Archive for the ‘Light’ Category

Mind Control by electro-magnetic waves?

Saturday, August 15th, 2020

Good information about electromagnetic spectrum, cheap instruments for measuring electromagnetic waves, etc. Phones, computer, are bad for radiation?

https://steemit.com/science/@jrmagnetics/emf-and-mind-control

mind-control.jpg

More References:

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_compatibility

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_interference

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_field

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_harassment

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_transform

Luz: a Solar seria a Luz Natural na sua terceira geração?

Wednesday, July 15th, 2020

( Texto obtido no forum com link abaixo. para pesquisar se esta informação está correta.)

This sun is a 3rd generation sun. We know this because of the quantity of heavy metals. The universe is about 13.8 billion years old, so divide by 3 … About 4.5 billion each, round up to 5. Actually the first two generations probably formed faster, as with each supernova the elements get spread out further. The first one formed pretty fast due to clumpy matter. Anywho that combined with the paleontological record … It’s all pretty much done with huge assumptions so it’s more like +/- 1 or 2 billion years.

https://forums.space.com/threads/is-the-milky-way-harboring-dozens-of-intelligent-civilizations.32039/

davea0511
davea0511- Jan 7, 2020

Universidades e Ciencias dominadas por uma ideologia na busca da solução para a origem da vida ( e a minha versão, da minha diferente ideologia).

Wednesday, July 15th, 2020

Was the Origin of Life a Fluke? Or Was It Physics? ( A origem da vida foi uma sorte, uma casualidade? Ou foi pela Física?)

By Ian O’Neill August 30, 2017

https://www.space.com/37988-did-life-emerge-from-physical-laws.html?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com&fbclid=IwAR0gjviyr8j7MU3MmS_kzAf-AjPF_LQiTg-DhEXYrO1Ont_zhgslm5J5scU

Aqui pretendo copiar cada frase importante do texto e comenta-la sob o ponto de vista da Matrix/DNA, minha propria teoria ( em portugues).

Meu post nos comentarios desta noticia no Facebook, em 13/07/2020:

” The academic mindset has a wrong approach and in this way they never will find the natural right solution. This is the opinion of a naturalist philosopher studying this problem at Amazon jungle by seven years. That whole biosphere suggests a very different history than the labs are suggesting. So, I elaborate the Matrix/DNA Theory. There is no origins of life, the word and human concept “life”, in relation to real nature, is a big cause of our mistakes. Instead life or non-life there is the biological shape of a universal natural system, which can be in other shapes, as electromagnetic or astronomic mechanical. Since this universal system coming from the Big Bang is under evolution, it makes no sense saying humans are alive and atoms doesn’t. Physics does not produces Biology, Physics is about the mechanical skeleton of a natural system, instead, it is Biology that produces Physics, the meat produces the bones. So, we must search where else there is Biology and I found it in my theoretical models of atoms, galaxies, in the electromagnetic spectrum of light waves, etc. The big secret of natural information lays on photons and light waves, which are above Physics and Biology, our Science is not searching the networks of photons inside the systems. And so on, the world is a little bit more complex and multidimensional than the academics believes. I like to talk about this issue, between different world views, someone else?”

xxxxx

Interpretação/Discussão do Texto pela Matrix/DNA World View

Jeremy England, a biophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is trying to answer these profound questions. In 2013, he formulated a hypothesis that physics may spontaneously trigger chemicals to organize themselves in ways that seed “life-like” qualities.

