known data shows blank spaces where is missing data. But we need some guide, meanings that makes sense, then we do the connection and hypothesizes how should be that missing data and get a final picture. This is called “theory”. Sample? The Higgs bosom. It is a guide for next search, experiments. Still waiting your picture.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Comparative anatomy is the most ancient and authentic method for rational theories about the unknown. Opening the bodies of animals instead the body of humans was the method for inferring what was inside the human body, which substantiates ancient medicine. We don’t know the natural forces that drove abiogenesis, then, take the state of the world of that time, put the existent systems, atoms and galaxies, over the table, and do comparisons with the first cells systems. Get theories of forces.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 2 seconds

YOU’RE SO STUPID AND CAN’T THINK FOR YOURSELF.

WHO SAW A BEAR BECOME A WHALE, OR DINOSAUR BECOME A BIRD, OR AN APELIKE CREATURE BECOME A HUMAN, OR CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN WARM POOLS OR WATER SPONTANEOUSLY GENERATE THE ALLEGED COMMON ANCESTOR OF ALL AND THEN ITS TRANSMUTATION INTO ALL THE LIFE FORMS THAT EVER LIVED? EVOLUTION FROM POND SCUM TO ALL THAT EVER LIVED WAS AND IS NEVER SEEN FOR REPEATED TESTING AS THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD REQUIRES. THEREFORE, EVOLUTIONISM IS ATHEISTIC PSEUDOSCIENCE/SCIENCE

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes ago

You are right. The great transformations of, to say, reptiles into mammals, are not well explained solely by the three mechanisms of ToE: Variation, Selection, Inheritance. Then, what a rational mind should do? Go back re-observing everything. Put the galaxy over the table, put the reptile inside the galaxy, stands above the galaxy and think. One day, one year, or 30 years like I did, no matter, think. I got an answer: there are more four mechanisms added to those three. I got my mammal. Theory

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Are you saying that I can’t think by myself and you can, then, I should accept like a ewe your conclusions? You are insulting my intelligence. Ne pas jamais. But I like to learn and changing real information. If you go straight to the data…

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second

COMPARING ALL CARS AND THEIR ENGINES DOESN’T MEAN THAT THIS COMPARATIVE EXAMINATION CONFIRMS THAT CARS EVOLVED BY ACCIDENTAL COLLABORATION OF MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS. DID YOU WAIT FOR YOUR CAR AND HOME TO MAKE ITSELF?

WHY ARE YOU INCAPABLE OF RATIONAL CRITICAL THINKING? WHY DO YOU LOVE THE LIE OF EVIL EVOLUTIONISM? WHAT SIN DO YOU LOVE OVER THE TRUTH OF GOD?

YOUR IDEA OF THEORIES IS ACTUALLY VILE FOOLISH HUMAN IMAGINATION.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes ago

Comparative anatomy does not work in this way, it works only applied over real natural wholes systems. But the comparison of cars, since the carriage pulled by horses to a BMW suggests evidences for a process of evolution and suggests the existence of an external agent driven this evolution. Since it is not a living thing, the evolution happens in the agent, not in the cars. If a future car gets artificial intelligence, it should evolve by itself. That’s what happens since origins of life.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 2 seconds ago

GOD DOESN’T LIE. MAN DOES. WHY ARE YOU LYING FOR EVIL EVOLUTIONISM?

THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION OF LIFE FALSIFIES EVOLUTIONISM, AS DOES THE FOSSILIFEROUS SEDIMENTARY WITH BILLIONS OF DEAD FLORA & FAUNA AS GOD PLANNED TO DESTROY, AS DOES INFORMATION IN THE GENOME OF ALL BIOLOGICAL LIFE AND THE DNA CODE THAT CAN ONLY COME FROM AN INTELLIGENT MIND, AS DOES ALL THE KNOWN SCIENTIFIC LAWS THAT EVOLUTIONISM DEFIES.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes

You are right, accordingly with my theory, which does not agree with the idea of a meteorite causing it. Dinosaurs disappeared due same cause disappears all species that super-specializes as closed systems and closes the door to its own evolution. But is not falsifies evolutionism. Nature applied the old astronomical mechanism of entropy producing chaos for dinosaurs and went backwards, finding the small cyanodont for continuing evolution and getting a mammal. And then, new order arose.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

There’re many idiotic stories for the extinction of dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are found in graveyards with many different animals together. This information is kept from the public because it falsifies the alleged order of evolution which the fossil record doesn’t help as with the Cambrian Explosion of life containing more than 100 phyla that suddenly appear without links to the bacteria, spores, algae in the adjacent layer, the Precambrian, just below the Cambrian. Evolutionism is a cosmic lie.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 1 minute ago

Sorry, I have not studied completely the Cambrian explosion as you seems to be well informed. But I said that I am waiting your information about the method you been using and the final picture you got. You have found intervention of a God producing a flood at that time? Is it 60 millions years ago? My method has suggested that – if had no evolutionary links between pre-Cambrian and after-Cambrian, there was intervention of solar flares due atomic reactions reaching internal new layers.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

YOUR COMPARATIVE ANATOMY IS EXACTLY THE SAME AS MY CAR/ENGINE ANALOGY. STOP LYING. DID YOU READ ROMANS 1:18-32?

ALL THE CHEMICAL ELEMENTS IN YOUR BODY AS IN THE CAR ARE NOT ALIVE I.E. HYDROGEN, OXYGEN, CALCIUM, NITROGEN, CARBON ETC. ARE NOT ALIVE AND CAN’T CONTRIVE ENGINES, CARS OR BIOLOGICAL LIFE.

THE “EVOLUTION OF THE CAR” IS YOUR DECEPTIVE USE OF THE WORD. IN THIS CASE IT’S THE PROGRESS IMPROVEMENT OF THE AUTOMOBILE AND TECHNOLOGY BY HUMAN INTELLIGENCE, NOT WITHOUT INTELLIGENCE.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 4 minutes ago

You are right, is the same analogy, and that’s why we arrived to same conclusion: there is an external agent doing it. The difference between us is about who is the external agent acting over biological evolution. You have seen a magical god I have seen a new cosmological model. The elements in our bodies are not alive, but they were connected by photons coming from sun light and cosmic radiation bringing on informations about a system that is half-mechanical/half-biologica­l. That’s a theory.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

ANYONE THAT ACCEPTS EVOLUTIONISM IS A MORON.

NOBODY SAW MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS POPPING INTO EXISTENCE FROM THE ALLEGED BIG BANG OF NOTHING AT ALL, THAT THEN COLLABORATED TO CONTRIVE THE ALLEGED COMMON ANCESTOR OF ALL WHICH THEN TRANSMUTED INTO EVERYTHING THAT EVER LIVED?

BILLY NYE THE PSEUDOSCIENTIFIC GUY IS SUGGESTING THE OPPOSITE WHICH IS A PUT-DOWN AND AN INSULT TO BELIEVERS OF GOD.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to HodadWah (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Who are you in Internet calling me a “moron”? What evidence/proof have you found for bringing on the table and proving that?

Natural evolution was the rational conclusion of any healthy mind in my teenager times. There was no enough data about abiogenesis and Big Bang, so, any affirmative conclusion would be not rational, it were opened questions. About History, myths, the one of my nation has the first place, and there is no mention of interventions of supernatural beings. What do you want?!!

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second

XXX

I did not say DNA cannot “divide or reproduce”. It cannot change into another (entity’s) DNA.

TrueVerdicts in reply to TheHigherVoltage (Show the comment) 7 minutes ago

I think you are based on the information that scientists have trying to ad information into DNA and never got an improvement – an information that fits your world view. I read it 20 years ago, and I don’t know if still is valid. But, since you are advocating the idea that humans are special because you believe they have “soul”, I ask you: “why not a soul under evolution that can change DNA when the body is a hardware that does not works?” Have you thought in this possibility?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

I agree. Though, dolphins are not intelligent, as they CANNOT engineer and innovate. I submit to all following this debate that only Humans are intelligent.

TrueVerdicts in reply to ExtantFrodo2 31 minutes ago

I think you need change the word “intelligent” in this debate and not using the words “engineer, innovation” for advocating an idea of human “soul”. Intelligence has been defined in many different ways including, abstract thought, understanding, self-awareness, communication, reasoning, learning, retaining, planning, and problem solving. People here understand it as it derives from the Latin verb intelligere which derives from inter-legere meaning to “pick out” or discern.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts 2:21 AM – Thu – 11

XXX

Thankyou but there is a God and he is the the one and only holy GOD and that is the only one you should believe in!

