Posts Tagged ‘Ateísmo’

Os Tres Conflitos Entre Deísmo, Ateísmo e Agnosticismo

quarta-feira, maio 3rd, 2017

xxxx

 

EVOLUÇÃO vs DEUS, documentário que enfurece ateus em todo o mundo. Assista! ( legendado em português)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDvi2defQEM

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli – Maio – 5/3/2017

O vídeo é uma farsa, como e’ uma covardia apelar pela falsa associação entre ateísmo e comunismo. Porem, os ateus merecem estes ataques. Pois ao invés de procurarem corrigir as falhas obvias nas Ciências que comprovariam a teoria moderna (neo-darwinista ou Moderna Síntese) que almeja explicar a diversificação das especies, e vem acoplada com a teoria da abiogêneses que almeja explicar as origens da vida na mesma linha logica sem ainda ter o respaldo cientifico, continuando o trabalho real investigativo na Natureza, dão o salto metafisico para fazer afirmações sobre o que ainda não foi alcançado por esta investigação. Ateísmo é fé metafisica, a outra face da moeda religiosa deísta. E quando a fé’ se instala, vão de choque com a fé oposta. Os dois grupos também rejeitam o agnosticismo e neste caso sim, é um conflito entre a presença de fé metafisica e ausência de qualquer tipo de fé metafisica.

Ateísmo Surgindo Numa Criança: Doutrinação?

segunda-feira, julho 18th, 2016

xxxxx

O vídeo abaixo trata do depoimento de uma criança de 8 anos sobre uma visão de mundo existente em outras mentes adultas humanas e chamada de ateísmo. E por algum motivo ( doutrinação, ou mutação genético-neuronial, etc.) ela pensa já ter decidido ser uma visão de mundo correta. Isto incomoda a visão de mundo chamada de Matrix/DNA, a qual ‘e minha preferida porem não aceita como Verdade Ultima, e por isso publiquei nos comentários do vídeo o seguinte post abaixo. A seguir exponho o link para outro vídeo como exemplo de como esta doutrinação se faz via Internet e tambem, a seguir, meu comentário publicado:

Post de Luois Morelli: 18/07/2016
Acredita na Ciência?! Mas a ciência apenas lida com os fatos que ela pode lidar ate agora, e ela mostra, comprova, estes fatos. E quando a Ciência lidou com a tal poeira que fez o mundo?! Quantos estudantes a Ciência levou ate aquele evento e provou que ele de fato aconteceu?
 
E’ triste ver uma mente ainda tao infantil, ingenua, de um ser já lastimável que foi produzido por esta biosfera caótica, condenada antes de nascer a morrer um dia… a um tipo de vida absurdo, sendo conduzida por adultos a aceitar sua debilidade e submeter-se ao mundo e sua existência como lhe foi imposta. Ela diz: “Eu vou morrer ( isto e’ fato comprovado cientificamente) – e tudo vai se acabar para mim – dizem os adultos meus sacerdotes (os quais nunca poderiam dizer isso enquanto a neurologia não explicar o que e’ a consciência e não explicar como os neurônios estão relacionados a mente e explicarem os milhões de fatos ocorridos no âmbito da parapsicologia, pois isto não e’ fato cientifico, isto e’ a “teoria” deles).
 
Deixem a mente das crianças livres. Livrem-nas da doutrinação mistica religiosa, porem nada ponham em seu lugar, nenhuma outra doutrinação, pois nenhum humano sabe nada e não tem autoridade para drogar suas mentes. Acreditar na Ciência e’ acreditar nos poucos fatos e limitados ao nosso imediatismo ambiente, a Ciência humana nunca saiu daqui para trazer alguma confirmação do que existe ou não existe em tempos e espaços alem de nossos ridículos horizontes. Ela esta acreditando em teorias cientificas, as quais existem apenas na mente de humanos e não na Ciência. Quem a enganou desta maneira?
 
Nos temos inimigos mortais. O maior terrorista e’ a forca que degenera corpos-sistemas levando-os a morte. Nos temos que investigar este inimigo incansavelmente para ir expulsando-o do nosso território, aumentando a nossa longevidade. Temos os inimigos que produzem este corpo débil, os que destroem nossos ambientes, etc. Nos temos que conduzir estes nossos corpos `a transcendência para uma forma cada vez mais eficiente e poderosa. Mas um deísta ou um ateísta se tornam inúteis nestas batalhas, porque se desviam para outros caminhos e aceitam passivamente a ação destes inimigos.
 
Teacher! Live our kids alone! – já dizia Pink Floyd, referindo-se a liberdade de cada um em elaborar sua própria visão do mundo.
xxxx
E um video exemplar de como esta sendo administrada esta doutrinacao via Internet: ( a seguir meu comentario postado no Youtube.

Por que sou ateu?

Louis Charles Morelli

Você deve saber que os fanáticos ateus de Mao invadem as propriedades e matam os monges do Tibet alegando que a religião deles e’ opio do povo. Stalin, outro ateu, fez o mesmo. Então, se você quer realmente um compromisso com a evolução da Humanidade, não fomente o ateísmo porque existem mentes fracas mas que podem tornarem-se ditadoras, usarem seus argumentos para as justificativas mórbidas deles e você não terá controle sobre eles.
E pare de usar o método cientifico, e seu nome mais arrogante – Ciência – como muleta para o ateísmo. A Ciência lida com fatos, mostra fatos e não tem opinião, principalmente sobre o espaço e o tempo que ela não alcançou ainda, mas sobre os quais a crença ateísta se fundamenta. Que a evolução seja um processo cego, que a admirável complexidade construída por partículas fundamentais,sejam meros produtos de uma sucessão fortuita de acasos, e’ uma valida teoria, porem ainda e’ uma “teoria”. Todas as teorias foram remendadas, modificadas, completadas, portanto, acreditar no estado atual de uma teoria, e disseminar esta crença, e’ o que as religiões misticas tem feito. E teoria não e’ um fato demonstrado cientificamente.
Você acredita na “gravidade”? Então o que você entende por gravidade? Se todas as forças naturais são dicotômicas – todas tem sua anti – qual e’ a anti-gravidade? Esta força que esta fazendo o Universo se expandir, ao invés de se contrair, como teria feito a gravidade? De que e’ composta a gravidade? Porque ainda não demonstraram sua partícula fundamental, teórica, o graviton?
Mas não use esta palavra intelectualmente elegante para impressionar-se a si mesmo, pois o que existe e todo humano, todo mistico religiosos sabe, ‘e que o que estiver solto no ar acima da Terra vai cair no solo. Se nenhum religioso e’ louco para saltar no ar, porque estas usando um argumento sem sentido? Como a gravidade se torna uma extensão dos campos eletromagnéticos dos corpos? Qual a ação da gravidade nos outros estados de densidade da matéria, como nos vários estados previstos pela String Theory e suas 11 dimensões?
Quando Newton teve a sua grande ideia da “gravidade”, ele o fez ao abandonar o chamado de descartes para a omnisciência, o inteiro conhecimento do todo, e admitiu que ele ignorava qual era o componente central de seu sistema – gravitação.
Acreditam em Deus e nada entendem de Deus, como acreditamos em gravidade mas não sabemos o que ela e’. Vamos aceitar a existência das forças de atracão e repulsão, mas dai transformar um conjunto teórico sobre estas forças com o nome de gravidade em ferramenta do acaso absoluto e’ perda do controle mental, porque a mecânica celeste de fantastica eficiente engenharia sugere que a fonte da gravidade pode ser qualquer outra coisa, menos o acaso. Algo contendo em si um principio de ordem e previsibilidade esta’ por trás da força gravitacional. Obviamente. E obviamente este algo esta acima das galaxias, onde a gravidade foi introduzida. E qualquer assunto relacionado ao “alem das galaxias” escapa totalmente ao nosso conhecimento, tudo o que se afira sobre aquele dimensão sera’ artigo de fê. Então a evolução cega, a complexidade produzida pelo acaso, tem que ser um estado de fê, mistico, religioso.
Você sabia da teoria que defende existirem seis faixas de orbitas em volta de uma estrela porque esta força que chamam de gravidade nada mais e’ que a força das ondas de luz emitidas pelas estrelas? E que estas ondas imitam as faixas de frequência vibracionais das ondas de luz, que cada planeta tem sua especifica medida vibracional, e por isso os planetas se movem dentro destas faixas especificas que coincidem com sua vibração? E que a Ciência ainda não tem como derrubar esta teoria? Mas ai a partícula fundamental seria o fóton ( este sim, já detectado) e não o graviton.
Eu prefiro a visão de mundo denominada Matrix/DNA Theory porque ela tem acertado mais que todas as outras, nas suas previsões. E esta teoria sugere que a enorme complexidade de hoje evoluída a partir da singularidade inicial o foi porque existe uma formula natural inserida nesta longa cadeia de causas e efeitos que vem rolando a 13,7 bilhões de anos. Mas desconhece-se a origem desta formula. Apenas se sugere que os sensores do cérebro humano não podem capta-la e portanto não pode processar esta informação e portanto ACREDITAR EM QUALQUER VISÃO DE MUNDO E’ IRRACIONAL. Seja deísta, ateísta ou outro diabo qualquer inventado pelos pequeninos e limitados cérebros humanos.
Devemos sim, criticar e não participar de maneira nenhuma destas organizações, mafias, religiosas. Mas o método correto e responsável de minar seus alicerces e’ investir mais na busca cientifica e mostrar os fatos reais. Eles por si só vão desmascarar as mentiras de hoje. E vão nos encaminhar para o caminho correto, a Verdade correta, que deve ser uma alternativa diferente da dicotomia “existe Deus, não existe existe Deus”. O que existe de fato nosso cérebro ainda não pode processar.