Matrix/DNA: Porque “physics”? O que existia no princípio eram forças naturais – que talvez seja o que denominamos de energias, porque o efeito mais evidente dessas forças era produzir movimentos no meio da inércia – e provavelmente substâncias, mais etéreas, já que ainda não tinham os átomos constituidores das substancias materiais. Talvez existissem mais coisas que ainda desconhecemos ou estas coisas com outros nomes – como a espuma ou vibrações quânticas – mas seja como for, a totalidade do que existia era Natureza Total, e não apenas Física, entendida como aspecto do mundo material. E pelo fato de depois o mundo material conter biologia, mente, vida, etc, acho racional concluir que o que os físicos lidam era apenas parte da totalidade da Natureza, ou mundo material. Então não aceitamos o que Jeremy England diz, e isso deveria ser trocado por ” a Natureza, o mundo material talvez possa espontaneamente mover químicos a se organizarem, ou serem organizados, em compostos que semeiam qualidades ou propriedades vitais. Mas qual foi o resultado final dessa movimentação dos químicos? Um sistema e funcional, o sistema celular. Então foi um sistema que moveu os químicos pois apenas um sistema pode produzir sistemas, ou se estiver fragmentado, separado em suas partes, recompor-se. E falar em sistema engloba tudo na natureza, vai muito alem da Física.

Now, new research by England and a colleague suggests that physics may naturally produce self-replicating chemical reactions, one of the first steps toward creating life from inanimate substances.

Matrix/DNA: May? Ou can? May se traduz por “pode ser que”, então não se afirma, é uma teoria. Mas tudo bem, vamos ver qual foi o experimento laboratorial ou fato real observado. Eu sou propenso a duvidar disso enquanto não identificarem no prévio mundo físico alguma situação em que um composto mais complexo se reproduz, pois se não existe, seria dizer que pela primeira vez no Universo ou nestas regiões foi criado o fenômeno da reprodução, e isso seria magica.

This might be interpreted as life originating directly from the fundamental laws of nature, thereby removing luck from the equation. But that would be jumping the gun.

Matrix/DNA: Não podemos ter certeza que o cérebro humano disponha de todos os sensores ( e que os atuais estejam completos) para captar todas as leis fundamentais da natureza. E ninguém nunca poderá afirmar que conhece a totalidade da Natureza para poder afirmas que sabe tudo o que existe nela. Ele deveria dizer ” leis fundamentais na Natureza que detectamos…”

Life had to have come from something; there wasn’t always biology.

Matrix/DNA: O que é life, para o Universo, a Natureza? O que é biologia, para o Universo, a Natureza? Se perguntar-mos, o Universo deverá responder que não sabe nem porque os humanos criaram os conceitos embutidos nestes nomes. para mim, estes nomes representam objetos que foram produzidos na evolução deste planeta dentro do sistema solar dentro da galaxia dentro do Universo… do qual quase nada sei. Em outras palavras, vida e biologia vieram da evolução. E o que representa este outro nome criado pelos humanos, “evolução”? Bem, para mim só pode sugerir baseado no que conheço e vejo com meus olhos: na embriogênese vejo a forma de um corpo se transformar enquanto passa do simples para o mais complexo devido a expressão de informações que estavam inertes. Nenhum acaso aqui e também isso nunca foi estudado e não pertence a área da Física.

Biology is born from the raw and lifeless chemical components

Matrix/DNA: Bem, essa afirmação não pode ser cientifica porque a Ciência nunca demonstrou o evento em que químicos apenas produzem a biológica organização deles mesmos em sistemas. Para mim, existe a evolução universal de um único sistema natural que surgiu ou se formou com o Big Bang. Este sistema foi uma auto-projeção materializada de um sistema que está encriptado numa onda de luz natural. Esta onda se propaga por ondas, que podem ser divididas em sete tipos, devido suas frequências, vibrações comprimentos, etc. A primeira forma deste sistema foi feita pela primeira faixa da onda, a segunda forma pela segunda faixa… a organização da matéria no tipo biológico é uma produção da quarta faixa dessa onda. Também não posso demonstrar isso em laboratorio, portanto é teoria contra teoria, apesar de que no meu caso particular vejo mais evidencias e racionalidade na minha teoria. Porque vejo um feto aqui na embriogênese como um corpo “vivo” sob organização biológica que foi produzido pelo DNA que tem justamente a mesma configuração que vejo na onda de luz.