Chloe Woodward 14 minutes ago

If you feel happy with your belief, good for you. But, please, don’t tell it to my kids neither through their school because I want the mind of my kids free of private fantasies for better learning so many things about the nature of this world and be prepared for survival facing the ferocious competition. Fantasies are defined as private world views without public evidences.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to Chloe Woodward 9:36 – PM – Wed – 10

XXX

One does not convert to atheism because atheism is nothing. It is a neutral stance on the claims about god. One just wakes up one day and says ” shit I’ve wasted my life on bullshit!!!”

allanhill1 1 minute ago

But…attacking the name “god” is wrong, I think. My life’s experience and little knowledge are suggesting that this mind inside each human head and probable in many other lifeforms are like bubbles of dense substance called “consciousness” floating in an infinite ocean of slight consciousness, like a photon floating in light waves. Particles of photons with high quantum of light can be wave, also. Each one can call this “ocean” by the name he/she wants. If “god”, no problem.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to allanhill1 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Life is so complex, that just a few proteins coming about by chance …even if the whole universe was an organic soup, is 10 with 40,000 zero’s after it to 1. Note that 10 with 50 zero’s after it, is a number greater than the atoms in the universe. So the chance is 0

iaml3642494 2 hours ago

An ovum is so simple and an embryo is so complex! Any hypothetical microscope being located inside an ovum, seeing only yolk, should say that the chance of something like genes coming about… even if that little universe was an organic soup, is 10 with 40.000 zero’s after it to 1. he should concludes the chance is 0.

But.. it happens. Nature has some forces in it that makes it happens. This microscope being that can’t see those forces would believe in magical gods or magical randomness. You?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to iaml3642494 – 8:47 PM – Wed – 10

Yes for a few proteins to randomly pop up in thin air is damn near impossible. That’s not what scientists think happened btw. please do some research on abiogenesis. and it’s not evolution anyway.

tsub0dai in reply to iaml3642494 (Show the comment) 2 hours ago

Yes, iaml3642494 appealing to magical gods for explaining what happened in that primordial soup is not rational. But, scientists appealing to chemical reactions for explaining it is not rational too. My post above to iaml3642494 appealing to observed process happening in Nature is more rational, but… then, the same observation reveals that the events in that soup are driven by instructions coming from external source. Those scientists are suffering from myopia.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to tsub0dai (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

XXX

Oh, friend, I thank FATHER for you this day! I, too, come from hard knocks, I can thus praise HIM for it’s not of me that you are seeing such a “good life” & “living a rich life” but of HIM & HIS love by HIS grace & mercies that I can share my testimony today with you & others. There’s nothing too impossible for FATHER to correct, nothing too bad/monstrous HE can not heal with in your hurting heart, friend, I assure you. Place your trust in HIM & HE’ll make a way for you. Feel free to PM me, OK?

netta2158 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes ago

“Feel free to PM me, OK?”

No it should not be good for you. If you are happy with your faith and respect the space of my kids, good for you. I am not the kind that go to church because when the priest says the first phrase and I think it is wrong, I stop him or I go out. No talks one direction alone. Debates only are useful if starts with real facts on the table. For instance: why your God permitted that me and other 1 million Americans that worked hard all life loose our homes?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to netta2158 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

We have been seeking beings like us through the cosmos for decades with no success, that’s because our kind is unique. It’s not just biological. And we are mistakenly looking for intelligence of a difference creed than us. We are likely to encounter our same creed first in the cosmos, and they won’t necessarily  be more intelligent than us, but they could be more or less ‘advanced’ than us. And when/if we do find our kind, rest assured, that they will resemble us from top to bottom.

TrueVerdicts 2 minutes ago

Again you are only half-right. Seeds of “life” are produced and spreaded by galaxies in different time/space and they can germinate and grow if a convergence point is appropriate. That’s due the building blocks of galactic systems are half-alive and has the same configuration of nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. Entropy attacking galaxies produces the transmission as in genetics and nanotechnology do the rest. But then is possible that we find a lifeform made-up of iron or plastic

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

There are diverse, transferable degrees of intelligence. Humans’ degree of intelligence was transferred, not evolved. In fact, biology CANNOT evolve; it is universally decreed impossible. Because all bodies within Time-Space, whether (inert or alive, including Humans) have a constant, identifiable structure, pre-determined mechanism, and purpose.

TrueVerdicts 1 hour ago

We don’t know yet. There is the new theory of Universe, called biocentrism. It makes sense also. Opposing Physics-centrism, if this Universe is the place where is occurring a process of genetic or computational reproduction of what was before the Big Bang, from Biology will come the Theory of Everything. All you said fits with evolution of a universal embryo: intelligence is transferred and evolves, all bodies has a Matrix/DNA structure, purpose, pre-determined mechanism, etc.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Science’s narrowed biology-alone approach to intelligence simply diminishes the magnitude of what we’re part of; thus, has conducted studies on the wrong platform. Which is why we remain largely incapable of conquering the cosmos. The degree of intelligence needed to be fully fluid within Time-Space is metaphysical, not just biological or physical. It MUST be metaphysical as the state of being of Time-Space, itself, is metaphysical; i.e.Time-Space simply be; this fact is biologically unexplained

TrueVerdicts 1 hour ago

You are only half right, but if your goal is conquering the cosmos, we are together. Mathematical theorems has indicated that matter alone could not jump to self-consciousness and neurology has not found how neurons are related to mind. It means that biology producing consciousness is largely theoretical. I said before how “metaphysical intelligence” seems merely natural ex-machine software. Time is measure of chains of events and space arises only if have two objects. They aren’t entities.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Another reason why intelligence does not reside in biology/genes is.. take robots/computers for example.. they can only showcase a mechanism. This is the plague that has stopped Artificial Intelligence dead on its track. AI will NEVER be self-innovative no matter the amount of physical intelligence inserted in a robotic entity; it can only showcase a limited, programed mechanism — even when it records new things on its own by means of repeated patterns, it cannot engineer and make things better

TrueVerdicts 1 hour ago

You don’t know the work of those two Physicists that earned the Nobel-2012. They got the isolation and observation of photons waves which is one step before quantum computation, which will be one step before artificial intelligence. If you add this discovery with what we had get in Matrix/DNA models, you will see the relation biology+intelligence+light. See our model: any wave of natural light seems the arm and hand of “the father’s source” that brings the code for imprinting life on matter.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

INNOVATION is UNIQUELY what intelligence is! The reason that, thus far, only Humans, as a subject of Time-Space, can innovate (not the stars, nor gravity, nor dolphins, nor monkeys, etc), is because only Humans are direct progenies of gods. Only gods can innovate. Therefore you are a god, not just biological matter, not EVOLVED. Because biology CANNOT evolve. You were engineered/created with the same properties/intelligence of “that” which engineered you (As it says: “In his image”)! Read below.

TrueVerdicts 1 hour ago

Human intelligence produces real innovation only when observing Nature, discovering its mechanisms/process and mimicking them. But you are right: only who has consciousness which are direct progenies of that “generator of universes” ( some fish, apes, already has flashes of it) can do it. But since you are mirroring in humans for inferring what is our “father” why you forget that we are not magicians, only natural? For avoiding rational evidence that the ex-machine “father” is too natural?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Biology can exist without intelligence (as all physical entities, including matter, are biological); and intelligence can exist without biology in a metaphysical form. However, biology cannot exist in a metaphysical form – which is where science remains stuck until it changes course.

Humans have inherited and can tap into the metaphysical source: innovation, dreaming, imagining, weeping, meditation, etc. Other forms of biologies, that we know of, cannot. [some say ‘spiritual’ for “metaphysical”]

TrueVerdicts 54 minutes ago

What you call “metaphysical intelligence” we call “universal software”, and biology is the hardware. We get the software when extracting out the energetic circuit of any natural system, included human brain and DNA. We have tracked backwards the evolution of this software and seen its origins at the Big Bang (quantum vortex and fluctuations of light waves). Only humans have dreams, consciousnesses, etc, because this software was sleeping in atoms, dreaming in galaxies and is waking up in humans

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

1) You are wrong, and you know it. Because you would have to explain the origin of the Big Bang. Secondly, if you’ve “extracted” it, you ought to be able to integrate it into other physical/biological entities. You folks should start with AI for instance, why not? Not gonna happen!

TrueVerdicts in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 2 minutes ago

Nope. And I can explain the origin of the Big Bang. Reason suggests that when you feels that there is a natural phenomena but you can not see it, collect its effects and search in nature the same manifestations. The phenomena producing these manifestations that you can see is the best source for a theory about what you can’t see. There is another “Big Bang” initializing a natural system and producing expansion, etc: the fecundation starting your own body. Nature does not play dice with us.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

2) Had Humans been solely biological, we would’ve digressed to the level of intelligence of the other biological species; or, it would be natural that other biological species progress/evolve to the level of intelligence of Humans. Biology, being found throughout Earth, could not have singled out just Humans be to intelligent, leaving behind all other species.

