Físico diz que solucionou o grande mistério – como a vida veio da matéria – e ele pode estar certo

Physicist says he’s solved the big mystery — how life came from matter — and he may be right

Físico diz que solucionou o grande mistério – como a vida veio da matéria – e ele pode estar certo

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/22/physicist-says-hes-solved-the-big-mystery-how-life-came-from-matter-and-he-may-be-right/

( Obs.: este artigo da RawStory esta causando acirrado debate nos comentarios, onde estou participando)

By Travis Gettys
Wednesday, January 22, 2014 15:17 EST

3D rendering of a sun rising over craggy peaks of a newly formed, volcanic landscape Shutterstock

Jeremy England ♦ massachusetts institute of technology ♦ mathematical formula ♦ mathematical standpoint

O pensamento materialista está suspeitando de si próprio, está percebendo que tem cometido um erro crasso porque os experimentos científicos e as ultimas informações coletadas na Natureza não estão batendo com suas teorias. Me refiro à teoria – defendida com mais ênfase por Richard Dawkins, o gênio que descobriu os memes culturais e o gene egoísta, e tornou-se o moderno “papa” do ateísmo – de que os genes tem propósitos ( inteligíveis), como o de buscar sua disseminação e reprodução a qualquer preço.  Para mim, desde pequeno me incomodava esta idéia, porque nunca pude entender como um mero punhado de átomos – o que são, na realidade, os genes – poderia ter essa mistica personalidade capaz de saber a existência do momento seguinte, o futuro, a ponto de desejar estar existindo no tempo futuro, por isso fui para a selva buscar na natureza virgem uma solução mais compatível com minhas exigências racionais.  Passado o deslumbramento do impacto causado por aquela teoria no pensamento materialista ávido por encontrar evidencias que provem sua visão de mundo, começaram a refletir no que disseram e emergiu a falta de lógica na proposta. Tentam consertar o êrro mas não sua visão do mundo e assim continuam obcecadamente buscando uma solução que se encaixe em seus íntimos desejos. Se os biólogos materialistas que combatem acirradamente os biólogos do “Intelligent Designer” se cansaram e quase retiraram seu time todo de campo, a investida materialista re-ergueu seus físicos e matemáticos com nova ofensiva e agora surge mais esta teoria explicada neste artigo. Aplicando o raciocínio e logica matemática que se extrai da observação de sistemas naturais termodinâmicos ( em teoria, pois a minha formula da Matrix esta sugerindo que nunca conheceram o que é um verdadeiro e completo sistema termodinâmico, o que eles tem são apenas processos, e não sistemas), obtiveram a famosa Segunda Lei da Termodinâmica, que trata da dissipação da energia de tais “sistemas”, e agora um Físico desenvolveu ainda mais essa formula matemática tentando englobar os processos nas origens de sistemas biológicos… e, segundo diz este artigo, a formula esta sendo considerada válida, mesmo que ainda não tenha sido provada factualmente. Segundo esta teoria, seria a capacidade dos sistemas vivos em radiar (dissipar) sua energia transferindo-a para os elementos materiais à sua volta. Quando fazem isso, inserem suas informações nesta energia radiada, atuando sobre o meio externo e finalmente fazendo cópias de si mesmos… (!).

Em outras palavras, se não deu certo tentar impregnar átomos com personalidade para ter propósitos próprios, agora estão mudando o foco de objeto, tentando impregnar a energia dessa personalidade…

Apesar de eu nada ter de concreto contra o pensamento materialista e também nada ter de concreto sobre a existência ou não de Deus, ainda digo que… ” Deus queira que acertem, que estejam certos, pois para mim, seria melhor perder essa. É muito mais fácil mudar uma cabeça que mudar a de milhões, portanto, se eu ganhasse a Humanidade perderia mais tempo na sua evolução. Mas fico com a amarga impressão que vai ser difícil eles acertarem dessa maneira. deixem passar esse novo “awe”, esse novo deslumbramento, deixem as coisas se assentarem quando a realidade bater duro novamente, e essa teoria vai para levantar novas suspeitas logicas. mas toda tentativa humana na busca de respostas é melhor que a inercia de muitos que nada buscam, porque no velho processo de aprendizagem conhecido como “julgamento e erro” – onde vai se aprendendo ao se aprender que todas nossos julgamentos vão se revelando errados e assim cada vez mais vai ficando a descoberto o tesouro da verdade – é assim que caminha a purificação das mentes arrogantes visando finalmente sua evolução. Eu vou tentar buscar o “paper” cientifico que publicou essa formula matemática, quero conhece-la, e se alguém me adiantar isso, agradeço muito. O meu gráfico chamado “Do Big Bang ao Big Birth” esta sugerindo que a Matemática não traduz o processo da evolução para seus símbolos, não é a unica linguagem da natureza, pois ela capta apenas os trechos lineares de uma evolução que é essencialmente curva, por isso começo suspeitando desta formula, mas não quero cair no mesmo erro de prévios julgamentos levado também por uma obsessão na minha particular visão do mundo que por certeza deve estar incompleta, senão, toda errada.

