Posts Tagged ‘circuito’

Ciclo Vital das Células: Oscilação do Núcleo

segunda-feira, setembro 11th, 2017

xxxx

http://www.alphr.com/science/1006968/internal-clock-is-discovered-in-a-living-human-cell

Internal clock is discovered in a living human cell

Sugestao da Matrix/DNA = Ele é produzido pelo circular de informação no circuito. Tal como acontece com uma onda de luz (a qual é a primeira ocorrência deste fenômeno no universo e desde o qual o fenômeno é repetido em todos os sistemas naturais), a vibração ou intensidade dos flashes cintilantes começa forte, na maior intensidade do circuito, e continua forte em crescente ate a F4, quando começa a decair porque começa a entropia.)

Matrix/DNA suggestion – It is produced by the flux of information in the circuit. As it happens with a light wave (which is the first occurrence of this phenomena in the Universe and from which the phenomena is repeated at natural systems), the vibration or intensity of the scintillating flashes starts strong at the highest intensity of the circuit and continues strong in increasing to the F4, when it begins to decay because entropy begins.)

The discovery may give insights into how and when diseases start – 11 Sep 2017

Cells dramatically change their shape and size during a lifetime. But this is the first time the changes have been seen over short time periods.

O ritmo da  cintilacao num  precise point of a cell in its life cycle…. During the lifetime of the cell, the amount the cell changes in shape during these ‘flickers’ also gets smaller. This means measuring the fluctuations can give away the age of the cell.

“However, with this discovery, which shows that the nucleus exhibits rapid fluctuations that decrease during the life cycle of the cell, we can enhance our knowledge of both healthy and diseased human cells.”

the nucleus of the living cells, and saw a part of it, known as the nuclear envelope, flickering over a period of a few seconds. 

(Este mecanismo de oscilacao do nucleo das celululas foi projetado nos organismos? De que forma os corpos de organismos sinalizariam estas pulsacoes?)

“This process can serve as an internal clock of the cell, telling you at what stage in the cell cycle the cell is,”

“We know that structural and functional errors of the nuclear envelope lead to a large number of developmental and inherited disorders, such as cardiomyopathy, muscular dystrophy, and cancer,” she said. “Illuminating the mechanics of nuclear shape fluctuations might contribute to efforts to understand the nuclear envelope in health and disease.”

xxxx

A proposito, eu postei esta resposta num debate:

God of War – Q1. what are the type of mathematical equations that describe the growth of organisms?

Matrix/DNA : – Lol, good! I am just coming back from reading the best scientific news today, it is related to “grow of organisms”, which is related to life’s cycles and here you have a little idea how the knowledge of Matrix/DNA models and formula works in parallel with official science and offers different interpretation for natural phenomena. The news is in the link:
http://www.alphr.com/science/1006968/internal-clock-is-discovered-in-a-living-human-cell
Please, read the article and come back to this post….
I never knew that cells’ nucleus are flickering. But, missing this knowledge was my fault, because my formula predicted it 30 years ago. My fault is due no enough time for analyzing all predictions from the formula, which must be millions. So, look what Matrix/DNA says now:
” This internal clock is produced by the flux of information in the systemic circuit. As it happens with a light wave (which is the first occurrence of this phenomena in the Universe and from which the phenomena is repeated at natural systems like cells), the vibration or intensity of the scintillating flashes starts strong at the highest intensity of the circuit and continues strong in increasing to the F4, when it begins to decay because entropy begins. It is merely the life’s cycle pathway.”
Since you don’t know how to analyzing the formula, I think you will not understand this says from Matrix/DNA, but my long time doing it ( 30 years), I am very practical doing it.
Where and when the researchers would have this interpretation, linking a reductive detail of a phenomena to the whole Cosmos, linking it with the first waves of light emitted at the Big Bang? When they will linking thermodynamics like entropy to this phenomena for having new glimpses how to control it and finding ways for avoiding the diseases they are looking for? That’s why I am here alerting that the current scientific method and scientists world view must be amplified for inserting the systemic method upon the reductive method, and how is the new kind of lab we are in needs just now.
Organisms grow and decay are very well represented by Matrix/DNA formula, which is not showed as mathematical equation but by software’s diagram because the dynamics of life are based on codes, genetics codes, and computational codes are not writing with mathematical equations. Now I will take my beer in commemoration of more one victory of my theory… Cheers…

