Archive for the ‘Theories existing others’ Category

Helena Blavatsky: Como uma pessoa leiga em Ciências obteve informações que as Cieências iriam obter apenas um século mais tarde? Semelhanças com a cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA

Saturday, February 27th, 2021

xxxx

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R52Jf1Q_gIg

(tem outros vídeos talvez mais completos, na lista do Youtube.)

Outra teoria cosmológica: Criação continua como sugeriu os diversos mitos esotéricos.

Thursday, June 4th, 2020
Genesis of the Cosmos: The Ancient Science of Continuous Creation
https://www.scribd.com/book/351487119/Genesis-of-the-Cosmos-The-Ancient-Science-of-Continuous-Creation

Provides compelling evidence that creation myths from the dawn of civilization correspond to cutting edge astronomical discoveries

• Exposes the contradictions in current cosmological theory and offers a scientific basis for the ancient myths and esoteric lore that encode a theory of continuous creation

• By the scientist who was the first to disprove the Big Bang theory on the basis of observational data

Recent developments in theoretical physics, including systems theory and chaos theory, are challenging long-held mechanistic views of the universe. Many thinkers have speculated that the remnants of an ancient science survive today in mythology and esoteric lore, but until now the scientific basis for this belief has remained cloaked in mystery. Paul LaViolette reveals the remarkable parallels between the cutting edge of scientific thought and creation myths from the dawn of civilization. With a scientific sophistication rare among mythologists, LaViolette deciphers the forgotten cosmology of ancient lore in a groundbreaking scientific tour de force. In direct, nontechnical language, he shows how these myths encode a theory of cosmology in which matter is continually growing from seeds of order that emerge spontaneously from the surrounding subquantum chaos.

Exposing the contradictions that bedevil the big bang theory, LaViolette offers both the specialist and the general reader a controversial and highly stimulating critique of prevailing misconceptions about the seldom-questioned superiority of modern science over ancient cosmology. By restoring and reanimating this ancient scientific worldview, Genesis of the Cosmos leads us beyond the restrictive metaphors of modern science and into a new science for the 21st century.

Evolution x Intelligent Design controversy: data of pools in USA

Wednesday, October 9th, 2019

xxxxx

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/science-course-at-ball-state-university-sneaks-in-religion/

Mark Joseph
Posted April 25, 2013 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

“You sound as if you would resolve scientific issues in the court of public opinion, but that isn’t the way science works.”

Ah, but the illustrious William Dembski would disagree with you. Here he is babbling in a ludicrous essay entitled “Skepticism’s Prospects for Unseating Intelligent Design” which is chapter 10 in the book of essays “Science and Religion: Are They Compatible?” edited by Paul Kurtz:

“A few years ago skeptic Michael Shermer wrote a book titled Why People Believe Weird Things. Most of the weird things Shermer discusses in that book are definitely on the fringes, like Holocaust denial, alien encounters, and witch crazes–hardly the sort of stuff that’s going to make it into the public school science curriculum. Intelligent design by contrast is becoming thoroughly mainstream and threatening to do just that.
Gallup poll after Gallup poll confirms that about 90 percent of the U.S. population believes that some sort of design is behind the world. Ohio is currently the epicenter of the evolution-intelligent design controversy. Recent polls conducted by the Cleveland Plain Dealer found that 59 percent of Ohioans want both evolution and intelligent design taught in their public schools. Another 8 percent want only intelligent design taught. And another 15 percent do not want the teaching of intelligent design mandated, but do want to allow evidence against evolution to be presented in public schools. You do the arithmetic.”











Nova teoria biologica onde DNA e’ blueprint, como a Matrix/DNA – Bruce Lipton

Friday, August 16th, 2019

xxxxxx

Bruce Lipton The Biology of Belief Full Lecture

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82ShSNuru6c

( o nascimento da epigenetica )

Muito importante a considerar:

Nature or Nurture?

Nenhum dos dois.

O que define fe consciousness. Pois consciousness pode mudar os genes (Nature) e a aprendizagem (Nurture).

Pensar nisto no assunto sobre curar os humanos do instinto de presas.

 

 











A visão do mundo oriental sendo buscada pelo povo do Ocidente sera sua melhor alternativa nesta atual crise existencial?

Thursday, August 15th, 2019

xxxxx

Vamos tentar responder analisando um vídeo e palestra de um guru ocidental sendo cultuado no Ocidente.

A mídia está noticiando que está havendo uma grande guinada do povo ocidental na direção das antigas filosofias ou visões do mundo orientais, principalmente a hindu, representando-se principalmente pela yoga ( aqui mesmo neste website escrevi um artigo acho que ha uns dez dias atras, mencionando um debate no Reddit sobre um artigo ou livro no tema em questão, falando do retorno ao pampsiquismo, etc.).  Será isto bom ou ruim para estas pessoas? O que, qual é a visão de mundo dos seus criadores orientais? A quanto está essa visão de mundo em relação a verdadeira realidade? Muito distante ou mais próxima que as já experimentadas pelo Ocidente? Como conectar a visão de mundo criada a milhares de anos atras com a psicologia humana de hoje e o ambiente urbano moderno? Essas mentes dominadas por essa visão de mundo vão sobreviver ou melhorar sua qualidade de vida dentro deste sistema social vigente? Creio ser evidente que o povo ocidental está meio perdido entrando nesta era de incertezas em que o materialismo cientifico bombardeia as crenças herdadas dos antepassados, que ele esta precisando de um novo suporte psíquico. Mas seria o caso de buscar no passado e ressuscitar uma antiga visão de mundo ou de buscar construir uma nova, como eu fiz para mim, com a visão do mundo pela Matrix/DNA?