 

The origin of life is basically inevitable from a mathematical standpoint, according to one physicist, and “should be as unsurprising as rocks rolling downhill.”

A origem da vida é basicamente inevitável  desde um ponto de vista da Matemática, de acôrdo com um Físico, e “e deveria ser t!ao evidente quanto as rochas rolando colina abaixo.” Ele diz que desenvolveu uma fórmula matematica para explicar sua teoria de que “a matéria necessariamente adquire os principais atributos para a vida se encontrada em certas condições”. “Um grupo de átomos – diz o cientista –  dirigidos por uma fonte externa de energia , tal como o Sol, e colocados numa banheira quente, tal como o oceano e a atmosfera, irão eventualmente re-estruturar-se a si mesmos para dispersar o calor – uma definitiva caracteristica da vida.   

Jeremy England, an assistant professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said he’s developed a mathematical formula to explain his theory that matter necessarily acquires the key attributes for life if placed under certain conditions. The 31-year-old England theorized that a group of atoms driven by an external energy source, such as the sun, and placed in a heat bath, such as the ocean or atmosphere, will eventually restructure itself to disperse heat – a defining characteristic of life.

“You start with a random clump of atoms, and if you shine light on it for long enough, it should not be so surprising that you get a plant,” England told Quanta Magazine.

“Você começa com uma porção de átomos pegos ao acaso, e se você incide luz sobre eles por tempo suficiente, não deveria ser surpresa que você consiga uma planta.”

Many scientists believe a primordial soup, lightning and extraordinary luck sparked the formation of life and its subsequent evolution, but England says his theory follows the fundamental laws of nature and complements Darwin’s theory of natural selection.

“I am certainly not saying that Darwinian ideas are wrong,” he said. “On the contrary, I am just saying that from the perspective of the physics, you might call Darwinian evolution a special case of a more general phenomenon.”

But if England’s idea can be demonstrated, it would allow biologists to stop seeking a Darwinian explanation for every adaptation and view organisms more generally as energy dissipators.

Although his idea is controversial among other physicists, England’s theoretical results are generally considered to be valid – even if his formula remains unproven.

Researchers are eager to test whether his formula, based on the second law of thermodynamics that helps explain the transfer of heat from a source, might represent the driving force that created life.

“We can show very simply from the formula that the more likely evolutionary outcomes are going to be the ones that absorbed and dissipated more energy from the environment’s external drives on the way to getting there,” England said.

For example, a plant absorbs sunlight energy, uses it to create sugars and disperses infrared light, another form of energy.

Biological reproduction is a logical process for dispersing more and more energy over time, he theorized, adding that the theoretical minimum amount of dissipation that occurs during the replication of RNA molecules and bacterial cells is very close to the actual amount measured during that process.

A great way of dissipating more is to make more copies of yourself,” England said.

Scientists have already observed self-replication in nonliving systems, such as vortices in turbulent fluids that replicate by drawing energy from surrounding liquid, and England said snowflakes and sand dunes also demonstrate an internal order using condensation and wind.

“He is making me think that the distinction between living and nonliving matter is not sharp,” said Carl Franck, a biological physicist at Cornell University.

xxxxxx

Meu comentario postado no artigo: 

Avatar
TheMatrixDNA  january, 24, 2014

Is this the 2014 model of materialism? They suspected that materialists biologists headed by Dawkins made a big mistake – giving personality and hidden intentions to a bunch of atoms called genes – then they hired the biologists and called mathematicians and physicists for continuing the supreme search of proof or evidences for their world vision. Now, the new team took off the personality from genes and are giving it to “energy”, which has a hidden purpose revealed when dissipating…The new conspiracy theory: there is a Lucifer’s energy trying to make nanoscales copies of itself (Lucifer)!

