The Universal Matrix/DNA – Artigos

You see I’m going to have to disagree with Bill’s biased opinions, I think that all children should know things so that they can make there own informed decisions about life rather than being forced into one thing or another. They choose religion one must accept that, if one follows science then so be it.

You are right accordingly with my personal viewpoint, which must be no totally right accordingly to the final Truth. This debate is between two extreme opposite world views – theists and atheists – and your suggestion means you are in the middle, like me. The question of this video is too much important, it is about the chose of the destiny of human kind. We in the middle need our voice be heard also, but all that came here suddenly disappears. We need here a list for subscribers. Or not?

@DarwinsFriend Yes, let’s everyone rebel and become kings. There would be no inhabitants in our own personal kingdoms though since everyone one is king of their own inhabitantless kingdom as well. We will turn the universe into a hell. Or did you think you would deny one single individual the rebellion you enjoy? Party on, alone.

Wrong. We, evolutionists don’t want to be kings. We want to rebel against any gods as described on the Bible, against humans’ gangs that gets money and power based on the rules of predators/prey observed in this chaotic and salvage biosphere, we want the universal human family as dreamed by a man, Jesus Christ. Everybody is our brooder with equal rights and obligations, every mother is our mother, every child is our child… This is the great cause of Humanity, going to its own transcendence.

Someone give me proof that creation is wrong WITHOUT using evolutionary theories

That’s easy. The mental transformations of any individual human being due the process of life’s cycle is projected as mental transformation of the whole specie and vice-versa. While a baby yet the individual impregnates objects with fantasies because has no notion of the real world. This Universe has a natural system growing under a process of life’s cycle. Atom, galaxy, cell system are shapes as blastula, fetus, embryo. Mind is new shape that was born a minute ago, believe in Santa Claus.

That doesn’t work.

The pertubations emanating from the transcendental dimesionless void fluctuate a priori via the superposition quantum entangled mass density, with an impulse inversely proportional to the time flux patternized through electrostatic equilibrium.

And finally that impulse takes several units of DNA for to make a unique being appropriately called “DNAunion”. Which is funny because spreads only love because is our brother in the mithy, tiny. lovely lord PinkUnicorn. Thanks, bro…

Consider this. God created a perfect world, man sinned so he had to destroy what he made but not completely because there was a righteous man alive and he saved the animals. The flood completely altered the state of the world and the ongoing natural disasters are actually considered a sign of the 2nd coming of Christ as they get closer and closer together. These are my beliefs. I’m not stating them as fact because I know people wouldn’t like that.

Hummm… let’s see the logic here. Suppose you are a rich man, owner of a beautiful farm and have 20 sons. Suddenly yours 19 sons make something wrong that causes perturbation in the farm’s harmony. You kill your 19 son, keep one, destroy the farm and begins building the farm again. Please… this is the most stupid history I have seen. First, if you are a father able to kill yours sons – be their fault what could be – you are a monster. Destroying the whole for reassuring harmony?!

Read Genesis?

Yes. But I also went in Amazon jungle searching the origins of anything, included how salvages creates their mythologies. Under their beverages they described same thing that Orientals said 7.000 years ago and called chakras, etc. I draw the description: is the same description of the shape of DNA. Then I went further about origins of biological systems and got a model of the shape of the world in that time: it is the same described in Genesis. Is the voice of our memory, not the voice of gods.

When I said state I meant that it changed how the ground lays, formed mountains and such-like altering the seasons. Besides, wouldn’t anything made by the same being have a similar pattern?

It seems that Noah’s event is a repetition of Adams event brought from the sky to Earth. There is a sin, the fall, etc. But the state of the world that felt at Earths surface and was reduced to a microscope cell system happened 4 billion years ago when a closed thermodynamic system, astronomical ( I have its theoretical model) was attacked by a natural force measured as entropy, a flood of free radicals, not by a flood of water. That system shows the symbols of serpent, Adam/Eve, etc. Design.