Este é um assunto sério, pois pessoas estarão investindo sua qualidade de vida numa aposta, da qual, eu não sei se serão ganhadores ou perdedores. Portanto, pela seriedade do assunto, é de nossa responsabilidade gastar algum do nosso tempo e esforço mental raciocinando sobre o problema. Acho que no Ocidente a maioria está como eu… Eu leio desde criança textos esparsos e até alguns livros curtos mencionando a visão de mundo oriental, mas nunca li um dos seus grandes livros, quanto mais estudar por completo o tema ( lembro-me que li, gostei, e reli Krishnamurthy, mas hoje não me lembro de mais nada dele. Porque nunca me foi útil ou porque não tentei aplica-lo disciplinarmente?). Portanto meu conhecimento é muito limitado. Mas de maneira alguma teria tempo para este estudo e nem entraria nele sem um motivo maior, pois sinto de antemão uma intuição de que não me seria útil. Pois olho para esses países orientais e deduzo que estão superpovoados com 90% da sua população vivendo sob o ciclo da miséria sendo torturada brutalmente por rituais religiosos, anti-femininos, e impedida de evoluir seus cérebros e poderes de atuação no ambiente em que vivem, e isso para mim é o indício de que a visão do mundo que produziu e mantém este estado de coisas não será salutar para o Ocidente. Posso estar errado, mas ninguém num breve argumento me convenceu o contrário. Então, ao invés de um pesado livro “sagrado” ou o estudo completo, vamos pegar um atual discurso de um guru oriental que está sendo bem difundido na moda atual ocidental entre as pessoas entrando neste barco. E vamos tentar esmiúça-lo, analisando-o, vamos ver no que vai dar.

O exemplar que selecionei para iniciar esta analise, e que achei bastante curioso mas fiquei com a sensação de inutilidade, vai no vídeo e transcript copiado abaixo para analisar-mos paragrafo a paragrafo.

What Is The Purpose Of Life?

Sadhguru answers a question about the purpose of life and explains why having a “god-given” purpose will only restrict life.

https://isha.sadhguru.org/us/en/wisdom/video/what-is-the-purpose-of-life

Questioner: It seems like there are people who know, what he meant to do, and I just don’t get that and I am in this path, where am I? What’s for me the purpose of life, if you can give an insight on that? Thank you.

Sadhguru: Isn’t it fantastic that if there is no purpose, you have nothing to fulfill, you can just live…

Matrix/DNA: Mas assim vivem os animais nossos antepassados, vivem o aqui e agora, são especialistas em praticidade, não possuem qualquer propósito na vida a ano ser manterem-se vivos… para que?! Se soubessem o que sabemos descobriram que sua especie sera irremediablemente extinta pela Natureza. E que sua existência será para sempre apagada do mundo, o Universo nunca sabera que sequer exististes. Mas aí vem a pergunta: e por acaso sera diferente com os que viveram a vida com um propósito? Nao podemos saber. Mas enfim, decididamente eu nao quero adotar esta mentalidade de vida sem qualquer propósito, sem um norte, um sonho a lutar por, pois tudo o que fizeram e são os animais eu quero me distanciar cada vez mais. Mas… se tem gente que acha que se sentirá melhor assim, que o seja.

Por enquanto, 0 a 1, esta perdendo o guru.

Sadhguru: ” No, but you want a purpose and not a simple purpose, you want a “God-given” purpose…

Matrix/DNA: Certo. Acho que por mais materialista ou ateu seja o indivíduo que tem um propósito para a vida, mesmo que seja quase inconscientemente tem a sensação de que exista algo sobrenatural no seu propósito, algo que transcende a vida, algo que esteja sendo aprovado, se não for por outro algo sobrenatural, ao menos pelo olho do Universo. Eu tenho um proposito na vida, não sou deísta, mas sinto que meu proposito esta sintonizado co o proposito do algo que disparou o Big Bang, que esta alem do Universo. portanto seria um ” natural super-ser dado proposito”. Enquanto isso, a maioria do povo vive na crença de que seguir o proposito que seguem esta sendo aprovado e foi determinado por um Deus.

Um x Um, o guru empatou o jogo… Apesar de que o guru erra sugerindo que as pessoas que querem ter um proposito estão erradas, e principalmente porque querem um proposito determinado por um imaginário Deus. Não, eu quero um proposito simplesmente para me diferenciar evoluindo do estado animal.

Sadhguru:  It’s very dangerous. People who think they have a God-given purpose are doing the cruelest things on the planet. Yes or no? They are doing the most horrible things and they’ve always been doing the most horrible things because when you have a God-given purpose, life here becomes less important than your purpose.

Matrix/DNA: Rapaz…! O guru agora deu uma acertada fantástica! Aqui nos percebemos que esta filosofia oriental é inimiga combatente do deísmo ocidental, mesmo que seja apenas na militância verbal e nunca tenha visto isso se projetar como violência física. Mas estes monges, que foram agredidos pelo deísmo ocidental, os vi sendo agredidos também pelos ateus orientais do Mao-Tse-Tung. Então como lidam com o ateísmo ocidental?

Esta acertada foi tao boa que vale uns 3 pontos. Então esta 4 x 1 para o guru.