My agnostic world vision ( another human mistake, but… I am a human also), elaborated my theory called “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” and I pretend to include at my website a graphic called ” from The Big Bang to The Big Birth”, which shows that Math can not translate processes and events of biological systems, so, I want to see this mathematical formula, but, I suspect something wrong with it. Math only grasp the little space of linear events at every micro-cycle of evolution, but does not grasp the whole universal process of evolution, because it is a curve, not linear. Do you want a sample? Mother giraffe produces a new body that mimics the shapes of primordial atomic nebulae (the morula), the mass of galaxies ( blastula), the bacteria shape, the fish shape, the reptile shape, and finally, the giraffe’s shape. In a Cartesian graphic, this process designs a curve, starting at giraffe’s species, mimicking the history of evolution and going back to giraffe’s species. Same thing is universal evolution, and Math can not describe it, principally because such process includes time going back. Ok… it is theory against theory and I wish good luck to Mr. jeremy England: he has made a good contribution for our mental evolution, like any process of trial and error. And he is on the right track, accordingly with my theoretical results: we need applying the variables coming from thermodynamic systems over biological evolution if we want to proof the theory of evolution. But, as it is explained in my website, the whole thing is very more complex than it is supposed by Mr. England and Mr. Darwin. Como’n… brute energy with intentional purpose of doing copies of itself?!… Merely by dissipation?! Do you also believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster?!

xxxxxx

TheMatrixDNA – 24/01/2014

Questions and suggestions to Mr. England:

1) Question: From Wikipedia we see that dissipation is a irreversible process in inhomogeneous thermodynamic systems: the capacity of the final form to do mechanical work is less than that of initial form. Do you agree that matter, alone and by itself, has the eternal tendence to reach the state of thermodynamic equilibrium? If you agree with that and agree that the Universe is composed by 95% of inertial dark matter, almost reaching the supreme goal of matter, why Nature did not the logical way, converting the other 5% (white mater?) into equilibrium and, instead, decided triggering evolution towards most non-balanced systems? If thermodynamic equilibrium is the supreme goal of matter, why that matter called “amnion”, which fills an ovule that triggered the existence of yours own body, does not go towards thermodynamic equilibrium, an goes to the opposite way? Was yours father shining light over that ovule, long time enough? Can’t you see that the answer for the origins of yours own life must be the answer for the origins of all life? Isn’t the answer: an existing genetic code? Are you suggesting that sun’s light brought a kind of genetic code to a terrestrial random clump of atoms, for organizing the first biological system?

2) Suggestion: Observing the models of my theory, called “The Universal Matrix Formula for Natural Systems”, you are almost right, touching the most deeper secret in Nature. My models are suggesting that natural light has a deep secret – it is the carrier of the code for life ( see the graphic of electro-magnetic spectrum at my website). The division of any natural light wave into different intensities of vibrations is the responsible for imprinting the process of life’s cycle into inertial matter. So, the initial light wave emitted by the Big Bang is absorbed and transmitted by bodies like stars, the sun, and when it reaches the kind of atoms that keeps the shape of that formula like carbon atoms, and specific environmental conditions, this light begins to organizing those atoms into biological systems. You are applying Physics and Math, a very useful and complex method of investigation, but if you applies this method over that substance that fulfills an ovule, yours method never will grasp the details of the hidden genetic code inserted at that substance. Yours method could reveals the DNA, like it is revealing light ayt life’s origins, but never could reveals the secrets inside the DNA, then, you can see the light, its effects, but can’t see the hidden details in that light.

XXXXXX

Pesquisa:

1) Wikipedia

Dissipation

Dissipation is the result of irreversible processes that take place in inhomogeneous thermodynamic systems. A dissipative process is a process in which energy (internal, bulk flow kinetic, or system potential) is transformed from some initial form to some final form; the capacity of the final form to do mechanical work is less than that of the initial form. For example, transfer of energy as heat is dissipative because it is a transfer of internal energy from a hotter body to a colder one. The second law of thermodynamics, which states that the entropy of an isolated system never decreases, implies that this reduces the capacity of the combination of the two bodies to do mechanical work.

Thermodynamic dissipative processes are essentially irreversible. They produce entropy at a finite rate. In a process in which the temperature is locally continuously defined, the local density of rate of entropy production times local temperature gives the local density of dissipated power. ( continuar a ler)

Tags: