Posts Tagged ‘partícula’

Corpo Humano é Onda ou Partícula? Questão relativística?

sexta-feira, abril 7th, 2017

xxxx

Acabei de postar esta pergunta maluca no Quora:

Um observador macroscópico veria um corpo humano como uma onda; observadores microscópicos como nos, humanos, vemo-lo como uma partícula. Seria isto a estranheza quântica?

A macro-observer would see a human body as a wave; micro-observers, like us, see it as particle. Is this quantum weirdness?

https://www.quora.com/unanswered/A-macro-observer-would-see-a-human-body-as-a-wave-micro-observers-like-us-see-it-as-particle-is-this-quantum-weirdness

Qual o fundamento da minha questão? Bem, … esse grilo na minha cuca começou a 30 anos atras quando descobri que os sistemas naturais são montados pelo processo do ciclo vital. E as partículas até agora observadas são em si mesmas sistemas ( compostas de quarks, leptons), portanto elas devem apresentar propriedades vitais, ou seja, elas também devem nascer, crescer, amadurecer e morrer, sendo que nesse meio tempo elas vão sendo transformadas em formas diferentes assim como o corpo humano é transformado em varias formas devido a força do ciclo vital. As partículas foram – são – nossas ancestrais, elas já apresentam alguns sinais de vida.

Mas as partículas tem um período de vida brevíssimo, apenas 17 bilionésimos de segundos. Por isso nunca conseguiram ver uma partícula, apenas seu rastro deixado num evento de choque, como veem no acelerador do CERN. Isto porque a partícula é microscópica, seu tempo é medido na escala microscópica, e em relacao a elas, nos somos macroscópicos, nosso tempo flui muito mais lentamente.

Praticamente eu diria que a proporção entre nosso tempo e o delas seria a mesma entre nossos 70 anos de vida e os 17 bilionésimos de segundo delas.

Ora, vamos agora supor que exista um observador do tamanho do sistema solar, ou da galaxia. Ele conseguiria ver um corpo humano? Certamente não. Com alguma tecnologia ele poderia ver os nossos rastros. Com uma tecnologia mais poderosa ele poderia fixar nosso corpo em relacao ao tempo, parando nosso tempo num momento qualquer da nossa vida, digamos, quando temos 40 anos de idade. Então ele veria a nossa forma de adulto e acreditaria erroneamente que essa é a nossa forma fixa, sem saber que transformamos nossas formas. se em outra situação ele visse um bebe humano ele juraria que se trata de outra especie. E se ele fixar nosso corpo em relacao ao espaço? Ele nunca saberia qual nossa idade, qual período de tempo vivemos.

Então penso que matei a charada da famosa questão denominada ” Principio da Incerteza de Heisenberg”, o qual foi o inicio da revelação do mundo estranho da quântica. Por este principio não é possível fixar uma partícula para medi-la pois se medimos uma coisa não conseguimos medir a outra.

E depois aconteceu o “split experiment” onde os cientistas atônitos viram que uma partícula se comporta como onda e vice-versa.

Vai dai que isso também deve acontecer com uma observador macrocósmico vendo um corpo humano. Imagine você rodando um filme sobre a vida de um humano que dura 70 anos de forma tao rápida que dure apenas 17 bilionésimos de segundo. O que vai aparecer na tela? Primeiro e com certeza, nenhuma forma. Segundo ver-se ia um rastro, se a tecnologia for igual a do CERN, mas pode parecer ser uma onda se aplicar o split experiment (talvez). Porque o anteparo com varias fendas só pode ser observado em um piscar de olho do macrocósmico e isso duraria para nos, uns 10 anos. Ora, em dez anos nos nos movemos muito, passamos por muitos lugares, muitas fendas, e no experimento estas passagens teriam que juntarem-se todas numa só, e isto seria uma superposição quântica, ou superposição de rastos, ou talvez ainda, de ondas.

Mas o desfecho final nesse grilo na minha cuca venho quando observei melhor a formula da Matrix/DNA e percebi que ali, o corpo rola como partícula em relacao ao espaço, mas também rola como onda em relacao ao tempo.

