Mais um Sinal de Grande Vitória para meu Modelo Teórico Astronomico: Stephen Hawkings Muda sua Teoria para minha Teoria

Baseado no artigo:

Black hole theory my ‘biggest blunder,’ Stephen Hawking says

( Teoria dos Buracos Negros foi Meu Maior Equivoco, diz Stephen Hawkings )

http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/01/26/stephen-hawking-contradicts-earlier-black-hole-claims/

Stephen Hawking at stem cell lab 3.jpg

Stephen Hawking at stem cell lab 3.jpg

Sem nunca na vida ter imaginado antes que um dia eu estaria envolvido em debates sobre astronomia, cosmologia, mas caí nessa levado por uma busca bem mais simples ( o hobby de ficar identificando na selva amazônica os sistemas naturais que compõem aquela biosfera e comparando sistemas vivos e não-vivos para imaginar quais serão os elos entre eles), terminei por elaborar uma completa teoria sobre a estrutura do Universo e como teria sido a evolução universal para chegar onde chegou aqui e agora – na emergência da auto-consciência neste planeta. Elaborei modelos teóricos com desenhos, diagramas, formulas, etc. . Uma das primeiras consequências deste modelo foi notar que eles não batiam com o modelo acadêmico moderno elaborado por pessoas mil vezes mais bem informadas que eu, como o grande professor Stephen Hawking. Por exemplo, como núcleo de um sistema astronômico que denominei “building blocks of first original galaxies”, meus modelos sugeriam a existência de um simples vórtice turbilhonar perfeitamente inteligível pelas causas que o produzem mas que ao mesmo tempo esconde em suas invisiveis funções algo tão espetacular como o protótipo, os primórdios, do aparato gerador feminino de novas vidas. No entanto, no modelo acadêmico se apresentava como ocupante desse núcleo um fantasmagórico e invisivel objeto a que denominavam “buraco negro”. E dai teve toda uma teoria explicativa que venho se desenvolvendo nas ultimas décadas, enquanto eu ficava observando deprimido pois desbancava meus modelos. Mas acompanhando todos os dias as informações da comunidade astronômica, as imagens mandadas diariamente pelos grandes telescópios terrestres e espaciais, etc., eu sentia que as informações reais cada vez mais obrigava os teóricos acadêmicos a mudarem, torcerem, refazerem sua teoria, enquanto a minha ia sendo reforçada, cada nova informação arrolada como mais uma evidencia aos meus modelos. Timidamente por varias vezes entrei em debates reclamando que estavam dando por real o que era apenas teoria e expondo algo do meu modelo, o que prontamente levantava os comentários mais irônicos e ofensivos contra minhas sugestões, e nunca ninguém quis sequer estudar o que eram meus modelos. Essa noticia é apenas mais uma das manifestações que se tem visto na mídia, desaprovando a teoria acadêmica e reforçando o meu modelo. Hawkings modelo dizia que do objeto no nucleo destes sistemas jamais escaparia qualquer coisa, e agora admite que pode escapar luz e informações, exatamente como previu o meu modelo a 30 anos atrás. Isso tudo não quer dizer que estou plenamente convencido do meu modelo, que o leitor possa confiar nele – como cético e agnóstico tudo está aberto a testes ate que seja definitivamente provado com fatos reais.

Meus comentários postados no artigo:

LouisCharlesMorelli

LouisCharlesMorelli –  26, january, 2014

The delusion of computer’s age that caught Sir Hawking in a trap:

 

Time ago there were those mechanical machines for doing calculations. Then, the human mind created the first generation of computers hardware ( mimicking barely the human brain with memory, etc.) and inserted informations and commands for operations called “software”. Later the electro-mechanic brain was receiving mechanical sensors like telescopes, electronic microscopes, etc. With its own sensorial complex, the mechanical brain invaded nature at invisible scales and got new informations, sending them to the biological brain. based on these informations, the biological brain re-designed the software and sent the computer’s tentacles to search more information, which were again inserted into the biological brain. This process has produced the evolution of generations of computers and works as feed-back between the two kinds of brain, but the final result is no good for us: the mechanical brain have selected only the mechanistic aspect of any natural phenomena, object, event, and have modelled the biological brain to be logical mechanistic also. Then arose a new world view, beginning with Big bang Theory, abiogenesis theory. formation of galaxies and so on, but… this world view is the world as seen by the mechanical brain: like the event of the first machine/motor was an explosion, the supreme meaning of the universe is re-cycling eternally like the gears of machines, etc.

Sir Hawking unfortunately loose his sensorial natural complex due a disease and his biological brain was connected straight to a mechanical brain. He was the first and strongly attacked by the biggest human delusion of modern times.