… that somehow organized themselves into prebiotic compounds, created the building blocks of life, formed basic microbes and then eventually evolved into the spectacular array of creatures that exist on our planet today. [7 Theories on the Origin of Life]

Matrix/DNA: Ótimo. Por favor, vamos pegar um bilhão de átomos separados entre si, de todos os tipos, vamos bota-los como um monte encima da prancha da mesa do laboratorio, vamos dar uma ajudazinha botando a mesa a vibrar, sacudir-se, e vamos assistir alguns átomos procurando outros átomos certos formando combinações certas para que apareça ali building blocks que continuarão a se moverem e se organizarem formando finalmente o primeiro sistema celular… da vida. Aí aplaudiremos e teremos mais um fato real a ser listado no rol da Ciência.

Bem… terei que pausar esta tarefa agora, mas volto depois…

“Abiogenesis” is when something nonbiological turns into something biological and England thinks thermodynamics might provide the framework that drives life-like behavior in otherwise lifeless chemicals. However, this research doesn’t bridge life-like qualities of a physical system with the biological processes themselves, England said.

“I would not say I have done anything to investigate the ‘origin of life’ per se,” England told Live Science. “I think what’s interesting to me is the proof of principle – what are the physical requirements for the emergence of life-like behaviors?”

Self-organization in physical systems

When energy is applied to a system, the laws of physics dictate how that energy dissipates. If an external heat source is applied to that system, it will dissipate and reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, like a cooling cup of coffee left on a desk. Entropy, or the amount of disorder in the system, will increase as heat dissipates. But some physical systems may be  sufficiently out of equilibrium that they “self-organize” to make best use of an external energy source, triggering interesting self-sustaining chemical reactions that prevent the system from reaching thermodynamic equilibrium and thus maintaining an out-of-equilibrium state, England speculates. (It’s as if that cup of coffee spontaneously produces a chemical reaction that sustains a hotspot in the center of the fluid, preventing the coffee from cooling to an equilibrium state.) He calls this situation “dissipation-driven adaptation” and this mechanism is what drives life-like qualities in England’s otherwise lifeless physical system.

A key life-like behavior is self-replication, or (from a biological viewpoint) reproduction. This is the basis for all life: It starts simple, replicates, becomes more complex and replicates again. It just so happens that self-replication is also a very efficient way of dissipating heat and increasing entropy in that system.

In a study published July 18 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,  England and co-author Jordan Horowitz tested their hypothesis. They carried out computer simulations on a closed system (or a system that doesn’t exchange heat or matter with its surroundings) containing a “soup” of 25 chemicals. Although their setup is very simple, a similar type of soup may have pooled on the surface of a primordial and lifeless Earth. If, say, these chemicals are concentrated and heated by an external source – a hydrothermal vent, for example – the pool of chemicals would need to dissipate that heat in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. Heat must dissipate and the entropy of the system will inevitably increase.

Under certain initial conditions, he found that these chemicals may optimize the energy applied to the system by self-organizing and undergoing intense reactions to self-replicate. The chemicals fine-tuned themselves naturally. These reactions generate heat that obeys the second law of thermodynamics; entropy will always increase in the system and the chemicals would self-organize and exhibit the life-like behavior of self-replication.

“Essentially, the system tries a bunch of things on a small scale, and once one of them starts experiencing positive feedback, it does not take that long for it to take over the character of organization in the system,” England told Live Science.

This is a very simple model of what goes on in biology: chemical energy is burned in cells that are – by their nature – out of equilibrium, driving the metabolic processes that maintain life. But, as England admits, there’s a big difference between finding life-like qualities in a virtual chemical soup and life itself.

Sara Imari Walker, a theoretical physicist and astrobiologist at Arizona State University who was not involved in the current research, agrees.

“There’s a two-way bridge that needs to be crossed to try to bridge biology and physics; one is to understand how you get life-like qualities from simple physical systems and the other is to understand how physics can give rise to life,” Imari Walker told Live Science. “You need to do both to really understand what properties are unique to life and what properties are characteristic of things that you consider to be almost alive […] like a prebiotic system.”

Emergence of life beyond Earth?

Before we can even begin to answer the big question of whether these simple physical systems may influence the emergence of life elsewhere in the universe, it would be better to understand where these systems exist on Earth first.

“If, when you say ‘life,’ you mean stuff that is as stunningly impressive as a bacterium or anything else with polymerases and DNA, my work doesn’t yet tell us anything about how easy or difficult it is to make something that complex, so I shouldn’t speculate about what we’d be likely to find elsewhere than Earth,”  England said. (Polymerases are proteins that assemble DNA and RNA.)

This research doesn’t specifically identify how biology emerges from nonbiological systems, only that in some complex chemical situations, surprising self-organization occurs. These simulations do not consider other life-like qualities – such as adaptation to environment or reaction to stimuli. Also, this thermodynamics test on a closed system does not consider the role of information reproduction in life’s origins, said Michael Lässig, a statistical physicist and quantitative biologist at the University of Cologne in Germany.

“[This] work is indeed a fascinating result on non-equilibrium chemical networks but it is still a long way from a physics explanation of the origins of life, which requires the reproduction of information,” Lässig, who was not involved in the research, told Live Science.

There’s a critical role for information in living systems, added Imari Walker. Just because there appears to be natural self-organization exhibited by a soup of chemicals, it doesn’t necessarily mean living organization.

“I think there’s a lot of intermediate stages that we have to get through to go from simple ordering to having a full-on information processing architecture like a living cell, which requires something like memory and hereditary,” said Imari Walker. “We can clearly get order in physics and non-equilibrium systems, but that doesn’t necessarily make it life.”

To say England’s work could be the “smoking gun” for the origin of life is premature, and there are many other hypotheses as to how life may have emerged from nothing, experts said. But it is a fascinating insight into how physical systems may self-organize in nature. Now that researchers have a general idea about how this thermodynamic system behaves, it would be a nice next step to identify sufficiently out-of-equilibrium physical systems that naturally occur on Earth, England said.

Evidencia para Matrix/DNA: Biofotons no Cérebro

Sunday, May 17th, 2020

Scientists Discover Biophotons In The Brain That Could Hint Our Consciousness is Directly Linked to Light!

Published on September 24, 2017

ByAbbey Stirlin

https://educateinspirechange.org/science-technology/scientists-discover-biophotons-brain-hint-consciousness-directly-linked-light/

Photons from the Sun

Monday, May 4th, 2020

How long does it take for a photon to travel from the central core of the Sun to reach its surface and then the Earth?

I’ve read estimates that a photon will be emitted & absorbed trillions of times as it makes its way to the surface of the Sun – taking 250,000 to a million years finally reaching the photosphere…. from there, the journey is about 8 1/3 minutes across space to reach Earth.

So, 250,000 years and 8 1/3 minutes, minimum.

Nanotecnologia baseada no DNA, e Feynman “tiny machines”

Sunday, April 26th, 2020

“There’s plenty of room at the bottom”​: DNA, Dr. Feynman, and learning to ask the right questions

by Anu Thubagere – Hardware Engineer at X, moonshot factory ; Visiting Research Scholar at Caltech

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/theres-plenty-room-bottom-dna-dr-feynman-learning-ask-anu-thubagere/?trackingId=f%2FeRxOsmTvG5jG%2BnXSXSpg%3D%3D

Meu comentario postado no artigo: ( my cooment.)