Agora vou correndo procurar um guarda-chuva para me proteger porque com certeza as pedradas e ovos chocos vão vir aos borbotoes… se os físicos e matemáticos lerem a minha questão e depois deixar eu explicar a razão dela com o texto acima. Com certeza não vão entender bulhufas e muito menos concordar com alguma coisa e vão me chamar de idiota para baixo. A minha justificativa é que eu venho da selva, outro mundo, e não dos laboratórios com ar condicionado como o CERN.

xxxxx

Primeira resposta que veio:

Ian MillerIan Miller, Independent physical scientist, author
Who says a macro observer would see humans as a wave? Quantum effects only apply when the interaction leads to a change of action in the order of Planck’s quantum of action. If it is big enough that h can be ignored, quantum effects can be ignored.
xxxx
Minha resposta a Ian:
Louis Charles Morelli – 4/8/2017

Thanks, Ian. My question arises when thinking about the weirdness that arises from the split experiment ( wave or particle or both?), plus the observation of Matrix/DNA formulas, not about Planck’s constant.

xxxx

A resposta do Ian me fez perder algumas horas pensando no tema e pensandop em como entabular um dialogo com Ian. Porem, no final conclui que por Internet e’ impossivel. Porem deixo abaixo escrito algo do que pensei em enviar como resposta para depois voltar nisso e continuar pensando no assunto:

xxxx

Yours brain is hard-wired in a very different configuration than is mine, Yan. We are based on two very, very different interpretations of nature. I think both interpretations has more mistakes than thru, and if we makes the comparisons between these two, we could fixing some errors on both, and producing some new practical things.

Please, try to imagine the following:

A macro-observer of the size of this solar system or a galaxy. His scale of time is astronomical, ok? So, the lifetime for him runs very, very slower than the lifetime of humans runs for humans. In another hand, I read somewhere that there are particles which time of existence is about 17 billionth of a second (measured by human scale of time). So, time for particles runs very, very faster than time runs for humans. At Cern we do not see particles, we see the trails left by particles. The cause I think is due the different scales of time between particles and humans. Is it right? If it is right, the giant observer would see a human body moving at his lifetime as a trail.

But, at the split experiment, the interpretation of the trail becomes the interpretation as a wave. Am I wrong?

At split experiment we throw a particle by a laser canon, than, the particle leave a linear trail. But the weirdness is that it can pass on two points in space at same time. Humans normal behavior is moving around, going ahead and back, etc., but the giant observer has no time to see these movements. Our movements can result passing on two or more points of space, which will appears same time or one momentum, for the giant. Will he believe that are seeing a wave, also? Or we are seeing superposed trails at split experiment believing that we see waves?

Maybe the macro-observer see humans like we see particles. What do you think?

But nobody see particles. I think that’s why we have sometimes the belief that it is a particle, other time it is a wave. I am wrong?

My Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems is suggesting that, if the giant observer see the human body as an object with mass, he would believe that he is seeing a particle. Because mass shows things in relation to space and particles occupies a place in space. But if the giant observer see a human body acting normally as we do, moving towards different directions, going ahead and back, etc., and reducing our 70 years of a lifetime into 17 billionth of a second, he would see only only a linear trail. Am I wrong? If the giant places a wall with several holes over these trails, the human body would crossing several wholes at that reduced time. Because in reality, we had superposed several movements into one momentum.

Then, suppose that this macro-observer see a human lifetime as his one billionth of a second of his scale of time. I think that he would see only a trail, as particles are seeing at CERN. Do you agree with this hypothesis?

Observing the behavior of a human body at a very reduced time as it would appears to the macro-observerby someone that naturally reduces when reducing its scale of time , the results would be different than throwing a particle by a canon laser towards two holes in a plate?

I saw that you are very interested in the not solved problems of quantum theory, and I think here you have the opportunity to think about it from a very different approach and, maybe, creating yours own novelty. My question refers to the weirdness at the split experiment, not about the Planck’s constant.

You have the knowledge about quantum mechanics that I don’t have, but I have a kind of world view that you do not know. From my theoretical models and formulas arises lots of possibilities/questions which are related to what I am reading in the published literature about quantum theories. But nobody think or talk about the details that I would appreciate for developing my research. The reverse way could be thru: knowing the details of my theory, could help one developing quantum theory till suggesting new ideas/experiments.

But, my advice is that it would be a very hard intellectual work. First due our different native languages, second due our very different method of research and approaches, third due it is a very, very complex issue. So, if you have interest in continuing this dialogue, I would appreciate, if not, sorry by this time that you spent here.

if you will continue reading, I will advance that my formulas are suggesting that measuring a human body lifetime from astronomical scale of time, we see the body as particle – if we fix the body at a momentum in relation to space – and as a wave or superposed trails – if we fix the body in relation to time. The split experiment could solve this problem for the giant macro-observer, I think, if in the eyes of the giant observer the human body acting normally as we do, would show the behavior like the particle throw by a laser canon. Trail or wave? So I need details why the scientists believes that at split experiment the particle behaves as a wave and not as multiple superposed trails?

try to imagine the following:

A macro-observer of the size of this solar system or a galaxy. His scale of time is astronomical, ok? In another hand, I read somewhere that there are particles which time of existence is about one billionth of a second (measured by human scale of time). Then, suppose that this macro-observer see a human lifetime as his one billionth of a second. I think that he would see only a trail, as particles are seeing at CERN. Do you agree with this hypothesis?

When we try to understanding the Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems, we see lots of phenomena that the literature about quantum mechanics are publishing. And is unavoidable arising questions like this one. The formula suggests that any new shape of natural system is built when nature applies the force or process of life’s cycle upon a unique initial body. The body is transformed into new shapes ( like the human body is transformed from the shape of fetus to embryo to adult, etc), and these shapes are connected as part of a functional working system, like atoms, galaxies,cells, etc. If we try to see this body reducing drastically its lifetime, but fixing alternates momentum, at these momentum we see it as particle and the time between two particles makes the body invisible. I am not sure if these slices of time occurs as a trail or a wave in the eyes of the observer.

Now, he throws this human towards the two wholes at a metal plate, like the split experiment. He see the scene as his one second, which is too much slow for humans. In this astronomical one second, a human moves to several different pathways, included passing into the wholes. The giant macro-observer would believe that the human did it at the same momentum. I am wrong?

A Dualidade da Luz Como Onda e Particula e a Teoria Quântica – Excelente Video

segunda-feira, fevereiro 6th, 2017

xxxx

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5_V78SWGF0#t=1838.990453

Mas antes de assistir os dois videos, veja meus comentários abaixo postados no Youtube. Você tera’ uma visão diferente e mais completa sobre os fenomenos apresentados…

Quantum Theory Made Easy [1]

Louis Charles Morelli  Louis Charles Morelli – 02/05/2017

The whole magnetic spectrum propagates into spacetime at the exactly way that a living body propagates into spacetime. I had discovered this after discovering the universal matrix/dna formula for all natural systems. If our body expands and grows changing shapes and energy intensity after fecundation – from blastula to fetus to embryo to baby to kid to teenager to adult, to senior to cadaver and then, dissipates as fragments – the electromagnetic spectrum ( a light wave?) expands and grows after the source changing the same sequence of energy and creating shapes – as gamma rays to infrared to ultraviolet to X-ray, till being fragmented into photons.
If we say that the force responsible for our body growing and changing shapes is called “life’s cycle”, this force was manifested in this Universe first time by waves of light ( probably resulting from the Big Bang). If it is correctly, it means that those cosmic light waves contains the code for building natural systems from the scratch that must be the inertial dark matter. Un another words, cosmic wave of light are the carriers of life’s code. Photons are the first ancestrals of genes. They behavior as primitive living things like the light waves they comes from. They have a lifelong drive by the life’s cycle force.
That’s why happens the Heisenberg uncertainty: if we fix our body at any given moment, we have its aspect as particle, but we don’t have its whole history of 70 years, we can not fix its aspect time. The Matrix/DNA formula is a light wave transformed Into a natural working system, where each different radiation becomes each piece of that system. The formula is encrypted into the individual unit of information of DNA ( a lateral base pair of nucleotides), it is encrypted into the building blocks of galaxies, it is encrypted into any atom system, that’s why I called it Matrix/DNA. ( If you are interested Google ” The Universal MatrixDNA for all natural systems and life’s cycles”. But, remember, it is merely a theory developed by a layman studying natural systems at Amazon jungle.
xxxx
Segundo video:

Quantum Theory Made Easy [2]

Louis Charles Morelli  Louis Charles Morelli – 02/05/2017
Thanks a lot and be sure I will try to donate what I can. My Matrix/DNA Theory suggests lots of new interpretations about these issues because it is a different and never tried approach. The quantum dimension is the link between the Physical aspect of matter/energy and its biological aspect. So, the questions not answered by Physics will be answered by Biology, or the living aspect embracing the microscopic and macroscopic worlds.
The Matrix/DNA formula for all natural systems suggests an explanation why it is wave and particle. The formula shows a systemic circuit running its lifelong existence and it is alternated into particles and waves. At any given moment the circuit is a wave ( when seeing the thing in its time aspect, seeing the movement that gives its age) nut it contains the particle and it reaches a peak when shows the properties of particle ( when seeing its space aspect its matter’s shape) although the particle contains the wave. Then the circuit continues running from the particle as wave, but the wave contains the particle and can express it accordingly the state of the external world ( the formula is at my website)
This whole messy becomes clear when we discover that particles/waves composes a systemic circuit that works like a systemic living body. Studying a human body, Physics and Math applies to its mechanic skeleton aspect. For studying the body beyond the skeleton ( the soft meat and substances, genetics and hard-wired neurons,etc), we need change the Physics method for the Biological method, where Math does not have too much to do. Since in the Matrix/DNA Theory we discovered that atoms and galaxies are systems that contains a tiny cover of biological properties, we grasp the whole thing. The stranger things at quantum dimensions are not unnatural, they are aspects of biological organization of matter, so they are stranger only while we are applying only Physics for investigating them. Remember that the skeleton is the solid mechanistic framework of a human body ( as atoms and galaxies are the framework of biological systems) but the human skeleton was built by a system containing biological properties ( our parents). Understanding the biological properties of an atom or an astronomic system as a human body system is necessary to know the universal formula that build them.
The formula is a system with seven principal pieces, which are different in vibrational/frequency/shapes states due the systemic circuit being the force of life’s cycle. So, the seven different electronic layers of an atom are primitive potential expression of seven different connected parts. At a human body system, these electronic layers evolves as the seven principal organs. At cell systems, they are the seven principal organelles. So, an atom does not expresses all its “organs” at same time, only those layers occupied by electrons. Evolving to astronomic systems, as the building blocks of galaxies, these parts becomes the seven known types of astronomi bodies: stars, planets, black holes, quasars, etc. ( ok, this is merely a theory, under testings. If you are interested, Google “The Universal Matrix/DNA formula for all natural systems”).

Vida ou Não-Vida Após a Morte: Incrivel Nova Tese Nasce Dentro da Matrix/DNA: Seríamos A Dualidade Onda/Particula Em Evolutivo Feed-Back: Guidance Wave Theory

quinta-feira, março 19th, 2015

xxxx

Capitulo Contendo Coleções de Dados Sobre a Categoria “Vida ou Não-Vida Após a Morte?”

Esta nova teoria denominada Guidance Wave Theory de Ian Miller bate surpreendentemente com os resultados sendo sugeridos pela Matrix/DNA Theory sobre o que acontece na morte de um corpo humano. Veja meu comentário explicando como, a seguir:

Life after death

https://ianmillerblog.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/life-after-death/

ian miller blog

Meu Comentario ( a ser traduzido para português) ( Não Publicado, aguardando moderação):

A Vida Após a Morte Pode ser Explicada pela Dualidade Onda/Partícula. Cada corpo humano individual representa os aspectos “onda” e  “partícula”.  Partícula é seu aspecto corpo material visível, é sua posição em relação ao espaço, e onda em relação ao tempo é um aspecto invisível a nós, pois não vemos e não podemos tocar o tempo. Como partícula ela não se limita a um corpo individual ( o qual é apenas uma micro-cópia, um fractal da partícula) , ela se completa como o coletivo dos indivíduos, ou seja, a espécie. E espécies podem desaparecerem para sempre ou serem transformadas em novas formas, outras espécies. A espécie humana vem de uma linhagem evolutiva de um único sistema natural que se originou no Big Bang na sua mais simples forma e até o presente momento sempre foi transformado, ou seja, como partícula e no coletivo, ela nunca morreu.

No seu aspecto de onda do tempo, cada corpo humano no  seu tempo de existência é apenas um infinitesimal tempo do tempo total deste sistema sob evolução, ou seja, do tempo universal de 13,7 bilhões de anos. Isto quer dizer que na morte de um corpo a onda universal jamais morre ali. Em outras palavras, não existe vida após a morte porque simplesmente, na verdade, não existe “morte”.

We are arriving to same theoretical results coming from two different methods ( mine is comparative anatomy between living and nonliving natural systems). My theory called “Matrix/DNA, the universal formula for all natural systems and life’s cycles”, suggests that a unique body under the process of life’s cycle is at same time a wave and a particle. The particle is any momentum of that body and the wave is the lifelong time of that body. It happens that our DNA, which is the essence of every life’s species is merely the terrestrial biological shape of a universal essence, which I am calling “Matrix”. This result from my method is due when extracting the circuit flow connecting all parts of a system we get a formula in shape of computational diagram and it is equal from atoms to galaxies to plants cells to human brain’s configuration. Again, this universal formula coming within a system that emerged at the Big Bang and today is acquiring the shape of human brain and possibly also the shape of a new system called consciousness, is the universal Matrix/DNA.

So, it means that each momentum state of this unique universal system is a particle and this particle had appeared as several individuals which dies, but the particle’s shape continues to existing as the collective, called “species”. It is the particle as collective that is evolutionary transformed into new more complex systems. As sample we have an analogy with the individual human body, which could be called “particle” and we know that this particle under the process of life’s cycle is transformed into several shapes, from blastula to fetus to teenager, etc.  So, an individual body-particle dies, but the collective of this body particles does not: it is transformed. It means that this universal system-particle called human body is 13, 7 billion years old, like the Matrix/DNA.

But… the formula is showing that the body which is a system is seen by us as particle at a given moment of its lifelong, while we can not see its time running at that moment because the time or life’s cycle force is a wave. Since that there is a unique natural system evolving under the process of life’s cycle since the Big Bang to today consciousness, it means that there is a unique wave of time and it is 13,7 billion years old. It means that when a body-system-particle disappears as individual, the wave does not disappear because it is the collective of all individuals and it will continuing the evolution, certainly to the next transcendental or more complex shape of this universal system.

My method lead me to a new interpretation of the electromagnetic spectrum of light waves. From gamma ray to radio, all different states of frequencies/vibrations/colors are equal the sequence of transformations of the state of energy/vibration of a unique human body, from fetus to adult. It means that also a light wave is under the process of life’s cycle… in another words, a light wave is the most simplest “living thing”. So simplest that it goes back to the extreme singularity at the initial moments of the Universe… or, beyond it. It means that the Universal Matrix, which today and here is encrypted into the biological DNA, and is the formula organizing the brain and consciousness, was existing before this Universe in shape of light. If consciousness is the final end of this evolution, it must be returning to be the initial light. Again, as light, it is a wave.

Declarations like the famous neuroscientist that had a left hemisphere stroke and saw everything as light without separation between her body and the external world are good evidences that this theory about the consciousness being a kind of light waves the survives after death is in the right track. Congratulations Mr.Ian: you had an astonishing insight. (sorry by the English language errors and you can see the Matrix/DNA formula at its website).

xxxx

( Artigo copiado aqui para ser traduzido)

The issue of whether there is life, or consciousness, after death is one of those questions that can only be answered by dying. If there is, you find out. My wife was convinced there is, and she was equally convinced that I, as a scientist, would quietly argue the concept was ridiculous. However, as she was dying of metastatic cancer we had a discussion of this issue, and I believe the following theory gave her considerable comfort. Accordingly, I announced this at her recent funeral, in case it helped anyone else, and I have received a number of requests to post the argument. I am doing two posts: one with the mathematics, and one where I merely assert the argument for those who want a simpler account. The more mathematical post is at (http://my.rsc.org/blogs/84/1561 ).

First, is there any evidence at all? There are numerous accounts of people who nearly die but do not, and they claim to see a tunnel of light, and relations at the other end. There are two possible explanations:
(1) What they see is true,
(2) When the brain shuts down, it produces these illusions.
The problem with (2) is, why does it do it the same way for all? There was also an account recently of someone who died on an operating table, but was resuscitated, and he then gave an account of what the surgeons were doing as viewed from above. The following study may be of interest (http://rt.com/news/195056-life-after-death-study/ ) One can take this however one likes, but it is certainly weird.

