Posts Tagged ‘Teoria’

Video/Palestra sobre Mudancas de Paradigmas

quinta-feira, outubro 19th, 2017

xxxx

Como a Matrix/DNA Theory e’ um novo paradigma, a palestra neste video nos interessa, e abaixo vai meu comentario postado no YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RxOTi_ZKftg

Palestra | Os Paradigmas e o Novo Tempo [CM+P]

Ok… mas… senhor Juliano, como o senhor reage a uma nova ideia que vai contra o seu paradigma da espiritualidade kardexista ou mesmo de Chico Xavier? Ou o senhor utiliza o dogma de que “paradigmas devem mudar” apenas contra a ciencia e a religiao porque estas sao reacionarias para com o espiritismo? O senhor concorda que os paradigmas do espiritismo terao que serem mudados tambem? Mas como o senhor aceitara estas mudancas, que tipos de mudancas serao estas? ( muitos erros de ortografia devido usar teclado ingles). Pois bem, para testar sua honestidade e disponibilidade para com sua evolucao, existe uma nova ideia exatamente capaz de fazer isso. Me refiro a Matrix/DNA Theory, em http://theuniversalmatrix.com . Aplicando metodos ineditos como anatomia comparada entre os sistemas naturais vivos e “nao-vivos”, o autor descobriu que existe um sistema-elo evolucionario entre evolucao cosmologica e biologica: o building block dos sistemas astronomicos e’ a mesma formula natural do building block do DNA. Isto significa que o ultimo ancestral nao-biologico nunca viveu na Terra e sim, e’ a propria Via Lactea. E significa que o DNA nao foi iniciado na Terra, e sim e’ apenas uma forma biologica de um “dna” existente nos sistemas astronomicos, atomicos, e as origens dessa matriz/dna retrocedem ao Big Bang. E significa que a consciencia humana sempre esteve encriptada nesta matriz/dna universal desde os atomos, apenas se levantando expressada no homem. Entao, entidades espirituais nada mais sao que expressoes mais evoluidas desta consciencia em outros planetas. Porem o mais importante desta nova ideia e’ o codigo moral e o comportamento mais agressivo e energetico que ela sugere do que o comportamento sugerido pelo espiritismo. E aqui ela mexe contigo de maneira tao incomoda que certamente iras buscar todos os argumentos para rejeita-la, como estao reagindo materialistas e religiosos. Inclusive os argumentos rebuscados, ocultos, no seu paradigma. Aceitas o desafio? De uma olhada no website e retorne aqui dizendo como te comportaras de hoje em diante em relacao aos homens, a sociedade, o trabalho, etc. ( e talvez o senhor sera’ obrigado a conhecer esta nova ideia, pois o autor me disse que a qualidade de seus videos e’ a melhor indicada para fazer o filme de sua sua teoria e podera contratar a Pozati…)

Teoria dos Modelos

sábado, outubro 7th, 2017

xxxx

Model Theory

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/model-theory/

`A primeira vista, aconteceu com o conceito de “modelo” o mesmo que aconteceu com o conceito de sistemas. De repente deixaram o objeto real, o fato, para um lado e se entregaram a exercitar as abstracoes mentais sobe o fato ( Already by the late 17th century the word “model” could mean an object that shows the form, not of real-world objects, but of mathematical constructs. Leibniz boasted that he didn’t need models in order to do mathematics.)

Pode se ver isto nesta encyclopedia definindo teoria dos modelos. Ela inicia falando do que ‘e a teoria em matematica e so’ mais tarde retorna ao que realmente e’ modelo de fato.

Ler com mais tempo isto para conhecer a historia da evolucao do pensamento a respeito deste assunto:

 

A Morte de Uma Estrela Sendo Fotografada Para Comparação com o Modelo Da Matrix/DNA

sexta-feira, setembro 22nd, 2017

xxxx

Crescente Olho Vermelho: Bolha Cósmica Envolve Velha “Estrela de Carbono” 

https://www.space.com/38202-carbon-star-bubble-alma-photos-video.html?utm_source=notification

Otimo Video Sobre Pesquisas da Origem da Vida nas Rochas

sexta-feira, abril 28th, 2017

xxxx

Ao alcançar um nível intelectual o ser humano fica desesperado em saber o que ele é, e para isso ele precisa antes saber como a vida surgiu neste mundo de rochas, gases e água. Primeiro ele teorizou que a vida começou pelos gases sob relâmpagos elétricos e tentou reproduzir a atmosfera inicial da Terra num tubo de ensaio onde aplicou descargas elétricas. Conseguiu a formação de umas moléculas de aminoacidos parecidas com as usadas pela vida mas estas moléculas nunca deram o passo evolucionário seguinte, que seria elas formarem proteínas, RNA, etc. Desanimado nesta hipótese veio a teoria da sopa primordial, em algum pântano ou na lama no fundo de oceanos sob ventos vulcânicos… mas também não conseguiu o estalo inicial. Agora um novo grupo esta crendo na teoria de que as intrigantes reações químicas nas superfícies de minerais e rochas de todos os tipos podem ser a chave para o mistério. Dessa linha de pesquisa trata este vídeo, muito bem elaborado e informativo.