TrueVerdicts in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 3 minutes ago

My post agree with you that humans are not solely material biology, as only hardware, I told about the software. The cause that among all primates and other biological species only ancestors of humans got a brain that could wake up this universal living software was that only they went to leave in a cave, feeding the younger and older, which was the root of the human family, where arose feelings and emotions, the impulse for this awakening. If any ape give food to his father, he can get it too.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

if your god is the father then who was the mother? You should have symmetry in your anthropomorphism in order for your mythology to make some sense..

Mike Johns in reply to netta2158 (Show the comment) 2 hours ago

Well…glup…in certain meaning, the last universal common ancestor was the father of all living beings, and he was hermaphrodite… Oh…no…is God gay?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to Mike Johns 2 hours ago

Noah is our common ancestor, and having 3 sons doesn’t make him a hermaphrodite. As for FATHER being gay, I do think HE is a very happy and joyful CREATOR after all look at all HE’s created … such beauty through all that our senses marvel in! What an awesome CREATOR we serve! Hallelujah, FATHER! Amen! Won’t you please learn of HIM & that of HIS love? HE truly is wonderful. HE loves you & us all so very much. Peace & HIS abundantly blessings to you, friend. <(^8

netta2158 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 2 minutes ago

Este post abaixo devia ir para TrueVerdicts e errei:

Sorry, it is not possible an intelligent conversation between us. It seems that you had a good life with lots of money and living in a rich place for explaining why you have seen only the half part of this world, the beautiful one, which could explain the way your brain was hard-wired and your faith in a intelligent designer. Unfortunately I have seen the other half, the bad and monstrous design, which had effects in my hard-wiring and explains why I can’t believe in gods watching this here.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to netta2158 1 second ago

Every living thing through out the universe exists to evolve on some level, however, with out GOD, creationism & evolution would cease to exist. Therefore the human race who the FATHER of the Universe created, along with all seen & unseen things, need to teach our offspring about HIM & all that HE’s created especially of HIS mercy, forgiveness, grace, & unconditional love. I can only hope HE draws you, & us all, closer to HIM. May YESHUA/JESUS bless & fortify you, & us all, everyone. Peace. <(^8

netta2158 25 minutes ago

You are right, accordingly to last results of Matrix/DNA evolutionary cosmology, “theory”. Human race have as father who created the Universe. The problem is who created the Universe. Physics suggests it was a small atom. This theory suggests that this Universe is a kind of cosmic egg where is occurring a process of genetic or computational reproduction of who was existing before the Big Bang. But, parents outside the womb/egg does not go there creating shapes of fetus, embryos, etc. All Nature.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to netta2158 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Yes, of course it’s nature … GOD, our FATHER in Heaven, created the very essence of nature and that of its’ components and cosmos. With out HIM there would be nothing, and nothing from nothing equals nothing … no womb, no egg, nor creation, no “big bang theory” and no “us” to debate HIS existence. I thank GOD the FATHER for HIS mercy, patience, forgiveness, grace, and love for we are a stubborn and rebellious creation. JESUS bless you, friend. Peace. <(^8

netta2158 in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 2 minutes ago

XXX

1) Ask yourself, if the essence of Earth was to harbor Humans, as we so arrogantly think, then why is it that Earth must have been in existence some 4 billion years prior to Humans insignificant few thousand lousy years on it. We can all agree that humans is the best thing to happen to Earth; then why must Earth have existed such length prior to the main Event?? That’s because, the Earth is, assuredly, NOT billions of years old; and science as a whole is in error.

TrueVerdicts 3 minutes ago

Nope. The shape of humans are result from evolution coming since abiogenesis, and abiogenesis took some billion years which is natural when a shape is coming from systems belonging to cosmological evolution. Think abiogenesis as process of macro-universal embryogenesis which takes billions years. Why should humans to be the best thing to happen to Earth?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts4:36 AM – Wed – 10

Your science has gotten you so lost. Nothing, absolutely nothing, lasts such length within Time-Space. You cannot even truly begin to wrap your mind around ONE million years of past events, much less billions of years. Your science is tedious, very suppository and speculative. Yes, Humans, are the best thing to happen to Earth.

TrueVerdicts in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 22 minutes ago

Nature is tedious for a microscopic observer but it runs fast for an universal observer. Look to Solar System just now, it seems eternal, never changing, the moon always around Earth, the Sun always there… What then if observing the galaxy, 10 billion years, same shape? This vision impregnates us with tedious… but only those that think microscopically. Stars dies, becomes dust and resuscitates from its own gray, everything is moving. Abiogenesis is for universal observers understanding.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TrueVerdicts (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Não Publicado

There is a method for training a person to evolves from a microscopic observer to an universal observer and you can learn it. But then, you need understanding universal macro evolution (13,7 billions years) and not only biological evolution (3,5 billion). And you need learn that DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal Matrix that began as simplest quantum vortexes emitting light at the Big Bang, has organized matter into atoms, galaxies and now is living inside cells systems.

XXX


louie says – ToE alone will not keep free thought.

Religious brainwashing is the antithesis of free thought…

geezusispan in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 2 minutes ago

You should say “creationism brainwashing is the antithesis of free thought”. Because there are religions more like philosophies different than creationism, which believes in ex-machine consciousness not interfering with human existence. But, the surprising and aggressive reaction of atheists (denialism of some form of superior consciousness) against a religion suggests that atheism is the other side of a coin, and if so, it seems also the antithesis of free thought. Why not ID also?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment) 1 second ago

So let’s hear your argument for ID

tsub0dai in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 3 minutes ago

I think nobody will accept my deep reasons for ID not in science classroom but in philosophical studies. Because for understanding my arguments, one needs leave out this planet, going above the galaxy, and from there, observe biological evolution here. I don’t know nobody did it besides myself. Doing it, ToE is revealed as a very poor theory that needs be improved. Then forget this argument and keep only the following: ID has been a tool for evolutionists rethinking evolution, improving it.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to tsub0dai (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Why not admit that God is the slow force behind evolutionary processes and cut out the middle man?

unclethermo in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 20 minutes ago

Why not admit that God is the slow force behind evolutionary processes and cut out the middle man?

unclethermo in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 20 minutes ago

I think that if one accepts evolutionary process by evidences seen in biological evolution, can not relates it with the idea of magic and omnipresent gods. Rationally, the two ideas are self-exclusive. But, universal evolution leaves an open door to the possibility that this evolution we are observing could be merely steps of an ex-machine process of reproduction (till of consciousness) like a virus inside an egg see evolution of an embryo. We are microscope beings in relation to the universe.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to unclethermo (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

single cell organism’s from chemical reactions, research the theories instead of asking people on youtube…

kegstar4mma in reply to DarkHoundNero (Show the comment) 9 minutes ago

Certainly he knows the theory about “single cell organism’s from chemical reactions”from high school. If he is asking how life began is because he does not accept this theory. Why hydrogen cyanide separated from the Prussian blue and linked to ammonia for resulting in adenine if it never happens and any other situation? The theory suggests it was due pure chance, which is a hypothesis not falsiable. He is in his right.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to kegstar4mma (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

Alma 14:124 “Yea, and my joy is carried away, even unto boasting in my God; for he has all power, all wisdom, and all understanding; he comprehendeth all things, and he is a merciful Being even unto salvation, to those who will repent and believe on his name.”

One of my favorites. Makes me feel happy. :)

bigjoegamer09 10 minutes ago

So you will educate your kids saying to them they are sinner and needs repent? Ok, we must respect the way you want to educate yours children, but, please, never tell this thing to my kids and does not force it into schools, because I am sure this is very prejudicial to the self-esteem of my kids.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to bigjoegamer09 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

ok, well, answer this qustion, if we came from life, and they say we came after the big bang theory, how did life start?

from whatever beginning of time they claim the big bang happened

how does life come from nothing?

if the first organism was brouht into existence and started repopulating

how could it be alive?

life just doesnt start from nothing, it had to be given it

DarkHoundNero in reply to parsivalshorse 2 minutes ago

When we have no enough data for provide an answer about any natural phenomena the logic is searching in Nature parameters, patterns. Because nature has its laws for doing natural things, and maybe there are patterns from where we can learn those laws. So, a good parameter for yours questions: Nature did your own body starting by an “explosion” ( abrupt opening of spermatozoon membrane), your life came from yours parents existing before that explosion. And they are “natural”. Any question?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to DarkHoundNero1:55 AM – Wed – 10

XXX

And today we have separated the two fields of study into clearly defined “abiogenesis” and “evolution.” There is even an informal and outdated “law” in the study of evolution called “biogenesis” in which it is given that life is only formed from other life.

