Posts Tagged ‘Earth’

Terra: As Mudanças no núcleo e a importância do campo magnético para a vida.

Tuesday, September 1st, 2020

Os astrônomos discutem a idade do núcleo da Terra e teorias variam desde 4 bilhões de anos a 1,3 bilhão, supondo que a idade do núcleo solido não é a mesma idade do planeta. Este artigo divulga um estudo baseado no ferro liquido que concluiu pelos 1,3 bilhões de anos. Outro assunto interessante tratado aqui é: este planeta é o único do sistema solar que tem vida porque tem uma atmosfera respirável e na superfície não tem radiação. Mas estes predicados existem aqui graças a um outro fenômeno: o campo magnético da Terra. Se não fosse o campo magnético barrar a radiação vinda do Sol acima da atmosfera, esta radiação destruiria esta atmosfera. Mas este é o único planeta do sistema solar que tem campo magnético. Por isso é o único que cria e suporta a vida.

Earth’s core is a billion years old

https://www.space.com/earth-core-billion-years-old.html

Earth's layers shown in this modified NASA image.
(Image: © Shutterstock)

Artigo: Not much is known about the history of this 1,500-mile-wide (2,442 kilometers) iron ball that’s the Earth’s nucleus. Estimates of its age have ranged from half a billion years to more than 4 billion years, almost as old as 4.5-billion-year-old Earth itself. Now, researchers have squeezed a miniscule piece of iron between two diamonds and blasted it with lasers to arrive at a new estimate of 1 billion to 1.3 billion years old — a date range that coincides with a measurable strengthening of the Earth’s magnetic field that happened around the same time.

Matrix/DNA: Mas o que é 1,3 bilhão de anos, a substancia do núcleo ou o estado físico desta substancia – se solida. liquida? Eu não posso me arriscar a opinar porque não sei se esta galaxia e este sistema estelar é de primeira ou segunda geração, pois existiram dois processos diferentes de formação destes sistemas, assim como o sistema celular teve como primeiro processo a simbiose e depois disso aprendeu a se reproduzir… no caso dos sistemas astronômicos aprenderam a se reproduzirem auto-reciclando-se. Creio que no sistema celular a simbiose na formação das células modernas manteve-se encoberta: a partir das proteínas produzidas pelo DNA/RNA as organelas são produzidas numa sequencia e esta é a mesma sequencia do ciclo vital da primeira geração quando as organelas foram geradas fora da célula. Então a logica aconselha que na formação dos sistemas astronômicos modernos deve estar encoberto o processo da primeira geração, o qual está explicitado na formula Matrix/DNA.

E sugere esta teoria da primeira formação que os núcleos dos planetas são formados antes dos planetas, no estado liquido, depois são congelados tornando-se sólidos e depois voltam a serem líquidos, sempre variando pela variação da temperatura externa. Mas esta sequencia e esta variação é sugerida também quando aplicamos outro método de construção do nosso modelo teórico, o qual consiste em verificar o que este sistema astronomico produziu aqui quando criou os sistemas biológicos para calcular como teria sido a formação destes sistemas astronômicos, pois a ideia é que sistemas só sabem gerar outros sistemas pelo mesmo método que eles próprios foram gerados.

E o método para gerar i sistema biológico vegetal, que veio primeiro do que a célula animal, portanto sento mais fiel ao método do ancestral, começa pela formação da semente, que corresponde ao núcleo dos astros e ditas sementes de novas estrelas. pensamos como exemplo uma semente de milho. Ela é feita sob alta temperatura exposta ao sol, depois é esfriada quando inserida na terra, e depois volta a esquentar quando recebe novamente a energia solar pela água e o solo, quando então cresce e brota. Assim deve acontecer no aspecto astronomico quando desabrocha uma nova estrela. Não é por acaso que vindo por dois caminhos diferentes, dois métodos diferentes, chegamos um mesmo resultado: porque seja no processo de primeira geração, no processo da segunda, e no caso da semente vegetal, em todos os três casos a formula construtora é a mesma.

