Posts Tagged ‘Vida’

Lucas Olles: Vida Apos a Morte? Experiencia da morte

terça-feira, outubro 10th, 2017

xxxx

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aJW0HGHwxAw

Louis Morelli – 10/10/2017

Parte 2/3

21:00 – Lucas: ” … seres nao-humanos, todos interligados num consciente coletivo…”

Incrivel como a nossa inteligencia humana aqui consegue prever isto quando busca pelos caminhos certos. Na “Matrix/DNA Theory”, o autor observa os fenomenos naturais daqui e calcula quais podem ser as causas e efeitos destes fenomenos, desenhando modelos, elaborando formulas e algoritmos e por fim chega a uma sugestao: ” Nos somos 8 bilhoes de genes-semi-conscientes aqui na Terra e pertencemos a trilhoes mais espalhados neste Universo, todos construindo uma mesma obra: um embriao cosmico de auto-consciencia total. Este aglomerado de galaxias que denominamos “universo” nao passa de fosseis de nossos ancestrais que serve de estrutura fisica para nossa missao, ou seja, este universo funciona como o amnion e a placenta dentro de um ovo, ou um utero, portanto, dentro deste universo esta ocorrendo um simlpes e natural processo de reproducao genetica. Reproducao de que, ou de quem?
Infelizmente o autor so pode observar e raciocinar os limites dentro deste Universo e seu plano fisico, portanto, fica sem resposta, apenas sugerindo algo: “reproducao daquilo que produziu aquele Big Bang `a imagem e semelhanca de seus pais carnais quando iniciaram o primeiro momento de sua existencia fisica atraves de um pequeno bigbang dentro de um ovulo recem-fecundado, que  foi o resultado do subito rompimento da membrana de um espermatozoide.” Estas entendendo que a Teoria do Big Bang pode ser correta porem sua atual interpretacao teorica fisico-matematica pode estar errada? Que ele foi um evento mais biologico que casuistico?
Quando se entende que somos genes, que os genes todos se tornam um so no corpo final construido, e que se algum gene for atrapalhado em sua missao especifica – construir a parte do corpo que apenas ele tem a informacao – nos nasceremos com algum defeito,… todas nossas relacoes humanas mudam de sentido. E ai, ninguem mais segura a humanidade… rumo ao nosso supremo destino cosmico… alem deste ovo-universo.(clique no meu avatar se tens interesse em ver o website da teoria). Se usarmos nossa inteligencia com boa intencao nao precisaremos de experiencias dolorosas como a do Lucas para saber das coisas certas…
xxxx
6:00 – Lucas: ” O planeta estara’ quase vazio e os que estiverem estarao muito mal…”
Mas porque uma retirada de nos ( que nao vivemos aqui), deste planeta sera’ inevitavel? A resposta pode ser uma analogia com computacao, onde o nosso consciente funciona como um software: um modelo atualizado do Windows 10 nao tem como funcionar bem num hardware de modelo velho, de 20 anos atras; mas aqui so tem esse modelo velho. Entao levemos o software para onde tem modelo atualizado. A nao ser – uma maneira disto ser evitado –  e’ que o proprio hardware tenha livre arbitrio e deseje mudar para alcancar o novo software. Se assim fizessemos, se evitaria toda essa necessaria cirurgia dolorosa que pode vir”.  Explicando isso na realidade:
Ja prestaram atencao que todos os tipos de sistemas sociais criados pelo homem ate’ agora ( seja a monarquia, o comunismo, o feudalismo, ou o capitalismo), e ate’ mesmo todas as religioes criadas ate’ agora, imitam exatamente as mesmas regras de divisao de forsas e poder das selvas, entre os animais? Eu vivi sete anos na selva bruta e pude observar como ali as coisas funcionam. Os nossos sistemas sociais imitam as regras de onde vem as origens do nosso cerebro e psique primaria, porque ainda mantemos os instintos dos animais nas selvas. Entao temos em todos os sistemas sociais a divisao entre:
1) A classe aristocratica que imita os instintos dos grandes predadores (leoes, tubaroes, aguias, etc); 2) A classe media que imita os instintos dos medios predadores (lobos, raposas, urubus, etc); e 3) A classe pobre que imita os instintos de inercia e egoismo individualista das presas (vacas, ovelhas, coelhos,etc). Sei que isso gera um desconforto as pessoas ( sendo comparadas a animais), porem, se nao se despertarem para essa realidade, sobre onde seu verdadeiro “Eu” consciente esta’ hospedado aqui, continuarao tendo a mente dominada pelas forsas deste cerebro e desta psique primaria modelada por esta genetica que veio de uma biosfera em estado de caos, e com isso, sera inevitavel a sua transferencia atraves uma cirurgia natural dolorosa. Como Lucas disse, o planeta nao vai manter estas condicoes ambientais que suportam a vida aqui, e devemos ainda agradecer que antes destas condicoes deteriorarem, podemos abandonar o barco.
A sabia attitude de todo humano consciente, aqui, agora e urgente, e’ procurar – primeiro – se auto-exorcizar destes instintos, e, segundo, gritar ao mundo a todo tempo que todos devem procurar este exorcismo. E’ ficar atento nos comportamentos seu e das pessoas para detectar todos estes efeitos destes instintos e imediatamente denuncia-los a si e ao mundo. Por exemplo, observe o comportamento e atitudes do dono de uma loja, de uma empresa, como ele se comporta exatamente igual a um leao que se agarra com unhas e dentes a seu territorio, tenta controlar os lobos ( da classe media), e ao mesmo tempo usa-los na manutencao do seu reinado, todos para colherem os produtos do trabalho das presas, que trabalham transformando grama em suculenta carne. Ou como se comportam as “celebridades” imitando exatamente o comportamento dos parasitas. A falta de vontade dos pobres em criarem e se unirem em cooperativs de consume e producao para boicotarem os que levam suas energias.  O humano nao se toca nisso ( em parte devido a mentirosa mistica criada pelos predadores na forma de religioes), a ponto de idolatrarem seus predadores, mas voce sabe que se continuarem a terem o intelecto subjugado aos instintos… a tragedia sera inevitavel. De uma chance ao nosso livre-arbitrio…

Mais completo documentário atualizado sobre o conhecimento científico sobre as origens da vida

quinta-feira, setembro 28th, 2017

xxxxx

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20161026-the-secret-of-how-life-on-earth-began

O que é “Vida”? Vídeo Acadêmico e Interpretação da Matrix/DNA

sábado, setembro 23rd, 2017

xxxxx ( traduzir artigo)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-cTlKVsvvM

00:44 – What’s life? In the sky, a pulsar, performing the male function, erupted giant volcanoes (the male sexual organ) emitting comets (the spermatozoons) towards a quasar (the most beautiful body in the sky, performing the female function and attracting the comets with matter from the male), containing a nuclear vortex in which the matter for stars nucleus is generated, and from which is expelled a new baby-star. This system is not alive? Pions ( and maybe electrons) are produced by similar process, by a couple of protons/neutrons at the atomic nuclei, thousand times more simplest in evolutionary scale. Still, isn’t this system not alive? So, we are learning that what we call “life” is a kind of wrong anthropomorphization , a human self-projection upon its ancestors like the idea of “humans and Earth as center of the world”. The real thing is that since the Big Bang there is a unique system that is coming evolving which passed throught atoms, galaxies and now is in biological shape. The difference between what we call “a living system” and what we call “non-living system” is merely the evolutionary stage of these systems’ internal dynamism. Knowing that, we can suppose that this galaxy that created biological systems inside it, can create such diversity of systems that we can see some and not believing that it is “life”. (ok, everything here is based on the theoretical models of matrix/DNA Theory, so, I could be wrong…)

02:30 – If Schrodinger noticed that heredity is the key, it is about information and it is due the stability of cell structures… why he didn’t the rational question: ” From which forces and elements of the state of the world before “life, origins”, life got this natural phenomena called heredity? Of course, such complex phenomena dealing with informations could not be created, invented first time in the Universe, by the stupid matter of this lost planet alone. This is one of the rational question I did before elaborating Matrix/DNA Theory. So, I asked – “There was no heredity in cosmological evolution? There is a kind of heredity, or genetic transmission link, between the super-particles and the first atom, and later, between the atoms and astronomical systems. And later yet, between this astronomical system and the first biological system? Must have it because if not, heredity falls from the sky by magics? Let’s goo looking for it” – As result I found a theoretical rational model of cosmological evolution where heredity is there at all places and time. Ok, it is still merely theoretical, but is scientifically falsifiable and the unique rational I know. It makes no sense forgetting the Cosmos, the system surrounding us, when searching the “origins of life”. There was no origins of life inside this Universe, this Universe is not magic.

03:04 – Schrodinger: “There is a code script in the chromosomes…” That’s wrong! There is no genetic code. Code would infer a kind of intelligence, because only intelligence can creates symbols representing things and obeying some sort of logics. At Matrix/DNA Theory we found that: 1) All natural systems are derivation of a unique universal initial system, so, the natural formula – the template or blueprint of the system’s circuits – must be the formula that build all following evolutionary shapes of that system. As the DNA is the formula that build all living species. 2) The first biological system’s shape must have the evolutionary state of that formula at the astronomical system that created it, which we will call “Matrix/DNA”; 3) The formula is seen composed by four nucleotides, aligned laterally horizontal and vertical: that’s the building block of DNA, the fundamental unit of information, and it is a complete working system; 4) All sequential units of DNA are merely diversified copies of that system, each one with a minimal difference; Would make sense saying that the set of employes in a car’s factory compose a code script? All them are copies of a unique species – humans – each one with a minimal specific difference. There are divisions in groups making the parts of a car, like there genes in the DNA, groups of nucleotides. Saying code is a disservice to Science and human kind because it deviates our rationality to mysticism: one group will need mythical gods, other group will need mystical magical randomness. But,… Schrodinger was a Physicist, so, we understand that he did not understood Biology. -” Then,… from where came the first code of the first shape of the universal system? Isn’t this circular reasoning?” – someone smart would ask. -” Nope: We found that the vital process that results in all life’s cycle of all systems is the same dynamics that makes a light wave propagating into time/space. See the Matrix/DNA Theory interpretation of the electromagnetic spectrum. A specif wavelength with its frequency/vibration is the first basics of an specific shape of a human life. It must be also the a specific systemic function of all systems. And the first light wave with this “code” came with the Big Bang, so, it is coming from somewhere before this Universe. If a god or randomness are the creator, they do it using merely a light wave, and everything there is here and now will be…” – ” Lol! I am creationist, I told that has a God behind everything, God is light!” – ” No. I am atheist, I told about the quantum foam from Nothing, its vibrations, etc. Nothing is pure light…” Matrix/DNA: – ” Well… I don’t know… because I only can deal with natural real facts, whose last limit is the event of the Big Bang. I can go only till the Big Bang. What is beyond it, for me, is in the reign of metaphysics, which is not my business… You believe in what you want…”

06:41 – “Biology was considered a second class science and the first molecular biologists came from Physics background…” This is the cause of Biology nightmare till today. For explaining it I need an analogy with the human body. If to a Physicist with a Mathematician would be asked to apply their fields at a human body, searching to translate it into Math logics and all anatomy movements as Physical laws, how they would do it? For sure, they would begin by the bone skeleton, is is all mechanics, loved by Physicians and Mathematicians. But arriving to the last limits of the bones, and beginning the soft meat, the cellular working, etc., what they could do? And when arriving to the neurological level? The thoughts level? Almost nothing. For studying this Universe with life on it is same thing. We had cosmological evolution with its building blocks – particles, atoms, galaxies – which is the frame, the supportive skeleton after which, the soft biological systems begins. At Matrix/DNA Theory we are discovering all life’s properties already existing and some of them being expressed at those skeletons composing systems. These properties are hidden from nude eyes, we need smart intelligence for identifying it. A complete reproductive sexual system can be performed by five kinds of astronomical bodies’ inter-connections, in the sidereal space! Same for metabolism, homeostasis, etc. It merely indicates that life’s properties are not created here at Earth, they are product of universal evolution that begins with brute forces at the Big Bang. Atom system is so subtle and primitive alive that it express only a organ – let’s say, a stomach, or a liver – at its entire existence. Not a liver as we know it, but the universal systemic function that creates at all system a tool that performs it. So, an electron at energetic level number 6 is to atoms, what a lysosome is to a cell system, a dying star is to an astronomic system, as what a liver is to a human body system. So, the Universe today is composed all places by a bone skeleton which cells are galaxies and it is getting as a thin cover, a biological aspect, the soft meat. Do not try to see this Universe in relation to space – you will not see the truth about it because you are the universe’s cover just now – but try to see in relation to time, its evolution through time. Life creates the skeleton and not skeletons creates life. So life is most important than its skeleton, that’s saying: Biology, Neurology, would be the Science first class. It happens that our living body is inside the skeleton, he will survival if we learn about the skeleton and which technology we can do mimicking the properties of skeletons, starting by the skeleton. That’s why Physics and Math has the power today producing this kind of technology we have today. Wait more a few years… Quantum minded computers, genetic robots, a real technology for humans as living beings and not a technology for humans as machines. We will never get a Theory of Everything by Physics and Math alone, without the participation of Biologists, Neurologists… Without them we arrive to Krauss’ “Something from Nothing”…

(11:00) – The difference between life and the whole world is that life is based on chemistry? But, what is Chemistry? There is no chemistry in non-living world? The key here is that life is based in organic chemistry. And organic chemistry is merely the evolutionary product from the forces and elements of Physics when is added the liquid state of matter, the mean being water. Because the ancestors of biological systems (aka, life) were atoms and galaxies which were formed only with particles, electromagnetic forces and/or solid and gaseous states of matter. So, our ancestor produced liquid and organic chemistry like mammals produces amnion and placenta for their new baby. Life ( a wrong word) is based on our ancestors, which you call non-living, mistakenly. ( ok, I am merely expressing the Matrix/DNA Theory world view. It could be wrong )

Texto Padrão da Matrix/DNA para polemizar todo anuncio sobre “Origens da Vida”

quarta-feira, setembro 20th, 2017

xxxx

Texto a ser usado e melhorado em toda ocasião que aparecer o tema “origens da vida”. Com as respostas, críticas e refutações vou melhorando o texto. A seguir vai uma lista dos links onde a mensagem foi postada.

There was no “origins of life” if the essential building blocks of all biological systems (mistakenly called “living beings”) are exactly a microscopic copy of the building blocks of galactic systems, and if this galactic system has produced biological systems applying the same process of genetics. There is a new theory suggesting astronomic models, DNA’s building blocks models, a model of the evolutionary link between cosmological and biological evolution, how the complex properties of biological systems exists working at astronomical systems, and DNA is merely the biological counterpart of a universal formula Nature has used for organizing matter into systems, from atoms to galaxies to human brains. This is rational: we are not product of some powerful god coming here creating crocodiles by magics neither product of an infinite Nothing that produces Michael Jacksons throughout billions accidents at billion light years. Worst: there is no creation and no evolution, but, merely a genetic process of reproduction of the unknown thing that triggered the Big Bang… and we are in the middle of this process… ( See “The Universal Matrix/DNA of All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycle”).

Entendendo a origem da Vida pela origem do seu corpo

segunda-feira, setembro 18th, 2017

xxxx

Para entender como e porque a Vida surgiu neste mundo, você precisa entender por uma nova perspectiva, como seu corpo surgiu neste mundo, pois os dois eventos foram produzidos pelo mesmo método.

O seu corpo foi criado por uma unica força dividida em suas duas forças opostas. Uma força começou como um ponto, no centro do ovulo, vamos chama-la de “genética”. A outra força começou como uma grande bolha, vinda do mundo exterior, amnion, placenta, vamos chama-la “epigenética”. A fonte, a força unica, chama-se “espécie humana”. Esta especie se coloca como causa primeira, na forma dos pais, e se coloca como efeito ultimo, quando sua forma renasce como uma criança. Na forma de causa primeira, ela é o ponto, o genoma dos pais, que tem a tendencia a reproduzir a forma e no seu aspecto epigenético ela é o ambiente exterior que ajuda esta reprodução porque ele é modelado como um berço para acomodar o feto e como um magneto, puxando, ajudando, o feto a ir na sua direção, na direção da forma.

Nas origens da Vida, o genoma veio da evolução anterior de 10 bilhões de anos, a chamada “evolução cosmológica”. A qual modelou planetas como a Terra para ser o ideal ovo contendo o ideal amnion, envolvido pela ideal placenta – esta atmosfera que nos circunda. Assim a epigenética se coloca como exterior ao palco onde a Vida germina e floresce, intervindo com mutações para a forma do feto se encaixar na sua forma. A estas mutações, que a humanidade ainda não conhece a causa, por isso acredita que são meros produtos causais, erigindo dai’ toda uma visão de mundo niilista que construirá mais uma civilização fadada ao fracasso, a ser derrubada pela realidade natural como foram as outras construídas em cima de visões de mundo misticas equivocadas.

A forma a ser reproduzida pela vida final ora espalhada em muitos planetas de muitas galaxias vai finalmente reproduzir o ser desconhecido que produziu a fecundação num estrondoso evento conhecido como o Big Bang. De  vem a força total, unica, e isto significa que  tem alguém esperando o nosso nascimento, como seus pais aguardaram ansiosamente e torcendo com fervor (pois pouco podem fazer para consertar os seus caminhos errados, já que os pais não podem estarem na genética dentro do ovo), para que você tivesse o melhor desenvolvimento e o maior sucesso. Mas para ser bem sucedido nesta obra de grandeza cósmica, é preciso saber o que fazer, como se conduzir, e isto só se faz se realmente entender-mos o que é este mundo e nossa Vida.

(Obs.: Isto e’ uma teoria, resultado da minha investigação e raciocínio particular. Como eu não sou dono da Verdade e de fato não a conheço, e como nao sou fanatico crente em teorias, apenas escolho a melhor sefgundo minhas preferencias. Voce deve conhecer esta teoria para acrescentar as outras existentes, pois isto enriquece as fundacoes da sua propria escolhida visao do mundo).

A bruta realidade do trabalho do cientista manual moderno perante a impossivel solucao da origem da vida

domingo, setembro 3rd, 2017

xxxx

James Tour ( produtivo cientista, inventor, centenas de papers publicados, e fora da Ciência, declarado criacionista), foi expulso da posição de capataz-professor dos grandes predadores porque não se conformou com as mentiras na cultura humana destinada ao manípulamento das mentes da massa de estudantes. Uma aula de extrema abordagem puramente técnica, a realidade nua e crua, mostrando que a mente humana não pode por enquanto processar a informação de como o mundo pre-biótico conseguiu sequer produzir as moléculas precursoras das moléculas mais complexas, muito menos como conseguiu montar milhões de peças prontas para finalizar com um avião pronto. Retornar a esta aula sempre que nos debates for confrontado pelos arrogantes “cientificistas defensores da teoria da abiogeneses tal como ela esta elaborada hoje. E fazer uma pesquisa sobre James Tour. Não tem como escrever meu livro sem mencionar dados desta palestra.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zQXgJ-dXM4

DNA, como os virus, e’ morto, apenas se torna vivo dentro de celula viva

domingo, setembro 3rd, 2017

xxxx

Este e’ mais um dos misterios desfiando os modernos biologos? O que e’ DNA? Quando Craig Venter produziu um DNA em seu laboratorio, ele viu que tinha algo morto, sem qualquer reacao. Foi necessario inseri-lo dentro de uma celula viva para ve-lo reagir e tornar-se parte da vida.

Esta informacao foi obtida em:

Genetics, epigenetics and disease

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHpfkNRscOc

O que a Matrix/DNA tem a dizer sobre isso?

E a Matrix universal, e’ algo vivo? A onda de luz que foi sua primeira forma?  A luz tambem so’ expressa seu ciclo ou principio vital quando toca algo organico, ou vivo, e nao rochas?

Lições de vida: O que só se descobre na hora da morte

terça-feira, agosto 8th, 2017

xxxx

Bronnie Ware, uma enfermeira que durante vários anos cuidou de pessoas que eram muito idosas ou estavam enfermas em suas casas – escreveu “The Top Five Regrets of the Dying – A Life Transformed by the Dearly Departing”, que, como o título diz, trata dos cinco arrependimentos mais comuns manifestados pelas pessoas antes de morrerem.

No livro da Bronnie aparecem essas ideias, e os comentários dela:

  1. Eu gostaria de ter tido a coragem de viver a vida que eu quisesse, não a vida que os outros esperavam que eu vivesse.

“Esse foi o arrependimento mais comum. Quando as pessoas percebem que a vida delas está quase no fim e olham para trás, é fácil ver quantos sonhos não foram realizados. A maioria das pessoas não realizou nem metade dos seus sonhos e têm de morrer sabendo que isso aconteceu por causa de decisões que tomaram, ou não tomaram. A saúde traz uma liberdade que poucos conseguem perceber, até que eles não a têm mais.”

  1. Eu gostaria de não ter trabalhado tanto.

“Eu ouvi isso de todo paciente masculino que eu trabalhei. Eles sentiam falta de ter vivido mais a juventude dos filhos e a companhia de seus parceiros. As mulheres também falaram desse arrependimento, mas como a maioria era de uma geração mais antiga, muitas não tiveram uma carreira. Todos os homens com quem eu conversei se arrependeram de passar tanto tempo de suas vidas no ambiente de trabalho.”

  1. Eu queria ter tido a coragem de expressar meus sentimentos.

“Muitas pessoas suprimiram seus sentimentos para ficar em paz com os outros. Como resultado, ele se acomodaram em uma existência medíocre e nunca se tornaram quem eles realmente eram capazes de ser. Muitos desenvolveram doenças relacionadas à amargura e ressentimento que eles carregavam.”

  1. Eu gostaria de ter ficado em contato com os meus amigos.

“Frequentemente eles não percebiam as vantagens de ter velhos amigos até eles chegarem em suas últimas semanas de vida e não era sempre possível rastrear essas pessoas. Muitos ficaram tão envolvidos em suas próprias vidas que eles deixaram amizades de ouro se perderem ao longo dos anos. Tiveram muito arrependimentos profundos sobre não ter dedicado tempo e esforço às amizades. Todo mundo sente falta dos amigos quando está morrendo.”

  1. Eu gostaria de ter me permitido ser mais feliz.

“Esse é um arrependimento surpreendentemente comum. Muitos só percebem isso no fim da vida que a felicidade é uma escolha. As pessoas ficam presas em antigos hábitos e padrões. O famoso ‘conforto’ com as coisas que são familiares O medo da mudança fez com que eles fingissem para os outros e para si mesmos que eles estavam contentes quando, no fundo, eles ansiavam por rir de verdade e aproveitar as coisas bobas em suas vidas de novo.”

Existe evidencias de vida apos a morte? Melhor lista de evidencias

domingo, agosto 6th, 2017

xxxx

Is There Evidence of Life After Death?

https://disqus.com/home/discussion/channel-disqusunderground/is_there_evidence_of_life_after_death/

To listen to skeptics, only the gullible masses believe in an afterlife, desperate to be reunited with loved ones.

As we have shown, however, skeptics are so convinced of their intellectual superiority that they are incapable of examining evidence objectively that contradicts their strongly-held viewpoints.

Unlike the cases for ESP and UFOs, however, the evidence for survival after death is by its nature less measurable and more subtle and complicated.

Militant skeptics would have everyone believe that this is merely anecdotal and easily explained away by the biochemistry of the dying brain, pumped up by morphine and stress, with the particular hallucinations the result of a combination of wishful thinking and religious preconception. But as we shall see, this view ignores some inconvenient facts.

While looking at several types of relevant experiences, I will only focus on the issue of immediate survival after death, not theological assertions about what happens beyond that, such as whether there is a heaven or hell or reincarnation. Nor will we try to resolve here exactly what it is that may survive death.

One way to think about the larger picture of reality that the so-called supernatural presents is like the difference between the world of ordinary objects we interact with daily and the invisible quantum world that underlies everything. It is difficult for our minds to get around the fact that what seems like solid reality is mostly empty space. Skeptics are invited to imagine that the paranormal world is something like the theorized other dimensions of the “multiverse.”

Death-Bed Visions

Let us begin with something that should be a perfect test for the skeptical case about hallucinations of the dying: death-bed visions. It is not uncommon for people who are about to die to imagine that the heavens open up and relatives appear to welcome them to the other side.

In What They Saw at the House of Death: A New Look at Evidence for Life After Death by Karlis Osis, a noted physics professor, and Erlendur Haraldsson, a clinical psychologist. Between them, they had carefully examined 5,000 cases of death-bed visions for nearly two decades starting in 1959. These were culled from observations by 17,000 physicians and nurses. Most were medical personnel in the U.S., but some came in from a separate study about patients in India, to check to what extent cultural and religious beliefs influenced the experiences.

Investigative journalist Michael Schmicker, in Best Evidence, summarized the remarkable conclusions:

Biological-Pharmaceutical Factors

*Patients who were given painkilling drugs were not more likely to have such visions than those who were not.

*Brain malfunctions were more likely to reduce such visions.

*A history of using psychoactive drugs did not increase the likelihood of these visions.

*There was no evidence that a lack of oxygen induced the visions.

Psychological Factors

*Stress played no role in predicting which patients would see “the dead.”

*Whether the patient believed in an afterlife did not matter.

*In some cases, the death-bed visions came to people who did not know they were dying.

Cultural Factors

*The visions often did not fit with the religious preconceptions of the individuals. Christians saw no evidence of hell; Hindus had no visions that confirmed they would be reborn.

*There were 11 aspects to these visions that were shared by both American and Indian cases, so they are likely common to many cultures.

Schmicker cited a compelling example. In 1919, Horace Traubel, a friend and biographer of the poet Walt Whitman, was dying in Bon Echo, Ontario, Canada. With him was Lt. Col. L. Moore Cosgrave. Cosgrave reported that at 3 a.m., Traubel stared at a point in the room three feet above the bed.

“A light haze eventually resolved itself into the form of Whitman…wearing an old tweed jacket, an old felt hat, and had his right hand in his pocket,” which Cosgrave could see. The apparition nodded twice to Traubel, who said, “There is Walt.” As the ghost brushed by him, Cosgrave felt a slight electric shock.

Near-death Experiences

“Near-death experiences” (NDEs) was the term coined by Dr. Raymond Moody, a physician who wrote the first popular book on the phenomenon, Life After Life, in 1975. He studied cases of patients who were pronounced clinically dead, but claimed they could see and hear things that seemed impossible, according to the materialist understanding of reality.

A 1982 Gallup poll revealed that one out of seven Americans had at least once been close to dying and 35% of these reported having the NDE. These experiences would seem fairly common, but were not generally reported by physicians, which is explained by the fact that only 32% of doctors at the time believed in an afterlife vs. 67% of the public.

While the specific details of the experience would be interpreted by the person who was supposedly dead, based on his or her cultural and religious background, the most common stages occurred in this order:

*A sense of dying as a release from cares and pain.

*The patient feels he or she is rising from the body and able to look down on it and the attending medical personnel.

*This self or spirit is compelled to pass through a dark tunnel with light at the end.

*Beings of light greet the spirit at the end of the tunnel—often these are deceased family or friends and sometimes a person understood as a founder or leader of their religious tradition (atheists reported an abstract figure of light).

*As many as 29% recalled having their life’s events flash through their memories, as if reviewing them before judgment.

*Many wanted to stay in this disembodied state, but were told they needed to return.

*Consciousness returns to the body, startling medical personnel, who had pronounced the patient dead.

Moody’s initial report has been confirmed in thousands of cases investigated by others. The International Association for Near-Death Studies www.iands.org was founded in 1978 to encourage the serious study of the phenomenon.

Skeptics are quick to argue that all of these things can be explained by incorrect judgments about clinical death and by the combined effects of a sick brain and the drugs administered at the time.

Among the most notable books to take a more systematic scientific approach to anecdotal evidence were by medical doctors Kenneth Ring, in Life at Death, and Michael Sabom, in Recollections of Death: A Medical Investigation.

Sabom in particular was skeptical. He accepted the critics’ theory that NDEs were hallucinations due to heightened brain activity and was surprised to realize that they occurred most commonly in patients who had been unconscious for at least 30 minutes, when neuroactivity was reduced.

He believed that claims that these “dead” patients had accurately described what was happening around them were easily explained by hearing medical personnel discussing them or that they were educated guesses.

Sabom set up a control group of cardiac patients who had not reported having NDEs. He found the NDEers’ accounts very accurate, while the guesses of cardiac patients were way off, and he was able to rule out the possibility in many cases of the “dead” picking up the information by hearing it.

Doctors at Southampton General Hospital studied 3,500 patients and concluded that cases of NDEs being reported involved “well-structured, lucid thought processes with reasoning and memory formation at a time when their brains were shown not to function,” contradicting the materialistic view of how the brain works.

______________________________________________________________________

Dr. Eben Alexander’s NDE

The most famous of modern NDEs was recounted in the 2012 bestseller by Dr. Eben Alexander, a neurosurgeon, in Heaven is Real: A Doctor’s Experience with the Afterlife (a good example if skeptics’ inability to state the facts in their rebuttals can be found in a response to an article in Esquire: http://iands.org/news/news/…. He went into a seven-day coma after suffering from microbial meningitis in 2008 and had an experience that ran counter to his expectations. He recalled:

I did not believe in the phenomenon of near-death experiences…I sympathized deeply with those who wanted to believe that there was a God and I envied such people the security that those beliefs no doubt provided. But as a scientist, I simply knew better.

When I entered the emergency room, my chances of survival in anything beyond a vegetative state were already low, but they soon sank to near nonexistent. For seven days I lay in a deep coma, my body was unresponsive, my higher-order brain functions totally offline.

All the chief arguments against near-death experiences suggest that these are the results of minimal, transient, or partial malfunctioning of the cortex. But mine took place not while my cortex was malfunctioning, but while it was simply off. This is clear from the global cortical involvement documented by CT scans and neurological examinations. According to current medical understanding of the brain and mind, there is absolutely no way that I could have experienced even a dim and limited consciousness during my time in the coma, much less the hyper-vivid and completely coherent odyssey I underwent.

_______________________________________________________________________

A 2001 study reported in the British medical journal The Lancet reported that the NDEs could not be explained by reactions to medications, a lack of oxygen to the brain, or fear of death.

Perhaps most convincing is that patients are able to report events outside the room where their bodies were. For example, some claimed that their spirits went into the waiting room and heard conversations between family members, which they recalled accurately. Given the skeptics’ position on ESP, this should be impossible.

In 1990, Seattle pediatrician Melvin Morse’s Closer to the Light examined the cases of 120 children who had NDEs. In most cases, they would have been too young to have absorbed a well-grounded religious expectation of what might happen. He made a point-by-point refutation of the skeptics’ arguments about the biochemistry of death and hallucination, compelling enough to have persuaded some skeptics to take a more open-minded position.

In Beyond: On Life After Death, Fred Frohock attempted to weigh the evidence objectively and concluded:

The problem with the materialist explanation that NDEs are a purely neurological reaction to the stress of death is that we would have to stretch the powers of the brain to new and unproven levels of achievement. The weight of the likelihood, of possibilities, seems to be in favor of transcendent experiences, although NDEs could be both transcendent and part of the physical world.

The brain may be the instrument that guides the self into a realm of existence as real and empirical as the dimension we currently occupy. All we have to do is move the perimeters of physical reality out to more comprehensive dimensions. Death is as ordinary as birth, and may be the same kind of portal to another empirical stage of life. Physicists tell us there must be more dimensions to reality to explain the reality we sense and know.

In Dr. Andrew Newberg’s Teaching Co. course The Spiritual Brain, he cites the impact these experiences have on those who go through them: “People come away from a near-death experience with a radically altered set of beliefs about themselves, the meaning of life, relationships—everything. They no longer fear death and are more spiritual and less religious. Many say things like, ‘I don’t think there is a God; I know there is a God.’ One said that the experience was ‘bigger’ than religion, which was not sufficient to help encapsulate the NDE.”

Teoria Fisica da Origem da Vida como resultado da Termodinamica,

terça-feira, agosto 1st, 2017

xxxx

O biofísico Jeremy England fez algum estardalhaço em 2013 com uma nova teoria que projeta a ideia de origem da vida como um resultado inevitável da termodinâmica….

Cientista apresenta pela primeira vez uma teoria física para o surgimento da vida

(registrado artigo para voltar a ler e pesquisar)