Posts Tagged ‘planet’

A Terra – Uma Criatura Viva. Bonito Video pela NASA porem, com um grave equivoco…

segunda-feira, outubro 23rd, 2017

xxxx

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlqjz9OEhk0&lc=z12wdnjjypaespbxl04cdzcbjpjzh3kp224.1508662277159596

My comment posted in YouTube at 1023/2017

The signals of a living planet are not seen at its external appearance, like the first almost-living creature produced in this planet – viruses – has no external signals of life. The active nucleus and its surrounding layers are showing the same signals that a corn seed will show when inserted into the land and receiving water/sun’s light. Biological systems, (aka, life) were made by and inside these astronomic systems (stellar and galactic system) so, it is rational to think that all basic elements and life’s properties must be present in a very primordial shape in these systems. The current astronomical models are wrong that’s why you are not seeing the clear signals of primordial life in this planet. As planet’s nucleus we have the germ of new stars and if this Milk Way is old enough that would be formed by the first process of galactic formation, we will see in the next thousands years the big transformations as every living thing. By the way, the video is a brilliant art work and has a good message. Congratulations to NASA.

And…

My comment posted at 08/22/2017

So,… who says that life came from non-life? Or who needs magical gods for explaining life here? Earth is not a living creature as we understand “life”, but it is not non-life also. Any living being is a working system and Earth is not a system in itself, it is merely part of a system, called stellar system. System only comes from previous systems, there are no self-organizing systems. We can not making comparisons between systems as living beings with parts of systems, like Earth. So, is the stellar system, more “alive”? Has it all forces and elements for producing organic matter and biological systems? Where “life” came from? Thinking about this question, applying comparative anatomy between these systems, I elaborated Matrix/DNA Theory with the following explanation: No, a stellar system alone has no all forces and elements necessary for building biological systems, but a building block of galaxies has all forces, all elements, and the exactly anatomical configuration for reproducing itself – nannotechnologically – as the building blocks of DNA, a lateral base-pair of nucleotide. The evolution of these building blocks towards the fist cell system was due the new state of matter, water, and its production, organic chemistry. Earth alone, neither this stellar system are alive, but they are organs, or parts, of something half-alive… By the way, Earth, the Sun, this system and this galaxy are our ancestors like bacteria and monkeys are… ( this is merely, a theory, don’t forget it)

ASTRONOMIA: Novo Planeta Anima a Velha luta entre Copérnico (agora Matrix/DNA) e o Modêlo Geocentrico das Universidades no Séc. XV

quinta-feira, janeiro 10th, 2013

ZME Science

Most earth-like planet detected orbiting sun-like star: extraterrestrial life likely

http://www.zmescience.com/space/earth-like-planet-koi-10012013/

Planet KOI 172.02 ( Kepler Object of Interest) Compared to Earth

Planet KOI 172.02 ( Kepler Object of Interest) Compared to Earth

Unglamorously named KOI 172.02 (Kepler Object of Interest), the planet is some 50% larger than Earth, orbiting its star on an orbit which would make its surface habitable. Well, to be more precise, it has a 242-day long year instead of our 365.25 day, and its mass rather makes it a super-Earth than an Earth, but the differences are small when put into the larger picture.

(Ver resto do artigo)

A seguir, comentário postado por nós no artigo:

Avatar

TheMatrixDNA1:47 PM – Jan – 10 – 2013

It is arriving the time when the modern big conflict inside Astronomy will be solved: which is the right cosmological model? The Physics based model of current official Astronomy or the Biological based model of Matrix/DNA Theory? Remember that once time Copernicus was alone with his model against the academic establishment. More proved data about these different shapes of astronomical bodies that we are discovering day after day will be the final judge. The problem for Matrix/DNA interpreting this few initial data is about the question about the age of this system, for knowing which from two methods nature used for this star formation. If it is an old system (generated by symbiosis) the star must be turning cooler and the planet hotter (there is transference of energy from the star to the planet), bigger, with less weight. The planet must be getting more giants volcanoes, which eruptions will make it seems a pulsar, and he must go far away from the star orbit, for becoming a star itself. If he was able to produce life, it must be a older life than Earth, becoming non-habitable, its population more evolved than humans must be re-located to other place. Bit, if this systems is a modern one, its formation was by the method of replication, self-recycling from a died system. We have not calculated the development of such modern systems yet.