As you have been informed twice now that abiogenesis and evolution are two separate fields of study, you will begin to be a liar yourself should you choose to repeat the claim that abiogenesis and evolution are the same field of study.

arthurjeremypearson in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

Lol… thanks! That’s why I am following this debate: every minute you learn something new. The difference between abiogenesis, biogenesis and evolution, very well explained.

There is a tentative for searching how those ancestors non-living systems could produce – directly and evolutionary – the first living cell system. The Matrix/DNA Theory found a theoretical solution: a model of the building block of ancient galaxies that’s half-mechanical/half-biologica­l. Maybe ToE will be cosmological.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to arthurjeremypearson (Show the comment) –  1:36 AM – Wed- 10

XXX

indicating outward velocity as if, say, from an explosion.

we beleive that god is eternal and there for exists outside of time

its an explanation and realy better than nothing

why answers are better than nothing

boldburrito, you believe in the Bible’s god,  and I must respect the freedom of beliefs.  But why are  you here? I have collected your writtens: “every scientist now agrees that time started at somewhere”, “what made the big bang how did something come from nothing?”, “we believe that god is eternal and there for exists outside of time”, ” its an explanation and really better than nothing”, “why answers are better than nothing”.  All of this is debatable. Are you trying to extrapolate it to public education?

XXX

YOUR COMMENT IS THE NON SEQUITUR FALLACY. ATHEISTS DID NOT INVENT GRAVITY, GEOMETRY, OR ANY OTHER FIELD OF STUDY. ANYONE CAN STUDY GOD’S CREATION TO REALIZE GOD USED SYMMETRY, PROPORTION, PURPOSEFUL DESIGN ETC. WHEN HUMANS DISCOVER THE THINGS GOD MADE AND GET SOME SUPERFICIAL UNDERSTANDING IT NO MORE SUPPORTS THE RIDICULOUS NOTION OF EVIL EVOLUTIONISM THAN ONE STUDYING THE INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINE WOULD. MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS DON’T AND CAN’T CONTRIVE LIFE OR ENGINES.

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to parsivalshorse (Show the comment) 2 minutes ago

“ANYONE CAN STUDY GOD’S CREATION TO REALIZE GOD USED SYMMETRY”

So, symmetry is used by creationists as argument for magical creation? Sorry, it is not. Symmetry is result of a natural force that had been always present when Nature developed a new specie of systems. So, this force has been a systemic function and its mathematical number is phi, considered the golden ratio. Go to see the Matrix/DNA formula for systems, you will see there is no magical action for producing symmetry.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

YOU’RE A ROYAL BUFFOON. YOU JUST TOLD A FANCIFUL STORY. HAVE YOU SEEN NATURAL FORCES I.E. WIND, RAIN, THUNDER & LIGHTENING MAKE LIFE? MINDLESS AND LIFELESS CHEMICAL ELEMENTS CAN’T AND DON’T CONTRIVE LIFE OR CARS, BOATS, HOMES ETC.

DID YOU WAIT FOR NATURAL FORCES TO MAKE YOU A COMPUTER?

WHY DO YOU TALK ABOUT AND SAY THINGS THAT ARE IDIOTIC WITHOUT CRITICAL THINKING?

HISTRUTHBEKNOWN in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 1 hour ago

But you have not search the Matrix/DNA formula as I suggested for you learn how I based my arguments about where bi-lateral symmetry seen here is coming from. You have jumped to the conclusion that mine is “a fanciful history”, without knowing the foundations of that argument. This is the way you are dealing with origins of life, universe. etc.? Jumping to conclusions without searching the data collected by Science and/or empiricism? Sorry, in this way is not possible an educated debate.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 second ago

A computer is not a living creature…Completely wrong comparison..

TheRainmaker2001 in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 59 minutes ago

By the way, computer are made by humans, and if humans are not a natural force, I don’t know what else they are…

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to TheRainmaker2001 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

And he says: “ALL THE ELEMENTS OF YOUR BODY AREN’T ALIVE LIKE THOSE IN A COMPUTER” . Is he suggesting something like the vital force as suggested by Pasteur – but is he suggesting this vital force coming from a magical god? If so, he does not know the strong evidence that the “vital force” was existing before life’s origins, animating the ancestors systems and there are strong evidences that it is encoded in a single wave of natural light. Ah..ah…now you are saying: this guy is also crazy!

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXX

what makes you atheist so sure that there is no God. science says nothing on the subject.

itsoriginalme 3 days ago

That’s right. Science doesn’t prove a thing. It only disproves.

Disproves stuff like talking snakes and “stopping the sun in the sky” and a worldwide flood.

Science is a knife that cuts away falsehoods, leaving something that’s the closest we can get to the truth.

God, spirits, and the supernatural might exist, but science says nothing about them. It all comes down to if you accept unfounded claims of magic, or not.

And if you do accept magic, I got a bridge I want to sell you.

arthurjeremypearson in reply to itsoriginalme 48 minutes ago

They are not unfounded claims most are founded on personal evidence granted that it is not testable but, it does not mean the claims are not valid. It just seems unlikely. The story of Adam and Eve is an allegory even though there are some who believe in it literal interpretation. Mass Christianity however recognizes that the story is an allegory

itsoriginalme in reply to arthurjeremypearson 1 minute ago

If it is allegory, must have a real event/fact that support the message in that allegory. What’s the real event/fact related to the narrative about Adam and Eve?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to itsoriginalme 9:39 PM – MOn – OCT – 08

It is a story of how original sin came in to play and mankind gain free will independently of God. There also moral to the story that making something forbidden only makes people want all the more.

itsoriginalme in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 46 seconds ago

No, it is not “a story of how original sin came in to play”. The discipline of History in school there is anything related with this story. If you have discovered some real event/fact that in the past there was a ordered/perfect world, there was human beings or other lifeforms, these beings did something wrong and had a fall …. you need send it for peer-review. I elaborated a testable theory of a real event/fact for that allegory, it seems related to real event, do you want know it?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to itsoriginalme (Show the comment) 1 second ago

i’m listening

itsoriginalme in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 2 minutes ago

Ok. There was a real world as described allegorically. In this world were living our ancestors, they did a “sin”, and they felt towards planets and they drove abiogenesis, still driving our evolution. This world is rational, scientifically testable, and I have its pictured model. It is the result of a method: comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems. Since Science has not got all data about that space/time, still is a naturalistic philosophical theory. Do want know more?

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to itsoriginalme (Show the comment) 1 second ago

XXXX

You see I’m going to have to disagree with Bill’s biased opinions, I think that all children should know things so that they can make there own informed decisions about life rather than being forced into one thing or another. They choose religion one must accept that, if one follows science then so be it.

MrDevin712

You are right accordingly with my personal viewpoint, which must be no totally right accordingly to the final Truth. This debate is between two extreme opposite world views – theists and atheists – and your suggestion means you are in the middle, like me. The question of this video is too much important, it is about the chose of the destiny of human kind. We in the middle need our voice be heard also, but all that came here suddenly disappears. We need here a list for subscribers. Or not?

Austriak1 in reply to MrDevin712 9:39 PM – MOn – OCT – 08

XXX

@DarwinsFriend Yes, let’s everyone rebel and become kings. There would be no inhabitants in our own personal kingdoms though since everyone one is king of their own inhabitantless kingdom as well. We will turn the universe into a hell. Or did you think you would deny one single individual the rebellion you enjoy? Party on, alone.

John Brown 21 minutes ago

Wrong. We, evolutionists don’t want to be kings. We want to rebel against any gods as described on the Bible, against humans’ gangs that gets money and power based on the rules of predators/prey observed in this chaotic and salvage biosphere, we want the universal human family as dreamed by a man, Jesus Christ. Everybody is our brooder with equal rights and obligations, every mother is our mother, every child is our child… This is the great cause of Humanity, going to its own transcendence.

Austriak1 in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago – 9:39 PM – MOn – OCT – 08

All this without authority right?

John Brown in reply to Austriak1 51 minutes ago

I don’t want be authority, I don’t want followers, employees, nobody below me, I want partners. If someone or a group want different, think different, no problem, keep their space and respect our space. Any social system that needs nucleus and periphery, predator and prey, any kind of authority, is based in the formula of closed systems, or dispersion opened system, which is a non-complete and related to past times of evolution shape of the ideal natural universal formula. Yes, no authority.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 19 minutes ago

@Louis Charles Morelli Sounds ideal but what do we do with those who refuse to play along? They say they don’t want partnership but war. What do we do and by who’s authority?

John Brown 3 minutes ago

Of course, first of all we need a cohesive group. Second we need to choose: let’s stay here among them or chose a separated place for living? Third: we need work hard for to be prepared for our self-defense. Fourth: while developing ourselves – materially and intellectually – we begins to ignore them – no business with them. And so on… While we don’t do nothing about this “dream” we need participate in this kinds of debate for not permitting any group getting the power. Snakes swelling snakes.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

@Louis Charles Morelli So unresolved disagreement means separation, like in a marriage. How long, unless disagreements cease, before we’re all separated? And, a military without a chain of command? Also, it’s death for those who don’t want partnership? Guess they weren’t free to rebel.

John Brown 4 minutes ago

Needs separation because the two groups, certainly, if one gets power, will make life here insupportable and self-destroyed. Atheism would leads to a kind of “Brave new World”ruled by a Big Brother, cutting our dreams about “to be something else more than apes” which is a mind-stopper. Theism would permit that the normal evolution of Nature with its normal changes caught us non prepared by Science, because they lives based in the “supernatural”. We need evolving but keeping our mind free.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

We will be separated – living at the same or different places – only temporary. We will joining together because we will develop the right Science and the right technology, we will have better society while they will be in trouble.Today technology is not for humans welfare because technology arises every time we discover new natural process/mechanism and Science is selecting some data and discriminating others due be driven by profit. They are our brothers in species, we will save them.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

@Louis Charles Morelli I’m having a hard time understanding you, are you translating from another language? Anyway, I don’t completely disagree with your utopian idea but you haven’t given me any realistic method to accomplish it. How will men ‘get along’?

John Brown 4 minutes ago

Sorry, English is not my native language, I am still learning. I think you have not read my two last posts to you. I think there is a possibility for human kind solving these actual problems that are leading us to out of control. A new big discovery about real Nature, about the meaning of our existence. This discovery would be the right drive towards a new worldview with new moral, where each human being will be part of solution. There is a scientific method that can leads us to this discovery:

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

@Louis Charles Morelli Oashpe? Scientology? Too naive and vague for today’s problems. So enlightening it’s blind.

John Brown 17 seconds ago

Nope, I don’t approve Oashpe and scientology. The worldview that I think is more rational and explains better our existence is TheMatrix/DNA Theory, but I don’t believe in it also. I need a world view now for driven my behavior but I cant believe in anything created by this little human brain when I remember the size and age of this Universe. I am still searching…

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

@Louis Charles Morelli I take that to mean that humankind doesn’t have the answer right now and I agree. Salvation won’t come from the mind of men and science. It came from above this world and Christians like me are saying “comprehend the light in the darkness (Christ) and take hold while you have the chance to choose life”.

John Brown 1 minute ago

Sorry, I can’t agree with this organized religion called “Christianism” because the real world I have seen in my life’s experience is suggesting to me that this religion is wrong. Christians are not real Christians I think and Jesus Christ said lots of wrong things and I don’t believe he was a son of God’s Bible.But Jesus said the most beautiful and lovely phrase: The universal sacred family is not this nuclear family but one where all brothers are my brothers, etc. Science is the unique hope.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

@Louis Charles Morelli I take that to mean that humankind doesn’t have the answer right now and I agree. Salvation won’t come from the mind of men and science. It came from above this world and Christians like me are saying “comprehend the light in the darkness (Christ) and take hold while you have the chance to choose life”.

John Brown 1 minute ago

I have post a comment answering this one. But let’s take this good example you said:”comprehend the light in the darkness (Christ)”. Yes, since light seems to be a universal constant, it should be the treasure keeping the secrets of universe and human existence. Comprehend what is light and finding all existent sources of light is the supreme goal. But you stop doing it when you think you know the mystery: you said “Christ”. Meanwhile my research of light is suggesting it has the code for life.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Mark 3:35 “For whoever does the will of God is My brother and My sister and mother .” We don’t get to decide which parts of God’s word works us while we reject the rest. It’s either all valid and important or none of it is . You wouldn’t have it any other way would you ?

John Brown in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes ago

God never said direct to me or to my parents or to my grandparents, to nobody that I know, what is his will. Why not? I am not a son of God equal others human beings? Why he talks with one son and not with other? My understanding about good fathers is that they does not discriminates their sons. So, it is most probable that my brother who said that god talked to him is lying. What will work for us, for our next generations? I have my opinion based in my life’s experience, anything else.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

@Louis Charles Morelli Searching? There is nothing else but Jesus.

John Brown 3 minutes ago

So Jesus is a searching-stopper. Who accepted Jesus and follow Jesus has arrived to the ultimate Truth. Does not need searching anymore. It means this being arrives to the ultimate shape and from now it will be eternal. I would not support eternity in this weak and stupid shape of human species. I know, you will say that the eternal is not human shape, but, the soul(spirit) shape. It is not rational to believe that we have soul and humans can ending the evolution of souls. No evidences.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

So you don’t believe because you don’t understand or accept His actions in a matter? Are you your father’s judge or authority?

John Brown in reply to Louis Charles Morelli 4 minutes ago

I never will accept that a father talks to one son and not with other. If my father do that, I go out of that house and never will see him again. It means he does not love me. That’s was my position when I began concluding that the Bible (the book of the Christian community where I grew up) is merely fiction. Then, I did my own search about the meaning of universe’s and human existence. Today I keep the possibility of having a superior kind of consciousness and why it does not talks to humans.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

The bible indicates that people will reject the truth in favor of appealing doctrines of malevolent beings. I can’t stress how important it is to be careful and pray for guidance. Your eternal destiny depends on it. Please.

John Brown in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 1 minute ago

A book does not indicates anything, the author does. The intention of this author is clear: he was advocating a doctrine, he want more people following the doctrine and is trying to keep the people that is already indoctrinated. He believes in that doctrine? Maybe yes but certainly nod guided by Reason. He is guided by natural instinct of survival and selfishness which approves privileged status for him, approves authority of ones over others, and avoids his obligation for doing the hard work..

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

My will ?! First of all, since I was born I never had an opportunity to apply my will. I was born in the wrong place, in the wrong time, and earned a body that seems merely an ape, less able to survive. The most bad design. And a human civilization that mimics the rules of the jungle, shared into predators and preys.That is why I choose early not reproduce me, I made myself the job of evolution, discarding what must be discarded.

Course I will select what I think operates better as you does.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

I lean completely on the bible . You rely on your own wisdom which is limited by it’s comparative lack of knowledge.

John Brown in reply to Louis Charles Morelli (Show the comment) 3 minutes ago

No, you not lean in the Bible, you lean on what the authors of a book wrote. Who were those authors? 3.000 years ago? Yes, of course, I prefer lean on my poor and faulting knowledge than on the thousands minor knowledge of that authors. That’s why I am still searching knowledge, but the unique source for knowledge I believe is Mother Nature. I don’t approve the fact that Jesus worked as a searching-stopper for you, because you will not helping me to fix what I think is wrong.

Louis Charles Morelli in reply to John Brown (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Adendos Começam Aqui:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Excelente Esclarecimento da Diferença Entre Abiogenesis, Biogenesis, e Evolução:

And today we have separated the two fields of study into clearly defined “abiogenesis” and “evolution.” There is even an informal and outdated “law” in the study of evolution called “biogenesis” in which it is given that life is only formed from other life.

As you have been informed twice now that abiogenesis and evolution are two separate fields of study, you will begin to be a liar yourself should you choose to repeat the claim that abiogenesis and evolution are the same field of study.

arthurjeremypearson in reply to HISTRUTHBEKNOWN (Show the comment) 1 hour ago

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Against Creationism/ID

What’s malevolent, evil, & vile about the biblical god? Where shall I start? Maybe drowning a planet, sending fire bombs on a couple of cities, murdering the firstborn of Egypt for his own glorification, considering burning his chosen people & needing a mere man (Moses) to set him straight, sending his son down to be murdered so that he could forgive people their transgressions instead of just forgiving them. God is a total douche bag who despite his omniscience couldn’t teach a dog to bark.

ExtantFrodo2 14 seconds ago

“Slaves, obey your earthly masters with fear and trembling, with a sincere heart, as you would Christ” Ephesians 6:5

“Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to win their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord.” Colossians 3:22

“Christians who are slaves should give their masters full respect so that the name of God and his teaching will not be shamed.” 1 Timothy 6:1

So much for that.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

SÔBRE EDUCAÇÃO DAS CRIANÇAS, NAS ESCOLA E FAMILIAS

Public school teachers and administrators shouldn’t allow creationism, which is a religious ideology, to be presented in classes or other officially sponsored school activities (assemblies, field trips, etc.). Unfortunately, we can’t always trust school administrators to do the right thing. Whether through ignorance or malice, creationism slips in and complaints from parents come too late.

IDisnotscience 21 minutes ago

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Informações Valiosas

Ohno stated, “The earth is strewn with fossil remains of extinct species; is it a wonder that our genome too is filled with the remains of extinct genes?”1 Due to his evolutionary presupposition, he assumed that non-coding DNA was merely a “genetic fossil” that may have been useful somewhere in our evolutionary past but had been discarded as we evolved into more complex, higher organisms. Since this “junk” DNA was no longer needed,

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Contra Evolução/Ciência

Hmmmm, science is the gathering of evidence and basing conclusions on that evidence. So technically evolution can’t be at the core of science because it would bend the scientists thoughts on a subject towards it. And that’s bad science. Just a thought.

Filosofia Existencial: Invenção da Oração dos Agnósticos

segunda-feira, junho 11th, 2012

Hoje durante meu período de meditação inventei um tipo de oração. Como sou agnóstico, óbviamente esta é uma oração agnóstica. Vou jogá-la de chôfre, depois se tiver tempo explico cada detalhe, cada significado de cada palavra.

Antes de qualqier julgamento, peço que pense no seguinte:

Há 4 bilhões de anos atrás, a superficie dêste planeta era estéril, via-se apenas água, rochas, gêlo, nuvens, vales, montanhas. Os unicos movimentos eram causados pelos ventos e ondas nos oceanos. Um silêncio que parecia eterno. Nada mais. Demos um salto no tempo e voltamos aqui agora, 4 bilhões de anos depois. Vemos muitas novidades, mas uma nos interessa aqui: na superficie se movem sete bilhões de cabeças e cada qual possui algo que vamos denominar “auto-consciência”. Nosso problema agora é saber o que aconteceu nêstes 4 bilhões de anos de nossa ausência, que produziu esta novidade. Numa coisa tenho que apostar, se quero continuar a buscar respostas para as existências e pelo método naturalista: o potencial para produzir a auto-consciência estava aqui, no meio da matéria terrestre, a 4 bilhões de anos atrás ( não me venha dizer que não estava aqui e sim no sistema solar, ou não no sistema solar, e sim na galáxia, ou não na galáxia, e sim numa dimensão super-natural – pois se assim for, não tenho como procurar nestes lugares, mas não vou deixar de procurar onde posso agora). Então quando descrevemos acima o estado do planeta naquela época fomos incompletos: havia muito mais. Esta falha vai agora nos dar muito trabalho, vamos ter que descobrir onde e como estava êste  potencial.

Êste potencial devia ser constituído de fôrças e elementos naturais. Outra coisa é possivel: se Gaia não é consciente, ela tinha em si o potencial para gerar em si a consciência. Então, assentado que Gaia tem algo a ver com consciência, e sabido que consciência tem algo a ver com o cérebro humano, podemos inferir um quadro de Gaia hoje:

Gaia é constituída de um nucleo denso envolvido por uma camada circular atmosférica. Existe em Gaia sete bilhões de porções auto-conscientes. Estas porções não são fixas, se movem, e não se situam como parte do nucleo denso, nem como parte da atmosfera, está mais ou menos na linha fronteiriça, mais para o lado da atmosfera. Se Gaia e cérebro produzem consciência, algo os dois tem em comum, vejamos então uma comparação de formas:

No cérebro existem neuronios; em Gaia existem algo como que “bolhas plasmicas”. No cérebro os neuronios se comunicam, através de sinapses; em Gaia as bôlhas não se comunicam diretamente, não existem sinapses, mas existe uma comunicação difusa através de sinais que se propagam através da matéria de Gaia, contendo emissores e receptores. No cérebro os neuronios estão em posições fixas; em Gaia as bôlhas sem movem. No cérebro os neuronios tem uma duração de existência igual ao do cérebro; em Gaia as bôlhas tem uma duração de existência muito mais reduzida que Gaia, porem estas bôlhas se reciclam e com isso mantem um estado semi-consciente do todo. Bingo! É por aqui que vai minha oração.

ORAÇÃO AGNÓSTICA

Deitado e em posição de relaxamento total, inspira-se todo ar possivel. Antes de solta-lo abre-se a boca e deixa o ar sair pelas cordas vocais, os sons sendo modelados pela mente no método da sua linguagem. Êstes sons modelados levando palavras são ondas emitidas a partir de seu corpo e tenha-se a esperança de que estas ondas perturbem a paz do corpo maior e mais imediato em que existes. A êste corpo maior dá-se o nome de “Gaia” e Gaia é imaginado como a esfera de matéria densa que constitui o nucleo dêste planeta mais a faixa atmosférica que envolve esta esfera. Assim como seu corpo é constituido de um nucleo material denso e uma porção de algo menos denso denominado “mente”, Gaia é constituida da esfera sólida mais a faixa anelada envolvente atmosférica mo meio da qual existem hoje sete bilhões de porções mentais, e estas porções mentais são como os neuronios de Gaia, e êstes neuronios humanos mentais se comunicam criando sinapses, estas sinapses como relampagos contínuos criam uma espécie de nuvem de luz constante, esta nuvem constante é a consciencia de Gaia, a qual é a camada de inconsciente coletivo composta pela mente da humanidade e talvez tambem dos animais.

Assim como seu corpo contem 10 trilhões de bactérias e virus que executam funções que o mantem vivo, Gaia  tem sua camada mental constituida por 7 bilhões de bactérias mentais – e talvez de bactérias mentais inferiores que são os outros animais. Assim como seu corpo tem necessidades e busca nutrientes no mundo externo, Gaia-mental tem suas necessidades e busca seus nutrientes no espaço externo dentro do sistema solar, inclusive nutrientes que existem dentro do sistema solar mas que vem da galáxia.

Que nutrientes Gaia-mental precisa? O seu corpo precisa de imediato nutrientes que façam seu corpo funcionar e funcionar como sistema perfeito. Gaia precisa de tais ingredientes para que seu todo funcione, a mantem viva, e funcione de maneira mais perfeita possível. Estes nutrientes perfeitos são oriundos do sistema galáctico, pois a galaxia é um sistema que funciona como uma maquina perfeita. Mas estes nutrientes não são oriundos da matéria densa e sólida ou gasosa do corpo da galáxia, e sim da identidade, da mente da galaxia como sistema. Resumindo, Gaia existe como um sistema novo e pequeno acossado por perturbações dentro de um sistema maior, mais idoso e menos acossado por perturbações. O que Gaia precisa é dessas particulas ou ondas-informação geradas pelo estado existencial dêste sistema maior, mais idoso e menos perturbado. Cujo sistema maior, deve ter suas perturbações e busca particulas, ondas mentais que formam a identidade sistemica de outro corpo ainda maior, talvez sob o nome demos a êle, Universo.

Se uma bactéria necessitada e infeliz dentro de seu corpo conseguisse sua atenção e comunicar-se contigo, seria facil para ela ter seus problemas resolvidos. E voce teria interesse em ajuda-la a resolver seus problemas, pois ela é como sua escrava, ela trabalha para que funciones. Então eu, na posição de bactéria em relação a Gaia, tenho que tentar me fazer notar e encontrar uma maneira de me comunicar com Gaia. Preciso dos nutrientes que expulsem as particulas que estão me causando disfunções e se assentem para que eu, como sistema, funcione o mais próximo possivel como funciona o sistema de mais longa vida que é Gaia.

Como me fazer notar? Como é que seu cérebro e mente nota algum ponto dentro de seu corpo que normalmente não é notado? Se este ponto emitir alguma onda de perturbação do sistema que é seu corpo, uma onda que produza um efeito notável, na forma de dor ou de satisfação, como um formigamento, uma coceira. Vou experimentar uma idéia, esta experiencia é o que denomino “oração”. Solto todo ar dentro do corpo na forma de onda sonora modelada pela mente na forma de linguagem levando uma mensagem. É quase impossivel que Gaia capte isso, mas existem outros fatores que me induzem a suspeitar que existe a possibilidade, que eu como um ponto dentro do corpo de Gaia, emita algo que me faça notar por ela.

Um destes fatores é que a camada atmosférica de Gaia é inundada pela luz do Sol e uma menor quantidade de luz das estrelas mais distantes, tudo, em seu conjunto, compondo a luz da galaxia. É nessa luz que existe as informaçoes da identidade sistemica da galaxia, a qual tem o poder de impor a ordem às suas partes dentro de si mesma que as mantem como sistema em equilibrio perfeito (quase-perfeito, em relação ao Univero; o qual tambem é quase-perfeito em relação ao corpo do algo mais no qual está contido).

