Archive for the ‘Debates with Matrix/DNA’ Category

Sobre a filosofia passiva oriental e os efeitos das vibrações

Monday, September 7th, 2020

Fico incomodado, irritado, quando vejo as cenas dos humanos na Índia e na China, totalmente subjugados em situação de real miséria material e atraso evolucionista. Não tenho certeza de nada, principalmente da minha visão do mundo, mas não evito a vontade de aplicar uma força que suspeito iria mudar aquela situação para melhor. Suspeito que a causa do atual estado naquelas regiões está no estado mental da maioria da população, e este estado mental foi construído por uma visão de mundo, a qual deve certamente estar errada, em dessintonia com as leis naturais. A força quer transformaria para melhor seria a que emana da visão de mundo que denomino Matrix/DNA. Essa visão sugere que não sejamos passivos, e como consequência disso, procuro ser ativo inclusive na luta para a desconstrução daquela visão do nundo errada. Por isso publico respostas nos comentários de propagandas daquela filosofia oriental, como a seguir:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/ratanshalini10/detail/recent-activity/

No alt text provided for this image
WRONG (Matrix/DNA))

Meu comentário publicado:

Louis C. Morelli  – 9/7/2

My opinion: is this kind of indoctrination applied by the 1% of India that built a country with more than a billion person as slaves of misery. Merely my opinion: do not give up to others what belongs to you as co-owner of this planet. Fight for it.

O qual foi seguido do seguinte comentario:

 K Bharath Kumarout – 11h

Unless you act towards what you want you will never get it just by relaxing and doing nothing Dr.Shalini Ratan

E a resposta da autora:

Dr.Shalini RatanAuthor – .9h

So you mean to say the Quote is Incorrect, or may be Osho did not know what he was saying..

E minha resposta:

Louis C. Morelli : 

Dr.Shalini Ratan Yes, Osho was human, and no microscopic human knows the cosmic thru. An example: in this corrupted social system, almost all jobs are corruptions, and as such, they have its specific vibration. If your vibration comes from you as a elevated ethics and moral, the vibration of that job never will couple with your vibration.

Materialismo: “O Universo e a Vida podem ser explicados pela Física e Matemática com as 4 forças naturais mais uma carrada de acidentes”

Thursday, September 3rd, 2020

Assim afirma o físico Premio Nobel no vídeo com link abaixo, mas antes deixa-me registrar o comentário que postei no TED abaixo do vídeo:

Louis Charles Morelli – Posted at 9/3/2020

Poor man. At the next corner there will be a discovery that a known natural element is a force more important and universal than anything he knows, which contains and rules the four natural forces and will reveal that only 5% of this world is grasped by Physics and Math.

Why we find the same Math equation when opening the next order of natural phenomena? Because when we opens the next body of a new species, and any next natural system, we find the same universal natural formula, which we say “Matrix/DNA”, the fifth and more important natural law, which contains Physics and Math, that’s why you find the same Math equations. Which is the best indication of beauty and elegance in nature? The roots at its foundation or the buildings of life, emotions ans consciousness? Mr Gell-Mann believes that the natural world is only from the Big Bang till the last galaxy, he is blind to what came before the Big Bang and what comes after the galaxies, which he says that are accidents. But in the real world is the meat that produces the bone skeleton and not the skeleton that produces the meat.

All natural orders of phenomena are properties of natural systems, there is a unique universal natural system that is coming under evolution since the Big Bang, which had the shapes of atomic systems, astronomic systems, cell systems and now is getting the shape of consciousnesses system. And all these shapes were built by a unique and same natural force, a kind of universal genome, which we call “Matrix/DNA”. We can see it encrypted into natural light waves. When he says “you don’t need to search something more” he is not different from those religious medievals dominating the universities and saying that “you have the Bible and God, does not need search anything more”. This is a science-stopper, inhibiting the students from keeping the open mind and searching.