Cerebro e Matrix/DNA: Inteligencia Surge de Um Algoritmo no Cerebro Humano

domingo, março 26th, 2017

xxxx

Ha’ mais de um seculo – depois de algumas importantes descobertas sobre o cérebro – tem sido acreditado que existe uma infra-estrutura no estilo computacional que deve estar oculta por trás das funções do cérebro e tem-se insistido que e’ necessário descobrir esta infraestrutura para se entender melhor este cérebro. Esta logica computacional, acreditam os acadêmicos – deve dirigir a maneira pela qual as células neuroniais se conectam para produzirem o conhecimento inteligente e a flexibilidade nas atuações. Existe uma tal de Teoria da Conectividade que já’ sugeriu que a origem da inteligencia esteja enraizada numa logica de permutação na base da potencia-de-dois, um conceito bastante comum em algoritmos na programação computacional. Agora os cientistas responsáveis por um paper publicado nesta semana revelam uma pesquisa pela qual acreditam que confirma a teoria. A formula algorítmica seria N = 2i−1 ( onde i para números de entradas de informações distintas; N e’ o numero de neuronial cliques com todos os padrões possíveis de conectividades combinadas).

Por outro lado, eu – que venho da selva com uma teoria cosmovisionária para caipiras da roça – penso ter descoberto ha’ 30 anos atras uma formula que pode ser interpretada como um conjunto de algoritmos que teria modelado e inserido as funções no cérebro. Mas a formula que sugiro e’ mil vezes mais complexa e tem a grande diferença de produzir processos vitais e não apenas no estilo mecanicista computacional. Esta teria sido a formula aplicada pela Natureza para organizar a matéria em sistemas naturais e o cérebro em si mesmo e’ um sistema natural.

Esta formula e’ representada por uma figura animada pois suas variáveis são produzidas pelo processo do ciclo vital. Porem, a representação da formula e’, ao mesmo tempo, um programa de algoritmos como dos mais simples para softwares – descobri isso a 30 anos atras ainda na selva. Acontece que o cérebro em si mesmo e’ mais um sistema natural e portanto, deve ter sido modelado pela formula que e’ um conjunto de algoritmos. Então o que a Teoria da Conectividade e a investigação dos cientistas publicada hoje estão batendo com minhas previsões de 30 anos atras. Mas tem umas diferenças cruciais nas interpretações deste fenômeno e para explica-las preciso trazer a formula para cá:

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

E o desenho do circuito do fluxo interno de informação da fórmula da Matrix/DNA na sua versão de sistema perfeito fechado, na forma de diagrama de software

Segundo minha teoria, o cérebro esta montado em cima desta formula. Devido uma serie de dificuldades ( como a falta de tempo, a falta de acesso aos cientistas da área, etc.) eu ainda não pude identificar qual elemento do cérebro corresponde a qual F (função sistêmica) da formula. Tenho anotado centenas de papers sobre as informações, mapas cerebrais e as mais recentes descobertas no campo das ciências neurológicas buscando montar essa identificação, porem a falta de tempo e condições de trabalho estão me atrasando. Alem disso, eu preciso algo que acho não existir: figuras inteiras do interior do cérebro para ter uma visão de conjunto como tenho da formula. A primeira indicação que salta aos olhos ‘e que `a esquerda da F5 temos o hemisfério esquerdo, e a direita de F5 temos o hemisfério direito. A base central, nuclear do cérebro deve ser a região do hipocampo e portanto este deve corresponder a F1, o qual’e’ o núcleo e o inicio do circuito da formula. Mas depois, no cérebro vem suas partes, como as glândulas, etc. e estas partes que precisamos identificar de acordo com suas funções. Então, num primeiro relance, penso que as camadas de neurônios representam os espaços das setas na formula, os quais são, na formula, as formas do corpo que rola sob a forca do ciclo vital. Se isto for correto, a teoria dos investigadores esta’ muito distante de finalizada. Eles estão pensando que apenas as camadas de neurônios, suas diferentes regiões no cérebro são o hardware onde se instala e se processa o software algorítmico. Estão ignorando as peças do cérebro nestas regiões?