Porem… tem um zé ninguém por ai, um semi-macaco saído da selva amazônica, americano de origem brasileira, sem diploma cientifico, que me aparece com uma outra nova teoria, a principio totalmente estapafúrdia e diferente, mas o cara tem arrolado tantas evidencias e tem uma certa logica na coisa que… Bem, no Youtube, na seção de comentários deste vídeo, este cara se intromete com um comentário o qual copio abaixo:

Origin of Life – How Life Started on Earth

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyhZcEY5PCQ

xxxx

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli  – 4/27/2017

Lol! Now it is rock? No soup anymore?And no gases under electric strikes? I still prefer Matrix/DNA Theory: soup, rock, gases, were the ingredients for the hardware of life. But… where was the software? It is simple: bits-information in shape of photons resulted from the fragmentation due entropy that attacked our astronomic system. They fall at planets’ surfaces and if there are good conditions, they reproduces the system where they came from.
These photons invade electrons inside atoms and creates networks of atoms like neurons emitting synapses, be it inside rocks, soup, gases, or a mixed cake of everything.
The big fault for human intelligence is due our wrong astronomic theoretical models. Planets, stars origins, galactic formations, our theories about are wrong. There are seven kinds of astronomic bodies, there were seven organelles, elements, in the first cell system. These astronomic bodies are arranged as a working system, almost biological. It is the fundamental unit of information of a galaxy. But its configuration and shape is just the same of an unit of information of our RNA/DNA.
It means that biological DNA is a formula evolved from the formula that builds atoms and galaxies. This formula is called Universal Matrix/DNA. You can see this formula and the theoretical models of astronomic systems at my website. I got it applying comparative anatomy between all natural systems, from atoms to human beings.
It is losing time searching how life began at Earth, we need search how the first biological system began. Only changing this word “life” which is a wrong concept, and we see the need for linking cosmological and biological evolution in one unique lineage. Or we learn how to study the photons coming from the sun and the Earth’s nucleus or we will need wait that spatial exploration fix our knowledge of our truly creator.

Exoplaneta Faz Astrônomos Revelarem que a Formação de Planetas Ainda é um Mistério

terça-feira, janeiro 10th, 2017

xxxx

Hubble Detects Signs Of A Young Exoplanet

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/hubble-detects-signs-of-a-young-exoplanet/ar-BBy4RbS?ocid=wispr

Eu não consigo entender isto. Basta ler qualquer livro pedagógico destinado a educação escolar que se encontra detalhadamente descrito o processo de formação de planetas, estrelas, etc. Nem avisam mais que trata-se de uma teoria, vão direto afirmando que os planetas surgem assim e assim. Mas só os educadores burocráticos que elaboram ou aprovam este curriculum escolar que “sabem” a verdade, pois os cientistas astrônomos não sabem! Vejamos este paragrafo nesta notícia (traduzido a seguir):

Scientists hope that by studying the protoplanetary disk around TW Hydrae, they would be able to understand exactly how planets form — a process whose exact mechanism is still shrouded in mystery. (Os cientistas esperam que estudando o disco protoplanetário em volta de TW Hydrae, eles poderiam ser capazes de entender exatamente como o planetas são formados – um processo cujo exato mecanismo ainda esta’ envolto em mistério.)

Pois bem, estão mentindo para nossos filhos, esta nova geração de cuja visão do mundo vão depender eles e as próximas gerações para sobreviverem ou serem extintos para sempre. Na minha opinião esta mentira tem um motivo: eliminar a idéia de algum sentido sublime para a existência incutindo definitivamente no ideário humano que toda existência é obra do acaso. Pois a teoria sendo ensinada se resume em geração espontânea por acaso, dos planetas. E’ a ideologia dos grandes predadores humanos que assim se justificam no seu comportamento de rapina a seu bel prazer, pois não terão que enfrentar nenhuma justiça sublime alem da humana que eles mesmos elaboram.

Como eu não mantenho nem o instinto animalesco para predador nem o instinto para ovelha – porque vim da desclasse social desideologizada – fui buscar a minha própria visão de mundo e nessa busca elaborei uma teoria do tudo que ha’ neste Universo, portanto, também uma teoria astronômica. E nos meus modelos astronômicos, a formação de sistemas astronômicos obedece não ao acaso nem a uma criacao magica de algum magico sobrenatural, mas sim ao processo conhecido para a formação de sistemas biológicos, descontadas as complexidades adquiridas no intermeio evolutivo entre estas duas formas de sistema. E assim como encontrei um motivo sublime na formação celular, este motivo também foi encontrado na formação astronômica. Mas,… ainda é teoria contra teoria, ninguém conseguiu derrubar a minha e eu não consegui derrubar a deles… que ainda esta envolta em mistérios. O que me deixa indignado é essa pregação no estilo religioso transmitindo o que é teoria como se fosse verdade cientificamente comprovada. E fico indignado ainda porque de tudo que vejo na Internet e no mundo hoje em geral eu sou o único no mundo que esta gritando que isso é teoria, não é verdade cientifica, enquanto os pais, que deveriam ser os mais interessados na salvação da mente de seus filhos, se calam inertes. Como parte da minha militância, aproveito sempre a oportunidade de dar uma cutucada nos autores e comentaristas destas noticias, como fiz aqui e copio a seguir:

