Posts Tagged ‘life’

A busca por sinais de vida la’ fora continua, porem, mirando os alvos menos promissores.

domingo, janeiro 28th, 2018


Pela NASA:

Our experts are well on the way to toppling a barrier that has thwarted scientists from achieving a long-held ambition: building an ultra-stable telescope that locates and images dozens of Earth-like planets beyond our solar system and searches their atmospheres for signs of life. Details:

Louis Charles Morelli – 1/28/2018 

Great job, but, life? Do you means “biological organization of matter”? The law that produces diversity at Earth suggests there is no biological systems around Earth like there is no other human species at Earth. I would looking for signals of complex systems more complex than galaxies. The periodic table shows that there are lots of atoms repeating the properties of carbon, all they must be able to develop these systems, till reaching intelligence. And the Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems is what we need for detecting “living” non-biological systems. If we wish to find biological systems we need to look for planets too far away… At the ends of the others galaxy’s arms, this is the environment that produces organic chemistry and biology. The seeds for complex systems more than galactic system are everywhere, because the galaxy projects itself in shape of the building blocks of DNA, but since galaxies are mechanics, electro-magnetic, there are lots of other possibilities than organic matter for reaching intelligence… Ok, this is merely my humble different world view…and I am with you, this job is great

Louis Charles Morelli  – 1/28/18

We are going into this search with too much narrow human concepts, unable to think universally. At Earth there is life in the rocks, in the ocean, in the air… every place here. Same thing about the universe and the enormous possibilities for diversification of complex working systems. If we make an arrangement of connections between the seven kinds of known astronomic bodies, we get a system repeating the same life’s cycle of our human body. Since that astronomic systems are described by Newtonian mechanics, these astronomic systems has the appearance of mechanic machines but containing biological properties. Since we are getting Artificial Intelligence from mechanic like-brains-systems, it is great the possibility that from the ancestor astronomic system can develops mechanics systems with intelligence. or electromagnetic systems, or other thing. I think we will be very surprised when to know what alien means.

Origem da Vida: Cientista produz enzima sintetica em 2017 e suspeita que ela criou a vida a 4 bilhões de anos atrás!!!

segunda-feira, novembro 13th, 2017


Então fui eu que tendo nascido neste século matei o Mar Morto a 2 bilhoes de anos atras… O artigo está no link abaixo e a seguir estao as copias de meus comentarios no debate do artigo.

Chemists May Have Found the ‘Missing Link’ to the First Life on Earth

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017
To the authors:
You said: ” … A subset of chemists have devoted their careers to puzzling…”
I think it is clear that a new kind of information from a more complex natural system were among the matter of that water slime. I can’t understand these chemists that are working with the effects and not searching the cause, because if they want to solve the puzzle, the rational way is going after the cause.DAP – if it ever existed naturally – is an effect, containing the entire or part of the cause, not the cause. We are watching everyday how a new life emerges from water slime produced not by the slime, but by a bunch of information coming from outside the womb’s water, so, why for the first life would be different? Why scientists are mimicking mysticals that need never seen before phenomens? Our method at Matrix/DNA Theory found a possible natural force/element that could be the source of these outside informations for first life. Chemists need know the models and looking inside DAP and the other primordial elements for this “invisible” genome. We are losing time and money.

Chris Sievert · Columbia (Missouri)

@Phillip Czekala –  I’m going to guess you’ve never actually witnessed the Birth of a Baby? If you had you would know how Ignorant your claim not to have started your life in “a bucket of shit water slime” because yours and everyone elses actually did start that way.You may or may not have started in shit, not all babies crap in Uetero, but you certainly started in “a bucket of piss water slime”. All Mammals do.
Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017


Edward Guest · FSU College of Law

The ability to produce intelligent beings, well somewhat intelligent, through this process if true could likely occur in millions, maybe even billions, of star systems in our Universe. Maybe we will be surprised in a few billion Earth years how many species we find that are a lot like us.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Edward Guest – There is a curious option, maybe you don’t know it. Life is like agriculture, so, if a seed falls in an environment with good conditions, it will flourish. The seeds are splitted everywhere in space/time. But, what is this “seed” and from where it comes from? At Matrix/DNA Theory we discovered that a new theoretical model of galaxies fits exactly the configurations for a source of these seeds. The astronomical building blocks is the face and configuration of DNA building blocks. When I got these models, it was suggesting a new version of “universal history” from the Big Bang to nowadays. And the final history suggests that – as you said – initially must have diversification among aliens but all them will be fine tunelled to a unique final shape… which is the unknown shape of the natural intelligent system that triguered the Big Bang and must be existing beyond this Universe. Curious, isn’t it?

Philip Czekala

It’s publish or perish in college land and this clown professor Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy will make up and write ANYTHING to keep his job. Maybe his life started out in a bucket of shit water slime but mine didn’t. Just think about how many gullible assholes believe this crap too. We are DOOMED.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Philip – You are right, Our life began in water slime also but the womb’s water slime can do nothing without the insertion of an almost invisible genetic code from something existing above and beyond the womb ( it means also beyond Earth as the womb for first living thing). Why the modern academic mindset is separating cosmological evolution from biologiccal evolution?! The effects of this absurd faith is causing this blindness? Do you have any explanation for human behavior?
Fred Wood You have a good point. There is a theoretical “universal natural formula for organizing matter into systems” and applying the formula for to calculate “life’s origins” the results of this calculations says exactly what you said about the role played by the Moon. New shapes of systems ( like the biological ones built at the abiogenesis period) begins by the Function 1 of the formula, which is “agitation for fragmentation and mixture of the elements of the environment”. We have not found other element able to do that function necessary for biological systems organization here. Then comes the F2, which takes the “baby” created by F1 and begins the agregration of nutrients. This formula explains how the first lighter gazeous starand the later stellar systems were made from an atomic nebulae, how galactic’s nuclei are created by central vortex, etc. If you are curious about the formula, search ” The Universal Matrix for All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. Congratulations by the right insight.

Jerry Bunker · Purdue University

Professing themselves wise they traded the truth for a lie. This garbage that once upon a time is sheer nonsense. Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states that in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. It takes much more faith to believe in these fairytales than to believe in the creator God

Louis Charles Morelli ·Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Jerry: ” Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states”
A book written by foreign ancient people states nothing to our people of our country and to people of XXI century, why are you coming at a Science issue and Western World telling that?! Don’t worry: if God has something to say to our country and to people of this time, He will say it directly to us, we does not accept humans intermediaries between us and God. 
Here you comes professing yourself wise. So, bring on to the table the proofs how life started and get the Nobel prize. Or are you trading the truth for a lie?
Fred Wood – None

Something folks seem to miss in their Synthesis of supposed early biology is the intense stiring caused by the Moon tides which were a hundred or more times stronger than they are now. Not only 100-200 foot ocean tides, tides expressed in the ground around the sea and, more importantly, beneath the sea too, stiring up the lighter and heaver elements, separating the stone from the metal, breaking the shell of the Earth into mud and sand, even as it tries to harden, heating things up in a band beneath the Moon’s early orbit. Remember, the Moon, containing much of it’s present mass was only a few thousand miles above the Earth at that time, having been formed by a collision between the Earth and a stoney body about the size of Mars. It slowly escaped Earth’s gravity until now it’s effects on land is negiligable though the seas still rise and fall by tens of feet now, rather than by hundreds. THERE is your crucible!
Like · Reply · 1 · 4 hrs
Fred Wood –None