XXXXXX

LouisCharlesMorelli – 
 My theoretical model registered copyright 30 years ago suggests a different kind of object at galactic nucleus, which should be emitting light, informations and “seeds of stars”. And I have pointed out the reasons that lead Sir Hawking to his different theory. At my website there is “The Universal Matrix for Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles” exposing the models.
xxxxxx
The modern scientific method is the way that hypothetical intelligent microbes living inside a cell of a bone of a skeleton of a human being is interpreting the whole body ( their “universe”). They have space telescopes showing something of the far away soft meat and they are making theories about. But, since that the skeleton is a mechanical structure which can be translated by Maths symbology and logics, their “mind” are conditioned to believe that the whole body obeys the same natural laws. Then, their theories are result from the projection of their local learning and mental conditioning upon the soft meet, the level of biological organization of matter. Of course, it is almost everything wrong with those theories, despite the fact that sometimes they gets the right track about the far biological level, which permits them to discover surprising technologies, like GPS. It happens due the soft meet having at its internal microscope structures, those processes of organic chemistry which developed from the skeleton mechanism.
I am telling that due my different and unusual experience of life ( living by seven years at the heart of Amazon jungle and curious studying natural systems and how they composes the whole biosphere), which suggested to me that a better interpretation of the soft meat should be starting my investigation about the origins of everything by focusing at the biological level, where I am now, and making the reverse way, going towards the past back to the skeleton. The final world view is very different from the academic scholar official world view today.
So, the Universal Natural History has been calculated in two opposite pathways: the official modern scientific method – called “reductionist” – commanded by Physics and Math, which History starting from the past ( The Big Bang Theory) going to future, arriving to biological systems, and now, trying to explain the human mind; and the philosophical naturalism that search the knowledge about the real facts collected by reductionism, arranging them in big pictures as whole systems like biological levels, and starting from here and now goes back calculating the past till the origins of everything.  I think that the two methods got final results full off errors, of course, but, I think that the best practice now is a dialogue between them, rational and not personal comparison between the two results. Mine is being at my website, “The Universal Matrix of Natural Systems and Life’s Cycle”.
XXXXX
birthersaredumb

birthersaredumb

Yes, scientists make mistakes. They learn over time and adjust as new information are collected. Still much better than the 1st grade level intellectual cop out of “god did it”

LouisCharlesMorelli

LouisCharlesMorelli – jan, 27 – 7:55PM

@birthersaredumb The 1 st grade has lessons applied forever, and sometimes adults forgets them. Materialism never would have the intuition for asking if everything of life today could be reducible to  LUCA ( the Last Universal Common Ancestor), as theorized by evolutionary biology as emerging from terrestrial matter. It seems so evident that any thought inquiring it should be immediately discarded as non coherent. But, nobody has showed a picture of LUCA that have all  natural forces and elements as creators principles of all known properties of a human body. So, the rational attitude should be: we does not know LUCA, yet.

 

Now, my different method of investigation have produced a theoretical picture of LUCA, where we can see all life’s properties reduced to natural brute forces and elements. But, this LUCA is not a mater’s terrestrial product, Earth is merely a part of LUCA, it leaves in the sky…

 

Despite the fact that my results could be wrong, I have discovered that there are only two kinds of persons testing, inquiring, the existence of LUCA, firmly believed by modern scientific community; religious united around the Intelligent Designer Theory, and me, a naturalist philosopher isolated, which theories are rejected and unknow by the scientific community. So, despite the fact that I am also against the religious mythology behind the people of Intelligent Designer, I am recognizing that their presence is good for Humanity just now, because they have grasped a hole existing inside the world view at the control today.

xxxxxx

jimmc1952

jimmc1952

Physicists are allot like Politicians, You only have their word and by the time you discover they’re wrong, the damage has been done…..just my take.

LouisCharlesMorelli

LouisCharlesMorelli

 

@jimmc1952 The biggest damage caused by this Human Modern Science dominated by Physicists and Mathematicians is compared with the biggest damage caused at the Middle Age’s human science dominated by the biblical theologists: the effect over the children minds, inoculated by the scholar curriculum.

 

How we will go back to the youngers today, from 10 to 40 years old, telling them that the horrible ghost called black hole, the cannibal of entire galaxies, the proof that our lives means nothing, the notion that at any moment one of theses black holes can terminate forever the human existence? We will tell them that our professors and the school have lied to them?

 

The human consciousness is still an embryo of consciousness that emerged here yesterday, considering cosmological scale of time. So, the collective mind of Humanity, is like a baby, whose world is explained by phantasies, product of imaginations, like invisible friends in the sky talking to our minds, or invisible monsters in the sky as seen by Stephen Hawking. The baby minded is perceiving sounds, objects which makes her creating phantasies as sources and causes, them we have Big Bang Theory, magical random forces creating something from nothing, as we still have phantasies of Santa Claus and powerful anthropomorphic gods in the sky.