Artigo: Modern Earth is like a layer cake, with a solid outer crust, a hot, viscous mantle, a liquid outer core and a solid inner core. That solid inner core is growing slowly as the liquid iron in the core cools and crystallizes. This process helps power the churning motion of the liquid outer core, which in turn creates the magnetic field that surrounds Earth and helps protect the planet from harmful cosmic radiation. ( leia mais no link acima)

Terra, e evidencias para a Matrix/DNA Theory

Friday, October 4th, 2019

xxxxx

Pela observada interação entre o núcleo e o campo eletromagnético, cientistas suspeitam que existam cristais metálicos misturados com o ferro incandescentes no núcleo. Sempre tenho tentado calcular como os fótons/genes/bits/informação da formula Matrix/DNA no seu aspecto astronômico estariam no meio do ferro incandescente, e agora a possibilidade dos cristais, que podem ter interações especiais com luz e fótons, chama atenção. Entra também aqui o caso co campo eletromagnético, suscitando mais uma vez a possibilidade de que a formula se projeta eletromagneticamente.

A informação de que o núcleo é quase tao quente quanto o SOL favorece a teoria de que o núcleo seja um germe estelar.

http://discovermagazine.com/2013/jan-feb/20-things-you-didnt-know-about-inner-earth?fbclid=IwAR3tJqktewCBwb40dn4Jib6wpoFdtOK3iJGtruKkpjWTmL4xmPwVaN8MyCc

Alguns textos do artigo:

Change is inevitable, even in the core. Examining paleomagnetic data, geoscientists at Johns Hopkins University suggest that the eastern and western halves of Earth’s core take turns growing and melting.

( Ver o que é paleomagnetic data e geoscientists at Johns Hopkins University)

Terra e seu germe nuclear

Terra e seu germe nuclear

At Earth’s center is an iron-rich orb more than 4,000 miles wide—bigger than Mercury, actually—closer to our feet than L.A. is to New York.

Earthquake waves that pass through the inner core travel faster north-south than they do east-west. One theory: The inner core consists of metallic crystals aligned with Earth’s poles, and the waves move more rapidly when they go with the grain.

The inner core is nearly as hot as the surface of the sun, and the pressure down there is 3 million times what it is on the surface.

Berkeley physicist Richard Muller speculates that oxygen, silicon, and sulfur are being squeezed out of the inner core and floating up to the core-mantle boundary, where they collect into hot, slushy dunes. Every once in a while, one dune may violently tumble into the mantle, revving up convection and disturbing the magnetic field.











Origins of Life: Scientists produces synthetic enzyme in 2017 and they suspects that it created life at 4 billions years ago!

Monday, November 13th, 2017

xxxx

Then it was me who being born at this century killed the Death Sea at 2 billions years ago… This article is at the link below and following it are the copies of our commentaires at the article’s debate: 

Chemists May Have Found the ‘Missing Link’ to the First Life on Earth

https://www.livescience.com/60907-missing-link-first-life-on-earth.html?utm_source=notification

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017

To the authors:
You said: ” … A subset of chemists have devoted their careers to puzzling…”
I think it is clear that a new kind of information from a more complex natural system were among the matter of that water slime. I can’t understand these chemists that are working with the effects and not searching the cause, because if they want to solve the puzzle, the rational way is going after the cause.DAP – if it ever existed naturally – is an effect, containing the entire or part of the cause, not the cause. We are watching everyday how a new life emerges from water slime produced not by the slime, but by a bunch of information coming from outside the womb’s water, so, why for the first life would be different? Why scientists are mimicking mysticals that need never seen before phenomena? Our method at Matrix/DNA Theory found a possible natural force/element that could be the source of these outside informations for first life. Chemists need know the models and looking inside DAP and the other primordial elements for this “invisible” genome. We are losing time and money.
xxxxx
@Phillip Czekala –  I’m going to guess you’ve never actually witnessed the Birth of a Baby? If you had you would know how Ignorant your claim not to have started your life in “a bucket of shit water slime” because yours and everyone elses actually did start that way.You may or may not have started in shit, not all babies crap in Uetero, but you certainly started in “a bucket of piss water slime”. All Mammals do.
Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed – 12:56 PM – 11/13/2017
Chris Sievert – Yes but the piss water slime does nothing without an almost invisible element called genome, which did not come from the piss water slime, but from the parents of the baby, existing above and before the piss water slime. If you are rational and not a mystic or have some obscurus agenda, you will calculate that in that primordial water slime arrived some kind of prior genome. That’s why Matrix/DNA Theory is suggesting a theoretical model of this non-Earth genome: it is merely the miniaturized copy of astronomical systems’ building blocks. Of, course, what else were existing above and before Earth if not the Milk Way?