You are a liar

1) Chakras have NOTHING to do with ANYTHING remotely connected to DNA

2) I don’t buy for a second that you went to the Amazon based on your reference to people there as “Salvages” (Savages btw)

3) We don’t have any records of anyone sayign anything 7,000 years ago, writting has only been around abotu 5,000

5) Genesis doesn’t cover it either

You are a closed mind which makes you blind. See the rude artistic image drawn as two serpents involved in a spiral having 7 stars among then ( kundaline and its chakras). Now see the rude artistic image of two strains of sugar+phosphate involved in a spiral having the nitrogenous bases between them. They are bot images far away from the reality due difficult of visions. Yes a lived in Amazon 7 years, exactly dates does not matter here and genesis cover it but with wrong interpretations.

King’s Lomatia is unusual because because it has three sets of chromosomes (a triploid) and is therefore sterile, reproduction occurs only vegetatively: when a branch falls, that branch grows new roots, establishing a new plant that is genetically identical to its parent. Although all the plants are technically separate in that each has its own root system, they are collectively considered to be one of the oldest living plant clones the plant has been cloning itself for at least 43,600 years.

That’s easy to understand for those who knows the universal formula for natural systems. Organisms with two chromosomes means that one is the left side and other is the right side of that formula, which can be seen as a face ( this is evolution from the primordial double particles with spins left and right). What would happen if the organism has two same sides of a face? The two original sides never could be linked into new face. When a chromosome falls he does not reproduces but self-recycles.

Guys, these debates in the comment section are ridiculous. Just let the ignorant creationists think what they want. I know it’s hard not to tell them they’re wrong constantly, but most of them are stubborn and won’t listen to fact. Just let them think what they want, and hopefully one day they will open there eyes.

They will open their eyes when NASA will discover the true cosmological model and all of us will discover that the narrative of Adam/Even in the Paradise is a narrative of a real event happened 4 billions years ago. But then, they will discover that the event was distorted due human interpretation of things that were not known in the time Bible was written. The event is registered in our memory, encrypted in our DNA and ancient authors of Bible got obscures flashes of a thermodynamic system.

God is the witness to the creation and claims so in the Bible. Adam is an eyewitness to the animals God made for him to name; Adam is the eyewitness to the first operation on a human to remove the compatible genetic material used to make Eve his perfect human companion. Adam and Eve are witnesses to the dialog with God and warning, and expulsion from the Garden of Eden for rebellion etc. as recorded in the Bible.

My biggest intellectual problem is that I never will understand how the contents of this stupid fiction book called “Bible” works like a viral meme that penetrates a human brain destroying the hard-wired configuration built by Nature and builds a new totally silly hard-wired configuration! My great lord PinkUnicorn, please, resuscitate Freud, Jung or someone else able to investigate and finding the cure for this disgrace that has caused such prejudice to Humanity.

Evolution is the belief that everything came from nothing for no reason at all. Furthermore, the so-called “scientific theory” of evolution is worhtless on a couple of counts. First, it can make no predictions about the future. Consequently, it can’t be evaluated like other scienticfic theories, which do make predictions about the future. Real scientific theories actually take a stance on the future, and thus, are subject to being modified. No so with evolution.

Evolution can make prediction about the future and Nature supports this prediction. In a Cartesian graphic having as coordinates time and space and the point of intersection being considered the starting point (the Big Bang), we see a system evolving till arriving here and now as conscious system. The line makes a curve and returns to the initial point but matter/energy are discarded likely is the placenta and we see a Big Birth, of a conscious being. Everything equal embryogenese. Need more?

If we deny evolution, or don’t evolve at all, our entire civilization would fall apart, and lead to a self destructive humanity.

But… if you accept Darwinian Theory of Evolution in such manner like think the most healthy and right-wing people today, as the unique Truth, you will build a social system mimicking the rules of what is seeing in Nature here and now. The salvage world shared between predator and prey, justifying your privileged status. This will be the world of Big Brother ruling the Brave New World. You need improve ToE, by leading it to see the rules of an ordered Nature in Cosmos. That’s Matrix/DNA Theory

you mean the world that murders 259,000,000 inconvenient people and 453,000,000 inconvenient babies

I know that religions taking the power and building social systems have only tortured human beings with slavery and is backwards in relation to human progress. I think that the two worldviews, when becomes fundamentalism, when a person think that this little human brain of this microscopic living being walking over the surface of this lost planetary point in this immense world full of universes should be able to know the final Truth, are both dangerous. Improve ToE.

I think the fossils we have are enough to prove biological evolution. But I don’t see logic in the idea that evolution was invented by the stupid matter of this lost planet. So, I went search if evolution was not existing before Biology here. The method used is comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems. The results ( which has the possibility of being wrong) leave me to see the same evolution at cosmological level, arising at the Big Bang. Then I think that ToE can be improved.

“improve ToE”

When a fossil is found, we do.

I think the fossils we have are enough to prove biological evolution. But I don’t see logic in the idea that evolution was invented by the stupid matter of this lost planet. So, I went search if evolution was not existing before Biology here. The method used is comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems. The results ( which has the possibility of being wrong) leave me to see the same evolution at cosmological level, arising at the Big Bang. Then I think that ToE can be improved.

do galaxies replicate with inheritance? Are they subject to natural selection

Hummm…the cosmological model of Matrix/DNA reveals the history of evolution of replication’s mechanism. Before any natural system reached the technology for self-replication there was the mechanism of self-recycling. In this mechanism, a system needs to die for its copy arise. It is easy to see it: a stellar system dies decomposed into dust, the dust is a nebulae and from this nebulae new stellar system arises, equal the anterior. We can improve ToE, if we go to our ancestor stars…and beyond

Maybe life requires “the stupid matter of this lost planet.” for life to emerge. A necessary step from a Galaxy, through a planet, to living organisms.

I’m a semi-retired artist.

The problem is with the word “life”. The cosmological models of Matrix/DNA shows that makes no sense to say that a cell is alive and a galaxy or an atom is not. Of sure, there are the difference of complexity, like the difference of a living cell and a living ape. All properties observed here in organisms we can see its principles – expressed or not – in those ancestors systems. A portion of matter of planets can not build a biological system, mas the system to which Earths belongs, can do.

Evolution didn’t need to be invented. It has to occur whenever you have variant replicators that are non-randomly culled. This happens in biology hence evolution occurs in biology.

That’s what we conclude rationally from Biology learned in school. I thought in this way too. But I made my own research, the research suggests new things that makes sense, and points to things that I was believing to be true and today makes no sense. One is that this Universe can not created new information beyond those that were here at the Big Bang. Evolution is a natural process composed by mechanisms and my results shows these mechanisms arisen at the Big Bang. It was not invented nowhere.

Question to atheists: What is wrong with the following affirmation?:

A chicken is the “ex-machine previous natural genetic design” of the embryo inside her egg that will be a chicken tomorrow”.

If nothing wrong, why should be wrong the following affirmation: ” God is the previous design like a conscious and intelligent chicken ex-machine existing outside this universe which is a cosmic egg and we, human beings, are the genes building his conscious son”. (???)

Plz enlighten me. How can 2 people start a race of 7 billion? lol

You know their kids wouldn’t be inbred but they’d have to fuck with each other so the second gen would start to be inbred and the 3rd would start to have various diseases. The 4th and 5th gen would start to produce mutated kids not capable of life and by the 6th everyone would die.

Either god made more Adam and Eves with different genomes to fuck with the original Adam and Eves kids or humanity wouldn’t exist today. lol

Austriak1 -Do you understand a semantics argument? Are you claiming a “god” designed life? For some reason I can’t post directly to you…

Semantics is the study of meaning. Meaning is what the source or sender expresses, communicates, or conveys in their message to the observer or receiver, and what the receiver infers from the current context. I think I understand. No, I am not claiming a god designed life. And you are going to the same pathway of others persons that has English as native language. Why the word “design” leads you straight to the idea of intelligent design by God? Don’t you accept “genetic previous natural design?

“Where is the scientific bases?”

You mean when you compare anatomy, when you compare the genomes, the circulatory system, the common ERVs?

I don’t understand why the creationists are so afraid to admit we are animals and related to all other life on Earth. Besides all the scientific proof. It’s just obvious to me…

I read a scientific book long ago relating a symposium among scientists, mathematicians ( I think Wiener and Rosenthal was there) when they conclude that in no way matter and energy, still organized in shape of human brain, could produce consciousness. In that time I found the evidences and calculations very reasonable. Then I think, there is no doubt that our physical flesh/bone body came from primates, but consciousness was something coming from outside biological evolution. It is not obvious.

All life came from other life. Is it right? If so, the formula for making the second life was in the first life (you know, the DNA, etc)..Right? I have called this formula “design” and people that had English as native language have criticized me, saying it is not design. Looking at dictionaries I saw that English definitions only uses the sense as human intelligent design, reduced to business, job. In Italian, design also means any natural shape, as drawn. Do you know better name for formula ?

We don’t know the source of life. Some believe that is a built in feature , that energy and matter will eventually organize into life. There are more questions than answers… The point of the video is to NOT teach creationism as an answer to life, because there is NO evidence for it.

geezusispan in reply to Austriak1 1 minute ago

Austriak1 in reply to geezusispan (Show the comment) 1 second ago

You said: “I don’t understand why the creationists are so afraid to admit we are animals”. I told about the final conclusion in that scientific symposium that matter can not extrapolates for to be conscious of itself because I don’t understand how materialists (atheists) can reduce human beings to “improved apes”. No “soul”. It is here that creationists hates atheists, all hopes of some meaning for existence goes down. Maybe we are apes, I have no problem with it. Where is the scientific bases?

“Where is the scientific bases?”

You mean when you compare anatomy, when you compare the genomes, the circulatory system, the common ERVs?

I mean: where is the scientific bases for believing that humans are merely improved apes and consciousness is produced by matter when matter became conscious of itself? I asked it based in two premises:1) modern neurology has not found how neurons are linked with the mind; 2) When and how scientists proved that the results of that scientific symposium is wrong?

What I gave you is evidence that we are apes (us, homo sapiens).

However, are you suggesting that the other species are not conscious of themselves and their surrounding?

Good point. I know what you are talking about: several scientific experiments and observations suggesting other species are conscious. But the difference between human production and apes production, the question if apes have dreams when sleeping like us, the concept of “mind”, the difference between thoughts without inter-connections and continuous thought, etc., reveals a “jump” that open the possibility of insertion of informations into human brain coming from outside biological matter.

You need look no further than the identically broken GULO gene we share in common with other apes.

I know. But this is not the most weird thing about shared genes. There is other…incredible! We share the selfish gene in common with ancient galaxies. Wait…I will explain… Selfishness is the state of closed systems. The opposite is altruism=opened systems. And in the whole universal history there is only one event were a portion of matter is organized as closed system: the building block of galaxies. Seven bodies inter-connected composing a system, isolated and self-recycling. Our ancestor

I’m sorry, but nothing in what you said makes us different from the other apes (since we, homo sapiens, are apes).

You are right. here in Amazon jungle, everyday in the evening when I arrive at the cave from hunting, my girlfriend – a lovely orangotanga called Maryllin – is at the door waiting for me with opened arms and reading the new poem that she wrote for me.

Since other apes do display social interactions (to the point where genocides actually occurs between populations), uses tools and communicate between each other, I am afraid your sarcasm is lost.

Ok… sorry by the joke, it was not sarcasm intended. I am trying to remember that two scientific premises, two scientific indications that we don’t be stressed to believe something yet. Of course, physically, flash meat appearance, we are merely improved apes. But I have my own method of research and the theoretical models are suggesting that there are a new natural systems acting over biological evolution here, and consciousness should be product of informations coming from this system.

Atharkas in reply to Austriak1 12 hours ago

Austriak1 in reply to Atharkas (Show the comment) 1 second ago

whiteowl1415 in reply to Austriak1 (Show the comment) 11 hours ago

Austriak1 in reply to whiteowl1415 (Show the comment) 1 second ago

It’s him. He’s not trying to hide it, really. He has “Matrix/DNA” as his profile name. According to him, Youtube spontaneously deleted his old account for some reason. Don’t know why, he seems like a rather harmless crank to me.