Eu penso que o cérebro esta dividido – vertical e horizontalmente – em seis regiões, cada região tem um função especifica em qualquer pensamento, mas cada região e’ um sub-sistema no mesmo modelo da formula, ou da totalidade do sistema que e’ o cérebro.

O fato e’ que o cérebro tem uma grande diferença com computadores, apesar de que os humanos criaram os computadores como uma imitação do cérebro. A diferença e’ que o cérebro e’ autônomo, cria e produz e modifica, transforma por si próprio, enquanto o computador nada faz disso. Em outras palavras o cérebro e’ um sistema vivo e o computador um sistema em hibernação, mecânico. A diferença vem do fato que o código em que o cérebro se baseia e’ um código vivo, de algoritmos vivos, porque esta animado pelo ciclo vital. Então esta investigação acredita que descobriu a causa da inteligencia baseado num exercício matemático do calculo de todas as variáveis do numero dois elevado a uma potencia n, e disso resulta uma sequencia fixa, mecânica, linear de números.

Na minha macaquica e humilde opinião, eles vão se deparar com um cérebro-maquina, morto, que nada vai produzir do que o cérebro vivo produz. Muito menos a inteligencia com sua criatividade e autonomia. Não vejo como as nossas ciências vai mudar esta abordagem enquanto imperar no meio acadêmico esta visão de mundo mecanicista e redutora. talvez estes pequenos avanços no caminho errado sejam o guia para endireitar sua cosmovisão, pois a ciência tem progredido pelo método tentativa e erro para então descobrir o acerto. Vou me esforçar para estudar e assimilar o que fizeram pois nesse meio tem as informações cientificas que foram ( junto com as informações da natureza bruta da selva), a base da minha cosmovisão.

Fui notificado desta pesquisa primeiro por um artigo no link ( e dai puxei o paper cujo link vai depois a seguir):

https://futurism.com/new-clues-hint-at-the-imminent-release-of-teslas-newest-model/

Intelligence May Stem From a Basic Algorithm in the Human Brain

A theory posits that the all of our thoughts are a function of a basic algorithm, N=2^i–1. ( A teoria sugere que todos os pensamentos são uma função básica algorítmica: N=2^i-1)

This development may be huge for AI, since artificial neural networks operate much like the brain, applying this formula may be the key to true intelligence. ( Este desenvolvimento pode ser valioso para Inteligencia Artificial, desde que rede neuroniais artificiais operam aparentemente como o cérebro, aplicando esta formula pode ser a chave para a verdadeira inteligencia natural.)

 

The brain’s formula

Neste artigo obtive o Scientific Paper, cujo titulo e link e’:

Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Permutation Logic

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00095/full

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Syst. Neurosci., 15 November 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00095

Meu comentario publicado no paper da Frontier:

I am a layman in this specific area, but from my specialized field I think I can offers a new insight to the authors about this “flexible behavior”. My theoretical results are suggesting ( since about 30 years ago), a general natural formula for all natural systems, and the brain’s structure for this process called “intelligence” must obey that formula. It happens that the formula is an algorithmic representation (as you can see the formula at my website). So, in this case my models has predicted yours findings.
The difference is that my algorithmic formula is a kind of “living process”, than, the flexible behavior, while yours mathematical algorithm is not. Thoughts mimics biological or living processes, they are developed by a life’s cycle common process. That’s the secret of creation, autonomy, etc., which, AI does not have it, yet. I had no time for learning yours mathematical development for arriving to yours formula and making comparisons with my formula, for to perceive where are the differences. I think this work can help you developing yours research and knowledge on this issue. Cheers…
xxxx
E outros comentários publicado pela MSN-USA, em:
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/researchers-uncover-algorithm-which-may-solve-human-intelligence/ar-AAkTr2R?fb_action_ids=10210902314866604&fb_action_types=og.comments
I have registered the copyrights from 30 years ago in Brasil and USA showing a set of alghoritms as the framework of the brain as of all natural systems and life’s cycles. But my formula/alghoritm is a lot more complex than this N = 2i-1 formula. It is not my interest to comunicate that I had predicted it, but suggesting that these researchers changes their interpretations and approaches, because they are in the most difficult and slow way, And we need this right konwledge for helping millions of people being tortured by mental ilness.

My formula represents a thing that is alive, autonomous, creator and has flexible behavior. There is not only two variables, but, seven, like seven are the variables encrypted at a DNA’a unit of information. And each variable for the whole system is variable in relation to itself. it is not translated by Math neither mechanistic processes like the alghoritm above which merely results in a sequence of fractals and nothing else. Each new brain’s region and elements are built by the same process of life’s cycle that build our entire boddy and produces the differentiation of shapes along a lifetime. This formula wich I called “Matrix/DNA” was extracted from comparative anatomy between living and non-living natural systems, so, it is natural and alive, can not be compared with our nowaday computers. The formula and explanations are at my website, if someone is curious about

Turiel Grigori ·Owner at Trabalhador(a) independente

And might this same algorithm be responsible for disallowing us from seeing reality as it REALLY is?
No, Turiel. We and the whole Universe has evolved under a kind of Matrix, in the sense that all biological systems has evolved under a matrix called DNA. Like the DNA is not playing dice with us, the universal matrix is not too. We can’t see the reality as it really is because we are almost blind ( we can see only one face of objects – those reflecting the visible frequency of the eletromagnetic spectrum, and we are blind to the other six frequency/vibrations that are here and compose this world. Also our brain has poor and limited sensors such our technological sensors. I am not seeing supernatural ghosts or intelligent aliens behind this matrix for explaining its existence and functionality, it is purely natural. But, since I am almost blind…who knows?
xxxx
ESTUDO/TRADUCAO DO ORIGINAL PAPER:
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2016.00095/full

Brain Computation Is Organized via Power-of-Two-Based Permutation Logic

Computação Cerebral e’ Organizada via Logica de Permutação Baseada na Potencia-de-Dois

Ha’ considerável interesse cientifico em entender como as células se conectam – o tao presumido computacional padrão – tao organizadas que o cérebro possa gerar inteligente conhecimento e flexível comportamento.

A Teoria da Conectividade propõe que a origem da inteligencia esta enraizada numa logica de permutação na base da potencia-de-dois (N=2i-1), ( ver wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_of_two ) produzindo especificidade para arquiteturas de células montadas capazes de gerar especificas percepções e memorias, assim como generalizado conhecimento e acoes flexíveis. Nos mostramos que esta logica de permutação e’ amplamente usada nos circuitos corticais e subcorticais através de especies animais e e’ conservada para o processamento de uma variedade de modalidades cognitivas incluindo apetite, emocional e social informações.

Todavia, modulatórios neurônios, tais como os neurônios dopaminergic (DA), usam uma logica mais simples apesar de seus distintos subtipos. Interessante, esta logica de permutação do especifico para o geral permanece largamente intacta através dos NMDA receptores – o switch sináptico para aprendizagem e memoria –  foram deletados durante a fase adulta, sugerindo que a logica ‘e um desenvolvimento pre-configurado. Alem disso, esta logica computacional e’ implementada no cortex via a combinação de uma estrategia de conectividade ao acaso nas camadas superficiais (2/3), enquanto ns profundas camadas as organizações  de não-acaso são 5/6.

(continuar tradução)

 

Pesquisar:

  • Theory of Connectivity ( proposes that the origin of intelligence is rooted in a power-of-two-based permutation logic (N = 2i–1), producing specific-to-general cell-assembly architecture capable of generating specific perceptions and memories, as well as generalized knowledge and flexible actions.)
  • Muito importante a pesquisar aqui: We show that this power-of-two-based permutation logic is widely used in cortical and subcortical circuits 
  • modulatory neurons, such as dopaminergic (DA) neurons – use a simpler logic despite their distinct subtypes.
  •  ler: Theory of Connectivity: Nature and Nurture of Cell Assemblies and Cognitive Computation ( em https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4850152/

Onde se le: How should cell assembly organize itself so that incoming information can be orderly and gradually converted into memory, concepts, and flexible motor behavior?

 

A Celula Viva E Seu Complexo Circuito Eletrico

terça-feira, novembro 15th, 2016

xxxx

THE LIVING CELL A COMPLEX ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT

http://www.spiritualgenome.com/index.php/articles/47-the-living-cell-a-complex-electrical-circuit

Teoria e artigo de:

Bradley York Bartholomew initially trained as a lawyer in Queensland, Australia. He subsequently came across the works of Sigmund Freud and experienced a profound realization that Freud’s Unconscious Mind and the Hindu Inner Self were one and the same. From then on he has devoted his life to tracking the Inner Self. After spending considerable time in an Ashram in India he wrote several articles about Hindu Philosophy in the 1990s that were published in prestigious philosophical journals in India including the Indian Philosophical Quarterly. His revelations that the Hindu Upanishads have a Quantum Mechanical interpretation led him back to University to formally study Physics and Genetics where he made a pivotal discovery how the DNA acts as a Quantum Computer. This discovery has brought Hinduism into the information age.

Artigo copiado para traduzir e pesquisar:

In an article in New Scientist (8/29/15) entitled Power from within it has been announced that for the first time scientists have been able to harvest the energy from inside the body. They have done this by implanting thin layers of metal in the living cells. Essentially what they are harvesting is our Orgone energy (or life force).

At this point they have simply managed to generate 3.73 volts which is about enough to run a pacemaker but as this technology develops, and with the use of amplifiers etc, there would appear to be no limit to the amount of Orgone energy that can be collected. So let’s see just exactly what is this “life force.”

There is a well-known theory of consciousness advanced by Hameroff & Penrose more than 20 years ago, to the effect that the microtubules in the neuron are responsible for generating our consciousness.

I deal with their theory in my book. Briefly, to quote Hameroff: “Consciousness depends on anharmonic vibrations of microtubules inside neurons, similar to certain kinds of Indian music, but unlike Western music which is harmonic.” These quantum vibrational computations in microtubules are “orchestrated” by synaptic inputs and memory stored in the microtubules. Essentially then quantum computing is occurring in these microtubules.

So what is a microtubule. For a start, they are not just found in neurons. They are pretty much everywhere in the cells of animals and plants, in the cytoskeleton where they are responsible for the structure of the cell, the cytoplasm were they connect various organelles inside the cell, and in the genome where they play important roles in various genetic processes including mitosis, meiosis and gene expression. We are told that they are tubular in shape and principally composed of the protein tubulin. We are also told that microtubules have a polarity, that is to say they have a positively charged end and a negatively charged end. Two microtubules can join with the positive end of one attached to the negative end of the other. Similarly the positive end of a microtubule will attach to a negatively charged area in an organelle in the cell.

There are a group of scientists who are trying to establish consciousness and intelligence in plants. I wrote about them in my article Plant Consciousness and the Networked Intelligence (on this website). Essentially they used to call themselves The Society for Neurobiology in Plants, but after stinging criticism from some of their colleagues they were forced to change the name to the Society for Plant Signaling and Behavior in Plants. The criticisms centered around the fact that plants do not have neurons and therefore to talk about neurobiology in plants was an oxymoron. Furthermore, because plants don’t have neurons it was therefore impossible for them to have intelligence or consciousness.

A member of this society, Dr Peter Barlow, from the University of Bristol in the UK wrote to me and told me that he was working on a paper with the title The Natural History of Consciousness, and the Question of whether Plants are Conscious, in Relation to the Hameroff-Penrose Quantum-Physical ‘Orch OR’ Theory of Universal Consciousness. He even sent me a copy of the abstract and introduction to this paper. Essentially he is arguing that although it is true that plants do not have neurons, they do have microtubules in abundance in the cell and therefore if Hameroff & Penrose are right with their hypothesis that quantum computing in the microtubules of neurons were responsible for our consciousness, then it could well be the case that these cytoskeletal microtubules in plants were responsible for plant consciousness as well. I applauded his work and told him that although I had dealt with the Hameroff & Penrose theory in my book I had not tipped to this point that in fact there is a plethora of microtubules in all eukaryotic cells, plants included. He had ordered a copy of my book, and I referred him to the relevant pages where I assert that the microtubules in the neurons act merely as a conduit for electromagnetic activity emanating from the genome, i.e. the nucleus of the neuron. I also told him that his observation about microtubules in the cells of plants was a vital piece of information for me, because any theory about consciousness or intelligence in the DNA would be inadequate if it did not also account for the plant kingdom.