Novo Debate Entre Criacionistas e Ateus Sobre o Mistério das Existências e a Sugestão da Matrix/DNA

quarta-feira, julho 6th, 2016

xxxx

It takes a fool to deny the obvious

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2016/06/26/it-takes-a-fool-to-deny-the-obvious/#comment-845574

And my comment published at the Myers’ article:

The Matrix/DNA
July 6, 2016 – Amazon Jungle

Creationists and atheists world views are both “magical thinking” due a fundamental mistake: they are forgetting the naturalist systemic perspective. Any living thing is a system, a systemic biological organization of matter and energy. And systems can only coming from other system. Nobody had discovered a system coming from a part or piece of a system, neither from something not belonging to a system.
So, the first amino-acids were systems in itself, made by atoms systems and this astronomical system. Since that atoms system are too much simple, and galactic systems are lots more complex, the logic’s suggests that amino-acids were a production of astronomic nanotechnology, like human genome, chromosomes,ovules, are products of human natural nanotechnology.

Following this line of logic’s we got a new world view called Matrix/DNA where a new theoretical astronomical and atomic model fits just as the ancestors of the first living cell.

Now the problem would be:but the first system, be it an atom or an elemental particle composed by other smaller particles as a system, where it came from?

We found that all these natural systems were made by a unique natural formula. Then, we found that any universal set of radiation performing a light wave has the same formula for systems. Conclusion? The forst natural system in this Universe and perceptible dimension was a light wave.

Where the light wave came from? No other simplest thing in this Universe was detected as ” the light wave producer”. Our method of rationalization is suggesting that the first natural light wave worked as the genome of some ex-machine entity. If so, this Universe is merely a kind of egg where is occurring a natural process of genetic reproduction of the systemic thing that produced it. Is is God? If you want call it by that name, remember that it is not magical, it does things by natural process. Is is a big absolute chance? If you want call it by tat name, remember that it is a phenomena that is being reproduced exactly like it happened once, so, when this process arrive to an end, it will not be the absolute chance, because it would be an event that has been repeated.

What matters here is the final moral concept from this world view: we are 8 billion genes plus trillion of genes spread in this Universe building a kind of baby. So, each of us – as gene – has a unique, specific, not mimicked, not able to be stolen – information. It is our mission and we are not conscious about that. If one of us dies not do his/her job, the baby will born handicapped. So, let yours brother free for doing its mission. If creationism, atheism or Matrixism are wrong interpretations of this world, our inner mission will correct our wrong beliefs. And we got correction every time that we learn something new about the Universal Nature. That’s why I made the Amazon jungle my second house: there are plenty of natural phenomena for learning there.

 

Uma Grande Mentira do Professor Ateu E’ Combatida com outra Mentira do Padre: O que aconteceu com os Dinossauros.

terça-feira, junho 2nd, 2015

xxxxx

(desculpem os erros gramaticais devido a pressa e estar usando um keyboard que so fala inglês)

Os materialistas da academia cientifica estão brabos porque quando um estudante digita uma busca no Google como ^ O que aconteceu com os dinossauros^, o Google aponta como primeiro da lista de resultados um anuncio postado pelos criacionistas da academia cientifica dizendo que o curriculum escolar esta’  errado porque os ateus dizem que os dinossauros e’ a prova de que a Terra tem mais de 6.000 anos enquanto isso não e’ verdade e bla-bla… repete-se a velha guerra entre ateus e religiosos cada qual querendo puxar as Ciências para a sua brasa.

No link a segui podes ver o artigo, e também o comentário que postei no artigo. Eu digo que os ateus evolucionistas provocaram esse problema porque também cometeram erros crassos ao inserirem nos curriculuns absurdos teóricos  se fazendo passar por ciências confirmadas, como e’ a hipótese de que os dinossauros desapareceram devido a um meteorito gigante ter caído bem em cima da cabeça deles, quando na própria teoria darwinista da evolução que explicam razoavelmente o processo pelo qual espécies que adotam os comportamentos como os dinossauros são descartados pela natureza e condenados a extinção. O feitico vira contra o feiticeiro…

What happened to the dinosaurs?

http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2015/05/26/what-happened-to-the-dinosaurs/#comment-622014

Image result for images of dinosaurs

E o meu comentário postado no artigo:

  1. #46 Louis Morelli
    New York
    June 2, 2015

To evolutionists: You asked it, you got it. You are applying the wrong method and this is the opportunity that creationits are using against you.Inserting into the scholar curriculum that dinossaurs were extinct due a meteor is not Science, it is a sensacionalist theory. It is like an appeal to magics, to supernatural, which permits that others inserts their magical thinking into the curriculum.

I don~t know who did it because it was not necessary. There is an evolutionary process by which any species that grows in the wrong natural way, that acomodates in a kind of super-speciation, becomes a closed system in itself, closing the door to evolution, then, natural selection take it from the trunk of the evolutionay tree and make it as a branch that is a dead end. This was what happened with dinossaurs and with all big but extreme predator animals it is happening just now with lions, Eagles, wales, gorillas, etc.
So, Nature has a good lesson for our children – not going in the wrong evolutionary way – but, who wrote the scholar curriculum preferred a fantastic hypothesis instead. Earth has 4,5 billion years, and just na unique event never saw anymore happened falling just on the head of dinossaurs !!! Oh… cam’on… you got the trobble with creationists because you deservs it.

Mas para quem se interessa pelo tema, veja como dentro de um grupo já ocorre o conflito de teorias fantásticas:

Volcanoes, Not Meteorite, Killed Dinosaurs, Scientist Argues

http://www.livescience.com/25324-volcanoes-killed-dinosaurs.html

 

Pharyngula Banned: Como o Big Brother Está Sendo Inoculado na População Via Universidades, Professores, Internet.

sexta-feira, março 20th, 2015

Eu fui proibido de participar dos comentários/discussões no Blog Pharyngula, que pertence a um militante ateu professor de Biologia. O meu post que foi a gôta d’água não foi a real causa do banimento mas sim uma anterior discussão que tive com os seguidores do proprietário blogueiro a respeito do cérebro e como acontece a memorização. Naquela discussão ele já tinha ameaçado me expulsar de seu blog. Os materialistas ateus estão empenhados férreamente em impor a “sua verdade cientifica” de que a mente humana, ou auto-consciencia, é mais um produto da mera evolução ao sabor das fôrças cegas naturais. Não tenho nenhum problema que eles acreditem nisso, mas quando querem por na mente dos estudantes que isso já é verdade cientifica eu entro no meio lembrando que não existe ainda prova cientifica disso. E aí querem me calar a bôca.

Eu não concordo com nenhuma das teorias religiosas que tem sido imposto na formação da intelectualidade humana nestes ultimos milhares de anos e penso mesmo que elas foram e continuam a serem prejudiciais à Humanidade. Mas o inconsciente coletivo da humanidade é uma projeção do inconsciente coletivo do individuo, o qual enquanto criança precisa de fantasias para manter sua instalada capacidade ociosa que é sua imaginação, viva, e não deixar que ela se atrofie, e portanto, o inconsciente coletivo da Humanidade que ainda é  criança tambem, precisa de fantasias organizadas sociais. Nesse ponto as religiões tem servido como um mal necessário, indispensavel enquanto não se inventa um outro tipo de fantasia menos nocivo. E a doutrina ateísta infelizmente não preenche o vácuo na imaginação do individuo quando ela ataca e mata a religião. A doutrina materialista ateísta desemboca no NADA, no nihilismo netzsheniano e com isso deixa as mentes vazias de fantasias. Mas como a fantasia é uma necessidade imperiosa do cérebro, e é impossivel alguem se mover para fazer algo sem ter um propósito inconsciente, estas mentes vazias jovens ficam pr6esas fáceis e hipnotizadas à mercê dos traficantes e suas drogas produtoras de fantasias. Não adianta derrubar um mal colocando outro pior no seu lugar. Por isso me animei com a cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA, pois ela não é uma fantasia religiosa, não deixa a mente vazia: ela fornece um propósito naturalista de transcendental Natureza, e esse transcendental é uma nova fantasia mas saudável e benéfica para a Humanidade.

É possivel que meu post gôta d’água foi um ato equivocado da minha parte no tocante ao bom costume de “comentar dentro do tópico”, e tambem em relação à idéia de “como deve ser o tamanho de um post, não sendo  muito longo”,  e ainda pelo fato de que estou propragando minha teoria e meu website. E outros motivos negativos podem meus posts causarem: devido meus erros na gramatica em inglês tornando dificil e  incomoda sua leitura para os nativos no inglês; a chocante dificuldade de uma mente criada e condicionada por uma especifica visão do mundo e sua doutrina ideológica ao se deparar com outra visão do mundo jamais vista que sempre vai contradizer algo do que tal mente acredita piamente.

Portanto, entendo o desconforto causado ao proprietário e seus seguidores, que não precisam e não são obrigados a engolirem tais dissabores em sua própria casa.

Então porque o fia e vou continuar a fazê-lo, me comportando como um estraga-prazeres e “troll” sempre invadindo os endereços da Internet dominados por pessoas que jamais vão sequer se disporem a estudarem e analizarem a minha especifica e  inédita visão do mundo, principalmente se nem eu mesmo “acredito” nela?! E sem ganhar um tostão, muito pelo contrário, pagando com meu tempo de vida para fazer tal trabalho nada prazeiroso?!

Acontece que os modelos teóricos resultantes dos calculos que acredito serem impessoais aplicados para chegar à Matrix/DNA cosmovisão estão sugerindo que a Natureza tende a dirigir a biosfera na Terra ao destino de ser uma máquina perfeita e estupida como é o estado da galaxia que  criou esta biosfera. E a espécie humana a ser transformada de maneira que sua ultima forma seja meramente mais uma peça de tal máquina. Tal estado final e tal final propósito inconsciente desta galáxia já foi intuido por autores em livros como “The Brave New World” de Aldous Huxley e “1984” de George Orwell”. E penso estar vendo a implantação deste estado fluindo através da visão do mundo dominante nos curriculums escolares, sendo que professores, estadistas, bilionarios no poder global de fato, e estudantes, já são as consequencias, os efeitos, desta ideologia que emerge da doutrina escolar.

Eu não tenho certeza sobre estes resultados, por isso continuo tentando testa-los contra quaisquer fatos/fenomenos naturais que se me apresentem. Mas eu penso que estes resultados, a sua visão do mundo, apesar de estarem certamente incompletos, é o que de mais lógico e racional que temos aqui hoje. E o destino para a espécie humana que eles pintam, é negro. O mais terrivel destino possivel à minha mente cujo principal motivo de desejar continuar sua existencia é a capacidade de ser livre e poder continuar a evoluir, a crescer. Esse destino seria pior que o inferno cristão, ao menos ali eu estaria livre para buscar uma maneira de liquidar o diabo e seu inferno. No admiravel mundo novo a perda da propriedade sobre minha própria mente mataria tambem até o desejo de escapar do Big Brother.

Eu vou continuar sim a minha luta, mesmo que o campo de batalha se torne cada vez mais estreito e inacessivel, por conta destes banimentos. Já não importa muito se a minha visão de mundo, incompleta, tem ou não algo de verdade nela, se meus temores tem ou não fundamentos naturais, vou continuar defendendo e divulgando-a, pois o mais terrivel que poderia me acontecer na hora da morte seria continuar mantendo este temor e olhar para tras vendo que nada fiz para combate-lo. naqueles ultimos momentos da minha vida um sentimento doloroso estaria me sufocando, o sentimento de ter sido um covarde, um pária. Ao contrário, se eu continuar lutando, seja qual for o modo da minha morte, sempre vou cair com a cabeça em pé e um sorriso intimo de alegria da missão cumprida, uma sensação prazeirosa inigualavel. Em relação aos meus inimigos ou meros militantes oponentes como o proprietario do Pharyngula, nos meus lábios o  rumor de umas poucas palavras: “Perdô-os, porque vocês como eu, não sabemos se o que estamos fazendo é certo ou errado”.

A seguir o tópico e o post causador do meu banimento, mas antes disso…

A propósito, um video com uma jóia do humor britanico, ilustrando como está ocorrendo esta patrulha ideológica na Internet:

Argument Clinic – Monty Python’s The Flying Circus

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQFKtI6gn9Y

Explicação sobre o enredo do video:

This Entire sketch is the representation of the internet. Which is a bit silly since this came out long before the internet…
“The man enters a establishment, it being the web-browser. He asks the lady for help in getting a argument, she being the web browsers search bar and/or search engine.The Search engine/Search Bar seems to be a bit faulty, so he ends up going to a wrong website(The Websites being represented by each room) for which he ends up being yelled at(CAPS LOCK AND ALL!1!).
When He finds himself in the right place, he soon learns that the internet can be a bit stupid/stubborn/one-sided, et cetera. At times and doesn’t end up getting the entertainment he wanted, ending with him leaving in search for a place to complain about these things.And of course the man screws up again and ends up in the weird place of the internet.”

…In fact, I think that if the web existed like it does now back then, it would be a bit too much like Monty Python. As Monty Python is pretty much the Internet of old. It’s random, silly, stupid, funny and majority of us love it and always visit it every once in a while(or in some cases, are always in front of it.)  😉

xxxxx
A seguir o tópico e o post causador do meu banimento:
Oh, right, it’s today

We first met in 3rd grade, which would have been 50 years ago. We used to sometimes walk home together from school — we lived about 4 blocks apart — in junior high, about 43, maybe 44 years ago. I worked up the nerve to ask her out on one date in high school, the homecoming dance in 1974, which was 41 years ago. We started dating regularly in 1976, so 39 years ago. We took our time with the courtship, and got married over spring break while we were in grad school, on 16 March 1980, 35 years ago…

 louismorelli

Congratulations,… but, you and yours wife merely repeated the event occurred 13,7 billions years ago, when happened the first date and marriage in this Universe. This is the theory we get when unifying the Physics of the great Nobel Prize Hideki Yukawa and Matrix/DNA models. You are repeating the beginnings of a new evolutionary cycle so, you need to know what is coming next. At that time there were only a unique species, ours first ancestors: quantum vortices. They were shared into two groups: one spin right and the other, spin left ( the first manifestation of this universal dichotomy of extreme opposites). So, they were beginning the evolution of opposites that today is also about the sexual division into female and male. Like you and yours wife were popping out in the space of the school, these vortices was popping out in the substance ( aether or dark matter) of this universe-bubble. One group emerged as a micro point, then was growing as a spiral and exploded by excess of energy. It was you, the male. The other group emerged as micro bubble/spiral that was decreasing till disappearing due missing energy. It was yours wife, the female. As they, both, drew a spiral and fast movement in the space, it was common happening chocks among them. These chocks and movements turned on the Universe very hot and everything was chaos. Like the boys and girls initially have the tendency to fight one to other. The Universe was condemned to stands in that state for the eternity.

However, it seems that those non-material vortices had the principles of human emotions, because they learned that their quickly existence of merely 17 millionth of a second and bad life in the chaos making them sick was caused by themselves, because their mutual fight. Meanwhile the spatial substance was expanding, resulting into less chocks, and then, the Universe was less hot. The female and male vortices sometimes were flying in parallel, avoiding the shocks and suddenly one female that was dying due losing energy linked with a male that was going to die due increasing and excess of energy. This is mimicked today when at a mate, the male transfers its energy and substance to the female.

Then, instead the female dying, she got the energy from the male, and instead the male dying by energy’s explosion, he passed on its energy to the female. They unified into one unique body, but, now in equilibrium and here was born the nuclear atomic glue between protons and neutrons, when the particle pion with energy goes from one to another and go back. At this moment the first quark appeared, the first manifestation of matter in this world, and the whole sky celebrated. Today this event is the marriage, and the pion became the first baby of the universe. Of course, also, at this event at 13,6 billions years ago happened the first shape of sexual intercourse in the Universe.

That’s why you and yours wife must celebrated this anniversary with all emotions and happiness – which is my will, you deserve it. This event is also repeated at every time that occurs a new fecundation: the explosion of a spermatozoon’s membrane at the center of an ovule, the following liberation of males genome/genes in the amnion for to meet the female genes, the marriage between each pair responsible by same genetic trait, etc.

This is beautiful, the world without magics and gods is more lovely, wonderful and divine. Without intelligent designs but throughout previous genetic designs repeated again and again in the whole universal evolutionary history – like mother giraffe does not apply intelligence but, naturally, produces the most extraordinary engineering as a new baby giraffe – and the pappy/mom PZ Myers produces a new baby Myers. Get the must fun in yours celebration, Mr. Myers, and don’t forget to lift up a glass with champagne in saludo to the Universe which must always also celebrates these same events. And another glass to the genius of Hideki Yukawa that lead us to learning such wonderful lessons.

And don’t forget the next evolutionary step waiting for you. Those two vortices made one quark where one couple became one body. Then they look for another neighbours quarks for making a great society, a super particle like proton, neutron, electron. Then they evolved to an atom system, those to galactic systems… So, the next step for you is to search the best union with neighbors, citizens of this country and finally all citizens of this planet. Our mission must go on…

PZ Myers

Now that Louis Morelli is puking up his technicolor bullshit in random threads, it is time to say goodbye.

Banned.

xxxx

O que você pensa disso?

Eu penso que

Me Chamam de Pseudocientista e os Chamo de Pseudonaturalistas

sexta-feira, dezembro 19th, 2014

Apesar de eu repetir sempre que possivel nos debates o que esta afirmado na introducao inicial do meu website ( a minha nao e uma obra cientifica e nao sou cientista. Sou filosofo naturalista), os materialistas que se apegam nas muletas das Ciencias Humanas desesperadamente para apoiar seus argumentos, vivem mencionando que meu trabalho `e pseudo-ciencia. Se nao `e sobre ciencia nao pode ser pseudo-ciencia. Mas quem milita ou pratica a vida professional em alguma area das ciencias, seja como professor ou autor de livros sobre ciencias,  se confessa ateu, nao pode ser um legitimo cientista. Pois cientistas afirmam fatos limitados ao que podem alcancar e provar, nunca afirmam e muito menos colocam sua fe em coisas muito distantes dos fatos que manipulam, como ‘e o caso de se existem deuses ou nao, ou se a materia sozinha e tal como ora conhecida por nos explica tudo ou nao. Estes certamente sao pseudocientistas. Mas o que eles sao em relacao as ciencias humanas nao me interessa muito. Me interessa o que sao em relacao ao meu objeto exclusivo de estudo, que e a Natureza. E todo aquele que tem fe em algo que metafisicamente ultrapassa a natureza que foi ate agora alcancada pela humanidade, ‘e um desertor do estudo da Natureza. `E um pseudo-naturalista. Como pensei e einventei esse nome agora, deixo isto aqui registrado para me lembrar como chamar os que me criticam.

Quântica e Picaretagem Quântica: Um Conselho para a Matrix/DNA

sexta-feira, novembro 21st, 2014

Interessante vídeo de debates com link e titulo abaixo, nos lembra e informa que do ponto de vista da Física, todas as teorias esotéricas, como estas de auto-ajuda, se querem serem consideras Ciência, que não usem a quântica, pois a Física quântica mostra que ela trata do nível abaixo dos átomos apenas, nada vê em relação a consciência, medicina, etc.

O vídeo suscitou a postagem do nosso seguinte comentário:

PSEUDOCIÊNCIAS E PICARETAGEM QUANTICA

http://universoracionalista.org/2-hangout-do-universo-racionalista-pseudociencias-picaretagem-quantica/#comments

Avatar

Para começar, a Natureza não é propriedade nem dos picaretas mencionados e nem das atuais Ciências Humanas, como a Fisica e a Matematica. A palavra “quantica” é meramente um nome dado por humanos quando se referem a uma dimensão ou ordem de fenômenos naturais, ou seja, essa parte da Natureza é “quantica” para os humanos, não para a Natureza. Ocorre que os sensores do cérebro humano, limitados, não conseguiram captar esta dimensão, e a tecnologia produziu instrumentos que são extensões tecnológicas destes sensores, os quais não estão disponiveis a todas as pessoas, foram entregues pelos governos e corporações aos Fisicos, e não aos biólogos, neurologistas, etc. Por isso esta dimensão ainda está sendo estudada apenas pela perspectiva dos Fisicos e sua linguagem, a Matematica. É preciso democratizar o uso destes instrumentos de observação e medições, para que maior numero de diferentes perspectivas enriqueçam o conhecimento. E assim dê-os aos tais picaretas quanticos para que eles mesmos se destruam se constatarem que suas teorias não tem fundamento. O certo é que vão tentar experiencias e abordagens que os Fisicos não admitem.

Pela perspectiva da Matrix/DNA Theory, a Fisica faz um necessario trabalho de desvendar o “esqueleto” do Universo, formado de átomos, galáxias e forças, mas quem prova que este Universo que produziu o corpo humano, começa e termina nesse esqueleto? Não existirá na dimensão macrocósmica niveis de organização da matéria mais complexos, como o corpo humano possui alem do esqueleto, a parte carnal, mental? Se existir nunca será o método cientifico usado pelos Fisicos que os descobrirá, e nem a lógica matematica que se aplicará. Nem os atuais instrumentos que amplificam os sensores humanos, pois eles são compostos e desenhados mecanicamente.

A dimensão dos fenômenos abaixo dos átomos certamente toca os limites materiais deste Universo para baixo e os limites do seu passado nas suas origens. Assim como o estudo da embriogênese chega ao limite espacial microscópico do DNA e ao limite temporal no momento da fecundação de um óvulo. Mas de onde veio o DNA daquele embrião e de onde veio a causa da origem daquele embrião? Estão fora do “universo” estudado. Se na embriogênese ultrapassamos estes limites, ao invés de chegar-mos ao NADA ou a Deus, vamos chegar a pais humanos, ver que o mundo se abre numa complexidade muito maior do que a embriogênese, pois vamos ver os pais, e o mundo alem deles. Vamos ver que a consciência no embrião já existia antes das origens do embrião. Assim são os limites do Universo quando estudados pelos métodos da Física e da Matemática.

Por estas coisas que defendo as tentativas de se aproveitar do conhecimento destes limites – que se convêm chamar “quânticos” por biologistas, neurologistas, psicólogos, etc. Uma complexidade maior e ainda desconhecida é uma possibilidade racional, o mais baixo nível microscópico da Natureza pode ser uma janela aberta para se ver esta complexidade, mas esta janela tem um vidro muito escuro que só permite se ver sombras do outro lado, ou não ver nada, e tem pessoas que estão fazendo teorias sobre o outro lado, inclusive algumas acreditam tanto em suas teorias, como o Chopra, que as afirmam como se fossem verdades comprovadas… e incautos compram teorias. Como é teoria a afirmação que da dimensão quântica não se aufere um conhecimento que possa explicar algo da consciência. Se a Natureza é um corpo só, o seu “pé” não pode estar separado de sua “cabeça”.

O Debate Entre os Que Projetam o Homem para Interpretar o Mundo e os que Ignoram o Homem na Mesma Interpretação

terça-feira, novembro 4th, 2014

O brilhante astro-físico Brian Koberlein, em seu website publicou um artigo interessante intitulado “Self- centered”, o que talvez se traduza por “egocêntrico”, como sendo as pessoas comuns que normalmente projetam a personalidade e experiencia de vida humana quando tentam explicar o mundo, o Cosmos desconhecido. Eu penso que no fundo sua intenção foi dar vazão à moda entre os modernos cientistas materialistas de repudiar o pensamento popular, considerado por eles “mistico” e sem fundamentos racionais.

Apesar de eu tambem sentir certo desconforto quando vejo essas crenças populares, não é menor meu desconforto quando vejo as crenças destes materialistas. Pois se o homem comum é egocêntrico – e sabemos que é – o homem não-comum porque está situado no pedestal da intelectualidade moderna, é mais egocêntrico ainda. Diria que é “ego-criador”, pois ele não vê nada de humano no Cosmos, portanto, o humano se auto-criou, a partir da matéria não-orgânica. Para mim, tanto os egocêntricos quanto os ego-criadores estão errados, ao menos é o que está sugerindo meus modelos téoricos deste mundo compilados na Matrix/DNA Theory. Bem… como não podia deixar de ser, imediatamente sentí a necessidade de retrucar ao artigo do Brian, no comentário copiado abaixo, que postei no artigo cujo link é:

Self Centered

https://briankoberlein.com/2014/10/28/self-centered/

BY  · 28 OCTOBER 2014

E meus comentarios postados ( aguardando moderação)

Louis Morelli: 04, November, 2014

To Brian Koberlein, who said: “Of all the ideas in astronomy and cosmology, the anthropic principle is perhaps the most controversial”. My question should be:

“And why is not controversial the common strong anti-anthropic principle among cosmologist and astronomers?!”

What’s the opposite of self-centered? Is it self-created? The title of this article must contains these two kinds of people.

I think ( and I know that my little brain thinks lots of wrong things) that you was educated inside a world view that is biased and like the people making the mistake of anthropic principle has no conscience of their mistake, you too have no conscience of yours mistake. And I will suggest an answer to my question:

The Cosmos is being “scientifically” seen and interpreted by humans whose intellectual formation was dominated by Physics and Math. You know… Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, etc., were biased towards Physics and Math. No Biologists, Chemists, Neurologists, pointed the telescopes to the sky. This fail from our sciences was worst when Darwin ( a naturalist philosopher) forgot the sky for elaborating the evolutionary theory. Supposing that the stupid matter of this lost rock-planet has invented the process of evolution.

Biological systems ( aka, life) like human beings were produced by this galaxy and inside this galaxy. No information came from outside this galaxy, due the distance among them. So, all life’s properties ( like sexual reproduction, metabolism, embryogenesis, digestive apparatus, etc.) must have been in its primitive e less complex shape existent at this galaxy. Thinking that they were not is not rational, it is magical thinking. So, why the theoretical model of galaxies made by the western current academic mindset does not points out where these properties are? Because they does not see the necessity for doing that due their strong anti-anthropic principle.

The modern current cosmology have divided the Universal History of Evolution into two blocks, without connections between them. There are no bridges, no evolutionary links between Cosmological Evolution and Biological Evolution in this theoretical model. But… it is against all that we know about Reason! Reasoning. Logistics. Atoms systems, astronomical systems, are species of natural systems that are ancestors of biological systems, that’s it. Like prokaryotes and reptiles are ours ancestors species. So, there is something anthropic in the sky, ours roots are there.

My big question that have wrapping my mind at night is “what happens with human brains ( by 1.500, or Middle Age) that, suddenly, suffered a mutation and was hard wired by Physics and Math alone?!”

If you could considering the hypothesis that all our modern staff of our modern schools are making a big mistake also, based upon a wrong world view; if you think that still is possible that cosmology is subject for a total revolution like the one when the heliocentric model changed the geocentric model; that Physics and Math, when approaching the human body are able only for seeing the human bone skeleton and its mechanics properties, being blind to the coverture of soft meat and neuronal connections, and so, is the same when Physics and math approaches to the Universe, seeing only its skeleton composed by galaxies… you will be interested in trying totally different astronomical models, calling Biologists, Chemists, Neurologists for participating. You can see a tentative of doing that, it is called “The Universal Matrix/DNA of All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”, googling it. Sorry, but, I am coming from other different habitat than the schools that you have – the heart of Amazon jungle – and as a naturalist philosopher asking answers to the virgin and salvage Nature, i am suspecting that a weak anthropic principle is part of the Cosmos, which is the creator of who has anthropic properties.

Frases de Experts Contra a Teoria da Evolução: Veja Como A Matrix/DNA Derruba Todas Elas, Fácil.

quarta-feira, outubro 8th, 2014

É bom ler estas frases ( intermediadas com opiniões vindas da minha interpretação dos modelos da Matrix/DNA), pois elas ajudam a pensar o fenomeno da evolução e servem para testar nossas prórprias teorias. Um trabalho meticuloso, bem feito, de coleção por…

Judy’s Patch – WEBSITE

QUOTES

http://pointstoponder.yolasite.com/—quotes-from-scientists.php

Quoting scientists themselves:

ON PROBABILITIES:

“The probability for the chance of formation of the smallest, simplest form of living organism known is 1 to 10-340,000,000. This number is 1 to 10 to the 340 millionth power! The size of this figure is truly staggering, since there is only supposed to be approximately 10-80 (10 to the 80th power) electrons in the whole universe!” (Professor Harold Morowitz)

Matrix/DNA: Ok, but, natural informations is not in shape of electrons, and so, in shape of photons. Which we don’t know the number. By the way, I don’t agree with chance formation either… 

“The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less we can believe that it just happened by blind chance. Superficially, the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer.” (Professor Richard Dawkins, an atheist)

Matrix/DNA : Porque temos que sair de uma teoria extrema e cair em outra teoria extrema? Você não pode enxergar que existem mais teorias sem serem tão extremas?

“Complex molecules that are essential to particular organisms often have such a vast information content as…to make the theory of evolution impossible.” (Bird, Origin of Species Revisited, Vol. 1, pg. 71)

“A close inspection discovers an empirical impossibility to be inherent in the idea of evolution.” (Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson, Swedish botanist and geneticist, English Summary of Synthetische Artbildung, pg. 1142-43, 1186.)

Matrix/DNA: No. A close inspection suggests the empirical impossibility of Darwinism, not about natural evolution.

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that ‘a tornado sweeping through a junk yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein’.” Sir Fred Hoyle (English astronomer, Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge University), as quoted in “Hoyle on Evolution”. Nature, vol. 294, 12 Nov. 1981, p. 105

Matrix/DNA: O problema é que a origem da vida aqui não foi como a construção de um Boeing 747, e sim, como o desmonte de um existente Boeing 747 para com suas peças e material fazer um pequeno avião. O sistema astronomico – esta galaxia – que produziu a primeira simples célula viva aqui era a maquina mais perfeita possível de ser feita pela Natureza. Entidades muito complexas podem darem um enorme salto construindo coisas muito simples, porem o contrario é impossível: coisas muito simples não podem dar o enorme salto de construírem imediatamente algo muito mais complexo.

Darwin’s evolutionary explanation of the origins of man has been transformed into a modern myth, to the detriment of scientific and social progress…..The secular myths of evolution have had a damaging effect on scientific research, leading to distortion, to needless controversy, and to gross misuse of science….I mean the stories, the narratives about change over time. How the dinosaurs became extinct, how the mammals evolved, where man came from. These seem to me to be little more than story-telling.” (Dr. Colin Patterson, evolutionist and senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, which houses 60 million fossils)

Matrix/DNA: You are right, really this non-complete theory have prejudicing scientific evolution into the right and best way for human life’s conditions. But, still, it is better with Darwin than with the creationist myth alone as it were at the Middle Ages.  

“The probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the probability of the unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing shop.” (Dr. Edwin Conklin, evolutionist and professor of biology at Princeton University.)

Matrix/DNA: Yours own body is the result of a big explosion occurred inside an ovule, when exploded the spermatozoon membrane. But… we know that yours body and that event did not occurred by accident.

“The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 nought’s after it…It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of Evolution. There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, highly respected British physicist and astronomer)

Matrix/DNA: Yours mistake is that the formation of life did not occurred from inanimate matter, but, from animated natural systems, which have no  fixed limits with animated “life”.  Yours problem is that you does not know the astronomical system where this event occurred, and which, produced this event. 

ON THE FOSSIL RECORD:

“The entire hominid collection known today would barely cover a billiard table, … the collection is so tantalizingly incomplete, and the specimens themselves often so fragmented and inconclusive, that more can be said about what is missing than about what is present. …but ever since Darwin’s work inspired the notion that fossils linking modern man and extinct ancestor would provide the most convincing proof of human evolution, preconceptions have led evidence by the nose in the study of fossil man.” John Reader (photo-journalist and author of “Missing Links”), “Whatever happened to Zinjanthropus?” New Scientist, 26 March 1981, p. 802

“We are about 120 years after Darwin and the knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a quarter of a million species but the situation hasn’t changed much. The record of evolution is still surprisingly jerky and, ironically, we have fewer examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin’s time. By this I mean that some of the classic cases of Darwinian change in the fossil record, such as the evolution of the horse in North America, have had to be discarded or modified as a result of more detailed information …. ” – D. Raup, “Conflicts Between Darwin and Paleontology,” Field Museum of Natural History Bulletin, vol. 50 (1), p. 24, 25

 

“The facts of paleontology seem to support creation rather than evolution. All the major groups of invertebrates appear suddenly in the first fossiliferous strata. (Cambrian) of the earth with their distinct specializations, indicating that they were all created at almost the same time.” – David Enock Associate Professor of Biology. BS Yeshiva College, MS Hunter College

 

“In spite of the examples, it remains true (as every paleontologist knows) that most new species, genera and families appear in the record suddenly, and are not led up to by known, gradual, completely continuous transitional sequences.” George Gaylord Simpson, Harvard high priest of evolution 

 

ON MISPLACED FOSSILS:

“Evolutionists believe, for example, that the land plants didn’t appear until over 100 million years after the Cambrian trilobites died out. Yet over sixty genera of woody plants, spores, pollen, and wood itself have been recovered from lowest ‘trilobite rock’ (Cambrian) throughout the world. The evidence is so well known that it’s even in standard college and biology text books.

“There are gaps in the fossil graveyard, places where there should be intermediate forms, but where there is nothing whatsoever instead. No paleontologist..denies that this is so. It is simply a fact, Darwin’s theory and the fossil record are in conflict.” David Berlinsky Senior Fellow of the Discovery Institute.

 

ON THE EVOLUTIONARY TREE:

“The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as a trade secret of Paleontology. Evolutionary trees that adorn our textbooks have data only at the tips and nodes of their branches; the rest is inference, however reasonable, not the evidence of fossils.” (Dr. Stephan J Gould, Harvard Paleontologist, “Evolution, Erratic Pace”)

 

ON MUTATIONS:

We add that it would be all too easy to object that mutations have no evolutionary effect because they are eliminated by natural selection. Lethal mutations (the worst kind) are effectively eliminated, but others persist as alleles. …Mutants are present within every population, from bacteria to man. There can be no doubt about it. But for the evolutionist, the essential lies elsewhere: in the fact that mutations do not coincide with evolution.”Pierre-Paul Grassé (University of Paris and past-President, French Academie des Sciences) in Evolution of Living Organisms, Academic Press, New York, 1977, p. 88

“It’s impossible by micro-mutation to form any new species.” (Dr. Richard Goldschmt, evolutionist. Founder of the “Hopeful Monster” theory.)

“The essence of Darwinism lies in a single phrase: natural selection is the creative force of evolutionary change. No one denies that natural selection will play a negative role in eliminating the unfit. Darwinian theories require that it create the fit as well.” Stephen Jay Gould (Professor of Geology and Paleontology, Harvard University), “The return of hopeful monsters”. Natural History, vol. LXXXVI(6), June-Jule 1977, p. 28

ON CIRCULAR REASONING:

There are twelve major layers that form what is called the standard geologic column. Each of these layers is identified by the fossils that are found in it. But, strangely enough, most often the fossils are dated by the strata in which they are found. Can you see the faulty logic in that approach? Let us read what some evolutionary geologists say:

“Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory.” Ronald R. West, PhD (paleoecology and geology) (Assistant Professor of Paleobiology at Kansas State University), “Paleoecology and uniformitarianism”. Compass, vol. 45, May 1968, p. 216

“The rocks do date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks more accurately. Stratigraphy cannot avoid this kind of reasoning … because circularity is inherent in the derivation of time scales.” Dr. J. E. O’Rourke, “Pragmatism Versus Materialism in Stratigraphy,” American Journal of Science. (1976)

“Scientists determine when fossils were formed by finding out the age of the rocks in which they lie.”S. Welles: World Book Encyclopedia Vol.7 (1978) p. 364

compare with:

Palaeontology (the study of fossils) is important in the study of geology. The age of the rocks may be determined by the fossils found in them.” S. Welles: World Book Encyclopedia Vol.15 (1978) p. 85 
(Samuel Welles was Research Associate, Museum of Palaeontology, University of California, Berkley)

“It cannot be denied that from a strictly philosophical standpoint geologists are here reasoning in a circle. The succession of organisms has been determined by a study of their remains embedded in the rocks, and the relative ages of the rocks are determined by the remains of organisms that they contain.”
R. Rastall (Cambridge geologist): ‘Geology’ Encyclopedia Britannica Vol. 10 1949.

ON THE CAMBRIAN EXPLOSION:

“One of the major unsolved problems of geology and evolution is the occurrence of diversified, multi-celled marine invertebrates in the lower Cambrian rocks on the continents and their absence in rocks of greater age…

…however when we turn to examine the Pre-Cambrian rocks for forerunners of these early Cambrian fossils, they are nowhere to be found. Many thick (over 5,000 feet) sections of sedimentary rock are now known to lie in unbroken succession below strata containing the earliest Cambrian fossils. These sediments apparently were suitable for the preservation of fossils because they are often identical with overlying rocks which are fossiliferous, yet no fossils are found in them.” Axelrod (1958), a paleontologist

This evolutionary paleontologist was willing to ask some hard questions about transitional forms showing how one organism turned into another.

Ager, an evolutionary geologist, seems to think this is a problem all the way through the fossil record. He predicted that no matter where we searched we would find: “not gradual evolution, but the sudden explosion of one group at the expense of another.”  (This is what the creationist model predicts!)

“It remains true, as every paleontologist knows, that most new species, genera, and families, and that nearly all categories above the level of families, appear in the record SUDDENLY and are not led up to by known, gradual completely continuous transitional sequences.” (Dr. George Gaylord Simpson of Harvard)

‘Phyletic gradualism [gradual evolution]… was never “seen” in the rocks’.” Stephen Gould and Niles Eldredge (both evolutionists).

The single greatest problem which the fossil record poses for Darwinism is the ‘Cambrian explosion’ of around 600 million years ago. The animal phyla appear in the rocks of this period without a trace of the necessary evolutionary ancestors:

“It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history…Despite tempting fragments of evidence, such as cutinized [waxy] spores and bits of xylem [wood] dating back to the Cambrian period…” Richard Dawkins,Weier, Stocking, and Barbour

Most evolutionists still believe that land plants didn’t evolve until much later. But notice, the evolutionist argues ‘in spite of the evidence.'”

ON THE “FACT” OF EVOLUTION:

“The explanation value of the evolutionary hypothesis of common origin is nil! Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, it seems to convey anti-knowledge. How could I work on evolution ten years and learn nothing from it? Most of you in this room will have to admit that in the last ten years we have seen the basis of evolution go from fact to faith! It does seem that the level of knowledge about evolution is remarkably shallow. We know it ought not be taught in high school, and that’s all we know about it.” (Dr. Colin Patterson, evolutionist and senior Paleontologist at the BritishMuseum of Natural History, which houses 60 million fossils)

“If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” (Charles Darwin, “The Origin of Species”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory. Is it then a science or a faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation. Both are concepts which believers know to be true but neither up to the present has been capable of proof.”
L. Harrison Matthews FRS – Introduction to Darwin’s Origin of Species – 1971 p.11

The Second Law of Thermodynamics, also known as the Law of Entropy, states that every system left to its own devices will always move from a condition of order to disorder.
“… all we have to do is nothing, and everything deteriorates, collapses, breaks down, wears out all by itself.” – Isaac Asimov – “In the Game of Energy and Thermodynamics, You Can’t Even Break Even,” – Smithsonian (June 1970) p.6

The universe and the Laws of Physics seem to have been specifically designed for us. If any one of about 40 physical qualities had more than slightly different values, life as we know it could not exist: Either atoms would not be stable, or they wouldn’t combine into molecules, or the stars wouldn’t form heavier elements, or the universe would collapse before life could develop, and so on…” (Stephen Hawking, considered the best known scientist since Albert Einstein, Austin American-Statesmen, October 19, 1997)

“Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless.” (Prof. Louis Bounoure, Director of Research, NationalCenter of Scientific Research.)

“We have had enough of the Darwinian fallacy. It is time we cry, “The emperor has no clothes.” (Dr. Hsu, geologist at the Geological Institute in Zurich.)

“The great cosmologic myth of the twentieth century.”(Dr. Michael Denton, molecular biochemist, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis.)

“9/10 of the talk of evolution is sheer nonsense not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by fact. This Museum is full of proof of the utter falsity of their view.” (Dr. Ethredge, British Museum of Science.)

“We have now the remarkable spectacle that just when many scientific men are agreed that there is no part of the Darwinian system that is of any great influence, and that, as a whole, the theory is not onlyunproved, but impossible, the ignorant, half-educated masses have acquired the idea that it is to be accepted as a fundamental fact.” (Dr. Thomas Dwight, famed professor at Harvard University)

“I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens, many people will pose the question, “How did this ever happen?” (Dr. Sorren Luthrip, Swedish Embryologist)

“The more one studies paleontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based upon faith alone; exactly the same sort of faith which is necessary to have when one encounters the great mysteries of religion….The only alternative is the doctrine of special creation, which may be true, but irrational.” (Dr. Louis T. More, professor of paleontology atPrinceton University)

“Evolution is faith, a religion.” (Dr. Louist T. More, professor of paleontology at Princeton University)

“In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to “bend” their observations to fit in with it.” (H.S. Lipson, Physicist Looks at Evolution, Physics Bulletin 31 (1980), p. 138)

“My attempts to demonstrate evolution by an experiment carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed…..It is not even possible to make a caricature of an evolution out of paleobiological facts…The idea of an evolution rests on pure belief.” (Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson, noted Swedish botanist and geneticist, of Lund University)

“250,000 species of plants and animals recorded and deposited in museums throughout the world did not support the gradual unfolding hoped for byDarwin.” (Dr. David Raup, curator of geology at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, “Conflicts Between Darwinism and Paleontology”)

“The pathetic thing about it is that many scientists are trying to prove the doctrine of evolution, which no science can do.” (Dr. Robert A. Milikan, physicist and Nobel Prize winner, speech before the American Chemical Society.)

“Hypothesis [evolution] based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts….These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without a murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernst Chan, Nobel Prize winner for developing penicillin)

“There is the theory that all the living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form. This theory can be called the “general theory of evolution,” and the evidence which supports this is not sufficiently strong to allow us to consider it as anything more than a working hypothesis.” (Dr. G. A. Kerkut evolutionist)

“For over 20 years I thought I was working on evolution….But there was not one thing I knew about it… So for the last few weeks I’ve tried putting a simple question to various people, the question is, “Can you tell me any one thing that is true?” I tried that question on the Geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, A very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time and eventually one person said, “Yes, I do know one thing, it ought not to be taught in High School”….over the past few years….you have experienced a shift from Evolution as knowledge to evolution as faith…Evolution not only conveys no knowledge, but seems somehow to convey anti-knowledge.” (Dr. Collin Patterson evolutionist, address at the American Museum of Natural History, New York City, Nov. 1981)

“The theories of evolution, with which our studious youth have been deceived, constitute actually a dogma that all the world continues to teach; but each, in his specialty, the zoologist or the botanist, ascertains that none of the explanations furnished is adequate . . It results from this summary, that thetheory of evolution is impossible.” (Dr. P. Lemoine, “Introduction: De L’ Evolution?” Encyclopedie Francaise, Vol. 5 (1937)

“Often a cold shudder has run through me, and I have asked myself whether I may have not devoted myself to a fantasy.” (Charles Darwin, Life and Letters, 1887, Vol. 2, p. 229)

“I have always been slightly suspicious of the theory of evolution because of its ability to account for any property of living beings (the long neck of the giraffe, for example). I have therefore tried to see whether biological discoveries over the last thirty years or so fit in with Darwin’s theory. I do not think that they do. To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all.” (H. Lipson, “A Physicist Looks at Evolution,” Physic Bulletin, 31 (1980), p. 138.)

“In conclusion, evolution is not observable, repeatable, or refutable, and thus does not qualify as either a scientific fact or theory.” (Dr. David N. Menton, PhD in Biology from Brown University)

“The success of Darwinism was accomplished by adecline in scientific integrity.” (Dr. W.R. Thompson, world renowned Entomologist)

“The world is too complicated in all parts and interconnections to be due to chance alone. I am convinced that the existence of life with all its order in each of its organisms is simply too well put together. Each part of a living thing depends on all its other parts to function. How does each part know? How is each part specified at conception? The more one learns of biochemistry the more unbelievable it becomes unless there is some type of organizing principle—an architect.” (Scientist Allan Sandage)

“I believe that one day the Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of science. When this happens, many people will pose the question, “How did this ever happen?” (Dr. Sorren Luthrip, Swedish Embryologist)

“A growing number of respectable scientists are defecting from the evolutionist camp…..moreover, for the most part these “experts” have abandoned Darwinism, not on the basis of religious faith or biblical persuasions, but on strictly scientific grounds, and in some instances, regretfully.” (Dr. Wolfgang Smith, physicist and mathematician)

“Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of life are great con-men, and the story they are telling may be the greatest hoax ever. In explaining evolution, we do not have one iota of fact.” Dr. T. N. Tahmisian (Atomic Energy Commission, USA) in “The Fresno Bee”, <?August 20, 1959.

ON ACCURACY of RADIOMETRIC DATING:

“It will never be possible to prove scientifically whether the earth and universe are old or young. All calculations involving processes which antedate recorded history must be based on assumptions which can never even be tested, let alone proved, scientifically.” Dr. Henry Morris

“When the blood of a seal freshly killed at McMurdo Sound in the Antarctic was tested by Carbon-14, it showed the seal had died 1,300 years ago.”Antarctic Journal, Vol.6 – (1971) p.211

“Richard Leakey’s ‘1470 Man’ was variously dated using the same rocks, the same equipment and the same technicians, at both 220 million years and 2.6 million years BP.

Similarly, rocks associated with Louis Leakey’s ‘Nutcracker Man’ gave a date of 1 .75 million years, although material from the same stratum submitted to Carbon 14 dating gave an age of 10,000 years.

A single sample of rock, one of many brought back from the moon, was dated by the uranium-thorium-lead method to give results ranging from 5.4 billion years (somewhat more than the estimated age of the moon) to 28.1 billion years (half as old again as the greatest estimate of the age of the universe!).

Results have been published that show that recently erupted rocks have been dated at 22 million years old by the Potassium Argon method … The hair on a mammoth was found to be 26,000 years old while the peat in which the mammoth was preserved was measured by the same Carbon 14 technique and found to be only 5,600 years old.” Dr. D. Rosevear Ph.D. Organometallic Chemistry

“If a C14 date supports our theories we put it in the main text. If it does not entirely contradict them, we put if in a footnote. And if it is completely ‘out of date’, we just drop it” Professor Brew (1970 – speaking at a symposium on the prehistory of the Nile) – The Revised Quote Book – p.23

“Why do geologists and archeologists still spend their scarce money on costly radiocarbon determinations? They do so because occasional dates appear to be useful. While the method cannot be counted on to give good, unequivocal results, the number do impress people, and save them the trouble of thinking excessively. Expressed in what look like precise calendar years, figures seem somehow better … ‘Absolute’ dates determined by a laboratory carry a lot of weight, and are extremely helpful in bolstering weak arguments.

“No matter how ‘useful’ it is, though, the radiocarbon method is still not capable of yielding accurate and reliable results. There are gross discrepancies, the chronology is uneven and relative, and the accepted dates are actually selected dates. This whole bless thing is nothing but 13th-century alchemy, and it all depends upon which funny paper you read.” Robert E. Lee, “Radiocarbon: ages in error”. Anthropological Journal of Canada, vol.19(3), 1981, pp.9-29.

ON WHY EVOLUTIONISTS BELIEVE AS THEY DO:

“Evolution is unproved and unprovable. We believe it only because the only alternative is special creation and that is unthinkable.” Sir Arthur Keith, a famous British evolutionist

Incrível! Vídeo de Bill Nye Atacando Religiosos e Sugerindo Revolução na Educação Alcança Meio Milhão de Comentários!

quarta-feira, outubro 8th, 2014

Incrível! Um vídeo publicado em 2012 já conta quase sete milhões de visitantes e o debate que se segue parece ser o mais longo da história do Youtube, pois já conta com quase meio milhão de comentários !!!

Mas o assunto do vídeo realmente é importante e faz parte da responsabilidade de todos os seres humanos conhecerem e tomarem posições participando do tema, pois disso depende o nosso e o futuro das gerações: qual a visão de mundo estamos pondo na cabeça dos estudantes, formando suas mentes.

É um combate ferrenho entre a recem-nascida mentalidade materialista e a velha mentalidade mistica que ainda governa a maioria das decisões sociais mundiais. São duas posições extremas, dois lados de uma mesma moeda, e no meio surge agora mais uma diferente e inédita posição, tentando tambem entrar na briga. Veja o vídeo, veja o comentário abaixo postado por essa nova visão do mundo, e reflita buscando sua posição, pois disso depende se nossos herdeiros irão cantar nosso sucesso ou chorar nosso fracasso.  Pois é a maneira como interpretamos a existência do mundo e nele, nossa própria existência, que determina nossos comportamentos e portanto, nosso destino.

xxxxx

Bill Nye: Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHbYJfwFgOU xxxxxx E o ultimo comentário postado pela nova cosmovisão “do meio”: 

Louis Charles Morelli – October 08, 2014

Darwinism is not equal the real observed natural phenomena of evolution. And Creationism is far away off the natural real world. The Universal Natural History can not be reached and understood by any human brain with these limited sensors in time/space. One need to see a system standing outside the system for understanding it, and nobody went outside this Universe… yet. Natural evolution is a observed phenomena when we see a simplest thing ( a morula, a blastula) transforming shapes and increasing complexity in 9 month. And it is easy to accept that Nature can amplify this individual phenomena, projecting it into populations transformations. But… we know that the force causing those individual transformations is something “invisible” inside the blastula, the fetus, etc.: DNA. So, why not the transformations from atoms systems to stellar systems to galactic systems to biological systems could not have a invisible force doing it?! Yes there is one, a natural universal formula for all natural systems, called “Matrix/DNA”, which is showed at “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” ( Google it). It is not possible to understand in full, biological evolution ( which is merely another cycle of universal evolution) if not knowing cosmological evolution. And darwinism knows nothing about it. There are more four variables coming from the Cosmological Evolution, acting over biological evolution here – it is not merely the three variables considered now by Modern Synthesis ( VSI – Variation, Selection, Inheritance), which fill the gaps. They are natural laws and mechanisms coming from the electromagnetic dimensions, some of them described by thermodynamic systems theory. Our problem just now is that our official astronomic and atomic theoretical models are not complete, far away off the beam, so, the scientific community can not detect the evolutionary lings between cosmological and biological evolution, while Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a model of LUCA that fits the gaps. You can see the Matrix formula working into the shape of yours hands, as any natural systems, sub-systems and accessories, like the hands. You can see as elemental structure of atoms, galaxies and now, this new shape of system called ‘consciousness”. You can see the formula inside a lateral pair of nucleotides, the fundamental unit of information of DNA. That’s due DNA is merely the biological shape of something coming from since the Universe’s origins – the Universal Matrix. The first shape of this Matrix we see at the spectrum of natural light waves, so, the original light already had the code for Life. We see evolution here, but it is not the whole history. The phases of evolution are steps of a bigger universal process: reproduction. Inside this universe as a kind of big cosmic egg, is occurring a genetic process of reproduction. Reproduction of what?! Obvious: the Unknown system that generated this Universe. We can not know it.So, while this discussion among theories ( Darwinism, Creationism, Matrix/DNA, etc.) is necessary and good for stimulating the search for more knowledge towards the final thru, it is not rational the offenses, fundamentalisms. Never forget it: our little brain is not equipped for grasping the thru about the system we are inside it. The most rational method for inquiring this mystery is observing what Nature shows here and now, and then, calculating what must be where and when we can not reach. I myself don’t believe on my elaborated theory – The Matrix/DNA – because I bet that it is not complete, it can not be completed by my little brain. My fellows at this mission, the search for our existential meanings: “Try to understand that beliefs are products of Nature and personal specific experiences hard-wiring the connections among neurons and providing informations, some of them false, others real – and only bringing on to the table real natural approved facts and events, can help the Humanity inits evolution. E outro comentario postado: 

Louis Charles Morelli – October 08, 2014

“…if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, highly respected British physicist and astronomer)” Have been normal that human’s goes first to the two extremes of any issue, and finally reaching the middle term, where relies the final thru. Like Nature goes from the extreme hot to the extreme could for reaching the middle state good for life. Here, about the universal meanings of existence, humans have going from extreme infant phantasies ( creationism) to extreme materialism ( Modern Synthesis for Natural Evolution). Sir Fred Hoyle is dancing between these two extremes, so, if it is not randomness, must be divine intelligence. The third hidden alternative, the real thru, must be in between and lots more complex. My suggestion is that when we have a big unsolved mystery, and the known theories are extremists, we need ask it directly to Nature. And Nature shows to us that the life of a baby giraffe has not beginings at random, but… it is not product of mother’s giraffe intelligence either. It is merely a long chain of causes and effects known as genetic process.So, tell us the pure rational thinking, that we must search this genetic process as responsible for emergence of life at any planet of the Cosmos. The long chain of causes and effects has coming from the simplest to gradual more complexity (it happens here, facing our eyes: the embryonary morphogenetic event), so, the genetic process must be under evolution too. It must be coming from cosmological evolution, non-living world. Here relies the third hidden alternative, which must be the final thru. No randomness, no intelligent designers. Nature does not plays dice with her creatures.Ask her, She will tell you the thru, showing to you her production here, and revealing that how She does things here, is how She did things at the origins of this Universe and life here. See what you can discover, yourself, doing that, as I did. See the solution that I discovered after seven years asking the last remained life’s origins witnesses that still are alive at the heart of Amazon jungle, and published at my website: The Universal Matrix/DNA Formula for natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. But, be advised, my findings are not the final real thru also. I have watched only the half-face of Nature, which  is the chaotic face that produced this salvage biosphere.We know that there is another half-facem the ordered state, when we lift our eyes and see this solar system and galaxy working as a watch.And even if we get the real theoretical model of the ordered Cosmos, we know that we don’t get the final thru yet. Chaotic and ordered states are the two extremes again, the final thru must relies on a third hidden more complex alternative. Today we can build theoretical models about the structure and evolutionary history of the Cosmos, as the scientific astronomers community are doing. They must be not complete, even wrong, since we have our brains hard-wired by the chaotic state, never experimenting the ordered state of Nature. So, the astronomers are projecting the laws and mechanisms of chaotic states when building their astronomical models. There is only a unique way for getting a little bit closer to the final thru: making comparisons between the ordered state and the chaotic state, extracting a third theoretical model. I did it, after 30 years of calculations, but… the final results are suggesting that it is not materialism, it is not randomness and it is not intelligent design: it is something never imagined before. Remembering that this model is not complete, it must have lots of errors, so, we must no believe on it. xxxx E como resposta a este post do Fallible Fiend:

Fallible Fiend – 4 weeks ago (edited)

When I taught at university, I warned students against cheating, but some would do it anyway.  They were always shocked that someone who understood the subject could detect their cheating, even though it was obvious.  They changed variable names and other things to mask their copying, but to no avail!  When you lie to somebody who understands, the lying is obvious!  Creatioinsts use quote mines and thereby misrepresent the scientists without caring that they are misrepresenting them!   Being caught in their intellectual incompetence is what’s making them so frothing in fraudulent Arjunasquirtz these days!  

   

Louis Charles Morelli – Octuber 09, 2014

To Fallible Fiend: “They were always shocked that someone who understood the subject could detect their cheating, even though it was obvious.”

Are you conscious about the virtual cultural matrix 10.000 or more years old built by human inheritance of animals’ instinct? I am talking about this culture that rules ours social systems, shared into big predators (the high class), medium predators (  medium class) and preys ( the slaves workers), mimicking the rules of the salvage jungle? The invention of religions is a good support for this culture due being good strategy for predators keeping slaves.  If yours students were shocked when facing reality it means they believed in it and came from middle class ( conditioned minds) because the high class knows that they are cheating. I will suggest a fantastic discovery from Matrix/DNA Theory for explaining how this virtual matrix works: I watched natives “shamans”  of Amazon jungle when taking their hallucinogenic beverages describing the same picture that very ancient people from Asia used as foundations for their mythos. The big surprise and question for me was: how could it be?! Ok, the first answer is that those people from such different places and time drunk same drugs. But, why this “altered visions” could be the foundations for religions? How they entered a brain dominated by animals instincts and survive together inside the brain?! One possible but surprising answer came when I arrived to Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems… like brains. The formula is suggesting a picture of LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor), which should be the evolutionary link between cosmological and biological evolution. This “luca” never stood at Earth’s surface, because it is the building block of astronomical systems, like this one that earth belongs to it. Another big surprise is that LUCA was described in full by those mythos. LUCA is a thermodynamic system working as perfect machine described by Physics, ( Newtonian mechanics plus general relativity) using a kind of words, metaphors, symbols, but, The Eden Paradise is the same thing described by another kind of metaphors, words, symbols! Same thing for the world view based on the symbols of I Ching. How could it be?! The explanation is rational, pure natural logistic. Systems as atoms, stellars, galaxies, are species and as such they are our evolutionary ancestors, like the species as bacterias, amoebas, reptiles. All these species are registered into our DNA’s memory. There is DNA for biological systems, but it came from another kind of “DNA” existing as building blocks for non-biological systems, which name I prefer “universal matrix”. ( The inanimate systems are registered at the junk DNA). So, when someone have altered states of brain, like those produced by drugs, this memory comes as flashes, scenes, and each people try to interpret it by its own way. You can see the seven symbols used for building the fable of Adam and Eve at the Eternal Paradise, inside a building block for any natural system, a perfect natural machine, described also by thermodynamic theory. Since that this astronomical building block is reproduced as the fundamental unit of  information called “a lateral pair of nucleotides”, you can now understand why these memories are inside our neurons. Look to LUCA at my website, and you can identify there, the serpent, the apple, the tree, the perfect paradise for Adam and Eve – which were the astronomical evolutionary state of X and Y chromosomes about 4 billion years ago! You will still understand what really was the Fall, and why the entropic force produces biological systems like me and you here. I think that once time this whole theory will be approved, it will destroy those mythos that are the foundations of all religions, forever. But… be aware: the world vision that you are teaching could be another kind of cheating the reality also. And it is, if this new theory will be proved right. So, like you can not see the virtual cultural matrix acting over you, don’t be surprised that yours students are shocked facing reality.