xxxx

 Louis Charles Morelli · jan-01/10/2017
This is important for several things, but one is fundamental: when you see something that you desire at a long distance, you will find the way to get there. Thanks NASA.
About the planet formation, it is possible that astronomers are forgetting a very important issue. Accordingly to my different method, must have two process for astronomic systems formation, as we had two different process for cellular system formation. One, the first and initial process, was by symbioses. Then, the system learned how to reproduce itself, by self-recycling the resulting dust of a died system. I have all details about the bodies formation at the first process, but I did not get yet the second process. If this is a young system, it must be formed by the second, like our own solar system. We need to search the differences between the symbiontic cellular formation and the automatized cellular reproduction for inferring how our ancestrals astronomic systems do it.
xxxx
Chris Hood ·- Works at Reformou-se
This is not important in our lives. NASA has spent Trillions on worthless endeavors. Stop bleeding us dry. Oh, the military complex is running the show. I guess we need the military in space.
Louis Charles Morelli · to – Chris Hood
Oh, yes… and your opinion is that humanity deal only with the terrestrial issues, till the day that this planet and star – which are under transformations – does not support life here anymore. Thanks to NASA, we will be able to destroy a meteorite before it destroy us, and we will be able to leave at other young planet escaping from extinction here. If we listen you, we will be caught like the dinosaurs.
xxxx
People do not have a clue as to the expanse of the UNIVERSE. Our CREATOR has infinite things going on throughout eternity that mankind has no way of even starting to comphrehend. “The Start (of) Your Life, Your Future” is a book that should be read by everyone on Earth. If you believe what it says it will change your life for the better forever.

Louis Charles Morelli · to – Carol Harmon

“Our CREATOR has infinite things going on throughout eternity that mankind has no way of even starting to comphrehend.”
And because the Universe is so big and complex you has no way of even start to comprehend the Universe, then you prefer the theorists of magical thinking that imagined they know the thru inventing a ghost magical creator and believing that eternity is a proved fact. The unique thing that can be eternal os transformation, evolution, because everything we know are transformed, nothing went to be eternal.

A Historia de 4,5 Bilhoes de Anos da Terra, neste Vídeo, Revela o Sentido ou Não-Sentido da Nossa Existência? Veja a resposta da Matrix/DNA

terça-feira, setembro 6th, 2016

xxxx

Vídeo inesquecível de longa duração, narrando as muitas transformações porque passou a formação do planeta Terra, da Lua, mostrando principalmente como estamos por um fio em cima de uma bola de magma incandescente e como a vida aqui se mantem de forma tao fugaz. Apesar desta historia ser ainda uma teoria – a acadêmica – e diferenciar da nossa teoria da Matrix/DNA, e’ um filme e com muitos recursos técnicos, muito interessante para ver e repetir.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPATtHrY1AM

Construindo o Planeta Terra

E meu comentário postado no video:

Louis Charles Morelli Louis Charles Morelli – Set/06/2016

Este excelente filme narra uma teoria cuidadosamente elaborada em seculos de observações, cálculos, etc. mas existem varias falhas na teoria. A primeira ‘e isolar o calculo da formação da terra do sistema a que ela pertence, a Via Láctea. E quando observamos esta não vemos violência alguma, vemos o estado harmônico de ordem da natureza. E’ erro comum ao homem projetar o caos da sua biosfera aqui sobre seis modelos teóricos de sistemas estelares e galácticos, mas se esquecem de projetar a ordem destes sistemas para calcular esta formação do planeta.
Todas estas mudanças que parecem catastróficas sob a perspectiva humana seriam também catastróficas ao microbio assistindo as varias mudanças dos nossos corpos durante a embriogênese, de morula, a blástula, a feto, embrião. Então o que vemos aqui sugere que estas mudanças ocorreram dentro de uma especie de útero celeste, como sugere o modelo astronomico da Matrix/DNA.
Outra falha inexplicável nesta teoria e’ que esta Terra tal como a calcularam jamais teria as forças e elementos que mais tarde produziram os corpos dos primeiros seres vivos. Então estas forças e elementos caíram do céu ou foram inventadas pela primeira vez neste Universo por essa matéria bruta e estupida deste pequeno planetinha perdido na imensidão sideral? Oh,.. como’n, isto precisa de uma grande dose de ato de fé… Não seria mais logico supor que a extraordinária engenharia no processo da nossa embriogênese seja produto de um processo semelhante pelo qual passou o planeta que nos produziu?! Os materiais podem ser diferentes, o ambiente pode ser diferente, mas o significado do processo deve ser o mesmo, ou então houve magica. E isto e’ outra religião.
Mas o modelo da Matrix/DNA sugere onde estavam todas estas forças e elementos neste sistema astronomico que geraram fenômenos como metabolismo, ciclo vital, reprodução sexuada, etc. No entanto, parabéns pela qualidade técnica, pelo esforço em acertar, e pelo incentivo a nossa continua busca do conhecimento… o filme esta excelente, o conteúdo porem, não e’ um fato cientifico e nunca sera enquanto não se filmar por 4 bilhões de anos como se forma outro planeta. A falha gritante no vídeo esta em se esquecerem de avisar a toda momento que cada cena daquela ‘e uma “TEORIA”, como eu sempre aviso que a Matrix/DNA, por enquanto ‘e apenas uma teoria.

xxxxx

E outro comentário sobre o assunto:

A julgar pelo conteúdo dos comentários aqui: Assim como estes continentes emergem de oceanos, um fenômeno, uma questão, emerge na mente do humano no final do vídeo: “Qual o sentido da nossa existência?” Uma resposta o vídeo forneceu: ” Como todos estes animais que surgem e desaparecem sem sentido algum, sua existência não tem sentido algum. No próximo remexer deste planeta, sera’ sua vez e de todos seus edifícios serem enterrados.” Claro, isto suscita uma inconformidade com nosso ego, e por isso muitas alternativas fantasiosas são imaginadas e até acreditadas, para contornar essa inconformidade e nos manter a viver essa vida, a trabalhar, respeitar as leis sociais.
Mas se alcançamos o ponto de enviar veículos ao espaço e produzir computadores e a Internet, porque não somos capazes de produzir ou encontrar um habitat ou uma forma de vida cujas existências tenham ao menos uma duração mais longa, torcendo que ela nos conduza finalmente a produzir um sentido logico e aceitável, para a nossa existência?
Ao invés de Deus e todas estas outras teorias que geram fantasias para esquecer a nossa realidade, a Historia neste vídeo aponta firmemente numa direcao: o mundo é governado pelo Acaso Absoluto. Mas a Historia deste mundo é de 13,8 bilhões de anos e num espaço trilhões de vezes maior que o deste planeta e não apenas os 4,5 bilhões neste pequenino ponto perdido na imensidão cósmica. Então, que este sentido existencial extraído da Historia deste planeta pode indicar algo parecido para a Historia do mundo, é um salto temerário e confiar nele, é preciso um voto de fé, o que já sai fora do racional.
A Historia do mundo sugerida pelos meus modelos teóricos  que inclusive sugere uma diferente formação para este planeta do que esta versão no vídeo – sugere um sentido para nossa existência que apenas eu tenho defendido entre todos os humanos nascidos até hoje. A Historia deste mundo tem sido a historia das transformações e evolução, do simples para o mais complexo, de um único sistema natural. Ele surgiu como sistema atômico, evoluiu para sistema estelar, depois galáctico, depois celular e seu topo hoje aqui e agora é o sistema corpo humano. Por 13,8 bilhões de anos esse sistema e sua linhagem de herdeiros sobreviveu a todos os eventos ao acaso. E desde o primeiro átomo até o ultimo humano, todas as formas deste sistema manteve algo intimo, comum a todos, que é uma formula, a qual denomino de Matrix/DNA. Porque o nosso DNA veio dessa formula que esta’ na base da formação de cada átomo, de cada galaxia, colocando estes sistemas como nossos ancestrais tal como são as bactérias. Nos somos a primeira forma desta formula onde emerge isso que denominamos “auto-consciência”. Esta parece ser a nova forma deste sistema universal a transcender a existência humana. E quando fomos mais fundo na investigação desta formula universal, descobrimos que sua primeira aparição neste Universo foi na forma de uma onda de luz. No meu website explico como uma onda de luz é um sistema funcional em si mesmo, e se propaga pelo mesmo processo do código da vida. Por outro lado, observando como as sinapses elétricas nos pensamentos “parecem” gerar uma “nuvem luminosa dentro de um black hole”, e nesta luz ocultada ocorrem as operações da consciência, estamos apostando que a luz da origem volta no final de nossos tempos, porem, agora, auto-consciente. Ora, se eu fosse um Deus criador de um multiverso ( um mundo com uma infinidade de universos), bastaria criar essa forma de luz e lança-la a todos os cantos do espaço. Os átomos, as galaxias, os humanos, e a auto-consciência já estavam determinados a existirem por esta simples formula. Ou então, fazer tudo sem magicas, ao natural, bastando que o meu genoma fosse esta forma de luz. Assim este Universo nada mais seria do que um Ovo Cósmico onde estaria ocorrendo um processo natural genético de reprodução do ser ou da coisa desconhecida que gera universos. nesse contexto, todas estas mudanças e movimentos do planeta e da galaxia seriam as mesmas que ocorrem na placenta, ou seja, fazem parte da formação do embrião, e não são produtos do acaso, nem de outra forma de magica. E eu estou apostando mais nessa hipótese do que nas hipóteses de Deus Magico e Acaso Magico. Mas assim somos nos, cada um com sua teoria para iludir sua inconformidade com a historia da realidade que acabamos de assistir. Não se esquecendo que tambem a historia neste video é uma teoria, ainda.

Videos virais para baixar nossa moral emitem falsas mensagens

segunda-feira, novembro 16th, 2015

xxxx

Não existe “Universo”

O Universo e sua Historia, pela Física do Sec XX

O Universo e sua Historia, pela Física do Sec XX

Esta na moda agora os modernos produtores de filmes na forma de videos que pululam na Internet, inserirem suas visões de mundo particulares, que , pelo simples fato de serem visões humanas, tem que estarem totalmente erradas ou muito incompletas. Uma destas modalidades e’ focalizar o nosso planeta como um microscópico ponto insignificante dentro de um Universo sem fim. Mas o mais engraçado e triste ao mesmo tempo, e’ que nos milhares de comentários que geralmente se seguem a estes videos, ninguém tem outra ideia, outra visão, ninguém contesta estas mensagens decepcionantes que só fazem baixar nossa auto-estima e perder a esperança em algum significado maior para nossa existência.

Obviamente contra fatos não tem argumentos, e os fatos apresentados nos videos (planetas, galaxias) são fatos reais. O problema esta em que os fatos apresentados são uma ínfima parcela dos fatos que existem neste mundo mas que não ainda não temos como personifica-los com nossos limitados sensores e não tem como reproduzi-los em filmes com nossa atual tecnologia. Então estes indivíduos estão reunindo estes 1% ou 5% dos fatos deste mundo, conectando-os entre si de qualquer maneira, obtendo assim uma sombra de alguma figura indecifrável, mas que forcam uma descrição e o pior, passam a acreditar no seu mundo imaginado. E pior ainda: criam a mesma crença nas pessoas, telespectadores, desavisados, como e’ nossa juventude.