Sadhguru: No, life is important. Life is important – when I say “life,” I am not talking about your family, your work, what you do, what you do not do, your party – I am not talking about that as life. This is life (referring to the self), isn’t it? Life is within you or around you? You’re mistaking the ambiance of life for life. Your home, your family, your workspace, your party – this is all ambiance of life. This is not life, isn’t it? Yes or no?

Participants: Yes.

Sadhguru: You’re mistaking the ambiance for the real thing. No. Life is important because it’s the only thing you know, you don’t know anything else. Do you know something else? Rest is all imagined stuff. The only thing is that this is beating and alive and that’s all there is.

Matrix/DNA: para mim isto esta um tanto confuso. O insight é bonito, mas pode ser apenas bonito como discurso, sem utilidade. Não existe vida que não seja suportada por um ambiente. O ambiente é sim muito importante, pois temos que estuda-lo ara melhor se adaptar nele, ou perecer. Este tipo de mentalidade mais se alinha na mentalidade que ele criticou nos deístas ( o mundo real mundano não importa, e sim o reino sobrenatural de Deus) do se alinha com os materialistas, para quem apenas importa a vida no ambiente no melhor ambiente aqui e agora. Esse tipo religioso, mistico de entender o mundo esta na base dos anti-aquecimento global, para quem o ambiente não merece atenção e se vai mudar, sera a vontade de Deus. O resto, o Universo, não é apenas imaginário, sera o ambiente que vai nos salvar quando este planeta não mais suportar vida aqui, portanto é importante, para que tenhamos motivação de estuda-lo, explora-lo, preparando nossa futura morada. Aqui o guru deu uma grande escorregada, merece perder dois pontos. 4 para o guru, 3 para os contra. 4 x 3.

 This is the greatest aspect of life – that it has no meaning to it and there is no need for it to have a meaning.

SadhguruSo, is this important? It is of paramount importance. Not you as a person, that’s not important, but you as a piece of life – it’s very important because that is the basis of everything. When I say that is the basis of everything, the universe exists for you only because you are, isn’t it? Yes or no? The world exists for you only because you are, otherwise it won’t exist in your experience. So, in every way this is important.

Matrix/DNA: ” Você não é importante, sua vida não é importante mas sim o importante é que você é uma peça da vida…”

Raios, parece que esse guru quer me fazer pirar? Meu pequenino cérebro não teve capacidade para processar logicamente está frase. Para mim o valor desta frase é zero, porque entendo que o fim dela contradiz e anula seu começo. Alias, é isto que tenho sentido ate aqui… uma frase contradiz a anterior. Sera isto charlatanismo? Mas e os brilhantes insights? Acho que não da para se analisar logicamente um assunto separado – como o proposito da vida – sem que antes se peça ao proponente descrever sua total visão do mundo. Eu cansei minha mente por enquanto, vou parar, sabendo que a responsabilidade me ordena voltar e continuar, por mais indigesto que seja. Se alguém pudesse dar uma ajudazinha continuando isso aqui…

Sadhguru: So, what is the purpose for this? See, if you had a purpose and if you’ve fulfilled it, after that what would you do? Bored, isn’t it? It is just that life is so intricate and so phenomenally intricate that if you spend a 10,000 years looking at it carefully, you still will not know it entirely. If you spend a million years looking at it with absolute focus, still you will not know it in its entirety. That’s how it is. Is there a meaning to it? The greatest thing about life is that there is no meaning to it. This is the greatest aspect of life – that it has no meaning to it and there is no need for it to have a meaning. It is the pettiness of one’s mind that it’ll seek a meaning because psychologically you will feel kind of unconnected with life if you don’t have a purpose and a meaning.

People are constantly trying to create these false purposes. Now, they were quite fine and happy. Suddenly, they got married. Now the purpose is the other person. Then they have children. Now they become miserable with each other. Now the whole purpose that I go through all this misery is because the children. Like this, it goes on. These are things that you’re causing and holding these as purposes of life and is there a God-given purpose? What if God does not know you exist? No, I am just asking, by chance. I am saying in this huge cosmos, for which God is supposed to be the Creator and the manager of these hundred billion galaxies, in that this tiny little planet and you in Houston, Tch… Suppose he doesn’t know that you exist, what to do? Possible or no? I am sorry, I am saying such sacrilegious things but is it possible or no? What if he doesn’t know that you exist?

The need for purpose has come because you’re trapped in your psychological structure, not in your life process.

What if he doesn’t have a plan for you? Like Obama care. Suppose, he doesn’t have an individual plan for you! Don’t look for such things. The thing is, the creation is made in such a way that Creation and Creator cannot be separated. Here you are a piece of creation. At the same time, the source of creation is throbbing within you. If you pay little attention to this process of life, you would not need any purpose. It’ll keep you engaged for a million years if you want. There is so much happening – so much means so much unbelievable things are happening right here. If you pay enough attention, a million years of existence, it will keep you busy or more.

Right now, the need for purpose has come because you’re trapped in your psychological structure, not in your life process. Your psychological structure functions from the limited data that it has gathered. Within that it rolls and right now, your thought and emotion has become far more important than your life. So, because of this you’re seeking a purpose as an escape from the trap that you have set for yourself. It is a trap set by you. You can easily come out of it. If the trap was set for you by somebody else, difficult to come out because they’ll set the trap in such a way that you cannot come out.