Beauty, Truth and… Physics? by Murray Gell-Mann

TED – Beauty, Truth and… Physics? by Murray Gell-Mann

Linguagem e cooperação não foram inventados pelos humanos: os genes já os praticavam.

Sunday, August 30th, 2020

HOW LANGUAGE TRANSFORMED HUMANITY

My comments posted at TED:

Louis Charles Morelli Posted a few seconds ago

If genes communicates by electric signals and their job is an example of cooperation, I can´t understand some people saying that humans invented inter communication and cooperation. A human organism is merely self-projection of genes for better dealing with external world. it is curious that a set of 30.000 active genes becomes one set among 8 billons of other equal sets. Living together, the genes needed to expand the internal communication of 30.000 different individuals for to be the communication among 8 billions copies of 30.000. So, the logics would be a unique language. The problem is that the copies went to different places, and the genes of one place could not know how the other place was talking.
I think that language was a natural goal of genes since the beginning, since archaea, bacteria, etc. All the intermediates species between bacteria and humans were like the first calculators machines and modern computers, which now can speak. Same technological process under evolution. The problem between us and Neandertals must be that the dispatcher gene FOX2 had Neandertal´s brain like ENIAC and homo sapiens´ brain as a laptop…
Genes determines that will be a unique human society as a unique global country. Like all humans came fragmented from a unique place – Africa – all biological genes ancestors ( astronomic genes) came from a unique place – this galaxy. But, all dispersed genes joining together trying to reproduce the galactic systems in a new environment and they got a first and unique biological system, the cell system. So, it is a natural law that all humans will come together building a new unique conscious system. ( well… this is what is suggesting Matrix/DNA Theory)

Fascinante rocha de meteorito do espaço na Antártica poderia explicar o mistério da estranha assimetria na vida

Sunday, August 23rd, 2020

Astonishingly old Antarctic space rock could explain mystery of life’s weird asymmetry

https://www.space.com/pristine-antarctic-meteorite-amino-acid-chirality.html?utm_source=notification

An image of a piece of the Antarctic meteorite Asuka 12236 as seen through a microscope; the sample is about 0.3 inches (1 centimeter) across.

My comments published at the articles debate:

Well,.. the Matrix/DNA Theory has different suggestions:

1) Left handed amino acids are related to birth and grow, while right handed are related to the second phase of any natural system, entropy and death. Below is the universal formula of all natural systems. F1 is the initial source, then the systemic circuit goes clock-wise through left side till reaching F4. Since the circuit is built by the vital cycle process, when applied to a human body which is a system, F1 is the mother, F2 is the baby, F3 the teenage and F4 the young adult. From here, F4, begins entropy, the level of energy decreases, going to F6 ( old adult), to F7 (seniors) and the decomposed cadaver goes back to the source ( it is a closed system), or to other place ( if it is a opened system). At F4 begins the reproductive process and here life demonstrates its wisdom: i the first living system was complete with the two sides, never the first would to reproduce before dying. Pick up the phase of life growing and you will have life forever.

2) Information for left-handed ( F1 to F4) are delivered by planets nucleus reactions reaching the surface and right-handed are delivered by stars like the Sun. So, this meteorite must be from some destroyed planet.

A Nova Terra Regenerada: Alguns começam a despertar como a cosmovisão da Matrix/DNA

Saturday, August 22nd, 2020

Exemplo: um dialogo no forum da Socientifica:

https://forum.socientifica.com.br/index.php?threads/ecovilas-comunidades-sociedades-alternativas.557/

Thinker – abril, 14, 2020

Eu gostaria de conhecer mais sobre Ecovilas/Comunidades/Sociedades alternativas. Já vi o filme Zeitgeist/Projeto Vénus mas achei meio utópico, é bem antigo e aparentemente não conseguiu fazer nada muito relevante fora do plano das ideias. Também já dei uma pesquisada sobre ecovilas no Brasil. A maioria é extremamente focada no ambientalismo, algumas são espiritualistas/religiosas. Eu gostaria de conhecer/participar de algum projeto com mais foco na ciência e no empreendedorismo. Alguem conhece algo sobre? Tem interesse no assunto?


Louis Morelli :

Cooperativa de Consumo, Associações cooperativas de trabalho e produção: o único método disponível agora e possível que libertaria os pobres da escravidão. É o método aprovado pelo significado da nossa existência neste mundo: “Somos 8 bilhões de semi-conscientes irmãos-genes que somados a trilhões de outros irmãos-genes espalhados neste Universo estamos construindo o embrião de uma Consciência Universal”. Então mire-se em como operam os genes, para saber qual o comportamento sensato. Se um gene prejudicar que outro acrescente aquela sua unica, intransferível, indestrutível, informação, o conjunto todo teria que viver num corpo aleijado. Este método seria um boicote ao sistema econômico criado pelos predadores humanos de humanos. Predadores humanos existem porque a substancia da consciência para sua gestação tem que passar por todas as fases evolucionarias da vida, inclusive a animal, de quem recebemos este corpo e genética. Esta genética ainda domina modelando nossa psique e ego, por isso todos os sistemas econômicos criados até agora ( da monarquia ao capitalismo ao comunismo, etc) imitam exatamente o sistema de divisão de classes da selva: 1% de grandes predadores, 10% de médios predadores ( a classe média), e 85 % de presas, a classe pobre. precisamos nos auto-exorcizar destes instintos mas nunca acontecerá com os grandes predadores, porem as presas são acessíveis à mudança, e as associações no consumo e trabalho podem conduzir a isso. Nunca funcionou revoluções pela violência ( foram médios predadores insatisfeitos substituindo médios predadores satisfeitos, como é a briga entre direita e esquerda, os grandes continuaram), nem por qualquer outro método. Você está certo ao dizer que todas estas sociedades alternativas estão com o foco errado, principalmente porque não destacam a evolução pelas Ciências, tecnologia e uma ética/moral transcendente. Hoje minha principal ocupação é procurar como iniciar este novo modelo de comunidade.

Universidades e Ciencias dominadas por uma ideologia na busca da solução para a origem da vida ( e a minha versão, da minha diferente ideologia).

Wednesday, July 15th, 2020

Was the Origin of Life a Fluke? Or Was It Physics? ( A origem da vida foi uma sorte, uma casualidade? Ou foi pela Física?)

By Ian O’Neill August 30, 2017

https://www.space.com/37988-did-life-emerge-from-physical-laws.html?utm_campaign=meetedgar&utm_medium=social&utm_source=meetedgar.com&fbclid=IwAR0gjviyr8j7MU3MmS_kzAf-AjPF_LQiTg-DhEXYrO1Ont_zhgslm5J5scU

Aqui pretendo copiar cada frase importante do texto e comenta-la sob o ponto de vista da Matrix/DNA, minha propria teoria ( em portugues).

Meu post nos comentarios desta noticia no Facebook, em 13/07/2020:

” The academic mindset has a wrong approach and in this way they never will find the natural right solution. This is the opinion of a naturalist philosopher studying this problem at Amazon jungle by seven years. That whole biosphere suggests a very different history than the labs are suggesting. So, I elaborate the Matrix/DNA Theory. There is no origins of life, the word and human concept “life”, in relation to real nature, is a big cause of our mistakes. Instead life or non-life there is the biological shape of a universal natural system, which can be in other shapes, as electromagnetic or astronomic mechanical. Since this universal system coming from the Big Bang is under evolution, it makes no sense saying humans are alive and atoms doesn’t. Physics does not produces Biology, Physics is about the mechanical skeleton of a natural system, instead, it is Biology that produces Physics, the meat produces the bones. So, we must search where else there is Biology and I found it in my theoretical models of atoms, galaxies, in the electromagnetic spectrum of light waves, etc. The big secret of natural information lays on photons and light waves, which are above Physics and Biology, our Science is not searching the networks of photons inside the systems. And so on, the world is a little bit more complex and multidimensional than the academics believes. I like to talk about this issue, between different world views, someone else?”

xxxxx

Interpretação/Discussão do Texto pela Matrix/DNA World View

Jeremy England, a biophysicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is trying to answer these profound questions. In 2013, he formulated a hypothesis that physics may spontaneously trigger chemicals to organize themselves in ways that seed “life-like” qualities.

Matrix/DNA: Porque “physics”? O que existia no princípio eram forças naturais – que talvez seja o que denominamos de energias, porque o efeito mais evidente dessas forças era produzir movimentos no meio da inércia – e provavelmente substâncias, mais etéreas, já que ainda não tinham os átomos constituidores das substancias materiais. Talvez existissem mais coisas que ainda desconhecemos ou estas coisas com outros nomes – como a espuma ou vibrações quânticas – mas seja como for, a totalidade do que existia era Natureza Total, e não apenas Física, entendida como aspecto do mundo material. E pelo fato de depois o mundo material conter biologia, mente, vida, etc, acho racional concluir que o que os físicos lidam era apenas parte da totalidade da Natureza, ou mundo material. Então não aceitamos o que Jeremy England diz, e isso deveria ser trocado por ” a Natureza, o mundo material talvez possa espontaneamente mover químicos a se organizarem, ou serem organizados, em compostos que semeiam qualidades ou propriedades vitais. Mas qual foi o resultado final dessa movimentação dos químicos? Um sistema e funcional, o sistema celular. Então foi um sistema que moveu os químicos pois apenas um sistema pode produzir sistemas, ou se estiver fragmentado, separado em suas partes, recompor-se. E falar em sistema engloba tudo na natureza, vai muito alem da Física.

Now, new research by England and a colleague suggests that physics may naturally produce self-replicating chemical reactions, one of the first steps toward creating life from inanimate substances.

Matrix/DNA: May? Ou can? May se traduz por “pode ser que”, então não se afirma, é uma teoria. Mas tudo bem, vamos ver qual foi o experimento laboratorial ou fato real observado. Eu sou propenso a duvidar disso enquanto não identificarem no prévio mundo físico alguma situação em que um composto mais complexo se reproduz, pois se não existe, seria dizer que pela primeira vez no Universo ou nestas regiões foi criado o fenômeno da reprodução, e isso seria magica.

This might be interpreted as life originating directly from the fundamental laws of nature, thereby removing luck from the equation. But that would be jumping the gun.

Matrix/DNA: Não podemos ter certeza que o cérebro humano disponha de todos os sensores ( e que os atuais estejam completos) para captar todas as leis fundamentais da natureza. E ninguém nunca poderá afirmar que conhece a totalidade da Natureza para poder afirmas que sabe tudo o que existe nela. Ele deveria dizer ” leis fundamentais na Natureza que detectamos…”

Life had to have come from something; there wasn’t always biology.

Matrix/DNA: O que é life, para o Universo, a Natureza? O que é biologia, para o Universo, a Natureza? Se perguntar-mos, o Universo deverá responder que não sabe nem porque os humanos criaram os conceitos embutidos nestes nomes. para mim, estes nomes representam objetos que foram produzidos na evolução deste planeta dentro do sistema solar dentro da galaxia dentro do Universo… do qual quase nada sei. Em outras palavras, vida e biologia vieram da evolução. E o que representa este outro nome criado pelos humanos, “evolução”? Bem, para mim só pode sugerir baseado no que conheço e vejo com meus olhos: na embriogênese vejo a forma de um corpo se transformar enquanto passa do simples para o mais complexo devido a expressão de informações que estavam inertes. Nenhum acaso aqui e também isso nunca foi estudado e não pertence a área da Física.

Biology is born from the raw and lifeless chemical components

Matrix/DNA: Bem, essa afirmação não pode ser cientifica porque a Ciência nunca demonstrou o evento em que químicos apenas produzem a biológica organização deles mesmos em sistemas. Para mim, existe a evolução universal de um único sistema natural que surgiu ou se formou com o Big Bang. Este sistema foi uma auto-projeção materializada de um sistema que está encriptado numa onda de luz natural. Esta onda se propaga por ondas, que podem ser divididas em sete tipos, devido suas frequências, vibrações comprimentos, etc. A primeira forma deste sistema foi feita pela primeira faixa da onda, a segunda forma pela segunda faixa… a organização da matéria no tipo biológico é uma produção da quarta faixa dessa onda. Também não posso demonstrar isso em laboratorio, portanto é teoria contra teoria, apesar de que no meu caso particular vejo mais evidencias e racionalidade na minha teoria. Porque vejo um feto aqui na embriogênese como um corpo “vivo” sob organização biológica que foi produzido pelo DNA que tem justamente a mesma configuração que vejo na onda de luz.

… that somehow organized themselves into prebiotic compounds, created the building blocks of life, formed basic microbes and then eventually evolved into the spectacular array of creatures that exist on our planet today. [7 Theories on the Origin of Life]

Matrix/DNA: Ótimo. Por favor, vamos pegar um bilhão de átomos separados entre si, de todos os tipos, vamos bota-los como um monte encima da prancha da mesa do laboratorio, vamos dar uma ajudazinha botando a mesa a vibrar, sacudir-se, e vamos assistir alguns átomos procurando outros átomos certos formando combinações certas para que apareça ali building blocks que continuarão a se moverem e se organizarem formando finalmente o primeiro sistema celular… da vida. Aí aplaudiremos e teremos mais um fato real a ser listado no rol da Ciência.

Bem… terei que pausar esta tarefa agora, mas volto depois…

“Abiogenesis” is when something nonbiological turns into something biological and England thinks thermodynamics might provide the framework that drives life-like behavior in otherwise lifeless chemicals. However, this research doesn’t bridge life-like qualities of a physical system with the biological processes themselves, England said.

“I would not say I have done anything to investigate the ‘origin of life’ per se,” England told Live Science. “I think what’s interesting to me is the proof of principle – what are the physical requirements for the emergence of life-like behaviors?”

Self-organization in physical systems

When energy is applied to a system, the laws of physics dictate how that energy dissipates. If an external heat source is applied to that system, it will dissipate and reach thermal equilibrium with its surroundings, like a cooling cup of coffee left on a desk. Entropy, or the amount of disorder in the system, will increase as heat dissipates. But some physical systems may be  sufficiently out of equilibrium that they “self-organize” to make best use of an external energy source, triggering interesting self-sustaining chemical reactions that prevent the system from reaching thermodynamic equilibrium and thus maintaining an out-of-equilibrium state, England speculates. (It’s as if that cup of coffee spontaneously produces a chemical reaction that sustains a hotspot in the center of the fluid, preventing the coffee from cooling to an equilibrium state.) He calls this situation “dissipation-driven adaptation” and this mechanism is what drives life-like qualities in England’s otherwise lifeless physical system.

A key life-like behavior is self-replication, or (from a biological viewpoint) reproduction. This is the basis for all life: It starts simple, replicates, becomes more complex and replicates again. It just so happens that self-replication is also a very efficient way of dissipating heat and increasing entropy in that system.

In a study published July 18 in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,  England and co-author Jordan Horowitz tested their hypothesis. They carried out computer simulations on a closed system (or a system that doesn’t exchange heat or matter with its surroundings) containing a “soup” of 25 chemicals. Although their setup is very simple, a similar type of soup may have pooled on the surface of a primordial and lifeless Earth. If, say, these chemicals are concentrated and heated by an external source – a hydrothermal vent, for example – the pool of chemicals would need to dissipate that heat in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics. Heat must dissipate and the entropy of the system will inevitably increase.

Under certain initial conditions, he found that these chemicals may optimize the energy applied to the system by self-organizing and undergoing intense reactions to self-replicate. The chemicals fine-tuned themselves naturally. These reactions generate heat that obeys the second law of thermodynamics; entropy will always increase in the system and the chemicals would self-organize and exhibit the life-like behavior of self-replication.

“Essentially, the system tries a bunch of things on a small scale, and once one of them starts experiencing positive feedback, it does not take that long for it to take over the character of organization in the system,” England told Live Science.

This is a very simple model of what goes on in biology: chemical energy is burned in cells that are – by their nature – out of equilibrium, driving the metabolic processes that maintain life. But, as England admits, there’s a big difference between finding life-like qualities in a virtual chemical soup and life itself.

Sara Imari Walker, a theoretical physicist and astrobiologist at Arizona State University who was not involved in the current research, agrees.

“There’s a two-way bridge that needs to be crossed to try to bridge biology and physics; one is to understand how you get life-like qualities from simple physical systems and the other is to understand how physics can give rise to life,” Imari Walker told Live Science. “You need to do both to really understand what properties are unique to life and what properties are characteristic of things that you consider to be almost alive […] like a prebiotic system.”

Emergence of life beyond Earth?

Before we can even begin to answer the big question of whether these simple physical systems may influence the emergence of life elsewhere in the universe, it would be better to understand where these systems exist on Earth first.

“If, when you say ‘life,’ you mean stuff that is as stunningly impressive as a bacterium or anything else with polymerases and DNA, my work doesn’t yet tell us anything about how easy or difficult it is to make something that complex, so I shouldn’t speculate about what we’d be likely to find elsewhere than Earth,”  England said. (Polymerases are proteins that assemble DNA and RNA.)

This research doesn’t specifically identify how biology emerges from nonbiological systems, only that in some complex chemical situations, surprising self-organization occurs. These simulations do not consider other life-like qualities – such as adaptation to environment or reaction to stimuli. Also, this thermodynamics test on a closed system does not consider the role of information reproduction in life’s origins, said Michael Lässig, a statistical physicist and quantitative biologist at the University of Cologne in Germany.

“[This] work is indeed a fascinating result on non-equilibrium chemical networks but it is still a long way from a physics explanation of the origins of life, which requires the reproduction of information,” Lässig, who was not involved in the research, told Live Science.

There’s a critical role for information in living systems, added Imari Walker. Just because there appears to be natural self-organization exhibited by a soup of chemicals, it doesn’t necessarily mean living organization.

“I think there’s a lot of intermediate stages that we have to get through to go from simple ordering to having a full-on information processing architecture like a living cell, which requires something like memory and hereditary,” said Imari Walker. “We can clearly get order in physics and non-equilibrium systems, but that doesn’t necessarily make it life.”

To say England’s work could be the “smoking gun” for the origin of life is premature, and there are many other hypotheses as to how life may have emerged from nothing, experts said. But it is a fascinating insight into how physical systems may self-organize in nature. Now that researchers have a general idea about how this thermodynamic system behaves, it would be a nice next step to identify sufficiently out-of-equilibrium physical systems that naturally occur on Earth, England said.

A busca da Matrix/DNA num mundo com galáxias dentro de galáxias dentro de galáxias

Wednesday, April 29th, 2020

https://www.livescience.com/hoags-object-perfect-ring-mystery.html

Hoag’s Object Is a Galaxy Within a Galaxy Within a Galaxy (and Nobody Knows Why)

By Brandon Specktor – Senior Writer December 03, 2019

Para quem refuta que não pode haver sistema astronomico como o meu modelo, aqui está um argumento: o que sabemos de galaxias? Por exemplo, o que são os Hoag´s objetos? Galáxias dentro de galáxias dentro de galáxias, mas na verdade são completos misterios ainda, não sabemos nada a respeito.

Para responder aos “ad hominem” attacks nos debates

Saturday, March 14th, 2020

Socrates understood all that sort of trash talk….

“When debate is lost, slander is the resort of the loser”… 

Debate no EvC Forum com minha participação

Thursday, January 30th, 2020
EvC Forum:
https://www.evcforum.net/dm.php?Control=msg&m=871207#m871207
From: Matrix/DNA Theory
Message 1385 of 1385 (871207) 
01-30-2020 3:56 AM

RE: Any practical use for Universal Common Ancestor?

No, because Science has not designed the right model of UCA, yet. Are there any scientific practical use for your parents as the common ancestor species of you and yours brothers? You had the shape of an unique initial cell as also the shape of the initial cell after abiogenesis; you had the shape of fetus as the shape of reptilians: the shape of embryo as the shape of mammals. But, your parents as your UCA never existed inside yours little ovule universe during yours embryogenesis. So why the UCA of the first cell should be at Earth during abiogenesis?

So, the design of the model for UCA is not for Biology or Physics, it is for Astronomy, the space beyond this little egg-Earth, like your mother´s body was the space beyond your little egg. And why Astronomy did´n it yet? It happens that Academic Astronomy did not get the right theoretical model of astronomic systems, the formation of astros, etc, because the academy is under magical thinking: magic accidents which, instead destroying things, build on new complex things. Like any other non-existent magical gods.

Comparative anatomy between the last most evolved astronomic system from Cosmological Evolution and the first cell-biological system from Biological Evolution must be the unique rational and right method for finding the right model of UCA. I did it, I got a model, I don´t know if it is right, need more testing. But, if it is right, will be very, very useful not only for practical science and new technologies, meaning more useful for eliminating magical thinking from human mind.

It is weird thinking to make comparisons between living and non-living systems. I thought that also, till find that there is no such division between living and non-living when talking about natural systems: all properties of cells are there, working, at the right model of astronomic systems. And there where no “origins of life”, neither here neither other place, there are no “origins”, every natural system is under transformation from pre-existing systems, and evolution. The words “origins” and “life” are big prejudices to rationality because they lead us towards magical thinking with all the prejudices to humankind. Ok, mine is merely another theory, so…


There was no origins of life and universe, astronomical systems are half-alive, light waves contains the code for life and DNA is not a code: Matrix/DNA Theory

Porque minha teoria não é exatamente “as below, as above”

Monday, January 27th, 2020

Teria nexo colocando numa mesa um feto humano e um adulto e apontando para os dois dizer : ” Assim como é encima, é embaixo”? Ou dizer: ” Como era no passado, é agora e será no futuro”?

Claro que não. As duas formas são muito diferentes. Existe um processo de evolução, complexificação, no meio entre os dois objetos que é fundamental mas não está mencionado nestes ditados reducionistas. Os materialistas tem descrito minha teoria como isso de ser uma imitação da antiga filosofia do ” tal como embaixo é encima”. Eles cometem esse erro porque não entendem que os modelos teoricos, calculados, que monto sobre o que esteve nas origens, no passado, ou que estará no fim, no futuro, são baseados em processos e significados e não imagens, objetos, conceitos humanos, ou logica da razão humana. E estes processos em que me baseio são novidades, pois baseados na nova e unica formula dos sistemas. E a razão de me basear em processos é simples: Só existe uma Natureza, universal, e como obreira, criadora, como artista ela possui apenas um estilo, um método de fazer todas suas criações. Este método é o processo. Portanto, esta critica está errada.

O meu modelo astronomico sobre os building blocks de galaxias em nada se parecem com galaxias, assim como um feto não se parece com um adulto. O grau de complexificação entre os dois é muito diferente.