Just by chance I received a spam email about a mitochondrial antioxidant supplement. This spam email contained the following statements:

Not many people know that they have tiny power plants in almost every cell in their body. These power plants are called mitochondria. They take the air that we breathe and the food that we eat and produce ATP – the energy molecule that provides the power to every one of our cells.

Mitochondrial function peaks around the age of 28 and then starts to decline. We start to feel this as we head into our 40s and beyond. We have less energy, we start to slow down, we feel tired, we don’t recover from illness or injury as quickly and we start to see health problems emerging.

As a by-product of the energy production process mitochondria generate free radicals. To protect themselves mitochondria have very strong natural antioxidant protection systems. One of the key antioxidants mitochondria use is CoQ10 (also known as CoenzymeQ10 or ubiquinone).

CoQ10 levels decline as we age leaving mitochondria increasingly susceptible to free-radical damage. This damage reduces mitochondrial function leading to less energy being available to your cell. With less CoQ10 available we also see increasing levels of free radicals leak into the cell causing damage to cell contents and DNA.

It makes sense that we should supplement with CoQ10 to replace levels lost as we age. It’s a reasonable line of thought but with one serious flaw. CoQ10 is a very oily sticky molecule that doesn’t cross into the mitochondria easily. Mitochondria make their own CoQ10 for this very reason. The reality is that whilst you might get a small benefit from taking CoQ10 very little of your supplement is actually getting to where it needs to get to.

A breakthrough. 

Scientists at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand were studying mitochondrial dysfunction and its link to diseases of the brain, heart, liver and kidneys. They stumbled upon a way to get CoQ10 into the mitochondria by simply adding a positive charge. This simple change caused CoQ10 to flood the mitochondria – a significant breakthrough as no one had ever been able to deliver antioxidants to the mitochondria before.

Umm! I thought about this for awhile. This random spam email was trying to tell me something. The things that caught my eye were the statement that the release of this ConenzymeQ10 from mitochondria was involved in the protection of the DNA from free-radicals, and the fact that simply adding a positive charge to the mitochondria resulted in a CoQ10 “flood.” I decided to look into it, and lo and behold the first thing I found was that the mitochondria are connected by microtubules. Microtubules that have a positively charged end and a negatively charged end. The simple fact of adding a positive charge to the mitochondria can only mean one thing – the microtubules are conducting electricity.

Once I came to this realization, then it became crystal clear to me that the living cell in animals and plants are actually an incredibly sophisticated, complex and compact electrical circuit. These microtubules run everywhere through the cytoskeleton and the cytoplasm. And not just microtubules. There are also many other connections like microfilaments and intermediate filaments that are all conducting electricity. In addition the mictrotubules that play a key role in genetic processes, like the mitotic spindles that pull the chromosomes apart, must also be conducting electricity. No wonder Hameroff and Penrose were able to detect “quantum fluctuations” in the microtubules of neurons. Quantum processes were at work, namely the passage of electrons as an electrical current.

Hameroff and Penrose have introduced a new argument in favor of their theory. The underlying origins of EEG rhythms (brain waves) remains a mystery even after a century of clinical use, and they now assert that quantum vibrations (e.g. in megahertz) appear to interfere and produce much slower EEG “beat frequencies.” We are therefore in a position to put this question to rest once and for all. It is not the quantum microtubule fluctuations in the microtubules of the neurons that are causing the brain waves. It is simply the electrical currents flowing all through the cell in the microtubules, the microfilaments and the intermediate filaments that are combining into certain characteristic frequencies as different groups of cells are turned on in the various states of consciousness, that is responsible for the EEG. What else would you expect now that you realize that the living cell is not a chemical unit at all, but is actually an exquisitely complex unit of electrical circuitry. A pulsating ball of electromagnetic energy of incomparable sophistication. And there are trillions of them in every living creature, each cell being orchestrated and directed by quantum computing processes in the DNA.

xxxxx

Criando um comentario:

 – then quantum computing is occurring in these microtubules.

  • We are also told that microtubules have a polarity, that is to say they have a positively charged end and a negatively charged end.