O problema não estão tanto nos poucos fatos mostrados nestes videos, esta na “interpretação” destes fatos. E e’ isto que esta faltando nestes comentários e na inteligencia dos espectadores, a busca por outras das milhares de interpretações possíveis. Poie e’ da interpretação que emerge uma mensagem. Tal como ” existe Deus e somos filhos deles”, ou “tudo veio do nada, não existe Deus” ou outras mais ainda, como e’ a interpretação que eu descobri e da qual falo na minha cosmovisão, a Matrix/DNA Theory. Por isso sou obrigado a postar ao menos um comentário que ao menos alerte autores e espectadores para esta importante faceta que esta passando despercebida.

Um exemplo e’ o conceito cultural mental por tras de uma palavra, um nome: universo. Universo, segunbdo a definicao oficial em Wikipedia e’:

” Universo é tudo o que existe fisicamente, a totalidade do espaço e tempo e todas as formas de matéria, incluindo todos os planetasestrelasgaláxias e os componentes do espaço intergaláctico. O termo Universo pode ser usado em sentidos contextuais ligeiramente diferentes, denotando conceitos como o cosmo, o mundo ou a natureza.”

Agora pergunto: quando e onde a Ciência mostrou o fato da “totalidade” de tudo que existe?! Com certeza, nunca, portanto, a totalidade não e’ um fato cientifico. Ponto final. Mas dai pegam isso que não existe – a totalidade como um fato conhecido cientificamente – e atropeladamente já o consideram como comprovado e em cima deste equivoco continuam a criar teorias. Teorias devem ser elaboradas, porem, devem ser resultado de cálculos baseados em fatos reais, para dai sugerirem que podem existir ou como são os fatos ainda desconhecidos. Entra ai então a “teoria do universo”. Teoria e não fato.  Este um dos detalhes destes videos que procuro alertar o incautos. A seguir o link para o vdeo e meu comentario postado no video:

The Detailed Universe: This will Blow Your Mind.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IVqMXPFYwI

 

Louis Charles Morelli – 11/16/2015

After we discovering that the building blocks of astronomic systems are the same building blocks of microscopic biological systems, there is no more ” universe”. There is a unique natural system that began at the Big Bang and is evolving by the process of life’s cycles ( see Matrix/DNA Theory). A unique system that is being transformed into new shapes, like the vital cycle makes yours body transforming its shapes.  So, while the human body goes from embryo’s shape to baby, child, teenager, adult, etc., the universal system goes from atom, stellar, galaxy, biological system, etc. Galaxies are our ancestors, some of them still alive, others must be merely fossils of our ancestors. The immense space has as substance something (be it dark matter, the aether, or any other name you want), doing the job of the amniotic liquid, galaxies are the placenta, and all this maybe is inside something like a primitive cosmic egg.)  We, humans, and every other conscious life form at any other astronomic system, are the genes building the next shape of this universal system, which must will be the son of the thing that triggered the Big Bang, an act of fecundation. You can not explain the existence of life and consciousness from this idea of “universe”. But when you learn that DNA’s fundamental unit of information ( a base-pair of nucleotides) has same shape, configuration, operation and function that has the building block composed by seven kinds of astros (planet, old star, quasar, pulsar, black hole,comet and supernova), you see the natural living system with 13,7 billion years old that explain our existence here.  And with a beautiful meaning for our existence: we ( and all lifeform in this univ… opps… in this cosmic placenta) will be one, at the day of the Big Birth. Don’t worry that the world is too much bigger and our bodies are too much smaller, because, here and now, we are the most complex thing in this world, and the biggest, because the whole past and future world is encrypted into our DNA. Congratulations, brothers and sisters from Earth…

Origens da Vida: Bom video sob a otica materialista e debate com a Matrix/DNA

sábado, setembro 5th, 2015

 

xxxx

The Origin of Life – Abiogenesis – Dr. Jack Szostak

video no Youtube:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg&google_comment_id=z125glhhuvy2vzwsr23ced0h2yj1ypfvl

E meus comentarios, respostas, no Yotube:

Louis Charles Morelli · September, 04, 2015
” Life only appears to come from life…”Only appears?!!! When and where somebody saw any life coming from other thing than life?! All life come from life, there is no known and proved fact of other way, so, any human being that ” belief” there is life coming from non life is not rational, is metaphysics, is an appeal to something supernatural.Then we have the first living beings at Earth that we don’t know which life produced them. What’s the problem? Let’s go making theories ( maybe from extra-terrestrials, then prove that there are extraterrestrials, etc.) for investigations, but any rational theory must pointing to some kind of life. These people and the whole scholar mindset loose the control of their rationality.
E other post:

The building block of galactic systems are equal the building blocks of DNA and both are ancestors of the first biological system at Earth, a complete and working cell. So, an astronomical system composed by seven different shapes of astronomic bodies ( planets, stars, pulsars, quasars, black(white) holes, comets, cloud of dust and gases) performs the same functions that a cell composed by seven or eight organelles or parts ( ribosome, DNA, RNA-m, lysosome, mitochondria, chloroplasts, membrane) and that a DNA’s building block composed by seven elements ( two lateral sugars, four bases plus uracil).  Then, DNA is not a only the code for biological systems, it is merely the biological shape of a universal matrix, which is the code for all known systems, from atoms to galaxies to human beings. Abiogenesis was merely a process of astronomical reproduction and embryogenesis in a different environment and added with anew state of matter – the liquid water.At Matrix/DNA Theory ( vide its website) everything is detailed explained. But where this universal Matrix/DNA came from? We discovered that natural systems are elaborated by Nature applying the process of vital cycle upon a unique initial body. So the question was: from where came this process? And we also discovered it: the electromagnetic radiation ( aka waves of light) propagates in time and space by the same sequence of vibration/energy that a human body propagates in its time and space.So, life came from a wave of light, emitted at or by the Big Bang, and penetrating the dark matter. The problem now isL where these waves of light that contains the code for life came from?We don’t know, because as human beings we can only investigate what is inside this Universe, and these things came before and beyond the Universe. Final: Remembering Godel – ” nobody can know the truth of a system standing inside it” – if life was produced by Nature or God or something else non human we know it, never. For knowing it, we will need transcendence of our actual shape. But, with our intelligence we can know everything inside.
xxxxx
+Louis Charles Morelli You should learn some correct English first. Then you can start to tackle such advanced concepts as what a scientific Theory is.
Louis Charles Morelli 1 second ago

+JustinMShaw I know what theory is since my 12 years old when reading all Greek philosophers. Theory is a contemplative and rational type of abstraction, or the results of such thinking. Depending on the context, the results might for example include generalized explanations of how nature works. The owners of this name – theory – is those who coined the word, in ancient Greek.But,… when someone want to be rational and thinking about Nature, there is no chance for metaphysical appeals. Nature shows to us that all known life only comes from a previous existing life, that’s it.Neither the scientific mindset of this times ( which will be substituted by another more advanced at the next times, as always has been) is the owner of the word ” theory”, neither the English language is the owner of natural phenomena like the one here – life’s origins. Can you understand that ” life” has its electromagnetic version and its astronomical mechanical version also? So, searching the origins of life at 3,5 billions years ago and at Earth surface or some comets, makes no sense.
xxxxx

+Louis Charles Morelli  – Well it’s a good thing that science has not tried to wage a war against the continued use of the word theory that you just summed up – the purely philosophical and not even remotely dependent on empiricism version of the world. But your lament at the inaccessibility of the intangible to a scientific Theory suggests that you don’t know the meaning of the latter and clearly reveals your intolerance of it. That begs the question of what you’re doing on a video like this that is purely concerned with empiricism. But since you seem to enjoy babbling about scientific terms, what exactly do you mean about life having an electromagnetic form and an astronomical mechanical version? Are the two supposed to be mutually exclusive and if so then what’s the difference between them?
xxxx
+JustinMShaw ” Well it’s a good thing that science has not tried to wage a war against the continued use of the word theory”
Hummm… among the founding fathers of the scientific method, there were those that was merely wishing to open a war against religion and there were those, like Francis Bacon, that was purely rationalists and from them we learn that Science is observation of natural phenomena, annotation, and from the data trying to get more data through experiments.  Pure Science opens war against humans enemies like viruses, meteorites falling from the sky, etc., not against abstract things like words, religions, etc., because the abstract is not business for Science. Is an ideology (as materialism) dominating the head of a scientists that produces behaviors like Szostack which leads them far away from rational thinking, like the imagination that life could coming from non-life.
” the purely philosophical and not even remotely dependent on empiricism version of the world.”
That’s funny. You says that I must learning English while you knows how to talk English but you does not know the formal definition of English words. Like theory and empiricism. Empiricism is not derivated and not limited to scientific experiments. It is a “theory” that states that knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience. And which rational theoretical scientist have a sensory experience of life coming from non-life?! Do you know why it happens? It is missing to learn with Einstein about the relativistic world. It teaches us for instance, trying to see things from a microscope perspective. Like the imagination that we are intelligent microbes inside an embryonary sac nurturing a human fetus. The microbes watches the development from a unique cell, blastulae, fetus, fish, reptile, mammals shapes and of course – since they never saw reptiles and mammals – everything is blind evolution by random mutations producing complex systems. They never could know that driving all events there is a natural formula, called genetic code, which comes form other life existing beyond the microbes’ universe. That’s what I am discovering with my Matrix/DNA Theory, after studying natural systems, applying comparative anatomy between living and non-living systems and discovering that abiogenesis was driven by the same formula, he same genetic code, coming from a half-living system – the building blocks of astronomical systems.
” what exactly do you mean about life having an electromagnetic form and an astronomical mechanical version?”
No, Justin, there was no life when the Universe began by an electromagnetic order of natural phenomena, neither when the universe was composed by astronomical systems… The magical thinking ( be it materialist, deist, atheist) needs that a universe not linked to a kind of life could create life by magic, be it magical gods or magical random movements. A magic event that brought from nothing the living principle, and inserted it inside itself as genetic code! Go to my website to see a model of atoms operating almost by electromagnetic forces already expressing life’s properties, and models of astronomical systems were all life’s properties are expressed in a mechanic fashion. At the Big Bang, the living principle was like a extreme singularity, but, you know, there is evolution, and then, we have this complex shape of the same life today. If the theoretical smallest atom that gave birth to this Universe had no living principle, forgets that atom and search another prior cause, as we did at Matrix/DNA Theory. Everything is natural, no supernatural creation as wishes Mr. Szostack.

” Are the two supposed to be mutually exclusive and if so then what’s the difference between them?”

The difference between lifes’ properties expressed at the primordial electromagnetic order of phenomena and the later astronomical order is less mass and more mass – and billions of years of evolution between then. Why they must be mutually exclusive? I can’t see Newton mechanics without electromagnetic effects, magnetic fields, etc. If you are saying that radiations like gamma-ray from the electromagnetic expectrum are mortal to life you are wrong: they are mortal to biological life only. Included, the sequence of electromagnetic frequencies/vibrations from gamma-ray to radio is the same sequence of the living energy that drives yours own body in yours lifetime, from blastulae to death.

(Obs.: Definition of Empiricism by Wikipedia):

Empiricism is a theory that states that knowledge comes only or primarily from sensory experience.[1] One of several views of epistemology, the study of human knowledge, along with rationalism and skepticism, empiricism emphasizes the role of experience and evidence, especially sensory experience, in the formation of ideas, over the notion of innate ideas or traditions;[2] empiricists may argue however that traditions (or customs) arise due to relations of previous sense experiences.[3]

Empiricism in the philosophy of science emphasizes evidence, especially as discovered in experiments. It is a fundamental part of the scientific method that all hypotheses and theories must be tested against observations of the natural world rather than resting solely on a priori reasoning, intuition, or revelation.

xxxxxx

JustinMShaw 2 days ago

+Louis Charles Morelli
You really should work on improving your English, but I think I can decipher that. Let me know, does this paraphrasing come close to what you meant (I’ll separate it into the three paragraphs you did, but much shorter)?
~”Some of the founders of the scientific method wanted to wage a war against religion. Science can’t declare war against concepts, only against tangible things like viruses and meteorites. But ideology leads many scientists astray and Szostak has been compromised by his belief in materialism. By the way, abiogenesis is a joke.
In fact founders of the scientific method lived in an era when an accusation of atheism could earn them the death penalty. Of course we can speculate about their inner beliefs, but character witness is something that science has already shown us to be exceptionally bad at, besides the pointlessness of the endeavor. But what they did openly, if they criticized religion at all, is favor one at the expense of another. You don’t see rationalists really start speaking out against religion until the eighteenth century, and even then generally not from an atheist perspective but merely more of a deist one. The current acceptance of atheism is really just a generation old if that. So no, you are directly wrong about the history of religion and science. But you make it very clear that you’re intolerant of materialism and consider it a religion. That is an extremely dishonest and offensive position. Materialism means to invoke everything tangible but nothing else. By definition it means everything except the supernatural, everything except magic. Your pet definitions of those words are rejected.
You don’t know the definition of the words you use, empiricism means relating to the senses and we can’t sense abiogenesis happening. There are theories like the one that we’re intelligent microbes inside an embryonic sac that feeds a fetus. The microbes watch various animal shapes develop and assume it’s just natural selection. They never guess that there’s a hidden pattern guiding it all. That’s what I’m discovering with my Matrix/DNA Theory.
And you’re wrong in the exact same way about the definition of empiricism. Good for you getting into the root meanings of words, and shame on you for thinking that modern thinking must adhere to those roots. Though in this case there is a connection. Empirical things can be sensed even if we must enhance our senses with machines, and they are clearly distinguishable from things that can’t yet be sensed such as (again, by definition) the intangible. More to the point empiricism just refers to checking assumptions against experimental results rather than merely against our own inner logic. Anyway, to continue with your rant about intelligent microbes, you seem there to be trying to describe the mainstream scientific view, but are failing miserably. It is not assumed that we are intelligent microbes or that we see all those animal forms in sequence. Maybe if you were to dishonestly mix up some pseudoscience with some long outdated claims you could patch that together, but it’s extremely dishonest now. And you hilariously end trying to claim that you have the answer with your own pet pseudoscience. You’re not the discoverer of the universe’s great mathematical secrets, and if a pattern does repeat itself in and out of biological systems that isn’t necessarily evidence of a pattern from another universe. According to mainstream science it’s merely the consistent nature of the universe that makes science possible, and the symmetry that hopefully makes it within our grasp to someday fully understand.
Life appearing in this universe, whether by abiogenesis or by divine biogenesis, is magic. Only my theory of a pattern for life from another universe makes sense. And Szostak is invoking magic, I’m not.
” If that is what you meant to say then you clearly not only don’t get the definition of natural versus supernatural, you outright rebel against it and call natural phenomena supernatural. So don’t expect this conversation to stay civil for very long.
You did not clarify the difference between your own claims of “electromagnetic form” and “astronomical mechanical version,” instead you just acted the pompous and ignorant idiot and pretended that I didn’t realize life was younger than the universe. So you dodged the question, perhaps lost in the euphoria of expounding on your own pathetic fantasies, and then declared that only the involvement of a pattern from another universe could be considered “not magic.” Your stupidity just gets worse and worse. Any mathematical patterns we find are by definition within this universe, you idiot. And you invoking another universe while claiming that this one is not enough is invoking magic. I am so glad that your brand of pseudoscientific quackery is on a steep decline. It’s especially hilarious how transient your followers are, being sucked in one minute by some new quantum discovery and then falling out of favor when the scientific site that informed them about it explains a few things. The age of unsupported dogma is coming to a close. Granted, it’s throwing a loud temper tantrum as it’s put to bed, but it’s going down.
xxxxxx
Justin, you did a great contribution  translating my text, now I can know how English speakers and totally ignorant about the new Matrix//DNA world view interprets almost everything wrong. I never said such stupid things like that life came from another universe and by magics, I never said that there is a theory about intelligent microbes, I never said that rationalists started speaking out against religion before the eighteenth century, there is no such confusion between natural and supernatural, etc.. Yours paraphrasing is not close to  the concepts that I was trying to explain, but yours fault is not due my English language errors, since that people of my native language makes the same interpretations error mistakes that you do.  Yours fault is due yours wrong interpretations about each real natural phenomena, because a wrong millenary human culture that are interpreting those phenomena has indoctrinated your mind. in the way that you will believe that an extraterrestrial intelligent life form made with non-organic materials has an absurd and stupid interpretation.     
But, if you are interested to learn how to check yours nowadays world view and how it will be difficult for humans to communicate with other lifeforms  that  have a world view totally weird and never imagined before by you,  it will be good to keep this conversation here…
You interpreted:  “…. By the way, abiogenesis is a joke.
I never wrote this word – joke – go reading again my post. The total time of abiogenesis ( maybe 3 billion years) was anything else than a process of embryogenesis at astronomical scale of time, because the mother of abiogenesis was this astronomical system inside which the first living being was born.  Human embryogenesis takes only 9 months, but the formation of a star takes millions or billions years, and here, embryogenesis and formation has the same meaning, they are the same process – one is the other, the difference is merely evolutionary. I could explain this process if I could bring here the picture of the model of an astronomic system by Matrix/DNA Theory, which is pretty different of yours ” Standard and Nebular Theories’ models” , despite that my facts and yours facts are the same facts – the theoretical connections and interpretations of these facts are different, and one theory has no fact for debunk the other.
The abiogenesis theory is well based on  facts and evidences, like the self-replicating molecules, the Miller/Urey aminoacids, etc. What is wrong with the theory is the  human imagination that tried to connect those data and evidences for to see the big picture, or to write the Natural History from the non-living matter of this planet till the first  living being. And the errors of these theorists was due their minds believing that there was an agent, a force, called ” random events” as guide of this history. It is not random  events that drives the process of embryogenesis, it was not random events that drove the formation of the first living being. Formation or embryogenesis is driven by the bodies’ parents, , and the parents of the first living being was the body of this astronomical system called Milk Way.  Or don’t was it ?!!! Which real proved known fact have you for convincing me that Nature has decided to apply an unknown different mechanism for formation of the first biological system? A mechanism other than that applied for formation of astronomical systems?
Oh….. I know, yours answer will be that random events also was the  mechanism applied for formation of astronomical systems. And you will throw over the table the academic model for astronomical systems. But this is circular reasoning, like any other mystical world view will bring its sacred scripture as proof. The academic model is wrong.
I am advocating that this connection was wrong because I did this ( also imaginative) connections and the final result is a different theory. So, we are debating  theories, yours against mine. But, please, be non-personal, without an ideology, a belief system like that the school of this time indoctrinated you towards the materialistic world view. I don’t believe that my theory ( which school is  the  wild environment of Amazon jungle), or any other human theory  is the ultimate thru, because I recognize that my little brain without good sensors and my dimensions as a microbe in this Universe is not able to grasp and to understand the ultimate truth. So, this  debate between ours different theories must be focused upon the real facts known by you and me, and  the motives that you connected the fact A with the fact L while I connected A with the fact  R.
( I will be back posting the corrections to yours others paraphrasing)

Especificas Razoes do Porque Nao Aceitam Quando Uma Teoria Se Torna Suspeita ou Obsoleta

sábado, agosto 29th, 2015

xxxx

Specific reasons why not see when a theory becomes archaic and obsolete:

1st –  Sponsorships and financial support to Universities ought not to be lost.

2nd – The Institutes’ reputation ought not to be damaged.

3rd –  The sales of many books must continue without damages.

4th –  As teacher on Human origins you must keep your job.

– . – . –

You know money speaks louder than Math,

The best fish does not go to your home. You must go and bring the fish to your home.

Also archeologists do not go to your home for free.

If they are able to tell you lies then you ascertain with Math and know that they’ve lied to you,

because they did not come to tell you about datas for free or just because they like you.

They were sponsored, supported and paid by those who believe that evolution is what best explains the origin of the Human body. And whoever needs to sell books about the subject, and whoever needs to get paid for teaching Human origins according to Evolution.

Money has spoken about the importance and accuracy of surrealist datas provided by the respective organized/sponsored institutes.

 

Nova Teoria Sobre Formação de Estrelas e Planetas Contra A Acadêmica Hipótese Nebular e a Favor da Matrix/DMA

quinta-feira, agosto 13th, 2015

xxxxx

Stellar Metamorphosis: An Alternative for the Star Sciences

http://vixra.org/pdf/1303.0157vC.pdf

Artigo cientifico em PDF, bastante técnico. O autor defende que:

” A planet is a star and a star is a planet.”

E diz isto:

” It is up to the reader to decide what is correct not authority or “established science”. Established science is full of people who are more concerned with their self worth than actually understanding nature. If you make discoveries of your own do not get acceptance from “establishment or peer review” just work on it and develop it. The peer review system is broken it only favors theories that do not threaten the status quo.”