Quando emito esta onda sonora modelada na forma de linguagem, dentro das palavras vão forças produzidas pela minha mente, a qual é a camada atmosférica do meu corpo fisico, a qual tambem deve ter suas particulas e ondas sistemicas. Então aposto na possibilidade que identidades de sistemas se captem e se comuniquem. Nesno quando existe enorme distancia dos niveis evolutivos, de complexidades, de grandezas espaço-temporais entre tais sistemas, pois eu como um sistema consigo me comunicar com um cachorro que é um sistema inferior a mim.

Portanto devo fazer a experiencia, repeti-la muitas vêzes e aguardar se ocorrem efeitos, resultados. A esperiencia vai na forma de oração que tento me lembrar como minha mente a modela e transcrevê-la aqui:

“Gaia! Tu és como uma bolha que surgiu, vai permanecer por alguns segundos do tempo cósmico, e vais desaparecer. Existes composta por dois estados da matéria, um muito denso que forma sua esfera nuclear, e outro menos denso que forma sua faixa atmosférica como uma membrana, e dentro desta membrana existem bolhas minusculas auto-conscientes as quais dão a ti um estado de semi-consciencia. Dentro de ti existem estas bilhões de bolhas, suas cópias em miniatura, que surgem e desaparecem muito mais rapidamente que ti, mas existes como semi-consciencia porque estas bolhas constituintes se reciclam, mantendo uma perpetuidade. Eu sou uma destas bactéria-bolhas mentais que existe dentro de ti. Estou te chamando, porque acho que devemos estabelecer um sistema de trocas, porque acho que êste sistema pode ajudar a ti e a mim. Vamos nos ajudar mutuamente? Sua sobrevivencia e progresso como entidade mentalizada dependerá do periodo de sobrevivencia e progresso das bolhas mentais da qual faço parte.

Quero te ajudar! Quero ser uma bactéria trabalhadora que faça aqui dentro o melhor possivel para que funciones como sistema o mais perfeito e em equilibrio possivel. Se possivel a mim, farei naves para buscar no espaço exterior ingredientes que necessitas. Se me ajudares, prometo que tentarei convencer as outras sete bilhões de bolhas a se comportarem desta mesma maneira benéfica a ti. Necessitas algo agora que pensas que eu posso fazê-lo? Procure uma maneira de me comunicar, a atenderei com toda satisfação.

O fato de eu poder me manter mais tempo vivo, se comportando como queres, mantendo-a mais tempo viva… O fato de eu procurar melhorar minha condição sofrida atual e progredir, pode ser orientado para ações que a mantenha mais tempo viva, e a ajude a progredir mais rapidamente na solução dos seus obstaculos.

…..

O saco! O trabalho lá fora me chama, não pode esperar mais, tenho que interromper isso agora. Mas antes quero dizer algo. Isso aqui me parece loucura, se a faço é porque quero fazer experiencias. Porem talvez esta técnica surtisse realmente um efeito se fôsse praticada ao mesmo tempo pelos sete bilhões de humanos. O fato relevante a ter em mente é que nossos corpos são feitos dos mesmos átomos que é feita tôda matéria do Universo. Nós somos assim porque os atomos que constituem nossos corpos estão combinados de uma maneira especifica, particular. E não vemos na matéria do Universo a fonte da força que leva estes atomos a se combinarem desta maneira que produza o que chamamos “consciencia”. Ou mente. Já decifrei qual é a força que atua sobre atomos e monta sistemas como nossos corpos de carne e osso, mas existe outra força mais fundamental que ainda não captei, e é esta que produz esta sensação pratica de consciencia. Talvez esta força venha por ondas formando dimensões, e talvez numa destas passagens formem esta suposta semi-conciencia constituida da camada mental que reveste a superficie da Terra. Vou experimentar este talvez. Afinal, não tenho por ora nenhum outro lugar mais importante para onde ir… mentalmente. Não me venha dizer que “você tem que ir para um hospício” , pois não adiantará, eu não vou.

xxx

Atenção! Cuidado!

Eu não tenho capacidade e honestidade suficiente para obedecer o agnosticismo puro, portanto minha cosmovisão é um agnosticismo tendencioso, puxado por uma ideologia. Acredito que no atual estado de evolução da espécie humana todos os indivíduos possuam sua ideologia íntima, tendenciosa, mesmo que inconscientemente, a qual é inevitável. Uma deologia é baseada na escôlha e preferência pessoal de uma especifica “cosmovisão”, ou “visão de mundo e pessoal interpretação dos fatos e eventos reais”, em detrimento das demais interpretações e suas respectivas cosmovisões existentes. Um puro agnóstico seria aquêle que não tivesse preferência por nenhuma cosmovisão elaborada dentro da Humanidade, inclusive alguma elaborada por êle mesmo.

A minha cosmovisão escolhida e preferida denomina-se “A Matrix/DNA” e resumidamente é descrita pelo texto a seguir:

A COSMOVISÃO E IDEOLOGIA DA MATRIX/DNA

1) O Universo é palco de uma reprodução genética de um sistema ainda desconhecido existente antes/acima dêle, mas que certamente possui um atributo, o qual é alguma forma de mais evoluída “auto-consciência”;

2) Êste processo de reprodução é regulado pela Matrix/DNA, uma fórmula genética que carrega o çodigo para o ciclo vital imprimindo vida à matéria, fórmula essa que se expressa inicialmente na forma de partículas/ondas de luz e que evolui mudando de formas enquanto avança o processo de reprodução. A ultima forma conhecida da Matrix nêste nosso ponto do espaço-tempo é a forma do DNA biológico. Indícios sugerem que através do cérebro humano esteja emergindo uma nova forma mais complexa dessa fórmula, a qual está compondo uma nova forma do embrião universal. Assim a Matrix deve saltar para a forma de “DNA auto-consciente” e construir um novo sistema natural de substancia ainda desconhecida denominada “auto-consciência”.

3) O motivo da origem dos sistemas na forma biológica – denominados seres vivos – é um resultado natural da queda pela entropia de um ancestral na forma astronomica, o qual, já dotado de um principio de livre-arbitrio escolheu o caminho de se tornar um sistema fechado em si mesmo, o que interromperia os passos da evolução do processo da reprodução universal. As particulas-genes transmitidas nesta queda entrópica caem sôbre superficies de astros  e podem florescer se houver as condições ambientais favoraveis. O processo pós queda entrópica é sempre iniciado no estado de caos, com as criaturas no estado de “filhas da necessidade” e dividindo-se entre si a totalidade do êrro ideológico do ancestral, mas em parcelas diferenciadas entre si, o que faz com que cada criatura represente a ação de uma fração do êrro total, que conviva, se defronte e experimente os efeitos dolorosos das ações das outras frações do êrro total representadas pelos outros seres vivos. Assim, aprendendo através de suscessivas existencias de suas Matrix, a rejeitarem a ideologia ancestral, depura-se a totalidade da população com uma nova mutação caráter, personalidade, cosmovisão e ideologia. E assim como todos os genes dos pais biológicos, após construírem o corpo do filho, sobrevivem sempre e sobem e se assentam como células neuroniais constituindo uma só nova personalidade, assim todos os genes-autoconscientes do Universo serão reunidos formando uma só nova personalidade, para completar o processo da reprodução ocorrendo dentro dêste “ôvo cósmico”. Essa ultima personalidade será a forma final do embrião que irá à luz alem do Universo no dia do “Big Birth” e finalmente conhecerá seu/sua criador, o sistema ex-machine que aqui está sendo reproduzido.

4) A ideologia Humana da Cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA

Desde que os resultados dos modêlos teóricos sugerem que as galáxias primitivas originais foram/são um sistema que funciona como uma máquina, estúpida mas quase-perfeita, hermafrodita, que se recicla a si mesma eternamente, e que na sua entropia irradia suas partículas-informação na forma de fótons, e êstes fótons, espalhados no interior do corpo galáctico, treinados e condicionados no sistema-máquina, ao caírem nas superficies de planetas penetram seus átomos e tentam assumir o contrôle de sua maquinaria, para conduzi-los a se combinarem e formarem moléculas, compostos cada vez mais complexos, com o efeito final de reproduzir o sistema-maquina de onde vieram, salvas as mutações impostas pelo novo tipo de ambeiente e novos materiais disponiveis, inclusive um novo estado da matéria, o liquido. Assim resulta dentre os seres vivos uma evolução de formas, sendo que na Terra esta evolução/reprodução do ancestral astronomico chegou a um ponto máximo possível na forma de simios, mais exatamente na forma do “gorila”. Mas desde o ancestral símio o DNA biológico não mais registra acréscimos de complexidade fisica, porem mesmo assim o DNA tem crescido, sugerindo que algo está sendo acrescentado, e nossa opinião é que êstes registros se referem à evolução psicológica. Assim como aconteceu com dinossauros e acontece com tôdas as espécies e individuos que se sobressaem pelo uso da força dirigida pela ideologia herdada do ancestral galactico e inscrita em sua carga genética, cuja ideologia é se assentar em equilibrio termo-dinamico com elevado estado vibracional em territórios paradisiacos, super-especializando-se numa forma provisória de um modo de vida, e assim tornando-se um sistema fechado em si mesmo, e dirigindo tôdas suas fôrças e pensamentos para manter e conservar seu reino, mesmo com o recurso á violência contra semelhantes, tambem a forma de gorila foi abandonada pela evolução universal, a qual regrediu a buscar em simios menores e ainda necessitados, abertos e acessiveis à evolução, a espécie que teria seu cérebro desenvolvido e no qual emergiria a nova forma da Matrix, a auto-consciência. Portanto essa nossa cosmovisão gera sua inevitável nova forma de ideologia, a qual se baseia na crença de que a razão e objetivo supremo da vida humana é desenvolver o cérebro através da busca de conhecimentos sõbre todos os fenômenos naturais, cuja busca é dirigida pelos métodos cientificos reducionista, sistêmico, e filosófico naturalista, o qual é a tentativa de montar o quebra-cabeças dêste mundo funcionando em teorias cada vez mais próximas da Natureza real.