Louis C. Morelli

Louis C. Morelli – Independent Research – 26/04/20

Ok, what I have to tell about DNA I think you will not understand – it is a totally different world view with a different approach. The building block o DNA is not a nucleotide, but a lateral base pair of nucleotides. This building block is a workable living system in itself. But you will not understand while you don´t know the universal formula of all natural systems ( from cells to DNA to galaxies to atoms, etc. Yes, DNA is merely the biological shape of a unique universal system that has as ancestors the astronomic and atomic systems, so you have the electromagnetic shape, the mechanicist shape, etc. but then, it is a universal dna/matrix ) ), which I have designed in the shape of a diagram, at my website and called it The Matrix/DNA. So, each building block works like an employee in a factory, but these workers are multitasks, they can work with different teams (genes) for building different things, like proteins. The formula explains what is a perpetual motor: merely the formula as closed system, instead opened system. But can not exists eternal perpetual motor, due excaping particles from the circuit of flow of information, which is measured by entropy. This flow of energy/information connects the pieces of the system mimicking the flow of vital cycle. If you got the exactly replica of the right building blocks,( without knowing it) the unique explanation for yours robot does not need external fuel should be if it is getting external light, like photons from the sun. I think DNA uses the ATP as fuel also, but since the formula came from light waves, it is possible that it works getting light in shape of photons. If you look to the formula, I have identified some DNA´s elements: the two lateral sugars are F1 and F4, the bases are F2, F3, F6 and F7. Uracil, from RNA is F5. Your mind will change your interpretation about what DNA really is… Cheers… and thanks by these important information…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4eRCygdW–c

Richard Feynman “Tiny Machines” Nanotechnology Lecture – aka “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”

Luz e a Origem do Universo: Teoria Oficial Acadêmica em Video

Wednesday, April 15th, 2020

Video na Lbry:

https://lbry.tv/@DeepAstronomy:0/first-light-the-dark-age-of-the-universe:7

First Light: The Dark Age of the Universe

October 5th, 201233.01 LBC • 48 Views Deep Astronomy@DeepAstronomy

O mesmo video no Youtube:

00:21 – For the first three hundred thousand years, our universe was a hot, dense ocean of protons, 00:26 electrons and photons.

Matrix/DNA: This theory is not right. Where came from these particles? Protons and electrons are compounds of smaller particles, and as such, these super-particles already were a system in itself. The code for creating these systems was encrypeted in light waves, maybe the light wave fromm or with the Big Bang. That light wave expanded trhought the spatial substance, which could be dark matter. While expanding, due fricction with dark matter was created eletricity ( or energy) and the smallest, non-material particles, like quarks and leptons. From the wave were excaping its own particles – photons – wiich are smallest fractals of the big wave, so photons had the code also. Then, the photons, as free radicals, tried to joining again for re-creating the big wave, but, for some reason, they needed to mimic the wave as a technological tool made off matter, like we build airplanes mimicking birds. So, the photons drove those quarks and leptons to organize as copies of the wave as system, and got protons, electrons. The mass came from the dark matter, or the Higgs field. With those super-particles the photons built bigger systems – the atoms. And so on…

My comments posted on Lbry: ( Não consegui postar, retornar e tentar novamente

Thanks, beautiful video. I need to remember that this is a theory. O prefer another theory, called Matrix/DNA. Why I prefer this theory? Because the theoretical academic model of the beginning and evolution of the Universe, til the time when all these things produced life – biological systems – has nothing to see with the final product: life. if a theory about the unseen does not explain the very fact, the final product we can see now, this theory can not be right. There is no evolutionary link between cosmological and biological evolution in the academic model. In another hand, the most simplest rational exercise – comparison anatomy and dynamics – between the embryogenesis of the Universe and the embryogenesis of a human body – solve all these problems. This video is like a Chemist and Physicist watching the embryogenese of a baby without knowing the existence of DNA and describing what they see as chemistry and physics events inside the ovule. I have found that light waves propagates moved by the process of vital cycles and its different phases works like parts of a complete natural system. So, a light wave must be the DNA, the photons are the genes, at the Big Bang. They are right, as right would be when describing human embryogenesis without seeing the DNA and genes. They are not seeing the light.They use the expression “so, suddenly something extraordinary happened…”. Extraordinary claims requires extraordinary evidence. The cosmic radiation background is coming from the initial light wave, which still is spread at the whole Universe being fragmented into its particles, the photons. If we have here and now a real natural parameter that explains what happened 13,8 years ago, why we need to create very complicated models based on things that we never saw anywhere?! Please, apply Occam´s Razor here.

Cont. of transcrit:

00:29 This ocean was a plasma so thick, and the particles so close together, that a photon

00:34 could only travel a short distance before running into one of the closely packed particles, 00:39 scattering it in different directions. 00:43 Because a photon could not travel very far without hitting something else, the universe 00:47 was opaque. 00:48 In the very early days of the universe, photons were imprisoned by the crowd of seething particles. 00:56 As time passed, the universe expanded, creating more space between the jostling protons and 01:01 electrons. 01:03 Then something extraordinary happened, after three hundred thousand years, the cosmos freed 01:09 the photons, the particles of the early universe had spread enough that a photon could run 01:14 unhindered and finally escape its prison. 01:20 As photons were released from their bonds and became decoupled from matter, the event 01:24 became immortalized in a snapshot of the cosmos when it was just a baby. 01:29 These unleashed photons became forever imprinted in the Cosmic Microwave Background. 01:37 This event is known as Recombination, and with it, the universe had just entered the 01:42 era known as The Dark Ages.

Como a reprodução sexual estava programada numa onda de luz

Sunday, March 29th, 2020

Até ontem dividíamo-nos nos que acreditam que essa extraordinária engenharia da reprodução sexual tivesse sido criada com magicas por Deus ou que tivesse sido produto da evolução natural atraves da seleção natural. Agora descobrimos que ela não foi criada na materia deste Universo, pois ela está encriptada na formula natural universal para todos os sistemas naturais. Entendemos agora o que modelou a forma do XX para gerar femeas: é o circuito sistêmico com todas as informações do sistema, que é gerado pela contraparte feminina em F1; e o que modelou Y: é a metade das informações do lado esquerdo que expressa o masculino em F4. Como X contem Y tambem, dias doses de Y torna o aspecto macho dominante ao modelar o baby.

Mas descobrimos tambem que a primeira forma dessa formula que surgiu neste nosso mundo foi na forma de onda de luz. Como aquela emitida no instante do Big Bang. Um genoma vindo de fora e de antes do Universo. Vindo do que ou de quem… ainda não sabemos…

As formas e composições dos planetas coincidem com os estados na sequencia das fases da Luz? Nova intuição a pesquisar

Saturday, February 1st, 2020

Tenho a intuição de que o Sol é uma central energética e fonte de luz do qual a luz se propaga em ondas circulares, formando aureolas desde o Sol até os limites do sistema. Sabendo que uma onda de luz se divide em sete estados principais, cada aureola deveria apresentar as propriedades de cada estado da luz. Assim, cada planeta ocupando uma aureola, ou faixa de orbita, deveria ser modelado pelo estado especifico da luz. A coisa bate quando vemos a composição de asteroides na ultima faixa, que coincide com a fragmentação da luz na ultima faixa. Tambem alguns indícios batem com o fato da Terra distribuir a vida, que é uma propriedade da quarta faixa da onda e parece que a Terra esta justamente na quarta orbita. Os estados gasosos de planetas como Jupiter é outro indicio, pois ocupando galaxias mais distantes indica o processo de enfraquecimento, envelhecimento da onda. E o tamanho maior de Jupiter coincide com as faixas da onda mais distante da fonte, faixas que são maiores por apresentarem maior comprimento de onda.