xxxx

Edward Guest · FSU College of Law

The ability to produce intelligent beings, well somewhat intelligent, through this process if true could likely occur in millions, maybe even billions, of star systems in our Universe. Maybe we will be surprised in a few billion Earth years how many species we find that are a lot like us.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Edward Guest – There is a curious option, maybe you don’t know it. Life is like agriculture, so, if a seed falls in an environment with good conditions, it will flourish. The seeds are splitted everywhere in space/time. But, what is this “seed” and from where it comes from? At Matrix/DNA Theory we discovered that a new theoretical model of galaxies fits exactly the configurations for a source of these seeds. The astronomical building blocks is the face and configuration of DNA building blocks. When I got these models, it was suggesting a new version of “universal history” from the Big Bang to nowadays. And the final history suggests that – as you said – initially must have diversification among aliens but all them will be fine tunelled to a unique final shape… which is the unknown shape of the natural intelligent system that triggered the Big Bang and must be existing beyond this Universe. Curious, isn’t it?
xxxxx

Philip Czekala

Total BULLSHIT.
It’s publish or perish in college land and this clown professor Ramanarayanan Krishnamurthy will make up and write ANYTHING to keep his job. Maybe his life started out in a bucket of shit water slime but mine didn’t. Just think about how many gullible assholes believe this crap too. We are DOOMED.

Louis Charles Morelli · Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Philip – You are right, Our life began in water slime also but the womb’s water slime can do nothing without the insertion of an almost invisible genetic code from something existing above and beyond the womb ( it means also beyond Earth as the womb for first living thing). Why the modern academic mindset is separating cosmological evolution from biologiccal evolution?! The effects of this absurd faith is causing this blindness? Do you have any explanation for human behavior?
xxxx

Jerry Bunker · Purdue University

Professing themselves wise they traded the truth for a lie. This garbage that once upon a time is sheer nonsense. Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states that in the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. It takes much more faith to believe in these fairytales than to believe in the creator God

Louis Charles Morelli ·Fritador de batatas fritas at Self employed

Jerry: ” Genesis chapter 1 verse 1 states”
A book written by foreign ancient people states nothing to our people of our country and to people of XXI century, why are you coming at a Science issue and Western World telling that?! Don’t worry: if God has something to say to our country and to people of this time, He will say it directly to us, we does not accept humans intermediaries between us and God. 
Here you comes professing yourself wise. So, bring on to the table the proofs how life started and get the Nobel prize. Or are you trading the truth for a lie?
xxxx
Something folks seem to miss in their Synthesis of supposed early biology is the intense stirring caused by the Moon tides which were a hundred or more times stronger than they are now. Not only 100-200 foot ocean tides, tides expressed in the ground around the sea and, more importantly, beneath the sea too, stirring up the lighter and heaver elements, separating the stone from the metal, breaking the shell of the Earth into mud and sand, even as it tries to harden, heating things up in a band beneath the Moon’s early orbit. Remember, the Moon, containing much of it’s present mass was only a few thousand miles above the Earth at that time, having been formed by a collision between the Earth and a stoney body about the size of Mars. It slowly escaped Earth’s gravity until now it’s effects on land is negligible though the seas still rise and fall by tens of feet now, rather than by hundreds. THERE is your crucible!
Like · Reply · 1 · 4 hrs
It occurs to me that the occasion of the birth of our Moon might be quite rare in water planets. There might be fewer examples of life because of it, if the Moon tides really were a part of the equation. The local sudden heating and cooling of subsurface muds by those large tides might also have played a part, again making life as we know it even more rare.
 
Fred Wood – You have a good point. There is a theoretical “universal natural formula for organizing matter into systems” and applying the formula for to calculate “life’s origins” the results of this calculations says exactly what you said about the role played by the Moon. New shapes of systems ( like the biological ones built at the abiogenesis period) begins by the Function 1 of the formula, which is “agitation for fragmentation and mixture of the elements of the environment”. We have not found other element able to do that function necessary for biological systems organization here. Then comes the F2, which takes the “baby” created by F1 and begins the aggregation of nutrients. This formula explains how the first lighter gaseous star and the later stellar systems were made from an atomic nebulae, how galactic’s nuclei are created by central vortex, etc. If you are curious about the formula, search ” The Universal Matrix for All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”. Congratulations by the right insight