I am talking about life not marriage, that’s what I mean. So this is a trap set by you. This is easy to come out, but that is the whole thing. Why it is so difficult is, now you’re identified with the trap, you like it. You like it because it gives you a certain sense of safety and security and protection and individual identity. If you build a cocoon around yourself, it gives you safety, but it also imprisons you. Walls of self-preservation are also walls of self-imprisonment. When it protects you, you like it. When it restricts you, you do not like it. That is why we have doors. We like the walls because it’s protecting us, but we have doors so that we can open it and get out when we want to. It doesn’t matter how nice it is, we still want to go out, isn’t it?

Those who find a purpose in their life, they become so conceited. They will live within their own trap forever thinking that they’re doing the most fantastic thing.

So that is how it is with every trap that you set. It doesn’t matter how nice it is, you still want to go out. So, the psychological wall that you’ve built, which gives you some sense of identity, which gives you some sense of being an individual person and which gives you security, beginning to experience it like a trap; somewhere you want to break it. So, one way of not breaking it is to find a purpose. Those who find a purpose in their life, they become so conceited. They will live within their own trap forever thinking that they’re doing the most fantastic thing. And now you said I’ve found a purpose. No, I am just fooling around, really! This is not a mission. People think I am some kind of a missionary because of the energy with which I am going at it. I am not going at it with any zeal, but I am going at it with a certain energy because it’s normal for me to involve myself like this in anything for that matter.

You know like last two months have been a blitz of activity; blitz means like without a day’s break, without an hour’s break it’s been going on like over twenty hours a day nonstop. So, I was in London, I did a three-day event, then I went straight from there to Kumbh. From there all of us who went there caught a flu, but then I went straight to Hyderabad, that afternoon I flew and in the evening I started a program – three-day event. All of them went down who traveled with me, but with my flu I taught three days’ program. Then I came into the ashram and then samyama started that evening, eight days of samyama which is an intense process. The day samyama closed, we started the Yaksha program and the Inner Way program. The day that closed, we had the Mahashivaratri, then Brahmachari meet and teachers’ meet – going on like this. My busy day means I am sitting twelve to fourteen hours in the same place unmoving. Everybody goes to the bathroom, but I don’t.

So, I thought I need to move a little bit and I said, ‘Let’s go golfing.’ So, we went into a mountain place close by and I went with three other people who traveled from somewhere else and came. In two-and-a-half days I did eighty-five holes in the mountains. They all came in turns, but I went all the way. Every round that you do you walk, no buggies and all that stuff, walking. Ten kilometers you walk in the mountains at 6300 feet, eighty-five holes in two-and-a-half days.

It is wonderful to exist here without any purpose. It takes a certain freedom from your psychological structure to be here without any purpose.

So, if I go like this. Is golf a purpose of my life? No. I approach everything with a certain energy. This does not mean I found a purpose in hitting a ball. Similarly, I am teaching Inner Engineering because I find it’s useful for the people. If I see a little boredom in anybody’s face, maybe I won’t teach after that. Because I still see people are eager and anxious wanting to know something, I am on. If I see people around me are bored, then maybe you’ll never see me teaching again, because I am not seeing teaching Inner Engineering as a purpose. Right now, I see it is needed.

So, it’s difficult for you to understand probably right now, but the things that I throw my life into, are things that don’t mean anything to me, really! You think Isha Foundation means a world to me? No. Right now, I see without a foundation, we cannot function. With great reluctance, I formed the organization. Now it’s grown, grown beyond what most people understand – it’s grown very big. Is it the apple of my eye? No. I don’t like apple in my eye, I like my eyes clear. I keep it clear of all apples. You know the last time somebody got into the apple trouble, what happened to them.

So, I am saying I am throwing myself at something with great passion. This does not mean that is the purpose of my life. It is wonderful to exist here without any purpose. It takes a certain freedom from your psychological structure to be here without any purpose. If you’re trapped in your psychological structure you need a purpose. Otherwise, your psychological structure will lose its integrity. That’s why the girl who was asking at that time, I said, “First thing you need is balance. If you have balance, then you can climb. If you don’t have balance, it’s better you stay on the ground.” It’s not safe for somebody who is not balanced to climb high. It’s best you stay close to the ground. You should not climb.

So, first thing is to establish a balance, then you loosen your psychological structure, then it’s a wonderful thing. If you are loosening your psychological structure without balance, which lot of people are doing today. See, why does somebody want to drink alcohol or take a drug? Because it loosens your psychological structure and makes you feel liberated for a moment but without the necessary balance. You have not worked for the balance, but you got freedom. Freedom without balance is destruction, anarchy, isn’t it?

The purpose of life is to live and to live totally. To live totally means – before you fall dead, every aspect of life has been explored, nothing has been left unexplored.

So, first thing is to work for balance, an enormous sense of balance where even if you dismantle your psychological structure, you can simply live here. Dismantling your psychological structure is an important process because that is your trap, that is your security, that is your stability. At the same time, that’s your trap. Because the walls are set, you feel secured, but that’s also your trap. If you dismantle your trap, you also dismantle your security, isn’t it? You also dismantle your sense of purpose. You also dismantle everything that matters to you. So, that will need balance. Without balance, if you dismantle you’ll go crazy. But, don’t look for a purpose because if you look for a purpose, you are seeking madness. If you find one, you are sure mad. Yes. If you think you’ve found a purpose in life you’re for sure gone crazy because only the insane people have purpose or people who have a purpose are insane in many ways.

