Posts Tagged ‘Creation Museum’

Evolução versus religião na América perturbando escolares, e a Mediação pela Matrix/DNA Theory

sábado, janeiro 4th, 2014

Este assunto na América está ficando muito sério e perigoso, pois veja neste artigo como ele está atormentando dia a dia a vida de professores, estudantes, reitores, políticos, etc. Está até derrubando grandes colégios, quando os financiadores descontentes com o ensino da Evolução retiram seu patrocínio.

Mas o conflito não deveria existir se ambos os lados tivessem um pouco mais de conhecimento sôbre a real Natureza e os profundos significados ocultos em suas criações, ou seja, se soubessem o que a Teoria da Matrix/DNA tem descoberto e reunindo mais evidencias para seus modelos que as duas outras partes juntas.

Tentarei traduzir aqui um inteiro artigo publicado por quem realmente sabe o que está se passando, pois trata-se de um professor que está sendo perseguido num destes colégios, ao mesmo tempo que vou copiando aqui os meus comentários postados no debate que se segue ao artigo.

2013 Was a Terrible Year for Evolution

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/02/2013-was-a-terrible-year-for-evolution.html

Karl W. Giberson

By Karl W. Giberson – 2014/01/02/

Meu comentário postado no artigo do The Daily Beast 

MatrixDNA –  

 The problem is not the real natural process of evolution and real facts of origins hidden under the Bible’s scripture. It is all about human interpretations, as discovered now by a new and different interpretation of those real facts, called Matrix/DNA Theory. The facts that Science and the Bible deal with are the same, the interpretations of evolutionists are 50% right and 50% wrong, while the interpretations of Christians are just 50% right where evolutionists are 50% wrong, and vice-versa. Evolution of biological systems is a fact, the problem is the neo-Darwinian theory, pointing out wrong interpretations of real mechanisms and non-complete, since that the three variables VSI – Variation, Selection, Inheritance – are merely half history because the variable are seven, not three. The problem is that Darwin and reductionism has separated Cosmological Evolution and Biological evolution into two blocks without any link between then, and it is a big mistake. Then, the four variable acting here over evolution are not seen, producing gaps and denying the effort of explanations, which are opportunistically used by creationists.

 Genesis, Adam and Even in the Paradise, were not revealed by supernatural beings, it was the memory of ancient people remembering by flashes the history of our ancestors comprising 13,7 billion years, history registered at the memory of our DNA at the center of neurons.  But those flashes were wrong interpreted, the Paradise is the right description of ancestors at the state of thermodynamic system under equilibrium by metaphors.

See a little bit of Matrix/DNA interpretation and discover how it is just the factor that is missing for keeping faith and Science, everybody will be happy.

Tradução:

MatrixDNA –  

O problema não é o real natural processo da Evolução e os reais fatos das origens ocultos sob a escritura da Bíblia. É a respeito das interpretações humanas, tal como foi descoberto agora por uma nova e diferente interpretação daqueles fatos reais, denominada Teoria da Matrix/DNA. Os fatos que a a Ciência e a Bíblia estão abordando são os mesmos, as interpretações dos evolucionistas estão 50% corretas e 50% erradas, enquanto as interpretações dos cristãos são justamente 50% corretas onde evolucionistas são 50% errados, e vice-versa.  A evolução dos sistemas biológicos são um fato, o problema é a teoria neo-darwinista, afirmando errôneas interpretações de real mecanismos naturais, e incompleta, desde que as três variáveis VSI- Variação, Seleção, Hereditariedade – são meramente a metade da história, porque as variáveis são em numero de sete e não três. O problema é que Darwin e o reducionismo têm separado Evolução Cosmológica e Evolução Biológica em dois blocos sem nenhum elo entre eles, e isso é um grande equivoco. Então, as quatro variáveis atuando aqui sobre a evolução não estão sendo vistas, produzindo falhas na teoria da evolução e anulando os esforços de explicações, o que são oportunisticamente usados pelos criacionistas.

Gênese, Adão e Eva no Paraíso, não foram revelados por seres supernaturais, foi apenas a memória do povo antigo se lembrando através de visões relâmpagos e intuições, a história de nossos ancestrais compreendida em 13,7 bilhões de anos, história registrada na memória do nosso DNA, que estão no centro dos neurônios. Mas aquelas visões foram equivocadamente interpretadas, o Paraíso é a correta descrição dos ancestrais no estado de sistemas sob equilíbrio termodinâmico, por metáforas.

Veja um pouco da interpretação da Matrix/DNA e descubra como ela é justamente o fator que está faltando para manter fé e Ciência, e todos serão felizes.

Comentario:

Saltinecracker –  

If God is so great and so perfect then why are their birth defects.So God couldn’t create a being that can’t give birth to something that doesn’t have defects. That doesn’t sound so smart to me nor  God like.

Reply da Matrix/DNA:

MatrixDNA –  

@Saltinecracker  –  That’s an easy answer by creationism. The Creator is responsible by His creation, not for the wrong practice of free will making new wrong creations. And easy answer for Matrix/DNA Theory: our ancestors, about four billions years ago, yet under the primitive evolutionary shape of an astronomical system, choose to be a closed selfish system, cutting relations with external world, closing the doors to Evolution. The Universe reacted applying the force of entropy, the system decayed here, initially under a chaotic state, creating this salvage biosphere in state of chaos, and we, humans, inherited that mistake in shape of selfish genes. So, birth defects are still happening.

Comentario:

GarthMaul – 
If evolution is real, why is it nowhere observed to occur in nature? If science cannot prove that it occurs, why should anyone accept it? Seems to me it is more reasonable to believe in an invisible intelligent creator, than an invisible unintelligent who-knows-what.

Reply da Matrix/DNA:

@GarthMaul  There is a third alternative, you are missing it: an invisible intelligent creator, but, not supernatural. Be it “who-knows-what”, something triggered the Big Bang. Why not a natural intelligent system merely doing the same thing that triggered the Big Bang of an envelope spermatozoon inside an ovule at the initial moment of yours own body? Evolution is proved by 9 months of embryogenesis, when an initial ball of cells evolves into a being. We can’t see Cosmological Evolution due the relativistic effect: the point in time/space that we are as observers is microscopic, while only a macroscopic observer can see evolution as we see it at embryogenesis. So, if you want calling the mysterious system existing before this Universe as God, feel free, no problem for us, agnostics and evolutionists.

Steve50 –  

I thought maybe this article would have some evidence….nope!!! All about being offended that we don’t buy this stuff. We are not like animals. We create. The gulf in between attests to creation. Their is no in between.

Reply da MatrixDNA

MatrixDNA – 

@steve50  Yous said: “The gulf in between attests to creation. There is no in between”

Nope. There are no gulf in betweens. It happens that in Nature there is something called “hierarchy of systems”. If you does not know genetics, you should believe in evolutionary gaps between the shape of a fetus and the shape of an embryo when watching a static movie of embryology. Who works the informations that transforms fetus into embryos is the DNA, a hidden system. Same way has worked biological evolution here, from bacteria to monkeys. It happens that you does not know the real source for biological systems. At Matrix/DNA models we have found that astronomical galactic systems has as building blocks a working primitive system that has all life’s properties. So, the Milk Way is the real LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor) which Darwin thought that was microscopic and living at earth surface. Every gulf in between at Darwinian theory is now fulfilled by informations supplied by that hidden hierarchic system. I agree that nature is surprising us every day at each discovery, I agree that nature is a job of supreme intelligence, but… my body seems a job of intelligence also and I know that my parents – even that they are intelligent – did not applied any intelligence and no magics for doing me. Why not God?

EABlair –  

I find more dignity and wonder in the notion that I am related, however distantly, to every other living thing on the planet than in believing that my ultimate ancestor started out as a pile of dirt breathed on by an invisible spirit.

Reply by MatrixDNA – 

@EABlair But…the first living being on the planet, from which evolved every living being, with exception of human species, was made by an invisible spirit that breathed a pile of dirt or initial soup. Natural systems are like computers, composed by hardware and software. We created computers merely copying what exists in Nature. I know it because the bits-information that penetrated terrestrial atoms at that soup, were photons radiated by galactic decay, and they drove the atoms to make new combinations, reproducing here the building blocks of galaxies in its biological fashion, as cell’s systems. The anatomy and functionality of those astronomical building blocks are the same we see at a base-pair of nucleotides, the building blocks of DNA. So, there is a photonic counterpart of every natural system, you can call it “software”, or “invisible spirit”, no problem, you are always right. Human species has a novelty, called consciousness, which is the same software of atoms and galaxies. It happens that the “spirit”, or the software, came with the Big Bang, was sleeping at atoms, dreaming at galaxies, began waken up at animals, and lifted up at human beings. You are the one that breathed on that soup.

Something else: we are discovering that the seven principals shapes of any human body under a life’s cycle, vibrating at specific frequencies, the same sequence that vibrates the seven frequencies of any natural light wave. So, natural light is the source that imprints the vital cycle over inertial mass, like dark matter. In other words, light is the first source of a code for life. The Bible says that first God created the light. It seems thru for me now, since that natural light seems to be the arms and hands used by God for creation, everything by natural genetic process. And remember that light is composed by photons, or vice-versa.

somervillechangeling – 

Quote: “Hey, did you know that Adam and Eve were not the first humans and never even existed? And that you can still be a Christian and believe that?”

I have no problems with Adam and Eve not being the first physical humans, but they were the first spiritual humans made in God’s image…

Reply by MatrixDNA –  

@somervillechangeling  Adam and Eve were not the first humans, they were not humans, but, they existed as ancestors of all living beings. The fable of Eden Paradise was written by primitive ancient people with brains not occupied by this accumulated culture in the last 4 thousands years. Their brains were almost empty, so, at their dreams, the neurons produced flashes of scenes and events registered at their DNA’s memory. It happens that DNA is 3,5 billion years old, but its history did not began here. DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal Matrix, a kind of DNA of our ancestors systems, like atoms and galaxies. So, the MatrixDNA  is at least, 13,7 years old, and its whole life’s history is registered at our DNA, most of them, registered at those 300 genes that emerged with the first living being, and today is the most part of “junk DNA”. The description of Eden Paradise by biblical authors is a metaphor for describing the building blocks of galaxies, which were our ancestors, which is registered at our DNA . If you describes a closed perfect natural system under thermodynamic equilibrium, yours description with “scientific words” will describes the same images of an Eden Paradise. I have the system designed here and I can see here every symbol used in Bible: the serpent, the tree, the apple, a paradisiac system, and the system has a circuit  composed by two flows of informations. it happens that those two energetic flows works exactly as works the spermatozoon and ovule at sexual organisms. What the problem if the biblical writers – who never saw a spermatozoon and ovule – choose a name for them, like Adam and Eve? Really they were our female and male ancestors, but, hey, when the top of evolution was the galactic shape. The fable of the Paradise in Genesis was not revealed by supernatural beings, neither by God: it was merely sweet memories from the past when our ancestors where like Gods… without consciousness…  Even the entropic decay of that system could be described as The Fall of Adam and Even, and the beginning here as “the sons of necessity” because here they lifted up as opened systems.  C.S. Lews was pretty right !

somervillechangeling – 
@Saltinecracker  –

I’m inclined to doubt evolution just as much as I doubt intelligent design. Both sides cherry pick arguments and have axioms that I’m not sure will hold up as viable in the next civilization that replaces ours as ours did the medieval.

Reply by 

MatrixDNA – 

@somervillechangeling @Saltinecracker  – Intelligent Designer has some good points, like the irreducible reversibility to a LUCA existing at Earth. Life at earth is product of a design, the source of this design never existed at Earth, but that source was not an intelligent being. Like the genome of yours parents that designed yours body was not intelligent being. LUCA (the Last Universal Common Ancestor) of all living beings is the building blocks of galaxies, and its picture is at my website. Every detail of any living body of any species are reducible to LUCA, but LUCA leaves in the sky. I don’t know and don’t have yet the picture of the system that triggered the Big Bang. The MatrixDNA theoretical models are suggesting that that system must be a conscious intelligent system, since that we are seeing consciousness being reproduced here. But the models suggests that inside this Universe is occurring a process of genetic reproduction, reproduction of that ex-machine system. if you want call it God, no problem with that. I know that the origins of life here did not require intelligence.

 XXXXXXX

Obs: Meu nickname no Daily é MatrixDNA

XXXXXXX

Tradução do Artigo no The Daily Beast

2013 Foi um Terrível Ano para Evolução

Nunca duvide da crescente evidencia – 64 por cento dos Protestantes Evangélicos e brancos rejeitam a ciência, e professores dos Colégios cristãos são atacados se a noticia de que estão ensinando evolução se espalha para alem da escola.

Evolução não trabalhou bem em 2013. O ano terminou com o livro ante-evolucionista “A Duvida de Darwin” como best seller na categoria de paleontologia da Amazon. O estado do Texas consumiu uma boa parte do ano tentando manter o mais respeitado texto da Biologia para o médio ensino fora das escolas publicas. E o líder ante-evolucionista e administrador do Creation Museum, Ken Ham, fêz seu discurso anual dizendo que “o prego final tinha sido posto no tumulo da pobre e cambaleante teoria da evolução do Darwin.

( continuar esta tradução quando o tempo permitir)

Evolution did not fare well in 2013. The year ended with the anti-evolution bookDarwin’s Doubt as Amazon’s top seller in the “Paleontology” category. The state of Texas spent much of the year trying to keep the country’s most respected high school biology text out of its public schools. And leading anti-evolutionist and Creation Museum curator Ken Ham made his annual announcement that the “final nail” had been pounded into the coffin of poor Darwin’s beleaguered theory of evolution