What I told Claire arises from my interpretation of quantum mechanics, which is significantly different from most others’. First, some background. (If you have no interest in physics, you can skip this and go to the last three paragraphs.) If you fire particles such as electrons one at a time through a screen with two slits, each electron will give a point reading on a detector screen, but if you do this for long enough, the points give the pattern of wave diffraction. This is known as wave-particle duality, and at the quantum level, an experiment either gives properties of a particle or those consistent with a wave, depending on how you do it. So, how is that explained? Either there is a wave guiding the particles or there is not. Most physicists argue there is not and the electrons just happen to give that distribution. You ask, why? They tend to say, “Shut up and compute!” Einstein did not agree, and said, “God does not play dice.” What we know is that computations based on a wave equation give remarkably good agreement with observation, but nobody can find evidence for the wave. All we detect are the particles, but of course that is what the detectors are set up to detect. It is generally agreed that the formalism that enables calculations is sufficient. For me, that is not sufficient, and I think there must be something causing this behaviour. Suppose you cannot see ducks but you here a lot of quacking, why do you assume the quacks are just the consequence of your listening, and there are no ducks? There is a minority who believe there is a wave, and the pilot wave concept was formed by de Broglie.

Modern physics states the wave function is complex. In general, this is true, but from Euler’s theory of complex numbers, once (or twice) a period (which is defined as the time from one crest, say, to the next) the wave becomes momentarily real. My first premise is
The physics of the system are determined only when the wave becomes real.
From this, the stability of atoms, the Uncertainty Principle and the Exclusion Principle follow. Not that that is of importance here, other than to note that this interpretation does manage to do what standard theory effectively has as premises. My next premise is
The wave causes the wave behaviour.
At first sight, this seems obvious, but recall that modern quantum theory does not assert this. Now, if so, it follows that the wave front must travel at the same velocity as the particle; if it did not, how could it affect the particle? But if it travels at the same velocity, the energy of the system must be twice the kinetic energy of the particle. This simply asserts that the wave transmits energy. Actually, every other wave in physics transmits energy, except for the textbook quantal matter wave, which transmits nothing, it does not exist, but it defines probabilities. (As an aside, since energy is proportional to mass, in general this interpretation does not conflict with standard quantum mechanics.) For this discussion, the most important consequence is that both particle and wave must maintain the same energy. The wave sets the particle energy because the wave is deterministic, which means that once the wave is defined, it is defined for every future with known conditions. The particle, however, suffers random motion and has to be guided by the wave in my theory.

Now, what is consciousness? Strictly speaking, we do not know exactly, but examination of brains that are conscious appear to show considerable ordered electrical activity. But if electrical activity is occurring, that is the expenditure of energy. (The brain uses a remarkably high fraction of the body’s energy.) But since the movement of electrons is quantum controlled, then the corresponding energy must be found in an associated set of waves. Moreover, it is the associated wave that is causal, and it alone can overcome the randomness that may arise through the uncertainty of position of any particle. The wave guides the particle! Another important feature of these Guidance Waves is they are linear, which means they are completely separable. This is a general property of waves, and is not an ad hoc addition. It therefore follows that when we are conscious and living “here”, there is a matrix of waves with corresponding energy “there”.

Accordingly, if this Guidance Wave interpretation of quantum mechanics is correct, then the condition for life after death is very simple: death occurs because the body cannot supply the energy required to match the Guidance Waves that are organizing consciousness, and the random motion of particles in the brain, due to heat, overpower the order that bodily consciousness requires. The body now is no longer conscious, and hence is dead, and useful brain activity ceases. But if at the point where the brain can no longer provide its energy contribution for consciousness, the energy within the Guidance Wave can dissociate itself from the body and maintain itself “there”, and recall that the principle of linearity is that other waves do not affect it, then that wave package can continue, and since it represents the consciousness of a person, that consciousness continues. What happens next depends on the conditions applicable “there”, and for that we have no observations.

Is the Guidance Wave interpretation correct? As far as I am aware, there is no observation that would falsify my alternative interpretation of quantum mechanics, while my Guidance Wave theory does make two experimental predictions that contradict standard quantum mechanics. It also greatly simplifies the calculation of some chemical bond properties. However, even if it is correct, that does not mean there is life after death, but at least in my interpretation of quantum mechanics it is permitted. That thought comforted Claire in her last days, and if it comforts anyone else, this post is worth it.

xxxxx

Outro excelente artigo e posterior comentários com muitos links sobre o tópico:

Near death, explained

New science is shedding light on what really happens during out-of-body experiences — with shocking results.

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/21/near_death_explained/

( E como resposta ateísta de PZ Myers, ver:

Near-death, distorted

Taking aim at a recent Salon story about the science of out-of-body experiences

http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/near_death_distorted/

Encontrada a Causa Fundamental da Obesidade: A Partícula Higgs é quem “dá massa aos corpos” – Louis Morelli

quinta-feira, julho 5th, 2012

Famosa equipe de pesquisadores de medicina no Hoapital do Cern descobriu porque o Universo está engordando. E como todo homem tem o Universo dentro dêle…

Êles disseram que a partícula Higgs é o que dá à tôda matéria do Universo, tamanho e forma. Se foi essa partícula que deu o tamanho e a forma à matéria do corpo da Jennifer Lopes, eu quero comprar um monte destas partículas…

xxx Categoria: Humor da Matrix/DNA

COMO UMA INTELIGÊNCIA SUPERIOR PODE ALTERAR NOSSO PASSADO, PRESENTE E FUTURO!

terça-feira, agosto 2nd, 2011

Incrível, mas pode ser verdade. Uma partícula portando algum defeito que pode destruí-la pode ser sanada se um humano atuar numa outra partícula que está distante. E assim uma pessoa com câncer num estado terminal pode ser imediatamente curada se um alienígena atuar no passado desta pessoa retirando a causa do cancer. Ou nós mesmos podemos aprender a fazer isso se desenvolver-mos essa ciência.

É fácil entender porque. Unimos aqui três facetas da Natureza: o principio da incerteza ( não se pode medir a posição e velocidade de uma partícula ao mesmo tempo); o principio da não-localidade ( partículas distantes entre si podem se comunicarem instantaneamente sem trocarem informações); e a fórmula da Matriz Universal ( o diagrama-software que existe por trás de todos os sistemas naturais).

O principio da incerteza acontece porque as particulas, como os seres vivos, estão sujeitas ao ciclo vital. Êste ciclo faz com que um corpo se transforme, mudando de formas durante sua existência. Portanto a cada dado momento ou ponto no tempo, o corpo tem uma especifica forma e está num determinado lugar. E assim nós vemos outra pessoa: se a vimos a 20 anos atrás quando nasceu ela era um baby, se a vemos agora ela é um adulto. Mas uma partícula vive apenas por dezessete bilionésimos de segundos, e nesse periodo ela apresenta tôdas suas formas diferentes. Ora, se nós com nosso tempo lento porque ampliado para um ciclo de 80 anos observar-mos essa particula, vamos ver todas suas formas instantaneamente. Tem-se então que não se vê forma exata alguma e um ponto fixo onde ela tenha estacionado, ou seja, não se consegue fixar a posição e forma de uma partícula em qualquer tempo.

Mas existem aparelhos que permitem hoje aos cientistas alterar o estado de uma particula num dado momento, e essa alteração então vai alterar o futuro da particula. Por isso, quando se altera a particula que aqui está, fazendo-a girar para a direita, a particula que está em Londres e que representa ela no futuro dela, tambem passa a girar para a direita. Mexemos no seu passado alterando seu futuro.

Agora, vamos pensar em têrmos de Universo. É óbvio que nos trilhões de astros e galaxias existem outras formas de vida. E é óbvio que muitas são mais atrasadas que nós enquanto muitas são mais adiantadas. Mas tambem o tamanho é algo relativo. Tanto que o Universo pode ser algo vivo como um dinossauro, que nós sejamos como micróbios vivendo dentro de um átomo dêsse dinossauro, cujo átomo para nós é nossa galaxia inteira, e ainda não temos como perceber se estamos dentro de algo vivo.

Então pode existir alguem muito mais inteligente, muito maior que nós. E com um periodo de vida de milhões de anos. Tal ser nos veria como vemos as partículas: todas nossas formas, de baby a velhinho alquebrado se apresentariam a êle num mesmo instante. Sendo mais inteligente e com uma ciência superior êle pode fisgar duas formas nossa ao mesmo tempo, uma quando criança e outra quando adulto. E naquele momento que tivemos um acidente que nos deixou aleijado, ele altera o evento do passado de maneira que hoje, de repente, olhamos para nosso corpo e constatamos que nunca foi aleijado.

Seria dificil explicar isso para o INPS e evitar a prisão por ter recebido o salario-aposentadoria por invalidez… mas é só mandar os examinadores do INPS irem aprender a Teoria Quântica e a Teoria da Matrix/DNA…