I don’t said Youtube deleted my account. I was trying to fusion an old lost account with the new one and I got it, but I need to fix the problem that the name kept is the old one. By the way I am trying to defending my worldview like everybody is trying to defend their here. My suggestion is teaching only ToE in science class, but we need bring back a class of philosophy, the study of evolution of human thought, where others worldview can be informed, included ID theory and Matrix/DNA Theory..

Maybe he just thinks they did. He doesn’t strike me as the most computer-savvy person, having looked at his website (which was hacked by some Turks and he’s never bothered to fix it).

But still, if you click through to his new profile, it does read “Matrix/DNA” so he’s not trying to hide his identity. Instead, he’s proud of his so-called ‘discovery’ and wants to publicize it as much as he can.

Ohhh… you said something that is the most interest for me. Actually my website was hacked, prejudicing about 15.000 people/month from whole world that was visiting, doing some research. I don’t understand nothing about websites and my time is very busy, so, my question: is it possible to fix it? Do you know how? Know someone that can do it? I am not proud and did any discovery: the theory is suggesting new approaches to diseases and technologies as automated systems. It can improve something.

If they deleted his old account, then why can I access it? Either way he’s just a nut, I ignore him as I don’t expect anyone to take him seriously anyway.

We have a complex problem here, which needs to be solved through an educated debate. Evolution is a process that we can see in embryogenesis: one initial cell is shared into a diversification of different cells, shapes are transformed into other shapes in the way that the first initial shape (cell, blastula, ) is not recognizable in the later shapes. The built body does not comes to light in shape of blastula, neither fetus, it only comes to light in shape of a final human being, this is…

Evolutionists believe a talking snake is less credible than a talking gorilla/man that climbed out of a prehistoric petri dish .

Talking is not invention of gorillas. Millions years ago “genes” were “talking”among themselves and billions years ago, before DNA’s emergence here, the ancestral of DNA had its elements talking among themselves in the sky. But for transforming this “talking” into sounds waves in manner that humans can heard, the DNA need the apparatus of voice, which snakes does not have. Talking snakes is a fiction, not rational, and talking primates becoming humans is rational.

Austriak1 in reply to TheHigherVoltage (Show the comment) 1 second ago

TheHigherVoltage in reply to Austriak1 10 minutes ago

Austriak1 in reply to TheHigherVoltage (Show the comment) 1 second ago

Tom Adams claims to be a genius, yet spends his time trying to debunk evolution on a youtube thread. Brilliant! This shit is entertainment. Are the evil scientist listening yet. Ha ha!

Don’t worry! The mighty, tiny, lord PinkUnicorn said that he will send a special X-ray from the solar flare at December, 12, 2012, straight upon the head of Tom Adams for illuminating his ideas. The energy then will be transformed in pure sweet honey for feed him and turning better his humor. Pink is all love. Pink bless you!

As an agnostic atheist I think no one can say for sure that a God doesn’t exist, but on the other hand I don’t think anyone can say with certainty that a God DOES exist. The only evidence is subjective hearsay and the spurious reasoning of the already indoctrinated.

If a God does indeed exist, though, it certainly isn’t the primitive, petty, jealous, genocidal, misogynistic, foreskin-hating, magical patriarchal buffoon described by the Bible. That creature reeks of human-inspired conceit.

Agnostics here, Subscribes here!

So, there are believers: theists and atheists. And no believers: agnostics. As an agnostic myself, I am watching this debate with discomfort, because there is a third option – the agnostic worldview, ethics, morals, behavior and life’s purpose – and I need this worldview be the standard education of children, but we have no voice, neither here, neither at public arena. Let’s try beginning something here? Say hello and stick straight to the facts.

No, that’s wrong, you fucking retard. Most atheists aren’t believers, and agnostics fall under both categories, agnostic theists, and agnostic atheists. Learn the definitions of the words you use before spouting your ignorance.

This kind of aggressiveness is proof of fundamentalism produced by beliefs. Agnostics has no motivation for reacting in this way. Retardation is what happens with you: your education is not complete, we can see it in your words. If you are an atheist, how hell do you understand what atheism is? Don’t know the fatality described by Godel’s theorem? Nobody can know the Truth about a system, a process, standing inside it. You are inside the process of atheism. Try to listen who is outside.

God is a myth. You haven’t typed a fucking to change that FACT. God belief is more proof of evolution and our primate origins with it’s primitive superstitions.

It is dependable what is your meaning for “god”. All meanings given by religions must be wrong since the founders did not know Nature how we know it today. All beliefs about “god” are not rational, included the non-belief in god. The very fact that inside this Universe we are seeing the existence of this unknown thing called “consciousness”, the rationalization that a Universe made with matter/energy could not create “consciousness”, leave an open possibility of “cosmic consciousness”. God?

The level of order and sophistication found in nature is unreal m-theory; evolution; quantum mechanics; right down to the strings found in atoms all working in perfect harmony. Did you know that the likely hood that the universe could cause a life permitting universe is 1/10 billion to the power of 124 its crazy. We still don’t understand all the mysteries in the universe and you want me to believe it was some cosmic fluke? I don’t know man what your say is a alot harder to believe in than God

Do you think that consciousness exists only here? Do you think that only “life”can produce consciousness?

My calculations suggests there are zillions of lifeforms and zillions of types of organized matter/energy that can support consciousness. There are lifeforms and consciousness more evolved than us and less evolved, certainly we are not at the bottom neither the top. Maybe there is a kind of consciousness at the top ( not how creationists defines their god). If you want call it God…

To you first two questions my answer is no. I agree with what you saying but hear me out. God is a divine will or consciousness which created governs and gives purpose to the universe. We are made in the image of God In that we are conscious. We have the ability to create, govern and give purpose to our surroundings. What makes us sons of God (not to confuse with The Son of God) is our connection or oneness with God through the holy spirit…………..

No, since I was born I never had free will and never could do what I think should be the right thing to do. I was born as product of chaos – from this chaotic and salvage biosphere – and condemned to be slave like I am till now. And I saw my family, my ancestors, my neighbors, everybody in the same situation. If there is god he is the god of people in Wall Street, they have some free will, not mine. The real world suggests that your tortured mind is out of control, sorry. .

A spirit which was planted into mankind like a seed. Mankind was given the option of freewill “the knowledge of good and evil” knowing that we would take it and be condemned. What we do with this freewill is the test. Will we use it to bring “life” into the world and bear fruit or will we use it for personal gain and take life from the world becoming a weed. When the harvest comes it is the fruit that will be taken because they have proven they are sons of God. This is the christian Idea of God

My life’s experience in this world and the world I have seen does not support the christian theory. The suffering and torture I have seen upon my loved people of my species makes me hate any kind of god. If I meet any god I go immediately to war trying to destroy it because if exists a god he is responsible for torturing me and my brothers. My method of investigation has suggested the existence of a ex-machine consciousness but totally natural, and absent here.

Design aims for simplicity. Life is complex and inefficient, wasteful, lacks plan, and full of decay.In design, form typically follows function yet life shows many examples of different forms with the same function, and some structures and even entire organisms without apparent function. Humans naturally look for design because we are pattern seeking mammals.Intelligent design is subjective (cont.).

form from increasingly complex molecules.Self replicators are simple enough to form via prebiotic chemistry.Self-replication sets the stage for evolution to begin.Biochemistry inevitably produces complex products.In synthetic DNA, a different assemblage of molecules can replicate and evolve just like DNA and RNA. These different molecules can even convert to DNA and back, and has also shown stronger than regular DNA or RNA, in that they’re more resistant to degradation by biological nucleases.

But…but…it is just what I am saying: there was the perfect Paradise, the perfect Adam, they was the most simplest perfect design, but then, happened the sin and the fall, down to the worst complex design…

Sorry, I was joking…but this biblical allegory fits surprisingly with the real history: the perfect and simplest Newtonian watch ( this astronomical system) fail/evolved into the inefficient complex cell system. Or do you have doubt that it happened? Do you see continuing evolution?