It occures to me that the occasion of the birth of our Moon might be quite rare in water planets. There might be fewer examples of life because of it, if the Moon tides really were a part of the equasion. The local sudden heating and cooling of subsurfice muds by those large tides might also have played a part, again making life as we know it even more rare.
Fred Wood You have a good point. There is a theoretical “universal natural formula for organizing matter into systems” and applying the formula for to calculate “life’s origins” the results of this calculations says exactly what you said about the role played by the Moon. New shapes of systems ( like the biological ones built at the abiogenesis period) begins by the Function 1 of the formula, which is “agitation for fragmentation and mixture of the elements of the environment”. We have not found other element able to do that function necessary for biological systems organization here. Then comes the F2, which takes the “baby” created by F1 and begins the aggregation of nutrients. This formula explains how the first lighter gaseous star and the later stellar systems were made from an atomic nebulae, how galactic’s nuclei are created by central vortex, etc. If you are curious about the formula, search ” The Universal Matrix for All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. Congratulations by the right insight.

O que é “Vida”? Vídeo Acadêmico e Interpretação da Matrix/DNA

sábado, setembro 23rd, 2017

xxxxx ( traduzir artigo)

00:44 – What’s life? In the sky, a pulsar, performing the male function, erupted giant volcanoes (the male sexual organ) emitting comets (the spermatozoons) towards a quasar (the most beautiful body in the sky, performing the female function and attracting the comets with matter from the male), containing a nuclear vortex in which the matter for stars nucleus is generated, and from which is expelled a new baby-star. This system is not alive? Pions ( and maybe electrons) are produced by similar process, by a couple of protons/neutrons at the atomic nuclei, thousand times more simplest in evolutionary scale. Still, isn’t this system not alive? So, we are learning that what we call “life” is a kind of wrong anthropomorphization , a human self-projection upon its ancestors like the idea of “humans and Earth as center of the world”. The real thing is that since the Big Bang there is a unique system that is coming evolving which passed throught atoms, galaxies and now is in biological shape. The difference between what we call “a living system” and what we call “non-living system” is merely the evolutionary stage of these systems’ internal dynamism. Knowing that, we can suppose that this galaxy that created biological systems inside it, can create such diversity of systems that we can see some and not believing that it is “life”. (ok, everything here is based on the theoretical models of matrix/DNA Theory, so, I could be wrong…)

02:30 – If Schrodinger noticed that heredity is the key, it is about information and it is due the stability of cell structures… why he didn’t the rational question: ” From which forces and elements of the state of the world before “life, origins”, life got this natural phenomena called heredity? Of course, such complex phenomena dealing with informations could not be created, invented first time in the Universe, by the stupid matter of this lost planet alone. This is one of the rational question I did before elaborating Matrix/DNA Theory. So, I asked – “There was no heredity in cosmological evolution? There is a kind of heredity, or genetic transmission link, between the super-particles and the first atom, and later, between the atoms and astronomical systems. And later yet, between this astronomical system and the first biological system? Must have it because if not, heredity falls from the sky by magics? Let’s goo looking for it” – As result I found a theoretical rational model of cosmological evolution where heredity is there at all places and time. Ok, it is still merely theoretical, but is scientifically falsifiable and the unique rational I know. It makes no sense forgetting the Cosmos, the system surrounding us, when searching the “origins of life”. There was no origins of life inside this Universe, this Universe is not magic.

03:04 – Schrodinger: “There is a code script in the chromosomes…” That’s wrong! There is no genetic code. Code would infer a kind of intelligence, because only intelligence can creates symbols representing things and obeying some sort of logics. At Matrix/DNA Theory we found that: 1) All natural systems are derivation of a unique universal initial system, so, the natural formula – the template or blueprint of the system’s circuits – must be the formula that build all following evolutionary shapes of that system. As the DNA is the formula that build all living species. 2) The first biological system’s shape must have the evolutionary state of that formula at the astronomical system that created it, which we will call “Matrix/DNA”; 3) The formula is seen composed by four nucleotides, aligned laterally horizontal and vertical: that’s the building block of DNA, the fundamental unit of information, and it is a complete working system; 4) All sequential units of DNA are merely diversified copies of that system, each one with a minimal difference; Would make sense saying that the set of employes in a car’s factory compose a code script? All them are copies of a unique species – humans – each one with a minimal specific difference. There are divisions in groups making the parts of a car, like there genes in the DNA, groups of nucleotides. Saying code is a disservice to Science and human kind because it deviates our rationality to mysticism: one group will need mythical gods, other group will need mystical magical randomness. But,… Schrodinger was a Physicist, so, we understand that he did not understood Biology. -” Then,… from where came the first code of the first shape of the universal system? Isn’t this circular reasoning?” – someone smart would ask. -” Nope: We found that the vital process that results in all life’s cycle of all systems is the same dynamics that makes a light wave propagating into time/space. See the Matrix/DNA Theory interpretation of the electromagnetic spectrum. A specif wavelength with its frequency/vibration is the first basics of an specific shape of a human life. It must be also the a specific systemic function of all systems. And the first light wave with this “code” came with the Big Bang, so, it is coming from somewhere before this Universe. If a god or randomness are the creator, they do it using merely a light wave, and everything there is here and now will be…” – ” Lol! I am creationist, I told that has a God behind everything, God is light!” – ” No. I am atheist, I told about the quantum foam from Nothing, its vibrations, etc. Nothing is pure light…” Matrix/DNA: – ” Well… I don’t know… because I only can deal with natural real facts, whose last limit is the event of the Big Bang. I can go only till the Big Bang. What is beyond it, for me, is in the reign of metaphysics, which is not my business… You believe in what you want…”

06:41 – “Biology was considered a second class science and the first molecular biologists came from Physics background…” This is the cause of Biology nightmare till today. For explaining it I need an analogy with the human body. If to a Physicist with a Mathematician would be asked to apply their fields at a human body, searching to translate it into Math logics and all anatomy movements as Physical laws, how they would do it? For sure, they would begin by the bone skeleton, is is all mechanics, loved by Physicians and Mathematicians. But arriving to the last limits of the bones, and beginning the soft meat, the cellular working, etc., what they could do? And when arriving to the neurological level? The thoughts level? Almost nothing. For studying this Universe with life on it is same thing. We had cosmological evolution with its building blocks – particles, atoms, galaxies – which is the frame, the supportive skeleton after which, the soft biological systems begins. At Matrix/DNA Theory we are discovering all life’s properties already existing and some of them being expressed at those skeletons composing systems. These properties are hidden from nude eyes, we need smart intelligence for identifying it. A complete reproductive sexual system can be performed by five kinds of astronomical bodies’ inter-connections, in the sidereal space! Same for metabolism, homeostasis, etc. It merely indicates that life’s properties are not created here at Earth, they are product of universal evolution that begins with brute forces at the Big Bang. Atom system is so subtle and primitive alive that it express only a organ – let’s say, a stomach, or a liver – at its entire existence. Not a liver as we know it, but the universal systemic function that creates at all system a tool that performs it. So, an electron at energetic level number 6 is to atoms, what a lysosome is to a cell system, a dying star is to an astronomic system, as what a liver is to a human body system. So, the Universe today is composed all places by a bone skeleton which cells are galaxies and it is getting as a thin cover, a biological aspect, the soft meat. Do not try to see this Universe in relation to space – you will not see the truth about it because you are the universe’s cover just now – but try to see in relation to time, its evolution through time. Life creates the skeleton and not skeletons creates life. So life is most important than its skeleton, that’s saying: Biology, Neurology, would be the Science first class. It happens that our living body is inside the skeleton, he will survival if we learn about the skeleton and which technology we can do mimicking the properties of skeletons, starting by the skeleton. That’s why Physics and Math has the power today producing this kind of technology we have today. Wait more a few years… Quantum minded computers, genetic robots, a real technology for humans as living beings and not a technology for humans as machines. We will never get a Theory of Everything by Physics and Math alone, without the participation of Biologists, Neurologists… Without them we arrive to Krauss’ “Something from Nothing”…

(11:00) – The difference between life and the whole world is that life is based on chemistry? But, what is Chemistry? There is no chemistry in non-living world? The key here is that life is based in organic chemistry. And organic chemistry is merely the evolutionary product from the forces and elements of Physics when is added the liquid state of matter, the mean being water. Because the ancestors of biological systems (aka, life) were atoms and galaxies which were formed only with particles, electromagnetic forces and/or solid and gaseous states of matter. So, our ancestor produced liquid and organic chemistry like mammals produces amnion and placenta for their new baby. Life ( a wrong word) is based on our ancestors, which you call non-living, mistakenly. ( ok, I am merely expressing the Matrix/DNA Theory world view. It could be wrong )

O que e’ vida? Artificial Intelligency vai tornar a definição ainda mais dificil

quinta-feira, julho 20th, 2017


Pedaco de texto obtido num debate:

“… you’d need to have an absolute definition of what constitutes alive… or life.

So a virus is not alive because as a system it requires another systems to act as a reproduction factory… otherwise it just sits there as a polymer doing nothing. Or perhaps you’d need to explain if a digital systems that can copy itself and metabolize in a computers memory is alive…or more alive than a biological virus?

So if an A.I. model gets to replicate itself breeding with other models to create a more complex or even less complex but more capable model is it technically alive?”

Why Curiosity could touches signal of life but NASA could not grasp it.

terça-feira, agosto 7th, 2012

Matrix/DNA sent a comment to NASA TV, driving the reader to this article, waiting for moderation ( See the comment after the article):

The first goal for Curiosity is informations about the planet and the investigation about how these informations could elaborate or not elaborate complexes molecules and if time ago they were there? If so, NASA need to be sure that the currenty cosmological model is the unique elected as the right one, because the investigation will follow the logic emerged from this model. Right? What if the model is far away off the real cosmological history? It happened several times before, depicts any amount of informations. Because models about the unknown are based in data which  – we, human beings – has searching for, selected by everybody inevitable ideology. Nobody wants NASA loosing time and maybe the directions of this investigation is going in a wrong way due a non complete knowledge of Universe’s functioning. I hope that the theoretical stuff at NASA (`cause cosmological models are theoreticals) make the effort of listening others cosmological models made by human beings because we don’t have the knowledge about the neuroscience of the human brain and its inner ability to remember the history of its past times and creations, a history that goes back to the Big Bang. The technology used by NASA is great,  it is an acessory made by human brains searching things that explain the own existence of human brains, but, remember, the pharmaceutical industry is another extension for solving things that the human brain already has solved with its immune system. Why could not be possible that commons human brains has solved a better cosmological model than this current one, which is based in few informations about the Universe and computer’s simulations? I will provide an example, and my goal is that NASA applies the best possible method of investigation about the Curiosity future data.

The current cosmological model is based in the theory of spontaneous generation of astronomic bodies, like when humanity began thinking about the generation of life. Thousands years later we now know that life can emerges from non-living matter, but the spontaneity is not immediate, it tooks at last 3 billion years, the whole time of biogenesis. And now we know that the buiding blocks of organisms – the cell system –  had two different methods of formation: 1) first the formation of the first cell system, probable by symbioses among different micro-organisms or complexes molecules that became organelles. Once time Nature got the first cell system, she applied a more easygoing method, the process of reproduction. So my question 30 years ago was: why not the formation of galactic systems followed the same process of two different methods? If so, the generation of astronomic bodies  in the formation of first astronomic bodies and galaxies system used a different method than the method that was used for later astronomical bodies and systems, like the Milk Way. This spontaneity could be enlarged also. And if we don’t consider this in our currenty cosmological model, our investigation will be made by a non totally right logic, our conclusions about those data sent by Curiosity could be wrong.

But, what kind of cosmological model we could get if calculated under the possibility of two methods for generation of astronomical bodies and systems? I have no information that somebody tried it already. I made a tentative under my poor conditions and the final result is suggesting a different history than that related by the currenty model. And surprising, my resulting model is suggesting that despite the fact that our stellar system, and also its elements, appeared later by the reproductive process method, where old galaxies dies and its matter recycles them into new ones, like the MIk Way, these astronomical bodies are physiologic elaborated in a way that conserves the formula of the primordial building block, like any modern cell system today conserves the primordial DNA from the first cell system. The modus operand of Mars matter towards the direction of composing organic matter and complexes molecules must follows the orientation of this primordial formula.

If NASA does not know this second rational possibility – as a merely curiosity under observation every time new data arrives – and if this cosmological model has more things right than the current model – NASA and we, the watching and fervor supporters of NASA goals – will be losing time and opportunities. My models are suggesting hundreds of novelties that need be observed when arriving the data from Curiosity, which will not be considered because NASA does not know the models. For instance, my Matrix/DNA model of the astronomic primordial building block is suggesting that – due the strong oxidation in Mars atmosphere – photons coming from Mars nucleus and the sun is trying to drive the Mars superficial atoms to compose amino-acids with no success, because the oxygen atom means the Function 7 ( the entropy and death of natural systems) reinforced by the excess of one atomic number. But, maybe the earlier atmosphere was different and then, if any complex molecule or even microbial life has formed, they are living in sub-extracts below the surface in anaerobic way. Curiosity is going to get informations in the deep crater, maybe touching this sub-extract, maybe touching atomic compositions that are prototypes of pieces of Matrix/DNA formula, and due NASA does not know the formula, maybe will loose this great opportunity for advancing our knowledge. By the way… thanks for everything to the great team of NASA.


Comment sent by Matrix/DNA to NASATV:

Maybe my suggestion could be useful for analyses of the data Curiosity will send, and I will appreciate any answer/criticism from someone. Due the suggestion needs a large text I will direct the reader towards my article in:
By the way I will try posting the text here, hoping that the moderator analyses if it can be published or not. Thanks…
Comment sent to:
Why Curiosity could touches signal of life but NASA could not grasp it. ( See ) and, please, I want to know what do you think about ( if you can understand the text)

Encontrada Nova Forma de Vida Extraterrestre!

sábado, março 5th, 2011

Vida Extraterrestre

– “… isto é uma batata frita?”

– “ Não, bocó, isto é um extraterrestre!”

( A mente humana está sendo obrigada a se ampliar, crescer, vencer os limites e fronteiras do planeta e da vida biológica para se estabelecer no espaço sideral e tornar-se uma unica e final mente universal, quando o Universo finalmente adquirirá sua auto-consciência de sua própria existência e se transcenderá, nascerá para outro mundo, talvez onde nos aguarda de braços abertos um casal onde sua parte feminina esteja grávida, no dia do Big Birth. Isto é o que sugerem os modêlos da Teoria da Matriz/DNA, e isto foi o que me fêz despertar um amor apaixonado pela Humanidade inteira, pois cada ser humano, o mais simples que existe, é uma parcela de mim, e devo ajuda-la, trata-la com todo cuidado, pois de sua facilidade na vida e desenvolvimento perfeito dependerá  a perfeição e saúde do meu corpo mental no futuro. Nêsse processo temos ultimamente sendo acossados pela idéia de que não somos os unicos vivos no mundo, a Terra está sendo bombardeada por meteóritos e êstes estão sendo captados por sondas humanas, e nêstes meteóritos estamos descobrindo que, colado nêles, existem moléculas bioquimicas e até sistemas bioquimicos organizados, como indica a foto acima. A NASA está investindo pesado nesta busca, mas o problema, quando me baseio na cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA, é que o modêlo cosmológico e entendimento do Cosmos sugeridos pela teoria acadêmica oficial mais aceita no meio cientifico está com alguns êrros, e isto está prejudicando esta pesquisa, tornando-a muito mais lenta, gastando-se mais inutilmente, e sendo desviada da realidade. A sugestão de meus modêlos é unica e desconhecida para êles:  a Vida, tal como a vemos nêste planeta, nada mais é que a continuação evolutiva da evolução anterior, cosmológica, atômica, primordial, e qualquer sistema estelar com as suficientes e necessárias condições emite bits-informação na forma de fótons que carregam o código astronomico semi-biológico, e uma vez na superficie de qualquer planeta,  nestas condições,  pode gerar os sistemas biológicos (os seres vivos) em vários pontos do planeta. Alguns sistemas não apresentam perfeitas condições mas de qualquer maneira desenvolve algumas espécies, e isto resulta no que o cientista diz abaixo: formas de vida diferentes de tudo que vemos na Terra. Estou estudando com atenção o “paper” publicado pelos cientistas no Journal of Cosmogy  e emocionando-me por ver vários ítens comprovando o que meus modêlos preveram a 25 anos atrás. Por exemplo, que todos os exemplares organicos extraterrestres apresentam apenas 8 tipos de aminoácidos, quando a Vida é constituída por 20 tipos. Ora meus modêlos sugeriam que se  a vida principia prematuramente em velhos planetas, novos pulsares, ou em cometas produzidos nestes astros, ela deve se estabilizar apenas com a metade das informações do código genético, relativa à meia-face esquerda da Matriz/DNA. E pelo que diz os artigos, desconfiam que os meteóritos vieram de cometas.  Ora, a presença da metade dos aminoacidos indica justamente isso! Outra informação é que mediram temperaturas  do nucleo de cometas e descobriram que os nucleos tem regiões quentes ! Na base de 350 graus Kelvin! Quando expus os modêlos da Matriz/DNA um dos assuntos mais criticados foi essa sugestão que seus nucleos já foram quentes um dia, ou se o cometa ainda é novo deve ser ainda quente, pois todas as teorias na época afirmavam que o nucleo de cometas seria gêlo. Eu não quero acreditar na cosmovisão da Teoria da Matriz/DNA mas não tem como me desviar dela, ela agarra como carrapato, e cada vez que a Ciência descobre algo novo ela me dá um beliscão e sussurra: “Eu não disse?”

O trecho seguinte é meu comentário postado em alguns blogs que veicularam esta noticia:

Sinto muito mas posso estar trazendo uma má notícia: vocês com educação acadêmica podem terem sido enganados a respeito como funciona êste mundo. Da mesma forma que todos os estudantes antes de Copérnico foram enganados a verem o mundo ao contrário.

Resolver o mistério sôbre as origens da Vida hoje é mais um trabalho para detetives  filósofos do que laboratorial, aplicando o mesmo método de Watson e Crick para decifrar o código genético. Pois agora trata-se de identificar e decifrar o código cósmico que evoluiu e gerou o código genético. Vocês não estão fazendo isso porque separaram a Evolução Cosmológica da Evolução Biológica, criando dois blocos da História Universal sem conexão alguma entre êles, interpondo um abismo entre os dois que foi preenchido pela doutrina do Acaso Absoluto.

Meu método nesta tentativa de detetive filósofo foi a anatomia comparada entre as duas evoluções, entre sistemas naturais vivos e não-vivos, e o resultado que está sob testes por enquanto, está na Teoria “A Matriz Universal dos Sistemas Naturais e Ciclos Vitais” em cujo website estou publicando as evidências encontradas a cada dia. E segundo indicam estes resultados, rápidamente tenho os seguintes comentários sôbre o tema:

1) A Vida pode emergir em muitos astros e em vários pontos diferentes de um mesmo astro. O problema do Dr. Hoover é sua crença na panspermia, a qual aponta para uma unica origem da Vida e seu posterior espalhamento pelo Cosmos. Acontece que os sistemas biológicos (aka seres vivos) são meras continuidades evolutivas dos sistemas naturais anteriores, e o mais evoluído antes da primeira célula era o sistema galáctico, portanto nêste está o principio do código que evoluiu para o DNA, conforme indica o diagrama/software em meu website. Tôda galaxia tem este código como organizador de sua estrutura e portanto tôda galaxia pode gerar a Vida. E isto implica em vida sob muitas origens em muitos pontos diferentes.

2) O fato de que todas as amostras creditadas como vida extraterrestre apresentarem apenas 8 dos 20 aminoacidos necessarios para a vida terrestre e a possibilidade de que estas amostras vieram de cometas confirma a minha teoria da Matriz/DNA. Cometas, ao contrário do que a teoria Acadêmica Nebular está sugerindo, são produzidos pela emissão no espaço de magma provenientes de gigantes vulcões em planetas velhos sendo transformados em pulsares. Como eles carregam apenas metade do código cósmico, apenas podem produzir protótipos de sistemas biológicos e com a metade dos aminoacidos relacionados à meia-face esquerda da Matriz/DNA.

3) A revelação no “paper” do Dr. Hoover de que nucleos de cometas apresentam regiões quentes (350 graus K) é consagração de mais uma das previsões dos modêlos registrados a 25 anos atrás da Teoria da Matriz/DNA, quando fui criticado por muitos devido a teoria acadêmica afirmar que este nucleo seria congelado.

4) Por meu lado eu estou muito satisfeito e animado que cientistas de coragem e muito trabalho como o Dr. Hoover esteja em atividade. Ele está lutando contra as barreiras das crenças predominantes e pode estar abrindo mais as portas para a evolução do conhecimento humano.
                                                          Atenciosamente, Louis Morelli, New York, USA

Vejamos artigos relacionados (alguém aí tem tempo para traduzir os textos em inglês para português e vice-versa? Por favor!)  

NASA Offers Proof Of Alien Life

A NASA scientist has come to the surprising conclusion that alien life exists, and even has the fossils of it to back the claims up.

The alleged fossil shown in the picture above was found in a meteorite by Dr. Richard B. Hoover, an astrobiologist with NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center, cracked open the meteorite in a totally sterile lab, and using an electron microscope took the image above, which certainly does look like bacteria. In fact, Dr Hoover noted that it looked surprisingly similar to the giant bacterium Titanospirillum velox, an organism found here on planet Earth.

I interpret it as indicating that life is more broadly distributed than restricted strictly to the planet earth. This field of study has just barely been touched — because quite frankly, a great many scientist would say that this is impossible.

Dr Hoover speaking with

Some of the supposed fossils found in the research look very similar to ones we have here on Earth, while he says that others are totally alien and look nothing like anything we have ever seen before. Many people often assume alien life will be remotely similar to Earths life, or totally different, but rarely not both.

The exciting thing is that they are in many cases recognizable and can be associated very closely with the generic species here on earth. There are some that are just very strange and don’t look like anything that I’ve been able to identify, and I’ve shown them to many other experts that have also come up stumped.

Dr Hoover speaking with

Dr Hoover spoke with Fox News about the discovery, although the report itself is not actually new, in fact it was published in a paper by NASA back in 2007 . It is surprising that this was not picked up on earlier, now that a major news source has picked up on it, the story is quickly gaining momentum in the media. The final article is to be published in the March addition of the Journal Of Cosmology. When officially published, this paper will be heavily scrutinized, people will try and deny it or prove it wrong, and it will be exciting to see what the consensus of opinion is.

This is not the first time people have claimed to have found fossilized life in a meteorite from Mars, although this was never confirmed and the supposed fossil did not look quite as convincing as this one.

If provable, this could change the way we explore space forever, we would no longer be looking for whether microbial life can exist elsewhere, but instead we will be looking to find out where it is from. It would be even more exciting for the prospects of the universal alien life if it were ever determined that this possible alien microbe was from somewhere else in our own solar system, as two occurrences of life in one solar system would mean that we can be near certain of life elsewhere and it might not be as rare as once thought.

Not only this, but if we want to send manned missions to other planets, moons and asteroids in the future, we will have to be extremely careful in doing so, careful to protect the crew from anything that could be harmful, but just as important is the protection of any potential ecosystems of microbes or more advanced life.

It shocks me that it has taken over 3 years for this story to get wide attention even though the work hasn’t been officially published yet, I’d have thought the media would have jumped on this from the go; now that the cat is out of the unsealed bag, what an exciting development, perhaps this is the first alien ever seen by mankind, it may not be a green man in a flying saucer on the lawn of the white house, but to us here at Spaceosaur, it is just as amazing if real.


Microfossils of Cyanobacteria in the Orgueil Carbonaceous Meteorite

Richard B. Hoover, BSc
Astrobiology Laboratory

During the past decade, Scanning Electron Microscopy investigations at NASA/MSFC and NSSTC have resulted in the detection of embedded coccoidal and filamentous forms in freshly fractured interior surfaces of the Orgueil CI1 carbonaceous meteorite. Many of these forms have sizes and morphologies consistent with well-known genera and species of Cyanobacteria. Similar forms have never been detected in any of the stony chondrites, achondrites, diogenites, nickel-iron meteorites or lunar samples studied. Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) and 2D maps indicate that these filaments in Orgueil are permineralized with magnesium sulfate, encased within carbon-rich sheaths and depleted in Nitrogen. Many of the large and complex forms are polarized filaments that exhibit highly differentiated and specialized cells for nitrogen fixation (heterocysts) and reproduction (hormogonia, akinetes and baeocytes). High-resolution images will be presented to show that the Orgueil filaments are biological in origin and can be interpreted as morphotypes of all known Orders of Cyanobacteriaceae. C/S and C/N ratios will be presented to demonstrate that the forms embedded in the meteorite rock matrix cannot logically be dismissed as post-arrival biological contaminants. It is concluded that the well-preserved, fossilized filaments and dense mats found in Orgueil represent the remains of a complex aquatic and benthic cyanobacterial mat community that grew on the parent body of the meteorite prior to entry into Earth’s atmosphere.


Richard B. Hoover conducts research in Microbial Extremophiles and Astromaterials at the NSSTC Astrobiology Laboratory. He has authored/edited 35 books and over 250 scientific papers. He is well known for his work on X-Ray Optics and is an internationally recognized diatomist. He Inventoried the Henri van Heurck Diatom Collection at the invitation of the Royal Society of Belgium and authored the first article on Diatoms to appear in National Geographic (June, 1979). He collaborated with the late Sir Fred Hoyle exploring the possibility that diatoms and other microorganisms might inhabit comets or the oceans of Europa. His diatom photos have appeared in many international publications published and for almost a decade his arranged diatom slides were exhibited at the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Hoover has led scientific expeditions to collect microbial extremophiles in California, Santorini, Hawaii Alaska, Patagonia, North Siberia and Antarctica that resulted in the discovery and valid publication of a new genus Anaerovirgula and several new species of bacteria and archaea. Astronauts James Lovell and Owen Garriott participated in the Antarctica 2000 Expedition that resulted in the discovery of the new species Trichococcus patagoniensis that grows at -5 degrees C. The new species Tindallia californiensis, Desulfonatronum thiodismutans and Spirochaeta americana (a hydrogen producer) were discovered in samples from Mono Lake and Carnobacterium pleistocenium is a living Pleistocene bacterium recovered from 32,000 year old ice sample from the Fox Tunnel of Alaska. Thermococcus thioreducens is a new species of archaeon from the Rainbow Hydrothermal Vent that will be published in July 2007. He has extensively studied living cyanobacteria, cryopreserved cyanobacteria in the Deep Vostok Ice Cores and cyanobacterial microfossils in Proterozoic Phosphorites from Mongolia and Archaean rocks from Siberia. Hoover is a Fellow of SPIE and was 2001 SPIE President. He served on several Boards of Directors: SPIE; American Association of Engineering Societies; and Council of Scientific Society Presidents as well as Editorial Boards of several Journals: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, Optical Engineering, Advances in Optical Technology; and Astrobiology and his book Perspectives in Astrobiology was published in 2005. Richard Hoover was elected a Fellow of the Explorers Club (2001) in recognition of his exploration in search for novel life forms in some of the most hostile environments on Earth, and his detection of evidence of microfossils in meteorites, led to his selection as an Honorary Life Member (2004) of the Planetary Studies Foundation.

Richard Hoover has led scientific expeditions to collect extremophiles in the permafrost and glaciers of North Siberia, Alaska, Patagonia and Antarctica; haloalkaline lakes, geysers and fumaroles of California, Santorini, and Hawaii. He was Science Team Leader to the Patriot Hills, Thiel Mountains, and South Pole of Antarctica. These expeditions resulted in the discovery and valid publication of several genera and species of bacteria and archaea previously unknown to science. Astronauts James L. Lovell and Owen K. Garriott participated in Antarctica 2000 Expedition, which resulted in the discovery of Trichococcus patagoniensis that can grow at -5 degrees C. Novel species of bacteria: Tindallia californiensis, Desulfonatronum thiodismutans and Spirochaeta americana (which produces hydrogen as its main waste product) were isolated from samples he collected in Mono Lake, CA. Carnobacterium pleistocenium is a living Pleistocene microorganism that he recovered from 32,000 year old ice of the Fox Permafrost Tunnel in Alaska. The new genus Anaerovirgula multivorans is unusual in that it can grow on both D- and L- sugars. Thermococcus thioreducens is a novel archaeon collected by Owen Garriott from the Rainbow Hydrothermal. He is Fellow of SPIE and was 2001 SPIE President of SPIE. He has served on the Boards of Directors of SPIE; the American Association of Engineering Societies; and the Council of Scientific Society Presidents and the Editorial Board of: Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology, Optical Engineering and Astrobiology. His book Perspectives in Astrobiology was published in 2005. In recognition of his exploration in some of the most hostile environments on Earth in search of novel life forms, Hoover was elected a Fellow of the Explorers Club in 2001. His research on new species of microbial extremophiles and the detection of evidence of microfossils in meteorites, led to his selection in 2004 as an Honorary Life Member of the Planetary Studies Foundation.

Journal of Cosmology:

4.4 Amino Acids and Chiral Biomarkers Modern Bacteria and Carbonaceous Meteorites. A suite of 20 life-critical amino acids are present in the proteins of all life forms known on Earth. The protein amino acids exhibit homochirality in that they are exclusively the L-enantiomer. Table IV shows the protein L-amino acids in the exopolysaccharide (EPS) slime sheath of the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa K-3A; living cells of the bacteria E. Coli and Salmonella sp. and ancient terrestrial biology (e.g., a Fly in amber and teeth of a Cretaceous Duck-Billed Hadrosaur) for comparison with extraterrestrial amino acids detected in the Murchison, Murray, Orgueil and Ivuna meteorites reported by Ehrenfreund et al., Engel et al. and Cronin and Pizarello. The amino acids of Table IV shown in italics or marked with “-“ or “n.d.” were either not detected or present at only trace levels in the fossils in terrestrial rocks and carbonaceous meteorites. Even though there is no doubt that the amber encased fly and the Hadrosaur teeth are biological in origin, it is seen that these fossils are also missing several of the same amino acids that absent in the carbonaceous meteorites. Only 8 of the 20 life-critical protein amino acids are detectable in water/acid extracts of carbonaceous meteorites. The fact that several of the amino acids missing in meteorites and ancient terrestrial fossils are abundant in living bacteria provides strong evidence that the meteorites are not contaminated by modern biological materials. If modern bio-contaminants were present, all 20 protein amino acids should be detected.

The data of Table IV indicates that the most abundant (by weight%) amino acids in the cyanobacterium Microcystis sp. are GLU, ASP, ALA, GLY and LEU (all above 8%) followed closely by THR, SER, VAL, ILEU and PRO (all above ~5%). However, GLY is by far the most abundant protein amino acid in the Murchison (CM2), Murray (CM2), Orgueil (CI1) and Ivuna (CI1) carbonaceous meteorites and it is followed by ALA, GLU and ASP. However, in these carbonaceous meteorites, the protein amino acids LEU, THR, SER, VAL, ILEU and PRO, which are abundant in all life on Earth, are either totally absent or detected only at trace levels. As has been pointed out by Engel and Macko (2005) these missing protein amino acids provide clear and convincing evidence that the interior portions of the CI1 and CM2 carbonaceous meteorites are not contaminated by modern cyanobacteria, pollen, fingerprints or other microbial contaminants. Isovaline (IVA), α-aminoisobutyric acid (AIB) and γ -Aminobutyric Acid (GABA) are the most abundant non-protein amino acids in carbonaceous meteorites. While they are not protein amino acids it is wrong to conclude that they are not biological in nature. The amino acids IVA and AIB are formed on Earth by the diagenetic alteration of ancient biological materials and γ -Aminobutyric Acid is synthesized by organisms on Earth. However, most protein amino acids are absent in meteorites and terrestrial fossils and only 8 of the 20 life-critical protein amino acids have been found in carbonaceous meteorites using the most sensitive modern methodologies available.



4.5 Comets as Parent Bodies of CI1 Carbonaceous Meteorites. The CI1 carbonaceous meteorites are jet-black stones that contain indigenous extraterrestrial water. The albedo of the Orgueil meteorite is extremely low (~0.05) and comparable to that of the very dark C-type asteroids and the nuclei of comets. This is blacker than asphalt which has an albedo of ~ 0.07. The European Space Agency Halley Multicolor Camera aboard the Giotto Spacecraft obtained images at the closest approach (00:03:01.84 UT on March 14, 1986) at a distance of 596 km from the centre of the nucleus revealing detailed topographic features on the black (albedo 0.04) surface and jets Lamarre et al. (1986) reported that IKS-Vega data indicated the temperature of nucleus of comet Halley was 420 K +/- 60K at 0.8 A.U which was consistent with “a thin layer of porous black material covering the comet nucleus.” The Deep Space 1 spacecraft found the 8 km long nucleus of Comet 19P/Borrelly to be very hot (~345 K) with prominent jets aligned with the orientation of the rotation axis of the nucleus and albedo of 0.01 to 0.03 (Soderbloom et al. 2002). Ices of water, carbon dioxide, methane and other volatiles in the cold nucleus in proximity to the hot crust would melt and then boil to produce high pressure beneath the crust if gas is released faster than it can escape through the porous crust. In regions where the pressure exceeds the strength of the crust, localized failure of portions of the crust could result in explosive release of the gas giving rise to the observed flaring of comets and the dramatic jets.

Once a comet enters the inner solar system, it becomes hot from solar radiation on the black nucleus and loses mass rapidly. The European Space Agency Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) showed that water was the primary volatile (75-80 %) of the 40-50 km diameter nucleus of Comet Hale-Bopp. Minor volatile fractions detected (CH4, NH3 and H2CO) could have come from clathrates (H2O ice with simple gasses like CO2 and NH3 in a stable lattice structure) or result from atmospheric chemistry. ISO found that Hale-Bopp released water vapor, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide at a rate of 2 x 109 kg/sec and detected olivine in the dust. Olivine is commonly encountered in meteorites. As comets lose ices they develop an inert outer crust from the less volatile material. The nuclei of comets are extremely complex – they exhibit rugged terrain, smooth rolling plains, deep fractures and are composed of very dark material. This black crust becomes very hot while the comet is in the inner regions of the Solar System.

Figure 7.a. is a NASA Deep Space 1 spacecraft composite false color image showing geyser-like jets erupting from the long prolate nucleus (8 km) of comet 19P/Borrelly on Sept. 22, 2001. (The colors indicate three orders of magnitude in light level (red is 1/10, blue 1/100 and purple 1/1000 the intensity of the comet nucleus). The red bumps on the nucleus are real and show where the main jet resolves into three distinct narrow jets coming from distinct sources on the comet nucleus. These narrow jets are entirely consistent with the hypothesis that internal pressures generated by steam produced by melting of internal ices which then boil into gases as they are vaporized as heat conducts through hot crust. The NASA Deep Impact probe obtained the valuable data about the nature of comets as it approached and when the impactor collided with the nucleus of comet 9/P Temple 1 on July 4, 2005. Fig. 7.b is a Deep Impact image of the nucleus of comet Temple 1. The regions shown in blue are where exposed deposits of water ice that were detected on the surface of the comet nucleus Sunshine et al. (2005). These water ice regions ere observed to be ~30% brighter than the surrounding areas and probably were exposed when portions of the black crust was blown off into space by the explosive eruptions such as were recorded in a video by the spacecraft. The Deep Impact measurements of the temperature profile of comet P/Temple 1 nucleus at 1.5 AU is shown in Figure 7.c. Even as far away from the Sun as Mars the jet-black comet nucleus reaches temperatures as high as 330 K (57 oC). Furthermore, the lowest temperatures measured on the crust were ~ 280 K (7 oC) which is slightly above the temperature at which water ice changes from solid to liquid phase. Prior to the impact, the ambient outgassing of Temple 1 was ~6×1027 molecules/s of water. However, the free sublimation of ice calculated above (~200 K) was only ~4.5 x 1021 molecules/m2/s indicating that the ambient outgassing had significant subsurface sources. The Deep Impact spacecraft also observed numerous events of flaring of the nucleus and eruption of geyser-like jets as the comet was approached and before the collision of the impactor. On November 4, 2010, the NASA EPOXI extended mission of the Deep Impact Spacecraft passed within 435 miles of the 2.2 km long nucleus of comet Hartley 2 and revealed bright jets of carbon dioxide gas and dust.

These observations of comets are consistent with the hypothesis that the comet crust impedes the flow of gasses such that pressures develop as ices melt and vaporize in pockets and cavities beneath the crust. This provides the pressures needed to allow water to transition from the solid to the liquid state and then into the gaseous state. This would create micro-niches with pools of liquid water trapped within pockets in rock and ice, very much analogous to the cryoconite and ice bubble ecosystems contained psychrophilic microbial extremophiles such as those described from the glaciers and frozen Pleistocene thermokarst ponds of Alaska and Siberia and the glaciers and perennially ice covered lakes of the Schirmacher Oasis and Lake Untersee in East Antarctica (Hoover, 2008; Hoover and Pikuta, 2010; Pikuta et al. 2005). If gas is produced faster than it can escape through the porous crust, it could high pressures resulting in localized failure of weaker portions of the crust and the violent eruption into space of carbon dioxide, water vapor and chunks of crust and particles of ice and dust propelled into space and directed into the dust tail of the comet. These dust particulates could give rise to meteor showers as the comet passes through the tail. From time to time, larger chunks of the ejected may survive passage through the Earth’s atmosphere and this could be the link between comets and the CI1 (and possibly the CM2) carbonaceous meteorites. The fact that the CI1 meteorites contain minerals that were extensively altered by liquid water on the parent body and that the stones have been found to contain a large amount of indigenous extraterrestrial water clearly establishes that their parent bodies were most likely comets or water-bearing asteroids. It is now well known that the black nuclei of comets get very hot (significantly above >273 K where water ice melts) as they approach the Sun.

Gounelle et al. (2006) used the eyewitness accounts to compute the atmospheric trajectory and orbit of the Orgueil meteoroid and concluded that the orbital plane was close to the ecliptic and that entry into the atmosphere took place at a height of approximately 70 km and an angle of ~20°. Their calculations indicated the meteoroid terminal height was ~20 km and the pre-atmospheric velocity was > 17.8 km/sec. They found the aphelion to be 5.2 AU (the semi-major axis of orbit of Jupiter) and perihelion ~0.87 AU, which is just inside the Earth’s orbit as would be expected for an Earth-crossing meteorite. This calculated orbit suggests the Apollo Asteroids and the Jupiter-family of comets are likely candidates for the Orgueil parent body include (although Halley-type comets are not excluded).

The cosmochemistry data for a cometary parent body is entirely consistent with the composition and characteristics of the CI1 meteorites. This suggestion that the parent body of the CI1 carbonaceous meteorites were possibly comets is significant with regard to possible existence of indigenous microfossils in the Alais, Ivuna and Orgueil meteorites. From the extensive evidence of aqueous alteration on the Orgueil parent body and the presence of indigenous water in the Orgueil meteorite it is clear that the parent body was either a water-bearing asteroid or a comet. However the Giotto and Vega observations of Halley and the Deep Impact Observations of the nucleus of 9P/Temple-1 have clearly established that these bodies get very hot as they enter the inner regions of the Solar System. It is now clear that any water bearing asteroid with an albedo of the Orgueil meteorite would reach a temperature above 100 C at 1AU. At these temperatures, water ice and other volatiles would be converted to liquid water, steam, and produce an expanding cloud of gas and expelled particulates. Any planetessimal orbiting the Sun and possessing a gaseous envelope and dust tail is traditionally refered to as “comet” rather than an asteroid, and therefore it seems logical that comets represent the most probable parent bodies for these water rich, black meteorites that travel in trajectories that cross the orbit of planet Earth.

4.6 Role of Comets and Carbonaceous Meteorites in the Origin and Evolution of the Earth’s Atmosphere, Hydrosphere, and Biosphere The relationship of comets with carbonaceous meteorites and their role in the origin and evolution of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere of Earth has become better understood during the past few decades. The cratered surface of the moon provides clear evidence of the intense Hadean bombardment of the inner planets and moons by comets, asteroids and meteorites during the early history of the Solar System. Watson and Harrison (2005) interpreted the crystallization temperatures of 4.4 Ga Zircons from Western Australia as providing evidence that liquid water oceans were present on the early Earth within 200 million years of the formation of the Solar System. It has recently become more widely recognized that comets played a crucial role in the formation of the atmosphere and oceans of early Earth during the Hadean bombardment (Delsemme, 1997; Steel, 1998; Owen, 1997).

In 1978, Sill and Wilkening proposed that comets may have delivered life-critical biogenic elements carbon and nitrogen trapped within clathrate hydrates in their icy nuclei. In the same year, Hoyle and Wickramasinghe (1978, 1981, 1982, 1985) have proposed that comets delivered not only water, biogenic elements and complex organic chemicals to the surface of planet Earth, but that they also delivered intact and viable microorganisms. The detection of microfossils of cyanobacteria and other filamentous trichomic prokaryotes in the CI1 carbonaceous meteorites (which are likely cometary crustal remnants) may be interpreted as direct observational data in support of the Hoyle/Wickramasinghe Hypothesis (Wickramasinghe 2011) of the role of comets in the exogenous origin of terrestrial life.

Eberhardt et al. (1987) measured the deuterium/hydrogen ratios in the water of comet P/Halley. Delsemme (1998) found that that the D/H ratio of the water molecules of comets Halley, Hale–Bopp and Hyakutake were consistent with a cometary origin of the oceans. Dauphas et al., (2000) interpreted the deuterium/hydrogen ratios indicate that the delivery of water and ice to the early Earth during the late Hadean heavy bombardment by comets, asteroids and meteorites helped to cool the Earth’s crust and form the early oceans. Table V shows data extracted from the Robert et al. (2000) compilation of Deuterium/Hydrogen ratios of selected components of the Cosmos.

When these bodies are grouped in accordance with their D/H ratio it is easily seen that the telluric inner planets and the LL3 (stony) and SNC (Mars) meteorites have high (~500-16,000) ratios and the gas giants, protosolar nebula, ISM and Galaxies are very low (~15-65). The D/H ratios of the comets (~290-330) and carbonaceous meteorites (~180-370) are much closer to that of Earth (~149) and support the hypothesis that they may have made significant contributions to the formation of the oceans of our planet. It is interesting that the D/H ratios of comets are very similar to the ratios measured in the kerogen, amino acids and carboxylic acids of the Orgueil (CI) and other (CM, CV, and CR) carbonaceous meteorites. This supports the view that although stony meteorites are most probably derived from rocky asteroids, the carbonaceous meteorites most probably are derived from water-bearing asteroids or the nuclei of comets. The 30 m diameter fast-spinning carbonaceous asteroid 1998 KY26 that was discovered on June 2, 1998 has been found to contain 10-20% water. However, the small carbonaceous, water-rich asteroid 1998 KY26 also has color and radar reflectivity similar to carbonaceous meteorites and it may be a spent comet. Near IR observations indicated the presence of crystalline water ice and ammonia hydrate on the large Kuiper Belt object (50000) Quaoar with resurfacing suggesting cryovolcanic outgassing. The Cassini/Huygens spacecraft has recently obtained data indicating that a vast liquid water ocean may also exist beneath the thick frozen crust of Titan. Cassini/Huygens has also detected evidence for cryovolcanic water-ice geysers on Titan and Saturn’s moon Enceladus.


The detection of evidence of viable microbial life in ancient ice (Abyzov et al., 1998, 2003; Hoover and Pikuta, 2010) and the presence of microfossils of filamentous cyanobacteria and other trichomic prokaryotes in the CI1 carbonaceous meteorites has direct implications to possible life on comets and icy moons with liquid water oceans of Jupiter (e.g. Europa, Ganymede or Callisto) and Enceladus (Fig. 8.a) Saturn’s spectacular moon that is exhibiting cryovolcanism and spewing water, ice and organics into space from the region of the blue and white “tiger stripes.” Europa exhibits red, orange, yellow and ochre colors and fractured regions indicating the icy crust is floating on a liquid water ocean. The possibility of life on Europa has been discussed by Hoover et al. (1986): Chyba et al. (2001) Dalton et al. (2003), and in edited books by Russell (2011), and Wickramasinghe (2011) and in Volumes 5, 11, and 13 of the Journal of Cosmology. Hoover et al. (1986) argued while deep blue and white colors in the Galileo images of the Jovian moon Europa were typical of glacial ice, ice bubbles and snow on Earth as seen in this image of ice bubbles from the Schirmacher Oasis of East Antarctica (Fig, 8.b). The red, yellow, brown, golden brown, green and blue colors detected by the Galileo spacecraft in the Conamara Chaos region (Fig. 8.c.) and the deep red lines of the icy crust of Europa (Fig. 8.d.) are consistent with microbial pigments rather than evaporite minerals. The 1986 paper suggested that the colors seen in Europa images resulted from microbial life in the upper layers of the ice. A number of more recent studies and books have been published concerning the significance of ice microbiota to the possibility of life elsewhere in the Solar System (e.g. Russell 2011; Wickramasinghe 2011; Volumes 5, 7, 13 of the Journal of Cosmology).

Diatoms are golden brown and cyanobacteria exhibit a wide range of colors from blue-green to red, orange, brown and black. Bacteria recovered from ice are often pigmented. For example, the extremophiles isolated from the ancient Greenland ice cores produce pigmented colonies. Herminiimonas glaciei colonies are red (Fig. 8.e) and the colonies of “Chryseobacterium greenlandensis” exhibit yellow pigments (Fig. 6.b.). Figure 5.c. shows the red pigmented colonies of the new genus of psychrophile, Rhodoglobus vestali isolated from a lake near the McMurdo Ice Shelf, Antarctica (Sheridan et al. 2003). Colonies of Hymenobacter sp. (Fig. 6.d.) isolated from the Schirmacher Oasis Ice Cave are red-ochre in color (Hoover and Pikuta, 2009, 2010). The possibility of life on Enceladus and the detection of biomarkers in the plumes of water, ice and organic chemicals ejected from the “Tiger Stripes” of Enceladus has been discussed by McKay et al., (2008) Hoover and Pikuta ( 2010) and in a number of articles published in volumes 5, 7, and 13 of the Journal of Cosmology.


It is concluded that the complex filaments found embedded in the CI1 carbonaceous meteorites represent the remains of indigenous microfossils of cyanobacteria and other prokaryotes associated with modern and fossil prokaryotic mats. Many of the Ivuna and Orgueil filaments are isodiametric and others tapered, polarized and exhibit clearly differentiated apical and basal cells. These filaments were found in freshly fractured stones and are observed to be attached to the meteorite rock matrix in the manner of terrestrial assemblages of aquatic benthic, epipelic, and epilithic cyanobacterial communities comprised of species that grow on or in mud or clay sediments. Filamentous cyanobacteria similar in size and detailed morphology with basal heterocysts are well known in benthic cyanobacterial mats, where they attach the filament to the sediment at the interface between the liquid water and the substratum. The size, size range and complex morphological features and characteristics exhibited by these filaments render them recognizable as representatives of the filamentous Cyanobacteriaceae and associated trichomic prokaryotes commonly encountered in cyanobacterial mats. Therefore, the well-preserved mineralized trichomic filaments with carbonaceous sheaths found embedded in freshly fractured interior surfaces of the Alais, Ivuna, and Orgueil CI1 carbonaceous meteorites are interpreted as the fossilized remains of prokaryotic microorganisms that grew in liquid regimes on the parent body of the meteorites before they entered the Earth’s atmosphere.

The Energy Dispersive X-ray spectroscopy data reveals that the filaments detected in the meteorites typically exhibit external sheaths enriched in carbon infilled with minerals enriched in magnesium and sulfur. These results are interpreted as indicating that the organisms died on the parent body while aqueous fluids were present and the internal cells were replaced by epsomite and other water soluble evaporite minerals dissolved in the liquids circulating through the parent body. The nitrogen level in the meteorite filaments was almost always below the detection limit of the EDS detector (0.5% atomic). However, nitrogen is essential for all amino acids, proteins, and purine and pyrimidine nitrogen bases of the nucleotides of all life on Earth.

Extensive EDS studies of living and dead cyanobacteria and other biological materials have shown that nitrogen is detectable at levels between 2% and 18% (atomic) in cyanobacterial filaments from Vostok Ice (82 Kya) and found in stomach milk the mammoth Lyuba (40 Kya); mammoth hair/ tissue (40-32 Kya); pre-dynastic Egyptian and Peruvian mummies (5-2 Kya) and herbarium filamentous diatom sheaths (1815). However, Nitrogen is not detected in ancient biological materials such as fossil insects in Miocene Amber (8 Mya); Cambrian Trilobites from the Wheeler Shale (505 Mya) or cyanobacterial filaments from Karelia (2.7 Gya). Consequently the absence of nitrogen in the cyanobacterial filaments detected in the CI1 carbonaceous meteorites indicates that the filaments represent the remains of extraterrestrial life forms that grew on the parent bodies of the meteorites when liquid water was present, long before the meteorites entered the Earth’s atmosphere. This finding has direct implications to the distribution of life in the Cosmos and the possibility of microbial life in liquid water regimes of cometary nuclei as they travel within the orbit of Mars and in icy moons with liquid water oceans such as Europa and Enceladus.