Em suma, são vários indícios sugerindo que esta intuição praticamente racional merece uma pesquisa mais seria, arrolando tudo o que se sabe sobre cada planeta e todas as interpretações sugeridas pela formula da Matrix/DNA sobre as ondas de luz ( que podem estarem atreladas a qualidades especificas de campos magnéticos). Infelizmente não tenho tempo para isso agora, mas fica aqui registrado para quando o tiver…

A imagem abaixo causa problemas ‘a visão da sequencia das ondas, pois o primeiro cinturão de asteroides parece o final de uma onda, a orbita de Jupiter parece o inicio de outra onda mas em sentido inverso… talvez sejam ondas superpostas, mas o que seria a fonte da outra onda?

Image result for solar system
  • ai vem um gaiato e diz: – ” A fonte da segunda onda está localizada nos limites do sistema solar, é Nibiru, a estrela de neutrons invisível companheira do Sol…”
  • – ” Ora,… tenha a santa paciência… mas… espere aí… e porque não?!”
  • -… inclusive uma estrela de neutrons se desfazendo explicaria a presença da sujeira e asteroides no cinturão… raios…

Luz: Artigo diz que “Ciência descobre as origins da primeira luz no Universo”. Não descobriu, segundo a Matrix/DNA Theory

Saturday, January 25th, 2020

Science uncovers the origin of the first light in the Universe

‘Let there be light’ isn’t just biblical. It’s science.

Ethan Siegel

Ethan SiegelJul 7, 2017

https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/science-uncovers-the-origin-of-the-first-light-in-the-universe-8a985cb5f02b

My cooments published below the article:

Go to the profile of TheMatrixDNA
TheMatrixDNA – Jan/ 25/2020

We see here today that “ Biology preceeds Physics”. But the modern human scientific enterprise is based on the idea that in relation to the universal Nature and the past, it is different: “Physics preceeds Biology”. Physics deals with hard and mechanic structiures of natural systems, which means, the skeletons. Here, in terrestrial nature, the biological meat is what produces bones and skeletons, not the other way around. So, why, when and how the terrstrial Nature rebels against universal nature and inverted the old chain of causes and effects? Which real scientific fact we have pointing out that it happened? Nobody says.

So, not satisfied with this mindset, I tried to assemble the real know facts supposing that Biology created atoms, galaxies, etc., the components of the Universe´s skeleton or structure. A totally different world view was built, which I called “The Matrix/DNA Theory”, because biological DNA is a pattern that can be found inside atoms and galaxies at simplest states, so, it is a universal matrix building all universal natural systems. 

But, the reason I come to read all articles and papers about light is that in my theory the whole sum of radiation of all elements build a wave of light that has an internal anatomy identical to the matrix universal pattern. From the initial gamma ray to the final radio wave, this universal natural initial light wave mimics just the sequence of transformations of natural systems, included the human body. Meaning that a human body since its first moment as well a light wave since its source propagates into time/space by the same force/process we call “life´s cycles”. 

The first light wave, being similar to the matrix/DNA, which built from galaxies to human bodies, must had all information of all natural systems. Break this wave into its smallest bits, the photons, we have photons as bits of information. 

The first moment of a human body is the “explosion” of a spermatozoon membrane at the center of an ovule. There are videos showing that in this moment there is sparks of light inside the ovule. That´s what I am watching here and now, how begins a new natural system. I have never found any real fact to suppose that terrestrial nature has rebelled against the Universal nature, so, I will continuing to observing this theory suggesting that “as it is here and now, it was there in the past”… My universe began with a Big Bang also, but very different interpreted, it is a biological one. Theories against theories…

xxxxx

Pesquisa no artigo ( Researh of this article)

The distant Universe, as viewed here through the plane of the Milky Way, consists of stars and galaxies, as well as opaque gas and dust, going back as far as we can see. But beyond the last star in the Universe, there’s still more light. Image credit: 2MASS.

 

Comentario digno de nota a ser pesquisado: ” Since there is clearly more light than we can account for, than what should be here, it’s obvious it’s seeping or leaking in from outside.”

De onde ele obteve a informação de que tem mais luz do que nossos cálculos indicam? Se isso for certo, está realmente vindo luz de fora desta dimensão material a que denominamos “universo”?