The process of Abiogenesis need not be the only requirement for evolution to begin. Why is that? Because we already know from observation in 2011 that stars naturally produce complex compounds, like amino acids and even sugar molecules that don’t need to be synthesized in space. Stars naturally produce them in a matter of weeks and spew them into deep space, where they can drift onto forming planets. Its a natural occurrence.There is no law of biogenesis saying that very primitive life cannot

Ok, our difference is that you see evolution in prebiotic chemistry arising from the simplicity of molecules reactions and I see in the same prebiotic evolution atoms being guided by photons that works like genes towards the reproduction of a previous, astronomical design. Wait… I know my suggestion seems totally absurd ( it was for me before 30 years of thousands of natural phenomena suggesting that it, at least, makes sense). For instance, the previous prechemical design, non-living (cont)

shows the mechanical/magnetic principles that evolved into chemicals replicators. I mean, replication is a mechanism that exists before the origins of chemistry at Earth. Astronomical systems, without chemistry, are self-replicating. But their replication is shared into two phases: the original system needs dying for producing its copy. It is recycling.You can see how in “The Matrix´s Software at the Evolutionary Stage of Closed System” ( Google this name in “image”). Take time to understanding

Okay. That’s a hypothesis. Now demonstrate that it’s correct.

Expulsar este ateista fanatico

I can’t explain 30 years of hard work in 500 letters. But there is a simple parameter: your body began with molecules called gametes which were driven by instructions of a design ex-machine in relation to your inner universe (the ovule) towards the formation of a cell system. Or do you think those molecules only did everything obeying the forces of chemical reactions? If you have here pure Nature explaining to you how she make things, why do you go after explanations that you never saw?!

Demonstrate how “astronomical systems” work “without chemistry”, and demonstrate how they are “self-replicating”. You’re making baseless assertions.

Have you seen the formula I suggested above? Go Google, images, type “The Matrix´s Software at the Evolutionary Stage of Closed System”.Then type “Humam Life’s Cycle and Astronomical Life’s Cycle”- second image. And for understanding the origins of sexual reproduction see the picture “Origin Of Sex Chromosomes”. But the explanation for photons as “life’s designers” see “Light – The Electro-Magnetic Spectrum by Matrix/DNA Theory” in Google images. Please, don’t go..

Describing a gamete as a molecule is utterly disingenuous, since gametes are a type of cell and composed of many, many, many molecules. And yes, the molecules of the cell act according to the natural laws of biochemistry, no supernatural influence needed. Would you mind translating “instructions of a design ex-machine in relation to your inner universe” into intelligible English please? Your pseudo-intellectual gibberish is tiring.

Nope. It is clear that instead searching knowledge and changing information you have a political agenda. It is not my business. That’s explain your insults, which finished forever our conversation. Only a stupid closed mind could attain to the word””gamete” without understanding the unnecessary mention of chromosomes molecules. Only a stupid could say that astronomical systems are supernatural. Only a stupid does not understand that the human specie is the ex-machine design outside the ovule.

Confirmed idiot

16) Debunking “darwins-theory-of-evolution(d­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ot)com”: “We now know that there are in fact tens of thousands of irreducibly complex systems on the cellular level.”

I am challenging any person to point out one, only one, detail in any biological system or at the cellular level that I could not locate the its ancestral mechanic/electric/magnetic shape in the universal formula of natural systems. It means that all of them are not only reducible to LUCA, but to galaxies and atoms.

15) Debunking “darwins-theory-of-evolution(d­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ot)com”: “Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is a theory in crisis in light of the tremendous advances we’ve made in molecular biology, biochemistry, genetics over the past fifty years.”

Of course Darwin could not describe in full the natural process called “evolution” with the knowledge of 150 years ago. For explaining evolution today and filling the Darwinian gaps we are increasing more 4 variables over those three discovered by Darwin.

14) Debunking “darwins-theory-of-evolution(d­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ot)com”:”Darwi­n conceded that, “If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down.” Such a complex organ would be known as an “irreducibly complex system”.

Darwin did not know the astronomical LUCA, to whom all cellular pieces are reducible.

13) Debunking “darwins-theory-of-evolution(d­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ot)com”: “Breeders eliminate undesirable traits gradually over time. Similarly, natural selection eliminates inferior species gradually over time.”

Here ID uses strategy for getting the readers (common people=inferior class) against ToE. But Natural selection has not elected “superior species” when gave the reward of transcendence to be the next top evolutionary specie. Was not dinosaur, but the small cyanodont choose to be mammal.

12) Debunking “darwins-theory-of-evolution(d­­­­­­­­­­­­­­ot)com”:”Natural selection is the naturalistic equivalent to domestic breeding.”

There are several differences. One is that the human breeder is visible to the specie being driven and the natural breeder of evolution from aminoacids to apples was not visible to apples. Its is about “hierarchy of systems” where informations comes from systems that we can’t see/touch. Other is.. natural selection always has the purpose of self-reproduction

Why is it that only creationists make these arguments? If something was wrong with evolution scientists in general would be objecting not just creationists. Creationists purposefully or ignorantly ignore the evidence and then make these twisted comments in regards to science that no credible scientist would.. Crazy spins on thermal dynamics that solely come from creationists for example. Rejecting fact on the basis of faith is crazy.

I think there are faults in both sides. I am seeing the current worldview among scientists is being driven by Physics/Math. Evolution is natural process that had worked at biological/cosmological systems, so, why Biology is not trying to expand the understanding of evolution to its roots, which is coming from the so called “non-living systems”? If Universe is a living thing, Physics never will grasp it The result is a non-complete view of evolution, a good opportunity for creationism.

11) Debunking “darwins-theory-of-evolution(d­­­­­­­­­­­­­ot)com”:”Natural selection is the preservation of a functional advantage that enables a species to compete better in the wild.”

No, sometimes is not. For instance the transformation of a reptile laying egg out into a mammal keeping the egg inside was a mutation disvantage since the female became less able to hunt/escape. This mutation was expression of potential genes in junk DNA: astronomical systems already puts eggs out and keep inside.

Sorry, but it wasnt a disadvantage. A pregnant female can move from cave to cave, or go collect fruits, vegetables and what have you. If you have a nest full of eggs you need to keep warm, you can´t do all those things. You have to stay near the nest and keep the eggs warm. So this was even a pretty big advantage !!!

My friend, we, from the jungle, always are laughing with these kinds of jokes from civilized people. You are really funny, I will pay the beer. Are you talking that reptiles eat vegetables and fruits as enough diet? No, they are carnivorous. And resting over nest full of eggs? No, they leave the egg in the pathway and if they can, they eat the eggs and babies. You are invited to watch them here and smoking a Cuban “charutto” with my lord, the mithy, tiny, PinkUnicorn. Please, send more jokes…

You shouldnt just believe what some website tells you !!! Go look what the real scientists have to say, they have all the evidence on their side, and you are free to check the evidence yourself.

Those anti-evolution websites are constantly caught lying, and i bet if i visit that website i will find hundreds of propaganda lies ! HUNDREDS !

That alone proves them wrong: if you advertize the truth you don´t need any lies.That they use lies proves they don´t even believe their BS themselves !!!

Yes, I agree, and does not understand which are the advantages in lying about these topics. By the way, about evolution, Science have all evidences, but the connection among these data trying to get the final big board when there is no all enough data for, always produces non-complete theories. And evolution must be a continuing universal process, starting at Big Bang, so, biological evolution is micro and does not offers all data. That’s why I like also the efforts made by Matrix/DNA Theory.

Austriak, you are staking facts and debunking them based on the fact that your opinion differs from theirs. Natural selection is nature’s way of selecting the best traits in an organism, just because you think it isn’t won’t change it. If something were put at a major disadvantage by an evolutionary change, it would die out. No changing that.

Ok, you are right, it should be written: “opinions that debunks the opinions of ID” It is all about theories and good for our own evolution. Best traits in relation to what? I think the answer is: adaptation. But, when a blastula shows a new trait towards the future fetus, this trait is bad to the blastula in relation to the state of the womb now. It will be adapted to a state that does not exist yet. It exists, outside the womb. The mammal apparatus were selected to adapt to a future system.

-Ad hominem – attacking the arguer instead of the argument.

-Poisoning the well – a type of ad hominem where adverse information about a target is presented with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says

-Abusive fallacy – a subtype of “ad hominem” when it turns into name-calling rather than arguing about the originally proposed argument.