These are things that you create in your mind and believe it’s true, isn’t it? Right now, ‘fighting for my country is my purpose.’ Right now if it’s necessary, I’ll fight knowing fully well it’s an unnecessary bloody fight. Yes. Then you’ll fight only to the extent it’s necessary. If you think this is your purpose, you would want to destroy the whole world for what nonsense you believe in, isn’t it? If something is needed, we will do it with absolute involvement. Tomorrow suppose I find all of you are enlightened, it may happen! Suppose I find all of you are enlightened, will I come here and say “See, what did you have? Maggi noodles? Your body, you accumulated. You are not the body, you are not the mind,” it would be irrelevant, isn’t it? Yes or no? So when I see that you are enlightened, I’ll stop Inner Engineering. Right now, it’s needed, we’re doing. This doesn’t mean this is the purpose of my life. This is an unfortunate necessity, but I will do it joyfully and with great vigor because I do that with everything, not just with this. Don’t think I only teach the program with intensity and vigor, I live my life like that with everything, I eat like that also. I will do everything with intensity and vigor, that’s how you’re supposed do your life, isn’t it?

So, please do it that way. There’s no other purpose. The purpose of life is to live and to live totally. To live totally does not mean party every night. To live totally means – before you fall dead, every aspect of life has been explored, nothing has been left unexplored. Before you fall dead, even if you do not explore the cosmos, at least this piece of life (Referring to oneself) you must know it in its entirety. That much you must do to yourself, isn’t it? That’s living totally, that you experience the whole of this, all dimensions of what this is. You did not live anything untouched. You just do that. That will take a long time. That’s good enough purpose for you.

xxxxx











Jeremy England: Busca Acadêmica por Forças e Elementos da Física como Bases da Origem da Vida

Wednesday, August 14th, 2019

xxxxxx

Nova teoria sobre as origens da vida por um fisico, Jeremy England

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_England  

He was raised Jewish but did not study Judaism until he attended graduate school at Oxford University. He now considers himself an Orthodox Jew

Theoretical work

England has developed a hypothesis of the physics of the origins of life, that he calls ‘dissipation-driven adaptation’. The hypothesis holds that random groups of molecules can self-organize to more efficiently absorb and dissipate heat from the environment. His hypothesis states that such self-organizing systems are an inherent part of the physical world.

Pulitzer-Prize winning science historian Edward J. Larson said that if England can demonstrate his hypothesis to be true, “he could be the next Darwin.

xxxxxx

Artigo divulgando a teoria:

A origem da vida foi uma casualidade? Ou leis da física?

https://ciencianautas.com/a-origem-da-vida-foi-uma-casualidade-ou-leis-da-fisica/

xxxxxxxx

Artigo original em ingles:

Massachusetts physicist claims he solved mystery of how life emerged from matter

https://www.rt.com/usa/massachusetts-physicist-solve-mystery-life-098/ England pointed to plants as a great example of energy dissipaters, since they take in the energy around them, use it to sustain themselves, and disperse even more energy into their environment in the form of infrared light. Matrix: O que?! Plantas emitem luz infravermelha e no ambiente? pesquisar isso…. When sunlight strikes objects, certain wavelengths of this spectrum are absorbed and other wavelengths are reflected. The pigment in plant leaves, chlorophyll, strongly absorbs visible light and reflects near infrared.

Do plants emit infrared radiation?
When an object is not quite hot enough to radiate visible light, it will emit most of its energy in the infrared. For example, hot charcoal may not give off light but it does emit infrared radiation which we feel as heat. The warmer the object, the moreinfrared radiation it emits.
What produces infrared light?
Infrared radiation is popularly known as “heat radiation”, but light and electromagnetic waves of any frequency will heat surfaces that absorb them. Infrared light from the Sun accounts for 49% of the heating of Earth, with the rest being caused by visible light that is absorbed then re-radiated at longer wavelengths
———

Jeremy says: ” As various forms of matter seek to disperse more energy over long periods of time, they would naturally start to replicate or reproduce, since replication itself disperses as much energy as it uses up – at least on the level of RNA molecules and bacteria. “A great way of dissipating more [energy] is to make more copies of yourself,” England said.











Nassim Haramein and its “Unified Field Theory”

Sunday, August 11th, 2019

xxxxx

Comece vendo este video:

https://resonancescience.org/nassim-haramein-talks-unified-physics-with-dr-j/

Nassim Haramein talks unified physics with Dr. J!











The R-complex reptilian inheritance and/or the ex-machine consciousness inheritance?

Thursday, August 31st, 2017

xxxxx

The R-Reptilian Complex

The R-Reptilian Complex

The reptilian brain inside the human brain?

I am sure we have often heard the expression that you have a reptilian brain. This comes from a literal interpretation of a theoretic concept developed in the 60s by American physician and neuroscientist Paul D. MacLean and as Wikipedia state: he “propounded it at length in his 1990 book The Triune Brain in Evolution’ ”  If you look it up, you will see why he has a lot to answer for in mythologizing this meme as it was he, who coined the terms ‘R’-complex/reptilian complex. ( source: diggingupthefuture.com )

This is more one detail revealing the big difference between the academic standard world view and Matrix/DNA world view, due two different approaches resulting in two different interpretations of same natural phenomenon. Before explaining this differences, let me remembering two others:

1) Freud invaded the basement of human brains and saw the beast there, because he found what he was previously and intentionally looking for. As Jewish minority in Austria, he wanted to show the white supremacists that they are inferior also. But, ok, we agree that our unconscious states preserves our animal inheritance, that the beast is there, the cause of competition among humans, but… what about the other obligatory duality complement – the angel? Humans also are able to altruism and cooperation among them. The Matrix/DNA, intentionally searching this angel, found it (the ordered face of Matrix/DNA formula modelling the brain);

2)  Darwin went to the a more primitive world and found what he was previously intentionally looking for: humans came from monkeys. His intention was due his face and body seemingly to monkey what produced the bullying from the college’s students. He was in need to prove them that they are monkeys also. Ok, we agree that the human body was inherited from some kind of monkeys’ cousin. But, humans are different from monkeys due very well expressed consciousness. So, what about consciousness? Matrix/DNA went to the jungle searching its origins and found it: while a human baby takes some months for expressing consciousness inherited from his/her creators ( the parents), the universal system produced by Matrix/DNA formula – which works like a genome – takes 13,8 billions years for expressing consciousness inherited from its creator. So, I don’t care that my body came from monkeys, I am my mind, and it came from a superior hierarchy.

Freud and Darwin made great discoveries moved by hate. Why hate sometimes finishes as benefit to human kind? These discoveries has amplified human knowledge. Because, for our evolution it is better to make some movements than standing inertial. And hate usually is moving, mixing things. But there is another force that produces movements, mixing things and producing great discoveries: love. The secret key is that all discoveries from hate puts us down (like, you are monkey, beast), while all discoveries from love puts us up (you are consciousness, angel).

Now we have the Neo-Darwinist Paul D. MacLean  that found the reptilian brain inside the human brain because he was previously intentionally looking for to prove the Darwinian theory of evolution. Good job, he got a great information for human knowledge, we agree that reptilians were ancestors of humans, so, they still are kept in our memory and anatomy. But,… what about the universal obligatory duality complement? What is it?

With Matrix/DNA formula at hands, asking what it tells about this issue, I had the intuition to the look carefully to the R-complex image, and then, searching the same image mentioned by a different intention, like, the medicine approach. And found this:

Cerebro-na-Forma-de-Espermatozoide

Showing a real brain, other neuroscientist like Dr. MacLean, Dr. Jill Bolte Taylor, did it with a very different intention: telling to people a wonderful message about human grandiose, how we are beings of light. Dr. Jill can be seen in an astonishing video:

My stroke of insight | Jill Bolte Taylor (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyyjU8fzEYU&t=9s )

Dr. Paul discovery make us uncomfortable because remembering our most inferior conditions. For compensation, if you have time after reading this article, try to watch this video of Dr. Jill ( there is her book too), which make us feeling the opposite way because is a suggestion of our superior condition.

The Matrix/DNA world view is suggesting that humans are the tools used by a new transition of shapes of the universal system, a transition from biological system to consciousness system. And every past transitions was applied the same process: the transition event is triggered by an act of fecundation. At the astronomical building blocks, this “fecundation” occurs when a comet ( which seems like a spermatozoon) reaches the nuclear vortex; at human beings, the fecundation occurs when a spermatozoon reaches the center of an ovule. This is not merely coincidences: the formula has an ideal shape for each function/tool and if the environment does not oppose to it, Nature does not care in using the same shapes again and again.

If this hypothesis elaborated from reading the Matrix/DNA models is the right thing, the origins of consciousness should repeat the fecundation event and, if the materials of the environment does not resist to it, should repeat the same shapes of those formula’s universal functions. Then, the origins of consciousness should exhibits the image of an ovule being fecundated by a spermatozoon. This is just the image where the head is the egg, the brain is the amnion/placenta, the hippocampus region (which is the representative of F1 in the Matrix formula, the function of formation of a new body), is the spermatozoon head and the spermatozoon tail is the spinal cord tail…

So, I entered this research with a previous intention to prove the Matrix theory while looking for an up or good effect for humans, from the R-complex. Due this intention, seeing the above image, and more this one:

 

Cérebro-e-Medula-Espinhal

 I remembered this image:

 

Óvulo-Fecundado

 

Final conclusion:

A unique image – the brain and the spinal cord – is result of a unique universal natural method applied by Nature in two different time/space of evolution with the same final meaning: the origins of a new evolutionary stage, with its appropriated shape, of the universal system. The two events were: the origins of mammals and the origins of consciousness.

Nobody can denying that the head of the spinal cord inside the brain and the tail of the spinal cord outside the brain seems the image of the head of a spermatozoon inside the ovule and the tail of the spermatozoon outside the ovule. Now, everybody is free ( and this is dependable of one previous intention due its preferred world view) for choosing if it is randomness and merely a coincidence, or it is the obligatory result when a unique author ( Nature) is the responsible for the two phenomenon.

What do you decide? How Reptilian are YOU? Or how cosmic consciousness are you? The image from Dr. Paul MacLean is representative of a real fact, but it relates to far away past times; the image from Matrix/DNA is also representative of a real fact, but it relates to our nowadays and future. It suggests that we are 8 billion humans which existence means half-conscious genes building – with more billions or trillions of conscious genes in this Universe – our unique and final body of a cosmic consciousness that will born at the day of The Big Birth. But, be carefully: as Dr. Paul and all Neo-Darwinists as me, a matrixist, we are human beings, and humans, with this little poor brain and limited sensors, are not able yet to reach the right interpretation of the real final Truth. One theory has less errors than other, we don’t know which… But for doing judgements, we need be careful that we have no previous intentions.

(Note: The fact that evolution produced reptilians was due a big mistake of our ancestors (maybe the fishes or birds?) trying to accommodate in a provisory shape in a provisory environment, threathing to stop their evolution, becoming the most competitive reptilian. How Nature has reacted and fixed the mistake is very surprising and you can know it at the article here: From Reptiles to Mammals: An Heroic Act? – https://theuniversalmatrix.com/en-us/articles/?p=106  )











Big Bang Theory: The difference between the current academic model and the Matrix/DNA model

Thursday, August 31st, 2017

xxxxx

 

big_bang_theory

Big Bang Theory

The debate below is a brief resume about this difference and it was extracted from:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ADiql3FG5is&list=PLNo5MCiPJ6c9T7RcptFQVuoah2ZF5zgff&index=3

Setekh says: ” Big Bang Theory is the best  explanation we have so far and its predictions turn out to all work. Show me a better theory that has any predictive capability that helped us progress in science and our understanding of how the universe works.”

xxxx
Louis Morelli: There is other theory, The Matrix/DNA Theory, which has a better explanation and has predicted thousands more details that works. This theory was elaborated by a different approach, the reverse way that current academic standard Big Bang theory: while this was elaborated by Physics+Math and from the past to the future, Matrix/DNA was elaborated starting now and from the Biological perspective regretting to the most past time possible. Then, Matrix/DNA arrived to an universal initial event that could be called “Big Bang” also.

But the interpretation of the event is very different and as result, ir produces a very different world view. The initial moment of your own body was a tiny big bang explosion when broke the membrane’s spermatozoon at the center of an ovule. After that event, the genetic formula inside the genome ( the DNA), tunneled the world inside that ovule for producing your body. Think about that…











The controversy between Hindu culture and Matrix/DNA culture

Saturday, August 12th, 2017

xxxx

Reading articles from a Hinduist tendency blog, I noted that their concepts are good challenge for testing and developing my preferred world view, called Matrix/DNA Theory.

The blog is:

Wise Humans Wakeup Call

“Human Society Needs Stability”

Author: Jay Krishnan

https://wisehumans.blogspot.in/

The article is:

NURTURING IS EQUALLY IMPORTANT AS GENES MIGHT REMAIN DORMANT

Then I wrote to Jay and we are at the following debate. Some paragraphs of the article will be copied here for registering the replies by Matrix/DNA

xxxx

Jay Krishnan Jay Krishnan 4 days ago – about 8/8/17
I read Marton Piller comments below and we all should agree that Science can neither lead us to God nor prove that there is no God. All the wonders that we observe through science is by itself a proof of what a great design and creation it is, not necessary that it is an individual known as God but the energy or the power that drives everything on this universe is a unique phenomena one could consider as an invisible thing beyond our senses to recognize!
Please, take a shower of real world going to live in the jungle, from where we came from. And come back saying that this world is intelligently designed. Or go to live with 7 billions humans today that are in misery as slave workers or no work at all. See a tiger eating a baby in front of the eyes of its mother, and come telling that a benevolent powerful God is watching the scene. I have lived among the poor of the third world, I was slave, and escaped to the jungle living 7 years in Amazon jungle, I saw horrific things, I know this biosphere is product of chaotic state of Nature, we are the sons of chaos. Not of powerful, benevolent, magical Gods.
You can make yourself the questions I did at the jungle. Why chaos if we lift our eyes and see the ordered state of the Cosmos, so ordered that it can be described by Newtonian mechanics? Then, if a person is weak of brain, he will concludes that are two Gods, one, good God that designed the Cosmos and other, bad God that designed our biosphere and life. This person will invent the demon, as the second god. And will create a fairy-tale about a sin made by our ancestors, for explaining why the first biggest God permits the actuation of the second god. But if a person has the honesty wish for searching the truth he will apply the rational scientific method, and doing that, he will go further into chaos, and will not see demons, but natural causes.
Going further he will find lots of evidences of, as you said ” an energy or the power that drives everything on this universe is a unique phenomena one could consider as an invisible thing”. The weak brain will stop here with a precipitate conclusion: a magical God. The strong brain will find that there is a similar situation going on here, just facing our eyes: inside a womb, is occurring the development of a baby and, as you said ” All the wonders that we observe through science is by itself a proof of what a great design and creation it is…”. But science show us what the designer is, what the invisible energy or power is: the DNA, genetics. Not magical gods. So, the right thing to do, when questioning the causes making the complex systems in this world is searching a kind of world’s DNA, and what is doing universal genetics. I did the hard work and found a rational possibility: biological DNA is merely the biological shape of a universal Matrix , from which a got its formula. Then, was born the Matrix/DNA Theory. Since you don’t want go to be tortured in the jungle for learning the real world, and have not did the hard work, I suggest you must see this another possibility than gods and demons and magical accidents creating complex natural systems. Cheers.
Jay Krishnan  Jay Krishnan 16 hours ago Highlighted reply
Hi Charles I am sorry I had mistaken you as Marton Piller. Thanks for the awakening. If you find time please visit my blog http:// wisehumans.blogspot.in – where I suppose you will get some answers to material science versus human life science. Best regards
Jay Krishnan – I began to read your blog and I like the link you do between modern human behaviors and ancestors animals till genes. I did it also in the jungle for finding my world view called Matrix/DNA, but I went further, to ancestrals like astronomic and atomic systems. As I saw meanwhile, you didn’t this and you change it by the concept of karma, which I don’t understand and I can’t grasp real facts about it. So, if you have time and interest, we could change ideas/information between two such different cultures.
As example, you wrote:
” During early days human species lived only up to the age of 20 to 30 years if one survived childhood and adolescence and it was rare for someone to survive beyond 30 or more. It was perhaps women who survived a little bit longer as they mostly remained indoors. So generally the experience of a woman is highly internalized and passive in nature and not usually displayed like the aggressive men.”
The Matrix/DNA formula for natural systems suggests that woman’s highly internalized factor is not due social nurture and so due its universal systemic function that is coming since the astronomic configuration that produced biological systems (aka, life) here. Before producing biological DNA, this formula was a universal Matrix encoded into light waves ( we can see it at the electromagnetic spectrum) that produced fundamental particles, atoms and galaxies, so, these systems are our ancestrals like a bacteria is. The formula is hermaphrodite where the female function has the tendency to introversion, towards closed system and male function, extroversion, towards dispersion due extreme tendency to opened system. So, the female psyche tendency to be highly internalized is encrypted at the primordial DNA, when there were no humans yet. Our difference is that you goes to early biological ancestry searching the causes of humans behaviors and conditions, while I go further in the past at the ancestry that produced the early biological ancestry. Of course, we, both, has no a scientific proved statement, we have theories, maybe the right one or not, and debating it we can improve both. Cheers…
Jay Krishnan – Another example: you wrote:
” Several thousand years ago human species felt safe during day time because the daylight gave him or her awareness of what is where and how safe he or she is in a particular place. Day light provided them direction enabling one to search food and change the place of dwelling as per the individual or group needs.”
In Amazon jungle was famous among natives the bat-tribe, where humans live and hunting at night sleeping at day, Some white men told that meet then and they are blind under sun’s light. Since their territory is gold rich, they are being extinct. You know about marine’s species that lives in the darkness. So, if one species is blind at night or at day, it is produced by their free will or imposed by the environment. The very fact that humans became day-awakened seems to be the return imposed by evolution, since that insects and butterflies can’t resist to flying around a lamp and its cause is its genes rules that came from its atomic rules where particles flies around a luminous proton, or planets around a luminous star. This is universally imposed by the Matrix/DNA formula where non-radioactive pieces orbits radioactive pieces.
This “evolution return imposed by the code” is saw also in the case that insects has established a high automatized social system (ants, bees ) while humans began as chaotic groups and now is going to mimic the insects towards the highly automatized social system. What is the fundamental cause driven us towards it? Without enough intellect and no knowledge about the bad face of the code ( the Matrix/DNA has a bad force which is a system working automatized as a perfect machine – and a good force – which is a system opened to evolution – in relation to humans) for resisting to it, which dominated our last non-biological ancestral and has the tendency to be reproduced here, we are going to build a social system like predicted by Aldous Huxley under the rules of a Big Brother by Orwell. So, I am insisting that, for understanding the modern world and modern humans, we need know its roots in the past till the Big Bang.
Jay Krishnan – Another example: you wrote:
” Also the innate spiritual or political nature of a child is not only woman centric (though man’s Y chromosome provides the initial seed) but is also nurtured by a woman!”
Innate traits means genetic inheritance. Do you think that humans’ child nurtured by women has incorporated these “external far away phenomena” into its code? I don’t, because I think that biological genetics has a non-biological ancestry, I got a theoretical model of this ancestry and the model is suggesting a different solution. You must see my model-picture of the Matrix/DNA formula in relation to ” The Origins of Chromosome X and Y”. The model suggests that the very fact well described by you about the child’s woman centric is due our last non-biological hermaphrodite ancestor being a system female centralized. The X chromosome is bigger than Y because X contains the whole spherical circuity flow of information while Y contains only the left half flow of information, in a system where the female function is dominant and male function is recessive. Since that through the biological evolution there is the tendency to guide the whole Earth biosphere to be a unique system reproducing the non-biological ancestor/creator, the innate child tendency to be woman centric is very well explained by the Matrix/DNA formula.
xxxxxx
And other example:
Jay wrote:

” Therefore women folk are required to play the great role of nurturing character for human civilization to go further distance or I would rather say in the right direction!”

Louis suggestion:

Nope, it is not the right direction, accordingly to the supreme universal laws suggested by Matrix/DNA world view. The right direction for human civilization will be the one that the great role be a third alternative resulting from mixing, or fusion, the female and male character.

The female universal tendency is to be a closed system – domestic internalized, with a big house in a big farm with her male partner under her rules and full of her children playing in the yard, isolated from the external world and kept in this way eternally. She has the tendency to be monogamist. This was just the state of evolution at our astronomic ancestor where female was dominant over male character, and the universal laws destroyed it through entropy, showing that Nature does not approve this tendency,. But the tendency does not stop here: as closed system it has the natural movement for collapsing herself till reaching its own nucleus where it disappears as a point…. and this movement was the common behavior of fundamental left-spinner particles at the universe’s origins.

In another hand, the male universal tendency is to be an opened system – travelling far away from home, as warrior and hunter, conquering the world till the galaxies, leaving his offspring abandoned to its own lucky, making changes, business, with all things at the external world. He has the tendency to be polygamist. At our last non-biological ancestor, he was submitted to the female force, since the female was occupying the nucleus ( as F1, as we can see in the Matrix/DNA astronomic’s state formula, while the male was F4, orbiting around F1), and that is the cause biological chromosome Y is shorter than X ) .  But the male tendency does not stop at being an opened system, he goes to the last possibilities when becomes dispersion, disappearing by fragmentation, and this movement was the common behavior of fundamental right-spinner particles at the universe’s origins.

Two characters that are, each one, 50% right and 50% wrong. The right direction for humans is dependable that male be accessible to the right 50% from female, destroying his negative 50%, and female do the same. We need to build the third most evolved character, synchronized with Nature’s laws.