Cada parcela dêsse conhecimento de cada fração/operação da Natureza se torna no cérebro uma porção de substancia plasmica, a qual se constitui num tijolinho na construção do novo edificio da nova forma sistêmica da Matrix, por nós denominada “auto-consciência”. A auto-consciência de cada ser humano deve ser conectar cada vez mais com as demais auto-consciencias e a unificação final de tôdas elas nada mais será que todos os fenômenos naturais reunidos e recompostos numa só entidade, tôda a Natureza universal transcrita numa nova substancia, cujo produto final é a auto-consciência do próprio ser universal sendo aqui gerado.

5) Militância, Ativismo, Modêlo de Comportamento Individual e Social Humano:

O nosso objetivo supremo é ser um trabalhador como um gene, empregando tôdas nossas energias para desenvolver nosso cérebro nêsse sentido de busca e acumulo de conhecimentos sôbre os fatos/eventos da Natureza Universal, ao mesmo tempo que ajudar a desenvolver todos os cérebros humanos sem excessão, pelo mesmo método. É ser um vigilante e soldado se necessário fôr, agindo como os anti-corpos do sistema imunizador, contra as investidas da ideologia da máquina ancestral e aquilo ou aquêles que por ela está infectado e agem aqui representando seus interêsses. Contra a robotização e consequente estagnação da evolução cerebral. Contra qualquer aspecto do sistema social em que se notar cérebros humanos absorvidos em atividades mecanicistas, tais como fábricas de produção em série, lavouras de produção massiva baseada no trabalho escravagista, etc. Os cérebros humanos devem nascer livres da condição de filhos das necessidades básicas, para tanto tendo os seus produtos necessários feitos pelo trabalho da tecnologia automatizada.  E incentivados a substituirem as ocupações outrora voltadas para a satisfação das necessidades fisicas básicas, pelas ocupações que satisfaçam as necessidades intelectuais naturalistas, sem se entregarem ao ócio e orgias do sexismo e do consumismo. Temos que tentar atuar para libertar de qualquer situação ou aspecto de um sistema social, politico e economico, qualquer cérebro humano que fôr detectado estar sendo impedido na sua evolução, sem distinção de raça, cor, credo ou status social. Se o motivo, a causa, que esteja atrapalhando a evolução de um cérebro humano for outro cérebro humano, de alguma forma ao primeiro deve ser oferecido uma oportunidade de liberdade e condições materiais para exercer essa liberdade, e ao segundo visto como um paciente doente portador de um virus maligno inimigo da Humanidade, o qual deve ser boicotado em qualquer tipo de relações e mantido distante da nossa comunidade.

Mas jamais nos será permitido usar da violência agredindo primeiro, nem tentar impor pela fôrça ou maquinaões conspiratórias os comportamentos individuais e sociais eleitos pela nossa ideologia. Jamais esquecer que essa ideologia é passageira, que é apenas mais uma forma provisória da evolução, não correspondente à Verdade Ultima a qual ainda é nos inacessivel o entendimento por limitações fisicas do nosso cérebro e do conhecimento incompleto da Natureza Universal.  Quanto aos que não concordarem com nossa ideologia e quanto aos que não se comportarem segundo o modêlo de comportamentos ideais sugeridos pela cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA, devemos nos separar socialmente dêles, porem sem jamais vê-los como adversários ou inimigos desde que não invadam e agridam nossos espaços, ao contrário, devemos respeitar suas existências, comunidades, posses e territórios, inclusive observando seus progressos em suas ideologias, como sugestões para corrigir os êrros da nossa ideologia e aprimorá-los.  As portas de nossas comunidades estarão sempre abertas para receber e prover qualquer dêles que deseja passar ao nosso lado obedecendo nossos regulamentos. Cremos que a Natureza será a Juíza Final, pois ela entregará seus secretos mecanismos e processos que geram Ciências e tecnologias de maior poder à ideologia que mais de perto se sintonize com seu ritmo e sua realidade. A militancia deve ser dinamica e urgente haja visto a presente ameaça do rápido progresso que se está verificando do sistema social baseado no “Admirável Mundo Novo”, de Aldous Huxley, sob o dominio da “Big Mother”,  ou “Grande Rainha”, no estilo do “Big Brother” de George Orwel, que já se instalou na Terra na forma dos sistemas sociais de seres vivos como abelhas e formigas. Porque esta ameaça é indicadora da presença e fortalecimento da ideologia mecanicista e robotiizante e estancadora da evolução universal que vem do ancestral uma vez já derrubado pelo Universo antes das nossas origens vomo seres vivos, a qual está encriptada em nossa carga genética e no meio-ambiente de biosfera caótica que nos envolve, e tenta fazer as leis menores dos átomos que constituem nossos corpos dominarem e interromperem as leis maiores que investem no desenvolvimento do cérebro e embrião da auto-consciência. Tôdos os tópicos acima, inclusive os modêlos teóricos da cosmovisão e as bases da ideologia estão abertos a debates e devem ser mudados á medida que nosso conhecimento sôbre fatos naturais progride.

Louis C. Morelli


Movimento de Ateus e Agnósticos no Brasil

domingo, janeiro 29th, 2012

Hoje a Matrix/DNA está conhecendo pela primeira vez e iniciando análise dêsse movimento.

– Post da Matrix/DNA publicado:

Blog: “Paulopes”

http://www.paulopes.com.br/

Artigo: Ateus brasileiros vão realizar seu primeiro encontro nacional

quinta-feira, 19 de janeiro de 2012

xxx

Louis Morelli disse…

Agnósticos podem comparecer?

Se sim, algumas sugestões ao gôsto agnóstico:

1)Sem discursos tipo religiões, ditaduras,celebridades, doutores de conhecimentos, etc.: cada “falador” tem que parar imediatamente quando alguem da platéia levantar a mão para dizer/perguntar algo; Qualquer tema tem que ser aberto e participativo, sem dar oportunidade à imposição de ideologias, crenças, etc.

2)Não ficar apenas na pregação e debate estéril de idéias. Ter objetivos, metas e atas registrando as decisões votadas pela assembléia. Os objetivos não devem ser parasitários ao gôsto dos intelectuais de gabinete/computador mas sim de intelectuais dispostos a arregaçarem as mangas e sujar as mãos no trabalho produtivo de fato.

3) Não apenas discursos, ideologias, politica, denuncias do errado. Em paralelo à luta politica tem que ter a associação e cooperativa economica, para se fortalecer à altura dos adversários e se proteger em grupo contra as mafias corporativistas; Todo discursante que enveredar por êste caminho pode ser interrompido e perguntado qual o plano pratico imediato. O objetivo não pode ser individualista, ou de classes, tem que ser em nome da Humanidade e trocado a palavra “eu” pela palavra “nós”.

4) Não planejar construção de templos, que são os tronos dos manipuladores e predadores das massas. Para reuniões visando reunir o util ao agradavel e atração de curiosos, planejar construção de clubes sociais, com salas de debates, áreas ao ar livre, esportes, etc.

5) Espaço aberto aos que em qualquer canto, sala, queira demonstrar seu conhecimento/opinião sôbre quaisquer fenômenos e eventos naturais, os quais são as fontes de poder para tecnologias, incentivando a propagação do método cientifico mas não limitado ao jugo atual das ciências acadêmicas. Filosofia naturalista e experimentação por qualquer método deve ser aceito e estimulado.

6) Etc..

xxx

Sites pesquisando:

http://www.atea.org.br/index.php

xxx

Bôa essa!
xxx

Ateísmo e sua Perspicácia

xxx