 

Those that really love our children who are going to the scholar seats, should never forgetting this problem about the infant human consciousness and poor knowledge about the universal Nature.  Physicists, Mathematicians should be careful avoiding that the media and scholar curriculum sells a established truth, what they know are their theories. We need a scholar curriculum oriented to produce free thought, free minds, that’s the best a father, a mother, a professor, a scientist, a sacerdote, the Pope, that really want the best for Humanity, that really loves all childrens as their childrens, all human beings as their brothers, should do.

xxxxx

freeinalaska

freeinalaska –  

I thought he was going to say his biggest blunder was in being an atheist.

@freeinalaska – He is a great man. He stopped making money with his book for the good of human kind, telling the truth. Now I am admiring here more than before. And he is great because he is a searcher, trying to increase human knowledge, then, increasing our freedom. This is the human condition: trial and error. The truth is hidden under a pile of errors. He saved lots of others that should losing time taking off this error.

xxxxxxx

 IShankey 5ptsFeatured
It isn’t that Black Holes ‘Don’t Exist’. They obviosuly do, by all obeservations. What Hawking is saying is the ‘Event Horizon’ MIGHT NOT exist in the way we thought it did. Instead of calling it an’absolute’ boundary

from which no matter or information can escape from, Hawking & co. are saying it should be called an ‘Apparent Horizon’, a boundary that traps all matter with intense gravity, but that may allow ‘SOME matter & information to escape.

The fact that anyone would listen to Michelle ‘Fortunately I didn’t take any Science Classes in College’ Bachmann seriously on anything to do with Science is horrifying. I have a degree in Computer Science. Does that make me an ‘Expert’ on Heart Surgery?

LouisCharlesMorelli 5ptsFeatured – 1/29/2014 – 1;40 PM

Is it obvious that Santa Claus exists, because by all observations every Christmas appears a gift in my room? The history of black hole theory is the same of atom theory. First is observed manifestations around something invisible, it generates a theoretical model and the model goes changing with more data. Like atoms, the data demonstrating that the chemical “atom” was divisible and that the name might not be appropriate, the name black hole is not appropriated for the object hidden inside the cloud called event horizon.

Applying a different method of investigation (comparative anatomy between parents ( astronomical systems) and their offspring (biological systems)), I got also a theoretical model about that hidden object, but it is very different than the suggested black hole by physicians and mathematicians. The academic community would say that my method is absurd, infant, form the stone age, but my model was made 30 years ago and all observations till now can not change it, while the academic model is changing every year.

The last atomic model of an atom (quantum theory) is very different from the initial models of Dalton and Rutherford. I think that Stephen Hawking is for galactic nucleus theory what Dalton was for atomic theory. And I think my model is more logical, rational, because it explains in full the state of the world 4 billion years ago that produced the first biological system ( a living cell) and in the academic model there is no way for seeing how the Milk Way could produce any biological system. Ok, the basic idea is that life was an accident possible by probabilistic calculus, which makes the phenomena of probability a ghost magic creator and then, we are not surprised that someone based on this world view does accept the sequential production of magical thinking, like accepting that there are ghost monsters in the space… There is no Santa Claus, but there is my father who puts my gift every year, there is no black holes but there is a galaxy producing living beings everywhere inside her – by genetic process – as described at my website. With errors, of course, models are here for being corrected.

xxxxxx

tigertail34  –  

It has been interesting reading all of these posts.  In the interest of full disclosure, let me just say that I am a Christ follower.  The one thing that I have never read, seen or heard from anyone who does not believe in creation by God is where did the basic elements come from that eventually became us?

LouisCharlesMorelli

LouisCharlesMorelli  — 1/29 – 3;44 pm

 @tigertail34  yes, someone did. All those elements are shown their place and functionality at 4 billion years ago, then at 13,7 billion years ago and then, the whole history of universal evolution suggests some properties of the unknown natural system that triggered the Big Bang. The history is called “From the Big Bang to the Big Birth” and it is an extension of “The Universal Matrix/DNA of All Natural Systems and Life’s Cycles”.

 

But, for understanding this history is necessary to grasp the final meaning of the existence of every natural system at every stage of evolution. For instance, you see the whole process of biological reproduction here, its elements and functionality, but is necessary to understand that the same process of sexual reproduction was made by astronomical bodies in the space ruled by Newtonian mechanics and general relativity. That’s weird, you will avoid trying to see it, because this new world view is opposite to everything you have believed and heard. Then, I can’t do anything more for you.

 

 

Tags: